LSSIP Year Level 1 Implementation Overview. < what needs to be filled in>

Transcription

1 LSSIP Year 2017 Level 1 Implementation Overview < what needs to be filled in> In yellow text guidance to help fill in the document to be deleted afterwards by FP In red text elements to be updated by CP from the DB no task for the State

2 TEMPLATE CHANGE TRACKING No Change Rationale Formatting in whole document (fonts, colours, tables etc.) In Executive Summary new ATM Deployment Outlook Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report Conclusions updated Chapter 4 Implementation Projects created Chapter 5 Cooperation Activities created Chapter 6 presentation of Implementation Objectives modified (no link to scope code), new subchapter for Local Objectives added Annexes regular update of Annex A, reshuffling of annexes, new Annex C, E, F To adjust to EUROCONTROL Visual Identity Guidance To present the results on a timeline Adjusted to the results of the 2016 ATM MP L3 Implementation Report Covers all projects for the State (national, FAB and regional), short version of list of projects presented in Level 1 document, detailed list extracted from the DB presented in Level 2 document. To distinguish between Projects and other cooperation activities. No detailed presentation of 5.1 FAB Coordination with division into Key Features and performance indicators only free text as in previous years. To adjust to EUROCONTROL Visual Identity Guidance, to adjust to new type of Objectives New Annex C to present the scope of the Objectives, links to SESAR Key Features and ICAO ASBUs in a short manner to ease the reading and understanding of the document. New Annex E and F on request of EDA to collect the military stakeholders information on the DP Families and military infrastructure. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 Released Issue

3 FOREWORD Will be available by the end of December 2017 LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 Released Issue

4 Document Title Infocentre Reference Date of Edition LSSIP Focal Point LSSIP Contact Person Status Intended for Available in LSSIP Year 2017 for <State> <XX> (LSSIP Support) <Date> Name + + Organisation Name + + EUROCONTROL / DPS/PEPR <Working draft / Draft /proposed issue / Released Issue> Agency Stakeholders Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2017 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2016 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations <National AIP> <FAB Performance Plan> atm masterplan level 3 implementation plan atm masterplan level 3 implementation report and LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 Released Issue

5 APPROVAL SHEET One signature page 1) Preferably, one of the national regulatory authorities signs on behalf of all the involved stakeholders leaving the arrangements between the signatory authority and the national stakeholders to be decided at State level. If this option is selected, the national arrangements must ensure that a person at the appropriate level of each of the involved stakeholders provides to the signatory authority written confirmation (e.g. e mail, letter, etc.) of the correctness of the information provided. 2) The traditional way in which each involved stakeholder signs the approval sheet. The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). Stakeholder / Organisation Name Position Signature LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 Released Issue

6 CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in <State> ACC <XX> ACC < YY> Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions National Projects National projects FAB projects Regional projects Cooperations activities FAB Co ordination Regional cooperation Implementation Objectives Progress State View Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 Released Issue

7 Executive Summary National ATM Context Provide an overview of the ATM applicable legislation and national stakeholders and highlight here any important change having occurred during the past year or foreseen for the planning period related to legislation, national stakeholders and geographical scope. Traffic and Capacity Executive summary relating to Traffic and Capacity including en route figures. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. <Add additional explanatory text, if felt necessary> SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation SB PCP Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 1 Released Issue

8 Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. <Add additional explanatory text, if felt necessary> Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 85% 15% 70% 10% 65% 10% 90% 25% Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter <Add additional explanatory text, if felt necessary> Block B0 Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 2 Released Issue

9 ATM Deployment Outlook State objectives Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Airport objectives XXXX Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 3 Released Issue

10 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions; Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document; Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016.In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 4 Released Issue

11 1. National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership <State> is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC <yyyy> EUROCONTROL <yyyy> European Union <yyyy> EASA <yyyy> ICAO <yyyy> NATO <yyyy> ITU <yyyy> Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the <State> FIR(s): <Name of FIRS>. <State> FIRs is surrounded by FIRs of <Nr> States, namely <names of States and FIRs>. <(non ECAC bordering states)> LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 5 Released Issue

