LSSIP Year 2015 <STATE>

Transcription

1 LSSIP Year 2015 <STATE> State can choose a personalised picture for the cover FP should send the State-personalised picture to the CP before 15 December Requirements for the picture to be as follows: rectangular shape, high resolution (300 dpi/21 cm width). In black normal text common text <In yellow what needs to be filled in> In yellow text guidance to help fill-in the document to be deleted afterwards in the LSSIPs reports In green Instructions for CPs/FPs In red text pending to be further updated in template and LSSIP documents

2 TEMPLATE CHANGE TRACKING No Change Rationale 1 Approval Sheet : slightly updated Reflecting preference to the first option, in line with AAB/12 decision a and 4b 5 Executive Summary : National ATM context: slightly updated Executive Summary : Traffic and Capacity: deleted some text <ANSP(s)>: a). Added subtitle before the table for ANSPs b) Keep two sub-chapters, but change format of ATM Systems in use and keep ATC Units (as last year) first sentence APO SLoAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, INF07, ITY- ADQ and SAF11 is removed To give the readers of the Executive Summary a better picture of the national ATM environment. To reflect the contents of the relevant Chapter. Change of format of the table in ATM Systems : in this way we can collect all the necessary information for the systems installed in ACC and TMAs This sentence could be misleading, as Airports in their role as SP may have to implement ASP SLoAs as well. In fact the new AOP objectives have more ASP SLoAs than AOP SLoAs. The sentence has a questionable added value reference to Annex B of ESSIP Plan is taken out and is replaced by List of Airports in ESSIP Plan Part I Section 4 7 Chapter 3: fully updated List of Airports moved To take into account recommendations from the most recent ESSIP Report Chapter 6.2 : ESSIP Objectives Implementation Progress Annex A rows added for each national Stakeholder Annex D - Questionnaire for States Military Organizations Need to provide the progress of each objective for each stakeholder organization, identifying the MIL within REG and ANSP To clearly point out the need to give names of FPs for each national Stakeholder Added as requested by EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL, to capture information on military infrastructure LSSIP Year 2015 Template Final

3 FOREWORD By Adriaan Heerbaart Director of the Pan European Single Sky Directorate EUROCONTROL Agency January 2016 To be updated before Jan 2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Template Final

4 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for <STATE> Infocentre Reference: <XX> Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015 LSSIP Year 2015 <STATE> Edition Date: <Date> LSSIP Focal Point - <NAME> < > < Stakeholder and function> LSSIP Contact Person - <NAME> < > Unit DPS/PEPR Status Intended for Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Internet ( Path: Y:\06 Methods and Quality\3. Templates - LN\LSSIP Templates\LSSIP Template 2015 LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition European ATM Portal 4 ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 6 Acronyms and abbreviations 7 European ATM Master Plan 8 LSSIP Documents 9 <National AIP> 10 <FAB Performance Plan> LSSIP Year 2015 Template Final

5 APPROVAL SHEET One signature page 1) Preferably, one of the national regulatory authorities signs on behalf of all the involved stakeholders leaving the arrangements between the signatory authority and the national stakeholders to be decided at State level. If this option is selected, the national arrangements must ensure that a person at the appropriate level of each of the involved stakeholders provides to the signatory authority written confirmation (e.g. , letter, etc.) of the correctness of the information provided. 2) The traditional way in which each involved stakeholder signs the approval sheet. ( as in the previous years = taken out) The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan Edition Stakeholder / Organisation Name Position Signature Date LSSIP Year 2015 Template Final

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) <ANSP(s)> Airports Military Authorities... 8 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in <State> ACC <XX> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period ACC <XY> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2015 Template Final

7 Executive Summary National ATM Context Provide an overview of the ATM applicable legislation and national stakeholders and highlight here any important change having occurred during the past year or foreseen for the planning period related to legislation, national stakeholders and geographical scope. Traffic and Capacity Executive summary relating to Traffic and Capacity including en-route figures. ESSIP Objective Implementation Summarise overall situation in the implementation of ESSIP Objectives in the State. Special focus should be put on: 1) Any problem in completing objectives due for ) Plans for completing objectives due for 2016 and 2017 Example: XXXX is late in implementing objective(s) XXXX which is/are planned to be completed by March 2016 due to a delay of XXXXX. The introduction of a new Voice Communication System was a major project, which was finalised by end of 2014 and contributed to the completion of objectives COM09, COM10 and COM11. The objectives ATC02.5, ATC02.6 and ATC02.7 will be fully completed with the new ATM system upgrade which is foreseen in The objective SAF11 is currently in the planning stage and is envisaged to be completed by 2018: LSSIP 2015 * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) State-related ESSIP Objectives <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.2 ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 * ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools * ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring * LSSIP Year 2015 Template 1 Final

