Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) LATVIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) LATVIA Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for Latvia Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-75 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia Edition Date: 25/04/16 LSSIP Focal Point - Erika NEIMANE LSSIP Contact Person - Luca DELL ORTO Status Erika.Neimane@latcaa.gov.lv luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int Intended for Head of ATM Section Unit DPS/PEPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Latvia (LV) - LDO\Year 2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_Latvia Released.docx LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition European ATM Portal Working - Public ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 6 Acronyms and abbreviations 7 LSSIP Documents 8 AIP of Latvia 9 FAB Performance Plan LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. Edition LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia Released Issue

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) Air Navigation Service Provider Airports Military Authorities... 9 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Latvia RIGA ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Summer 2015 performance Planning Period Summer Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ANNEXES Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process 45 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts 47 Annex C Glossary of Abbreviations 50 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context In November 2015, Latvia, along with the rest of NEFAB states implemented Free Route Airspace above FL95, to facilitate environment friendly and more efficient flight trajectories. Traffic and Capacity Latvia has no issues with capacity. Traffic in Latvia increased by 0.1% during summer 2015 (May to October inclusive) when compared to summer No problem of capacity is foreseen in Riga ACC in the planning period. Medium forecast predicts an average annual air traffic growth between 0.1% and 5.0%. ESSIP Objective Implementation Based on the 2015 ESSIP Objective implementation data in Latvia, overall implementation of the the ESSIP Objectives is either in planning phase, completed or not applicable. The following objectives have yet to be completed: ATC07.1 (EVRA), COM10 and FCM01. Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes of the ITY-COTR objective was completed by 2015, with the exception of those services based on the use of Data Link. These are planned for implementation in 2018, in accordance with the requirements in the amended DLS regulation. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 1 Released Issue

12 State-related ESSIP Objectives LSSIP Latvia * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Implementation of Direct Routing Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 ATC12.1 ATC15 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 * Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 FCM05 FCM06 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID ITY-ADQ Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 2 Released Issue

13 LSSIP Latvia * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-COTR Implement 8,33 khz air-ground voice channel spacing below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV * NAV10 Implement APV procedures * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= EVRA-Riga Airport AOP04.1 AOP04.2 AOP05 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 Time Based Separation Initial Airport Operations Plan Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring [PCP] [E] [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures * ENV01 ENV02 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports Understanding the Table Objective Objective Partly Objective No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (Latvia/Riga Airport does not participate in this objective) Late E= Essential Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Latvia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1993 EUROCONTROL 1 January, 2011 European Union 1 May, 2004 EASA 1 May, 2004 ICAO 13 July, 1992 NATO 1 May, 2004 ITU 29 March, Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the RIGA FIR. RIGA FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 5 States, namely Estonia, Russian Federation, Belarus, Lithuania and Sweden. Adjacent FIR/UIRs of ECAC States: North - Tallinn FIR/UIR (Estonia); West - Malmö and Stockholm FIRs/UIRs (Sweden); South - Vilnius FIR/UIR (Lithuania). Adjacent FIR/UIRs of non-ecac States: East - Sankt-Peterburg FIR/UIR (Russian Federation); Southeast - Minsk FIR/UIR (Belarus) LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 5 Released Issue

18 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation The current classification of Latvian airspace is outlined below: FIR: GND - UNL RIGA CTA: FL FL National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Latvia are the following: National Supervisory Authorities: - The Department of Air Transport of the Ministry of Transport (MoT); - Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia (LCAA); Transport Accident and Incident Investigation Bureau; Air Navigation Services Provider State Joint Stock Company Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme (LGS); Riga International Airport; The Ministry of Defence (MoD) National Armed Forces; The Ministry of Internal Affairs (Border Guard). Their activities are detailed in the following sub-chapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 6 Released Issue

19 Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in Latvia is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The LCAA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making Cabinet of Ministers Constitution Safety Oversight LCAA Law on Aviation Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements LCAA Law on Aviation Airspace LCAA Law on Aviation, Cabinet of Ministers regulation N 507( ) Economic Department of Air Transport (MoT) Law on Aviation, Cabinet of Ministers regulation N 991 ( ) Environment LCAA Law on Aviation, Cabinet of Ministers regulation N 487 ( ) and N 1041 ( ) Security LCAA Law on Aviation, Cabinet of Ministers regulation N 397 ( ) Accident investigation Transport Accident and Investigation Bureau Law on Aviation, Law on accident and incident investigation in civil aviation LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 7 Released Issue

20 Department of Air Transport of the MoT and LCAA According to the act Law on Aviation, the Department of Air Transport of the Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia (LCAA) implement State policy and exercise State administration in the field of civil aviation. As per SES regulations the LCAA, is nominated as the National Supervisory Authority (NSA). The LCAA is responsible for certification of the air navigation services providers in Latvia. LCAA is responsible for safety supervision and approves/certifies/licenses staff, operations and equipment of service provider organisations. LCAA is institutionally separated from the service providers. The LCAA is an independent governmental Agency subordinated to the Ministry of Transport. LCAA operates as a non-profit organisation, financed from fees from aviation enterprises. Annual Report published: Y pdf More detailed information is available on the following web sites: - The Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia: - Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia: LCAA Organisational Chart is presented in Annex B Air Navigation Service Provider Services provided Name of the ANSP: Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme (LGS) Governance: Ministry of Transport Ownership: 100% State Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS Y Y Y Y Y MET Y LGS is responsible for the meteo observations at the airports only. ATCO training Y Unit Training (Transitional; Pre-On the Job Training and On the Job Training); Continuation Training (Refresher; Emergency and Conversion); Other training for ATM staff (Development Training; Classroom Instructors and ATM Management Staff Training). Others Y FIS (provided by Liepaja FIC in Western part of FIR); Alerting Services; Pre-tactical and tactical airspace management. Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Airspace under the responsibility of Lithuania. Route segment NINTA ADAXA. Annual Report published: Y This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. ANSP website: LGS Organisational Chart is presented in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 8 Released Issue

