Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) POLAND

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) POLAND Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Poland Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/131 Date of Edition 19/05/2017 LSSIP Focal Point Jolanta WAKULICZ - j.wakulicz@pansa.pl LSSIP Contact Person Status Intended for Available in Ingrid Feijt ingrid.feijt@eurocontrol.int Frédéric Rooseleer - Frederic.rooseleer@eurocontrol.int Released Agency Stakeholders Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations AIP Polska Baltic FAB Performance Plan and LSSIP Year 2016 Poland Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2016 Poland Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) PANSA Airports Military Authorities Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Poland WARSAW ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Performance summer Planning Period Summer Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Poland Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context As a part of the development of the air traffic control system, to meet the operational needs, the functionality of the current PEGASUS_21 system is still being improved. In 2016, actions to implement the itec validation platform started. Air navigation service providers PANSA (Poland) and Oro Navigacija SE (Lithuania) signed in 2016 contracts with INDRA company for the deployment of itec last-generation air traffic management systems. The itec systems incorporate the most advanced technologies based on 4D trajectory (3 Dimensions + time) that permit the introduction of the latest advances in safety for very advanced Air Conflict Management. It will also allow managing airspace in a very flexible and dynamic way, being able to respond to changes in traffic demand, weather conditions or adapting to reserved military airspace. The contracts are the result of a common procurement procedure, and are key for the deployment of a common system across the Baltic FAB. According to the SES goals, the itec systems allow to define more efficient routes (performancedriven), with the corresponding fuel economy and environmental efficiency. As a part of improving the comprehensive management of the airspace, the first stage of the vertical split in FIR Warsaw was implemented and based on current GAT ACC sectors in two layers. The process of acquiring new frequencies and investment to build new centres of radio communication were completed and the complex process of training of operating personnel had started. Within the Aeronautical Information Services (AIS) works connected to the integration of Polish and Lithuanian AIS were carried out. It was connected with a shared AIS database for FAB, shared software and integration of the part of AIS tasks. The expected outcome of the vertical split implementation is as follows: separation of air traffic flows, reduction of delays, shortening the flight paths, reduction of CO2 emissions and improvement of the competitiveness offered by the Polish Air Navigation Services Agency for users of the Polish airspace. Implementation of Direct Routing (FRA like) in FIR Warsaw is one of the phases of Free Route Airspace Implementation. This stage is already implemented, however it is still under further development. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Poland increased by 8.7% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period of There were significant changes in traffic over the last two years, including changes in: origins and direction of overflying traffic, aircraft structure, length of overflying traffic routes, parts of airspace used/sectors occupancy. It should also be noted that current political situation in Europe is reflected in significant scope of military exercises over Poland, also impacting capacity and traffic flows. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 1 Released Issue

12 We are currently also observing increasing traffic to/from Polish airports, including schedule development of LOT Polish Airlines using Warsaw/Chopin airport. This additional traffic originating in Poland also needs to be accommodated by ANS. Current traffic situation in FIR Warsaw is significantly different than the one before July 2014, and as a consequence is much different from traffic assumptions on which BFAB PP RP2 was based. These changes impact operational practices in air navigation services, which need to be adjusted accordingly. Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 3% 1; 3% 0; 0% 0; 0% Completed Ongoing 0; 0% 7; 17% 9; 22% Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable 22; 55% Missing Data Undefined The large majority of LSSIP objectives are either ongoing or completed. In detail, there are 21 ongoing objectives, 9 out of 39 objectives are completed, in addition one has a planned status and 8 out of 39 objectives are late. Regarding NAV objectives, implementation of P-RNAV (NAV03) is completed and of APV procedures (NAV10) is late but in progress 78%. All Environment objectives are reported completed. The implementation of AOM and ATC objectives has continued steadily, except ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets (late but with 90% progress) and ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 which is completed for the civil ANSP but late for the military part with target date in The implementation of airport related objectives is late. At Warsaw Chopin Airport AOP04.2 is planned to be completed in IQ2019. AOP05 is late with 85% progres and planned implementation date in The newly introduced objectives from AOP10 to AOP13 are reported as Not applicable. The objective concerning Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 is completed and phase 2 planned to be implemented in The activity toward implementation of interactive rolling Network Operations Plan (FCM05) and Traffic Complexity Assessment (FCM06) has started. The implementation of integrated briefing (INF04) is reported as late, PANSA intends to implement operational version of the integrated briefing level 6 by the end of The objective regarding Aircraft Identification (ITY-ACID) and the objective regarding Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (ITY-SPI) are progressing within the required timeframe. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 2 Released Issue

13 The implementation of Ground-Ground Automated Co-ordination Processes (ITY-COTR) and Flight Message Transfer Protocol (ITY-FMTP) is completed. For the objective concerning Aeronautical Data Quality (ITY-ADQ), which has ongoing status, some actions to improve implementation have been taken by ASP, APO and REG to meet the deadline of Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 74% 24% 78% 54% 72% n/a 56% 1% SESAR Baseli ne PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP Baseli Baseli Baseli ne ne ne LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 3 Released Issue

14 ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 4 Released Issue

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 5 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Poland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 28 th June, 1990 EUROCONTROL 1 st September, 2004 European Union 1 st May, 2004 EASA 1 st May, 2004 ICAO 4 th April, 1947 NATO 12 th March, 1999 ITU 1 st January, Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document is the Warszawa Flight Information Region (FIR Warszawa). It consists of Polish airspace over the land, internal waters and territorial sea and certain airspace over the open Baltic Sea. The Polish airspace consists of controlled airspace (CTA FL095 FL 660, TMAs, CTRs) and uncontrolled airspace. The uncontrolled airspace is defined as airspace outside controlled airspace, Temporary Segregated Areas (TSA), Temporary Restricted Areas and Military Aerodrome Traffic Zones (MATZ). There are 11 TMAs within the FIR WARSZAWA at Gdańsk, Kraków, Szczecin, Warszawa, Rzeszów, Łódź, Poznań, Lublin, Bydgoszcz, Radom and Olsztyn-Mazury. TMA Lower limit Upper limit No of sectors LTMA/UTMA Gdańsk 1800ft FL135 (LTMA) FL285 (UTMA) 5 LTMA/UTMA Kraków 2300ft FL095 (LTMA) FL285 (UTMA) 6 TMA Szczecin 1700ft FL135 4 TMA Warszawa 1000ft FL225 9 TMA Rzeszów 2000ft FL145 4 TMA Łódź 1800ft FL095 2 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 6 Released Issue

18 TMA Poznań North 1600ft FL195 4 South 2100ft FL195 7 TMA Lublin 1800ft FL135 4 TMA Bydgoszcz 1800ft FL135 3 TMA Radom 2000ft FL The lateral dimensions of all TMAs are described in the Polish AIP starts from section ENR 2.1. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 7 Released Issue

19 Airspace Classification and Organisation From 18 March 2004 Airspace ICAO class C has been applied from FL 95 to FL 660 except Airspace ICAO class G that will be applied from SFC/GND to FL 95 in non-controlled airspace. Class D has been implemented in CTR and TMA Lublin up to FL095; CTR and TMA Zielona Góra up to FL095; CTR/TMA Radom up to FL095;, CTR EPLL; CTR EPBY; CTR EPMO. Further implementation is planned systematically within other TMA s and CTR s. At present, the situation is as follows: FL or Alt Band Upper Limit Poland C GND-FL095 Outside CTR s and TMA s G Major TMA Minor TMA CTA/AWY C C C D Up to FL09 5 CTR C D Legend A B C D E F G Unclassified or N/A No Reply LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 8 Released Issue

20 1.2. National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders important for efficient ATM operations in POLAND are the following: - The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), also the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) for Poland; - The Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA); - The Polish Air Force; - The Military Air Traffic Service Office; - The Polish Airports State Enterprise, operating the Warsaw Chopin Airport and Zielona Góra/Babimost Airport; - The State Commission on Aircraft Accident Investigation (SCAAI). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Ministry of Infrastructure and Construction Airspace Advisory Committee Ministry of National Defence The State Commission for Aircraft Accident Investigation Polish Air Navigation Services Agency Polish Airports State Enterprise Civil Aviation Authority Armed Forces General Command Military Accident Investigation Office Military Air Traffic Service Office Warsaw Chopin Airport Zielona Góra Babimost Airport LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 9 Released Issue

21 Civil Regulator(s) General Information The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development is responsible for civil aviation in Poland. The different national entities, having regulatory responsibilities in ATM, are summarised in the table below. The CAA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Safety Oversight Organisation responsible The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Legal Basis Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002 with further amendments Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011 Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002 with further amendments Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011, Art. 12 Regulation (EU) 970/2014 Regulation (EU) 2016/1006 Regulation (EC) No 2150/ 2005 Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002 with further amendments Economic The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development Regulation (EU) No. 390/2013 Regulation (EU) No. 391/2013 Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002 with further amendments Environment Security The Ministry of Environment The Ministry of Internal Affairs The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 Annex 16 ICAO Regulation (EC) No 820/2008 MoIA general rules CAA approval of Security Programme for aerodromes and conducting of security inspections, oversight LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 10 Released Issue

22 Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Accident investigation State Commission on Aircraft Accidents Investigation (SCAAI) Convention on International Civil Aviation signed on 7 Dec1944 The Aviation Law Act of 3 July 2002 The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) The President of the Civil Aviation Authority performs functions of aviation administration and aviation supervision authority in the following main areas: compliance with legal provisions relating to the civil aviation, operation of aircraft and certification of entities conducting activity in civil aviation, airworthiness of aeronautical equipment and competency of flight personnel, registers of aircraft, aerodromes, aviation ground facilities, flight personnel and landing areas, flight safety in civil aviation, including examination and evaluation of safety levels in civil aviation, application of civil aviation regulations, approving boundaries of manoeuvring area of the aerodrome. Polish Aviation Law act of 3 July 2002 provides main basis upon which the Polish aviation regulatory framework is being developed. IAW Aviation Law, the Civil Aviation Authority is in charge of ATM safety regulation and has been nominated as the National Supervisory Authority (as per the SES Regulations). As the National Supervisory Authority, the CAA is independent from the Polish Air Navigation Services Agency. The independence is thus achieved at institutional level. Rulemaking, Safety Oversight and Safety Performance Monitoring have been entrusted to the safety regulatory function (CAA). ATM safety occurrence analyses have been entrusted to CAA together with SCAAI and PANSA. In the flight safety domain the CAA covers following areas: - evaluation of principles for creating methods leading to organising flight safety and prevention activities; - safety oversight and inspection of ATM services and aircraft; - co-operation with the State Commission for Aircraft Accidents Investigation evaluation and analysis of accident causes; - conclusions and, after accident recommendations, supervision and control of their implementation; - managing the accident and aviation incidents database; - preparation of annual and immediate after-flight damage reports; - consultation of draft aviation regulations; - preparation of Annual Summary Template. Annual Report published: Y Safety Oversight Annual Report. (Available in CAA) The address of NSA website: LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 11 Released Issue

23 PANSA Service provided The Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA) was set up on 1 April 2007 and replaced the Polish Air Traffic Agency (PATA) which as a state body was responsible for air traffic over Poland. PANSA is responsible for guaranteeing safe, continuous, fluent and efficient air traffic. It is a state body (acting as a legal entity with an autonomous budget) responsible for air traffic management within Polish airspace in accordance with ICAO, except at military airports. Name of the ANSP: Polish Air Navigation Services Agency Governance: Independent Agency Ownership: State-owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS Y Y Y Y Y MET N Institute of Meteorology and Water Management-National Research Institute(IMGW-PIB) is the institution certified by the CAA RADOM-METEO Limited Company ATCO training Y Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Flight Safety Inspection (NAV&SUR test flights, and control flight of the procedures). Cross-border areas with Czech Republic where PANSA is a service provider, and with other two countries: Germany and Sweden which provide services in parts of EPWW FIR. Annual Report published: Y PANSA publishes an Annual Report every year. Address of ANSP website: LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 12 Released Issue

