Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SWEDEN

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SWEDEN Year 2016 Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Sweden Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/138 Date of Edition 07/04/17 LSSIP Focal Point Bengt NILSSON LSSIP Contact Person Oscar Alfaro Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations FAB Performance Plan and LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden Released Issue

6

7

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) ANSP Airports Military Authorities Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Sweden MALMÖ ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Summer STOCKHOLM ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Summer Chapter 3 National Projects LFV Swedavia Chapter 4 Regional Coordination FAB Coordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives A6 Alliance Regional Projects Chapter 5 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Sweden are: The Swedish Transport Agency, LFV, ACR, Swedavia, Swedish Armed Forces and The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority. Enhanced cooperation between DKSE FAB and NEFAB has been established in intra FAB arrangements at all levels. DECEMBER 2015 NEFRA FRA was implemented in NEFAB and DKSE FAB covering the airspace of the two FAB s abov fl 285. In June 2016 a seamless FRA was implemented between the two FAB s with exemption Norway. A seamless FRA will be fully implemented in 2017 including Norway because of a necessary system upgrade to accommodate a seamless FRA. The Swedish Armed Forces is an authority governed by the Swedish Parliament and the Swedish Government and is headed by the Supreme Commander. Military authorities are responsible for the certification of military aircraft and equipment, but have no other ATM regulatory power or ATM provisions responsibilities. The civil air navigation service provides service for military air traffic hence there is no military service provider in Sweden and the ATCsystem for ACC and TWR/APP is integrated civil and military. Coordination between civil Air Navigation Service Providers and Military authorities are ensured through LoAs. Traffic and Capacity Stockholm and Malmö ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period. Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives In general the implementation of ESSIP Objectives 1; 2% 7; 16% Ongoing Planned remains satisfactory, as shown in the table below. The exceptions are: AOP04.2 (ASMGCS Level 2) and AOP05 (ACDM) in 8; 18% 2; 4% Not Applicable ATC02.8 APW is already implemented but MSAW 7; 16% Missing Data and APM are planned for implementation in Undefined FCM03 Collaborative flight planning is now planned 20; 44% Late Stockholm Arlanda planned for implementation in 2018 No Plan and early 2017 respectively. for implementation in INF07 implementation of etod May is delayed to December 2020 according to Sweden s notification of differences to ICAO. ITYADQ on aeronautical data quality is planned for completion in ITYFMTP common flight message transfer protocol transition for each adjacent ACC will take place individual to be completed during 2017 depending on the readiness of Oslo, Bodö and Tampere. SAF11 on the prevension of runway excursions is pending completion by Swedavia which will take place in LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 1 Released Issue

12 Most of the remaining objectives are completed or planned in line with the agreed deadlines. Some objectives are in the early planning stages due to the late publication of supporting material and hence are reported as no plan. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 70% 0% 94% 75% 90% 8% 68% 8% SESAR Baseli ne PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP Baseli Baseli Baseli ne ne ne LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 2 Released Issue

13 ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 4 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 5 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 5.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Sweden is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1995 European Union 1995 EASA 2002 ICAO 1946 NATO NO ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 5 Released Issue

18 The geographical scope of this document addresses Sweden FIR. Sweden FIR is surrounded by FIR(s) of 9 States, namely Norway FIR/UIR, Kobenhavn FIR/UIR (Denmark), Rhein UIR (Germany), Warszawa FIR/UIR (Poland), Kaliningrad FIR/UIR (Russia non ECAC), Vilnius FIR/UIR (Lithuania), Riga FIR/UIR (Latvia), Tallinn FIR/UIR (Estonia) and Finland FIR/UIR. The Division Flight Level (DFL) is not applied in Sweden Airspace Classification and Organisation The classification of the airspace in Sweden is shown in the following picture: Lower limit of SUECIA CTA is FL 125 in NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area) National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Sweden are the following: Transportstyrelsen the Swedish Transport Agency; Luftfartsverket (LFV) the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) ATS Service Provider; Swedavia Swedish airport company; The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 6 Released Issue

19 ACR AB Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Sweden is the responsibility of the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Swedish Transport Agency is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rulemaking Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Organisation responsible The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency and the National Police Board Legal Basis Luftfartslagen (2010:500) Civil Aviation Act Commission Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011 Luftfartslagen (2010:500) Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen ( 2010:770) Civil Aviation Ordinance Brottsbalken (1962:700) Penal code Luftfartslagen (2010:500) Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) Civil Aviation Ordinance Commission Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 Luftfartslagen (2010:500) Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) Civil Aviation Ordinance Luftfartslagen (2010:500) Civil Aviation Act Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) Civil Aviation Ordinance Lag om luftfartsskydd (2004:1100) Civil Aviation Security Act LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 7 Released Issue

20 Accident investigation Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK) Swedish Transport Agency Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council Accident Investigation Act (1990:712) Accident Investigation Ordinance (1990:717) Ordinance providing Instructions for Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (2007:860) Accidents and incidents not covered by EU No. 996/2010 may be investigated by the Swedish Transport Agency. Civil Aviation Authority Swedish Transport Authority The Swedish Transport Agency is a government agency operating under the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The core activities within Swedish Transport Agency are: Railway, Civil Aviation, Maritime, Traffic Registry and Road Traffic. The agency is institutionally separated from the ANSPs. The current organisation chart is given in Annex B. Swedish Transport Agency website: Annual Report published: Y Transportstyrelsen Årsredovisning sredovisning/arsredovisning2016.pdf ANSP Service provided LFV Name of the ANSP: LFV Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Stateowned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute Y LFV is the only provider of ATC enroute in Sweden for both civil and military users. ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS Y Y Y Y MET Y Partly (MET OBS and MET briefing). ATCO training Y Partly (additional training). Basic training is provided by EPN (Entry Point North). Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 8 Released Issue

21 Annual Report published: Y LFV Annual Report % pdf This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. LFV s organisation chart is given in Annex B. LFV website: ACR Name of the ANSP: Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) Governance: Private company Ownership: Private owned Services provided Y/N Comments ATC enroute ATC approach ATC Aerodromes AIS CNS N Y Y N N MET Y MET OBS at aerodromes ATCO training Y Certified for local endorsement training Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N N Annual Report published: Y ACR Annual Report 2014 available through This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. ACR website: ACR s organisation chart is given in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 9 Released Issue

22 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y COOPANS FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Thales Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept. No Plan Thales Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept. No Plan ATC Units The ATC units in the Swedish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Malmö 12 1 Sweden FIR Enroute call sign are the same for Stockholm 11 3 Sweden FIR both Malmö and Stockholm Sweden Control. There are two Areas of Responsibility (AoR) in Sweden FIR served by Malmö ACC and Stockholm ACC. In Stockholm TMA the three sectors are served by one or two additional op. positions (ARR/DEP/DIR) in order to handle the traffic in an efficient and safe manner. There is also one coordinator position to support the controllers in the TMA sectors. In general, Controlled Airspace in Sweden comprises all airspace between FL 95 and FL 660, including the airspace within TMAs and CTRs. The exception is the NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area) where the CTA lower limit is FL Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 10 Released Issue

23 Airports General information There are 46 instrument airports in Sweden, of which 10 airports are operated by Swedavia. The other airports are in general owned and operated by the municipality where they are located (e.g. Norrköping and Kalmar Airports). Two military aerodromes are also used for regular civil traffic. Generally Swedish airports own the main part of the ATM related equipment and the ATS Provider is the contractor for the service. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport. Swedavia Swedavia, is a Stateowned airport company which owns, operates and develops 10 airports in Sweden. In addition to this Swedavia also owns Göteborg Säve Airport and is a minority shareholder in the company that operates the airport. Swedavia s organisation chart is given in Annex B. Swedavia website: Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Sweden (Swedish Armed Forces) is an authority governed by the Swedish Parliament and the Swedish Government and is headed by the Supreme Commander. The leadership is located at the Armed Forces Headquarters in Stockholm. The Military Authorities play, during peacetime, a limited role in managing the airspace. The civil air navigation service provides service for military air traffic hence there is no military service provider in Sweden. The legal basis for these provisions is the Swedish Civil Aviation Act (SFS 2010:500). Coordination between civil air navigation service providers and the military authorities is ensured through Letters of Agreements (LoAs). Besides the LoA there is an agreement between Swedish Armed Forces and Swedish Transport Agency concerning military demands for ATC. Military authorities are responsible for the certification of military aircraft and equipment, but have no other ATM regulatory power or ATM provision responsibilities. This is reflected in the tables below, as well as in the LSSIP Database, in which only SLoAs for Military that address the limited regulatory power and the airspace user role are kept. The Swedish Armed Forces website: LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 11 Released Issue

