Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) TURKEY

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) TURKEY Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Turkey Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/140 Date of Edition Released Issue LSSIP Focal Point Cihan Sahin - Cihan.SAHIN@dhmi.gov.tr LSSIP Contact Person Predrag Vranjkovic - predrag.vranjkovic@eurocontrol.int Status Released Issue Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations and LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) DHMI Airports Military Authority... 9 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Turkey ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Summer 2016 performance Planning Period Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey. Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate general of State Airports of Turkey ( is the unique provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State-owned Governmental department. According to SHY- Gözetim which was enacted in parallel ESARR 1, DGCA Air Navigation Department undertakes the NSA responsibilities. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Turkey decreased by 5.0% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 2.5% and 7.1% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%. Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 2 % 0; 0% 0; 0% 0; 0% 7; 18% 7; 18% 7; 18% 17; 44% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined All phases of the objectives (AOP05, ATC16, ENV01, FCM01, NAV10) due for are planned to complete in short term. There is a good progress in implementation of the objectives due for The Objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for period. In order to complete Objective ATC12.1 and ATC 17, the rest of actions will be conducted and the objective INF07 is planned to complete on time. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 1 Released Issue

12 SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 80% 93% 82% 38% SESAR Baseli ne 0% 40% 0% 13% PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP Baseli Baseli Baseli ne ne ne ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block 0 Block % % LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 2 Released Issue

13 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 3 Released Issue

14

15 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Turkey is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1989 European Union NA EASA NA ICAO 1945 NATO 1952 ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Ankara and Istanbul FIRs. There is no separation between the lower and the upper airspace in the Turkish FIRs. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 4 Released Issue

16 Airspace Classification and Organisation Turkey is evaluating the implementation of ICAO classification for both present and future systems. Airspace reorganisation as a result of studies is planned. It is not yet possible to predict when this will be completed National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved within ATM in Turkey are the following: - The Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication; - The Directorate General of Civil Aviation DGCA; - The Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (Directorate General of State Airports (Turkey) DHMI; - The Turkish Military Authority; and - The Turkish State Meteorological Service. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters. Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council, and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey. The Military Authority permit some military aerodromes to be used by civil aviation in order to improve air transport links within Turkey. Civil ATM incidents are investigated by the Investigation and Assessment Commission which reports incidents and investigation findings to the DGCA. The commission is formed from experts with sufficient qualifications. Where requested by the DHMI and/or if DGCA consider it necessary, experts from DGCA will also join the commission in accordance with SHY For civil or civil/military ATM related incidents occurring within the Military Terminal Area and military joint user airports, the DGCA will receive all documentation/reports concerning the incident from the military authorities and a joint investigation will be carried out. The Advisory and Steering Committee holds regular (quarterly) meetings with the participation of aviation organisations as coordinated by the DGCA to classify incidents, prepare statistical data, evaluate reports of the Investigation and Assessment Commission and to impose actions and/or give recommendations to the aviation community to prevent the re-occurrence of similar incidents. The committee has the authority to include any aviation related issue on its agenda. Members of this Committee are comprised from the following organisations as appropriate: - DGCA ( - DHMI ( - Military Authority - School of Civil Aviation (Aviation Experts) - Turkish Airline Pilots Association (TALPA) - Air Traffic Controllers Association of Turkey - Other related stakeholders. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 5 Released Issue

17 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table overleaf. The DGCA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Safety Oversight DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Airspace DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Economic Ministry of Transport, maritime Affairs and Communication Environment DGCA and Ministry of Environment and Urbanism Security DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Accident investigation Investigation and Assessment Commission DGCA The Regulator is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The DGCA is a body within the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication with its own operating budget. The CAA responsibility is processed by DGCA. The DGCA is responsible for: - Licensing of Aircrew and Engineers - Licensing of Air Traffic Controllers - Licensing of ATSEPs - Certificate of Airworthiness (CoA) of aircraft - Approval of all airborne electronic equipment - Oversight and certification of airports - Investigation of Incidents by means of participation in Investigation and Assessment Commission and holding Advisory and Steering Committee Meetings. - Approval and generation of all ATM rules/regulations (including ESARRs) in coordination with stakeholders (DHMI, Turkish Air Force General Staff and other bodies as appropriate). Economic regulation is carried out by the Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 6 Released Issue

