Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SERBIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SERBIA Year 2012 Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET Local Single Sky ImPlementation document for SERBIA Infocentre Reference: 13/01/02-34 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2012 LSSIP Year 2012 SERBIA Edition Date: 25 March 2013 LSSIP Focal Point - Bojan SAVNIK bojan.savnik@smatsa.rs SMATSA - ANSP LSSIP Focal Point Nataša Kočović LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioara Status nkocovic@cad.gov.rs octavian.cioara@eurocontrol.int Intended for CAD Unit DSS/EIPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Serbia (RS)\Year_2012\Released\LSSIP 2012_RS_Released.doc LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1. LSSIP Guidance Material: 2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2012: 3. ESSIP Report 2011: 4. STATFOR Forecasts: 5. Acronyms and abbreviations: 6. Single European Sky (SES): 7. European ATM Master Plan: 8. Previous LSSIP Documents: LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia ii Released Issue

6

7

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...v Introduction...viii Chapter 1 - National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) SMATSA Military Authorities Airports Accident/incident Investigation Body Chapter 2 - Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) ATC units Airspace Classification and Organisation Chapter 3 - National Projects Chapter 4 - Regional Co-ordination and Projects Regional Co-ordination Regional Projects Chapter 5 - ATM Safety Chapter 6 - Airspace Organisation and Management Chapter 7 - Air Traffic Control & Data Processing Systems Chapter 8 - Traffic Flow and Capacity Management Chapter 9 - Aeronautical Information Management Chapter 10 - Human Resources Management and Human Factors Chapter 11 - CNS Communications Navigation Surveillance Chapter 12 - Airport ATS Airport Beograd Nikola Tesla (LYBE) Chapter 13 - Environment Airport Beograd Nikola Tesla (LYBE) Chapter 14 - Cost-efficiency Chapter 15 - En-route Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Belgrade ACC (Serbia, Montenegro and the airspace of Bosnia- Herzegovina where ATS is delegated to SMATSA) ACC Belgrade Reference values of the breakdown of the European capacity/delay target Chapter 16 - Airport Traffic and Capacity ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia iv Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary Part - State Context Serbia is a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) Member State. In the context of this document, there are two main stakeholders in Serbia, Civil Aviation Directorate (CAD) and Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc. Serbian National Supervisory Authority (NSA) is embedded in the CAD. SMATSA is a common service provider for two states, Serbia and Montenegro. Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation Serbian stakeholders are committed to implement all ECAC and EU+ objectives with the least possible delays. The Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12) has greatly reduced the discrepancies between the European and national legislation, while contributing to the speed up promulgation of bylaws. Further amendments to the Law are expected in Serbia has completed the transposition of SES I legislation package, as foreseen in Annex IB of the ECAA Agreement. The first phase of the FAMUS project (modernisation of ANS provision) which was finalized in May 2011 significantly contributed to the successful implementation of the objectives particularly in ATC and ATFCM domains. Further improvements as well as implementation of system related ESSIP objectives are planned with the second phase of FAMUS, expected towards the end of LSSIP Serbia Implementation Completion dates Active ESSIP Objectives Ch AOM - Airspace Organisation and Management AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 6 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management 6 AOM13.1 Harmonize Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 6 AOP - Airport ATS AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 LYBE-Belgrade 12 AOP01.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual LYBE-Belgrade 12 AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions 12 AOP08 Implement Airport Airside Capacity Planning Method LYBE-Belgrade 12 AOP09 Implement Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations LYBE-Belgrade 12 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) LYBE-Belgrade 12 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 LYBE-Belgrade 12 ATC - Air Traffic Control ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 7 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia v Released Issue

12 LSSIP Serbia Implementation Completion dates Active ESSIP Objectives Ch ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools 7 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 ATC12 ATC15 ATC17 COM - Communications COM09 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 11.1 COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM 11.1 ENV - Environment ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) techniques for environmental improvements LYBE-Belgrade 13 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports LYBE-Belgrade 13 FCM - Flow and Capacity Management FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services 8 FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning 8 GEN - General GEN01 HUM - Human Factors Implement European ANS contingency measures for Safety Critical Modes of Operation 5 HUM01.1 Ensure timely availability of ATCOs 10 HUM02.1 Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations 10 HUM03.1 Integrate Human Factors into the lifecycle of ATM systems 10 INF - Aeronautical Information Management INF04 Implement integrated briefing 9 ITY - Interoperability ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) 11.1 ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information 7 9 ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability 11.3 NAV - Navigation LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia vi Released Issue

13 LSSIP Serbia Implementation Completion dates Active ESSIP Objectives Ch NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV 11.2 NAV10 Implement APV procedures 11.2 SAF - Safety Management SAF04 SAF05 SAF10 SRC - Safety Regulation SRC- AUDI SRC- CHNG SRC- OVCA SRC- RLMK SRC- SLRD Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences. Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Implementation of Safety Regulatory Auditing by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) Implementation of ATM Safety Oversight Capabilities by NSAs Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies Understanding the Table Objective Completed Objective Partially Completed Objective Planned No Plan Missing Data (Serbia does not participate in this obj.) Late NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. The Harmonisation Objectives are not reflected in this table. Part - Traffic and ATM Performance Cost-efficiency Serbia and Montenegro s actual real en-route unit cost has remained stable in 2011 compared to 2010 (instead of the forecasted decrease of -6.6% foreseen back in November 2011), as the forecasted decrease in costs did not materialise and actual traffic turned out slightly lower than foreseen. En-route Traffic and Capacity Traffic at Belgrade ACC (Beograd FIR/UIR and the portion of Bosnia-Herzegovina airspace where ATS is delegated to SMATSA) decreased by 3.5% during Summer 2012 (May to October), when compared to the same period during At the same time En-route delay decreased from 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2011 to zero in Summer Airport Traffic and Capacity The Beograd airport Nikola Tesla (LYBE/BEG) does not have a declared maximum capacity. However, the available capacity is far greater than the demand and there are no capacity constraints. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia vii Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. They also contain a report by the State on its level of compliance against the Single European Sky Regulations, where applicable. This LSSIP documents Year 2012 describe the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into three parts to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Part - State Context (Chapters 1 to 4), presents the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved. Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation (Chapters 5 to 13), contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective, grouped per ESSIP domain. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: This Part is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Part - Traffic and ATM Performance (Chapters 14 to 16), contains information on the evolution of traffic (en-route and at main airport(s)), and the State s five-year plans to improve its performance and achieve its targets in respect of Cost-Efficiency and en-route Capacity. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia viii Released Issue

16

17 LSSIP Year 2012 PART - STATE CONTEXT LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Released Issue

18

19 Chapter 1 - National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Serbia are the following: - Government of the Republic of Serbia - Ministry of Transport - CAD Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia (the role of NSA) - SMATSA llc Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO CAD MANAGING BOARD Minister of transport Ministry for Transport and Maritime Affairs Minister of finance Minister of internal affairs Minister of defense Minister of environmental protection CAD CAD Director SMATSA Civil Aviation Agency 1.1 Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil aviation in Serbia falls under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAD is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Rule-making Organisation responsible Government, Ministry of Transport and CAD Safety Oversight Ministry of Transport, CAD (audit and inspection) Establishment of Tolerable Safety Levels Government, Ministry of Transport and CAD Legal Basis Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12), bylaws on transposed EU Regulations Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12), Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 32/11 and No 54/12) and relevant European regulations transposed Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12) LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-1 Released Issue