8 LSSIP 2015 * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * * ATC17 COM09 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer * Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP * FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID Aircraft identification ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-COTR Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV NAV10 Implement APV procedures * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * SRC-RLMK SRC-SLRD Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= EBAW-Antwerp Airport ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements EBBR-Brussels Airport AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) * ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * LSSIP Year 2015 Template 2 Final

9 ENV02 EBCI-Charleroi Airport ENV01 EBLG-Liege Airport ENV01 EBOS-Oostende Airport ENV01 Understanding the Table Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * Objective Completed Objective Partly Completed Objective Planned No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (<State/Airport> does not participate in this obj.) Late E= Essential Master Plan Reference NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 3 Final

10 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 4 Final

11 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment <CP : Copy appropriate content of Chapter 1 of LSSIP Year 2014 > <FP : Update here the content of Chapter 1 of LSSIP Year 2014> 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership <State> is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: <CP: Updates: Deletion of European Common Aviation Area and JAA. Addition of ITU > Organisation Since ECAC <yyyy> EUROCONTROL <yyyy> European Union <yyyy> EASA <yyyy> ICAO <yyyy> NATO <yyyy> ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the <State> FIR(s): <Name of FIRS>. <State> FIRs is surrounded by FIRs of <Nr> States, namely <names of States and FIRs>. <(non-ecac bordering states)> Airspace Classification and Organisation Describe the current classification of the airspace, if possible also add chart (example below). 1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in <xxxx> are the following: - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 5 Final

12 A diagram is to be inserted here as per the example below. It should be the State diagram Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in <XXX> is the responsibility of the <Ministry of Transport>. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The <CAA> is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Accident investigation Organisation responsible Legal Basis If for any of the activities above there is more than one organisation responsible, please explain here who-does-what (is responsible for) <CAA/DGAC> Explain what type of organisation structure is in place for ATM regulation (Aviation Ministry, Ministry department, State s aviation office, Autonomous agency, Civil Aviation department, Civil Aviation authority, other). Explain how it is separated from the ANSP (functionally, organisationally). Explain the relationship with the Ministry of Transport (or equivalent). Annual Report published: <Y/N> If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document. NOTE 1: The Annual Report referred to in this table is not to be confused with the State SES Annual Report submitted to the European Commission, it refers to the Report produced to capture its annual activities. NOTE2: If the Annual Report covering 2014 activities is still under preparation, provide above information for the 2013 Report. Give address of CAA/DGCA website Reference to organisation chart at annex LSSIP Year 2015 Template 6 Final

13 1.2.2 <ANSP(s)> Services provided Fill-in table below for the main ANSP in the State Governance: <e.g. Joint Stock Company, State enterprise...> Ownership: <e.g. 100% Ministry of Economy> Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC approach <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATC Aerodrome(s) <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> AIS <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> CNS <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> MET <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> ATCO training <Y> <if no, specify who provides the service(s)> Others Please specify (ex. Airport management) Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): <Y> <if yes, specify which service(s), in which State> Annual Report published: <Y/N> <If Y, add URL or provide full name/reference to the document.> This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. Give address of ANSP website Reference to organisation chart at annex ATC systems in use FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit <Year> <Year> SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit <Year> <Year> When you answer this question please refer to the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing system and surveillance data processing systems. 1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2015 Template 7 Final

14 ATC units Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); service provided (en-route or TMA no more ref to TWR) The ATC units in the <States> airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Airports General information Describe, in a few words, the general situation (ownership, number of airports in the State) of the airports Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Voluntarily, any information for selected or all airports which considered as important for the traffic or capacity related issues within the state / FIR (/FAB?/Region?) could be provided Military Authorities The Military Authorities involved in ATM in <State> are composed of: - <xxxx>; - <xxxx>; They report to <the Ministry of Defence>. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. <Reference to organisation chart at annex> Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y/N by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Organisation of military ATS for OAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training ATCO Licensing GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Y/N /NA Level of such legal provision: <State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation, Other> Authority signing such legal provision: <Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force, Other> These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training ATCO Licensing LSSIP Year 2015 Template 8 Final

