Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) FINLAND

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) FINLAND Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for Finland Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-66 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland Edition Date: 25/04/2016 LSSIP Focal Point - Iiro KESKIVÄLI LSSIP Contact Person - Luca DELL ORTO iiro.keskivali@trafi.fi luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int Senior Inspector, ANS Unit DPS/PEPR Status Intended for Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Finland (FI) - LDO\Year 2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_FI Released.docx LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition European ATM Portal Working - Public ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 6 Acronyms and abbreviations 7 LSSIP Documents 8 Finnish AIP 9 FAB Performance Plan LSSIP Year 2015 Finland Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. Edition LSSIP Year 2015 Finland Released Issue

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) FINAVIA CORPORATION Airports Military Authorities... 9 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Finland TAMPERE ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Summer 2015 performance Planning Period Summer Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives Regional Projects Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2015 Finland Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi (CAA Finland), including the role as NSA. Finavia Corporation is the main ATS provider in Finland. It provides air navigation services for the whole country. Finavia also operates 25 airports, including Helsinki Airport, the main airport in Finland and the only one covered by this LSSIP document. The Finnish Meteorological Institute is designated as MET service provider to supply MET data on an exclusive basis in Finland FIR. Trafi, Finavia and FMI report to Ministry of Transport and Communications. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) is the military regulatory body. Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation. Safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by the Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice. Traffic and Capacity The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.1% and 3.5% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.7%. Traffic in Finland increased by 1.4% during Summer 2015 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in En-route traffic decreased by 2.7% during 2015 summer period, and overall en-route traffic in 2015 decreased to an average of 447 flights per day (459 flights/day in 2014). The average en-route delay remained at zero minutes per flight in summer 2015 period. ESSIP Objective Implementation The overall ESSIP objective implementation status in Finland is satisfactory. Finland has been able to complete several objectives during 2015 and for objectives with planned implementation date after the ESSIP FOC date there are implementation plans in place. Finland is late in implementing objectives COM10, which is planned to be completed in 2018, Objectives ITY-FMTP, INF04, ITY-SPI are expected to be implemented in Objective ITY-ADQ is expected to be implemented in LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 1 Released Issue

12 State-related ESSIP Objectives LSSIP Finland * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Implementation of Direct Routing Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 ATC12.1 ATC15 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 * Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 FCM05 FCM06 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID ITY-ADQ Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * ITY-AGVCS2 Implement 8,33 khz air-ground voice channel spacing below FL195 * LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 2 Released Issue

13 LSSIP Finland * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV NAV10 Implement APV procedures * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= EFHK-Helsinki Vantaa Airport AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) * AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 Time Based Separation Initial Airport Operations Plan Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring [PCP] [E] [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures * ENV01 ENV02 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * Understanding the Table Objective Objective Partly Objective No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (Finland / Helsinki airport does not participate in this obj.) Late E= Essential Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 2001 European Union 1995 EASA 2006 ICAO 1949 NATO - - ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Finland FIR (EFIN). Finland FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR), Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a non-ecac State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR). In order to achieve some of the objectives of the ESSIP, Finland ACC co-ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 5 Released Issue

18 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660 (i.e. in excess of the requirements of Achieved ECIP Objective AOM09). AIP Finland is available at: The Finnish Military uses the Metric system in one aircraft type (the L70, a single engine piston trainer). 1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following: - Finnish Transport Safety Agency -Trafi (CAA) the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA - Finavia Corporation - the main ATS provider in Finland; - Finnish Meteorological Institute designated MET provider - Mikkeli airport (EFMI), AFIS service provider; - Seinäjoki airport (EFSI), AFIS service provider; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA) the military regulatory body; - Air Force Command Finland; - Safety Investigation Authority (SIA). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 6 Released Issue

