Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) LUXEMBOURG

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) LUXEMBOURG Year Level 1

2

3

4

5 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET LSSIP for Luxembourg Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-77 Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015 LSSIP Year Luxembourg Edition Date: 07 Mars 2016 LSSIP Focal Point - Roland REISER LSSIP Contact Person - Valerie Oblin Status roland.reiser@airport.etat.lu valerie.oblin@eurocontrol.int Intended for Administration de la navigation aérienne Unit DPS/PEPR Working Draft General Public Draft Agency Stakeholders Proposed Issue Restricted Audience Released Issue Accessible via: Path: Internet ( Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Luxembourg (LU) - VO\Year 2015\Released Issue\LSSIP Year 2015_LU_ReleasedIssue.doc LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 1 LSSIP Guidance Material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition European ATM Portal Working - Public ESSIP Report STATFOR Forecasts 6 Acronyms and abbreviations 7 LSSIP Documents 8 National AIP 9 FABEC Performance Plan RP2/ LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of this LSSIP document, and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the ESSIP Plan. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg Released Issue

8

9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment Geographical Scope International Membership Geographical description of the FIR(s) Airspace Classification and Organisation National Stakeholders Civil Regulator(s) Luxembourg Airport Military Authorities Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 4 - National Projects Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination FAB Co-ordination FAB related Projects FABEC Project Description Regional cooperation Initiatives Co-ordination with adjacent States Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation Conventions ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context The national ATM context has not changed during However, it is to be noted that, the ANSP for Luxembourg was also appointed in 2014 to assume the role as the Aerodrome Operator for Luxembourg Airport. This role has an impact on the internal management structure and competence requirement in but also on the existing working arrangements with aerodrome partners. The main task of since 2014 was to create a functioning steering framework and working group structure with all aerodrome partners with the main task of the certification of the aerodrome by latest end of With the start of RP2 and national stakeholders are aligned with the performance and charging scheme regulation. The modulation scheme for terminal charges developed by was approved by DAC and EC. pursued the strategic initiative that was endorsed by MDDI with the main aim to assess the potential for synergies and cooperation with FABEC partners Belgocontrol and DFS. Traffic and Capacity During 2015 traffic figures for freight and passenger transport from / to Luxembourg Airport have further increased in line with the assumed BASE traffic scenario adopted in the (national) Performance Plan for terminal airspace. En-route traffic in the common charging zone and FIR (Brussels) also increased and justify taking the STATFOR - BASE traffic scenario in the common BE LU Performance Plan. There are no capacity problems in Luxembourg airspace and airport. ESSIP Objective Implementation There is modest progress in Luxembourg in implementing the applicable Objectives: SAF10 (Implement measures to reduce risks to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements) is now completed and ATC17 (Coordination and Transfer) could be partially completed. There are also no more Objectives for which there is no plan or no decision taken on the applicability. Most of the new Objectives are clearly identified as not being applicable in Luxembourg. There is a continuing problem in getting some Objectives implemented: AOP03 (RWY incursion prevention) is not finished in full, although good progress has been made in some actions; the AOP and airport related issues on the use of a common frequency and ICAO communication recommendations are not implemented on the airport. But a long-term plan has been agreed and will be developed with all stakeholders at ELLX. Similarly, SAF11 (RWY excursions) is late due to lack of compliance with ICAO infrastructure (RWY) requirements. These will be resolved once the refurbishment of the RWY (in planning) will have been done. The planning is done in the frame of the aerodrome certification project ongoing. ENV01 (CDO) is still not implemented (as was planned to achieve in 2015) due to a continued lack of TOD required before introducing the procedures that have been developed. This Objective is therefore related to INF07 (TOD) which is also identified as being late. However, a break-through has been achieved as the institutional and organisational issues were decided and the regulatory framework for TOD is in the make. This will finally also resolve the regulatory framework for the handling of aeronautical data and progress in the related Objective on ADQ (ITY-ADQ) which is also late for this reason. One Objective (INF04) continues being late is the full implementation of an integrated level 5 briefing However, it is firmly planned to be resolved in Objective ITY-SPI (IOP of SUR chain) is further delayed for some month. The safety assessment of the current SUR system has been finished and is now delivered to the regulator. The respective oversight actions are expected to be done during 2016; the timing depends on the severity of the safety issues identified. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 1 Released Issue

12 State-related ESSIP Objectives LSSIP Luxembourg * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) <= AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling * AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * AOM21.1 AOM21.2 Implementation of Direct Routing Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * ATC02.5 ATC02.6 ATC02.7 ATC12.1 ATC15 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 * Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 FCM05 FCM06 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID ITY-ADQ Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information * ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 2 Released Issue

13 LSSIP Luxembourg * FOC Date Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ITY-AGVCS2 ITY-COTR Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV * NAV10 Implement APV procedures * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Airport-related ESSIP Objectives <= ELLX-Luxembourg Airport AOP04.1 AOP04.2 AOP05 AOP10 AOP11 AOP12 ATC07.1 ENV01 ENV02 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Time Based Separation Initial Airport Operations Plan Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Implement AMAN tools and procedures Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports [PCP] [E] [PCP] [E] * [PCP] [E] Understanding the Table Objective Completed Objective Partly Completed Objective Planned No Plan Missing Data (Luxembourg does not participate in this obj.) Late E= Essential Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the Implementation Completion Date as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 3 Released Issue

14

15 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them: Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter. Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned; Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP. Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 4 Released Issue

16

17 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment 1.1 Geographical Scope International Membership Luxembourg is a founding Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: ECAC, EUROCONTROL, EU, European Common Aviation Area, EASA, ICAO, JAA, and NATO Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document is the Luxembourg airspace. The handling of OAT (and some GAT) in the Brussels FIR/UIR, including the delegated airspace, is the responsibility of the military area ATS unit ATCC SEMMERZAKE. ANS provision in the Luxembourg airspace delegated to EUROCONTROL Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC) above FL245 and to Belgocontrol (above FL145/165 up to FL245) is not within the scope of this document. Schematic representation of the G.D. of Luxembourg airspace horizontal limits LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 5 Released Issue

18 The airspace controlled by Luxembourg ATC () is composed of: LU TMA ONE A N E - along the DE-LU border N E N E N E - along the DE-LU border N E - along the FR-LU border - Lateral limits N E - along the BE-LU border N E N E N E. Vertical limits FL 165 / 2500 ft AMSL LUTMA ONE B N E - along the DE-LU border N E N E - Lateral limits N E - along the DE-LU border N E N E N E - along the BE-LU border N E. Vertical limits FL 145 / 3500 ft AMSL LUTMA TWO A (1) N E N E N E N E - along the Lateral limits DE-LU border N E. Vertical limits FL 145 / 2500 ft AGL LUTMA TWO B (1) N E N E N E - along the DE-LU border - Lateral limits N E. Vertical limits FL 145 / 1000 ft AGL LUTMA TWO C (1) N E N E N E N E N Lateral limits E E E N E N E. Vertical limits FL 95 / 5500 ft AMSL LUTMA TWO D (1) N E N E - along the DE-LU border N E - Lateral limits N E. Vertical limits FL 165 / 1000 ft AGL LUTMA TWO E (1) N E N E N E N E N Lateral limits E E E N E. Vertical limits FL 95 / 1000 ft AGL(2) (2) Lower limit partially 2500 ft AGL (see AIPDE for further details). LUTMA TWO F (1) N E N E N E - along the DE-FR border - Lateral limits N E - along the DE-LU border N E. Vertical limits FL 165 / 1000 ft AGL(2) (2) Lower limit partially 2500 ft AGL (see AIPDE for further details). LUTMA THREE (1) N E N E - along the DE-FR border N E - along Lateral limits the FR-LU border N E. Vertical limits FL 75 / 2500 ft AMSL LUTMA FOUR (1) N E N E N E - along the FR-LU border - Lateral limits N E - along the BE-FR border N E. Vertical limits FL 75 / 2500 ft AMSL LUTMA FIVE (1) N E N E N E N E - along the Lateral limits Belgian-FR border N E - along the BE-LU border N E. Vertical limits FL 165 / 2500 ft AMSL LUCTR N E - an arc of circle, 5 NM radius, centred on N E and traced Lateral limits clockwise to N E N E - an arc of circle, 5 NM radius, centred on N E and traced clockwise to N E N E. Vertical limits ft AMSL The Zone EL-P01 centred at ,5 N ,6 E is a prohibited zone from ground up to Remark 2500 ft QNH with a radius of 0,16 NM. BRUSSELS CTA SOUTH N E N E N E - along the BE-LU border - Lateral limits N E N E N E N E - along the BE-FR border N E Vertical limits FL 165 / FL 55 Delegation of ATS from Brussels ACC to Luxembourg APP Remark LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 6 Released Issue

19 B-RNAV Routes in the Lower Airspace over Luxembourg Airspace Classification and Organisation The ELLX TMA1A extends over parts of Luxembourg territory from 2500ft MSL to FL 165 included. The ELLX TMA1B extends over parts of Luxembourg territory from 2500ft MSL to FL 145 included. Luxembourg has implemented the airspace classification over Luxembourg territory: - Above FL 245 under the control of MUAC; airspace is Class C; - Between FL 145 / FL 165 and FL 245 under the control of Belgocontrol, airspace is Class C; - Between FL 95 to FL 145 / FL 165 included; airpace is Class C; - From Ground to FL 95; airpace is Class D; - Outside the CTR the airspace from ground to 2500 ft is Class G. The close proximity of France, Belgium and Germany constrains the handling of arriving traffic. This means that there is limited space for radar vectoring, especially when RWY 24 is in use. Furthermore, Luxembourg has to deal with four different airspace classifications (i.e. Class C, D, E and G). There is a permanent delegation of ATS from Belgium to Luxembourg Southwest of the TMA (CTA South), with France in the south and with Germany in the east. There is also a tactical delegation of ATS from Luxembourg to Spangdahlem Airbase (ETAD RWY23/05), when ETAD has RWY05 in use. Another airspace in the north called TRA 29C can be delegated on request up to FL 65 included. The airspace above FL 95 as well as the CTA south is Class C. At and below FL 95 the classification of the TMA is Class D except for the airspace portion in Germany which is Class E. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 7 Released Issue

