Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP TURKEY

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP TURKEY Level 1 - Implementation Overview

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Turkey Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/43 Date of Edition 04/06/18 LSSIP Focal Point Cihan Sahin LSSIP Contact Person Predrag Vranjkovic Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2017 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2016 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations and LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan - Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). Stakeholder/ Name Position Signature Organisation DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION (DGCA) Bahri KESICI Acting Director General GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY Funda OCAK General Director TURKISH AIR FORCE Brigadier General Yusuf ERGE Director of Air Defence and Com.Cont. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Turkey ANKARA ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays Summer 2017 performance Planning Period Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Implementation Projects National projects Regional projects Cooperation activities FAB Coordination Regional cooperation Implementation Objectives Progress State View Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey. Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate general of State Airports of Turkey ( is the unique provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % Stateowned Governmental department. According to SHY Gözetim which was enacted in parallel ESARR 1, DGCA Air Navigation Department undertakes the NSA responsibilities. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Turkey increased by 7.5% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 3; 6% 9; 19% 2; 4% 6; 12% 5; 10% 24; 49% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined All phases of the objectives (ATC02.9, ATC12.1 and ATC17) have been completed. The objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for period. All actions of the objectives (ATC15.2, COM12, INFO07.1) will be conducted on time. The objectives (AOP10, AOP 12 and AOP 13) are planned to complete in short term for Istanbul New Airport. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the presesar and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered presesar. The four aforementioned objectives are neither presesar nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives AOM19.1 and FCM05 are considered as both part of the presesar and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 1 Released Issue

12 The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. PreSESAR Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 89% 94% 96% 43% 0% 10% 15% 11% PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block 0 Block % % LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 2 Released Issue

13 ATM Deployment Outlook State objec ves Deployed in : RNAV 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.1] 100% progress Runway excursions [SAF11] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ ETFMS [FCM01] 89% progress etod [INF07] 81% progress APV Procedures [NAV10] 55% progress TCAS II v7.1 [ATC16] 87% progress AMAN to enroute [ATC15.1] 78% progress Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 10% progress Voice over IP [COM11] 53% progress Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 10% progress Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 0% progress NewPENS [COM12] 0% progress Airport objec ves LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Airport objec ves LTAI Antalya Airport Deployed in : CCOs [ENV03] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CDOs [ENV01] 47% progress Airport CDM [AOP05] 10% progress LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 3 Released Issue

14 Airport objec ves LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Deployed in : AMAN [ATC07.1] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Airport CDM [AOP05] 93% progress CDOs [ENV01] 47% progress Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 18% progress Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 12% progress LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 4 Released Issue

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions; Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document; Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 5 Released Issue

16

17 1. National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Turkey is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1989 European Union NA EASA NA ICAO 1945 NATO 1952 ITU 1866 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Ankara and Istanbul FIRs. There is no separation between the lower and the upper airspace in the Turkish FIRs. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 6 Released Issue

18 Airspace Classification and Organisation Turkey is evaluating the implementation of ICAO classification for both present and future systems. Airspace reorganisation as a result of studies is planned. It is not yet possible to predict when this will be completed National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved within ATM in Turkey are the following: - The Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication; - The Directorate General of Civil Aviation DGCA; - The Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (Directorate General of State Airports (Turkey) DHMI; - The Turkish Military Authority; and - The Turkish State Meteorological Service. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters. Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council, and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey. The Military Authority permit some military aerodromes to be used by civil aviation in order to improve air transport links within Turkey. Civil ATM incidents are investigated by the Investigation and Assessment Commission which reports incidents and investigation findings to the DGCA. The commission is formed from experts with sufficient qualifications. Where requested by the DHMI and/or if DGCA consider it necessary, experts from DGCA will also join the commission in accordance with SHY For civil or civil/military ATM related incidents occurring within the Military Terminal Area and military joint user airports, the DGCA will receive all documentation/reports concerning the incident from the military authorities and a joint investigation will be carried out. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 7 Released Issue

