Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) NORWAY

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) NORWAY Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Norway Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/130 Date of Edition 04/04/2017 LSSIP Focal Point Rajunesh SHANKAR - rks@caa.no LSSIP Contact Person Luca Dell Orto - luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP FAB Performance Plan and LSSIP Year 2016 Norway Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET With reference to s received from the Chief Executive Officer of Avinor AS, Chief Executive Officer of Avinor ANS AS and the Royal Norwegian Air Force, the Civil Aviation Authority-Norway is authorized to sign the 2016 Norwegian Local Single Sky Implementation Plan, Level 1 (CAA document reference 17/02862) on behalf of the above-mentioned stakeholders. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) ANSP(s) Airports Military Authorities... 8 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Norway NORWAY ACC- SECTOR GROUP NORTH Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period NORWAY ACC SECTOR GROUP EAST Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period NORWAY ACC SECTOR GROUP WEST Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Norway Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Norway remains committed to further developing the Single European Sky objectives, evolving the use of Functional Airspace Blocks and implementing Pilot Common Project requirements in support of the ATM Master Plan. NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). First step of Scenario 8 was implemented in June 2016 with seamless cross-border FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway will be finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs. In 2016, CAA-Norway initiated plans to implement a significant organisational change effective The focus of the change is to improve strategic management, clarification of roles towards external stakeholders and building stronger internal multidisciplinary collaboration. The Director General (DG) of CAA-Norway announced that he will step down from his position effective The Department of Transport and Communication has commenced a recruiting process with plans to appoint a new DG in early In the meantime, the Deputy DG will act as the DG of CAA-Norway. Until 2016, Oslo Airport AS was a limited company owned by Avinor AS. However, in 2016, the company merged with Avinor AS and is no longer separate company. Avinor Flysikring AS provide ATS on Oslo Airport while CNS services are provided by Avinor AS. An extensive upgrade of the main Norwegian ATM system is planned in This upgrade will facilitate the implementation of several LSSIP objectives between now and Avinor AS and Avinor Flysikring AS also have several large projects under way to improve ATM in Norway, described in detail in chapter 4. In 2013, Avinor Flysikring AS initiated a project to develop and implement a remote tower solution for selected Avinor airports. In August 2015, a contract was signed with Kongsberg Defence System for the supply of remote towers to 15 airports with possible further expansion in the coming years. The project goal is to have the first remote tower operational in The construction of the new terminal at Oslo Airport is progressing according to plan. During 2016, parts of the new terminal have been tested and gradually taken into operation. The official opening of the new terminal is planned for April Torp Sandefjord Airport is owned and operated by Sandefjord Airport AS percent of the shares are county/municipally owned percent of the shares are owned by private investors. In 2016, Torp Sandefjord Airport released an international tender for the ATS service. Concluding this, Avinor Flysikring AS was awarded a service provision contract with a duration of 5 years. Moss Airport, Rygge was closed for commercial traffic in 2016 and is taken over by the Royal Norwegian Air Force. ATS is provided by Avinor Flysikring AS. Including the above-mentioned Moss Airport, Rygge, the Royal Norwegian Air Force operates at four airports in Norway with commercial traffic. Avinor provides ATS to all of these airports. Avinor operates civil passenger terminals on two of the military operated airports (Bardufoss and Andøya Airport). At Ørland Airport, another company operates the civil passenger terminals. Bodø Aerodrome operations were handed over from the Royal Norwegian Air Force to Avinor AS The following AFIS airports are still privately owned and are fully operated by the owners; Notodden, Stord, Spitsbergen, Ny Ålesund and Svea Airports. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway Released Issue

12 A liaison from the Royal Norwegian Air Force has joined CAA-Norway to improve military coordination of airspace usage, facilitate consultation on regulatory matters concerning the military and safeguarding military interests within domains managed by CAA-Norway. The liaison has also contributed to facilitating the LSSIP process. Traffic and Capacity 2016 Traffic in Norway decreased by 0.3% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to Summer The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between -1.1% and 2.2% throughout the planning cycle, with an average baseline growth of 0.4%. Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 2% 10; 24% 5; 12% 12; 29% 14; 33% Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined The overall situation in the implementation of 2016 Implementation Objectives in Norway has changed since An extensive upgrade of the main Norwegian ATM system (Future ATM System, FAS) is planned in The FAS Project is separated into the FAS En-Route project managed by Avinor Flysikring AS and the FAS Tower project managed by Avinor AS, each with different implementation dates. This upgrade will facilitate the implementation of several Implementation Objectives between now and As a result of this upgrade, the following Implementation Objectives will be implemented late: ATC2.8 Ground-based Safety Nets, ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer, FCM03 Collaborative flight planning, ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link service and FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services. The following Implementation Objectives will be implemented as part of the new FAS TWR ATM system but are marked as having no plan: AOP12 - Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring and AOP13 - Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing. The following objectives are late: ENV01 Continous Descent Operations at Oslo Airport still requires sufficient, systematic monitoring to provide exact data on the effects of CDA. Monitoring is expected to be completed in ITY-ADQ Avinor AS is in the process of implementing a new AIM system planned to be operation in ITY-AGVCS 12 state aircraft that fall in under the scope of Article 9 No 11 are identified and an exemption letter is sent to EFTA with a copy to EC and NM. NAV10 Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap ( ). Implementation planned to be finalised in ATC16 All aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training. This objective is marked "Late" as reflecting MIL status. MIL plans to be fully compliant by the end of LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 2 Released Issue

13 The following Implementation Objectives have no plan: AOP10 Time Based Separation, AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan and FCM Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - phase 2. Work is ongoing concerning 14 Implementation Objectives. At this time, there is no indication that those objectives will be completed late. To date, 12 objectives applicable to Norway have been completed. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 97% 46% 18% 69% 67% 0% 55% 3% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 3 Released Issue

14 ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 4 Released Issue

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Norway is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1993 European Common Aviation Area 2007 EEA (European Economic Area) 1992 EASA 2005 ICAO 1947 NATO 1949 ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Norway FIR/UIR (on 27 Nov 2003 the Norwegian airspace was established as one single FIR/UIR). Control areas extend between 5500 FT and FL 660. In addition, controlled airspace in Norway also comprises 19 TMAs, and 20 CTRs. Four offshore control areas, Ekofisk CTA, Statfjord CTA and Balder CTA (Established in 2016) in the North Sea and Heidrun CTA in the Norwegian Sea, are established to support the helicopter traffic related to the Norwegian oil production. Norway FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 6 States, namely United Kingdom (Scottish FIR), Iceland (Reykjavik FIR), Russia (Murmansk FIR), Finland (Finland FIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR) and Denmark (Copenhagen FIR). Among the above, Russia is the only non-ecac bordering state. Bodø Oceanic FIR is a part of the NAT-region and not within the scope of this document. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 1 Released Issue