12 Airspace Classification and Organisation Describe the current classification of the airspace, if possible also add chart (example below) National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in <xxxx> are the following: <xxxx>; <xxxx>. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. A diagram is to be inserted here as per the example below. It should be the State diagram. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 6 Released Issue

13 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in <XXX> is the responsibility of the <Ministry of Transport>. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The <CAA> is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Accident investigation If for any of the activities above there is more than one organisation responsible, please explain here whodoes what (is responsible for). <CAA/DGAC> Explain what type of organisation structure is in place for ATM regulation (Aviation Ministry, Ministry department, State s aviation office, Autonomous agency, Civil Aviation department, Civil Aviation authority, other). Explain how it is separated from the ANSP (functionally, organisationally). Explain the relationship with the Ministry of Transport (or equivalent). Annual Report published: <Y/N> If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document. NOTE 1: The Annual Report referred to in this table is not to be confused with the State SES Annual Report submitted to the European Commission, it refers to the Report produced to capture its annual activities. NOTE2: If the Annual Report covering 2017 activities is still under preparation, provide above information for the 2016 Report. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 7 Released Issue

14 National Civil Aviation Master Plan (CAMP): <Y/N> If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document. NOTE 1: National CAMP is referenced in ICAO resolutions below: A39 23: No Country Left Behind (NCLB) Initiative (Draws the attention of Contracting States requesting technical cooperation and technical assistance to the advantages to be derived from well defined projects based on civil aviation master plans) A39 25: Aviation s contribution towards the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Urges Member States to enhance their air transport systems by effectively implementing SARPs and policies while at the same time including and elevating the priority of the aviation sector into their national development plans supported by robust air transport sector strategic plans and civil aviation master plans, thereby leading to the attainment of the SDGs) A39 26: Resource Mobilization (Requests the Secretary General to develop guidance material to assist States in including and elevating the priority of the aviation sector into their national development plans and developing robust air transport sector strategic plans and civil aviation master plans). Give address of CAA/DGCA website Reference to organisation chart at annex. <ANSPs> Service provided Fill in table below for the main ANSP in the State Governance: <e.g. Joint Stock Company, State enterprise...> Services provided Y/N Comment Ownership: ATC en route <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC approach <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC Aerodrome(s) <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> AIS <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> CNS <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> MET <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATCO training <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): <Y> Please specify (ex. Airport management) <if yes, specify which service(s), in which State> <e.g. 100% Ministry of Economy> Annual Report published: <Y/N> <If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document.> This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. Give address of ANSP website. Reference the organisation chart in annex. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 8 Released Issue

15 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 <Y/N> <If Y, specify name> FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit <Year> <Year> SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit <Year> <Year> When you answer this question please refer to the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing system and surveillance data processing systems. ATC Units Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); service provided (en route or TMA no more ref to TWR) The ATC units in the <States> airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En route TMA 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 9 Released Issue

16 Airports General information Describe, in a few words, the general situation (ownership, number of airports in the State) of the airports. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 Annex E, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Voluntarily, any information for selected or all airports which considered as important for the traffic or capacity related issues within the state / FIR (/FAB?/Region?) could be provided The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): XXXX: weblink Military Authorithies The Military Authorities involved in ATM in <State> are composed of: <xxxx>; <xxxx>; They report to <the Ministry of Defence>. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. <Reference to organisation chart at annex> Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y/N Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Organisation of military ATS for OAT OAT/GAT Co ordination GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Y/N/ NA Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Co ordination LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 10 Released Issue

17 ATCO Training ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: <Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> ATCO Training ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision ESARR applicability Additional Information:<Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: <name, > Additional information: < > GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: <name, specify if it is: a military NSA, separated from the civil NSA (In this case, please explain in Additional information whether it is separated from service provision, a Joint Civil military NSA; a Civil NSA> Additional information: < > Service Provision role Services Provided: En Route OAT If not provided by MIL specify who does provide this service Services Provided: GAT En Route Approach/TMA Approach/TMA Airfield/TWR/GND Airfield/TWR/GND AIS AIS MET MET SAR TSA/TRA monitoring FIS Other: <Specify> Additional Information: Additional Information: SAR Other: <Specify> LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 11 Released Issue

