Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ESTONIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ESTONIA Year 2013 Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for ESTONIA Infocentre Reference: 14/01/0712 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013 LSSIP Year 2013 ESTONIA Edition Date: 24/04/14 LSSIP Focal Point Victor Popov LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL ORTO Status Intended for Head of Development department Unit DSS/EIPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Estonia (EE)\Year 2013\Released\LSSIP Year 2013_EE_Released.docx LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1. LSSIP Guidance Material: 2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2013: 3. ESSIP Report 2012: 4. STATFOR Forecasts: 5. Acronyms and abbreviations: 6. European ATM Master Plan: 7. LSSIP Documents: 8. AIP Estonia: LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia Released Issue

6

7

8

9 TABLEE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders... 7 Chapter 2 Enroute Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Estonia TALLINN ACC Chapter 3 ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Coordinationn FAB Coordination FAB Projects Other regional coordination projects Chapter 6 ESSIP Objective Implementation ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary State Context For the year 2012 GDP increased by 3.2 % comparing with the The forecast for 2013 is 2 %, for 2014 is 4.2%. Since the establishment of the Northern European Functional Airspace Block (NEFAB) in December of 2012, consistent efforts have been contributing towards planned implementation of the free route airspace in NEFAB member states airspace in 2015 ESSIP Objective Implementation The implementation of ECAC/PanEuropean and MultiNational Objectives is progressing well. All ECAC/Pan European Objectives are implemented with the exception of AMHS. Implementation of AMHS and Data link on a regional basis is being discussed with North Europeans ANSPs and planned for EANS has developed within Sherpa project SBAS APV procedures for Kuressaare aerodrome. Implementation of the procedures is planned for PRNAV/CDA was implemented in Tallinn TMA in May EANS in cooperation with NEFAB partners has started Free Route Airspace (FRA) project. Implementation is scheduled for the end of LSSIP 2013 Estonia * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) Staterelated ESSIP Objectives <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling [IDP] [E] * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] * AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7 [E] * AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.2 ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 [E] * Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 [E] * ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] * ATC12 ATC15 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring [E] * Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations [IDP] [E] * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 COM09 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) [IDP] [E] * [IDP] * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 1 Released Issue

12 LSSIP 2013 Estonia FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 [IDP] [E] * FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information [E] * ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 [IDP] [E] * ITYAGVCS2 ITYCOTR Implement airground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 * Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes [E] * ITYFMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of PRNAV [E] * NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * SRCCHNG Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) * SRCRLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) * SRCSLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies * Airportrelated ESSIP Objectives <= EETNTallinn AOP01.2 AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 [E] * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] * ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] * ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * * LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 2 Released Issue

13 Understanding the Table Objective Objective Partly Objective No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (Estonia / Tallinn airport does not participate in this obj.) Late NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colourcode indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a fiveyear plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2013 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapters 1 to 5 present the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved. Chapter 6 contains highlevel information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Estonia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field f of ATM: Organisation ECAC EUROCONTROL European Union European Common Aviation Area EASA ICAO JAA NATO Since May M May M May M January March April A Geographical description of thee FIR(s) Tallinn FIR is located in a High Density Area. The geographical scope of this document addresses the Tallinn Flight Information Region (FIR), which encompasses the airspace delineated in the ICAO European Regional Air Navigation Plan (EUR/ANP), extending from the ground surface upwards, without an upper limit. The FIR adjoins Finland FIR and Helsinki TMA to the North, St. Petersburg P FIR to the East, Riga FIR/TMA to the South and Malmö/ /Stockholm FIRs to the West. St. Petersburg belongs to the Russian Federation, a non ECAC State. The Control Area (CTA) covers the geographical limits of the Tallinn FIR from FL 955 up to FL 660. Control Zones (CTRs) are implemented around 2 airports, namely Tallinn and Tartu. In addition Kärdla, Kuressaare and Pärnu AFIS. Military There are no military control zones. There is 1 military aerodrome under development at Ämari with associated planned traffic information zone from ground up to a level to be defined. There is no permanently reserved military airspace in Estonia. FMP A Flow Management Position (FMP) is located at Tallinn ATCC and is responsible for the provision of ATFM services in the Tallinn FIR. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 5 Released Issue

