Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP GEORGIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP GEORGIA Level 1 - Implementation Overview

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Georgia Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/20 Date of Edition 06/04/2018 LSSIP Focal Point Zaal Khocholava LSSIP Contact Person Predrag VRANJKOVIC Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2017 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2016 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations and LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authority has approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Georgia TBILISI ACC Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Implementation Projects National projects Cooperation activities FAB Coordination Regional cooperation Implementation Objectives Progress State View Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Georgia is committed to implement Single European Sky objectives both from regulatory and technical perspectives. Governmental Decree 2497 of December 26, 2014 defines the roadmap on the implementation of EC regulations stemming from Common Aviation Area Agreement (CAAA). TWINNING project II (Legal approximation of Georgian Civil Aviation Regulations with EU standards) has started in July Air Code of Georgia has been updated and its provisions require Georgian ANSP to apply objectives of European ATM Master Plan. This update has been passed to the Government for approval. Parliament has approved it in By Ministerial Order CAA has been tasked to oversee the implementation of SES and to report to relevant Stakeholders. By Governmental Decree on airspace and classification Georgian airspace has been aligned with Reg. 730/2006 and all airspace above FL 195 is now Class C Airspace. By updated Rules of the Air VFR flight are now allowed to operate above FL 195. National Safety Committee is set up and its role to establish acceptable levels of safety in aviation. The Gap analysis between national system and ICAO/EU requirements is ongoing. Georgian ANSP (SAKAERONAV) is in the process of upgrading its ATC system which will be finalised in Tbilisi airport operator TAV URBAN Georgia LLC in 2016 has renovated the current runway in Tbilisi international airport. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Georgia increased by 14.9 % during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 13; 36% 3; 8% 2; 6% 10; 28% 8; 22% Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Missing Data Undefined The overall implementation progress in Georgia is aligned with Master Plan deadlines. Some delays are identified in implementation of FCM objectives, but this is absolutely reasonable because Georgia has joined applicability area later and these objectives are part of the full integration to NM. More objectives are completed than last year. Particular success was FRA implementation in cooperation with NM. NAV10 objective is late due to the unavailability of applicable regulations at national level. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 1 Released Issue

12 Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the presesar and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered presesar. The four aforementioned objectives are neither presesar nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives AOM19.1 and FCM05 are considered as both part of the presesar and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. PreSESAR Implementation PCP Implementation % % Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 100 % 100 % 82% 59% 43% 52% n/a 13% PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 2 Released Issue

13 ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter Block 0 Block % % ATM Deployment Outlook State objec ves Deployed in : OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 100% progress Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 100% progress STCA EnRoute [ATC02.2] 100% progress Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 100% progress Integrated Briefing [INF04] 100% progress Mandatory Coordination & Transfer [ITYCOTR] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ AMHS [COM10] 95% progress Aircraft Identification [ITYACID] 62% progress Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 56% progress Voice over IP [COM11] 53% progress Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 40% progress APV Procedures [NAV10] 33% progress etod [INF07] 33% progress ETFMS [FCM01] 50% progress MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 40% progress RNAV 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.1] 10% progress Enhanced STCA for TMAs [ATC02.9] 0% progress Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 30% progress Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 0% progress LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions; Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document; Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 4 Released Issue

16

17 1. National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Georgia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 2005 EUROCONTROL January 1st 2014 European Union EASA N/A ICAO 1994 NATO Working Agreement (signed 2009) N/A ITU 1993 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Tbilisi FIR. Tbilisi FIR is surrounded by the following 4 State FIRs: Rostov FIR (Russia), Baku FIR (Azerbaijan), Yerevan FIR (Armenia), Ankara FIR (Turkey). This is graphically presented on the figure below. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 5 Released Issue

18 Airspace Classification and Organisation Classification of Georgian Airspace is presented on the picture below National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Georgia are: - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia; Transport policy department is body integrated within the Ministry; - Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is under Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia - Ministry of Defence o Land Forces Command; - Georgian Civil Aviation Agency (GCAA) is a Legal Entity of Public Law (LEPL) is under the state control of the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development; - Sakaeronavigatsia LTD (SAN) the only Air Navigation Service Provider in Georgia (ANSP is organised under private law, responsible for the provision of ANS in Georgia); - United Georgian Airports o - National Airlines; TAV URBAN Georgia LLC (Airport Operator); - Training Institutions/Organisations. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 6 Released Issue