18 Annual Report published: N Organisation chart is shown in Annex B of this document DHMI Service provided Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey ( is the unique Provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State-owned Governmental department. DHMI provides all the Air Traffic Services within civil airspace (Controlled Airspace, TMA and CTRs). DHMI cooperates very closely with the DGCA, particularly on safety matters such as the implementation of the ESARRs. Name of the ANSP: Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey ( Governance: Governmental department Ownership: 100% State owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Airport(s) AIS CNS Y Y Y Y Y MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service ATCO training Others Y Airport management Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y N Number of air traffic controllers ACC 492 APP 363 TWR 389 Annual Report published: Y ort_2015_site.pdf Organisation chart is shown in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 7 Released Issue

19 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2015 ATC Unit Ankara ACC SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2015 ATC Unit Ankara ACC When you answer this question please refer to the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing system and surveillance data processing systems. ATC Units En-route air navigation services throughout Turkish Airspace from one Area Control Center located in Ankara There are 24 TMAs and 12 MTMAs in Turkish Airspace. Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; Size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); Service provided (en-route or TMA no more ref to TWR); The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Ankara ACC 22 2 Ankara Istanbul Istanbul APP 7 Istanbul Izmir APP 4 Istanbul Antalya APP 8 Ankara Dalaman APP 3 İstanbul 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 8 Released Issue

20 Airports General information Turkey has 55 airports used by GAT. These range from busy international airports to small regional airports with perhaps ten or less movements daily. Air navigation service is provided for all airports by DHMI except Eskişehir Anadolu, İzmir Efes and İstanbul Hezarfen Airports. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP The airports covered by this LSSIP document are as follows: - Istanbul Atatürk airport - Antalya airport, and - Ankara Esenboga airport Military Authority The military authority also plays a major role in managing the Turkish Airspace especially with regard to FUA. Military ATC is entirely separated from Civil ATC, although very good civil/military coordination is maintained. Co-ordination between the military authority and the DHMI is ensured through a Civil-Military Co-ordination Group. Some (11) airports/airfields of military origin are jointly used by military and civil aviation. For the eight (8) airports of them, all aircraft are under military ATC control. Currently, Turkish Military Authority and DHMI have their own alternative FUA concept which is considered more suitable for the local geo-political situation. In order to increase the capacity of Turkish airspace, with implementation of the SMART system, DHMI and the Military Authority are planning to implement EUROCONTROL Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept to do that necessary legislation has been published at Official Gazette dated 18 April The studies are going on to establish infrastructure and units. The military regulatory, service provision and user role within ATM is detailed below. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 9 Released Issue

21 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920 Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT N Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training (only military pilots) Y ESARR applicability N Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: Other than the State Law 2920 which grants provision for OAT the Turkish Air Force operate under different State or NATO regulations. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N Additional Information: There is a protocol between the General Staff and Ministry of Transport, Maritime affairs and Communication for the use of military airports by civil aircraft. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other N/A Other: N/A Y Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: Turkish General Staff HQ GAT National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 10 Released Issue

22 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route N/A En-Route N Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y AIS Y MET Turkish State Meteorological MET Turkish State Meteorological N N Service Service SAR Y By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT SAR By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y Y Other: Security Services Additional Information: Other: Security Services Additional Information: User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: The above exemptions do not apply to military heavy transport or VIP aircraft. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Turkey applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: N FUA Level 2 implemented: N FUA Level 3 implemented: N N LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 11 Released Issue

23 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Turkey Turkey - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H -1.9% 4.0% 9.2% 7.5% 7.7% 7.0% 7.2% Turkey B 7.1% 11.2% 6.8% -2.4% 1.2% 6.2% 5.8% 5.0% 4.5% 4.8% L -2.8% -1.2% 3.1% 3.8% 3.9% 2.7% 2.7% ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Turkey decreased by 5.0% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 2.5% and 7.1% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 12 Released Issue