18 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation FIR: GND UNL CTA: FL 95 FL 660 In accordance with national regulations only the Imperial System is used in Estonia. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 6 Released Issue

19 1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Estonia are the following: The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MoEA&C); The Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (ECAA); Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS (Estonian ANS or EANS); Ministry of Defence; Tallinn Airport Ltd. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Government Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications Ministry of Defence Civil Aviation Administration Air Force Tallinn Airport Ltd. EANS Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in Estonia is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The ECAA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rulemaking Safety Oversight Establishment of Tolerable Safety Levels Organisation responsible Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications Estonia Civil Aviation Administration (ECAA) Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MoEA&C)M Legal Basis Statutes of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 323 of 23 October 2002) Aviation Act Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006 Statutes of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 323 of 23 October 2002) LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 7 Released Issue

20 Safety Performance Monitoring ECAA Aviation Act Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006 Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements ECAA Aviation Act Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006 Airspace ECAA Aviation Act Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006 Economic MoEA&C Statutes of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 323 of 23 October 2002) Environment Ministry of Environment Statutes of Ministry of Environment (Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 19 of 10 December 2009) Security ECAA Aviation Act Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006) Estonian CAA The Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (CAA or ECAA) is in the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications and it is the Estonian Safety Supervisory Authority, responsible for exercising state supervision over the compliance with the requirements deriving from legal acts regulating the field of activity of ECAA. It has enforcement powers and it is the extrajudicial body which conducts proceedings in matters of misdemeanours, ECAA participates in the drafting of legal acts concerning its area of activities, makes proposals on the amendments of those legal acts, such as the improvement of Estonianlanguage aviation terminology, participates in the development of policies, strategies, development plans, prepares and implements projects in its area of activities, including international projects. CAA is institutionally separated from the Estonian Service Providers. Annual Report published: Y Annual Safety Oversight report ( ) Annual Safety Oversight Report pdf Annual Safety Oversight Report Annual Safety Oversight report covering 2013 is under preparation. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 8 Released Issue

21 1.2.2 Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS EANS The Estonian ANS, Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS (EANS), is a state owned stock company and a main service provider in Tallinn FIR, at Tartu and Tallinn Airports. The Air Traffic Services units of domestic airports provide service in defined portions of terminal airspace and belong to the airport enterprises. The functions of EANS are: Provision of airspace utilisation; Provision of Air Traffic Service; Publication, exchange and dissemination of Aeronautical Information Aeronautical Information Services; Consultancy Services and expertise in the field of aviation. Name of the ANSP: EANS Governance: MoEA&C Ownership: 100% State (MoEA&C) Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute ATC approach Y Y ATC Airport(s) Y Currently Tallinn and Tartu Airports. There is a plan to provide services also at other domestic airports. AIS Y CNS Y MET N Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (EMHI). ATCO training Y EANS provides OJT and complementary training. Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. Further information is available on the EANS websites: The organisation chart is in the annex B ATC system in use Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Major upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Year Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 9 Released Issue

22 ATC units The ATC units in the Estonian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA TALLINN ATCC 2 1 Tallinn UTA (Class C)+ CTA (Class C) + 1 Feeder sector suite operational regularly (EUROCAT 2000) as from Nov 2005 Tallinn APP 1 Tallinn TMA Collocated with Tallinn ACC Tartu APP 1 Tartu TMA Airports General information The main airports in Estonia, including Tallinn, are operated by Tallinn Airport Ltd. Tallinn Airport is the main international airport of Estonia. It is a 100% State owned stock company under the supervision of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. It was established with the assets of RE Eesti Lennujaamad (State Enterprise Estonian Airports) Tallinn Airport was entered in the Estonian Commercial Register on 31 December Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, APO, FCM, ITYADQ and SAF11. In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2013, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. Only Tallinn airport is covered in this LSSIP document Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Estonia concerned with ATM are: Ministry of Defence; Air Force, reporting to the Ministry. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. Further information is available on the Estonian Air Force websites: Information on the application of FUA is in subchapter LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 10 Released Issue