19 The activities of stakeholders are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in figure below: LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 7 Released Issue

20 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM in Georgia are summarised in the table below. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rulemaking Safety Oversight GCAA Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia GCAA Air Code Article 9 Law on Governance and Regulation of Transport Field N 4593 (S) of Article 7 (G), Article 8 Law on Governance and Regulation of Transport Field N 4593 (S) of Article 7 (D) Air Code Article 8 Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace GCAA Law on Administrative Violation Articles President of Georgia GCAA /MOD Air code Article 11 Parliamentary decree N363on Airspace structure and classification Presidential decree N253 on distribution of responsibilities and roles between state agency regarding civil and state aviation oversight and control Economic Environment GCAA Ministry of environment Air Code Article 47 Security GCAA MIA Air Code Chapter V Accident investigation AAIB Ministerial Order 11/242 on Incident and accident investigation rules in civil aviation of 4 September The Georgian Civil Aviation Agency (GCAA) The Georgian Civil Aviation Agency is a Legal Entity of Public Law (LEPL), established by Article 7 of Transport Law. The Agency is under the state control of the Minister of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia. GCAA has its own operating budget and is functionally separated from the Service Provider. Ministerial Order on Statute of the Agency establishes its internal structure and main functions. Among others one of the main functions of the Agency are to develop technical regulations, oversee their application and enforce the compliance with the requirements as necessary. The figure in the Annex B indicates the organisational structure of the Agency. Annual Report published: N Annual report as per EU requirements is not published. However under ongoing implementation of occurrence reporting system and continuous maturing the oversight system in Georgia GCAA has developed third safety report. The report is currently under internal review and is planned to be addressed under national SSP committee to improve the overall reporting, analysis and safety level. Complimentary information could be found on LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 8 Released Issue

21 Georgian ANSP (SAKAERONAV) Services provided Governance: Limited Liability Company Ownership: 100% State owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS MET Y Y Y Y Y Y ATCO training Y Initial Training is outsourced. Transitional Training, Refresher and other local specifics related is provided inhouse. Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Annual Report published: None N N AFIS Number of air traffic controllers Supervisors 7 Senior Controller 13 ACC 33 APP 28 TWR 33 SAKAERONAV organisational chart is presented in Annex B. ANSP web site: LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 9 Released Issue

22 ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? SELEX SI Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Upgrade of the system is ongoing The ATS services are provided from main centre in Tbilisi ACC SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? SELEX SI Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Upgrade of the system is ongoing The ATS services are provided from main centre in Tbilisi ACC ATC Units ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Tbilisi ACC 1 Tbilisi FIR 2 sectors Tbilisi TMA 1 Tbilisi FIR Batumi TMA 1 Tbilisi FIR Kutaisi TMA 1 Tbilisi FIR Airports General information The main international Airports in Georgia are: Tbilisi International Airport Batumi International Airport, Kutaisi International Airport 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 10 Released Issue

23 Tbilisi International Airport is owned by United Airports Georgia LLC but is operated by TAV Urban Georgia LLC. Batumi International Airport is owned by the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia but is operated by TAV Batumi Operations. Georgia has some airfields for general aviation as well. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. The airport covered by this edition of LSSIP document is TBILISI International Airport (TIA) as a main international airport in Georgia. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 11 Released Issue

24 Military Authority Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Air Code. Presidential Decree 253, on distribution of responsibilities between civil and military aviation authorities. Authority signing such legal provision: President/Parliament/ MOD These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination N/A ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N/A ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N/A ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision N/A Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability N/A Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: There are no military ATS provided on [civilian airdromes/for GAT traffic]. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N Additional Information: There are no military ATS provided on [civilian airdromes/for GAT traffic, civilian airspace users]. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP N/A National Military AIP N National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eaip Y EUROCONTROL eaip N/A Other: Other: N/A N Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: MoD Additional information: Nil N/A Additional information: Nil GAT LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 12 Released Issue

25 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: EnRoute N EnRoute N/A Approach/TMA N Approach/TMA N/A Airfield/TWR/GND N Airfield/TWR/GND N/A AIS N AIS N/A MET N MET N/A SAR Y SAR N/A TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N/A Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information: Nil Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: N/A N/A User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only Nil Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Nil Under radar advisory service Nil If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Nil CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N/A Mode S N ACAS N Others: LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 13 Released Issue