20 1.2 National Stakeholders The main national stakeholders involved in ATM in Luxembourg are: - Ministère du Développement Durable et des Infrastructures (MDDI) (= Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructures) - Département des Transports - Administration des Enquêtes Techniques (AET) (= Accident Investigation Body); - Direction de l'aviation Civile (DAC) (= Directorate of Civil Aviation) / NSA (National Supervisory Authority)); - Administration de la Navigation Aérienne () as the ANSP and Aerodrome Operator; - lux-airport (Luxembourg Airport Operator) (airport and apron management). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Luxembourg Air Navigation Organisation Minister Accident Investigation Body (multi-modal) (AET) Directorate of Civil Aviation (DAC) Administration de la Navigation Aérienne () lux-airport Civil Regulator(s) General information DAC, which is subordinated to the MDDI, is the regulatory authority and supervises the safety of aviation in the national airspace. DAC is the NSA., a State administration under the authority of the MDDI, is the ANSP in the scope of this document. There is institutional separation between DAC and. In the G. D. of Luxembourg there is no Military Air Force, and the only international airport is Luxembourg Airport (ELLX). Civil Aviation in Luxembourg is the responsibility of the MDDI. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. DAC activities are further detailed in the following section. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making MDDI Loi modifiée du 19/05/1999 instituant une Regulatory and Safety Oversight DAC Direction de l aviation civile. Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements DAC Loi modifiée du 31/01/1948 relative à la réglementation de la navigation aérienne. Airspace DAC Loi modifiée du 19/05/1999 see above Economic Environment DAC MDDI Security DAC Loi modifiée du 19/05/1999 see above LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 8 Released Issue

21 Accident investigation Administration des Enquêtes Techniques, (AET) Loi du 30 avril 2008 portant a) création de l'administration des Enquêtes Techniques b) et c). The website of the MDDI is at: DAC Regulation of Civil aviation in the G. D. of Luxembourg is the responsibility of DAC which is under the authority of the MDDI. DAC is the Regulatory Authority and it supervises the safety of aviation in the national airspace and in 2015 assumed the role as competent authority for the certification of Luxembourg airport in accordance with EU Regulation 139/2014. DAC has been appointed as the NSA. It is institutionally independent from the ANSP (). In accordance with the Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation, the Accident Investigation is independent from DAC and and is a function of the MDDI. Members from DAC represent the G.D. of Luxembourg at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council. Annual Report published: Yes The 2014 DAC Activity Report is available on: pdf The website of DAC: The organisational chart of DAC is available in Annex B. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 9 Released Issue

22 1.2.2 is the ANSP and the aerodrome operator technical and operational infrastructure management provider in Luxembourg. Since mid-2014 is nominated as the Airport Operator in accordance with EU Regulation 139/2014 (Aerodrome IR). The legal base for as an ANSP is laid down in national law creating the Administration de la navigation aérienne () and assigning its mission and management structure. The legal basis for as Airport Operator and technical and operational infrastructure manager of Luxembourg Airport is detailed in Chapter Name of the ANSP: Governance: State Administration Ownership: 100% State of Luxembourg Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y Up to FL 145/165 included ATC approach Y From 2500ft up to FL 145/165 included ATC Airport Y ELLX Airport TWR services from ground to 2500 ft in CTR AIS Y AIP is published by Belgocontrol CNS Y Maintenance of the communication, navigation and surveillance infrastructure MET Y Since 2013 MeteoLux provides both aeronautical and public meteorological information and alert services ( ATCO training Y Initial training is done abroad, unit training on site. is certified as a Training organisation for ATC unit training (transitional training, pre-ojt training, OJT training) and ATC continuation/refresher training since Others Y SAR is provided in cooperation with the police and the Protection Civile. Luxembourg is a Rescue Coordination Sub-centre (RCS) of the Belgium Rescue Coordination Centre (RCC). SIS Y (Service Incendie et Sauvetage) Airport fire brigade and rescue service Note: wildlife service is part of the ADMIN services supporting the Aerodrome unit. ELE Service Électrotechnique Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Electrical equipment and airfield lighting systems; power supply / Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) and generators; maintenance of the aerodrome communication and power connectivity and infrastructure; water supply has been asked to assume the role as Aerodrome Operator for Luxembourg Airport and leading the certification process according to EU 139/2014 requirements. Y Delegation of ATS from France, Germany and Belgium. Annual Report published: Y Annual Report (Ed. 1.0), October 2015 The annual report of is in conformance with EU 1035/2011 and covers the period from July end June 2015 activities and reconciles s performance against performance indicators laid down in the Annual Plan for the same reporting period. The Annual Report is published on the website of : The website of : The organisational chart of is available in Annex B. 1 Loi du 21 décembre 2007 portant création de l Administration de la navigation aérienne. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 10 Released Issue

23 ATC system in use Flight Data Processing System (FDPS) Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2016 Replacement of the ATC system by a new one is planned? No full replacement of the system is planned. ATC Unit ATC and AIS Surveillance Data Processing System (SDPS) Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade 1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by a new one is planned? ATC Unit SELEX 2016 (to ensure interoperability, implementation of safety net functions, radar data network (SDDS) and A-SMGCS integration) No full replacement of the current SUR system is planned. ATC ATC units The ATC units in the G.D. of Luxembourg airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Controlled Airspace Remarks Luxembourg APP 1 Luxembourg TMA Luxembourg airspace from 2500 ft MSL to FL 145 / FL 165 included Luxembourg TWR 1 Luxembourg CTR Luxembourg airspace from Ground to 2500 ft MSL in CTR horizontal dimensions Luxembourg Airport General information is, as the Airport Operator is responsible for the technical and operational infrastructure on the airport manoeuvring area. received its mission through the law of 02 November Since May 2014 was assigned to take the role as the assumed Aerodrome Operator in accordance with the EU Regulation 139/2014 and to lead the process towards certification of the airport. Lux-Airport received its mission through the law of 26 July and has, amongst other tasks, the responsibility to operate the passenger terminals and the management of apron operations. The roles and responsibilities of and lux-airport are defined. is leading the process and work with Lux-Airport and other airport stakeholders on the certification of Luxembourg Airport in accordance with applicable requirements of EU regulation 139/2014. The work started in 2014; the certification of the airport is planned to be achieved latest by end 2017 as stipulated in the regulation. The website of Luxembourg airport: Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) Règlement grand-ducal du 2 novembre 2012 portant modification du règlement grand-ducal modifié du 24 mai 1998 fixant les conditions d exploitation technique et opérationnelle de l aéroport de Luxembourg Loi du 26 juillet 2002 sur la police et sur l exploitation de l aéroport de Luxembourg ainsi que sur la construction d une nouvelle aérogare LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 11 Released Issue

24 Airport covered by the LSSIP Luxembourg Airport is the sole airport in Luxembourg and is the one covered by APO SloAs in the LSSIP Year 2015 especially in the following objectives: AOP03, INF07, ITY-ADQ, ITY-AGVCS2 and SAF Military Authorities The Military Authorities are under the responsibility of the Ministère des Affaires étrangères et de l Immigration within the Directorate of Defence. There is no Military Air Force based in the G. D. of Luxembourg. The regulatory, service provision and user role of MIL in ATM are detailed below Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making: There is no provision of service for GAT/OAT by the Military. Oversight: Luxembourg has no military NSA Service Provision role, the civil service ANSP provides the service to MIL traffic User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only N GAT only Y Both OAT and GAT N If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: NA Free Routing N Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: Y No special arrangements - Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM N/A 8.33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: None Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Luxembourg applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: NA FUA Level 1 implemented: Not applicable FUA Level 2 implemented: Not applicable FUA Level 3 implemented: Not applicable LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 12 Released Issue

25 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity Data on En-Route traffic and capacity in the common Belgium Luxembourg airspace and charging zone is provided in the LSSIP document for Belgium. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 13 Released Issue

26 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Luxembourg for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC Recommendation 2014 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP04.1 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Ownership Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: NA Description: Luxembourg is not in the applicability area of this Objective but implementation of A-SMGCS Level 1 is ongoing and will be finished in REC Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of, SAF10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: YES Description: The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan - Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction have been implemented by. A Bulletin for VFR pilots was prepared in collaboration with DAC. Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of REC INF04 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Local Stakeholders Description: The implementation of full integrated briefing facilities is subject to the outcome of the ongoing SYNergie study and assessment with FABEC partners Belgocontrol. Access to the EAD is required and two main possibilities for this are currently under investigation. REC Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of NAV03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: NA Description: The objective is not mandatory for TMA airspace nor is there a local business case and justification for implementation in LU as there are no capacity problems. The objective is considers as not applicable. However, coordination with stakeholders and users continues on P-RNAV implementation. Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of REC AOP03, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Local Stakeholders Description: (Aerodrome Operator) leads the process towards certification of Luxembourg airport and coordinates the related activities between the stakeholders and partners at the airport. The open SloA s concern ICAO related training and assessment requirements for vehicle drivers and the full implementation of SMS on the airport. These actions are handled in the ongoing work towards the certification of the airport in accordance with Reg 139/2014. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 14 Released Issue