24 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision N/A These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Organisation of military ATS for OAT OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Additional Information: see above Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N/A GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision ESARR applicability Additional Information: See OAT comment Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N National Military AIP N National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: N Other: N N/A Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: N/A Additional information: No OAT services provided by the military. GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A Additional information: No GAT services provided by the military. Service Provision role Services Provided: OAT Services Provided: EnRoute N Provided by LFV EnRoute N Approach/TMA N Provided by LFV/ACR Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Provided by LFV/ACR Airfield/TWR/GND N GAT AIS N Provided by LFV AIS N MET Y Provided by Swedish Armed Forces SAR Y Provided by Swedish Maritime Administration MET SAR N N LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 12 Released Issue

25 TSA/TRA monitoring Y Provided by Swedish Armed Forces. Other: Provided by LFV Other: N Additional Information: LFV and ACR are the ATS service providers, LFV also provides AIS service. Additional Information: See OAT comment FIS N Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: See above. User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: These measures are applicable only for flying in Swedish airspace Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military apply FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: FUA Level 2 implemented: FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 13 Released Issue

26 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Sweden Sweden Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements Actuals IFR movements Baseline forecast IFR movements High forecast IFR movements Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 2.8% 3.3% 3.9% 3.5% 3.8% 3.1% 3.2% Sweden B 0.9% 1.2% 1.6% 2.5% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.3% 1.6% L 2.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% ECAC B 1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Sweden increased by 1.2% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive), when compared to Summer The EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast predicts an average annual growth between 0.1% and 3.5% during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.6%. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 14 Released Issue

27 2.2. MALMÖ ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays ESMMACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast Summer Low Traffic Forecast Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +1.4 % 124 (0%) No The average enroute delay per flight increased from zero in Summer 2015 to 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were for the reason Equipment (ATC). Capacity Plan +5% Achieved Comments Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Vertical split of sector 2 (at 355) OLDI extension to field 15 FPL Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Training for 3 to 2 sector groups controller ratings Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Minor updates of COOPANS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Final completion May 2017 together with full NEFRA implementation Finalised with Copenhagen and Oslo, ongoing for other neighbouring ACCs Maximum configuration: 12 (2 sector groups) Yes 4E + 4W +2L, sufficient to meet traffic demand. Summer 2016 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 121 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 110. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 15 Released Issue

28 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC 2016 baseline Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous) H 128 3% 134 5% 140 4% Ref % 128 2% 130 2% ESMM 124 L 125 1% 126 1% 127 1% Open 126 2% 128 2% 130 2% C/R 126 2% 128 2% 129 1% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Max sectors Capacity Plan Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB 12 (2 sector groups) Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 12 sectors Minor updates of COOPANS Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand 12 (2 sector groups) 12 (2 sector groups) 12 (2 sector groups) 12 (2 sector groups) Planned Annual Capacity Increase 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Reference Profile Annual % Increase 2% 2% 2% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 0.8% 1.6% 2.3% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information Slight capacity issues are expected in some elementary sectors in Malmo ACC. Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 A maximum of 9 sectors are planned to be regularly operated during summer 2017, though up to 12 sectors can be opened if required. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 16 Released Issue

29 ESMMACC Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook Malmö ACC is expected to experience a slight capacity gap during the planning period. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 17 Released Issue

30 2.3. STOCKHOLM ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays ESOSACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast Summer Low Traffic Forecast Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +1.4 % 112 (0%) No The average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.02 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were for the reason Equipment (ATC) and 16% for Weather. Capacity Plan +2 % Achieved Comments Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Airport CDM at ESSA (Jan 2016) No Expected by 2017 Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Training for 3 to 2 sector groups controller ratings Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Minor updates of COOPANS Maximum configuration: 6 (N) + 5 (S) Summer 2016 performance assessment Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Final completion May 2017 together with full NEFRA implementation 10 sectors (2 (M) + 2(N) + 4 (S)), sufficient to meet traffic demand The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 88 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 79. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 18 Released Issue

31 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC 2016 baseline Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous) H 112 0% 112 0% 112 0% Ref % 112 0% 112 0% ESOS 112 L 112 0% 112 0% 112 0% Open 112 0% 112 0% 112 0% C/R 112 0% 112 0% 112 0% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Minor updates of COOPANS Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Max sectors 6 (N) + 5 (S) 6 (N) + 5 (S) 6 (N) + 5 (S) 6 (N) + 5 (S) 6 (N) + 5 (S) Planned Annual Capacity Increase 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 0.9% 1.8% 2.7% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference Value (min) N/A N/A Additional information Sector 2 might reach its capacity limits during peak periods depending on the actual evolution of traffic demand and its complexity Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 Based on the expected traffic evolution in summer 2017, a maximum of 9 sectors should be sufficient to handle traffic demand. However, as stated in the above plan, up to 11 sectors can be opened if required. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 19 Released Issue

32 ESOSACC Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook Stockholm ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 20 Released Issue

33 Chapter 3 National Projects 3.1. LFV ADQ Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: The project started in 2012 with the initial planning phase. During ADQ awareness campaigns has been performed AIS internal processes and routines have been adapted to meet the ADQ requirements minor system modifications have been implemented Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with data originators (such as airports and other parties according to chapter 2.2 in the ADQ Implementing Rule) have been signed by a majority of the stakeholders. In 2015 a procurement for an ADQ compliant AIM production system has been initiated.the procurement process will continue into Tender evaluation late 2016 and early Implementation late 2017early Operational mid 2018 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: This project aims to adapt the organisation as national AIS and as originator of flight information to the requirements of the ADQ Implementing Rule. This include establishing complete traceability of each piece of information from the moment of creation, up through the value chain until the point the information is published from the AIS. The main added value is significant improvements in quality control and in the long term cost efficiency and safety. ADQ is seen as an important enabler to future ATM concepts. L3: ITYADQ Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: improved consistency, reliability and integrity. avoidance of repair, correction and rework activities at data provider and data user level LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 21 Released Issue

34 Implementation of VoIP (2015_320_AF3) Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Ongoing. Upgrade of VCS and Backup VCCS in progress. Network updates also in progress Enabling dynamic sectorisation and therefore flexible AirSpace Management within LFV through the implementation of a VoIP compliant system Developing and implementing VoIP capable endsystems within LFV Upgrading the VCS within Arlanda's terminal and terminal control centre and of backup VCCS to support VoIP Enabling the implementation of a VoIP compliant system via the implementation of an IP based network L3: COM11 NA Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_320_AF3; Family Implementing redundant WAN (2015_098_AF5) Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Ongoing. Network services for 2nd WAN delivered and endnetwork equipment under implementation Network services for 3d WAN partly delivered and endnetwork equipment at ATCC Stockholm commissioned Ensuring SWIM capability within LFV's communication systems Ensuring redundancy in LFV's communication systems via the implementation of additional WAN services Commissioning Second national WAN Commissioning Third national WAN INF08.1; INF08.2 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_098_AF5; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 22 Released Issue