19 The Advisory and Steering Committee holds regular (quarterly) meetings with the participation of aviation organisations as coordinated by the DGCA to classify incidents, prepare statistical data, evaluate reports of the Investigation and Assessment Commission and to impose actions and/or give recommendations to the aviation community to prevent the reoccurrence of similar incidents. The committee has the authority to include any aviation related issue on its agenda. Members of this Committee are comprised from the following organisations as appropriate: - DGCA ( - DHMI ( - Military Authority - School of Civil Aviation (Aviation Experts) - Turkish Airline Pilots Association (TALPA) - Air Traffic Controllers Association of Turkey - Other related stakeholders. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table overleaf. The DGCA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rulemaking DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Safety Oversight DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Airspace DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Economic Environment Ministry of Transport, maritime Affairs and Communication DGCA and Ministry of Environment and Urbanism Security DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431 Accident investigation Investigation and Assessment Commission LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 8 Released Issue

20 DGCA The Regulator is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The DGCA is a body within the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication with its own operating budget. The CAA responsibility is processed by DGCA. The DGCA is responsible for: - Licensing of Aircrew and Engineers - Licensing of Air Traffic Controllers - Licensing of ATSEPs - Certificate of Airworthiness (CoA) of aircraft - Approval of all airborne electronic equipment - Oversight and certification of airports - Investigation of Incidents by means of participation in Investigation and Assessment Commission and holding Advisory and Steering Committee Meetings. - Approval and generation of all ATM rules/regulations (including ESARRs) in coordination with stakeholders (DHMI, Turkish Air Force General Staff and other bodies as appropriate). Economic regulation is carried out by the Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. Annual Report published: N Organisation chart is shown in Annex B of this document. ANSPDHMI Services provided Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey ( is the unique Provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % Stateowned Governmental department. DHMI provides all the Air Traffic Services within civil airspace (Controlled Airspace, TMA and CTRs). DHMI cooperates very closely with the DGCA, particularly on safety matters such as the implementation of the ESARRs. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 9 Released Issue

21 Name of the ANSP: Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey Governance: Governmental department Ownership: 100% State owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS Y Y Y Y Y MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service ATCO training Others Y Airport management Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y N Annual Report published: Y 0Report% pdf Organisation chart is shown in Annex B. ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? - ATC Unit Ankara ACC SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? - ATC Unit Ankara ACC 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 10 Released Issue

22 ATC Units Enroute air navigation services throughout Turkish Airspace from one Area Control Center located in Ankara There are 27 TMAs and 12 MTMAs in Turkish Airspace. Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; Size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); Service provided (enroute or TMA no more ref to TWR). The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Ankara ACC 22 2 Ankara Istanbul Istanbul / Yeşilköy APP Izmir / Menderes APP 7 Istanbul 4 Istanbul Antalya APP 8 Istanbul Dalaman APP 3 İstanbul Airports General information Turkey has 58 airports used by GAT. These range from busy international airports to small regional airports with perhaps ten or less movements daily. Air navigation service is provided for all airports by DHMI except Eskişehir Anadolu, İzmir Efes, Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs and İstanbul Hezarfen Airports. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 11 Released Issue

23 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP The airports covered by this LSSIP document are as follows: - Istanbul Atatürk airport - Antalya Airport, and - Ankara Esenboga airport The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): Military Authorities The military authority also plays a major role in managing the Turkish Airspace especially with regard to FUA. Military ATC is entirely separated from Civil ATC, although very good civil/military coordination is maintained. Coordination between the military authority and the DHMI is ensured through a CivilMilitary Coordination Group. Some (11) airports/airfields of military origin are jointly used by military and civil aviation. For the eight (8) airports of them, all aircraft are under military ATC control. Currently, Turkish Military Authority and DHMI have their own alternative FUA concept which is considered more suitable for the local geopolitical situation. In order to increase the capacity of Turkish airspace, with implementation of the SMART system, DHMI and the Military Authority are planning to implement EUROCONTROL Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept to do that necessary legislation has been published at Official Gazette dated 18 April The studies are going on to establish infrastructure and units. The military regulatory, service provision and user role within ATM is detailed below. Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920 Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT N Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N Aircrew Licensing N y LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 12 Released Issue