27 Reference number Recommendation 2014 Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of REC ENV01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Ownership Local Stakeholders Description: The implementation of designed CDO procedures will be done once the TOD for the respective routes is available. To speed up the process will acquire the required specific obstacle and terrain data in a separate project in A decision on the institutional responsibilities was taken in December 2015 as regards the acquisition of the aeronautical data (), the surveillance of the data furnishing process (DAC) and the establishment of the national legislative framework that will allow (AIS) to receive and manage the aeronautical data. Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY- REC AGDL to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: NA Local Stakeholders Description: The objective is not applicable to Luxembourg stakeholders. Airspace above FL145/165 is delegated to BE and MUAC (> FL245). Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY- REC ADQ to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Local Stakeholders Description: A proposal was made in 2014 to MDDI for the institutional and regulatory framework for the acquisition and management of TOD followed by coordination meetings at State level (MDDI and other Ministries and institutions) in A decision on the institutional responsibilities was taken in December 2015 as regards the acquisition of the aeronautical data (), the surveillance of the data furnishing process (DAC) and the establishment of the national legislative framework that will allow (AIS) to receive and manage the aeronautical data. Work is ongoing in AIS on the respective changes in the internal structure and procedures that are demanded by the regulation. REC Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of COM09, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays. Local Stakeholders Corrective actions taken: NA Description: The local IP network is IPv6 protocol enabled and implemented as part of the 4 States / MUAC plan. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 15 Released Issue

28 REC (equal to REC ) The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. FAB ANSPs Corrective actions taken: YES Description: The FABEC ANSP Strategic Agenda, contains, amongst others, all agreed planned and ongoing FABEC activities. Based on this Strategic Agenda the FABEC 5-Year-Work-Plan (5YWP) detailing all the activities, the time schedule and the required budget is developed. Both the Strategic Agenda and the 5YWP are revised twice a year. Besides, the OPS and TECH domains have jointly developed the FABEC roadmap containing the FABEC projects/activities and the ANSP local studies/projects that have a direct/indirect impact on the FABEC project implementation timeframe. This roadmap is also revised twice a year. In this way, it is made sure that an agreed ANSP work plan and roadmap is available, including the main system renewals. Within FABEC, dedicated Standing Committees address all operational, technical and SESAR matters and make sure that proper coordination is done among FABEC ANSPs to ensure proper interoperability between stakeholders. Even if common procurement is investigated, ANSPs should not be constrained on the how to implement functionalities and reach the performance objectives. Note (): has the started in 2014 a strategic initiative with the main goal to find and investigate synergies with FABEC partners for service provision, potential for common procurement and sharing of competence. The projects started in the frame of the SYNergie strategy described in detail in the Annual Plan and progress reported in the Annual Reports and The assessment is still ongoing and a CBA is expected to be delivered in Further investigations as regards synergies and cost-savings in ATM infrastructure update / renewal are ongoing; several items for common purchase and rationalisation of infrastructure have been identified and will be implemented. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 16 Released Issue

29 Chapter 4 - National Projects has reviewed the national, regional and FAB projects and established an updated list of projects. Project Name AWOS / ATIS (Automatic Weather Observation System) and ATIS (Automatic Terminal Information Service) A-SMGCS Level 1 Continuous Descent Operation (CDO) Project Code PRJ PRJ PRJ PRJ Description - Scope AWOS systems distribute weather information towards national and international ATM systems. Implementation of Advanced Surveillance Movement Guidance Control System Level 1. Approach Control: Implementation of two CDAs procedures in Luxembourg airspace to ELLX. Schedule Status ESSIP Objective System in operation; safety case ongoing and will be finalised in early Emergency message implementation for Clear the sky procedure. FAT successful finalised. Site construction works (SSR) finalised. Network connectivity and integration in SUR chain / MLAT sensor deployment ongoing Design and development of procedures finalised. Implementation delayed due to TOD. Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 5 Capacity Safety Environment Cost-Efficiency None Nil Nil Nil Cost effective weather observation system. AOP04.1 Increased capacity through reduced ATCO workload and less delays during low visibility. The system will provide routing, guidance and surveillance for the control of aircrafts & vehicle. TWR controllers to offer improved safety, efficiency and capacity on the airport surface under all weather conditions. ENV01 Nil Nil Reduced CO2 and reduced noise emission. Nil Fuel (cost) savings resulting in reduced CO2 emission and reduced noise during approaches to ELLX due to continuous descent of a/c from En-route to landing. Cooperation Activities ATIS emergency message related to the Clear the Sky procedure established and validated with Belgocontrol. None Done in cooperation with Belgocontrol (procedure design). 5 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in recital 25 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 17 Released Issue

30 Project Name CNS Network infrastructure, ATM systems architecture & SUR chain upgrade Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Full Integrated Briefing MET - AIS - ARO Project Code PRJ PRJ PRJ PRJ PRJ Description - Scope Network and hardware environment overhaul and replacement of current network topology. Virtualized HW architecture. Upgrade of the SUR chain HW & SW based on Linux OS. Establishing the regulatory framework and infrastructure for the acquisition, implementation and handling of aeronautical etod in line with EC Reg 73/2010. Full Integrated briefing of AIS / ARO & MET in conformance with ESSIP Level 5 (single front-end application). Schedule Status ESSIP Objective SUR chain ATC02.2 upgrade pending ATC02.5 due to SYN ATC02.6 project. Server ATC02.7 virtualisation ITY-SPI project & network topology work started. Phase I implementation decided and procurement action started Institutional framework and policy drafted by DAC, issued to State and decided in late Technical requirements for the procurement ready. TBD AIS investigates options i.e. EAD access, webbased briefing or facilities at the airport. INF07 ITY-ADQ Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity Safety Environment Cost-Efficiency Nil Enabling the full Nil Application of application and modern technology use of safety net solutions; i.e. functions (STCA, implementation of a MSAW, APM, "state of the art" APW) and radar high redundant contingency. CORE Network, facilitating and improving network management and network monitoring i.e. virtualization of servers save implementation and Nil Increase of flight safety due to availability of reliable and valid TOD; implementation of ICAO safeguard measures. maintenance costs. Nil Nil None INF04 Nil Nil Nil Level 5 MET & AIS briefing products combined into one single output and tailored as requested by user (pilot) and issued via a single front-end application. Cooperation Activities SUR chain upgrade and integration dis related to the ongoing SYNergie project with Belgocontrol / DFS. The SUR chain upgrade Phase 1 (independent from SYN projects) will be implemented as planned. Investigation of common use of EAD with Belgocontrol under investigation. Pending decision on SYN project assessment. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 18 Released Issue

31 Project Name Project Code Description - Scope IOP Gateway PRJ Implementation of an (interoperable) input/output interface between A- SMGCS and SUR chain (FDP) for an integrated air situation correlation between radar (TAR2) and A- SMGCS TWR CWP PRJ Replacement of (consoles) and PRJ TWR CWP's 50" TFT ADD PRJ (consoles) and display replacement of replacement; two 50" TFT implementation displays (AWOS of an upgraded - Radar) as a Airfield part of A- Lighting and SMGCS project Control and Management implementing a System ground (ALCMS) with controller A-SMGCS position. The project is related also to the A- SMGCS project. Schedule Status ESSIP Objective Design and AOP04.1 planning phase completed. Preparing for implementation All facilities implemented in Integration of advanced Airfield Lighting and Control Management System (ALCMS) and A-SMGCS interface in the TWR planned. AOP04.1 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity Safety Environment Cost-Efficiency Supporting Supporting Supporting Nil ASMGCS to ASMGCS to ASMGCS for provide increased provide routing, TWR controllers capacity through guidance and to offer improved reduced ATCO surveillance for safety, efficiency workload and the control of and capacity on fewer delays aircrafts & vehicle the airport surface during low on the ground and under all weather visibility. aircraft in the air conditions. for TWR and APP. Increased capacity through reduced ATCO workload and less delays during low visibility. Enables the full use of the A- SMGCS guidance and surveillance for the safe control of aircraft and vehicle on the entire movement area. Cooperation Activities None Nil Nil Design concept and development and project implementation done in cooperation with DFS. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 19 Released Issue

32 Project Name VCS fall-back (contingency) system replacement SDDS - Surveillance Data Distribution System (Replacement of the RMCDE (Radar Message Conversion and Distribution Equipment; Eurocontrol) Project Code PRJ PRJ Description - Scope Replacement of the outdated VCS will be done in two steps: Step 1. is the replacement of the current fall-back (Last Resort System). Step 2 is the replacement of the main VCS tbd in a separate Project. New radar data exchange system between adjacent centres in the SURNET framework. The current RMCDE system is approaching end-of-life cycle and is replaced by SDDS. Schedule Status ESSIP Objective Study phase finished and planning phase has started SURNET agreement signed. Implementation is ongoing. Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity Safety Environment Cost-Efficiency Nil Potential for costefficiency through common purchase. None Nil Ensuring reliable air-ground voice com capability during situations of contingency. ITY-SPI Nil High availability hardware platform, alternative data path selection, syntax and range checking, static and dynamic filtering. SUR chain contingency. Improves surveillance coverage and availability of SUR Data in the FIR of SURNET Users. The project will allow cost-effective sharing of radar data. With the planned A- SMGCS feed as planned full contingency with radar coverage up to ground level will be possible during outage / maintenance of Luxembourg TAR2. Cooperation Activities Common purchase of main system replacement (Step 2 project) is under investigation with Belgocontrol. This project is a major enabler for the radar data exchange in the frame of the SURNET agreement signed and replacing the RADNET agreement. Cooperation and development done with EUROCONTROL. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 20 Released Issue