20 Safety Performance Monitoring CAD Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12) Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Ministry of Transport, CAD Government, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Transport, CAD Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Finance CAD Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Ministry of Transport, CAD Government, Ministry of Transport, CAD Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12), Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 32/11 and No 54/12) Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12), Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on airspace management and flexible use of airspace ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 69/11) Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12); Accounting and Auditing Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 46/2006, Corrigendum No. 111/2009 and 99/2011) which implies International Accounting Standards (IAS) as well as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12) Air Transport Law ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12), National Civil Aviation Security Program (NC) of the Republic of Serbia, Regulation establishing the common rules in the field of civil aviation security ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 2/11), Regulation supplementing common basic standards in civil aviation security, Regulation on derogation from common basic standards in civil aviation security, Regulation on Commission inspections in the field of civil aviation security ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 19/11), Decision establishing the national aviation security committee ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 20/11), Regulation on detailed measures for implementation of common basic standards in Aviation security ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 78/11) The National Supervisory Authority, as per SES Service Provision Regulation is described in the Part on Legislation Implementation available in the 2011 LSSIP report CAD The Civil Aviation Directorate of Serbia (CAD) was founded by the Government as a public agency (Article 233 of Air Transport Law, Official Gazette of the RS No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11 and No 93/12) and entrusted with the tasks of regulation, oversight (audits and inspections), certification, licensing and record keeping in the civil aviation in the RS, as well as cooperating with the international aviation organizations. The CAD is headed by the Board and Director. CAD Board consists of five ministers (Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Defence, Minister of Finance and Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning), chaired by the minister of transport (Article 238 of the Air Transport Law). CAD is the NSA (National Supervisory Authority) for the area of air navigation compliant with relevant EU provisions, and as such issues certificates and performs continued oversight over ANSPs (Article 234 of the Air Transport Law). The organisational chart of CAD is depicted in the Annex B of this document. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-2 Released Issue

21 The CAD of Serbia can be visited at Annual Report published: Y The Annual Report covering 2012 activities is under preparation. The NSA Safety Oversight Annual Report for 2011 is available under ref. no. NSA-AREP-11-SR of April 1 st For SES and NSA matters, see the Part on Legislation Implementation available in the 2011 LSSIP report. 1.2 SMATSA Name of the ANSP: SMATSA Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc Governance: Two State Enterprise Ownership: Gov. of Serbia=92%; Gov. of Montenegro=8% Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y ATC approach Y ATC Airport(s) Y AIS Y CNS Y MET Y ATCO training Y Others Y Flight Check and Calibration Service for NAVAIDs / COM / PANS-OPS Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Bosnia and Herzegovina, (within the eastern portion of the upper airspace of Sarajevo FIR). Montenegro (within the entire controlled airspace) SMATSA web address: The organisational chart of SMATSA is depicted in the Annex B to this document. 1.3 Military Authorities The Military Aviation Authority in Serbia is represented by Serbian Air Force and Air Defence. The main role of the Military Aviation Authority in ANS provision is in the domain of ATM by contributing in ASM planning processes and in co-ordinating, organising and controlling special activities in TSAs. Information on civil-military airspace coordination, including FUA is presented in Chapters 6 and 7. The MAA does not have any particular role in the provision of ATS. The Military Aviation Authority is the main source of the information and data promulgated in the Military Aeronautical Information Package, which is published by SMATSA. The MAA is also responsible for military aircraft registry, certification of military aircraft and equipment. Military authorities are taking part in the incident/accident investigations when military aircraft are involved. The MAA reports to the Serbian Ministry of Defence. Information on the application of FUA can be found in the Part on Legislation Implementation available in the 2011 LSSIP report. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-3 Released Issue

22 1.3.1 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Ministerial Decree, and Air Force Regulation. Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force. These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: NA Authority signing such legal provision: NA These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination N OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training N ATCO Training ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: Legal provisions do not cover ATM/ANSP related matters. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Y Y Additional Information: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP National Military AIP Y National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip Other: Other: NA Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: CAD Additional information: GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Additional information: Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: NA En-Route N SMATSA is providing service En-Route Approach/TMA N SMATSA is providing service Approach/TMA Airfield/TWR/GND N SMATSA is providing service Airfield/TWR/GND AIS Y SMATSA is providing service AIS MET N SMATSA is providing service MET SAR Y SAR TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information: LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-4 Released Issue

23 Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Certificate issued by: Additional Information: NA If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing N Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control N Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: 1.4 Airports General information Three international airports in Serbia, namely LYBE (BEG) Beograd Nikola Tesla, LYNI (INI) Niš Konstantin Veliki, and LYPR (PRN) Priština are organised as State Enterprises, owned by the Government of Serbia. The Priština Airport is temporarily operated by UNMIK (United Nations Mission In Kosovo). Two airports, LYBT (BJY) Batajnica and LYKV (KVO) Kraljevo are operated by the military, owned by the State and are available for the civilian air traffic Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP The criteria to determine the airports concerned by the LSSIP Year 2012 are: - the main national airport of the State; or - the airports identified as potentially having an effect upon the network in terms of ATFCM delays; or - the airports with more than 150,000 commercial air transport movement in 2011; or - the Airports contained in Table 8 of Part 4, Annex B of the ESSIP Plan Edition According to these criteria, the airport covered in this LSSIP is Beograd Nikola Tesla Airport (LYBE) being the main national airport in Serbia. 1.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body Technical investigations The Civil Aviation Accident Investigation Commission established by the Director of the Directorate conducts the investigations of accidents and serious incidents in civil aviation. The Commission comprises aviation experts from the list of aircraft accidents and serious incidents investigation experts and is separately established for every accident or serious incident. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-5 Released Issue

24 The Commission has the obligation to investigate all the facts and circumstances that led to an accident or serious incident and to propose measures for their prevention. The accidents and incidents investigation and analysis does not have for its purpose apportion of criminal, administrative, disciplinary, civil or any other liability for the accident and serious incident. The Commission is independent in its work. The Commission investigates all civil aviation accidents and serious incidents which occurred in the territory of the Republic of Serbia, in accordance with the Air Transport Law, the Regulation on accidents investigation and the provisions of Annex 13 of the Chicago Convention Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data CAD s Department for accident investigation and risk analysis performs the following duties: - development of regulations within the scope of its competences; - organization of the initial examination of the site of aircraft accident and serious incident; - organization of aircraft accident and serious incident investigation, in accordance with the Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention and the regulations of the Republic of Serbia; - notification of the competent bodies of interested foreign states and the International Civil Aviation Organization on an aircraft accident or serious incident; - cooperation with the bodies of interested foreign states; - disclosure of information on an aircraft accident or serious incident; - cooperation with the judicial authorities; - communication of preliminary and final reports on aircraft accident investigation; - proposing of official communications on an accident, incident and other occurrences; - receipt, processing and analysis of occurrence reports, occurrence evaluation, the provision of assistance to other bodies in the course of occurrence investigation and safety analysis; - monitoring and analysis of the causes of accidents, incidents and other occurrences and the recommendation of preventive actions; - accidents, incidents and other occurrences database management; - development of periodical reports on accidents, incidents and other occurrences; - collection, storage, protection, exchange and analysis of safety information Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents When an accident or a serious incident involves a civil and domestic or a foreign military aircraft, the accident or serious incident is investigated by a joint civil-military commission. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 1-6 Released Issue

25 Chapter 2 - Geographical Scope In the context of LSSIP, this paragraph reflects the current airspace organisation and service provision respectively. 2.1 International Membership Serbia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 2002 EUROCONTROL 2005 European Union European Common Aviation Area 2006 EASA ICAO 2001 JAA 2006 NATO 2.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses Beograd FIR/UIR (airspace over Serbia, Montenegro, Montenegro territorial waters and the airspace over the portion of high seas in the Adriatic). Beograd FIR/UIR is surrounded by FIRs of eight States, namely Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, FYROM, Hungary, Italy and Romania. The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL ATC units The ATC units in the Serbian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors En-route TMA Associated FIR(s) Beograd ATCC 12 - Beograd FIR/UIR; Sarajevo FIR Beograd ATCC NA 2 Beograd TMA Niš APP/TWR NA 1 Nis TMA Remarks Eastern part. of Sarajevo FIR FL285 FL660. Information on Air Traffic Service delegation to/from other States can be found in the Part on Legislation Implementation available in the 2011 LSSIP report. 2.4 Airspace Classification and Organisation The Serbian airspace is generally divided into uncontrolled and controlled portions according to the Government Regulation on the use of Class C ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 115/2003) valid since Nov 21 st 2003 and the Government Regulation on airspace classes in the Republic of Serbia and the conditions for their use ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 20/11) that entered into force on Dec 1 st LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 2-1 Released Issue