19 Activity in ATM: Rule-making Organisation responsible MoTC, CAA Finland Legal Basis Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Safety Oversight CAA Finland (NSA) Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889) Airspace MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014) Economic MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014) Environment Security Accident investigation Environmental permit authority CAA Finland MoTC, CAA Finland Ministry of Justice, Safety Investigation Authority Environmental permits for airports are granted by permit authority according to Environmental Protection Act 86/2000 and Environmental protection decrees 169/2000 and 713/2014. CAA Finland has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014) Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) Safety Investigation Act (525/2011) The CAA Finland is further detailed in the following sections FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi). It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is institutionally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers. Annual Report published: Y Finnish Transport Safety Agency Annual report can be found via the following link. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland. The current organisation chart is given at Annex B. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 7 Released Issue

20 1.2.2 FINAVIA CORPORATION Services provided Name of the ANSP: Finavia Corporation Governance: Corporation Ownership: 100% State-owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Airport(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training Y Y Y Y Y N Y Others Y Operates Helsinki- Airport and 24 other airports in Finland Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y Finavia annual reports can be found at Finavia s website is found at: Finavia s organisation chart is at Annex B. Finavia organisation is governed by Board of Directors as described in the Annual Report ATC systems in use FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development. EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 24 sites. SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development. EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 24 sites. 1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 8 Released Issue

21 ATC units The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Finland ACC (EFIN) En-route TMA 13 EFIN 13 En-Route sectors from 13th Nov 2014 onwards when a new airspace structure was taken into operation. Helsinki APP 4 EFIN Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors, some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats Airports General information Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 25 state owned airports with ATS, of which 21 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are two non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being coordinated and covered by the LSSIP Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11. In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki airport Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of: - Defence Command Finland; - Air Force Command Finland; - Navy Command Finland; - Army Command Finland; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA). They are supervised by the ministry of Defence. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management. Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs. Information on the application of FUA is in The current organisation chart is given at ANNEX B. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 9 Released Issue

22 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? N/A Level of such legal provision: 1) Finnish Aviation Act Level of such legal provision: 2) Aviation Regulation-series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives) Authority signing such legal provision: 1) Parliament/Head of State (President) Authority signing such legal provision: 2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 3) Director of MAA 4) Commander of Finnish Air Force These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training Y ATCO Training ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Y Additional Information: - Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP National Military AIP N National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip Other: - Other: - Oversight OAT GAT 2 National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A Additional information: - Additional information: - LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 10 Released Issue

23 Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route N Civil ANSP (Finavia) En-Route N Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N Civil ANSP (Finavia) AIS N MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N SAR N Civil ANSP (Finavia) The Military assists civil ARSC on request SAR N TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N Additional Information: Other: Other: N Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Certificate issued by: Additional Information: N If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 11 Released Issue

24 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Finland Finland - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015) IFR flights yearly growth 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F H 1.2% 3.9% 3.3% 3.3% 3.1% 3.9% 2.9% Finland B -5.8% -3.5% 2.0% 0.8% 1.8% 1.4% 1.8% 1.7% 2.1% 1.3% L 0.4% -0.4% -0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 0.5% -0.1% ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8% 2015 Traffic in Finland increased by 1.4% during Summer 2015 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.1% and 3.5% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.7%. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 12 Released Issue

25 2.2 TAMPERE ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays EFINCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/ Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Summer 2015 performance Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap -2.7 % 58 (0%) No The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Airspace re-structurisation (Nov 2014) Maintain number of controllers Starting part of staff located in EFHK WAM impl.in Western Finland (Q4 2014) Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10 ATCOs) Yes Yes No WAM project Postponed UFN due problems with supplier Yes Maximum configuration: feeders Yes 5 sectors were opened Summer 2015 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 39 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 32. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 13 Released Issue

26 2.2.3 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. EFINCTA Annual Summer En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values Capacity Profiles ACC 2015 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Ref. 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% EFIN 58 L 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Open 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% C/R 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Capacity Plan Free Route Airspace NEFRA phase2 (ES and EK to join) Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10ATCOs) CPDLC Maintain number of controllers Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10ATCOs) Possible complete move of ACC to EFHK to be decided Max sectors Max Conf Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 14 Released Issue