33 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination 5.1 FAB Co-ordination FAB Europe Central (FABEC) consists of the following states: Belgium, France, Germany, Luxemburg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The FABEC Feasibility Phase ( ) led to the conclusion that FABEC is feasible. The Implementation Phase ( ) demonstrated that the FABEC structure was compliant with SES regulations. After the ratification of the FABEC Treaty by all FABEC States, FABEC formally entered into force on the 1st of June This means that FABEC is now operational. FABEC intends to deliver on the goals set by SES II and as laid down in the FABEC Performance Plan. FABEC intends to provide capacity, avoid bottlenecks, reduce costs and emissions, make flying more efficient and ensure military mission effectiveness, while maintaining the high safety standards that exist over Europe. To achieve this, FABEC is developing a set of projects which are described in the next section. The DAC participates in the governing bodies of the FABEC arrangements and the in the FABEC NSA Committee and its substructures. participates mainly in the SAF and OPS Standing Committees and in the Financial (FIN) and Performance (PMG) Groups. To enhance cooperation and steer the development and implementation work, the seven civil ANSPs designated in these States (, Belgocontrol, DFS, DSNA, LVNL, Skyguide and MUAC) have set up an organisational and management structure consisting of a Strategic Board and seven Standing Committees plus a separate Social Dialogue Committee (see FABEC organisation chart below). LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 21 Released Issue

34 5.2 FAB related Projects The FABEC Performance Plan has set a target to implement CDOs. started the following CDO project in 2013 which was still ongoing in 2015: Project Name Airspace Design South- East (AD-SE) Project Code AD SE Description - Scope (LU) Belgocontrol (BE) DFS (DE) DSNA (FR) MIL (DE) MUAC (MAS) MIL (BE) (FR), (NL), (CH) Skyguide (CH) Schedule Status ESSIP Objective & PCP link AD-SE project consists of 2 main changes: 1. SWAP will remove the current dual crossing of traffic flow on UN852 / UN EUC22 establishes a new Cross Border Area (CBA) EUC22 for use by the French, German and United States Air Forces. EUC 22 will increase the amount of airspace available for civilian use in the LUX area enabling optimisation of the route network (SWAP) and will assist the various Airspace Projects around the LUX area to achieve their performance targets. SIDs & STARs that will be implemented to join the SWAP network. Luxembourg SID/STARS will also need to be re-defined. Phase 1 implementation is planned for the 5th of March Phase 2 solution design (SWAP and EUC22 step 1) has been finalized by end of December and DGCA/DSNA have developed a solution for the SID/STAR from ELLX in The project was stopped / frozen in late AOM20: Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) V. 7 Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas 6 Capacity Safety Environment Future updates a demand / capacity analysis will be conducted; impacts of the change on delays can only be assessed when a sector structure including movement load limits are available. Handling higher capacity than today with the same or improved level of safety. Additionally, a reduction in the number of serious separation minima infringement incidents is expected due to the removal of the upper level crossing points on UN852 and UN853. The overall horizontal flight efficiency will be improved. Annually, a total reduction of more than 900,000 NM is expected reducing fuel consumption by more than 5 million kg / annum. This will also result in a reduction of CO2 emissions. Cost Efficiency Higher flight efficiency translates into substantial cost savings (about 9 Mio ) for airlines. Cooperation Activities (FABEC) and DGAC / DSNA (FR) worked together to develop a concept and solution for the connectivity of ELLX SID/STAR to the new routes. Work has been stopped in late 2015 and the project is under re-evaluation. 6 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment as defined in recital 25 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 22 Released Issue

35 Project Name AIM Expert Task Force Implementation of Common Cost Management level II Project Code AIM CCM level II Description - Scope Belgocontrol (BE) DFS (DE) DSNA (FR) LVNL (NL) MUAC ANSP (MAS) MIL (BE) Skyguide (CH) (LU) Belgocontrol (BE) DFS (DE) DSNA (FR) LVNL (NL) MUAC ANSP (MAS) Skyguide (CH) Schedule Status ESSIP Objective & PCP link AIM Steering Group merged 'AIM Harmonisation' and 'AIM Publication' subgroups into the AIM Task Force with 4 main activities: - Harmonisation of Aeronautical Information (Common AIS Reference Data set); - Alignment of National AIP; - Development of a Common FABEC AIM Data Package for airspace design project; - Early contribution to the implementation of an airspace design project (upload the specific AIM data to EAD as early as possible). The common planning of financial aspects (investments, cost savings, etc.) between ANSPs is considered the next step towards an aligned financial framework. The project will analyse which cost items can commonly be planned, which synergies can be derived and which consequences can be derived from the obtained information. Work has been started in September PCP: AF5: Initial System Wide Information Management. Preliminary Deployment Programme: FT 5.3.3: Interface NMS Centralised Services: CS5: European ATM Information Management Service (EAIMS) None Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas Capacity Safety Environment Harmonised aeronautical information, avoiding duplications or ambiguities, significantly contributes to ATM safety. FABEC wide harmonised data sets available from a single source will allow for improved flight planning. Cost Efficiency Expected: A significant positive impact on the cost efficiency of e.g. Airspace Design Projects as cross-border data becomes readily and seamlessly available. Not started yet None None None None The project is the baseline for future financial cooperation and hence an enabler for future benefits in Cost Efficiency without actually delivering own elements of cost saving. Cooperation Activities (FABEC) is not involved in the AIM TF; Belgocontrol is the publisher of the BE/LU AIP. in 2014 developed a new strategy aiming for investigating existing potential for synergies in service provision with FABEC partners Belgocontrol and DFS and common purchasing. The outcome in terms of financial cost and benefit, technical, operational and legal feasibility are expected in LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 23 Released Issue

36 5.2.1 FABEC Project Description On the following pages, tables detail for each ongoing main FABEC project: which ANSPs and military partners are participating a description, the scope and objectives the schedule and implementation planning the status end 2015 the link to the ESSIP, if any the expected performance contribution to the SES KPAs capacity, safety, environment and costefficiency Note: Luxembourg is not involved in all projects described in the following. However, some projects may have financial or operational impacts for Luxembourg. The major FABEC projects are provided as reference. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 24 Released Issue

37 Project Name: Airspace Design South-East Project Code: AD SE Organisation(s) LUX Belgocontrol DFS DSNA MUAC Skyguide Military partners of: B, CH, D, F and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The scope of the South East airspace project consists of 2 main airspace changes: 1. EUC22 Establish a new Cross Border Area (CBA) EUC22 for use by the French, German and United States Air Forces. This EUC 22 will increase the amount of airspace available for civilian use in the LUX area. This additional airspace will allow for optimisation of the civil route network (SWAP) and will assist the various Airspace Projects around the LUX area to achieve their performance targets. A stepwise approach was chosen for the implementation of the EUC SWAP In the current situation, the flows of traffic on UN852 and UN853 cross twice, once in Brussels UIR at the DIK waypoint, and again to the north of Geneva. The SWAP concept intends to remove this dual crossing to improve safety and increase the capacity of the network by: De-conflicting upper air routes UN852 and UN853 by swapping the direction of the traffic flows Creating duplicate parallel routes to allow for segregation of over flights from climbing and descending flights The boundaries of the EUC 25 (French-Swiss Cross Border Area) were redefined in March 2015 to ensure sufficient civil airspace for the new Geneva SIDs & STARs that will be implemented to join the SWAP network. Schedule/Implementation planning To facilitate the implementation, the project has been divided into three phases: Phase 1 EUC25 Phase 2 SWAP and new EUC22 step 1 Phase 3 FULL EUC22 As the project is now suspended the implementation planning is TBD. Status Phase 1 was successfully implemented in March Phase 2: Significant operational and technical concerns were raised during training sessions using large scale simulations; these concerns were considered as too important for an implementation in March As a result, in December 2015 the project has been suspended. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM20: Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7. (Objective set to Achieved and removed from ESSIP ed.2014) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Project under re-evaluation. Safety Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency Project under re-evaluation. Project under re-evaluation. Project under re-evaluation. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 25 Released Issue

38 Project Name: Airspace Design CBA Land/Central West Project Code: AD CBALCW Organisation(s) DFS LVNL MUAC Military partners of: D and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The objective of the CBA Land/Central West project is to design and implement an optimised ATS structure of the FABEC Central West area and of the North area which also includes a CBA Land. Based on known constraints in current airspace design, the objectives of the project are to: Release military airspace in the south of the Netherlands, to create increased civil capacity and more direct civil routes for the hub airports London, Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam. To compensate the military airspace users, to implement a larger consolidated Cross-border exercise area to accommodate legacy as well as fifth generation fighter training operations. Schedule/Implementation planning In the original work planning two implementation steps were foreseen: Step 1 This step implements the new and changed sectorisation and ATS route structures related to the Northern area and the core area of CBA Land military cross-border area over Northern Netherlands and Germany. The implementation also requires improved ASM arrangements and initial GAT route network improvements in the southern part and it will also implement the required cross-border ATM legislation, rules and procedures. Step 2 This step completes the full implementation of CBA Land/Central West project. It will implement the restructuring of the airspace structure in the southern part and allow full release of a MIL training area (TRA12) in the South- East of the Netherlands and the implementation of the 4 th IAF for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, resulting in direct routings in the lower and upper airspace. At the same time the end state of the CBA will be implemented. As the project is now suspended the implementation planning is TBD. Status The airspace and route design has been developed and successfully validated. In October 2015 the project has been suspended. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM20: Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 7. (Objective set to Achieved and removed from ESSIP ed.2014) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. Safety To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 26 Released Issue

39 Project Name: AIM Task Force Project Code: AIM Organisation(s) LUX Belgocontrol DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC Skyguide Military partners of BE and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The AIM Task Force has three areas of activities: Harmonisation of aeronautical information inside the FABEC area Creation of a consistent FABEC ATM Data Set Provisions for an efficient management of the FABEC ATM Data Set Schedule/Implementation planning The AIM Task Force received revised priorities. The work plan 2015/2016 was changed accordingly. Status The team started its new activities in June Two deliverables (AIM P-2 and AIM P-3) are completed and handed over to the FABEC AIM Steering Group. AIM TF plans to finalize the present deliverables by end Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - ITY-ADQ: Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information. PCP: - AF5: Initial System Wide Information Management. Deployment Programme DP 2015: - FT 5.3.3: Interface to Network Management System (NMS) > Aeronautical Information Exchange Centralised Services: - CS5: European ATM Information Management Service (EAIMS) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity N/A Safety Harmonised aeronautical information, avoiding duplications or ambiguities, significantly contributes to ATM safety. Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency FABEC wide harmonised data sets available from a single source will allow for improved flight planning. Expected: A significant positive impact on the cost efficiency of e.g. Airspace Design Projects as cross-border data becomes readily and seamlessly available. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 27 Released Issue

