LSSIP Year 2014 <STATE>

Transcription

1 LSSIP Year 2014 <STATE> State can choose a personalised picture for the cover FP should send the State-personalised picture to the CP before 15 December Requirements for the picture to be as follows: rectangular shape, high resolution (300 dpi/21 cm width). In black normal text common text <In yellow what needs to be filled in> In yellow text guidance to help fill-in the document to be deleted afterwards in the LSSIPs In green Instructions for CPs/FPs In red text pending to be further updated in template and LSSIP documents

2 TEMPLATE CHANGE TRACKING No Change Rationale 1 Excecutive Summary Title of section State Context renamed with National ATM Context Avoid Confusion 2 Note added to Introduction to refer that Chapter 6 data is used for ICAO ASBU monitoring. 3 In CAA Deletion of Institutionally. Request from EASA to limit the choice only to functional and organizational as per SES Regulation. 4 In ATC System in use New row for Major Changes inserted 5 Deletion of Accident/Incident Investigation Body 6 Chapter 4 & 5 The national/fab project are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents Regional Cooperation 2 new sub-chapters added: Regional Cooperation Initiative and Regional Projects 8 Chapter 6 Progress of PCP Pre-requisite and Facilitators - Optional diagram Clarification Request from EASA Input from LSSIP EG This part was developed mainly for the SRC Objectives which have been already closed. Additionally same information is gathered by EASA in their Questionnaire Part 2.5, 7.81 and To avoid duplication of work between LSSIP document (Chapters 4 & 5) and DB (National Projects) - Single source for National/FAB projects for links to Master Plan and avoid inconsistencies Clarification LSSIP Year 2014 Template Released Issue

3 FOREWORD - To be updated before Dec 2014 LSSIP Year 2014 Template Released Issue

4 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for <STATE> Infocentre Reference: <XX> Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014 LSSIP Year 2014 <STATE> Edition Date: <Date> LSSIP Focal Point - <NAME> < > < Stakeholder and function> LSSIP Contact Person - <NAME> < > Unit DPS/PEPR Status Intended for Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( Y:\06 Methods and Quality\3. Templates\LSSIP Templates\LSSIP Template 2014\LSSIP Template Year 2014_FINAL16Sept.doc LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 5 Acronyms and abbreviations 6 European ATM Master Plan 7 LSSIP Documents 8 <National AIP> 9 <FAB Performance Plan> LSSIP Year 2014 Template Released Issue

5 APPROVAL SHEET One signature page As last year, in order to make the signature process more flexible to different national environments, two options for signature are provided: 1) One of the national regulatory authorities signs on behalf of all the involved stakeholders leaving the arrangements between the signatory authority and the national stakeholders to be decided at State level. If this option is selected, the national arrangements must ensure that a person at the appropriate level of each of the involved stakeholders provides written confirmation (e.g. , letter, etc.) to the signatory authority of the correctness of the information provided. 2) The traditional way in which, as in the previous years, each involved stakeholder signs the approval sheet. The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2014 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. Edition Stakeholder / Organisation Name Position Signature Date LSSIP Year 2014 Template Released Issue

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) <ANSP(s)> Airports Military Authorities... 8 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in <State> ACC <XX> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period ACC <XY> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiative Regional Projects Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2014 Template Released Issue

7 Executive Summary 1 National ATM Context <Highlight here any important change having occurred during the past year or foreseen for the planning period>. Traffic and Capacity <Executive summary relating to Traffic and Capacity including en-route and airports (major, selected or all airports) figures> ESSIP Objective Implementation <Summarise overall situation in the implementation of ESSIP Objectives in the State. Special focus should be put on: 1) Any problem in completing objectives due for ) Plans for completing objectives due for 2015 and 2016> Example: With regard to objectives due for the period , XXXX is late in implementing objective(s) XXXX which is/are planned to be completed by March 2015 due to a delay of XXXXX. The introduction of a new Voice Communication System was a major project, which was finalised by end of 2014 and contributed to the completion of objectives COM09, COM10 and COM11. The objectives ATC02.5, ATC02.5, ATC02.6 and ATC02.7 will be fully completed with the new ATM system upgrade which is foreseen in 2015: The objective SAF11 is currently in the planning stage and is envisaged to be completed by 2018: LSSIP State * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) State-related ESSIP Objectives <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling [IDP] AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] * ATC02.2 ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring LSSIP Year 2014 Template 1 Released Issue