15 ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: <Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision ESARR applicability Additional Information:<Add any clarification you feel necessary on the topics above> Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: <Specify> Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: <name, > Additional information: < > GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: <name, specify if it is: - a military NSA, separated from the civil NSA (In this case, please explain in Additional information whether it is separated from service provision, - a Joint Civil-military NSA; - a Civil NSA> Additional information: < > Service Provision role Services Provided: En-Route OAT If not provided by MIL specify who does provide this service Services Provided: GAT En-Route Approach/TMA Approach/TMA Airfield/TWR/GND Airfield/TWR/GND AIS AIS MET MET SAR TSA/TRA monitoring FIS Other: <Specify> Additional Information: Additional Information: SAR Other: <Specify> Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? <Y/N> If YES, since: <Dd/mm/yy> Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: <name of NSA> If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: xx years LSSIP Year 2015 Template 9 Final

16 User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within the regular (GAT) national route network Within a special OAT route system Within specific corridors only Under radar control Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: <Specify> Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in <State> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 2 implemented: Y/N FUA Level 3 implemented: Y/N Y/N LSSIP Year 2015 Template 10 Final

17 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity This section was coordinated and will be prepared by EUROCONTROL DNM/OPL (Operations Planning), agreed with the Specialists concerned in the State and provided to the CP. Estimated timings: - For capacity-constrained States information will be available after the visit (due to take place between November 2015 and January 2016). The schedule of the visits will be provided to the CPs (some States may have their meetings scheduled in January 2015 due to budgetary reasons.) - For the non-capacity-constrained States information will be available by mid-december. A reference will be inserted at the beginning of the chapter pointing to information related to the methodology used for breaking down targets will be available. The same reference includes also clarifications and important definitions of terms used in the text. It will be articulated into the following sub-chapters: 2.1 Evolution of traffic in <State> ACC <XX> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period ACC <XY> Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period LSSIP Year 2015 Template 11 Final

18 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations <CP : To customise recommendations for the State> Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to <XX> (State) for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number Recommendation 2014 Ownership REC Corrective actions taken: <YES/NO> To increase implementation activities related to SES and SESAR improvements with support of EUROCONTROL. BA, GE Description: <If YES, please provide short description> Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY- REC AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: <YES/NO> Local Stakeholders Description: <If YES, please provide short description> REC (equal to REC ) Corrective actions taken: <YES/NO> The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs Description: <If YES, please provide short description> LSSIP Year 2015 Template 12 Final

19 Chapter 4 - National Projects <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> <Introduce the table with a sentence of your choice: e.g. the main projects currently ongoing in <State> are depicted in the table below. Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> Example ORO NAVIGACIJA <Name of the Project> Air-ground data link implement ation <Project Code, where applicable> L-CNS- 01/1-I/V-C <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> Entities providing communication services shall ensure that the ground communication systems and their constituents apply airground communications for CM and CPDLC data exchanges in compliance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009, allowing either ATN/VDL-2 or an alternative communication technology. <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 2 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> EC Regulation: 29/2009; IDP WP 4 ATM Master plan: AUO 0301, OI IS- 040; ESSIP/LSSIP ITY-AGDL ICAO ASBU: <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > New project, initiated. <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Safety: Enhancement through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages, the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval. Capacity: Increased capacity through both Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 2 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 13 Final

20 SPC03.01 OFA reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency. Cost effectiveness: Data link is a costeffective capacity increase enabler through sector productivity increase and delay cost savings. Security: not a significant issue, as Data-link is a complimentary initiative in support to voice. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 14 Final

21 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination <The national/fab projects are managed via the LSSIP DB. Data (Reports from DB) will be exportable to MSWord and directly usable for integration in LSSIP Documents. CPs and FPs to review information in the DB for projects> 5.1 FAB Co-ordination Elaborate if the State is part of the FAB project. If yes, please elaborate in few sentences the status of FAB project that State participates. Include all other participating States. 5.2 FAB Projects Include all projects with FAB partners only. Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> <Name of the Project> <Project Code, where applicable> <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 3 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 3 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 15 Final

22 5.3 Regional cooperation In 5.3.1, specify any other regional cooperation initiative with one or more States other than those within your FAB, if applicable. In 5.3.2, Indicate if your State is involved in other regional or multi-state projects, beyond those belonging to the FAB project of your State Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Organisations Name Code Description Implementation Planning <Name of the Organisation> <Name of the Project> <Project Code, where applicable> <Short description / scope / objectives of the project> <Indicate whether the project is supported by EUROCONTROL> <Initiation / Implementation dates > EATM Links Status Performance Contribution 4 <List the ESSIP objectives or OI Steps/enablers which the project contributes to> <Explain in briefly the progress made so far > <Explain briefly the expected contribution of the project to the different KPAs (capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment)> Cooperation Activities <Where applicable, include common activities (e.g. common procurement, sharing of resources, etc.) as part of the agreement among the participating organisations> 4 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 16 Final