40 Project Name: FABEC ATFCM/ASM Project Project Code: FAAP Organisation(s) Belgocontrol DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC Skyguide Military partners of: BE, CH, DE, FR and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The aim of this project is to develop ASM solutions, addressing both civil and military airspace user s needs. All AMC responsibilities are remaining as they currently are but AMCs should use interoperable tools to enhance data exchange/sharing and coordination between stakeholders. A stepped approach will give sufficient time to take advantage of future achievements of on-going FUA related activities (e.g. FUA harmonization, Booking Principles and Priority Rules (D7.1)) and to acquire the necessary confidence in and the appropriate knowledge of working methods between stakeholders. Furthermore, DFS and DSNA joined in a bilateral initiative to support FAAP developments. Schedule/Implementation planning Step 1: Provide a FABEC airspace status overview (FASO) and enhance the cooperation between AMCs. FAAP started to further develop the FASO tool. This is done by taking into account requirements from airspace design projects and related initiatives. The task includes further the development of general requirements and the technical implementation of FASO. Status In November 2014, Step 1 has been implemented successfully. Subsequent steps are currently under discussion at the level of the Standing Committee Operations. Until agreement on the future of the FABEC ATFCM/ASM Project (FAAP) has been reached, the Standing Committee Operations decided to limit the scope of FAAP to further develop the FABEC Airspace Status Overview (FASO) by taking into account requirements from airspace design projects. In the framework of the bilateral initiative DFS DSNA a trial is executed from 12/11/2015 until 04/02/2016 to validate AMC coordination to optimize the availability of cross-border CDR routeing (City Pair Paris Munich). Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM19 : Implement Advanced Airspace Management PCP: - AF3.1.1 & 3.2: Airspace Management and Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 3.1.1: (Initial) ASM Tool to support AFUA Centralised Services: - CS4: Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Step 1 Further Steps The main objectives of Step 1 focussed on the preparation of further Steps: analysis and description of local working methods, defining additional working methods, and set-up of an information sharing process. As such Step 1 did not deliver any performance benefits as far as it concerns the 5 KPAs contained in the FABEC Performance Plan. TBD LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 28 Released Issue

41 Project Name: Free Route Airspace Project Code: FRA Organisation(s) Belgocontrol DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC Skyguide Military partners of: BE, DE, FR and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The FRA programme aims at developing and implementing a Free Route Airspace FABEC wide. The objective of the FRA implementation is to give users opportunities to improve the horizontal flight efficiency through both plannable direct routes and at a later stage defined volume/s of Free Route Airspace within FABEC airspace. The FRA programme defines a stepped and gradual implementation approach where FABEC ACCs will develop and implement various iterations of Free Route Airspace. Schedule/Implementation planning The FABEC FRA project was launched in 2011 with the objective of setting up a FABEC Free Route Airspace with A-FUA at FL 365 (and lower when and where possible) in a stepped approach by the end of RP2. In 2015, the project has been aligned with the requirements of Pilot Common Project requirements. This induced an implementation of FABEC Free Route Airspace FL310+ by Since the feasibility to achieve the implementation of Free Route at FL 310 in the whole FABEC airspace (and at all time), especially in high density airspace, is not yet proven, a stepwise approach will be chosen. The stepwise implementation may start at higher Flight Levels and/or in parts of FABEC airspace with lower traffic density and may be time and/or area restricted. The different situation at FABEC ANSP's such as system functionalities, system implementation plans as also the MME shall be taken into account. All Free Route initiatives conducted locally, bilaterally or within a FABEC framework are under the FABEC FRA umbrella. Free Route activities which are not directly conducted within FABEC working groups are managed at ACC or national level using local management processes and are monitored at FABEC level. The Project focuses on the launch of FRA implementation whilst continuing the Direct Routing implementation, moving from three steps to three parallel work streams. Each work stream develops a specific concept: Stream 1: National and cross border DCTs Stream 2: Long Range Direct Routing Mil OFF/Mil ON Stream 3: Initial Free Routing Status For all ANSP s, stream 1 and 2 implementations have begun and are on-going. For DFS and MUAC, initial implementations of Free Routing are planned by Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM21.1: Implementation of Direct Routing - AOM 21.2: Implementation of Free Route Airspace PCP: - AF3.1.2, 3.2 & 3.3: Free Route Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 3.2.1: Upgrade of ATM systems (NM, ANSPs, AUs) to support Direct Routings (DCTs) and Free Routing Airspace (FRA) - Family 3.2.3: Implement Published Direct Routings (DCTs) - Family 3.2.4: Implement Free Route Airspace Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Capacity benefits could be foreseen since reduced average transit times may result in an increase in capacity. Capacity benefits may also be possible if there is proven to be a reduced number of conflicts, fewer redirects, and the resulting impact on controller tools. However it is also possible that in some cases conflicts may become more complex and other or new choke points may emerge. Hence the overall impact of FRA on sector capacity cannot be determined without simulations. Safety No impact. Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency FRA allows airspace users to fly direct routes, thus reducing flight distance flown, with consequent savings in fuel and direct and strategic operating costs. There are environmental benefits from savings in CO2-emissions. Investments at ANSP-level will deliver benefits in financial terms to users, but not to ANSPs. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 29 Released Issue

42 Project Name: Extended Arrival Management Project Code: XMAN Organisation(s) Belgocontrol DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC Skyguide NATS Description/Scope/Objectives The XMAN/AMAN project will develop and implement a harmonised approach to arrival management in the core area of Europe because it has to rely on cross-centre and cross-border processes and procedures. The implementation of XMAN will improve and optimise arrival management operations for the major 5 airports/tmas as well as for other selected intermediate airports as defined by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 716/2014. One of the main characteristics of the XMAN project is the extension of the planning horizon of arrival management systems (AMAN) from the local TMA into the airspace of upstream control centres. The final extension of arrival management operations is expected to reach as far as 200 NM or even beyond, depending on the operational environment and the needs of the stakeholders. These extended planning horizons will cover almost the entire FABEC airspace and, as a consequence, most of the FABEC control centres will be affected by extended AMAN operations and some of them will need to feed several arrival streams for different airports/tmas. Schedule/Implementation planning The XMAN project envisages 3 development and implementation steps: Basic - from 2012 to 2017 The Basic Step uses the currently available systems and technologies in order to establish cross-centre arrival management in the airspace controlled by DFS, LVNL, MUAC, DSNA and NATS. Advanced - from 2013 to 2023 The Advanced Step will take into account validated SESAR results concerning Time Based Flow Management (TBFM) in order to improve the en-route part of cross-centre arrival management in the overall FABEC airspace. This step also requires enhanced data exchange between ACC/UAC in order to support a delay sharing strategy. Additional planning information related to departures and airborne flights will be used to be provided by Airport- CDM and/or Network Management. This step has potentially an impact on all FABEC ACCs. Optimised - from 2017 to 2023 The Optimised Step will take into account further validated SESAR results and will optimize the cooperation between arrival management and Airport-CDM, Aircraft Operators and Network Management in order to widely share Arrival Management (AM) information between all partners and to process and to apply Arrival Management information where needed. Status The FABEC XMAN Basic Step definition has been finalized in September The concept development of the Advanced Step has been finalized in November Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - ATC07.1: Implement arrival management tools. - ATC15: Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations. PCP: - AF1: Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMA Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 1.1.1: Basic AMAN - Family 1.1.2: AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Safety Improved average punctuality: small positive effect. Better forecast for sector loads: small positive effect. Reduced controller workload: no significant effect. Improved situational awareness: small positive effect. Reduced tactical interventions: small positive effect. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 30 Released Issue

43 Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency Reduction of: Track miles and holdings: small positive effect; Fuel burn: large positive effect; CO2/NOX emissions: large positive effect. From ANSP point of view: large negative effect (investment cost without financial return for ANSP). LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 31 Released Issue

44 Project Name: Flow Optimisation Concept Scenario Project Code: FOCS Organisation(s) Belgocontrol DFS DSNA MUAC NATS Description/Scope/Objectives The overall objective of the FOCS Project is to develop, to validate (when applicable) and to implement the different tabled implementation packages defined during the FOCS Study, while taking the most recent changes of the FABEC airspace into account. For RP3, an updated problem statement will be developed in Q which will be the basis for further work for this reference period. FOCS area Schedule/Implementation planning The Local Implementation Packages will be fully executed and managed locally (ASM and VFE improvements, CBA100, French corner). For these elements the FOCS Project only ensures FABEC monitoring. As such, their planning is done at local level and not in scope. For the Implementation Packages (IPs) West (W) and East-South (ES), work is planned in two parallel streams (W and ES). Each stream has its own set of PLC milestones. The phase up to MS2 will focus on achieving an agreement on the overall design (for West) or on a shortlist of acceptable overall designs (for ES). The phase up to MS3 will use real-time simulations to select and validate the final design for ES. The W and ES designs will be further elaborated to a level of detail allowing actual implementation. The safety and performance work up to MS2 will be limited to monitoring of progress. Furthermore, the technical domain is not involved at this stage. The bulk of the work up to MS2 will therefore be done by the PMT, which has a mixed attendance of civil and military operational experts. The PMT will handle both streams of work (W, ES). Expected availability of PMT members drives the rate of progress in the current planning. Status The FOCS project is in the launch phase and its scope may be revisited in Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: n/a Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Safety Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency Still to be determined. Shall not deteriorate. Still to be determined. Still to be determined. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 32 Released Issue