27 EFINCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 15 Released Issue

28 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Finland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY- REC AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Local Stakeholders Description: INF04 (Implement integrated briefing): Finavia s comment in LSSIP2014: Due to a complicated combination of several back ground systems, the integrated automated briefing function and corresponding user interface is somewhat a challenging task to develop. However, even if the integrated service is not yet automated, the integrated output is presently carried out manually by the briefing unit in order to give the requested output for the pilot. The automated integrated briefing function software is planned to be developed and operational during year ITY-AGDL (Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285): LSSIP State comment: ATC-Air Ground Data Link services requirements will come into force in the southern part of Finland from 05/02/2018 which is the target date for implementation. Finavia is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfil the regulation requirements with other NEFAB countries, relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by Finavia. ITY-ADQ (Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information): LSSIP DB Comment: special joint-project team has been set up to solve this problem and create a plan for way ahead. COM10 (Migrate from AFTN to AMHS): LSSIP DB Comment: Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but due to delays at regional AMHS center at Copenhagen, transition of connections from Cidin to AMHS are not yet implemented. Transition planned during ITY-FMTP (Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)): LSSIP DB Comment: Finavia ATM System complies with EUROCONTROLl FMTP specification Edition 2.0. Implementation is delayed to be able to create credible cyber security systems to protect ATM System. There are plans on implementing the FMTP by the end of year ITY-COTR (Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes): LSSIP DB Comment: The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations (ASP-08 & ASP-09 by 02/2018). REC (equal to REC ) Corrective actions taken: YES The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs Description: Up-grading of the systems is a continuous process by introducing new functionalities in order to satisfy new regulations and needs. This process is equivalent within NEFAB and as long as the new functionalities are according to the interoperability regulation, there should be no problem despite of the system manufacturer. Within NEFAB we have common project plans for certain ESSIP objectives, e.g. AOM21.2, AOM19 and ITY-AGDL. Such FAB-wide common project planning shall and will take place also for the remaining FAB-wide interconnecting functionalities like e.g. ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP, ATC17, COM09 and COM10. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 16 Released Issue

29 Chapter 4 - National Projects The development of the present ATM system is a continuous process by introducing new functionalities which are mainly originated from the IR regulations and/or ESSIP objectives. The progress of these projects is therefore reflected in the progress of ESSIP objectives in Ch. 6. There are no other projects for public view ongoing at national level at the moment. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 17 Released Issue

30 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination 5.1 FAB Co-ordination North European Functional Airspace Block NEFAB NEFAB was established by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway in NEFAB ANSPs have established a programme with the objective of managing projects and initiatives among the ANSPs in the cooperation. The NEFAB Programme regularly develops and maintains 5 year business plans, and on that basis develops the annual business plans for use by NEFAB ANSPs in order to follow up NEFAB Programme projects and activities. The latest 5 year business plan is covering the period with the annual plan and budget for The 5 year business plan describes the strategies for the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into concrete activities planned for each year with defined deliverables and milestones. In November 2015 The NEFAB Target Concept Scenario 6 was implemented. The Target Concept is defined in the NEFAB Network Plan, composed of key elements being Free Route Airspace, Service Provision, ASM and FUA concepts as well as rules, procedures and ATM functionalities supporting the concept. The FRA is composed of three volumes being Estonia, Finland and Latvia as one seamless FRA above FL95, and Norway above FL135. FRA in Bodø Oceanic will be implemented above FL195 in accordance with the formal ICAO NAT procedures in summer In June 2016 NEFAB FRA will be further developed by implementation of Scenario 8, i.e. NEFAB FRA to be one seamless FRA volume connected seamless with the Danish/Swedish FAB (see Regional Cooperation Initiatives). The individual ANSP s in the FAB-cooperation will implement the required operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 18 Released Issue

31 5.2 FAB Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO) NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) Implement FRA in Bodoe Oceanic NAT region Summer 2016 in accordance with ICAO procedures in NAT region AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV) NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) Implement seamless FRA volume across all NEFAB States Target date 23. June 2016 Active, on time Active, on-time ESSIP:AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM-0401, AOM- 0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A Other: - ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM- 0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 19 Released Issue