26 Airspace classes are applied as follows: - ICAO class C: between 1500 FT (450 M) AGL and FL 660, except in control zones (CTR) and aerodrome traffic zones (ATZ) when active; - ICAO class D: in all CTRs; and - ICAO class G: from the ground up to 1500 FT (450 M) AGL and ATZ when active, except in CTRs. The Serbian airspace is sub-divided into: a) en-route (FL145 FL660) for which the responsibility rests upon Beograd ATCC, b) seven TMAs and CTRs for which the responsibility rests upon the Approach Offices located at the respective airports. The lower limits of all TMAs are 450m (1500ft) above GND while the upper limit is FL145. The revised version on the Regulation on airspace classes in the Republic of Serbia and the conditions for their use is currently in the process of collecting final comments from the relevant organisations and is expected to be released in the first quarter of LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 2-2 Released Issue

27 Chapter 3 - National Projects The major national ATM modernisation undertakings fall within the two categories: a) ANS provision and b) Legislative reforms. a) The modernisation of ANS provision, referred to as FAMUS project, started in 2002 with the approval of the Modernization Master Plan by the Federal Government. Project included the construction of a new ACC building as well as the supply and installation of a new ATM system and other equipment. The first phase of the FAMUS project was finalized in May The second phase will have finished by December b) The legislative reform includes the enactment of the Air Transport Law (entered into force on the 20 th October 2010 and published in the Official Gazette of the RS No 73/10, amended in No 57/11 and No 93/12) together with passing new regulations in line with the SES requirements. CAD incorporated the following regulations into the national system during 2012: - Regulations (EC) 549/2004, 550/2004 (amended by 1070/2009), 1034/2011 and 1035/2011 integrated within the Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 32/11 and No 54/12); - Relevant provisions of Annex 3 and WMO-No.258 transposed within the Regulation on Certificate of Competence of Aeronautical Meteorological Personnel and Training Organizations ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 32/11); - Regulation (EC) 552/2004, amended by 1070/2009 within the Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 69/11); - Regulation (EC) 551/2004 (amended by 1070/2009) and 2150/2005 transposed within the Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on airspace management and flexible use of airspace ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 69/11); - Regulation (EU) 255/2010 transposed within the Regulation transposing EU Regulation laying down common rules on air traffic flow management ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation laying down requirements for the application of flight message transfer protocols ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation on operating licence and common rules for the operation of air services ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation on observed meteorological data for the development of aeronautical aerodrome climatological information ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation on occurrence reporting in civil aviation ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation on air traffic controller licences and training organizations ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation laying down requirements on air-ground voice channel spacing ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12); - Regulation on common rules in the field of civil aviation and the competences of the European Aviation Safety Agency ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 23/12); - Regulation on requirements for automatic systems for the exchange of flight data ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 23/12); - Regulation laying down requirements on procedures for flight plans in the pre-flight phase ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 23/12); LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 3-1 Released Issue

28 - Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 23/12); The main projects currently ongoing in Serbia are depicted in the table below. Name Schedule Description Scope Status Link with ESSIP Obj. FAMUS (Future Air Traffic Management Modernization and Upgrade System Project) December nd phase of the project; 1 st phase completed in May ARTAS Tuning October 2012 April 2013 SMATSA external IP network September 2012 March 2013 CIMACT February 2013 June 2013 DVOR and DME NAV aids Surveillance system upgrade Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM June 2012 October 2013 April 2012 February 2014 January 2013 December 2018 Centralised SSR Code Assignment and Management System (CCAMS); Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC); ARTAS tuning for connection of additional radars from adjacent ANSPs Establish SMATSA external IP network for transfer of AFTN, OLDI and radar data, enabling implementation of new technology in line with European recommendations. Civil Military ATM co-ordination tool - integration of civil and military air information Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing AOM13.1 AOM20 ATC12 COM09 COM10 FCM01 FCM03 ITY-AGDL ITY-COTR ITY-FMTP SAF05 Ongoing COM09 Ongoing DVOR and DME for airports Beograd and Vrsac Ongoing Radar systems' upgrade for Koviona radar site, including radar software upgrade on Kosevac and Srpska Gora; Belgrade ATCC Voice Communication System upgrade to VoIP Ongoing Ongoing COM11 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 1 Major contributions expected in the following KPAs: - capacity, - safety and - cost-efficiency. 1 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 3-2 Released Issue

29 Air-Ground radio network enhancement ATIS/Volmet system May 2012 November 2015 August 2012 August 2013 Installation and Upgrade of VHF/UHF radios at Belgrade, Kopaonik, Rudnik and Podgorica locations Ongoing ATIS/Volmet system for TMA/TWR Beograd Ongoing LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 3-3 Released Issue

30 Chapter 4 - Regional Co-ordination and Projects 4.1 Regional Co-ordination ECAA (European Common Aviation Area) is a project initiated and managed by the European Commission, aiming at the establishment of equal conditions of competition and common rules in aviation, including ATM and environment. As for ATM, the project will seek the highest degree of cooperation with the view to extending SES among the States concerned (ECAA Agreement was signed between the European Community and its Member States, the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of Montenegro, the Kingdom of Norway, Romania, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of June 10 th 1999) on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area). Serbia has accepted to align its national aviation legislation to the complete aviation acquis of the Community. To this end, Serbia signed the ECAA Agreement in May 2006 which was ratified in May 2009 ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia International Treaties No 38/09). Serbia completed the transposition of the SES I legislative package contained in Annex IB to the ECAA Agreement. Along the lines of SES, concrete and effective actions forward fulfilling operational requirements resulted in signing the agreements on operational-technical cooperation between SMATSA and other ANSPs in the region. Agreements have been signed with NATA (Albania) and Slovenia Control (Slovenia) in 2010 and with HungaroControl (Hungary), BULATSA (Bulgaria) and MK CAA (FYROM) in 2011, as well as with ROMATSA (Romania) in Agreements will consecutively contribute to airspace usage, increased capacity and ensure safe and efficient flow of air traffic with minimum delays. Application of the agreements will bring many benefits and improvements in ANS provision, especially in the areas of safety, flight efficiency, predictability, environment, cost effectiveness and interoperability. 4.2 Regional Projects The Republic of Serbia had an active role in the ISIS Programme (Implementation of the Single European Sky in the South East Europe) which provided support to ISIS Beneficiaries in transposing the European regulations and developing institutional capacity to implement those regulations. Within the ISIS programme CAD had a leading role in the projects of Transposition and Capacity Building of NSAs. The ISIS Programme has come to a finish at the end of LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 4-1 Released Issue

31 LSSIP Year 2012 PART - ESSIP OBJECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Released Issue

32 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date. Progress (**) Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: SES and SESAR ECIP Completed No Plan ECAC Pan-European Partially Completed EU+ Planned Missing Data Multi-N Multi-National Late APT Airport related LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Released Issue