24 2.2. ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Summer 2016 performance Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap %* 208 (N/A) No *Increase linked to the new area of responsibility of Ankara ACC Average enroute delay per flight in Ankara ACC decreased from 0.22 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to zero minutes per flight during the same period in Capacity Plan +6% Achieved Comments Improved civil/military coordination AMAN/DMAN at LTBA Partially AMAN implemented Airport CDM at LTBA Improved ATFCM, including STAM ATS route structure development Additional controllers (45 per year for enroute) Capacity Assessment of new sectorisation Maximum configuration: 25 sectors Summer 2016 performance assessment Yes Partially Yes Yes Yes Ongoing Yes 17 sectors opened, sufficient for the traffic demand The capacity baseline of 208 was calculated with ACCESS for the new area of responsibility of Ankara ACC. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 210 and the peak 3 hour demand was 197. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 13 Released Issue

25 2.4. Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. Capacity Profiles ACC 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous baseline H % 248 6% 261 5% Ref % 238 5% 248 4% LTAA 208 L 221 6% 226 2% 231 2% Open 216 4% 227 5% 235 4% C/R 218 5% 229 5% 238 4% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Capacity Plan DMAN at LTBA Airport CDM at LTBA Stepped implementation of direct/free route operations above FL290 Improved civil/military coordination Istanbul area ATC/TMA Center Improved ATFCM, including STAM ATS route structure development Gradual upper airspace resectorisation (20 to 25 sectors + FL235) New interface with neighbouring states for new Istanbul airport MINI project for interface within Turkey additional CWPs RTS of Turkish airspace and Interface with neighbouring states Capacity Assessment through a CAPAN study New airport in Istanbul from Q phase 1A Additional controllers (45 per year for enroute) New APP control office for LTFJ New airport in Istanbul from end 2018 phase 1B Independent parallel runway and new ground infrastructure at LTFJ New airport in Istanbul 3 additional phases (depending on capacity triggers) Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase 10% 6% 6% 6% 6% Reference profile Annual % Increase 9% 5% 4% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 0.9% 2.1% 4.0% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information Note: DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 14 Released Issue

26 Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LTAAACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 15 Released Issue

27 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Turkey for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. These recommendations are extracted from the Executive Summary of the Implementation Report Reference number REC-2015/1 Corrective actions taken: Noted. Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-sesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Ownership All operational stakeholders Description: Turkey has a very high completion of SESAR baseline objectives (76%). Committed to implement remaining elements as appropriate for Turkish airspace. REC-2015/2 Corrective actions taken: Noted. Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ATC07.1, NAV10, ENV01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Local Stakeholders Description: Turkey completed ATC07.1 in NAV10 objective is planned for 2018; design of procedures is currently ongoing. ENV01 will be implemented in medium term, in LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 16 Released Issue

28 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in Turkey are depicted in the table below. A-SMGCS Level I and II (SMGCS) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution A-SMGCS Level II system for Antalya, Esenboga and Istanbul Ataturk. L3: AOP04.1, AOP04.2 NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ Increased safety. Environment: - Capacity: +++ Increased capacity. Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - AMAN (AMAN) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution AMAN is management tool to arrange the sequence of arrivals. Planned to be operational for Atatürk Airport and Sabiha Gökçen Airport. L3: ATC07.1 NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ Safety benefits. Environment: - Capacity: +++ More capacity in TMA. Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 17 Released Issue

29 ARTAS (ART) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The main RDP is used ARTAS in new Ankara ACC in SMART Project, 2 ARTAS units have been located in Ankara ACC/APP and Istanbul APP in Turkey. L3: ITY-SPI NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ Safety benefits. Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - MINI Project (MINI_TR) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Target date is the opening time of the new airport. Ongoing ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Integration of additional sectors for ATC units of Istanbul New Airport. Also current ATC systems will be upgraded according to new demands. NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Ensuring safety benefits Environment: - Capacity: +++ Increasing the capacity and capability of current ATC systems including Istanbul New Airport Tower and APP Units. Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 18 Released Issue