18 Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? <Y/N> If YES, since: <Dd/mm/yy> Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: <name of NSA> If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: xx years User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OAT IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within the regular (GAT) national route network Within a special OAT route system Within specific corridors only Under radar control Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: <Specify> Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in <State> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 2 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 3 implemented: Y/N Y/N LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 12 Released Issue

19 2. Traffic and Capacity This section was coordinated and will be prepared by EUROCONTROL DNM/OPL (Operations Planning), agreed with the Specialists concerned in the State and provided to the CP. Estimated timings: - For capacity constrained States information will be available after the visit (due to take place between November 2017 and January 2018). The schedule of the visits will be provided to the CPs (some States may have their meetings scheduled in January 2018 due to budgetary reasons.) - For the non capacity constrained States information will be available by mid December. A reference will be inserted at the beginning of the chapter pointing to information related to the methodology used for breaking down targets will be available. The same reference includes also clarifications and important definitions of terms used in the text. It will be articulated into the following sub chapters: 2.1. Evolution of traffic in <State> 2.2. ACC <XX> Traffic and en route ATFM delays Performance summer 2017 Planning Period ACC < YY> LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 13 Released Issue

20 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to <XX> (State) for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Conclusion COLLABORATIVE FLIGHT PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION DELAYS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AND SUPPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION FROM NM GIVEN TO THE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS. (page 07 of the Report) Applicable to NO, SE, UK, HU, MK, AM State s action planned for this conclusion: YES/NO Description of the planned action: xxxxxxx Conclusion VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT ROUTING. THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS. (page 14 of the Report) Applicable to All State that are implementing AOM21.1 and AOM21.2 State s action planned for this conclusion: YES/NO Description of the planned action: xxxxxxx Conclusion DELAYS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF A SMGCS SURVEILLANCE CAN POTENTIALLY IMPACT THE TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION OF OTHER SUBSEQUENT A SMGCS FUNCTIONALITIES. (page 21 of the Report) Applicable to EDDL, LIMC, LIRF, EGCC, EGLL, EGSS State s action planned for this conclusion: YES/NO Description of the planned action: xxxxxxx Conclusion ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) Applicable to All States + EC State s action planned for this conclusion: YES/NO Description of the planned action: xxxxxxx LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 14 Released Issue

21 4. Implementation Projects 4.1. National projects <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> <Introduce the table with a sentence of your choice: e.g. the main projects currently ongoing in <State> are depicted in the table below. Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links <Name of the Project> <Name of the Organisation> [Start date End date (Free text)] <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > ATM MP links: [Selection from OBJ, OI, ENB] Link to RP2 PP Link to 2017 DP 4.2. FAB projects <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links <Name of the Project> <Name of the Organisation> [Start date End date (Free text)] <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > ATM MP links: [Selection from OBJ, OI, ENB] Link to RP2 PP Link to 2017 DP Include all projects with FAB partners only. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 15 Released Issue

22 4.3. Regional projects <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links <Name of the Project> <Name of the Organisation> [Start date End date (Free text)] <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > ATM MP links: [Selection from OBJ, OI, ENB] Link to RP2 PP Link to 2017 DP LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 16 Released Issue

23 5. Cooperation activities 5.1. FAB Co ordination Elaborate in few sentences the status of FAB project that State participates in. Coordinate with all other participating States Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives Provide details of other cooperation initiatives which are important from the State s perspective. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 17 Released Issue

24 6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 4; 10% 21; 53% 14; 35% Late Plannned Ongoing Completed 1; 2% Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Summarise overall situation in the implementation of Implementation Objectives in the State. Special focus should be put on: 1) Any problem in completing Implementation Objectives due for ) Plans for completing Objectives, especially those due for 2017 and 2018 Example: XXXX is late in implementing Objective(s) XXXX which is/are planned to be completed by March 2017 due to a delay of XXXXX. The introduction of a new Voice Communication System was a major project, which was finalised by the end of 2016 and contributed to the completion of Objectives COM10 and COM11. The Objective ATC02.8 will be fully completed with the new ATM system upgrade which is foreseen in The Objective SAF11 is currently in the planning stage and is envisaged to be completed by LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 18 Released Issue

