Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP FRANCE

Transcription

1 EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP FRANCE Level 1 - Implementation Overview

2

3

4

5 Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for France Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/18 Date of Edition 24/05/2018 LSSIP Focal Point LSSIP Contact Person Status Intended for Available in Jorge Pinto Released Agency Stakeholders Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2017 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2016 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP FAB Performance Plan Jean Jacques Blanchard jean jacques.blanchard@aviationcivile.gouv.fr atm master plan level 3 implementation plan atm master plan level 3 implementation report and civile.gouv.fr/ pics/pdfdownloads/performance_plan/fab%20ec%20fab%20rp2%20performance%20plan%20b ody_revised_v3.0_complete%20pdf%20format.pdf LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue

6

7 APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan - Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). Stakeholder/ Name Position Signature Organisation Directi n du Transport Aerien Marc BOREL Direction des Services de la Navigation Aerlenne Maurice GEORGES Direction de la Circulation Aerlenne Militaire BG* Pierre REUTTER LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue

8

9 CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment Geographical Scope National Stakeholders Traffic and Capacity Evolution of traffic in France Bordeaux ACC Brest ACC Marseille ACC Paris ACC Reims ACC Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Implementation Projects National projects FAB projects Regional projects Cooperation activities FAB Co ordination Regional cooperation Implementation Objectives Progress State View Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue

10

11 Executive Summary National ATM Context Leading stakeholders involved in ATM in France are the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, respectively through French Military Air Traffic Management Directorate (DIRCAM Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire) and French Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC Direction Générale de l Aviation Civile). Air Transport Directorate (DTA Direction du Transport Aérien) and Civil Aviation Safety Directorate (DSAC Direction de la Sécurité de l Aviation Civile), both belonging to DGAC but functionally separated, are defined as national supervisory authorities (NSA) : DTA for charging and performance and DSAC for safety oversight in air navigation services and air traffic management, including in particular changes oversight and interoperability. For services provided to general air traffic, DIRCAM exercises the national supervisory functions within Defence on behalf of DSAC, according to national decrees. Main civil ATM ANSP includes DSNA (Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne), the French air navigation services provider certified and designated for ATM services (as well as for CNS and AIS) and 65 stakeholders, providing Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS) for GAT on 66 aerodromes. In addition seven military ANSPs providing services to general air traffic and covering ATC, CNS and AIS services, are certified in France. Among them four are designated since December 2011 as military air traffic service provider for the benefit of general air traffic. Météo France is certified and formally designated as the only one national MET provider since 20th December Moreover, major airports (Paris Roissy CDG, Paris Orly, Nice Côte d Azur, Lyon Saint Exupéry, Toulouse Blagnac, and Marseille Provence) operators contribute to reporting. France is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Switzerland. In the course of 2011, two performance plans have been established for the first reference period ( ) and submitted to the European Commission in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 of 29th July 2010 and agreed according to Commission Recommendation 2012/C 228/01 of 29th July Those first national and FABEC RP1 performance plans addressed safety, capacity, flight efficiency and military mission effectiveness through complementary Key Performance indicators (KPI, with targets) and Performance Indicators (PI, for monitoring purposes without targets). In addition, the national plan addressed cost efficiency performance indicators. For the 2nd reference period the FABEC Performance Plan for has been delivered to the Commission 30th June 2014 in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 and 391/2013 of 3rd May 2013 ; a first revised version has been submitted 2nd July 2015 and a final one 30th January 2017 is still under assessment. It sets safety, en route and terminal capacity, flight efficiency and cost efficiency targets. There is no more national French performance plan as such, as for RP1 but national chapters of the FABEC performance plan address targets set at national level. More over the DSAC is involved in the agreement on the cooperation of the FABEC national supervisory authorities and a manual for their common activities of has been issued in LSSIP Year 2017 France 1 Released Issue

12 Traffic and Capacity Traffic in France increased by 4 % during summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during Regarding the period the STATFOR medium term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 0.3% and 3.5% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0%. Regarding the current capacity plan of 5 French ACC between 2018 and 2022: - Bordeaux ACC: a small capacity gap is expected for 2018 and Brest ACC: There will be a capacity gap in Brest ACC in 2018 and The traffic increase in Brest ACC was high in 2017 (+7.6%), and the high capacity increase of 10% was not sufficient to close the capacity gap. For 2018, a high traffic increase is expected, and the planned capacity increase of +12% will not be sufficient to close the capacity gap. - Marseille ACC: the current capacity gap should be closed in The capacity increases in 2018 and 2019 should mainly come from the flexible rostering implementation. The national agreement is validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. - Paris ACC: no capacity gap is expected for the planning period. - Reims ACC: a capacity gap is expected in Reims in 2018 and Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives AOM19.1 and FCM05 are considered as both part of the pre SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition ) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. Pre SESAR Implementation PCP Implementation % % LSSIP Year 2017 France 2 Released Issue

13 Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 79% 52% 84% 48% 92% 70% 12% 18% Pre SESAR PCP Pre SESAR PCP Pre SESAR PCP Pre SESAR PCP ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter Block % LSSIP Year 2017 France 3 Released Issue

14 ATM Deployment Outlook State objectives Deployed in : OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 100% progress ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 100% progress Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 100% progress Ground Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 100% progress Mandatory Coordination & Transfer [ITY COTR] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ TCAS II v7.1 [ATC16] 100% progress STAM Phase 1 [FCM04.1] 97% progress AMAN to en route [ATC15.1] 78% progress APV Procedures [NAV10] 78% progress AMHS [COM10] 76% progress FMTP [ITY FMTP] 65% progress Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 62% progress Runway excursions [SAF11] 96% progress Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 80% progress Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY SPI] 83% progress Voice over IP [COM11] 80% progress etod [INF07] 51% progress Aircraft Identification [ITY ACID] 90% progress Data Link [ITY AGDL] 81% progress AMAN to further en route [ATC15.2] 73% progress ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 70% progress Real Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 70% progress MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 36% progress 8,33 khz below FL195 [ITY AGVCS2] 29% progress Aeronautical Information [ITY ADQ] 28% progress STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 28% progress Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 25% progress Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 21% progress Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 17% progress NewPENS [COM12] 7% progress Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 5% progress LSSIP Year 2017 France 4 Released Issue

15 Airport objec ves LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry Deployed in : Airport CDM [AOP05] 100% progress Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress A SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 20% progress Airport objec ves LFMN Nice Côte d Azur Deployed in : A SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress Airport CDM [AOP05] 70% progress Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 21% progress Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 5% progress Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress Airport objec ves LFPG Paris CDG Airport Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 30% progress Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 23% progress Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress LSSIP Year 2017 France 5 Released Issue

16 Airport objec ves LFPO Paris Orly Airport Deployed in : Airport CDM [AOP05] 100% progress By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 30% progress Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 23% progress Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress Time Based Separation [AOP10] 0% progress Airport objec ves LFML Marseille Provence Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) [AOP04.1] 16% progress A SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 3% progress Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 0% progress Airport objec ves LFBO Toulouse Blagnac Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) [AOP04.1] 40% progress A SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 33% progress LSSIP Year 2017 France 6 Released Issue

17 Airport objec ves LFBP PAU PYRENEES Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress Airport objec ves LFMD CANNES MANDELIEU Deployed in : By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress LSSIP Year 2017 France 7 Released Issue

18

19 Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions; Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document; Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2017 France 8 Released Issue

20

21 1. National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope International Membership France is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 16th, December, 1955 EUROCONTROL 13th, December, 1960 European Union 18th, April, 1951 EASA 15th, July, 2002 ICAO 7th, December, 1944 NATO 4th, April 1949 ITU 1 st, January 1866 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the BREST, PARIS, REIMS, BORDEAUX and MARSEILLE FIRs / UIRs. LSSIP Year 2017 France 9 Released Issue

22 Upper Airspace: ACC in UIR France (above FL 285) LSSIP Year 2017 France 10 Released Issue

23 Airspace Classification and Organisation CURRENT APPLICATION OF AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATIONS UP TO FL v1 FL or Alt Band France Upper Limit C* D 115 3K* G SFC - 3K* Major TMA A C D E* Minor TMA C D E CTA/ Awy D E CTR A D* LTA* D E Legend A B C D E F G Unclassified or N/A No Reply C* = Class C with VFR restrictions, implemented above FL 195 in November K* = FL55/ Alt 1,000 /1,500 /2,000 /2,500 /3,000 /3,500 /5,000 (ft AGL/AMSL) E* = marginal portions of TMA or week-end periods; D* = all CTR are class D except for Paris. LTA* = special arrangements for mountainous regions and high seas which are classified E. In France, Class A is only applied for Paris CTR and TMA National Stakeholders Civil aviation in France is under the responsibility of the Ministère de l Environnement, de l Energie et de la Mer (Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea) which represents France in the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council together with its military counterpart on behalf of the Ministère de la Défense (Ministry of Defence). The stakeholders involved in ATM/ANS in France are the following: Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy; Direction Générale de l Aviation Civile (DGAC), for the: Direction du transport aérien (DTA), responsible for the rule making of air navigation under general air traffic rules and National Supervisory Authority for the charging and performance regulation (liaising with DSAC for safety performance); Direction de la sécurité de l aviation civile (DSAC), the National Supervisory Authority except for charging and performance regulation (see above); Direction des services de la navigation aérienne (DSNA), as the main provider of Air Navigation Services. Bureau d'enquêtes et d'analyses pour la sécurité de l'aviation civile (BEA) is an independent body responsible for accident and serious incident investigations reporting directly to the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea. Météo France, for the provision of meteorological services. Ministry of Defence (MoD) LSSIP Year 2017 France 11 Released Issue

