Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP DENMARK

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP DENMARK Level 1 - Implementation Overview

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Denmark Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/14 Date of Edition 30/04/18 LSSIP Focal Point Bo Feldberg LSSIP Contact Person Oscar Alfaro Status Released Issue Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2017 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2016 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP FAB Performance Plan and LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan - Edition A representative of the national regulatory authority has signed on behalf of all the involved contributory stakeholders. This arrangement between the signatory authority and national stakeholders was decided at State level. Naviair and Copenhagen Airport have provided written confirmation (via ) to the signatory authority of the correctness of the information provided. Name Position Signature Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority Kare Clemmesen Director Aviation Centre I Danish Defence Command, Airstaff. Jan Dam Colonel. Chief of Force Planning Division, Airstaff. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in Denmark Copenhagen ACC Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Implementation Projects National projects FAB projects Regional projects Cooperation activities FAB Coordination Regional cooperation Implementation Objectives Progress State View Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Harmonisation of LSSIP reporting among regulators, airports and ANSPs in DKSE FAB is ongoing. Continuous close coordination between Naviair and LFV has been in place for years, handled by dedicated forums and the participation in the SESAR Deployment Manager s work. Naviair and LFV coown the certified ATS provider NUAC HB which handles the enroute traffic in DKSE FAB and harmonises e.g. operational concepts and system layout in DKSE FAB. The work is coordinated by the Joint Programme Office, JPO. In addition, Naviair together with LFV and IAA jointly owns the Air Traffic Services academy Entry Point North. Naviair s involvement in the Borealis alliance and COOPANS Alliance facilitate the coordination concerning system deployment in adjacent FABs and ANSPs. From 2013 onwards, upgrades have been and will be implemented on a continuous basis to ensure that the COOPANS ATMsystem is always up to date and harmonised. Traffic and Capacity Copenhagen ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the presesar and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered presesar. The four aforementioned objectives are neither presesar nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives AOM19.1 and FCM05 are considered as both part of the presesar and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. PreSESAR Implementation PCP Implementation % % LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 1 Released Issue

12 Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 68% 32% 100% 54% 100% 10% 73% 13% PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP PreSESAR PCP ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 2 Released Issue

13 ATM Deployment Outlook State objec ves Deployed in : ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 100% progress ETFMS [FCM01] 100% progress FMTP [ITYFMTP] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Mandatory Coordination & Transfer [ITYCOTR] 95% progress 8,33 khz below FL195 [ITYAGVCS2] 67% progress Voice over IP [COM11] 56% progress Aircraft Identification [ITYACID] 32% progress Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 25% progress OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 20% progress AMAN to further enroute [ATC15.2] 6% progress Data Link [ITYAGDL] 91% progress Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITYSPI] 89% progress Aeronautical Information [ITYADQ] 21% progress NewPENS [COM12] 10% progress etod [INF07] 0% progress RNP 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.2] 10% progress Airport objec ves EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Deployed in : Airport CDM [AOP05] 100% progress CCOs [ENV03] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 11% progress Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 25% progress Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 2% progress LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions; Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document; Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016.In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 4 Released Issue

16

17 1. National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership Denmark is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 1994 European Union 1973 EASA 2002 ICAO 1946 NATO 1949 ITU 1865 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the single Danish FIR. The following map shows the FIRs/UIRs adjacent to the Danish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP. In order to achieve some of the Implementation Objectives, Copenhagen ACC will have to coordinate some of its actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UACs. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 5 Released Issue

18 Airspace Classification and Organisation In general Danish territory is covered by control areas between 3500 FT / FL 195 (North Sea) and FL 660. In addition, the controlled airspace in Denmark comprises the airspace within the TMAs and the airspace within the CTRs (Aalborg, Billund, Copenhagen Airports Kastrup and Roskilde, Karup, Ronne (on Bornholm Island, within Malmö FIR), Skrydstrup and Aarhus). Airspace classification within København FIR LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 6 Released Issue

19 1.2. National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Denmark are the following: Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority; Naviair the Danish ATS Service Provider; Copenhagen Airport; The military authorities (Defence Command Airstaff); Accident Investigation Board Denmark Havarikommissionen (AIB) Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Parliament Government Ministry of Defence Defence Command Denmark Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Naviair Airstaff Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority Danish Accident & Investigation Board LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 7 Released Issue

20 Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Denmark is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rulemaking Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority/ Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority/ Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing 1. Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority/Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing 2. The police and the public prosecutor Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority / Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority / Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority / Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority / Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 149 and Administration of Justice Act Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 152 Air Navigation Act 152 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 8 Released Issue

21 Accident investigation Accident Investigation Board Denmark Havarikommissionen (AIB) for accidents and serious incidents and Civil Aviation Administration (CAA), Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority, for incidents Council Regulation 996/10 Civil Aviation Authority Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority in Denmark is under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing and it acts as CAA for Denmark providing the safety regulation for civil aviation. CAA Denmark was separated from the national ATS Service Provider, Naviair, in CAA Denmark sets and enforces technical and operational standards relating to the manufacture, operation and maintenance of aircraft, the establishment and operation of ANS, and the establishment and operation of airports. It also rates and licences aircrew, ATCO and maintenance personnel. Additionally, the CAA is concerned with noise abatement and enforces regulations concerning the transport of hazardous goods by air. The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority employs around 100 persons within the aviation area (Bornholm Airport excluded). The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority is located in Ørestaden in Copenhagen. The organisation chart of The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority is attached in Annex B. Annual Report published: Y kkerhedsrapport%20for%20dansk%20civil%20luftfart% pdf The address of the Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority website is: LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 9 Released Issue

22 Naviair Service provided Name of the ANSP: Naviair Governance: State owned company Ownership: 100% Danish State Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute Y Services provided by NUAC HB ATC approach ATC Aerodrome(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training Others Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Y Y Y N Y Y Maintenance work under contract with various airports Crossborder delegation of ATS with Sweden and Germany as well as Scottish and LondonFIR respectively. Annual Report published: Y This webpage contains the English versions of the available publications, including the annual reports. The organisation chart of Naviair can be found in Annex B. ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y COOPANS FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit COOPANS / Thales TopSky COOPANS (twice a year) COOPANS (incremental upgrades) Copenhagen SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: ARTAS, V8B2 patchset 6 Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Upgrade of HW & SW in 2017 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No replacement, only upgrade ATC Unit Copenhagen 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 10 Released Issue

23 ATC Units The ATC units in Denmark airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Copenhagen ACC 13 5 Copenhagen FIR COOPANS has been in operational use since March Airports General information 8 controlled airports are situated within Copenhagen FIR of which Copenhagen Airport Kastrup is the main airport. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex 2 of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. Copenhagen Airport Kastrup is the main airport covered by this LSSIP, being the only coordinated airport in Denmark The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for Copenhagen Airport Kastrup: Military Authorithies Danish military ATM is executed in accordance with national law and military regulations. National Lov om Luftfart authorises the Ministry of Defence to negotiate matters concerning the interaction between civil and military air traffic with the Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing. Defence Command Denmark Airstaff deals with the tactical execution of ATM through military regulations. The organisation chart of Defence Command Denmark, Airstaff can be found in Annex B. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 11 Released Issue