21 ATC systems in use FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SiATM (Sweden) Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No, next upgrade is planned for 2017 ATC Unit RIGA ACC SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SiATM (Sweden) Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No, next upgrade is planned for 2017 ATC Unit RIGA ACC ATC units The ATC units in the Latvian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA RIGA ACC 3 RIGA En-route RIGA TMA / APP 2 RIGA LIEPAJA FIC 1 RIGA FIS below FL095 in Western part of FIR Airports General information The main international airport in Latvia is RIGA International Airport. It is fully state owned Joint-Stock Company of the Republic of Latvia. The holder of state capital shares is the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia. Latvia has some airfields for general aviation as well Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Riga airport Military Authorities The Military Authorities (Air Forces) in Latvia are composed of: - Air Forces HQ; - Air Surveillance Squadron; - Aviation Squadron; - Ground based Air Defence Battalion; 1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 9 Released Issue

22 - Airfield Operations Support Unit. They report to the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Latvia and Commander of Latvian National Armed Forces. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. Information on the application of FUA is in National Armed Forces website: Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Cabinet of Ministers Authority signing such legal provision: Cabinet of Ministers These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A OAT/GAT Coordination N OAT/GAT Coordination N/A ATCO Training N ATCO Training N/A ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N/A ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N/A Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability N/A Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: Bilateral agreement between NATO and the three Baltic States. (NATO Air Policing) Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N Additional Information: Military are subject to Civil Rules Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP Y National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip Y Other: Other: N/A Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: MoD Additional information:n/a GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: there is no Military NSA in Latvia. Military does not provide service to GAT. Additional information: N/A LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 10 Released Issue

23 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: NATO (only for air policing) Services Provided: En-Route N En-Route N Approach/TMA N Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N AIS N MET Y MET N SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y (NATO) FIS N Other: Other: N Additional Information: There are no TRAs for OAT. Additional Information: The SAR coordination is provided by LGS. Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Certificate issued by: Additional Information: N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? * Yes in case of A - Scramble. OAT only N GAT only Y Both OAT and GAT N* If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing N/A Within specific corridors only N/A Within the regular (GAT) national route network N/A Under radar control N/A Within a special OAT route system N/A Under radar advisory service N/A If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Y Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N/A CNS exemptions: RVSM N/A 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS N Others: Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in <State> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 11 Released Issue

24 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Latvia Latvia - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015) IFR flights yearly growth 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F H 1.3% 5.4% 5.2% 4.6% 4.6% 5.1% 4.1% Latvia B -1.0% 1.3% 2.8% 0.7% 2.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.6% 1.9% L 0.1% -2.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% 1.0% 0.5% ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8% 2015 Traffic in Latvia increased by 0.1% during Summer 2015 (May to October inclusive), when compared to Summer The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.1% and 5.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.3%. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 12 Released Issue

25 2.2 RIGA ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays EVRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/ Summer 2015 performance En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap % 85 (0%) No The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Various ATM system improvements Maximum configuration: APP Yes 4 sectors were opened Summer 2015 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as in The average peak 1 hour demand was 64 and the peak 3 hour demand was 58 flights during the measured period, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet the demand. Yes LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 13 Released Issue

26 2.2.3 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. EVRRCTA Annual Summer En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values Capacity Profiles ACC 2015 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 85 0% 86 1% 89 3% 95 7% Ref. 85 0% 85 0% 86 1% 87 1% EVRR 85 L 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% Open 86 1% 86 0% 87 1% 88 1% C/R 86 1% 86 0% 87 1% 88 1% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Capacity Plan Various ATM system improvements Max sectors APP APP APP APP APP Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand Reference profile 0% 0% 1% 1% N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 14 Released Issue

27 EVRRCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Riga ACC during the planning period. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 15 Released Issue

28 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Latvia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number Recommendation 2014 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY- REC AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Ownership Local Stakeholders Description: LGS: FCM01-ASP02 is late. Provision of Standard Correlated Position Data is expected by 30/04/2016. LGS: COM10-ASP03 Enhance AMHS capability (Extended ATSMHS) is late. LGS has signed a contract with manufacturer on system upgrade by 31/12/2016. LGS: Currently no delay is expected by other objectives and SloAs. REC (equal to REC ) Corrective actions taken: YES The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs Description: LGS: ATM system modernisation in the frame of FRA implementation was coordinated together with NEFAB and Borealis partners. FRA was implemented successfully within NEFAB airspace. Data link implementation is a subject of close coordination and partnership with NEFAB and Borealis alliance. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 16 Released Issue