32 5.3 Regional cooperation Regional Cooperation Initiatives North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) programme NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB with an agreed concept to implement a continuous an seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). The NEFRA concept is implementation of a seamless interface in Scenario 8 between the two FABs above FL285 (Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 (Scenario 6) was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. Scenario 8 with seamless operations across the two FABs are planned implemented in June Borealis Alliance The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a legal document that sets up a framework for the business co-operation between 9 European ANSPs LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure. In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA)Programme to implement a multi-fab FRA covering 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one FRA volume to our customers (airspace users). NORACON NORACON, the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium, consists of nine members. Swedavia (Swedish airports) and eight European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). The purpose of NORACONs membership in the SESAR Joint Undertaking is to ensure impact from the partners in the development of the future European ATM business. NORACON will have last deliverables in June The consortium is expected to be dissolved around 1st quarter 2017, after all commitments towards the SJU have been dealt with. LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 20 Released Issue

33 5.3.2 Regional Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK) Borealis FRA Borealis FRA NEFRA phase 1 (Scenario 8) NEFRA phase 2 (Scenario 8) Implementation of FRA in London FIR, Interface with neighboring FRA volumes Implementation of FRA in Icelandic Airspace, Interface with neighboring FRA volumes Implementation of FRA in Scottish FIR, Interface with NEFAB and DK/SE FAB FRAs. Implementation of seamless interface of NEFAB FRA and DK/SE FAB FRA above FL285 ATM systems upgrade and IFPS integration End 2021 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 Other: - End of 2018 Active, on-time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM June 2016 Active, on-time Other: - ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Other: - End 2017 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present of improved safety Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Capacity: Present or additional capacity Safety: Present or improved safety LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 21 Released Issue

34 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references OI-Steps: AOM- 0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM- 0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM- 0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas * Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 22 Released Issue

35 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation 6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Partly Not Applicable Multi-N Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 23 Released Issue

36 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 AAMS10a(EN), AIMS19b(EN), AOM0301(OI) Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 31/12/2018 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2018) FCAA Military Authority ASP (By:12/2018) Military Authority Aviation act revised in November Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation expected to be carried out during Aviation act revised in November Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation expected to be carried out during MIL has no service provision role. FINAVIA Implementation and training of staff planned for the year 2018 MIL (By:12/2018) Military Authority Air force has sent a draft to National Regulator about harmonizing national OAT and GAT traffic which is based on EUROAT. National implementation process (civ & milauthority cooperation) planned to continue in /12/ /12/2016 Not Applicable 31/12/ /12/ /12/2017 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AAMS11(EN), AOM0201(OI), AOM0202(OI), AOM0205(OI), AOM0401(OI), DCB0203(OI) Partly Implementation is expected to be on time. 31/12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,NO] ASP (By:12/2016) Military Authority FINAVIA Combined civmil AMCfunction operating (according to published ASMhandbook). Military has no service provision role in Finland. Combined civmil AMCfunction for airspace delegation. Need for actions on implementation of notification process supporting the Rolling ASM/ATFCM process will be reviewed. AUP and UUP in use. Borealis FRA, Phase 1 / Borealis FRA, Phase 2 / NEFRA Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2 Partly 31/12/2016 Partly 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 24 Released Issue

37 AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 AOM0401(OI), AOM0402(OI), AOM0500(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL95 to FL660. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA Not Applicable Not Applicable AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM0401(OI), AOM0402(OI), AOM0501(OI) [E], AOM0502(OI) [E], CM0102A(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] NEFAB wide continous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV,NO] ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA NEFAB wide continous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Borealis FRA, Phase 1 / Borealis FRA, Phase 2 / NEFRA Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2 Partly 31/12/2021 Partly 31/12/2021 AOP03 AO0101(OI) Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 HelsinkiVantaa Airport complies with the requirements set in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (vol 2.0). A Runway Safety Team was established in Finavia's SMS is implemented since [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2013) FCAA All recommendations are implemented. ASP (By:12/2013) FINAVIA A Runway Safety Team was established in EFHK in APO (By:12/2013) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport A Runway Safety Team was established in EFHK in Finavia has implemented a SMS in /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2011 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 25 Released Issue