23 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking Oversight OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: NA Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT N GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: NA Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence These provisions cover: NA Organisation of military ATS for OAT NA Organisation of military ATS for GAT NA OAT/GAT Coordination NA OAT/GAT Coordination NA ATCO Training NA ATCO Training NA ATCO Licensing NA ATCO Licensing NA ANSP Certification NA ANSP Certification NA ANSP Supervision NA ANSP Supervision NA Aircrew Training NA ESARR applicability NA Aircrew Licensing NA Additional Information: Military apply civil rules Additional Information: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP NA National AIP NA National Military AIP NA National Military AIP NA EUROCONTROL eaip NA EUROCONTROL eaip NA Other: Other: N OAT National oversight body for OAT: None GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Currently military do not provide service to civil flights Service Provision role OAT Services Provided: EnRoute N EnRoute Military fly GAT, the service is provided by EANS Services Provided: LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 11 Released Issue GAT EnRoute Approach/TMA N EANS Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS Y AIS N MET Y MET N SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N Additional Information: Other: Other: Additional Information: On pilot s demand, Military provide traffic information to civil VFR flights, flying through Ämari Parachute Dropping Area. N

24 Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: NA Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: NA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: Currently military do not provide service to civil flights.. NA NA User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only N GAT only Y Both OAT and GAT N If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within the regular (GAT) national route network Within a special OAT route system Within specific corridors only Under radar control Under radar advisory service If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Y Exemption from Route Charges N Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS N Others: Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Estonia applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y Accident/incident Investigation Body Technical investigations Technical investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau (ESIB). ESIB is permanent and independent investigation bureau under Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications in accordance with ICAO Annex XIII and EU regulation 996/2010. The sole objective of the safety investigations is to determine the causes of the accidents or serious incidents, not to apportion any blame or liability. This body performs its functions independently in compliance with Council Directive 94/56/EC reporting only to the MoEA&C. The ESIB conducts investigations for Civil Aviation aircraft accidents and serious incidents. The ECAA and EANS investigate incidents and/or occurrences. Results of the investigations and statistics (or annual reports) are made public through the web site LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 12 Released Issue

25 Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data The ESIB performs the collection, evaluation, process and storing of all information related to accidents, incidents and occurrences, as well as making this information available to the other EU States. In order to collect, evaluate, process and store all relevant information, ESIB uses the tools developed in the framework of the programme for the European Coordination Centre for Aviation Incidents Reporting System (ECCAIRS). The ECAA collects, evaluates and stores also information related to civil aviation incidents and occurrences CivilMilitary Accidents/Incidents Military/Military Civil/Military Accident ESIB and FSO (If GAT EANS is involved also) ESIB, FSO and EANS Serious incident ESIB and FSO (If GAT EANS is involved also) ESIB, FSO and EANS Incident FSO (If GAT EANS is involved also) ECAA, EANS and FSO Occurrence FSO (If GAT EANS is involved also) ECAA, EANS and FSO Military accidents are investigated by the civil investigator (ESIB) with the participation of the Military Flight Safety Officers (FSO). Civil/Military incidents are investigated with the participation of the ECAA. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 13 Released Issue

26 Chapter 2 Enroute Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Estonia Estonia Annual IFR Movements Estonia Distribution (Ref. year 2012) Overflights 75% IFR flights IFR movements Actuals IFR movements Baseline forecast IFR movements High forecast IFR movements Low forecast Domestic flights 2% International Dep/Arr 23% A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F A = Actual F = Forecast STATFOR MediumTerm Forecast (September 2013) IFR flights yearly growth 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F H 1,0% 5,9% 6,4% 5,7% 5,4% 5,0% Estonia B 2,1% 14,1% 6,1% 1,6% 3,7% 3,9% 3,7% 3,4% 3,6% L 2,1% 1,7% 1,6% 1,9% 1,7% 1,9% ESRA B 0,8% 3,1% 2,4% 0,9% 1,4% 2,6% 2,7% 2,2% 2,5% 2019 F 4,7% 3,6% 1,8% 2,5% 2013 Traffic in Estonia decreased by 2.7% during Summer Summer (Mayy to October), when compared to /19 The STATFOR mediumterm forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 1.8% and 5.5% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.6%. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 14 Released Issue

