Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Austria Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/103 Date of Edition 18/05/2017 LSSIP Focal Point M. Stieber - Martin.Stieber@austrocontrol.at LSSIP Contact Person A. Dybowska - agnieszka.dybowska@eurocontrol.int Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP and FAB Performance Plan Latest FABCE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fabce.eu LSSIP Year 2016 Austria Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2016 Austria Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) ANSP(s) Airports Military Authorities Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Austria Vienna ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Austria Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context NSA: In 2016, Austria has ensured full compliance with Assembly resolution A37-11 as regards ICAO s highest priority of implementing PBN. The implementation planning was done in the scope of the Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) program, which Austria considered as the applicable implementation plan. All requirements as laid out in ICAO Assembly Resolution A37-11 were addressed by implementing RNAV/RNP procedures to all instrument runway ends in Austria, to route structures in the en-route segment (based on the RNAV 5 standard from FL100 and upwards), as well as routes in the terminal segment (SID/STAR, RNAV transitions based on RNAV 5 and RNAV 1 standard, respectively). Oversight activities were carried out in order to ensure the implementation. Austro Control: In fulfilment of the FABCE FRA Roadmap, the first implementation of cross border Free Route Airspace has been achieved between Slovenia and Austria since 10th of November 2016 ( SAXFRA ). The cross border area extends vertically from ground up to FL660 (partly FL460) and comprises the Areas of Responsibility of Austro Control (east of Rocky Line) and Slovenia Control H24. Traffic and Capacity ACC Wien: Traffic increase in 2016 was +0.4 % Summer 2016 performance assessment: ATFM delay target derived from RP2 was 0.21 min/flight, actually ACC produced only 0.07 min delay per flight. The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 194, same value as in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 181 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 168. APP/TWR Wien: Traffic decreased by -0,5% producing 0,96 min delay per arriving flight. (Delay reasons: majority weather delays) LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 1 Released Issue

12 Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 3; 7% 5; 11% 17; 39% 19; 43% Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined Objectives reported LATE: FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment < % The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2024 at the latest, as the reception, processing and integration of EFD message is planned for implementation by the end of 2024 only - following the recent plans of COOPANS / TOP Sky development steps. ATC02.8 Ground-based Safety Nets < % APW function according to the ECTL guidelines is implemented in the ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since implementation in MSAW and APM functions have been implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, nevertheless the full rollout of the TopSky-Safety Net Server (MSAW and APM) for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place in June < AOP05 Airport CDM LOWW - Vienna International Airport 96% The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June Stepwise completion according to the A-CDM project in order to reach the status of 'full implementation' is conceived until April 2018, dependent on the DPI implementation. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 2 Released Issue

13 FCM08 ITY-ADQ Extended Flight Plan Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information < % 40% FCM08: Based on the future TOPSky SWIM capabilities, the reception and processing of Extended FPL Information is planned to be operational in Subject to discussion within COOPANS. ITY-ADQ:. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators), but today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation % PCP Implementation % LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 3 Released Issue

14 Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 54% 9% % % 75% 14% 79% 2% ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 4 Released Issue

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 5 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Austria is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1993 European Union 1995 EASA 2003 ICAO 1948 NATO N/A Partnership for peace since 1995 ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) FIR WIEN is surrounded by FIRs of 8 States, namely I. Germany, (FIR Munchen, UIR Rhein), II. Czech Republic (FIR Praha), III. Slovak Republic (FIR Bratislava), IV. Hungary (FIR Budapest), V. Slovenia (FIR Ljubljana), VI. Italy (FIR Milano), VII. Switzerland (FIR Zurich) and VIII. Croatia (FIR Zagreb) as adjacent FIR to the MURA Sector (Slovenian Airspace) which is delegated to Austria. Further details to be found in Austrian eaip: LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 6 Released Issue

18 Airspace Classification and Organisation To see recent details, open the following www-link and refer to Part II ENR 1.4: LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 7 Released Issue

19 1.2. National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Austria are the following: - The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which is part of the MoTIT and which performs the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivilluftfahrt Behörde), - The Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (MoTIT / NSA), - Austro Control Luftfahrtagentur (LFA), NSA for civil ATCO licensing. - The Accident Investigation Board which is an independent Body within the MoTIT, - Austro Control, the sole ANS Provider in Austria, - The Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports: Joint Forces Command / Air. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the figure below: Institutional Arrangements and Links Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD) Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology as supreme CAA / NSA Joint Forces Command / Air AUSTRO CONTROL Other main National Stakeholders are the 6 main Airports in Austria. They are operated by public and public/private enterprises. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 8 Released Issue

20 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Austria is the responsibility of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (M of TIT) which represents Austria at the EUROCONTROL Decision Making Bodies. The Regulator is institutionally separated from the ANS Service Provider. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is part of the MoTIT (Oberste Zivilluftfahrtbehörde). The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Civil Aviation Authority is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) Safety Oversight NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section. 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are described in AASREF (ministerial decree) and NSA directive for ongoing oversight. Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c, d and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are described in AASREF (ministerial decree) and NSA directive for ongoing oversight. Airspace CAA/Austro Control Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 119, 120 a,c and section 124. Economic NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Refer to FAB CE performance plan RP2 Environment NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Refer to FAB CE performance plan RP2 Security CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Accident investigation SUB (Sicherheitsuntersuchungsstelle des Bundes) 136 Aviation Act and 2 UUG 2005, BGBl. I Nr. 123/2005 Austrian Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) MoTIT incorporates the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which performs at the same time the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehörde). ATM Safety occurrence analysis is done by the ANSP and there is a separate Accident Investigation Board as an independent body within the MoTIT; details can be found in chapter CAA Web site is the same as the NSA one: LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 9 Released Issue

21 Annual Report published: Y To ensure conformity with Art. 12, Commission Regulation (EC) 549/2004, continuous reporting takes place through EASA Audit Reports, answering of pilot procedures and the LSSIP reporting process. An organisational chart of MoTIT is given in Annex B ANSP(s) Service provided Name of the ANSP: Austro Control Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zivilluftfahrt mbh Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Republic of Austria Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training SAR Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Others Y Certification of Aircraft, Pilot licensing, Medical check for pilots and ATCOs Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y German regional airports (ATS-TWR for 10 German regional Airports) Annual Report published: Y Address of ANSP website: An organisational chart is given in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 10 Released Issue

22 Name of the ANSP: Meteo Serve Wetterdienst GmbH Governance: GmbH Ownership: 100% Austro Control Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS N N N N N MET Y certified MET-Provider, no designation ATCO training SAR Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Annual Report published: N N N N N ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y COOPANS FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES: TOPSKY system within COOPANS alliance AVIBIT: for all main TWRs, using the Electronic Flight strip system DIFLIS Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? A major upgrade of the TOPSKY took place in November 2015, integrating the terminal areas and MIL Control Centre. Upcoming releases in line with COOPANS enhancements up to twice per year. Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? First deployment of TOPSKY took place in So, no plans yet, as the current system is considered as a new one. ATC Unit ACC and APP Wien, all Local Approach Units plus TWRs (linked with the DIFLIS system), VFSS (Vienna Flight Service Station) 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 11 Released Issue

23 SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Thales, using ARTAS tracker Austrian WAM: SAAB Planned continuously, 1-2 upgrades/year No ACC, APP/TWR Vienna, Local APP Units, MCC ATC Units The ATC units in the Austrian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Wien ACC Max 17 ** Refer to Although the hardware/software configuration of the A-ATMS allows a theoretical maximum of 17 elementary sectors, the current demand is served by a maximum of 12/14 sectors Wien APP 6 FIR Praha, Bratislava and Budapest TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building SALZBURG 1 LAU* SALZBURG INNSBRUCK 1 LAU* INNSBRUCK LINZ 1 LAU* LINZ GRAZ 1 LAU* GRAZ KLAGENFURT 1 LAU* KLAGENFURT * LAU=Local Approach Unit ** Note that the number of sectors, as indicated in this Table, is the maximum number of civilian control sectors that can be operated simultaneously by the unit, provided there is sufficient availability of ATCOs. Due to FRQ limitations a theoretical maximum of 14 sectors can be achieved Airports General information The main airports in Austria are operated by public and public/private enterprises. They are listed in the table below. As the sole ANS Provider, Austro Control provides Air Traffic Services at the airports. Terminal Airspace (TMA or equivalent) Airport Controlled by WIEN WIEN/ SCHWECHAT TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building SALZBURG SALZBURG LAU* INNSBRUCK INNSBRUCK LAU* LINZ LINZ LAU* GRAZ GRAZ LAU* KLAGENFURT KLAGENFURT LAU* * LAU = Local Approach Unit LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 12 Released Issue

24 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: WIEN Schwechat Military Authorities The Military Authority in Austria is the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS). The Military Aviation Division = Abteilung Militaerluftfahrt (MLF) is part of the Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS) and is responsible for Air Traffic Management (ATM) plus Air Navigation Services (ANS). Co-ordination with Ministry of Transport at strategic level is done via the CIV/MIL ATS coordination board = Lenkungsausschuss Flugsicherung (LAF). The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil/military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC). Day-to-day co-ordination of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is handled at the tactical level between Austro Control and representatives of the Military Control Centre (MCC). Austro Control is the sole Austrian ATS provider and allocates airspace to military units on a temporary basis. Military ATS is normally provided only to OAT, and additionally to GAT within Military Training Areas (MTA) on and around Air Force bases. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 13 Released Issue