24 Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire (DIRCAM): Military Air Traffic Management Directorate which is the regulator for all traffic flying under operational air traffic rules, and also for the provision of air traffic services to GAT in some parts of the French national airspace. DIRCAM performs oversight activities on behalf of DSAC, French national supervisory authority, regarding military providers providing air navigation services to general air traffic; CFA: Air Force Command, for the provision of air navigation service (ATS & CNS) in particular for the benefit of MIL aircraft and ANS providers; ALAVIA: Navy Aviation, for the provision of air traffic services, it should be certified for CNS; COMALAT: Army Aviation, for the provision of air traffic services, it should be certified for CNS also mid 2017; DGA/EV: Test and Acceptance Centre, for the provision of air traffic services; DIRISI: Defence network communication and information systems directorate, for the provision of ground ground communication; DIA: Aeronautical Division Information for provision aeronautical information services for OAT only. In addition, in FIRs managed by France: 65 independent air navigation service providers provide AFIS for GAT on 66 aerodromes; the ESSP (European Satellite Services Providers), the members of which are AENA (ENAIRE), DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, NAV and Skyguide, is in charge of the provision of the EGNOS Open Service (OS) and Safety of Life (SoL) Service. Since November 2012, EASA is competent authority for the certification and oversight of ESSP; Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Main organisation charts are given in annex B. LSSIP Year 2017 France 12 Released Issue

25 Ministry of Defence (MoD) Ministry in charge of Transport (MoT) State Aviation Safety Authority (DSAÉ) General Directorate for Civil Aviation (DGAC) Military Air Traffic Management Directorate (DIRCAM) High Level Airspace Policy Board Air Transport Directorate (DTA) Air Navigation Services Directorate (DSNA) Civil Aviation Safety Directorate (DSAC) Operations Directorate (DO) Technical & Innovation Directorate (DTI) LSSIP Year 2017 France 13 Released Issue ACCs, APPs, TWRs, AIS Operational System, R&D

26 Note: Apart from the civil BEA, a BEAD Air (Defence Air Accident Investigation Board) has been created in the same way in order to provide accidents and serious incidents involving State aircraft with investigations. This defence organism is placed under the direct surveillance of the Ministry of Defence. The BEAD Air is coordinating with the BEA in some cases but remains independent Civil Regulator(s) General Information The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The DGAC is further detailed in the following sections. Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule making Safety Oversight Enforcement actions in case of non compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace Economic Environment Security Accident investigation Direction du Transport aérien (DTA) Direction de la Sécurité de l Aviation civile (DSAC) DSAC DTA DTA DTA DTA DSAC assists DTA with technical expertise regarding regulatory activities, monitoring and application of the Civil Aviation Security Quality Control National Program Arrêté of July, 9 th, 2008 on the organisation of the MEEDDAT Article (NOR: DEVK A) Arrêté of December, 19 th, 2008 on the organisation of the DSAC (NOR: DEVA A) DSAC sets the corrective measures or operational restrictions to be taken. Enforcement actions have different meanings, not used in our regulation on oversight. Arrêté of July, 9 th, 2008 on the organisation of the MEEDDAT Article (NOR: DEVK A) Arrêté of July, 9 th, 2008 on the organisation of the MEEDDAT Article (NOR: DEVK A) Arrêté of July, 9 th, 2008 on the organisation of the MEEDDAT Article (NOR: DEVK A) Arrêté of July, 9 th, 2008 on the organisation of the MEEDDAT Article (NOR: DEVK A) Arrêté of December, 19 th, 2008 on the organisation of the DSAC Article 10 (NOR: DEVA A) LSSIP Year 2017 France 14 Released Issue

27 DTA In France the Regulator is composed of different directorates of DGAC which belongs to the Ministry in charge of Transport: DTA and DSAC. They are functionally separated from DSNA which is also part of DGAC. The Direction du Transport Aérien (DTA) is entrusted with the Environment, Security, Economic regulation (airlines, airports, ANS, passenger rights) Social law issues within the industry, International matters and relationships, as well as airspace management, ATM/ANS safety rule making and policy. Within DTA, a dedicated unit, the Mission Ciel Unique (MCU), is responsible for the Single European Sky matters, and with Airspace organisation, ATM/ANS rule making (except ANS staff training and licensing issues) and performance regulation. Single European Sky Unit and Air Navigation Rulemaking Gilles Mantoux Deputy: Luc Lapène Air Navigation Rulemaking and Airspace Philippe Mesquida Single European Sky Jean Jacques Blanchard DSAC Direction de la Sécurité de l Aviation Civile (DSAC) is the national supervisory authority set up by the French order of the 7th December DSAC, as French supervisory authority is in charge of ensuring compliance with international standards applicable to civil aviation, European regulations, and national legal provisions regarding safety, environment and security. As a consequence, DSAC has national authority for supervising, in particular, ATM/ANS safety, interoperability and security. DSAC includes five central technical directorates addressing European cooperation and safety regulation, flight crews, airworthiness and operations, airports and air navigation and security. The national supervisory authority revolves around a central directorate in Paris and regional offices located throughout mainland France, overseas departments and territories of the Antilles Guyana, and in the Indian Ocean region. Annual Report published: Y The last 2016 Annual Report is available and can be downloaded: LSSIP Year 2017 France 15 Released Issue

28 DSNA Service provided Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne (DSNA) was created by decree of 28th February DSNA is the single civil ANSP that provides ATC for en route, TMA and aerodromes in FIR France. It is state owned and is an entity of DGAC. Functional separation is achieved between rule making, oversight activities and service provision activities. Both DSNA and DSAC have a specific status called service à compétence nationale (nation wide competence office) defined by Decree of 9th May Governance: State Ownership: 100% State Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en route Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP ATC approach Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP AIS Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP CNS Y MET N METEO FRANCE is the only certified MET provider, and was designated on 20th December ATCO training Y Initial training is provided by ENAC (French Civil Aviation School) Others Y AFIS providers are generally aerodrome operators, except Miquelon, done by DSNA Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): Y Existing ATS services through letters of agreement where appropriate Annual Report published: Y solidaire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/dsna DGAC RA 2016 FR.pdf For more information see civil aviation website durable.gouv.fr/politiques/aviation civile ATC systems in use DACOTA Thales Air systems V8 (2016) IRMA Sogeti High Tech V8 (2016) ODS Cap Gemini (2016) OMEGA Sogeti High Tech V9 (2016) STIP Thales Services I 27 (2016) STPV Thales Services V29 (2016) S.Erato V5.0 LSSIP Year 2017 France 16 Released Issue

29 Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 Y DSNA/ENAV FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: STIP/STPV: Thalès Services Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? N Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2020 ATC Unit SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit ARTAS, EUROCONTROL (CAMOS) N N/A ATC Units The en route ATC units in the French airspace which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En route TMA BORDEAUX ACC 20 LFBB BREST ACC 18 LFRR MARSEILLE ACC 28 LFMM PARIS ACC 21 LFFF REIMS ACC 19 LFEE 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2017 France 17 Released Issue

30 A total of 44 TMAs are managed in the French mainland airspace (excluding overseas regions) by APPs located at the principal airports. Most important of them are: ATC Unit Number of approach positions En route TMA Associated FIR(s) PARIS CDG 15 IFR LFFF PARIS ORLY 7 IFR LFFF BÂLE MULHOUSE BORDEAUX 6 IFR + 2 VFR 4 IFR + 1 VFR LFEE LFBB LILLE 4 IFR LFFF LYON MARSEILLE MONTPELLIER NANTES NICE 8 IFR + 2 VFR 6 IFR + 2 VFR 4 IFR + 1 VFR 3 IFR + 1 VFR 9 IFR + 4 VFR LFMM LFMM LFMM LFRR LFMM STRASBOURG 5 IFR + 1 VFR LFEE TOULOUSE 6 IFR + 1 VFR LFBB Remarks Airports General information In addition to aerodromes operated by Aéroports De Paris (ADP), eleven major airports (11), whose land belongs to the state, are operated by companies under concession by DGAC. This concession tasks the Airport Operator to manage not only the land side and the air terminals but also the air side (that includes signs and markings, lighting). Regional airports property has been transferred to regional communities. These communities delegate the operation to airport operators under statement of work. DSAC certification addresses all tasks of the aerodrome operator including SMS (Safety Management System), structures, lighting on the runway and taxiways. Each year, the number of aerodrome operators that need a certification is increased in order to phase the process. UAF (Union des Aéroports Français is the association of the Airport Operators. An airport slot coordinator COHOR (Association pour la Coordination des Horaires a different entity independent from State, airlines and airports, is responsible for the airport slot allocation for the airlines or any aircraft operator, for any operation at French coordinated airports, based on the EU Regulation 95/93 as amended. LSSIP Year 2017 France 18 Released Issue