27 2.2. TALLINN ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays / Summer 2013 performance Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baselinee Enroute Delay (min/flight) Optimumm All reasons Without weather Capacity gap 1.2 % 622 (+0%) No Average enroute ATFM delay decreased from 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2012 too 0 minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Adaptation of sector opening times Consolidation of operations with the new ATM system Maximum configuration: 2 (+1 FEEDER) Summer 2013 performance assessment Achieved Yes Yes Yes Comments 2 sectors opened o The capacity baseline of 62 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 52 and thee average peak 3 hour demand was Planning Period /19 Summer The planning focuses on the Summer seasonn to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planningg cycles. The /19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters: 2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC ass provided in January /19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay targett of 0.5 min/flight LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 15 Released Issue

28 EETTCTA Annual Summer Enroute ATFM delay breakdown Reference Values Capacity Profiles 2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline H 62 0% 62 0% 65 5% 68 5% 71 4% 72 1% Ref. 62 0% 62 0% 62 0% 63 2% 65 3% 66 2% EETT 62 L 62 0% 62 0% 62 0% 62 0% 62 0% 62 0% C/R 62 0% 62 0% 63 2% 64 2% 66 3% 67 2% Capacity Plan Year Measures planned Significant Events New routes Additional OLDI functions DLK/CPDLC NEFRA Additional staff and controller rating Adaptation of sector opening times 1additional sector Max sectors 2(+1 FEEDER) 2(+1 FEEDER) 3(+1 FEEDER) 3(+1 FEEDER) 3(+1 FEEDER) 3(+1 FEEDER) Capacity increase Reference profile Additional information Sufficient capacity to meet demand 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 2% EETTCTA Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan /19 Planning Period Outlook To ensure the required delivery of capacity in the mediumterm, Estonian ANS is reviewing: creation and deployment of an additional sector (in case enroute capacity does not meet the demand any more) after 2015; implementation of additional OLDI functions with adjacent FIRs (2014); reorganising / adding new routes crossing the boundary with SanktPeterburg FIR; implementation of the DLK/CPDLC and NEFRA (2015 end). LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 16 Released Issue

29 Chapter 3 ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for applicable to Estonia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements ahead of the 2013 reporting exercise. Number Recommendation Ownershipp EE Feedback REC REC REC REC To ensure that all Stakeholders s report the expected completion dates business plans. as definedd in their National To ensure correct application of LSSIP guidance material and to implement the results of mandatory LSSIP incycle check. To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the implementationn of basic ATSMHS capability (ESSIP objective COM10). To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the implementation of remaining SLoAs for implementation NAV03) ). of PRNAV (ESSIP objective LSSIP date are in All States line with BPs Taken into All States account. AL, AM, AZ, CY, CZ, DK, EE, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IT, LU, MAS, MD, MT, NO, SE,, SI, UA AL, AZ, BA, BE, BG, CY, DE, EE, ES, GE, GR, HR, HU, IT, LV, ME, MT, NO, PT, RS, SI, UA, UK Basic AMHS by 07/2015 Implemented at EETN in 2013 Interim Deployment Programme View Number Recommendation Ownershipp EE Feedback REC States are encouraged to speed up the AFP implementation and to schedule AFP testing with Network Manager All States Ongoing activity REC States are encouraged to take into consideration the deployment of ASM systems if it is not already planned. EE, ES, SK, HU, GR, TR, GE, AZ Work in progress REC Airports are encouraged to establish performance committees and implement information sharing and performance reporting processes in line with A CDM guidelines (AOP05 objective). Airports in applicability a area reported other than completed, slightly delayed REC To revise deployment plans and as much as possible speed up the implementation of CPDLC requirements ANSPs A of core area States for 2015 Stakeholders View Number Recommendation Ownershipp EE Feedback REC ANSPs are encouraged to routes. publish more APV All ECAC ANSPs for 2015 LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 17 Released Issue