24 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: AIRSTAFF/CAA Denmark Authority signing such legal provision: Chief of Airstaff /Director CAA Denmark These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: CAA Denmark/AIRSTAFF Authority signing such legal provision: Director CAA Denmark/ Chief of Airstaff These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: All military ATCOs hold licences issued by CAA. Military ATS units are audited by Airstaff Flight Safety at regular intervals. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N Additional Information: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip N Other: Other: Y Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: Defence Command Airstaff Additional information: Additional information: GAT Reference regulation 550/2004 article 7.5. Denmark is taking measures to ensure maximum compliance with the common requirements. Reference: ATSinstruks and VFK reg and LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 12 Released Issue

25 Service Provision role Services Provided: OAT Services Provided: EnRoute Y All enroute service provided by joint civil military ACC in Copenhagen. Naviair is the designated service provider. Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y AIS N MET N Basic information provided by the DMI. SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y GAT MET Y N Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? N If YES, since: n/a Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: n/a If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: All ATCOs hold personal licenses issued by CAA n/a N User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only N GAT only N Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S N ACAS Y Others: Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: FUA Level 2 implemented: FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y Y LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 13 Released Issue

26 2. Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Denmark Denmark - Annual IFR Movements 900, , , ,000 IFR flights 500, , , ,000 IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast 100,000 IFR movements - Low forecast A = Actual F = Forecast A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017) IFR flights yearly growth 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F H 1.9% 3.3% 3.1% 3.8% 2.5% 2.4% 2.3% Denmark B 0.0% 1.3% 2.1% 1.6% 2.0% 1.7% 1.5% 1.0% 1.2% 1.3% L 1.2% 0.5% -0.4% 0.2% -0.5% -0.2% -0.1% ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 2017 Traffic in Denmark increased by 1.7% during summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.1% and 3.0%, with a baseline growth of 1.5% during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 14 Released Issue

27 2.2. Copenhagen ACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays EKDKACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +2.0 % 127 (0%) No The average enroute delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer Capacity Plan +2 % Achieved Comments Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active LPV (Localiser Performance with Vertical guidance) Procedures at EKCH New arrival concept for EKCH including PBN procedures, Extended AMAN, TBS (Time Based Separation) Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 8 sectors Minor updates of COOPANS Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes Yes Yes Ongoing expected 2018 Yes Ongoing final target 2023 Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) Yes 3 (E) + 2 (W) were sufficient Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 127, same as in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 119 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 110. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 15 Released Issue

28 Planning Period The planning focuses on the summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC 2017 baseline EKDK 127 Capacity Profiles Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) H 128 1% 130 2% Ref % 128 1% L 127 0% 127 0% Open 127 0% 128 1% C/R 127 0% 127 0% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Summer Capacity Plan Cross Border FRA with Karlsruhe and Maastricht Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active LPV (Localiser Performance with Vertical guidance) Procedures at EKCH New arrival concept for EKCH including PBN procedures, Extended AMAN, TBS (Time Based Separation) Operational capacity expansion at EKDK ACC to increase ATM capacity at EKCH Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 8 sectors Technical Minor updates of COOPANS Capacity Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand EURO 2020 Significant Events Football Competition Max sectors 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) Planned Annual Capacity increase 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 1% N/A N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 0,8% 0,8% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 16 Released Issue

29 Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 Based on the expected traffic evolution in summer 2018, a maximum of 5 sectors should be sufficient to handle traffic demand. However, as stated in the above plan, up to 8 sectors can be opened if required. EKDKCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook Copenhagen ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 17 Released Issue

30 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Denmark for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Conclusion ADQ implementation issues have to be addressed as soon as possible as they can impact on swim implementation. (page 25 of the Report) State s action planned for this conclusion: YES Applicable to All States + EC Description of the planned action: DK/Naviair is in the final negotiation with LFV in Sweden to become clients in their ADQ compliant system. It is our intension to be compliant by the end of LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 18 Released Issue

31 4. Implementation Projects 4.1. National projects Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: AF 2.5 ASMGCS Safety Nets (2015_046_AF2) AF2.4 ASMGCS Routing & Planning (2015_043_AF2) AF5 iswim (2015_045_AF5) CANDIIP (execution phase) (2015_131_AF5) Implementation of initial DMAN and AOP at Copenhagen Airport (2015_044_AF2) COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK), Naviair (DK) COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK), Naviair (DK) COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK) contractual dates 01/01/ /09/ /01/ /09/ /02/ /09/2019 Naviair (DK) 22/02/ /12/2018 COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK), Naviair (DK) contractual dates 01/04/ /12/2018 Naviair WAMDK Naviair (DK) Implementation 21/ Standardization of A SMGCS Synchronised PBN Implementation VoIP Programme (2015_132_AF3) COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK) COPENHAGEN Airport KASTRUP (DK), Naviair (DK) 01/12/ /11/2016 Naviair (DK) 01/03/ /12/2018 activities in project delayed until 2018 but expected to finish in time. activities in project delayed until 2018 but expected to finish in time. L3: AOP12 DP2016: Project 2015_046_AF2; Family L3: AOP13 DP2016: Project 2015_043_AF2; Family L3: FCM05 DP2016: Project 2015_045_AF5; Family Ongoing Because of delay application for extension until ultimo 2019 has been sent to SDM. Delay is caused by supplier. The project is in the execution phase The project is in the execution phase. DP2016: Project 2015_131_AF5; Family L3: AOP05, AOP11 DP2016: Project 2015_044_AF2; Family L3: ITYSPI L3: AOP04.1, AOP04.2 DP2016: Project: 103AF2; Family 2.2.1; ongoing DP2016: AF1 Family Ongoing L3: COM11, ITY AGVCS2 DP2016: Project 2015_132_AF3; Family LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 19 Released Issue

32 4.2. FAB projects Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: DKSE FAB Aeronautical Data Quality (ADQ) (2015_099_AF5) Joint Programme Office (JPO) LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 01/03/ /11/2020 Ongoing In progress in accordance to plan L3: ITYADQ DP2016: Project 2015_099_AF5; Family Regional projects Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B) Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) COOPANS and DSNA ATM System Convergence Programme (CODACAS), phase 1b European Deployment Roadmap for Flight Object Interoperability Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) (2015_207_AF3_A; 2015_207_AF3_B) ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), DSNA (FR), IAA (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), Austrocontrol (AT), ENAIRE (ES), ENAV (IT), EUROCONTROL (MAS), IAA (IE), LFV (SE), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 15/02/ /12/ /01/ /12/2016 Ongoing, delayed by NATS Project completed during Ongoing Finished end of /01/ /12/2020 Releases being deployed twice a year. Implementation of B3.3 delayed. L3: AOM21.2 DP2016: 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B; Family 3.2.4; L3: AOM21.2 DP2016: Project 020AF3; Family L3: AOM21.2, ATC12.1, ATC17, FCM03, ITY ACID, ITYAGDL, ITYSPI DP2016: 2015_207_AF3_A and 2015_207_AF3_B; Family LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 20 Released Issue