29 Chapter 4 - National Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas LGS (LV) ATRACC (RP- AD/PLN-01/57 (2013)) The title ATRACC (Air Traffic Riga Area Control Centre) comprises an ATM system for tower, approach and area control of the Riga FIR. The system has been designed and produced by the Swedish company Systemintegrering AB. The system is based on multi-sensor tracking, advanced flight plan data processing, predicted flight trajectories, OLDI (On-Line Data Interchange), silent co-ordination and paperless HMI. From the functional point of view, the system consists of two main components: Primary System, providing the full set of functionalities described above, and Radar Bypass System as a backup if the primary system failed. This open architecture system can easily be expanded. It comprises more than 15 working positions intended for operators with different operational roles, specifically TWR (tower), ACC (Area Control), APP (Approach Control), ARCC (Area Rescue Co-ordination Centre), FDA (Flight Data Assistant), HIST (History, Recording and Playback), OSUP (Operational Supervisor) and TSUP (Technical Supervisor). The system has experienced some modernization stages. Current modernization project named ATRACC aims system upgrade for: CPDLC functionalities; Free Route Airspace implementation (this part is coordinated with NEFAB); November 2013 / June 2016 Project is in progress. The ATM modernization is moving smoothly as prescribed by the Project Management Plan. Corresponding software modules for CPDLC and Free Route Airspace functionality were developed in time. Interface to LARA system is developed. ESSIP:AOM21.2, ITY-ADQ, ITY-AGDL, ITY-COTR, ITY- FMTP OI-Steps: AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, AUO-0301, CM-0102-A, CM- 0201, IS-0202, IS Other: - Capacity: CPDLC: Increased capacity through both reduction of voice congestion and increase of controller efficiency. FRA: The implementation of free route airspace brings significant flight efficiency benefits to airspace users due to user preferred routes. As a step to full trajectory based operations the FRA concept brings increased flight predictability, reduced uncertainty for the Network which in turn can lead to capacity increase for ATM which will also benefit the user. DMAN: Improved airport / TMA capacity. Safety: CPDLC: Through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages (entailing significant error and fatigue reduction), the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval, data link communications are a major safety enhancement. FRA: Some enhancement through reduction in controller workload. DMAN: The same or improved safety. AUTOMATED AERONAUTICAL DATA INPUT: Improved consistency, reliability and integrity of data. Environment: FRA: The free route airspace implementation brings significant flight efficiency benefits namely: reductions in emissions through the use of optimal routes and preferred flight profiles. DMAN: A positive environmental effect in terms of noise and fuel usage due to reduced holding and low level vectoring. Cost-Efficiency: CPDLC: Data link is a costeffective capacity increase enabler through LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 17 Released Issue

30 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Departure Manager (D-MAN); New tower working positions implementation (TWR Supervisor & Clearance Delivery); Automated aeronautical data input; Others. CPDLC Implementati on in the RIGA FIR (RP- AD/PLN-01/2 (2014)) CPDLC module of ATM system modernization is a subject of CPDLC Implementation Project as well. THE PROJECT OBJECTIVE The project objective is implementation of CPDLC services in accordance with COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 29/2009 of 16 January 2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky. It means a compliance with all applicable ICAO standards, corresponding community specifications as well as user needs. TRANSVERSAL PROJECT Inside LGS the project crosses with the ATRACC project. The last one is a separate complex project focused on: Free Route Airspace Implementation; Departure Manager and some other features. CPDLC module is just a part of the ATRACC project (CPDLC related functions; HMI; others). On the January 2014 / February PROGRESS Within 2014 the main efforts are focused on two packages: the ATM System Upgrade and the Data Link Communication Infrastructure. The ATM modernization is moving smoothly as prescribed by the Project Management Plan. In contrast the Data Link Communication Infrastructure package experienced some disturbances. In June 2014 the EC has acknowledged the technical problems with data link services. LGS was forced to put the project on a temporary hold, to await the EC decision. In July LGS ESSIP:ITY-AGDL OI-Steps: AUO-0301 Other: It is a transversal project with ATRACC Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas sector productivity increase and delay cost savings. ANSPs savings derived from staff cost avoidance. Aircraft operators will benefit of en route cost savings and reduction of delays. FRA: The implementation of free route airspace brings significant flight efficiency benefits to airspace users due to user preferred routes. As a step to full trajectory based operations the FRA concept brings increased flight predictability, reduced uncertainty for the Network which in turn can lead to capacity increases for ATM which will also benefit the user. DMAN: Reduced costs through reduction in delays. AUTOMATED AERONAUTICAL DATA INPUT: Avoidance of repair, correction and re-work activities at data provider and data user level as a necessary step towards the implementation of system wide information management. Capacity: Increased capacity through both reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency. Safety: Through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages (entailing significant error and fatigue reduction), the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval, data link communications are a major safety enhancement. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Data link is a cost-effective capacity increase enabler through sector productivity increase and delay cost savings. ANSPs savings derived from staff cost avoidance. Aircraft operators will benefit of enroute cost savings and reduction of delays. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 18 Released Issue

31 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references other hand the modernization of ATM system is an absolute pre-requisite for CPDLC successful implementation. THE PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS 1. Customer: LGS; 2. Target group: airspace users; 3. Subject of EC Regulation : Republic of Latvia; 4. SES dimension: NEFAB + IDP; 5. Sponsorship: EC (INEA former TEN-T Agency); 6. Communication Service Providers: SITA & ARINC; 7. Developer of ATM System: SiATM. Board decided to postpone a discussion of the contract with SITA and ARINC. This pause will help LGS to take into account all new requirements of the European Commission if any. However the CPDLC implementation project is not closed. LGS is eager to continue based on a new clear roadmap. Currently LGS continues modernisation of ATM system preparing the platform for CPDLC implementation. Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas THE PROJECT COMPRISES 8 WORKING PACKAGES: 1. Project Management; 2. Data Link Communication Infrastructure; 3. ATM System Upgrade; 4. Provision of Initial Operations; 5. Training of LGS Staff; 6. Validation; 7. Assessment of the Fleet Equipage; 8. Coordination with neighbours PROGRESS Within 2015 the Project Management Plan was reviewed as per the Regulation (EU) 2015/310. The project mangement team is awaiting results and new technical solutions (if any) from the SJU study. All appropriate activities for the TEN-T funding closure to be completed by March Communicati on Project The project objective is enhancement of existing AMHS functionality adding new functions according to the requirements of the ESSIP (COM10-ASP03) and ATM Master Plan (CTE-C10). One of the new system components is going to be "AMHS to SWIM Connector" providing SWIM. December 2016 The project is ongoing. LGS has signed a contract with manufacturer to upgrade AFTN/AMHS system and implement AMHS Extended functionality. ESSIP:COM10 OI-Steps: - Other: - Capacity: - Safety: A harmonised set of safety requirements. Environment: Reduction of power consumption and heating emission. Cost-Efficiency: Use of COTS messaging systems. Support exchange of any kind of message format including new binary data. Cost reduction of messaging services at the end. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 19 Released Issue