30 FAB View Number Recommendation Ownership EE Feedback REC To update the FABs plans and establish a more appropriate roadmap to improve the current lack of coordination and ensure a common response to deployment needs. FAB States Ongoing REC The ANSPs should coordinate system deployment (including system upgrades) and capabilities implementation plans with FAB partner first, and then follow on with coordination to adjacent FABs and ANSPs. FAB States Work in progress REC Ongoing work to harmonise reporting culture between States in the FAB should be continued to ensure alignment of reporting principles. FAB States More efforts for coordination of the reporting agreed LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 18 Released Issue

31 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in Estonia are depictedd in the table below. Name Schedule Description Scope Status Link with European Master plan Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 2 EETN Traffic area expansion Expansion of EETN airport traffic area to increase capacity. Upgrade of Tallinn aerodrome runway to CAT II. Definition phase for expansion. Capacity 3d ACCC Sector Implementation Introduction of 3d Sector of Area Control Centre Definition phase completed. Implementation planned for FCM01 Safety Capacity DLC/CPDLC Infrastructure development and ATM system upgrade for CPDLC implementation Requirement specified and contracts with manufacturers signed ITYAGDL Safety, capacity Ämari airbase development project ATS services provision at Ämari airbase: Ämari CTR establishment, Tallinnn TMA Airspace reorganisation Work in progress AOM13.1 Safety Ämari aerodrome modernisation (Military Airbase) Manoeuvring area reconstruction completed. All navigation systems installation (ILS, VOR/TAC) finalised, certification completed. Runway lightning system installation (CAT I with readiness CAT II). ATC TWR renovated. New Tower ATC systems implementation in progress. New METEO equipment installed and certified. Development of Ämari CTR and IFR procedures in progress. Progressingg on time so far. Safety Tallinnn ACDM project ACDM establishment and its integration with NM Delayed. The project work will start in AOP05 Capacity 2 Capaci ty, safety, costefficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 19 Released Issue

32 Chapter 5 Regional Coordination 5.1 FAB Coordination North European Functional Airspace Block NEFAB NEFAB is a functional airspace block created by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway. NEFAB has established a programme with a programme management office (PMO) with the objective off managing projects and initiatives among the ANSP s in the cooperation. In addition there is close cooperation with LFV and Naviair in DK/SEFAB concerning airspace development. In this cooperation the implementation of a seamless Free Route Airspace above FL 285 across the two airspace blocks iss prioritised in the short term with planned implementation towards the end of The activityy is targeted to connect Free Route Airspace in the two FAB s ensuring a continuous Free Route Airspace. The activity is organised as a project called North European Free Route Airspace NEFRA. Thiss project is not aimed at airspace developments inside the two airspace blocks. The ANSPs in NEFAB have developed a 5 year business plan, covering the period and an annual plan for The 5 year businesss plan describes the strategies forr the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into activities planned for 2014 with defined deliverables andd milestones. In April 2013 two key projects, Airspace 2015 and ATS Provision 2015, delivered the NEFAB Network Plan. The NEFAB Network Plan describes the operational requirements for the establishment of the airspace and service s provision within NEFAB in is considered an intermediate step towards a performance scenario planned forr 2020 and beyond. The individual ANSPs in the FABcooperation will implement the required r operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept. 5.2 FAB Projects Name Schedule FAB Partner Status Expected Contribution too the Key Performance Areas and link to ESSIP NEFAB Target Concept Dec Nov Avinor, EANS, Finavia and LGS Ongoing according to project schedule Resulting in improved capacity through improved airspace structures and alignment of sectors. Safety is not considered a specific objective for the project, but safety levels shall be maintained or increased after implementation. The project will enable e more effective use of operational resources and contribute to improved cost efficiency. More efficient airspace and routing options for airspace users will increase flight efficiency and contribute to reduced emissions. NEFRA (North European Free Route Airspace) May 2012 Nov Avinor, EANS, Finavia, LFV, LGS and Naviair Ongoing according to project schedule Capacity and ANSP cost efficiency are not considered specific objects for the project. Capacity levels shall be maintained or improved and the implementation shall not reduce ANSPP costefficiency. Safety is not considered a specific objective for the project, but safety levels shall be maintained or increased after implementation. More efficient airspace and routing options for airspace users will increase flight efficiency and contribute to reduced emissions. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 20 Released Issue