25 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law, Aviation Act Level of such legal provision: Y Authority signing such legal provision: Austrian Government These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Authority signing such legal provision: MOD / MLF These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y Additional Information: N/A Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y Aircrew Training Y ESARRs as applicable Y Aircrew Licensing Y SES legislation as applicable Y Additional Information: N/A Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N/A National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: Aeronautical Charts Y Other: Aeronautical Charts Y Y Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: MoD Additional information: N/A For TRG and licensing of MIL ATC personnel GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Y Additional information: N/A MIL NSA LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 14 Released Issue

26 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route Y En-Route within MIL TRG Areas Y Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y AIS Y MET Y MET Y SAR Y SAR Y MIL Training Area (MTA) monitoring Y FIS Y Other: N/A Other: N/A Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: N/A N/A Y User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: Y No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: N/A Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Austria applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 15 Released Issue

27 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Austria Austria - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 0.7% 4.3% 4.8% 4.0% 4.5% 3.7% 3.7% Austria B -1.7% 3.4% 1.4% 0.3% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 2.5% 2.1% 2.3% L -0.1% -0.2% 0.1% 0.8% 1.0% 0.5% 0.7% ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Austria (ACC plus INN corridor) increased by 0.1% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an annual traffic growth of between 0.4% and 4.2% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.2%. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 16 Released Issue

28 2.2. Vienna ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Performance summer 2016 Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +0.2 % 194 (+0%) No The average en route delay per flight decreased from 0.15 to 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were due to Weather, 10% due to staffing and 6% due to ATC capacity. Capacity Plan +5 % Achieved Comments DCTs H24/ in parallel ops with ATS routes Cross border DCTs FAB intern & with adjacent ACCs where possible November 2016 SAXFRA Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Stepped improved sectorisation according to on going projects Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Recruitment to maintain staff level Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Maximum configuration: 14 sectors Summer 2016 performance assessment Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Even though 14 is max, 12 sectors were sufficient to cope with demand The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 194, same value as in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 181 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 168. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 17 Released Issue

29 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. Capacity Profiles ACC 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous baseline H % 222 4% 233 5% Ref % 215 2% 219 2% LOVV 194 L 204 5% 206 1% 208 1% Open 201 4% 206 2% 209 1% C/R 194 0% 195 1% 197 1% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Stepwise increase of FAB CE wide cross border FRA applications ASM AMAN LOWW full FAB CE wide cross border application of DCT/FRA H24 Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Stepped improved sectorisation according to on going projects Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Recruitment to maintain staff level Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels System upgrade Java HMI Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Reference Profile Annual % Increase 9% 2% 2% N/A N/A Current Routes Profile % Increase 0% 1% 1% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile 5.2% 4.2% 3.2% N/A N/A +3.1% +5.6% +7.6% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information Capacity planning ACC Vienna is based on current routes. In case the political or financial situation changes, they are prepared to cope with an expected traffic increase on the shortest route. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 18 Released Issue

30 An outline of available sector configuration for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2017: Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 Saturday :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 12 Sectors available Summer 2017 Sunday Additional Information: This Sector Opening Scheme reflects the needs of the (already passed) summer period 2016 and will be used for summer 2017 as well, due to the fact that the expected traffic growth is +/ 0% on the current route forecasted for ACC Vienna. Any change in the traffic forecast for summer 2017 will have a direct impact on this proposed scheme and in case of growing traffic, the number of needed sectors to cope with the demand will be (planned) opened accordingly until an amount of 14 sectors maximum. Should there be for any reason a change in the usage of the airspace from current route to shortest route, ACC Vienna has the possibility to open up to 17 sectors (as a maximum) for the 3 consecutive peak hours of the day. 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 19 Released Issue

31 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Austria for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC-2015/1 Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-sesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Ownership All operational stakeholders Corrective actions taken: YES Description: FCM STAM Phase 1 has been actively launched within FABCE context and will go operational in April 2017 FCM05 Rolling NOP implementation status has reached 40%, thus demonstrating a constructive approach to reach the target in AOM19.1 ASM Support Tool LARA has been chosen to be implemented by 2018 at the latest. FCM03 - Collaborative flight planning. The activation of AFP message is foreseen by end 2017 at the latest. REC-2015/2 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: Yes Description: AOM19: see also REC-2015/1; moreover the topic is tackled within COOPANS and FABCE context FCM04: see also REC-2015/1 ATC07.1: in line with the FOC, AMAN implementation planned by 2018 ATC15: ATC 15.1completed Arrival Management extended to en-route Airspace planned within FOC time frame. NAV10: completed ENV01: completed AOP04.1: completed ITY-ADQ: Late ITY-FMTP: completed INF07: ongoing in time COM10: completed REC-2015/7 ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. ANSPs benefiting from EU funding Corrective actions taken: YES Description: At present, 4 ACG projects together with FABCE or COOPANS are active for 2014 CEF Transport Call, and 9 ACG projects are carried out in context of 2015 CEF Transport Call. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 20 Released Issue

32 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in Austria are depicted in the tables below: 8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 (COM Services ) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), Flughafen Wien AG (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 31st December 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: According to EU IR 1079/2012, the conversion to 8,33 khz will be implemented below FL195, including Airport VIE. L3: ITY-AGVCS2 Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - The justification results from operator s obligation from 1st January 2018 not to operate an aircraft in airspace where carriage of radio is required unless the aircraft radio equipment has the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 21 Released Issue

33 AF2_MET-Compliance-Program (2015_220_AF2) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2020 Status: Procurement in preparation until end of Full OPS planned by Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Developing distance-based separation to time-based separation Recovering and improving loss of capacity due to bad weather conditions Supporting automatic observer functions Improve exchange of meteorological information L3: AOP10 Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_220_AF2 - AF5 AIM Compliance Pogram (2015_230_AF5) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - ongoing according to Project plan. Analysing, developing and upgrading or implementing AIM infrastrucuture to comply with iswim requirements Ensuring continuous improvement of data distribution and aeronautical data quality according to iswim requirements Upgrading and/or implementing and continuously improving the AMSS to comply with iswim requirements Implementing ongoing enhancements to the AIMP - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_230_AF5 - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 22 Released Issue

34 ATM Data Quality (ADQ) (#006AF5) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2018 Status: Late Description: The project aims to migrate Austro Control s aeronautical data base to support AIXM 5.1, ensuring the data quality to be high enough to be compatible with System Wide Information Management (SWIM). This migration will support the enhancement of security, data integrity and capacity, as well as promotion of ATM automation. The proposed action is therefore instrumental to the fulfilment of the requirements according to ICAO Annex15 and ESSIP INF05, as well as for creating the basis for a smooth implementation of SES/ADQ, more specifically aiming at: Compliance to ICAO Annex 15 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 ensured Validation and integrity checks introduced Workflow management system introduced to the service delivery management domain (SDM) Stream for internal and external data delivery digitalized National legislation aligned Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: NSP: SO 2/5 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: #006AF5 - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 23 Released Issue

35 Collaborative Decision Management (CDM) fully implemented (#011AF2) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 17/07/ /04/2018 Status: - Description: Link and references ATM MP links: CDM fully implemented in LOWW and certified by Eurocontrol Process organisation established, considering all stakeholders involved and guaranteeing a sustainable CDM operation Meaningful KPIs are constantly measured and used for improvement Additional tasks contain Enhanced De-icing and the guarantee of a Degraded Mode in case of partial system failure L3: AOP05 Other links: NSP: SO6/4 NOP: Yes (Annex 5) Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: #011AF2 - Implementation of Voice over IP technology (COM Services) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: between 2018 and 2020 Exchange to VoIP for ACC Wien, and between 2021 and 2024 stepwise implementation for all remaining ATC Units in Austria. Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: ongoing in implementation steps / 2020 ACC Wien, till 2024 for all ATC Units Austria Implementation of Voice over IP technology for all ATM units L3: COM11 Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: - improved information consistency improved FAB interoperability - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 24 Released Issue

36 Integrated Briefing System New (IBSN) update SAMIB (#009AF5) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 20/04/2017 Status: roll out planned in April 2017 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: NSP: SO 2/5 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - AIDA (Aeronautical Information Data-handlingsystem Austria)/Integrated Briefing System (IBS) Legacy System (technology end of life as well as software architecture) replaced EAD customized (EAD - European Aeronautical Database) implemented Connection to existing Austro Control infrastructure (network, working positions, ECITs EAD Connection Interface Terminal, BF (Briefing Facility)- Box, IBS Web services etc.) ensured Data from legacy system transferred AIDA/IBS legacy system cut out and sub-provider contracts cancelled OPS (operations) training (AIM/VFSS) and briefing of technical personnel (ACG Service Control Center and experts) conducted Nagios and Trouble Ticket System inserted EAD customized set in operation after successful FAT and SAT Austro Control s Integrated Briefing Legacy System has reached end of life (of the technological product cycle)and needs to be replaced. The new briefing service will be prepared to be compliant with the System-Wide Information Management (SWIM) architecture. The upgrade of AIS services shall be seen as a SWIM prerequisite by using EAD core services (reference is made to ESSIP INF 05) New briefing functions introduced by the new system include: Graphical display (FPL Flight Plan & NOTAM Notification to airman) Mobile devices Meteorological (MET) web interface Webshop - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: #009AF5 - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 25 Released Issue