23 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation <CP to produce RTP108> 6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2015 Template 17 Final

24 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Partly Completed - dd/mm/yyyy REG (By:12/2018) CAA Completed dd/mm/yyyy Completed MIL dd/mm/yyyy ASP (By:12/2018) MIL Completed dd/mm/yyyy Completed ANSP. dd/mm/yyyy MIL (By:12/2018) Partly MIL. Completed dd/mm/yyyy LSSIP Year 2015 Template 18 Final

25 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress The expected completion date will be available end of February 2016 (depends on Objectives) State SESAR KEY FEATURES Deployment PCP ATM functionalities OPTIMISED ATM NETWORK SERVICES Advanced Airspace Direct routing Free Route Airspace Conflict detection and monitoring APW level 2 Electronic Dialog (OLDI) Coordination and Transfer Rolling NOP Collaborative Flight AMAN extended to En Route STAM 1 Rolling NOP Tactical Flow Man. Traffic Complexity Assessment Related to AF3 Related to AF4 ADVANCE D AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES Aeronautical Data Quality Basic AMAN AMAN extended to En Route E TOD P RNAV APV procedures Related to AF1 HIGH PERFORMI NG AIRPORTS Tac. Flow Man. A SMGCS L1 A SMGCS L2 Airport CDM Time Based Separation Initial Airport Operations Plan Runway and airfield safety Related to AF2 ENABLING THE AVIATION INFRASTR UCTURE Aeronautical Data Electronic Dialog Rolling NOP FMTP MIL EAD AG Data Link Related to AF5 Related to AF6 ESSIP timeline Expected completion ESSIP FOC passed Related LSSIP is Year to be 2015 understood Template as an ESSIP objective leading 19 into (i.e. pre requisites to, facilitators for or part of) Final a DP family.

26 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process <To be updated with the FP> LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for <State> <.> <.> LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA <.> <.> LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP <.> <.> LSSIP Focal Point for Airport <.> <.> LSSIP Focal Point for Military <.> <.> EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for <State> DPS/PEPR <.> ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA <.> AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC <.> AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE Yi XIONG <.> AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE Yi XIONG <.> AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE Yi XIONG <.> ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT <.> ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO <.> National Stakeholder Specialist(s) LSSIP Year 2015 Template 20 Final

27 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO <.> COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA <.> COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA <.> ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL <.> ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL <.> FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA <.> FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA <.> FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA <.> FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA <.> FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO <.> INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA <.> ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO <.> ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA <.> ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO <.> ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO <.> ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO <.> ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA <.> NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA <.> NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA <.> SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT <.> SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT <.> National Stakeholder Specialist(s) LSSIP Year 2015 Template 21 Final

28 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts <CP : Copy organisation charts from LSSIP Year 2014> Insert the different organisation charts LSSIP Year 2015 Template 22 Final

29 Annex C Glossary of Abbreviations <CP : Copy Abbreviations from LSSIP Year 2014> Specific abbreviations for this State : PCP Abbreviations : AF FT PCP PDP S-AF ATM Functionality Fast Track Pilot Common Project Preliminary Deployment Programme Sub ATM Functionality LSSIP Year 2015 Template 23 Final