33 5.3 Other regional coordination projects Noracon NORACON, the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium, consists of nine members. Swedavia (Swedish airports) and eight European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). The purpose of NORACONs membership in the SESAR Joint Undertaking is to ensure impact from the partners in the development of the future European ATM business Borealis Borealis Alliance includes the ANSPs of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Borealis will focus on strategic business cooperation between the member ANSPs, seeking economies of scale and projects that can be achieved on a commercial basis, complementing the work of the northern European Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) but without the need for regulatory or State involvement. SESAR Joint Undertaking Membership EANS is also participating to NORACON, the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium, together with other 7 European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria) and the North European ANS Providers (NEAP) including AVINOR (Norway), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). SESAR ANSP Coordination Project (IDSG initiative) Estonian ANS together with other ANSPs has started ANSP Coordination Project to facilitate and timely synchronise Interim Deployment Programme (IDP) implementation. LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 21 Released Issue

34 Chapter 6 ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of o overall objective, inc nonstate SloAs) State s high level progress statement REG REG highh level progresss statement (By:mmyyyy) ASP ASP highh level progress statement (By:mmyyyy) high level progress statement (By:mmyyyy) APO APO highh level progresss statement (By:mmyyyy) Obj. Progress (**) State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date. Progress (**) Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: ECAC EU+ MultiN APT (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: No Plan Partly Not Applicable Missing Data Late L LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 22 Released Issue

35 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air[IDP] Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018) [Essential] Estonia will apply common principles, rules and procedures for OAT handling by the 12/2015 end 2015 (FOC). REG ECAA will revise national legislation as required and inform (By:122018) Eurocontrol on time. ASP EANS will apply common principles, rules and procedures (By:122018) OAT/GAT interface. Estonian AF will connect national route structures and arrangements to form a flexible system facilitating OATIFR (By:122018) crossborder flights across Europe and implement harmonised military flight planning for OAT crossborder operations 12/ / /2015 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management (By:12/2016) [IDP] [Essential] Advanced Airspace management will be implemented by the end of /2015 ASP Advanced Airspace management will be implemented by the (By:122015) end of (By:122015) 12/2015 No Plan AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7 (By:10/2013) [Essential] ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7 will be implemented. 10/2013 ASP ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7 is implemented. (By:102013) There is only one airspace regulator in Estonia, i.e. Ministry of (By:102013) Communications and Economy. 10/2013 Not Applicable AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace (By:12/2017) [IDP] [Essential] Free Route Airspace Concept will be implemented within NEFAB area in November 11/ REG National legislation will be revised to support FRA (By:122017) implementation. ASP NEFAB Target concept will be implemented by November (By:122017) / /2015 NEFAB Target concept will be implemented in November (By:122017) 11/2015 LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 23 Released Issue

