Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) FINLAND

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) FINLAND Year 2013 Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for FINLAND Infocentre Reference: 14/01/07-14 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013 LSSIP Year 2013 FINLAND Edition Date: 07/04/14 LSSIP Focal Point - Iiro KESKIVÄLI LSSIP Contact Person - Luca DELL ORTO Status iiro.keskivali@trafi.fi luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int Intended for Senior Inspector, ANS Unit DSS/EIPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Finland (FI)\Year 2013\Released\LSSIP Year 2013_FI Released.doc LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1. LSSIP Guidance Material: 2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2013: 3. ESSIP Report 2012: 4. STATFOR Forecasts: 5. Acronyms and abbreviations: 6. European ATM Master Plan: 7. LSSIP Documents: 8. National AIP: 9. National Performance Plan RP1 LSSIP Year 2013 Finland Released Issue

6

7

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) FINAVIA CORPORATION Airports Military Authorities Accident/incident Investigation Body Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Finland FINLAND ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays / Summer 2013 performance Planning Period /19 - Summer Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Other regional coordination projects Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2013 Finland Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary State Context The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi (CAA Finland), including the role as NSA. Finavia Corporation is the main ATS provider in Finland. It provides air navigation services for the whole country. Finavia also operates 25 airports, including Helsinki Airport, the main airport in Finland and the only one covered by this LSSIP document. Both the Trafi and Finavia report to Ministry of Transport and Communications. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) is the military regulatory body. Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation. Safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by the Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice. Since the establishment of the Northern European Functional Airspace Block (NEFAB) in December of 2012, consistent efforts have been contributed towards planned implementation of the free route airspace in NEFAB member states airspace in ESSIP Objective Implementation The overall progress of the implementation of the ESSIP Objectives is satisfactory, even though there is some delay in the implementation of some objectives. Out of the Objectives due to be implemented by the end of 2013, work remains to be done with following objective: INF04. The objective is planned to be implemented by the end of year Out of the ESSIP objectives agreed to be implemented in , considerable advancement has been achieved in the objectives, which are completed, partially completed or planned to be completed according to schedule. The requirements of ESSIP objective ITY- ADQ are considered extremely challenging to meet by LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 1 Released Issue

12 LSSIP Finland * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) State-related ESSIP Objectives <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling [IDP] [E] * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] * AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 [E] * AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.2 ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] * ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] * ATC12 ATC15 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring [E] * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations [IDP] [E] * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 COM09 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) [IDP] [E] * [IDP] * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] [E] * FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information [E] * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E] * ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-COTR Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E] * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] * LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 2 Released Issue

13 LSSIP Finland * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * SRC-CHNG Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) * SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) * SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives EFHK-Helsinki <= AOP01.2 AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 [E] * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] * ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] * ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * * Understanding the Table Objective Objective Partly Objective No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (Finland/Helsinki airport does not participate in this obj.) Late NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2013 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapters 1 to 5 present the key players in the State, and set the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved. Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 2001 European Union 1995 European Common Aviation Area 2006 EASA 2002 ICAO 1949 JAA 1979 NATO Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Finland FIR/UIR (EFIN). Finland FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR), Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a non-ecac State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR). In order to achieve some of the objectives of the ESSIP, Finland ACC co-ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 5 Released Issue

18 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660 (i.e. in excess of the requirements of Achieved ECIP Objective AOM09), as shown in the AIP extract below. AIP Finland is available at: The Finnish Military is using also the Metric system even though its importance is decreasing. 1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following: - Finnish Transport Safety Agency -Trafi (CAA) the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA - Finavia Corporation - the main ATS provider in Finland; - Mikkeli airport (EFMI), AFIS service provider; - Seinäjoki airport (EFSI), AFIS service provider; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA) the military regulatory body; - Air Force Command Finland; - Safety Investigation Authority (SIA). LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 6 Released Issue