30 Annex D Questionnaire for States Military Organisations Note: This questionnaire was added as requested by EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL, to capture information on military infrastructure. For practical reasons, for the 2015 cycle the questionnaire is included in this Annex. This Annex is NOT required to be included in the published (and public) version of the document. However, it is considered an integral part of the LSSIP 2015 cycle and fully covered in the remit of the States authority(ies) signature. A full rationale for this request is provided below by EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL. Rationale SESAR in Europe as well as NEXTGEN in the USA represent the largest initiatives currently in place aimed at modernising globally the ATM system. These programmes expect the involvement of a massive number of stakeholders like the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSP), the Airspace Users (AU), the Airports Operators (AO), the supply industry and the States civil and military authorities. For the latter, in particular, is of utmost importance to be aware of the potential impacts stemming from the implementation of those programmes either on military aircraft fleets or on the ATM/CNS ground infrastructures in order to safeguard and mitigate potential interoperability issues. To do that, it would be worth to rationalise and harmonise the initiatives at the moment steered separately by the most important organisations dealing with SES/SESAR ATM matters EDA NATO and EUROCONTROL in order to facilitate the contribution of the states military authorities in building a common set of data on ATM/CNS capabilities to be used for different purposes. This will avoid the risk to duplicate the efforts already in place and for which the military community have committed to contribute. The information collected and stored will be key to understanding the system/interoperability requirements identified in ATM modernization and deployment programmes. Examples of the need for data capturing are: Understanding ATM innovation programs (Deployment Program implementation) ; The projects which will be put at front by the Deployment Manager; Air Traffic Management Master Plan Updates; Operational and financial impact analyses. There is a need for engagement with the States military organisations in order to obtain the input information necessary to derive better validated cost estimates: their understanding of their State s current military ATM/CNS architecture, and of its military operational imperatives and policy regarding, for instance, SESAR participation. Composition of the current fleets with in and out of service dates and equipment level, dual-use aerodromes with relevant civilian traffic indicative numbers, number of ATM/CNS and AD systems, also the NATO and USAFE assets should be known to complete the picture. A facilitated questionnaire, through the existing ESSIP/LSSIP methodology seems to be an appropriate way forward. The questions are built in close cooperation between EUROCONTROL, NATO and EDA, in order to get a comprehensive picture of military ATM/CNS airborne and ground capabilities currently available to allow nations to provide Air Navigation Services (ANS) in the airspace of own responsibility. The results of previous questionnaires have been inserted in this annex. The National answers will be used to feed the three organisations (EDA, NATO and EUROCONTROL) to facilitate e.g.: a) Business View and Cost Benefit Analysis (impact) of Master Plan updates; b) ATM/CNS Systems database repository (NATO); c) Assessment on Performance Based Certification for ATM/CNS avionics; d) CNS interoperability and rationalisation opportunities; e) Assessment of the deployment opportunities. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 24 Final

31 Air Navigation Services (ANS 5 ) and Air Defence (AD) ground infrastructure questionnaire 1. Military En-route Area Control Centers (ACCs) 1.1 How many military en-route ACCs are there in # your State? Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 1.2 How many of the military en-route ACCs are: Integrated on the same ATM 6 system as Civil ANSP? Co-located with and on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? Co-located with and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? Separated but on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? # # # # Separated and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 1.3 How many of the military en-route ACCs are providing ANS to: Primarily to General Air Traffic (GAT)? # Operational Air Traffic (OAT) + GAT frequently? # OAT + GAT occasionally? # OAT only? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 1.4 If there is more than one military en-route ACC, are there different ATM systems for ATM provision? Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 1.5 Are any of the military en-route ACCs currently using any of the following COM systems? Connection to civil Aeronautical Messaging Handling System (AMHS) Connection to Pan European Network Service (PENS) (through civil ANSP or direct to the backbone) Y/N/ Y/N/ Voice over IP (VoIP) for inter-center coordination Y/N/ VHF 8.33 ground radio infrastructure Y/N/ UHF at all sectors Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 5 Air Traffic Management and Communication, Navigation & Surveillance related infrastructure. 6 All ATM systems operated in the Centre LSSIP Year 2015 Template 25 Final

32 1.6 Are any of the military en-route ACCs currently relying on conventional NAV 7 systems? Y/N/ Additional Info centers. Add clarification, if needed.> 1.7 Are any of the military en-route ACCs currently using any of the following SUR systems? Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) Mode S (Selective). If so, are they clustered with civil radars. Y/N/ Primary Surveillance Radar Y/N/ Plot/track data derived or received from civil Centers. Y/N/ Multi-Lateration (MLAT) Y/N/ Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Y/N/ centers. Specify if they are clustered with civil radars.> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 7 NDB, VOR, DME, TACAN. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 26 Final