36 AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions (By:12/2013) The Tallinn Airport safety committee is established. The safety committee leads collective actions on all runway related issues and in particular on runway safety. The safety committee convey meetings regularly or at least once every quarter. Safety Management System is in place. 12/2007 International regulations applicable to airports for runway safety and the prevention of runway incursions are implemented in national regulations. Not all communications associated with runway operations are conducted in aviation English. The CAA issued the regulation applicable to airports for runway REG safety and the prevention of runway incursions in accordance (By:122013) with material contained in EAPRI documentation and for theee TLL ANS 12/2007 establishment of the Tallinn Airport runway Safety team. Provision of aeronautical information in standard electronic format will be developed current 2009 and operational as of September All infrastructure, practices and procedures relating to runway ASP operations are in compliance with ICAO provisions. Safety (By:122013) management systems implemented in accordance with EE TLL ANS 12/2007 ESARR3 provisions. Situational awareness is approved by conducting all communications on a common frequency in CAAs regulation is not applicable at military aerodrome. Tallinn (By:122013) Airport is not a Military Airport. Not Applicable The Tallinn Airport safety committee is established with airport stakeholders (EANS, Aircraft operators, CAA,...) and they have regular meetings. APO Not all communications associated with runway operations are (By:122013) conducted in aviation English. Airport infrastructure, practicesee TLL ANS 12/2005 and procedures are in accordance with ICAO provisions. Situational awareness is approved by conducting all communications on a common frequency in AOP04.1 EETN Tallinn Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 (By:12/2011) [Essential] ASMGCS Level 1 system is implemented on 10 February /2013 REG Transponder operating procedures are published in the AIP. (By:122010) EE TLL ANS 12/2013 ASP ASMGCS system on the Tallinn airport is implemented on (By:122011) February, EE TLL ANS 02/2011 (By:122010) Not Applicable APO ASMGCS system on the Tallinn airport is implemented on (By:122010) February, EE TLL ANS 02/2011 LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 24 Released Issue

37 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 (By:12/2017) EETN Tallinn ASMGCS Level II system at Tallinn Airport is implemented on 10 February /2011 REG ECAA is approved ASMGCS Level 2 operation. (By:122017) ASP ASMGCS Level II system at the Tallinn airport is implemented (By:122017) on 10 February APO ASMGCS Level II system at Tallinn Airport is implemented on (By:122017) 10 February / / /2011 AOP05 EETN Tallinn Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)[IDP] (By:01/2016) [Essential] Estonia plans to implement ACDM at Tallinn aerodrome by the end of /2015 ASP EANS will define and implement ACDM procedures by the end (By:012016) of Performance objectives and KPIs are not defined yet. (By:012016) Tallinn Airport Ltd will define and implement ACDM APO procedures by the end of Performance objectives and (By:012016) KPIs are not defined yet. 12/2015 Not Applicable 12/2015 ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 (By:01/2013) [Essential] STCA Level II function was implemented in 2012 and safety assessment was performed. Safety oversight was conducted on time.12/2012 REG ECAA approved the STCA Level II. (By:012013) TATCI 12/2012 The EUROCAT 2000 System has STCA implemented and ASP operational (Initial Operational Capability). The STCA Level 2 (By:012013) was implemented and operational since FOC was TATCI 12/2012 implemented in March ATC do not provide RADAR services (By:012013) Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 25 Released Issue

38 ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] The EUROCAT 2000 has the APW implemented and operational. FOC in accordance 12/2016 with Eurocontrol Specification will be provided by the end of APW Level 2 with FOC in accordance with Eurocontrol Specification was introduced during major system upgrade in ASP However, FOC in accordance with Eurocontrol (By:122016) Specification will be implemented by the end of TATCI 12/2016 ATC do not provide RADAR services (By:122016) Not Applicable ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] No plan yet. However, the functionality itself is present in the system. It requires fine tuning and safety assessment. ASP (By:122016) No Military do not provide service to civil flights. (By:122016) TATCI No Plan No Plan Plan ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] The Approach Path Monitor Level 2 function was introduced during the major system upgrade in However, the function is not in use yet. It will be12/2016 implemented by 12/2016 The Approach Path Monitor Level 2 function was introduced ASP during the major system upgrade in However, the (By:122016) function is not in use yet. it will be implemented by 12/2016. TATCI 12/2016 Military do not provide service to civil flights. (By:122016) Not Applicable ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring (By:12/2016) [Essential] Support functions (MTCD, route adherence monitoring, cleared level adherence monitoring etc) are are already implemented. However, automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring functions based on FASTI03/2012 requirements will be implemented during the next major upgrade of the system. ATCO training for the use of FASTI related functions was performed. REG ECAA will approve use of MTCD and conformance monitoring (By:122016) functions and associated operational procedures. TATCI 03/2012 The automated support for conflict detection and conformance ASP monitoring functions will be implemented during the next major (By:122016) upgrade of the system in The training of the controllerstatci 03/2012 will be finalised in March LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 26 Released Issue