24 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y itec system FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Indra Sistemas S.A. (PEGASUS_21 FPDS) Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Ongoing - next upgrade planned for Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? New system planned after 2021 ATC Unit Warszawa ACC, Gdańsk APP, Kraków APP, Poznań APP, Warszawa APP Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 3 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Indra Sistemas S.A. (PEGASUS_21 local contingency FDPS) No No Gdańsk APP, Kraków APP, Poznań APP SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Indra Sistemas S.A. (PEGASUS_21 primary SDPS) Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Ongoing - next upgrade planned for Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? New system planned after 2021 ATC Unit Warszawa ACC, Gdańsk APP, Kraków APP, Poznań APP, Warszawa APP Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Comsoft Gmbh (PEGASUS_21 secondary SDPS ARTAS) Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? No Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? New system planned after 2021 ATC Unit Warszawa ACC, Gdańsk APP, Kraków APP, Poznań APP, Warszawa APP Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Indra Sistemas S.A. (PEGASUS_21 local contingency SDPS) No No Gdańsk APP, Kraków APP, Poznań APP 1 PANSA and SE Oro navigacija, signed contracts with INDRA SISTEMAS S. A. for the deployment of the itec last-generation air traffic management system. These contracts are the first steps for the both air navigation services (ANS) providers to join the itec Alliance, which already encompasses DFS (Germany), ENAIRE (Spain), NATS (U.K.), LVNL (The Netherlands) and AVINOR (Norway). 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) 3 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 13 Released Issue

25 ATC Units The following Table lists the ACC sectors and TMAs in the Polish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP. ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Warszawa ACC 9 FIR WARSZAWA (CTA) Warszawa APP 9 FIR WARSZAWA (TMA Warszawa) Gdańsk APP 5 FIR WARSZAWA (LTMA Gdańsk, UTMA Gdańsk) Kraków APP 6 FIR WARSZAWA (UTMA Kraków, LTMA Kraków) Poznań APP 11 FIR WARSZAWA (TMA Poznań) Warszawa ACC provides Radar Services for all aircraft in assigned airspace. ATC sectors are opened, closed and combined according to predicted traffic demand. Note: vertical split planned at the beginning of 2016 will increase number of sectors. APP collocated with ACC and utilizes the same ATM system. APP collocated with TWR. Gdańsk APP utilizes the same ATM system as ACC Warszawa. Local ATM system is available as a contingency. APP collocated with TWR. Kraków APP utilizes the same ATM system as ACC Warszawa. Local ATM system is available as a contingency. APP collocated with TWR. Poznań APP utilizes the same ATM system as ACC Warszawa. Local ATM system is available as a contingency Airports General information Two of the currently functioning Polish Airports: Warszawa-Chopin, Zielona Góra-Babimost are operated by Polish Airports State Enterprise. Other regional airports: Gdańsk-Lech Wałęsa, Katowice-Pyrzowice, Wrocław-Strachowice, Kraków-Balice, Szczecin-Goleniów, Poznań-Ławica, Łódź-Lublinek, Rzeszów-Jasionka, Bydgoszcz-Szwederowo, Warszawa-Modlin, Lublin, Radom and Olsztyn-Mazury have been transformed into commercial companies with ownership shared by State Treasury, PPL, local authorities and private sector. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. The following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Warsaw Chopin Airport which is the main national airport of Poland is covered in this LSSIP and it is part of airports listed in the APT related list of airports. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 14 Released Issue

26 Military Authorities The Military Authorities responsible for air traffic management for military aircraft in POLAND are the Armed Forces General Command, and the Military Air Traffic Service Office (MATSO) of Polish Forces. They report to the Ministry of Defence through the Chief of General Staff. In peace time, the management of Polish airspace functions is carried out by the Minister for Transport. During wartime or a state of emergency, upon the Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002, the Minister of Infrastructure and the Minister of Defence, by means of regulations, define the rules for handling the functions to the Minister of Defence, considering the rules of co-operation between national air traffic management authority with relevant military services. All responsibilities relating to state security are realised by the Minister of Defence through appropriate executive bodies. On the basis of legal documents, on the 1 st January 2002, the Military Air Traffic Service Office (MATSO) of Polish Armed Forces was established. Being the main military authority subordinate to the Armed Forces General Commander, MATSO holds the position of the central management and supervision body over the military air traffic service in Polish Armed Forces. MATSO accomplishes the tasks on the operational management level and its area of responsibility comprises the general supervision over military air traffic services at military air bases as well as co-ordination between civil and military services. Additionally its area of responsibility includes the implementation of unified procedures, norms, and standards of technical equipment, and unification of ATS personnel qualifications in integrated air traffic management system. MATSO co-operates with the Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA) and other Polish civil aviation organisations. The main objective of this co-operation is the delegation of air traffic management authority to MATSO in times of war or crisis. Polish military authorities set objectives for adoption of NATO standards and procedures under the guidelines of NATO Air Traffic Management Committee (NATMC). This led to the integrated ATM system. The Polish Aviation Law of 3 July 2002 allows Military to provide ATC services at military aerodromes. Military Air Traffic Control Service (aerodrome control, approach control) is provided to all aircraft (civil/military) performing flights in Military Air Traffic Zone (MATZ) designed for every military airport. MATZ is non-classified airspace, however all ATC services provided are compliant with D class airspace regulations. It means that by internal regulation all services are provided in accordance to CAA regulations with exceptions (for military users) described in ATC Local Operational Procedures and MIL AIP but in the light of standing CAA regulations, provided services are not considered as controlled. Practically, ATC provided by the military ATS to civil aircraft relates to occasional humanitarian, private/business and SAR flights at military aerodromes. The military part is not a service provider, neither for GAT nor for OAT. The military provide military ATS solely at military aerodromes, except SAR service, which is provided in the whole FIR Warszawa (MET can be provided by separate organisation according to regulations; some services can be provided by MIL MET, but not all). The provision of Flight Information Service by the military ATS to civil aircraft relates to occasional humanitarian, private/business and SAR flights at military aerodromes. This service is not considered an ATC service and the clearance limit for the controlled part of the flights is provided to the crew individually, therefore military aerodromes are not considered controlled in the light of standing ICAO regulations, except one military airport Poznan-Krzesiny. The level of integration between civil and military is realised through the ASM specialists (MATSO officers at AMC Poland in the Polish Air Navigation Services Agency. The Military regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are recalled in a synthetic way in the chart below. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 15 Released Issue

27 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Authority signing such legal provision: These provisions cover: Additional Information: Rules of the Air for OAT N N GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Authority signing such legal provision: These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT N OAT/GAT Coordination N OAT/GAT Coordination N ATCO Training N ATCO Training N ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Additional Information: ESARR applicability Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: Other: N Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: N GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Not applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 16 Released Issue

28 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route PANSA En-Route PANSA Approach/TMA N/A Approach/TMA PANSA Airfield/TWR/GND AFGC Airfield/TWR/GND PANSA AIS AFGC AIS PANSA MET AFGC MET MET office SAR AFGC, PANSA coordination SAR PANSA coordination TSA/TRA monitoring AFGC, PANSA FIS PANSA Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information: Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? N/A N User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements X Exemption from Route Charges X Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM X 8.33 X Mode S ACAS X Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Poland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 17 Released Issue

29 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Poland Poland - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 8.0% 7.6% 6.4% 6.2% 5.7% 5.1% 4.0% Poland B 1.1% 1.4% -0.3% 7.5% 4.7% 3.0% 3.5% 3.2% 2.7% 3.0% L 7.0% 2.0% 0.2% 1.0% 1.5% 0.6% 0.9% ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2016 Traffic in Poland increased by 8.7% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.1% and 6.2% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.4%. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 18 Released Issue

30 2.2. WARSAW ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays EPWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Performance summer 2016 En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual Capacity gap +8.8 % 144 (+1%) Yes The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.27 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.66 minutes per flight in Summer % of delays were for the reason ATC Staffing, 16% for ATC Capacity, and 7% for Weather. Capacity Plan +5% Achieved Comments Stepped implementation of FRA Yes Implementation of A-CDM at Warsaw Chopin airport No Completion expected in autumn 2017 Advanced ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes Stepped implementation of vertical sectorisation Yes 7 additional controllers Yes Eight new, three expected by December 23 students on OJT Re-evaluation of sector capacities in new vertical split airspace No CAPAN in progress in 2016 Improved flexibility in vertical sectorisation, new configurations responding to flow demand Yes Improved sector configurations and management of configurations Yes Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes 10 sectors opened Summer 2016 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 144, 1% higher than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 161 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 152. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 19 Released Issue

31 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC EPWW 144 Capacity Profiles 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 156 8% 164 5% 171 4% Ref % 154 3% 159 3% L 146 1% 148 1% 150 1% Open 155 8% 159 3% 164 3% C/R % 168 3% 172 2% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Stepped implementation of FRA Full implementation of FRA in Baltic FAB Initial ASM Tool to support Advanced FUA Implementation of A-CDM at Warsaw Chopin airport Advanced ATFCM techniques, including STAM Stepped implementation of vertical sectorisation Re-evaluation of sector capacities in new vertical split airspace Polish airspace project Introduce 5 NM longitudinal separation Improved flexibility in vertical sectorisation, new configurations responding to flow demand Additional layer Additional controllers Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 Implementation of air-ground 8,33 khz ch. spacing requirements below FL195 Continuous development of sector configurations and management Significant Events Max sectors 10/11 11/12 11/12 11/12 11/12 Planned Annual Capacity Increase 5% 3% 3% 3% 0% Reference Profile Annual % Increase 3% 3% 3% N/A N/A Current Routes Profile % Increase 13% 3% 2% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Current routes Profile -7.4% -7.1% -6.4% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 20 Released Issue

32 Sectors available Summer 2017 WD :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22: Sectors available Summer 2017 Fri. + WE 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22: Planning Period Outlook The capacity gap is expected to be closed from 2020, and the performance should improve over the planning period. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 21 Released Issue

33 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Poland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC-2015/1 Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-sesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Corrective actions taken: YES Ownership All operational stakeholders Description: CAA performs the oversight tasks on ANSP to ensure that pre-sesar elements will be enter into force in secure, safety and appropriate way. CAA also monitors timely delivery of SESAR baseline. REC-2015/2 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: NO: AOM19: ongoing/on time ATC07.1: not applicable ENV01: completed ITY-FMTP: completed FCM04: STAM phase 1 has implemented; Resectorization of airspace, additional layer planned in Corrective actions taken: YES: COM10: ongoing/the implementation was started in 2010 and was finished in 2014 (for Basic ATSMHS). Upgrade the AMHS capability in existing COM centres to provide the Extended ATSMHS in accordance with the profile specified in the AMHS Community Specification. NAV10: Actions to reduce implementation delays: training procedure designers, training ATCO s. ATC15 : Group of functionalities related to AMAN (AMAN for Warsaw TMA, AMAN support in ACC, X-MAN support in ACC) is initially planned for the ATM system modernization project scheduled for years Scope of the actual implementation may vary depending on initial validation results. INF07: Apart of actions already mentioned in the particular REG's tasks, the CAA Poland started or plan to start several other measures to reduce delays including: - etod "on site" oversight inspections to check correctness of gathered data, implementation of one common Poland-wide obstacle data exchange format based on.xls file to speed up processes, an increase in working hours and staff resources delegated to the etod project. AOP04.1: In 2015 project has been reorganized with steering committee establishing. This with additional PANSA management support resulted in further significant steps as operational concept provision and signature of an agreement between PANSA and PPL, related to cooperation in A- SMGCS system implementation. Then the tender process could be initiated and published on 21/07/2016. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 22 Released Issue