18 Airspace Classification and Organisation Reference is made to AIP Norway: National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Norway are the following: Avinor AS - The Company owns state airports (including Oslo Airport from 2016) and plans civil aviation infrastructure. It provides airport and aviation safety services for passengers and airlines and other users of civil aviation installations. Avinor AS is an ANSP delivering AIS and AFIS services in Norway. Avinor AS fully owns the following limited company: o Avinor Flysikring AS (Avinor Air Navigation Services) - the main Air Navigation Service Provider in Norway. o Svalbard Lufthavn AS AFIS Provider at Longyearbyen Airport (Established in 2016) Luftfartstilsynet - the Norwegian CAA The Royal Norwegian Air Force - the Military Aviation Authority of Norway is responsible for Military Airworthiness, Operations and military airports. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 2 Released Issue

19 Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Figure 1 Organisational overview Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Norway is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC). The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA (Luftfartstilsynet) is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Accident investigation Organisation responsible Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-N) Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-N) As above As above As above As above As above Aircraft Accident Investigation Board/Norway (AAIB/N) Legal Basis Luftfartsloven (Civil Aviation Act) As above and regulation FOR no 99 (BSL G 1-1) on the establishment of a Single European Sky. Luftfartsloven (Civil Aviation Act) and the Directive for the Accident Investigation Board Norway LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 3 Released Issue

20 Luftfartstilsynet, the Norwegian CAA Luftfartstilsynet, the Norwegian CAA, is the regulatory body for flight safety in Norway. This includes rulemaking, certification, safety oversight, safety performance monitoring and ATM safety occurrence analysis. The flight safety regulatory function in Norway is independent from the Service Provision function by an organisational separation. Annual Report published: Y On this link, you can find the annual report for 2015 covering yearly activities of CAA-Norway (Luftfartstilsynet). The 2016 report is not yet published. apport% pdf Web address: An organisational chart giving a more detailed structure of the CAA is found in Annex B ANSP(s) Service provided Avinor AS Avinor AS is a state owned limited company fully owned by the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The company owns state airports and plans civil aviation infrastructure. It provides airport and aviation safety services for passengers and airlines and other users of civil aviation installations. Avinor AS is the certified provider of AIS and provides in addition AFIS and MET services in Norway and CNS services at Oslo Airport. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 4 Released Issue

21 Avinor Flysikring AS Avinor Flysikring AS was established in June 2014 and acts as the major ANSP in Norway. It is a limited company fully owned by Avinor AS. Avinor Flysikring AS provides Air Traffic Services in Norwegian airspace including aerodrome control, approach control and en-route control. Avinor Flysikring AS perform in addition maintenance and operation of the technical infrastructure relating to air navigation services in Norway except CNS services at Oslo Airport. Name of the ANSP: Governance: Avinor Flysikring AS State owned limited company Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach Y Y Owners hip: Owned by Avinor AS ATC Airport(s) Y AFIS - Aerodrome Flight Information Services is provided by Avinor AS AIS N AIS is provided by Avinor AS CNS Y Avinor AS provides CNS services at Oslo Airport MET Y Both Avinor AS and Avinor Flysikring AS provides MET observations at airports ATCO training Y Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y On this link, you can find the final report for 2015 and an interim report for 2016 covering yearly activities of the ANSP. Web address: LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 5 Released Issue

22 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y itec FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Indra Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Jan 2017 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2020 (Sector Group West, East and TMA) 2022 (Sector Group North) ATC Unit Norway ACC (Sector Group North, West, East and TMA) SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Raytheon/ARTAS Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2016 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Tracking functions in legacy SDPS was replaced by ARTAS Multi-sensor tracker in ATC Unit Norway ACC (Sector Group North, West, East and TMA) ATC Units The ACC unit in the Norwegian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, is the Norway ACC. ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Norway ACC Norway FIR -Sector Group North 6 (7)* 3 Incl. 1 offshore sector -Sector Group West 12 1 Incl. 3 offshore sectors -Sector Group East 8 0 -Sector Group TMA 0 2 *): The total number of En-route sectors in SG North is 7 when including the Bodø Oceanic Control sector (not within the geographical scope of this LSSIP). The Norway ACC is split into 4 Sector Groups (SG) located on 3 different locations. SG North is located in Bodø, SG West is located in Stavanger and SG East and TMA are located in Oslo (Røyken). 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 6 Released Issue

23 The TMA sectors presented above are those sectors co-located with the ACC. There are several other TMAs in Norway; the provision of APP control in these TMAs is done either at the local airport or as a dedicated centralised service providing APP control to more than one airport in a region Airports General information The main airports in Norway are owned and operated by Avinor AS. The following exceptions apply: Until 2016, Oslo Lufthavn AS was a limited company owned by Avinor AS. In 2016, Oslo Lufthavn AS was merged with Avinor AS and is not a separate company. Avinor Flysikring AS provide ATS on Oslo Airport while CNS services are provided by Avinor AS. Torp Sandefjord Lufthavn: The Airport is owned and operated by Sandefjord Lufthavn AS percent of the shares are municipally owned percent of the shares are owned by private investors. ATS is provided by Avinor Flysikring AS. Moss Lufthavn Rygge: The airport was closed for commercial traffic in 2016 and is taken over by the RNOAF. Avinor Flysikring AS provide ATS. Including the above-mentioned Moss Lufthavn Rygge, the Royal Norwegian Air Force operates four airports in Norway. Avinor provides ATS to all of these airports. Avinor operates civil passenger terminals on two of the military operated airports (Bardufoss and Andøya Airport). At Ørland Airport, another company operates the civil passenger terminals. Bodø Aerodrome operations were handed over from the Royal Norwegian Air Force to Avinor AS The following AFIS airports are privately owned and are fully operated by the owners; Notodden, Stord, Ny Ålesund and Svea. In 2016 the operation of Svalbard Lufthavn Longyearbyen was spun off into a separate company; the limited company Svalbard Lufthavn AS, wholly owned by Avinor AS. Svalbard Lufthavn AS is a certified provider of flight information services (sub-service AFIS), alerting meteorological services. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 7 Released Issue

24 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11. In addition to the List of Airports in Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. In Norway, only Oslo Airport Gardermoen is covered in this LSSIP Military Authorities The Chief of Staff of the RNoAF is the Military Aviation Authority. According to the Norwegian Aviation Act, the military is given the authority to issue rules and regulations for Military Aviation (BML). The Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the education and certification of personnel (Pilots, Air Defence Controllers, Investigation Board Officers, Maintenance and Ground Support Personnel). LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 8 Released Issue

25 Additionally, the Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the Military Aircraft Registry, for the certification of military aircraft and equipment and regulation of Military Airfields. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. Information on the application of FUA is in Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: OAT: Military legislation (BML) ANS to OAT: CAA regulation (BSL) Authority signing such legal provision: Ministry of Transport These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT GAT *) Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A These provisions cover: Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT N/A Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A OAT/GAT Coordination N/A OAT/GAT Coordination N/A ATCO Training N/A ATCO Training N/A ATCO Licensing N/A ATCO Licensing N/A ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Supervision N/A ANSP Supervision N/A Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A Aircrew Licensing Y *) Additional Information: MAA regulates OAT. OAT inside segregated airspace will be controlled by military air defence controllers. The responsibility for separation between non-participating air traffic and OAT inside segregated airspace rests with the civil ANSP and is described in the national FUA agreement (FUA level 1) and the established LoA between the Royal Norwegian Air Force and Avinor (FUA level 3). ANS provision to OAT outside segregated airspace is to be regulated through CAA. The need for ANS to OAT in shall be described in ANSP handbooks. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Additional Information: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N/A National Military AIP N National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eaip N/A EUROCONTROL eaip N/A Other: - Other: - N LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 9 Released Issue

