Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Year 2016 Level 1

2

3 FOREWORD The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents are the yearly expression of commitment of civil and military National Organisations (Regulators and National Supervisory Authorities), Service Providers and Airport Operators, towards the implementation of the European ATM Master Plan. They provide a comprehensive view, for the benefit of the ATM community at large, of how ECAC States and stakeholders concerned are progressing in planning and deploying the mature elements of the European ATM Master Plan. The Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning and Reporting mechanism (formerly known as ESSIP) and LSSIP are wellestablished and mature mechanisms, with a long history dating back more than 20 years. They provide a wellrecognised stable platform for implementation planning, monitoring and reporting, while continuously adapting to the changing environment. The constant improvement of the reliability and quality of data provided by national stakeholders allowed, for the fourth consecutive year, to use the LSSIP documents and tools as a support to the Performance Review Body for its capital expenditure analysis. The LSSIP documents and tools also constitute the sole source of information for the development of the Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBUs) Implementation Monitoring Report. This work is undertaken for the ECAC States on behalf of ICAO, in accordance with the Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP). This ASBUs Implementation Monitoring Report is now a formal companion document and integral part of the ICAO European Air Navigation Plan. It is also the fourth year that the LSSIP Expert Group is operational and that has provided an invaluable support to the Agency in various domains like process improvement, upgrade of IT tools and LSSIP Database, enhancement of the methodology on Implementation Objectives progress determination and in particular advising the Agency how best to avoid multiple reporting. The need for coordination and cooperation between the Agency and the SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) has been recognised and is currently being addressed through a Pilot exercise with SDM and the SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) in order to identify a common way to optimise reporting by relevant stakeholders and to avoid unnecessary duplications of work. I would like again to thank you for the substantial effort spent on your contribution to this LSSIP document. I see this as a proof of your commitment to the principles of transparency and partnership, to the benefit of the entire ATM community! Adriaan Heerbaart Director of Directorate Pan European Single Sky EUROCONTROL Agency LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM Released Issue

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for FYROM Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/116 Date of Edition 28/03/2017 LSSIP Focal Point Jasmin Malinkov LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioara Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP and art.htm LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM Released Issue

6

7

8

9

10

11 CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) Macedonia Air Navigation Service Provider (MNAV) Airports Military Authorities Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ACC SKOPJE Traffic and enroute ATFM delays Summer 2016 performance Planning Period Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Chapter 4 National Projects Chapter 5 Regional Coordination Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress State View Overall Objective Implementation Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ICAO ASBU Implementation Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM Released Issue

12

13 Executive Summary National ATM Context The separation between the regulatory and the service provider is effective in Macedonia since 1 July The Macedonian Air Navigation Service Provider (MNAV) has been created as the State owned company for the ANS provision. The autonomous Civil Aviation Agency (CAA) has encapsulated the role of ATM regulator and National Supervisory Authority (NSA). Under the concession agreement, TAV Holding has been assigned as the airport operator for Skopje/Ohrid airports in MNAV is currently actively involved in the procurement of a new ATM System, allowing the implementation of the majority of ESSIP Objectives. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia decreased by 4% during the summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to summer The EUROCONTROL SevenYear forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 1.5% and 6.0%, with an average baseline growth of 3.6% throughout the planning cycle. Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 3% 0; 0% 0; 0% Completed 4; 14% 2; 7% 5; 17% 9; 31% 8; 28% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Missing Data Undefined The progress on the implementation of the objectives is generally satisfactory. It is observed that the implementation of a substantial number of objectives is related to the deployment of the new ATM system, expected for A major achievement during the reporting period was the implementation of Free Route Airspace (AOM21.2) in the upper airspace in June Another important milestone has been reached with the full implementation of TCAS7.1 (ATC16). It should be noted that even if most of the SES interoperability Regulations have not been transposed yet into the national legislation, most of the ITY, SES related ESSIP Objectives are being implemented on a voluntary basis. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 1 Released Issue

14 Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 54% 2% 74% 77% 50% 8% n/a 35% SESAR Baseline PCP SESAR PCP SESAR PCP SESAR Baseline Baseline Baseline LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 2 Released Issue

15 ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 3 Released Issue

16

17 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 4 Released Issue

18

19 Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC YES 1997 EUROCONTROL YES 1998 European Union No EASA No ICAO YES 1993 NATO No ITU YES Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses Skopje FIR. The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL245. The following map shows the geographical situation of the Macedonian airspace: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 5 Released Issue

20 Lower airspace chart: Upper, Free Route airspace chart: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 6 Released Issue

21 Airspace Classification and Organisation On 27 November 2003, the airspace classification has been changed. Airspace ICAO class A from FL 200 till FL 660 was replaced by ICAO class C. No modifications have been stipulated for airspace classification below FL Airspace class C is applied to UTA from FL 245 till 660 and for CTA from FL 200 till FL 245 within the lateral limits of Skopje FIR. 2. Airspace class D applied to: CTA from FL 105 till FL 200 within the lateral limits of Skopje FIR all ATS routes within Skopje FIR (lower limit 1000ft AGL, upper limit FL200) Within the lateral limits of Skopje TMA o Lower limit 1000ft AGL within 20 NM circle centred at Skopje Airport, or 1000ft AGL or 9000ft AMSL outside the circle, whichever is higher o Upper limit FL 145 Skopje CTR within its lateral limits, lower limit GND upper limit 4000ft AMSL Ohrid CTR within its lateral limits, lower limit GND upper limit 4000ft AMSL 3. Airspace class E applied to CTA within Skopje FIR lateral limits, with exemption of CTRs, TMA and ATS routes, lower limit 1000ft AGL, upper limit FL105, and within Skopje TMA lower limit GND upper limit 1000 ft within 20 NM circle centered at Skopje airport or 1000ft AGL or 9000ft AMSL outside this circle, whichever is higher. 4. Airspace class G applied with lateral limits of Skopje FIR with exemption of TMA and CTRs from GND till 1000ft AGL Metric system is not used, only imperial system is available in accordance with national regulations. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 7 Released Issue