33 Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Joint COOPANS development Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), IAA (IE), LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) Build 1 deployed March in Denmark. Since then biyearly deployment of upgrades have taken place. Releases being deployed twice a year. L3: ATC12.1, ATC17, FCM03, ITYACID, ITY AGDL, ITYFMTP, ITY SPI NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS (Part A: General Call; Part B: Cohesion Call) (2015_174_AF5_A; 2015_174_AF5_B) ANS Finland (FI), Austrocontrol (AT), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), BULATSA (BG), Belgocontrol (BE), DSNA (FR), ENAIRE (ES), EUROCONTROL (MAS), Groupe ADP (FR), IAA (IE), IAAATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LVNL Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (NL), NATS (UK), NAV (PT), Naviair (DK), SMATSA (BA), SMATSA (ME), Slovenia Control (SI) 15/02/ /12/2020 Ongoing DP2016: 2015_174_AF5_A and 2015_174_AF5_B; Family Subregional SWIM MET deployment to support NEFRA (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A) Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE) 01/11/ /12/2018 DP2016: 2015_025_AF5_A and 2015_025_AF5_B; Family LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 21 Released Issue

34 5. Cooperation activities 5.1. FAB Coordination DKSE FAB general: In accordance with the reply to the Commission in 2014 and the ministerial declaration 2013 enhanced cooperation between DKSE FAB and NEFAB has been established in intra FAB arrangements at all levels. Since May 2017 full seamless FRA is in place in the entire airspace of DK SE FAB and NEFAB. The MET consortium NAMCon has continued their cooperation in accordance to agreed plans. FAB Board: DKSE FAB Board had 2 meetings in The military authorities in Sweden and Denmark have participated as well as the national enroute ATSPs. The main focuses have been to monitor the development of the FAB. Consultation with stakeholders took place on the 5th December 2017 regarding FAB developments, performance and costefficiency. Airspace: In 2017 no meetings was held in the airspace group as no proposals from airspace users or ANSPs regarding the need for airspace changes from a FAB perspective were received. Dansk Luftrumsudvikling og udviklingspotentialer was finalised in The need for harmonisation with Sweden's forthcoming Riktlinje för luftrummets utformning och användning is planned for Civil military cooperation One meeting in the civil military coordination group was held in Main issue is the Danish military operations over Bornholm. Further meetings will be held in Performance/Charging: In January 2015 the Commission adopted the DanishSwedish performance targets for RP 2 and agreed that the targets in the DanishSwedish Performance Plan are consistent with the union wide performance targets for RP2. The ToR for the High level Group has been revised to include a wider group of stakeholders in the consultation process. The annual consultation meeting 2017 took place in Stockholm on the 5th December LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 22 Released Issue

35 Rule Harmonisation Group: MET WT Report was finalized during 2017 and the DKSE FAB Board decided to terminate the MET Working Group. While awaiting the Opinion from EASA on the Part ATS, the Rule Harmonisation Group worked according to the approved 2017 work plan for the DKSE FAB, and reported accordingly to the DKSE FAB Board. Safety Oversight Group The Safety Oversight Group had 4 meetings in 2017 and NUAC HB Stockholm was audited. Focus has been to continue the development of common procedures and standards between the two authorities, and to implement agreements in an updated version of the Authority Agreement. This work is still ongoing. In late 2017, NUAC decided to divide the NUAC training organization in two separate certified organizations; a Danish certified by TBST and a Swedish certified by TS. This required a lot of coordination and work in the SOG Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives Regional cooperation between Regulatory Authorities There is extensive coordination between the Swedish and Danish Regulatory Authorities on Safety Regulation Issues and other common regulatory issues stemming from the Single Sky Regulations. The work is anchored in the DanishSwedish FAB initiative. In addition to the coordination linked directly to the DanishSwedish FAB initiative, cooperation related to ATM/ANS matters is taking place in the 7State NSA Group, ensuring coordination between NSAs, in the area of ATM/ANS, of the DanishSwedish FAB and NEFAB (Estonia, Finland, Norway and Latvia) as well as Iceland. Finally, cooperation is taking place in the 9State NSA Group, consisting of representatives of the regulatory authorities in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Latvia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The 9State NSA Group has been formed to facilitate the implementation of BOREALIS Free Route Airspace, an initiative taken by the ANSPs in the Borealis Alliance. Regional cooperation and alliances between Service Providers NUAC Nordic Unified Air traffic Control NUAC was established in 2009 as the first and still the only integrated operating company in Europe that is responsible for en route ATM in a joint functional airspace block (FAB). NUAC operates the three ATCCs in Copenhagen, Malmö and Stockholm as a subcontractor on behalf of Naviair and LFV. NUAC only has approximately ten direct employees, while the remaining approximately 650 employees are on secondment to NUAC from Naviair and LFV. The three ATCCs and other equipment used by NUAC are owned by Naviair and LFV, but made available to NUAC. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 23 Released Issue

36 Through our coownership of NUAC, we are implementing a part of our ambition to contribute to the harmonization of ATM in Europe. Through NUAC, we also ensure continued improvement of the efficiency of ATM. Entry Point North The ATS training academy Entry Point North (EPN, is situated at Malmö Airport and is jointly owned by Naviair, the Irish Aviation Authority and LFV. The academy was established in 2006 as the first transnationally owned academy offering ATM training, and the Irish Aviation Authority became coowner of the academy in The services provided by Entry Point North include Recruitment services, Initial training, Conversion training, Refresher training and Development training. In line with the ambition in SES, the primary aim of Entry Point North is to provide standardized and harmonized training for ATCO trainees and ATCOs. The academy is the course provider for all ATM training, including English aviation training and tests, Safety Management System, Accident investigation, Supervisor courses, ATSEP courses and the training of technical staff who carry out the maintenance of the ATM and CNS equipment. Besides providing ATS training to its four owners, Entry Point North services ANSPs worldwide by selling training courses tailored to customer requirements that are held either at Entry Point North in Sturup or onsite at the customer. Entry Point North has more than 40 customers in more than 20 countries. In Feb16 Entry Point North became certified under Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/340. COOPANS alliance COOPANS (COOPeration of Air Navigation Service providers) is an international partnership consisting of Naviair, Austro Control, Croatia Control, the Irish Aviation Authority and LFV. Since COOPANS was set up in 2006, the partners have cooperated on the joint development, upgrading and harmonization of their ATM systems. The systems now use common software and the maintenance processes have been harmonized. As a result, seven control centres in Denmark, Sweden, Ireland, Austria and Croatia have now been harmonized and undergo synchronized upgrading twice a year. In 2015, these upgrades took place over a twoweek period per upgrade without any delays or other inconvenience to air traffic. We also expect periodical future system upgrades to be implemented without any form of negative impact on air traffic. This is a unique development in European ATM, where the ANSPs in the other countries are still running their control centres with individual, technically very diverse systems. In addition, in COOPANS we harmonize operational and technical concepts and methods in order to limit specific and individual functionalities at the various ANSPs. We estimate that we cut our system development costs compared with the costs each partner would incur if we had to develop the technology independently. To this should be added our considerable savings in operating expenses as a result of joint work concepts and exchange of experience. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 24 Released Issue