33 Chapter 5 - ATM Safety GEN01 Implement European ANS contingency measures for Safety Critical Modes of Operation (By:12/2008 / Active) Completed Requirements for contingency plans are contained in the Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services. Currently applied contingency measures are aligned with the new regulation and ICAO recommendations. SMATSA has developed contingency plans and procedures and has put them in place. REG (By:06/2008) Requirements for contingency plans are contained in the "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of RS", No 32/11 and 54/12). Contingency plans are reviewed and verified as a part of the regular auditing process and continued oversight of the ANSP. Completed 12/ /2010 (By:06/2008) SMATSA has developed the contingency plans and procedures and has put them Completed in place. Staff training is in line with the procedures. 07/2008 MIL (By:06/2008) SAF04 Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences (By:01/2008 / Active) Actions to apply measures to limit level bust situations were commenced and works on airspace design review and ATCOs training are expected to be finished till end of REG (By:01/2008) (By:01/2007) National regulation on occurrence reporting has been updated to include the requirements contained in Directive 2003/42/EC, Reg (EC) No. 1330/2007 and Reg (EC) No. 1321/2007 was adopted. Safety oversight focuses on occurrence reporting and lesson dissemination in line with Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 1035/2011. Actions to apply measures to limit level bust situations were commenced and works on airspace design review and ATCOs training are expected to be finished till end of Late Completed Late 12/ / /2013 MIL (By:01/2008) SAF05 Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences. (By:01/2010 / Active) Completed ANSP has finished all the actions for target implementation. National regulation on occurrence reporting has been updated to include the requirements contained in Directive 2003/42/EC, Reg (EC) No. 1330/2007 and Reg (EC) No. 1321/2007 was adopted. REG (By:01/2010) National regulation on occurrence reporting has been updated to include the requirements contained in Directive 2003/42/EC, Reg (EC) No. 1330/2007 and Reg (EC) No. 1321/2007 was adopted. Safety oversight focuses on occurrence reporting and lesson dissemination in line with Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 1035/2011. Completed 05/ /2012 (By:01/2010) ANSP have finished all the actions for target implementation. Completed 03/2008 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 5-1 Released Issue

34 SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements (By:12/2011 / Active) CAD is committed to applying the recommendations from the European Action Plan Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction. Service provider is planning to implement measures to reduce risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements. Late 12/2013 REG (By:12/2011) (By:12/2011) CAD is committed to applying the recommendations from the European Action Late Plan Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction. 12/2013 FIS service positions are expected to be implemented in OPS and together with Late procedures progress and staff training will provide excellent basis for great reduction of occurrences caused by airspace infringement. 12/2013 MIL (By:12/2011) MIL Authorities will be included in the detailed plan in due course. Late 12/2013 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 5-2 Released Issue

35 Chapter 6 - Airspace Organisation and Management AOM13.1 Harmonize Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018 / Active) No Plan A harmonised OAT and GAT handling is provided by the application of the national principles, rules and procedures. Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on air space management and flexible use of airspace ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No 69/11) transposing Regulations (EC) 551/2004 and 2150/2005 has been promulgated in April Further harmonization of OAT/GAT handling is to be coordinated with the relevant military authorities. REG (By:12/2018) Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on air space management and flexible use of airspace ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No 69/11) transposing Regulations (EC) 551/2004 and 2150/2005 has been promulgated in April Further harmonization of OAT/GAT handling is to be coordinated with the relevant military authorities. No Plan (By:12/2018) Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan MIL (By:12/2018) Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management (By:12/2015 / Active) Planned Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by /2015 (By:12/2015) Establishment of the High Level National body is planned for 2013 and Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by Planned 12/2015 MIL (By:12/2015) Under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 (By:10/2013 / Active) Planned SMATSA actively participates in the RNDSG, thus planning is done in accordance with the agreed timeframes. 10/2013 (By:10/2013) SMATSA actively participates in the RNDSG, thus planning is done in accordance Planned with the agreed timeframes. 10/2013 MIL (By:10/2013) LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 6-1 Released Issue

36 Chapter 7 - Air Traffic Control & Data Processing Systems ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 (By:01/2013 / Active) STCA is implemented in the current system and is effective on enroute, Beograd and Podgorica TMA. Safety oversight of the changes is performed by the NSA. REG (By:01/2013) (By:01/2013) Safety oversight of changes is performed by the NSA according to the provisions of Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 1035/2011 which have been fully transposed through the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11 and 54/12). STCA is implemented in current system and is effective on enroute, Beograd and Podgorica TMA. Expect Implementation of STCA optimisation procedures in Late Completed Late 12/ /2012 FAMUS 12/2013 MIL (By:01/2013) Military has no role in ATS provision. ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned The implementation of APW is planned with a new system under the FAMUS Project. 12/2013 (By:12/2016) The implementation of APW is planned with a new system under the FAMUS Planned Project. FAMUS 12/2013 MIL (By:12/2016) Military Authority has no ATS provision role. ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned The implementation of Ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 will follow the implementation of FAMUS. 12/2013 (By:12/2016) The implementation of Ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Planned Warning level 2 will follow the implementation of FAMUS ATM system. FAMUS 12/2013 MIL (By:12/2016) Military has no role in ATS provision. ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned Planned for implementation within the second phase of the FAMUS project. 12/2013 (By:12/2016) Implementation is planned for Beograd and Podgorica airports. Application of Planned Approach Path Monitor in Podgorica depends on radar coverage. FAMUS 12/2013 MIL (By:12/2016) Military has no role in ATS provision. ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools (By:12/2015 / Active) There is no operational justification to implement the tool, at present. (By:12/2015) There is no operational justification to implement the tool, at present. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 7-1 Released Issue

37 ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring (By:12/2016 / Active) Completed MTCD functions are implemented through FAMUS Project. Safety oversight of the changes is performed by the NSA. REG (By:12/2016) Safety oversight of the changes is performed by the NSA according to the provisions of Regulations (EC) 1035/2011 and 1034/2011 which have been fully transposed through the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11 and 54/12). Completed 04/ /2012 (By:12/2016) MTCD functions are implemented through FAMUS Project. Completed FAMUS 05/2011 ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations (By:12/2017 / Active) No Plan Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. REG (By:12/2017) Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan (By:12/2017) Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 (By:12/2015 / Active) Completed CAD supervises compliance with regulatory provisions, provides airworthiness certification and delivers operational approval for ACAS II version 7.1. equipped aircraft. Training of the ANS personnel is planned for the March /2012 REG (By:12/2015) CADs Flight Ops and Airworthiness Departments supervise compliance with regulatory provisions, provide airworthiness certification and deliver operational approval for ACAS II version 7.1. equipped aircraft. Completed 04/2011 (By:03/2012) Training completed in March Completed 03/2012 MIL (By:12/2015) No Military State aircraft put into service ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer (By:12/2018 / Active) Service provider is planning to implement this objective by NSA will conduct oversight of changes accordingly. REG (By:12/2018) NSA will assess the proposed change according to the relevant provisions of the "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 32/11, 54/12) and in line with the procedure Safety Oversight of Changes NSA PRO003SR. Planned Planned 12/ /2018 (By:12/2018) SMATSA is planning to implement this objective. Planned 12/2018 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 7-2 Released Issue

38 ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes (By:02/2015 / Active) Completed Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 552/2004 transposed into national regulation. The objective done within the framework of the FAMUS project. REG (By:12/2012) Regulation 1034/2011 (Eu) transposed into national regulation through the amended "Regulation on the requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the RS", No 32/11 and 54/12). Regulation (EC) 552/2004 transposed into national regulation through "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" ("Official Gazette of RS" No 69/11). Regulation (EC) 1032/2006 transposed into national regulation through "Regulation on requirements for automatic systems for the exchange of flight data" (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No 23/12). Completed 05/ /2012 (By:02/2015) The objective done within the framework of the FAMUS project. Completed FAMUS 05/2011 MIL (By:12/2012) Military has no role in ATS provision. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 7-3 Released Issue