26 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Georgia applies national FUA requirements: Under ongoing legislative changes national CivilMilitary WG is established to apply EU FUA principles by the end of FUA Level 1 implemented: N FUA Level 2 implemented: N, however military unit is integrated into the civil ATM FUA Level 3 implemented: N LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 14 Released Issue

27 2. Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Georgia Georgia - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017) IFR flights yearly growth 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F H 16.5% 9.5% 6.2% 6.2% 5.4% 5.6% 5.6% Georgia B 5.2% 5.5% 2.8% 15.9% 7.7% 4.1% 4.0% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% L 15.4% 5.9% 2.1% 2.6% 2.1% 2.3% 2.3% ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 2017 Traffic in Georgia increased by 14.9 % during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL SevenYear forecast predicts an average annual increase between 3.0% and 6.6%, with a baseline growth of 4.7% during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 15 Released Issue

28 2.2. TBILISI ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays UGGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Summer 2017 performance Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap % 50 (0%) No The average enroute delay per flight remained at zero in Summer Planned capacity: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments FRAG implementation of the Step One Yes Has been implemented from FL255 and above Implement ATFCM measures and improve FMP issues Improved ATFCM Enhanced ATFM techniques through cooperative traffic management Yes Yes No Monitor of demand and capacity is in progress by Tbilisi FMP and in case of imbalance appropriate actions are taken ATFM is continuously improving in close cooperation with NM Enhanced ATFM techniques is under consideration. The implementation is premature for the current operational environment. Further optimisation and implementation of ATS route network Yes Optimization of ATS route is continuous process Enhancement of current of sectorisation No In cooperation with Eurocontrol, the sectorisation is currently being evaluated to be enhanced Implementation of RNAV1 (GNSS) for SID/STAR s No Implementation of RNAV1 is planned by mid of 2019 Optimization of manpower planning Yes Activity completed Technical implementation of new ATM system No New ATM system is operating in shadow mode Transfer to new ATM system No The project is ongoing Traffic management improvements Yes Monitoring of demand and capacity balance on pretactical and tactical phases Maximum configuration: 2 sectors Yes Planned to be changed by 2019 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 16 Released Issue

29 Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be 50. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 37 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24. Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC 2017 baseline UGGG 50 Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) H 50 0% 50 0% Ref. 50 0% 50 0% L 50 0% 50 0% Open 50 0% 50 0% C/R 50 0% 50 0% Summer Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events FRAG implementation of the Step Two Enhanced ATFM techniques through cooperative traffic management Further optimisation and implementation of ATS route network Implementation of two upper ACC sectors Implementation of RNAV1 (GNSS) for SID/STAR s Implementation of APV LNAV/VNAV (including LNAVonly minima) at all instrument runway ends as a backup for ILS precision approaches Technical implementation of new ATM system. Transfer to new ATM system Traffic Management Improvements Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 17 Released Issue

30 Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 UGGGCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Tbilisi ACC in the coming planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 18 Released Issue

31 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Georgia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Conclusion VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT ROUTING. THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS. (page 14 of the Report) Applicable to All State that are implementing AOM21.1 and AOM21.2 State s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: Georgia has implemented FRA in cooperation with NM. Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY All States + EC CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) State s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. This regulation is not in the Common Aviation Area Agreement (CAAA) between Georgia and EU. Nevertheless State is ensuring in Quality of Aeronautical data and Aeronautical information in accordance with the requirements of ICAO Annex 15 and National legislation. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 19 Released Issue

32 4. Implementation Projects 4.1. National projects Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: ADSB implementation (ADSB) ATFCM EUROCONTROL Support to GCAA/NSA/ANSP (SUPPGCAA) FRA implementation (FRAG) New automated management system for ATS (NEWATC) PBN Implementation (PBN) Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) (SMSSSP) TMA reconfiguration Transition from AIS to AIM SAKAERONAV (GE) SAKAERONAV (GE) GCAA (GE), SAKAERONAV (GE) GCAA (GE), SAKAERONAV (GE) SAKAERONAV (GE) GCAA (GE), SAKAERONAV (GE) GCAA (GE), SAKAERONAV (GE), TBILISI Airport (GE) SAKAERONAV (GE) GCAA (GE), SAKAERONAV (GE), TBILISI Airport (GE) 2018 Ongoing L3: ITYACID Completed L3: FCM05, FCM Ongoing L3: AOM13.1, AOM21.2, FCM05, FCM06, INF07, NAV03.1, NAV Completed L3: AOM Ongoing L3: ATC12.1, ATC17, COM10, FCM03, ITYACID Ongoing L3: NAV03.1, NAV Ongoing L3: AOM21.2, NAV03.1, NAV10, SAF Ongoing L3: ATC Ongoing L3: INF07, NAV03.1, NAV10 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 20 Released Issue