34 Reference number REC-2015/7 Recommendation 2015 ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. Corrective actions taken: YES Ownership ANSPs benefiting from EU funding Description: Polish Air Navigation Services Agency actively takes part in the SESAR programme deployment process and makes use of available EU aid to facilitate this process. In this regard, PANSA, in response to so called CEF Transport Calls for Proposals, has already submitted several implementation projects to Innovation and Network Executive Agency for co-funding purposes. So far, the following projects have been granted EU financial support: 1st part of the upgrade of the PEGASUS_21 system to SESAR functionalities test and validation platform, submitted in response to 2014 CEF Transport Call for Proposals, ECG communication System Upgrade, submitted in response to 2015 CEF Transport Call for Proposals, LAN Network upgrade, submitted in response to 2015 CEF Transport Call for Proposals. On top of this, PANSA is currently applying for co-funding of further SESAR/PCP-related projects in response to 2016 CEF Transport Call for Proposals. The list of projects includes the following projects: ATM System Upgrade Towards Free Route Airspace, itec Tests, Validations and Planning (itec-tvp), TRAFFIC FRA, Traffic Complexity Tool, Implementation of Data-link Services for the ATM in FIR Warsaw. Also, PANSA wishes to participate in 2016 CEF Call for Proposals as a contributor with the following projects: Global Deployment Roadmap for Flight Object Interoperability (project led by DFS), NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS (project led by EUROCONTROL), Deploy SWIM governance (project led by DSNA), DLS Implementation Project - Path 1 "Ground" stakeholders (project led by ENAIRE), DLS Implementation Project - Path 2 (project led by ENAV), Gate One Free Route Airspace (GO FRA) Study (project led by FABCE Ltd.). LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 23 Released Issue

35 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in POLAND/PANSA are depicted in the table below. 1st part of the upgrade of the P_21 PEGASUS system to SESAR New Project (131AF3) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/09/ /02/2017 Status: - Description: The P_21 system transition to itec has the following objectives: Deployment of Preliminary Deployment Plan functionalities of the ATM System, mostly the ATM. Functionality 3 - Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route (Family 3.2.1), with references to: - Pilot Common Project Technical Annex for the AF 03: Airspace Management and Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace: - The ATC system shall support flexible configuration of sectors so that their dimensions and operating hours can be optimized according to the demands of the NOP. - The system shall allow a continuous assessment of the impact of changing airspace configurations on the network. - ATC systems shall correctly depict the activation and de-activation of configurable airspace reservations and the change of a volume of airspace from a fixed route network to FRA. - The ASM, ATFCM and ATC systems shall securely interface in a way that allows the provision of air navigation services based on a common understanding of the airspace and traffic environment. The ATC systems shall be modified to enable this functionality to the extent necessary to comply with Regulation (EC) No 552/2004, point 4 of Part A of Annex II Free Route - ATC systems shall implement the following: - Flight data processing system, including HMI, to manage trajectory/flight planning without reference to the fixed ATS network. - Flight planning systems to support FRA and cross-border operations - ASM/ATFCM to manage FRA for FRA, Medium Term Conflict Detection (MTCD) including Conflict Detection Tools (CDT), Conflict Resolution Assistant (CORA), Conformance Monitoring, and APW for dynamic airspace volumes/sectors; Trajectory prediction and de-confliction shall support an automated MTCD tool adapted to operate in FRA airspace and, when required, on DCT. - Flight Data Processing System (FDPS) shall support FRA, DCT and A-FUA. - The controller working position shall support the operating environments, as ppropriate - Baltic FAB CONOPS FRA (Free Route Airspace) - The deployment of FRA will initially require the introduction of a number of key enablers - System support enhancement for the purposes of flight planning, flight data processing, flight data display and exchange, coordination, conflict detection and resolution; Deployment at the same time of elements of other ATM Functionalities: - Enable the ATM System to support RNP operations (Family 1.2.3) - Electronic Flight Strips (Family 2.1.2) - Interface to NMS (Family 4.2.3) - FDP system adaptation to interface with NOP (Family 4.4.1) - ATM system adaptation to support AIXM 5.1 (Family 5.3.2) - FDPS upgrade preparing for IOP Flight Object exchanges (Family 5.6.1) - Alignment of the PEGASUS ATM system to further joint development within the itec cooperation and with the FAB partner. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 24 Released Issue

36 Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: AF3; Sub AF3.1, Family 3.1.1; AF 1; AF 4; AF 5; Family 1.2.3; Family 2.1.2; Family 4.2.3; Family 4.4.1; Family 5.3.2; Family NSP: The project has direct links with SO 3/1 (Deploy full free route airspace hroughout the European ATM network, to the maximum extent possible); SO 3/2 (Implement Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace); SO 4/1 (Modernise the local/fab system capabilities including ATC planning functions and Controller tools procedures); NOP: This project is not addressed by NOP Annex 5 (ACC TRAFFIC FORECAST & CAPACITY PLANS) as the PANSA listed only the data link system improvement as the technical measures for capacity enhancement. Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: - Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Synchronisation with ANSPs, ECTL/NM - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 131AF3 - LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 25 Released Issue

37 COM (There is no separate project yet) (Code is not assigned yet ) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Final stage. Description: Implementation of 8.33 khz channel separation above FL195 (in line with EU 1079/2012). Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ITY-AGVCS2 Other links: EU 1079/2012). Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Implementation of 8.33 khz channel separation above FL195 Transition from analogue to digital technology for ground communications systems and for the CPDLC will increase the reliability of these system and at the same will increase the level of safety The radio-communication system s develop related to the new airspace resectorisation will enable increased airspace capacity. Implementation of CPDLC will increase capacity around 14%, assuming that 100% of transition aircrafts will be equipped with VDLM2 Implementation of new technologies in the COM area allows to reduce the operating costs of systems. Implementation of new technologies and the development of communications systems will require funding, but will reduce operating cost in the long term. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 26 Released Issue

38 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System - A-SMGCS system for Warsaw airport (Pr-12 A-SMGCS ) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Project planning Operational efficiency: - A-SMGCS system for Warsaw airport will be implemented in cooperation PANSA and PPL (APO).AA SMGCS project has started in PANSA for the Warsaw Chopin Airport. L3: AOP04.1, AOP Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - Improve situational awareness for aerodrome ATCO and enhanced safe operations. Precise identification and determination of the position of aircraft at the aerodrome area. Reduction of noise and emissions. Ability to maintain traffic when aerodrome traffic cannot be observed visually by aerodrome ATCO through the use of surveillance information and appropriate procedures. Reduction of taxi time, reduction in delay and fuel burn through more efficient control of aerodrome surface traffic. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 27 Released Issue

39 Implementation of Controller-Pilot Data Link Communication (Pr67-CPDLC) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: In scope of schedule.the project is an initial stage of implementation the European Common Data Link System for the delivery of Data Link Service to Users (ANSPs) in accordance with the outcomes of the A6 Study on ""DLS Common Service Provision"" Description: Implementation of CPDLC (in line with EU 29/2009): - implementation of ACSP (Air Ground Communication Service Provider); - ATM system upgrade. Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ITY-AGDL Other links: EU Regulation: 29/2009 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Y Name/Code in DP2016: Initial A/G Data Link network deployment for Air & Ground Communication Transition from analogue to digital technology for ground communications systems and for the CPDLC will increase the reliability of these system and at the same will increase the level of safety. The radio-communication system s develop related to the new airspace resectorisation will enable increased airspace capacity. Implementation of CPDLC will increase capacity around 14%, assuming that 100% of transition aircrafts will be equipped with VDLM2. Implementation of new technologies in the COM area allows to reduce the operating costs of systems. Implementation of new technologies and the development of communications systems will require funding, but will reduce operating cost in the long term. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 28 Released Issue

40 Modernisation of ATM System (Code is not assigned yet) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Change of conception. A contract was signed for itec Tests, Validations and Planning (itec-tvp). i-tec public procurement announced. ATM system upgrade to itec, preparing to Network, SWIM, Enroute, including advanced TWR functionalities: a) Enable the ATM System to support RNP operations b) Electronic Flight Strips c) Upgrade the ATM system to support DCT routes d) Interface to NMS e) FDP system adaptation to interface with NOP f) ATM system adaptation to support AIXM 5.1 g) FDPS upgrade preparing for IOP Flight Object exchanges h) FDP System upgrade in preparation to integrate aircraft flight data prediction L3: FCM05 Cost-efficiency: - Operational efficiency: - Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Modernisation of PEGASUS_21 Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF3 Sub. AF3.2 Project Family Improved safety and controllers confidence. System will support cross-border FRA contributing to ENV KPIs for horizontal fuel savings and corresponding reduction of CO2 emission. Increased through better airspace utilisation to and reduced controller workload. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 29 Released Issue

41 NAV Infrastructures (DVOR, DME) (PR-49) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: In scope of schedule. Installation of new DVOR (12 sites) and DMEs (18 sites) L3: NAV03 Operational efficiency: - - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - Fulfilment of the requirements of navigation coverage. Multiple coverage of the beacon signal, will increase the accuracy of the aircraft location and to provide redundancy radio navigation coverage. The flexibility to design procedures for fluent air traffic management and reduction trajectory. Increase of the accuracy of the position of the aircraft by increasing the coverage of the navigation will allow more flexible airways and flight procedures. Minimizing delays in air traffic by increasing the precision of determining the position of the aircraft. Transition from the use of the DVOR / DME to the DME which is a cheaper technology, will reduce infrastructure maintenance costs. Coverage of the RNP1 is much cheaper than RNP5, also due to the increased accuracy of the location of the aircraft, reducing delays and generated support for air traffic services. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 30 Released Issue

42 NAV Infrastructures (ILS) - There is no separate project yet (Code is not assigned yet) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Warsaw- final stage, other scheduled to be finished until Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Installation/ modernization of ILS in 10 locations. - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - Exchange of exploited ILS systems will increase safety - new equipment are generally more reliable. Increasing the accuracy of the aircraft location can navigate the aircraft with the prescribed rate on the path of approach in low visibility. Provide by instrument approach for landing, depending on the category, minimize the amount on which the decision is made whether to interrupted the approach to landing. The Airport with ILS system, are able to service the aircraft in bad weather conditions. Airport facilities in the ILS can reduce separation between landing aircraft and making possible to increase the number of landings. Airport facilities in the ILS allows to increase the number of aircraft to be serviced even under adverse weather conditions, which generates income for both ANSPs and Airport. Simultaneously are decreasing costs and delays associated with the return of aircraft to another airport in heavy weather. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 31 Released Issue

43 Remote TWR (Pr-73) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Change of conception, implementation in stages. Implementation of Remote TWR in selected aerodromes. Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Remote TWR Greater flexibility and higher safety levels. Enhanced controller tools such as enhanced runway incursion monitoring. Decrease of service provision costs both capex and opex through better use of existing infrastructure and avoiding costly TWR development and better utilisation of operational personnel. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 32 Released Issue

44 SUR Infrastructure (PR-65) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: In scope of schedule Construction of 4 new radiolocation stations MSSR Mode-S in order to optimize signal coverage in FIR Warsaw area. L3: ITY-ACID Environment: - Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - ATM MP: CTE-S5; CTE-S9 - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - Improved safety through the deployment of surveillance solutions in non radar area. Potential for capacity increase through the deployment of surveillance solutions in areas where currently procedural separation is applied. Facilitate the deployment of the most efficient surveillance solutions by the ANSPs. TWR Poznan Pr48 (TWR-POZ); TWR Kraków PR52 (TWR-KRA); TWR Katowice Modlin Pr69 (TWR KAT/MOD) (PR-48/ PR-52/PR-69) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Poznan - finished, Krakow - to be finished in 2016, Modlin and Katowice - planning stage. Modernisation and erecting new TWR. Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Improved safety and ATCO confidence. Utilizing environmental friendly technology. - Potential for capacity increase Aerodrome Control and Radar Approach Control Service (POZ & KRA). Reducing building maintenance costs (other operating costs). LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 33 Released Issue