37 METSW-DB PCP Evolution (2015_231_AF5) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/12/ /12/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - ongoing according to Project plan, considering stepwise evolution developments to ensure compliance with PCP Implementing a new METSW as technical enabler for iswim and ACG AF5 MET Compliance Program Ensuring compliance through continuous system upgrades to ensure functionality and required performance needs Evolutions will react on changes in developments and ensure fulfillment of new requirements - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_231_AF5 - TBS4LOWW (Time Based Separation for Vienna Airport) (2015_232_AF2) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: /2023 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and architectural developments, including HMI aspects Establishing Procedural Time Based Separation concept (P-TBS) Preparation of Safety, HP and Business Cases supporting full TBS System Based deployment L3: AOP10 Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_232_AF2 - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 26 Released Issue

38 VHF Concept Implementation 2020 (2015_236_AF3) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/03/ /11/2020 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: Project ongoing - in time Implementing Voice COM System as an enabler for PCP AF3 regards to Regulation No 716/ Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route Validating and verifying system safety - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_236_AF3 enhanced virtual redundancy NIL NIL lower life cycle and maintenance costs NIL - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 27 Released Issue

39 etod Database Phase 1 (AIM / ATM System) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: National Schedule: implementation of the etod requirements is planned to be ready by May Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: establish a Data base and basic software including GUI to collect the required terrain and obstacle data. L3: INF07 Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: etod implementation detailed and more precise Terrain and Obstacle data ACID Phase 2 Mode S and WAM implementation (SUR Service) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: FAB Schedule: End 2019 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution - As of 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation within FIR Wien (more than 50% of the traffic) is the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A-WAM. Full coverage down to all Local Approach Units has not yet been reached, therefore ACID Phase 2 deals with the overall Implementation of the ACID requirements to reach definitely 100% of the whole FIR Wien. L3: ITY-ACID Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - improved FAB interoperability according to FAB CE ACID Implementation Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 28 Released Issue

40 ATM system and Sub-System evolution for COTR (ATM System) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Dependent on bilateral implementation until 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: ongoing Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Implementation of OLDI messages according to national and FAB roadmap - Transfer of Communication - Transfer of Coordination L3: ATC17 - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: interoperability for improved consistency and improved safety net performance Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: reduced ATCO workload - COTR evaluated in the context of a FAB CE wide Free Route Airspace Study (CEF funded) LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 29 Released Issue

41 Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination 5.1. FAB Co-ordination 5.1. FAB Co-ordination Optimised ATM Network Services AOM For the time being, only Hungary has a specific ASM support tool (LARA) in operation, Croatia to follow early All other FABCE ANSPs plan to deploy LARA or an equivalent system by the end of The real-time management of ASM information (AOM19.2 and AOM19.3) currently sees a variety of intentions, ranging from no plan to ongoing. FCM03 - The implementation of collaborative flight planning messages (APL, ACH, AFP) shows a heterogeneous status, whereas the weakest point turns out to be the full AFP implementation ( no plan to late ). FCM STAM Phase 1 is planned to go into operation at FABCE level on 27 th of April 2017 (except SK, BiH). STAM Phase 2 (FCM04.2) is still under discussion. FCM05 (interactive rolling NOP) - Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrades of the automated ASM support systems with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM. The objective is considered to become part of a FABCE project. FCM06 (TFC complexity assessment) - is tackled at FABCE level within the DAM/STAM study. Advanced Air Traffic Services AOM 21.1/2 (DCT, Free Route Airspace) - forming part of a main FABCE project, Free Route Airspace is going to be deployed stepwise within and across FABCE borders. Two main crossborder initiatives have been implemented in 2016, respectively early 2017 at H24 basis: SAXFRA- SLO/AUT and SEENFRA - HUN/ROM/BUL. Besides that, national DCT implementations are already in force and are planned to be extended. Likewise, further crossborder FRA applications beyond FABCE are planned for implementation in 2018 (e.g. SECSI FRA, merging SAXFRA and Croatian+Serbian/Montenegrin Airspace. Moreover, a Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study) has been identified to start off in 2017, including Baltic FAB, Danube FAB, FAB CE, SMATSA and M-NAV. ATC07.1 (ATC15.1, ATC 15.2) - AMAN Vienna is considered as a regional project, but nevertheless, will include and affect the majority of the FABCE states. Planned for implementation by end Extended AMAN for Vienna is currently scheduled until 2023 at the latest. ATC Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring: dependent on the national ATM system development, the MTCD function is considered a prerequisite for Free Route Airspace application. MTCD is already widely implemented; TCT is left to the ANSPs depending on local conditions. ATC17 - Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer: Having identified this objective as extremely beneficial for FRA application, the operational deployment is foreseen at those Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 30 Released Issue

42 High Performing Airport Operations AOP ASMGCS Level 2 is implemented in Praha and Vienna. Budapest has implemented Level 1, and Level 2 planned by end Although not part of the applicability area, Zagreb plans Level 2 before end AOP05 - A-CDM: implemented in Praha, planned in Budapest by end 2017 and Zagreb (2017/18). Vienna status is locally fully implemented, missing only DPI message transmission, planned for mid AOP10 - Time Based Separation: Applicable for Vienna; project has started, and in conjunction and based on AMAN implementation, it will be operational by end of AOP 12/13 - Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring: planned for Praha and Vienna in time Enabling Aviation Infrastructure COM10 - Migration to AMHS: completed in AUT, SLO and SK. Ongoing in HUN, CRO and BiH; late in CZR (2018) COM11 Voice over IP: all FABCE states are ongoing and plan this objective in time by FCM08 Extended Flight Plan: Specifications and requirements for the EFPL / ICAO FF-ICE are locally under discussion. Roadmaps for TOPSKY will foresee a later implementation, e.g ITY-AGDL: completed in AUT, CZR and HU. Ongoing CRO and SLO, planned for BiH and late for SK (2019) ITY-ACID - Aircraft ID: Mode S, and partly additionally A-WAM technologies, are applied in all FABCE states. Remaining actions to reach 100% of coverage are conceived until 2019, for BiH in ITY-AGVCS khz below FL195: All FABCE states do plan the FRQ conversions in time until end of LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 31 Released Issue

43 A safety approach to the Network operations is ensured through the FAB CE Safety Sub-committee and its cross domain Safety activities. The FAB CE Safety Management Roadmap specifies that the FAB CE ANSPs share inter alia experience regarding Just Culture. Just Culture implemented locally, taking into account the national legislation. In close cooperation with NM, capacity enhancements are permanently identified and implemented. FABCE is going to reach the RP2 targets for ATFM Delays throughout the whole period. Shared technical platforms, common use of Networks and maintenance, reduced NAV equipment, and others. X-Bone, common HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17) The goal is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X-bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11, and to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities. Integration of Security Event Management and Security Information Management into one service providing better quality and security of communication systems and higher resistance against potential threats. Two main projects of the FABCE Program Management deal actively with operational efficiency: Airspace Planning and Design (FRA) including aligned operational procedures, and Flexible Use of Airspace (ASM / STAM). Flight efficiency through Free Route applications improves steadily, based on the above mentioned ops efficiency projects. (AOM21.2) LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 32 Released Issue

44 5.2. FAB Projects FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Project 1: Start , End: Continuous Type of project: FAB Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: , End: Ongoing activity Project is on track: - CEF FRA Study RTS CONOPS is delivered - FRA CONOPS available and the review and update will commence in 01/2017 once RTS report is available - ATM System Requirements report is available - Other activities in progress, will be delivered on schedule - FAB CE Airspace Plan 2016 delivered - FAB CE Network Operations Plan delivered The objective of Project 1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept. The project will implement the FAB CE X-Border FRA study ( Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea project). The key benefit expected from the project is to create a clear definition of the operational end technical pre-conditions for a conceived FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace, by creating a study. The study aims at defining the operational end technical pre-conditions to implement the FAB CE Free Route Airspace, including Concept of Operations, the necessary validation exercises thereof and the required development and upgrade requirements of ATM systems of the FAB CE members. Project 1 also includes annual updates of FAB CE Network Operations Plan (FNOP) and FAB CE Airspace Plan. L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 SESAR Key Feature: Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF AF AF FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace Baseline scenario FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace') Y Name/Code in DP2016: 102AF3 Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 33 Released Issue

45 Performance contribution Safety: ++ The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a FAB CE FRA OPS Environment: % saving in horizontal flight efficiency by saving 2.1 km deviations (millions) from GCD and saving 23,000 tonnes of Annual CO2 in Capacity: ++ To increase capacity to cope with the increase of around 60% in traffic in 2017 with a maximum delay of 0.28 minutes Cost-efficiency: +++ Improvement over 2006 in ATM/CNS costs per flight hour and achieve 469 of economic costs per flight hour in 2017 Operational efficiency: ++ Advanced ATS required for FRA implementation have a positive impact on all aspects of operational efficiency Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE Project 3 / DAM/STAM Study) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Project 3: Start: , End: 2016 Type of project: FAB DAM/STAM Study: Start: , End: Status: Project 3 closed in 2016 Description: Follow-on project 'DAM/STAM Study': Planned Currently under development, the CEF application is being finalised The objective of Project 3 was to optimise the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP/DM Activity Areas. The project achieved most of its original objectives and was closed in Project 3 is being followed-up with the new 'FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM' Study Project. The main objective of the DAM/STAM study project is to obtain a key FAB CE high-level document that contains all relevant elements required for a consequent FAB CE wide implementation of DAM and STAM processes. As such the DAM /STAM final report can be seen as an implementation roadmap for all involved FAB CE ANSPs, a FAB CE ASM document that defines the high level operational concept for FAB CE DAM/STAM by describing the collaboration, processes, procedures and tools needed for later implementation. The second main objective of the DAM/STAM study is to provide the involved ANSP with all required information necessary to plan for closing existing gaps to PCP /Deployment Plan on a local level. As a FAB CE wide assessment revealed gaps to the DP 2016 among the ANSP in all the related AF families, the DAM /STAM study is the FAB CE led activity to coordinate the closure of these remaining gaps. Furthermore, it is a stated goal of the DAM/STAM study to describe and prepare the conditions required to allow for a FAB CE wide harmonization of ASM-, FUA-, DAM and STAM processes. The effect of this is seen to be FAB CE wide ASM that will allow to unlock the full operational benefits associated to FAB CE FRA implementation. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 34 Released Issue