19 Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram above Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA Finland is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Organisation responsible MoTC, CAA Finland Legal Basis Aviation Act (1194/2009), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Safety Oversight CAA Finland (NSA) Aviation Act (1194/2009), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Establishment of Tolerable Safety Levels CAA Finland Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) Safety Performance Monitoring CAA Finland Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements CAA Finland Aviation Act (1194/2009), Criminal Code (39/1889) Airspace MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (1194/2009) Economic MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (1194/2009) Environment Environmental permit authority Environmental permits for airports are granted by permit authority according to Environmental LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 7 Released Issue

20 Security CAA Finland MoTC, CAA Finland Protection Act (86/2000) and environmental protection decree (169/2000). CAA Finland has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (1194/2009) Aviation Act (1194/2009) and Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency - Trafi. It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is institutionally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers. The Director General of the Oversight Sector also acts as the Director General of Civil Aviation for Finland. The current organisation chart is given at Annex B. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency -Trafi is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland. Annual Report published: Y Finnish Transport Safety Agency Annual report for the year e4/11982-trafi_vuosiraportti_eng_netti_2.pdf FINAVIA CORPORATION Name of the ANSP: Finavia Corporation Governance: Corporation Ownership: 100% State-owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Airport(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training Y Y Y Y Y N Y Others Y Operates Helsinki- Airport and 24 other airports in Finland Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP Finavia annual report Finavia s organisation chart is at Annex B. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 8 Released Issue

21 ATC system in use Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Major upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? THALES AS EFIN 2004, EFHK ATC units The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated En-route TMA FIR(s) Finland ACC 7 EFIN (EFIN) Remarks Helsinki APP 4 EFIN Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors, some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats Airports General information Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 25 state owned airports with ATS, of which 21 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are two non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being coordinated and covered by the LSSIP Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, APO, ITY-ADQ and SAF11. In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2013, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki airport Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of: - Defence Command Finland; - Air Force Command Finland; - Navy Command Finland; - Army Command Finland; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA). They are supervised by the ministry of Defence. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act and the Decree on Military Aviation. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management. Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs. Information on the application of FUA is in Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 9 Released Issue

22 The current organisation chart is given at ANNEX B Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: 1) Finnish Aviation Act 2) Government Decree on Military Aviation 3) Aviation Regulation-series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g. supplements to Rule of the Air) 5) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives) Authority signing such legal provision: 1) Parliament/Head of State (President) 2) Council of State (Government)/Minister in charge 3) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 4) Director of MAA 5) Commander of Finish Air Force These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Authority signing such legal provision: These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training Y ATCO Training ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Aviation Act empowers the Government to issue decrees concerning exemptions from the Aviation Act for military aviation purposes, which however may not endanger the safety of civil aviation. Based on this Act the Ministerial Regulation on Military Aviation has been issued on 26 May 2011, according to which MAA has right to supplement these regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Y Additional Information: - Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP National Military AIP N National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip Other: Other: N/A Oversight OAT GAT 2 National oversight body for OAT: MAA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 10 Released Issue

23 Service Provision role Services Provided: OAT Services Provided: En-Route N Civil ANSP (Finavia) En-Route N Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Airfield/TWR/GND N GAT AIS N Civil ANSP (Finavia) AIS N MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N SAR N Civil ANSP (Finavia) The Military assists civil ARSC on request TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N Additional Information: SAR Other: Other: N Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military N Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Certificate issued by: N If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 11 Released Issue