45 The ECG Communication System upgrade (2015_038_AF5) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: 01/01/ /12/2018 Status: - Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - - Improving reliability level for AMHS. - Upgrading AMHS functionality for Warsaw AMHS COM Center Other links: AF5; S-AF 5.2; Family Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: - Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_038_AF5 Benefits resulting from the application of a harmonised set of safety requirements. - Use of COTS messaging systems will de-facto reduce the cost of messaging services and support any kind of message format including the exchange of new binary data leading to lower ANS provision costs Training and administration building (Pr-56 OSA ) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Final stage. ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: - Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Infrastructure - development of the new training and administration building. Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Introducing high security requirements. Utilizing environmental friendly technology. Training and administration building Reducing building maintenance costs (other operating costs). LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 34 Released Issue

46 WAM/ADS-B SYSTEM for TMA GDAŃSK (PR-53) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: In scope of schedule. Final stage, operational implementation in the 1Q2017 Wide Area Multilateration system for TMA Gdansk. L3: ITY-SPI Operational efficiency: - ATM MP: CTE-S5a N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - - Precise identification and determination of the position of aircraft with surveillance information continuity, enable to provide continuous coverage of the area and maintain the current level of safety with an increasing level of air traffic. Backup surveillance data source in Gdansk TMA airspace. Reduction of interrogation power. Determine the position of the aircraft along with ensuring continuity of information, surveillance, can reduce the separation of aircraft and leads to increased capacity and reduce delays in air traffic. Separation 3Nm in TMA and 5Nm in En-Route. Secondary impact on the cost-effectiveness. Maintaining and developing surveillance infrastructure, increased the number of aircraft operated. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 35 Released Issue

47 WAM/ADS-B System for Warsaw FIR (Poznań, Wrocław, Kraków, Katowice,Warszawa) (Pr-70) Organisation(s): PANSA (PL) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost-efficiency: Project planning Wide Area Multilateration system for Warsaw FIR L3: ITY-ACID Operational efficiency: - ATM MP: CTE-S5a - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - - Precise identification and determination of the position of aircraft with surveillance information continuity, enable to provide continuous coverage of the area and maintain the current level of safety with an increasing level of air traffic. Backup surveillance data source in Poznań Norh and South TMA airspace. Reduction of interrogation power. Determine the position of the aircraft along with ensuring continuity of information, surveillance, can reduce the separation of aircraft and leads to increased capacity and reduce delays in air traffic. Separation 3Nm in TMA and 5Nm in En-Route. Secondary impact on the cost-effectiveness. Maintaining and developing surveillance infrastructure, increased the number of aircraft operated. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 36 Released Issue

48 Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination 5.1. FAB Co-ordination Both ANSPs will implement automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM by end of 2017 Both OLDI and MONA implementation FAB coordinated and to be implemented by 2018 and 2021, respectively Tactical flow management services implemented by both ANSPs The automatic exchange of the AFP messages implemented by Lithuania, Poland to complete in 2017 (testing in progress) Joint Baltic FAB project: Free Route implementation: Direct Routing is Routing implemented in Poland. FRA (DCT) above FL245 was implemented in December 2015 and above FL095 in December 2016 in the whole Vilnius FIR. PRNAV is fully implemented by both ANSPs APV procedures implementation is in progress at number of airports within FAB. Completion expected by the end of AMAN capabilities are not implemented at major airports in the FAB. However, Poland plans to implement extended AMAN to an en-route environment Vilnius Airport implemented A-SMGCS level 1 and level 2, Warsaw Airport is planning for 2019 Airports CDM is planned for 2017 at Warsaw Chopin Airport and 2018 at Vilnius Airport None of the airports in Baltic FAB are included in the PCP airport list for mandatory implementation of AF2 requirements Both ANSPs implemented Basic AMHS capabilities Both ANSPs implemented FMTP AGDL implementation will be completed 02/2018 for both ANSPs In 2017, Poland will implement AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 37 Released Issue

49 Baltic FAB Safety KPIs of reported SMIs of >= 80% and RIs of >= 80% were achieved efficiency for Lithuania and Poland. Present level will be maintained as minimum but efforts will be addressed to minimize number of incidents. En-route ATFM delay at national level KPI varies from 0,00 (KPI 0,01) to 0,19 (KPI 0,26) Baltic FAB actual for 2015 was 0,16 (KPI - 0,21). Capacity is presently sufficient and ATM system will be further developed so that capacity can be increased within short notice if capacity demand grows. Cost efficiency will be improved along with the developments of the Operational Efficiency programs. ANSPs are committed to protect their organisations and systems from cyber threats. Full FRA implementation foreseen for Baltic FAB in In Lithuania it would be implemented in the end of Horizontal en-route flight efficiency in 2015 was little bit lower, than foreseen KPI (1,64% vs 1,50%). However, implementation in the end of 2015 of initial stage of the Free Route Concept - DCT in Baltic FAB states should have positive impact on this KPI for the rest years of the 2nd reference period. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 38 Released Issue

50 5.2. FAB Projects The establishment of the Baltic FAB in the joint airspace of Poland and Lithuania is a first step in bringing about improvements in Air Navigation Services (ANS) in the region. Moreover, it is expected that further opportunities and measures giving considerable benefits will be achieved in cooperation with all the countries neighbours, and there is the potential for Poland and Lithuania to act as a bridge between the EU and non-members to the East. ASM/ATFCM cooperation within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 1.1) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Dec 2013-Sept 2018 Status: Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Having in mind the obligations stemming from the Article 33.3 of State level agreement, FAB can be suspended in the event of threat to the national security, where ANSP have to be able to ensure operations separately on very short notice. Therefore it was concluded that is not possible to delegate ASM or FMP functions entirely to one of the ANSPs. To ensure promptly reaction to any airspace requirements, activating/deactivating or reallocating specific pre-tactical/tactical ASM scenarios and, at the same time, establishing and activating the most appropriate airspace configurations, the common ASM support system will be used in both ANSP and will be based on PANSA in-house product CAT and Eurocontrol LARA. Project is therefore closed, further actions will be executed by relevant ASM divisions of ANSPs. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Objective of this project is to address the aspects necessary to plan for the harmonised application of Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept within the Baltic FAB, including airspace management and flow management. Exchanges in compliance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009, allowing either ATN/VDL-2 or an alternative communication technology. L3: FCM05, ITY-AGDL Other links: EC Regulation: 21/2005; 29/2009 ICAO ASBU: SPC03.01; OFA Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Medium impact Improved through better co-ordination of civil and military airspace needs at the FAB, Regional and European Network level. Potential gains through more efficient airspace allocation and better knowledge of traffic environment and some enhancement through reduction in controller workload. Enhancement through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages, the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval. Environment: ++ Medium impact Emissions reduced through the use of more optimum routes/trajectories. - LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 39 Released Issue

51 Capacity: +++ High impact Increased through better utilization of airspace resources. Potential increase through dynamic adjustment of airspace resources and suppression of some flight regulations thanks to local ATFCM measures with the same ATC sector manning. Increased capacity through both reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency. Cost-efficiency: + Low to Medium impact Potential cost reduction through the availability of more optimum routes/trajectories and reduction of flight delays thanks to increased capacity. Data link is a cost effective capacity increase enabler through sector productivity increase and delay cost savings. Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Best practice sharing among Baltic FAB stakeholders (PROJECT 3.2) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed Baltic FAB States agreed on the Baltic FAB Strategy Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Project objective is to achieve long term savings in area of non-operational staff and nonstaff operating costs through sharing the best practices among the Baltic FAB stakeholders, including provision of certain services (ie. calibration flights). EC Regulations: SES Legislation ATM Master plan: TBD ("Regulatory roadmap", all applicable OI and enablers) ESSIP/LSSIP: TBD N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: + Low impact Environment: + Low impact Capacity: + Low impact Cost-efficiency: + Low impact Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 40 Released Issue

52 Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision (PROJECT 2.2) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Dec 2013-Jun 2019 Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed technical solution agreed, public procurement announced, contracts signed, implementation procedure started. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Objective of this project is to achieve ATM system convergence which will be an enabler for several solutions aiming at achieving the optimal use of technical and human resources resulting in lower provision costs and higher operational performance in the Baltic FAB. It will be then possible, for two ANSP operating the same ATM system, to provide contingency ATM services for themselves, without necessity to build an external ATM contingency centre. L3: ATC02.8, ATC12.1, ATC17, ITY-AGDL, ITY-AGVCS2, ITY-FMTP Other links: EC Regulations: 1035/2011; 552/2004; ESSIP/LSSIP: All ESSIP/LSSIP ATC & ITY-xxx objectives related to ATM and COM systems; FOC< 2019 and IOC>2017 ATM Master Plan: All ATM MP OI steps with FOC< 2019 and IOC>2017 related to VLCN Network Strategy Plan: SO4 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ High impact Improved safety and controllers confidence while using complete set of Safety Nets, Conflict detection and monitoring aids available for manufactured systems be offered by manufacturers (from 2018+). Environment: + Low impact 1) System will support cross-border FRA contributing to ENV KPIs for horizontal fuel savings and corresponding reduction of CO2 emission; 2) System will be upgradable to future XMAN and thus capable to contribute future ENV KPIs most probably related to vertical fuel savings and corresponding CO2 emission and noise reduction (from 2018+). Capacity: +++ High impact 1) Designed to support dynamic sectorization it will allow to deliver capacity on demand thus optimizing controllers workload while avoiding either overdelivery or underdelivery of the tactical capacity; 2) Air-Ground and Ground-Ground data exchange for seamless ATC coordination, dialog and transfer of communication means will allow to accommodate significant traffic growth/fluctuations without increasing the number of controlling sectors, protecting them from tactical overloads which may cause potential delays; 3) Interoperable with the airport systems to support A-CDM (from 2018+). Cost-efficiency: +++ High impact It will reduce equipment maintenance costs (other operating costs) and minimize the required installation of new upgrades and functions in exciting ATC system (from 2018+). Operational efficiency: ++ Medium impact Reduction in flight time and reduction in fuel burn. - LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 41 Released Issue

53 Cooperation Activities: Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Linked with SE "Oro navigacija projects": L-ATM/CNS-01-I/V-V. Coordinated AIS provision within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 2.4) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed ANSP agreed on common tools for AIS provision. Further actions will be performed by AIS divisions of ANSP where appropriate. Project is ongoing. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Optimization of AIS provision in the Baltic FAB including AIS data sharing and integrity and unification of used AIS systems which will allow ensuring contingency of AIS provision within the Baltic FAB. L3: INF07, ITY-ADQ Other links: EC Regulation: 73/2010 CP: AF.5 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Medium impact Improved consistency, reliability and integrity. Environment: + Low impact 1) Paperless information distribution; 2) System will be upgradable to future. Capacity: + Low impact Cost-efficiency: + Low impact Negligible savings of work force. Contingency service provision. Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Additionally future business model of AIM provision has been discussed as well as joint training program and procedures for recruitment. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 42 Released Issue

