Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) HUNGARY

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) HUNGARY Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Hungary Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/120 Date of Edition 31/03/17 LSSIP Focal Point B. Kis - barnabas.kis@hungarocontrol.hu LSSIP Contact Person A. Dybowska - agnieszka.dybowska@eurocontrol.int Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP and FAB Performance Plan Latest FABCE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr. Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fabce.eu LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) ANSP HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co Airports Military Authorithies Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Hungary ACC Budapest Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context From 1 st of January 2017 the National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) and the Transportation Safety Bureau (TSB) are integrated into the Ministry of National Development and the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) is integrated into the Ministry of Defence (MoD). The detailed changes will be described and new organigrams will be included in the next LSSIP 2017 document. Information and organigrams related to the above mentioned stakeholders in this document reflect the situation valid until 31 December 2016.Since 2011 the National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) provides the oversight over aviation in Hungary. The tasks of the Civil Aviation Authority and the Military Aviation Authority are integrated into the NTA AA but are functionally separated. The supervision of military aviation is managed by the NTA AA State and Government Aviation Department. HungaroControl is the main air navigation service provider in the State. Separate military ATC is provided for military TMAs and CTRs. Regional ANS for military airspace users is provided by HungaroControl. Airspace Management is a joint responsibility of the Minister of National Development and the Minister of Defence. The Government has established the National Airspace Co-ordination Board (NACB) in order to prepare the implementation of the strategic airspace management tasks. The AMC (Airspace Management Cell) is a part of HungaroControl as a joint civil military cell and it is staffed with military and civilian experts. The AMC is an operationally independent body; its activities are supervised by the NACB. Technical investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by the Transportation Safety Bureau (TSB) for civil aircraft accidents and all serious incidents. Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Hungary 2016 Traffic in Hungary increased by 2.5% during summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 1.5% and 5.9% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.5%. BUDAPEST ACC Summer 2016 performance The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 195, 5% lower than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 180 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 162. Planning Period No problems are foreseen for Budapest ACC in the coming planning cycle. However a slight capacity gap could be experienced if traffic grows in line with the current routes scenario. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 1 Released Issue

12 Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives Completed 8; 22% Ongoing Planned 15; 41% Late 5; 13% No Plan Not Applicable 9; 24% Missing Data Undefined Hungary completed objectives AOM13.1, AOM19.1, AOM21.2, AOP04.1, ATC02.8, ENV01, ENV02, FCM04.1, ITY-ACID, ITY-AGDL and ITY-FMTP. Objectives AOM19.2, AOM19.3, ATC15.2, FCM04.2, FCM06, FCM08, NAV03, NAV10 have the status No Plan. Objectives AOM21.1, AOP10, AOP11, AOP12, AOP13, ATC07.1 have the status Not Applicable. Objectives AOP04.2, ATC12.1, ATC17, COM10, COM11, FCM05, INF07, ITY-AGVCS2, ITY-SPI have the status Ongoing. Objectives AOP05, ATC15.1, FCM03, ITY-ADQ, SAF11 have the status Late. Problems in completing objectives due for : Objective AOP05 (due by 31/12/2016) is Late due to system test and validation problems. Planned to be finalised by 31/12/2017. Plans for completing objectives due for 2017 and 2018: Objective AOP04.2 (due by 31/12/2017) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/12/2017. Objective ATC15.1 (due by 31/12/2017) is Late due to the fact that the implementation of the arrival management functionality will be performed within the MATIAS Build 11 project. The implementation is planned by 28/12/2018, the operational use is planned by 31/12/2019. Objective ATC17 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing. The formal approval by the NSA of the changes induced by upgrades of the MATIAS ATC system to support Electronic Dialogue during Coordination and Transfer is planned to be obtained by the end of Objective COM10 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing and planned to be implemented and operationally used by end of Objective FCM03 (due by 31/12/2017) is Late. The MATIAS system software satisfies the requirements since December 2005 but a number of functionalities are not yet in operation. The automation of sending all of the corresponding messages is planned to be operational by December Objective INF07 (due by 31/05/2018) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/05/2018. Objective ITY-ADQ (due by 30/06/2017) is Late and is planned to be fully implemented by 31/12/2017. Objective ITY-AGVCS2 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/12/2018. Objective NAV10 (due by 31/12/2016) is No Plan, since the development and publishing of the necessary national regulatory material is not on the legislative program yet. APV/Baro/LPV SBAS procedures have been implemented for Budapest Liszt Ferenc International airport and APV/Baro procedures at aerodrome Győr/Pér. For other aerodromes presently no concrete plans and information are available. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 2 Released Issue

13 Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 73% 77% 56% 75% 59% 15% n/a 17% ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Hungary is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1990 EUROCONTROL 1992 European Union 2004 EASA 2004 ICAO 1969 NATO 1999 ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Budapest FIR. Budapest FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 7 States, namely Austria, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Ukraine Airspace Classification and Organisation The current classification of the airspace is described in the table and graph below. Airspace Class Main Rules Applicable airspace Controlled Airspace Class C Class D Class D Class D IFR and VFR permitted (en-route VFR); all flights are subject to ATC IFR and VFR permitted; all flights are subject to ATC IFR and VFR permitted; all flights are subject to ATC IFR and VFR permitted; all flights are subject to ATC Controlled airspace from 9500 up to FL660 and Budapest TMA Košice TMA below 9500 AMSL LESMO area between FL245 and 5500 AMSL LHSM, LHDC CTA/CTR from GND up to 9500 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 5 Released Issue

18 Uncontrolled Airspace Class F Class G IFR and VFR flights are permitted and receive FIS, transponder C- mode operation is mandatory IFR and VFR flights are permitted and receive flight information service if requested. Uncontrolled airspace between 4000 and 9500 AMSL Uncontrolled airspace below 4000 AMSL 1.2. National Stakeholders From 1st of January 2017 the National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) and the Transportation Safety Bureau (TSB) are integrated into the Ministry of National Development and the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) is integrated into the Ministry of Defence (MoD). The detailed changes will be described and new organigrams will be included in the next LSSIP 2017 document. Information and organigrams related to the above mentioned stakeholders in this document reflect the situation valid until 31 December The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Hungary are the following: - Ministry of National Development (MoND) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) are jointly responsible for the governance of air traffic services; - National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) is acting as the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) - HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co acting as the Air Navigation Service Provider (ANSP); - The Transportation Safety Bureau (TSB) is responsible for the investigation of civil aviation, rail and water transport related incidents and accidents; The role of the military aviation authority is integrated into the NTA AA. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 6 Released Issue

19 Ministry of National Development Department for Civil Aviation and Inland Navigation Government Ministry of Defence Military Aviation Directorate Office of Authorities Other Ministries National Transport Authority Aviation Authority Transportation Safety Bureau HUN Joint Forces Command Air Bases & MIL ATS National Airspace Coordination Board HungaroControl Hungarian Air Navigation Services Pte. Ltd. Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Legend: Regulation Service Provision Oversight and Inspection Accident / Incident Investigation Command Superintendence Civil Regulator(s) General Information The Aviation Authority (AA) was founded within the NTA from the former Civil Aviation Authority and the former Military Aviation Authority. The Aviation Authority has the oversight over aviation in Hungary. The Minister of National Development and the Minister of Defence of Hungary are responsible for the regulation of aviation. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 7 Released Issue

20 Different other national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM, according to the National Aviation Act are summarised in the table below. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Organisation responsible Parliament, Government, Ministry of National Development and Ministry of Defence National Transport Authority - Aviation Authority National Transport Authority - Aviation Authority Minister of National Development and Minister of Defence/ NTA Minister of Finance/ National and Customs Administration (access of data) Ministry of National Development, together with the Minister of Finance (Route charges) Minister of National Development together with the Minister of Rural Development (Noise protection) Legal Basis Aviation Act XCVII/1995 Aviation Act XVII/1995, Gov. Decree 263/2006. (XII. 20.) (From 1. January 2017: Gov. Decree 382/2016. (XII. 2.) instead of Decree 263/2006. (XII. 20.)) Commission Regulation (EC) 549/2004, Aviation Act XCVII/1995 Aviation Act XCVII/1995; Gov. Decree 4/1998., (I.16.), MO 26/2007. (III.1.) GKM Act XCII of 2003 on the Rules of Taxation* 84/2011. (XII.29.) NFM Ministerial Order on the charges payable after the use of the Hungarian airspace. Gov. Decree 176/1997. (X.11.) on the rules of the designation, benefit and termination of noise protection areas established in the vicinity of airports* MO 18/1997 (X.11.) KHVM-KTM joint decree* on detailed technical rules of the designation benefit and termination of noise protection areas to be established in the vicinity of airports* Security Government /NTA Gov. Decree 169/2010. (V.11.) on the rules of civil aviation security and the sphere of authority duties and rules of operation of the Aviation Security Committee. Accident investigation *Not specifically related to ATM. Ministry of National Development Act CLXXXIV/2005., Gov. Decree 70/2015. (XII. 1.) NFM, Regulation (EU) 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October Regulation (EU) 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June The NTA is further detailed in the following sections. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 8 Released Issue

21 National Transport Authority Aviation Authority The Aviation Authority has the oversight over aviation in Hungary. The Aviation Authority (AA) was founded within the NTA from the former Civil Aviation Authority and the former Military Aviation Authority. The Aviation Authority is separated organisationally from the ANSPs. The NTA is under governance of Ministry of National Development. Annual Report published: Y Annual report covering 2016 activities is published on the NTA/AA website. The address of NTA/AA website is the following: The website may be changed in the near future due to the change in the organisational structure. The organisational chart is in Annex B ANSP HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co Service provided Name of the ANSP: Governance: Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co Ministry of National Ownership: State 100% Development Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Others Y Flow management, Airspace management Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y ATS in Austria and Slovak Republic ATC en-route in the KFOR sector established over Kosovo Annual Report published: Y Annual Report 2015 is published, Annual Report 2016 is expected to be published in the first half of 2017 on the website. The address of the ANSP website is the following: The organisation chart of HungaroControl (valid from 1 st of January 2017) is in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 9 Released Issue

22 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N - FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES Air Systems Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Performed: 2015, Planned: 2019 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No ATC Unit Budapest ACC, Budapest APP, Budapest TWR Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES Air Systems Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Performed: 2014, Planned: 2019 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No ATC Unit Budapest ACC KFOR Sector SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES Air Systems Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Performed: 2015, Planned: 2019 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No ATC Unit Budapest ACC, Budapest APP, Budapest TWR RDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES Air Systems Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Performed: 2014, Planned: 2019 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No ATC Unit Budapest ACC KFOR Sector 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 10 Released Issue

23 ATC Units The ATC units in the Hungarian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Budapest ACC For overflights, inbound/outbound traffic to/from aerodromes within, or adjacent to, the Budapest FIR and KFOR Sector Budapest APP 4 -- For inbound/outbound traffic to/from aerodromes within the Budapest TMA. Budapest TWR - For aerodrome traffic at Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (LHBP) Airports General information Due to size of Hungary and the geographical situation the civil aviation is focused on the international operations mainly. The domestic flights are not relevant. The significant part of flights are using eight (8) airports published in the Hungarian AIP. These eight (8) airports are the following: LHBP-Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport; LHDC-Debrecen; LHSM-Hévíz/Balaton; LHPR- Győr/Pér, LHBC-Békéscsaba, LHNY-Nyiregyháza, LHPP-Pécs-Pogány, LHUD-Szeged. The main airport is Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport owned by the state but all operational rights were privatised in The current owner of these rights is a consortium led by Avialliance GmbH. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (LHBP/BUD) Military Authorities From 1st of January 2017 the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) is integrated into the Ministry of Defence (MoD). The detailed changes will be described and new organigrams will be included in the next LSSIP 2017 document. Information and organigrams related to the MIL stakeholder in this document reflect the situation valid until 31 December LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 11 Released Issue