22 1.2. National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Macedonia are the following: Civil Aviation Agency (CAA) Macedonian Air Navigation Service Provider (MNAV) Military Authorities; Airport Operators Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Government National Assembly Ministry of Defense C O O O Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Agency Air Force and Defense Coordination Coordination TAV Airport Operator MNAV Coordination LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 8 Released Issue

23 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in the Republic of Macedonia is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rulemaking CAA Aviation Act Safety Oversight CAA Aviation Act Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace CAA The government is currently responsible for managing the airspace. The establishment of Airspace Management board has been done in November CAA is responsible for the oversight National regulation which defines the mode, rules and specific requirements concerning the ATM safety oversight Economic CAA Aviation Act Environment Ministry of environment and physical planning Security CAA Aviation Act Accident investigation Committee for Investigation of Aviation Accidents and Serious Incidents Aviation Act Civil Aviation Agency (CAA) The CAA was created in 1995 and was set up as a part of the Ministry of Transport. With the new Aviation Act, the status of the Civil Aviation Administration as body within the Ministry of Transport was changed into an independent authority outside of the Ministry of Transport under the name Civil Aviation Agency. However, the Aviation Act of 2006 stipulates in Article 7 that an independent CAA must be created with its own legal identity. This was achieved by 8 February With this change, CAA reports to the Government, but the Ministry of Transport is conducting administrative supervision of the work of CAA. The CAA regulates and supervises all aviation activities. The CAA is established by the Aviation Act which also defines its responsibilities. In particular, the CAA is responsible for the supervision of the implementation of the provisions of the Aviation Act and the regulations enacted there under. The CAA also supports the drafting of laws and enacts bylaws related to National Aviation Safety Programme of the applicable international aviation standards, recommended practices and legislation of the EU, ICAO, ECAC, JAA/EASA and EUROCONTROL. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 9 Released Issue

24 The formal consultation and approval with respect to rulemaking is the responsibility of the Governmental body Secretariat for Legislation. Acting as regulator of the national aviation sector, the Agency is an independent state body and selffinanced from the air navigation charges, airport infrastructure, issuing licenses, approvals and agreements fees. The amendments of Aviation act enacted in May 2010 define CAA as a regulatory authority under the supervision of National Parliament. The National Parliament nominates 3 members of CAA s Management Board. The CAA Director is appointed by the CAA Management Board. Annual Report published: Y Annual working and development programme and annual financial plan of the Civil Aviation Agency of the Republic of Macedonia for Website Macedonia Air Navigation Service Provider (MNAV) Services provided MNAV, the State owned company being registered under the private company law for the ANS provision has been established on 1 July A governmental ordinance regarding the foundation of MNAV has been enforced in The government assigned a supervisory board of the new company and the supervisory board appointed the MNAV management board. Name of the ANSP: MNAV Governance: Joint Stock Company Ownership: 100 % State owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute Y Skopje ACC ATC approach Y Skopje APP/ Ohrid APP ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Skopje TWR/Ohrid TWR AIS Y 2 airports plus enroute CNS Y All ATM infrastructure is property of MNAV MET Y 2 airports plus enroute ATCO training Y Unit training Others None Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP. Website LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 10 Released Issue

25 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2018 ATC Unit Skopje ACC/APP, Ohrid TWR/APP SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2018 ATC Unit Skopje ACC/APP ATC Units The ATC units in the Macedonian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Skopje ACC/APP 2 (maximum 4 sectors) Ohrid TWR/APP 1 Skopje FIR 1 Skopje FIR 2 sectors configuration usually operated in 2015/ sector configuration has been operated whenever traffic demands. Two sectors configuration encompassed two vertical sectors, divided as follows: From GND to 365 From 365 to 660 or From GND to 345 From 345 to 660, depending on the traffic demand. Three sectors configuration encompassed three vertical sectors, divided as follows: From GND to Threesector configuration is supported by the ATM system and VHF/VCS system. There is no Air Traffic Service delegation to/from other States. 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 11 Released Issue

26 Airports General information The airports are state owned and managed by TAV Airports Holding, which is responsible for the management of two international Airports (Skopje Alexander the Great airport and Ohrid St. Paul the Apostle airport). Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. Therefore, Skopje Alexander the Great airport is the only Macedonian airport covered by the LSSIP Year Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Macedonia are composed of: Macedonian Aviation Operation Unit (MAOU); Macedonian Air Sovereignty Operation Centre. The civil/military coordination is organised at three levels. The highest level is the ministerial level between MoT and MoD. The level of CAA and the Macedonian Air Defence Operation Centre within MoD is mainly concerned with technical matters. The operational problems of airspace use, coordination procedures and daytoday problems are discussed between MNAV and MAOU (Macedonian Aviation Operation Unit). A further level exists for tactical decisions on Skopje ACC/APP and MAOU level. For the time being, the Macedonian militaries do not possess military transport fleet. Inside the Macedonian Aviation Operation Centre, the ATM team is staffed with 7 persons. The military coordinators (3 persons) are responsible for the supervision of the military activities. The military controllers are responsible for the provision of ATS to the military flights inside the temporary restricted airspace. Outside the temporarily restricted area, the civilian ATCOs control the military flights. The military zones for IFR/VFR flights are dynamically allocated within the Skopje FIR airspace on tactical and daily basis, upon military request. Dynamic airspace management is achieved through the real time verbal civilmilitary coordination; no plans exist for enhanced civilmilitary coordination with electronic tools. The coordination of the military flights inside temporarily restricted area is done from the military premises, using their own equipment. For a purpose of coordination with the civilian ATC authorities, a telephone hot line has been established, in order to transfer the estimates about military flight exit/entry conditions in restricted areas. The national equivalent of FUA concept is implemented; there are no operational needs for CDRs and the necessity of AMC has to be evaluated for further utilisation. Restricted areas are assigned by CAA NOTAM office, upon the military request. They are published in the national AIP. Cooperation between the CAA and military with regard to Search and Rescue (SAR) activities is defined in the Government Regulation on method, organization and entities for Aircraft Search and Rescue, that was enacted in 2013 and published in Official Gazette of RM", No. 36/13. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 12 Released Issue