54 Enhancement of inter-fab cooperation and cooperation with non-eu countries (PROJECT 3.1) Organisation(s): Schedule: Lithuanian CAA (LT), Mil. Authority (PL), Military Authority (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), Reg. Authority (PL) Continuous activity Type of project: FAB Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed Baltic FAB ANSPs will continue to seek for further possibilities of common actions in international environment in accordance with Baltic FAB Development Strategy. Project is a continuous activity. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The main objective of cooperation is to drive progress towards greater flight efficiency, cost efficiency and operational consistency in line with Single European Sky performance goals. L3: AOM21.2, ATC02.8, ATC07.1, ATC12.1, ATC15.1, ATC15.2, ATC17 EC Regulations: SES Legislation ATM Master plan: "Regulatory roadmap" N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Medium impact Environment: ++ Medium impact Capacity: ++ Medium impact Cost-efficiency: Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: N/A - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. ANSP activity was focused on cooperation within interfab Cooperation platform and GATE ONE as well as on opportunities provided by joint participation in SESAR Deployment Manager (Common implementation of AGDL, participation in definition of DLS functionality B, itec), B4 Consortium (Pansa, Oro Navigacija, LPS and ANS CZ) and Centralised Services (PANSA, Oro Navigacija, Uksatse) projects. Also, meetings were held with Belarusian ANSP, Ukrainian ANSP, and Kaliningrad ANSP with the aim to discuss the optimisation of CNS. Numerous common activities prove that ANSPs in Baltic FAB consider its common presence as valuable tool to achieve benefits. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 43 Released Issue

55 Establishment of a Free Route Airspace within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 1.2) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Nov 2013-Jun 2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: First phase is already implemented (DCTs in Vilnius and Warsaw IFRs). Full FRA implementation at the moment considered in both FAB and whole eastern Europe region under auspicies of GATE ONE FRA initiative. As the outcome of Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase completed project will be executed further as ANSPs FRA projects. Status - ongoing. Objective of this project is to implement uniform Free Route Airspace within Baltic FAB Airspace. L3: AOM21.2 Other links: EC Regulations: 716/2014 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Medium impact Some enhancement through reduction in controller workload. Environment: ++ Medium impact Reductions in emissions through use of more optimal routes. Capacity: +++ High impact Increased through the better airspace utilisation to enhance productivity and reduce controller workload. Cost-efficiency: + Low impact Savings in route distances as well as better fuel efficiency through increased use of preferred flight profiles and improved sectorization. Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Baltic FAB ANSP established common FRA definition and cooperation mechanism. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 44 Released Issue

56 Harmonization of ANS provision and supervision rules and procedures within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 2.1) Organisation(s): Schedule: Dec 2013-Jun 2016 Lithuanian CAA (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), Reg. Authority (PL) Type of project: FAB Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed the framework to harmonize ANS provision and supervision rules and procedures is established and operational. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Other links: - Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Taking into account the foreseen cross-border service provision the harmonization of rules and procedures in the Baltic FAB will ensure a seamless cross-border provision of services and operations. It gives the opportunity to develop a single set of rules and procedures that will govern ANS provided in the FAB. - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: +++ High impact Higher safety of common operations through harmonized rules and procedures. Reduction of "misunderstanding" possibility. Environment: ++ Medium impact Reductions in emissions through use of synchronized / optimal procedures. Capacity: +++ High impact Increased through the better airspace utilisation as result of harmonized procedures. Cost-efficiency: ++ Medium impact Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 45 Released Issue

57 Optimization of ATM/CNS technical infrastructure within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 2.3) Organisation(s): ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Dec 2013-Oct 2015 Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed ANSPs agreed on mechanism to coordinate CNS infrastructure development and optimisation, Activities will be performed on daily basis by appropriate technical departments of Baltic FAB ANSPs. Delayed. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Project objective is to optimise ATM/CNS infrastructure as well as CNS service provision model in the Baltic FAB through a better usage of the current resources, common planning and maintenance. L3: COM10, COM11, ITY-AGDL, ITY-SPI Other links: EC Regulation: 30/2009, 1032/2006, 552/2004, 73/2010 ICAO ASBU: SPC02.01; OFA Network Strategy Plan: SO2 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution - Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: - Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: ++ Medium impact Is achieved through the reduction of human error potentially occurring due to VC quality and info accuracy. Increase safety of flight operations by increased situational awareness and indirect benefit to both ATC and pilot through reduction of workload during RNAV operations (as from mid 2017). Environment: ++ Medium impact Emissions and noise nuisance reduced by use of optimal flight procedures and routings when new optimised equipment installed (as from mid 2017). Capacity: +++ High impact Reduction of controller workload. Increased capacity through both reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency. Cost-efficiency: +++ High impact It will reduce equipment maintenance costs (other operating costs) and minimize the required installation of new upgrades and functions in exciting CNS system (from 2018+). Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Linked with SE "Oro navigacija projects": L-L- CNS-04-I/V-C; R-NOP-02-I/V-C. Both Baltic FAB parties agreed to continue development towards certain level of unification to avoid monopoly and increased risk in case of insolvency of any industrial partners following operational needs. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 46 Released Issue

58 Optimization of MET service provision model within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 3.3) Organisation(s): Schedule: Lithuania Hidrometeorological Service (LHMT) (LT), Lithuanian CAA (LT), Ministry of Environment (MoE) (LT), Ministry of Transport and Communication (MoT) (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), Reg. Authority (PL) Type of project: FAB Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation Phase finished due to achieving the main objectives. Project is ongoing. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: To optimise MET service provision model and ensure contingency service provision. There is a potential for saving costs by optimizing meteorological services provision model within Baltic FAB. Some efficiency could be made from a common approach to MET services through economies of scale and, furthermore, competition could force prices down. L3: ITY-ADQ Other links: EC Regulation: 1035/2011; 552/2004 ATM Master plan: AGSWIM-44 (enabler), ICAO ASBU: ENB Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: - Safety: + Low impact Early and provided on time meteo information helps to: - reduce the workload and the risk of the impact of controllers and pilots errors, - support the possibility to maintain high level of safety with an maintain in capacity due to right tactical decisions taken on time. Environment: + Low impact Capacity: + Low impact Timeliness and correct MET information could reduce controller workload, and impact better sector productivity. Cost-efficiency: + Low impact Negligible savings of work force. Contingency service provision. Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: - Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. Both entities are closely cooperating in all areas related to MET under World Meteorological Organization which is a specialized agency of the United Nations. They can exchange their experience and consult difficult cases as they act on a similar legal basis e.g ICAO Doc or WMO-No Thus it should be considered that both partners performed all possible actions to provide MET service on most efficient manner to achieve their goals. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 47 Released Issue

59 Search and Rescue (SAR) service coordination within Baltic FAB (PROJECT 3.4) Organisation(s): Schedule: Lithuania Hidrometeorological Service (LHMT) (LT), Lithuanian CAA (LT), Military Authority (LT), Ministry of Defence (MoD) (PL), Ministry of Environment (MoE) (LT), Ministry of Transport and Communication (MoT) (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), Reg. Authority (PL) Type of project: FAB Status: Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation Phase finished. Project is ongoing. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: - Objective of this project is to optimise SAR Coordination service provision within the Baltic FAB and ensure contingency service provision. Other links: EC Regulation: 1035/2011 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: NA Name/Code in DP2016: - Search & Rescue infrastructure Safety: + Low impact Coordination between Civil and Military authorities; Promotion of Safety Program, Contingency Plan; Exchange of information - enhancing communication; Environment: + Low impact Capacity: + Low impact More effective use of airspace as consequence of coordinated actions. Cost-efficiency: + Low impact Negligible savings of work force. Contingency service provision. Operational efficiency: - Cooperation Activities: Joint execution of the project based on ANSPs resources (financial, technical, HR), MoT, MoD, NSAs in-kind contribution. It has been decided that cooperation will be focused on harmonization efforts and ensuring better coordination between ARCC rather than focussing on establishment of common ARCC. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 48 Released Issue

60 5.3. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives B4 Consortium B4 Consortium was set up formally on 8 September 2014 by: - PANSA, Polish ANSP - ANS CR, the Czech Republic ANSP - LPS SR, š.p., the Slovak Republic ANSP - Oro navigacija, Lithuanian ANSP representing small and medium-sized European Air Navigation Service Providers and their 3rd linked parties from research (universities, research centres, consultancy) and industry (equipment manufacturers) community. PANSA (Poland) and Oro Navigacija (Lithuania) composes Baltic FAB. ANS CR (Czech Republic) and LPS (Slovakia) belongs to neighbouring FAB CE. All 4 ANSPs are the members of GATE ONE. B4 Consortium is a member of ANSP Consortium A6+ on SESAR 2020 Programme content. On January 25, 2016 in Warsaw, the above members of B4 Consortium signed the Membership Application to the SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU). B4 Consortium considers the vast expertise of its members in ATM operational and technical domains, Project and Quality management and experience in execution of several high complexity ATM projects as well as the expertise and experience of its Linked Third Parties ranging from scientific research, concept developments, up to product prototyping and manufacturing highly beneficial for the successful accomplishment of the SESAR 2020 program objectives. B4 Consortium together with its Linked Third Parties can see its role in SESAR 2020 Projects not only in eliminating current absence of small and medium-sized ANSPs in the SESAR projects but also in bringing different experiences and approaches to the SESAR 2020 programme by providing the SJU with its broadly experienced and highly motivated staff and well-equipped facilities. B4 Consortium intends to contribute to Industrial Research, Transversal and Very Large Scale Validation Projects. The financial contribution of B4 Consortium to the SESAR 2020 Programme is planned at the level of round 20 M. A6 Alliance The A6 Alliance was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.: - ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP; - DFS, the German ANSP; - DSNA, the French ANSP; - ENAV, the Italian ANSP; - NATS, the British ANSP; - NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium), which consists of nine members: Swedavia (Swedish airports) and eight European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 49 Released Issue

61 After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalise the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonised strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organise co-operation at expert level. The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015). The A6 Alliance leads European-wide technical activities validated and co-funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Recently INEA awarded close to 543 million to A6 members implementation projects as part of 2014 and 2015 Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) calls within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project PCP). PANSA is now a full member of the A6 Alliance, which has also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities and today, the A6 Alliance members provide significant support either in logistics or in staff to the SESAR Deployment Manager. Finally, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4 Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and an agreement has been recently established between the A6 Alliance and Skyguide in order to authorise exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 50 Released Issue

62 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 3% 1; 3% 0; 0% 0; 0% Completed 0; 0% 7; 17% 22; 55% 9; 22% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined The large majority of LSSIP objectives are either ongoing or completed. In detail, there are 21 ongoing objectives, 9 out of 39 objectives are completed, in addition one has a planned status and 8 out of 39 objectives are late. The NAV objectives for implementation of P-RNAV (NAV03) is completed and APV procedures (NAV10) are late but in progress 78%. All Environment objectives are reported completed. The implementation of AOM and ATC objectives has continued steadily, except ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets (late but with 90% progress) and ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 which is completed for the civil ANSP but late for the military part with target date in The implementation of airport related objectives is late. At Warsaw Chopin Airport AOP04.2 is planned to be completed in IQ2019. AOP05 is late with 85% progres and planned implementation date in The newly introduced objectives from AOP10 to AOP13 are reported as Not applicable. The objective concerning Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 is completed and phase 2 planned to be implemented in The activity toward implementation of interactive rolling Network Operations Plan (FCM05) and Traffic Complexity Assessment (FCM06) have started. The implementation of integrated briefing (INF04) is reported as late, PANSA intends to implement operational version of the integrated briefing level 6 by the end of The objective regarding Aircraft Identification (ITY-ACID) and the objective regarding Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (ITY-SPI) are progressing within the required timeframe. The implementation of Ground-Ground Automated Co-ordination Processes (ITY-COTR) and Flight LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 51 Released Issue

63 Message Transfer Protocol (ITY-FMTP) is completed. For the objective concerning Aeronautical Data Quality (ITY-ADQ) which has ongoing status some actions to improve implementation have been taken by ASP, APO and REG to meet deadline Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 52% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 STAM Phase 2 FCM05 FCM06 Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 84% 100% 68% 60% 10% 10% 3% 33% 50% LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 52 Released Issue