33 2. Military Approach Centers (APPs) for Terminal Approach Areas (TMA) 2.1 How many military APPs are there in your State? # Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.2 Do you have centralised approaches serving Y/N/ multiple airfields? Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.3 How many of the military APPs are providing ANS to: Primarily to GAT? # OAT + GAT frequently? # OAT + GAT occasionally? # OAT only? # How many military APPs are providing ANS to GAT (e.g. feeding an Aerodrome) to a High level of interaction 8 TMA? # Medium level of interaction TMA? # Low level of interaction TMA? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.4 Do you have common ATM systems at ACC - Y/N/ APP level? Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 2.5 How many of the military APPs are: Integrated on the same ATM system as Civil ANSP? Co-located with and on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? Co-located with and with a different ATM system than the Civil ANSP? # # # Separated but on the same ATM system as the Civil ANSP? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.6 If there is more than one military APP, are there different APP systems for ANS provision? Y/N/ If yes, how many different APP systems? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.7 Are any of the military APPs currently using any of the following COM systems? Connection to civil AMHS (replacing AFTN)? Y/N/ Connection to PENS Y/N/ 8 As used in the document Military Impact assessment of ATM Master Plan Deployment Packages and Deployment LSSIP Year 2015 Template 27 Final

34 2.7.3 Voice over IP (VoIP) Y/N/ VHF 8.33 Y/N/ UHF Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.8 Are any of the military APPs currently using conventional NAV 9 systems? If developing RNAV and RNP approaches, please state. Y/N/ Y/N/ <Indicate plans for RNAV and RNP approaches.> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 2.9 Are any of the military APPs currently using any of the following SUR systems? SSR Mode S Y/N/ Primary Surveillance Radar Y/N/ Plot/track data derived or received from civil Centers. Y/N/ Multiple radars tracking Y/N/ MLAT Y/N/ ADS-B Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 9 NDB, VOR, DME, TACAN. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 28 Final

35 3. Military Airbases (TWR, Wing Operation Centre (WOC) 10 ) 3.1 How many airbases in your State are under the Military jurisdiction? At how many airbases are ANS provided by the Military? # # At how many airbases does your State provide ANS to GAT (Aerodromes open to the Public)? # Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 3.2 Are these airbases operating different ATM Y/N/ systems for ANS provision? Additional Info <Add clarification, if needed.> 3.3 Are any of these airbases currently using any of the following COM systems? Connection to civil AMHS (replacing AFTN) Y/N/ Connection to PENS Y/N/ Voice over IP (VoIP) Y/N/ VHF 8.33 Y/N/ UHF Y/N/ Remote Tower Y/N/ aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes > Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 3.4 Are these airbases currently using any of the following systems for Precision Approach Landing operations? Instrument Landing System Y/N/ Microwave Landing System Y/N/ Precision Approach Radar / Ground Control Approach Y/N/ Ground Based Augmentation System Y/N/ Non precision approach systems Y/N/ aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes> aerodromes> Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 3.5 Are these airbases currently using any SUR Systems? Y/N/ Additional Info airbases. Add clarification, if needed.> 3.6 How many WOC s (functionality) do you operate? # 10 Unclassified WOC information is requested and is related to the ability to interact with MIL/CIV ANSP. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 29 Final

36 3.6.1 How many different WOC systems relevant to ATM do you operate? Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> # 4. Air Defence (AD 11 ) systems 4.1 How many AD centers are there in your State? If you have more than one, How many different AD systems do you operate to provide AD? How many different ATS systems do you operate to provide AD? # # # Are you planning to transition to the NATO ACCS AD system? Y/N/ Additional Info <Add clarification on any item in the table above, if needed.> 5. EUROAT 5.1 Has EUROAT been implemented by the National Military in your State? If yes, Y/N/ Specify the method of publishing EUROAT? <Select the relevant option(s) below: - Military Regulation, - MIL AIP, - CIV/MIL AIP, - CIV AIP, - Other (Specify)> If there are deviations from EUROAT, are they published in the national aeronautical publications? Y/N/ Is the civil ANSP taking into account EUROAT for ANS provision? If yes, is EUROAT included in the recurrent training of the civil ATCOs? 5.2 Which sources of ATM terminology do you use in ATM related matters? 5.3 What kind of phraseology do you use while rendering ATS to OAT flights? Y/N/ Y/N/ <Select the relevant option(s) below: - NATO, - ICAO, - EUROCONTROL, - National military rules and regulations> <Select the relevant option(s) below: - ICAO, - NATO STANAG, - National (non-icao)> 6. Flight planning 6.1 Do you file flight plans for the OAT IFR flights conducted in controlled airspace outside reserved/restricted airspace? 6.2 Do you file a flight plan for OAT IFR flights conducting cross-border operations? 6.3 Do you have a dedicated flight plan filing system in your MIL organisation? Y/N/ Y/N/ Y/N/ 11 Unclassified AD information is requested and is related to the ability to interact with MIL/CIV ANSP. LSSIP Year 2015 Template 30 Final