38 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 AO0201(OI), CTES02b(EN), CTES03b(EN), CTES04b(EN) EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in /03/2011 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2010) FCAA ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in ASP (By:12/2011) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2010) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in Currently EFHK has got ASMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMRs and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in /03/ /03/ /03/2011 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AO0102(OI), AO0201(OI), CTES02b(EN), CTES03b(EN), CTES04b(EN) EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport HelsinkiVantaa Airport ASMGCSsystem fulfills ETSI EN v1.1.1 and ETSI EN v1.2.1 specifications being ASMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which are not yet in operational use. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2017) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport HelsinkiVantaa Airport ASMGCSsystem fulfills ETSI EN v1.1.1 and ETSI EN v1.2.1 specifications being ASMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which are not yet in operational use. The equipment installed is a Mode Sbased vehicle transponder with GPSreceiver Partly 31/12/2017 Partly 31/12/ /06/2010 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 26 Released Issue

39 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO0501(OI), AO0601(OI), AO0602(OI), AO0603(OI) EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport CDM was implemented at HelsinkiVantaa in /12/2012 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA CDM was implemented at HelsinkiVantaa in 2012 APO (By:12/2016) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport CDM was implemented in /12/ /12/2012 Time Based Separation [PCP] AOP10 Not Applicable [Essential] not applicable AO0303(OI) [E] EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) AOP11 AO0801A(OI) [E] Initial Airport Operations Plan EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] Not applicable [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 27 Released Issue

40 AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring not applicable AERODROMEATC36(EN), AO0104A(OI) [E] EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) [PCP] [Essential] Not applicable [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) Not Applicable ATC02.5 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. 30/04/2012 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA Implemented in /04/2012 ATC02.6 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). 30/04/2012 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA MSAW processing is included in operational systems (Eurocat). 30/04/2012 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 28 Released Issue

41 ATC02.7 CM0801(OI) Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Implemented in /10/2012 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA Implemented in /10/2012 ATC07.1 TS0102(OI) Implement AMAN tools and procedures EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. 30/11/2005 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2015) FINAVIA Initial arrival management tool functionality is completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs. 30/11/2005 ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM0202(OI), CM0203(OI), CM0205(OI), CM0207A(OI) 31/12/2021 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA Original ATC12, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRAairspace needs. 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 29 Released Issue

42 ATC15 TS0305(OI) Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 in the year 2000, this feature is included in the HelsinkiVantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000 ATC16 PROAC21(EN) Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been implemented in Finland. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2015) FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. ASP (By:03/2012) FINAVIA MIL (By:12/2015) Military Authority Training completed in ACAS performance monitoring has been in place since Transport type aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft. 31/12/ /12/ /05/ /12/2013 ATC17 CM0201(OI) Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Fully completed and operational between FinlandEstonia 6/ /06/2014 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2018) FINAVIA Fully completed and operational between FinlandEstonia 6/ /06/2014 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 30 Released Issue

43 COM10 CTEC06c(EN) Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but due to delays at regional AMHS center at Copenhagen, transition of connections from Cidin to AMHS are not yet implemented. Transition planned during [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2014) FINAVIA Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but due to delays at regional AMHS center at Copenhagen, transition of connections from Cidin to AMHS are not yet implemented. Transition planned during Finavia is presently building PENSbackbone. As soon as the PENSBB will be ready we will start to test it with EKCH and with the other COM centers. implementation of the gateways will take place Q4/2016. Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 COM11 CTEC05a(EN) Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 This objective is expected to be implemented within the given timeframe. 31/12/2020 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2020) FINAVIA Implementation will occur within given timeframe, except that NSA will be notified in /12/2020 ENV01 AOM0701(OI) Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2013) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2013) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2009 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 31 Released Issue