45 Project Name: Organisation(s) LUX Implementation of Common Cost Management level II Belgocontrol DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC Skyguide Project Code: CCM level II Description/Scope/Objectives The common planning of financial aspects (investments, cost savings, etc.) between ANSPs is considered the next step towards an aligned financial framework. The project will analyse which cost items can commonly be planned, which synergies can be derived and which consequences can be derived from the obtained information. Schedule/Implementation planning Status Ongoing; started in Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: n/a Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Safety Environment (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency N/A N/A N/A The project should be the baseline for future financial cooperation and hence an enabler for future benefits in Cost Efficiency without actually delivering own elements of cost saving. 5.3 Regional cooperation Initiatives Co-ordination with adjacent States Letters of agreement (LoAs) have been signed and are regularly updated between and neighbouring and are conform to the Common Format, Cross-Border and the Inter-Centre Letter of Agreement. ATC related LoAs are annexed to the Manual for ATS (MATS). LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 33 Released Issue

46 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation 6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective box : o o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-state SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State s high level progress statement REG (By:mm-yyyy) ASP (By:mm-yyyy) MIL (By:mm-yyyy) APO (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement ASP high level progress statement MIL high level progress statement APO high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO Impl. Date (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 34 Released Issue

47 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 The OAT in Luxembourg is negligible. Military Authorities have no ANSP role, do not exercise regulatory functions, and have no aircraft. Hence this OBJ is not applicable to Luxembourg. REG (By:12/2018) DAC\NSA The OAT is negligible. Therefore this can be considered as not applicable. ASP (By:12/2018) The OAT is negligible. Therefore this can be considered as not applicable. MIL (By:12/2018) AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 The airspace controlled by does not contain military airspace and consequently no ASM cell is required in LU. ASM / ATFCM is handled at FIR Brussels level by EBBR via NM. It is at this level where this objective will have to be implemented. This OBJ is therefore not applicable to Luxembourg. ASP (By:12/2016) The airspace controlled by does not contain military airspace and consequently no ASM cell is required in LU. ASM / ATFCM is handled at FIR Brussels level by EBBR via NM. It is at this level where this objective will have to be implemented. The OAT in Luxembourg is negligible. FABEC ATFCM/ASM Project AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 [PCP] [Essential] The objective is not applicable to as the ANSP in Luxembourg. Service provision above FL 145/165 is delegated to Belgocontrol and above FL 245 to EUROCONTROL Maastricht (MUAC); direct routes are provided in the entire airspace controlled by MUAC. ASP (By:12/2017) The objective is not applicable to as the ANSP in Luxembourg. Service provision above FL 145/165 is delegated to Belgocontrol and above FL 245 to EUROCONTROL Maastricht (MUAC); direct routes are provided in the entire airspace controlled by MUAC. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 35 Released Issue

48 AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] The Objective is not applicable for Luxembourg. Delegation of service provision above FL 145/165 is to Belgocontrol and above FL 245 to EUROCONTROL Maastricht (MUAC); direct routes are provided in the entire airspace controlled by MUAC. FABEC FRA 3step plan does not include airspace controlled by. ASP (By:12/2021) SP in Luxembourg airspace above SFL 145/165 is delegated to Belgocontrol and as of FL245 to MUAC. Since 2011 direct routes are available in the airspace controlled by MUAC (24hrs or during nights /wends in parts of the AoR); further FRA is planned in a stepped approach. LU airspace is excluded from FABEC FRA plans. AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 In 2010 DAC established an Airport Safety Committee (ASC) and two subgroups, one of which, GTSAM, took over the responsibilities of the former Runway Safety Team (RST). GTSAM was found to be ineffective and with the agreement of DAC a new group consisting of representatives from the aerodrome operator and users, the Luxembourg Airport Airside Safety Team (LAST), with ToR encompassing runway incursion prevention, has now been established. Work is continuing between as Aerodrome Operator and aerodrome partners to implement remaining actions in the frame of the aerodrome certification ongoing which will latest be achieved by end REG (By:12/2013) DAC\NSA ASP (By:12/2013) APO (By:12/2013) Lux. Airport In 2010 the DAC established an Airport Safety Committee (ASC) that comprises two subgroups: Movement Area Safety Workgroup (Groupe de travail sécurité des aires de mouvement GTSAM) and the Wildlife Management Committee (Comité de contrôle de la faune). The Movement Area Safety Workgroup took over the responsibilities of the former local Runway Safety Team (RST). The ASC is composed of managers with decision power, whereas the Working Groups are composed of experts. According to national regulations (Art. 2 of framework regulation), is the aerodrome operator for the manoeuvring area at ELLX. According to national legislation (Art. 255 of luxairport's "Airport development contract" regulation), luxairport is responsible for apron management and all infrastructures not related to the manoeuvring area. has reestablished a team, LAST, to undertake this role in 2014 with the involvement of operational staff from airport users, airport and ATC throughout the entire process until implementation. The new arrangements were approved by DAC and the group started working in According to national regulations (Art. 2 of framework regulation), is the aerodrome operator for the manoeuvring area at ELLX. According to national legislation (Art. 255 of luxairport's "Airport development contract" regulation), luxairport is responsible for apron management and all infrastructures not related to the manoeuvring area. Luxairport is a member of the LAST. The remaining actions to align the SMS with ICAO standards will be completed as means to comply with EU regulation 139/2014 are put in place. Work is continuing between as Aerodrome Operator and Late Late 31/12/2017 Completed 31/12/2012 Completed 31/12/2013 Late 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 36 Released Issue

49 Aerodrome operator aerodrome partners to implement remaining SLoAs in the frame of the aerodrome certification ongoing which will latest be achieved by end /12/2017 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1 not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) The implementation of ASMGCS is not mandatory for Luxembourg airport. However, based on an indepth analysis of local conditions and safety risks has started in 2013 with the implementation of an ASMGCS system level 1, which will increase the safety of airport operations. Initial operation of Level 1 is planned in Q1 of Regulatory actions will be identified in time subject to DAC/ consultation on ASMGCS plan and requirements REG (By:12/2010) DAC\NSA ASP (By:12/2011) APO (By:12/2010) Aerodrome operator The MDDI invited to implement an ASMGCS. The DAC/NSA will review the change to the functional system. Regulatory actions will be identified in time subject to DAC/ consultation on ASMGCS plan and requirements. has started implementation of an ASMGCS system level 1, which will increase the safety of operations. ASMGCS system is planned to be implemented in 2 phases; operational Q1/2017 for Level 1. aerodrome operator is involved and leads the project, setup and installation of the system and coordinates with luxairport on the vehicle equipment and driver training. ASMGCS Level 1 / IOP Gateway / TWR CWP (consoles) and 50" TFT ADD display replacement; implementati on of an upgraded Airfield Lighting and Control Management System (ALCMS) with ASMGCS 31/03/2017 No Plan 31/03/ /03/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 37 Released Issue

50 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level 2 not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) The implementation of ASMGCS is not mandatory for Luxembourg airport. However, based on an indepth analysis of local conditions and safety risks has set up a plan to implement an ASMGCS system Level 2, which will further increase the safety of airport operations. The implementation of Level 2 will start after final approval and full operational use of Level 1 ASMGCS has been achieved and if the approval for operational use is feasible. ASP (By:12/2017) Aerodrome operator APO (By:12/2017) Aerodrome operator has started implementation of an ASMGCS system level 1 in a first phase, which will increase the safety of operations. ASMGCS system is planned to be implemented in 2 phases. Level 2 implementation planned to start after successful installation and operation of Level 1 and is foreseen to be available by end of The implementation of ASMGCS is not mandatory for Luxembourg airport. However, based on an indepth analysis of local conditions and safety risks has set up a plan to implement a Level 2 ASMGCS system, which will further increase the safety of operations, by end of ASMGCS Level 1 shall be operational in Q The implementation of a Level 2 ASMGCS is planned to start after Level 1 is fully operational and approved and Level 2 safety functionalities are technically feasible and their approval for operational use is ensured. Aerodrome Operator is involved and leads the project, the setup and installation of the system and is coordinating with luxairport on vehicle equipment and driver training. 31/12/ /12/ /12/ /03/2016 AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Luxembourg is not in the applicable area of this objective. However, and luxairport are taking actions to improve cooperation between all airport partners and have established a platform to improved collaboration and coordination of all activities in the entire airport movement area. ASP (By:12/2016) APO (By:12/2016) Aerodrome operator Luxembourg is not in the applicable area of this objective. However, and luxairport are taking actions to improve cooperation between all airport partners and have established a platform to improved collaboration and coordination of all activities in the entire airport movement area. (Airport Operator) and luxairport are taking actions to improve cooperation between all airport partners and have established a platform to improved collaboration and coordination of all activities in the entire airport movement area. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 38 Released Issue

51 Time Based Separation [PCP] AOP10 [Essential] not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Luxembourg airport is outside of the applicability area of this objective. REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan ELLX Luxembourg Airport Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] Planned Coordination with the respective NM unit has started in 2015 (meetings and follow up actions) 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) APO (By:12/2021) Aerodrome operator Coordination with the respective NM unit has started in 2015 (meetings and follow up actions)., as the ANSP and APO started to investigate the situation and information with airport partners (luxairport, airlines). Planned 31/12/2021 Planned 31/12/2021 AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) [PCP] [Essential] Luxembourg airport is not on the list of airports in the applicability area. ASP (By:12/2020) Aerodrome operator Luxembourg airport is not on the list of airports in the applicability area. Luxembourg airport is not on the list of airports in the applicability area. APO (By:12/2020) Aerodrome operator Luxembourg airport is not on the list of airports in the applicability area. Luxembourg airport is not on the list of airports in the applicability area. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 39 Released Issue