37 In 2015, the COOPANS cooperation was extended, becoming the COOPANS Alliance, which, besides technicaloperational cooperation, now also includes a common approach to and participation in SESAR 2020, SESAR Deployment Manager, EU funding projects, and the A6 Alliance in which COOPANS Alliance participates on an equal footing with the five largest ANSPs in Europe. Through these alliances, we are making our mark on the development in Europe. Further information on SESAR 2020, SESAR Deployment Manager and A6 can be found in the section European framework. The COOPANS Alliance has enabled the five partners to take the lead in the matter of implementing EU requirements for the harmonization of ATM. During 2017 the two builds (B3.2 & B3.3) was implemented. For 2018 the builds B3.4 are planned. Future Builds will continuously ensure that the ATM systems in the COOPANScountries are harmonized and compliant with a number of emerging EC regulations, ESSIP objectives and SES/SESAR though the PCP and Deployment manager. For the 5year timeframe COOPANS will introduce a harmonized SWIM yellow profile solution planned for deployment in 2023, preparing for Flight Object introduction around The organization within COOPANS Alliance has been adapted to cover all the activities the Alliance is involved in. It will now cover the activities from SESAR to Realization, including strategic planning. COOPANS consortium The COOPANS consortium (same ANSP members as in the COOPANS alliance) will participate in SESAR 2020 also as member of the SESAR Joint Undertaking and A6. The purpose of the COOPANS consortium is to contribute with best practice from the members and thus ensure influence on the technicaloperational development in Europe, including alignment of the partners longterm strategic investments in the perspective of SESAR. A6 Alliance The A6 Alliance was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.: ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP; DFS, the German ANSP; DSNA, the French ANSP; ENAV, the Italian ANSP; NATS, the British ANSP; NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium). After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation, which was concluded in June The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize cooperation at expert level. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 25 Released Issue

38 The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky. It has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015). PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS[1] ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager. The A6 Alliance leads Europeanwide technical activities validated and cofunded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project PCP). Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4[2] Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an adhoc consortium agreement with DSNA. Finally the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and HungaroControl (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL[3] that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers. The Borealis alliance The members of Borealis alliance are AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden), LGS (Latvia), NATS (UK) and Naviair (Denmark). The alliance is based on an Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) signed on the 20th of June The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The nine members of the Borealis Alliance control more than 10,000 flights a day, 3.8 million flights a year, across 12.5 million km2 of North European airspace. That is 38% of all flights in Europe. The programme will see FRA implemented across the airspace controlled by the nine members of the Alliance. FRA has already been implemented across NEFAB and DKSE FAB. The programme also extends beyond the boundaries of the EU, fostering close relations, interoperability and mutual benefit with neighbouring countries namely Norway and Iceland. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 26 Released Issue

39 6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 2; 4% 4; 8% 6; 12% 13; 26% 25; 50% Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined The summary of the 42 objectives for 2017 are: 20, 13 Ongoing, 3 Late, 5 No Plan, 1 Not Applicable The 3 objectives marked as Late a) REG INFO7 (terrain data available from other source) b) Delayed ITYADQ, ITYAGDL, The 5 objectives marked as No Plan : a) due to low load AOM19.2, FCM04.2 b) awaiting NM development AOM19.3, FCM08 c) awaiting feasibility study AOP10 One objective is marked as Not Applicable FCM04.1 as Denmark is not in applicability area. The progress distribution indicates that there is a need for further investments in DK in order to keep up the pace of changes for the new objectives. The pace will (among other) depend on INEA funding received ( ) and the outcome of RP3 negotiations (for ). Naviair has along with LFV initiated a number of operational projects both in DKSE FAB and in collaboration with other ANSPs adjacent FABs which among others contributes positively to the key performance areas. From the point of view of system development, the COOPANSalliance ensures that Naviair continuously complies with a substantial number of ESSIPobjectives. Timely compliance with ESSIPobjectives whose finish dates are set in the coming years will among others be ensured by gearing up system functionality for the implementation of new technologies such as VoIP (COM11, ITYAGVCS2). LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 27 Released Issue

40 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services Collaborative Flight Planning Interactive Rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 100% 0% 0% 100% 93% n/a 0% 25% 100% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 28 Released Issue

41 Advanced Air Traffic Services < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) AOP14 ATC02.2 ATC02.8 ATC02.9 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) Direct Routing Free Route Airspace Remote Tower Services Local objective EKBI BILLUND 0% STCA EnRoute GroundBased Safety Nets Enhanced STCA for TMAs AMAN Tools and Procedures EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Information Exchange with Enroute in Support of AMAN Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 ATC17 ATC18 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Multi Sector Planning Enroute 1P2T 100% 100% Local objective n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 6% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 100% ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective ITYCOTR NAV03.1 NAV03.2 (PCP) NAV10 NAV12 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 100% GroundGround Automated Coordination 95% Processes RNAV 1 in TMA Operations RNP 1 in TMA Operations APV procedures Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Local objective n/a 100% 100% 10% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 29 Released Issue

42 High Performing Airport Operations < AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 100% AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 100% AOP05 Airport CDM EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 100% AOP10 (PCP) TimeBased Separation AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) ENV02 SAF11 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 0% Initial Airport Operations Plan EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 11% Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 25% Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 2% Collaborative Environmental Management EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions 100% 100% Enabling Aviation Infrastructure < COM10 COM11 COM12 (PCP) FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) NewPENS Extended Flight Plan Integrated Briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft Identification Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100% 100% 100% 56% 0% 32% 21% 91% 89% 67% 0% 10% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 30 Released Issue

43 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 31 Released Issue

44 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C. Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 32 Released Issue

45 Main Objectives AOM13.1 Harmonizse Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling 20% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority and The Airstaff plan to implement EUROAT in This Implementation Objective will not cause changes to the national legislation. 31/12/2018 Naviair has certain procedures in place already. Further progress and outcome will be based on the national legislation (REG01) which is set to be "implemented" in REG (By:12/2018) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency In 2012 the Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority and The Airstaff had initial discussions to start the work and the task was expected to be completed by the end of In 2016 the Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority did a gap analysis and forwarded it to The Airstaff. The task is awaiting comments from The Airstaff and the task is now expected to be completed by the end of ASP (By:12/2018) No revised national legislation (REG01) is foreseen. Therefore implementation is considered to be in Q Naviair The data have already been provided to the SDM for the DP monitoring exercise MIL (By:12/2018) The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority and AIRSTAFF planned to implement in 2015 Airstaff However the task was postponed and it is now expected to be completed by the end of % 0% 45% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % ASM support tools implemented. 01/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2018) Airstaff 100% 01/12/2017 The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Naviair Common Project is redundant because it is also 100% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 01/12/2017 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 33 Released Issue