32 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references PBN Implementati on Project (RP-AD/PLN- 01/6 (2013)) LGS (LV), RIGA Airport (LV) A-SMGCS Modernisatio n (RP- AD/PLN-01/20 (2012)) Analysis of the existing airspace structure of Riga FIR, development, validation and implementation of PBN air space elements and procedures. A-SMGCS modernization with Followthe-Green concept. March 2013 / November 2016 May 2012 / November 2017 During 2015 PBN Project Team created technical specification and rules of a tender. The tender was issued to all interested parties globally. There were 5 bidders who expressed their interest and submitted requested documentation to the Tender Committee. Currently Tender Committee performs evaluation of selected candidates. System upgrade was completed successfully. Transition to the upgraded system is planned within Besides of hardware and software upgrade the system comprises a bunch of new functionalities for instance "stop - bar" monitoring and control. ESSIP:COM10, ENV01, NAV03, NAV10 OI-Steps: AOM- 0601, AOM-0602, AOM-0604, AOM Other: - ESSIP:AOP04.2 OI-Steps: AO-0102, AO-0201 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity: 1. Increase airspace capacity. 2. Increase of traffic compared to Reduction of flight time in TMA. Safety: 1. Reduction of numbers of incidents related to airspace design and volume. 2. Reduction of known interface challenges in specific areas. 3. Segregation of air routes and de-conflicting of SIDs/STARs. 3. Improvement of safety compared to a 2008 baseline. Environment: 1. Reduction of CO2 emissions and noise by means of new airspace and route design. 2. The target is 5% reduction of CO2 emissions per flight Cost-Efficiency: 1. Increase of traffic with the same staff. 2. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 3. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues. Capacity: 1. Increase of capacity compared to 2013 due to reduced taxing time on the ground. Safety: 1. Reduction of incidents related to RWY incursions. 2. An integrated system processing the data from ATM and A - SMGCS systems. The system will provide ATCOs with reliable data on air and ground situation. 3. Improved safety compared to the 2008 baseline. Environment: Reduction of CO2 emissions and noise due to better traffic management on the ground. Cost-Efficiency: 1. Increase of capacity as well as improvements of the service provision. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 20 Released Issue

33 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Implementati on in Riga Airport (RP- AD/PLN-01/43 (2012)) The project aims increase capacity of the RIGA International Airport by means of A- CDM implementation. Initial steps assume investigation of problems and development of Implementation Plan. September 2012 / November 2019 The working group was established in September Memorandum of Understanding between stakeholders (LGS; RIX and AirBaltic Company) was signed. The working group has started development of A-CDM operational procedures. ESSIP:AOP05 OI-Steps: AO-0501, AO-0601, AO-0602, AO-0603 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 2. Increased traffic with the same staff number. 3. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 4. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues. Capacity: 1. Traffic increase due to CDM (2013 baseline). 2. Reduction of flight time on the ground. 3. Increase airspace capacity Safety: 1. Airport operators, aircraft operators, ground handlers and air traffic control use real time data sharing. Due to this an accurate and timely information will provide more safe and efficient flights. Environment: 1. Reduction of flight time on the ground. Cost-Efficiency: 1. Reduction of flight time on the ground. 2. Increased traffic with the same staff number. 3. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 4. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues. LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 21 Released Issue

34 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination 5.1 FAB Co-ordination North European Functional Airspace Block NEFAB NEFAB was established by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway in NEFAB ANSPs have established a programme with the objective of managing projects and initiatives among the ANSPs in the cooperation. The NEFAB Programme regularly develops and maintains 5 year business plans, and on that basis develops the annual business plans for use by NEFAB ANSPs in order to follow up NEFAB Programme projects and activities. The latest 5 year business plan is covering the period with the annual plan and budget for The 5 year business plan describes the strategies for the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into concrete activities planned for each year with defined deliverables and milestones. In November 2015 The NEFAB Target Concept Scenario 6 was implemented. The Target Concept is defined in the NEFAB Network Plan, composed of key elements being Free Route Airspace, Service Provision, ASM and FUA concepts as well as rules, procedures and ATM functionalities supporting the concept. The FRA is composed of three volumes being Estonia, Finland and Latvia as one seamless FRA above FL95, and Norway above FL135. FRA in Bodø Oceanic will be implemented above FL195 in accordance with the formal ICAO NAT procedures in summer In June 2016 NEFAB FRA will be further developed by implementation of Scenario 8, i.e. NEFAB FRA to be one seamless FRA volume connected seamless with the Danish/Swedish FAB (see Regional Cooperation Initiatives). The individual ANSP s in the FAB-cooperation will implement the required operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept. 5.2 FAB Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV) NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) Implement seamless FRA volume across all NEFAB States. Target date: 23. June 2016 Active, on-time. ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 22 Released Issue