24 Additional Information: Other than the State Law 2920 which grants provision for OAT the Turkish Air Force operate under different State or NATO regulations Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Additional Information: There is a protocol between the General Staff and Ministry of Transport, Maritime affairs and Communication for the use of military airports by civil aircraft. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP NA National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: NA Other: NA Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: Turkish General Staff HQ. GAT National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military. Service Provision role Services Provided: OAT Services Provided: EnRoute NA EnRoute N Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y AIS Y MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service SAR Y By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y Additional Information: NIL. Other: Security Services Other: GAT Additional Information: NIL. MET SAR N Y Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: MOD If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 13 Released Issue

25 User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: The above exemptions do not apply to military heavy transport or VIP aircraft. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Turkey applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: N FUA Level 1 implemented: N FUA Level 2 implemented: N FUA Level 3 implemented: N LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 14 Released Issue

26 2. Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Turkey Turkey - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017) IFR flights yearly growth 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F H 6.3% 9.2% 6.6% 6.4% 5.5% 5.6% 5.7% Turkey B 11.2% 6.8% -1.5% 5.8% 6.9% 4.8% 4.0% 3.6% 3.8% 3.6% L 5.4% 4.9% 2.5% 2.8% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 2017 Traffic in Turkey increased by 7.5% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 2.8% and 6.7% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 15 Released Issue

27 2.2. ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/ Summer 2017 performance Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap + 7.4% 221 (+6%) No The enroute delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at zero minutes per flight as in Summer Capacity Plan +10% Achieved Comments Improved civil/military coordination DMAN at LTBA Airport CDM at LTBA Improved ATFCM, including STAM ATS route structure development Gradual upper airspace resectorisation (20 to 25 sectors + FL235) Additional controllers (45 per year for enroute) MINI project for interface within Turkey additional CWPs Yes Ongoing Capacity Assessment through a CAPAN study Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Technical problems solved. Tests ongoing. Planned implementation Technical problems solved. Tests ongoing. Planned implementation Maximum configuration: 17 sectors Yes 15 sectors were sufficient Summer 2017 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 221 was calculated with ACCESS for the new area of responsibility of Ankara ACC. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 225 and the peak 3 hour demand was 211. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 16 Released Issue

28 2.4. Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC 2017 baseline LTAA 221 Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) H % 267 7% Ref % 256 4% L 240 9% 245 2% Open 235 6% 246 5% C/R % 253 5% Summer Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Stepped implementation of direct/free route operations above FL290 Istanbul area ATC/TMA Center Improved civil/military coordination Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Gradual upper airspace resectorisation (20 to 25 sectors + FL235) New interface with neighbouring states for new Istanbul airport New SIDs/STARs for Istanbul TMA airports MINI project for interface within Turkey additional CWPs RTS of Turkish airspace and Interface with neighbouring states New airport in Istanbul from Q phase 1A New APP control office for LTFJ Improved ATFCM, including STAM ATS route structure development Additional controllers (45 per year for enroute) Capacity Assessment through a CAPAN study New airport in Istanbul from beginning 2019 phase 1B New airport in Istanbul Independent parallel runway and new ground infrastructure at LTFJ 3 additional phases (depending on capacity triggers) Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase 20% 6% 6% 6% 6% Reference profile Annual % Increase 11% 4% N/A N/A N/A LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 17 Released Issue

29 Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 8.2% 9.8% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 Based on the expected traffic evolution in summer 2018, a maximum of 21 sectors should be sufficient to handle traffic demand. However, as stated in the above plan, up to 30 sectors can be opened if required. LTAAACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 18 Released Issue

30 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Turkey for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Conclusion VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT ROUTING. THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS. (page 14 of the Report) State s action planned for this conclusion: YES Applicable to All State that are implementing AOM21.1 and AOM21.2 Description of the planned action: TR is planning implementation of Free Route by LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 19 Released Issue