24 Under the authority of the Department for Planning and Coordination, the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) was in existence until 30 June By a governmental decision the MAA was integrated into NTA since 1 July The Directorate for Air Transport was founded within the NTA from the former Civil Aviation Authority and the former Military Aviation Authority. In April 2011 there was an organizational change within the NTA. The result of this change was that the Directorate for Air Transport became the Aviation Authority (AA) with a renewed organization structure. The Aviation Authority has the oversight over aviation in Hungary but the tasks of the Civil Aviation Authority and the Military Aviation Authority are separated functionally within this new structure. The supervision of military aviation is managed by the NTA AA State and Government Aviation Department. The oversight activities and responsibilities of the NTA AA are described above (see chapter ). Separate military ATC is provided for military TMAs and CTRs. Service in TRAs is provided by Air Defence Controllers (mainly) and military ATCUs (rarely). Regional ANS for military airspace users is provided by the national ANSP. Airspace Management is a joint responsibility of the Minister of National Development and the Minister of Defence. The Government has established the National Airspace Co-ordination Board (NACB) by a Government Decision 1298/2011. (IX.1.) in order to prepare the implementation of the strategic airspace management tasks in line with Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005, laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace. The AMC (Airspace Management Cell) is a part of HungaroControl as a joint civil-military cell and it is staffed with military and civilian experts. The two Ministers concerned regulate the tasks, duties and responsibilities of the AMC. The AMC is an operationally independent body; its activities are supervised by the NACB. At the Ministry of Defence the Chief of Defence Staff is inter alia superior of the Defence Forces Joint Forces Command, which is responsible for the Air Defence of Hungary. In addition this Command is responsible for the overall policy and planning of the Airforce administration and logistics. Foreign Air Forces operations in national airspace during NATO/PfP (Partnership for Peace) exercises are performed according to national regulation and/or individual exercises plans. The organisation chart is in the Annex B. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 12 Released Issue

25 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Air Navigation Act. (1995. XCVII. tv.); and Government Decree on enacting clauses of the Air Navigation Act (141/1995. (XI.30.) Government decree). Authority signing such legal provision: The President of the Republic and the President of the National Assembly (in case of State Law); Prime Minister on behalf of the Government (in case of Government Decree). These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT X Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Air Navigation Act (1995. XCVII.) and Government Decree on enacting clauses of the Air Navigation Act (141/1995. (XI. 30.) Government decree). Authority signing such legal provision: The President of the Republic and the President of the National Assembly (in case of State Law); the Prime Minister on behalf of the Government (in case of Government Decree) These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT X Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination X OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training X ATCO Training ATCO Licensing X ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision X ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training X ESARR applicability Aircrew Licensing X Additional Information: N/A Additional Information: N/A Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP X National AIP National Military AIP X National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip EUROCONTROL eaip Other: Other: Y Oversight OAT GAT 2 National oversight body for OAT: National Transport National oversight body for GAT: National Transport Authority - Aviation Authority Authority - Aviation Authority Additional information: None Additional information: Military ATS provides services primarily not for GAT inside MCTR/MTMA/TRA. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 13 Released Issue

26 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route X En-Route X Approach/TMA X Approach/TMA X Airfield/TWR/GND X Airfield/TWR/GND X AIS X AIS X MET X MET X SAR X SAR TSA/TRA monitoring X AMC is operating within HungaroControl FIS X Additional Information: Other: Other: Additional Information: ASP is responsible for provision of Alerting Service within Budapest FIR. Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: -- Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: -- If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: According to Article 7(5) of 550/2004. (EC) Regulation, certification is not necessarily required where providers offer primarily their services to aircraft movement other than GAT. N User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT X If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing X Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network X Under radar control X Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges X Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures X Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM X 8.33 X Mode S X ACAS X Others: None LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 14 Released Issue

27 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Hungary applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 15 Released Issue

28 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Hungary Hungary - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast A = Actual F = Forecast A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 5.3% 7.5% 6.1% 5.1% 5.8% 5.1% 5.1% Hungary B 1.9% 11.6% 11.1% 4.8% 5.0% 3.2% 3.0% 3.3% 2.9% 3.1% L 4.4% 2.6% 0.7% 1.5% 1.5% 1.1% 1.3% ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Hungary increased by 2.5% during summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 1.5% and 5.9% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.5%. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 16 Released Issue

29 2.2. ACC Budapest Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LHCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +1.8 % 195 (5%) No The average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.04 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.13 minutes per flight during the same period in % of the delays were due to Weather and 44% due to ATC capacity. Capacity Plan +2.5% Achieved Comments Optimization of airspace structure Recruitment and training of controllers Full FRA Yes New geographical sectors are planned with step by step implementation 7 new ATCOs expected after the summer season 2017 with uncertain (05) retirements CPDLC operational Yes Very low usage from the operators Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes max. 8 sectors with level capping Summer 2016 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 195, 5% lower than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 180 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 162. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 17 Released Issue

30 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LHCC 195 Capacity Profiles 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous baseline H 198 2% 200 1% 203 1% Ref % 195 0% 198 2% L 195 0% 195 0% 195 0% Open 195 0% 195 0% 195 0% C/R 199 2% 204 3% 209 2% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events 3 geographical ACC sectors Sector optimisation tool FMP/Supervisor NATO Exercise Optimization of airspace structure 3 geographical 4 geographical ACC ACC sectors sectors Recruitment and training of controllers and possible extra work Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase 2.5% 3% 3% 3% 3% Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 2% N/A N/A Current Routes Profile % Increase 2% 4% 4% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Difference Capacity Plan v. Current routes Profile 2.6% 5.6% 7.1% N/A N/A 0.5% 1.0% 1.4% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information ATS also provided in KFOR sector LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 18 Released Issue

31 The graphs above show an outline of available sector configurations for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer Note: It always must be considered that the Budapest ACC has to ensure staff for the KFOR sector as well as the traffic demand. It is important when determining backbone vs. sectors. Max. Configuration will be Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Budapest ACC in the coming planning cycle. However a slight capacity gap could be experienced if traffic grows in line with the current routes scenario. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 19 Released Issue

32 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Hungary all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC-2015/1 Corrective actions taken: Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-sesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Ownership All operational stakeholders Description: FCM03 ASP: YES. The software upgrade will be installed by 21/12/2018 and the AFP message sending/reception function will be introduced by 31/12/2019. The software upgrade has been already contracted with the ATM system provider company. FCM05 ASP: YES. The activity is planned to start at the begining of The training plan covering all aspects of the interaction with the NOP will be developed by the middle of APO: YES. The responsible manager is selected. The data sharing process is defined. The activities will start in Q Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, REC-2015/2 ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Corrective actions taken: Local Stakeholders Description: AOM19 MIL: NO. AOM19 is completed from the military side. NAV10 REG: YES. The discussion on adding the relevant regulation to the legislative program has started. Although there is no agreed plan when will be the regulation done, but the Ministry is planning to publish the relevant regulation. ASP: YES. APV/Baro/LPV SBAS procedures have been implemented at Budapest Liszt Ferenc Int. aerodrome for all RWY-s in the frame of SESAR LSD project (Budapest 2.0) on 15th September Coordinates data are published in WGS-84 in accordance with ICAO Annex 15 requirements and Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. HungaroControl as an ANSP is responsible only for LHBP aerodrome procedures, but we are ready for cooperation in development, implementation and publication of APV procedures at other concerned aerodromes (project: Beyond 2.0) if requested by the concerned airport operators. ITY-ADQ REG: YES, national legislation draft is developed, it is currently under legislative review. ASP: YES. The ADQ implementation project is established, all stakeholders within HungaroControl are involved. Formal arrangements with airports are in place. The negotiation processes with public LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 20 Released Issue

33 Reference Recommendation 2015 Ownership number entities (MoND, NTA AA) are ongoing. The data quality and process requirements are implemented. For the data collection and direct electronic data transfer a new AIM System has been implemented fulfilling the traceability, interoperability, common dataset and digital exchange format requirements of the ADQ regulation. Personnel and performance requirements are fulfilled, the ADQ Operating Manuals of AIS staff are in line with the supporting system implemented. MIL: NO. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 para (9) and Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council article 1 para (2) this objective should not concern military operations and training. However military makes effort to meet requirements. Essential measures have been taken via HDF JFC action No 127/2011 to regulate procedures of providing aeronautical information and data processing. Military will make efforts to obtain ISO9001 certification for MILAIS. APO: YES. The ADQ working group is in place. The LoA with ANSP is signed. The in house procedures and trainings are ongoing. INF07 REG: YES. The relevant regulation is under legislative review, it will be published in this year. ASP: No. ASP is dependent on the national policy and regulation which is not in force yet. APO: No. The APO is waiting for the detailed national policy. REC-2015/7 ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. ANSPs benefiting from EU funding Corrective actions taken: YES Description: HungaroControl used and intends to continue to use CEF Founding opportunities to achieve full interoperability of its ATM systems and procedures in line with MP Level 1. Ongoing activities in connection with above: CEF Call 2014: A-CDM own project, FAB CE FRA common project CEF Call 2015: MATIAS upgrade for cross-border FRA own project, AMAN LOWW common project, CEF Call 2016: go to Data Link Service Implementing Project Path I common project, Data Link Service Study Project Path II common project, SWIM Governance common project, Flight Object Interoperability common project, FAB CE Dynamic Airspace Management study common project, Gate One FRA study common project. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 21 Released Issue

34 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in Hungary are depicted in the tables below: A-SMGCS (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 03/2013 To: 12/2016 Status: The A-SMGCS upgrade has been finished. The date of operation is 06/2016. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - HW and SW upgrade of the A-SMGCS with the implementation of some CDM functionalities. L3: AOP04.1, AOP04.2 Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - A-SMGCS By the hardware upgrade the system robustness will be increased. CDM functionality implementation: the decongestion from situational awareness and transparency will lead to a reduction of incidents and accidents in CDM airports. Contribution in CDM: increased efficiency and productivity lead to lessened environmental impact, both emissions and noise-related. After a local analysis of savings, the emissions reductions will be accurately determinable. CDM: More accurate common planning and information sharing leads to an increase of the throughput in peak hours in CDM airports. Overall benefit/cost ratio has been estimated at CDM airports and those with local implementation to be at least 9/1 with a maximum two-year payback. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 22 Released Issue

35 ADQ implementation (-) Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. (HU), Hungarocontrol (HU), National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) (HU) From 2011 ongoing Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Type of project: National Data Quality Assurance Plan and data origination, provision and publication processes, company level and AIS ISQMS,, Data Quality Assurance Summary and and parts of AIS conformity documents are developed in HungaroControl. Formal arrangements with airports are in place.; ADQ compliant AIM IT systems is under installationin operation. Obligations of Eurocontrol Data Assurance Level Specification to conduct awareness campaign is fulfilled in HungaroControl. On national level, data provider list is agreed, public consultation of implementation rule is underclosed and it is under inter-ministerial consultation public consultation.; Awareness campaign on national level was executed in Q The objective of the project is to transform HungaroControl activities related to aeronautical information to reach ADQ compliancy, as well as to support the development of national implementing rule of the ADQ regulation. Within HungaroControl special emphasis is put on the development of ADQ compliant data origination and handling processes, implementation of new ADQ compliant AIM IT system. On national level, a working group is proposing to adapt Eurocontrol specifications as means of compliance. Eurocontrol supported the project through its specifications and giving forum for international workshops. L3: INF07, ITY-ADQ N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - ADQ is intended to increase safety through making aeronautical data management more reliable, and to support new concepts of operation within the European air traffic management network. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 23 Released Issue

36 ANS I renovation (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 06/2013 To: 30/06/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - The ANS I renovation project is closed by the scheduled deadline. The Contingency and Simulation Centre is operating. Renovation and reconstruction of the HungaroControl old ATCC into a Contingency and Simulation Centre. It will contain : - New Radar Simulator - CRDS - EPC (Entry Point Central) Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - ANS I renovation Stand-by system for ACC/APP at 70% capacity within 6 hours. Stand-by system for ACC/APP at 70% capacity within 6 hours. Reduced cost of eliminating distributed placing of systems to be housed in ANSI. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 24 Released Issue