46 Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM06 Optimised ATM network services Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution DP2016 Families: AF AF AF AF AF AF AF FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions) N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call Safety: + -Increased situational awareness of FMPs, supervisors and ATCOs. STAM will give more options to avoid overloads. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Environment: ++ Trajectories are expected to be more efficient due to procedures and processes accommodating short-term changes. Larger selection of airspace configurations/scenarios available to allow for more robust planning. Direct positive impact thanks to shorter and more direct routes whenever possible, which will lead to an optimized fuel usage of the AU. In addition, increased robustness on the overall allocation of airspace will lead to a more appropriate fuel loading of airspace users. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Capacity: ++ Better usage of available airspace volumes with reduced complexity will lead to higher capacity. Short-term opportunities are effectively and efficiently managed. Overall increase of airspace capacity through optimised utilisation of airspace configurations and scenarios. STAM will give more opportunities to balance traffic demand and available capacity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Cost-efficiency: + A capacity increase combined with increased situational awareness of the ATCO is enhanced through the introduction of complexity assessments for expected scenarios. Combined this will lead to adjustments of sector monitoring values and ATCO productivity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Operational efficiency: ++ The application of the data / information sharing concept among all involved stakeholders will lead to an increased robustness and predictability of the FAB CE managed airspace. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE Project 13) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 35 Released Issue

47 Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The coordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities. The project was frozen in FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.1: Implementation and monitoring of the commonly approved Common Competence Schemes N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Cost-efficiency of training Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 36 Released Issue

48 Training Facilities (FAB CE Project 14) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources. The project has been frozen in FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.2: Common training of ATCO of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.3: Common training of ATSEP of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.4: Common use of training facilities of two or more ANSPs conducted N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility. Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 37 Released Issue

49 ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15) Organisation(s): Schedule: Start: Status: Frozen in 2015 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Type of project: FAB The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs. The project was frozen in N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Cost-efficiency: + Improve cost-efficiency, mitigation of financial risks Operational efficiency: - - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 38 Released Issue

50 X-Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Type of project: FAB Ongoing Tender documentation finalised, common procurement expected early 2017 Description: The primary goal of this project is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X- bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11. The secondary goal of this project is to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities, if feasible. Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO6, target 6.5: Realise common (smart) procurement of relevant CNS infrastructure and ATM processing systems in FAB CE Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Optimisation of CNS resources Cost-efficiency: + Savings in procurement of CNS infrastructure Operational efficiency: - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 39 Released Issue

51 Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové sluzby Slovenskej republiky, Státny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Ongoing Some processes finalised, others being developed Type of project: FAB Project 18 within the FAB CE is expected to: - Develop processes for coordinated infrastructure planning and maintenance thus leading to a proactive consultation process and a FAB CE-wide information exchange regarding SUR systems for increased cost-effectiveness; - Propose improvements in SUR coverage quality by coverage optimisation; - Conduct a feasibility study including a Cost Benefit Analysis of implementing a regional tracker for different scenarios vis-a-vis EUROCONTROL CS3 Study [R7], bringing facts and figures for making a "make or buy" decision. CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO6, target 6.3: Incorporate planning of the CNS infrastructure and ATM processing systems aligned with RP planning, to achieve its harmonisation and optimisation in the FAB CE Implementation Plan FSO6, target 6.4: Establish common operation of CNS infrastructure and ATM processing services as defined by the FAB CE Architecture including shared data processing functions, shared information pool and sharing of human resources where applicable and proven to be beneficial FSO7, target 7.1: Establish FAB CE common approach to technical operation and corrective / preventive maintenance of systems, including sharing of spare parts Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Optimisation of CNS resources Cost-efficiency: + Efficiency of the processes Informed decision about future solution for the regional tracker Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 40 Released Issue

52 5.3. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects AMAN LOWW initial (2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B) Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK) Schedule: 01/03/ /12/2018 Type of project: Regional Status: Tuning Phase has started in 2016, refined implementaion steps identified till end Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: Deploying Basic Arrival Manager (AMAN) function (allowing evolution to extended AMAN) for Terminal Area Vienna Attaching ACC Vienna to the Vienna AMAN Integrating AMAN functionality with the training and simulation environment ("BEST") Ensuring Interaction with adjacent units - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B The project implementation scope depends on the coordinated work of all 4 partners (Austro Control GmbH, Hungarocontrol, LPS, ANS/CR) and is split into a cohesion and non-cohesion part. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 41 Released Issue

53 Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), BULATSA (BG), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), M-NAV (MK), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), ROMATSA (RO), SMATSA (BA), Slovenia Control (SI) Schedule: Start: , End: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Planned CEF Application is being finalised under CEF Call 2016 Type of project: Regional GO FRA Study within the Gate One region is expected to: - Evaluate the feasibility of connecting FAB and national level FRA initiatives to a larger common FRA area as a step towards Pan-European FRA deployment; - Expand the application of FRA and cover geographical gaps in FAB-level FRA implementation by the inclusion of non-fab states to the GO FRA scope; - Facilitate the deployment of FRA in a large multi-fab/state area by utilising the existing FRA initiatives, lessons learned and individual studies performed by the participating ANSPs in defining the framework for a common GO FRA application within a defined airspace, fully integrated with the FAB/state level FRA initiatives; - Reduce fragmentation and remove overlaps between the currently on-going different national/bi-lateral/fab-level FRA initiatives; - Enable airspace user benefit realisation with regard to FRA operations in a larger area resulting in improved flight efficiency and reduced environmental impact. L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF AF AF FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace Baseline scenario FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call Safety: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. Occurrences of SAF2, SAF3 and SAF4 KPI s should not increase as a result of the Gate One wide FRA application. The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA is expected to introduce improvements in system interoperability, procedures and potentially the use of ground based safety nets and monitoring aids expected to result in improvements to the overall safety in the impacted area. Environment: + The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA is expected to improve flight efficiency through the availability of user preferred routing and improved network connectivity between the participating FABs/states. Indicative flight efficiency (in time) assessments will be made through macro-level modelling and FTS exercises during Activities 3 and 4. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 42 Released Issue

54 Capacity: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be capacity neutral or positive, i.e. the participating ANSPs capacities would not degrade (KPI CAP5) due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. The introduction of multi-fab/state FRA may increase the airspace capacity with the appropriate system support and sector configuration and capacity management procedures. However, this would need to be verified through local/fab-level RTS simulations and/or live-trials during the potential implementation phase. Cost-efficiency: + Introduction of Gate One FRA is not expected to impact ANS Cost Efficiency KPI COS1. Impact on COS3 is expected to be negligible as ASNPs will be required to implement changes to their ATM systems for FRA compatibility regardless of GO FRA. Operational efficiency: + It is expected that the ATM functionalities required to support flight data sharing in a large-scale FRA environment will improve predictability but this will require validation on local/fab-level. Cooperation Activities: - LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 43 Released Issue

55 Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSP including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) (2015_207_AF3_A; 2015_207_AF3_B) Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), IAA- ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2019 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Type of project: Regional complementing enhancements for the ATC System (TopSky) will be implemented, nevertheless, full structurally limited FRA has been implemented in Nov Harmonisation of ATM platforms in 5 ANSP's to gain economy of scale for PCP implementations - Platform support for AF3 Free Route Airspace - Preparation of other PCP related implementations - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_207_AF3_A, 2015_207_AF3_B LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 44 Released Issue

56 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 3; 7% 5; 11% 17; 39% 19; 43% Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined Objectives reported LATE: FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment < % The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2024 at the latest, as the reception, processing and integration of EFD message is planned for implementation by the end of 2024 only - following the recent plans of COOPANS / TOP Sky development steps. ATC02.8 Ground-based Safety Nets < % APW function according to the ECTL guidelines is implemented in the ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since implementation in MSAW and APM functions have been implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, nevertheless the full rollout of the TopSky-Safety Net Server (MSAW and APM) for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place in June LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 45 Released Issue

57 < AOP05 Airport CDM LOWW - Vienna International Airport 96% The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June Stepwise completion according to the A-CDM project in order to reach the status of 'full implementation' is conceived until April 2018, dependent on the DPI implementation. FCM08 ITY-ADQ Extended Flight Plan Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information < % 40% FCM08: Based on the future TOPSky SWIM capabilities, the reception and processing of Extended FPL Information is planned to be operational in Subject to discussion within COOPANS. ITY-ADQ:. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators), but today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 46 Released Issue