35 5.3 Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) programme NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB with an agreed concept to implement a continuous an seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). The NEFRA concept is implementation of a seamless interface in Scenario 8 between the two FABs above FL285 (Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 (Scenario 6) was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. Scenario 8 with seamless operations across the two FABs is planned to be implemented in June Borealis Alliance The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a legal document that sets up a framework for the business co-operation between 9 European ANSPs LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure. In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to implement a multi-fab FRA covering 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one FRA volume to our customers (airspace users) Regional Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK) Borealis FRA Implementation of FRA in Scottish FIR, Interface with NEFAB and DK/SE FAB FRAs. End 2018 Active, on-time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Borealis FRA Implementation of FRA in London FIR, End 2021 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, Capacity: Present or additional capacity LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 23 Released Issue

36 NEFRA phase 1 (Scenario 8) NEFRA phase 2 (Scenario 8) Implementation of seamless interface of NEFAB FRA and DK/SE FAB FRA above FL285 ATM systems upgrade and IFPS integration 23 June, 2016 Active, on-time Other: - ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 Other: - End 2017 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Interface with neighbouring FRA volumes AOM21.2 Implementation of FRA in Icelandic OI-Steps: AOM- Airspace, Interface with neighbouring FRA 0201, AOM-0202, volumes AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present of improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 24 Released Issue

37 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation 6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Partly Not Applicable Multi-N Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 25 Released Issue

38 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 AAMS10a(EN), AIMS19b(EN), AOM0301(OI) State aircraft are handled as GAT outside of restricted areas or TSAs. Mixing of OAT and GAT air traffic is not authorized in Latvian airspace. Civil ATC provides service to GAT traffic only. There is no military ATC providing services to OAT in Latvia. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2018) CAA ASP (By:12/2018) State aircraft are handled as GAT outside of restricted areas or TSAs.Mixing of OAT and GAT air traffic is not authorized. Civil ATC provides service to GAT traffic only. EUROAT document has been formally introduced to the military for consideration. There is no military ATC providing services to OAT in Latvia. LGS Currently state aircraft are handled as GAT except specified areas (TSAs). MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority Military flying in the airspace under GAT rules, they fly OAT only in TSAs and in predefined specific areas. OAT is authorized to operate only under military fighter control in segregated airspace.no plans to develop military ATC for OAT by Not Applicable 31/12/2018 Not Applicable 31/12/2018 Not Applicable 31/12/2018 Not Applicable 31/12/2018 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AAMS11(EN), AOM0201(OI), AOM0202(OI), AOM0205(OI), AOM0401(OI), DCB0203(OI) FUA is implemented at all three levels. Advanced ASM / ATFCM process is under implementation in accordance with Eurocontrol Guidance materials. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,NO] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS Mil. Authority Advanced ASM process is under implementation in accordance with Eurocontrol Guidance materials. Advanced ASM process is under implementation in accordance with Eurocontrol Guidance materials. Borealis FRA / Borealis FRA / NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) / NEFRA phase 1 (Scenario 8) / NEFRA phase 2 (Scenario 8) 31/12/2016 Partly 31/12/ /12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 26 Released Issue

39 AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 AOM0401(OI), AOM0402(OI), AOM0500(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] Free route airspace in Latvia along with the rest of the NEFAB states has been implemented on November 12, [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) LGS Latvia has already implemented FRA over FL095. Not Applicable Not Applicable AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM0401(OI), AOM0402(OI), AOM0501(OI) [E], AOM0502(OI) [E], CM0102A(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] Latvia has implemented free route airspace above FL095 along with the other NEFAB member states on November 12, [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV,NO] ASP (By:12/2021) LGS FRA over FL095 has been implemented in coordination with the NM and FAB partners. ATRACC / Borealis FRA / Borealis FRA / NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) / NEFRA phase 1 (Scenario 8) / NEFRA phase 2 (Scenario 8) 12/11/ /11/2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 27 Released Issue

40 AOP03 AO0101(OI) Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 The runway safety team is operational. LGS and the Riga airport have implemented the EAPPRI requirements. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2013) CAA ASP (By:12/2013) LGS APO (By:12/2013) RIGA Airport The CAA issued an order to invite all involved stakeholders to create a runway safety team and implement the specific recommendations from the EAPRI (European Action plan for the prevention of runway incursions). The runway safety team is operational. LGS has implemented all EAPPRI requirements. The runway safety team is operational. LGS and the Riga airport have implemented most of EAPRI requirements. All communications associated with runway operations are conducted using aviation English. 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2013 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 AO0201(OI), CTES02b(EN), CTES03b(EN), CTES04b(EN) EVRA Riga Airport ASMGCS Level 1 system is operational from The ASMGCS is composed by a surface movement radar and a multilateration system based on Mode A/C and Mode S. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2010) CAA ASP (By:12/2011) LCAA has approved ASMGCS Level 1 operating procedures and the installations at Riga airport. Appropriate information has been published in the AIP EVRA AD 220. Local Traffic regulations. LGS ASMGCS Level 1 system is operational at Riga International Airport. APO (By:12/2010) RIGA Airport ASMGCS Level 1 system is operational at Riga International Airport. 30/06/ /06/ /06/ /12/2007 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 28 Released Issue