35 Lower Airspace optimization (104AF1) Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/02/ /06/2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Ongoing Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: General information: This project is primarily a prestudy, and therefore no major changes will happen. This project aims to contribute to the PCP AF1 Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs, through the development and implementation of short term improvements for Stockholm TMA and the development of a roadmap for long term implementation. A complete set up of requirements for the design and use of the future terminal airspace for Stockholm A baseline and a defined long term forecast Well defined KPIs for the baseline and the future Implementation of short term measures within Stockholm TMA A long term implementation Plan (What, When) with the main purpose to: Increase the general efficiency of operations in lower airspace (more efficient route structure, better use of the available space, better planning of movements) Specifically increase efficiency by the removal of suboptimal solutions currently required to ensure safety, e.g. during missed approaches Reduce environmental impact L3: ATC15.2, NAV03 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 104AF1; Family The environment is expected to have a small positive effect when the AMAN for ESSB will be implemented due to better traffic sequencing (planned for implementation week ). The cost efficiency is expected to have a small positive effect for the airliners when the AMAN for ESSB will be implemented due to better traffic sequencing, which will reduce holding and reduce of speed in the upper airspace when needed (planned for implementation week ). LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 23 Released Issue

36 MUS Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Procurement done. This project is the final step for Sweden to be fully compliant with ITYSPI. The project will procure at least 5 MSSR Mode S for installation at existing radar sites. L3: ITYSPI Environment: Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: duplicate coverage and contingency improvement. Safety improvement also through Mode S information. Capacity: Natural increase with implementation of Mode S. Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: The cheapest way to get second layer of coverage independent of layer1. More efficient Flight Planning (2015_118_AF5) Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/10/ /09/2019 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Implementing an integration platform within Sweden, allowing for more efficient flight planning Ensuring the necessary technology is in place for LFV's transition to SWIM Services Supporting the streamlining of LFV AIM function and the introduction of ADQ Establishing the strategic ability to effectively utilize information in both operational and administrative systems Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_118_AF5; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 24 Released Issue

37 SUPS Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Partly operational. Will be complete before end Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Through this project, LFV will deploy separate WAM systems in the Stockholm TMA and in a large part of the northern area of the country and deployment of additional systems providing nationwide coverage. The goal of the SUPS program is comprehensive coverage of the LFV area of responsibility. SUPS WAM will support Mode A/C, Mode S, and ADSB 1090 ES. The system will provide surveillance from low levels in the Stockholm TMA up to 66,000 ft according to coverage requirements. Note. LFV is completed regarding the existing surveillance infrastructure. Projects SUPS will also be in line with ITYSPI. L3: ITYSPI Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: duplicate coverage and removal of NRA, deployment of surveillance solutions in non radar areas. potential for capacity increase through deployment of surveillance solutions in areas where currently procedural separation is applied. enable for future reduction of costs for technical operation and facilitate the deployment of the most efficient surveillance solution. VHF Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Planned installation Final phase of radio replacements. Good progress Replacement of older VHF radio equipment to enable 8,33 channel separation in mid and northern parts of Sweden. L3: ITYAGVCS2 CTEC5 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: By satisfying the demand for new frequency assignments in the VHF band. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 25 Released Issue

38 3.2. Swedavia ACDM Optimization Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Objectives: Although Airport Collaborative Decision Making Optimization Project covers several areas that can be attributed to basic ACDM the focus is primarily on optimization of Information Sharing which is one of the cornerstones in the milestone approach process described in the A CDM Manual. The detailed purpose of the project is to facilitate cooperation between different organizations while raising the quality of information dissemination at Stockholm Arlanda Airport and at Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC). The distribution of information will only be recorded once Online information will replace the estimated values. The quality of operational flight data will increase by making data available online Improve the quality of "Departure Progress Information" to NMOC The main steps are: Development and introduction a WEBinterface. Development and introduction of an Flight Operational APP Develop and introduce a CDM portal System integration Introducing Flight information at GATE and STAND L3: AOP05 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 136AF2; Family ASMGCS Level 2 implementation (2015_291_AF2) Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Upgrading ASMGCS for Level 2 incl training and changes of procedures Upgrading MLAT to fulfill requirements for Level 2 Identifying potential need for additional sensors to reduce false incursion alarms Installed and fully operational Solid State SMR L3: AOP04.2 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_291_AF2; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 26 Released Issue

39 ADQ implementation Stockholm Arlanda (2015_288_AF5) Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2017 Status: Description: Stockholm Arlanda Airport ADQ compliant Implementing Quality control Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution L3: ITYADQ Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_288_AF5; Family DMAN Stockholm Arlanda Airport (2015_292_AF2) Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/04/ /06/2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Definition of operational conditions Development of algorithms and interfaces towards other systems Flight safety assessment and operational implementation L3: AOP13 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_292_AF2; Family Enhancement of Airport Safety Nets at Stockholm Arlanda Airport Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/08/ /06/2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Objectives: Improve the performance of the surveillance function of the A SMGCS system at Stockholm Arlanda airport, in order to enable to provision of highquality, reliable surveillance data for integration in the advanced Airport Safety Nets function. Keep the implementation of the surveillance function upto date to enable future expansion of the ASMGCS system, to enable future functionality of the ASMGCS system and to ensure interoperability with new components in the future. The main steps to reach this objective are: Upgrade of SMR stations Enhancement of Airport Safety Nets Operational validation and introduction of Airport Safety Nets L3: AOP12 Name/Code in RP2 Project in DP2016: Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 137AF2a; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 27 Released Issue

40 Implementation of OTP (2015_294_AF2) Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Establishing a robust operational environment needed for PCP implementation Reducing/eliminating IT blocking points and establish reduced resolution time of IT incidents Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_294_AF2; Family Initial AOP (2015_290_AF2) Organisation(s): SWEDAVIA (SE) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/10/ /12/2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Creation of an Airport Operation Plan based initially updated with the latest information regarding KPI in airport processes, that can be shared among all stakeholders Ability to evaluate and then update the airport plan using different scenarios (known as Demand Capacity Balancing, DCB) to optimise it. L3: AOP11 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_290_AF2; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 28 Released Issue

41 Chapter 4 Regional Coordination 4.1. FAB Coordination DKSE FAB general: In accordance with the reply to the Commission in 2014 and the ministry declaration 2013 enhanced cooperation between DKSE FAB and NEFAB has been established in intra FAB arrangements at all levels. Free route airspace has been implemented in the whole area facilitated by the NSA. Full seamless FRA has been in place since June 2016 with the exemptions of the Norwegian airspace that will join the seamless FRA in May 2017.The MET consortium NAMCon has continued their cooperation in accordance to agreed plans. FAB Board: DKSE FAB Board has had 2 meetings in The military authorities in Sweden and Denmark have participated as well as the national enroute ATSPs with good experience. The main focuses have been to monitor the development of the FAB. Consultation with stakeholders have been done on 8 th December 2016 regarding FAB developments, performance and costefficiency. Airspace: FAB Board has decided to address the work with a national strategy in 2016 in order to if possible merge a FAB strategy in Civil military cooperation The civil military coordination group activated 2015 has in 2016 not had any meetings due to unforeseen circumstances. New meeting dates have been set up for Performance/Charging: In January 2015 the Commission adopted the DanishSwedish performance targets for RP 2 and agreed that the targets in the DanishSwedish Performance Plan are consistent with the union wide performance targets for RP2 The ToR for the High level Group has been revised to include a wider group of stakeholders in the consultation process and a consultation meeting took place the 8 th of December LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 29 Released Issue

42 Oversight: The integrated DanishSwedish enroute ANSP, NUAC HB, was certified as ATSP as of 1 July 2012 and as a Training Organization for personnel in air traffic services as of 20 July Ongoing oversight of NUAC HB is done by the joint oversight team. On site oversight of NUAC HB, ATCC Copenhagen and NUAC training organization has been performed in accordance with the annual oversight plan..a revision of the oversight plan will be sent for approval by the FAB Boardspring The scope of common oversight has been extended to include Training organizations and MET Providers that provide services cross border. New ToR for oversight group has been adopted in Rule Harmonisation: MET WT Report is delayed until July 2017 NPA (A+B) Requirements for ATS Published on 16 September 2016 will be coordinated, completed febr Deadline for reply is 28 February Ongoing dialogue in RHG Dialogue and decision has been taken not to apply Amd. 7 to ICAO PANSATM, as the amendment will be applied through Requirements for ATS (above). LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 30 Released Issue