27 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y Level of such legal provision: Aviation Act, Instruction for Service provision to OAT Authority signing such legal provision: National Assemble in respect of Aviation Act, CAA DG and the commander of Macedonian Air Force regarding the instruction These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y ATCO Training N ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y Aircrew Licensing Y Additional Information: None Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip Other: None Oversight National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of Defence Additional information: None OAT LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 13 Released Issue

28 Service Provision role The service provision to the OAT is mandated to MNAV, except the handing of OAT within the restricted areas, whereas the ATS to OAT is provided by the military coordinators. Services Provided: Additional Information: User role EnRoute Approach/TMA Airfield/TWR/GND AIS MET SAR TSA/TRA monitoring Other: OAT MNAV MNAV MNAV MNAV Military MET service and MNAV MET service A Specialised Military Unit Civil Military coordination group None IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S N/A ACAS Y Others: None Military in the Republic of Macedonia applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 14 Released Issue

29 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia FYROM Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements Actuals IFR movements Baseline forecast IFR movements High forecast IFR movements Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F Overflights 90% FYROM Distribution (Ref. year 2015) Internationa l Dep/Arr 10% Domestic flights 0% EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 3,7% 7,0% 6,2% 5,6% 6,0% 5,2% 5,4% FYROM B 0,1% 29,9% 3,9% 4,2% 4,2% 3,3% 3,5% 3,8% 3,2% 3,4% L 4,6% 1,5% 0,7% 1,6% 2,1% 1,4% 1,6% ECAC B 1,1% 1,7% 1,6% 2,7% 1,4% 2,1% 2,1% 2,4% 1,9% 2,1% 2016 Traffic in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia decreased by 4.0% during the summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to summer The EUROCONTROL SevenYear forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 1.5% and 6.0%, with an average baseline growth of 3.6% throughout the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 15 Released Issue

30 2.2. ACC SKOPJE Traffic and enroute ATFM delays LWSSACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast Summer Low Traffic Forecast Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/ Summer 2016 performance Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap 4.6% 59 (0%) No The delays decreased from 0.02 minutes per flight in during Summer 2015 to 0.01 minutes per flight during Summer Capacity Plan 15% Achieved Comments Free route airspace Implementation June 2016 Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Summer 2016 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer During the measured period the average peak 1 hour was 45 and the average peak 3 hour was 40. Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 16 Released Issue

31 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. Capacity Profiles ACC 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 72 22% 75 4% 80 7% Ref % 72 3% 74 3% LWSS 59 L 67 14% 68 1% 69 1% Open 69 17% 71 3% 73 3% C/R 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Capacity Plan Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events New ATM system Dynamic DFL Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase 5% 5% 10% 5% 5% Reference profile Annual % Increase 19% 3% 3% N/A N/A Current Routes Profile % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 11.4% 9.7% 2.7% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile 5.1% 10.2% 22% N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A New system: Additional information The implementation of the new ATM system is planned for 2018, after the Summer. Additional capacity increase of at least 10% is planned. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 17 Released Issue

32 Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LWSSCTA Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 18 Released Issue

33 Planning Period Outlook A capacity gap could be expected at the beginning of the planning period if traffic continues to grow in line with the reference scenario hypothesis. However the likelihood of this scenario is linked to the impact of fuel prices and ATC service costs on airspace user s route choices. The actual traffic evolution for 2017 may be closer to the current routes scenario, particularly taking into consideration the existing negative traffic trends in Skopje ACC since the summer of 2016, which are expected to continue through In order to further decrease the possible capacity gap as early as possible, stricter management of human resources will be applied in 2017, allowing further extension of the utilisation periods of the maximum 3sector configuration. In relation to the dynamic changing of DFL between sectors, the current system capabilities are very limited as they allow selecting the DFL between Lower/Upper from two predefined values only. However, even the current implementation with switching the DFL between FL345 and FL365 is beneficial for the optimization of the sectorisation. The combined effects of human resources planning and selectable DFL between Lower/Upper sectors will allow an increase of the capacity in 2017 of approximately 5%. The implementation of the new system (planned for 2018, after the Summer) will allow fully dynamic changing of DFL. The new functionalities provided by the new system will allow an increase of the overall capacity of approximately 10%. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 19 Released Issue

