Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for Austria Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-55 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria Edition Date: 10/05/2016 LSSIP Focal Point - Martin Stieber LSSIP Contact Person - Agnieszka Dybowska Status Martin.Stieber@austrocontrol.at agnieszka.dybowska@eurocontrol.int Intended for Manager ATM Int l Program Coordination Unit DPS/PEPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Austria (AT) - AD\Year 2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_Austria Released.docx LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition European ATM Portal Working - Public ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 6 Acronyms and abbreviations 7 LSSIP Documents 8 National AIP 9 RP2 FAB Performance Plan Latest FABCE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fab-ce.eu LSSIP Year 2015 Austria Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan Edition LSSIP Year 2015 Austria Released Issue

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 5 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) ANSP(s) Airports Military Authorities Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Austria VIENNA ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays Summer 2015 performance Planning Period Summer Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB Projects Regional cooperation Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ANNEXES Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts Annex C Glossary of Abbreviations LSSIP Year 2015 Austria Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context NSA: Austria signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ICAO regarding the USOAP CMA. According to the MOU, Austria agreed to an ICVM, which was conducted from 15 to 21 July The mission evaluated the status of implementation of the latest CAP of the State on the USOAP F&Rs and resulted in an updated overall EI of per cent. Austro Control: In November 2015, ATM System TOPSKY was fully deployed for Approach/TWR Wien plus Local APP Units. Since this date, all ATC units are commonly using one single ATM system. Military Control Centre: In November 2015, ATM System TOPSKY was fully deployed for MCC, plus enhanced monitoring and evaluation of TRAs. MIL: The MIL Authority in Austria is the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS) Traffic and Capacity Traffic and capacity in 2015 ACC: Traffic increase in 2015 was +1.7%. Summer 2015 performance assessment: ATFM delay target derived from RP2 was 0.21 min/flight, actually ACC produced only 0.09 min delay per flight. The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 194, 3% higher than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 187 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 170. APP/TWR Wien: Traffic decreased by 1.4%, producing 1.05 min delay per arriving flight (Delay reasons: majority weather delays, and to a small extent the implementation of the new ATM system for APP/TWR Wien in November) ESSIP Objective Implementation Quick implementation status of the objectives: : 21 Partly : 1 : 15 Late: 4 No Plan: 0 Outside applicability area: FCM04 (Short Term ATFCM Measures / STAM phase 1). Although FAB CE and Austria are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, a FAB CE wide STAM Live Trial was executed in September 2015, and based on preliminary results (the final Report on the Operational Trial will be published Q1/2016), FABCE states agreed to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 1 Released Issue

12 Problems in completing objectives due for (status late): AOM19 (Advanced Airspace Management): although AMC has been established since March 2010, the implementation of the local ASM support system interoperable with the NM system (LARA tool) is conceived by mid AOP05 (Airport CDM): CDM has been locally implemented, but connectivity with Network Manager (DPI message) is pending. Implementation foreseen by mid ATC7.1 (AMAN tools/procedures): Full AMAN functionality for Vienna is conceived to be operational by end of 2017, in alignment with the TopSky ATM system development. ITY-ADQ (quality of aeronautical data and information): A pattern for a formal arrangement has been developed and issued by Austro Control and approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators), but not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on Plans for completing objectives due for 2016 and 2017 AOM21.2 (Implement Free route Airspace): In close coordination within FABCE, Slovenia and Austria are planning a cross border FRA application between the two ACCs in November ATC2.6 (MSAW level2): This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, whereas the full rollout of the TopSky-Safety Net Server for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place by end of ATC2.7 (APP Path monitor): The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid FCM03 (collaborative flight planning): Collaborative flight planning was already fully implemented, but after the deployment of the new ATM System, it turned out that one action - the AFP activation and provision - has been wrongly implemented. Time for correction is under discussion to reach the final operational capability by end of 2017 at the latest. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 2 Released Issue

13 State-related ESSIP Objectives LSSIP Austria * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Implementation of Direct Routing Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 ATC12.1 ATC15 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 * Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 FCM05 FCM06 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID ITY-ADQ Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * ITY-AGVCS2 Implement 8,33 khz air-ground voice channel spacing below FL195 * LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 3 Released Issue

14 LSSIP Austria * FOC Date implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV NAV10 Implement APV procedures * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= LOWW-Vienna International Airport AOP04.1 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) * AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 Time Based Separation Initial Airport Operations Plan Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring [PCP] [E] [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures * ENV01 ENV02 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports * Understanding the Table Objective Objective Partly Objective No Plan Missing Data Not Applicable (Austria does not participate in this obj.) Late E= Essential Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 4 Released Issue

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 5 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Austria is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation ECAC Since 1955 EUROCONTROL 1993 European Union 1995 EASA 2003 ICAO 1948 NATO N/A Partnership for peace since 1995 ITU Geographical description of the FIR(s) FIR WIEN is surrounded by FIRs of 8 States, namely Germany, (FIR Munchen), Czech Republic (FIR Praha), Slovak Republic (FIR Bratislava), Hungary (FIR Budapest), Slovenia (FIR Ljubljana), Italy (FIR Milano), Switzerland (FIR Zurich) and Croatia (FIR Zagreb) as adjacent FIR to the MURA Sector (Slovenian Airspace) which is delegated to Austria. Further details to be found in Austrian eaip: LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 6 Released Issue

18 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation To see recent details, open the following www-link and refer to Part II ENR 1.4: National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Austria are the following: - The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which is part of the MoTIT and which performs the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivilluftfahrt Behörde), - The Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (MoTIT / NSA), - Austro Control Luftfahrtagentur (LFA), NSA for civil ATCO licensing. - The Accident Investigation Board which is an independent Body within the MoTIT, - Austro Control, the sole ANS Provider in Austria, - The Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports: Joint Forces Command / Air. Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the figure below: Institutional Arrangements and Links Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD) Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology as supreme CAA / NSA (MoTIT) Joint Forces Command / Air AUSTRO CONTROL Other main National Stakeholders are the 6 main Airports in Austria. They are operated by public and public/private enterprises. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 7 Released Issue