31 4. Implementation Projects 4.1. National projects Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: ASMGCS Level I and II (SMGCS) DHMI (TR) L3: AOP04.1, AOP04.2 AMAN (AMAN) DHMI (TR) L3: ATC07.1 AMAN/DMAN (Arrival Manager/Departure Manager) Extention at Istanbul Ataturk Airport DHMI (TR) Ongoing ARTAS (ART) DHMI (TR) L3: ITYSPI MINI Project (MINI_TR) Project SMART implementation (SMART_SYS) Radars replacement (RDR) Renovation of Dalaman SSR System and Supply and Installation of PSR / ModeS SSR System to Istanbul New Airport DHMI (TR) Target date is the opening time of the Istanbul New Airport. Ongoing DHMI (TR) L3: ATC17, FCM03 DHMI (TR) L3: ITYSPI DHMI (TR) Ongoing LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 20 Released Issue

32 4.2. Regional projects Extended AMAN Project (EXTAMAN) Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: Regional Schedule: Target date for this project is first quarter of Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Ongoing Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution This project is comprimising Bulgarian airspace besides Istanbul TMA including Atatürk and Istanbul New Airport. New AMAN positions will be installed related Bulgarian ATC units. L3: ATC15.1, ATC15.2 NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: ++ Providing more efficient safety benefits Environment: Capacity: +++ Increasing capacity Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: +++ Increasing the coordination and operational procedures between two adjacent ATC units Cooperation Activities: LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 21 Released Issue

33 5. Cooperation activities 5.1. FAB Coordination Not applicable Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives It is to be noted that Turkey maintains very close cooperation/coordination with all neighbouring states. Turkey has taken on responsibility of some transition tasks in the area and arranging air traffic flow to / from Europe. Turkey is cooperating with neighbouring states such as Greece and Bulgaria to optimise the performance of GroundGround Networks and data exchange. It is also considered that, collaborating as closely as we can with our neighbouring civil air navigation service providers has a paramount importance in order to optimise the airspace design and management and increase the regional capacity, safety and quality. Therefore, Turkey undertakes initiatives and efforts to ensure the application of same concepts, standards and projects under the EUROCONTROL framework. The fundamental purpose of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative (CAI) is to foster cooperation between NATO members on airspace surveillance and air traffic coordination with the goals of enhancing transparency, predictability and the collective capabilities to fight against terrorist air threats. Turkey is playing an essential role in this project with Local Coordination Unit (LCU), established in Ankara. On 16 May 2012, a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) was signed between DHMI and Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority (BULATSA) in Ankara. The MoC aimed at common understanding or adoption of ICAO, EUROCONTROL and other international requirements relevant for the ATM domain and cooperation for operational area. In the framework of this MoC, the delegations of the DHMI and BULATSA discussed the main aspects of future cooperation, such as ensuring an effective route network, common operational and technical projects, etc. On 20 June 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) and DHMI signed a MOU in Ukraine which aims the development of regional cooperation between UkSATSE and DHMI. It was also agreed that working groups on air traffic management, communication, navigation and surveillance, economic and financial support will further negotiate the related issues. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 22 Released Issue

34 Regarding with the enhancement of traffic flow between airspaces of Turkey and her neighbouring countries, DHMI has been cooperated with ANSPs to implement airspace changes (new COPs and routes) at the Bulgarian, Georgian, Iranian and Iraq interfaces. As a result of this cooperation; DHMI has completely changed the routes on main axes for traffic between Europe and MidEast / Gulf Area / Asia / FarEast. Also; together with her neighbouring ANSPs and Eurocontrol, DHMI has been working on the airspace changes that are required to facilitate the traffic flow for Istanbul New Airport that is planned to be in use from the last quarter of LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 23 Released Issue

35 6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives All phases of the objectives (ATC02.9, ATC12.1 and ATC17) have been completed. The objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for period. All actions of the objectives (ATC15.2, COM12, INFO07.1) will be conducted on time. The objectives (AOP10, AOP 12 and AOP 13) are planned to complete in short term for Istanbul New Airport. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 24 Released Issue

36 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C. Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services Collaborative Flight Planning Interactive Rolling NOP < % 0% 0% 0% 89% 100% n/a n/a 0% FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment n/a LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 25 Released Issue