44 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO0703(OI), AO0705(OI), AO0706(OI) EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport Finavia's cooperation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2016) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport As an Airport and Air Navigation Service Provider Finavia is having a constant cooperation with Airline Operators. The cooperation has been in place for several years. The MoA on CDO procedures is the main achievement of this cooperation so far. Discussions to set up the official CEM collaboration according to Eurocontrol guidance have been started. Issues pertaining to CEM are discussed at least thrice a year together with airport and aircraft operators. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2009 FCM01 IS0102(OI) Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Objective has been completed. 31/03/2009 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:07/2014) FINAVIA /11/2010 FCM03 IS0102(OI) Implement collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year /12/2017 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA Functionality installed and available but problems so far at NM within processing of AFPmessages correctly, causes that full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2017 according to revised plan for FCM03 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 32 Released Issue

45 FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Not Applicable not applicable DCB0205(OI) N/A [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2015) FINAVIA N/A Not Applicable FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM0202(OI), AOM0205(OI), DCB0102(OI), DCB0103A(OI) [E], IS0901A(OI) [E] [PCP] [Essential] Plans exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP, starting project during Application for INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2017) Military Authority FINAVIA APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Plans exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP, starting project during Application for INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP, starting Application for INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/ /12/2017 Not Applicable 31/12/ /12/ /12/2017 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM0101(OI), CM0103A(OI) [E], IS0102(OI) [PCP] [Essential] according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 33 Released Issue

46 INF04 IS0201(OI) Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in /12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2012) FINAVIA Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in However, even if the integrated service is not yet automated, the integrated output is presently carried out manually by the briefing unit in order to give the requested output for the pilot. Late Late 31/12/2016 INF07 AIMS16(EN) Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed on time. 31/05/2018 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:05/2018) FCAA Planning in progress. ASP (By:05/2018) FINAVIA Planning in progress APO (By:05/2018) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Planning in progress Late 31/05/ /05/ /05/2018 ITYACID GSURV0101(EN) Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 Planning in progress, see ASP comment. 02/01/2020 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:01/2020) FINAVIA Planning in progress, the A/C link and ACID capability will be technically ready 06/2015 as ARTAS and WAM will become operational and necessary software (DAPS, Downlinked Aircraft ParameterS) for ATMsystem TopSky will be installed. The operational use of ACID is planned to happen country wide Q1/2017 when the WAM covers entire Finland FIR. Helsinki Airport may become operational for ACID already 2015 but final decision has not yet been done. 02/01/2020 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 34 Released Issue

47 ITYADQ IS0202(OI), IS0204(OI) Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 The requirements of this objective are considered extremely challenging to meet by /06/2017 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:06/2017) FCAA REG03 is challenging to meet within the timeframe of the objective ASP (By:06/2017) FINAVIA APO (By:06/2017) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Many of the requirements are obviously fullfilled but there is a dispute about which organisation should be responsible for reporting of various requirements. Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. A special jointproject team has been set up to solve this problem and create a plan for way ahead during year Many of the requirements are obviously fullfilled but there is a dispute about which organisation should be responsible for reporting of various requirements. Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. A special jointproject team has been set up to solve this problem and create a plan for way ahead during year Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 AUO0301(OI), CTEC02b(EN) ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 ATCAir Ground Data Link services requirements will come into force in the southern part of Finland from 05/02/2018 which is the target date for implementation. Finavia is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements with other NEFAB countries, relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by Finavia. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV] REG (By:02/2018) FCAA ASP (By:02/2018) ATCAir Ground Data Link services requirements will come into force in the southern part of Finland from 05/02/2018, which is the target date for implementation. Finavia is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements, relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by Finavia. FINAVIA MIL (By:01/2019) Military Authority No plans to equip current transporttype State aircrafts with data link capabilities. 05/02/ /02/ /02/ /01/2014 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 35 Released Issue

48 ITYAGVCS2 CTEC01a(EN) Implement 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Finland is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule 31/12/2018 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2018) FCAA ASP (By:12/2018) Military Authority The requirements are planned to implemented within the given timeframe. Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule FINAVIA MIL (By:12/2020) Military Authority APO (By:12/2018) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Military Authority MIL has no service provision role. Need for exemptions (8,33kHz radios) for tactical aircraft will be reviewed. Need for manual updates and training will be reviewed within timescale. Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 36 Released Issue