43 Danish ANSP will implement AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM by Swedish ANSP has no operational need to implement this function Both DKSE FAB ANSPs have completed COTR implementation The automatic exchange of the AFP messages will be implemented in 2016 (SE) and 2017(DK) MONA function is operational in both ANSPs, and OLDI will be implemented by 2018 Joint FAB project: FRA implemented for and above FL285 in DKSE FAB Basic AMAN implemented at Copenhagen and Stockholm Arlanda Airports. Extended AMAN implemented in both States. PRNAV implemented in both SE and DK APV procedures implemented in SE, published in AIP. In DK, PBN IR is awaited, subject to local decisions. ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 implemented at Copenhagen Airport. Stockholm Arlanda airport implemented Level 1 (level 2 to be implemented in 2017). ACDM will be implemented at Copenhagen Airport in 2017 and Stockholm Arlanda in 2016 Stockholm Arlanda and Copenhagen Airports are included in list of airports for mandatory implementation of PCP AF2 functionalities Migration to AMHS completed FMTP implemented by both ANSPs Define a common WAM initiative project to provide seamless coverage in FAB AGDL implementation to be completed in 2018 VCCS delivered by Frequentis under common procurement LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 31 Released Issue

44 A joint SMS is under development shared between Naviair, LFV & NUAC HB. The arrival delay for ARN & CPH is close to zero. RP2 targets for AFTM delays will be met. Within the DKSE FAB we have established a Joint Programme Office with the purpose to identify, plan & realize joint harmonization initiatives that will streamline & harmonize technical/operational implementation of joint development & implementation plans. The objective is to achieve the capacity, safety, efficiency, economic performance and environmental benefits that the European Commission desires to result from the implementation of the Single European Sky. DK/Naviair have been able to reduce enroute charges for 2015 (11,3%) & 2016 ( 2,3%). Sweden have been able to reduce enroute charges four years in a row now, 2015 (4.6%) and 2016 (4.9%), LFV has contributed to this. NEFRA was implemented in 2015, and this will expand into Borealis FRA covering Ireland, UK, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and DKSE FAB (Sweden and Denmark). A number of initiatives have been taken to ensure airspace development from a holistic perspective. Being part of NEFRA (phase 1) the flight can be planned at the discretion of the AO covering multiple FIRs. ARN makes CDO, while CPH is focused on using CCO. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 32 Released Issue

45 4.2. FAB Projects DKSE FAB Aeronautical Data Quality (ADQ) (2015_099_AF5) Organisation(s): LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Type of project: FAB Schedule: 01/03/ /09/2018 Status: Ongoing Description: Migrating LFV s and Naviair s aeronautical data to support AIXM 5.1 Ensuring compliance to ICAO Annex 15 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 Enabling the first set of aeronautical SWIM compliant services; Seeking efficiency improvements within DKSE FAB inline with SES objectives Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: L3: ITYADQ Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 2015_099_AF5; Family Joint Programme Office (JPO) Organisation(s): LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: In progress in accordance to plan The purpose of this project is to identify, plan & realize joint harmonization initiatives that will streamline & harmonize technical/operational implementation of joint development & implementation plans. Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: Costefficiency: ++ Lean implementation of projects in DKSE FAB Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 33 Released Issue

46 4.3. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives NUAC Nordic Unified Air traffic Control The DanishSwedish FAB (DKSE FAB) was declared in The same year LFV and Naviair established the jointly owned NUAC HB Company. As from 1 July 2012 NUAC HB runs the operation of LFV s and Naviair s three ATCCs in Copenhagen, Malmö and Stockholm and handles all enroute traffic in DKSE FAB on behalf of LFV and Naviair. The prime objective of NUAC HB is to provide the most safe, efficient and inexpensive operation of air traffic in DKSE FAB. To achieve this the NUAC HB company has jointly with LFV and Naviair initiated the implementation of a number of efficiency improvement initiatives, including the development of Free Route Airspace. These initiatives will in the long term reduce airlines costs both related to ATM and fuel consumption. In addition the initiatives will have a positive effect on the environment and the climate by reducing the companies CO 2 and NO X emissions. A total of around 750 employees are seconded from LFV and Naviair to NUAC HB. The ATCCs and ATMsystems remain LFV and Naviair property as they are on secondment to NUAC. The coownership of NUAC HB makes LFV and Naviair well equipped to meet future requirements and expectations in the industry. EPN Entry Point North Entry Point North (EPN), jointly owned by AVINOR, LFV, Naviair and IAA. EPN was established in 2006 by AVINOR, LFV and Naviair and was the first transnational supplier of ATM education and training. In 2013 IAA became a joint owner of the academy. EPN has its headquarters in Sturup, Sweden, and is authorised by the Swedish authorities. EPN offers initial, maintenance and development training and was created with the prime purpose to deliver standardised education of ab initios and controllers in accordance with best practices and regulations from ICAO and EC. In 2011 EPN broadened its range of courses to include the training of technical personnel engaged in the maintenance of ATM equipment known as Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel (ATSEP). In addition to training of the owners own personnel, EPN offers education on a commercial basis. This has led to the establishment of Entry Point Central (EPC) ATS training academy in Budapest, which is a subsidiary owned by EPN and Hungaro Control. The academy provides courses based on EPN s training programme and methods The COOPANS alliance The COOPANS (Cooperation between ANSPs) alliance is established between the five ANSPs IAA (Ireland), LFV (Sweden), Naviair (Denmark), Austro Control (Austria) and Croatia Control (Croatia) with Thales as supplier and partner. The overarching purpose of the alliance is to reduce costs and reduce risks related to investments and operation for each of the five ANSPs through common training, maintenance contracts etc. This is achieved through a harmonised approach where the ATM systems are upgraded to a common COOPANS ATM system. The system utilises joint software and harmonised technical and operational procedures in order to limit specific national functionalities. The organisation within COOPANS Alliance has been adapted to cover all the activities the Alliance is involved in. It will now cover the activities from SESAR to Realisation, including strategic planning. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 34 Released Issue

47 4.4. A6 Alliance The A6 Alliance was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership. The A6 Alliance was formalized in 2011 through a Memorandum of Understanding. Members of the A6 Alliance are: ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP DFS, the German ANSP DSNA, the French ANSP ENAV, the Italian ANSP NATS, the British ANSP COOPANS Alliance, Cooperation of ANSP s from Austria, Croatia, Ireland, Sweden and Denmark; PANSA, the Polish ANSP B4 Consortium, Cooperation of ANSP s from Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Lithuania The A6 Alliance furthermore has established an agreement with Skyguide, the Swiss ANSP, in order to authorise exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D. The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonised strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organise cooperation at expert level. The A6 Alliance is an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015). The A6 Alliance leads Europeanwide technical activities validated and cofunded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Recently INEA awarded close to 543 million to A6 members implementation projects as part of 2014 and 2015 Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) calls within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project PCP). A6 Alliance has developed a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. NORACON North European and Austrian consortium NORACON, the North European and Austrian Consortium is led by LFV and consists of Swedavia (former LFV airports) and eight European ANSPs: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 35 Released Issue

48 The NORACON consortium is a formal member of the SJU during SESAR1. The purpose of the NORACON consortium is to ensure influence on the technical development in Europe, including protecting the partners longterm strategic investments in the perspective of SESAR. Within the SJU, NORACON is in lead of WP8, Information Management, and is making significant contributions to both operational and technical areas. The Borealis alliance The members of Borealis alliance are AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden), LGS (Latvia), NATS (UK) and Naviair (Denmark). The alliance is based on an Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) signed on the 20th of June The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. By the establishment of the Borealis alliance the cooperation agreement known as NEAP (North European ANS Providers) was formally ended. Borealis has two objectives, the first relates to delivering value through business cooperation between the Members, the second to being collectively more influential by developing and expressing a joint position on common issues. These objectives will be achieved by developing and delivering a joint Borealis business plan. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 36 Released Issue