19 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) General information Civil Aviation in Austria is the responsibility of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (M of TIT) which represents Austria at the EUROCONTROL Decision Making Bodies. The Regulator is institutionally separated from the ANS Service Provider. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is part of the MoTIT (Oberste Zivilluftfahrtbehörde). The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Civil Aviation Authority is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) Safety Oversight NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section. 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are described in AASREF (ministerial decree) and NSA directive for ongoing oversight. Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c, d and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are described in AASREF (ministerial decree) and NSA directive for ongoing oversight. Airspace CAA/Austro Control Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 119, 120 a,c and section 124. Economic NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Refer to FAB CE performance plan RP2 Environment NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Refer to FAB CE performance plan RP2 Security CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. Accident investigation SUB (Sicherheitsuntersuchungsstelle des Bundes) 136 Aviation Act and 2 UUG 2005, BGBl. I Nr. 123/ Austrian Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) MoTIT incorporates the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which performs at the same time the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehörde). ATM Safety occurrence analysis is done by the ANSP and there is a separate Accident Investigation Board as an independent body within the MoTIT; details can be found in chapter CAA Web site is the same as the NSA one: Annual Report published: Y To ensure conformity with Art. 12, Commission Regulation (EC) 549/2004, continuous reporting takes place through EASA Audit Reports, answering of pilot procedures and the LSSIP reporting process. An organisational chart of MoTIT is given in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 8 Released Issue

20 1.2.2 ANSP(s) Services provided AustroControl GmbH Name of the ANSP: Austro Control Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zivilluftfahrt mbh Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Republic of Austria Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training SAR Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Others Y Certification of Aircraft, Pilot licensing, Medical check for pilots and ATCOs Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y German regional airports (ATS-TWR for 9 German regional Airports) Annual Report published: Y The latest annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP in 2014 can be found under: figures Address of ANSP website: An organisational chart is given in Annex B ANSP Meteo Serve Wetterdienst GmbH Name of the ANSP: Meteo Serve Wetterdienst GmbH Governance: GmbH Ownership: 100% Austro Control Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS N N N N N MET Y certified MET-Provider, no designation ATCO training SAR Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Annual Report published: N N N N N LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 9 Released Issue

21 ATC systems in use FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES: TOPSKY system within COOPANS alliance AVIBIT: for all main TWRs, using the Electronic Flight strip system DIFLIS Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? A major upgrade of the TOPSKY took place in November 2015, integrating the terminal areas and MIL Control Centre. Upcoming releases in line with COOPANS enhancements up to twice per year. Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? First deployment of TOPSKY took place in So, no plans yet, as the current system is considered as a new one. ATC Unit ACC and APP Wien, all Local Approach Units plus TWRs (linked with the DIFLIS system), VFSS (Vienna Flight Service Station) SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit Thales, using ARTAS tracker continuously, 1-2 upgrades/year No ACC, APP/ TWR Vienna, Local APP Units, MCC ATC units The ATC units in the Austrian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Wien ACC Max 18 ** Refer to The hardware/software configuration of the A-ATMS allows a theoretical maximum of 18 elementary sectors The current demand is served by a maximum of 12 sectors (during daytime). Wien APP 6 FIR Praha, Bratislava and Budapest TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building SALZBURG 1 LAU* SALZBURG INNSBRUCK 1 LAU* INNSBRUCK LINZ 1 LAU* LINZ GRAZ 1 LAU* GRAZ KLAGENFURT 1 LAU* KLAGENFURT * LAU=Local Approach Unit ** Note that the number of sectors, as indicated in this Table, is the maximum number of civilian control sectors that can be operated simultaneously by the unit, provided there is sufficient availability of ATCOs. Due to FRQ limitations a theoretical maximum of 16 sectors can be achieved. 1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 10 Released Issue

22 1.2.3 Airports General information The main airports in Austria are operated by public and public/private enterprises. They are listed in the table below. As the sole ANS Provider, Austro Control provides Air Traffic Services at the airports. Terminal Airspace (TMA or equivalent) Airport Controlled by WIEN WIEN/ SCHWECHAT TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building SALZBURG SALZBURG LAU* INNSBRUCK INNSBRUCK LAU* LINZ LINZ LAU* GRAZ GRAZ LAU* KLAGENFURT KLAGENFURT LAU* * LAU = Local Approach Unit Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: WIEN Schwechat Military Authorities The Military Authority in Austria is the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS). The Military Aviation Division = Abteilung Militaerluftfahrt (MLF) is part of the Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS) and is responsible for Air Traffic Management (ATM) plus Air Navigation Services (ANS). Co-ordination with Ministry of Transport at strategic level is done via the CIV/MIL ATS coordination board = Lenkungsausschuss Flugsicherung (LAF). The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil/military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC). Day-to-day co-ordination of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is handled at the tactical level between Austro Control and representatives of the Military Control Centre (MCC). Austro Control is the sole Austrian ATS provider and allocates airspace to military units on a temporary basis. Military ATS is normally provided only to OAT, and additionally to GAT within Military Training Areas (MTA) on and around Air Force bases. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 11 Released Issue

23 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law, Aviation Act Level of such legal provision: Y Authority signing such legal provision: Austrian Government These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Authority signing such legal provision: MOD / MLF These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y Additional Information: N/A Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y Aircrew Training Y ESARRs as applicable Y Aircrew Licensing Y SES legislation as applicable Y Additional Information: N/A Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N/A National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: Aeronautical Charts Y Other: Aeronautical Charts Y Y Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: MoD Additional information: N/A For TRG and licensing of MIL ATC personnel GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Y Additional information: N/A MIL NSA Service Provision role Services Provided: OAT Services Provided: En-Route Y En-Route within MIL TRG Areas Y Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y MIL Training Area (MTA) monitoring LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 12 Released Issue GAT AIS Y AIS Y MET Y MET Y SAR Y SAR Y Y FIS Y Other: N/A Other: N/A

24 Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: N/A N/A Y User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: Y No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: N/A Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Austria applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 13 Released Issue