52 ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets Area Proximity Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 EUROCONTROL specifications are recommended to be considered as applicable. Area Proximity Warning level 1 is operational. Area Proximity Warning level 2 will be implemented in the wake of the upgrade of the SUR chain. ASP (By:12/2016) Area Proximity Warning level 2 will be implemented in 2016 in the wake of the SUR chain upgrade. CNS Network infrastructure ATM systems architecture & SUR chain upgrade Planned 31/12/2016 Planned 31/12/2016 ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets Minimum Safe Altitude Warning level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 MSAW Level 2 is implemented and operational as a safety alert tool and no changes were made to the system since implementation. Any changes or upgrades of the system will be subject to safety assessment and change notification. This will be the case with the SUR chain upgrade in ASP (By:12/2016) MSAW Level 2 is implemented and operational as a safety alert tool. An update of the SUR chain is planned in The local procedures for the use of MSAW were reviewed and aligned with local operational practices. CNS Network infrastructure ATM systems architecture & SUR chain upgrade Completed 31/12/2009 Completed 31/12/2009 ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets Approach Path Monitor level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 EUROCONTROL specifications are recommended to be considered as applicable. plans to implement the Approach Path Monitor level 2 in 2016 as part of the SUR chain upgrade. ASP (By:12/2016) plans to implement the Approach Path Monitor level 2 in 2016 in the wake of the SUR chain Phase 1 upgrade. CNS Network infrastructure ATM systems architecture & SUR chain upgrade Planned 31/12/2016 Planned 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 40 Released Issue

53 ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Luxembourg is not in the applicable area. ELLX is not a high density TMA. Taking into account the forecast traffic levels for the forthcoming years, no need to implement this Objective can be identified. ASP (By:12/2015) Luxembourg is not in the applicable area. ELLX is not a high density TMA and airport. Taking into account the forecast traffic levels over the forthcoming years, there is no need to implement this Objective nor justify the investment. Cooperation and participation in FABEC projects D MAN, AMAN, XMAN is however ensured. ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 There is no need / justification for the implementation of this OBJ in Luxembourg TMA. Therefore, the OBJ is declared as not applicable in Luxembourg ATC ASP (By:12/2021) Luxembourg APP is responsible for the TMA traffic within a short time horizon. There is no need and justification for the implementation of this objective in Luxembourg ATC. ATC15 Implement, in EnRoute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Luxembourg does not operate in En route sectors (FL145/165 delegated to Belgocontrol; FL245 and above to MUAC) and its TMA has no direct interface with any other TMA that is supporting AMAN. The status reflects the national airspace controlled by. For details on the upper airspace, see LSSIPs of BE and MUAC. FABEC plans foresee the implementation of XMAN/AMAN for the 5 major airports and TMAs in FABEC in line with EC Reg 716/2014 on Pilot Common Projects; Luxembourg airport and TMA is not included. ASP (By:12/2017) does not provide En route services and the TMAs in Luxembourg airspace have no direct interface with any other TMA supporting AMAN and Luxembourg airport and TMA is not in the applicability area of EU Reg 716/2014 and respective FABEC programme. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 41 Released Issue

54 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Completed Implemented as per (EU) regulation 1332/2011 of 16 December /03/2012 REG (By:12/2015) DAC\NSA ASP (By:03/2012) MIL (By:12/2015) Implemented as per (EU) 1332/2011 of 16 December Airworthiness certification does not fall under the responsibility of the NSA. Given the small size of Luxembourg TMA, no performance monitoring system for ACAS has been established. All TCAS alerts are reported and investigated. Completed 31/03/2012 Completed ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Luxembourg has an upgraded ground communication system with basic functions implemented and enabled. The other functions supporting the electronic transfer and coordination are implemented but currently not enabled / not in operational use pending requests for implementation of additional OLDI messages of adjacent centers; they can be implemented on request. The principle capability for implementing additional OLDI messages is therefore available. ASP (By:12/2018) The ANSP has an upgraded ground communication system with basic functions implemented and enabled. The other functions supporting the electronic transfer and coordination are implemented but currently not enabled. currently has no plan on installing electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controllers during coordination and transfer. However, monitors requests for implementation of additional OLDI messages by adjacent centers and will implement them on request. Partly Completed 31/12/2018 Partly Completed 31/12/2018 COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 Completed The implementation and full migration to AMHS is achieved since June The system is operational. 30/06/2014 ASP (By:12/2014) The implementation and full migration to AMHS is achieved since June The system is operational. Completed 30/06/2014 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 42 Released Issue

55 COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 The project has started with a study and definition phase and a formal decision and plan with implementation dates in a 2phased approach for initial and final implementation is available. It is ensured that the final implementation date of this Objective will be met. ASP (By:12/2020) The local COM team has attended VoIP information and training sessions and the supplier has provided technical requirements for the changes in the COM system as a further step in the planning process. The final implementation of the entire VoIP system will happen before the final implementation date 12/2020 in line with the requirements. Planned 31/12/2020 Planned 31/12/2020 ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ELLX is not in the applicability area for this objective. However, currently 2 CDAs (Continuous Descent Approach) in Germany feeding Luxembourg TA are in operation; CDO is applied each time the traffic allows it. The FABEC PP states two additional Luxembourg CDOs to be implemented. They are designed and developed in cooperation with Belgocontrol and ready for implementation but could up to now not been implemented due to lacking TOD. The required specific TOD for this project will be acquired in 2016 and will allow the implementation latest during ASP (By:12/2013) APO (By:12/2013) has in close cooperation with DFS implemented the CDAs from DE. The procedures for 2 CDOs to ELLX from BE are developed and ready for implementation which is pending complete Luxembourg terrain obstacle data and map as required (ICAO). luxairport is informed about the plan but not involved in the implementation process of this Objective. (Aerodrome Operator) will monitor performance of CDO and inform users and the local community. Continuous Descent Operation (CDO) Continuous Descent Operation (CDO) Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 43 Released Issue

56 ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports not applicable ELLX Luxembourg Airport (Outside Applicability Area) ELLX is not on the list of airports in the ESSIP Plan for which this Objective is applicable. However, public information and access through internet to the noise level reports at the airport and in its vicinity is made available through internet. The implementation of CEM is subject to consultation between the parties, ANSP, users and airport authorities, which started in 2014 and is done regularly since. ASP (By:12/2016) APO (By:12/2016) Aerodrome operator The implementation of CEM is under consideration in consultation between the parties ANSP and Aerodrome Operator, users and lux Airport have started in 2014 regular consultation. Environmental management issues are part of the plan. The implementation of CEM is under consideration in consultation between the parties ANSP and Aerodrome Operator, users and lux Airport have started in 2014 regular consultation. Environmental management issues are part of the plan. FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 All priority SLoAs are implemented. Due to the size of the Luxembourg TMA, considers FCM01ASP06 as not applicable. As there are few holdings, the implementation of FCM01ASP07 is economically not justified therefore considered also not applicable. All other SLoAs are completed, hence the overall Objective is considered completed. ASP (By:07/2014) All priority SLoAs are implemented. Due to the size of the Luxembourg TMA, considers FCM01ASP06 as not applicable. As there are few holdings, the implementation of FCM01ASP07 is economically not justified therefore considered also not applicable. All other SLoAs are completed, hence the overall Objective is considered completed. Completed 31/10/2007 Completed 31/10/2007 FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Some SLoAs of this objective are not economically justified and therefore are considered not to be applicable. ASP (By:12/2017) Due to the size of Luxembourg TMA, considers FCM03ASP05 to ASP14 as not applicable and has no plan so far to implement it. Completed 31/12/2012 Completed 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 44 Released Issue

57 FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable Luxembourg is not in the applicability area of this objective but implements the parts of this programme as far as agreed in FABEC. ASP (By:12/2015) Luxembourg is not in the applicability area of this objective but implements the parts of this programme as far as agreed in FABEC. FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] Luxembourg has no intention to implement this objective. Given the fact that the ANSP does not operate an ASM system nor automated ASM support tool and Luxembourg airport is not a coordinated airport and provides no airport slot info to the EU Airport Coordinators Association (EUACA) it is not required to implement this Objective. The objective is considered therefore as not applicable for LU. ASP (By:12/2017) APO (By:12/2021) Aerodrome operator does (a) not operate an ASM system, (b) has no automated ASM support tool and ELLX is (c) not a coordinated airport and therefore does not provide airport slot info to the EU Airport Coordinators Association (EUACA) it is not considered to implement this Objective. The objective is considered not applicable to LU. FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 [PCP] [Essential] The implementation of this facility is not justified / required for the sector management in APP. ASP (By:12/2021) The implementation of this facility is not justified / required for the sector management in APP. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 45 Released Issue

58 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Luxembourg has no full integrated level 5 briefing function in place. There is a plan under development for a full integrated briefing of AIS / ARO and MET products at level 5 with several options under investigation but further pending due to open strategic, organizational and institutional issues that are due to be decided in ASP (By:12/2012) has no full integrated level five briefing function in place, i.e. briefing products from MET and AIS / ARO cannot be combined into a single output tailored as requested by the pilot and at one briefing station. Instead briefing products are available as separate AIS / MET briefings. has a plan (in study phase) for providing a full integrated MET and AIS briefing function at level 5 and investigates two options: using the briefing products via the EAD with LU becoming a user of the EAD or developing a webbased briefing facility. This has not yet been decided. Full Integrated Briefing MET AIS ARO Late 31/12/2017 Late 31/12/2017 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The regulatory and institutional framework for this has been developed and in the pipeline for endorsement and integration into national legislation which will include the implementation of the related ADQ requirements. REG (By:05/2018) DAC\NSA ASP (By:05/2018) APO (By:05/2018) Aerodrome operator The regulatory and institutional framework for TOD has been developed and in the pipeline for endorsement and integration into national legislation. The related ADQ requirements are included in the framework plan. is waiting for the integration into national legislation of the regulatory and institutional framework for the TOD. shall be responsible for the provision and handling of TOD; the legislative framework will now be set up by the respective State body. The technical requirements for the acquisition of the data are ready to be issued as part of a call for tender. is waiting for the integration into national legislation of the regulatory and institutional framework for the TOD. Electronic terrain and obstacle data (etod) Electronic terrain and obstacle data (etod) Late 31/05/2018 Late 31/05/2018 Late 31/05/2018 Late 31/05/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 46 Released Issue