33 5. Cooperation activities 5.1. FAB Coordination Not applicable Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives Currently there are no regional coordination initiatives and projects ongoing in Georgia. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 21 Released Issue

34 6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives Completed Ongoing 13; 36% 3; 8% 2; 6% 10; 28% 8; 22% Planned Late No Plan Missing Data Undefined The overall implementation progress in Georgia is aligned with Master Plan deadlines. Some delays are identified in implementation of FCM objectives, but this is absolutely reasonable because Georgia has joined applicability area later and these objectives are part of the full integration to NM. More objectives are completed than last year. Particular success was FRA implementation in cooperation with NM. NAV10 objective is late due to the unavailability of applicable regulations at national level. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 22 Released Issue

35 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C. Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services Collaborative Flight Planning Interactive Rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % n/a n/a n/a 50% 56% n/a n/a 30% 100% LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 23 Released Issue

36 Advanced Air Traffic Services < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) AOP14 ATC02.2 ATC02.8 ATC02.9 Direct Routing Free Route Airspace Remote Tower Services UGGV TBILISI/VELII STCA EnRoute GroundBased Safety Nets Enhanced STCA for TMAs n/a Local objective n/a 100% 100% 0% 100% ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Information Exchange with Enroute in Support of AMAN Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer n/a n/a n/a 100% 40% 40% ATC18 Multi Sector Planning Enroute 1P2T Local objective n/a ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective ITYCOTR NAV03.1 NAV03.2 (PCP) NAV10 NAV12 UGKO KUTAISI/KOPITNARI UGSB BATUMI UGTB Tbilisi Airport GroundGround Automated Coordination Processes RNAV 1 in TMA Operations RNP 1 in TMA Operations APV procedures Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 100% Local objective n/a 33% 10% LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 24 Released Issue

37 High Performing Airport Operations < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a AOP05 Airport CDM UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a AOP10 (PCP) TimeBased Separation UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a n/a n/a ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management SAF11 UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions n/a 100% LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 25 Released Issue

38 Enabling Aviation Infrastructure COM10 COM11 COM12 (PCP) FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) NewPENS Extended Flight Plan Integrated Briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft Identification Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance Performance and Interoperability < n/a n/a n/a n/a 100% 100% 45% 95% 33% 62% 53% 0% LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 26 Released Issue

39 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2017 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable < B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 22% 100% B0SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) B0FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration 80% 100% B0DATM B0ACAS Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 72% 100% 100% B0SNET Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets 50% 100% B0ACDM Improved Airport Operations through B0RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 100% B0NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view 53% 100% B0ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance B0CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link EnRoute LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 27 Released Issue

40 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C. Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Missing Data Main Objectives AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 National regulation sets the harmonized rules for OAT and GAT operations outside restricted or temporarily segregated areas. 31/12/2016 REG (By:12/2018) GCAA ASP (By:12/2018) SAKAERONAV MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority National regulation sets the harmonized rules for OAT and GAT operations outside restricted or temporarily segregated areas. National regulation sets the harmonized rules for OAT and GAT operations outside restricted or temporarily segregated areas. National regulation sets the harmonized rules for OAT and GAT operations outside restricted or temporarily segregated areas. EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP 100% 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2016 Completed 31/12/2016 Completed 31/12/2016 AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 % Not Applicable FUA upgrade project is ongoing. Application of support tools will be considered at later stage. ASP (By:12/2018) SAKAERONAV FUA upgrade project is ongoing. Application of support tools will be considered at later stage. % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 28 Released Issue