30 Project SMART implementation (SMART_SYS) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The SMART Project (Systematic Modernisation of ATM Resources in Turkey) brings together a number of sub projects and strategies in to one global project. The new SMART systems were commissioned and used in operation on 18 November 2015 in Air Traffic Control Center at Ankara. A pan-turkish ACC is located in Air Traffic Control Center in Ankara which is near Esenboga Airport, The replacement or extension of the major airport APPs in Turkey A Building Programme for the new ACC at Ankara, Replacement or refurbishment of the APP buildings, A new Tower (TWR) at Antalya and Istanbul-Atatürk, A state-of-the-art RDPS/FDPS/ODS system are supplied in the new Ankara ACC Building (Air Traffic Control Center at Ankara ). Off-the-shelf (OTS) system with a minimum of customisation in this project. The new SMART systems were commissioned and used in operation so, additional functionalities can be added in this case. L3: ATC17, FCM03 NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ The new systems were positively affect safety. Environment: - Capacity: +++ The new systems are enable Turkey to achieve higher capacity. Cost-efficiency: +++ Higher cost-efficiency of operations. Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 19 Released Issue

31 Radars replacement (RDR) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution 18 Mode S and 5 PSR Radars have been installed. L3: ITY-SPI NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Safety benefits. Environment: - Capacity: ++ Capacity gains. Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 20 Released Issue

32 Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination 5.1. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives It is to be noted that Turkey maintains very close cooperation/co-ordination with all neighbouring states. Turkey has taken on responsibility of some transition tasks in the area and arranging air traffic flow to / from Europe. Turkey is co-operating with neighbouring states such as Greece and Bulgaria to optimise the performance of Ground-Ground Networks and data exchange. It is also considered that, collaborating as closely as we can with our neighbouring civil air navigation service providers has a paramount importance in order to optimise the airspace design and management and increase the regional capacity, safety and quality. Therefore, Turkey undertakes initiatives and efforts to ensure the application of same concepts, standards and projects under the EUROCONTROL framework. The fundamental purpose of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative (CAI) is to foster cooperation between NATO members on airspace surveillance and air traffic coordination with the goals of enhancing transparency, predictability and the collective capabilities to fight against terrorist air threats. Turkey is playing an essential role in this project with Local Coordination Unit (LCU), established at Esenboğa Airport. On 16 May 2012, a Memorandum of Co-operation (MoC) was signed between DHMI and Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority (BULATSA) in Ankara. The MoC aimed at common understanding or adoption of ICAO, EUROCONTROL and other international requirements relevant for the ATM domain and cooperation for operational area. In the framework of this MoC, the delegations of the DHMI and BULATSA discussed the main aspects of future co-operation, such as ensuring an effective route network, common operational and technical projects, etc. On 20 June 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) and DHMI signed a MOU in Ukraine which aims the development of regional cooperation between UkSATSE and DHMI. It was also agreed that working groups on air traffic management, communication, navigation and surveillance, economic and financial support will further negotiate the related issues. Regarding with the enhancement of traffic flow between airspaces of Turkey and her neighbouring countries, DHMI has been co-operated with ANSPs to implement airspace changes (new COPs and routes) at the Bulgarian, Georgian, Iranian and Iraq interfaces. As a result of this co-operation; DHMI has completely changed the routes on main axes for traffic between Europe and Mid-East / Gulf Area / Asia / Far-East. Also; together with her neighbouring ANSPs and Eurocontrol, DHMI has been working on the airspace changes that are required to facilitate the traffic flow for Istanbul New Airport that is planned to be in use from the first quarter of LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 21 Released Issue

33 5.2. Regional Projects The main regional projects currently ongoing in Turkey are depicted in the table below. Extended AMAN Project (EXT-AMAN) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: Regional Schedule: Target date for this project is first quarter of Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution This project is compromising Bulgarian airspace besides Istanbul TMA including Atatürk and Istanbul New Airport. New AMAN positions will be installed related Bulgarian ATC units. L3: ATC15.1, ATC15.2 NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Providing more efficient safety benefits Environment: - Capacity: +++ Increasing capacity Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: +++ Increasing the coordination and operational procedures between two adjacent ATC units Cooperation Activities: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 22 Released Issue