31 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Paris Roissy Charles de Gaulle (LFPG) Paris Orly (LFPO) Nice Côte d Azur (LFMN) Lyon Saint Exupéry (LFLL) Marseille Provence (LFML) Toulouse Blagnac (LFBO) Military Authorities The defence activities encompass the functions of regulator, ANSP, airport operator, airspace user, aircraft operator, aeronautical information provider (only for OAT), for all the traffic flying OAT and also for the provision of air traffic services to OAT and GAT flights in some parts of national airspace and around some airports. Regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. Regulatory role DIRCAM (Military Air Traffic Management Directorate) is the defence authority responsible for providing regulation of air navigation under operational air traffic rules. DIRCAM is embedded inside the State Aviation Safety Authority (DSAÉ), which deals with regulation and oversight for ATM and airworthiness, and also aircrew training and aircraft operations. To ensure safety of air navigation in the whole French airspace, regulatory activities are coordinated between DIRCAM and DTA under the High Level Airspace Policy Board ( Directoire de l Espace Aérien ). In the same way than DGAC organisation, military ATM safety regulatory functions have been separated in two parts, under the authority of the Director of the DIRCAM, which encompasses three sub directorates: Airspace sub directorate (SDEA) in charge of airspace and relevant rulemaking; Regulatory sub directorate (SDR) in charge of Air navigation, Airspace and Aerodromes regulation; Surveillance and Audit sub directorate (SDSA) in charge of military ANSPs supervisory activities, on behalf of DSAC for the services provided for GAT, approval of military aerodromes for the need of State aviation. Therefore, DIRCAM is organized as follows: LSSIP Year 2017 France 19 Released Issue

32 DIRCAM Director BG** Pierre REUTTER Deputy: COL Marc LAPIERRE SDEA LTC Luc ANTOON SDR LCL François CLEMENT SDSA COL Vianney CAZELLE Regulatory framework and rule making OAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Decrees in State council or Prime minister level. DIRCAM Regulation Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, Minister of Defence These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Y GAT Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Decree in State council or prime minister level Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y OAT/GAT Co ordination Y OAT/GAT Co ordination Y ATCO Training N ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability Y Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: Crews and controllers are both trained and licensed by relevant Defence Authorities but most of them have a civil licence too. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N Additional Information ATCO licences are delivered by DSAC and trained in a military school certified by DSAC Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y EUROCONTROL eaip Y EUROCONTROL eaip Y Other: Other: Y LSSIP Year 2017 France 20 Released Issue

33 Oversight OAT National oversight body for OAT: DIRCAM OAT oversight has been launched in September Actually it encompasses the oversight of training organisations, military ATCO licenses and OAT providers. Additional information: GAT NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: The French National Supervisory Authority for GAT services provided by military ANSPs is the DSAC. Some military ANSPs supervisory activities are performed by DIRCAM, on behalf of DSAC, through a national decree and an operational letter of agreement. Oversight methods used by DIRCAM are supervised by DSAC. Military ATCO training oversight and licensing are performed by DSAC. Additional information: Service Provision role MoD organizations are providing ATS to general air traffic in some parts of the airspace. DIRCAM is responsible for providing aeronautical information at national level for OAT. Ministry of Defence Army COMALAT Navy ALAVIA Air Force ATS/CNS DGA DGA/EV EMA DIRISI DIRCAM DIA CFA Services Provided: OAT En Route Y If not provided by MIL specify who does provide this service Services Provided: GAT En Route Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y AIS Y MET Y For observations and forecasting, data are provided by METEO FRANCE and military services under METEO FRANCE supervision, and tools are METEO FRANCE devices SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y Additional Information: Other: Additional Information: MET Other: N Y LSSIP Year 2017 France 21 Released Issue

34 Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Y If YES, since: 17/12/15 13/06/17 17/12/15 5/12/17 25/09/15 Duration of the Certificate: Certificate issued by: DSAC If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: User role State Aviation Authority Army COMALAT Navy ALAVIA Air Force CFA Procurement Agency DGA/EV Department of Finance CUSTOMS Department of Homeland Security Office of Public Safety Department of Homeland Security Gendarmerie IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y If Military fly OAT IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing N Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N If Military fly GAT IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: Flow and capacity exemptions are only authorized for some governmental and prioritized flights. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in France applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y LSSIP Year 2017 France 22 Released Issue

35 2. Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in France France - Annual IFR Movements IFR flights IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017) IFR flights yearly growth 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F H 4.3% 5.2% 3.3% 4.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% France B 1.6% 1.5% 4.4% 3.9% 3.2% 2.0% 1.8% 1.3% 1.5% 1.4% L 3.5% 1.4% -0.3% 0.3% -0.2% 0.1% 0.0% ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% LSSIP Year 2017 France 23 Released Issue

36 2017 Traffic in the France increased by 4.0 % during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during The EUROCONTROL Seven Year forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.3% and 3.5% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0% Bordeaux ACC Traffic and en route ATFM delays LFBBALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 LSSIP Year 2017 France 24 Released Issue

37 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap % 207 (+3%) Yes The average en route delay per flight decreased from 0.79 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.63 minutes per flight during the same period in % of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, 21% due to Industrial action,17% due to Weather, 9% due to Other, 3% due to Equipment, 2% due to Special Events, 2% due to ATC Staffing, 1% due to Airspace Management and 1% due to ATC Routing Capacity Plan +14% Achieved Comments FRA Step 2: H24 DCTs with military activity Improved Airspace Management / FUA FUA TSA 10 New TSA 6 (more dynamic ASM) Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM CDM processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) New TSA 6 SWFAB/FABEC Barcelona interface GIROM OKABI Partially Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Some DCTs implemented, a new stepped FRA implementation plan is developed New interface to be reviewed capacity decrease in LFBB 5th layer in R&L sectors No Postponed to 1 st March 2018 Flexible rostering ERATO (stripless, MTCD) Partially Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Re evaluation of sector capacities Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO No 20 sectors opened Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS/Reverse CASA to be at 207. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 217 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 204. Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2017 France 25 Released Issue

38 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LFBB 207 Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Summer Capacity Plan FUA TSA 34 ESSO project including new Madrid Bordeaux interface (BAMBI) 5th layer in R&L sectors FRA implementati on Improved Airspace Management / FUA Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM CDM processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Change of DFL between upper and lower airspace Procedures Staffing Flexible rostering Technical Enhanced Mode S Re evaluation Capacity of sector capacities Significant Events Training 4Flight Max sectors 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 20 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity Increase Reference profile Annual % Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 7%* 4% 2% 2% 1% 11% 3% N/A N/A N/A 3.9% 2.5% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information H % 246 4% Ref % 236 3% L 225 9% 228 1% Open % 236 3% C/R 226 9% 232 3% * The capacity increase is mainly coming from the implementation of ERATO and the flexible rostering. LSSIP Year 2017 France 26 Released Issue

39 The charts below show the average opening of sectors planned for Summer On busy days, up to 21 sectors could be open if necessary. Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LFBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook A small capacity gap is expected for 2018 and LSSIP Year 2017 France 27 Released Issue

40 2.3. Brest ACC Traffic and en route ATFM delays LFRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +7.6 % 224 (+10%) Yes The average en route delay decreased from 1.60 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 1.05 minutes per flight over the Summer period in % of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity, 14% due to Industrial Actions, 7% due to ATC Staffing, 5% due to Weather, 1% due to Equipment, 1% due to ATC Routeing, 1% due to Airspace Management, 1% due Special Events and 1% due to Other. Capacity Plan +13% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA New TSA 6 (more dynamic ASM) Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM CDM processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisation of airspace below FL145 No Postponed to Autumn 2018 New TSA Flexible rostering Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Re evaluation of sector capacities Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO Yes 19 sectors were opened Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2017 France 28 Released Issue

41 Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 224, 10% higher than in During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 247 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 227. Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LFRR 224 Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events H % 286 4% Ref % 273 2% L % 256 1% Open % 273 2% C/R % 267 2% Summer Capacity Plan Free route Lisboa/Madri d/ Brest FRA implementati on Enhanced Mode S Improved airspace management / FUA Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM CDM processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisatio n of airspace below FL145 Reorganisatio n of airspace Brest, Jersey, London Flexible rostering Training 4Flight Max sectors 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 17 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity Increase 12%* 3% 1% 2% 1% Reference profile Annual % Increase 20% 2% N/A N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 6.3% 5.1% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A LSSIP Year 2017 France 29 Released Issue

42 Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information * The capacity increase is mainly coming from the implementation of the flexible rostering. Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LFRRACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook There will be a capacity gap in Brest ACC in 2018 and The traffic increase in Brest ACC was high in 2017 (+7.6%), and the high capacity increase of 10% was not sufficient to close the capacity gap. For 2018, a high traffic increase is expected, and the planned capacity increase of +12% will not be sufficient to close the capacity gap. LSSIP Year 2017 France 30 Released Issue