37 Advanced Air Traffic Services AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) AOP14 ATC02.2 ATC02.8 ATC02.9 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) ATC16 ATC17 ATC18 ENV01 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace < % Local objective Remote Tower Services LTCO AGRI 0% STCA EnRoute GroundBased Safety Nets Enhanced STCA for TMAs AMAN Tools and Procedures 100% 100% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 100% Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Information Exchange with Enroute in 78% Support of AMAN Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II 87% Change 7.1 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to 100% Controller during Coordination and Transfer Multi Sector Planning Enroute 1P2T Continuous Descent Operations Local objective n/a LTAI Antalya Airport 47% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 47% 100% 10% 100% 16% ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective ITYCOTR NAV03.1 NAV03.2 (PCP) NAV10 NAV12 LTAI Antalya Airport 100% LTBA ISTANBUL/ATATURK 100% LTBS MUGLA/DALAMAN (MIL.CIV.) 100% LTFE MILAS/BODRUM 100% GroundGround Automated Coordination Processes n/a RNAV 1 in TMA Operations RNP 1 in TMA Operations APV procedures Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Local objective n/a 55% 100% 10% LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 26 Released Issue

38 High Performing Airport Operations AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport LTAI Antalya Airport LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) ENV02 SAF11 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport LTAI Antalya Airport LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Airport CDM < % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% LTAI Antalya Airport 10% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 93% TimeBased Separation 0% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport n/a (Outside Applicability Area) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Collaborative Environmental Management LTAI Antalya Airport 100% LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport 100% Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions 100% 18% 12% 0% LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 27 Released Issue

39 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure COM10 COM11 COM12 (PCP) FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) NewPENS Extended Flight Plan Integrated Briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft Identification Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance Performance and Interoperability < % n/a n/a n/a n/a 100% 36% 81% 100% 53% 0% 0% LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 28 Released Issue

40 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = (during 2017 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable < B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 78% 100% B0SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) 100% B0FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration 100% B0DATM B0ACAS B0SNET B0ACDM B0RSEQ Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 68% 87% 100% 52% 89% 100% 100% 100% 100% B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 37% 100% B0NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view 94% 100% B0ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance B0CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 47% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 29 Released Issue

41 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C. Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 30 Released Issue

42 Main Objectives AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling 25% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Turkish FUA Regulation has been published in Official Gazette on 18 April The Military Authority has completed it's structure to implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. Personnel assignments and software developments has been completed. The Military Authority is ready to fully implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. REG (By:12/2018) DGCA No current plan related appropriate legislation. 0% ASP (By:12/2018) No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed. DHMI Implementation of the objective will take place in parallel with the military MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority Turkish FUA Regulation has been published in Official Gazette on 18 April The Military Authority has completed it's structure to implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. Personnel assignments and software developments has been completed. The Military Authority is ready to fully implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. 0% % No Plan No Plan Not Applicable AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 This objective will be reevaluated for the next LSSIP cycle. ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI 0% No Plan AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% No Plan LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 31 Released Issue

43 AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No plan ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% No Plan AOM21.1 Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Late Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Implementation of direct routing planned and necessary activities will be completed before 31/12/ /12/2019 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Implementation of direct routing planned and necessary activities will be completed before 31/12/ % Late 31/12/2019 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Implementation of free route airspace is planned in /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI Implementation of free route airspace is planned in % Ongoing 31/12/2020 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA No plan to implement. Not applicable in TR. % ASP (By:12/2011) DHMI Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2010) ANKARA Esenboga Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% Not Applicable 30/06/ /06/2010 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 32 Released Issue

44 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTAI Antalya Airport Antalya implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA Not applicable in TR. % ASP (By:12/2011) Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June DHMI All training and development of procedures has been completed. APO (By:12/2010) ANTALYA Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system 100% Not Applicable 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Istanbul implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 REG (By:12/2010) DGCA Not applicable in TR. % ASP (By:12/2011) Istanbul implemented ASMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June DHMI All training and development of procedures has been completed. APO (By:12/2010) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% Not Applicable 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTAC Ankara Esenboga Airport Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Ankara implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ANKARA Esenboga Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 33 Released Issue