25 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Austria 1,600,000 Austria - Annual IFR Movements 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 IFR flights 800, , ,000 IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast 200,000 0 IFR movements - Low forecast 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015) IFR flights yearly growth 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F H 2.2% 4.4% 4.3% 4.0% 3.3% 4.1% 3.1% Austria B -1.8% -1.7% 3.4% 1.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.4% 2.6% 1.9% L 1.3% 0.0% 0.4% 1.3% 1.0% 1.2% 0.6% ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8% 2015 Traffic in Austria (ACC plus INN corridor) increased by 0.6% during Summer 2015 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during In total for 2015, traffic increased by 1.7% compared to The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an annual traffic growth of between 0.8% and 4.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.5%. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 14 Released Issue

26 2.2 VIENNA ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/ Summer 2015 performance Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +0.5 % 194 (+3%) No The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.04 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 to 0.15 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were due to Weather, 22% due to staffing and 8% due to ATC capacity Capacity Plan 5 % Achieved Comments DCTs H24/ in parallel ops with ATS routes Yes Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Additional layer top sector Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Data link (Oct 2014) Recruitment to maintain staff level SYSCO with neighbouring units Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Participation in FABCE STAM Live Trial 09/2015 Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Yes Maximum configuration: 13 sectors Yes Maximum 12 sectors needed Summer 2015 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 194, 3% higher than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 187 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 170. Actual observed peak was higher. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 15 Released Issue

27 2.2.3 Planning Period Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LOVVCTA Annual Summer 2015 baseline LOVV 194 En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) H % 230 4% 239 4% 249 4% Ref % 224 4% 230 3% 235 2% L 208 7% 211 1% 215 2% 220 2% Open 207 7% 216 4% 221 2% 225 2% C/R 196 1% 200 2% 205 2% 209 2% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Capacity Plan DCTs H24/ in parallel ops with ATS routes Cross border DCTs FAB intern & with adjacent ACCs where possible November 2016 SAXFRA Stepwise increase of FAB CE wide cross border FRA applications ASM AMAN LOWW full FAB CE wide cross border application of DCT/FRA H24 Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Recruitment to maintain staff level Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels 3 rd Runway Munich Max sectors Capacity increase p.a. 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% Reference profile 11% 4% 3% 2% N/A Profile Current routes 1% 2% 2% 2% N/A Additional information Capacity planning ACC Vienna is based on C/R. In case the political or financial situation changes, they are prepared to cope with an expected traffic increase on the shortest route LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 16 Released Issue

28 LOVVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook Vienna ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 17 Released Issue

29 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Austria for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. REC Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY- AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: All the above indicated Objectives are completed, except ITY-ADQ. For details refer to the elaboration in Chapter 6. Description: See above and ITY-ADQ REC (equal to REC ) Corrective actions taken: YES The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs Description: ANSPs within FAB CE had been coordinating their system renewal and capability evolution mainly through the following activities: CNS Cost Containment Task Force, Project 10 (technical harmonization and optimization) and Project 1 (FRA Study activity 5). The following systems deployment and upgrades have been and are being coordinated among FAB CE ANSPs: regional data network X-BONE (communication infrastructure), surveillance infrastructure (including SUR data exchange) and (currently as a study) ATM system upgrade supporting FRA. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 18 Released Issue

30 Chapter 4 - National Projects The main national projects currently ongoing in Austro Control are depicted in the table below. Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references (AT) etod Database Phase 1 (AIM / ATM System) Implementati on of Voice over IP technology (COM Services) 8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 (COM Services ) ATM system and Sub- System evolution for COTR (ATM System) Mode S and WAM establish a Data base and basic software including GUI to collect the required terrain and obstacle data. Implementation of Voice over IP technology for all ATM units According to EU IR 1079/2012, the conversion to 8,33 khz will be implemented below FL195, including Airport VIE. Implementation of OLDI messages according to national and FAB roadmap - Transfer of Communication - Transfer of Coordination As of 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation within FIR Wien (more than 50% of the implementati on of the etod requirement s is planned to be ready by May ongoing ESSIP:INF07 OI-Steps: - Other: ongoing ESSIP:COM11 31st December 2018 Dependent on bilateral implementati on until 2016 ongoing OI-Steps: - Other: - ESSIP:ITY-AGVCS2 OI-Steps: - Other: - ongoing ESSIP:ATC17, ITY- COTR OI-Steps: CM-0201 Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity: - Safety: detailed and more precise Terrain and Obstacle data Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: - Capacity: - Safety: improved information consistency Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: improved FAB interoperability Capacity: - Safety: The justification results from operator s obligation from 1st January 2018 not to operate an aircraft in airspace where carriage of radio is required unless the aircraft radio equipment has the 8,33 khz channel spacing capability. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: - End 2016 ongoing ESSIP:ITY-ACID Capacity: - Capacity: reduced ATCO workload Safety: interoperability for improved consistency and improved safety net performance Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: - LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 19 Released Issue

31 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references implementati on (SUR Service) traffic) is the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A-WAM. The remaining Local Approach Units' A- WAM segments will be operational by end of Nonetheless, the ACID requirements have been fulfilled for the whole FIR Wien since mid OI-Steps: - Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: improved FAB interoperability according to FAB CE ACID Implementation Plan LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 20 Released Issue