43 2.4. Marseille ACC Traffic and en route ATFM delays LFMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +4.7 % 239 ( 4%) Yes The average en route delay increased from 0.46 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 1.61 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity, 19% due to Weather, 14% due to Industrial Actions, 4% due to Staffing 1% due to Airspace Management and 1% due to Equipment. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Airspace management procedures for D54 during Summer season Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Flexible rostering No Planned before Summer 2018 Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO Yes 28 sectors open Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with REVERSE CASA to be at 239, 4% lower compared to Summer During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 263 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 252. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2017 France 31 Released Issue

44 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LFMM 239 Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H % 296 4% Ref % 283 2% L % 273 1% Open % 283 2% C/R % 287 2% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase Reference profile Annual % Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Summer Capacity Plan Implementati on of FRA Improved airspace management / FUA Airspace management procedures for D54 during Summer season Reorganisatio n of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 IAM project (Interface LFML) IAG project (Interface Geneva) SMART SKI Enhanced Mode S 28 UCESO (15+13) Improved ATFM procedures and STAM CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) LFKJ interface DFL changes in WW and MM sectors Flexible rostering Training for 4Flight (Autumn 2018 to end 2020) 25 UCESO 28 UCESO (tbd in (15+13) transition plan) 4flight (new ATM system) implementatio n 28 UCESO (15+13) 28 UCESO (15+13) 12%* 10%* 0% 1% 6% 16% 2% N/A N/A N/A 3.6% 4.2% N/A N/A N/A LSSIP Year 2017 France 32 Released Issue

45 Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information * The capacity increases are mainly coming from the flexible rostering. The national agreement is already validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. LFMMACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook The capacity gap should be closed in The capacity increases in 2018 and 2019 are mainly coming from the flexible rostering. The national agreement is already validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. LSSIP Year 2017 France 33 Released Issue

46 2.5. Paris ACC Traffic and en route ATFM delays LFFFALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap +0.6 % 283 (+1%) No The average en route delay decreased from 0.40 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.17 minutes per flight over the same period in % of the delays were due to the reason Weather, 15% due to ATC Capacity, 14% due to Industrial Action, 3% due to Equipment and 1% to Special Events. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project Yes GF project is part of istream CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Flexible rostering Yes Yes Yes Partially Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO Yes 20 sectors were sufficient Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS to be at 283, 1% higher than in Summer During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 272 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 252. LSSIP Year 2017 France 34 Released Issue

47 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC LFFF 283 Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Max sectors Planned Annual Capacity Increase Reference profile Annual % Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Summer Capacity Plan LMH project FRA above FL345 xstream Reorganisatio n of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL115 (South of FIR) SMART SKI Enhanced Mode S 20 UCESO (10+10) Improved airspace management / FUA Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisatio Reorganisatio n of lower n of lower airspace and airspace and delegation of delegation of ATS to APP ATS to APP units below units below FL115 (North FL115 (North West of FIR) East of FIR) 20 UCESO (10+10) Flexible rostering 20 UCESO (10+10) 20 UCESO (10+10) FRA Implementatio n Training for 4Flight (autumn 2021 to end 2022) 18 UCESO (9+9) 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% N/A N/A N/A 1.1% 1.4% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information H 284 0% 287 1% Ref % 285 1% L 283 0% 283 0% Open 283 0% 285 1% C/R 283 0% 285 1% LSSIP Year 2017 France 35 Released Issue

48 Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LFFFACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook There will be no capacity gap in Paris ACC for the planning period. LSSIP Year 2017 France 36 Released Issue

49 2.6. Reims ACC Traffic and en route ATFM delays LFEEACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) Peak Day Traffic Summer Traffic Yearly Traffic* Summer Traffic Forecast High Traffic Forecast - Summer Low Traffic Forecast - Summer Summer enroute delay (all causes) Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * *From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017 Performance summer 2017 Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En route Delay (min/flight) Summer Ref value Actual Capacity gap % 215 (+8%) Yes The average en route delay slightly decreased from 0.40 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.38 minutes per flight in Summer % of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, 20% due to Weather, 10% due to Industrial Action, 3% due to Staffing, 2% due to Airspace management, and 1% due to Special Event. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Additional DCTs Partially Work in progress Improved airspace management / FUA FABEC XMAN Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Flexible rostering Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 19 UCESO No 18 sectors Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 215. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 224 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 207. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes LSSIP Year 2017 France 37 Released Issue

50 Planning Period The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. Capacity Profiles ACC 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline H 234 9% 245 5% Ref % 234 2% LFEE 215 L 224 4% 227 1% Open 229 7% 234 2% C/R 226 5% 230 2% Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Summer Capacity Plan FRA implementati on FABEC XMAN YB sector Enhanced Mode S Improved airspace management / FUA Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Flexible rostering Training for 4Flight (Autumn 2018 to end 2020) 4flight (new ATM system) implementati on Max sectors 19 UCESO 19 UCESO 18 UCESO 19 UCESO 19 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity Increase 4% 3% 0% 1% 6% Reference profile Annual % Increase 7% 2% N/A N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile 2.2% 1.3% N/A N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) N/A N/A N/A Additional information The charts below show the average opening of sectors planned for Summer On busy days, up to 19 sectors could be open if necessary. LSSIP Year 2017 France 38 Released Issue

51 Sectors available Summer 2018 WD Sectors available Summer 2018 WE :00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LFEEACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios Capacity profile (movements per hour) Reference Capacity Profile Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) Capacity Profile Current Routes Capacity Profile High Capacity Profile Low Capacity Baseline Plan Planning Period Outlook There will be a capacity gap in Reims in 2018 and LSSIP Year 2017 France 39 Released Issue

52 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to France for all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Conclusion VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT ROUTING. THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS. (page 14 of the Report) Applicable to All State that are implementing AOM21.1 and AOM21.2 AOM21.1 is completed and AOM21.2 is well on track within FABEC context. Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY All States + EC CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be done considering the number of parties involved, including parties outside the scope of the oversight of the NSA. The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 will support the momentum already initiated towards compliance. LSSIP Year 2017 France 40 Released Issue

53 4. Implementation Projects 4.1. National projects Main national projects are listed below. 4 FLIGHT Defence Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), Mil. Authority (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Procurement is under final discussion for defence. Implementation of a new standardized ATS system for Enroute in both civilian and military centers L3: ATC07.1, ATC12.1, ITY AGDL Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety and capacity improvement through both advanced decision support tools available and better coordination process for the Air Traffic Controllers. Interoperability between military and civilian centers. Safety and capacity improvement through both advanced decision support tools available and better coordination process for the Air Traffic Controllers. Interoperability between military and civilian centers. LSSIP Year 2017 France 41 Released Issue

54 AMAN. ( ) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Procurement has been awarded a few years ago. AMAN is operational in version 1. A new more complete version will be implemented in To replace legacy AMAN system (MAESTRO), a new AMAN tool has been deployed and is operational at LFFF since mid 2014 for sequencing and metering the flow of traffic inbound the Paris terminal area. This new AMAN system has been implemented as well in the South East of France for the benefit of Lyon and Nice TMA and will be extended to LFMM in L3: ATC15.1 ASBU : B0 RSEQ Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Less fuel burnt through reduced speed and optimized trajectories. Increasing of capacity and reduction of holdings in TMA area. LSSIP Year 2017 France 42 Released Issue

55 Aéroport du Grand Ouest à Notre Dame des Landes (NDDL) ( ) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references A 6 month mission has been given to Mr ROL TANGUY, from the Cour des Comptes, to build the transportation strategy for the region, in collaboration with the local communities. Cancelled ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: A political decision was taken on the 17th of January 2018 to cancel the project of a future airport and maintain and develop Nantes Atlantique airport that is located very close to the city with a final approach 21 that flies over the city center. The upgrade of the current airport will comprise: extended RWY, precision approaches, new terminal, Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: To be determined LSSIP Year 2017 France 43 Released Issue

56 CSSIP Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: AMHS COM Centre is now operational IP WAN is now operational VoIP for telephony and radio is now operational Description: Migration of all networks for data and voice communications to Internet Protocol (IP) : LAN, IP WAN, AMHS COM Centre. Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution L3: COM10 ASBU : B1 SWIM Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Cost efficiency improvement through up to date technology LSSIP Year 2017 France 44 Released Issue

57 Geographic Database AIM tool Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), Groupe ADP (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2016 to 2020 Status: Description: Specifications are under writing. Creation of database including aeronautical information and geographical data (etod and AMDB). DSNA will use the database for their respective needs (procedure design, cartography...). Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: NA Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: SESAR DP AF The systems developed and the use of etod and AMDB will ensure a more relevant information at airspace users LSSIP Year 2017 France 45 Released Issue

58 ILS rationalization Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: 30 ILS have been decommissioned, 13 have been transferred to the airport operators. Within its navigation strategy, France equipped every instrument runway end with APV procedures and has defined the associated ILS decommissioning. NAV06 ASBU : B0 APTA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: A safety benefit by implementing APV at every IFR runway ends. An environmental benefit by implementing APV at every IFR runway ends. Cost efficiency by decommissioning ILS system. LSSIP Year 2017 France 46 Released Issue