34 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives All phases of the objectives (AOP05, ATC16, ENV01, FCM01, NAV10) due for are planned to complete in short term. There is a good progress in implementation of the objectives due for The Objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for period. In order to complete Objective ATC12.1 and ATC 17, the rest of actions will be conducted and the objective INF07 is planned to complete on time. LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 23 Released Issue

35 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 27% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP < % 0% 0% 0% 89% 100% n/a n/a 0% FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment n/a Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 63% < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 Groundbased Safety Nets AMAN tools and procedures 10% 100% 100% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 100% Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring 10% 50% LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 24 Released Issue

36 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 ENV01 ITYCOTR NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 NAV10 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Continuous Descent Operations < % LTAI Antalya Airport 47% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 47% Groundground automated coordination processes n/a APV procedures 82% 55% 87% 0% 100% High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 64% AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport LTAI Antalya Airport LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) ENV02 SAF11 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport LTAI Antalya Airport LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Airport CDM < % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% LTAI Antalya Airport 10% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 80% TimeBased Separation LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan n/a LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport n/a Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 0% Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 0% Collaborative Environmental Management LTAI Antalya Airport 100% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 100% Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 25 Released Issue

37 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 60% < COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100% COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 53% FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0% INF04 Integrated briefing 100% INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) 9% ITYACID ITYADQ Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information n/a n/a ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol n/a n/a 100% ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability n/a LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 26 Released Issue

38 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA B0SURF B0FICE B0DATM B0ACAS B0SNET B0ACDM B0RSEQ B0FRTO B0NOPS B0ASUR Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance 100% 55% 100% 100% 91% 100% 100% 87% 100% 100% 45% 100% 89% 100% 67% 100% 94% B0CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 74% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 27 Released Issue

39 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 0% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 The Military cannot implement this objective completely until appropriate legislation is passed. Meantime mature and robust procedures are already in force regarding the handling and interface of OAT/GAT operations. REG (By:12/2018) DGCA No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed. 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2018) No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed. DHMI Implementation of the objective will take place in parallel with the military MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority The Military cannot implement this objective completely until appropriate legislation is passed. Meantime mature and robust procedures are already in force regarding the handling and interface of OAT/GAT operations 0% % No Plan Not Applicable AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support AFUA Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 0% No Plan This objective will be evaluated and implemented by the 2016 completion date. However, for this LSSIP cycle resources will not be available. ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI 0% No Plan AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 28 Released Issue

40 AOM19.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% No Plan AOM21.1 Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Implementation of free route airspace is planned and necessary activities will be completed before the implementation date. 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Implementation of free route airspace is planned and necessary activities will be completed before the implementation date. 10% Ongoing 31/12/2017 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Implementation of free route airspace is planned for period. 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI Implementation of free route airspace is planned for period. 10% Ongoing 31/12/2017 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA No plan to implement. Not applicable in TR. % Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2011) DHMI Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2010) ANKARA Esenboga Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 29 Released Issue

41 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTAI Antalya Airport Antalya implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA Not applicable in TR. % Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2011) Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June All DHMI training and development of procedures has been completed. APO (By:12/2010) ANTALYA Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Istanbul implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA Not applicable in TR. % ASP (By:12/2011) Istanbul implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June All DHMI training and development of procedures has been completed. APO (By:12/2010) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% Not Applicable 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ANKARA Esenboga Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 30 Released Issue

42 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTAI Antalya Airport Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ANTALYA Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Istanbul implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Istanbul implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTAI Antalya Airport A draft MoU has been circulated to key stakeholders. Following the developments of Istanbul CDM studies, studies for Antalya will be focused. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2016) DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft DHMI MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders. APO (By:12/2016) ANTALYA Airport DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders 10% 10% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on. 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2016) A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have DHMI been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on. APO (By:12/2016) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on. 79% 82% Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 31 Released Issue