32 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination 5.1 FAB Co-ordination Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are part of FAB CE. The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies - the FAB CE Council, NSA Coordination Committee and Joint Civil-Military Airspace Coordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) have been established. The air navigation service providers of the FAB CE countries established and signed the foundation deed of a joint venture on 17 October 2014, at Brnik, Slovenia - FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd. The company is responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of the FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union. The FAB CE Strategy was finalized and approved in June 2014, driven by a need to move towards seamless operations in a way that ensures safe and efficient operations. The document describes the environment in which FAB CE is being developed and defines strategic objectives and targets in order to meet the SES performance requirements. The four priority areas are: Performance, Safety, Free Route Airspace and EU targets. A FAB CE Performance Plan (for AT, CZ, HR, HU, SI and SK) was adopted and signed by FCC representatives. In June 2015 it was sent to the European Commission for final approval. An Inter-FAB Cooperation Agreement at ANSP level between DANUBE FAB and FAB Central Europe was signed on 14 October Through the signature of this Agreement, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE have created a framework for cooperation for nine ANSPs. Establishing a flexible cooperation mechanism, the agreement will contribute towards the safe, efficient and optimised provision of air navigation services. The Agreement supports the Single European Sky legislation, with the aim of providing a safer, more cost-efficient, environment-friendly and performance-driven service. The areas of cooperation under the Agreement include the areas of operations, technical, training, performance and safety. FAB CE actively participated also at the Inter-FAB Coordination Platform Workshop in October Two Social Dialogue forums were held, in May and November 2015, with a wide variety of participants ANSP CEOs, FAB CE program management, social partners and trade unions. Two major milestones were achieved at the Social Dialogue Forums: the Social Dialogue Charter was amended, paving the way for the FAB CE Alpe Adria Alliance to officially join the Social Dialogue; the second one is the signing of the ATCO Mobility Paper by the CEO Committee and the ATCO unions. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 21 Released Issue

33 5.2 FAB Projects Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas ASP ANS CR (CZ), (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning (FAB CE P1) Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes (FAB CE P3) 'The objective of P1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept. The project will implement the FAB CE FRA study ( Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea project) which will include a simulation exercise to validate the concept and define requirements for the individual ATM systems. The study will also assess the feasibility of implementation FABCE FRA operations with the potential extension to neighbouring FABs (particularly to FABEC and Danube FAB). The objective of the project is to optimise the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP/DM Activity Areas. The project achieved most of its original objectives and is currently being redefined to meet the STAM and FUA/ASM requirements stemming from SESAR DP. A new follow-on project will be initiated in Initiation: Initiation: Ongoing activity Ongoing activity ESSIP:AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM-0401 Other: DP Family ESSIP:AOM19, FCM05 OI-Steps: AOM- 0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, DCB- 0203, DCB-0102 Other: DP Family Capacity: Improve performance (capacity, - flight efficiency), implementation of FUA, implementation of the agreed Airspace Plan; Contribute to achieve following performance indicators: Capacity: to increase capacity to cope with the increase of around 60% in traffic in 2017 with a maximum delay of 0.3 minutes Safety: - Environment: 11% saving in horizontal flight efficiency by saving 2.1 km deviations (millions) from GCD and saving 23,000 tonnes of Annual CO2 in Cost-Efficiency: Improvement over 2006 in ATM/CNS costs per flight hour and achieve 469 of economic costs per flight hour in Capacity: Improve performance through implementation of regular processes for the functional integration of pre-tactical ASM/ATFCM processes and STAM; enhance civil-military cooperation and contributing to full application of FUA in FAB CE airspace. Safety: - Environment: See "Capacity" Cost-Efficiency: See "Capacity" LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 22 Released Issue

34 Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE P13) Training Facilities (FAB CE P14) ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15) The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The coordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities. The project was frozen in The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources. The project has been frozen in The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs. The project was frozen in Initiation: Initiation: Initiation: Frozen in 2015 Frozen in 2015 Frozen in 2015 ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: - ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: - ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: - Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Cost-efficiency of training Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility. Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Improve cost-effciency, mitigation of financial risks LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 23 Released Issue

35 The following projects from the 2014 LSSIP list of FAB projects were closed in 2015: FAB CE P2 Flexible, Efficient and Safe Operations - in 2015, remaining activities transferred to P1, FAB CE P5 - Regional Communications Infrastructure Development - Closed in 2015; a follow-on project dealing with the X-bone hardware upgrade will be imitated in 2016, FAB CE P6 - Frequency management - Closed in 2015; remaining activities transferred to other projects and activities, FAB CE P8 Contingency - Closed in 2015 FAB CE P10 - Technical Services harmonisation and optimisation - Closed in 2015; remaining activities transferred to other projects and activities which will be initiated in 2016, FAB CE P16 - Air Ground Data Link -Closed in The following projects were deleted from the 2014 LSSIP list of FAB projects (closed before 2015): FAB CE P4 FMTP implementation, FAB CE P7 Safety, FAB CE P9 ANSP Performance Review Process, FAB CE P11 Coordination of FAB CE common approach to Aircraft Identification. 5.3 Regional cooperation No specific regional projects LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 24 Released Issue

36 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation 6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC No Plan EU+ Partly Not Applicable Multi-N Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 25 Released Issue

37 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) the described objectives are planned, respectively will be closely monitored within the European and FABCE context. National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date. REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority National agreements between MoD and MoT (Ressortbereinkommen) will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date. National agreements between MoD and MoT (Ressortbereinkommen) will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date. to be based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) 'Ressortübereinkommen' to be based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) 'Ressortübereinkommen' planned to be based on the agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) 'Ressortübereinkommen' 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2018 AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AMC has been implemented and is fully operational since March Further enhancements are planned according to the described objective process and common FABCE implementations in the context of ASM System Support tool LARA, which is going to be implemented by mid CDRs are operationally used according to the ASM handbook. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2016) Mil. Aviation Authority AMC has been implemented and is fully operational since March Further enhancements are planned according to the described objective process and common FABCE implementations. CDRs are operationally used according to the ASM handbook. As a follow up procedure and in favour of an interoperable system, the decision for the future ASM support system LARA was made, to be implemented by mid of AMC has been implemented and is fully operational since March Further enhancements are planned according to the described objective process and common FABCE implementations. CDRs are operationally used according to the ASM handbook. As a follow up procedure and in favour of an interoperable system, the decision for the future ASM support system LARA was made, to be implemented by mid of Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 26 Released Issue