59 New Project4 FLIGHT Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: The contract has been awarded in October Complete implementation scheduled between 2017 and 2024 : step 1: implementation is planned end of 2020 in Reims and Marseille ACC; step 2 implementation in Paris ACC end 2022; implementation is planned 2024 in Brest and Bordeaux ACC. Procurement has been awarded in October 2011 Initial trials performed successfully in December First partial planned operational use performed in two pilots ACC Commissioning is planned in pilot ACCs by 2020 The objective of 4 FLIGHT is the procurement of the next generation of the ATM system in order to prepare SESAR convergence. This new generation of ATM system will be based on an existing supplier line of product in 2 steps: the first one with a new architecture and very advanced functions, and the second one fully compliant with the SESAR CONOPS L3: ATC07.1, ITY AGDL Other links: AUO 0301, TS 0102 ASBU : B0 RSEQ B0 TBO Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Environmental performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Capacity performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Better cost efficiency through shared development and maintenance costs LSSIP Year 2017 France 47 Released Issue

60 PBN APV Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: Status: Publication of 200 RNAV approach procedures (156 LPV 81 baro VNAV) for 220 instrument runway ends. Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Publication of APV procedures on every instrument runway ends (according to ICAO resolution A37 11) L3: NAV10 ASBU: B0 APTA Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety improvement by providing vertical guidance on all runway ends Cost efficiency by reducing the conventional equipment network LSSIP Year 2017 France 48 Released Issue

61 SEPIA Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2017 to 2022 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Specifications are under writing. Cft issued at the beginning of Replacement of AIM system : AIXM 5 data exchange, enhanced process for collection of originated data, fabrication of AIM products and data sets. SEPIA is a SOFIA related project. L3: ITY ADQ ASBU : B0 DATM Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: DP AF (Compliance with SESAR interoperability standards are required) Ensuring quality and integrity of aeronautical data. LSSIP Year 2017 France 49 Released Issue

62 SOFIA Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2016 to 2022 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Consolidation of users needs and, elaboration of service implementation roadmap. Management for launching related projects for implement new services. Umbrella project for modernizing aeronautical information data chain and processes in order to provide added value services meeting with customer requirements. L3: ITY ADQ ASBU B0 DATM NA Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF (Compliance with SESAR interoperability standards are required) Indirect contribution to safety. This project is an enabler for DSNA. LSSIP Year 2017 France 50 Released Issue

63 SOFIA BRIEFING Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2017 to 2019 Status: User needs consolidated. Initial operation : end of 2018 Description: Replacement of the actual briefing tool. Link and references ATM MP links: SOFIA BRIEFING is a SOFIA related project Other links: ESSIP INF04 ASBU : B0 DATM Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety improvement by better general aviation flight planning LSSIP Year 2017 France 51 Released Issue

64 SYSAT (Systems for APP and TWR) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: From 2017 to 2021 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Procurements started in First order was made in April Negotiation is in progress, purchase will be done in autumn Paris CDG implementation in 2019, then Paris Orly and Le Bourget in 2020 and Nice TMA mid Replacement of ATM system in all DSNA mainland TWRs and in major APPs. Other links: HUM03.1 ICAO ASBU: B0 RSEQ, B0 SURF, B0 ACDM, B0 APTA, B0 FICE, B0 ASEP SESAR: Compliance with SESAR interoperability standards are required Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Safety through improved back up. Capacity through better automation Cost efficiency through sharing of cost and up to date technology LSSIP Year 2017 France 52 Released Issue

65 4.2. FAB projects There are two main FABEC projects ongoing: XMAN (Extended Arrival Manager) FRA (Free Route Airspace) Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Extended Arrival Management (XMAN) Belgocontrol (BE), DFS (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (NL), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Skyguide (CH) The XMAN project envisages three development and implementation steps: 1. Basic Step From 2012 to 2024 The Basic Step uses the currently available systems and technologies in order to establish cross centre arrival management in the airspace controlled by Belgocontrol, DFS, DSNA, LVNL, MUAC and skyguide. 2. Advanced Step From 2013 to 2024 The Advanced Step takes into account validated SESAR results in order to improve the en route part of cross centre arrival management in the overall FABEC airspace. This step requires enhanced data exchange between ACC/UAC in order to support a delay sharing strategy. Additional planning information related to departures and airborne flights will be provided by Airport CDM and Network Management. This step has an impact on all FABEC ACCs. 3. Optimised Step From 2018 to 2024 The Optimised Step will take into account further validated SESAR results and will optimise the cooperation between arrival management and Airport CDM, Aircraft Operators and Network Management in order to widely share Arrival Management (AM) information between all partners and to process and to apply Arrival Management information where needed. This Optimised Step has been put on hold until needs beyond the Advanced Step become more apparent. The FABEC XMAN Basic Step has already been implemented at several ACCs for several airports. The implementation phase of the Basic Step will continue until The Milestone 3 (solution design) of the Advanced Step was formally approved in September The first operational implementations are expected in the second half of The Optimised Step is planned to start in July L3: ATC07.1, ATC15.1 L2: TS 0102, TS 0305 LSSIP Year 2017 France 53 Released Issue

66 Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Free Route Airspace (FRA) Belgocontrol (BE), DFS (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (NL), MIL (DE), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Mil. Authority (BE), Mil. Authority (FR), Militaire Luchtvaart Autoriteit (NL), Skyguide (CH), Swiss Air Force (CH) The FABEC FRA project was launched in 2011 with the objective of setting up a FABEC Free Route Airspace with Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (A FUA) at FL 365 (and lower when and where possible) in a stepped approach by the end of RP2. In 2015, the project has been aligned with the requirements of the Pilot Common Project requirements. This induced an implementation of FABEC Free Route Airspace at FL310+ by In 2016, the project was organised into two work streams 1. National and cross border Direct Routes (DCT) including Long Range Direct Routings; 2. Free Routing. All Free Route initiatives conducted locally, bilaterally or within a FABEC framework are under the FABEC FRA umbrella. Implementation activities are managed at ACC or national level using local management processes and are monitored at FABEC level. In December 2017 the Project Management Plan version 4.0 has been approved. The project is now further supporting and monitoring the direct routing implementations and full FRA implementations. Next to this, the project team is also working on specific tasks like e.g. horizontal flight efficiency improvement of most penalized city pairs. DFS, DSNA, MUAC and skyguide have already implemented several direct routes and will continue to implement further direct routes in the coming years. On 7 December 2017, MUAC has achieved its first FRA implementation successfully (Full FRA at night). L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 L2: AOM 0401, AOM 0402, AOM 0500, AOM 0501, AOM 0505, AOM 0506, CM 0102 A LSSIP Year 2017 France 54 Released Issue

67 4.3. Regional projects Main regional project is the French Italian DSNA/ENAV COFLIGHT system, which will be the new generation of ATM FDP system with electronic environment and fully compliant with ATM Master Plan. COFLIGHT Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), ENAV (IT) Type of project: Regional Schedule: Procurement has been awarded in October Commissioning is planned in pilot ACCs between 2019 and Status: Initial trials performed successfully in December First deployment in pilot ACCs in June 2016 and associated first operation trial in Q Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Cost efficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: New generation ATM FDP system COFLIGHT, electronic environment and fully compliant with ATM Master Plan L3: ATC07.1, ITY AGDL ASBU : B0 RSEQ B0 TBO Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Environmental performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Capacity performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Better cost efficiency through shared development and maintenance costs LSSIP Year 2017 France 55 Released Issue

68 5. Cooperation activities 5.1. FAB Co ordination FAB Europe Central (FABEC) consists of the following states: Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The FABEC Feasibility Phase ( ) led to the conclusion that FABEC is feasible. The Implementation Phase ( ) demonstrated that the FABEC structure was compliant with SES regulations. After the ratification of the FABEC Treaty by all FABEC States, FABEC formally entered into force on the 1st of June This means that FABEC is now operational. FABEC intends to deliver on the goals set by SES II and as laid down in the FABEC Performance Plan. FABEC intends to provide capacity, solve bottlenecks, reduce costs and emissions, make flying more efficient and ensure military mission effectiveness, while maintaining the high safety standards that exist over Europe Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives Continuous cooperation relating to coordination and transfer procedures, airspace and route planning, etc., normally takes place between adjacent States, in accordance with ICAO SARPs and PANS. This cooperation is, among other issues, focused towards implementation of the ECAC Objectives and is complementary to the work undertaken for implementation of the European ATM Master Plan. More specific cooperation/coordination arrangements, which may be useful in coordinating Local Actions between adjacent States, are highlighted below. The ATM Master Plan, its level 3 ESSIP components and the Pilot Common Project provide the main framework on which these Regional Plans rely. In addition to the involvement in the FABEC initiative, the bilateral or multilateral coordination arrangements already set up by DSNA are the following: Joint AEFMP Harmonization Plan (Algeria Spain France Morocco Portugal) (2002), which replaced the formers EFP Harmonization Plan (1991) and AEFMP Harmonization Plan (1996), Member of A6 (ENAIRE, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, PANSA, COOPANS), Coordination with the 6 States/EUROCONTROL (Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, United Kingdom), SOUTH WEST AXIS, to improve ATM capacity and reduce delays in the area of Switzerland, Northern Italy, Northern Eastern Spain, France and United Kingdom with EUROCONTROL collaboration, Member of ESSP (European Satellite Service Provider) EGNOS, Member of the SESAR JU, Member of ANSPs cooperations for system developments such as New Voice Communication System implementation and ATM system developments, Member of the SESAR Deployment Alliance that drive the Deployment of SESAR as SESAR Deployment Manager. LSSIP Year 2017 France 56 Released Issue