64 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 69% < AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets 100% 100% 90% 13% ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 EPWA Warszawa Airport Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer n/a 5% 30% 87% 95% 4% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations ITYCOTR NAV03 RNAV 1 EPWA Warszawa Airport Groundground automated coordination processes 100% 100% 100% NAV10 APV procedures 78% LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 53 Released Issue

65 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 56% < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 AOP13 ENV02 SAF11 EPWA Warszawa Airport 6% EPWA Warszawa Airport 5% Airport CDM EPWA Warszawa Airport 85% TimeBased Separation EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Collaborative Environmental Management EPWA Warszawa Airport 100% Improve runway safety by preventing runway 82% excursions n/a n/a n/a n/a LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 54 Released Issue

66 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 42% COM10 COM11 FCM08 INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability < % 85% 40% 8% 66% 42% 43% 3% 6% 65% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 55 Released Issue

67 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA B0SURF B0FICE B0DATM B0ACAS B0SNET B0ACDM B0RSEQ B0FRTO B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO B0TBO Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute 100% 78% 100% 6% 100% 77% 100% 53% 100% 87% 100% 95% 100% 85% 100% 5% 100% 87% 100% 92% 100% 65% 100% 100% 43% LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 56 Released Issue

68 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: 68% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 PANSA and the Polish Air Force have started to work on the OAT/GAT harmonisation process. Currently, the agreed process contains OAT procedures in controlled airspace. PANSA will soon start the agreement 31/12/2018 with other military control area users. REG (By:12/2018) Reg. The legislation is now only at the level of proposal and has not Ongoing 40% Authority been endorsed as national regulation yet. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) PANSA and the MATSO (Military Air Traffic Service Office) Ongoing have finished to work on the OAT/GAT harmonization process. LoA regarding OAT between PANSA and MATSO has been signed in PANSA 75% Currently, the agreed process contains OAT procedures in 31/12/2018 controlled airspace. In accordance with OAT/GAT harmonization, PANSA have implemented new coordination procedures between ACC GAT and ACC OAT. MIL (By:12/2018) PANSA and the Polish Air Force have started to work on the Ongoing OAT/GAT harmonization process. Military have no EAD terminal but have access to EAD through Mil. Authority an agreement with PANSA at national level (Notam by MIL are 75% fed to civil AIS and thus available through EAD). Common AIP 31/12/2018 covers the Military aspects and needs based on the AIRAC cycle. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 57 Released Issue

69 AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support AFUA Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Adapt local systems to make them interoperable with ADR (AIXM interface) Conclude LoA with CNMF (31/12/2018). 31/12/2018 Provide relevant Aeronautical information required to implement dynamic ASM/ATFCM process (31/12/2018). 31/12/2018 Use ADR in accordance with LoA with CNMF (31/12/2018). Deploy Rolling Airspace Update Process by using ADR facilities, providing for airspace update reflecting any change in airspace use planning as described in the ASM Handbook (31/12/2018). Local ASM system is being developed to provide data as described above. ASP (By:12/2018) Adapt local systems to make them interoperable with ADR Ongoing (AIXM interface) 31/12/2018 Conclude LoA with CNMF (31/12/2018). Provide relevant Aeronautical information required to implement dynamic ASM/ATFCM process (31/12/2018). PANSA Use ADR in accordance with LoA with CNMF (31/12/2018). 60% 31/12/2018 Deploy Rolling Airspace Update Process by using ADR facilities, providing for airspace update reflecting any change in airspace use planning as described in the ASM Handbook (31/12/2018). Local ASM system is being developed to provide data as described above. AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Local systems and procedures under development. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Local systems and procedures under development. 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 AOM19.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Local systems and procedures under development. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Local systems and procedures under development. 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 58 Released Issue

70 AOM21.1 Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Implementation of Direct Routing (FRA like) in FIR Warszawa is one of the phases of Free Route Airspace Implementation. This phase is already implemented, however it is still under continues development. 10/12/2015 ASP (By:12/2017) PANSA The last phase of FRA like in FIR EPWW next package of DCT routes has been implemented from % Completed 10/12/2015 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Implementation of Free Route Airspace in FIR Warszawa is divided into several steps. First step of FRA implementation namely Direct Routing (Ref to AOM21.1) is completed in 10/12/ /12/2018 Baltic FAB FRA is in progress according to Baltic FAB Implementation program. ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Implementation of Free Route Airspace in FIR Warszawa is divided into several steps: I phase Free Route Like (Direct Routing), II phase Full Free Route Airspace (planned implementation 2018; initially in the TOP sectors). First phase of implementation of Free Route Airspace in FIR Warszawa is completed (however it is still under continues development). Baltic FAB FRA is in progress according to Baltic FAB Implementation program. Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries / Establishment of a Free Route Airspace within Baltic FAB 13% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 59 Released Issue

71 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 6% Late EPWA Warszawa Airport The ASMGCS system will be implemented at Chopin Airport (EPWA) in cooperation of PANSA and PPL. The project will cover installation of ASMGCS Level 2 (including Level 1 functionality) and integration with present SMR, approach radars and appropriate necessary cooperative (Local Area Multilateration) 27/03/2019 and noncooperative sensors that will be implemented before the ASMGCS is ready. REG (By:12/2010) Reg. Authority ASP (By:12/2011) PANSA APO (By:12/2010) PPL Warszawa Airport A SMGCS project has started in PANSA for the Warsaw Airport, with appropriate working group arrangements and cooperation with PPL. A SMGCS project has started in PANSA for the Warsaw Chopin Airport, with appropriate working group arrangements and cooperation with PPL. Other stakeholders company might be associated to adequate project activities. At present work is focused on the tender (competitive dialogue) which has been published on 21/07/2016 and is currently in progress. On 26/10/2015 PANSA and PPL signed an agreement related to cooperation in ASMGCS system implementation. According agreement General Director of Polish Airports State Enterprise appointed a task force to cooperate with PANSA. PPL s experts were involved in creation Operational Concept Document for ASMGCS for Chopin Airport. 3% Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS system for Warsaw airport 3% 10% Late 27/03/2019 Late 27/03/2019 Late 27/03/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 60 Released Issue

72 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 5% Late EPWA Warszawa Airport The ASMGCS system will be implemented at Chopin Airport (EPWA) in cooperation of PANSA and PPL. The project will cover installation of ASMGCS Level 2 including necessary integrated SafetyNets 27/03/2019 functionality. ASP (By:12/2017) PANSA APO (By:12/2017) PPL Warszawa Airport A SMGCS project has started in PANSA for the Warsaw Chopin Airport, with appropriate working group arrangements and cooperation with PPL. Other stakeholders company might be associated to adequate project activities. At present work is focused on the tender (competitive dialogue) which has been published on 21/07/2016 and is currently in progress. On 26/10/2015 PANSA and PPL signed an agreement related to cooperation in ASMGCS system implementation. According agreement General Director of Polish Airports State Enterprise appointed a task force to cooperate with PANSA. PPL s experts were involved in creation Operational Concept Document for ASMGCS for Chopin Airport. Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS system for Warsaw airport 3% 10% Late 27/03/2019 Late 27/03/2019 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 61 Released Issue

73 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: AOP05 85% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 EPWA Warszawa Airport The CDM project Kickoff meeting took place on 29 November The project organisation comprises already a Steering Committee and focal points in the various stakeholders represented PANSA, Warsaw Airport authorities, LOT and handling agents. A gap analysis was performed in April MoU was 31/12/2017 agreed and signed in March 2009 and updated in 2010 by all involved partners. DMAN TSAT generator was created by PANSA and POC verified in Cooperation with Eurocontrol NMOC established in 12/2016. Full implementation and operations is foreseen for 31/12/2017. ASP (By:12/2016) The CDM project Kickoff meeting took place on 29 November Late The project organisation comprises already a Steering Committee and focal points in the various stakeholders represented PANSA, Warsaw Chopin Airport authorities, LOT and handling agents. A gap analysis were performed in April PANSA 86% MoU was agreed and signed in March 2009 and 31/12/2017 updated in 2010 by all involved partners. Full implementation and operations is foreseen for The relevant Airport and ATC Staff took part in the general CDM training organized by IANS (APT ACDM). APO (By:12/2016) PPL Warszawa Airport General Director of Polish Airports State Enterprise appointed a task force to launch and implement the Airport Collaborative Decision Making (ACDM ) i.a. to improve efficiency of Warsaw Chopin airport performance. The CDM project Kickoff meeting took place on 29 November The project organisation comprises already a Steering Committee and focal points in the various stakeholders represented PANSA, Warsaw Chopin Airport authorities, LOT and handling agents. A gap analysis were performed in April MoU was agreed and signed in March 2009 and updated in 2010 by all involved partners. Full implementation and operations is foreseen for The relevant Airport and ATC Staff took part in the general CDM training organized by IANS (APT ACDM). 85% Late 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 62 Released Issue

74 AOP10 Time Based Separation Timescales: not applicable % Not Applicable EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Objective not applicable to the EPWA airport REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: not applicable % Not Applicable EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA No airports have expressed a commitment yet % Not Applicable APO (By:12/2021) AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Timescales: not applicable % Not Applicable EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Objective not applicable to the EPWA airport ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) AOP13 Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: not applicable % Not Applicable EPWA Warszawa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Objective not applicable to the EPWA airport REG (By:12/2023) Reg. Not Applicable % Authority ASP (By:12/2023) PANSA Objective not applicable to the EPWA airport % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 63 Released Issue

75 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 New ATM system with enhanced safetynets capabilities is running since November PANSA developed company policy for safety nets and assigned staff responsible for its maintenance and improvement (completed 30/06/2014). New ATM system with enhanced safetynets capabilities is running since November PANSA 31/12/2017 developed company policy for safety nets and assigned staff responsible for its maintenance and improvement (Ongoing). APM is a functional element of MSAW which is implemented in the new ATM system Pegasus_21. Operational context will be evaluated by the end of 2017 (Planned). ASP (By:12/2016) Convergence Late of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB New ATM system with enhanced safetynets capabilities is running since November PANSA developed company ACCs and Cross Borders policy for safety nets and assigned staff responsible for its Service maintenance and improvement (completed 30/06/2014). provision with New ATM system with enhanced safetynets capabilities is Joint PANSA running since November PANSA developed company Contingency 90% 31/12/2017 policy for safety nets and assigned staff responsible for its Service maintenance and improvement (Ongoing). Provision / APM is a functional element of MSAW which is implemented in the new ATM system Pegasus_21. Operational context will be evaluated by the end of 2017 (Planned). Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 % Not Applicable EPWA Warszawa Airport Polish airports are not within the geographical scope for AMAN, although operational potential of AMAN in Warsaw TMA environment is being analysed. ASP (By:12/2019) PANSA Polish airports are not within the geographical scope for AMAN, although operational potential of AMAN in Warsaw TMA environment is being analysed. Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 64 Released Issue

76 ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Timescales: 95% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Basic conformance monitoring and conflict detection tools are in use. MTCD scheduled for upgrade in More advanced solutions will be discussed within FAB and introduced in the new generation of 31/12/2017 ATM system. ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Basic conformance monitoring and conflict detection tools are in use. MTCD scheduled for upgrade in More advanced solutions will be discussed within FAB and introduced in the new generation of ATM system. Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision / Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries 95% Ongoing 31/12/2017 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN Timescales: 5% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Currently no plans for Basic AMAN implementation in any of FIR EPWW ADs.Deployment schedule for En Route AMAN support will depend on demand from adjacent FIRs. Currently estimated implementation 31/12/2017 period is the end of the year 2017 may be delayed depending on operational priorities. ASP (By:12/2017) PANSA Currently no plans for Basic AMAN implementation in any of FIR EPWW ADs. Deployment schedule for EnRoute AMAN support will depend on demand from adjacent FIRs. Currently estimated implementation period is the end of the year 2017 may be delayed depending on operational priorities. Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries 5% Ongoing 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 65 Released Issue