49 4.5. Regional Projects Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B) Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 15/02/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: On going Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Type of project: Regional Project Objective: Implementing FRA, which is a key element of ATM Functionality (AF3) Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route, across three functional airspace blocks (FABs). Namely, NEFAB, DKSE FAB and UKIRE FAB The implementation will support the achievement of the flight efficiency targets for RP2 of the performance scheme. The Performance Review Body (PRB) and the Network Manager (NM) has highlighted the need to pay particular attention to interfaces between the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) and the deployment of FRA initiatives to achieve these targets Reducing fuel consumption by allowing users to flightplan their preferred trajectories Introducing seamless integration among ACCs Reducing the effort on ATCOs by allowing a more costeffective approach, while keeping the highest level of safety The implementation also includes EANS (Estonia) who are applying for funding their contribution towards implementation through the Cohesion fund Contributors: Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, Irish Aviation Authority, LFV, NATS, Naviair, Ryanair, LGS, EANS, Isavia The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 9 partners (Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, IAA, LFV,LGS, NATS, Naviair, EANS, Isavia, Ryanair) and is split into a cohesion and noncohesion part. L3: AOM21.2 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 37 Released Issue

50 Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 01/01/ /05/2017 Status: Technically done. Implementation 25th May Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Type of project: Regional The Borealis Alliance will implement Free Route Airspace (FRA) within the NEFRA region that consists of the two functional airspace blocks (FAB) of DenmarkSweden and North European Functional Airspace Block (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway). Free Route Airspace is a key element of the Pilot Common Project and NEFRA is a crossborder inter FAB region of Europe. This project will be broken down into airspace design, fast and realtime simulations and finally implementation. A second part is planned at a later stage to cover also the airspaces of UK, Ireland and Iceland. L3: AOM21.2 Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: Project 020AF3; Family Negligible effect on Safety Decreased load on environment as a result of shorter flight and shorter flight planned distances. Negligible effect on Capacity Increased cost efficiency for airspace users as more direct routes can be planned LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 38 Released Issue

51 COOPANS and DSNA ATM System Convergence Programme (CODACAS), phase 1b Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), DSNA (FR), IAA (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Ongoing ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Type of project: Regional Establish a joint test platform in order to support the harmonized development of the COOPANS & DSNA ATM system Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: Interoperability ANS productivity: reduced enroute and TMA costs per flight Operational efficiency for airspace users: reduced fuel burn and flight time Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSP including support of free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) (2015_207_AF3_A; 2015_207_AF3_B) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references Ongoing ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Type of project: Regional Harmonisation of ATM platforms in 5 ANSP's to gain economy of scale for PCP implementations Platform support for AF3 Free Route Airspace Preparation of other PCP related implementations Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_207_AF3_A and 2015_207_AF3_B; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 39 Released Issue

52 NEFRA Organisation(s): Schedule: End 2015 Status: AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK). Type of project: Regional Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: In November 2015 NEFAB implemented two different FRA areas, one covering the airspace of Norway and one covering the airspace of FinlandEstoniaLatvia. In June 2016 these two areas will be joined with the existing DKSE FAB FRA and form a common FRA covering the airspaces of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Estonia and Latvia (i.e. DKSE FAB and NEFAB) above FL 285. North European Free Route Airspace for Denmark, Sweden, Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway. Extension of the FRA currently existing in the DKSE FAB to include Nordic Airspace above FL285. (DKSE FAB & NEFAB) L3: AOM21.2, FCM03 Name/Code in RP2 Name/Code in DP2016: Negligible effect on Safety Decreased load on environment as a result of shorter flight and shorter flight planned distances. Negligible effect on Capacity Increased cost efficiency for airspace users as more direct routes can be planned LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 40 Released Issue

53 NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS (Part A: General Call; Part B: Cohesion Call) (2015_174_AF5_A; 2015_174_AF5_B) Organisation(s): LFV (SE) Type of project: Regional Schedule: 15/02/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references Ongoing ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Project Objective: Deploying an Internet Protocol (version6 and version4) Network Service necessary to support the SWIM Exchanges Deploying within the ICAO EUR/NAT Region a unique Pan European Network Service to support the information exchange needs of all ATM stakeholders, ANSPs (almost users of PENS1) but also Airports, Airspace Users, MET Providers and Military Replacing PENS1 terminating in June 2018 Contributors: Austro Control, Avinor Flysikring AS, DSNA, ENAIRE, Finavia, Irish Aviation Authority, LFV, LVNL, MNAV, NATS, Naviair, SMATSA, NAV Portugal, Aéroports de Paris, Belgocontrol, Slovenia Control, BULATSA, ROMATSA The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 19 partners (EUROCONTROL, AUSTROCONTROL (Austria), Avinor Flysikring AS (Norway), DSNA (France), ENAIRE (Spain), FINAVIA (Finland), IAA (Ireland), LFV (Sweeden), LVNL (The Netherlands), MNAV (Macedonia), NATS (UK), NAVAIR(Denmark), SMATSA (Serbia & Montenegro), NAV Portugal (Portugal), Aéroports de Paris (France), Belgocontrol (Belgium), SLOVENIA CONTROL (Slovenia), BULATSA (Bulgaria), ROMATSA (Romania)) and is split into a cohesion and noncohesion part. COM12 Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_174_AF5_A and 2015_174_AF5_B; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 41 Released Issue

54 Subregional SWIM MET deployment to support NEFRA (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A) Organisation(s): Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE) Schedule: 01/11/ /12/2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Project Leader: Finnish Meteorological Institute Type of project: Regional Contributors: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 3 partners (Finnish Meteorological Institute, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute) and is split into a cohesion and noncohesion part. Project Objective Implementation of a flexible and costeffective interoperable production and exchange of MET information for Northern European MET service providers compliant with the SWIM data formats and interfaces Demonstration and verification of costeffective multistakeholder operational deployment of SWIM for MET information Implementation and verification covering TAFs and METARs for civil airports within the geographical scope of the project, AIRMETs and SIGMETs for Sondrestrom, Kobenhavn, Sweden and Finland (part A) and Tallinn and Riga FIRs (part B), METARs and AUTO METARs for civil airports and Significant Weather Charts (SWCs) for Sweden and Finland (part A) and Estonia and Latvia (part B) covering the Scandinavian footprint Development and implementation of a central database and web services for the exchange of MET information in SWIM compliant format and easy availability to users Development and implementation of common user interfaces to facilitate the generation and monitoring of harmonised and coherent MET information Embedding and implementing the systems/applications in the operational production and monitoring chains of all project contributors INF08.1 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_025_AF5_A and 2015_025_AF5_B; Family LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 42 Released Issue

55 Chapter 5 Implementation Objectives Progress 5.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 2% Ongoing 7; 16% Planned 20; 44% Late 8; 18% No Plan Not Applicable 7; 16% Missing Data 2; 4% Undefined Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 35% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 STAM Phase 2 FCM05 FCM06 Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < n/a n/a 100% 100% 82% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 43 Released Issue

56 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 88% < AOM21.1 Direct Routing AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets 100% 100% 62% 100% ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100% Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace 100% Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer 100% 73% 100% 0% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations ITYCOTR NAV03 RNAV 1 NAV10 ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport 100% ESMS Malmö Airport 100% ESNU Umeå Airport 100% ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100% Groundground automated coordination 100% processes APV procedures 100% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 44 Released Issue

57 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 56% < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100% AOP05 AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 AOP13 ENV02 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 40% Airport CDM ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 95% TimeBased Separation ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0% Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 25% Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0% Collaborative Environmental Management n/a SAF11 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100% Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions 88% LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 45 Released Issue

58 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 57% COM10 COM11 FCM08 INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability < % 72% 88% 52% 40% 41% 3% 100% 93% 33% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 46 Released Issue

59 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 100% B0SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) 70% 100% B0FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration 82% 100% B0DATM B0ACAS Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 76% 100% 100% B0SNET B0ACDM B0RSEQ Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 81% 100% 95% 100% 100% B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 100% B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 91% 93% 100% 100% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 47 Released Issue