69 DSNA, ENAV and various other partnerships DSNA is involved in two major projects in partnership with ENAV: The aim of COFLIGHT is to implement with ENAV a new FDP system that will be compliant to SES interoperability regulation. Following the definition phase, the realization of the COFLIGHT software has started in 2006, and several versions have been delivered to the Customer. Based on Coflight, DSNA and its partners ENAV, skyguide and Malta Air Traffic Service has launched the Coflight Cloud Services (formerly known as Coflight As a service project in The objective is to rely on the Coflight product to provide FDP remotely service and system s maintenance to other ANSPs. The objective of 4 FLIGHT is the specification with ENAV of the next generation of the ATM system in order to prepare SESAR convergence. This new generation of ATM system will be based on an existing supplier line of product in 2 steps: the first one with a new architecture and very advanced functions, and the second one fully compliant with the SESAR CONOPS. Step 1: implementation is planned in 2020 Step 2: implementation is planned in The contract has been awarded in October Common specification and procurement with Maastricht ACC (MUAC) of a next generation VCS (Voice Communications System). o o o o o o o In 2008, a working group of FABEC members developed the specifications for a new VCS (Voice Communication System) taking into account the needs of the FABEC ANSPs as well as the evolutions towards new common functional needs such as the management of the radio and the telephone on the same VCS or to technological evolutions such as the transport of the voice communications under IP. Following the preparation of these specifications, DSNA and MUAC/EUROCONTROL (Maastricht ACC Center) decided to collaborate to conduct a tender procedure for the development, supply and maintenance of New VCS (NVCS Project). A cooperation agreement has been drawn up between MUAC and DSNA to determine the rules for collaboration between the two organizations. One of the characteristics of this cooperation agreement was that a 20 year framework agreement would be awarded in partnership between MUAC and DSNA and that the tendering procedure would be carried out by DSNA, according to the rules of the French Public Procurement Code. The framework agreement offers the possibility for other FABEC ANSPs, if they wish, to integrate the cooperation agreement and to benefit rapidly of a NVCS system ready for use, compliant with European regulation and using state of the art technologies as well as from all the services offered by Framework agreement under the same conditions as the DSNA and MUAC. The NVCS project enable DSNA, MUAC to satisfy the following objectives: Purchasing of NVCS primary and backup systems under a common framework contract Implement an advanced Voice Communications System capable of delivering voice services over any possible telecom infrastructure in the foreseeable future. Support a coordinated transition from TDM (Time Division Multiplexing) based switching to Voice over IP (VoIP) among different Air Navigation Services Providers (ANSPs). Increased cost effectiveness of the ANSP s investments as a result of scale effects in the acquisition process as well as during the maintenance phase. The perimeter of NVCS project in DSNA is to replace main and backup radio/ telephone chains of the five French ACC and also replace Back up VCS for CDG airport. Brest ACC will be the first of five DSNA area control centers (ACCs) to be equipped with Main and Backup NVCS. Implementation is planned for Bordeaux ACC project was launched in 2017; contract has been notified on November Aix en Provence, Reims and Paris ACCs will follow. LSSIP Year 2017 France 57 Released Issue

70 o NVCS Backup will replace current radio and telephone backup at CDG Airport. Radio backup functionalities will be taken into service in Full operational capabilities (radio and telephone) are planned for Even for smaller projects DSNA gives more importance to partnership with European ANSPs: Development of a common Safety Nets Product with DFS; Interconnection with the SETINET Network with Skyguide; Common specification and procurement with Skyguide of an AMHS compliant message switching system (MESANGE: MESsagerie Aéronautique de Nouvelle GEnération) leading to system implementation in 2016; ESSP DSNA is a shareholder of the ESSP SAS Company established in Toulouse in 2009, along with other European ANSPs (DFS, ENAIRE, ENAV, NATS, NAV P, skyguide). The main aim of the cooperation between these seven ANSPs is having ESSP operating the EGNOS infrastructure and delivering several services, in particular the EGNOS Safety of Life service used by aviation to provide LPV approaches over Europe. The governance of the ESSP is ensured by a Board of Directors where shareholders are represented. The Board of Directors meets on a quarterly basis and it is supported by the CEO of the company, as well as by the financial and strategic direction. ESSP has won in 2014 the EGNOS operating contract for 8 years, following a competitive call for tender managed by GSA, the European GNSS Agency. ESSP is now an established and a key player in Europe in the field of satellite navigation services. ESSP is also developing business and consulting activities in several areas, ranging from expanding EGNOS services and user communities, to managing pan European networks A6 Alliance The A6 Alliance was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.: - ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP; - DFS, the German ANSP; - DSNA, the French ANSP; - ENAV, the Italian ANSP; - NATS, the British ANSP; - NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium). After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co operation at expert level. LSSIP Year 2017 France 58 Released Issue

71 The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015). PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS 3 ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager. The A6 Alliance leads European wide technical activities validated and co funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project PCP). Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4 4 Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an ad hoc consortium agreement with DSNA. Finally the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and HungaroControl (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL 5 that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers. Regional AEFMP Framework The AEFMP initiative was set up in 1996 in order to harmonize and optimize the air navigation operations among Algeria, Spain, France, Morocco and Portugal. It aims at promoting the establishment of common regional convergence objectives in order to increase safety and achieve a high operational efficiency in the provision of services. The collaboration was renewed in 2002 with the signature of a Joint AEFMP Plan. After 14 years of fruitful cooperation among the five countries, the AEFMP MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) was signed in January 2016, and publicly ratified during the WAC (World ATM Congress) held in Madrid, in March 2016, with the attendance of representatives of the European Commission. The renewed framework of cooperation includes updated leading principles and reinforced cooperation to face current and future ATM (Air Traffic Management) developments steaming from the SES (Single European Sky) framework evolution. During 2017, the AEFMP celebrated the 15th Anniversary of this long lasting initiative and all the members took the opportunity to highlight the regional ATM institutional environment evolutions achieved during AEFMP s life. 3 ACG, Croatia Control, IAA, LFV and Naviair together form the COOPANS Alliance Innovative Network 4 PANSA, ANS CR, LPS SR and Oro Navigacija together form the B4 Consortium 5 Association Internationale Sans But Lucratif», under Belgian law LSSIP Year 2017 France 59 Released Issue

72 AEFMP is particularly focused on harmonization of procedures, improvement of interoperability and management of implementation of new systems. Accordingly, the main AEFMP objectives are to: coordinate and collaborate on the operational and technical enablers alignment; harmonize and optimize the deployment timeline of the operational and technical enablers; push towards more interoperable systems; optimize the traffic flows across the AEFMP area; and interconnect ATM systems, share data stemming from AEFMP facilities and systems. The main achievements of the AEFMP have been the result of the collaboration in the following areas: Optimum use of Technical Systems: technical optimization is considered essential to provide the users with systems aimed at improving or maintaining performance through synchronized interoperable technology deployment. Likewise, the main general objectives are to: o o o establish systems and common protocols allowing a reliable, quick and effective exchange of information between operational centres; share data stemming from technical premises between cross border units, when pertinent; share technical knowledge and experience between AEFMP ANSPs and propose new technical ways of improving CNS/ATM systems. Optimum use of Airspace: common methods and procedures as well as operational changes have been and shall be assessed considering the impact on global performance and in order to optimize the use of the AEFMP airspace by its users. Also, some of the general objectives are to: o o o study and elaborate common working methods for the area, as well as establishing support systems necessities; establish common criteria for airspace organization and co ordination of adjacent units in order to avoid bottlenecks; analyse delays in the AEFMP area and propose joint measures in order to reduce delays in the area. AEFMP areas of work include inter FAB and other non AEFMP countries collaboration activities, with the aim to promote SES objectives to EU neighbouring airspaces in Western Mediterranean. It is worth to highlight the close cooperation of AEFMP with OACA (Air Navigation Service Provider of Tunisia) whose representatives were welcomed and attended the AEFMP Working Groups and Sub Groups meetings as observers during years 2016 and 2017, witnessing OACA willingness to join AEFMP membership. For further information on AEFMP please consult our website: atm.org. LSSIP Year 2017 France 60 Released Issue

73 6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View Overall Objective Implementation 2; 2% 2; 2% 25; 28% 35; 38% Ongoing Planned Late 6; 7% 21; 23% No Plan Not Applicable Country related objectives The status of compliance, achievements and main points of concerns for ESSIP objectives applicable to France can be summarized as follows regarding country related 34 applicable objectives: 10 objectives are already completed: - AOM13.1, Harmonise Airt Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling - AOM19.1, ASM Support Tools to support Advanced FUA (AFUA) - AOM21.1, Direct Routing - ATC02.2, Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 - ATC02.8, Ground based Safety Nets - ATC2.9, Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (SCTA) for TMAs - FCM01, Implement enhanced tactical flow management services - INF04, Implement integrated briefing - ITY COTR, Implementation of ground ground automated co ordination processes - NAV03, RNAV 1 LSSIP Year 2017 France 61 Released Issue