26 Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: Military Aviation Authority Additional information: - Additional information: - GAT NSA (as per BSL G 1-1) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route Avinor Flysikring En-Route Avinor Flysikring Approach/TMA Avinor Flysikring Approach/TMA Avinor Flysikring Airfield/TWR/GN D AIS MET Avinor / Avinor Flysikring Avinor / Avinor Flysikring The Norwegian Meteorological Institute Airfield/TWR/GND AIS MET Avinor / Avinor Flysikring Avinor / Avinor Flysikring The Norwegian Meteorological Institute SAR TSA/TRA monitoring Joint Rescue Coordination Centres Avinor Flysikring AS and RNoAF Air Defence Organisation SAR Other: Other: - Additional Information: Only TSAs are established in Norway. FIS Joint Rescue Coordination Centres Avinor / Avinor Flysikring Additional Information: CRCs will on request from GAT provide traffic information service Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A - Additional Information: N/A LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 10 Released Issue

27 User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS Y Others: Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Norway applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 11 Released Issue

28 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Norway Norway - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H -0.7% 0.4% 2.7% 2.5% 3.2% 2.4% 2.5% Norway B 4.0% 1.4% -2.5% -1.0% -1.4% 0.7% 0.9% 1.4% 0.7% 0.8% L -1.3% -2.9% -1.1% -0.4% -0.1% -0.8% -0.7% ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Norway decreased by 0.3% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to Summer The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between -1.1% and 2.2% throughout the planning cycle, with an average baseline growth of 0.4%. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 12 Released Issue

29 2.2. NORWAY ACC- SECTOR GROUP NORTH Traffic and en-route ATFM delays ENBDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +0.4 % 57 (0%) No Average enroute delay per flight slightly decreased to zero min/flight in Summer Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Achieved Comments Free Route Airspace Flexible rostering of ATC staff Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Maximum configuration: oceanic Yes 4 sectors were sufficient Summer 2016 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 49 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 45. Yes Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 13 Released Issue

30 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC ENBD 57 Capacity Profiles 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 57 0% 57 0% 58 2% Ref. 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% L 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% Open 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% C/R 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Capacity Plan Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Flexible rostering of ATC staff Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Technical Capacity Significant Events Max sectors oceanic oceanic oceanic oceanic oceanic Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 14 Released Issue

31 Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 ENBDCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 15 Released Issue

32 2.3. NORWAY ACC SECTOR GROUP EAST Traffic and en-route ATFM delays ENOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Ref value Actual gap +6.9 % 88 (0%) Yes Average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.10 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.20 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were for reason ATC capacity, 22% for ATC staffing 13% for equipment and 3% for weather. Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Free Route Airspace Yes Recruitment and training of air traffic controllers Yes Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Maximum configuration: 6 sectors Yes 6 sectors were opened Summer 2016 performance assessment The capacity offered was estimated at a level of 88, for an average peak demand of 81 (peak 1 hour) and 76 (peak 3 hour). LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 16 Released Issue

33 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. Capacity Profiles ACC 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 90 2% 91 1% 93 2% Ref. 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% ENOS 88 L 88 0% 88 0% 88 0% Open 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% C/R 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Capacity Plan Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Recruitment and training of air traffic controllers Flexible rostering of ATC staff Future ATM System Capacity Significant Events Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 1% 1% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 17 Released Issue

34 Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 ENOSECTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 18 Released Issue

35 2.4. NORWAY ACC SECTOR GROUP WEST Traffic and en-route ATFM delays ENSVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Ref value Actual gap -2.2 % 64 (0%) No Average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.06 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.09 minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Plan : sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Free Route Airspace Yes Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes Flexible rostering of ATC staff Maximum configuration: helicopter Yes 5 sectors were opened Summer 2016 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 64 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak demand was 57 (peak 1 hour) and 52 (peak 3 hour). Yes LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 19 Released Issue

36 Planning Period ENOSWCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen in the current planning cycle, provided that sufficient staff are available during peak periods LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 20 Released Issue

37 The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC ENSV 64 Capacity Profiles 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 64 0% 65 2% 66 2% Ref. 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% L 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% Open 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% C/R 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Recruitment and training of air traffic controllers Flexible rostering of ATC staff Future ATM System Max sectors helicopter helicopter helicopter helicopter helicopter Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 21 Released Issue

38 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Norway for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC-2015/1 Corrective actions taken: NO Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-sesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Ownership All operational stakeholders Description: No specific actions in place other than the planned ongoing activities for implementation of pre- SESAR elements. REC-2015/2 Corrective actions taken: NO Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Local Stakeholders Description: No specific actions in place for these objectives, but the ongoing activities are progressing as planned. REC-2015/7 Corrective actions taken: YES ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. ANSPs benefiting from EU funding Description: Avinor Flysikring is applying for EU funding (INEA Call 2016) through the SESAR Deployment Manager. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 22 Released Issue

39 Chapter 4 National Projects ADQ-implementation program (ADQ) Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Implementation planned Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Implementing ADQ-compliant AIM-system. Analyzing data and data originator systems within Avinor. The project will implement commission Regulation 73/2010, laying down requirements on the quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information throughout Avinor's organization. Both for Avinor's aerodromes with regards to data origination, and for Avinor as ANSP with regards to AIM. L3: ITY-ADQ Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - AMHS Extended Organisation(s): Avinor Flysikring AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Scheduled operational by March 2018 Status: Currently in a tender process. Contract award planned Q Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: The AMHS Extended Project will replace the current AFTN/CIDIN communication links between Norway and the connected nations, as part of fulfilling the interoperability requirements demanded by PCP Regulation EU No 716/2014, and be in position to send and receive messages with binary attachments. An AFTN-switch will still be part of the new architecture. L3: COM10 N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 23 Released Issue

40 ARTAS Integration (ARTAS) Organisation(s): Avinor Flysikring AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Operational in Southern Norway from December Planned operational in Northern Norway in Q On track Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The project will implement ARTAS as a Multi Sensor Tracker to provide system tracks to the ATM system. L3: ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Better tracker performance will improve safety nets. Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: No impact No impact No impact No impact - Future ATM System (FAS) Organisation(s): Avinor Flysikring AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: In 2016, Avinor Flysikring AS became part of the itec cooperation and will follow the common development of the future ATM system. The first version of the ATM system is planned to be oeprational in Ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The project will deliver a new ATM system built to handle future demands and fulfil PCP requirements. L3: ATC12.1, ATC17, FCM03, FCM06, ITY-ACID, ITY-AGDL N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Improved Safety due to implementation of New Safety Net functionality. Less human intervention is expected. Environment: + The system will enable future operational concepts that will reduce the environmental impact. Capacity: ++ The system upgrade will Improve Capacity. Cost-efficiency: + Improved Cost efficiency is expected. Operational efficiency: + Improved capacity, use of Datalink services like CPDLC and so on will imporve the operational ecfficiency. - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 24 Released Issue