41 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AO0102(OI), AO0201(OI), CTES02b(EN), CTES03b(EN), CTES04b(EN) EVRA Riga Airport ASMGCS Level 2 is fully implemented at the Riga International Airport. 31/12/2008 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) LGS APO (By:12/2017) RIGA Airport ASMGCS Level 2 system is operational at Riga International Airport. Approach controllers have the ASMGCS picture in view mode. ASMGCS Level 2 is fully implemented at the Riga International Airport. ASMGCS Modernisatio n ASMGCS Modernisatio n 31/12/ /12/2008 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) not applicable AO0501(OI), AO0601(OI), AO0602(OI), AO0603(OI) EVRA Riga Airport (Outside Applicability Area) The objective is not applicable to Riga International Airport. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS APO (By:12/2016) RIGA Airport The objective is not applicable to Riga International Airport. As initial step to ACDM LGS and RIX have implemented data exchange between automated ATC system and Airport Flight Information Processing System. Agreement on data exchange is signed. As initial step to ACDM LGS and RIX have implemented data exchange between automated ATC system and Flight Planning Management System of RIX to provide silent coordination. Agreement on data exchange is signed. Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Implementati on in Riga Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Implementati on in Riga Airport Not Applicable Not Applicable 31/12/2011 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 29 Released Issue

42 Time Based Separation [PCP] AOP10 Not Applicable [Essential] not applicable AO0303(OI) [E] EVRA Riga Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Latvian airports are not in applicability area [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) Not Applicable LGS AOP11 AO0801A(OI) [E] EVRA Riga Airport Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) LGS APO (By:12/2021) RIGA Airport Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring not applicable AERODROMEATC36(EN), AO0104A(OI) [E] EVRA Riga Airport (Outside Applicability Area) [PCP] [Essential] [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2020) LGS APO (By:12/2020) Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 30 Released Issue

43 ATC02.5 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Area Proximity Warning function is used operationally from Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and engineering staff are established. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS Area Proximity Warning function is used operationally from Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and engineering staff are established. 31/12/ /12/2013 ATC02.6 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning function is implemented in the automated ATC system and it is operational from Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and engineering staff are established. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS Minimum Safe Altitude Warning function is used from Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and engineering staff are established. 31/12/ /12/2013 ATC02.7 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LGS will plan the APM implementation if the local needs will be identified and upon readiness of the Eurocontrol Specification. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS LGS will plan the APM implementation if the local needs will be identified. No Plan 31/12/2016 No Plan 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 31 Released Issue

44 ATC07.1 TS0102(OI) EVRA Riga Airport Implement AMAN tools and procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Implementation of AMAN tools is planned for first half of The automated ATC system is already prepared to support AMAN. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2015) LGS LGS plans implementation of basic arrival management tools. The automated ATC system is already prepared to support AMAN. Late 01/06/2016 Late 01/06/2016 ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM0202(OI), CM0203(OI), CM0205(OI), CM0207A(OI) Automated support for conflict detection, resolution and support information and conformance monitoring objective has been implemented [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) LGS MTCD and Conformance Monitoring functions are implemented. The ATCOs are trained accordingly. 31/12/ /12/2008 ATC15 TS0305(OI) Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Implementation of AMAN support functionality for enroute operations is planned. 31/12/2017 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) LGS Implementation of AMAN support functionality for enroute operations is planned. 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 32 Released Issue

45 ATC16 PROAC21(EN) Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Respective nationaly registered aircraft have been equipped with enhanced ACAS II version 7.1 and ANSP staff has been approapriately trained in order to further reduce the risk of midair collisions in European airspace. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2015) CAA ASP (By:03/2012) LGS MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority Airworthiness certification and operational approval for ACAS II version 7.1 equipped aircraft has been issued for Latvian registered aircraft. Appropriate oversight of the ANSP staff training has been performed. All the personnel concerned have been trained accordingly. ACAS performance monitoring system is established as a part of ATS safety monitoring. National armed forces do not operate fixed wing transport type aircraft. Appropriate training to the helicopter flight crew operating in the airspace with other aircraft equipped with ACAS II, has been provided. 31/01/ /01/ /12/2012 Not Applicable 31/12/2015 ATC17 CM0201(OI) Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Upgrade of coordination and transfer through automated assistance of electronic dialogue is planned by the end of [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2018) LGS LGS and supplier have discussed a draft specification with regard to electronic dialog. This specification is a subject of the automated ATC system modernisation project "ATRACC 2014+". Implementation timeframe will be defined together with the neghbouring ANSPs. 31/12/ /12/2018 COM10 CTEC06c(EN) Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 The migration is planned by 31/12/2016. A contract with manufacturer on system upgrade is signed. 31/12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2014) LGS LGS has two operational AMHS connections with Bratislava and Frankfurt. LGS has signed a contract with manufacturer on system upgrade up to Enhanced AMHS capability. Communicati on Project / PBN Implementati on Project Late Late 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 33 Released Issue

46 COM11 CTEC05a(EN) Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Latvia plans to implement VoIP by the end of /12/2020 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2020) LGS LGS plans to implement Voice over IP in ATM. 31/12/2020 ENV01 AOM0701(OI) EVRA Riga Airport Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements not applicable (Outside Applicability Area) The implementation of this objective will be addressed after PBN implementation in Riga TMA. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2013) LGS APO (By:12/2013) RIGA Airport The implementation of this objective will be addressed after PBN implementation in Riga FIR. Riga International Airport has implemented noise monitoring system around aerodrome area. Noise footprint map is developed yearly including average day and night noise level. PBN Implementati on Project Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports not applicable AO0703(OI), AO0705(OI), AO0706(OI) EVRA Riga Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Riga International Airport is not in the related list of airports. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) LGS Riga International Airport is not in the list of airports. APO (By:12/2016) RIGA Airport Riga International Airport is not in the related list of airports. Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 34 Released Issue