49 ITYCOTR CM0201(OI) Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018 The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:02/2018) FINAVIA according to the regulations (1032/2006, 29/2009 and 30/2009). MIL (By:12/2012) Military Authority Integrated civilmilitary airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. Partly 05/02/2018 Partly 05/02/2018 Not Applicable 31/12/2012 ITYFMTP CTEC06(EN) Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 There are plans on implementing the FMTP by the end of year /12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2014) FINAVIA to implement IPv6 by the end of year MIL (By:12/2014) Military Authority Integrated civilmilitary airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. Late Late 31/12/2016 Not Applicable 31/12/2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 37 Released Issue

50 ITYSPI GSURV0101(EN) Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 This Objective is expected to be late due to upgrade of the surveillance system. 30/12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:02/2015) FCAA ASP (By:02/2015) FINAVIA MIL (By:06/2020) Military Authority This Objective is expected to be late due to upgrade of the surveillance system. Finavia has started a surveillance system renewal/enhancement project ( ) which, among other developments, will bring in full mode S capability. All ANSP related items in ITYSPI will be taken care within the scope of this project. The project has been delayed due to WAM system provider delays. Some of the transport type aircraft have MODE S capabilities. No plan to update other aircrafts. Late Late 30/12/2016 Late 30/12/2016 Not Applicable 28/02/2015 NAV03 Implementation of PRNAV Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 AOM0601(OI), AOM0602(OI), CTEN08(EN) PRNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 31/12/2012 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] ASP (By:12/2023) FINAVIA PRNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from PRNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and PRNAV routes have been implemented. 30/11/2005 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 38 Released Issue

51 NAV10 Implement APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AOM0602(OI), AOM0604(OI), CTEN06a(EN), CTEN06b(EN) Partly APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year /12/2016 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:04/2016) FCAA ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA Plans exist to publish national regulatory material based on EASA AMC 2027 and EASA AMC 2028 by 04/2016. APV/Baro/VNAV procedures are published for 75% of RWY ends. The publication of the remaining part will be accomplished by the end of /04/2016 Partly 31/12/2016 SAF10 CM0801(OI) Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 The European Action Plan Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction has been implemented 31/12/2011 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:12/2011) FCAA The European Action plan is implemented. ASP (By:12/2011) FINAVIA MIL (By:12/2011) Military Authority The European Action plan is implemented. Examples of implemented measures can be found at SAF10ASP01 Air Force is using "Operational Risk Management (ORM) for Flight Safety"system to minimize risk for Airspace Infringement. 31/12/ /12/2011 Not Applicable 31/12/2011 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 39 Released Issue

52 SAF11 PRO006a(EN) Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015 [Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ] REG (By:01/2018) FCAA ASP (By:12/2014) The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented utilising the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan. FINAVIA Requirements fulfilled during APO (By:12/2014) Military Authority HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Requirements fulfilled during /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2014 LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 40 Released Issue

53 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 41 Released Issue

54

55 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Finland Finnish Transport Safety Agency LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport Safety Agency Iiro KESKIVÄLI Iiro KESKIVÄLI LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Finavia Corporation Pekka VIRTANEN LSSIP Focal Point for Airport - - LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Finland DPS/PEPR Luca DELL'ORTO ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) A. DYBOWSKA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Heikki ISOMAA AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Heikki ISOMAA AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Heikki ISOMAA AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Timo SUORTO AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Heikki ISOMAA ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Jari TOIVONEN ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Osmo NIEMINEN COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Osmo NIEMINEN LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 42 Released Issue

56 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Heikki ISOMAA FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO Heikki ISOMAA INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Salli LEHERVO INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Jussi KIVELÄ National Stakeholder Specialist(s) ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Matti ETELÄPÄÄ ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Jussi KIVELÄ ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Jari TOIVONEN ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Osmo NIEMINEN ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Jari TOIVONEN ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Matti ETELÄPÄÄ NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Matti ETELÄPÄÄ SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Heikki ISOMAA SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Heikki ISOMAA LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 43 Released Issue

57 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts Finnish Transport Safety Agency Finavia LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 44 Released Issue

58 Finnish Air Force LSSIP Year 2015 Finland 45 Released Issue