39 Chapter 8 - Traffic Flow and Capacity Management FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services (By:12/2006 / Active) Late No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective will be met by the implementation of an advanced system (FAMUS project). 03/2013 (By:12/2006) No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective will be met by the implementation Late of an advanced system (FAMUS project). FAMUS 03/2013 MIL (By:12/2001) Military has no role in ATS provision. FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning (By:12/2012 / Active) Completed The objective was partly met by the implementation of the ASUE system. Full completion will be achieved by the implementation of the FAMUS system. 05/2011 (By:12/2012) The objective was partly met by the implementation of the ASUE system. Full Completed completion will be achieved by the implementation of the FAMUS system. FAMUS 05/2011 MIL (By:12/2006) Military has no role in ATS provision. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 8-1 Released Issue

40 Chapter 9 - Aeronautical Information Management INF04 Implement integrated briefing (By:12/2012 / Active) Late The objective will be met by the upgrade of EAD system i.e. implementation of future Integrated Briefing Facility EAD application. 12/2015 (By:12/2012) Project for implementation of integrated briefing involving SMATSAs AIS and Late MET experts with task to plan and implement appropriate steps is ongoing. 12/2015 MIL (By:12/2012) ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (By:07/2017 / Active) Planned CAD is developing a working draft of Regulation (EU) 73/2010. AIS SMATSA actively participated in the draft preparation process. REG (By:07/2017) (By:07/2017) CAD is developing a working draft of Regulation (EU) 73/2010. AIS SMATSA actively participated in the draft preparation process. Detailed timescale for the implementation of the requirements of this Regulation is to be established. AIS SMATSA has developed ADQ Gap analysis. The preliminary results of the analysis have been presented at Eurocontrol ADQ Rollout workshop. The scope of analysis has been the whole data chain in Serbia and in Montenegro, only. AIS has commented on requirements and proposed the activities which relates to SMATSA responsibility only. The gap analysis includes corrective actions aiming to meet ADQ requirements and proposals for cooperation with CAAs regarding State regulation. Corrective actions have been limited to SMATSA internal activities. Direct application of EC 73/2010 is possible. However, translation into Serbian could be very beneficial to make implementation easier. CAD has prepared draft translation. AIS SMATSA actively participated in the draft preparation process. Due to ADQ implementation complexity the second step will be to define timescale. Timescale for Implementation of data quality and process requirements is planned to be defined. Planned Planned 07/ / /2017 MIL (By:07/2017) Military has no role in AIS provision. SMATSA is the only AIS provider in Serbia. APO (By:07/2017) No Plan LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 9-1 Released Issue

41 Chapter 10 - Human Resources Management and Human Factors HUM01.1 Ensure timely availability of ATCOs (By:12/2012 / Active) Completed A necessary number of qualified air traffic controllers is available in all units at all times. Applied ATCOs manpower methodology takes into account best practice and recommended standards. 12/2012 (By:12/2012) A necessary number of qualified air traffic controllers is available in all units at all times. Applied ATCOs manpower methodology takes into account best practice and recommended standards. Completed 12/2012 MIL (By:12/2012) Military has no role in ATS provision. HUM02.1 Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations (By:12/2012 / Active) Late Integration of Human Factors into ATM Operations and related activities are ongoing process in SMATSA. 12/2013 (By:12/2012) Integration of Human Factors into ATM Operations and related activities are Late ongoing process in SMATSA. 12/2013 MIL (By:12/2012) Military has no role in ATS provision. HUM03.1 Integrate Human Factors into the lifecycle of ATM systems (By:12/2012 / Active) Completed SMATSA has completed all required actions for Integration of Human Factors into the lifecycle of ATM systems. 06/2012 (By:12/2012) SMATSA has completed all required actions for Integration of Human Factors into Completed the lifecycle of ATM systems. 06/2012 MIL (By:12/2012) Military has no role in ATS provision. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 10-1 Released Issue

42 Chapter 11 - CNS 11.1 Communications COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) (By:12/2014 / Active) Regulation (EC) No 633/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 283/2011 transposed into national system. The objective will be met completely by FAMUS project. REG (By:12/2010) Regulation (EC) No 633/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 283/2011 were transposed into national system through the "Regulation laying down requirements for the application of flight message transfer protocols" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12). Planned Late 06/ /2013 (By:12/2014) The objective will be met completely by FAMUS project. Planned FAMUS 06/2013 MIL (By:12/2014) COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (By:12/2014 / Active) Planned Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres. 12/2014 (By:12/2014) Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres. Planned FAMUS 12/2014 MIL (By:12/2014) COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM (By:12/2020 / Active) Planned SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM. NSA will review the proposed changes following the established process and procedures, when the changes are submitted by the ANSP. 12/2018 REG (By:12/2018) NSA will review the upcoming changes submitted by the ANSP accordingly. Planned 12/2018 (By:12/2020) SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM. Planned 12/2018 MIL (By:12/2020) ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 (By:02/2015 / Active) Planned Regulation (EC) 552/2004 transposed into national system. The objective will be met by FAMUS project in twophase approach. The first phase was finished in 05/2011 and the second phase will finish by 12/ /2014 REG (By:02/2015) (By:02/2015) The objective will be met by FAMUS project in twophase approach. The first Planned phase was finished in 05/2011 and second phase will finish by 12/2014. FAMUS 12/2014 The objective will be met by FAMUS project in twophase approach. The first Planned phase will finish by 05/2011 and second phase will finish by 12/2014. FAMUS 12/2014 MIL (By:-) Equipage of State aircraft will not be economically nor operationally justified. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 11-1 Released Issue

43 ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) (By:12/2014 / Active) Planned Regulations (EC) No 633/2007, (EU) 283/2011, (EU) 1034/2011 and (EC) 552/2004 transposed into national regulation. ATMsystems will be enhanced to support OLDI over IP according to the FAMUS implementation schedule. 06/2013 REG (By:12/2014) Regulations (EC) No 633/2007 and (EU) 283/2011 transposed into national regulation through "Regulation laying down requirements for the application of flight message transfer protocols" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 54/12). Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011 transposed into national regulation through the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11 and 54/12). Regulations (EC) 552/2004 and (EC)1070/2009 transposed into national regulation through "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" ("Official Gazette of RS" No 69/11). Completed FAMUS 05/2012 (By:12/2014) ATMsystems will be enhanced to support OLDI over IP according to the FAMUS Planned implementation schedule. FAMUS 06/2013 MIL (By:12/2014) Military has no role in ATS provision Navigation NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV (By:12/2012 / Active) Late PBN Manual planned for adoption upon consultations with relevant stakeholders. ANSP is planning to implement RNAV1 in accordance with PBN Manual. 03/2014 REG (By:01/2005) (By:12/2012) MIL (By:12/2012) PBN Manual planned for adoption upon consultations with relevant Late stakeholders. 03/2014 SMATSA is planning to implement RNAV1 for Belgrade airport and RNP1 for Late all other airports in accordance with PBN Manual. FAMUS 03/2014 Military has no role in service provision, while the equipage of State aircraft would not bring significant operational benefits. NAV10 Implement APV procedures (By:12/2016 / Active) No Plan Under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. REG (By:04/2011) Under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan (By:12/2016) Under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan MIL (By:04/2015) Under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. No Plan LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 11-2 Released Issue

44 11.3 Surveillance ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability (By:01/2019 / Active) Planned SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for surveillance data. CAD conducts safety oversight according to the established procedures and as prescribed in the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11 and 54/12) and "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" (Official Gazette RS No 69/11). 02/2015 REG (By:12/2013) Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 1035/2011 transposed through the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11 and 54/12). Regulation (EC) 552/2004 amended by (EC) 1070/2009 transposed through the "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" (Official Gazette RS No 69/11). Planned 06/2013 (By:02/2015) MIL (By:12/2019) SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for Planned surveillance data. 02/2015 Military has no role in service provision, while the equipage of State aircraft is not technically or operationally justified, taking into account the age of the fleet. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 11-3 Released Issue