41 Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADS-B Implementation Project (NORWAM) Organisation(s): Avinor Flysikring AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Implementation of WAM and renewal of some of the MSSR's will carry on until end of TMA WAM systems are planned operational in 2017 in addition to a ADS-B corridor between the Norwegian Mainland and Svalbard. The Surveillance Chain in Norway will be fully Mode S compliant before NORWAM is under implementation. The NORWAM Project will implement surveillance according to the Avinor Surveillance Masterplan. The nationwide surveillance will consist of a mix of WAM, ADS-B and MSSR. L3: ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Improved SUR will improve safety. Environment: + Improved SUR coverage contributes to more optimal flight profiles resulting in reduced pollution. Capacity: ++ Improved SUR coverage contributes to reduced separation minima and improved capacity. Cost-efficiency: + WAM and ADS-B implementation have reduced investment and operational cost in comparison to radar. Operational efficiency: - - Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Organisation(s): Avinor Flysikring AS (NO) Type of project: National Schedule: Most of the airports are compliant, but some implementation will continue in Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The implementation are proceeding and several airports have implemented APV. The implementation will continue until Implementation of PBN and APV on Norwegian airports according to the Norwegian PBN implementation plan. L3: NAV10 - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: + Safety improvement due to gradual elimination of non-precision approaches will reduce the potential for CFIT. Environment: - Capacity: + Increased capacity Cost-efficiency: + Reduced investment cost Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 25 Released Issue

42 Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination 5.1. FAB Co-ordination Optimised ATM Network Services All NEFAB ANSPs will implement automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM by end of 2017 All NEFAB ANSPs have nearly implemented the COTR (Avinor missing ASP08 & ASP09 due to ongoing system upgrade). Latvia has completed ITY-COTR. The automatic exchange of the AFP messages will be implemented by the end of 2017 in all NEFAB ANSPs. Latvia has implemented the automatic exchange of AFP messages. The implementation deadline for FRA traffic will be specified. * * EUROCONTROL has issued "IFPS Users Manual - Edition 20.1 Date 22/11/2016" containing AFP-related changes. ANSPs have to test the part of AFP functioning in FRA environment. Advanced Air Traffic Services Joint FAB project: NEFAB Free Route Airspace across the FAB above FL135 in Norway and above FL95 in Finland, Estonia and Latvia. Airspace scenarios and simulations weresupported by EUROCONTROL. Basic AMAN implemented for major airports in Norway and Finland. Latvia plans to implement Basic AMAN in RIX within PRNAV almost fully implemented, LGS partly. LGS plans to implement RNAV procedures by end High Performing Airport Operations All main airports have implemented A-SMGCS level 1 and level 2; at Helsinki level 2 will become operational during Airports CDM implemented fully by Helsinki and Oslo airports; others follow in line with the FOC. DPI messages exchanged between Network Manager and both Helsinki and Oslo Airport. LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 26 Released Issue

43 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure All 4 ANSPs have technical readiness to replace X.25 with TCP/IP. Due to institutional and technical reasons AGDL implementation is late for all ANSPs. Estonia, Norway and Latvia implemented FMTP provisions; Finland plans FMTP to become operational during Latvia, Norway and Finland are PENS users. Estonia and Latvia moved from AFTN to AMHS (COM 10), Finland implemented basic AMHS in October NEFAB Safety KPIs SMI of 95% and RI of 95% were achieved. Level of Effectiveness of Safety management was Level C for EANS, Finavia and LGS, and D for Avinor. Present level will be maintained as a minimum but efforts will be addressed to minimize number of incidents. The en-route ATFM delay in NEFAB in 2016 was 0.07 min per flight, which meets the FAB-wide KPI (0.12). The performance at national levels varied from 0.0 to Capacity is presently sufficient and ATM systems are developed with regard to the growing capacity demand. Cost efficiency will be improved along with the developments of the Operational Efficiency programs. ANSPs are committed to protect their organisations and systems from cyber threats. NEFAB Free Route Airspace implemented in NEFAB States in November 2015 is connected with the FRA in DK/SE FAB. Most enhancements to enable seamless cross-border FRA operations between both FABs were implemented in June 2016 and will be finalised in May The area is being further expanded in the Borealis FRA programme through establishing interfaces with FRA areas in UK/Ireland FAB and Iceland. Airspace users will perceive this as continuous FRA area across nine states maximising the benefits for customers. In NEFAB airspace airlines can select between the fixed route network and free route operations. The NEFAB Free Route Airspace enables users to flight-plan and fly user-preferred trajectories. NEFAB Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) in 2016 was 1.73%. The Union target requires inefficiencies in actual trajectories decrease to 2.60% by LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 27 Released Issue

44 5.2. FAB Projects Kirkenes Cross-Border Area Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), FINAVIA (FI) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Implemented In November 2016 Avinor and Finavia launched cross border ATS across the border of Finland and Norway, where Kirkenes Tower/Approach is now providing the services in parts of Finnish Airspace. The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. The cross border services in Kirkenes TMA are another result of the NEFAB development programme that is investigating airspace and service improvements for the benefit of the airlines and travellers. N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Safety improvement of cross-border operations Environment: Capacity: N/A N/A Cost-efficiency: + More efficient usage of resources Operational efficiency: ++ Better integrated TMA operations Cooperation Activities: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 28 Released Issue

45 NEFAB FRA Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV) Work in progress Type of project: FAB Implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. Implementation of seamless FRA interface with Norway was postponed due to technical upgrade delay in Avinor ATM system. Revised solution of unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, and state-wide FRA in Norway were implemented in November FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2 L2: AOM-0500 Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Nill N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N/A Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3 Safety levels remain unchanged Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn Capacity: Cost-efficiency: + Small Present capacity Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles Cooperation Activities: - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 29 Released Issue

46 5.3. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) programme NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). The NEFRA concept is implementation of seamless interface in Scenario 8 between the two FABs above FL285 (Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 (Scenario 6) was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. First step of Scenario 8 was implemented in June 2016 with seamless cross-border FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway will be finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs. Borealis Alliance The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a legal document that sets up a framework for the business co-operation between 9 European ANSPs LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move, which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure. In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to implement a multi- FAB FRA by establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one continuous FRA to our customers (airspace users). LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 30 Released Issue

47 5.4. Regional Projects Borealis FRA Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Work in progress Type of project: Regional Description: The Borealis FRA Programme aims at establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operations is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. seamless FRA interfaces connecting FRA areas so that airspace users perceive it as one continuous FRA. This will be implemented in seven steps until Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: L3: AOM Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3 Safety levels remain unchanged Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Present or additional capacity Small Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles Cooperation Activities: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 31 Released Issue