60 5.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable MultiN Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Handling of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is harmonised. 30/11/2012 REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable SWE Transport Agency National legislation is published and updated in accordance with EUROAT. ASP (By:12/2018) Common principles for EUROAT according to Swedish LFV regulation are applied. Comply to common principles rules and procedures for OAT ACR handling and OAT/GAT interface according to national legislation. MIL (By:12/2018) Military aeronautical information is migrated to EAD. Mil. Authority has no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Mil. Authority Regulatory power, so the ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'. 100% 100% 100% 100% 31/03/ /11/ /11/ /12/2010 AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support AFUA Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 % Not Applicable Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 LFV Advanced Airspace management is implemented, however without an automated ASM Support System, because no operational need found for it. For the military, flight plans have been amended according to notified dynamic airspace changes, but will not adapt to use ADR. ASP (By:12/2018) LFV Advanced Airspace management is implemented, however Not Applicable without an automated ASM Support System, because no LFV operational need found for it. % For the military, flight plans have been amended according to notified dynamic airspace changes, but will not adapt to use ADR. ACR ACR provides only TWR/APPservices, without advanced airspace management. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 48 Released Issue

61 AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan yet ASP (By:12/2021) LFV 0% No Plan AOM19.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan yet B2B is available in the LARA system but we are not there yet and there is no operational need at the moment. ASP (By:12/2021) LFV 0% No Plan AOM21.1 Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Free route airspace implemented 31/10/ /10/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) LFV Free route airspace implemented 31/10/ % 31/10/2013 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Free Route Airspace implemented. 31/10/2013 ASP (By:12/2021) LFV ACR Free Route Airspace implemented and final acceptance received from Swedish Transport Agency. ACR provides only TWR/APPservices, without advanced airspace management. Borealis FRA Implementati on (Part 2) / Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) / NEFRA 100% % 31/10/2013 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 49 Released Issue

62 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level1 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of transponders is completed. 31/12/2011 REG (By:12/2010) SWE Transport Agency Regulation is updated and requires all aircraft operating into airports equipped with ASMGCS Level 1 having equipment in accordance with the requirements of ICAO. Airport Manager is mandated to issue Local Safety Regulation applicable to the aerodrome operation. ASP (By:12/2011) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System LFV (ASMGCS) Level I implemented. APO (By:12/2010) Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of SWEDAVIA transponders to support existing SMR is completed. Training and installation of equipment are completed. 100% 100% 100% 31/07/ /04/ /12/2011 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level 2 40% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport ASMGS level 2 is installed and is planned to be operational /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2017) LFV Training and operational procedures will be implemented. 40% Late 31/12/2018 APO (By:12/2017) ASMGCS Late SWEDAVIA ASMGS level 2 is planned to be operational Level 2 40% implementati 31/12/2018 on AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport Validation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is completed, will be operational from February /02/2017 ASP (By:12/2016) This Stockholm CDM project is in collaboration between EEC LFV and StockholmArlanda aeronautical platform represented by 100% LFV, Swedavia, Aircraft Operators SAS, Britannia, Skyways and 31/12/2016 a number of Handling Agents. APO (By:12/2016) SWEDAVIA Implementation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is partly completed, final operational test are conducted. ACDM Optimization 90% Late 20/02/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 50 Released Issue

63 AOP10 Time Based Separation not applicable % Not Applicable ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Stockholm Arlanda Airport is not in the applicability area of this objective REG (By:12/2023) SWE Transport % Agency Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2023) LFV % Not Applicable AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 0% Planned Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Initial Airport Operational Plan according to SESAR deployment programme 2015.The planning phase of this project is ongoing. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) LFV Planning is ongoing. 0% Planned 31/12/2021 APO (By:12/2021) Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Initial Planned SWEDAVIA Airport Operational Plan according to SESAR deployment Initial AOP 0% programme 2015.The planning phase of this project is ongoing. 31/12/2021 AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport Depending on implementation of ASMGCS level 2 date 31/12/ /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) LFV 33% No Plan APO (By:12/2020) SWEDAVIA Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring, according to IR 716/2014, will be planned in the near future. Enhancement of Airport Safety Nets at Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0% Planned 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 51 Released Issue

64 AOP13 Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing 0% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport No plan yet. REG (By:12/2023) SWE Transport No plan yet. 0% Agency No Plan ASP (By:12/2023) LFV No plan yet. 0% No Plan ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. All is completed. 30/11/2012 National regulations for the use of STCA are in force since 1 January 2005 but the choice of the version and specifications is left to ANSP. ASP (By:01/2013) LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to ACR all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on 100% EUROCAT 2000E. 30/11/2012 LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to LFV all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on 100% EUROCAT 2000E. 30/11/2012 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 APW is already implemented in Topsky and will be compared to EUROCONTROL Specification on APW. MSAW is already implemented, but is not operationally used. The existing MSAW function will be compared to the approved EUROCONTROL Specification on MSAW. 31/12/2018 Waiting approved Eurocontrol specification on APM as the basis for implementation of APM. ASP (By:12/2016) APW is already implemented in Topsky. The existing APW Late function will be compared to the approved EUROCONTROL specification on APW to determine any delta. MSAW is already implemented in Topsky but is not LFV operationally used. The existing MSAW function will be 62% compared to the approved EUROCONTROL Specification on 31/12/2018 MSAW to determine any delta and possible modifications or implementation in other systems in use. The EUROCONTROL Specification will be used as basis for planning of any implementation of APM in systems. The initiative to implement safety nets at the airports rests ACR with AOP. ACR will support and participate when/if the % functionality is implemented. Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 52 Released Issue

65 AMAN tools and procedures ATC07.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the MAESTRO sequencing function which is integrated in the EUROCAT2000E. ASP (By:12/2019) ACR Basic AMAN functionality is ATCCrelated. % LFV Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the MAESTRO sequencing function which is integrated in the EUROCAT2000E. 100% 100% 31/03/2005 Not Applicable 31/03/2005 ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 LFV operates MTCD function in Malmö and Stockholm ACCs. 31/03/2005 ASP (By:12/2021) ACR % Not Applicable LFV 100% 31/03/2005 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AMAN is implemented and approved as a part of Eurocat. 31/12/2008 ASP (By:12/2017) ACR Basic AMAN functionality is ATCCrelated, ACR performs only Not Applicable % TWR/APP services. LFV AMAN is implemented and in operational use in Stockholm and Malmö ACC. 100% 31/12/2008 ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 No plan yet. ASP (By:12/2023) Lower LFV No plan yet. Airspace 0% optimization No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 53 Released Issue

66 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Approved operators are registered in authority registrysystem after approved application. LFV has a monitoring system in place and all concerned personnel have been trained. All transport A/C are 31/12/2015 equipped with TCAS 7.1. REG (By:12/2015) SWE Transport Agency Aircraft operators informed via published authority documents and information channels. Information containing applicable regulations and how to make complete airworthiness and operational/training updating and application for ACAS 7.1 Approved operators are registered in authority registrysystem after approved application. ASP (By:03/2012) Monitoring system is in place and all concerned personnel LFV have been trained. The functionality is ATCCrelated and therefore outside the ACR scope of ACR services. MIL (By:12/2015) 100% 100% % Mil. Authority All transport A/C are equipped with TCAS % 31/10/ /12/2011 Not Applicable 31/12/2015 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer 73% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer will be implemented according to plan. NSA has accepted and communicated proposed changes to ANSP. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) ACR The functionality is ATCCrelated and therefore outside the Not Applicable % scope of ACR services. LFV Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer will be implemented according to plan. 73% Ongoing 31/12/2018 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and gateway facilities to AFTN will be implemented during /06/2017 ASP (By:12/2018) LFV AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and Ongoing 88% gateway facilities to AFTN is implemented. 30/06/2017 ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 54 Released Issue

67 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and TDMbased) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. 31/12/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) LFV LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and TDMbased) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. Implementati on of VoIP ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. % 40% Ongoing 31/12/2020 Not Applicable ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2013) LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at 100% Landvetter / Göteborg. 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2013) SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg. 100% 31/10/2010 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 ESMS Malmö Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at MalmöSturup. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2013) LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at 100% MalmöSturup. 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2013) SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at MalmöSturup. 100% 31/10/2010 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 ESNU Umeå Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2013) LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2013) SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% 31/10/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 55 Released Issue