34 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Republic of Macedonia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC2015/1 Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of presesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Ownership All operational stakeholders Corrective actions taken: Yes Description: Most of these elements, notably those related to infrastructure are either implemented or will be implemented in the new ATM system expected to be put into service by The objectives related to Airports are considered as notapplicable as not justified by the current or expected operational conditions. REC2015/2 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITYADQ, ITYFMTP, INF07, COM10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: Yes Description: 7 of these objectives (AOM19, FCM04.1, ATC07.1, ATC15, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITYADQ) are considered to be notapplicable either due to the lack of operational justification or because the underlying SES Regulations have not been transposed yet in the national legislation. For those objectives for which there are implementation plans, the implementation will take place by the end of 2018 when the new ATM systems is expected to be put into service. REC2015/7 ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. Corrective actions taken: No Description: MK is not within the scope of the PCP Regulation therefore EU funding is not available. ANSPs benefiting from EU funding LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 20 Released Issue

35 Chapter 4 National Projects The main projects currently ongoing in the Republic of Macedonia are depicted in the table below. DME Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution A request shall be sent to EBRD by the management board for the approval of the investment Procurement of new DME to facilitate RNAV operations in Skopje TMA L3: NAV03 Safety: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Environment: + Emissions and noise nuisance reduced by use of optimal flight procedures and routings Capacity: + Airspace optimisation Costefficiency: + Fuel cost reduction through optimised routes and TMA procedures. Operational efficiency: DME Study (DME Study) Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: Study is scheduled for the first half of Further actions will be taken, depending on the results of the Study Status: Planned for the first half of 2017 Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution A study will take place in 2017 in order to assess the DME needs supporting the implementation of MNAV's navigation strategy. The study will evaluate the number of necessary DMEs as well as their locations. Depending on the results of the study, the procurement/relocation of DMEs may be considered. L3: NAV03 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 21 Released Issue

36 ILS/MM/DME LWOH Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution A request shall be sent to EBRD by the management board for approval of the investment Procurement and installation of a new ILS/MM at LWOH airport Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: ++ Better continuity and availability Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: MET Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By end of July 2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution The contract for new MET equipment is signed end of Installation to be done by the end July Procurement of additional METEO equipment as: New AWOS/VOLMET/ATIS equipment for Skopje Airport New AWOS/ATIS equipment for Ohrid Airport Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: + increased safety through the availability of more accurate meteorological information Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 22 Released Issue

37 New ATM System Project Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: OCD and technical specification has been prepared. Negotiations with manufacturers are taking place for the award of the contract. Implementation of ARTAS based SDPS and adaptation of existing ATM system (ARTAS gateway) Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Capacity: + Reduced wasted capacity due to exchanges of real time information with the NM Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: New ATM System Project Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution OCD and technical specification has been prepared. Negotiations with manufacturers are taking place for the award of the contract. Implementation of additional FDPS/CWP functions: A complete handling of ATC tactical constraints in 4 D profile calculation HMI improvements A complete concept of AoI implementation, definition of airspace volume outside of AoR where the trajectory prediction should be extended LINUX upgrade Simulator alignment with all SW upgrades listed related to the operational ATM system Upgrade of MONA and ATC tools Conflict Probe implementation L3: ATC17 Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: ++ Improved safety through the reduction of the controller workload and reduction of human error Environment: Capacity: ++ Increased capacity through increased controller productivity Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 23 Released Issue

38 New ATM System Project Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution OCD and technical specification has been prepared. Negotiations with manufacturers are taking place for the award of the contract. Implementation of FSA, AFP, AFL, ACH, FLS and DES in order to improve the data exchange mechanism with the NM. L3: FCM03 Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: + Better data exchange with the NM leading to the reduction of overloads Environment: Capacity: + Better use of the available network capacity Costefficiency: + Reduction of costs induced by delays Operational efficiency: New ATM System Project Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By the end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution OCD and technical specification has been prepared. Negotiations with manufacturers are taking place for the award of the contract. New ATM system L3: ATC17, ITYAGDL, ITYFMTP Some PCP prerequisites (e.g. AGDL) Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety: + Increase in safety facilitated by the modern ATM system and the facilities it will offer to the controllers. Environment: Capacity: ++ Increased capacity through the deployment of the Sate of the Art ATM system, in compliance with SESAR, encapsulating modern technologies: IP, Data Link, advanced OLDI, etc. Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 24 Released Issue

39 New ATM System Project New building Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Planned ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Negotiations with manufacturers are taking place for the award of the contract. An essential prerequisite for the deployment of the new ATM System by the end of 2018 is the construction and the availability in due time of the new building expected to accommodate the new Ops/Tech room. It will be part of the contract to be signed with the provider of the new ATM System. The project is not related to a Level2/3 element and it does not have a performance contribution by itself. However it is an essential prerequisite for the deployment of the New ATM system. Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: VoIP Organisation(s): MNAV (MK) Type of project: National Schedule: By end of 2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Technical specification to be prepared Procurement and installation of a new VCS (VoIP) for Skopje ACC/APP/TWR units. L3: COM11 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Allows more flexible dynamic sectorisation and allocation of voice resources Costefficiency: + Reduced costs through the use of standard hardware and of Internet off the shelf technologies Operational efficiency: LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 25 Released Issue