38 AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 [PCP] [Essential] Within the AoR of ACC Wien, Direct Routing Airspace has been identified and DCT Connections have been continuously implemented from FL165 / FL245 up to FL660. Coordination with NM via RNDSG and ERNIP publication goes without saying; the RAD has also been updated accordingly.\under the umbrella of the overall FABCE airspace planning, this step has been elaborated and coordinated with all FABCE Partners. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2017) Within the AoR of ACC Wien, Direct Routing Airspace has been identified and DCT Connections have been continuously implemented from FL165 / FL245 up to FL660. Coordination with NM via RNDSG and ERNIP publication goes without saying; the RAD has also been updated accordingly. Under the umbrella of the overall FABCE airspace planning, this step has been elaborated and coordinated with all FABCE Partners. 10/12/ /12/2015 AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] In fulfilment of the FABCE FRA Roadmap, the first implementation of Free Route Airspace will be achieved in conjunction with a FRA cross border application between Slovenia and Austria in November 2016 ( SAXFRA ). The cross border area will vertically extend from ground up to FL660 (partly FL460) and comprise the Areas of Responsibility of Austro Control (east of Rocky Line) and Slovenia Control H24. ATS routes within SAXFRA will be deleted, except NONRNAV ATS Routes below FL095 UFN. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2021) In fulfilment of the FABCE FRA Roadmap, the first implementation of Free Route Airspace will be achieved in conjunction with a FRA cross border application between Slovenia and Austria in November 2016 ( SAXFRA ). The cross border area will vertically extend from ground up to FL660 (partly FL460) and comprise the Areas of Responsibility of Austro Control (east of Rocky Line) and Slovenia Control H24. ATS routes within SAXFRA will be deleted, except NONRNAV ATS Routes below FL095 UFN. FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning 10/11/ /11/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 27 Released Issue

39 AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 Objective completed at State level (and at Vienna Airport as far as airport authorities are concerned). There are also local safety Teams performing the European Action Plan at regional airports. REG (By:12/2013) Mil. Aviation Authority Flughafen Wien AG ASP (By:12/2013) Objective completed. Objective completed. Objective completed. Mil. Aviation Authority Flughafen Wien AG APO (By:12/2013) Mil. Aviation Authority Flughafen Wien AG Objective completed. Objective completed. Objective completed. Objective completed at Vienna Airport. There are also local safety Teams performing the European Action Plan in regional airports. 30/04/ /04/ /04/ /04/ /04/ /04/ /04/ /04/2011 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LOWW Vienna International Airport ASMGCS is used as an advisory tool since June The required technical equipment is installed and in operation. See AIP The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in Dec REG (By:12/2010) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2011) APO (By:12/2010) Flughafen Wien AG The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been delayed until 12/2013, due to consideration and application of Interoperability regulatory requirements (Required Declarations). The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in Dec Operational procedures defined and the related safety case are pending the regulatory approval. The Certification of technical equipment and operational procedures are thus planned for The required safety assessment is still pending. The APO SLOAs are completed for Vienna airport. 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2004 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 28 Released Issue

40 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LOWW Vienna International Airport The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been issued in Dec /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) APO (By:12/2017) Flughafen Wien AG Operational procedures defined and the related safety case is pending for the regulatory approval. The Certification of technical equipment and of operational procedures are thus planned by mid The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework was delayed till mid 2013 due to consideration and application of Interoperability regulatory requirements (Required Declarations) as well as the certification of technical equipment and operational procedures (although in place). 30/09/ /12/2009 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LOWW Vienna International Airport The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June Stepwise completion according to the ACDM project in order to reach the status of 'full implementation' is conceived until April 2017, dependent on the DPI implementation. ASP (By:12/2016) The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June List of adverse conditions agreed, procedures are partially established and will be finalized by June Deicing procedures according to the CDM manual guidelines with regard to the status 'locally implemented 'are already in place. Refinement of the current procedures is in place and subject to ongoing continuous improvements. Late 30/04/2017 Partly 30/06/2016 APO (By:12/2016) Flughafen Wien AG The majority of APO tasks is fulfilled, required specific LoAs were ratified. DPI implementation is late, planned by April (Verification of Interface Connections between VIE and Austro Control Systems is ongoing, first trials with NMOC/ETFMS foreseen in Q1/2017) Late 30/04/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 29 Released Issue

41 AOP10 Time Based Separation Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LOWW Vienna International Airport [PCP] [Essential] TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and architectural developments, including HMI aspects. Publication aspects with regard to national aeronautical information will be duly respected. REG (By:12/2023) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2023) TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and architectural developments, including HMI aspects. Publication aspects with regard to national aeronautical information will be duly respected. TBS Project has been nationally set up. Operational and technical experts involved in procedural and architectural developments, including HMI aspects. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2023 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LOWW Vienna International Airport [PCP] [Essential] Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning with regard to the Initial AOP will continue and set up in coordination with all relevant stakeholders. ASP (By:12/2021) APO (By:12/2021) Flughafen Wien AG Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning, Information and data exchange with regard to the Initial AOP will continue in close cooperation with the Airport. Based on the current CDM Agreements, further planning with regard to the Initial AOP will continue and set up in coordination with all relevant stakeholders. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2021 AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LOWW Vienna International Airport [PCP] [Essential] For more than 10 years, a very advanced digital Flight Strip System is in operation at Vienna TWR, having been updated continuously to reach a state of the art system (DIFLIS by AVIBIT). Based on this tool, the advanced ATC clearance Monitoring function will be embedded. ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) Flughafen Wien AG For more than 10 years, a very advanced digital Flight Strip System is in operation at Vienna TWR, having been updated continuously to reach a state of the art system (DIFLIS by AVIBIT). Based on this tool, the advanced ATC clearance Monitoring function will be embedded. The required Training / Information will be executed when necessary. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2020 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 30 Released Issue