41 AOM19.2 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 % FUA upgrade project is ongoing. New ATC system will be in operation in Application of automated ASM tools will be considered at later stage. ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV FUA upgrade project is ongoing. New ATC system will be in operation in Application of automated ASM tools will be considered at later stage. % Not Applicable AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 % Not Applicable FUA upgrade project is ongoing. Application of support tools will be considered at later stage. ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV FUA upgrade project is ongoing. New ATC system will be in operation in Application of automated ASM tools will be considered at later stage. % AOM21.1 Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Georgia plans to implement FRA, therefore direct routing is considered as not necessary. ASP (By:12/2017) SAKAERONAV Georgia plans to implement FRA, therefore direct routing is considered as not necessary. % AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed FRA have been deployed in cooperation with NM. 25/05/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV FRA have been deployed in cooperation with NM. EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / FRA implementati on / Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) 100% Completed 25/05/2017 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 29 Released Issue

42 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. REG (By:12/2010) Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this GCAA airport objective. ASP (By:12/2011) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. APO (By:12/2010) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. % % % AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. ASP (By:12/2017) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. APO (By:12/2017) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. % % AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (ACDM) not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. ASP (By:12/2016) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. APO (By:12/2016) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not within the area of applicability of this airport objective. % % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 30 Released Issue

43 AOP10 TimeBased Separation not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Since Tbilisi airport is not a coordinated airport it has no impact on the network. ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV % APO (By:12/2021) TBILISI Airport % AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable objective for Georgia. REG (By:12/2023) GCAA % ASP (By:12/2023) SAKAERONAV % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 31 Released Issue

44 ATC02.8 GroundBased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed The training plans have been updated and a training package has been developed by the ANSP for the use of MSAW and APW functions. Ground systems support the MSAW and APW function which are in operational use. 31/12/2015 Following a cost benefit analysis SAN has no plan to implement APM functionality. ASP (By:12/2016) SAKAERONAV The training plans have been updated and a training package has been developed by the ANSP for the use of MSAW and APW functions. Ground systems supports the MSAW and APW function which are in operational use. Following a cost benefit analysis SAN has no plan to implement APM functionality. 100% Completed 31/12/2015 ATC02.9 Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 0% Planned Full operational capability: 31/12/ /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) SAKAERONAV Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs will be implemented/adopted no later than 31/12/2020. The implementation of this objective is linked to the upgrade of ATS System. TMA reconfiguratio n 0% Planned 31/12/2020 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures not applicable % UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) There are no capacity problems in the TMA and on the airport. Georgia considers this objective as not applicable. ASP (By:12/2019) SAKAERONAV There are no capacity problems in the TMA and on the airport. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 32 Released Issue

45 ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MTCD and resolution support functions have been implemented documented and is in operational use. Under ongoing ground system upgrade process MONA functions is planned to 31/12/2019 be implemented. ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV MTCD and resolution support functions have been implemented documented and is in operational use. Under ongoing ground system upgrade process MONA functions is planned to be implemented. New automated management system for ATS 40% Ongoing 31/12/2019 ATC15.1 Information Exchange with Enroute in Support of AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:12/2017) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. % ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable No applicable for Georgia. ASP (By:12/2023) SAKAERONAV % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 33 Released Issue

46 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Current ATC operational system has been updated to support basic OLDI functions ans its in operational use. Safety assessement of changes generated by upgrade of current ATC system is under development. New ATC system is planned to be put into operation by The system 31/12/2018 will have extended OLDI functions. ASP (By:12/2018) SAKAERONAV Current ATC operational system has been updated to support basic OLDI functions and its in operational use. Safety assessment of changes generated by upgrade of current ATC system is under development. New ATC system is planned to be put into operation by The system will have extended OLDI functions in New automated management system for ATS 40% Ongoing 31/12/2018 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Final migration from AFTN to AMHS is subject to crossboarder agreements. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) SAKAERONAV Final implementation of regional boundary gateways is subject to further crossboarder agreements. New automated management system for ATS 95% Ongoing 31/12/2018 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing NSA has been informed on the planned changes of voice Communication Systems. Notification on full operational capability will be addresses accordingly. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2020) SAKAERONAV Upgrade of voice communications systems is planned inline with putting into operation of new ATC system. Safety assessment for the planned changes is ongoing. 53% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 34 Released Issue

47 COM12 New PanEuropean Network Service (NewPENS) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (Other stakeholders): 31/12/2024 % Not Applicable Currently not applicable in GE. ASP (By:12/2024) SAKAERONAV Currently not applicable in GE. % APO (By:12/2024) TBILISI Airport Currently not applicable in GE. % ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. ASP (By:12/2013) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. APO (By:12/2013) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. % % ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management not applicable % Not Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. ASP (By:12/2016) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. APO (By:12/2016) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not in the area of applicability of this multinational objective. % % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 35 Released Issue