77 ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 4% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Extended AMAN is discussed to be included as a part of ACC support for AMAN designed for Warsaw. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2023) PANSA Extended AMAN is discussed to be included as a part of ACC support for AMAN designed for Warsaw. Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries 4% Ongoing 31/12/2018 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Timescales: 30% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Formal acceptance by the NSA of the proposed changes related to Electronic Dialogue will take place after its notification. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) Convergence Ongoing of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint PANSA Contingency 30% Service 31/12/2018 Provision / Enhancement of interfab cooperation and cooperation with noneu countries LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 66 Released Issue

78 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 The implementation was started in 2010 and was finished in 2014 (for Basic ATSMHS). Upgrade the AMHS capability in existing COM centres to provide the Extended ATSMHS in accordance with the profile 30/09/2018 specified in the AMHS Community Specification. ASP (By:12/2018) PANSA AMHS capability and gateway facilities to AFTN are a function of the new AMHS/AFTN system. Optimization of ATM/CNS technical infrastructure within Baltic FAB Mil. Authority 78% 85% Ongoing 30/09/2018 Ongoing 30/09/2018 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 3% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 PANSA is going to implement VoIP technology in the different components of the ATM COM domain (Ground radio stations VCS and VCS VCS). The implementation is foreseen based on EUROCAE 31/12/2020 standards. ASP (By:12/2020) PANSA PANSA is going to implement VoIP technology in the different components of the ATM COM domain (Ground radio stations VCS and VCS VCS). The implementation is foreseen based on EUROCAE standards. CAO acquainted with the PANSAs Strategic plan. Additional investment plan which is the basis for longterm PANSAs Plan, are associated with the implementation of ESSIP objectives. Implementation of the investment for which procurement procedure are carried out, will provide VoIP for EPWA Optimization of ATM/CNS technical infrastructure within Baltic FAB 3% Ongoing 31/12/2020 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed EPWA Warszawa Airport CDA is implemented in PRNAVs and the operational implementation took place on the 22 of October 2009 for the Warsaw TMA. Operational implementation of the STAR PRNAV procedures took place on the 17 of December /12/2009 This objective is implemented in 5 additional airports (EPGD, EPKT, EPKK,EPPO,EPWR) ASP (By:12/2013) PANSA Implemented in 2009 for night time traffic and during the day Completed 100% if the traffic patterns allow it. 31/12/2009 APO (By:12/2013) PPL Warszawa Airport Implemented in 2009 for night time traffic and during the day if the traffic patterns allow it. 100% Completed 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 67 Released Issue

79 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed EPWA Warszawa Airport Basic noise instrumentation exists. PPL and PANSA collaborate together in process of optimization SID and STAR procedures in order to 31/12/2016 minimization impact of noise. ASP (By:12/2016) PANSA Basic noise instrumentation exists. 100% Completed 31/12/2014 APO (By:12/2016) PPL Warszawa Airport Basic noise instrumentation exists. PPL and PANSA collaborate together in process of optimization SID and STAR procedures in order to minimization impact of noise. 100% Completed 31/12/2016 FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 ADEXP processing is implemented in the new ATM system, although supplementary software might still need upgrades before operational implementation of ADEXP 30/06/2017 MIL has no service provision role for civil traffic and does not currently have CFMU terminals. ASP (By:12/2017) ADEXP processing is implemented in the new ATM system, Ongoing although supplementary software might still need upgrades PANSA before operational implementation of ADEXP. Switchover from 84% ICAO to ADEXP format is postponed, as there is no operational 30/06/2017 benefit expected from this action. Automated AFP messages are supported integration tests with NM are in progress. Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 Timescales: FCM % Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/10/2017 STAM phase 1 has been gradually implemented as confirmed in ASP 01, ASP 02, ASP 03 and ASP 04 is completed. Gathered experience of implementation has been a subject to incorporate local operational procedures into FMP operational manual. Local safety assessment has been done by appropriate FMP management. The MCP (Mandatory Cherry Picking) operational functionality has became a standard 31/12/2015 operational procedure after successful trials coordinated with NMC Eurocontrol. PANSA received Safety Assessment/Mini FHA of MCP ( Network STAM) from NMOC Eurocontrol which has been adopted as a local safety assessment. ASP (By:10/2017) STAM phase 1 has been gradually implemented as confirmed Completed in ASP 01, ASP 02, ASP 03 and ASP 04 is completed. Gathered experience of implementation has been a subject to incorporate local operational procedures into FMP operational manual. Local safety assessment has been done by PANSA appropriate FMP management. The MCP (Mandatory Cherry 100% 31/12/2015 Picking) operational functionality has became a standard operational procedure after successful trials coordinated with NMC Eurocontrol. PANSA received Safety Assessment/Mini FHA of MCP ( Network STAM) from NMOC Eurocontrol which has been adopted as a local safety assessment. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 68 Released Issue

80 FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 3% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Resectorization of airspace, additional layer planned in /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Resectorization of airspace, additional layer planned in % Ongoing 31/12/2021 FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Internal PANSA consultations on the proper implementation are ongoing. Online training from actual NOP functionalities has been provided to FMP Staff. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA Internal PANSA consultations on the proper implementation are ongoing. Online training from actual NOP functionalities has been provided to FMP Staff APO (By:12/2021) PPL EUCAC database is filled with data on the Warsaw Chopin Warszawa Airport, where the data is transferred to the EUROCONTROL Airport within the DDR project. ASM/ATFCM cooperation within Baltic FAB / Modernisatio n of ATM System 0% 100% Planned 31/12/2021 Completed FCM06 Traffic complexity assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 PANSA developed and introduced in 2011 Dynamic Capacity Management. The number of operational tools and procedures related to predicted and current traffic situations are used along with excellent 31/12/2021 cooperation with NMOC Eurocontrol. ASP (By:12/2021) PANSA developed and introduced in 2011 Dynamic Capacity Ongoing Management. The number of operational tools and PANSA procedures related to predicted and current traffic situations 50% are used along with excellent cooperation with NMOC 31/12/2021 Eurocontrol. FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 The concept is still very generic in respect to the ANSP part. At current maturity level of Extended Flight Plan applications, PANSA is waiting for more guidance material to be available. ASP (By:12/2021) The concept is still very generic in respect to the ANSP part. At PANSA current maturity level of Extended Flight Plan applications, 0% PANSA is waiting for more guidance material to be available. No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 69 Released Issue

81 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 8% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Implementation of the objective has started and is ongoing. 31/05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) Reg. Authority The Polish CAA has taken several activities regarding the TOD INF07 objective. Since 2006 CAA specialists have been participating in the etod WG meetings in Eurocontrol. The etod area 1 obstacle dataset for Poland is available already. For the last four years several national ADQ and etod Implementation WG meetings, attended by CAA, AD and geodetic companies representatives, have taken place. The Polish CAA is working toghether with the Polish Head Office of Land Surveying and Cartography in order to make terrain dataset available within the framework of licence contracts. Concerning obstacles, the Polish CAA is also in close cooperation with MIL Authorities. ASP (By:05/2018) Currently PANSA does not have a plan or roadmap of implementation of TOD within Poland. There is no national TOD implementation program. However PANSA publishes obstacle data set for Area 1 according to Annex 15 specification. There is also the plan for PANSA collecting obstacles for Area 2, 3 and 4 from Airport Authorities with close cooperation with CAA PANSA already is collecting, managing and providing obstacle data sets for all of areas. The terrain data will be managed and provided by Polish Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography APO (By:05/2018) EPWA activities with respect to etod: in zone 2a and 2b air obstacles are systematically monitored (measured) and data about such obstacles are collected, PPL has bought from Geodetic and Cartographic PPL Documentation Center data of zones 3, 2a, 2b and 2c, which Warszawa fulfill etod standards. Airport zone 3 is optional, no etod data acquired for EPWA, etod for zone 4 is ready and submitted to CAA All data concerning etod both in discrete (point) and map form are updated and archived on an ongoing basis. 10% Coordinated AIS provision within Baltic FAB 10% 0% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Planned 31/05/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 70 Released Issue

82 ITYACID Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 PANSA has defined plans and started execution process to implement new radars and WAM systems providing FIR Warsaw mode S coverage.operational and technical training and documentation is required as part of existing procedures and will be provided in due time.safety related activities are required as 02/01/2020 part of the functional changes implementation and will be performed in due time under supervision of CAA. ASP (By:01/2020) PANSA PANSA has defined plans and started execution process to implement new radars and WAM systems providing FIR Warsaw mode S coverage.operational and technical training and documentation is required as part of existing procedures and will be provided in due time.safety related activities are required as part of the functional changes implementation and will be performed in due time under supervision of CAA. SUR Infrastructure / WAM/ADSB System for Warsaw FIR (Poznań, Wrocła w, Kraków, Katowice,War szawa) 42% Ongoing 02/01/2020 ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Ongoing Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 The implementation of the objective has started and is ongoing. 30/06/2017 REG (By:06/2017) Reg. Authority ASP (By:06/2017) PANSA Taking into consideration the importance of ITYADQ and in order to monitor and stimulate implementation of EU IR 73/2010, in 2011 CAA formed an ADQ Implementation WG consisting of CAA, ADs and Geodetic companies representatives. Awareness campain ended in Data quality requirements has been fulfilled by ASP. Mil. Authority For the military, data quality requirements are planned to implement to 31/06/2017. APO (By:06/2017) PPL Warszawa Airport The regulations implementing ADQ (Eurocontrol specifications) have been issued and apply; the employee authorised to enter data are both trained in the knowledge of ADQ (PANSA) and have authorizations to enter data through a relevant IT application, also have access to PLX. Optimization of MET service provision model within Baltic FAB Coordinated AIS provision within Baltic FAB / Optimization of MET service provision model within Baltic FAB 70% 86% 75% 37% Late 30/06/2017 Ongoing 30/06/2017 Ongoing 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 71 Released Issue

83 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/ % Ongoing ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Currently PANSA is planning implementation of data link services. Implementation process has started in Q /02/2018 REG (By:02/2018) Reg. Authority ASP (By:02/2018) PANSA Poland has implemented Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 amended by Regulation 310/2015. Requirements contained in AGDL regulation related to implementation of the data links will be checked during the process of airground data link services approvals. Currently PANSA is planning implementation of data link technical infrastructure and operational procedures. MIL (By:01/2019) Polish Air Force does not have plans to install data link Mil. Authority equipment on state transport aircrafts. 33% ASM/ATFCM cooperation within Baltic FAB / Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision / Implementati on of Controller Pilot Data Link Communicati on / Optimization of ATM/CNS technical infrastructure within Baltic FAB % 48% Ongoing 05/02/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2017 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 72 Released Issue

84 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 6% Ongoing All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 The implementation of 8.33 khz is foreseen when the airspace resectorisation is implemented after new ATC system implementation. To the end of 2016 PANSA plans to replace all radio communication equipment in all the towers in the country. Until the end of 2018 it is planned to be ready for 31/12/2020 implementation 8.33 khz below FL195. REG (By:12/2018) Reg. The implementation of 8.33 khz is foreseen when the airspace Ongoing 23% Authority resectorisation is implemented (vertical splitting of airspace). 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) PANSA To the end of 2016 PANSA plans to replace all radio communication equipment in all the towers in the country. Until the end of 2018 it is planned to be ready for implementation 8.33 khz below FL195. MIL (By:12/2020) Currently list of State aircraft that can not be equipped with Mil. Authority 8.33 khz radios is establishing and will be communicated to the Commission by 30 JUN APO (By:12/2018) COM (There is no separate project yet) / Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision 2% 0% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 73 Released Issue