47 FCM01 IS0102(OI) Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Implementation of the objective is expected during first half of /04/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:07/2014) LGS Implementation of CPR messages is expected by 30/04/2016. Late Late 30/04/2016 FCM03 IS0102(OI) Implement collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Flight plan messages, at Riga ATCC, are processed in ICAO 2012 Format. Automatic sending of AFP messages is planned for 12/2017. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) LGS LGS needs accurate definitions and clear rules from the NM to implement the ASP09. Partly 31/12/2017 Partly 31/12/2017 FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Not Applicable not applicable DCB0205(OI) Latvia is outside of applicability area. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2015) LGS Latvia is outside of applicability area. Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 35 Released Issue

48 FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM0202(OI), AOM0205(OI), DCB0102(OI), DCB0103A(OI) [E], IS0901A(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] Latvia plans to implement interactive rolling NOP by December /12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) LGS Implementation of ASM support system LARA is in progress. Mil. Authority APO (By:12/2021) RIGA Airport Riga airport has no plans to transition to coordinated slots. 31/12/ /12/2016 Not Applicable 31/12/2016 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM0101(OI), CM0103A(OI) [E], IS0102(OI) [PCP] [Essential] Implementation of the traffic load management tool is planned. 31/12/2021 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) LGS 31/12/2021 INF04 IS0201(OI) Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing is provided by Briefing Facility of Frequenties Company according with the Eurocontrol Specification. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2012) LGS Integrated briefing is provided by Briefing Facility of Frequenties Company according with the Eurocontrol Specification. 31/12/ /12/2012 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 36 Released Issue

49 INF07 AIMS16(EN) Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The existing policy documents will be reviewed and updated as necessary by It is planned to implement airport TOD management in accordance with the national policy. From an ANSP perspective, terrain and obstacle data are partly implemented. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:05/2018) CAA ASP (By:05/2018) LGS APO (By:05/2018) RIGA Airport The existing policy documents will be reviewed and updated as necessary by The National TOD Policy is not published. The required activities for the collection, management and provision of TOD will be planned right after implementation of INF07REG01 and INF07REG02. However for terrain data the objective is implemented for Area 1 as well as at RIX for Area 2 and Area 4. For obstacle data it is implemented for Area 1 as well as at RIX for Area 2 and Area 4. Implementation of TOD for Area 3 is expected within It is planned to implement airport TOD management in accordance with national policy by /05/ /05/2018 Late 31/05/ /05/2018 ITYACID GSURV0101(EN) Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 Latvia plans to implement the regulatory requirement to have the capability of downlinking the aircraft identification in order to improve the continuous and unambiguous IFR GAT aircraft identification. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:01/2020) LGS The appropriate surveillance systems have been upgraded. LGS has deployed and put into operations Mode S radars as well as WAM. The systems are capable to identify individual aircraft by means of the downlinked unique aircraft identification number. However flight data processing system and surveillance data processing system still use discrete SSR codes in compliance with the requirements laid down in the Annex III of the Regulation 1206/2011. Implementation of the appropriate capabilities for the whole cooperative surveillance chain as identified by the Regulation is planned. 02/01/ /01/2020 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 37 Released Issue

50 ITYADQ IS0202(OI), IS0204(OI) Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Latvia plans to ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 of 26 January 2010 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:06/2017) CAA ASP (By:06/2017) LGS APO (By:06/2017) RIGA Airport Safety assessments are to be supervised, and compliance with data quality requirements monitored. LGS plans to implement all the requirements ensuring quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information. It is planned to implement all the requirements ensuring quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information in time. ATRACC /06/ /06/ /06/ /06/2017 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 AUO0301(OI), CTEC02b(EN) ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Currently there is no ATN/VDL2 coverage over Riga FIR. 04/02/2018 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV] REG (By:02/2018) CAA Currently there is no ATN/VDL2 coverage over Riga FIR. ASP (By:02/2018) LGS MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority LGS plans implementation of initial ATC airground data link services above FL195. Data link implementation is a subject of BOREALIS and NEFAB cooperation. Military is not providing any ATM/ANS services. Military operates SAR helicopters only, not able to operate above FL285. ATRACC / CPDLC Implementati on in the RIGA FIR 04/02/ /02/2018 Not Applicable 04/02/2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 38 Released Issue

51 ITYAGVCS2 CTEC01a(EN) Implement 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 in accordance with EC regulation 1079/ /12/2018 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2018) CAA in accordance with EC regulation 1079/2012 Mil. Authority ASP (By:12/2018) LGS LGS plans to convert frequencies to 8,33 khz by the implementation date. Mil. Authority MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority APO (By:12/2018) LGS is going to implement 8,33 khz channel spacing below FL195. Voice communication system is upgraded. Appropriate personnel are trained. Existing plans includes acquisition of new aircraft fully and appropriately equipped to comply with EC reg. 1079/2012. Mil. Authority RIGA Airport Airport plans to implement the 8,33 khz channel spacing by the end of /12/ /12/2018 Partly 31/12/2018 Partly 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 39 Released Issue

52 ITYCOTR CM0201(OI) Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018 Flight data processing and exchange systems are implemented. Advanced functions are subject of further development. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:02/2018) LGS MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority Flight data processing and exchange systems are implemented. ATC system is fully compliant with the finalisation criteria. ATC personnel are trained properly with regard to operational use of implemented functions. The Logon Forward and the Next Authority Notified processes are planned for implementation by Military does not provide ANS/ATM services and there is no electronic flight data provision to civil ATC. ATRACC Partly 04/02/2018 Partly 05/02/2018 Not Applicable 28/02/2015 ITYFMTP CTEC06(EN) Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Modernization of the FMTP has been completed as planned. 31/12/2014 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2014) LGS MIL (By:12/2014) Communication systems are ready. To support information exchange via FMTP between FDPS(s) for the purpose of notification, coordination and transfer of the flights between ATC units LGS has signed a Contract with Eurocontrol and SITA for PENS services (ANSP applications: FMTP and AMHS) supporting IPv4/IPv6 dual stack. Corresponding IP addresses were received from Eurocontrol. NSA is notified properly. Currently IPV6 connection is operational with ACC Malmo where PENS is used for OLDI. Mid February 2016 is a target date for Stokholm ACC as well. Mil. Authority Military does not provide services to general air traffic ATRACC /12/2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 40 Released Issue