42 ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 APW function according to the ECTL guideline has been implemented being part of the new ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since 03/2013. ASP (By:12/2016) Mil. Aviation Authority APW function according to the ECTL guideline has been implemented being part of the new ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since 03/2013. APW function according to the ECTL guideline has been implemented being part of the new ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since 03/2013. The Military Control Centre uses AUSTRO CONTROL ATM system. The APW function according to the ECTL guideline is implemented and used. 31/03/ /03/ /03/2013 ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, whereas the full rollout of the TopSkySafety Net Server for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place by end of The Military will use the civil ATM system functionality accordingly. ASP (By:12/2016) Mil. Aviation Authority This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, whereas the full rollout of the TopSkySafety Net Server for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place by end of The Military will use the civil ATM system functionality accordingly. This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien, whereas the full rollout of the TopSkySafety Net Server for the complete Area of Responsibility will take place by end of /12/ /12/ /12/2016 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) in Phase 2 for APP Wien and Local APP Units in Nov The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid The civil infrastructure applies for MIL likewise. ASP (By:12/2016) This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) in Phase 2 for APP Wien and Local APP Units in Nov The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid /06/ /06/2016 Mil. Aviation Authority This function was implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) in Phase 2 for APP Wien and Local APP Units in Nov The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid 2016.The civil infrastructure applies for MIL likewise. 30/06/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 31 Released Issue

43 ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 LOWW Vienna International Airport Implementation of the AMAN functionality of the TopSky ATM system is foreseen to be operational by end Since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL are applying Arrival Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message exchange. ASP (By:12/2015) Implementation of the AMAN functionality of the TopSky ATM system is foreseen to be operational by end Nonetheless, since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL are applying Arrival Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message exchange. Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 TOP SKY functionality of MTCD covers in total this objective and the required lines of Actions. 28/11/2015 ASP (By:12/2021) TOP SKY functionality of MTCD covers in total this objective and the required lines of Actions. 28/11/2015 ATC15 Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 The information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC Vienna. ATC system is compliant with AMAN use in En Route. ASP (By:12/2017) En Route: information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC Vienna. ATC system is compliant to AMAN use in En Route. 31/03/ /03/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 32 Released Issue

44 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Austria fulfils the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/2011 and has achieved the training and performance monitoring actions. MIL transport A/C have been adequately equipped since March 2015 REG (By:12/2015) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:03/2012) MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Aviation Authority ATC17 Austria fulfils the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/2011 Austro Control has implemented the EU regulation 1332/2011 and has achieved the training and performance monitoring Actions accordingly. MIL transport A/C have been equipped since March 2015 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR, further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units. ASP (By:12/2018) Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR; further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units. ATM system and Sub System evolution for COTR 31/03/ /12/ /03/ /03/2015 Partly 31/03/2017 Partly 31/03/2017 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 Austro Control has implemented the complete required infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK, DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS application. ASP (By:12/2014) Austro Control has implemented the complete required infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK, DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS application. 31/12/ /12/2014 Austro control is the sole ANSP. The MIL unit is not an ANSP. AirDefence Centre is AMHS compatible and capable. LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 33 Released Issue

45 COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Further upgrades at all Local Approach Units and ATM units at Airport Schwechat have been undertaken during Final upgrades planned till 2020 at the latest for ATCCV. The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/ /12/2020 For the military, VoI is planned according to the VoIP project plan. ASP (By:12/2020) Mil. Aviation Authority according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Further upgrades at all Local Approach Units and ATM units at Airport Schwechat have been undertaken during Final upgrades planned till 2020 at the latest for ATCCV. The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/2013. according to the VoIP Roadmap and the VoIP project plan. Implementati on of Voice over IP technology Implementati on of Voice over IP technology 31/12/ /12/2020 ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LOWW Vienna International Airport CDO is facilitated by ATC for airport Vienna (originally conceived for off peak periods, meanwhile performed on a regular basis) including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to the IAF below FL150 to the RWY in use. (See AIP LOWW 226) ASP (By:12/2013) APO (By:12/2013) Flughafen Wien AG CDO is facilitated whenever feasible during off peak periods by ATC including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to the IAF below FL150 to the RWY in use. (See AIP LOWW 226) Additionally, shortened YBAR GNSS approaches are in force since Nov for noise abatement reasons during night time. These SLoAs will be implemented according to the target date i.e. end of There is a partnership agreement between AustroControl, Vienna airport and Austrian Airlines. All other Airlines are also invited. AustroControl is coordinating the actions between all partners. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 34 Released Issue

46 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 This objective is completed for Vienna Airport. LOWW Vienna International Airport Regular meetings of the "dialogue forum" are held between local Vienna Airport communities and Vienna Airport partners. check web page: ASP (By:12/2016) APO (By:12/2016) Flughafen Wien AG Objective completed at Vienna Airport. check web page: Objective completed at Vienna Airport. 31/12/ /12/ /12/2012 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 AustroControl fully completed this objective already in 2008, whereas the remaining objective FCM01 ASP08 (DPI) is subject to the use of the runway sequencing tool and further CDM Implementation. The DPI is also described in AOP05APO05 and will be implemented by 06/2016 in cooperation with Airport Vienna ASP (By:07/2014) AustroControl fully completed this objective in The remaining objective FCM01ASP08 (DPI) is also covered by AOP05APO05 and will be implemented by 06/2016 in the context of CDM. 31/12/ /12/2008 FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Collaborative flight planning was already fully implemented, but after the deployment of the new ATM System, it turned out that the AFP activation and provision has been wrongly implemented. Time for correction is under discussion to reach the final operational capability by end of 2017 at the latest. ASP (By:12/2017) Collaborative flight planning was already fully implemented, but after the deployment of the new ATM System, it turned out that the AFP activation and provision has been wrongly implemented. Time for correction is under discussion to reach the final operational capability by end of 2017 at the latest. 31/12/ /12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 35 Released Issue

47 FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable Although FAB CE and Austria are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015., Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. Based on preliminary results (the final Report on the Operational Trial will be published Q1/2016), FABCE states agree to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. OTMVs (peak and sustained) are defined for the most used traffic volumes and based on these, local procedures are applied. As soon as the official STAM applicability area will include Austria and further FABCE states, more detailed info in SLoAs will be given. ASP (By:12/2015) Although FAB CE and Austria are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015., Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. Based on preliminary results (the final Report on the Operational Trial will be published Q1/2016), FABCE states agree to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. OTMVs (peak and sustained) are defined for the most used traffic volumes and based on these, local procedures are applied. As soon as the official STAM applicability area will include Austria and further FABCE states, more detailed info in SLoAs will be given. 31/03/ /03/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 36 Released Issue