59 ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 Luxembourg plans to ensure that the capability of the SUR chain to use downlinked a/c identification is maintained and that the required network functions are in place. ASP (By:01/2020) The a/c identification function will be configured in the wake of the SUR chain upgrade planned to be done during Full operational use is planned before due date of this objective. Partly Completed 31/12/2019 Planned 31/12/2019 ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Luxembourg issues but does not publish aeronautical information. Aeronautical information concerning the territory of the GrandDuchy of Luxembourg is included in the AIP Belgium/Luxembourg, published by Belgocontrol. The organizational and institutional arrangements in regard to the future handling of aeronautical information (TOD) are in the process of being established at State level with all relevant parties involved. REG (By:06/2017) DAC\NSA ASP (By:06/2017) APO (By:06/2017) The applicability of the regulatory issues related to future AIS data provision functions regarding ADQ are under review and a framework document has been sent to State authorities for endorsement. AIS is not a publisher of aeronautical data or information. All data and information related to LU airport and ASP are provided to Belgocontrol AIS for official publication. The formal arrangements between and Belgocontrol will be updated accordingly. The organizational and institutional arrangements in regard to the handling of aeronautical information (TOD) are in the process of being established at national level and is waiting for the decision. Pending decisions at national level and reception of the applicable data quality requirements. Electronic terrain and obstacle data (etod) Electronic terrain and obstacle data (etod) Electronic terrain and obstacle data (etod) Late 31/12/2017 Late 30/06/2017 Late 31/07/2017 Late 31/07/2017 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 47 Released Issue

60 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services above FL285 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Given the scope of the implementation (>FL285) it is not applicable to and Belgocontrol. For further details, refer to MUAC LSSIP. REG (By:02/2018) DAC\NSA ASP (By:02/2018) MIL (By:01/2019) It is implemented for MUAC; it is not applicable for Luxembourg. Safety assessment take place under the lead of the IVW (CAANL) which is the SEScertifying authority for MUAC, under the authority of the 4 States NSA committee. Delegation of ATC service provision above FL 145/165 to Belgocontrol and above FL 245 to MUAC. ITYAGVCS2 Implement 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 A State focal point for coordination of actions is nominated. The interim target to convert 25% of frequencies by end 2014 was not applicable to ASP as no area control frequency nor OPC frequency is allocated to. The OPC frequencies used by airlines in Luxembourg however were converted in In a first step the radio fallback (LRS) system will be replaced with an 8.33 (and VoIP) capable system by The requirements for the replacement of the main VCS are under investigation depending on the outcome of the Synergy Project with FABEC partners (results expected in 2016). REG (By:12/2018) DAC\NSA Implementation plan will be monitored. ASP (By:12/2018) MIL (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2018) Aerodrome operator investigated the technical requirements for the changes in the current VCS. In a first step the radio fallback (LRS) system will be replaced with an 8.33 (and VoIP) capable system by The exact requirements for the replacement of the main system with 8.33 khz capability are under investigation depending on the outcome of the Synergy Project with FABEC partners (results are expected in 2016). is ready to consider an earlier conversion of some frequencies before the final implementation date 12/2018 at which time all frequencies will be converted. Aerodrome operator and luxairport will implement / change equipment and procedures and training of personnel as appropriate. Partly Completed 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 48 Released Issue

61 ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018 OLDI is already implemented and operational in the system since 2001; the FDP system was upgraded in 2012/2013. Luxembourg follows ongoing FABEC developments. ASP (By:02/2018) MIL (By:12/2012) OLDI is already implemented and operational in the system, which was updated in 2012 and put into full service in follows the ongoing developments in FABEC (Coordination of OLDI implementation in accordance with IR and IDP) and will implement the OLDI messages as required by FABEC accordingly and as applicable. Completed 29/02/2012 Completed 29/02/2012 ITYFMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Completed Luxembourg is fully FMTP compliant. 31/12/2014 ASP (By:12/2014) MIL (By:12/2014) Luxembourg ANSP is fully FMTP compliant; the FDP system was upgraded in 2012 and enables FMTP. Completed 30/11/2013 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 49 Released Issue

62 ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 The SUR system is interoperable with other ANSPs using a common protocol as agreed with the participating partners (SURNET). There are no new changes to the SUR system; changes will be introduced in These changes as well as the safety assessment and training and oversight will be done according to the IR and the provisions of EU 1034/2011. REG (By:02/2015) DAC\NSA Changes are subject to safety assessment and notification ASP (By:02/2015) MIL (By:06/2020) Surveillance performance and interoperability requirements as far as required are already implemented for the ground based SUR system. The safety assessment of the existing SUR infrastructure was done and was delivered to DAC end January There are currently no changes made to the current SUR system. However, a complete upgrade of the SUR chain is planned in 2016 which will ensure full interoperability. CNS Network infrastructure, ATM systems architecture & SUR chain upgrade / SDDS Surveillance Data Distribution System Late 31/12/2016 Late 31/12/2016 Late 31/12/2016 NAV03 Implementation of PRNAV Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 The objective is not mandatory for TMA airspace nor is there a local business case and justification for implementation in LU as there are no capacity problems in LU airspace. The objective is considers as not applicable. However, coordination with stakeholders and users continues on PRNAV implementation. Luxembourg also waits for the more fundamental changes coming up with the mandate and plan for PBN implementation at EU level. The respective WGS84 requirements from Annex 15 are met. ASP (By:12/2023) has decided not to implement PRNAV infrastructure and procedures in LU airspace and airport and considers this objective as not applicable. The implementation is not mandatory for TMA implementation and should be based on a local business case and justification in coordination with stakeholders and users which will continue in There are currently and for the foreseeable future no capacity problems that would justify the implementation of PRNAV. LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 50 Released Issue

63 NAV10 Implement APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 There is no local business case and justification for implementation at LU airport as there are no capacity problems. The objective is considered as not applicable. Luxembourg also waits for the more fundamental changes coming up with the mandate and plan for PBN implementation at EU level. The requirements for coordinated data in WGS84 are met. REG (By:04/2016) DAC\NSA ASP (By:12/2016) There is no need or justification to implement APV procedures in Luxembourg. The objective is considered not applicable. There are neither plans nor an established need to implement APV procedures at Luxembourg airport. SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 Occurrence reporting data suggests that airspace infringements are not a problem in Luxembourg airspace. Occurrences are closely monitored. A number of measures as proposed or recommended in the Action Plan are implemented aiming to reduce further airspace infringements. REG (By:12/2011) DAC\NSA action plan implementation is being monitored. ASP (By:12/2011) MIL (By:12/2011) Data on reported occurrences indicate that airspace infringements are not to be considered problematic. Recommended and proposed actions from the Action Plan are implemented in MET, AIS and ATC. Close monitoring of occurrences takes place to assure that additional risk reduction measures will be implemented when required. Completed 31/01/2016 Completed 31/01/2016 Completed 31/01/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 51 Released Issue

64 SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The planning of this Objective has started but not all applicable measures have yet been identified and implemented. The working arrangements for the work on the actions are in place. REG (By:01/2018) DAC\NSA The planning for this Objective has not yet started. ASP (By:12/2014) APO (By:12/2014) Aerodrome operator The local RWY safety team (LAST) is in place and working and reporting as appropriate; an aerodrome certification steering and working group was established in 2014 and is since working on all aerodrome and airport related issues also relevant for the Action Plan (AP). The majority of applicable measures recommended in the AP are already implemented. The remaining items are going to be implemented by the end of The local RWY safety team (LAST) is in place and working. luxairport is involved and takes an active role together with other stakeholders on ELLX in the LAST and in the aerodrome certification steering and working group which is led by as the Aerodrome Operator. Late 31/01/2018 No Plan Late 31/12/2016 Late 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 52 Released Issue

65 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 53 Released Issue

66

67 Annexes Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co-ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Luxembourg Roland REISER Hermann RATHJE LSSIP Focal Point for DAC / NSA DAC Stephane VALLANCE LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Roland REISER LSSIP Focal Point for Airport / AOP (Aerodrome Operator) Gary BEATON, Arnaud BOURBEY EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Luxembourg DPS/PEPR Valerie OBLIN ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners Objective AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) A. DYBOWSKA François MATHIEU, Roland REISER AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA François MATHIEU, Roland REISER AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA François MATHIEU AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA François MATHIEU AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Dominique WETS, Roby HENTZIG AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Dominique WETS, Guy FERBER AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Dominique WETS, Guy FERBER AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC François MATHIEU, Gary BEATON AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL François MATHIEU AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL François MATHIEU AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC François MATHIEU ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT François MATHIEU ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT François MATHIEU ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT François MATHIEU ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO François MATHIEU ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO François MATHIEU ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO François MATHIEU ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL ORTO François MATHIEU ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO François MATHIEU COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL François MATHIEU ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL François MATHIEU FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA François MATHIEU LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 54 Released Issue

68 ESSIP Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist(s) FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA François MATHIEU FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA François MATHIEU FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA François MATHIEU FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO François MATHIEU INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Roland REISER, Guy FERBER INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Roland REISER ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Roland REISER ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Guy FERBER, Kathy BAUER NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Roby HENTZIG, Raymond KIRSCH SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Dominique WETS, Gary BEATON SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Dominique WETS, Gary BEATON LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 55 Released Issue

69 Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation Charts See LSSIP Year 2015 Luxembourg 56 Released Issue