37 ATM System (MATIAS) upgrade for cross-border free route operation (2015_034_AF3) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: 04/01/ /03/2019 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: The procurement procedure has been finished. The preliminary design phase is ongoing. The planned date of implementation is recalculated due to review of the development roadmap of MATIAS ATM system. Instead of Build 11.1 and Build 11.2 the Build 11 and Build 12 version names have been introduced. Achieving the prerequisites for cross-border free route operation at a local level Contributing to the future FAB CE wide FRA implementation Improving the controllers effectiveness and increase safety with enhanced functionalities Contributing to the reduction of fuel consumption by allowing airspace users to plan and fly their preferred trajectories L3: AOM21.2 Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: MATIAS Build 11.1 Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_034_AF3 The new functions make the usage of more enhanced safety features available. It enables the development and deployment of future enhanced safety tools. The free route capability will contribute to the lower emission and fuel efficiency. Capacity: +++ The new functionality will allow better handling of the traffic, and will therefore increase the capacity. It is essential to integrate later developments of increasing capacity. Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - By the new functionalities higher volume of traffic can be controlled. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 25 Released Issue

38 CDM (-) Organisation(s): Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. (HU), Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 10/2013 To: 03/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: The MATIAS system has been upgraded by the new CDM functionality but not yet in operation. The planned date of operation is 31/03/2017. Implementation of new CDM messages in the MATIAS ATM system. Budapest Airport is the leading party of the global CDM project. The MATIAS ATM system upgrade has been implemented in cooperation with Budapest Airport. L3: AOP05 Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - By the hardware upgrade the system robustness will be increased. CDM functionality implementation: the decongestion from situational awareness and transparency will lead to a reduction of incidents and accidents in CDM airports. Increased efficiency and productivity lead to lessened environmental impact, both emissions and noise-related. After a local analysis of savings, the emissions reductions will be accurately determinable. More accurate common planning and information sharing leads to an increase of the throughput in peak hours in CDM airports. Increased efficiency and productivity lead to lessened environmental impact, both emissions and noise-related. After a local analysis of savings, the emissions reductions will be accurately determinable. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 26 Released Issue

39 Extension of the ATM radio system ANS-I. (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 01/2015 To: 06/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: The installation of the ANS-I ATM radio system was finished in July The operational approval by the NSA was received in December The aim of the project is to support the contingency air traffic control centre to be installed in the HungaroControl ANS-I building with radio equipment necessary for contingency ACC/APP, remote TWR and ATIS, VOLMET operation. L3: ITY-AGVCS2 Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - The project contributes to the possible contingency operation. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 27 Released Issue

40 Implement Voice over IP (VoIP) network segment for VoIP in ATM (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 10/ /12/2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Planning of the network is completed. Its implementation phase started in Q1 of 2016, the Voice Communication Switch to be capable for VoIP is upgraded. The test of the system in real operational environment will start in Q and the project is expected to be ended by It is an European ATM Master plan roadmap and also an LSSIP objective to implement Voice over IP (VoIP) in ATM. HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co. will implement VoIP capable radios and VoIP capability of the Voice Communication System. Between the radios and VCS there is a need for a reliable IP network to carry the VoIP traffic.. L3: COM11 Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Implement Voice over IP (VoIP) network segment for VoIP in ATM The network part of the complete VoIP in ATM chain will be reliable and redundant as well as the radios and the VCS. As a reliable network offers more availability figures, the capacity may increase. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 28 Released Issue

41 MANS Program (Military) (-) Organisation(s): Mil. Authority (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution From 2008 ongoing Finalisation is in progress Between MoD ran a successful program called 'MANS-2006' for the modernisation and harmonisation of the Hungarian military ATM system. MANS is the continuation of the previous program with the following aims: - further harmonisation of civil-military ATM systems and working methods; - further modernisation of the MIL ATM system; - further standardisation of the MIL ATC/AIS procedures and working technologies; - updating and issuing MIL ATM related regulations and legislative provisions; - adopting EUROCONTROL, EU and NATO directives and regulations; - developing the Hungarian Deployable ATM. Component as a part of national contribution to NATO led operations; - enhancement of the military AIS capabilities; - development of the military ATM related training system. L3: ITY-ADQ Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 29 Released Issue

42 MATIAS Build 11 (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: To: 31/03/2019 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Preparation of the preliminary system design is ongoing. The planned date of implementation is recalculated due to review of the development roadmap of MATIAS ATM system. Instead of Build 11.1 and Build 11.2 the Build 11 and Build 12 version names have been introduced. This development step for the MATIAS ATC system will contain AMAN OLDI functionality, add improvements for the Free route, increase of the capacity of the system by a new, more efficient HMI. L3: AOM21.2, ATC15.1 Other links: ATM System (MATIAS) upgrade for cross-border free route operation (2015_034_AF3) Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - MATIAS Build 11.1 The new functionality makes the usage of more enhanced safety features available. It enables the development and deployment of future enhanced safety tools. The free route capability will contribute to the lower emission and fuel efficiency. The new functionality will allow better handling of the traffic, and will therefore increase the capacity. It is essential to integrate later developments of increasing capacity. By the new functionalities higher volume of traffic can be controlled. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 30 Released Issue

43 Remote Tower (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references From: 01/02/2013 To: 31/03/2018 ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Control room construction and technological Site Acceptance Tests were completed in the first half of The A-SMGCS processing system was duplicated and the visualisation system was installed and approved for live trial by the NSA. The live trial was conducted successfully during August and September Further developments are under way to enable the facility for contingency operation. Developing and implementing a full remote tower service for Budapest Airport integrated with existing A-SMGCS and enhanced visualisation. N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - The integrated camera system will provide enhanced visualisation in LVP. The Remote Tower concept enables Air Traffic Control services (ATS) and Aerodrome Flight Information Services (AFIS) to be provided at aerodromes where such services are either currently unavailable, or where it is difficult or too expensive to implement and staff a conventional manned facility. Development of a multi-tower concept will create cost saving possibilities. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 31 Released Issue

44 Replacement of Remote radios (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 03/2013 To: 06/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - The installation of the radio sites Kőrishegy, Kékes, BUD 31 Building, Széchenyihegy and Dobogókő was finished in the first half of All operational approvals by the NSA was received in The aim of the project is the modernisation and extension of the radio equipment at the remote sites (Kékes, Széchenyi-hegy, Körishegy, BUD 31 Building). The project includes the installation of a new receiver site at Dobogókő, and the renewal of the power supply system of the most critical sites. The project also aims support of VoIP connections from the radio sites towards the ATC centre.. L3: COM11, ITY-AGVCS2 N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - The extension of the radio sites enables the offset carrier operation in the lowest ACC sectors and by better radio coverage contributes to enhancement of flight safety. The extension of the radio sites enables opening of additional ATC sectors if required. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 32 Released Issue

45 Replacement of the AFTN / AMHS communication center (-) Organisation(s): Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: To: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: In line with the Technical Specification the tenderers submitted final offer end of February The new centre is expected to go into operation at the end of The current AFTN Communication switch was made in It was operationally used from 2009, the hardware was upgraded in 2015, the new AFTN/AMHS COM center is planned to be implemented by end of L3: COM10 Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Replacement of the AFTN / AMHS communication centre. With the new technology the system can meet the current requirements and ensure safe operation and delivery of AFTN / AMHS messages in the long term. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 33 Released Issue

46 Replacement of the meteorological system at Budapest Airport (-) Organisation(s): Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. (HU), Hungarocontrol (HU) Type of project: National Schedule: From: 10/10/2014 To: 30/10/2017 Status: Procurement process finished. Factory Acceptance Test completed, the installation of the system is ongoing. Description: The current meteorological system was installed in 2006 so it will reach end of life in Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Replacement of the meteorological system at Budapest Airport The new system will represent the current technology and will meet the current requirements of the stakeholders. With more accurate and easily available meteorological data, capacity may increase. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 34 Released Issue

47 Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination 5.1. FAB Co-ordination Optimised ATM Network Services AOM For the time being, only Hungary has a specific ASM support tool (LARA) in operation, Croatia to follow early All other FABCE ANSPs plan to deploy LARA or an equivalent system by the end of The real-time management of ASM information (AOM19.2 and AOM19.3) currently sees a variety of intentions, ranging from no plan to ongoing. FCM03 - The implementation of collaborative flight planning messages (APL, ACH, AFP) shows a heterogeneous status, whereas the weakest point turns out to be the full AFP implementation ( no plan to late ). FCM STAM Phase 1 is planned to go into operation at FABCE level on 27 th of April 2017 (except SK, BiH). STAM Phase 2 (FCM04.2) is still under discussion. FCM05 (interactive rolling NOP) - Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrades of the automated ASM support systems with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM. The objective is considered to become part of a FABCE project. FCM06 (TFC complexity assessment) - is tackled at FABCE level within the DAM/STAM study. Advanced Air Traffic Services AOM 21.1/2 (DCT, Free Route Airspace) - forming part of a main FABCE project, Free Route Airspace is going to be deployed stepwise within and across FABCE borders. Two main crossborder initiatives have been implemented in 2016, respectively early 2017 at H24 basis: SAXFRA- SLO/AUT and SEENFRA - HUN/ROM/BUL. Besides that, national DCT implementations are already in force and are planned to be extended. Likewise, further crossborder FRA applications beyond FABCE are planned for implementation in 2018 (e.g. SECSI FRA, merging SAXFRA and Croatian+Serbian/Montenegrin Airspace. Moreover, a Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study) has been identified to start off in 2017, including Baltic FAB, Danube FAB, FAB CE, SMATSA and M-NAV. ATC07.1 (ATC15.1, ATC 15.2) - AMAN Vienna is considered as a regional project, but nevertheless, will include and affect the majority of the FABCE states. Planned for implementation by end Extended AMAN for Vienna is currently scheduled until 2023 at the latest. ATC Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring: dependent on the national ATM system development, the MTCD function is considered a prerequisite for Free Route Airspace application. MTCD is already widely implemented; TCT is left to the ANSPs depending on local conditions. ATC17 - Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer: Having identified this objective as extremely beneficial for FRA application, the operational deployment is foreseen at those Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 35 Released Issue

48 High Performing Airport Operations AOP ASMGCS Level 2 is implemented in Praha and Vienna. Budapest has implemented Level 1, and Level 2 planned by end Although not part of the applicability area, Zagreb plans Level 2 before end AOP05 - A-CDM: implemented in Praha, planned in Budapest by end 2017 and Zagreb (2017/18). Vienna status is locally fully implemented, missing only DPI message transmission, planned for mid AOP10 - Time Based Separation: Applicable for Vienna; project has started, and in conjunction and based on AMAN implementation, it will be operational by end of AOP 12/13 - Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring: planned for Praha and Vienna in time Enabling Aviation Infrastructure COM10 - Migration to AMHS: completed in AUT, SLO and SK. Ongoing in HUN, CRO and BiH; late in CZR (2018) COM11 Voice over IP: all FABCE states are ongoing and plan this objective in time by FCM08 Extended Flight Plan: Specifications and requirements for the EFPL / ICAO FF-ICE are locally under discussion. Roadmaps for TOPSKY will foresee a later implementation, e.g ITY-AGDL: completed in AUT, CZR and HU. Ongoing CRO and SLO, planned for BiH and late for SK (2019) ITY-ACID - Aircraft ID: Mode S, and partly additionally A-WAM technologies, are applied in all FABCE states. Remaining actions to reach 100% of coverage are conceived until 2019, for BiH in ITY-AGVCS khz below FL195: All FABCE states do plan the FRQ conversions in time until end of LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 36 Released Issue