48 FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] In the context of FABCE local/regional automated ASM support is under development. Close coordination with NMOC is ensured at FABCE level and via regional FMPs / AMCs. Airport slots are already transmitted to DDR. Implementation of LARA System is envisaged until July In accordance with the planned initiative of the Airport Operations Plan for Vienna, the required Integration with the NOP is envisaged and recognised until Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5. ASP (By:12/2017) Mil. Aviation Authority APO (By:12/2021) Flughafen Wien AG In the context of FABCE local/regional automated ASM support is under development implementation planned for July (LARA) In the context of FABCE local/regional automated ASM support is under development and implementation in progress. Close coordination with NMOC is ensured at FABCE level and via regional FMPs / AMCs. LARA implementation by July MIL is integral part of AMC, and MCC interface is technically ready for AIXM 5.1. Slot data for all airports in Austria are sent by SCA to the EUACA* Common Databank on a daily base (1900loc). From this databank EUACA provides the data regularly to EUROCONTROL for the use of these slot data in the DDR (DDR II) Project. The future AOP, being subject to coordination with the NOP, will be set up and conceived accordingly. Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes 31/12/ /07/ /07/ /12/2021 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2021 at the latest. ASP (By:12/2021) The required tools and messages foreseen to assess the traffic complexity are planned to be implemented by end of 2021 at the latest. 31/12/ /12/2021 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 37 Released Issue

49 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Objective completed. ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its customers to plan a flight, coordinate an innereuropean flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot preflight briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet ASP (By:12/2012) ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its customers to plan a flight, coordinate an innereuropean flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot preflight briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet. 31/12/2005 Not applicable to the Military. The Austrian Military Authorities are using their own briefing and FPLsystem which is tailored to their own specific needs and independent from the civil IBS. Only for flights outside Austrian airspace which is a very rare case the civil IBS is used for the retrieval of AIS and MET briefings, without using the FPLfunctions. 31/12/2005 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The Ministry of Transport is planning the national etod policy by mid 2016 and does foresee the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines. A national TOD project has been launched by the Ministry of Transport, whereas it is planned to establish this policy by mid of 2016 due to coordination work between Austro Control and National Geodetic Institute. Nonetheless, the implementation of the etod objective and its requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy in cooperation with MoD. REG (By:05/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:05/2018) APO (By:05/2018) Flughafen Wien AG The Ministry of Transport is planning the national etod policy by mid 2016 and does foresee the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines. A national TOD project has been launched by the NSA, whereas it is planned to establish this policy by mid of 2016 due to coordination work between Austro Control and a National Geodetic Institute. The implementation of the etod requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy The Airport Vienna is expected to implement the required activities for the collection, management and provision of TOD in accordance with national TOD policy in time etod Database Phase 1 31/05/ /05/ /05/ /05/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 38 Released Issue

50 ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 Since 31/03/2015 the basis of Aircraft ID for En Route and TMA Vienna is the use of downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and AWAM. The required evidences have been delivered in time to reach the target time in March MIL Control Centre: applies the civil surveillance structure Airport VIE: applies Mode S ACID and Multilateration ASP (By:01/2020) As of 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation is the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and AWAM. The required evidences have been delivered in time to reach the target time in March The following Mode S sensors are fully installed: Linz, Wien, Koralpe, Austrian Wide Area Multilateration. External sensors and sources: Muenchen, Javornik Mode S and WAM implementati on 31/03/ /03/2015 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 39 Released Issue

51 ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and has been approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators). Today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation. Due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on REG (By:06/2017) Mil. Aviation Authority Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:06/2017) Mil. Aviation Authority APO (By:06/2017) Flughafen Wien AG Ongoing according to project plan (to be analysed, if the Austro Control / ADQ compliance check list is the proper means of compliance for MIL) A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and has been approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed (2 Airports and several Austro Control internal originators). Today not all parties referred to in ADQ Article 2(2b) and Article 2(2c) have signed the formal arrangement yet. The national legal framework for the origination of aeronautical data according to the ADQ regulation is published, including the need of having a signed formal arrangement with Austro Control in order to supply aeronautical data in compliance with the ADQ regulation.due to the high amount of ADQ affected obstacle originators in Austria, the implementation date is dependent on the full implementation of the Austrian etod project according to ESSIP INF07 with its final milestone on The data quality project, led by ACG/AIM, is running according to the project plan. Several awareness workshop were held by ACG to find proper ways to comply with ADQ together with NSA, provincial governments (en route obstacles), aerodrome operators and surveyors for aerodromes. A draft formal arrangement has already been issued by Austro Control to be signed by the originators. A proper system (PLX) to supply AIP relevant data is already in place, even for external originators. For the military, ongoing according to project plan. The required data quality requirements have been fulfilled according to the ACG project 'DATA QUALITY' by 03/2013. Working instructions to describe the processes are in place. Ongoing according to project plan: Further steps can be made following the signature process for the required checklist, which will be given after clearing issues by CAA. Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 40 Released Issue

52 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). REG (By:02/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:02/2018) MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Aviation Authority CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311). Military committed to implement the objective by the SES target date. Present transport type aircraft remain outside applicability area (below FL285) Air Ground Data Link 17/10/ /10/ /10/2014 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 41 Released Issue

53 ITYAGVCS2 Implement 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Conversion is partly completed, required notifications to the commission have been, respectively will be transmitted in time. Requirements for the remaining stakeholders will be fulfilled in time. Conversion at ANSP level completed. For safety reasons, frequencies assigned to ATIS and Volmet will be converted to 8,33 khz channel spacing as of 31st December REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Aviation Authority MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Aviation Authority APO (By:12/2018) Flughafen Wien AG Mil. Aviation Authority 8.33 khz conversion is planned and already partly completed. Required notifications to the commission have been, respectively will be transmitted in time. Conversion is partly completed, required notifications to the commission have been, respectively will be transmitted in time. 8,33 conversions will take place by 12/2017 according to the national MIL conversion plan. Conversion at ANSP level completed. For safety reasons, frequencies assigned to ATIS and Volmet will be converted to 8,33 khz channel spacing as of 31st December ,33 conversions will take place by 12/2017 according to the national MIL conversion plan. State aircraft / MIL carrier aircraft are already equipped to a major part. No local exemptions for MIL aircraft are envisaged. 8,33 khz channel spacing capability will be available for all MIL aircraft. The national Frequency plan does foresee the required FRQ assignments and conversions for VIE plus relevant procedures. All necessary measures have been taken and verified at MoD Level to ensure compatibility with 8.33 khz channel spacing. 8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 42 Released Issue