40 Chapter 5 Regional Coordination 5.1. Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives In order to achieve some of the ESSIP objectives, the Macedonian ATM Stakeholders will have to coordinate some of its actions with a number of adjacent ATS units. The LSSIP document will also help to foster regional coordination with neighbouring states by identifying mutually dependent actions. The Republic of Macedonia constantly promotes and boosts the cooperation in the region through their active participation in several regional initiatives and agreements, as listed below: Radar Data Sharing Agreement with Bulgaria, Albania, Serbia and Greece Bilateral agreement of coordination in ATM field with Bulgaria European Common Aviation Agreement (ECAA) with European Commission ISIS project An agreement with Albania concerning the delegation of ATS. The buffer zone of Albanian airspace in vicinity of Ohrid airport has been delegated to the Macedonian authorities in order to facilitate terminal operation at the Ohrid Airport (implemented with the Ohrid TMA reorganisation). Special cooperation agreement with the NATOKFOR Joint Service Provision Area Initiative DANUBE FAB observer status GO (Gate One) The long term regional improvements addressed the creation of common interconnected regional communication network and network topology. Currently, the regional network encapsulated the links between Sofia, Varna, Skopje, Athens and Bucharest ACCs. There is a tendency for incorporation to the network of Beograd and Istanbul ACCs. The connectivity between Skopje and Sofia locations is established by 64K and ISDN links (backup). The data transmitted over this line include AFTN, OLDI, radar data, LB VOIP and administrative VOIP. The link between Skopje and Athens is 64 K and it is used for AFTN data exchange/oldi and ISDN backup line. Multilateral Agreement on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) The European Commission has launched the negotiations on the ECAA Agreement with the South East European partners, including the Macedonia in March The European Commission has reached an agreement to create a European Common Aviation Area with Macedonia, seven more countries from South Eastern Europe, Norway and Iceland in December The European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) will create a seamless and efficient European air transport network, linking European people, countries and cultures, and play a vital role in the further integration and development of Europe as a whole. The ECAA agreement has been signed by all contracting parties on 9 June 2006 in Luxembourg. The National Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia ratified the ECAA agreement in March LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 26 Released Issue

41 The ATM issues are covered by the Article 13 of the ECAA agreement that underlines a commitment of the contracting parties to extend to Single European Sky to the ECAA and fully associate them with the development of an ATM Master Plan and its implementation throughout the SESAR programme. Note: With regard to the obligation for alignment of national law with European legislation stipulated in Annex I of the ECAA agreement and heaving in mind the fact that Annex I has not be revised since 2008, the legal system of the Republic of Macedonia is in compliance only with the ATM legislation of SES Package 1. Transposition of SES II was initialised on the bases of the amendments of the Aviation Act enacted in 2016 and is ongoing. ISIS ISIS programme has been launched with the intention to help the interconnection between national air navigation network infrastructures and services and to align rules and standards with Single European Sky Regulations. Also, ISIS intends to provide national staff in charge of air traffic management with the adequate knowledge and understanding of the SES legislation and to help the establishment of wellfunctioning structures. As an important element of the Single European Sky, the setup of FABs in the South East Europe will however remain under national decision making processes. In the framework of the ISIS I programme, Republic of Macedonia has transposed into its national legislation several essential legal acts of the EU Single European Sky acquis specified in Annex IB to the ECAA Agreement. The progress made constitutes full alignment with the SES legislation. The alignment of the adopted transposition measures with EU law is ensured through a direct incorporation of EU regulations into the national legal order. Starting from 2013, the ISIS II programme has been launched focusing first of all on the support to the implementation of the SES performance scheme and cross border cooperation. The overall objective of the Programme is to foster the regulatory and technical convergence of ISIS Beneficiaries with the SES II legislation, with a specific focus on the SES performance scheme. The specific objectives of the Programme are to: bolster NSA capabilities in the SES performance scheme domain and in the scope of the four SES key performance areas; support the integration of ISIS Beneficiaries as part of the SES performance scheme processes at EU level; promote crossborder cooperation in the ISIS Region, as well as integration into FAB structures; where necessary, finalise the work undertaken in the framework of the ISIS I Programme with a view to ensuring full compliance with the SES I regulatory requirements. Initial performance plan was prepared and submitted to the European Commission in December JOINT SERVICE PROVISION AREA INITIATIVE Macedonia is participating in the Joint Service Provision Area Initiative together with Montenegro, Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hungary (as HUNGAROCONTROL provides Air Navigation services in Kosovo airspace). DANUBE FAB observer status On the sixth meeting of the Governing Council of the DANUBE FAB which was held on 28th October 2015 in Sofia, Observer Status was granted to the Republic of Macedonia. This new observer status for Macedonia, endorsed by the Governing Council, demonstrates DANUBE FAB s commitment to cooperate with the neighbouring countries to the fullest extent possible in order to improve the European ATM Network. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 27 Released Issue

42 GO (Gate One) The CEOs of the GO Initiative, which includes designated ANSPs covering 3 existing FABs (Baltic FAB, Danube FAB and FAB CE) and 2 noneu FIRs (Belgrade and Skopje) at their meeting in Sofia on 3rd December agreed to strengthen their operational and technical cooperation. As a pilot common project the CEOs proposed to launch a study to synchronize crossborder Free Route (FRA) implementation in the region for the airspace serviced by GO members LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 28 Released Issue

43 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 1; 3% 0; 0% 0; 0% Completed 4; 14% 2; 7% 5; 17% 9; 31% 8; 28% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Missing Data Undefined The progress on the implementation of the objectives is generally satisfactory. It is observed that the implementation of a substantial number of objectives is related to the deployment of the new ATM system, expected for A major achievement during the reporting period was the implementation of Free Route Airspace (AOM21.2) in the upper airspace in June Another important milestone has been reached with the full implementation of TCAS7.1 (ATC16). It should be noted that even if most of the SES interoperability Regulations have not been transposed yet into the national legislation, most of the ITY, SES related ESSIP Objectives are being implemented on a voluntary basis. LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 29 Released Issue

44 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 25% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % n/a 0% 0% 28% 35% n/a 0% n/a 10% LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 30 Released Issue