46 AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2021) Manual procedures exist to exchange realtime ASM No Plan data with NM systems. Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 0% AOM19.3 (PCP) Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2021) Awaiting further evolution of NM systems. No Plan Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 0% AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/ % 31/10/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) Free route airspace has been operation at FL285 and above in DK&SE FAB since November Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 100% 31/10/2013 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 34 Released Issue

47 AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Free route airspace implemented for FL285 and above in DKSE FAB November /11/2011 ASP (By:12/2021) Naviair Free route airspace implemented for FL285 and above in DKSE FAB November 2011 The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) / Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) / Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) 100% 30/11/2011 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport All applicable SLoAs are completed, including transponder operating procedures in AIP Denmark REG (By:12/2010) Danish Transport, Constructio All REG SLoAs are completed 100% n and Housing Agency ASP (By:12/2011) Naviair All ASP SLoAs are completed 100% APO (By:12/2010) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP All APO SLoAs are completed Standardizat ion of A SMGCS 100% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 35 Released Issue

48 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport All applicable SLoAs are completed ASP (By:12/2017) Naviair All ASP SLoAs are completed 100% APO (By:12/2017) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP All APO SLoAs are completed Standardizat ion of A SMGCS 100% AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (ACDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport CPH has initiated an ACDM project which is in a progress. Expected local ACDM implementation is mid 2016 and full ACDM network implementation by Q Naviair is 19/12/2016 fully involved in this airport initiative. ASP (By:12/2016) Implementa Naviair Airport CDM was implemented at EKCH 19/12/2016. tion of initial DMAN and 100% AOP at 19/12/2016 Copenhagen Airport APO (By:12/2016) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP CPH has initiated an ACDM project which is in progress. Expected local ACDM implementation is mid 2016 and full ACDM network implementation by Q Implementa tion of initial DMAN and AOP at Copenhagen Airport 100% 19/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 36 Released Issue

49 AOP10 (PCP) TimeBased Separation Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Awaiting analysis from Naviair and EKCH to determine feasibility study of timebased separation for EKCH. REG (By:12/2023) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency Awaiting analysis from Naviair and EKCH to determine feasibility study of timebased separation for EKCH. Responsibility for publication to be changed to Naviair. ASP (By:12/2023) An initial study for implementation of multiple PCPelements at EKCH has been concluded and the resutls is being evaluated. A schedule for implementation projects is expected during % 0% No Plan No Plan No Plan Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 0% AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Specific AOP functions will be established through a project in CPH called Initial AOP. The initiative is expected to started in ASP (By:12/2021) Naviair participates as a stakeholder in a project in CPH called Initial AOP. Specific AOP functions will be established through a project in CPH called Initial AOP. The initiative was kicked off in 2017Q3. Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View APO (By:12/2021) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP Specific AOP functions will be established through a project in CPH called Initial AOP.The initiative started in Implementa tion of initial DMAN and AOP at Copenhagen Airport Implementa tion of initial DMAN and AOP at Copenhagen Airport 11% Ongoing 17% 8% 31/12/2019 Ongoing 30/06/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2019 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 37 Released Issue

50 AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport At CPH two projects are defined to implement the necessary safety nets. The first is an upgrade of ASMGCS with planning and routing functions and the second project is focused on implementing the necessary safety nets regarding adheres to planning and routing. Both projects involve Naviair. ASP (By:12/2020) Awaiting results from ongoing study at EKCH regarding Routing & Planning and Safety Nets expected to be finalized Q % Ongoing 31/12/2020 Ongoing Naviair In Q two project was initiated Routing & Planning and Safety Nets both projects involve Naviair. The end date of the two project is Q The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View APO (By:12/2020) At CPH two projects are defined to implement the necessary safety nets. The first is an upgrade of A SMGCS with planning and routing functions and the second project is focused on implementing the necessary safety nets regarding adheres to planning and routing. AF 2.5 A SMGCS Safety Nets 33% 31/12/2020 Planned COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP Currently Copenhagen Airports A/S is implementing the project Standardization of ASMGCS which upgrade the existing ASMGCS to a newer and more standardized version. The standardization of the existing ASMGCS will facilitate the future procurement of adon modules necessary for the implementation of the ASMGCS advanced functions, end date of the project is week AF 2.5 A SMGCS Safety Nets 0% 31/12/2020 In Q two project will start Routing & Planning and Safety Nets both projects involve Naviair. The end date of the two project is Q LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 38 Released Issue

51 AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Copenhagen Airports A/S has rescheduled project AF2.4 ASMGCS Routing & Planning due to lack of maturity/readiness from Saab Technologies our supplier of ASMGCS. However, Copenhagen Airport is at the final stage in the analyzing & planning of the requirement specification to the manufacturer. REG (By:12/2023) Danish Transport, Constructio 0% n and Housing Agency ASP (By:12/2023) The development of AOP 13 is linked to the development of AOP 12. 2% Ongoing 31/12/2023 No Plan Ongoing Naviair COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View Copenhagen Airports A/S has rescheduled project AF2.4 ASMGCS Routing & Planning due to lack of maturity/readiness from Saab Technologies our supplier of ASMGCS. However, Copenhagen Airport is at the final stage in the analyzing & Planning of the requirement specification to the manufacturer. AF2.4 A SMGCS Routing & Planning AF2.4 A SMGCS Routing & Planning 3% 10% 31/12/2023 Ongoing 30/09/2020 ATC02.8 GroundBased Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 For Naviair, all functionalities implemented with COOPANS and prior to that DATMAS (end 2007). For the military MSAW and APW are implemented. APM is considered not applicable other 31/10/2013 safety nets are being installed as part of new radar display systems. ASP (By:12/2016) Naviair All functionalities implemented with COOPANS and prior 100% to that DATMAS (end 2007). 31/12/2007 MSAW and APW completed for the military. APM is Airstaff considered not applicable other safety nets are being 100% installed as part of new radar display systems. 31/10/2013 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 39 Released Issue

52 ATC02.9 Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/ /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2020) Airstaff STCA is fully implemented in all military TMAs since 100% /12/2013 Naviair Implemented together with STCA for the enroute environment. 100% 31/12/2007 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport A system to provide arrival sequencing and metering has been implemented. The system proposes a strategy to the ACC and APP controllers for sequencing and metering arriving flights, in order to optimise the overall flow of arrival traffic. ASP (By:12/2019) A system to provide arrival sequencing and metering has been implemented. The system proposes a strategy to Naviair the ACC and APP controllers for sequencing and 100% metering of arriving flights, in order to optimise the overall flow of arrival traffic. Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 MTCD has been operational since TCT is not considered to fit into our operational concept. ASP (By:12/2021) Naviair MTCD has been operational since TCT is not considered to fit into our operational concept. Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development 100% 01/01/ % 01/01/2008 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 40 Released Issue