58 Legend: Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 34% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support A FUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 STAM Phase 2 FCM05 FCM06 Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 62% 71% 38% 10% 10% 5% 0% 40% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 47 Released Issue

59 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 82% < AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 ATC07.1 Ground based Safety Nets AMAN tools and procedures 100% 62% LOWW Vienna International Airport 25% Automated support for conflict detection, ATC12.1 resolution support information and conformance monitoring ATC15.1 Implement, in en route operations, information 100% exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to en route airspace 100% ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 Electronic dialogue as automated 68% assistance to controller during coordination and transfer ENV01 ITY COTR NAV03 RNAV 1 NAV10 Continuous Descent Operations LOWW Vienna International Airport Ground ground automated co ordination processes APV procedures 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 48 Released Issue

60 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 62% AOP04.1 A SMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 A SMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 AOP13 ENV02 SAF11 LOWW Vienna International Airport LOWW Vienna International Airport Airport CDM < % 100% LOWW Vienna International Airport 96% Time Based Separation LOWW Vienna International Airport 10% Initial Airport Operations Plan LOWW Vienna International Airport 0% Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring LOWW Vienna International Airport 40% Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing LOWW Vienna International Airport 8% Collaborative Environmental Management LOWW Vienna International Airport Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions 100% 100% Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 63% COM10 COM11 FCM08 INF04 INF07 ITY ACID ITY ADQ ITY AGDL ITY AGVCS2 ITY FMTP ITY SPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC air ground data link services 8,33 khz air ground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability < % 100% 44% 100% 40% 92% 10% 100% 66% 44% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 49 Released Issue

61 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0 APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 100% B0 SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A SMGCS Level 1 2) 100% B0 FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground Ground Integration 89% 100% B0 DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management 70% 100% B0 ACAS ACAS Improvements 100% B0 SNET B0 ACDM B0 RSEQ B0 FRTO B0 NOPS B0 ASUR B0 CDO B0 TBO Increased Effectiveness of Ground Based Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network Wide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En Route 100% 81% 100% 96% 100% 62% 100% 70% 100% 81% 100% 66% 100% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 50 Released Issue

62 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: 38% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) the described objectives are planned, respectively will be closely monitored within the European context. National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established, likewise common principles, rules and 31/12/2018 procedures for OAT handling and OAT/GAT Interface are planned to be in operational use by end of REG (By:12/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Mil. Aviation Authority ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority Austrocontrol National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date, foreseen by end of National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date, foreseen by end of 2018 National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date, foreseen by end of 2018 At present, the reference documents are as folllows: 'Ressortübereinkommen' Annex 2 MOAT LFG 145a (aviation act) Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT handling and OAT/GAT Interface are planned to be in operational use by end of 2018 Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT handling and OAT/GAT Interfaces are planned to be applied by end of At present, the reference documents are as folllows: 'Ressortübereinkommen' Annex 2 MOAT LFG 145a (aviation act) 10% 10% 0% 5% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 51 Released Issue

63 MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date, foreseen by end of 2018 At present, the reference documents are as folllows: 'Ressortübereinkommen' Annex 2 MOAT LFG 145a (aviation act) Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT handling and OAT/GAT Interface are planned to be in operational use by end of % Ongoing 31/12/2018 AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support A FUA Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Kick off Meeting with Eurocontrol conducted on 30th of Nov in order to implement LARA tool, which is planned for implementation in Q /03/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) Austrocontrol Kick off Meeting with Eurocontrol conducted on 30th of Nov in order to implement LARA tool, which is planned for implementation in Q In FABCE context, Project 3 deals with Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 10% Ongoing 31/03/2018 AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Discussed during the LARA kickoff Meeting in Nov Further proceeding under discussion in context of TopSky / COOPANS development. Furthermore, project kickoff in FABCE context took place in order to apply for CEF funding Project; results available after March /12/2021 Upgrade to ATM systems to enable real time ASM data exchanges with local ASM support systems installed planned by end Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol Discussed during the LARA kickoff Meeting in Nov Further proceedings under discussion in context TopSky / COOPANS. Furthermore, project kickoff in FABCE context took place in order to apply for CEF funding Project; results available after March Upgrade to ATM systems to enable real time ASM data exchanges with local ASM support systems installed planned by end 2021 Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 52 Released Issue

64 AOM19.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 5% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Procedures and processes for a full rolling ASM/ATFCM process (including processes for initial CDM, full management of airspace structure via AUP/UUP, and process supporting sharing of information of airspace configurations via AUP/UUP) planned to be implemented by March /03/2018 Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol Procedures and processes for a full rolling ASM/ATFCM process (including processes for initial CDM, full management of airspace structure via AUP/UUP, and process supporting sharing of information of airspace configurations via AUP/UUP) planned to be implemented by March Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 5% Ongoing 31/03/2018 AOM21.1 Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Within the AoR of ACC Wien, Direct Routing Airspace had been identified and DCT Connections were implemented from FL165 / FL245 up to FL660 until November The SAXFRA area of application is available H24 and is not constrained by FIR or State boundaries. The SAXFRA area will consist of those areas where the following units provide ATS: ACCs Wien (except BUDEX Area) and Ljubljana, APP units Wien, Graz, Innsbruck (East of Rocky line), Klagenfurt, Linz, Salzburg (except Königssee Area), Ljubljana, Maribor and Portoroz (see attached map). As of 10NOV2016 ATS Routes within SAXFRA will be permanently withdrawn except for: ATS routes within areas of responsibility of APP Maribor and Portoroz to provide ATS without the use of ATS surveillance equipment. A set of ATS routes within FIR Wien below 9500FT AMSL for NON RNAV equipped flights. 10/12/2015 Under the umbrella of the overall FABCE airspace planning, this step has been elaborated and coordinated with all FABCE Partners. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2017) Austrocontrol Within the AoR of ACC Wien, Direct Routing Airspace has been identified and DCT Connections have been continuously implemented from FL165 / FL245 up to FL660. Coordination with NM via RNDSG and ERNIP publication goes without saying; the RAD has also been updated accordingly. Under the umbrella of the overall FABCE airspace planning, this step has been elaborated and coordinated with all FABCE Partners. Note: since 10th Nov FRA has been implemented within Austrian Airspace in a cross border initiative with Slovenia. See also AOM FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X Border Free Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study 100% Completed 10/12/2015 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 53 Released Issue

65 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 In fulfilment of the FABCE FRA Roadmap, the first implementation of Free Route Airspace in conjunction with a FRA cross border application has been achieved between Slovenia and Austria as of 10th of November 2016 ( SAXFRA ). The SAXFRA area of application is available H24 and is not constrained by FIR or State boundaries. The SAXFRA area will consist of those areas where the following units provide ATS: ACCs Wien (except BUDEX Area) and Ljubljana, APP units Wien, Graz, Innsbruck (East of Rocky line), Klagenfurt, Linz, Salzburg (except Königssee Area), Ljubljana, Maribor and Portoroz (see attached map). 10/11/2016 ATS Routes within SAXFRA have been permanently withdrawn except for: ATS routes within areas of responsibility of APP Maribor and Portoroz to provide ATS without the use of ATS surveillance equipment. A set of ATS routes within FIR Wien below 9500FT AMSL for NON RNAV equipped flights. Objective was planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol In fulfilment of the FABCE FRA Roadmap, the first implementation of Free Route Airspace has been achieved in conjunction with a FRA cross border application between Slovenia and Austria since 10th of November 2016 ( SAXFRA ). The cross border area extends vertically from ground up to FL660 (partly FL460) and comprisea the Areas of Responsibility of Austro Control (east of Rocky Line) and Slovenia Control H24. FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X Border Free Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study 100% Completed 10/11/2016 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 54 Released Issue

66 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LOWW Vienna International Airport A SMGCS is used as an advisory tool since June The required technical equipment is installed and in operation. See AIP 31/12/2013 The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in dec REG (By:12/2010) The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been delayed until 12/2013, due to Oberste Zivilconsideration and application of Interoperability regulatory Luftfahrtbehö 100% requirements (Required Declarations). rde in Austria The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in dec ASP (By:12/2011) Operational procedures defined and the related safety case are pending the regulatory approval. The Certification Austrocontrol of technical equipements and operational procedures are thus 100% planned for The required safety assessment is still pending. APO (By:12/2010) Flughafen The APO SLOAs are completed for Vienna airport. 100% Wien AG Completed 31/12/2013 Completed 31/12/2011 Completed 31/12/2004 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LOWW Vienna International Airport The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been issued in Dec /09/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) Operational procedures defined and the related safety case is Completed Austrocontrol pending for the regulatory approval. The Certification of 100% technical equipment and of operational procedures are thus 30/09/2013 planned by mid APO (By:12/2017) Flughafen Wien AG The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework was delayed till mid 2013 due to consideration and application of Interoperability regulatory requirements (Required Declarations) as well as the certification of technical equipment and operational procedures (although in place). 100% Completed 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 55 Released Issue