48 NEFRA Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK) Work in progress Type of project: Regional Implementation of Scenario 8 i.e. unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and interfacing it with DK/SE FRA; implementation of FRA in Bodø Oceanic. Implementation of Scenario 8 was postponed due to technical upgrade delay in Avinor ATM systems. Revised Scenario 6 with unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, Statewide FRA in Norway and harmonised FRA flight planning rules with DK/SE FAB were implemented in November First step of Scenario 8 was implemented in June 2016 with seamless cross-border FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc Seamless FRA interface between Norway and NEFAB East/DK-SE FAB will be implemented in May ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2 L2: AOM-0500 Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Nil - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3 Safety levels remain unchanged Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Present or additional capacity Small Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles Cooperation Activities: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 32 Released Issue

49 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives The overall situation in the implementation of 2016 ESSIP Objectives in Norway has changed since An extensive upgrade of the main Norwegian ATM system (Future ATM System, FAS) is planned in The FAS Project is separated into the FAS En-Route project managed by Avinor Flysikring AS and the FAS Tower project managed by Avinor AS, each with different implementation dates. 1; 2% 10; 24% 5; 12% 12; 29% 14; 33% Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined This upgrade will facilitate the implementation of several Implementation Objectives between now and As a result, the following Implementation Objectives will be implemented late: ATC2.8 Ground-based Safety Nets, ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer, FCM03 Collaborative flight planning, ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link service and FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services. The following Implementation Objectives will be implemented as part of the new ATM system but are marked as having no plan: AOP12 - Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring and AOP13 - Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing. The following Objectives are late: ENV01 Continous Descent Operations at Oslo Airport still requires sufficient, systematic monitoring to provide exact data on the effects of CDA. Monitoring is expected to be completed in ITY-ADQ Avinor AS is in the process of implementing a new AIM system planned to be operation in ITY-AGVCS 12 state aircraft that fall in under the scope of Article 9 No 11 are identified and an exemption letter is sent to EFTA with a copy to EC and NM. NAV10 Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap ( ). Implementation planned to be finalized in ATC16 All aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training. This objective is marked "Late" as reflecting MIL status. MIL plans to be fully compliant by the end of LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 11 Released Issue

50 The following Implementation Objectives have no plan: AOP10 Time Based Separation, AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan and FCM Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - phase 2. Work is ongoing concerning 14 Implementation Objectives. At this time, there is no indication that those objectives will be completed late. To date, 12 objectives applicable to Norway have been completed Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 30% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 62% 3% 25% 80% 53% n/a 0% 25% 10% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 12 Released Issue

51 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 66% < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) Groundbased Safety Nets AMAN tools and procedures ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 ENV01 ITYCOTR NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 NAV10 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Continuous Descent Operations n/a 100% 100% 100% 87% ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 83% Groundground automated coordination 100% processes APV procedures 60% 100% 10% 10% 10% 2% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 35 Released Issue

52 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 54% < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) ENV02 SAF11 ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Airport CDM 100% 100% ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 100% TimeBased Separation ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 0% Initial Airport Operations Plan ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 0% Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 0% Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport 0% Collaborative Environmental Management ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions 100% 82% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 36 Released Issue

53 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 43% < COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 55% COM11 FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 100% 3% 35% 43% 12% 17% 0% ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability 100% 33% 71% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 37 Released Issue

54 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 60% 100% B0SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) 100% B0FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration 70% 100% B0DATM B0ACAS B0SNET B0ACDM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through 68% 87% 55% 100% 100% 100% 100% B0RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 100% B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 87% 100% B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 66% 71% 92% 100% 100% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute 12% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 38 Released Issue

55 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 12% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Possible revision of national regulation (BSG G 21) has been through public consultation but no clear conclusion has been reached. Work is still ongoing from CAAN's side. In addition, MIL and ANSP are 31/12/2018 responsible for the implementation of ANSP procedures and training to ensure a timely implementation. REG (By:12/2018) Luftfartstilsyn If deemed necessary, CAAN will revise national legislation BSL Ongoing 10% et G 21 to implement EUROAT. 31/12/2017 If deemed necessary, CAAN will revise national legislation BSL Mil. Authority G 21 to implement EUROAT. MIL is in the process of revising % Military regulations (BML). Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2018) Avinor Implement CAA regulation in local operational procedures and Ongoing 25% Flysikring AS train staff in new procedures. 31/12/2018 MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority MAA will together with Avinor assess the different documents 3% Ongoing 31/12/2018 AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM support tools to support AFUA Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Avinor Flysikring AS is ready for operational use, however the Norwegian Armed Forces is delayed in implementing LARA due to CyberSecurity issues. Norwegian Armed Forces estimates that LARA will be implemented by April/May ASP (By:12/2018) Avinor Flysikring AS Avinor Flysikring AS is ready for operational use, however the Norwegian Armed Forces has yet to complete its system 62% 62% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 39 Released Issue

56 AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Functionality will be part of new ATM System implementation. Will upgrade local LARA implementation when required functionality is made available by EUROCONTROL. ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS AOM19.3 (PCP) Functionality will be part of new ATM System implementation. Will upgrade local LARA implementation when required functionality is made available by EUROCONTROL. Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 3% 3% Ongoing 31/12/2021 Ongoing 31/12/ % Ongoing LARA system is procured and will be upgraded when functionality is available. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS AOM21.1 (PCP) LARA system is procured and will be upgraded when functionality is available. Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable 25% Norway will in Cooperation With NEFAB and Borealis implement Free Route Airspace and therefore implementation of Direct Routing is not relevant. ASP (By:12/2017) Avinor Flysikring AS AOM21.2 (PCP) Avinor will in Cooperation With NEFAB and Borealis implement Free Route Airspace and therefore implementation of Direct Routing is not relevant. Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 % Cooperation on FAB level to ensure implementation in accordance with plan. First phase of implementation within NEFAB is completed. Second phase for implementation in NEFRA (NEFAB + DK/SE FABs) planned for June ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS FRA is implemented in cooperation with partners in NEFAB including necessary system improvements. Additional system support will be implemented later to meet PCP requirements. Borealis FRA / NEFRA Ongoing 31/12/2021 % Not Applicable Not Applicable 100% Completed 100% 12/11/2015 Completed 12/11/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 40 Released Issue

57 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Completed with final approval during /12/2013 REG (By:12/2010) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:12/2011) Avinor Flysikring AS An ASMGCS system has been approved. There is currently no plan to impement specific ASMGCS level 1 procedures in state regulations. ANSP action followed Airport Operator deployment of equipment and procedures. Final operational approval achied from regulator during APO (By:12/2010) Technical equipment available and procedures and training Oslo Airport implemented, included training actions for the ANS provider. Final approval completed during % 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2013 Completed 30/06/2012 Completed 30/04/2012 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport System enablers, procedures and training delivered and ASMGCS level 2 is implemented. 30/09/2012 ASP (By:12/2017) Avinor Procedure development and training of staff is completed and Completed 100% Flysikring AS ASMGCS Level 2 is operational. 30/09/2012 APO (By:12/2017) Oslo Airport Operational implementation of alarm functions, operational procedures for level 2 and training programme is completed. 100% Completed 31/12/2010 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Implementation of Airport CDM is completed 10/ /10/2015 ASP (By:12/2016) Avinor Flysikring AS Overall implementation of Airport CDM planned for 01/2014. Specific procedures for adverse conditions implemented 01/10/2015. APO (By:12/2016) Overall implementation of Airport CDM planned for 01/2014. Oslo Airport Specific procedures for adverse conditions implemented 01/10/ % 100% Completed 01/10/2015 Completed 01/10/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 41 Released Issue