43 AOP10 Time Based Separation not applicable % Not Applicable LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Objective not applicable for Turkish Airports. REG (By:12/2023) DGCA Objective not applicable for Turkish Airports. % ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI Objective not applicable for Turkish Airports. % Not Applicable Not Applicable AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 % Not Applicable Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports has been published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site. ASP (By:12/2021) All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports has been DHMI published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site. APO (By:12/2021) % Not Applicable AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be evaluated. ASP (By:12/2020) The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function DHMI is planned. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be evaluated. APO (By:12/2020) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport 0% 0% No Plan No Plan AOP13 Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing 0% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport No plan for Atatürk Airport. These functions will be executed as the part of Istanbul New Airport's A SMGCS System in REG (By:12/2023) DGCA 0% ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI 0% No Plan No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 32 Released Issue

44 ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Is a functionality included as part of SMART system and was operational from 09/2008. All enroute and TMA airspace is covered. STCA implementation/procedures will be audited by the DGCA when human 30/09/2008 resources permit. ASP (By:01/2013) DHMI STCA is a functionality included as part of the Interim SMART system. The STCA is in accordance with EUROCONTROL specifications. Project SMART implementatio n 100% 30/09/2008 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % All functions implemented. 18/11/2015 ASP (By:12/2016) DHMI Mil. Authority APW level 2 has been implemented with the SMART project which was completed 11/2015. MSAW has been implemented with the SMART system. APM, in line with EUROCONTROL specifications, has been implemented at Istanbul, Esenboga, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum and Izmir airports in parallel with SMART. Military units have APM functionality but due to the dynamic nature of OAT operations this functionality is only enabled at airports that serve GAT. 100% 100% 18/11/ /12/2008 ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of /09/2016 ASP (By:12/2019) DHMI Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of Preparation of technical aspects for Antalya Airport AMAN has been finalised and tender held on in 2015 but due to lack of enough participants for tender, second tender will be realized in AMAN 100% Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring ATC12.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MONA functions has been implemented.the test to implement MTCD functions is going on. ATCO training on MTCD functions, MONA and SYSCO has been conducted. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI MONA functions has been implemented.the test to implement MTCD functions is going on. ATCO training on MTCD functions, MONA and SYSCO has been conducted. 50% 30/09/ % Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 33 Released Issue

45 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN 78% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. Adjacent ACC sectors within SMART project have been equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware. 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. We have already arranged close cooperation with BULATSA on AMAN implementation. 78% Ongoing 31/12/2017 ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Planned not applicable Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started in /02/2018 ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started in % Planned 01/02/2018 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed. ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on 06 November Certain 31/12/2019 type of the military transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. REG (By:12/2015) DGCA Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on % November /12/2015 ASP (By:03/2012) The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been DHMI developed.atc units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority Certain type of the transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. The training has been completed.all the transport type a/c with ACAS II will be equipped until end of % 55% 31/03/2012 Late 31/12/2019 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer 82% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 All functions have been in use with SMART project.safety arguments for changes will be generated. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI All functions have been in use with SMART project. Project SMART implementatio n Mil. Authority % 82% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 34 Released Issue

46 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national nonamhs network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. 31/12/2014 Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP. ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI 100% Mil. Authority The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national nonamhs network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP. 100% 31/10/ /12/2014 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Turkey will be implementing VoIP based network until /10/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority Turkey will be implementing VoIP based network until % DHMI Turkey will be implementing VoIP based network until % Not Applicable Ongoing 31/10/2020 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LTAI Antalya Airport An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. There is no final date for this to be implemented but DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future. 22/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 45% Late 22/06/2017 APO (By:12/2013) ANTALYA Airport DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 50% Late 22/06/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 35 Released Issue

47 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. There is no final date for this to be implemented but DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future. 22/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 45% APO (By:12/2013) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 50% Late 22/06/2017 Late 22/06/2017 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTAI Antalya Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of 30/04/2015 enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. Local traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of ASP (By:12/2016) SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.local DHMI traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of APO (By:12/2016) ANTALYA Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.local traffic regulations have been developed in 2014 and implemented at first half of % 100% 30/04/ /12/2014 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. 31/12/2014 There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. ASP (By:12/2016) SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the DHMI most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. APO (By:12/2016) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 36 Released Issue