25 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C. Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF) 100% = Objective Completed = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support A FUA ASM Management of real time airspace data ASM Management of real time airspace data Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 (PCP) STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.1 (PCP) ATC02.8 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace Ground based Safety Nets ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Airport 1 Airport 2 LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 19 Released Issue

26 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) ATC17 NAV03 RNAV 1 NAV10 Airport 3 Airport 4 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in en route operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to en route airspace Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer APV procedures < % Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: < AOP04.1 A SMGCS Level 1 Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 AOP04.2 A SMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Airport CDM Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Time Based Separation Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Initial Airport Operations Plan Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Airport 1 Airport 2 LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 20 Released Issue

27 AOP13 (PCP) ENV01 ENV01 SAF11 Airport 3 Airport 4 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Continuous Descent Operations Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Continuous Descent Operations Airport 1 Airport 2 Airport 3 Airport 4 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions < % Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: < COM10 COM11 FCM08 (PCP) INF07 ITY ACID ITY ADQ ITY AGDL ITY AGVCS2 ITY FMTP ITY SPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC air ground data link services 8,33 khz air ground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 21 Released Issue

28 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0 APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 100% B0 SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A SMGCS Level 1 2) 34% 100% B0 FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground Ground Integration 22% 100% B0 DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management 85% 100% B0 ACAS ACAS Improvements 17% 100% B0 SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground Based Safety Nets 67% 100% B0 ACDM Improved Airport Operations through B0 RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 25% 100% B0 FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories B0 NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network Wide view 45% 100% B0 ASUR B0 CDO Initial capability for ground surveillance 100% Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 23% B0 TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En Route 20% 100% Above graph will be updated by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 22 Released Issue

29 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C. Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling AOM13.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 text REG (By:12/2018) CAA text MIL text ASP (By:12/2018) ANSP text MIL text MIL (By:12/2018) MIL text Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy dd/mm/yyyy Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy Implementation Status dd/mm/yyyy LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 23 Released Issue

30 Main Objectives Objectives will be extracted by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Objectives will be extracted by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Local Objectives Objectives will be extracted by CP after freezing the LSSIP Database Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area. AOP14 Remote Tower Services Implementation Status text dd/mm/yyyy LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 24 Released Issue

31 ANNEXES ANNEX A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP National Focal Point for <State> LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LSSIP Focal Point for Airport LSSIP Focal Point for Military EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for <State> DPS/PEPR LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 25 Released Issue

32 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator EUROCONTROL Objective Owners AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI <.> AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA AOM19.2 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA AOM19.3 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC M. BIRENHEIDE AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC M. BIRENHEIDE AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP10 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC M. BIRENHEIDE AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC M. BIRENHEIDE AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER B. BAKKER ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER B. BAKKER ATC07.1 L. DELL ORTO P. TERZIOSKI ATC12.1 L. DELL ORTO P. TERZIOSKI ATC15.1 L. DELL ORTO P. CONROY ATC15.2 L. DELL ORTO P. HOP ATC17 L. DELL ORTO S. MORTON ATC18 L. DELL ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY ENV03 A P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK INF07 A P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY National Stakeholder Specialist LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 26 Released Issue

33 ITY ACID O. CIOARA A. DESMOND KENNEDY ITY ADQ A P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER ITY AGDL B. HILL S. DISSING ATY AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET ITY FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU ITY SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET SAF11 F. ROOSELEER S. LAWRENCE LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 27 Released Issue

34 ANNEX B National Stakeholders Organisation charts Insert the different organisation charts. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 28 Released Issue

35 ANNEX C Implementation Objectives Applicability Objective SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU B0 AOM13.1 AOM19.1 B0 FRTO European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Moldova. All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and Moldova AOM19.2 All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova AOM19.3 All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova AOM21.1 B0 FRTO 25 ECAC States AOM21.2 All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands AOP04.1 B0 SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non PCP airports AOP04.2 B0 SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non PCP airports AOP05 B0 ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non PCP airports AOP10 16 PCP Airports AOP11 24 PCP airports, 15 non PCP airports AOP12 25 PCP airports AOP13 25 PCP airports AOP14 Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs ATC02.2 B0 SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did not yet implement it ATC02.8 B0 SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands ATC02.9 B0 SNET TMAs, according to local business needs ATC07.1 B0 RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non PCP airports ATC12.1 All ECAC States except Luxembourg ATC15.1 B0 RSEQ ATC15.2 ATC16 B0 ACAS EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that did not yet implement it ATC17 B0 FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine ATC18 Local: Subject to local needs and complexity COM10 All ECAC States COM11 All ECAC States LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 29 Released Issue