45 Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 79% < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) Direct Routing Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets 100% 100% 100% 100% ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute airspace ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 ATC17 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer n/a n/a n/a 100% 26% 82% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations ITYCOTR NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Groundground automated coordination processes n/a 100% 31% NAV10 APV procedures 53% LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 31 Released Issue

46 High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 0% < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) AOP05 Airport CDM LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) AOP10 (PCP) TimeBased Separation LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC AOP12 (PCP) clearances monitoring LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface AOP13 (PCP) Movement Planning and Routing LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve runway safety by preventing runway SAF11 excursions n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0% LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 32 Released Issue

47 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 25% < COM10 COM11 FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability n/a 100% 74% 0% 7% 40% 3% 8% 0% 22% 0% LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 33 Released Issue

48 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable < B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 53% 100% B0SURF B0FICE B0DATM B0ACAS Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 44% 100% 100% 100% B0SNET Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets 100% B0ACDM Improved Airport Operations through B0RSEQ B0FRTO B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO B0TBO Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute 66% 32% 22% 31% 8% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 34 Released Issue

49 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing MultiN Planned Missing Data APT Late AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 MNAV is responsible to handle civil and military traffic. The GAT rules and procedures are applied to GAT/OAT interface. 31/12/2014 REG (By:12/2018) An integrated civilmilitary system for provision of ATS to Completed CAA GAT/OAT traffic is regulatory defined. The regulation "Rules of 100% Air" for military flights has been enacted that covers the 31/12/2014 common civil military rules and procedures. Mil. Authority 100% Completed 30/04/2009 ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority 100% Completed 30/04/2009 MNAV is responsible to handle civil and military traffic. The Completed MNAV GAT rules and procedures are applied to GAT/OAT interface. 100% The defined rules are applied to night OAT VFR traffic. 30/04/2009 MIL (By:12/2018) Military traffic outside temporary restricted areas is handled by Completed Mil. Authority the civilian ATCOs. Common separation criteria are applied to 100% GAT/OAT traffic. The migration to EAD is considered as not 31/12/2014 applicable due to non existence of military AIS. AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM support tools to support AFUA (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % There is no operational need for implementation of AFUA ASP (By:12/2018) MNAV Please see state comment % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 35 Released Issue

50 AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 For the time being there is no state plan for further development of the ASM management. The SloA will be reassessed in 2017, as the bylaw that is covering the issue is under amendment of the national legislation. ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV Please see state comment. 0% 0% No Plan No Plan AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 No operational plan for the time being. The objective will be reassessed in 2017 as the bylaw regarding the objective is underway for amendment. ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV Please see state comment. 0% 0% No Plan No Plan AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Night Direct Routing was implemented in 2013, at the time planned for phase I of III in the implementation of full FRA in Skopje FIR. Full FRA in Skopje FIR above FL245 has been implemented in June ASP (By:12/2017) MNAV 100% 100% Completed 24/04/2013 Completed 24/04/2013 AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed FRA implemented in Skopje FIR above FL245, 24/7, on 23/06/ /12/2016 ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV FRA implemented in Skopje FIR above FL245, 24/7, on 23/06/ % Completed 01/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 36 Released Issue

51 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 AOP04.1 not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Macedonia is not part of the objective applicability area. There is no operational need for a ASMGCS system. REG (By:12/2010) CAA % ASP (By:12/2011) MNAV % APO (By:12/2010) SKOPJE Airport % % Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 AOP04.2 not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Macedonia is not part of the objective applicability area. There is no operational need for a ASMGCS system. ASP (By:12/2017) MNAV % APO (By:12/2017) SKOPJE Airport % % AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) % not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Macedonia is not part of the objective applicability area. ASP (By:12/2016) MNAV % APO (By:12/2016) SKOPJE Airport % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 37 Released Issue

52 AOP10 (PCP) Time Based Separation not applicable % LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) for Skopje Airport, outside of Applicability Area REG (By:12/2023) CAA % ASP (By:12/2023) CAA % MNAV % AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan not applicable % LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) for Skopje Airport. The low level of traffic and its lack of impact on the Network does not justify the implementation of an AOP. ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV % APO (By:12/2021) SKOPJE Airport % AOP12 (PCP) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring % not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) for Skopje Airport, outside of Applicability Area. Not needed due to the low level of traffic and low complexity. ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) AOP13 (PCP) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing % not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable, LWSK is not a PCP high performing airport REG (By:12/2023) CAA Not applicable, LWSK is not a PCP high performing airport % ASP (By:12/2023) MNAV No operational need for applying this objective due to low traffic at LWSK % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 38 Released Issue

53 ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 STCA function has been implemented on the ATM system deployed for service provision at Skopje ACC/APP. The system at Ohrid APP is also equipped with the STCA function. 31/12/2009 ASP (By:01/2013) STCA function has been implemented by all ATS units that MNAV provide radar service. The ATCO training on STCA was done in 100% Completed 31/12/2009 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed MNAV has implemented APW and MSAW. APM has been already implemented at Ohrid TWR. The implementation of Approach Path Monitoring (APM) will be reassessed depending on the implementation 31/12/2016 of the ModeS sensors and traffic volume at the Skopje airport. ASP (By:12/2016) The APM function is already implemented at Ohrid TWR. Completed The implementation of Approach Path Monitoring (APM) and MNAV download of TCAS Resolution Advisor (RA) will be reassessed in 100% 2017 depending in the implementation of the ModeS sensors 31/12/2016 and traffic volume at the Skopje airport ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures not applicable % LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ASP (By:12/2019) MNAV There is no operational need for AMAN tool but an arrival sequencing function is already implemented % ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring 82% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MONA and MTCD have been implemented. TCT is planned for the new ATM system. 31/12/2020 ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV MONA and MTCD have been implemented. TCT is planned for the new ATM system. 82% Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 39 Released Issue