48 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Some system modifications are still required and the date of 12/2017 is the planned completion date for all objectives. 31/12/2017 ASP (By:07/2014) DHMI Objective FCM01ASP08 will be in SMART phase so date of 12/2016 is the planned completion date. The other remaining objectives are ready and FSA mesages for Ankara have been tested with CFMU and approved. The software is not installed in accordance with sending proper FSA messages for Istanbul and Izmir. In addition the system is sending OAT rather than just GAT correlated flight data. All objectives will be completed by 12/2016. Project SMART implementatio n 89% Late 31/12/2017 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use. 07/07/2015 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use. Project SMART implementatio n 100% 07/07/2015 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable TR is not in the applicability area. ASP (By:10/2017) DHMI % Not Applicable FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 37 Released Issue

49 FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan The decision to implementation of interactive rolling NOP has not been taken yet. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% APO (By:12/2021) DHMI No plan 0% No Plan No Plan FCM06 Traffic complexity assessment (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. % Not Applicable FCM08 Extended Flight Plan (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable 0% Planned The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until % Planned 31/12/2021 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/ /07/2010 ASP (By:12/2012) DHMI 100% 31/07/2010 Mil. Authority All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/ % 31/07/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 38 Released Issue

50 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 9% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD implementation program. Necessary actions will be achieved in coordination with stakeholders. 31/05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) Necessary actions will be achieved in coordination with DGCA stakeholders. ASP (By:05/2018) The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD DHMI implementation program. APO (By:05/2018) DHMI The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD implementation program. 10% 10% 5% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 ITYACID Aircraft identification (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:01/2020) DHMI % Not Applicable ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. REG (By:06/2017) DGCA % Not Applicable ASP (By:06/2017) DHMI % APO (By:06/2017) Not Applicable ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. REG (By:02/2018) DGCA % ASP (By:02/2018) DHMI % MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 39 Released Issue

51 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable TR is not in the applicability area. REG (By:12/2018) DGCA % ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI % MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority % APO (By:12/2018) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ASP (By:12/2012) DHMI % MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable Not Applicable ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 The common flight message transfer protocol has been introduced with the SMART system. 31/05/2015 ASP (By:12/2014) The common flight message transfer protocol has been DHMI introduced with the SMART system. Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between Mil. Authority military/civil sites has been completed. Current interface is limited for monitoring the sellected flights. MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between military/civil sites has been completed. 100% 100% 100% 31/05/ /05/ /05/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 40 Released Issue

52 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Turkey is not an EU+ State. REG (By:02/2015) DGCA Turkey is not EU+ State. % ASP (By:02/2015) DHMI Turkey is not EU+ State. % MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Authority Turkey is not EU+ State. % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable NAV03 RNAV 1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % PRNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul and Antalya. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course. 30/11/2010 ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI 100% Mil. Authority PRNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul and Antalya. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course. 100% 30/11/ /09/2010 NAV10 APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO VNAV operations has been published. APV BAROVNAV procedures are planned. 31/12/2018 REG (By:04/2016) Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO DGCA VNAV operations has been published. ASP (By:12/2016) DHMI Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO VNAV operations has been published. APV BAROVNAV procedures for some airports have been published. The workings to design new procedures are going on. 100% 40% 31/12/2015 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 41 Released Issue

53 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions. 31/12/2016 REG (By:01/2018) DGCA Necessary actions have been handled. 100% ASP (By:12/2014) Local runway safety teams have been established for each DHMI aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions. APO (By:12/2014) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams areresponsible for runway excursions. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/ /12/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 42 Released Issue

54

55 ANNEXES Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Turkey DHMI Cihan Sahin LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA N/A N/A LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP N/A N/A LSSIP Focal Point for Airport N/A N/A LSSIP Focal Point for Military N/A N/A EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Turkey DPS/PEPR Predrag VRANJKOVIC Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 43 Released Issue

56 AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 44 Released Issue

57 Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts 1. DHMI Organisational Chart LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 45 Released Issue

58 2. DGCA Organisational chart LSSIP Year 2016 Turkey 46 Released Issue