36 COM12 Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement Agreement): 33 ANSPs Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part of Area 1 ENV01 B0 CDO 59 Airports ENV02 47 Airports ENV03 B0 CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity FCM01 B0 NOPS FCM03 B0 NOPS All ECAC States FCM04.1 B0 NOPS FCM04.2 B0 NOPS All EU+ States FCM05 B0 NOPS FCM06 B0 NOPS All EU+ States FCM07 All EU+ States FCM08 All ECAC States FCM09 All ECAC States INF04 B0 DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that did not yet implement it Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Moldova Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that did not yet implement it INF07 All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC INF08.1 All EU+ States INF08.2 All EU+ States ITY ACID All EU+ States ITY ADQ B0 DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC ITY AGDL B0 TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands ITY AGVCS2 All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova ITY COTR B0 FICE ITY FMTP B0 FICE All ECAC States ITY SPI B0 ASUR All EU+ States NAV03.1 B0 CDO, B0 CCO NAV03.2 Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did not yet implement it All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic Mandatory for TMAs listed in section of the Annex of the PCP Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs NAV10 B0 APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC NAV12 Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity SAF11 All ECAC States except Malta LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 30 Released Issue

37 Legend: Objective s link to SESAR Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 31 Released Issue

38 ANNEX D Glossary of Abbreviations This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP <State>. Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in Term AF FT PCP PDP S AF Description ATM Functionality Fast Track Pilot Common Project Preliminary Deployment Programme Sub ATM Functionality LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 32 Released Issue

39 ANNEX E Questionnaire for States Military Organisations on infrastructure The questionnaire below was added as requested by EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL, to capture information on military infrastructure. For practical reasons, for the 2017 cycle the questionnaire is included in this Annex. This Annex is NOT required to be included in the published (and public) version of the document. However, it is considered an integral part of the LSSIP 2017 cycle and fully covered in the remit of the States authority(ies) signature. A full rationale for this request is provided below by EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL. Rationale SESAR in Europe as well as NEXTGEN in the USA represent the largest initiatives currently in place aimed at modernising globally the ATM system. These programmes expect the involvement of a massive number of stakeholders like the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSP), the Airspace Users (AU), the Airports Operators (AO), the supply industry and the States civil and military authorities. For the latter, in particular, is of utmost importance to be aware of the potential impacts stemming from the implementation of those programmes either on military aircraft fleets or on the ATM/CNS ground infrastructures in order to safeguard and mitigate potential interoperability issues. To do that, it would be worth to rationalise and harmonise the initiatives at the moment steered separately by the most important organisations dealing with SES/SESAR ATM matters EDA NATO and EUROCONTROL in order to facilitate the contribution of the states military authorities in building a common set of data on ATM/CNS capabilities to be used for different purposes. This will avoid the risk to duplicate the efforts already in place and for which the military community have committed to contribute. The information collected and stored will be key to understanding the system/interoperability requirements identified in ATM modernization and deployment programmes. Examples of the need for data capturing are: Understanding ATM innovation programs (Deployment Program implementation) ; The projects which will be put at front by the Deployment Manager; Air Traffic Management Master Plan Updates; Operational and financial impact analyses. There is a need for engagement with the States military organisations in order to obtain the input information necessary to derive better validated cost estimates: their understanding of their State s current military ATM/CNS architecture, and of its military operational imperatives and policy regarding, for instance, SESAR participation. Composition of the current fleets with in and out of service dates and equipment level, dual use aerodromes with relevant civilian traffic indicative numbers, number of ATM/CNS and AD systems, also the NATO and USAFE assets should be known to complete the picture. A facilitated questionnaire, through the existing ESSIP/LSSIP methodology seems to be an appropriate way forward. The questions are built in close cooperation between EUROCONTROL, NATO and EDA, in order to get a comprehensive picture of military ATM/CNS airborne and ground capabilities currently available to allow nations to provide Air Navigation Services (ANS) in the airspace of own responsibility. The results of previous questionnaires have been inserted in this annex. The National answers will be used to feed the three organisations (EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL) to facilitate e.g.: a) Business View and Cost Benefit Analysis (impact) of Master Plan updates; b) ATM/CNS Systems database repository (NATO); c) Assessment on Performance Based Certification for ATM/CNS avionics; d) CNS interoperability and rationalisation opportunities; e) Assessment of the deployment opportunities. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 33 Released Issue