54 ATC15.1 Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) % not applicable No operational justification ASP (By:12/2017) MNAV % ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 So far, there is no operational need for implementation of Arrival Management to be extended to enroute airspace. ASP (By:12/2023) So far, there is no operational need for implementation of MNAV % Arrival Management to be extended to enroute airspace. % ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 See comments at stakeholder level. 31/12/2016 REG (By:12/2015) CAA The Regulator has plans to implement the SLoAs within the Completed 100% required timeframes. 31/12/2016 ASP (By:03/2012) The training has been completed during the refresher ATC Completed course at the end of 06/2012. MNAV 100% A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC 31/12/2012 environment has been established in 12/2012 MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority No State aircraft fulfil the criteria for equipage. % ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer 26% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) MNAV Will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of 2018 New ATM System Project / New ATM System Project 26% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 40 Released Issue

55 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing MNAV has implemented the EUROCONTROL Communication Gateway (ECG), which replaced the previous AFTN system. ECG as a means of AMHS compliance satisfies the AFS requirements for Macedonia. The only operational need for AMHS link is with Athens as Athens is the switching node for Skopje. 31/03/2007 However, the establishment of AMHS links with Athens depends of availability of AMHS capabilities of their system, which is not capable yet. At this time and in near future there is no operational need for implementation of the extended AMHS. ASP (By:12/2018) MNAV MNAV has implemented the EUROCONTROL Communication Gateway (ECG), which replaced the previous AFTN system. 74% Ongoing 31/03/2007 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Planned with the new system 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2020) MNAV Planned with the new system. VoIP 40% Ongoing 31/12/2018 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) % not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Macedonia is not part of the objective applicability area. ASP (By:12/2013) MNAV % APO (By:12/2013) SKOPJE Airport % ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management % not applicable LWSK Skopje Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Macedonia is not part of the objective applicability area. ASP (By:12/2016) MNAV % APO (By:12/2016) SKOPJE Airport % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 41 Released Issue

56 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 The provision of correlated surveillance data to ETFMS and implementation of FSA will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of /12/2018 ASP (By:07/2014) MNAV decided to procure a new ATM system which is required Late MNAV for ARTAS implementation and FDPS upgrade. Will be part of 28% the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of 31/12/ FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late Will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2017) MNAV Will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of 2018 New ATM System Project 35% Late 31/12/2018 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) % not applicable Macedonia is not in the area of applicability of the objective ASP (By:10/2017) MNAV Macedonia is not in the area of applicability of the objective % FCM04.2 (PCP) Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Currently there is no operational need for STAM P2. However the new system will have the capability to support STAM P2. ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV Currently there is no operational need for STAM P2. However the new system will have the capability to support STAM P2. 0% 0% Planned 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 FCM05 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % MNAV has no need and no plans to deploy LARA in a near future therefore the AIXM 5.1 interface is not applicable. AOP is not being implemented at Skopje Airport therefore there is no need for integration into the NOP ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV % APO (By:12/2021) SKOPJE Airport % LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 42 Released Issue

57 FCM06 (PCP) Traffic complexity assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Planned for implementation within the new ATM system 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV Planned for implementation within the new ATM system 10% Ongoing 31/12/2018 FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan No Plan yet, pending evolution of the concept. ASP (By:12/2021) MNAV No Plan yet, pending evolution of the concept 0% No Plan INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed The colocated integrated briefing has been already implemented. No plans have been developed for further integration. 30/06/2012 ASP (By:12/2012) MNAV The colocated integrated briefing has been already implemented. No plans have been developed for further integration. 100% Completed 30/06/2012 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 No plan has been set up so far as it requires the involvement of several State Agencies. REG (By:05/2018) CAA No implementation plans defined yet. 0% No Plan ASP (By:05/2018) MNAV No implementation plans defined yet. 0% No Plan APO (By:05/2018) SKOPJE Airport No implementation plans defined yet. 0% No Plan ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 3% Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 To be implemented in the new ATM system 31/12/2018 ASP (By:01/2020) MNAV To be implemented in the new ATM system 3% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 43 Released Issue

58 Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (Outside Applicability Area) ITYADQ not applicable The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet into the national legislation REG (By:06/2017) CAA % ASP (By:06/2017) MNAV % APO (By:06/2017) SKOPJE Airport % % ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Entry into force: 06/02/2009 8% Ongoing ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet in the national legislation. However voluntary implementation is planned. The data link airground, groundground infrastructure capabilities and ATM system upgrades are planned 05/02/2018 for 2018, without prejudice to the evolution of the technical aspects and possible amendments of the Regulation. REG (By:02/2018) CAA to approve the operational deployment of data link Ongoing services by MNAV. CAA 5% FHA, PSSA for the new ATM system has been approved by the 05/02/2018 CAA. ASP (By:02/2018) The data link airground, groundground infrastructure MNAV capabilities and ATM system upgrades are planned for MIL (By:01/2019) New ATM System Project Mil. Authority State transport fleet is not flying above FL 285. % 8% Ongoing 05/02/2018 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 44 Released Issue