53 ATC15.1 Information Exchange with Enroute in Support of AMAN Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Functionality implemented in Copenhagen ACC /12/1996 ASP (By:12/2017) Naviair Functionality implemented in Copenhagen ACC % 31/12/1996 ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to Enroute Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Expected to be implemented in OLDI concept with relevant neighboring ACCs before 31/12/2018, where squencing is needed. ASP (By:12/2023) Expected to be implemented in OLDI concept with relevant neighboring ACCs before 31/12/2018, where squencing is needed.' 6% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 6% 31/12/2018 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Electronic dialogue is technically implemented with all adjacent partners, however not all OLDI messages are in operational use 01/12/2014 ASP (By:12/2018) Naviair Electronic dialogue is implemented with all adjacent partners. However not all oldi messages are in operational use. Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development 100% 01/12/2014 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 41 Released Issue

54 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 All SLoA's have been implemented also including training and DoV. However, putting into operational service depends on neighbouring states. 30/09/2013 ASP (By:12/2018) All SLoA's have been implemented also including Naviair training and DoV. However, putting into operational 100% service depends on neighbouring states. 30/09/2013 Airstaff For the military, as for Naviair. Therefore completed. 100% 30/09/2013 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Planned civil implementation December MIL has planned implementation by Q1/ /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2020) Naviair Planned implementation is still December 2018 in VoIP Ongoing 40% compliance with this objective. Programme 31/12/2018 VCS systems are updated. New radios are under Airstaff installation. VOIP expected to be fully implemented in 88% Q1/2018. Ongoing 31/03/2018 COM12 (PCP) New PanEuropean Network Service (NewPENS) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/ % Ongoing 31/12/2020 ASP (By:12/2024) Naviair 10% Ongoing 31/12/2020 Airstaff No current plan to migrate to NewPENS. % Not Applicable APO (By:12/2024) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP CPH has no Blue Profile data only data related to yellow profile, why we do not consider NewPens as relevant to us for the time being we use the internet for data exchange. % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 42 Released Issue

55 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Procedures to make CDA techniques available have been compiled in cooperation with aircraft operators and are applied when feasible. ATCOs are trained 31/12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) Procedures to make CDO techniques available have Naviair been compiled in cooperation with aircraft operators 100% and are applied when feasible. ATCOs are trained. 31/12/2013 APO (By:12/2013) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP CDA is in the remit of Naviair, not CPH. However CPH participates in the definition of CDA procedures 100% 31/12/2013 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport CEM has been in place for many years in Denmark for the benefit of all airports, and in particular CPH. However, Naviair and CPH representatives are not using the Eurocontrol CEM guidelines. CPH recognises CEM as an important tool, but the approach in CEM is superseded 31/12/2013 by Danish law, in which environmental impact from airports is regulated in detail. CPH has an action plan for the coming years in which environmental management is an issue. ASP (By:12/2016) CEM has been in place for many years in Denmark for the benefit of all airports, and in particular CPH. However, Naviair and CPH representatives are not using the Eurocontrol CEM guidelines. CPH recognises CEM as Naviair an important tool, but the approach in CEM is 100% superseded by Danish law, in which environmental 31/12/2013 impact from airports is regulated in detail. CPH has an action plan for the coming years in which environmental management is an issue. APO (By:12/2016) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP CEM has been in place for many years in Denmark for the benefit of all airports, and in particular CPH. However, Naviair and CPH representatives are not using the Eurocontrol CEM guidelines. CPH recognises CEM as an important tool, but the approach in CEM is superseded by Danish law, in which environmental impact from airports is regulated in detail. CPH has an action plan for the coming years in which environmental management is an issue. 100% 31/12/2013 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 43 Released Issue

56 FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 SLoA s not dealing with automatic AFP have been implemented with COOPANS. AFP messages not currently completed will be completed when issues with NM have been solved. 30/06/2015 ASP (By:12/2017) Naviair SLoA s not dealing with automatic AFP have been implemented with COOPANS. AFP messages not currently completed will be completed when issues with NM have been solved. Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development 93% Ongoing 30/06/2015 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable % Not Applicable Denmark is not in the applicability area, and will not implement ASP (By:10/2017) Naviair Denmark is not in the applicability area, and will not implement % Not Applicable FCM04.2 (PCP) Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan ASP (By:12/2021) Within the foreseen traffic development our capacity is No Plan not under pressure. The current NM application is sufficient. Internal procedures are established to ensure that regulations are used as last resort. Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 0% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 44 Released Issue

57 FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 A project in CPH called "Initial AOP" (as mentioned in AOP11) will define the AOP content and setup manual data exchange. Full AOPNOP integration will be subject of future project within AF4. ASP (By:12/2021) We will follow the NM system evolution regarding interfaces with the NOP closely and implement changes when required. 25% Ongoing 30/06/2018 No Plan Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View APO (By:12/2021) COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP A project in CPH called "Initial AOP" (as mentioned in AOP11) will define the AOP content and setup manual data exchange. Full AOPNOP integration will be subject of future project within AF4. 0% AF5 iswim 50% Ongoing 30/06/2018 FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Local Traffic Load Management tool is implemented. Complexity tool awaits further development by NM. ASP (By:12/2021) Local Traffic Load Management tool is implemented. Complexity tool awaits further development by NM. 100% 01/01/2015 Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 100% 01/01/2015 FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 0% No Plan "No Plan" awaits implementation of Flight Object. ASP (By:12/2021) "No Plan" awaits implementation of Flight Object. No Plan Naviair The data have already been provided to the SDM for the DP monitoring exercise 0% LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 45 Released Issue

58 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 0% Late Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The development of a national strategy has been postponed, in order to assess any new requirements that may arise from new European AIS/AIM legislation regarding TOD. Denmark has filed a difference to Chapter 10 of Annex 15 regarding requirements for a terrain and 31/12/2020 obstacle database, although terrain data is available from the national geodetic institute REG (By:05/2018) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency The development of a national strategy has been postponed, in order to assess any new requirements that may arise from new European AIS/AIM legislation regarding TOD. Denmark has filed a difference to Chapter 10 of Annex 15 regarding requirements for a terrain and obstacle database, although terrain data is available from the national geodetic institute 0% ASP (By:05/2018) Awaiting sign of contract with LFV regarding ADQ Naviair 0% compliance system APO (By:05/2018) Danish Awating REG strategy 0% Airports Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 No Plan ITYACID Aircraft Identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 Upgrades of appropriate systems have been delayed and are now expected to be complete 31/12/ /12/2018 Odate still planned 12/2018. ASP (By:01/2020) Naviair Build 3.3 and has been delayed now planned for effective from Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development 32% Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 46 Released Issue