24 1.2.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body Technical investigations An independent body, the Safety Investigation Authority, SIA, was established in 1996 within the Ministry of Justice. The Safety Investigation Authority is an impartial and independent body which operates on the basis of the Safety Investigation Act (525/2011). This body performs its functions independently in compliance with Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation and repealing Directive 94/56/EC, reporting only to the Ministry of Justice. A safety investigation team is appointed separately for each investigation case. The SIA s main tasks are to: - conduct safety investigations for all major accidents in Finland, Civil Aviation aircraft accidents and serious incidents as well as rail and maritime accidents and serious incidents; - conduct safety investigations for all publicly relevant accidents (e.g. power plants, etc ) - issue safety recommendations as appropriate designed to prevent the recurrence of similar events and to monitor the implementation of the recommendations issued. A safety review is published annually at national level and is available on the following website: Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data The SIA performs the collection, evaluation, process and storing of all information related to accidents, incidents and occurrences, as well as making this information available to the other EU States according to Directive 2003/42/EC and Regulation (EU) No 996/2010. The SIA is using SRIS (Safety Recommendation Information System) based on ECCAIRS to share all published safety recommendations inside EU. A detailed safety investigation report is prepared on each case. Before publication, each report is submitted to the parties concerned and to relevant authorities for their possible comments. Once the report has been completed, it becomes public. The reports are made available also on the internet, on the SIA web site. In order to carry out this function, the SIA has agreed with the FCAA the access to the database developed in the frame of the programme for the European Co-ordination Centre for Aviation Incidents Reporting System (ECCAIRS). The SIA is an institution with a prevailing investigative connotation, which does not have - differently from the other aviation institutions - regulatory or management tasks within the national Civil Aviation System. Results of the investigations and statistics are made public through (Finnish) and (English) Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents For accidents and serious incidents involving both civil and military parties, the SIA is in charge of investigations. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 12 Released Issue

25 Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Finland Finland - Annual IFR Movements Finland - Distribution (Ref. year 2012) Domestic flights 21% IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals Overflights 18% IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast International Dep/Arr 60% A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F A = Actual F = Forecast STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (September 2013) IFR flights yearly growth 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F H -2,3% 3,2% 4,3% 3,8% 3,5% 3,6% 3,5% Finland B 0,6% 10,5% -5,8% -2,7% 1,4% 2,4% 2,1% 1,8% 2,1% 2,1% L -3,2% -0,4% 0,5% 0,7% 0,4% 0,6% 0,6% ESRA B 0,8% 3,1% -2,4% -0,9% 1,4% 2,6% 2,7% 2,2% 2,5% 2,5% 2013 Traffic in Finland decreased by 4.4% during Summer 2013 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in /19 The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.4% and 3.6% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0%. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 13 Released Issue

26 2.2 FINLAND ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays /19 EFESCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Summer 2013 performance Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) Optimum All reasons Without weather Capacity gap -5.9% 58 (+0%) No The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Plan : sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments 5 additional controllers Yes New sectorisation with 1 additional sector No Improved flexibility in sector openings Yes Night free route airspace (Dec 2012) Yes Enlarge feeder sector OKLOR to Helsinki Yes Maximum configuration: Feeders Maximum configuration: 5 sectors+3 Feeders was No sufficient to cope with traffic demand Summer 2013 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 40 and the average peak 3 hour demand was Planning Period /19 - Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. The /19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters: 2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January /19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5 min/flight LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 14 Released Issue

27 EFINCTA Annual Summer En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values ACC EFIN baseline 2014 Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) H 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Ref. 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% L 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% C/R 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Capacity Plan Year Measures planned Maintain number of controllers NEFAB initiatives: CPDLC and FRA Q Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK Airspace restructurisation (Nov 2014) WAM impl.in Western Finland (Q4 2014) Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK WAM impl.in Northern Finland Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK WAM impl.in Eastern Finland Possible complete move of ACC to EFHK to be decided Max sectors 13 (Nov) Max Conf feeders feeders feeders feeders feeders feeders 2019 Significant events Capacity increase Reference profile Additional information Sufficient capacity to meet demand 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% EFINCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile - Current Routes Capacity Profile - High Capacity Profile - Low Capacity Baseline Plan /19 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 15 Released Issue