40 Air Navigation Services (ANS 3 ) and Air Defence (AD) ground infrastructure questionnaire 1. Military En route Area Control Centers (ACCs) 1.1 How many military en route ACCs are there in your State? Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> # 1.2 How many of the military en route ACCs are: Integrated on the same ATM 4 system as Civil ANSP? # Co located with and on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? Co located with and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? Separated but on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? # # # Separated and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> # 1.3 How many of the military en route ACCs are providing ANS to: Primarily to General Air Traffic (GAT)? # Operational Air Traffic (OAT) + GAT frequently? # OAT + GAT occasionally? # OAT only? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 1.4 If there is more than one military en route ACC, are there different ATM systems for ATM provision? Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 1.5 Are any of the military en route ACCs currently using any of the following COM systems? Connection to civil Aeronautical Messaging Handling System (AMHS) Connection to Pan European Network Service (PENS) (through civil ANSP or direct to the backbone) Y/N/ Y/N/ Voice over IP (VoIP) for inter center coordination Y/N/ VHF 8.33 ground radio infrastructure Y/N/ UHF at all sectors Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> 3 Air Traffic Management and Communication, Navigation & Surveillance related infrastructure. 4 All ATM systems operated in the Centre LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 34 Released Issue

41 1.5.6 Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 1.6 Are any of the military en route ACCs currently relying on conventional NAV 5 systems? Y/N/ Additional Info <Specify which, or at least how many centers. Add clarification, if needed.> 1.7 Are any of the military en route ACCs currently using any of the following SUR systems? Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) Mode S (Selective). If so, are they clustered with civil radars. Y/N/ Primary Surveillance Radar Y/N/ Plot/track data derived or received from civil Centers. Y/N/ Multi Lateration (MLAT) Y/N/ Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS B) Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers. Specify if they are clustered with civil radars.> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2. Military Approach Centers (APPs) for Terminal Approach Areas (TMA) 2.1 How many military APPs are there in your State? # Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.2 Do you have centralised approaches serving multiple airfields? Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.3 How many of the military APPs are providing ANS to: Primarily to GAT? # OAT + GAT frequently? # OAT + GAT occasionally? # OAT only? # How many military APPs are providing ANS to GAT (e.g. feeding an Aerodrome) to a High level of interaction 6 TMA? # Medium level of interaction TMA? # Low level of interaction TMA? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 5 NDB, VOR, DME, TACAN. 6 As used in the document Military Impact assessment of ATM Master Plan Deployment Packages and Deployment military/2015 military impactassessment v1.0.pdf LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 35 Released Issue

42 2.4 Do you have common ATM systems at ACC APP level? Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.5 How many of the military APPs are: Integrated on the same ATM system as Civil ANSP? # Co located with and on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? Co located with and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? # # Separated but on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> # 2.6 If there is more than one military APP, are there different APP systems for ANS provision? Y/N/ If yes, how many different APP systems? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.7 Are any of the military APPs currently using any of the following COM systems? Connection to civil AMHS (replacing AFTN)? Y/N/ Connection to PENS Y/N/ Voice over IP (VoIP) Y/N/ VHF 8.33 Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> UHF Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.8 Are any of the military APPs currently using conventional NAV 7 systems? Y/N/ If developing RNAV and RNP approaches, please state. Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Indicate plans for RNAV and RNP approaches.> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.9 Are any of the military APPs currently using any of the following SUR systems? SSR Mode S Y/N/ Primary Surveillance Radar Y/N/ Plot/track data derived or received from civil Centers. Y/N/ <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> <Specify which, or at least how many centers> 7 NDB, VOR, DME, TACAN. LSSIP Year 2017 Template- Level 1 36 Released Issue