39 ATC15 Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange [IDP] mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations (By:12/2017) [Essential] In EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures 01/2017 will be implemented on time. REG Formal acceptance of the changes will be done on time. (By:122017) ASP In EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, (By:122017) tools and procedures will be implemented on time. 01/ /2017 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 (By:12/2015) ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 will be implemented on time. 01/2015 REG ECAA will supervise compliance with regulatory provisions for (By:122015) ACAS II (TCAS II version 7.1). 01/2015 ASP Late The staff will be trained by the end of (By:032012) (By:122015) 12/2015 No Plan ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller[IDP] during Coordination and Transfer (By:12/2018) [Essential] The ground systems will be upgraded and the functions will be implemented by the 12/2018 end of REG The ECAA will conduct safety oversight of the changes on time. (By:122018) ASP The ground systems will be upgraded and the functions will be (By:122018) implemented by the end of / /2018 COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data [IDP] networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) (By:12/2014) The migration will take place in accordance with EC regulation EC 283/2011 with a 12/2014 new date of 31 December REG ECAA has notified EANS. European Commission has been (By:122010) notified trough LSSIP document. 12/2013 ASP The migration will take place in accordance with EC regulation (By:122014) EC 283/2011 with a new date of 31 December TATCI 12/2014 Military ATC do not provide RADAR services (By:122014) Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 27 Released Issue

40 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (By:12/2014) Late There is a dedicated team within Borealis AMHS project to work out a consolidated 12/2015 solution for Borealis area. The migration is postponed to the end of There is a dedicated team within Borealis AMHS project to ASP work out a consolidated solution for Borealis area. The (By:122014) migration is postponed to the end of (By:122014) Late 12/2015 No Plan COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM (By:12/2020) Voice over Internet Protocol in ATM will be implemented by the end of 2020 (Full 12/2020 Operational Capability). REG NSA will conduct Safety oversight of the changes by the end of (By:122018) /2018 ASP EANS plans to implement VoIP in ATM by the end of (By:122020) (By:122020) 12/2020 Not Applicable ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)[IDP] techniques for environmental improvements (By:12/2013) Late EETN Tallinn CDA and PRNAV procedures were implemented in Tallinn TMA 30 MAy /2014 ASP EANS implemented PRNAV and CDA techniques on May (By:122013) /2013 Monitoring of performance is not established yet. Tallinn Airport Late APO will coordinate the activities and report performance feedback (By:122013) to allow continual improvement. 06/2014 LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 28 Released Issue

41 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports (By:12/2016) EETN Tallinn Estonia plans to implement CEM by Estonia participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the ANSP and Aircraft Operators Currently there are12/2015 no formal regulations or agreements. EANS has nominated a person to deal with environmental matters. On 12/4/2009 a meeting was held in EANS where CEM was introduced by Eurocontrol environmental unit specialists. This ASP subject is addressed through the North European ANSP (By:122016) Cooperation Project. EANS participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the Airport and Aircraft Operators. EANS trained controllers in the environmental implecations of aircraft operations within CDA/PRNAV project. (By:122015) Tallinn Airport has implemented its own environmental management system according to the requirements of ISO 14001:2005. Performance monitoring is described in Quality APO Management Manual. (By:122016) Tallinn airport participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the ANSP and Aircraft Operators. Airport procedures will be developed and implemented by end /2013 Not Applicable 12/2015 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services (By:12/2006) [Essential] Since May 2008 Estonia is in the IFPS zone. Currently only the FMP is connected to CFMU. During the major system upgrade, all the requirements were implemented in 06/ Connection to ETFMS is agreed for At present CPR format testing is in progress. Late ASP During the major system upgrade, all the requirements will be (By:122006) implemented. EE/CFMU / 06/2014 TATCI (By:122001) Late Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2013 Estonia 29 Released Issue