49 A safety approach to the Network operations is ensured through the FAB CE Safety Sub-committee and its cross domain Safety activities. The FAB CE Safety Management Roadmap specifies that the FAB CE ANSPs share inter alia experience regarding Just Culture. Just Culture implemented locally, taking into account the national legislation. In close cooperation with NM, capacity enhancements are permanently identified and implemented. FABCE is going to reach the RP2 targets for ATFM Delays throughout the whole period. Shared technical platforms, common use of Networks and maintenance, reduced NAV equipment, and others. X-Bone, common HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17) The goal is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X-bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11, and to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities. Integration of Security Event Management and Security Information Management into one service providing better quality and security of communication systems and higher resistance against potential threats. Two main projects of the FABCE Program Management deal actively with operational efficiency: Airspace Planning and Design (FRA) including aligned operational procedures, and Flexible Use of Airspace (ASM / STAM). Flight efficiency through Free Route applications improves steadily, based on the above mentioned ops efficiency projects. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 37 Released Issue

50 5.2. FAB Projects FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Project 1: Start , End: Continuous Type of project: FAB Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: , End: Ongoing activity Project is on track: - CEF FRA Study RTS CONOPS is delivered - FRA CONOPS available and the review and update will commence in 01/2017 once RTS report is available - ATM System Requirements report is available - Other activities in progress, will be delivered on schedule - FAB CE Airspace Plan 2016 delivered - FAB CE Network Operations Plan delivered The objective of Project 1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept. The project will implement the FAB CE X-Border FRA study ( Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea project). The key benefit expected from the project is to create a clear definition of the operational end technical pre-conditions for a conceived FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace, by creating a study. The study aims at defining the operational end technical pre-conditions to implement the FAB CE Free Route Airspace, including Concept of Operations, the necessary validation exercises thereof and the required development and upgrade requirements of ATM systems of the FAB CE members. Project 1 also includes annual updates of FAB CE Network Operations Plan (FNOP) and FAB CE Airspace Plan. L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 SESAR Key Feature: Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF AF AF FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace Baseline scenario FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace') Y Name/Code in DP2016: 102AF3 Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 38 Released Issue

51 Performance contribution Safety: ++ The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a FAB CE FRA OPS Environment: % saving in horizontal flight efficiency by saving 2.1 km deviations (millions) from GCD and saving 23,000 tonnes of Annual CO2 in Capacity: ++ To increase capacity to cope with the increase of around 60% in traffic in 2017 with a maximum delay of 0.28 minutes Cost-efficiency: +++ Improvement over 2006 in ATM/CNS costs per flight hour and achieve 469 of economic costs per flight hour in 2017 Operational efficiency: ++ Advanced ATS required for FRA implementation have a positive impact on all aspects of operational efficiency Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE Project 3 / DAM/STAM Study) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Project 3: Start: , End: 2016 Type of project: FAB DAM/STAM Study: Start: , End: Status: Project 3 closed in 2016 Description: Follow-on project 'DAM/STAM Study': Planned Currently under development, the CEF application is being finalised The objective of Project 3 was to optimise the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP/DM Activity Areas. The project achieved most of its original objectives and was closed in Project 3 is being followed-up with the new 'FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM' Study Project. The main objective of the DAM/STAM study project is to obtain a key FAB CE high-level document that contains all relevant elements required for a consequent FAB CE wide implementation of DAM and STAM processes. As such the DAM /STAM final report can be seen as an implementation roadmap for all involved FAB CE ANSPs, a FAB CE ASM document that defines the high level operational concept for FAB CE DAM/STAM by describing the collaboration, processes, procedures and tools needed for later implementation. The second main objective of the DAM/STAM study is to provide the involved ANSP with all required information necessary to plan for closing existing gaps to PCP /Deployment Plan on a local level. As a FAB CE wide assessment revealed gaps to the DP 2016 among the ANSP in all the related AF families, the DAM /STAM study is the FAB CE led activity to coordinate the closure of these remaining gaps. Furthermore, it is a stated goal of the DAM/STAM study to describe and prepare the conditions required to allow for a FAB CE wide harmonization of ASM-, FUA-, DAM and STAM processes. The effect of this is seen to be FAB CE wide ASM that will allow to unlock the full operational benefits associated to FAB CE FRA implementation. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 39 Released Issue

52 Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM06 Optimised ATM network services Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution DP2016 Families: AF AF AF AF AF AF AF FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions) N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call Safety: + -Increased situational awareness of FMPs, supervisors and ATCOs. STAM will give more options to avoid overloads. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Environment: ++ Trajectories are expected to be more efficient due to procedures and processes accommodating short-term changes. Larger selection of airspace configurations/scenarios available to allow for more robust planning. Direct positive impact thanks to shorter and more direct routes whenever possible, which will lead to an optimized fuel usage of the AU. In addition, increased robustness on the overall allocation of airspace will lead to a more appropriate fuel loading of airspace users. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Capacity: ++ Better usage of available airspace volumes with reduced complexity will lead to higher capacity. Short-term opportunities are effectively and efficiently managed. Overall increase of airspace capacity through optimised utilisation of airspace configurations and scenarios. STAM will give more opportunities to balance traffic demand and available capacity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Cost-efficiency: + A capacity increase combined with increased situational awareness of the ATCO is enhanced through the introduction of complexity assessments for expected scenarios. Combined this will lead to adjustments of sector monitoring values and ATCO productivity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Operational efficiency: ++ The application of the data / information sharing concept among all involved stakeholders will lead to an increased robustness and predictability of the FAB CE managed airspace. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 40 Released Issue

53 Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE Project 13) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The coordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities. The project was frozen in FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.1: Implementation and monitoring of the commonly approved Common Competence Schemes N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Cost-efficiency of training Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 41 Released Issue

54 Training Facilities (FAB CE Project 14) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources. The project has been frozen in FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.2: Common training of ATCO of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.3: Common training of ATSEP of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.4: Common use of training facilities of two or more ANSPs conducted N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility. Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 42 Released Issue

55 ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs. The project was frozen in N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Improve cost-efficiency, mitigation of financial risks Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 43 Released Issue

56 X-Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Type of project: FAB Ongoing Tender documentation finalised, common procurement expected early 2017 Description: The primary goal of this project is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X- bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11. The secondary goal of this project is to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities, if feasible. Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO6, target 6.5: Realise common (smart) procurement of relevant CNS infrastructure and ATM processing systems in FAB CE Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Optimisation of CNS resources Cost-efficiency: + Savings in procurement of CNS infrastructure Operational efficiency: - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 44 Released Issue

57 Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Ongoing Some processes finalised, others being developed Type of project: FAB Project 18 within the FAB CE is expected to: - Develop processes for coordinated infrastructure planning and maintenance thus leading to a proactive consultation process and a FAB CE-wide information exchange regarding SUR systems for increased cost-effectiveness; - Propose improvements in SUR coverage quality by coverage optimisation; - Conduct a feasibility study including a Cost Benefit Analysis of implementing a regional tracker for different scenarios vis-a-vis EUROCONTROL CS3 Study [R7], bringing facts and figures for making a "make or buy" decision. CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO6, target 6.3: Incorporate planning of the CNS infrastructure and ATM processing systems aligned with RP planning, to achieve its harmonisation and optimisation in the FAB CE Implementation Plan FSO6, target 6.4: Establish common operation of CNS infrastructure and ATM processing services as defined by the FAB CE Architecture including shared data processing functions, shared information pool and sharing of human resources where applicable and proven to be beneficial FSO7, target 7.1: Establish FAB CE common approach to technical operation and corrective / preventive maintenance of systems, including sharing of spare parts Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Optimisation of CNS resources Cost-efficiency: + Efficiency of the processes Informed decision about future solution for the regional tracker Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 45 Released Issue

58 5.3. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Operation of the KFOR sector Based on the Implementing Agreement between the Government of Hungary and the International Security Force in Kosovo (KFOR) for provision of Air Navigation Services and other relevant activities in the designated airspace over Kosovo HungaroControl has started service provision on 4th of April KFOR sector has inter-centre Agreements on the co-ordination procedures (LoA) with: - Belgrade - Skopje - Tirana, - Pristina Airport Budapest ACC has inter-centre Agreements on the co-ordination procedures (LoA) with: - Bucharest - Belgrade - Zagreb - Ljubljana - Vienna - Bratislava - Lviv - SAR agreement is established with Romania (between military) and Hungary is pursued to conclude SAR agreements with the other neighbouring countries. - The Hungarian Military Authorities have air policing agreement with Romania and negotiations are in progress with Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. The Hungarian Military Authorities have Air Surveillance Data Exchange agreements with Austria, Ukraine and Croatia. - ACT/LAM OLDI messages are in use with the Bucharest, Belgrade, Zagreb, Vienna, Bratislava and Lviv ACC s. Flight plan data and real time radar data are automatically transmitted to Air Defence (CRC Veszprém). - REV exchange with Lviv and Bucharest has been in operation since 2012 and with Bratislava since Plans are exist to start testing REV exchange with Beograd and Vienna ATM systems. - Night Cross-Border Free Route operation is available between Budapest FIR and Bucharest FIR from 20th of August NATO Hungary became a member of NATO in March As a consequence, NATO plans and NATO activities are also affecting the demand for military use of airspace. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 46 Released Issue

59 5.4. Regional Projects Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), M-NAV (MK), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), ROMATSA (RO), SMATSA (BA), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Planned CEF Application is being finalised under CEF Call 2016 Type of project: Regional GO FRA Study within the Gate One region is expected to: - Evaluate the feasibility of connecting FAB and national level FRA initiatives to a larger common FRA area as a step towards Pan-European FRA deployment; - Expand the application of FRA and cover geographical gaps in FAB-level FRA implementation by the inclusion of non-fab states to the GO FRA scope; - Facilitate the deployment of FRA in a large multi-fab/state area by utilising the existing FRA initiatives, lessons learned and individual studies performed by the participating ANSPs in defining the framework for a common GO FRA application within a defined airspace, fully integrated with the FAB/state level FRA initiatives; - Reduce fragmentation and remove overlaps between the currently on-going different national/bi-lateral/fab-level FRA initiatives; - Enable airspace user benefit realisation with regard to FRA operations in a larger area resulting in improved flight efficiency and reduced environmental impact. L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF AF AF Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace Baseline scenario FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 47 Released Issue

60 Performance contribution Safety: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. Occurrences of SAF2, SAF3 and SAF4 KPI s should not increase as a result of the Gate One wide FRA application. The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA is expected to introduce improvements in system interoperability, procedures and potentially the use of ground based safety nets and monitoring aids expected to result in improvements to the overall safety in the impacted area. Environment: + The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA is expected to improve flight efficiency through the availability of user preferred routing and improved network connectivity between the participating FABs/states. Indicative flight efficiency (in time) assessments will be made through macro-level modelling and FTS exercises during Activities 3 and 4 Capacity: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be capacity neutral or positive, i.e. the participating ANSPs capacities would not degrade (KPI CAP5) due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA may increase the airspace capacity with the appropriate system support and sector configuration and capacity management procedures. However, this would need to be verified through local/fab-level RTS simulations and/or live-trials during the potential implementation phase. Cost-efficiency: + Introduction of Gate One FRA is not expected to impact ANS Cost Efficiency KPI COS1. Impact on COS3 is expected to be negligible as ASNPs will be required to implement changes to their ATM systems for FRA compatibility regardless of GO FRA. Operational efficiency: + It is expected that the ATM functionalities required to support flight data sharing in a large-scale FRA environment will improve predictability but this will require validation on local/fab-level. Cooperation Activities: - LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 48 Released Issue

61 AMAN LOWW initial (2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK) Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2018 Type of project: Regional Status: Tuning Phase has started in 2016, refined implementaion steps identified till end Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: Deploying Basic Arrival Manager (AMAN) function (allowing evolution to extended AMAN) for Terminal Area Vienna Attaching ACC Vienna to the Vienna AMAN Integrating AMAN functionality with the training and simulation environment ("BEST") Ensuring Interaction with adjacent units - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B The project implementation scope depends on the coordinated work of all 4 partners (Austro Control GmbH, Hungarocontrol, LPS, ANS/CR) and is split into a cohesion and non-cohesion part. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 49 Released Issue