68 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at StockholmArlanda. 30/09/2009 ASP (By:12/2013) LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at 100% StockholmArlanda. 30/09/2009 APO (By:12/2013) CDA procedures have been introduced and published at SWEDAVIA StockholmArlanda. The availability of CDA is reduced during 100% peak hours. 30/09/2009 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 ESSA Stockholm Arlanda Airport A number of projects and activities are ongoing taking care of mutual interests in reducing environmental impact on neighbouring communities. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2016) Stockholm Arlanda Airport (Swedavia) and LFV have since long a developed methodology and tools are in place. Since 2006, LFV there is a project running at Arlanda Airport on environment 100% activities, developed together with the airport's neighbours. 31/10/2010 LFV has an integrated quality management system (ISO 9001 and ISO 14001). APO (By:12/2016) A number of projects and activities are ongoing taking care of SWEDAVIA mutual interests in reducing environmental impact on 100% neighbouring communities. 30/09/2009 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is implemented except DPI pending decision at Stockholm Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation 31/10/2009 ASP (By:07/2014) Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is LFV implemented except DPI pending decision at Stockholm 100% Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation 31/10/2009 ACR ACR Comply only to local (ATSunit) ATFM management. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 56 Released Issue

69 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Sweden intends to fulfil all actions required to support the collaborative flight planning. All remaining actions are planned to be fully implemented 2018 by implementation of Topsky at ACC 31/12/2018 Malmö and ACC Stockholm. ASP (By:12/2017) Sweden intends to fulfill all actions required to support the Late LFV collaborative flight planning. All remaining actions are planned NEFRA 82% to be fully implemented 2018 by implementation of Topsky at 31/12/2018 ACC Malmö and ACC Stockholm. ACR ACR will support the collaborative flight planning in the interface with COOPANS. % Not Applicable FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) % Not Applicable not applicable Sweden is not in the applicability area, and will not implement. ASP (By:10/2017) LFV Sweden is not in the applicability area, and will not implement. % Not Applicable ACR % Not Applicable FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan yet. ASP (By:12/2021) LFV 0% No Plan FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No operational need for an automated ASM Support System is identified and therefore the cost for such an implementation is not justified for the time being. ASP (By:12/2021) LFV 0% No Plan APO (By:12/2021) SWEDAVIA % No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 57 Released Issue

70 FCM06 Traffic complexity assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% Planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Analysis is ongoing. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) ACR ACR Comply only to local (ATSunit) ATFM management and Not Applicable % has no data exchange with NM. LFV Analysis in ongoing. 0% Planned 31/12/2021 FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan yet. ASP (By:12/2021) LFV 0% No Plan INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 AIS, Flight Plan and MET fully integrated. ATFM handled by the same entity (Flight Planning Centre) but subject to ATFM message confirmation on telephone. 31/10/2012 ASP (By:12/2012) ACR ACR has no AIS Service Provision. % Not Applicable AIS, Flight Plan and MET fully integrated. ATFM handled by the LFV same entity (Flight Planning Centre) but subject to ATFM 100% message confirmation on telephone. 31/10/2012 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 58 Released Issue

71 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4 which has been postponed to 31 December /12/2020 REG (By:05/2018) SWE Transport Agency Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4 which has been postponed to 31 December National TOD policy and implementation programme is established. The Swedish TOD Implementation Plan will be updated during ASP (By:05/2018) LFV has notified the regulator that the LFV part/responsibility when it comes to interfaces between the AIS and an etod solution will be established as a part of the overall ADQ implementation, in place in The national policy for etod LFV is from A number of open questions remain such as how to fulfil the requirements concerning obstacles in area 1 and area 2d,, responsibilities and financing regarding terrain data in area 2. Terrain data for area 1 will be published in % 40% ACR % APO (By:05/2018) SWEDAVIA Planning in progress. 0% Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 Not Applicable Planned 31/05/2018 ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 3% Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 On going investments related to Surveillance infrastructure that has Mode S capability. 02/01/2020 ASP (By:01/2020) LFV On going investments related to Surveillance infrastructure Ongoing 3% that has Mode S capability. 02/01/2020 The initiative to implement ACID at the airports rests with ACR AOP. ACR will support and participate when/if the 0% functionality is implemented. Planned 02/01/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 59 Released Issue

72 ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Planning and implementation in progress. 31/12/2018 REG (By:06/2017) SWE Transport Agency ASP (By:06/2017) LFV Verification of compliance will be done according to established routines when application is submitted or through ongoing oversight when applicable. Implementation is in progress. LoA exist between LFV and ACR concerning lowest available ACR vectoring altitudes APO (By:06/2017) SWEDAVIA Swedavia is in a preparatory phase which includes cost and workload estimates. Planning will be coordinated with LFV (ANSP). 70% ADQ / DKSE FAB Aeronautical Data Quality (ADQ) 53% 100% ADQ implementati on Stockholm Arlanda 20% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/ /12/2015 Ongoing 30/06/2017 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Entry into force: 06/02/ % ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any change to the existing system and that relevant information is published in AIP. LFV plans to support CPDLC over ATN/VDL Mode 2 in accordance with EC Regulation No 29/2009. Transporttype State aircraft will be equipped to comply with 16/04/2015 Commission Regulation (EC) 29/2009. REG (By:02/2018) SWE Transport Agency ASP (By:02/2018) Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any change to the existing system where availability of ATN/VDL2, Security Policy and address management will be assessed. It is dependant on the safety case presented by the effected ANSP. 100% ACR ACR has no service above FL 95. % LFV plan to support CPDLC over ATN/VDL Mode 2 in LFV accordance with EC Regulation No 29/2009. MIL (By:01/2019) Transporttype aircraft entering into service from 1January Mil. Authority 2014 have been equipped with data link capabilities. 100% 100% 16/04/2015 Not Applicable 16/04/ /01/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 60 Released Issue

73 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Ongoing All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 khz frequency conversions. 31/12/2018 REG (By:12/2018) SWE Transport Agency ASP (By:12/2018) Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 khz frequency conversions. 43% LFV VHF 50% Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services, ACR communication system is responsibility of the airports. All concerned personnel will be trained. MIL (By:12/2020) All aircraft are equipped for 8,33 khz channel spacing All radios (in all aircraft) will be modified for 8,33 khz channel spacing capability by Mil. Authority Mil. Authority has no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Regulatory power, so the ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'. APO (By:12/2018) Swedavia will comply to existing legislation meaning full SWEDAVIA compliant by 31st of December Planning of retrofit of VHF equipment is ongoing % 50% 0% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Not Applicable Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on additional functionality is always 31/12/2010 an integral part of implementation. ASP (By:12/2012) FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, LFV MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on 100% additional functionality is always an integral part of 31/12/2010 implementation. This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small ACR airports. Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and % participate in the activities when/if needed. Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority Mil. Authority has not ATM Service Provision role, so the ASP SLoAs is 'Not Applicable'. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 61 Released Issue

74 ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Late Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was implemented technically in Topsky systems 01/2013. Transition for each adjacent ACC (starting with Copenhagen, Bremen and Karlsruhe ACC in Q4 31/12/ ) will be individual and is planned to be completed during ASP (By:12/2014) This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small ACR airports. Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and % participate in the activities when/if needed. Not Applicable FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was Late implemented technically in Topsky systems 01/2013. Transition for each adjacent ACC will be done individually. The LFV connections to Copenhagen, Karlsruhe, Bremen, Warsaw, 72% Tallinn, Riga and the Remote Tower Centre are completed, we 31/12/2017 are currently waiting for Oslo, Bodö and Tampere to be ready on their side in order for us to finalize the implementation. To be completed during MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Safety assessment is conducted and reviewed by regulator, interoperability is ensured and training is performed when needed. 31/01/2019 REG (By:02/2015) SWE Transport Safety assessments reports will be reviewed when received. 100% Agency 30/11/2012 ASP (By:02/2015) LFV Safety assessment is conducted, interoperability is ensured MUS / SUPS 100% and training is performed when needed. 30/11/2012 ACR Safety assessment is conducted and training is performed 100% when needed. 03/02/2015 MIL (By:06/2020) The State aircraft operating as GAT in accordance with IFR Ongoing rules will be equipped with Mode S enhanced surveillance Mil. Authority 01/2019 and ADSB out 12/2017. Military Authority has no 75% ATM Service Provision role, so the ASP SLoAs are Not 31/01/2019 Applicable. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 62 Released Issue