28 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2012 applicable to Finland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements ahead of the 2013 reporting exercise. Number Recommendation Ownership FI feed-back REC REC REC To ensure that all Stakeholders report the expected completion dates as defined in their National business plans. To ensure correct application of LSSIP guidance material and to implement the results of mandatory LSSIP in-cycle check. To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the implementation of basic ATSMHS capability (ESSIP objective COM10). All States All States AL, AM, AZ, CY, CZ, DK, EE, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IT, LU, MAS, MD, MT, NO, SE, SI, UA It is the task of stakeholder focal points to ensure that the expected completion dates are reported as defined in their National business plans. A cross check between the national focal point and the stakeholder focal points is carried out before submission of data to ensure the correct application of LSSIP guidance material and to implement the results of mandatory LSSIP incycle check No delays expected in implementation, system availability in 2014 REC States to ensure that appropriate actions are taken for overcoming present delays in the implementation of priority capabilities specified in the ESSIP objective FCM03. BE, UK, SE, NO, FI, LV, PL, HU, UA, AM, TR, MK, FR, PT, MT, RO, HR, BA, AL, SI, IT, CZ, MAS, CY. No delay expected in Finland, full implementation expected well ahead of the ESSIP objective FCM03 Interim Deployment Programme View Number Recommendation Ownership FI feed-back REC REC REC States are encouraged to speed up the AFP implementation and to schedule AFP testing with Network Manager Airports are encouraged to establish performance committees and implement information sharing and performance reporting processes in line with A-CDM guidelines (AOP05 objective). ANSPs to increase activities towards the migration to IP. All States Discussions ongoing pertaining compatibility with NM Airports in Finavia has completed applicability area this objective reported other than completed NO, FI, IE, FR, ES, IT, HR, HU, UA, RS, ME, MK, GR, MT, CY, AZ, SE The FMTP testing with neighbouring countries using PENS will start in Networks/ services will be migrated in LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 16 Released Issue

29 Stakeholders View Number Recommendation Ownership FI feed-back REC ANSPs are encouraged to publish more APV routes. All ECAC ANSPs 60% of APV/Baro/VNAV procedures are published. The publication of the remaining part will be accomplished by the end of 2016 FAB View Number Recommendation Ownership FI feed-back REC To update the FABs plans and establish a more appropriate roadmap to improve the current lack of coordination and ensure a common response to deployment needs. FAB States The FAB-related plans are coordinated with other NEFAB ANSPs REC The ANSPs should coordinate system deployment (including system upgrades) and capabilities implementation plans with FAB partner first, and then follow on with coordination to adjacent FABs and ANSPs. FAB States Discussions ongoing within NEFAB and with adjacent SE/DK FAB REC Ongoing work to harmonise reporting culture between States in the FAB should be continued to ensure alignment of reporting principles. FAB States SMS harmonisation ongoing at ANSP-level LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 17 Released Issue

30 Chapter 4 - National Projects Name Schedule Description Scope Status Link with European Master Plan. WAM/ADS-B RNAV DME Airspace 2012 ADQ Implementation Datalink 2015 HK ATCC Avia College Upgrade From Jan/11 to Dec/14 From Jan/12 to Oct /16 From Feb/11 to Nov/14 From Mar/13 to Jun/14 June/12 to Dec/15 Nov/13 to Dec/14 Dec/13 to Dec/14 Implementation of Wide Area Multilateration system for FIR Finland Renewal of necessary en-route distance measuring equipment systems and decommissioning of selected VOR-stations Restructure of airspace to accommodate user needs Implementation of ADQ compliant data management of Airspace and etod, Implementation of Datalink services according to NEFAB specifications above FL 285 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 2 Ongoing ITY-SPI Safety and cost efficiency Ongoing NAV03 Safety and cost efficiency Ongoing AOM19 Capacity, safety and cost efficiency ITY-ADQ Safety Ongoing ITY-AGDL Safety and Capacity New premises for ACC at EFHK ATCC Ongoing N/A Capacity and cost efficiency Upgrade/relocation of training facilities/-systems Ongoing N/A Cost efficiency and quality 2 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 18 Released Issue