62 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives Completed Ongoing 5; 13% 8; 22% 9; 24% 15; 41% Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined Hungary completed objectives AOM13.1, AOM19.1, AOM21.2, AOP04.1, ATC02.8, ENV01, ENV02, FCM04.1, ITY-ACID, ITY-AGDL and ITY-FMTP. Objectives AOM19.2, AOM19.3, ATC15.2, FCM04.2, FCM06, FCM08, NAV03, NAV10 have the status No Plan. Objectives AOM21.1, AOP10, AOP11, AOP12, AOP13, ATC07.1 have the status Not Applicable. Objectives AOP04.2, ATC12.1, ATC17, COM10, COM11, FCM05, INF07, ITY-AGVCS2, ITY-SPI have the status Ongoing. Objectives AOP05, ATC15.1, FCM03, ITY-ADQ, SAF11 have the status Late. Problems in completing objectives due for : Objective AOP05 (due by 31/12/2016) is Late due to system test and validation problems. Planned to be finalised by 31/12/2017. Plans for completing objectives due for 2017 and 2018: Objective AOP04.2 (due by 31/12/2017) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/12/2017. Objective ATC15.1 (due by 31/12/2017) is Late due to the fact that the implementation of the arrival management functionality will be performed within the MATIAS Build 11 project. The implementation is planned by 28/12/2018, the operational use is planned by 31/12/2019. Objective ATC17 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing. The formal approval by the NSA of the changes induced by upgrades of the MATIAS ATC system to support Electronic Dialogue during Coordination and Transfer is planned to be obtained by the end of Objective COM10 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing and planned to be implemented and operationally used by end of Objective FCM03 (due by 31/12/2017) is Late. The MATIAS system software satisfies the requirements since December 2005 but a number of functionalities are not yet in operation. The automation of sending all of the corresponding messages is planned to be operational by December Objective INF07 (due by 31/05/2018) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/05/2018. Objective ITY-ADQ (due by 30/06/2017) is Late and is planned to be fully implemented by 31/12/2017. LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 50 Released Issue

63 Objective ITY-AGVCS2 (due by 31/12/2018) is Ongoing. Planned to be implemented by 31/12/2018. Objective NAV10 (due by 31/12/2016) is No Plan, since the development and publishing of the necessary national regulatory material is not on the legislative program yet. APV/Baro/LPV SBAS procedures have been implemented for Budapest Liszt Ferenc International airport and APV/Baro procedures at aerodrome Győr/Pér. For other aerodromes presently no concrete plans and information are available Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 46% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 STAM Phase 2 FCM05 FCM06 Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 100% 100% 100% 62% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 51 Released Issue

64 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 72% < AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets n/a 100% 100% 100% ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer n/a 100% 18% 62% 52% 0% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations ITYCOTR NAV03 RNAV 1 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Groundground automated coordination processes 100% 100% 69% NAV10 APV procedures 67% LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 52 Released Issue

65 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 70% AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 AOP13 ENV02 SAF11 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport < % LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport 50% Airport CDM LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport 38% TimeBased Separation LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Collaborative Environmental Management LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions n/a n/a n/a n/a 100% 60% LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 53 Released Issue

66 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 52% COM10 COM11 FCM08 INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability < % 24% 21% 28% 38% 100% 100% 81% 83% 52% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 54 Released Issue

67 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA B0SURF B0FICE B0DATM B0ACAS Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 100% 67% 100% 75% 100% 67% 100% 39% 100% B0SNET B0ACDM B0RSEQ Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 100% 100% 38% 18% 100% B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 100% 90% B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 81% 81% 100% 84% 100% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 55 Released Issue

68 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 56 Released Issue

69 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Hungary overviewed all of national legislation with respect on the EUROAT connections and its requirements. Modifying of the related regulations is not necessary. EnRoute MIL traffic flying under GAT rule is handled by civil ATC. OAT presently under military control in 31/12/2013 TRAs. ATS personnel are trained for present national regulations during initial and continuation training. Military AIP and NOTAM information is provided through the civil AIS (HungaroControl) into the EAD. REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority Ministry of National Development (MoND) ASP (By:12/2018) Hungary overviewed all of national legislation with respect on the EUROAT connections and its requirements. Modifying of the related regulations is not necessary. Hungary overviewed all of national legislation with respect on the EUROAT connections and its requirements. Modifying of the related regulations is not necessary. Enroute MIL traffic flying under GAT rules is handled by civilian Mil. Authority ATC. ATC personnel are trained. Enroute MIL traffic flying under GAT rules is handled by civilian Hungarocontro ATC. OAT presently under military control in TRAs. ATS l personnel are trained for present national regulations during initial and continuation training. MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority The Decree 3/2006. (II. 2.) of the Ministry of Defence on rules of the air applicable within the airspace designated for the purpose of state flights deals with this objective. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2013 Completed 31/12/2013 Completed Completed Completed 31/12/2013 AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support AFUA Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed Improved ASM/ATFCM processes and LARA system are implemented on the civil side and staff is trained accordingly. The rolling ASM/ATFCM and interoperability with ADR is ensured via LARA system. On the military side LARA deployment and training are completed. 31/12/2016 Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority Hungarocontro l The military and civilian ATM experts are working sidebyside in the HungaroControl AMC which is a joint cell in Hungary. On the military side LARA deployment and training are completed. Improved ASM/ATFCM processes are implemented. Deployment of LARA system is completed. The Hungarian AMC staff training is done. The rolling ASM/ATFCM and interoperability with ADR is ensured via LARA system. The military and civilian ATM experts are working sidebyside in the HungaroControl AMC which is a joint cell in Hungary. The AUP/UUP containing information about the airspace allocations is accessable in the HungaroControl WEB site. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2016 Completed 31/12/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 57 Released Issue

70 AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 HungaroControl has implemented LARA ASM tool. We are waiting for the further development of LARA to support this function. Presently there is no planned implementation date. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl has implemented LARA ASM tool. We are waiting for the further development of LARA to support this function. Presently there is no planned implementation date. 0% No Plan AOM19.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 HungaroControl has implemented LARA ASM tool. We are waiting for the further development of LARA to support this function. Presently there is no planned implementation date. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl has implemented LARA ASM tool. We are waiting for the further development of LARA to support this function. Presently there is no planned implementation date. 0% No Plan Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) AOM21.1 Timescales: not applicable HungaroControl has implemented full free route (without any limitattion) in February Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2017) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl has implemented full free route (without any limitattion) in February Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study % Not Applicable Not Applicable % LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 58 Released Issue

71 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed The implementation of Free Route concept in Budapest FIR was planned by 03/2015 but implemented by 05/02/2015 for the whole airspace H24 7/7 (24 hours a day 7 days a week, both upper and lower airspace). 05/02/2015 Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l The implementation of Free Route concept in Budapest FIR was planned by 03/2015 but implemented by 05/02/2015 for the whole airspace H24 7/7 (24 hours a day 7 days a week, both upper and lower airspace). The FRA airspace is coordinated with the FAB partners (and also with non FAB partners). The NM has been informed and the airspace is validated with the NM. The RAD is updated. The ASM and ATFCM processes have been reviewed. Publication was completed according to the AIRAC system by 11th of December ATM System (MATIAS) upgrade for crossborder free route operation / FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X Border Free Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study / MATIAS Build % Completed 05/02/2015 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Multilateration system (include new Surface Movement Radars) fulfilling Level 1 requirements is in operation and has been approved by NSA, staff has been trained. Automatic aircrafts identification is operational as from end Collaboration is established between HungaroControl and Budapest Airport. 31/12/2011 NTA approved the amendment of the Airport Rules. REG (By:12/2010) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:12/2011) Hungarocontro l APO (By:12/2010) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The carriage of required aircraft and vehicle equipment are mandated and verified, procedures are incorporated into national legislation. The ASMGCS Level 1 system has been approved for operational use. Multilateration system (include new Surface Movement Radars) fulfilling Level 1 requirements is in operation, staff has been trained. Automatic aircrafts identification is operational from the end of Collaboration is established between HungaroControl and Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport. ASMGCS is at HungaroControl costs (including surveys); equipment of vehicles, training of drivers is at Budapest Airport costs. Equipment of ground vehicles and training of drivers completed, ongoing process. 100% ASMGCS 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2010 Completed 31/12/2010 Completed 31/12/2011 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 59 Released Issue

72 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: 50% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Level 2 compliant ASMGCS is installed. Test for Level 2 functionalities are in progress but the system is not yet in operation. The test period of the Level 2 functionalities are extended. Operational use will start after finetuning of functionalities, to be achieved by 12/2017. Controllers training in accordance with agreed 31/12/2017 training requirements and programme planned to be completed at December ASP (By:12/2017) Hungarocontro l APO (By:12/2017) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. SMRs and Mode S multilateration are installed. Tests for level 2 are in progress, functionalities need to be fine tuned and are not yet in operation. Controllers training in accordance with agreed training requirements and programme will be completed by December Required surveillance and functional equipment for ASMGCS are installed and operated by HungaroControl at Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport. ASMGCS 33% 100% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Completed 31/12/2009 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport The CDM project has been restarted by Budapest Airport in September Budapest Airport is the leading party, HungaroControl and EUROCONTROL have initiated work to put in place CDM. The implementation plan based on CDM guideline is finalized and the data sharing platform is installed. The system test and validation will be finished in Q2 of The MoU and LoAs are planned to be signed in /12/2017 The modifications of the existing LoAs with all CDM stakeholders (handling agents, AOC, ATC Airport) are in progress and local procedures for turnaround processes planned to be defined in accordance with the CDM guidelines will be implemented till 12/2017. ASP (By:12/2016) Hungarocontro l APO (By:12/2016) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Budapest Airport is the leading party and HungaroControl is participating in the project. Local procedures for turnaround processes planned to be defined in accordance with the CDM guidelines will be implemented till 12/2017 in cooperation with Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Progress depends on Airport operator as the leading party. The Gap Analysis took place in September 2010; the report is finalised. The implementation plan based on CDM guideline is finalized and the data sharing platform is installed. The sytem test and validation will be finished in Q2 of The MoU and LoAs are planned to be signed in CDM 47% CDM 30% Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 AOP10 Time Based Separation Timescales: % Not Applicable not applicable LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Hungary is outside the applicability area. REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) Hungarocontro l Hungary is outside the applicability area. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 60 Released Issue

73 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: % Not Applicable not applicable LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Hungary is outside the applicability area. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro Hungary is outside the applicability area. % l APO (By:12/2021) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Hungary is outside the applicability area. % Not Applicable Not Applicable AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Timescales: % Not Applicable not applicable LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Hungary is outside of the Applicability Area. ASP (By:12/2020) Hungarocontro Hungary is outside of the Applicability Area. % l APO (By:12/2020) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The Budapest Airport at this stage is not part of the Applicability Area. % Not Applicable Not Applicable AOP13 Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: % Not Applicable not applicable LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Hungary is outside of the Applicability Area. REG (By:12/2023) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) Hungary is outside of the Applicability Area. % ASP (By:12/2023) Hungarocontro l Hungary is outside of the Applicability Area. % Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 61 Released Issue