58 AOP10 (PCP) Time Based Separation Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 0% No Plan ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Avinor Flysikring AS and Oslo Airport (Avinor) will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation. REG (By:12/2023) Avinor Flysikring AS and Oslo Airport (Avinor) will initiate a No Plan Luftfartstilsyn study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. 0% et Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation. ASP (By:12/2023) Avinor Flysikring AS AVINOR AS Avinor Flysikring AS and Oslo Airport (Avinor) will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation. Avinor Flysikring AS and Oslo Airport (Avinor) will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation. 0% 0% No Plan No Plan AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Oslo Airport (Avinor) consider whether they should implement AOP or not and will perform a prestudy before making the decision. ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS AVINOR AS Oslo Airport (Avinor) consider whether they should implement AOP or not and will perform a prestudy before making the decision. Oslo Airport (Avinor) consider whether they should implement AOP or not and will perform a prestudy before making the decision. APO (By:12/2021) Oslo Airport (Avinor) consider whether they should implement AVINOR AS AOP or not and will perform a prestudy before making the decision. 0% 0% 0% No Plan No Plan No Plan AOP12 (PCP) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 0% No Plan ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. ASP (By:12/2020) Avinor Flysikring AS AVINOR AS Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. APO (By:12/2020) Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances AVINOR AS monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. 0% 0% 0% No Plan No Plan No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 42 Released Issue

59 AOP13 (PCP) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 0% No Plan ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing will be part of the New ATM system for Oslo Airport. REG (By:12/2023) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:12/2023) Avinor Flysikring AS AVINOR AS Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing will be part of the New ATM system for Oslo Airport. Awaiting safety related change from ANSP. Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing will be part of the New ATM system for Oslo Airport. Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing will be part of the New ATM system for Oslo Airport. 0% 0% 0% No Plan No Plan No Plan ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. This objective is planned to be operational by /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2016) Avinor Flysikring AS Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. This objective is planned to be operational by % AMAN tools and procedures ATC07.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport AMAN was installed approved for operational test since November The system entered full operational use as part of the Oslo ASAP project in April ASP (By:12/2019) Avinor Completed as part of the Oslo ASAP project 100% Flysikring AS Late 31/12/ % Completed 30/04/2011 Completed 30/04/2011 ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring 10% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MTCD and Monitoring Functions will be implemented with the new ATM system and planned operational befrore 31/12/ /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS MTCD and Monitoring Functions will be implemented with the new ATM system and planned operational before 31/12/2021. Future ATM System 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 43 Released Issue

60 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Implemented at Oslo ATCC as a consequence of new airspace structure from 04/2011. Other areas under consideration. 30/04/2011 ASP (By:12/2017) Avinor Flysikring AS ATC15.2 (PCP) AMAN information mechanism, tools and procedures to support Basic AMAN operations are implemented in Enroute airspace in Oslo AoR. Other areas under consideration. Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed 30/04/2011 2% Ongoing Extended AMAN is planned and functionality will be part of New ATM system. 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Avinor Extended AMAN is planned and functionality will be part of Ongoing 2% Flysikring AS New ATM system. 31/12/2023 AVINOR AS Extended AMAN is planned and functionality will be part of New ATM system. 2% Ongoing 31/12/2023 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer 10% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Full functionality will be availble after upgrade of the ATM system by end of /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2018) Avinor Flysikring AS Full functionality will be availble after upgrade of the ATM system by end of Future ATM System 10% Late 31/12/2020 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Basic AHMS is implemented. Implementation of Enhanced AHMS is pending national decisions. Detailed implementation activities will be planned accordingly. 31/03/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) Avinor Flysikring AS Basic AMHS by AFTN/AMHS gateway is operational. Implementation of extended AMHS is planned in AMHS Extended 55% Ongoing 31/03/2018 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 The ANSP has started initial planning, including dialogue with system suppliers and network service providers. First planned implementation is a VoIP VCS for HF communication for Bodø OAC. A mature 31/12/2020 implementation plan will be developed in ASP (By:12/2020) Avinor Flysikring AS Initial planning started, including dialogue with system suppliers and network service providers. 17% Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 44 Released Issue

61 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport CDA awareness camapaign and controller working methods implemented to allow for CDA under specific conditions. Initial trials with reporting from airline operators are done, but monitoring is not sufficiently systematic to provide exact data on effects of CDA. Complete and systematic monitoring is planned in 31/12/ ASP (By:12/2013) Avinor Flysikring AS CDA awareness campaign conducted. Includes use of information material for operational staff and managers. Improved TMAprocedures implemented 03/2013. APO (By:12/2013) Initial trials with reporting from airline operators are done, but monitoring is not sufficiently systematic to provide exact data AVINOR AS on effects of CDA. Complete and systematic monitoring is planned in % 50% Completed 31/12/2014 Late 31/12/2017 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed ENGM Oslo Gardermoen Airport Formal partnership arrangements are in place at Oslo Airport to evaluate and control the environmental effect of Air Traffic Procedures. 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2016) Avinor Flysikring AS Local ANSP participates actively in meetings, consultation arrangements and briefings related to environmental effect of aircraft operations. APO (By:12/2016) Partnership arrangements are established through the use of regular meetings, involving ANSP and users. The collaborative Oslo Airport arrangements include the use of data derived from the airport s noise and trajectory monitoring systems. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2012 Completed 31/12/2012 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Some SLoAs are completed the remaining are either reported as Late or Ongoing. The Overall State Progress is "Late" due to ADEXP that will be deployed in 2020 when the new ATM system is planned 31/12/2020 oprational. ASP (By:12/2017) Avinor Flysikring AS AFP processing is included in system upgrade planned during Flight plan message processing in ADEXP format planned with a major system Upgrade in Future ATM System 53% Late 31/12/2020 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Not applicable for Norway ASP (By:10/2017) Avinor Flysikring AS N/A for Norway % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 45 Released Issue

62 FCM04.2 (PCP) Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS Avinor Flysikring AS will not develop any specific STAM Application. 0% No Plan FCM05 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/ /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Planned ATFCM Procedures will be developed and implemented. 0% Flysikring AS 31/12/2021 APO (By:12/2021) Oslo Airport NM receives data through connection to EU ACA. 100% Completed 31/12/2013 AVINOR AS Integration of AOP and NOP is not started yet. See status on AOP 11 Initial AOP. 0% No Plan FCM06 (PCP) Traffic complexity assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 The ANSP has technical support for these tools including procedures which will be implemted with the new ATM system Project, planned operational during /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Avinor Flysikring AS Technical support for these tools including procedures will be implemted with the new ATM system Project, planned operational during Future ATM System 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 0% Planned Full operational capability: 31/12/ /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) It is planned that the New ATM system will handle EFPL AVINOR AS information. More detailed plan will be developed during the 0% Project. Planned 31/12/2021 Avinor Flysikring AS It is planned that the New ATM system will handle EFPL information. More detailed plan will be developed during the Project. 0% Planned 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 46 Released Issue