48 FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Late With the accession to the EUROCONTROL some NM messages are generated and transferred manually due to limited capabilities of current ATC system. Automatic generation and 31/12/2018 distribution will take place with the new ATC system by ASP (By:12/2017) SAKAERONAV With the accession to the EUROCONTROL some NM messages are generated and transferred manually due to limited capabilities of current ATC system. Automatic generation and distribution will take place with the new ATC system by New automated management system for ATS 56% Late 31/12/2018 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. ASP (By:10/2017) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. % FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 % Not Applicable Not applicable ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV % FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing ANSP is in the process of integration into NOP. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV APO (By:12/2021) TBILISI Airport ANSP is in the process of integration into NOP. Tbilisi Airport has no operational need to implement this objective, ATFCM / EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP 30% % Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 36 Released Issue

49 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Completed Under ongoing process related to NM integration this objective is implemented. 10/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV Under ongoing process related to NM integration this objective is planned to be implemented. ATFCM / EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP 100% Completed 10/06/2017 FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% Planned Implementation of this objective is linked to the FCM06 and its future improvements. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) SAKAERONAV Implementation of this objective is linked to the FCM06 and its future improvements. 0% Planned 31/12/2021 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Under ongoing etod project TOD related legislative and technical changes are established. Implementation programme is under development. 31/05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) GCAA ASP (By:05/2018) SAKAERONAV APO (By:05/2018) TBILISI Airport Under ongoing etod national project TOD related legislative and technical changes are ongoing. Areas effected by TOD are established, responsible originators identified. TOD implementation programme is under development. ANSP is part of national TOD WG and is gradually applying legislative changes. Tbilisi airport operator is part of national TOD WG and is gradually applying legislative changes. EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / Transition from AIS to AIM EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / Transition from AIS to AIM Transition from AIS to AIM 55% 10% 10% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 37 Released Issue

50 ITYACID Aircraft Identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 Surveillance infrastructure has been updated to ensure unambiguous and continuous identification of individual aircraft. Current ATS system is not able to process this information. 31/12/2018 New ATC system will have such capability by ASP (By:01/2020) SAKAERONAV Surveillance infrastructure has been updated to ensure unambiguous and continuous identification of individual aircraft. Current ATS system is not able to process this information. New ATS system will have such capability by ADSB implementati on / New automated management system for ATS 62% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITYADQ (Outside Applicability Area) 45% Ongoing not applicable Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. This regulation is not in the Common Aviation Area Agreement (CAAA) between Georgia and EU. Nevertheless State is ensuring in Quality of Aeronautical data and Aeronautical information in accordance with the requirements 31/12/2019 of ICAO Annex 15 and National legislation. REG (By:06/2017) GCAA Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. 70% ASP (By:06/2017) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. 64% APO (By:06/2017) TBILISI Airport Georgia is not in the applicability area of this objective. 3% Ongoing 01/01/2019 Ongoing 01/05/2019 Ongoing 31/12/2019 ITYAGDL Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable The is no operational need to implement this objective. REG (By:02/2018) GCAA The is no operational need to implement this objective. % ASP (By:02/2018) SAKAERONAV The is no operational need to implement this objective. % MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority MIL does not provide ATC service in Georgia. Very low levels of MIL traffic. % LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 38 Released Issue

51 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable There is no operational need to apply 8,33 khz in Georgian airspace. REG (By:12/2018) There is no operational need to apply 8,33 khz in GCAA Georgian airspace. ASP (By:12/2018) SAKAERONAV There is no operational need to apply 8,33 khz in Georgian airspace. MIL (By:12/2020) % % Mil. Authority Not providing ATC services. % APO (By:12/2018) TBILISI Airport There is no operational need to apply 8,33 khz in Georgian airspace. % ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Completed Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Communications systems have been upgraded and in operational use. 30/06/2015 ASP (By:12/2014) SAKAERONAV Communications systems have been upgraded and in operational use. MIL (By:12/2014) 100% Mil. Authority MIL does not provide ATC service in Georgia. % Completed 30/06/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 39 Released Issue