59 ITYADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Agency has initiated a project in order to implement the ADQ regulation (EU 73/2010). Implementation is aligned with the implementation of the Aerodrome Regulation. Naviair and APO participate in the planning for implementing this objective with the Danish 31/12/2020 Transport, Construction and Housing Agency. The military ANSP did not yet address the issue. REG (By:06/2017) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency ASP (By:06/2017) Naviair The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Agency has initiated a project in order to implement the ADQ regulation (EU 73/2010). Implementation is aligned with the implementation of the Aerodrome Regulation. Ongoing contractual negociations with LFV who will be the supplier. 31/ is the latest info we have from LFV The military ANSP did not yet address the issue in relation to military publications. Airstaff Information about military airbases open for civil traffic is obtained in civil publications. Data is handled by Naviair. APO (By:06/2017) Danish Airports APO participate in the planning for implementing this objective with the Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Agency as agreed with NSADK(TBST), we are awaiting the outcome of the NPA % DKSE FAB Aeronautical Data Quality (ADQ) 26% 0% 10% Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 No Plan Late 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 47 Released Issue

60 ITYAGDL Initial ATC AirGround Data Link Services Entry into force: 06/02/ % Late ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Denmark implemented Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 in 2015 except for the equipage of military transport type a/c. All military transport type a/c are expected to be 31/12/2020 equipped in Therefore the status is partly completed REG (By:02/2018) Danish Transport, Constructio 100% n and 31/12/2015 Housing Agency ASP (By:02/2018) Harmonisation of Technical ATM Naviair Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and 100% preparation of PCP program 21/03/2015 (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development MIL (By:01/2019) Equipage of transport type a/c is planned. However not Airstaff all airframes will be ready by 31/12/ % Expected by end of 2020 Late 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 48 Released Issue

61 ITYAGVCS2 8,33 khz AirGround Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Ongoing All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 The Implementing Regulation 1079/2012 is directly applicable. Compliance will be verified by normal oversight arrangements. For Naviair, all is planned and will be completed prior to the deadlines in 12/2017 and 12/2018 respectively. 31/12/2018 For MIL, VCS updated and radios are replaced. N/A for Copenhagen Airport. Naviair is responsible for the implementation of new frequencies. REG (By:12/2018) Airstaff VCS updated and radios are replaced. Final Ongoing 100% implementation awaiting CAA decision. 31/12/2018 Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency The Implementing Regulation 1079/2012 is directly applicable. Compliance will be verified by normal oversight arrangements. The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority has received an application for the exemption of VFRtraffic operating in airspace classes DG below FL 195 and the Commission has been notified about the planned exemptions. The exemptions were be published late ASP (By:12/2018) All applicable SLoAs are planned and will still be Naviair completed prior to the deadlines in 12/2018 VCS updated and radios are replaced. Final Airstaff implementation awaiting CAA decision. MIL (By:12/2020) VCS updated and radios are replaced. Final Airstaff implementation awaiting CAA decision. APO (By:12/2018) COPENHAG For Airport Copenhagen it is found N/A. Naviair is EN Airport responsible for the coordination of new frequencies. KASTRUP VCS updated and radios are replaced. Final Airstaff implementation awaiting CAA decision. 100% VoIP Programme 18% 63% 100% % 55% 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Not Applicable Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 49 Released Issue

62 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITYFMTP All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Planned as an upgrade to COOPANS 12/2014. Implemented at the military airbases in 30/06/2017. ASP (By:12/2014) Naviair Naviair has transfered in accordance with the transitional arrangements in EC 283/2011, article 1 point 4. Joint COOPANS developmen t 100% 100% Airstaff Implemented in the three airbases. 100% MIL (By:12/2014) Airstaff Implemented in the three airbases. 100% 30/06/ /12/ /06/ /06/2017 ITYSPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 at REG and ASP level. Partially complete because ITYSPIMIL02 is not completed. 07/06/2020 REG (By:02/2015) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency ASP (By:02/2015) Naviair Already implemented systems have been accepted by the Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority in accordance with normal procedures. All SLoAs related to this objective are complete. MIL (By:06/2020) Transport type AC equipped with modes elementary. Airstaff Crews trained. ADSB out is planned. Other aircraft types considered N/A. Harmonisation of Technical ATM Platform in 5 ANSPs including support of Free Route Airspace and preparation of PCP program (COOPANS B3.3, B3.4 and B4.1) / Joint COOPANS development / Naviair WAMDK 100% 100% 70% 31/12/ /12/2014 Ongoing 07/06/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 50 Released Issue

63 NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 RNAV based SIDs are implemented and appropriate training is given to ATCOs. RNAV based STARs are developed and implemented since TACDEN has no concrete plans on this issue 31/01/2007 (considered N/A for Military). ASP (By:12/2023) RNAV based SIDs are implemented and appropriate Naviair training is given to ATCOs. RNAV based STARs are 100% developed and implemented since /01/2007 NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/ % Ongoing 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2023) The development of the RNP 1 in TMA operations is a Ongoing part of a project together with Copenhagen Airport concerning implementation of the PCP. Naviair The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View 10% 31/12/2021 NAV10 APV Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 For the time being implementation depends on local airport decisions to implement or the development of an EC implementing rule. A number of minor airports have implemented APV. Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Agency does not intend to enforce the 15/11/2012 establisment of procedures if no positive CBA can be provided. REG (By:04/2016) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency For the time being implementation depends on local airport decisions to implement or the development of an EC implementing rule. A number of minor airports have implemented APV. Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Agency does not intend to enforce the establisment of procedures if no positive CBA can be provided. ASP (By:12/2016) For the time being implementation depends on local airport decisions to implement or the development of Naviair an EC implementing rule. For those airports where Naviair is responsible for ATS, Naviar will participate in the project if requested by the local airport owner. 100% 100% 15/11/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 51 Released Issue

64 SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The issue is addressed by normal procedures for oversight with special focus in All applicable measures of the EAPPRE action plan have been implemented by APO and Naviair 31/12/2015 REG (By:01/2018) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency ASP (By:12/2014) A presentation was given to all stakeholders in May 2014 at an airport workshop. The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority will focus on runway safety including runway excursion in The issue is addressed by normal procedures for oversight. 100% Airstaff Not yet addressed by MIL. % All applicable measures of the EAPPRE action plan have Naviair been implemented. APO (By:12/2014) 100% Airstaff Not yet addressed by MIL. % COPENHAG EN Airport KASTRUP All applicable measures of the EAPPRE action plan have been implemented by Naviair. 100% 31/12/2015 Not Applicable 31/05/2013 Not Applicable 31/05/2013 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 52 Released Issue