31 5.1 FAB Co-ordination Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination North European Functional Airspace Block - NEFAB NEFAB is a functional airspace block created by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway. NEFAB has established a programme with a programme management office (PMO) with the objective of managing projects and initiatives among the ANSP s in the cooperation. In addition there is close cooperation with LFV and Naviair in DK/SE-FAB concerning airspace development. In this cooperation the implementation of a seamless Free Route Airspace above FL 285 across the two airspace blocks is prioritised in the short term with planned implementation towards the end of The activity is targeted to connect Free Route Airspace in the two FAB s ensuring a continuous Free Route Airspace. The activity is organised as a project called North European Free Route Airspace NEFRA. This project is not aimed at airspace developments inside the two airspace blocks. The ANSP s in NEFAB have developed a 5 year business plan, covering the period and an annual plan for The 5 year business plan describes the strategies for the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into activities planned for 2014 with defined deliverables and milestones. In April 2013 two key projects, Airspace 2015 and ATS Provision 2015, delivered the NEFAB Network Plan. The NEFAB Network Plan describes the operational requirements for the establishment of the airspace and service provision within NEFAB in is considered an intermediate step towards a performance scenario planned for 2020 and beyond. The individual ANSP s in the FAB-cooperation will implement the required operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept. 5.2 FAB Projects Name Schedule FAB Partner Status Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 3 and link to ESSIP NEFAB Target Concept NEFRA (North European Free Route Airspace) Dec Nov May 2012 Nov Avinor, EANS, Finavia and LGS Avinor, EANS, Finavia, LFV, LGS and Naviair Ongoing according to project schedule Ongoing according to project schedule Resulting in improved capacity through improved airspace structures and alignment of sectors. Safety is not considered a specific objective for the project, but safety levels shall be maintained or increased after implementation. The project will enable more effective use of operational resources and contribute to improved cost-efficiency. More efficient airspace and routing options for airspace users will increase flight efficiency and contribute to reduced emissions. Capacity and ANSP cost efficiency is not considered specific objects for the project. Capacity levels shall be maintained or improved and the implementation shall not reduce ANSP cost-efficiency. Safety is not considered a specific 3 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 19 Released Issue

32 objective for the project, but safety levels shall be maintained or increased after implementation. More efficient airspace and routing options for airspace users will increase flight efficiency and contribute to reduced emissions. 5.3 Other regional coordination projects Noracon NORACON, the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium, consists of nine members. Swedavia (Swedish airports) and eight European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). The purpose of NORACONs membership in the SESAR Joint Undertaking is to ensure impact from the partners in the development of the future European ATM business Borealis Borealis Alliance includes the ANSPs of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden and the UK.. Borealis will focus on strategic business cooperation between the member ANSPs, seeking economies of scale and projects that can be achieved on a commercial basis, complementing the work of the northern European Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) but without the need for regulatory or State involvement. LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 20 Released Issue

33 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) (By:mm-yyyy) (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) high level progress statement high level progress statement high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date. Progress (**) Impl. Date. Progress (**) Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Partly Not Applicable Multi-N Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 21 Released Issue

34 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018) [IDP] [Essential] Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 12/2018 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) Modification of national legislation has been initiated at the end of the year The updated regulations are expected to come into force in the first half of the year Implementation and training of staff planned for the year 2018 Air force has sent a draft to National Regulator about harmonizing national OAT and GAT traffic which is based on EUROAT. National implementation process (civ & mil authority cooperation) planned to continue after revision of national legislation. 06/ / /2015 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management (By:12/2016) [IDP] [Essential] Implementation is expected to be on time with the exception of the SloA 05 for which there is no plan for implementation. (By: ) (By: ) Implementation is expected to be on time with the exception of the SloA 05 for which there is no plan for implementation. Military has no service provision role in Finland. Combined civ mil AMCfunction for airspace delegation. Need for actions on implementation of notification process supporting the Rolling ASM/ATFCM process will be reviewed. 12/ / /2015 AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 (By:10/2013) [Essential] 12/ /2013 (By: ) (By: ) 12/2013 Not Applicable (Military does not have role in service provision). 12/2013 Not Applicable AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace (By:12/2017) [IDP] [Essential] FRA will be implemented by the end of /2015 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) FRA will be implemented by the end of 2015 FRA has been implemented for night time use, 24hr availability expected by the end of 2015 Finnish Military Authority has no Service Provision role. 12/ /2015 Not Applicable AOP01.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual (By:12/2013) EFHK - Helsinki Finavia fully compliant in /2012 (By: ) APO (By: ) Finavia fully compliant in 2012 Finavia fully compliant in / /2012 LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 22 Released Issue