52 ITYSPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 % Not Applicable Georgia is not in applicability area of this objective. REG (By:02/2015) GCAA Georgia is not in applicability area of this objective. % ASP (By:02/2015) SAKAERONAV Georgia is not in applicability area of this objective. % MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Authority % NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing Terrestrial navigation infrastructure to support RNAV operations has been conducted. Current DME/DME infrastructure is being expanded. Local PRNAV Safety Case is planned to be developed under ongoing national PBN implementation project to address appropriate SLoA of 31/12/2019 this objective. ASP (By:12/2023) SAKAERONAV Terrestrial navigation infrastructure to support RNAV operations has been conducted. Current DME/DME infrastructure is being expanded. Procedure designers responsible for the design of RNAV terminal procedures have been trained. All other SLoA will be addressed accordingly under ongoing national PBN implementation project. EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / PBN Implementati on / Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) / Transition from AIS to AIM 10% Ongoing 31/12/2019 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 40 Released Issue

53 NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 % Not Applicable Not necessary in Georgia. ASP (By:12/2023) SAKAERONAV Not necessary in Georgia. % APV Procedures NAV10 Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Under ongoing national PBN implementation project APV/Baro procedures are under development. REG (By:04/2016) GCAA ASP (By:12/2016) SAKAERONAV Under ongoing national PBN implementation project EASA material and ofher SLoA under this objective will be addressed. APV/Baro procedures are under development. EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / PBN Implementati on / Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) / Transition from AIS to AIM EUROCONTR OL Support to GCAA/NSA/A NSP / PBN Implementati on / Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) / Transition from AIS to AIM 33% Late 31/12/2018 Late 10% 31/12/2018 Late 40% 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 41 Released Issue

54 SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 GCAA has approved national regulation on the establishment on RWY Safety Teams on each international aerodrome. Regulation enforces recommendations contained in European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions. All stakeholders operating at international 31/12/2015 aerodromes are planning to conduct forums and regular meetings to implement the national requirements. Implementation of regulation is part of GCAA's supervision. REG (By:01/2018) GCAA has approved national regulation on the establishment on RWY Safety Teams on each international aerodrome. Regulation enforces GCAA recommendations contained in European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions. Implementation of regulation is part of GCAA's supervision. ASP (By:12/2014) SAKAERONAV APO (By:12/2014) TBILISI Airport In the frames of national improvement process Runway Safety Teams will be collaborated with aerodrome RWY Safety Teams at international aerodrome. In addition following national regulation on the establishment of RWY safety teams recommendations contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions will be addressed through continuous improvement process. Relevant parts of Action plan has been taken into account based on the local conditions and environment. Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions will be addressed following the national regulation on the establishments of RWY Safety Teams. Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) Safety Management System (SMS)/ State Safety Plan (SSP) 100% 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 30/12/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 42 Released Issue

55 Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 for enroute operations 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 STCA function exists and is optimised to the local environment. ATCOs are familiar with the functionality and applicability of STCA. This is ensured by dedicated documented procedure. Generated alerts are periodically collected and reviewed. Implementation of level 2 31/12/2016 EUROCONTROL specification is managed under ongoing project. Dedicated tool (ASMT) for the data colection and its analisys was installed and is now in operation. ASP (By:01/2013) SAKAERONA V STCA function exists and is optimised to the local environment. ATCOs are familiar with the functionality and applicability of STCA. This is ensured by dedicated documented procedure. Generated alerts are periodically collected and reviewed. Implementation of level 2 EUROCONTROL specification is managed under ongoing project. Dedicated tool (ASMT) for the data colection and its analisys is installed and operated. 100% Completed 31/12/2016 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Operational approval to aircraft operators having submitted an application has been delivered. Airworthiness certification for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) aircraft in the State of Registry under its responsibility has been provided. Evidence on the status of compliance with regulatory provisions for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) for aircraft and aircraft operators in the State of Registry 31/12/2015 under the CAA/NSA oversight has been provided. The training plan and package has been developed by the ANSP. REG (By:12/2015) Operational approval to aircraft operators having submitted an application has been delivered. Airworthiness certification for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) aircraft in the State of Registry under its responsibility has been GCAA provided. Evidence on the status of compliance with regulatory provisions for ACAS II (TCAS 7.1) for aircraft and aircraft operators in the State of Registry under the CAA/NSA oversight has been provided. The training plan and package has been developed by the ANSP. ASP (By:03/2012) SAKAERONA V MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment, by means of regular incident occurrence reporting, investigation and analysis, has been put in place. 100% 100% MIL has no ATS role. % Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 31/12/2015 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 43 Released Issue