59 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 0% Planned All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet into the national legislation. However there are plans to implement the requirements of the Regulation. 31/12/2018 REG (By:12/2018) The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not Planned CAA been transposed yet into the national legislation. However 0% there are plans to implement the requirements of the 31/12/2018 Regulation. ASP (By:12/2018) The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not Planned MNAV been transposed yet into the national legislation. However 0% there are plans to implement the requirements of the 31/12/2018 Regulation. MIL (By:12/2020) The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not Mil. Authority been transposed yet into the national legislation. Compelling % technical or budgetary constraints do not allow the equipage of State aircraft. APO (By:12/2018) SKOPJE Airport Due to the expected high level of non equipped traffic (general aviation, military traffic, etc) it will not be possible to convert any of the airport frequency assignments. therefore the AOP SLoAs are considered as % ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 The current ATM systems at Skopje ACC/APP/TWR and Ohrid APP/TWR unit are capable to send and receive complete set of OLDI messages (ACT, LAM, PAC, REV, MAC ABI), to present them to the controllers 30/06/2004 who could interact, modify and send back to the FDPS system. ASP (By:12/2012) REV/PAC/MAC are implemented. ROF/COF/MAS/LOF and NAN MNAV will be implemented in the new ATM system. MIL (By:12/2012) No operational needs exist for implementation of BFD/CFD Mil. Authority exchange with the military authorities, due to the fact that M NAV is responsible for handling OAT/GAT traffic. 100% % Completed 30/06/2004 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 45 Released Issue

60 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITYFMTP All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 The new FDPS will support the OLDI data exchanged over TCP/IP V6. Will be part of the new ATM system, planned to be operational by the end of 2018 ASP (By:12/2014) MNAV implemented the OLDI data exchange via TCP/IP by a dedicated router which encapsulates X.25 data packages into MNAV TCP/IP protocol. The new FDPS will support the OLDI data exchanged over TCP/IP V6. MIL (By:12/2014) Military does not provide ATS and does not have the ATM Mil. Authority system because there is no operational need for it, all ATS services for military flight are provided by civil ANSP MNAV. New ATM System Project 7% Late 7% % 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet into the national legislation. However part of the objective has been implemented or there are implementation plans. 31/12/2017 REG (By:02/2015) The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet into the national legislation. However part CAA of the objective has been implemented or there are implementation plans. ASP (By:02/2015) The Regulation is not part of the ECAA agreement and has not been transposed yet into the national legislation. However part MNAV of the objective has been implemented or there are implementation plans. MIL (By:06/2020) 0% 28% Mil. Authority No operational need for the military regarding this SloA. % Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Implementation of PRNAV procedures within Skopje TMA is foreseen for the end of /12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) MNAV Implementation of PRNAV procedures within Skopje TMA is foreseen for the end of DME / DME Study 31% Ongoing 31/12/2023 LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 46 Released Issue

61 NAV10 APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late Implementation of APV/Baro procedures within Skopje TMA is foreseen for the end of /12/2018 REG (By:04/2016) CAA The relevant regulation in respect of JAA TGL 9/10 promulgated Completed 100% in /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2016) MNAV APV/Baro procedures for Skopje TMA are planned to be implemented by the end of % Late 31/12/2018 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The objective has not been reviewed yet. REG (By:01/2018) CAA 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority 0% MNAV 0% APO (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority 0% SKOPJE Airport 0% No Plan No Plan No Plan No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 47 Released Issue

62 ANNEXES Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for FYROM MNAV Jasmin Malinkov LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAA Filip Trandafilovski LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP MNAV Jasmin Malinkov LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Skopje Airport Sasho Shterjov LSSIP Focal Point for Military Macedonian Aviation Operation Unit Maj. Ljupco Arnautovski EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for FYROM DPS/PEPR Octavian CIOARA Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Aleksandar GAVRILOV AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Sasho SHTERJOV AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Sasho SHTERJOV AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Sasho SHTERJOV AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Sasho SHTERJOV AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO Sasho SHTERJOV AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Sasho SHTERJOV AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Sasho SHTERJOV ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Aleksandar GAVRILOV Aleksandar PALCEVSKI LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 48 Released Issue

63 ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Aleksandar GAVRILOV Aleksandar PALCEVSKI Aleksandar GAVRILOV Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Aleksandar GAVRILOV COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Dragoljub PATCHEV COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Dragoljub PATCHEV ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Aleksandar GAVRILOV ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Aleksandar GAVRILOV FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC Branko PETROVIC Nenad KONSTANTINOVIC INF07 A. PETROVSKY AP. FRANGOLHO Saso BOJCIN Aleksandar GAVRILOV ITYADQ M. UNTERREINER AP. FRANGOLHO Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ITYAGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Dragoljub PATCHEV ITYFMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Dragoljub PATCHEV Aleksandar GAVRILOV ITYACID A. DESMONDKENNEDY O. CIOARA Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ITYSPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Aleksandar PALCEVSKI ITYAGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Aleksandar GAVRILOV NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Goran BIKOVSKI Saso BOJCIN Goran BIKOVSKI Saso BOJCIN SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Fahrudin HAMIDI LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 49 Released Issue

64 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation charts MNAV Supervisory Board Internal Revision Department MNAV Management Board Safety, Security and Quality Management Department ANS Division CNS Division Financial, Legal, Development and Investment Division ACC Department DPS Department Financial and Administration Department TMA Department SUR Department Procurement and Investment Department TWR/APP Ohrid Department COMMET Department Planning, Development and Budget Control Department Training Center Department NAVAIDS Department Legal Department FMP Department Forecast Unit Ohrid Department PR Department METEO Department Observing Unit PWR Department HR Department Ohrid MET Unit MM and HVAC Department Facility Management Department NOTAM Unit AIS Department ARO Unit RCO Department LSSIP Year 2016 FYROM 50 Released Issue