65 Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 for enroute operations 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Included in COOPANS and prior to that DATMAS, start of operation was end STCA approved by The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority. STCA implemented on 31/10/ airbases. ASP (By:01/2013) For Naviair, implemented with COOPANS and prior to that DATMAS (end 2007). Naviair For the military, STCA implemented. Safety oversight has been conducted, and the first system installed has been approved by NSA. Identical systems installed on two additional airbases. For Naviair, implemented with COOPANS and prior to that DATMAS (end 2007). 100% 31/12/2007 Airstaff For the military, STCA implemented. Safety oversight has been conducted, and the first system installed has been approved by NSA. Identical systems installed on two additional airbases. 100% 31/10/2013 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority is investigating the need for specific actions in order to provide evidence of the status of compliance. Existing NSA procedures may 31/01/2015 be sufficient to ensure operator compliance with applicable rules and procedures. REG (By:12/2015) Danish Transport, Constructio n and Housing Agency The Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority has completed all relevant actions. ASP (By:03/2012) ACAS II operational procedures are implemented. Naviair TCAS/ACAS is part of continuation training of ATCOs. MIL (By:12/2015) 100% 100% Airstaff completed 100% 31/01/ /08/ /10/2013 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 53 Released Issue

66 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Naviair has completed ASP01, ASP03 and ASP04 with DATMAS at the end of 2007 and is still complete with COOPANS. ASP07 is considered to be complete by other means of compliance. In addition COOPANS can send messages to the CFMU on reroutings (ASP06). Further refinement will be implemented with COOPANS build 2, also with regards to Asterix Cat /12/2017 (ASP02). The implementation of Departure Planning Information (ASP08) is based on the now available implementation of ACDM by CPH. ASP (By:07/2014) ASP02 is now operational (replacing the RMCDE with the Eurocontrol SDDS). Naviair ASP08 is linked to the implementation of ACDM 100% (AOP05APO05) which is managed by CPH (now 31/12/2017 available). INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 A coherent service is being delivered by Copenhagen ACC in relation to AIS, FPL, MET, ARO and ATFM. In addition most information is available on briefing.naviair.dk. Adjustments may be 31/08/2013 implemented in order to optimise the service. ASP (By:12/2012) A coherent service is being delivered by Copenhagen ACC in relation to AIS, FPL, MET, ARO and ATFM. In Naviair addition most information is available on 100% briefing.naviair.dk. Adjustments may be implemented in 31/08/2013 order to optimise the service. ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % Late For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 All civil SLoAs are complete and implemented with COOPANS. Awaiting the Military, for which new systems under installation on all Airbases, and OLDI and XDS planned. 30/06/2018 ASP (By:12/2012) Naviair All SLoAs are complete and implemented with COOPANS 100% 31/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2012) New systems under installation on all Airbases, and OLDI Late Airstaff and XDS planned. 70% Two airbases complete. 30/06/2018 One still remaining LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 54 Released Issue

67 Local Objectives Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area. AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local % No Plan EKBI BILLUND initial technical plans are being discussed. Nothing determined yet only locations. MultiSector Planning Enroute 1P2T Not ATC18 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local We don't see any added value to our traffic handling. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 100% EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Ad. 1: In EKCH >95% of all departures fulfils the objectives of CCO so this objective is considered completed. However this is not due the implementation of PBN SIDs, but rather a combination of the geographic location of the airport (mostly surrounded by water) and limited noise abatements procedures. This results in an environment where the ATCOs are able to route departing traffic direct any given waypoint shortly after airborne. EKCH is one of 25 airports included in the PCP (EU) 716/2014. To fulfil the obligation, PBN SIDs and STARs will be developed and implemented before end of This work is already in progress, and awaits confirmation of INEA funding within INEA Call Status 5/2017:. Ad. 2: There are no plans as such, to implement monitoring of performance and feedback to ANSP and AU (airspace users). However there will be an ongoing dialogue (annual meetings) between both parties, to keep them updated and make sure there is a common understanding with regards to future changes. Status 5/2017: Not applicable 31/12/2017 Ad. 3: No special actions are expected due to the implementation of these new procedures. Operators are responsible for the update of Operations Manuals. The NSA will through normal oversight ensure compliance. Status 5/2017: Not Applicable Optimised LowLevel IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Not NAV12 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local We have no intentions for now. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 55 Released Issue

68

69 ANNEXES ANNEX A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP National Focal Point for Danish Transport, Construction Bo FELDBERG Denmark and Housing Authority LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Danish Transport, Construction Bo FELDBERG and Housing Authority LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Naviair Magnus MOLBÆK LSSIP Focal Point for Airport CPH Lars IVERSEN LSSIP Focal Point for Military AIRSTAFF Ebbe PEDERSEN EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Denmark DPS/PEPR Oscar ALFARO LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 56 Released Issue

70 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator EUROCONTROL Objective Owners National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Bo FELDBERG AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 O. ALFARO O. ALFARO O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI Bo FELDBERG Bo FELDBERG Bo FELDBERG AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Bo FELDBERG AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Bo FELDBERG AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Bo FELDBERG AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Bo FELDBERG AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Bo FELDBERG AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM Bo FELDBERG AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Bo FELDBERG AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Bo FELDBERG AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Bo FELDBERG AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE Bo FELDBERG ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Bo FELDBERG ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Bo FELDBERG ATC07.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Bo FELDBERG ATC12.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Bo FELDBERG ATC15.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Bo FELDBERG ATC15.2 L. DELL ORTO P. HOP Bo FELDBERG ATC17 L. DELL ORTO S. MORTON Bo FELDBERG ATC18 L. DELL ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Bo FELDBERG COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Bo FELDBERG COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Bo FELDBERG ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Bo FELDBERG ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY Bo FELDBERG ENV03 AP. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN Bo FELDBERG FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 57 Released Issue

71 FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI Bo FELDBERG INF07 AP. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Patrick LIEBGOTT ITYACID O. CIOARA pending Bo FELDBERG ITYADQ AP. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Bo FELDBERG ITYAGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Bo FELDBERG ATYAGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Bo FELDBERG ITYFMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Bo FELDBERG ITYSPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Bo FELDBERG NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Bo FELDBERG NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Bo FELDBERG NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Bo FELDBERG NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET Bo FELDBERG SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending Bo FELDBERG LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 58 Released Issue

72 ANNEX B National Stakeholders Organisation charts Danish Transport Authority organisation chart as of January 2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 59 Released Issue

73 Naviair organisation as of January 2018 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 60 Released Issue

74 LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 61 Released Issue

75 Chief of Air Staff (CAS) Defence Command Denmark Flight Safety Force Planning Division Force Generation Division Capabilities Branch Consepts and Policy Branch ATM and ATC ATM MIL organisation as of January 2018 In the above organigram: - Chief of Force Planning Division is Defence Command, Airstaff ATM Director and representative in EURUCOONTROL Provisional Council. - An ATM specialist in Concepts and Policy Branch is Airstaff representative in EURAMID and EUROCONTROL CIMIC, MAB, SSC, AAB alternate PC and alternate MILHAG. - An ATC specialist in Capabilities Branch is Airstaff representative in EUROCONTROL NETOPS team. LSSIP Year 2017 Denmark 62 Released Issue