45 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTAI Antalya Airport Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Antalya implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ANTALYA Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Istanbul implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June /06/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI Istanbul implemented ASMGS Level 1 and 2 in June APO (By:12/2017) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport ASMGCS Level I and II 100% Drivers have received instruction on the system. 100% 30/06/ /06/2010 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (ACDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTAI Antalya Airport A draft MoU has been circulated to key stakeholders. Studies for Antalya are going on. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2016) DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A DHMI draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders. APO (By:12/2016) ANTALYA Airport DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders 10% 10% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 34 Released Issue

46 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (ACDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests have been completed. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2016) A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups DHMI have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests have been completed. APO (By:12/2016) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established. The exchange of messages will be implemented. 100% 85% 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2018 AOP10 TimeBased Separation not applicable 0% Planned LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area) The implementation of TBS is planned for Istanbul New Airport in /12/2021 REG (By:12/2023) Necessary actions will be taken before the DGCA implementation date. ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI The implementation of TBS is planned for Istanbul New Airport in % 0% Planned 31/12/2021 Planned 31/12/2021 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan not applicable % LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area) All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports has been published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site. ASP (By:12/2021) All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports DHMI has been published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site. APO (By:12/2021) % Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 35 Released Issue

47 AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) 18% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with new ASMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new 31/12/2018 software. ASP (By:12/2020) No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with DHMI new ASMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new software. APO (By:12/2020) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with new ASMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new software. 20% 10% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport No plan for Atatürk Airport. These functions will be executed as the part of Istanbul New Airport's ASMGCS System in REG (By:12/2023) DGCA All actions will be taken before implementation date. 0% ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI No plan for Atatürk Airport. These functions will be executed as the part of Istanbul New Airport's ASMGCS System in % 12% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 36 Released Issue

48 ATC02.8 GroundBased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % All functions implemented. 18/11/2015 ASP (By:12/2016) Mil. Authority DHMI Military units have APM functionality but due to the dynamic nature of OAT operations this functionality is only enabled at airports that serve GAT. APW level 2 has been implemented with the SMART project which was completed 11/2015. MSAW has been implemented with the SMART system. APM, in line with EUROCONTROL specifications, has been implemented at Istanbul, Esenboga, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum and Izmir airports in parallel with SMART. 100% 100% 31/12/ /11/2015 ATC02.9 Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Implementation of STCA funct,on in TMA has already adapted to major TMAs like Istanbul, Ankara, Antalya, Izmir; Dalaman, Milas and Trabzon. 31/12/2015 ASP (By:12/2020) DHMI Implementation of STCA funct,on in TMA has already adapted to major TMAs like Istanbul, Ankara, Antalya, Izmir; Dalaman, Milas and Trabzon. 100% 31/12/2015 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of /09/2016 ASP (By:12/2019) DHMI Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of Preparation of technical aspects for Antalya Airport AMAN has been finalised and tender held on in 2015 but due to lack of enough participants for tender, second tender will be realized in AMAN 100% 30/09/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 37 Released Issue

49 ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MONA functions has been implemented. ATCO training on MONA has been conducted. 07/07/2015 ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI MONA functions has been implemented. ATCO training on MONA has been conducted. 100% 07/07/2015 ATC15.1 Information Exchange with Enroute in Support of AMAN Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AMAN is operational for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. Adjacent ACC sectors within SMART project have been equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware. New AMAN software will be implemented by 2019 for Istanbul TMA including Istanbul 31/12/2019 New Airport and S.Gökçen Airport. Beside this related ACC sectors of Sofia ACC will equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. We have already arranged close cooperation with BULATSA on AMAN implementation. Extended AMAN Project 78% Late 31/12/2019 Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace ATC15.2 (Outside Applicability Area) 16% Ongoing not applicable Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started by end of /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started by end of Extended AMAN Project 16% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 38 Released Issue

50 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 All functions have been in use with SMART project.safety arguments for changes will be generated. ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority % DHMI All functions have been in use with SMART project. Project SMART implementati on 100% 100% 18/11/2015 Not Applicable 18/11/2015 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national nonamhs network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. 31/12/2014 Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP. ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI 100% Mil. Authority The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national nonamhs network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP. 100% 31/10/ /12/2014 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Turkey will implement VoIP based network until /10/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority % DHMI Turkey will implement VoIP based network until % Not Applicable Ongoing 31/10/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 39 Released Issue