85 ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Completed Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 There is an agreed Communication strategy for PANSA. The objective is well planned but linked to the implementation of the new ATM system (Pegasus 21), which is scheduled past the objective deadline date. 31/12/2013 PANSA has implemented TCP/IP interfaces to support flight data exchange in the new ATMC system. At this moment operational IPv6 connections are utilised with DFS, LFV and ANS CR. ASP (By:12/2014) PANSA MIL (By:12/2014) There is an agreed Communication strategy for PANSA. The objective is well planned but linked to the implementation of the new ATMC system (Pegasus 21), which is scheduled past the objective deadline date. PANSA has implemented TCP/IP interfaces to support flight data exchange in the new ATMC system. At this moment operational IPv6 connections are utilised with DFS, LFV and ANS CR. Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision Mil. Authority Military do not provide ATC service to civil flights % 100% Completed 31/12/2013 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 74 Released Issue

86 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 The requirements are already implemented in cases when surveillance data is transferred to other ANSP and will as well be implemented in case of new surveillance data exchange. New military aircrafts are equipped with Mode S Surveillance equipment. Plans for remaining aircrafts to equip them with Mode S 31/12/2019 Elementary Surveillance equipment are accepted REG (By:02/2015) Reg. Authority ASP (By:02/2015) PANSA The CAA verification of the necessary safety assessments for systems identified in Regulation 1207/2011 Art. 2.1 (b), (c), (d) are conducted as a constant process before their acceptance. The decisions are communicated to ANSP concerned. The requirements are implemented in cases when surveillance data is transferred to other ANSP and will as well be implemented in case of new surveillance data exchange MIL (By:06/2020) New aircrafts are equipped with Mode S Surveillance Mil. Authority equipment. Plans for remaining aircrafts to equip them with Mode S Elementary Surveillance equipment are accepted. 100% Optimization of ATM/CNS technical infrastructure within Baltic FAB / WAM/ADSB SYSTEM for TMA GDAŃSK 100% 7% Completed 31/05/2015 Completed 31/05/2016 Ongoing 31/12/2019 NAV03 RNAV 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 PANSA implemented PRNAV SID & STARS within TMA Warszawa on the 17 of December PANSA also planned PRNAV implementation in other airports (EPGD, EPPO, EPKK). There is no MIL Air traffic Controller controlling civil traffic under MIL command, so the other actions are 31/01/2010 "Not applicable". MIL ATCOs servicing civil traffic under PANSA Management are trained. All new military aircraft will be RNAVequipped. ASP (By:12/2023) PANSA PANSA implemented PRNAV SID & STARS within TMA Warszawa on the 17 of December PANSA also planned PRNAV implementation in other airports (EPGD, EPPO, EPKK). NAV Infrastructure s (DVOR, DME) 100% Completed 31/01/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 75 Released Issue

87 NAV10 APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 In 2013 PANSA was designed APV procedures for the Airport in Katowice. PANSA developes safety assessment (FHA,PSSA and SSA) for each imlemented procedures including APV Baro and APV SBAS approaches. 31/12/2018 To the end of 2018 PANSA will publish procedures for all applicable airports with IFR runways. REG (By:04/2016) Reg. The EASA AMC.2027 was translated and published on CAA Completed 100% Authority website. EASA AMC 2028 is still under development. 31/12/2013 ASP (By:12/2016) In 2013 PANSA was designed APV procedures for the Airport in Late Katowice. PANSA developes safety assessment (FHA,PSSA and SSA) for PANSA each imlemented procedures including APV Baro and APV 70% SBAS approaches. 31/12/2018 To the end of 2018 PANSA will publish procedures for all applicable airports with IFR runways. SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 In particular at the main Polish Airport Warsaw Chopin Airport The Safety Committee was established to share best practices of runway excursion among the other things. Members of the Safety Committee represent main stakeholders at Warsaw Airport, including Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA). 01/09/2017 CAA will exercise its role according to the forseen timetable on the basis of information from stakeholders. REG (By:01/2018) Reg. CAA will exercise its role according to the forseen timetable on Ongoing 10% Authority the basis of information from stakeholders. 01/09/2017 ASP (By:12/2014) Dedicated teams for prevention of runway excursions as well Completed as runway incursion were established in the following Polish airports: Warszawa, Katowice, Krakow, Poznan, Wroclaw, Gdansk, Szczecin, Zielona Gora, Rzeszow, Lodz and Bydgoszcz. The one of the main activity of those teams is to implement PANSA recommendations of European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursion. 100% 31/12/2014 In particular at the main Polish Airport Warsaw Chopin Airport The Safety Committee was established to share best practices of runway excursion among the other things. Members of the Safety Committee represent main stakeholders at Warsaw Airport, including Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA). APO (By:12/2014) PPL Warszawa 100% Airport Completed 30/09/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 76 Released Issue

88 6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 The CAA approved EUROCONTROL STCA Specifications New ATM system with enhanced safetynets capabilities is running since November PANSA developed company policy for safety nets and assigned staff responsible for its maintenance and improvement. ASP (By:01/2013) STCA capabilities in the new system are upgraded compared to Completed PANSA the old one. Initial training of ATCOs completed before 100% operational startup of the new ATM system in November ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Planned for its timely implementation. No specific training package was developed but all requirements arising from software changes ver 7.0 vs. ver 7.1 are in place in existing training plans and refreshment 30/12/2020 courses for ATCO. REG (By:12/2015) Reg. Completed Planned for its timely implementation. 100% Authority ASP (By:03/2012) No specific training package was developed but all Completed PANSA requirements arising from software changes ver 7.0 vs. ver % are in place in existing training plans and refreshment courses for ATCO MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority At present the possibility of equipment transporttype aicraft is under review 55% Late 30/12/2020 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 PANSA is equipped with CFMU terminals. Provision of flight activations to CFMU is implemented. Supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated Position is planned using Entry Nodes.as function of the new ATM system. MIL has no Service provision role. MIL does not currently have CFMU terminals ASP (By:07/2014) PANSA is equipped with CFMU terminals. Provision of flight Completed activations to CFMU is implemented. Supply ETFMS with PANSA Standard Correlated Position is planned as function of the new 100% ATM system using Entry Nodes. There is no plan for the implementation of other functions. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 77 Released Issue

89 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 PANSA finalized migration plan with Eurocontrol for Briefing Facility software. This was the first step of implementation of integrated briefing being a part of the software dedicated to ATS Reporting Offices in Poland. In second step PANSA started public procurement for software dedicated to the pilots. PANSA 31/12/2017 intends to implement operational version of the integrated briefing level 6 by the end of ASP (By:12/2012) PANSA finalized migration plan with Eurocontrol for Briefing Late Facility software. This was be the first step of implementation of integrated briefing being a part of the software dedicated to PANSA ATS Reporting Offices in Poland. In second step PANSA started 40% public procurement for software dedicated to the pilots. 31/12/2017 PANSA intends to implement operational version of the integrated briefing level 6 by the end of ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 In the current system Basic OLDI messages are is implemented with basic messages being exchanged with all neighbouring ACC at the exception of Kaliningrad. In tthe new Pegasus system is ready to exchange also other all OLDI messages (not yet operationally used with any partner)will be implemented. Military have one civil working position directly connected to the civil control centre ASP (By:12/2012) In the current system OLDI is implemented with basic Completed messages being exchanged with all neighbouring ACC at the exception of Kaliningrad. In the new ATM system is ready to PANSA support more advanced features, although the scope of 100% possible enhancements is yet to be confirmed by surrounding partners. Pegasus system all OLDI messages will be implemented. MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority Military have one civil working position directly connected to the civil control centre % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 78 Released Issue

90

91 ANNEXES Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Poland POLISH AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES AGENCY Mrs Jolanta WAKULICZ LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Ms Anna ABRAMOWICZ LSSIP Focal Point for Airport POLISH AIRPORTS STATE ENTERPRISE Mr Piotr CZECH LSSIP Focal Point for Military POLISH AIR FORCE Maj.Maciej JAFERNIK EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Persons for Poland DPS/PEPR Ingrid FEIJT Frédéric ROOSELEER Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA National Stakeholder Specialist Bogdan SUWAŁA PANSA / Marek WINIARSKI - CAA AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Jacek WYRWICH - PANSA AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Jacek WYRWICH - PANSA AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Jacek WYRWICH - PANSA AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Filip SOSIN - PANSA AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Filip SOSIN - PANSA AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Artur Żoładkiewicz PANSA / Maria OMIECIŃSKA-BOTWIN - LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 79 Released Issue

92 AOP04.2 AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE M. BIRENHEIDE CAA / Piotr CZECH - PPL P. VRANJKOVIC Artur Żołądkiewicz PANSA / Piotr CZECH - PPL F. ROOSELEER Grzegorz KOŚLACZ PANSA / Sławomir LORENT - PPL AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER n/a AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO n/a AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC n/a AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC n/a ATC02.8 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 ATC17 COM10 B. BAKKER P. TERZIOSKI P. TERZIOSKI P. CONROY P. HOP S. MORTON Y. EYUBOGLU F. ROOSELEER Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA L. DELL ORTO Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA L. DELL ORTO Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA L. DELL ORTO Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA L. DELL ORTO Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA L. DELL ORTO Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA J. PINTO Maciej DĄBROWSKI - PANSA COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Piotr ZAWISZA - PANSA ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Aleksandra BRYX - PPL FCM03 FCM04.1 FCM04.2 FCM05 FCM06 FCM08 INF07 ITY-ADQ ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-FMTP ITY-ACID ITY-SPI ITY-AGDL C. BOUMAN P. HOP P. HOP I. MENDES VIDEIRA P. HOP K. BREIVIK A. PETROVSKY M. UNTERREINER J. POUZET L. POPESCU A. DESMOND-KENNEDY M. BORELY S. DISSING O. CIOARA Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA O. CIOARA Włodzimierz SALWA - PANSA O. CIOARA Włodzimierz SALWA - PANSA O. CIOARA Marek SZKODZIŃSKI - PANSA F. ROOSELEER Włodzimierz SALWA - PANSA O. CIOARA Kacper WALCZAK - PANSA A-P. FRANGOLHO Rafał BRANDYS PANSA / Michał WITKOWSKI PPL / Marcin LATOS - CAA A-P. FRANGOLHO Rafał BRANDYS PANSA / Paweł MAJSTEREK PPL / Marcin LATOS - CAA B. HILL Bartłomiej KOCOT PANSA / Karol KAŹMIERCZAK - CAA O. ALFARO Maciej DĄBROWSKI - PANSA O. CIOARA Dariusz JASIŃSKI - PANSA O. CIOARA Dariusz JASIŃSKI PANSA / Bogusław BOSSOWSKI - CAA B. HILL Bartłomiej KOCOT PANSA / Antoni ZANIEWSKI - CAA LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 80 Released Issue

93 NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC Andrzej KRÓL - PANSA NAV10 SAF11 R. FARNWORTH S. LAWRENCE P. VRANJKOVIC Piotr CZEŚNIK PANSA / Marek WINIARSKI - CAA F. ROOSELEER Mariusz KRZYŻANOWSKI - PANSA / Anna ABRAMOWICZ - CAA LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 81 Released Issue

94 Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts Annex B1 Organizational Structure of Civil Aviation Authority Annex B2 PANSA Polish Air Navigation Services Agency was set up under the Act of 8 December 2006 and started its activity on the 1 st of April Agency s ongoing activity is supervised by the President of the Civil Aviation Authority under the provision of the Act of 3 July 2002 the Aviation Law. PANSA performs its functions under the authority of the minister of Infrastructure. LSSIP Year 2016 Poland 82 Released Issue