56 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services FCM01 Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 This objective is subject to deployment of new ATC system. Current ATC system does not support automated massege exchange functions. ASP (By:07/2014) SAKAERONA V This objective is subject to deployment of new ATC system. Current ATC system does not support automated massege exchange functions. 50% 50% Late 31/12/2019 Late 31/12/2019 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing function is implemented and used in operations 04/04/2016 ASP (By:12/2012) SAKAERONA V Integrated briefing function is implemented and used in operations 100% Completed 04/04/2016 ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Flight data processing and exchange systems have been upgraded and put into service. 13/01/2016 ASP (By:12/2012) SAKAERONA Flight data processing and exchange systems have been V upgraded and put into service. MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority 100% % Completed 13/01/2016 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 44 Released Issue

57 Local Objectives Remote Tower Services Not AOP14 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable UGGV TBILISI/VELII Not applicable in GE. No activities in this regard. MultiSector Planning Enroute 1P2T Not ATC18 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local No operational need in GE. Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Not ENV03 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable UGKO KUTAISI/KOPITNARI This objective is assessed as Not applicable for Georgia. There is no operational need. Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Not ENV03 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable UGSB BATUMI This objective is assessed as Not applicable for Georgia. There is no operational need. Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Not ENV03 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable UGTB Tbilisi Airport This objective is assessed as Not applicable for Georgia. There is no operational need. Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Not NAV12 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local Not applicable in Georgia. LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 45 Released Issue

58

59 ANNEXES ANNEX A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP National Focal Point for Georgia GCAA Zaal KOCHOLAVA LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA GCAA Zaal KOCHOLAVA LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Sakaeronavigatsia Sofia Turabelidze, Darius Vala, Samvel Karagulyan LSSIP Focal Point for Airport TAV URBAN Georgia LLC Mzia Londaridze LSSIP Focal Point for Military Ministry of Defence Kakhaber Kharhiladze EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Georgia DPS/PEPR Predrag VRANJKOVIC LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 46 Released Issue

60 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator EUROCONTROL Objective Owners National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI V. KULJANISHVILI (GCAA) AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / E.TAVADZE O. MROWICKI AOM19.2 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / E.TAVADZE O. MROWICKI AOM19.3 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / E.TAVADZE O. MROWICKI AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN V. KULJANISHVILI (GCAA) AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN E. TAVADZE AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI ATC07.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC12.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC15.1 L. DELL ORTO pending ATC15.2 L. DELL ORTO P. HOP ATC17 L. DELL ORTO S. MORTON ATC18 L. DELL ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI A. TRUBITSIN D.KADZANAIA A.TRUBITSIN D.ONIANI COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU G. KOCHLASHVILI COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY ENV03 AP. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI G. KOCHLASHVILI A.TRUBITSIN D. KADZANAIA D. ONIANI LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 47 Released Issue

61 I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. A.TRUBITSIN FCM05 O. CIOARA PENDACHANSKI D. KADZANAIA FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI D.KADZANAIA FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI INF07 AP. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY V. KULJANISHVILI (GCAA) ITYACID O. CIOARA pending ITYADQ AP. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER ITYAGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC ATYAGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET G. KOCHLASHVILI ITYFMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU ITYSPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Y. TRUBITSIN NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH L. KARANADZE(GCAA) Z.KHITARISHVILI NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending L. MOSESHVILI (GCAA) D. CHEISHVILI (GCAA) / L. MESERIDZE LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 48 Released Issue

62 ANNEX B National Stakeholders Organisation charts Organisational structure of the Georgian Civil Aviation Agency (GCAA) Title Director Title Advisor Title QMD Title Deputy Director Title 1st Deputy Director Title Deputy Director Title ANS Title OPS Title ADM Title AGA Title AIR Title SEC Title ATD Title FIN LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 49 Released Issue

63 Organisational structure of the Georgian ANSP: SAKAERONAV LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 50 Released Issue

64 Organisational structure of the TAV URBAN Georgia LLC LSSIP Year 2017 Georgia 51 Released Issue