53 ITYSPI GSURV0101(EN) Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Objectives for surveillance performance and interoperability have been implemented on the civil side. Military plans to complete the appropriate tasks by the end of [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:02/2015) CAA ASP (By:02/2015) LGS MIL (By:06/2020) Formal acceptance of the ANSP safety assessments has been performed and communicated to the ANSP. All surveillance data transferred from LGS groundbased surveillance systems to other air navigation service providers are in ASTERIX data format. It allows identification of the data source and the type of data. The data are timestamped as coordinated universal time (UTC). Safety assessment for all existing systems is developed and delivered to the Latvian CAA. The personnel affected by the changes have been trained properly. Mil. Authority It's planned to equip the military helicopters in due time. 31/12/ /12/ /02/ /12/2017 NAV03 Implementation of PRNAV Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 AOM0601(OI), AOM0602(OI), CTEN08(EN) Implementation of PRNAV procedures based on PBN Concept is planned for 2016 Navaids sites were assessed against the PRNAV requirements and needs for additional DMEs were identified. All coordinate data are published in AIP with reference to the WGS84 standard and meet the quality requirements of ICAO Annex 15. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2023) LGS LGS plans implementation of RNAV procedures based on National PBN Concept and corresponding National PBN Implementation Plan. Both national documents are not ready yet. Initial implementation is expected in All coordinate data are published in AIP with reference to the WGS84 standard and meet the quality requirements of ICAO Annex 15. PBN Implementati on Project Partly 31/12/2023 Partly 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 41 Released Issue

54 NAV10 Implement APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AOM0602(OI), AOM0604(OI), CTEN06a(EN), CTEN06b(EN) Latvia plans to move from NPA to APV procedures by the end /12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:04/2016) CAA ASP (By:12/2016) LGS Appropriate EASA material has been applied to local national oversight activities. LGS plans implementation of APV procedures. Initial implementation is expected in PBN Implementati on Project 30/04/2011 Late 31/12/2016 SAF10 CM0801(OI) Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 The objective has been implemented. 31/12/2015 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2011) CAA ASP (By:12/2011) Competent Authority safety oversight tasks have been performed with regard to ANSP safety changes for reduction of airspace infringement numbers. LGS All corresponding components of the Action Plan are implemented. MIL (By:12/2011) Mil. Authority Military will implement the objective together with LCAA and LGS. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 42 Released Issue

55 SAF11 PRO006a(EN) Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented by the involved parties. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:01/2018) CAA ASP (By:12/2014) LGS APO (By:12/2014) RIGA Airport The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions are implemented. Safety oversight program with audits and inspections covers runway safety. Participation of the CAA representatives at the Runway Safety Team discussions is ensured for consultation purposes. The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions are implemented. Local airlines are involved in the Runway Safety Team activities. Airport operators regularly and upon necessity enact the necessary safety initiatives through Runway safety team actions. 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 43 Released Issue

56 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 44 Released Issue

57 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Latvia CAA of Latvia Ērika Neimane LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAA of Latvia Ērika Neimane LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LGS. Vadims Stroiteļevs LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Riga International Airport Dzintra Jātniece LSSIP Focal Point for Military National Armed Forces, Joint HQ Maj Indulis Cepurītis EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Latvia DPS/PEPR Luca Dell Orto ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners Objective AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) A. DYBOWSKA Jurijs BAZULEVS LGS AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Mihails HAVKUNOVS LGS AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Vadims VORONOVS LGS AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Vadims VORONOVS LGS AOP03 AOP04.1 AOP04.2 T. LICU P. ADAMSON P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS LGS Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS LGS Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS LGS Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC not applicable AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL not applicable AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL not applicable AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC not applicable ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Vladislavs CASCINS LGS ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Vladislavs CASCINS LGS ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO Jurijs BAZULEVS LGS ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS LGS COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Ainars SNEPSTS LGS LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 45 Released Issue

58 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Ainars SNEPSTS LGS ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL not applicable ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL not applicable FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Sergejs OVSJANIKOVS LGS FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Sergejs OVSJANIKOVS LGS FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA not applicable FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Mihails HAVKUNOVS LGS FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO Sergejs OVSJANIKOVS LGS INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS LGS INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS LGS ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Aleksejs JAVORSKIS LGS Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS LGS ITY-AGDL ITY-AGVCS2 S. DISSING J POUZET A. KOKONA Vadims STROITELEVS LGS Ainars SNEPSTS LGS O. ALFARO Ainars SNEPSTS LGS Igors NEMAHOVS LGS Jurijs BAZULEVS LGS ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Igors NEMAHOVS LGS ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Alvis VILKS LGS Aleksejs JAVORSKIS LGS NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Janis LAPINS LGS NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Janis LAPINS LGS SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Alvis VILKS LGS SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Vadims ULJANOVSKIS LGS LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 46 Released Issue

59 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 47 Released Issue

60 SJSC LATVIJAS GAISA SATIKSME STRUCTURE LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 48 Released Issue

61 LSSIP Year 2015 Latvia 49 Released Issue