45 Chapter 12 - Airport ATS AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions (By:12/2013 / Active) Late Relevant recommendations from EAPRI Edition 2.0 to be implemented through the Regulation on airports, Regulation on establishing SMS and Regulation for airport maintenance. The implementation of all measures for the prevention of runway incursions is planned by the Airport Operators and ANS Provider. The measures implementation will be preceded by a framework Agreement to be concluded between Airport Operators and SMATSA. 05/2016 REG (By:12/2013) (By:12/2013) MIL (By:12/2013) APO (By:12/2013) Relevant recommendations from EAPRI Edition 2.0 to be implemented through Partially Completed the Regulation on airports, Regulation on establishing SMS and Regulation for airport maintenance. 12/2013 The implementation of all measures for the prevention of runway incursions is planned by the Airport Operators and ANS Provider. The measures implementation will be preceded by a framework Agreement to be concluded between Airport Operators and SMATSA. There are no air force units at Belgrade airport, which is the only airport described in this document. Late 05/2016 Apart from participating in a runway safety team all other SLoAs have been Partially Completed completed. 12/ Airport Beograd Nikola Tesla (LYBE) AOP01.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual (By:12/2013 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Belgrade Airport is not a part of the APT related lists of airports. Its capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. (By:12/2011) APO (By:12/2011) Belgrade Airport is not a part of the APT related lists of airports. Its capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is not a part of the APT related lists of airports. Its capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 12-1 Released Issue

46 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Level1 (By:12/2011 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. REG (By:12/2010) (By:12/2011) MIL (By:12/2010) APO (By:12/2010) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Level 2 (By:12/2017 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. REG (By:12/2017) (By:12/2017) APO (By:12/2017) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) (By:01/2016 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. (By:01/2016) MIL (By:01/2016) APO (By:01/2016) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 12-2 Released Issue

47 AOP08 Implement Airport Airside Capacity Planning Method (By:12/2015 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. Its available capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. (By:12/2015) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. Its available capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. MIL (By:12/2015) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. Its available capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. APO (By:12/2015) Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. Its available capacity far exceeds the demand, hence there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. AOP09 Implement Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations (By:12/2015 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. LYBE does not have parallel runways. REG (By:12/2015) There is no operational requirement for the implementation of this objective. (By:12/2015) There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 12-3 Released Issue

48 Chapter 13 - Environment 13.1 Airport Beograd Nikola Tesla (LYBE) ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) techniques for environmental improvements (By:12/2013 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Planned Implementation of CDA techniques is planned for the end of 2013, even though Serbia falls out of the applicability area. 12/2014 (By:12/2013) Currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective. Planned 12/2014 APO (By:12/2013) Planned 12/2014 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports (By:12/2015 / Active) LYBE - Belgrade (Outside Applicability Area) Serbia falls outside the applicability area, under review. (By:12/2013) Serbia falls outside the applicability area MIL (By:12/2013) Serbia falls outside the applicability area APO (By:12/2015) Serbia falls outside the applicability area LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 13-1 Released Issue

49 LSSIP Year 2012 PART - TRAFFIC AND ATM PERFORMANCE LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Released Issue

50

51 Chapter 14 - Cost-efficiency 14.1 Cost-efficiency KPI/PI and target/profile for In order to harmonise the metrics for monitoring cost-efficiency performance across all EUROCONTROL Member States, the cost-efficiency performance indicator was replaced in LSSIP 2011 by an indicator comparable to that applied by the SES States (EU Member States and associated States) in the context of the Performance Scheme (EU Regulation No 691/2010). For the SES States, the SES II regulation package provides for the replacement of the full cost-recovery system by determined costs and risk sharing for route charges from 2012 onwards. The cost-efficiency KPI at national/fab level is the determined unit rate for en-route air navigation services, defined as the ratio between the determined costs and the forecast traffic expressed in service units. It is expressed in national currency and in real terms and provided for each year of the reference period. It is adopted as part of the national/fab performance plans for the reference period. The performance plans for RP1 for the SES States, as well as the EC/PRB assessments and the EC acceptance letters sent to the States in July 2012 can be found on the PRB website at For the EUROCONTROL Member States which are not bound by these SES regulations, the full costrecovery mechanism is applied. For them, the cost-efficiency Performance Indicator (PI) corresponds to the national en-route unit cost, defined as the ratio between the total en-route costs expressed in national currency and in real terms and the traffic expressed in service units. This PI is not associated with binding targets and will be used for monitoring purposes only. The profiles that will be monitored for the period are based on the data submitted by these States to the Enlarged Committee for Route Charges at its 94 th session in November 2011 (see 14.2). The monitoring (14.4) is based on the data submitted to the Enlarged Committee at its 97 th session in November 2012 (see 14.3) Cost-efficiency PI profile set in November 2011 Real en-route unit rate cost profile A 2010 A 2011 F 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F Total ANS en-route costs (in RSD ) % 6.3% Inflation index (100 in 2009) % 5.0% Total costs in real terms (in RSD2009) % 1.3% Total SU % 3.6% Real en-route unit cost profile (in RSD2009) 2014 vs vs % -2.2% % n/n-1 7.4% -6.6% -2.5% 0.9% -4.9% Real en-route unit cost profile (in 2009EUR at 2009 exchange rate) % -2.2% % n/n-1 7.4% -6.6% -2.5% 0.9% -4.9% Source: LSSIP2011, based on data provided at the enlarged Committee for Route Charges in November 2011 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 14-1 Released Issue

52 14.3 1Cost-efficiency PI forecast dated November 2012 Real en-route unit rate cost profile A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F Total ANS en-route costs (in RSD ) % 5.2% Inflation index (100 in 2009) % 6.8% Total costs in real terms (in RSD2009) % -1.5% Total SU % 0.6% Real en-route unit cost (in RSD2009) % -2.1% % n/n-1 0.0% 7.4% -0.3% -12.1% 7.5% -0.7% Real en-route unit cost (in 2009EUR at 2009 exchange rate) % n/n-1 Source: Based on data provided at the enlarged Committee for Route Charges in November 2012 Data computation: PRU 2014 vs vs % -2.1% 14.4 Monitoring of the cost-efficiency PI for The tables and graph below show the revised forecast data for for Serbia and Montenegro s common charging zone cost-efficiency from November 2012, compared to the cost-efficiency PI profile as published in LSSIP They also show the actual outturn figures for Serbia and Montenegro cost-efficiency PI Actual Actual Forecast PI profile value (Nov2011) profile from November Real En-route Unit Cost (RSD2009) % n/n-1 7.4% -6.6% -2.5% 0.9% -4.9% -1.3% Source: LSSIP2011, based on data provided at the Enlarged Committee for Route Charges - November 2011 Serbia and Montenegro cost-efficiency PI Actual Actual Actual PI revised forecast (Nov2012) forecast from November 2012) Real En-route Unit Cost (RSD2009) % n/n-1 7.4% -0.3% -12.1% 7.5% -0.7% 0.1% Monitoring against the profile from November 2011 Source: Based on data provided at the Enlarged Committee for Route Charges - November 2012 Data computation: PRU 2014 P vs A (yearly average) 2014 F vs A (yearly average) Outlook for Serbia and Montenegro's cost-efficiency PI based on November 2012 data monitored against the profile from November 2011 forecast data, as published in LSSIP2011 ANS en-route unit cost per SU in RSD2009 Index (2009=1.00) PI Profile from November Unit cost (at 2009 prices) Actual 2010 Actual 2011 Act./For Forecast 2013 Forecast Unit Cost - Nov En-route costs index - PI profile Nov En-route costs index - Nov TSU index - PI profile Nov TSU index - Nov Unit Cost - PI profile Nov Forecast LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 14-2 Released Issue