8 LSSIP State * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations [IDP] ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 COM09 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) [IDP] [IDP] * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 ITY-ACID Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Aircraft identification ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-COTR Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * SRC-CHNG Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) * SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) * SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= AOP01.2 AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] * LSSIP Year 2014 Template 2 Released Issue

9 ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] * ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * Understanding the Table Objective Completed Objective Partly Completed Objective Planned No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (<State/Airport> does not participate in this obj.) Late NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 3 Released Issue

10 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. 2 Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 4 Released Issue

11 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment <CP : Copy appropriate content of Chapter 1 of LSSIP Year Attention: Tables and have been updated.> <FP : Update here the content of Chapter 1 of LSSIP Year 2013> 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership <State> is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: <CP: Updates: Deletion of European Common Aviation Area and JAA. Addition of ITU > Organisation Since ECAC <yyyy> EUROCONTROL <yyyy> European Union <yyyy> EASA <yyyy> ICAO <yyyy> NATO <yyyy> ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the <State> FIR(s): <Name of FIRS>. <State> FIRs is surrounded by FIRs of <Nr> States, namely <names of States and FIRs>. (non-ecac bordering states) Airspace Classification and Organisation Describe the current classification of the airspace, if possible also add chart (example below). 1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in <xxxx> are the following: - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 5 Released Issue

12 Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. <Diagram to be inserted here as per the example below. It should be the State diagram.> Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in <XXX> is the responsibility of the <Ministry of Transport>. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The <CAA> is further detailed in the following sections. <CP: Updates: Establishment of Tolerable Safety Levels and Safety Performance Monitoring deleted. Accident investigation added> Activity in ATM: Rule-making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Organisation responsible Legal Basis Accident investigation If for any of the activities above there is more than one organisation responsible, please explain here who-does-what (is responsible for) <CAA/DGAC> Explain what type of organisation structure is in place for ATM regulation (Aviation Ministry, Ministry department, State s aviation office, Autonomous agency, Civil Aviation department, Civil Aviation authority, other). 3 Explain how it is separated from the ANSP (functionally, organisationally). Explain the relationship with the Ministry of Transport (or equivalent). Annual Report published: Y/N <If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document.> NOTE 1: The Annual Report referred to in this table is not to be confused with the State SES Annual Report submitted to the European Commission, it refers to the Report produced to capture its annual activities. NOTE2: If the Annual Report covering 2013 activities is still under preparation, provide above information for the 2012 Report. <Give address of CAA/DGCA website> LSSIP Year 2014 Template 6 Released Issue

13 <Reference to organisation chart at annex> <ANSP(s)> <Fill-in table below for the main ANSP in the State> Name of the ANSP: Governance: <e.g. Joint Stock Company, State enterprise...> Services provided Y/N Comment Ownership: ATC en-route Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC approach Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC Aerodrome(s) Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> AIS Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> CNS Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> MET Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATCO training Y <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Please specify (ex. Airport management) <if yes, specify which service(s), in which State> <e.g. 100% Ministry of Economy> Annual Report published: Y/N <If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document.> This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. <Give address of ANSP website> <Reference to organisation chart at annex> ATC system in use 4 Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Year Year When you answer this question please refer to the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing systems, surveillance data processing systems and human-machine interface systems. 1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2014 Template 7 Released Issue

14 ATC units Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; Size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); Service provided (en-route or TMA no more ref to TWR); The ATC units in the <States> airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Airports General information Describe, in a few words, the general situation (ownership, number of airports in the State) of the airports Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, INF07, ITY-ADQ and SAF11. In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. <So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP:> <Voluntarily, any information for selected or all airports which considered as important for the traffic or capacity related issues within the state/fir(/fab?/region?) could be provided> Military Authorities The Military Authorities involved in ATM in <State> are composed of: - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; They report to <the Ministry of Defence>. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. <Reference to organisation chart at annex> Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y/N by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Organisation of military ATS for OAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Y/N /NA Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training LSSIP Year 2014 Template 8 Released Issue