51 COM12 New PanEuropean Network Service (NewPENS) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 0% Planned Full operational capability (Other stakeholders): 31/12/2024 Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of New contract and migration of services will be done until end of /12/2023 ASP (By:12/2024) Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of DHMI New contract and migration of services will be done until end of APO (By:12/2024) DHMI Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of New contract and migration of services will be done until end of % 0% Planned 31/12/2023 Planned 31/12/2023 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LTAI Antalya Airport An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 45% APO (By:12/2013) ANTALYA Airport DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 50% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 45% APO (By:12/2013) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. 50% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 40 Released Issue

52 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTAI Antalya Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. Local traffic regulations have been 30/04/2015 developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of ASP (By:12/2016) SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise DHMI map pilot project.local traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of APO (By:12/2016) ANTALYA Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.local traffic regulations have been developed in 2014 and implemented at first half of % 100% 30/04/ /12/2014 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LTBA Istanbul Atatürk Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of 31/12/2014 enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. ASP (By:12/2016) SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have DHMI been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. APO (By:12/2016) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2014 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 41 Released Issue

53 Collaborative Flight Planning FCM03 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use. ASP (By:12/2017) DHMI The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use. Project SMART implementati on 100% 07/07/ % 07/07/2015 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable TR is not in the applicability area. ASP (By:10/2017) DHMI % Not Applicable FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 2 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI % Not Applicable FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan The decision to implementation of interactive rolling NOP has not been taken yet. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI 0% APO (By:12/2021) DHMI No plan 0% No Plan No Plan LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 42 Released Issue

54 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. % Not Applicable FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% Planned The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DHMI The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until % Planned 31/12/2021 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 National law has been published to enable the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data for Area 1. The other regulatory issues will be completed in /05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) National law has been published to enable the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data for Area 1.TOD DGCA regulatory has been prepared in accordance with law for Area 1. ASP (By:05/2018) All actions have been completed in accordance with DHMI national TOD regulations. APO (By:05/2018) DHMI All actions have been completed in accordance with national TOD regulations. 63% 100% 100% Ongoing 31/05/ /12/ /12/2017 ITYACID Aircraft Identification (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:01/2020) DHMI % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 43 Released Issue

55 Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITYADQ (Outside Applicability Area) 36% Late not applicable Data quality and digital exchange format requirements have been implemented.the other actions will be completed before implementation date. 31/12/2022 REG (By:06/2017) Verification processes will be completed before the DGCA implementation date. ASP (By:06/2017) Data quality and digital exchange format requirements DHMI have been implemented.the other actions will be completed before implementation date. APO (By:06/2017) DHMI Data quality and digital exchange format requirements have been implemented.the other actions will be completed before implementation date. 0% 40% 52% Late 31/12/2022 Late 31/12/2022 Late 31/12/2022 ITYAGDL Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. REG (By:02/2018) DGCA % ASP (By:02/2018) DHMI % MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 44 Released Issue

56 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable TR is not in the applicability area. REG (By:12/2018) DGCA % ASP (By:12/2018) DHMI % MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority % APO (By:12/2018) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 The common flight message transfer protocol has been introduced with the SMART system. 31/05/2015 ASP (By:12/2014) The common flight message transfer protocol has been DHMI introduced with the SMART system. Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface Mil. Authority between military/civil sites has been completed. Current interface is limited for monitoring the sellected flights. MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between military/civil sites has been completed. 100% 100% 100% 31/05/ /05/ /05/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 45 Released Issue

57 ITYSPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not an EU+ State. REG (By:02/2015) DGCA Turkey is not EU+ State. % ASP (By:02/2015) DHMI MIL (By:06/2020) Turkey is not EU+ State. ARTAS / Radars replacement Mil. Authority Turkey is not EU+ State. % % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % PRNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul, S.Gökçen, Antalya, Esenboga, Dalaman, Bodrum, Trabzon Airports. Implementation at other airports will continue in due 31/12/2017 course. ASP (By:12/2023) Mil. Authority DHMI PRNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at some military airports. Implementation at other military airports will continue in due course. PRNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul, S.Gökçen, Antalya, Esenboga, Dalaman, Bodrum Airports. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course. % 100% 31/12/2017 NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % No Plan No plans at this stage. ASP (By:12/2023) DHMI 10% No Plan LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 46 Released Issue