74 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed The APW, MSAW and APM implementation by HungaroControl has been done fully in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification. The technical functionality is implemented in MATIAS. The operational implementation is completed in 28/02/ /2014. Not applicable for MIL. ASP (By:12/2016) Hungarocontro l The APW, MSAW and APM implementation by HungaroControl has been done fully in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification. Technical implementation has been done. The technical file (TF) with evidences of compliance and the EC declaration of verification of systems (DoV) has been delivered to the NSA at the end of The APW, MSAW and APM functions are in operation from 02/2014. The ATCOs have been trained according to the Eurocontrol Specifications. 100% Completed 28/02/2014 ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: % Not Applicable not applicable LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Hungary is not in the applicability area for this objective. Arrival management tool implementation will be considered when traffic increase at Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport demands it. Arrival sequencing is a function included in MATIAS Phase II, but is not sufficient to meet the requirements of this objective. ASP (By:12/2019) Hungarocontro l Arrival management tool implementation will be considered when traffic increase at Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport demands it. Arrival sequencing is a function included in MATIAS Phase II, but is not sufficient to meet the requirements of this objective. % Not Applicable ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Timescales: 52% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MTCD and the resolution support functions have been implemented in MATIAS system. TCT functions are planned to be implemented and in operational use by 31/03/ /03/2019 ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l MTCD and the resolution functions have been implemented in MATIAS system. TCT functions are planned to be implemented and in operational use by 31/03/ % Ongoing 31/03/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 62 Released Issue

75 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN Timescales: 18% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 HungaroControl plans to comply with the objective in coordination with Austrocontrol. HungaroControl plans to implement ATC procedures in EnRoute airspace/sectors. The MATIAS ATC system is planned to be 31/12/2019 upgraded to be complient to AMAN use in enroute. ASP (By:12/2017) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl plans to comply with the objective by 12/2018. The MATIAS ATC system will be upgraded to be complient to AMAN use in enroute having functionality implemented to support AMAN operations in Vienna Airport. MATIAS Build 11 18% Late 31/12/2019 ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 HungaroControl and NSA expect to comply with the objective with other stakeholders. HungaroControl expects to implement ATC procedures in EnRoute airspace/sectors. The MATIAS ATC system is expected to be upgraded to be complint to extended use of AMAN in enroute Airspace. ASP (By:12/2023) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl expects to comply with the objective in coordination with the adjacent ANSPs if required by them (i.e. Austrocontrol). All activities will start after finishing the objective ATC 15.1 Basic AMAN. 0% No Plan ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Timescales: 62% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 The OLDI messages of the Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer are fully implemented technically in the MATIAS system. Currently only the PAC, COF and MAS messages are in operational use since there is no partner ANSP ready for the common implementation. The training plans have been updated and a training package has been developed by the HungaroControl 31/12/2018 for the use of electronic dialogue procedure in case of intersector coordination. For any changes in the electronic dialogue procedure in case of inter ATSU coordination the ATM personal will be trained. Formal approval by the NSA of the changes induced by upgrades of the MATIAS ATC system to support Electronic Dialogue during Coordination and Transfer planned to be provided to the ANSP by the end of ASP (By:12/2018) Hungarocontro l The OLDI messages of the Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer are fully implemented technically in the MATIAS system. Currently the PAC, COF and MAS messages are in operational use. For the rest of the messages there is no plan since there is no partner ANSP ready for the common implementation. Testing of all the remaining OLDI messages has been started with partners. The training plans have been updated and a training package has been developed by the HungaroControl for the use of electronic dialogue procedure in case of intersector coordination. For any changes in the electronic dialogue procedure in case of inter ATSU coordination the ATM personnel will be trained. 62% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 63 Released Issue

76 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing AFTN/AMHS COM centre with AMHS functionalities have been implemented already in Hungary. International AMHS basic functionalities are planned to be operationally implemented by Q1 2017, the extended functionalities by Q MIL will follow afterwards and plans to migrate the system by the end 31/12/2018 of ASP (By:12/2018) Hungarocontro l Mil. Authority HungaroControl has implemented an AFTN/AMHS COM centre with AMHS functionalities. The international AMHS functionalities are planned to be operationally activated by Q1 of 2017, the extended functionalities by Q The military implementation of AMHS functionality depends on finishing of the implementation of this objective by HungaroControl.High level deceison is required for further actions. Replacement of the AFTN / AMHS communication center Replacement of the AFTN / AMHS communication center 47% 0% Ongoing 31/03/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 COM11 ASP (By:12/2020) Hungarocontro l Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 HungaroControl has the intention to implement the objective. Project is to upgrade Voice Communication Switch to be capable for VoIP, IP capable radios were implemented during 2016 and the network segment will be implemented until 31/12/2017. Military has no intention to implement this objective due security reasons. Implement Voice over IP (VoIP) network segment for VoIP in ATM / Replacement of Remote radios 83% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 83% 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 64 Released Issue

77 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport The objective was implemented in Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. took part in the consultation with HungaroControl and EUROCONTROL on the CDA implementation. CDA techniques training was accomplished for the Approach staff by 03/2013. The Noise Monitoring and Flight Track System is in place 31/12/2013 and capable of monitoring performance. The benefits of CDA are under the continuous analysis. The airlines, aircraft operators and other involved partners regularly informed about the benefits of the system. ASP (By:12/2013) Hungarocontro l APO (By:12/2013) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Development and validation of the CDA operational concept finished successfully in As part of the implementation of CDA live flight trials were conducted in cooperation with WizzAir within the frame of a SESAR related project (REACT Plus) in HungaroControl published the fully operational CDAs in The objective is completed for Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport. The Noise Monitoring and Flight Track System is already in place and capable of monitoring performance. Information for the local community as well as for general media is provided by Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The benefits of CDA are under the continuous analysis The airlines, aircraft operators and other involved partners regularly informed about the benefits of the system. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2013 Completed 31/12/2012 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport HungaroControl is actively participating in the Noise Committee established by Budapest Airport. Budapest Airport and HungaroControl have signed a partnership agreement with the local communities around the airport. At Budapest Airport local rules for active noise abatement are in force. The Noise Monitoring and Flight 31/12/2014 Track System is already in place and capable of monitoring performance. The local community is informed yearly by Budapest Airport. ASP (By:12/2016) Hungarocontro l APO (By:12/2016) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. HungaroControl is actively participating in the Noise Committee established by Budapest Airport. HungaroControl has signed a partnership agreement with the local communities around Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport. The environmental aspects of controllers work are part of the regular training. The Noise Committee is established and regular discussions are held between Budapest Airport, HungaroControl and the aircraft operators. Active noise protection programme has started in Environmental monitoring systems are implemented and functioning following the CEM guideline. 100% 100% Completed 30/06/2009 Completed 31/12/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 65 Released Issue

78 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late Automatic IFPS processing is achieved. The ATC system can send and receive flight plan data in ADEXP format. The MATIAS system software satisfies the requirements since December 2005 but a number of functionalities are not yet in operation. The automation of sending all of the corresponding messages is 31/12/2019 planned to be operational by December Not applicable for MIL since traffic amount does not justify the implementation. ASP (By:12/2017) Hungarocontro l Automatic IFPS processing is achieved. The ATC system can send and receive flight plan data in ADEXP format. The MATIAS system software satisfies the requirements since December 2005 but a number of functionalities are not yet in operation. The automation of sending all of the corresponding messages is planned to be operational by December % Late 31/12/2019 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: 100% Completed not applicable Although FAB CE States are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed as part of FAB CE P3 and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September Live Trial was used to explore and verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has 31/07/2014 decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. Implementation is planned for FAB CE States 27. April 2017.HungaroControl has already implemented STAM phase 1. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:10/2017) Hungarocontro l Despite HungaroControl is not in the applicability area for this objective it implemented STAM phase % Completed 31/07/2014 FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 HungaroControl has general intention to implement this objective by 12/2021 but there has not been defined project management and implementation plan for this objective with assigned financial and human resources yet. At FAB CE level Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). It is likely that STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the Nconnect Tool, planned for implementation end of Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl has general intention to implement this objective by 12/2021 but there has not been defined project management and implementation plan for this objective with assigned financial and human resources yet. 0% No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 66 Released Issue

79 Interactive rolling NOP Timescales: FCM05 3% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 The development and implementation of ATFCM procedures is planned to start at the begining of Until that we are going to define the list of actions to be performed. The training plan covering all aspects of the interaction with the NOP will be developed by the middle of The airport is providing the slot informations to the National Slot Coordinating Service. The NOP responsible person is selected and nominated. The integration of AOP information with the NOP process is not started yet. The airport operator just defining the required steps to finalize the road map plan. 31/12/2021 AT FAB CE level implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro The activity not yet started. 0% l APO (By:12/2021) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The airport is providing the slot information to the National Slot Coordinating Service and the Flow manager belonging to HungaroControl. The NOP responsible person is selected and nominated. The integration of AOP information with the NOP process is not started yet. The airport operator just defining the required steps to finalize the road map plan. 10% Planned 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2021 FCM06 Traffic complexity assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan Local implementation plan has not yet defined. AT FAB CE level several options are discussed on whether ANSP will procure a readymade Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l Implementation plan has not yet defined. 0% No Plan FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan HungaroControl has general intention to implement this objective by 12/2021 but there has not been defined project management and implementation plan for this SLoA with assigned financial and human resources yet. ASP (By:12/2021) Hungarocontro l HungaroControl has general intention to implement this objective by 12/2021 but there has not been defined project management and implementation plan for this objective with assigned financial and human resources yet. 0% No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 67 Released Issue

80 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Within the framework of the ADQ implementation program the TOD policy has been drafted. The relevant national regulation has also been drafted and now it is under legislative review. As the TOD policy is Late, stakeholders can t start their work on developing the required plan and the 31/05/2018 implementation. REG (By:05/2018) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) Ministry of National Development (MoND) ASP (By:05/2018) Hungarocontro l APO (By:05/2018) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The national TOD policy has been prepared however the approval at State level is ongoing. The approval will be realized by the adoption of the TOD regulatory framework. The TOD regulatory framework has been prepared. The legislative consultation and adoption is ongoing. The NTA AA plans to apply oversight of TOD implementation procedure and to verify the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation once the national TOD policy and regulatory framework is established. The national TOD policy has been prepared however the approval at State level is ongoing. The approval will be realized by the adoption of the TOD regulatory framework. The TOD regulatory framework has been prepared. The legislative consultation and adoption is ongoing. As the TOD policy is Late, stakeholders can't start their work on developing the required plan and the implementation. Within the framework of the ADQ implementation program the TOD policy has been drafted in terms of Aeronautical obstacle provision. The relevant national regulation has also been drafted and now it is under legislative review. Implementation programme will be developed based on the regulatory framework when it will be in force. Within the framework of the ADQ implementation program the TOD policy has been drafted. The relevant national regulation has also been drafted and now it is under legislative review. Implementation programme will be developed based on the regulatory framework when it will be in force. ADQ implementatio n 5% 40% ADQ implementatio n ADQ implementatio n 20% 20% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 ITYACID Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Completed System capability: 02/01/2020 The Aircraft Identification function technically implemented in MATIAS is fully in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification. The upgraded system have been put into service, allowing the establishment 31/12/2012 of the individual aircraft identification since 12/2012. ASP (By:01/2020) Hungarocontro l The Aircraft Identification function technically implemented in MATIAS is fully in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification. The upgraded system have been put into service, allowing the establishment of the individual aircraft identification since 12/ % Completed 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 68 Released Issue