15 ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: <Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision ESARR applicability Additional Information:<Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: <name, > Additional information: < > GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: <name, specify if it is: - a military NSA, separated from the civil NSA (In this case, please explain in Additional information whether it is separated from service provision, - a Joint Civil-military NSA; - a Civil NSA> Additional information: < > Service Provision role Services Provided: En-Route OAT If not provided by MIL specify who does provide this service Services Provided: GAT En-Route Approach/TMA Approach/TMA Airfield/TWR/GND Airfield/TWR/GND AIS AIS MET MET SAR TSA/TRA monitoring FIS Other: <Specify> Additional Information: Additional Information: SAR Other: <Specify> Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? <Y/N > If YES, since: <Dd/mm/yy> Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: <name of NSA> If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: User role xx years IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: LSSIP Year 2014 Template 9 Released Issue

16 Free Routing Within the regular (GAT) national route network Within a special OAT route system Within specific corridors only Under radar control Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: <Specify> Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in <State> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 2 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 3 implemented: Y/N Y/N LSSIP Year 2014 Template 10 Released Issue

17 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity This section was coordinated and will be prepared by EUROCONTROL DNM/OPL (Operations Planning), agreed with the Specialists concerned in the State and provided to the CP. Estimated timings: - For capacity-constrained States information will be available after the visit (due to take place between November 2014 and January 2015). The schedule of the visits will be provided to the CPs (some States may have their meetings scheduled in January 2015 due to budgetary reasons.) - For the non capacity-constrained States information will be available by mid-december. A reference will be inserted at the beginning of the chapter pointing to information related to the methodology used for breaking down targets will be available. The same reference includes also clarifications and important definitions of terms used in the text. It will be articulated into the following sub-chapters: Evolution of traffic in <State> ACC <XX> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer 2014 Planning Period ACC <XY> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer 2014 Planning Period LSSIP Year 2014 Template 11 Released Issue

18 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations <CP : To customise recommandations for the State> Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to XX (State) for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number Recommendation Ownership REC (1) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. DK, EE, MAS, BE, LV, MK, CZ, CY, NO, AM, PT, BA, UA, TR, UK REC (2) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-RLMK to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. UA, AZ, GE REC (3) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-SLRD to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. UA, AZ, GE REC (4) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP04.1 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. FR (LFMN), DE (EDDM), FR (LFLL), FR (LFML), GR (LGTS), BG (LBSF), GR (LGAV), IT (LIMC), IT (LIML), IT (LIPZ), IT (LIRF), FR (LFBO), BE (EBBR), DE (EDDL), UK (EGLL), PT (LPPT), ES (LEPA), RO (LROP), ES (LEBL), PL (EPWA), UA (UKBB) REC (5) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SAF10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. BE, BG, CZ, IE, ES, AZ, BA, LV, EE, MD, ME, MK, UA, GR, HR, HU, PT, TR, RS, SE, SI, AL REC (6) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of INF04 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. LU, BG, HR, BA, GR, DE, ES, PL, GE, RO, RS, FI, ME, HU, IT REC (7) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of NAV03 to take corrective ES, DE, BE, CY, BG, GE, LV, AZ, LSSIP Year 2014 Template 12 Released Issue

19 Reference number Recommendation Ownership measures to reduce the implementation delays. MD, ME, MK, MT, HR, IT, RS, UK REC (8) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. CZ, AL, BA, GR, ME, HR, BE, HU, ES, MD, PT, RO, RS, RO, RS, LU, SI, UA REC (9) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ATC02.2 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. IT, AL, BA, NL, MT, PL, ES, CZ, GE, TR REC (10) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ENV01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. BA (LQSA), EE (EETN), HR (LDZA), BE (EBBR), CZ (LKPR), BE (EBAW), BE (EBOS), BE (EBLG), IT (LIPZ), TR (LTBA), TR (LTAI), LU (ELLX), IT (LIRF), UK (EGPF), IT (LIMC), IT (LIML), NO (ENGM), RO (LROP) REC (11) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-AGDL to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. AT, IT, PT, SK, SI, SE, NO, RS, ES, ME, FR, MT REC (12) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-ADQ to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. IE, AL, AT, LT, CZ, SI, PT, NO, NL, FR, DE, ES, UK, HU REC (13) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of COM10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. NO, HU, FR, AM, GR, EE, UA REC (14) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. NO, UK, FR REC (15) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-COTR to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. AT, BE, DE, DK, BA, ES, IT, FR, GE, MT, HR, HU, IE, NO, SK, LSSIP Year 2014 Template 13 Released Issue