54 ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018 The main functionalities as required for coordination and transfer have been implemented in the current ATM system (TopSky). LOF / NAN messages for AGDL implementation were implemented in Oct ASP (By:02/2018) MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Aviation Authority The main functionalities for coordination and transfer are already implemented in the current ATM system. Enhanced functions are part of the new ATM System (NG AATMS) and were implemented in October ATM system and Sub System evolution for COTR The Military are exchanging BFD and CFD data with the civil ATM system 17/10/ /10/2014 Not Applicable 31/12/1995 ITYFMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 With regard to Regulation (EC) No 633/2007, the verification activities and the assessment of verification of systems (DoV) and the technical file (TF) was positively performed. Local system implementation has been finished and started with FMTP operation with MUN in 04/2011. Meanwhile all adjacent partners have been connected applying FMTP. ASP (By:12/2014) MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Aviation Authority Local and national system implementation is completed since. First FMTP operation with MUN since 04/2011 PRA since 10/2012. BRA since 05/2014, BUD since 02/2014, ZAG since 09/2013, LJU and PAD since 03/2015 ZUR since 09/2015 Finalised 04/2011 with the common use of the ATM System 30/09/ /09/2015 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 43 Released Issue

55 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA. Formal acceptance is communicated to the ANSP. SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year 2000, and safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and the relevant training is applied according to regulations. According to the Safety assessment process and derived procedures, all changes referring to the surveillance infrastructure have been subject to SA's and were delivered to the NSA. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment has been subject to all safety assessments in question. Dependent on the MIL planning and budget, aircraft fleet and the specific carriage and operation of Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADSB Out avionics, will be implemented by 12/2019 REG (By:02/2015) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:02/2015) MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Aviation Authority Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA and formal acceptance comminicated to the ANSP. SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year Safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and the relevant training is applied according to regulations. According to the Safety assessment process and derived procedures, all changes referring to the surveillance infrastructure have been subject to SA's and were delivered to the NSA. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment has been subject to all safety assessments in question. partly completed full Mode S compatible implementation covering the fleet update is foreseen by 12/ /12/ /10/ /03/ /12/2019 NAV03 Implementation of PRNAV Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures. After full completion of PRNAV implementation (SIDs, STARs, transitions) in Vienna in 2012, an RNAV rollout plan for the remaining Austrian airports has been established which includes the gradual replacement of conventional SIDs, STARs and where applicable transitions by PRNAV procedures. Besides STAR procedures which are still based on RNAV5 to serve all our customers, the roll out is completed. ASP (By:12/2023) Mil. Aviation Authority As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures.after full completion of PRNAV implementation (SIDs, STARs, transitions) in Vienna in 2012, an RNAV rollout plan for the remaining Austrian airports has been established which includes the gradual replacement of conventional SIDs, STARs and where applicabletransitions by PRNAV procedures. Besides STAR procedures which are still based on RNAV5 to serve all our customers, the roll out is completed. As far as RNAV applications are concerned, MIL will act from case to case.. 31/12/ /12/2014 Not Applicable 31/12/2010 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 44 Released Issue

56 NAV10 Implement APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz and Graz have been published in REG (By:04/2016) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2016) AMCs are generally not converted into national regulations. In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz and Graz have been published in /12/ /12/ /12/2013 SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in Additional specific workshops together with flight training organizations, aviation agency and the aero club had been held in 2011 and results were presented to the NSA in the beginning of Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan under the authority of the NSA. REG (By:12/2011) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2011) MIL (By:12/2011) Mil. Aviation Authority Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in 2010 and additional specific workshops together with flight training organisations, aviation agency and the aero club are regularly executed. Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan and the actions have been completed. Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in Additional specific workshops together with flight training organizations, aviation agency and the aero club had been held in 2011 and results were presented to the NSA in the beginning of Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan under the authority of the NSA. The locally planned necessary actions have been implemented by end /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2012 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 45 Released Issue

57 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting have been executed by the relevant ministerial section of the Ministry of Transport. The remaining stakeholders have completed their tasks. REG (By:01/2018) Oberste Zivil Luftfahrtbehö rde in Austria ASP (By:12/2014) APO (By:12/2014) Flughafen Wien AG The required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting have been executed by the relevant ministerial section of the Ministry of Transport. Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled. Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled. 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 46 Released Issue

58 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 47 Released Issue

59 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Austria Austro Control Martin STIEBER LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA MoT / BMVIT Alfred GULDER LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Austro Control Martin STIEBER LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Airport VIE Franz EHMOSER LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD / BMLVS Obst Gerold DOBLHAMMER EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Austria DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners Objective AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Ralph MICHALKE AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Roland SCHMIDT AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Christian KERN AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Franz EHMOSER AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Christian WOBORSKY ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Roman KIENAST ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Roman KIENAST ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Roman KIENAST ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Gerhard BERGER COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Thomas BAUMGARTNER ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL Daniel SCHAAD ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Christian WOBORSKY FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 48 Released Issue

60 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO Ralph MICHALKE INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Joachim BRUJA INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Joachim BRUJA ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Reinhard WALCHER ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Robert WEHOFER ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Michael LÖFFLER ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Thomas BAUMGARTNER ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Roman KIENAST ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Michael LÖFFLER ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Herbert SCHRANZ NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Daniel SCHAAD NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Daniel SCHAAD SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Alfred VLASEK SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Alfred VLASEK LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 49 Released Issue

61 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts NSA: LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 50 Released Issue

62 Austro Control: LSSIP Year 2015 Austria 51 Released Issue