74 16 objectives are considered as late: - AOM19.2, ASM Management of Real Time Airspace Data - ATC15.1, Information Exchange with En Route Support of AMAN - ATC16, ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change ATC17, Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer - COM12 New Pan European Network Service (NewPENS) - FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning - FCM4.1, Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 1 - FCM08, Extended Flight Plan - INF07, Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) - ITY ACID, Aircraft identification - ITY ADQ, Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information - ITY AGDL, Initial ATC air ground data link services - ITY AGVCS2, 8,33 khz air ground voice channel spacing below FL195 - ITY FMTP, Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) - NAV10, APV procedures - SAF11, Improve Runway Safety Preventing Runway Excursions Delays impacting the full achievement of these objectives are linked to two ongoing major national projects and investments for the renewal of legacy systems: CSSIP program for deployment of a new network infrastructure enabling for voice and data over IP, and 4 Flight for transition to a new SESAR compliant ATM system including final Data Link capabilities (as from 2018), for which a new implementation plan has been presented by DSNA to the Users and to the Commission. Regarding ADQ, AGVCS2 and etod implementations, delays are mainly due to the complexity of implementation and the coordination of the numerous stakeholders (airports operators for example with the necessary revision of current working agreements). 1 objective has no plan (NAV3.2, RNP 1 in TMA Operations). This is due to the fact the performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure should be studied further before planning the implementation of RNP1 + RF. The 10 remaining objectives are ongoing or planned and are progressing according to the implementation milestones. Airports related objectives All airports operators of the four coordinated French airports (Paris Roissy CDG, Paris Orly, Lyon Saint Exupéry, Nice Côte d Azur) have provided data together with DTA, DSAC, DSNA and DIRCAM. Compliance has also been assessed for the two other LSSIP French airports involved (Toulouse Blagnac, Marseille Provence). The two environmental objectives are completed (CDAs planned or in place in these six airports, environmental management in place between all involved stakeholders of those airports). AMAN tools and procedures are implemented according to the related objective in the 3 concerned French airports (Paris Orly, Paris Roissy CDG and Nice Côte d Azur). LSSIP Year 2017 France 62 Released Issue

75 Paris Roissy CDG is labelled A CDM since November 2010 (FUM process implementation in February 2013 and procedures in adverse conditions including de icing prior to end 2013). Paris Orly CDM has been implemented 17 th November Lyon Sain Exupéry is labelled A CDM since November 2016 and A CDM at Nice Côte d Azur has an implementation scheduled end 2018 (Advanced Tower Concept implemented in 2017). No A CDM implementation is planned in Toulouse Blagnac and Marseille Provence airports but The Advanced Tower Concept implementation is under study. A SMGCS level 1 and level 2 objectives are completed for both major Paris airports but, A SMGCS level 1 is also implemented at Nice Côte d Azur and Lyon Saint Exupéry airports but, due to the level of required investments (mainly surveillance systems), achievement of the A SMGCS level 1 is late for other airports. Nevertheless the projects are ongoing and full implementation is planned in Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing, Initial Airport Operations Plan objectives are planned and are progressing according to the implementation milestones. Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring objective is late at Paris and Nice Côte d Azurs due to the deployment of SYSAT (new ATM system for TMAs) expected mid LSSIP Year 2017 France 63 Released Issue

76 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C. Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF) 100% = Objective = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline Optimised ATM Network Services AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) FCM06 (PCP) Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA ASM Management of Real Time Airspace Data Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services Collaborative Flight Planning Interactive Rolling NOP Traffic Complexity Assessment < % 100% 100% 62% 97% 70% 28% 17% 80% 70% LSSIP Year 2017 France 64 Released Issue

77 Advanced Air Traffic Services < AOM21.1 (PCP) AOM21.2 (PCP) AOP14 ATC02.2 ATC02.8 ATC02.9 ATC07.1 ATC12.1 ATC15.1 ATC15.2 (PCP) Direct Routing Free Route Airspace 100% 21% Local objective Remote Tower Services LFBP PAU PYRENEES 0% LFMD CANNES MANDELIEU 0% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 0% STCA En Route Ground Based Safety Nets Enhanced STCA for TMAs AMAN Tools and Procedures 100% LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 100% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 100% LFPO Paris Orly Airport 100% Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Information Exchange with En route in Support of AMAN Arrival Management Extended to En route Airspace ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 ATC17 ATC18 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Multi Sector Planning En route 1P2T Local objective n/a 100% 78% 100% 100% 36% 25% 73% ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations LFBO Toulouse Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry LFML Marseille Provence LFMN Nice Côte d Azur LFPG Paris CDG Airport LFPO Paris Orly Airport 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective ITY COTR NAV03.1 NAV03.2 (PCP) LFBO Toulouse Blagnac 80% LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry 80% LFML MARSEILLE PROVENCE 80% LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 80% LFPG PARIS CHARLES DE GAULLE 80% LFPO PARIS ORLY 80% Ground Ground Automated Co ordination 100% Processes RNAV 1 in TMA Operations RNP 1 in TMA Operations 100% 0% LSSIP Year 2017 France 65 Released Issue

78 < NAV10 NAV12 APV procedures Optimised Low Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Local objective n/a 78% High Performing Airport Operations < AOP04.1 A SMGCS Level 1 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac 40% LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry 100% LFML Marseille Provence 16% LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 100% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 100% LFPO Paris Orly Airport AOP04.2 A SMGCS Level 2 AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) 100% LFBO Toulouse Blagnac 33% LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry 20% LFML Marseille Provence 3% LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 100% LFPG Paris CDG Airport LFPO Paris Orly Airport Airport CDM 100% 100% LFBO Toulouse Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) n/a LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry 100% LFML Marseille Provence (Outside Applicability Area) n/a LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 70% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 100% LFPO Paris Orly Airport 100% Time Based Separation LFPO Paris Orly Airport 0% Initial Airport Operations Plan AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) LFBO Toulouse Blagnac 0% LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry 100% LFML Marseille Provence 0% LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 21% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 30% LFPO Paris Orly Airport 30% Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 5% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 23% LFPO Paris Orly Airport 23% Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing LFMN Nice Côte d Azur 0% LFPG Paris CDG Airport 0% LFPO Paris Orly Airport 0% LSSIP Year 2017 France 66 Released Issue

79 < ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management SAF11 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry LFML Marseille Provence LFMN Nice Côte d Azur LFPG Paris CDG Airport LFPO Paris Orly Airport Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% Enabling Aviation Infrastructure < COM10 COM11 COM12 (PCP) FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITY ACID ITY ADQ ITY AGDL ITY AGVCS2 ITY FMTP ITY SPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) NewPENS Extended Flight Plan Integrated Briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft Identification Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Initial ATC Air Ground Data Link Services 8,33 khz Air Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100% 76% 65% 80% 51% 29% 83% 28% 81% 5% 90% 7% LSSIP Year 2017 France 67 Released Issue

80 ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = (during 2017 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable < B0 APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 89% 100% B0 SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A SMGCS Level 1 2) 68% 100% B0 FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground Ground Integration 63% 100% B0 DATM B0 ACAS Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 64% 100% 100% B0 SNET B0 ACDM B0 RSEQ Increased Effectiveness of Ground Based Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 100% 92% 89% 100% 100% B0 FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En Route Trajectories 100% B0 NOPS B0 ASUR B0 CDO Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network Wide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 81% 83% 100% 100% 100% B0 TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En Route 81% 100% LSSIP Year 2017 France 68 Released Issue

81 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C. Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Ongoing Planned Late No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Main Objectives AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Current harmonization OAT/GAT rules is completed through close civil military cooperation at strategic and tactical levels. New release of RCAM was published 1st november Any further update of EUROAT will be analysed and implemented when relevant. French regulation 31/12/2016 includes RCA4 Decree aiming at defining rules ensuring compatibility between GAT and OAT. REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Global harmonization OAT/GAT process is well advanced 100% Authority with close civil military cooperation. 31/12/2011 The global harmonization process is well advanced, due to permanent dialogue between State aviation and Civil DGAC aviation authorities, in order to apply as far as possible 100% common principles. It is formalized inside OAT rules 01/11/2016 (RCAM) and OAT/GAT compatibility rules (RCA/4). RCAM was published 1st November 2016 ASP (By:12/2018) DSNA The trials conducted in Reims ACC in 2013 were 100% successful, and a "type II CMCC" has been implemented. 31/12/2016 Mil. The trials conducted in Reims ACC in 2013 were 100% Authority successful, and a "type II CMCC" has been implemented. 31/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2018) Mil. Authority The global harmonization process is well advanced, due to permanent dialogue between State aviation and Civil aviation authorities, in order to apply as far as possible common principles. It is formalized inside OAT rules (RCAM) and OAT/GAT compatibility rules (RCA/4). RCAM was published 1st November % 01/09/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 France 69 Released Issue