75 NAV03 RNAV 1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 PRNAV is implemented in accordance with Swedish regulations for following aerodromes: Stockholm Arlanda, Halmstad, Göteborg Landvetter, Umeå, ÅreÖstersund, Göteborg City Airport and Stockholm 16/12/2015 Skavsta 2011/2012. RNAV for enroute based on DME/DME is implemented. ASP (By:12/2023) LFV RNAV for enroute based on DME/DME is implemented. Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP. Lower Airspace optimization 100% Mil. Authority 100% ACR Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP. 100% 30/11/ /11/ /12/2015 NAV10 APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV are published in Swedish AIP. National regulation implemented for APV procedures based on EASA material. 30/04/2015 REG (By:04/2016) SWE Transport Agency ASP (By:12/2016) National regulation implemented for APV procedures based on EASA material. 100% ACR 100% LFV Implementation is depending on the aerodrome owners initiative and PBNplan. Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV are published in Swedish AIP. 100% Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions SAF11 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, Aircraft Operator and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight. REG (By:01/2018) SWE Transport Agency The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, Aircraft Operator and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight. ASP (By:12/2014) Participating in Runway Safety Teams according to LoA LFV between ACR and AOPs. The applicable measures of the Action plan have been ACR implemented. APO (By:12/2014) Swedavia is planning to incorporate EAPPRE as a means to SWEDAVIA reduce Runway excursion. 100% 100% 100% 0% Mil. Authority 100% 30/09/ /04/ /10/ % Late 31/12/ /11/ /11/ /11/2014 Late 31/12/ /11/2013 LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 63 Released Issue

76

77 ANNEXES Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Sweden Swedish Transport Agency Eva NOREUS, Bengt NILSSON LSSIP Focal Point for LFV LFV Gunilla BLANK LSSIP Focal Point for ACR ACR Jan BOREN LSSIP Focal Point for Military Authority Swedish Armed Forces JanOlof NORBERG LSSIP Focal Point for Swedavia Swedavia Torstein GRÖNMO EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Sweden DPS/PEPR Oscar Alfaro Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Gunilla Blank LFV AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Gunilla Blank LFV AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Torstein GRÖNMO Swedavia AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Torstein GRÖNMO LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 64 Released Issue

78 AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER n/a AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Swedavia Torstein GRÖNMO Swedavia Torstein GRÖNMO Swedavia AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Gunilla BLANK LFV ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Claes ERIKSEN LFV ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Claes ERIKSEN LFV ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Claes ERIKSEN LFV COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Magnus SCHYLSTRÖM COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Fredrik NILSSON LFV ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Claes ERIKSEN LFV FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA n/a FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Gunilla BLANK LFV FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Kristina HOLMBERG Swedish Transport Agency Gunilla BLANK LFV FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Gunilla BLANK LFV FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Gunilla BLANK LFV INF07 A. PETROVSKY AP. FRANGOLHO ITYADQ M. UNTERREINER AP. FRANGOLHO ITYAGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Eva NORÉUS Swedish Transport Agency Roger LI LFV Eva NORÉUS Swedish Transport Agency Roger LI LFV Jan BOREN ACR Anders LEDIN Swedavia Anders Erzell Swedish Transport Agency Bo ERIKSSON Swedish Transport Agency Fredrik NILSSON LFV JanOlof NORBERG Swedish Armed Forces Torstein GRÖNMO Swedavia ITYFMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Claes ERIKSEN LFV ITYACID A. DESMONDKENNEDY O. CIOARA ITYSPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Anders ANDERSSON LFV Morgan SUNDELL Swedish Transport Agency Anders ANDERSSON LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 65 Released Issue

79 LFV ITYAGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Anders ERZELL Swedish Transport Agency Fredrik NILSSON LFV JanOlof NORBERG Swedish Armed Forces NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Jörgen ANDERSSON Swedish Transport Agency Jan BOREN ACR Rickard JORGENSEN LFV JanOlof NORBERG Swedish Armed Forces LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 66 Released Issue

80 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation charts Swedish Transport Agency Organisation The Swedish Transport Agency is working to achieve good accessibility, high quality, secure and environmentally aware rail, air, sea and road transport. We have overall responsibility for drawing up regulations and ensuring that authorities, companies, organisations and citizens abide by them. The Swedish Transport Agency has overall responsibility for civil aviation and is responsible for the authority tasks relating to air navigation services for civil and military aviation. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 67 Released Issue

81 Swedish Transport Agency Civil Aviation and Maritime Department Organisation The Civil Aviation and Maritime Department formulates regulations, examines and grants permits, as well as assessing civil aviation with particular regard to safety and security. And we monitor developments in the aviation market. We also formulate regulations, examine and grants permits, as well as exercising supervision principally of Swedish and foreign vessels sailing in Swedish waters. We work to improve maritime safety and environmental influence for recreational boating. We also analyse accidents and nearmisses. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 68 Released Issue

82 LFV LFV s primary mission is to provide safe, effective and environmentally adapted air navigation services for civil and military aviation. LFV is a State Enterprise 100% state owned. LFV is the only provider of ATC Enroute in Sweden and handle both civil and military users in an integrated system since LFV is organised in four departments (see above) and employs approximately people. LFV Head office is in Norrköping. LFV provides ATC services in: 19 ATC towers 1 RTC for two airports 2 Air Navigation centres located in Malmö and Stockholm. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 69 Released Issue

83 LFV s subsidiaries and associated companies LFV Aviation Consulting AB a wholly owned subsidiary whose role is to develop, produce and export aviation competence and represent the organisation in international commercial situations. NUAC HB, an LFV and Naviair jointly owned Company running the operations of the Danish and Swedish ACCs since EPN AB, the Nordic ATS Academy EPN. This is a subsidiary equally owned by LFV, Naviair Avinor and IAA. Norway A/S, a wholly owned subsidiary whose role is to develop, produce and export aviation competence and represent the organisation in Norway specifically. SAAB Digital Air Traffic Solutions AB, a jointly owned company with SAAB as majority owner. The company commenced operations on 1 September 2016 and will sell, develop and operate products and services for digital remote air traffic control. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 70 Released Issue

84 ACR Aviation Capacity Resources AB ACR Aviation Capacity Resources AB is a privately owned company and are providing air traffic services at fourteen airports in Sweden. ACR is designated as a provider at these airports and provides integrated air traffic services for both civil and military aviation. ACR conducts aerodromeand approach control services and has approximately 100 employees in 15 different locations. ACR is headquartered in Stockholm and has resources for operations, finance, security, management and staff. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 71 Released Issue

85 Swedavia Swedavia owns, operates and develops ten airports across Sweden, and the company is wholly owned by the Swedish state. The business is run as airport operations and real estate operations. Our role is to create the access Sweden needs to facilitate travel, business and meetings in Sweden, elsewhere in Europe and around the world. A focus on customers, sustainable development, and safety and security are the basis of everything Sweden does, both in our own operations and in society in general. Swedavia is a world leader in developing airports with the least possible environmental impact. In 2013, Swedavia had revenue of about 5.2 billion Swedish kronor and some 2,400 employees. A total of 33.5 million passengers flew via our airports in 2013, which is an increase of 3.5 per cent. Swedavia also owns the property Göteborg City Airport and is a minority shareholder in the company that operates the airport. LSSIP Year 2016 Sweden 72 Released Issue