67 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LOWW Vienna International Airport The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June Stepwise completion according to the A CDM project in order to reach the status of 'full 30/04/2018 implementation' is conceived until April 2018, dependent on the DPI implementation. ASP (By:12/2016) Austrocontrol The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June List of adverse conditions defined and agreed, procedures are established. De icing procedures according to the CDM manual guidelines with regard to the status 'locally implemented 'are already in place. The non taxative list of adverse conditions reads at present: freezing rain frequently changing DeIcing conditions xx snow storm at or close to airport xx thunderstorm with frequently changing conditions Refinement of the current procedures is self induced and subject to ongoing continuous improvements. Collaborative Decision Management (CDM) fully implemented 100% Completed 30/06/2016 APO (By:12/2016) Flughafen Wien AG The majority of APO tasks is fulfilled, required specific LoAs were ratified. DPI implementation is late, planned by April (Verification of Interface Connections between VIE and Austro Control Systems is ongoing, first trials with NMOC/ETFMS foreseen in Q1/2017, but implementation cannot be achieved earlier than April 2018) 92% Late 30/04/2018 AOP10 Time Based Separation Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LOWW Vienna International Airport Activity will start in due time dependent on the AMAN implementation and relevant TBS specification. Dependent on the conceived Java HMI implementation, this function is planned by end 2021, whereas additional monitoring functions will be added by TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and 31/12/2023 architectural developments, including HMI aspects. Publication aspects with regard to national aeronautical information will be duly respected. REG (By:12/2023) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2023) Austrocontrol TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and architectural developments, including HMI aspects. Publication aspects with regard to national aeronautical information will be duly respected. Activity will start in due time dependent on the AMAN implementation and relevant TBS specification. Dependent on the conceived Java HMI implementation, this function is planned by end 2021, whereas additional monitoring functions will be added by % AF2_MET Compliance Program / TBS4LOWW (Time Based Separation for Vienna Airport) 10% Ongoing 31/12/2023 Ongoing 31/12/2023 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 56 Released Issue

68 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 0% Planned Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LOWW Vienna International Airport Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning with regard to the Initial AOP will continue and set up in coordination with all relevant stakeholders. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning, Planned Information and data exchange with regard to the Initial AOP will continue in close cooperation with the Airport. ACG provides operational targets, thresholds, rules, etc. for the performance baseline and maintains the system supporting the AOP, plus: Consults the evolution of KPIs and PDIs and receives appropriate alerts and warnings. Updates the AOP information that is responsible for. Is informed about the impact of deviations from the Austrocontrol plan. Is informed about the impact of what if solutions Participates to the decision making process in case of collaborative decision process. Take appropriate decisions to remove any alert / warning under their sole area of responsibility. Note: decisions / actions will ultimately result in the update of the AOP. Runs searches through data mining and capture data according to their access rights (data privacy policy). Runs post operations analysis and generate performance reports. APO (By:12/2021) Flughafen Wien AG Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning with regard to the Initial AOP will continue and set up in coordination with all relevant stakeholders. Based on the reference OSED of OFA , the following Airport roles will be described with relevant responsibilities, e.g.: Airport Operator Airport Duty Officer Airport Slot Coordinator (Airport Capacity Department) Airport Operations Centre (APOC) Stand Planner (movement control) Apron Manager De icing Agent Ground Handling Agent 0% 0% 31/12/2021 Planned 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 57 Released Issue

69 AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LOWW Vienna International Airport For more than 12 years, a very advanced digital Flight Strip System is in operation at Vienna TWR, having been updated continuously to reach a state of the art system (DIFLIS by AVIBIT). 31/12/2020 Based on this tool, the advanced ATC clearance Monitoring function will be embedded. The pertinent start of the activity kicked off in December ASP (By:12/2020) For more than 12 years, a very advanced digital Flight Strip Ongoing System is in operation at Vienna TWR, having been updated Austrocontrol continuously to reach a state of the art system (DIFLIS by AVIBIT). 40% 31/12/2020 Based on this tool, the advanced ATC clearance Monitoring function will be embedded. The pertinent start of the activity kicked off in December 2016 APO (By:12/2020) Flughafen Wien AG The required Training / Information is not applicable for VIE Airport staff % Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LOWW Vienna International Airport Procedures and System implementation for automated assistance to ATCOs for surface movement planning and routing planned to become implemented by end 2020 REG (By:12/2023) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Relevant material for coordination and final official approval of procedures verified and operational approval granted to be planned by 2019 ASP (By:12/2023) Procedures and System implementation for automated Austrocontrol assistance to ATCOs for surface movement planning and routing planned to become implemented by end % 10% Not Applicable 8% Ongoing 31/12/2020 Planned 31/12/2019 Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 58 Released Issue

70 ATC02.8 Ground based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 APW function according to the ECTL guidelines is implemented in the ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since implementation in MSAW and APM functions have been implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC 30/06/2017 Wien, nevertheless the full rollout of the TopSky Safety Net Server (MSAW and APM) for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place in June ASP (By:12/2016) APW function according to the ECTL guidelines is implemented Late in the ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since implementation in Austrocontrol MSAW and APM functions have been implemented as part of 62% the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, nevertheless the 30/06/2017 full rollout of the TopSky Safety Net Server (MSAW and APM) for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place in June Mil. Aviation Authority APW function according to the ECTL guidelines is implemented in the ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since implementation in MSAW and APM functions have been implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, nevertheless the full rollout of the TopSky Safety Net Server (MSAW and APM) for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place in June % Late 30/06/2017 ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LOWW Vienna International Airport Implementation of the AMAN functionality of the TopSky ATM System for Airport Vienna is foreseen to be operational by end /12/2018 Since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL apply Arrival Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message Exchange operationally. ASP (By:12/2019) Implementation of the AMAN functionality of the TopSky ATM Ongoing System for Airport Vienna is foreseen to be operational by end Austrocontrol Since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL apply Arrival 25% Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time 31/12/2018 to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message Exchange operationally. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 59 Released Issue

71 ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 TOP SKY functionality of MTCD covers in total this objective and the required lines of Actions. 28/11/2015 ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol TOP SKY functionality of MTCD covers in total this objective and the required lines of Actions. 100% Completed 28/11/2015 ATC15.1 Implement, in en route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 The information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC Vienna. ATC system is compliant with AMAN use in En Route. 31/03/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) En Route: information exchange mechanisms, tools and Austrocontrol procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC 100% Vienna. ATC system is compliant to AMAN use in En Route. Completed 31/03/2013 Arrival Management extended to en route Airspace Timescales: ATC15.2 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Apart from the implementation of the basic AMAN tool, which is going to be operational by the end of 2018 at the latest, the upgrade of the ATC System (TopSky/COOPANS) will coherently support the functionality of Extended AMAN (AMA messages to be processed and likewise to be distributed, plus process those input data to AMAN, provided by the most accurate trajectory prediction information 31/12/2023 available) Concluding, the Extended AMAN is considered as a collaberative project with all adjacent partners / ATC Units concerned, plus Network Manager. Timeframe to become fully compliant with all ATC Units concerned is estimated till end 2023 at the latest. ASP (By:12/2023) Apart from the implementation of the basic AMAN tool, which Planned is going to be operational by the end of 2018, the upgrade of the ATC System (TopSky/COOPANS) will coherently support the functionality of Extended AMAN (AMA messages to be processed and likewise to be distributed, plus process those input data to AMAN, provided by the most accurate trajectory Austrocontrol 0% prediction information available) 31/12/2023 Concluding, the Extended AMAN is considered as a collaberative project with all adjacent partners / ATC Units concerned, plus Network Manager. Timeframe to become fully compliant with all ATC Units concerned is estimated till end LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 60 Released Issue

72 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Timescales: 68% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR, further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units. The functions to support the transfer and communication process will be documented and operationally used according to the project schedule of the TopSky /COOPANS plus the implementation roadmap for COTR within FABCE and adjacent Units PAC and COD are operational functions in the upgraded ATM System Top Sky /COOPANS. COD is operationally used according to CCAMS. 31/12/2018 Transfer of Communication: Full technical implementation for all OLDI Messages in question (ROF, COF, TIM, HOP, MAS and SDM) has been achieved in November Operational deployment is foreseen with those adjacent Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end Electronic dialogue procedure in Coordination process: Full technical implementation RAP, RRV, CDN, ACP, RJC, SBY, RRV: 03/2013. Operational deployment is foreseen with those adjacent Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end ASP (By:12/2018) Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR, further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units. The functions to support the transfer and communication process will be documented and operationally used according to the project schedule of the TopSky /COOPANS plus the implementation roadmap for COTR within FABCE and adjacent Units Ongoing Austrocontrol PAC and COD are operational functions in the upgraded ATM System Top Sky /COOPANS. COD is operationally used according to CCAMS. Transfer of Communication: Full technical implementation for all OLDI Messages in question (ROF, COF, TIM, HOP, MAS and SDM) has been achieved in November Operational deployment is foreseen with those adjacent Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end ATM system and Sub System evolution for COTR 68% 31/12/2018 Electronic dialogue procedure in Coordination process: Full technical implementation RAP, RRV, CDN, ACP, RJC, SBY, RRV: 03/2013. Operational deployment is foreseen with those adjacent Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 61 Released Issue

73 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Austro Control has implemented the complete required infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK, DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) 31/12/2014 ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS application. ASP (By:12/2018) Austro Control has implemented the complete required Completed infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres Austrocontrol within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK, DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS 100% 31/12/2014 application. Austro control is the sole ANSP. The MIL unit is not an ANSP. AirDefence Centre is AMHS compatible and capable. COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Planned according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Further upgrades at all Local Approach Units and ATM units at Airport Schwechat have been undertaken, whereas final upgrades planned till 2020 at the latest for ATCCV. The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/ /12/2020 For the military, VoI is planned according to the VoIP project plan closely with ATCCV. ASP (By:12/2020) Planned according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Further upgrades at all Local Implementati Approach Units and ATM units at Airport Schwechat have on of Voice Austrocontrol been undertaken, whereas final upgrades are planned for over IP ATCCV till 2020 at the latest. technology The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/2013. Mil. Aviation Authority Planned according to the VoIP Roadmap and the VoIP project plan. 10% 10% Ongoing 31/12/2020 Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 62 Released Issue