35 AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions (By:12/2013) Helsinki Vantaa Airport complies with the requirements set in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (vol 2.0). A Runway Safety Team was established in Finavias SMS is implemented since (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) All recommendations are implemented. A Runway Safety Team was established in EFHK in Not Applicable (Military do not have role in service provision), except for USE01, which is completed. A Runway Safety Team was established in EFHK in Finavia has implemented a SMS in / / /2011 Not Applicable 12/2011 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 (By:12/2011) EFHK - Helsinki [Essential] A SMGCS Level 1 implemented in /2011 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) A SMGCS Level 1 implemented in A SMGCS Level 1 implemented in Currently EFHK has got A SMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMR s and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use Military has mainly a customer role in this subject. Some state transporttype aircraft are equipped with MODE S transponders. No plan exists to update the remaining transponders. Only 1 vehicle exists for military personnel at EFHK, planned to be equipped during 2014 while purchasing a new vehicle. A SMGCS Level 1 implemented in / / / /2011 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 (By:12/2017) EFHK - Helsinki Level 2 of A SMGCS will be implemented in /2017 (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) Level 2 of A SMGCS is expected to be implemented by 12/2017. Level 2 of A SMGCS will be implemented in The equipment installed is a Mode S based vehicle transponder with GPSreceiver 12/ / /2010 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) (By:01/2016) EFHK - Helsinki [IDP] [Essential] CDM was implemented at Helsinki Vantaa in /2012 (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) CDM was implemented at Helsinki Vantaa in 2012 Not involved in the implementation process. CDM was implemented in /2012 Not Applicable 12/2012 LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 23 Released Issue

36 ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 (By:01/2013) [Essential] Implemented in /2012 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) ATC02.5 The introduction of the change into service was accepted and a notification of acceptance has been provided to the ANSP. Implemented in 2012 Not Applicable (Military has no role in service provision). Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] 03/ /2012 Not Applicable Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. 04/2012 (By: ) (By: ) Implemented in 2012 Not Applicable (Military has no role in service provision). 04/2012 Not Applicable ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). 04/2012 (By: ) (By: ) MSAW processing is included in operational systems (Eurocat). Not Applicable (Military has no role in service provision). 04/2012 Not Applicable ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] Implemented in /2012 (By: ) (By: ) Implemented in 2012 Not Applicable (Military has no role in service provision). 10/2012 Not Applicable ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools (By:12/2015) [Essential] Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. (By: ) ATC12 Initial arrival management tool functionality is completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs. Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring (By:12/2016) MAESTRO 11/2005 [Essential] FASTI tools have been implemented in Tampere and Rovaniemi ACCs. 05/2009 (By: ) (By: ) Functions has been approved by the NSA. Tampere ACC: Rovaniemi ACC:. 05/ /2009 LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 24 Released Issue

37 ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations (By:12/2017) [IDP] [Essential] in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki Vantaa Maestro system. 12/2000 (By: ) (By: ) in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki Vantaa Maestro system. in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki Vantaa Maestro system. 12/ /2000 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 (By:12/2015) Respective nationally registered aircraft are planned to be equipped with enhanced ACAS II version /2015 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) Airworthiness certification and operational approval will be carried for Finnish registered aircraft. Training completed in ACAS performance monitoring has been in place since Transport type aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft. 12/ / /2013 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer (By:12/2018) [IDP] [Essential] Partly Finavia expects to be fully compliant by 6/ /2014 (By: ) (By: ) Formal acceptance by the NSA of the proposed changes communicated to ANSP. Implementing was postponed due to an industrial action. New estimate 6/ /2012 Partly 06/2014 COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) (By:12/2014) [IDP] Networks/services will be migrated in IPv6 implementation in Finland is delayed. 06/2014 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) Networks/services will be migrated in IPv6 implementation in Finland is delayed. Finavia has taken PENS into use. It will be used as FMTP data transfer network. The FMTP testing with neighbour countries using PENS will start in Networks/services will be migrated in Not applicable for ( no service provision role). 12/ /2014 Not Applicable COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (By:12/2014) Plans exist for AMHS; system availability in /2014 (By: ) (By: ) Plans exist for AMHS; system availability in 2014 Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. 12/2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 25 Released Issue