53 Serbia and Montenegro s actual real en-route unit cost has remained stable in 2011 compared to 2010 (instead of the forecasted decrease of -6.6% foreseen back in November 2011), as the forecasted decrease in costs did not materialise and actual traffic turned out slightly lower than foreseen. The current (November 2012) forecasts for show a deterioration in the real en-route unit cost compared to the profile dated November 2011, as the downwards revision of the traffic forecasts (not yet reflected for 2012 in the November 2012 submission) is only partly compensated by a downwards revision of the costs. As a result, the forecast unit cost shows an average increase of +0.1% p.a. for compared to the profile showing a decrease of -1.3% p.a. as presented in LSSIP2011. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 14-3 Released Issue

54 Chapter 15 - En-route Traffic and Capacity 15.1 Evolution of traffic in Belgrade ACC (Serbia, Montenegro and the airspace of Bosnia-Herzegovina where ATS is delegated to SMATSA) Serbia&Montenegro - Annual IFR Movements Serbia&Montenegro - Distribution (Ref. year 2011) Overflights 86% IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast Domestic A = flights Actual 1% F = Forecast International Dep/Arr 12% IFR movements - Low forecast 2008 A 2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F A = Actual F = Forecast STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (released September 2012) IFR flights yearly growth 2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F H -2,2% 5,0% 5,3% 5,0% 5,2% 6,3% Serbia& B 3,3% 5,9% 2,7% -2,6% 3,3% 3,7% 3,8% 4,0% 4,8% Montenegro L -3,0% 1,8% 2,5% 2,8% 3,0% 3,2% ESRA B -6,6% 0,8% 3,1% -1,5% 0,0% 2,7% 2,9% 3,2% 3,0% STATFOR Medium Term Forecast (MTF September 2012): % growth 2013 compared to 2012 Domestic: 10 % Arr / Dep: 2.6 % Overflights: 3.3 % Total: 3.3 % 2012 Traffic at Belgrade ACC (Beograd FIR/UIR and the portion of Bosnia-Herzegovina airspace where ATS is delegated to SMATSA) decreased by 3.5% during Summer 2012 (May to October), when compared to the same period during The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 1.7% and 4.1% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.8%. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 15-1 Released Issue

55 15.2 ACC Belgrade Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LYBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) ,0 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0,0 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0, Summer 2012 performance En-route Delay (min/flight) Traffic Evolution 2012 Capacity Baseline Optimum All reasons Without weather Capacity gap % 164 (0%) No En-route delay decreased from 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2011 to zero in Summer Capacity Plan +5% Achieved Comments Route network Development Improved airspace management Flexible use of staff Civil/military coordination improvement Additional controllers Consolidated operation of the FAMUS Improvement of TMA airspace organisation and introduction of RNAV in TMA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Postponed for 2014 Reorganisation of lower airspace establishment of FIC No Postponed for 2014 Consolidation of new ATCC concept of operation CPR, CCAMS No Entry node is installed and under testing. CCAMS functionality is ready and implementation postponed for 2013 Elementary Mode S implementation No Postponed for 2013 Night DCTs Yes Radar sharing project No Postponed for 2013 Summer 2012 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer The peak 1 hour demand was 137 and the peak 3 hour demand was 128 during the measurement period. A maximum configuration of 8 sectors was opened. Yes LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 15-2 Released Issue

56 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. The summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters: : capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC (see 17.3) : breakdown of a European delay target of 0.7 min/flight for the Summer season, corresponding to the 2014 yearly target of 0.5 minute average ATFM enroute delay per flight. ACC LYBACTA 2012 baseline LYBA 164 Summer en-route ATFM delay breakdown ,31 0,20 0,11 0,10 0,08 Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over 2012) H 164 0% 164 0% 164 0% 166 1% 169 2% Ref % 164 0% 164 0% 164 0% 166 1% L 164 0% 164 0% 164 0% 164 0% 165 1% C/R 164 0% 164 0% 167 2% 169 1% 173 2% Capacity Plan Year Route network Development Improved airspace management Flexible use of staff Civil/military coordination improvement (FUA) Measures planned Radar sharing project CPR CCAMS Improvement of TMA airspace organisation and introduction of PBN in TMA Reorganisation of lower airspace establishment of FIC Additional controllers Dynamic airspace sectorisation - Modular sectorisation Dynamic airspace sectorisation - Modular sectorisation Data Link Data Link Cross border DCTs Cross border DCTs Free Route concept Consolidation of Free Route concept Significant Events Elementary Mode S implementation Phase 1 Elementary Mode S implementation Phase 2 Max sectors Capacity increase p.a. Reference profile Additional information 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 15-3 Released Issue

57 LYBACTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 180 Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile - Current Routes Capacity Profile - High Capacity Profile - Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook No capacity issues are expected in Belgrade ACC for the next planning period Reference values of the breakdown of the European capacity/delay target The planning period includes the following en-route delay targets, as adopted by the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council at its 35 th Session, in May 2011: 2014 : 0.5 minutes average en-route ATFM delay per flight for the full year 2013 : 0.7 and 0.6 minutes, respectively, average en-route ATFM delay per flight for the full year The en-route delay target was broken down at ANSP and ACC level by EUROCONTROL. To take into account the seasonality of traffic and delays, Summer and Winter seasons were assessed separately: 2013: 0.85 min/flight Summer season 0.3 min/flight Winter season 2014: 0.7 min/flight Summer season 0.3 min/flight Winter season The capacity requirement profile and delay breakdown have been calculated for all ECAC states. The figure below presents: * - yearly en-route delay performance *2012 up to end of October yearly en-route delay breakdown that has been assessed for each ACC to meet the Eurocontrol Provisional Council target. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 15-4 Released Issue

58 LYBAACC 0.50 Yearly delay per flight (all reasons) EU delay breakdown 0.40 Delay (min) per flight More information on the methodology related to capacity planning is available in the following document available on the EUROCONTROL website: LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 15-5 Released Issue

59 Chapter 16 - Airport Traffic and Capacity 16.1 Airport BELGRADE (LYBE) Airport Traffic The graph below shows traffic development from 2009 to actual and traffic forecast until 2017 (Departures + Arrivals). IFR movements yearly growth Airport Scenario LYBE Actual -7.95% 9.51% 3.25% [STATFOR] LYBE Base 1.29% 3.67% 5.18% 5.17% 5.33% 5.2% [STATFOR] LYBE High 1.84% 5.7% 7.4% 6.85% 6.97% 7.03% [STATFOR] LYBE Low [STATFOR] 0.8% 2.21% 3.93% 4.02% 4.17% 3.84% Sources: STATFOR MTF September Airport Delays and Capacity Airport Delays Airport BELGRADE is NOT identified as being critical and potentially having an effect upon the network in terms of ATFM delays therefore no delay information is indicated Airport Current Declared Capacity Peak Operations The Beograd airport Nikola Tesla (LYBE/BEG) does not have a declared maximum capacity. However, the available capacity is far greater than the demand and there are no capacity constraints. The Beograd airport is a single runway (RWY 12/30) airport (3400 x 45m) and is suitable for both IFR and VFR operations. The standard method of operations (optimum conditions) for Beograd Airport is described below: ATC issues a clearance for ILS approach regardless of the Category (I, II, III) flown. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 16-1 Released Issue