74 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LOWW Vienna International Airport CDO is facilitated by ATC for airport Vienna (originally conceived for off peak periods, meanwhile performed on a regular basis) including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to 31/12/2013 the IAF below FL150 to the RWY in use. (See AIP LOWW 2 26) ASP (By:12/2013) CDO is facilitated whenever feasible on a regular basis by ATC Completed including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to the IAF below Austrocontrol FL150 to the RWY in use. 100% (See AIP LOWW 2 26) 31/12/2013 Additionally, shortened Y BAR GNSS approaches are in force since Nov for noise abatement reasons during night time. APO (By:12/2013) Flughafen Wien AG The SLoAs have been implemented according to the target date.cdo is facilitated whenever feasible by ATC, including cross border application. 100% Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LOWW Vienna International Airport This objective is completed for Vienna Airport. Regular meetings of the "dialogue forum" are held between local Vienna Airport communities and Vienna Airport partners. check web page: ASP (By:12/2016) Objective completed at Vienna Airport. Austrocontrol 100% check web page: APO (By:12/2016) Flughafen Objective completed at Vienna Airport. 100% Wien AG Completed 31/12/ % Completed 31/12/2012 Completed 31/12/2005 Completed 31/12/2012 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Collaborative flight planning was already fully implemented, but after the deployment of the new ATM System, it turned out that the AFP activation and provision has been wrongly implemented. Time for 31/12/2017 correction is under discussion to reach the final operational capability by end of 2017 at the latest. ASP (By:12/2017) Collaborative flight planning was already fully implemented, Ongoing but after the deployment of the new ATM System, it turned Austrocontrol out that the AFP activation and provision has been wrongly 62% implemented. Time for correction is under discussion to reach 31/12/2017 the final operational capability by end of 2017 at the latest. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 63 Released Issue

75 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/10/2017 Although FAB CE States are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed as part of FAB CE P3 and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September Live Trial was used to explore and verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has 27/04/2017 decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. Implementation is planned for 27. April Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:10/2017) Austrocontrol Although FAB CE and Austria are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed as part of FAB CE P3 and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September Live Trial was used to explore and verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. Implementation is planned for 27th of April Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 71% Ongoing 27/04/2017 FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 0% Planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Initial activity started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3), kick off planned in2017. It is likely that STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the n CONECT Tool, planned for implementation end of /12/2018 Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol Initial activity started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3), kick off planned in2017. It is likely that STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the n CONECT Tool, planned for implementation end of Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 0% Planned 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 64 Released Issue

76 FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects; see details in LSSIP Chapter 5. 31/12/2021 Airport slots are already transmitted to DDR. Implementation of LARA System is envisaged until In accordance with the planned initiative of the Airport Operations Plan for Vienna, the required complement and integration with the NOP is envisaged and recognised to be implemented until ASP (By:12/2021) The new/changed operational procedures pertinent to the interaction with the NOP are subject to continuous update. Implementation are of LARA System is envisaged until 2018, and In accordance with the planned initiative of the Airport Operations Plan for Vienna, the required complement and Austrocontrol integration with the NOP is envisaged and recognised to be 30% implemented until Ongoing 31/12/2021 This objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. APO (By:12/2021) Slot data for all airports in Austria are sent by SCA to the EUACA* Common Databank on a daily base (1900loc). From this databank EUACA provides the data regularly to Flughafen EUROCONTROL for the use of these slot data in the DDR (DDR Wien AG II) Project. The future AOP, being subject to coordination with the NOP, will be set up and conceived acordingly to reach the target by end % Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 65 Released Issue

77 FCM06 Traffic complexity assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2024 at the latest, as the reception, processing and integration of EFD message is planned for implementation by the end of 2024 only following the recent plans of COOPANS / TOP Sky development steps. Several options are presently under discussion, on whether Austro Control will procure a ready made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. ASP (By:12/2021) Austrocontrol The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2024 at the latest, as the reception, processing and integration of EFD message is planned for implementation by the end of 2024 following the recent plans of COOPANS / TOP Sky development steps. Several options are discussed on whether Austro Control will procure a ready made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM 0% 31/12/2024 Late 31/12/2024 FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 0% Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Based on the future TOPSky SWIM capabilities, the reception and processing of EFPL Information will be installed at a time to be operational in /12/2024 ASP (By:12/2021) Based on the future TOPSky SWIM capabilities, the reception Austrocontrol and processing of EFPL Information will be installed at a time 0% to be operational in Late 31/12/2024 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 66 Released Issue

78 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The Ministry of Transport has launched and signed the national etod policy in 2016 and does foresee the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines. 31/05/2018 The implementation of the etod objective and its requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy in cooperation with Austro Control, Airport Vienna, a.o. REG (By:05/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:05/2018) Austrocontrol APO (By:05/2018) Flughafen Wien AG The Ministry of Transport has launched and signed the national etod policy in 2016 and does foresee the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines. The implementation of the etod objective and its requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy in cooperation with Austro Control, Airport Vienna, a.o. Two Task Forces have been established, dealing with technical issues and legal issues, respectively. The implementation of the etod requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy The Airport Vienna is intends to implement the required activities for the collection, management and provision of TOD in accordance with national TOD policy in time until mid % etod Database Phase 1 55% 10% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 30/05/2018 ITY ACID Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 Since 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation is the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A WAM. The required evidences to reach more than 50% have been delivered in time to reach the first target time in March /12/2019 Next step to reach 100% ACID Compliance is planned by end of ASP (By:01/2020) Austrocontrol Since 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation is the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A WAM. The required evidences to reach more than 50% have been delivered in time to reach the first target time in March Next step to reach 100% ACID Compliance is planned by end of 2019 at the latest. Note: The following Mode S sensors are fully installed: Linz, Wien, Koralpe, Austrian Wide Area Multilateration. External sensors and sources: Muenchen, Javornik ACID Phase 2 Mode S and WAM implementati on 92% Ongoing 31/12/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 67 Released Issue

79 ITY ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and has been approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators). Today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro 31/12/2018 Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on REG (By:06/2017) Mil. Aviation Authority Ongoing according to project plan (still to be analysed, if the Austro Control / ADQ compliance check list is the proper means of compliance for MIL) Formal arrangements planned to be established with all parties concerned. MIL Arrangements with Austro Control will be elaborated in time and rest on the Chain of Command. Note: A high level military quality management system meeting the safety and security management objectives has been implemented, documented and is maintained Military internal processes such as safety and security management stick to national MIL requirements and quality Standards and are subject to continuous improvement processes. 10% Late 31/05/2018 Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Moreover MIL is going to elect to comply with specific lines of action. A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and has been approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators). Today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on % Late 31/05/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 68 Released Issue

80 ASP (By:06/2017) A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and approved by NSA. Some formal arrangements have been already signed, out of Austrocontrol them only 2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators. The required data quality requirements have been fulfilled according to the ACG project 'DATA QUALITY' by 03/2013. Working instructions to describe the processes are in place. The data quality project, led by ACG/AIM, is running according to the project plan. Several awareness workshop were held by ACG to find proper ways to comply with ADQ together with NSA, provincial governments (en route obstacles), aerodrome operators and surveyors for aerodromes. A draft formal arrangement has already been issued by Austro Control to be signed by the originators and a proper system Mil. Aviation (PLX) to supply AIP relevant data is already in place, even for Authority external originators. Note: A high level military quality management system meeting the safety and security management objectives has been implemented, documented and is maintained Military internal processes such as safety and security management stick to national MIL requirements and quality Standards and are subject to continuous improvement processes. For the military, ongoing according to project plan. APO (By:06/2017) Flughafen Wien AG Ongoing according to project plan: Further steps can be made following the signature process for the required checklist, which will be given as soon as some issues will have been cleared by CAA. Common dataset and digital exchange format requirements are planned for implementation by end Further procedure, which Safety Assessments are required to be provided to the NSA, will be evaluated together with NSA 74% 40% 0% Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2018 ITY AGDL Initial ATC air ground data link services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/ % Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). 30/11/2014 REG (By:02/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Regulatory tasks finished by 31/08/2014. CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). ASP (By:02/2018) CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna Austrocontrol above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). MIL (By:01/2019) Military committed to implement the objective by the SES Mil. Aviation target date. Present transport type aircraft remain outside Authority applicability area (below FL285) 100% 100% % Completed 31/08/2014 Completed 30/11/2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 69 Released Issue