38 COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM (By:12/2020) This objective is expected to be implemented within the given timeframe. 12/2020 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) Formal acceptance will be carried out according to the NSA approval processes. Implementation will occur within given timeframe, except that NSA will be notified in 2016 Finnish Military Authority has no service provision role. This issue is taken care of by the service provider Finavia. 12/ /2020 Not Applicable ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements (By:12/2013) EFHK - Helsinki The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. (By: ) APO (By: ) The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. [IDP] 12/ / /2009 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports (By:12/2016) EFHK - Helsinki Finavias co operation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) As an Airport and Air Navigation Service Provider Finavia is having a constant co operation with Airline Operators. The co operation has been in place for several years. The MoA on CDO procedures is the main achievement of this co operation so far. Discussions to set up the official CEM collaboration according to Eurocontrol guidance this year have been started. No formal partnership arrangements, co operation with ANSP is continuous. Issues pertaining to CEM are discussed at least thrice a year together with airport and aircraft operators. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. 12/ /2012 Not Applicable 12/ /2009 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services (By:12/2006) [Essential] Objective has been completed. 03/2009 (By: ) (By: ) for both ACCs remain labelled as No Plan, otherwise Finavia has completed this objective. These issues are Rovaniemi ACC related. The merging of Rovaniemi ACC and Tampere ACC effectively means that this objective is completed 11/2010. Finnish Military Authority has no Service Provision role, and so this issue is taken care of by the Service Provider Finavia. However, military is participating in AMC functions. A joint civil military AMC has been established in ACC Finland to enhance optimum use of airspace. FATMI Rov Ph 2 / FATMI Tam Ph 2 11/2010 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 26 Released Issue

39 FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning (By:12/2015) [IDP] [Essential] Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year /2014 (By: ) (By: ) Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2014 Finnish Military Authority has no Service Provision role, and so this issue is taken care of by the Service Provider. FATMI Ph 2 12/2014 Not Applicable [IDP] FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP (By:12/2016) [Essential] Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP in /2016 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP in 2016 Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP in 2016 Not Applicable (Military does not have role in service provision). Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP in / /2016 Not Applicable 12/2016 INF04 Implement integrated briefing (By:12/2012) Late Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in /2016 (By: ) (By: ) Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in 2016 Finnish Military Authority has no Service Provision role, and so this issue is taken care of by the Service Provider Finavia. Late 12/2016 Not Applicable ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (By:07/2017) [Essential] The requirements of this objective are considered extremely challenging to meet by /2017 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) SLoA 01 Is considered achieved, 02 is expected to be late and 03 is challenging to meet within the timeframe of the objective Discussions ongoing between NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. No definite timetable can be given. In the Finnish ATM system, the service provider Finavia provides the aeronautical information. Discussions ongoing between NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. No definite timetable can be given. 07/2017 No Plan Not Applicable No Plan LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 27 Released Issue

40 ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 (By:02/2015) [IDP] [Essential] ATC Air Ground Data Link services requirements come into force in the southern part of Finland from 2/2015 which is also the target date for implementation. The ANSP is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements. (By: ) (By: ) (By:-) ATC Air Ground Data Link services requirements come into force in the southern part of Finland from 2/2015 which is also the target date for implementation. The ANSP is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements. Initial A/G datalink services will be provided by 02/2015 No plans to equip transport type State aircrafts with data link capabilities. 02/ / /2015 No Plan ITY- AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 (By:12/2020) Finland is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule 12/2018 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) The requirements are planned to implemented within the given timeframe. Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule has no service provision role. Need for exemptions (8,33kHz radios) for tactical aircraft will be reviewed. Need for manual updates and training will be reviewed within timescale. Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule 12/ / / /2018 ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated coordination processes (By:02/2015) [Essential] The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. within the timescales of the regulations (1032/2006, 29/2009 and 30/2009). Integrated civil military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. 02/ / /2015 Not Applicable ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) (By:12/2014) [IDP] There are plans on implementing the FMTP by the end of year /2014 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) for Implementation planned for Integrated civil military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. 12/ /2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 28 Released Issue