58 NAV10 APV Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO VNAV operations has been published. APV BAROVNAV procedures for some airports have been published. Studies to 31/12/2018 design new procedures are going on. REG (By:04/2016) Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV DGCA BARO VNAV operations has been published. ASP (By:12/2016) DHMI Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO VNAV procedures for some airports have been published. Studies to design new procedures are going on. 100% 40% 31/12/2015 Late 31/12/2018 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions SAF11 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions. REG (By:01/2018) DGCA Necessary actions have been handled. 100% Mil. Authority Necessary actions have been handled. 100% ASP (By:12/2014) Local runway safety teams have been established for DHMI each aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions. APO (By:12/2014) ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams areresponsible for runway excursions. 100% 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 47 Released Issue

59 Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 for enroute operations 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Is a functionality included as part of SMART system and was operational from 09/2008. All enroute and TMA airspace is covered. STCA implementation/procedures will be audited by the 30/09/2008 DGCA when human resources permit. ASP (By:01/2013) DHMI STCA is a functionality included as part of the Interim SMART system. The STCA is in accordance with EUROCONTROL specifications. 100% 30/09/2008 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed. ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on 06 31/12/2019 November Certain type of the military transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. REG (By:12/2015) Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on DGCA 06 November ASP (By:03/2012) The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been DHMI developed.atc units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority Certain type of the transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. The training has been completed.all the transport type a/c with ACAS II will be equipped until end of % 100% 55% 01/12/ /03/2012 Late 31/12/2019 LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 48 Released Issue

60 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services FCM01 Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Some system modifications are still required and the date of 12/2017 is the planned completion date for all objectives. ASP (By:07/2014) DHMI Objective FCM01ASP08 will be in SMART phase so date of 12/2016 is the planned completion date. The other remaining objectives are ready and FSA mesages for Ankara have been tested with CFMU and approved. The software is not installed in accordance with sending proper FSA messages for Istanbul and Izmir. In addition the system is sending OAT rather than just GAT correlated flight data. All objectives will be completed by 12/ % 89% Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/ /07/2010 ASP (By:12/2012) DHMI 100% Mil. Authority All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/ % 31/07/ /07/2010 ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ASP (By:12/2012) DHMI % MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority % Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 49 Released Issue

61 Local Objectives Remote Tower Services AOP14 0% Planned Applicability and timescale: Local LTCO AGRI Remote tower services planned by the end of /12/2019 MultiSector Planning Enroute 1P2T Not ATC18 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local Considered as not applicable in TR. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% LTAI Antalya Airport PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Antalya Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. 01/06/2016 Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% LTBA ISTANBUL/ATATURK PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Istanbul Atatürk. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. 01/06/2016 Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% LTBS MUGLA/DALAMAN (MIL.CIV.) PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Dalaman Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. 01/06/2016 Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% LTFE MILAS/BODRUM PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Milas Bodrum Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. 01/06/2016 Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term. Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Not NAV12 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local Considered as not applicable in TR. LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 50 Released Issue

62

63 ANNEXES ANNEX A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP National Focal Point for Turkey DHMI Cihan Sahin EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Turkey DECMA/PEPR Predrag VRANJKOVIC LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 51 Released Issue

64 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator EUROCONTROL Objective Owners National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 O. ALFARO O. ALFARO O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI ATC07.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC12.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC15.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC15.2 L. DELL ORTO P. HOP ATC17 L. DELL ORTO S. MORTON ATC18 L. DELL ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY ENV03 AP. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 52 Released Issue

65 FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI INF07 AP. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY ITYACID O. CIOARA pending ITYADQ AP. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER ITYAGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC ATYAGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET ITYFMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU ITYSPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 53 Released Issue

66 ANNEX B National Stakeholders Organisation charts 1. DHMI Organisational Chart LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 54 Released Issue

67 2. DGCA Organisational chart LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 55 Released Issue