20 Reference number Recommendation Ownership UK, PT, SI REC Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States REC The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States. All ECAC ANSPs REC The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs LSSIP Year 2014 Template 14 Released Issue

21 Chapter 4 - National Projects 6 <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> Introduce the table with a sentence of your choice: e.g. The main projects currently ongoing in <State> are depicted in the table below. Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> Example ORO NAVIGACIJA <Name of the Project> Air-ground data link implement ation <Project Code, where applicable> L-CNS- 01/1-I/V-C <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> Entities providing communication services shall ensure that the ground communication systems and their constituents apply airground communications for CM and CPDLC data exchanges in compliance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009, allowing either ATN/VDL-2 or an alternative communication <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 2 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> EC Regulation: 29/2009; IDP WP 4 ATM Master plan: AUO 0301, OI IS- 040; ESSIP/LSSIP ITY-AGDL <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > New project, initiated. <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Safety: Enhancement through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages, the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval. Capacity: Increased capacity Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 2 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 15 Released Issue

22 technology. ICAO ASBU: SPC03.01 OFA through both reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency. Cost effectiveness: Data link is a costeffective capacity increase enabler through sector productivity increase and delay cost savings. Security: not a significant issue, as Data-link is a complimentary initiative in support to voice. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 16 Released Issue

23 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination 6 <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> 5.1 FAB Co-ordination Elaborate if the State is part of the FAB project. If yes, please elaborate in few sentences the status of FAB project that State participates. Include all other participating States. 5.2 FAB Projects Include all projects with FAB partners only. Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> <Name of the Project> <Project Code, where applicable> <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 3 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 3 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 17 Released Issue

24 5.3 Regional cooperation In 5.3.1, specify any other regional cooperation initiative with one or more States other than those within your FAB, if applicable. In 5.3.2, Indicate if your State is involved in other regional or multi-state projects, beyond those belonging to the FAB project of your State Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> <Name of the Project> <Project Code, where applicable> <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 4 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 4 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 18 Released Issue

25 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation <CP to produce RTP008> Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2014 Template 19 Released Issue

26 AOM13.1 Xxx REG (By:12/2018) ASP (By:12/2018) MIL (By:12/2018) Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018 ) Xxx Xxx Xxx Partly Completed mm/yyyy Partly Completed mm/yyyy Partly Completed mm/yyyy Partly Completed mm/yyyy LSSIP Year 2014 Template 20 Released Issue

27 <Progress of PCP Pre-requisite and Facilitators - Optional diagram> LSSIP Year 2014 Template 21 Released Issue

28 PCP pre-requisites, essential pre-requisites and facilitators ATC07.1 Arrival Management Tools ATC15 In En Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations NAV10 Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance AOP04.1 A-SMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 A-SMGCS Level 2 AOP05 Airport CDM AOM19 Advanced Airspace Management AOM21 Free Route Airspace ATC12 Automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer FCM04 Short Term ATFCM Measures Phase 1 FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning COM09 Migrate from X.25 to Internet Protocol FMTP Flight Message Transfer Protocol ADQ Aeronautical Data Quality AGDL - Air-Ground Data Link LSSIP Year 2014 Template 22 Released Issue

29 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process <To be updated with the FP> LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Point for <State> <.> <.> LSSIP Focal Point for <Stakeholder> <.> <.> <.> <.> <.> LSSIP Contact Person for <State> EUROCONTROL <.> ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOM21 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO <.> COM09 L. POPESCU O. ALFARO <.> COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA <.> COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA <.> ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL <.> ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL <.> FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA <.> FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA <.> FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA <.> FCM05 N. AGACDIKEN O. CIOARA <.> INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> National Stakeholder Specialist(s) LSSIP Year 2014 Template 23 Released Issue

30 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA <.> ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA <.> ITY-AGVCS2 (TBD) O. ALFARO <.> ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO <.> ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO <.> ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA <.> NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA <.> NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA <.> SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT <.> SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT <.> SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA <.> SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA <.> National Stakeholder Specialist(s) LSSIP Year 2014 Template 24 Released Issue

31 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts <CP : Copy organisation charts from LSSIP Year 2013> Insert the different organisation charts LSSIP Year 2014 Template 25 Released Issue

32 Annex C Glossary of Abbreviations <CP : Copy Abbreviations from LSSIP Year 2013> Specific abbreviations for this State. LSSIP Year 2014 Template 26 Released Issue