60 An aircraft carrying out a CAT ll/lll approach shall not pass the FAF (L KN) before the preceding aircraft has landed. Separation between an aircraft carrying out a CAT ll/lll approach on RWY 12 and an aircraft rolling for take off on RWY 12 shall ensure that the departing aircraft will pass over the ILS localizer antenna before the arriving aircraft reaches a point 2 NM from touchdown. To achieve this, the departing aircraft must commence its take-off run before the arriving aircraft reaches L KN. Pilots of arriving aircraft will be informed about application of ATC procedures for Low visibility operations via RTF or ATIS: "LOW VISIBILITY PROCEDURES IN OPERATION". When RVR at TDZ is less than 550 m and/or cloud base/vertical visibility less than 60 m, the following minima separations are applied: - 6 min or 12 NM, whichever is greater, between two successive arriving aircraft; - between a departing aircraft and an arriving aircraft approaching RWY 12: take-off has to be commenced before the arriving aircraft reaches L KN. Note: During preparations for LVP separation minima for CAT I (5 NM) will be applied. Capacities during adverse weather conditions RWY 12 is suitable for guided Low Visibility Take Off. RWY 30 is suitable for non guided Low Visibility Take Off. The fixed minimum required RVR value for Low Visibility Take Off at Beograd AD is 150 M. Low visibility operations including Category Il/lII approach and landing operations are available and authorized on RWY 12. Low Visibility Procedures become effective when: - RVR at TDZ or at RWY mid-point reaches 550 m downward or less, and/or - cloud base/vertical visibility reaches 60 m (200 ft) downward or less Airport planned development As the Beograd Nikola Tesla airport does not have any capacity problems, there are no action plans regarding its capacity enhancement. However in connection with AOP03, establishment of a Runway Safety Team is planned in due course as a means of preventing runway incursions and optimizing conditions on the runway. Relevant recommendations from EAPRI Edition 2.0 are to be implemented through the Regulation on airports, Regulation on establishing SMS and Regulation for airport maintenance. The implementation of all measures for the prevention of runway incursions is planned by the Airport Operator and the ANSP. The measures implementation will be preceded by a framework Agreement to be concluded between the Airport Operator and SMATSA. LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Chapter 16-2 Released Issue

61 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination (and Part State Context) LSSIP Focal Point for Serbia SMATSA Bojan Savnik LSSIP Focal Point for Civil Aviation Directorate of Serbia CAD Nataša Kočović LSSIP Contact Person for Serbia EUROCONTROL Octvian Cioara Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective AOM13.1 EUROCONTROL Objective Owners DNM: R. BUCUROIU, A. HALLGREN DSS: E. REUBER EUROCONTROL LSSIP Advisor National Specialist(s) O. CIOARA Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Goran Živanović (SMATSA) AOM19 DNM: A. HALLGREN, G. ACAMPORA O. CIOARA Željko Šokčić (SMATSA) AOM20 DNM: R. BUCUROIU, A. HALLGREN O. CIOARA Danijel Miler (SMATSA) AOP01.2 AOP03 AOP04.1 AOP04.2 AOP05 AOP08 AOP09 DNM: P. ADAMSON, M. BIRENHEIDE DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: A. LICU DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: P. ADAMSON, D. BOOTH DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: P. ADAMSON, M. BIRENHEIDE DSS: P. JOPPART DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART P. VRANJKOVIC <.> P. VRANJKOVIC Vladimir Pavlović (CAD) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA) P. VRANJKOVIC Slobodan Kurćubić (SMATSA) P. VRANJKOVIC Slobodan Kurćubić (SMATSA) P. VRANJKOVIC <.> P. VRANJKOVIC <.> P. VRANJKOVIC Vladimir Pavlović (CAD) ATC02.2 DSR: B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) ATC02.5 DSR: B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) ATC02.6 DSR: B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Goran Živanović (SMATSA) ATC02.7 DSR: B. BAKKER, I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) DSR: S. DROZDOWSKI ATC07.1 DNM: B. PETRICEL L. DELL ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA) ATC12 DNM: B. PETRICEL L. DELL ORTO Stojan Bajalica (CAD) Goran Živanović (SMATSA) ATC15 DNM: B. PETRICEL L. DELL ORTO Stojan Bajalica (CAD) Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) ATC16 DSR: J. LAW L. DELL ORTO Nemanja Jović (CAD) Petar Sekulić (CAD) Đorđe Vasiljev (SMATSA) LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Annexes - 1 Released Issue

62 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL LSSIP Advisor ATC17 DNM: B. PETRICEL L. DELL ORTO <.> National Specialist(s) COM09 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET O. ALFARO Nina Tomić (CAD) Miroslav Glavonjić (SMATSA) Danko Erić (SMATSA) COM10 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA Đorđe Metikoš (SMATSA) Marko Trnavac (SMATSA) COM11 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA Irena Goševac (CAD) Natalija Golubović (SMATSA) ENV01 DNM: P. ADAMSON, B. DAY DSS: S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Danijel Šajn (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA) ENV02 DSS: S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL <.> FCM01 DNM: J. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA) FCM03 DNM: G. MATEUCA O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA) GEN01 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT Emir Šišić (CAD) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA) HUM01.1 DNM: M. DAMITZ B. HILL Mara Ćujić (SMATSA) HUM02.1 DNM: A. LICU B. HILL Mara Ćujić (SMATSA) HUM03.1 DNM: A. LICU B. HILL Mara Ćujić (SMATSA) INF04 DSR: P. BOSMAN, A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Emilija Radovanović (SMATSA) Marko Ljubičić (SMATSA) Đorđe Samardžija (SMATSA) ITY-ADQ ITY-AGDL ITY-COTR ITY-FMTP ITY-SPI DSR: P. BOSMAN DSS: M. UNTERREINER DNM: M. ADNAMS DSS: E. CERASI DNM: B. PETRICEL DSS: E. CERASI DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET DSS: E. CERASI DNM: A. DESMOND-KENNEDY DSS: M. BORELY A-P. FRANGOLHO Nina Tomić (CAD) A. KOKONA Nina Tomić (CAD) Zoran Latifić (SMATSA) L. DELL ORTO Nina Tomić (CAD) O. ALFARO Nina Tomić (CAD) Miroslav Glavonjić (SMATSA) A-P. FRANGOLHO NAV03 DSR: F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Gordana Knežević (CAD) Žarko Katančević (CAD) Danijel Šajn (SMATSA) NAV10 DSR: R. FARNWORTH, F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Gordana Knežević (CAD) Danijel Šajn (SMATSA) SAF04 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT Žarko Katančević (CAD) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA) SAF05 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA) SAF10 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT Miroslav Ivošević (CAD) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA) SRC-AUDI DSS: M. DEBOECK - Žarko Katančević (CAD) SRC-CHNG DSS: M. DEBOECK - Žarko Katančević (CAD) SRC-OVCA DSS: M. DEBOECK - Žarko Katančević (CAD) SRC-RLMK DSS: M. DEBOECK - Žarko Katančević (CAD) SRC-SLRD DSS: M. DEBOECK - Žarko Katančević (CAD) <.> LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Annexes - 2 Released Issue

63 Part - Traffic and ATM Performance Area EUROCONTROL Manager EUROCONTROL LSSIP Advisor National Specialist(s) Traffic DNM: D. MARSH A-P. FRANGOLHO Željko Šokčić (SMATSA) Nenad Šakić (SMATSA) En-route Capacity DNM: R. BUCUROIU S. VINCENT A-P. FRANGOLHO Airport Capacity DNM: M.C. MEYER A-P. FRANGOLHO P. VRANJKOVIC Željko Šokčić (SMATSA) Nenad Šakić (SMATSA) Vladimir Pavlović (CAD) Željko Šokčić (SMATSA) Cost-efficiency DSS: C. CAPART A-P. FRANGOLHO Grozdana Banković (CAD) Vladan Krstić (SMATSA) Vukosava Vujović (SMATSA) LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Annexes - 3 Released Issue

64 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts Organisational scheme of the Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Annexes - 4 Released Issue

65 LSSIP Year 2012 Serbia Annexes - 5 Released Issue