63 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 3% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 National TOD policy is in the planning stages and dialog between NSA and stakeholders is ongoing. Where appropriate, changes to State legislation will be initiated to ensure timely implementation. Regulator's 31/05/2018 national plan/policy is expected to be finished in 2017 with a close dialogue between ASP and regulator. REG (By:05/2018) Luftfartstilsyn et The National TOD policy document is under production, but has not yet been finished. Dialog between NSA and stakeholders is ongoing. ASP (By:05/2018) Waiting for national TOD policy to start detailed planning. Airport operator at Oslo Gardermoen Airport will be part of AVINOR AS the Avinor project plan for etod implementation. Also waiting for national policy. APO (By:05/2018) Airport operator at Oslo Gardermoen Airport will be part of AVINOR AS the Avinor project plan for etod implementation. Also waiting for national policy. 5% 0% 0% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Planned 31/12/2017 Planned 31/05/2018 ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 ACID Reg. 1206/2011 was incorporated into Norwegian Law via the EEA agreement as of 1 Jan The ANSP has a NORWAM project with plans to implement a Nationwide WAM system in Norway by /01/2020 ASP (By:01/2020) Avinor Flysikring AS The NORWAM system plan to implement a Nationwide WAM system in Norway by All MSSR radars will in addition be operating in Mode S. ARTAS tracker is implemented in ARTAS Integration / Future ATM System / Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADSB Implementati on Project 43% Ongoing 02/01/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 47 Released Issue

64 ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Work is in progress to ensure the quality of aeronautical data and information. Objective marked as "Late" with activity planned throughout /06/2018 REG (By:06/2017) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:06/2017) AVINOR AS APO (By:06/2017) AVINOR AS EU 73/2010 in now implemented into Norwegian Law. Work is in progress to ensure the quality of aeronautical data and information. New AIM system under implementation. New AIM system under implementation. 32% ADQimplementati on program ADQimplementati on program 36% 36% Late 30/06/2018 Late 30/06/2018 Late 30/06/2018 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Entry into force: 06/02/ % Late ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Changes will be assessed when notified by the ANSP. The ANSP has communicated that data link implementation will be delayed until A new ATM system is planned to be operational in 2020 which will implement data link functionalities. Necessary VDL Mode 2 infrastructure will be implemented 01/04/2020 accordingly. REG (By:02/2018) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:02/2018) Avinor Flysikring AS MIL (By:01/2019) Changes will be assessed when notified by the ANSP. The ANSP has communicated that data link implementation will be delayed until A new ATM system is planned to be operational in 2020 which will implement data link functionalities. The new ATM system planned operational in 2020 will implement datalink functionalities. Necessary VDL Mode 2 infrastructure will be implemented accordingly. 0% Future ATM System Mil. Authority MIL does not provide ATC services to civil flights % 18% Late 05/02/2020 Late 01/04/2020 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 48 Released Issue

65 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Late All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 as ammended by (EU) nr. 657/2013 has now been transposed into national regulation in Norway (BSLG 12, 2 nr. 4). This regulation does not apply to Svalbard. The NSA formed a National 8.33KHz working group in 2016 consisting of stakeholders and NSA to discuss a national 31/12/2025 implementation plan. The deliverables of this WG resulted in an exemption letter sent to EFTA Surveillance Authority with a copy to EC and NM. REG (By:12/2018) Luftfartstilsyn Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 has now been transposed into Late 25% et national regulation in Norway. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) Avinor Flysikring AS Voice Communication Systems are compliant and all transceivers can be converted into 8.33 khz. ANSP awaiting conversion plan and activities as mandated by NSA. MIL (By:12/2020) 12 state aircraft that fall in under the scope of Article 9 No 11 are identified and an exemption letter is sent to EFTA with a Mil. Authority copy to EC and NM. 90.3% of state aircraft are now equiped with 8,33 khz radios. APO (By:12/2018) Voice Communication Systems are compliant and all AVINOR AS transceivers can be converted into 8.33 khz. ANSP awaiting conversion plan and activities as mandated by NSA. 28% 100% 0% Late 31/12/2025 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/ % Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 ANSP plans implementation of FMTP in 2011, but the use of the protocol between ANSP and Controlling Military Units is considered not applicable, since no such units exist. 31/12/2014 ASP (By:12/2014) Avinor Flysikring AS MIL (By:12/2014) Implementation of FMTP is completed for Avinor Flysikring AS. Connection is established between Denmark and UK while connection to Sweden and Finland is pending. 100% Mil. Authority % Completed 31/12/2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 49 Released Issue

66 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Reg. 1207/2011 (SPI IR) was incorporated into Norwegian Law by National Regulation entering into force 15 July /06/2020 REG (By:02/2015) Luftfartstilsyn From 1 Jan 2015, Reg. 1207/2011 was incorporated into Completed 100% et Norwegian Law via the EEA agreement. 05/02/2015 ASP (By:02/2015) Avinor Flysikring AS All stakeholder lines of actions are implemented by Avinor Flysikring AS. MIL (By:06/2020) As of now, no plans for Mode S Enhanced Surveillance, Mil. Authority however Elementary Mode S and ADSB out are progressing within timescale. ARTAS Integration / Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADSB Implementati on Project 100% 23% Completed 05/02/2015 Ongoing 07/06/2020 NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 PRNAV STARs are implemented in some TMAs, and PRNAV SIDs are planned for some TMAs. Most SLoA s are completed. 31/01/2012 ASP (By:12/2023) Avinor Flysikring AS PRNAV SID/STAR implemented in the Oslo AoR. PRNAV STAR implemented at Stavanger Sola and Bergen Flesland. Further deployment is planned in accordance with PBN Implementation Plan Norway. 100% Completed 31/01/2012 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 50 Released Issue

67 NAV10 APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap ( ). In addition national regulations are amended with core requirements from PBN 31/07/2018 plan. REG (By:04/2016) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:12/2016) Avinor Flysikring AS AVINOR AS National implementation plan for PBN completed In addition national regulations are amended with core requirements from PBN plan Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap ( ). Ref ASP04: AIP coordinates is presently published in EUREF89 (local implementation of WGS84) in accordance With annex 15. Will be in accordance With article 14 of 73/2010 by (see also ITYADQ). 100% Performance Based Navigation 70% 20% Completed 30/04/2011 Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/07/2018 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The EAPRE is included in CAAN followup of Safety Initiatives and oversight activities of ANS and ADR. CAAN is in the process of establishing a SSP. Further detailed work with regards to safety initiatives will 31/01/2018 be considered in the Aviation Safety Management process. REG (By:01/2018) Luftfartstilsyn et The EAPRE is included in CAAN followup of Safety Initiatives and oversight activities of ANS and ADR. CAAN is in the process of establishing a SSP. Further detailed work with regards to safety initiatives will be considered in the Aviation Safety Management process. 10% ASP (By:12/2014) Avinor ASP Action Plan implemented 100% Flysikring AS APO (By:12/2014) Oslo Airport ASP Action Plan implemented 100% Ongoing 31/01/2018 Completed 31/12/2014 Completed 31/12/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 51 Released Issue