81 Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: ITYADQ 28% Late 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Hungary will declare the use of all of Eurocontrol Specification. The Hungarian ADQ implementing regulation will prescribe the evidence requirements for all regulated parties. The modification of the detailed plan is under development. AISP (HungaroControl) safety assessment report and EC declaration of verification of systems have been received and accepted by the NSA. The NSA is waiting for other ANSPs to send their change notification (based on ANSP implementation plan). NSA will audit ADQ conformity based on these evidence documents. One of the ADQ noncompliances are partly legislative and regulatory nature. To eliminate these incompliances are mainly State and Authority tasks. National ADQ implementation Working Group is established, with the participation of civil/military State representatives, Authority representatives, Hungarocontrol AIS, surveyors, and other stakeholders. National legislation draft is developed, it is currently under legislative review. Detailed implementation 31/12/2017 plan has been developed and provided to European Commission. Awareness campaign for HungaroControl staff is completed. DQAP, new ADQ compliant processes and procedures have been developed and are in force. ISQMS manuals are under review and will be updated with aeronautical data related contents. ADQ compliant IT system supporting the satisfaction to the requirements (workflow, traceability, archiving of amendment proposals, validation, etc) has been implemented and put into operation. Full ADQ compliancy is expected to be reached in Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport will implement this objective based on national guidelines. Military participating in national joint ADQ working group to make actions to comply with ADQ regulations. Part of the MILAIS staff finished ISO 9001:2008 training in 2014 November. Military will make efforts to obtain ISO9001 certification for MILAIS. REG (By:06/2017) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:06/2017) Hungarocontro l Hungary will declare the use all of Eurocontrol Specification. The Hungarian ADQ implementing regulation will prescribe the evidence requirements for all regulated parties. Detailed plan is under development. AISP (HungaroControl) safety assessment report and EC declaration of verification of systems have been received and accepted by the NSA. The NSA is waiting for other ANSPs to send their change notification (based on ANSP implementation plan). NSA will further audit ADQ conformity based on these evidence documents. Awareness campaign for HungaroControl staff is completed. DQAP, new ADQ compliant processes and procedures have been developed and are in force. ISQMS manuals are under review and will be updated with aeronautical data related contents. ADQ compliant IT system supporting the satisfaction to the requirements (workflow, traceability, archiving of amendment proposals, validation, etc) has been installed and put into operation. Full ADQ compliancy is expected to be reached in ADQ implementatio n ADQ implementatio n 7% 73% Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/07/2017 Mil. Authority According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 para (9) MANS % Late LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 69 Released Issue

82 and Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council article 1 para (2) this objective should not concern military operations and training. However military makes effort to meet requirements. Essential measures have been taken via HDF JFC action No 127/2011 to regulate procedures of providing aeronautical information and data processing. Military static and dynamic data published in EAD assured in conformity with SLA signed between AIS and MILAIS. Military participating in national joint ADQ working group to make actions to comply with ADQ regulations. Part of the MILAIS staff finished ISO 9001:2008 training in 2014 November. Military will make efforts to obtain ISO9001 certification for MILAIS. APO (By:06/2017) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Detailed implementation plan is under development. The SMS is implemented. Cooperation between the involved departments started. Meeting the requirements will be done based on the national guideline. Program (Military) ADQ implementatio n 28% 30/06/2017 Late 31/07/2017 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/ % Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 REG ensured the publication of all relevant information on the use of Datalink services in the AIP Hungary, and during the CPDLC audit, the NSA ensured ATN/VDL2 availability, security policy and address management procedures are compliant with the EU standards. 13/10/2016 HungaroControl completed the Objective by October of REG (By:02/2018) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:02/2018) REG ensured the publication of all relevant information on the use of Datalink services in the AIP Hungary, and during the CPDLC audit, the NSA ensured ATN/VDL2 availability, security policy and address management procedures are compliant with the EU standards. 100% Hungarocontro HungaroControl completed the Objective by October of % l MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority Only the brand new transport type State aircraft which will enter into military service will have this capability. 100% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 13/10/2016 Completed 31/01/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 70 Released Issue

83 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Ongoing All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 REG plans to complete the Objective by the target date. Notification has been sent to the European Commission (DG Move) on frequency conversions planned by 12/2014. All OPC frequencies were converted by the target date. All the frequency assignments will be converted to 8,33 khz and published so in the Table COM2 of ICAO Doc 7754, except where State has granted local exceptions. The State has published the additional local exemptions according to Hungarian AIP, AIC 003. From 17 November 2013, according to the requlations the NTA/AA implemented processes that all radio equipment put into service or subject to radio upgrades by ANSPs, operators and other users or owners of radios includes the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability and issues individual certificates of airworthiness or individual flight permits to aircraft that have a radio having the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability. The State nominated an 8,33 national coordinator to coordinate the process of converting radios on the 31/12/2018 ground and on board as well within Hungary and present the Hungarian status of implementation to the 8,33 Implementation Support Group. The status of the SAFIRE represents the conversion plan, most of the frequencies on the ground will be converted by the end of The remaining frequencies will be converted at the end 2025 since these frequencies are mostly used by state aircraft (some of them with equipage mandate in 2025 according to Paragraph 11 of Article 9 in Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012 ). Hungary sent an examption request to the EC regarding the onboard radios used by aircraft operated in Class F and G airspace for VFR traffic. The exemption request (onboard equipment to be replaced until 30 June, 2018) will not affect the European or the National frequency conversion progress. REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority plans to complete the Objective by the target Ongoing date. The status of the SAFIRE represents the conversion plan, Mil. Authority Frequencies used for military operations will be converted at 40% the end 2025 since these frequencies are used by state aircraft 31/12/2018 (some of them with equipage mandate in 2025 according to Paragraph 11 of Article 9 in Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012 ). National REG plans to complete the Objective by the target date. 62% Ongoing LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 71 Released Issue

84 Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:12/2018) Hungarocontro l Mil. Authority MIL (By:12/2020) Notification has been sent to the European Commission (DG Move) on frequency conversions planned by 12/2014. All OPC frequencies were converted by the target date. All the frequency assignments will be converted to 8,33 khz and published so in the Table COM2 of ICAO Doc 7754, except where State has granted local exceptions. The State has published the additional local exemptions according to Hungarian AIP, AIC 003. From 17 November 2013, according to the requlations the NTA/AA implemented processes that all radio equipment put into service or subject to radio upgrades by ANSPs, operators and other users or owners of radios includes the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability and issues individual certificates of airworthiness or individual flight permits to aircraft that have a radio having the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability. The State nominated an 8,33 national coordinator to coordinate the process of converting radios on the ground and on board as well within Hungary and present the Hungarian status of implementation to the 8,33 Implementation Support Group. The status of the SAFIRE represents the conversion plan, most of the frequencies on the ground will be converted by the end of The remaining frequencies will be converted at the end 2025 since these frequencies are mostly used by state aircraft (some of them with equipage mandate in 2025 according to Paragraph 11 of Article 9 in Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012 ). Hungary sent an examption request to the EC regarding the onboard radios used by aircraft operated in Class F and G airspace for VFR traffic. The exemption request (onboard equipment to be replaced until 30 June, 2018) will not affect the European or the National frequency conversion progress. All radio stations concerned by the project (remote radio sites and the ANSI center) are upgraded with radio equipment capable of 8.33 khz channel spacing. The new radios were put into operation with the license issued by the NSA in December HungaroControl has performed two frequency conversions according to the Regulation by the end of All other frequency conversions are planned to be implemented in accordance with the Regulation by the end of Currently all the radios operated on the ground are capable of providing 8.33 khz channel spacing, except the radio communication equipment operated by the Tower of Szolnok Air Base. All frequency assignments published in the Table COM2 of ICAO Doc 7754, except where derogations apply or the State has granted local exceptions, will have been converted to 8,33 khz by the target date. The military has already started the necessary developments. Mil. Authority Due to the improvements probably there will be no such kind of equipment which are not 8.33 khz capable to the deadline. APO (By:12/2018) The military has already started the necessary developments. Mil. Authority Probably there will be no equipment which are not 8.33 khz capable to the deadline. Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. The airport completed the required modifications based on regulations and authority requirements. Extension of the ATM radio system ANSI. / Replacement of Remote radios 68% 3% 50% 0% 100% 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Completed 31/12/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 72 Released Issue

85 ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Completed Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 FMTP solution is implemented, International FMTP tests were performed. FMTP is operational. Authority approval was issued based on the required documents (TF and DoV). On the Military side development is expected in the frame of National Military Plan. The MIL is considered 31/12/2018 'low key stakeholder' for the completion of this objective, therefore the status at ASP and objective level is 'Completed' despite of MIL 'Late' status. ASP (By:12/2014) Hungarocontro l Mil. Authority MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority FMTP solution is implemented and operational with Croatia, Austria, Slovakia, Romania and Serbia. The testing with Ukraine will be done after implementation of their new system (expected in 2016). Authority approval was issued based on the required documents (TF and DoV). The MIL is considered 'low key stakeholder' for the completion of this objective, therefore the status at ASP and objective level is 'Completed' despite of MIL 'Late' status. On the Military side development is expected in the frame of National Military Plan.. Development is expected in the frame of National Military Plan. The current system is being transformed, and the new one is delayed. 100% 0% 0% Completed 30/06/2013 Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 73 Released Issue

86 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Since the introduction of the SPI there was one change in the surveillance infrastructure. Safety assessment was done, acceptance was received from the NSA. Safety assessments for existing surveillance infrastructure as required by Regulation 1207/2011 EC has been developed and delivered to the NSA. NSA accepted the submitted safety assessment. Safety assessments in case of a change or new installation will be done when necessary. All HungaroControl personnel affected by the changes to the surveillance infrastructure have been trained. 31/01/2019 In case ANSP will submit safety assessment report concerning change or new installation planned NSA will review the report before acceptance. All applicable state aircraft equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Further developments are under review based on the capability set out in Part B and Part C of Annex II. REG (By:02/2015) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:02/2015) Hungarocontro l MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Authority Since the introduction of the SPI there was one change in the surveillance infrastructure, the ASMGCS at BUD Airport was upgraded. Safety assessment was done, acceptance was received. Safety assesments for existing surveillance infrastructure as required by Regulation 1207/2011 EC has been developed and delivered to the NSA. NSA accepted the submitted safety assessment. In case ANSP will submit safety assesment report concerning further change or new installation planned NSA will review the report before acceptance. Since the introduction of the SPI there was one change in the surveillance infrastructure. Safety assessment was done, acceptance was received. Safety assesments for existing surveillance infrastructure as required by Regulation 1207/2011 EC has been developed and delivered to the NSA. NSA accepted the submitted safety assessment. Safety assessments in case of a change or new installation will be done when necessary. The training plans have been updated, the training package has been developed and the personnel have been trained according to the Regulation (EU) 1207/2011 (SPIIR). All applicable state aircraft equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Further developments are under review based on the capability set out in Part B and Part C of Annex II. 100% 100% 50% Completed 30/09/2013 Completed 12/12/2015 Ongoing 31/01/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 74 Released Issue

87 NAV03 RNAV 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % No Plan REG has not progressed in the preparation of the related regulatory activities. Hungary does not have a requirement to introduce RNAV in its Terminal Airspaces. No RNAV terminal area procedures have been published. Redesign of all SIDs are in progress. Expected publication date is end of HungaroControl has implemented Free Route Airspace in February 2015 in Budapest FIR. On the military side, most of the SLoAs are implemented but some SLoAs are under review, and military has the general intention to implement them. ASP (By:12/2023) Mil. Authority Hungarocontro l On the military side, some of the SLoAs are implemented but some SLoAs are under review (JAS39 is capable for flying RNAV (PRNAV) procedures.), and military has the general intention to implement it. The existing DME infrastructure is sufficient to support RNAV operations in Budapest TMA. Aircraft RNAV equipage information is integrated into the latest upgrade of ATS automated systems. Currently, no RNAV terminal area procedures are published. The design of RNAV arrival procedures is completed, the implementation and publication is also completed in Redesign of all SIDs are in progress. Expected publication date is end of HungaroControl has implemented Free Route Airspace in February 2015 in Budapest FIR. Therefore there are no available ATS routes for RNAV applicability. 50% 87% No Plan Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 75 Released Issue