81 ITY AGVCS2 8,33 khz air ground voice channel spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Ongoing All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/ khz conversion is ongoing. The Notification for OPC assignments was transmitted to the commission in June 2016 and requirements for the remaining stakeholders will be fulfilled in time. Conversion at ANSP level completed. For safety reasons, frequencies assigned to ATIS and Volmet will be converted to 8,33 khz channel spacing as of 31st December MIL: 8,33 khz conversions will be ready by 12/2018 according to the national MIL conversion plan. MIL 31/12/2018 carrier aircraft are already equipped to a major part, fully converted by end 2017 at the latest. No local exemptions for MIL aircraft are envisaged. For Airport VIE: the required FRQ assignments and conversions to 8,33 khz for all radio equipment are planned until the end of REG (By:12/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria 8.33 khz conversion is ongoing according to the national FRQ conversion plan. The Notification for OPC assignments was transmitted to the commission in June 2016 and requirements for the remaining stakeholders will be fulfilled in time. 62% Mil. Aviation 8.33 khz conversion is ongoing. 41% Authority ASP (By:12/2018) Conversion at ANSP level completed. 8,33 FRQ For safety reasons frequencies assigned to ATIS and Volmet channel Austrocontrol 82% will be converted to 8,33 khz channel spacing as of 31st spacing below December FL195 Mil. Aviation Authority MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Aviation Authority APO (By:12/2018) Flughafen Wien AG Mil. Aviation Authority 8,33 khz conversions will be ready by 12/2018 according to the national MIL conversion plan. MIL carrier aircraft are already equipped to a major part, fully converted by end 2017 at the latest. No local exemptions for MIL aircraft are envisaged. 8,33 khz conversions will be ready by 12/2018 according to the national MIL conversion plan. State aircraft / MIL carrier aircraft are already equipped to a major part, fully converted by end 2017 at the latest. No local exemptions for MIL aircraft are envisaged. For Airport VIE, the required FRQ assignments and conversions to 8,33 khz for all radio equipment are planned until the end of 2017, according to the national Frequency Conversion Plan. All necessary measures have been taken and verified at MoD Level to ensure compatibility with 8.33 khz channel spacing at relevant MIL airports. 30% 30% 8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 7% 10% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 70 Released Issue

82 ITY FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Completed Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 With regard to Regulation (EC) No 633/2007, the verification activities and the assessment of verification of systems (DoV) and the technical file (TF) was positively performed. 30/09/2015 Local system implementation has been finished and started with FMTP operation with MUN in 04/2011. Meanwhile all adjacent partners have been connected applying FMTP. ASP (By:12/2014) Local and national system implementation is completed since. Completed First FMTP operation with MUN since 04/2011 PRA since 10/2012. Austrocontrol BRA since 05/2014, 100% BUD since 02/2014, 30/09/2015 ZAG since 09/2013, LJU and PAD since 03/2015 ZUR since 09/2015 MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Aviation Finalised 04/2011 with the common use of the ATM System % Authority Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 71 Released Issue

83 ITY SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transport type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS B Out in transport type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA. Formal acceptance is communicated to the ANSP. SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year 2000, and safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and therelevant training is applied according to regulations. According to the Safety assessment process and derived procedures, all changes referring to the 31/01/2019 surveillance infrastructure have been subject to SA's and were delivered to the NSA. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment has been subject to all safety assessments in question. Dependent on the MIL planning and budget, aircraft fleet and the specific carriage and operation of Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS B Out avionics, will be implemented by 2019 REG (By:02/2015) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA and formal acceptance comminicated to the ANSP. ASP (By:02/2015) SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year Safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and therelevant training is applied according to regulations. According to the Safety assessment Austrocontrol process and derived procedures, all changes referring to the surveillance infrastructure have been subject to SA's and were delivered to the NSA. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment has been subject to all safety assessments in question. MIL (By:06/2020) Full Mode S compatible implementation covering the relevant Mil. Aviation fleet update is foreseen by Authority No percentage data is going to be released. 100% 100% 10% Completed 31/10/2012 Completed 31/03/2014 Ongoing 31/01/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 72 Released Issue

84 NAV03 RNAV 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures. After full completion of P RNAV implementation (SIDs, STARs, transitions) in Vienna in 2012, an RNAV rollout plan for the remaining Austrian airports has been established which includes the gradual 31/12/2014 replacement of conventional SIDs, STARs and where applicable transitions by P RNAV procedures. Besides STAR procedures which are still based on RNAV5 to serve all our costumers, the roll out is completed. ASP (By:12/2023) As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully Completed compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures.after full completion of P RNAV implementation (SIDs, STARs, transitions) in Vienna Austrocontrol in 2012, an RNAV rollout plan for the remaining Austrian 100% airports has been established which includes the gradual 31/12/2014 replacement of conventional SIDs, STARs and where applicable transitions by P RNAV procedures. Besides STAR procedures which are still based on RNAV5 to serve all our costumers, the roll out is completed. Mil. Aviation Authority As far as RNAV applications are concerned, MIL will act from case to case.. % Not Applicable NAV10 APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz and Graz have been 31/12/2013 published in REG (By:04/2016) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö AMCs are generally not converted into national regulations. 100% rde in Austria Completed 31/12/2010 ASP (By:12/2016) In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently Completed Austrocontrol there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, 100% Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz 31/12/2013 and Graz have been published in LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 73 Released Issue

85 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting have been executed by the relevant ministerial section of the Ministry of Transport. 31/12/2015 The remaining stakeholders have completed their tasks. REG (By:01/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria The required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting have been executed by the relevant ministerial section of the Ministry of Transport. ASP (By:12/2014) Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and Austrocontrol managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled. APO (By:12/2014) Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and Flughafen managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to Wien AG tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled. 100% 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 31/12/2013 Completed 31/12/2013 LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 74 Released Issue

86 6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 The EUROCONTROL Specification has been approved for usage in Austria. STCA level 2 fully deployed in the current ATM system (Enroute Top Sky) 31/03/2013 ASP (By:01/2013) STCA level 2 fully deployed in the current area of responsibility Completed of ATM system (En Route Top Sky). Austrocontrol 100% 31/03/2013 The Military uses the civil infrastructure. Mil. Aviation Authority STCA level 2 fully deployed in the current area of responsibility of ATM system (En Route Top Sky). The Military uses the civil infrastructure. 100% Completed 31/03/2013 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Austria fulfills the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/2011 and has achieved the training and performance monitoring actions. 31/03/2015 MIL transport A/C have been adequately equipped since March 2015 REG (By:12/2015) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria Austria fulfills the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/ % ASP (By:03/2012) Austro Control has implemented the EU regulation 1332/2011 Austrocontrol and has achieved the training and performance monitoring Actions accordingly. 100% MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Aviation Authority MIL transport A/C have been equipped since March % Completed 31/12/2014 Completed 31/03/2012 Completed 31/03/2015 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 AustroControl fully completed this objective already in 2008, whereas the remaining objective FCM01 ASP08 (DPI) is subject to the use of the runway sequencing tool and further CDM Implementation. The DPI is also described in AOP05 APO05 and will be implemented by 04/2018 in cooperation with Airport 31/12/2008 Vienna ASP (By:07/2014) AustroControl fully completed this objective in The Completed Austrocontrol remaining objective FCM01 ASP08 (DPI) is also covered by 100% AOP05 APO05 and will be implemented by 06/2016 in the 31/12/2008 context of CDM. LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 75 Released Issue

87 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Objective completed. ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its customers to plan a flight, coordinate an inner European flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot pre flight 31/12/2005 briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet ASP (By:12/2012) ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its Completed customers to plan a flight, coordinate an inner European flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot pre flight briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet. Austrocontrol Not applicable to the Military. The Austrian Military Authorities are using their own briefing and FPL system which is tailored to their own specific needs and independent from the civil IBS. Only for flights outside Austrian airspace which is a very rare case the civil IBS is used for the retrieval of AIS and MET briefings, without using the FPL functions. 100% 31/12/2005 ITY COTR Implementation of ground ground automated co ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 The main functionalities as required for coordination and transfer have been implemented in the current ATM system (TopSky). LOF / NAN messages for AGDL implementation were implemented in Oct /10/2014 ASP (By:12/2012) The main functionalities for coordination and transfer plus Austrocontrol enhanced functions are part of the new ATM System Top Sky 100% and were implemented in October Completed 31/10/2014 MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Aviation The Military are exchanging BFD and CFD data with the civil Authority ATM system % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 76 Released Issue

88

89 ANNEXES Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Austria Austro Control Martin STIEBER LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA MoT / BMVIT Alfred GULDER LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Austro Control Martin STIEBER LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Airport VIE Franz EHMOSER LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD / BMLVS Obst Gerold DOBLHAMMER EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Austria DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Ralph MICHALKE AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Ralph MICHALKE AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Ralph MICHALKE AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Roland SCHMIDT AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Christian KERN AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO Franz EHMOSER AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Christian WOBORSKY LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 77 Released Issue

90 AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Christian WOBORSKY ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Roman KIENAST ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Gerhard BERGER COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Thomas BAUMGARTNER COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO Thomas BAUMGARTNER ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Daniel SCHAAD ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Christian WOBORSKY FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Reinhard WALCHER FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Roman KIENAST FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO Ralph MICHALKE FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Robert WEHOFER INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO Roman NOSSAL INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO Roman NOSSAL ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Robert WEHOFER ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Thomas BAUMGARTNER ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Michael LÖFFLER ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Reinhard WALCHER ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Wolfgang NEUMEISTER ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Michael LÖFFLER NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC Daniel SCHAAD NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Daniel SCHAAD SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Alfred VLASEK LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 78 Released Issue

91 Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts The Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit) LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 79 Released Issue

92 Austro Control GesmbH Airport Vienna LSSIP Year 2016 Austria 80 Released Issue