41 ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability (By:12/2019) Implementation is planned to be completed on schedule 02/2015 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) SLoAs completed on schedule Finavia has started a surveillance system renewal/enhancement project ( ) which, among other developments, will bring in full mode S capability. All ANSP related items in ITY SPI will be taken care within the scope of this project. Some of the transport type aircraft have MODE S capabilities. No plan to update other aircrafts. 12/ /2015 Not Applicable NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV (By:12/2012) [Essential] P RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 12/2012 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) AIS unit is ISO 9001 certified. P RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from P RNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and P RNAV routes have been implemented. Most transport type aircraft are equipped with P RNAV. Most of the other SLoAs are Not Applicable, since Finnish Military Authority has no Service Provision role, and the issues are taken care of by the Civil Service Provider. 11/ / /2012 NAV10 Implement APV procedures (By:12/2016) [IDP] [Essential] APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year /2016 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) Plans exist to publish national regulatory material based on EASA AMC and EASA AMC by 04/ % of APV/Baro/VNAV procedures are published. The publication of the remaining part will be accomplished by the end of Some transport type aircraft are equipped with systems approved for APV/Baro and/or APV/SBAS. Need for training will be reviewed by 12/2014. has no plan to design own APV/Baro VNAV procedures. 04/ / /2014 SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements (By:12/2011) The European Action Plan Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction has been implemented 12/2011 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) The European Action plan is implemented. The European Action plan is implemented. Examples of implemented measures can be found at SAF10 01 Air Force is using "Operational Risk Management (ORM) for Flight Safety" system to minimize risk for Airspace Infringement. 12/ /2011 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 29 Released Issue

42 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions (By:01/2018) Partly Finland expects to be compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE ahead of the objective FOC date. 12/2015 (By: ) (By: ) (By: ) APO (By: ) The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions will be implemented utilising the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan. SLoAs are expected to be finished by Most of the requirements fulfilled by the end of Need for actions will be reviewed in timescale. Air Force is also using "Operational Risk Management (ORM) for Flight Safety" system Most of the requirements fulfilled by the end of Partly 12/2015 Partly 12/ /2015 Partly 12/2014 LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 30 Released Issue

43 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Point for Finland Finnish Transport Safety Agency Iiro KESKIVÄLI LSSIP Focal Point for Service Provider Finavia Corporation Markku RIKKINEN LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI LSSIP Contact Person for Finland EUROCONTROL Luca DELL'ORTO ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL EIPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) O. CIOARA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI O. CIOARA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM20 R. BUCUROIU O. CIOARA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM21 R. BUCUROIU O. CIOARA Heikki ISOMAA AOP01.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Heikki ISOMAA AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Timo SUORTO AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Heikki ISOMAA ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Heikki ISOMAA ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC07.1 N. GAUTIER L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ATC12 N. GAUTIER L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC15 N. GAUTIER L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC17 N. GAUTIER L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA COM09 B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET O. ALFARO Jari TOIVONEN COM10 B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA Tero AULANKO COM11 B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA Tero AULANKO ENV01 P. ADAMSON B. HILL Tero AULANKO ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Heikki ISOMAA FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM05 N. AGACDIKEN O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Salli LEHERVO LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 31 Released Issue

44 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL EIPR Objective Coordinator ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Jussi KIVELÄ ITY-AGDL E. CERASI, S. DISSING A. KOKONA Jari TOIVONEN ITY-AGVCS2 J. ROCA O. ALFARO Tero AULANKO ITY-COTR N. GAUTIER L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ITY-FMTP B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET O. ALFARO Jari TOIVONEN ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART A-P. FRANGOLHO Jari TOIVONEN NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Jukka PIILOLA NAV10 R. FARNWORTH, F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Jukka PIILOLA SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Heikki ISOMAA SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Heikki ISOMAA SRC-CHNG M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA Kai VÄISÄNEN SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA Kai VÄISÄNEN SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA Kai VÄISÄNEN National Stakeholder Specialist(s) LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 32 Released Issue

45 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts Trafi Finavia LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 33 Released Issue

46 Finnish Air Force LSSIP Year 2013 Finland 34 Released Issue