68 6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 STCA level 2 was implemented in Oslo ATCC in 10/2009 and Bodø and Stavanger upgraded during /01/2013 ASP (By:01/2013) AVINOR Air Navigation Services Enhanced STCA was implemented in Oslo ATCC 10/2009 Bodø and Stavanber ATCC was upgraded during % Completed 31/01/2013 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 CAAN Operations Department has been in regular contact with all of the operators covered by this requirement (excluding MIL). Based on the feedback CAAN has received, all aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training. This objective is 31/12/2018 marked "Late" as reflecting MIL status. REG (By:12/2015) Luftfartstilsyn et ASP (By:03/2012) AVINOR Air Navigation Services CAAN Operations Department has been in regular contact with all of the operators covered by this requirement (excluding MIL). Based on the feedback CAAN has received, all aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training. Training Organization in Avinor FS AS has requested the relevant parts of the ANSP organization about the status for training in the system. Based on the fact that most units already has completed training as a part of continuation training when the system were incorporated, the training organization has decided to offer training only to the air traffic controllers that has not completed training in the new system. Follow up of performance will be done by means of regular incident occurence reporting, investigation and analysis. MIL (By:12/2015) No plan on 1 aircraft system and planned on 1 aircraft system Mil. Authority (see MIL SLoA ATC16MIL01). MIL plans to be fully compliant by the end of % 100% 55% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 30/06/2015 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 52 Released Issue

69 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 A number of SLoA's are already implemented. The two remaining SLoA's (ASP06 and ASP07) will be implemented in the new ATM system, planned for 12/ /12/2020 ASP (By:07/2014) The most improtant SLoAs (ASP02, ASP03 and ASP04) are Late AVINOR Air implemented. System generated messages to CFMU related to Navigation 80% reroutings and holding are not implemented, and is done 31/12/2020 Services manually. Oslo Airport DPI Message from Oslo Airport is (ASP08) is completed. 100% Completed 31/01/2014 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Norway is at Level 4 the lack of integrated ATFM prevents to upgrade to Level 5. ASP (By:12/2012) AVINOR Air Navigation Services Norway has implemented level 4. The lack of integrated ATFM prevents Norway to upgrade to level % Completed ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 This applies to regulation 1032/2006 and most of the SLA's is implemented in the current ATM system (NATCON). ASP08 and ASP09 will be implemented in conjunction with implementation of CPDLC and the 31/05/2015 new ATM system planned operational in ASP (By:12/2012) AVINOR Air Navigation Services MIL (By:12/2012) This applies to regulation 1032/2006 and most of the SLA's is implemented in the current ATM system (NATCON). ASP08 and ASP09 will be implemented in conjunction with implementation of CPDLC and the new ATM system planned operational in % Mil. Authority % Completed 31/05/2015 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 53 Released Issue

70

71 ANNEXES Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Norway Luftfartstilsynet Rajunesh SHANKAR LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Luftfartstilsynet Rajunesh SHANKAR LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Avinor Flysikring AS Bjørn HOVLAND LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Avinor Flysikring AS Bjørn HOVLAND LSSIP Focal Point for Military RNoAF Hans Jørgen NORDSKOG EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Norway DPS/PEPR Luca DELL ORTO LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 54 Released Issue

72 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Morten SKOGØ AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Lars ERIKSEN AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Lars ERIKSEN AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Lars ERIKSEN AOM21.1 AOM21.2 C. BRAIN C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Torgeir SLOTTE Hans Jacob HOFGAARD A. DYBOWSKA Torgeir SLOTTE Hans Jacob HOFGAARD AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Johan STEINKJER AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Johan STEINKJER AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Johan STEINKJER AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Johan STEINKJER AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO Johan STEINKJER AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Johan STEINKJER AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Johan STEINKJER ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Torgeir SLOTTE ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Torgeir SLOTTE ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Torgeir SLOTTE ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO Torgeir SLOTTE ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Torgeir SLOTTE ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Torgeir SLOTTE COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Erling BERGERSEN COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Hugo FRIVÅG COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO N/A ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Johan STEINKJER ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Fredrik NYGAARD FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Torgeir SLOTTE FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA Lars ERIKSEN FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Lars ERIKSEN FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Lars ERIKSEN FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Torgeir SLOTTE FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO Torgeir SLOTTE FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Torgeir SLOTTE FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA N/A INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Torunn CARLSSON LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 55 Released Issue

73 INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO N/A INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO N/A ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Torunn CARLSSON ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Hugo FRIVÅG ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Erling BERGERSEN ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Kjetil MOSESEN ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Kjetil MOSESEN ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Torgeir SLOTTE NAV03 NAV10 F. PAVLICEVIC R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Hans Petter KRISTOFFERSEN P. VRANJKOVIC Hans Petter KRISTOFFERSEN SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Anne CHAVEZ LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 56 Released Issue

74 Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts CAA - Luftfartstilsynet - is under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communication (MoTC). CAA Norway performs all functions of enforcement and control as delegated by the government body, in other words the responsibility for requirements and regulations, admission control and control of operators. The CAA relocated from Oslo to Bodø and has been fully operational at the new location since In 2016, CAA Norway has initiated plans to implement a significant organisational change effective from The focus of the change is to improve strategic management, clarification of roles towards external stakeholders and build stronger internal multidisciplinary collaboration. The following chart shows the structure in Luftfartstilsynet in 2016: LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 57 Released Issue

75 ANS Provider The Norwegian provider of Civil ANS (Avinor Flysikring AS) is under the responsibility of the MoTC and is a state owned limited company fully owned by Avinor AS. Included in the ANS are the area control service offered to aircraft flying in Norway FIR and Bodø OFIR as well as approach and tower control service offered at 20 airports and Aerodrome FIS in 29 airports in Norway FIS is provided in all Norwegian FIR to VFR flights flying in a non-controlled area. The following chart shows the structure of Avinor AS: Board of Directors CEO Corporate Staff Division Regional Airports EVP Operations and Infrastructure Svalbard Airport AS Bergen Airport, Flesland Stavanger Airport, Sola Trondheim Airport, Værnes Oslo Airport, Gardermoen Avinor Air Navigation Services AS The following chart shows the Avinor FlysikringAS in more detail: LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 58 Released Issue

76 Military Aviation Authority The Chief of Staff of the RNoAF is the Military Aviation Authority. According to the Norwegian Aviation Act, the military is given the authority to issue rules and regulations for Military Aviation (BML). The Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the education and certification of personnel (Pilots, Air Defence Controllers, Investigation Board Officers, Maintenance- and Ground Support Personnel). Additionally, the Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the Military Aircraft Registry, for the certification of military aircraft and equipment and regulation of Military Airfields. The following structure shows the Military Aviation Organisation: LSSIP Year 2016 Norway 59 Released Issue