88 APV procedures Timescales: NAV10 67% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Presently publishing a regulation based on the related EASA material is not on the legislative program yet, thus there is not a plan when this requirement can be fulfilled. Although the two EASA AMC materials are not published in Hungarian regulation, the National Transport Authority Aviation Authority has issued airworthiness approval based on EASA AMC (and the related EU regulations). APV/Baro/LPV SBAS procedures have been implemented at Budapest Liszt Ferenc Int. aerodrome for all RWYs in the frame of SESAR LSD project (Budapest 2.0) on 15th September Coordinates data are published in WGS84 in accordance with ICAO Annex 15 requirements and Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. APV/Baro procedures developed by and published in cooperation with HungaroControl have been implemented at aerodrome Gyor/Pér in the first half of For other aerodromes presently no concrete plans and information are available. HungaroControl is ready for cooperation in development, implementation and publication of APV procedures at other concerned aerodromes if requested by the concerned airport operators. HungaroControl has developed own local safety case according to Eurocontrol standards. It was applied for implemented instrument approach procedures at LHBP and LHPR aerodromes. The whole procedure design, implementation and safety process were covered by NSA oversight. Since LHBP and LHPR have already implemented APV, there is no need for a larger national safety case, it is enough to develop a local one for other aerodromes implementing the required operations in the future. REG (By:04/2016) Ministry of National Development (MoND) ASP (By:12/2016) Hungarocontro l Presently publishing a regulation based on the related EASA material is not on the legislative program yet, thus there is not a plan when this requirement can be fulfilled. Although the two EASA AMC materials are not published in Hungarian regulation, the National Transport Authority Aviation Authority has issued airworthiness approval based on EASA AMC (and the related EU regulations). APV/Baro/LPV SBAS procedures have been implemented at Budapest Liszt Ferenc Int. aerodrome for all RWYs in the frame of SESAR LSD project (Budapest 2.0) on 15th September Coordinates data are published in WGS84 in accordance with ICAO Annex 15 requirements and Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. APV/Baro procedures developed by and published in cooperation with HungaroControl have been implemented at aerodrome Gyor/Pér in the first half of For other aerodromes presently no concrete plans and information are available. HungaroControl is ready for cooperation in development, implementation and publication of APV procedures at other concerned aerodromes if requested by the concerned airport operators. 0% 100% No Plan Completed 15/09/2016 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 76 Released Issue

89 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: SAF11 60% Late Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Documentation for the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions has been disseminated. Preparation of audit plans is in progress. A slight modification was necessary and the deadline was postponed. The deadline of the reporting was also postponed until June In order to meet the deadline an enforcement mechanism is under preparation. The ASP has completed the actions related to its activities defined in the EAPPRE. On the MIL side designated Flight Safety officers are at the Mil Airfields. They are aware of the prevention 31/12/2018 of RWY Excursions (under supervision of the Flight Safety Division of HUN Defence Forces Joint Forces Command). Further infrastructural developments are planned. At Budapest Airport The LRST is established. Parts 3.1 and 3.2 of the Action Plan are implemented. The aviation English of vehicle drivers is not applicable yet. It is dependent on local safety case to be accomplished. REG (By:01/2018) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:12/2014) Hungarocontro l Mil. Authority APO (By:12/2014) Budapest Airport Pte. Ltd. Mil. Authority Documentation for the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions has been disseminated. Preparation of audit plans is still in progress, however the deadline for the applicable measures of the Action plan, Part 3.6 was planned to be implemented by end of 2016; a slight modification was necessary and the deadline was postponed. The deadline of the reporting was also postponed until June In order to meet the deadline an enforcement mechanism is under preparation. The ASP has completed the actions related to its activities defined in the EAPPRE part 3.1, 3.2, 3.3. The implementation of the actions is reported through the agreed notification process between the NSA and HungaroControl from Designated Flight Safety officers are at the Mil Airfields. They are aware of the prevention of RWY Excursions (under supervision of the Flight Safety Division of HUN Defence Forces Joint Forces Command). Further infrastructural developments are planned. The LRST is established. Parts 3.1 and 3.2 of the Action Plan are implemented. The aviation English of vehicle drivers is not aplicable yet. It is dependent on local safety case to be accomplished. Designated Flight Safety officers are at the Mil Airfields. They are aware of the prevention of RWY Excursions (under supervision of the Flight Safety Division of HUN Defence Forces Joint Forces Command). Further infrastructural developments are planned. Designated Flight Safety officers are at the Mil Airfields. They are aware of the prevention of RWY Excursions (under supervision of the Flight Safety Division of HUN Defence Forces Joint Forces Command). Further infrastructural developments are planned. 25% 100% 10% 40% 0% Ongoing 30/06/2017 Completed 31/12/2013 Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 77 Released Issue

90 6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 ATC02.2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Hungary has implemented and approved STCA functionality in accordance with EUROCONTROL Specification. ASP (By:01/2013) Hungarocontr ol STCA implemented in MATIAS is fully in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2005 Completed 31/12/2005 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 NTA AA supervises, certifies and delivers operational approval for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) equipped aircraft. The performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is monitored by HungaroControl as described in provisions of PANSATM ICAO Doc 4444 Fifteenth Edition 2007ATM/501. HungaroControl uses the 01/12/2015 ASMT (Automated Safety Monitoring Tool) RA module and regularly sends data to ASMT User Group and EVAIR. The training plan has been developed and the concerned personnel was trained by 03/2012. All transport type state aircraft equipped with ACAS II (TCAS II) compliant equipment. REG (By:12/2015) National Transport Authority Aviation Authority (NTA AA) ASP (By:03/2012) Hungarocontr ol NTA AA supervises and delivers operational approval for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) equipped aircraft. In accordance with CAT. IDE. A Commission Regulation 965/2012 and EU 1332/2011 IR the first individual certificate of airworthiness was requested in The performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is monitored as described in provisions of PANSATM ICAO Doc 4444 Fifteenth Edition 2007ATM/501. HungaroControl uses the ASMT (Automated Safety Monitoring Tool) RA module and regularly sends data to ASMT User Group and EVAIR. The training plan has been developed and the concerned personnel was trained by 03/2012. MIL (By:12/2015) All transport type state aircraft equipped with ACAS II (TCAS II) Mil. Authority compliant equipment. 100% 100% 100% Completed 01/12/2015 Completed 31/03/2012 Completed FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Hungary is participating in the ETFMS program. The MATIAS system software was adapted to provide the required data to ETFMS and all the messages are operational except the Departure Planning Information 31/12/2013 (DPI) message which to be provided by Budapest Airport (APO). ASP (By:07/2014) Hungarocontr ol The MATIAS system software has been upgraded and the whole functionality is operational. The CDM implementation and within the CDM the implementation of the DPI message sending capability is the responsibility of Budapest Airport (APO). 100% Completed 31/12/2013 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 78 Released Issue

91 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 On the ANSP side, the migration to EAD Briefing Facility Tool was completed by March 2012, from that time the system is in full operation. Functional extensions of capabilities with web based internet FPL submission, internet briefing, extended by MET information and selfbriefing have been implemented. On the military side, temporarily no plan for operational and technical integration, but military has the 31/07/2015 general intention to implement it. The MIL is considered 'low key stakeholder' for the completion of this objective, therefore the status at ASP and objective level is 'Completed' despite of MIL 'No Plan' status. ASP (By:12/2012) Hungarocontr ol Mil. Authority Migration to EAD Briefing Facility Tool was completed by March The system is in operation from that time. Web based internet FPL, internet briefing and integration of MET into the single briefing process was implemented by July On the military side, temporarily no plan for operational and technical integration, but military has the general intention to implement it. 100% 0% Completed 31/07/2015 No Plan ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 The implementation of ground ground automated coordination processes is completed and in operational use already. The Logon Forward and Next Authority notification messages has been implemented technically but the operational use is planned by 31/12/2016. The safety oversight of 24/11/2015 changes will be accomplished by the NSA after notification from ANSP. On the military side the Basic Flight Data Process is implemented and in operational use. ASP (By:12/2012) Hungarocontr ol The full implementation of some groundground automated coordination processes has been completed and they are in operational use by HungaroControl. HungaroControl has been implemented technically the Logon Forward and Next Authority Notified messages but the operational use is planned by 31/12/2016. MIL (By:12/2012) The Basic Flight Data Process is implemented and in Mil. Authority operational use. 100% 100% Completed 24/11/2015 Completed LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 79 Released Issue

92

93 ANNEXES Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Hungary HungaroControl Barnabás KIS LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA NTA AA Kornélia -SÜTT LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP HungaroControl Károly BRUNECKER LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Budapest Airport Zoltán ORMÁNDI LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Capt. Attila PAULOV LSSIP Focal Point for REGr MoND Zsófia ERDŐDI LSSIP Focal Point for REG TSB István BELSŐ EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Hungary DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO National Stakeholder Specialist Jozsef BAKOS Capt. Attila PAULOV Jozsef BAKOS Capt. Attila PAULOV AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Jozsef BAKOS AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Jozsef BAKOS AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Jozsef BAKOS AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Jozsef BAKOS AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Csaba GERGELY AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Gábor SZABÓ AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Gábor SZABÓ AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Gábor SZABÓ LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 80 Released Issue

94 AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO Csaba GERGELY AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Csaba GERGELY AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Gábor SZABÓ ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Gábor SZABÓ ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Barnabás KIS ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Gábor SZABÓ ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO Gábor SZABÓ ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Gábor SZABÓ ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Gábor SZABÓ COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Gábor BAJKÓ Lt. Col. Tamás DUSA COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Gábor BAJKÓ COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO - ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Jozsef BAKOS ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Jozsef BAKOS FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Gábor SZABÓ FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA Jozsef BAKOS FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Jozsef BAKOS FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Jozsef BAKOS FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Gábor SZABÓ FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO - FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Gábor SZABÓ FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA - INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO - INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO - ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Olivér TAMASKA Lt. col. Tamás DUSA Olivér TAMASKA Lt. col. Tamás DUSA Gábor Nagy Lt. Col. Zoltán PAPP Gábor SZABÓ Lt. Col. Zoltán PAPP ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Gábor SZABÓ ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC Tamás Porcsin Lt. Col. Zoltán PAPP Gábor SZABÓ KIS Lt. Col. Zoltán PAPP Gábor SzlifkaLt. Col. Tamás DUSA NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Gábor Szlifka SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Mihály KURUCZ Lt. Col Zoltán SOMOGYI LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 81 Released Issue

95 Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 82 Released Issue

96 Ministry of National Development Minister Audit Department Minister's Cabinet State Secretary State Secretary for Parliamentary Affairs State Secretary for Infocommunications and Consumer Protection State Secretary for Transport Policy State Secretary for Energy Affairs State Secretary for Development, Climate Policy and Priority Public Services State Secretary for Asset Policy Divisions Divisions Divisions Divisions Divisions Divisions Divisions LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 83 Released Issue

97 State Secretary for Transport Policy Department of Transport Strategy Secretariat Deputy State Secretary for Transport Deputy State Secretary for Transport Operational Programmes Department for Civil Aviation, Maritime and Inland Navigation Department for Transport Infrastructure Department for Bicycle Coordination Department for Road Transport and Railway Department for Transport Services Divisions Civil Aviation Unit Maritime and Inland Navigation Unit LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 84 Released Issue

98 National Transport Authority LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 85 Released Issue

99 LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 86 Released Issue

100 HungaroControl Hungarian Air Navigation Services Chief Executive Officer ATM Directorate Financial Directorate Technological Directorate Business Development Directorate Internal Audit and Compliance Department Legal Department Foreign Relations and Communications Department SQM Department Safety and Security Department ATS Department AIS Department Methodology and Coordination Department Purchasing and Materials Management Department ATM System Development Department Sales and Marketing Department ACC Department HR Department CNS Department Strategy and Project Management Department Terminal Control Department Controlling and International Finances Department ICT Services Department Professional Development Department Financial and Accounting Department Technical Operating and Development Department Project Engineering and Operating Department LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 87 Released Issue

101 The Hungarian Military Aviation Organisation LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 88 Released Issue

102 Transportation Safety Bureau (TSB) LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 89 Released Issue

103 Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport LSSIP Year 2016 Hungary 90 Released Issue