82 AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 French AMC (called CNGE) is using its own appropriate support systems (e.g. COURAGE,...). Moreover, LARA is used since February 2017 but some major software issues are not sold and 01/02/2017 significant evolution is needed. ASP (By:12/2018) French AMC (called CNGE) is using its own appropriate support systems (e.g. COURAGE...). Moreover, LARA is used since February 2017 but some major software issues are not sold and significant evolution is needed. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this 100% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 01/02/2017 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real Time Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 4FLIGHT system will exchange data directly with NM. Exchanges with local ASM systems are not yet precisely identified. 31/12/2024 ASP (By:12/2021) 4Flight system will exchange data directly with NM. Late Exchanges with local ASM systems are not yet precisely identified. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 70% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2024 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 70 Released Issue

83 AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 LARA will support the ASM/ATFCM process in France. For improving rolling process, NM system misses implementation of permanent Procedure 3. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) LARA supports the ASM/ATFCM process in France. For Ongoing improving rolling process, NM system misses implementation of permanent Procedure 3. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 70% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2021 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. AOM21.1 Direct Routing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Full implementation on the objective is done through the deployment of ERATO in Brest and Bordeaux. Current systems in other French ACCs allows implementation of direct routings. 31/12/2016 4FLIGHT system is expected to be deployed in Marseille, Reims and Paris allowing further application of DRA concept. ASP (By:12/2017) DSNA Many DCTs have been published and are operated daily. It's a permanent action to increase their amount and availability. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Free Route Airspace 100% 31/12/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 France 71 Released Issue

84 AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Free Route Airspace Implementation is being studied in the FABEC framework. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA Free Route Implementation is being studied in the FABEC framework and in collaboration with NM. The project Free Route Airspace is ongoing. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Free Route Airspace 21% Ongoing 31/12/2021 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 40% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac System planned for operations by 30/09/ /09/2019 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Late have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work DGAC within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline 10% for future regulation if deemed necessary. 30/09/2019 Acceptable Means of Compliance with Interoperability Regulation (EC 552/2004) is provided through the ETSI Community Specification EN for A SMGCS Level1 ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) is available Mode S multi lateration software and hardware is installed. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 63% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroport de Toulouse System planned for operations by 31/05/ % Blagnac Late 30/09/2019 Late 31/05/2019 LSSIP Year 2017 France 72 Released Issue

85 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry A SMGCS Level 1 was declared operational in Lyon in september /09/2014 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. DGAC However a basis is French RCA 3, (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). 100% 30/09/2014 Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment. An AIC has been published (AIC 16/13) regarding multilateration procedures validation at Lyon. ASP (By:12/2011) SMR is already available. A SMGCS Level 1 using Mode S multilateration has been installed in Lyon. System is in operational use since september The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroports de Lyon A SMGCS Level 1 done by DSNA September % 30/09/ /09/2014 LSSIP Year 2017 France 73 Released Issue

86 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 16% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFML Marseille Provence System planned for operations mid /06/2019 REG (By:12/2010) DGAC At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. Acceptable Means of Compliance with Interoperability Regulation (EC 552/2004) is provided through the ETSI Community Specification EN for A SMGCS Level1. However a basis is French RCA 3, (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). Local order (arrêté de police) will mandate the carriage of required aircraft equipment. % Not Applicable AIP procedures publication will be done in due time. ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) has been installed in 2012 and was in service in System with ModeS multilateration is planned for full operations by end DSNA The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroport de Marseille System planned for operations in % Provence Late 30/06/2019 Late 30/06/2019 LSSIP Year 2017 France 74 Released Issue

87 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur in /10/2015 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL DGAC have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. 100% However a basis is French RCA 3, (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). 30/10/2015 Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment. ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) and Multilateration ModeS have been installed in 2013 and in service in April The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroports de Nice in % Côte d'azur 30/04/ /10/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 France 75 Released Issue

88 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFPG Paris CDG Airport A SMGCS Level 1 implementation ongoing at CDG. This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work DGAC within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. However a 100% basis is French RCA 3, (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). Procedures have been published in the AIP ARR/DEP chapter An AIC was also been published for multilateration in 2004 (AIC 02/04). ASP (By:12/2011) A SMGCS Level 1 implementation ongoing at CDG This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) A SMGCS Level 1 is in operation at CDG airport since % 31/12/ /12/ /12/2002 Groupe ADP This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. 100% 31/12/2002 LSSIP Year 2017 France 76 Released Issue

89 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFPO Paris Orly Airport A SMGCS Level 1 implemented at Orly since This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. DGAC 100% However a basis is French RCA 3, (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). 100% 31/12/ /12/2007 Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment. ASP (By:12/2011) A SMGCS Level 1 already in service at Orly since The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) A SMGCS Level 1 implemented at Orly since % 31/12/2007 Groupe ADP This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. 100% 31/12/2007 LSSIP Year 2017 France 77 Released Issue

90 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 33% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Toulouse end /09/2019 ASP (By:12/2017) Due to existing experience in operational use of SMR, a Late direct transition to level 2 is planned. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 33% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/09/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Toulouse May 2019 % Not Applicable AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 20% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry A SMGCS Level 2 will be put in operation at Lyon in /06/2018 ASP (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 will be put in operation at Lyon by end Late of Q after retrofit of the existing A SMGCS Level 1 and upgrade of system up to level 2. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 20% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/06/2018 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroports de Lyon A SMGCS Level 2 equipment will be operational in Lyon end 2017 % Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 France 78 Released Issue

91 AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 3% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFML Marseille Provence A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Marseille by end of /12/2019 ASP (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Marseille by Late end of The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 3% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroport de Marseille Provence A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operation in Marseille by end of 2019 % Not Applicable AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur A SMGCS Level 2 in operation. 30/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also 100% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 30/06/2017 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur A SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Nice at the mid % 31/03/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 France 79 Released Issue

92 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFPG Paris CDG Airport A SMGCS Level 2 implemented at CDG since % Note that the project has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. 31/12/2003 ASP (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 already operational at CDG. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at CDG. 100% 31/12/2003 Groupe ADP This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. 100% 31/12/2003 LSSIP Year 2017 France 80 Released Issue

93 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFPO Paris Orly Airport A SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at ORLY This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. ASP (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 operational at Orly. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also 100% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) A SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at ORLY 100% 30/11/ /11/2009 Groupe ADP This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. 100% 30/11/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 81 Released Issue

94 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) not applicable % LFBO Toulouse Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages. Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding this implementation plan. ASP (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages. Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding this implementation plan. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages and will carry out a call for tender for an assistance of Aéroport de specifications on the 2018 first quarter; goal is to Toulouse develop a CDM web interface with network connection Blagnac in the end of % % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan. AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry The airport has been certified by the Network Manager. 14/11/2017 ASP (By:12/2016) The airport has been certified by Network Manager on 14/11/2017. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 14/11/2017 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroports de Lyon The project has been launched on the 22nd of March It has been frozen in 2013 due to budget constraints at DSNA, and the implementation took place on 07/02/ % 07/02/2017 LSSIP Year 2017 France 82 Released Issue

95 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) AOP05 not applicable LFML Marseille Provence (Outside Applicability Area) Marseille Provence is willing to implement ACDM level 1 (or Advance Tower) end Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan. ASP (By:12/2016) Marseille Provence is willing to implement ACDM level 1 (or Advance Tower) end Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de During the AMP AODB modification project (in Marseille progress), AMP plans to reach ACDM level 1 (or Advance Provence Tower). Target end 2018 % % % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur Implementation of CDM at Nice is ongoing in cooperation with Nice Côte d Azur. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2016) Implement of the CDM concept at Nice is ongoing at Late DSNA, in cooperation with Nice Côte d Azur. The system will be available on 31/12/2018 and the certification by NM is expected by 30/06/2019. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this 69% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2018 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur Nice Côte d Azur has planned to implement the CDM concept. It should be implemented by 31/12/2018: deployment of the PDS and KPIs is planned in 2017 to be continued in 2018 and connection with the DMAN by end % Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 83 Released Issue

96 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) AOP05 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPG Paris CDG Airport CDG airport is labellized "Airport CDM" since 16th November 2010; CDM procedures in adverse condition implemented 02/2013; FUM process implemented by end % However, this activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. DPI activities will be updated accordingly to the conclusions of the 3 task forces launched in 2017: A CDM HTF, DPI WG & IATA AACG. First outcomes expected in mid 2018: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. ASP (By:12/2016) CDG airport is "Airport CDM" since 16th November The predeparture sequencing tool is under the responsibility of the Airport Operator. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) CDG airport is labellized "Airport CDM" since 16th November 2010; CDM procedures in adverse condition implemented 02/2013; FUM process implemented by end Groupe ADP However, this activity has been reviewed in order to be 100% aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. DPI activities will be updated accordingly to the conclusions of the 3 task forces launched in 2017 : A CDM HTF, DPI WG & IATA AACG. First outcomes expected in mid /09/ /02/ /09/2014 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPO Paris Orly Airport Orly airport has been certified as a CDM airport on November 15th, /11/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) Paris Orly airport is Airport CDM since November 15th The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 15/11/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Groupe ADP Paris Orly airport is Airport CDM since November 15th % 15/11/2016 LSSIP Year 2017 France 84 Released Issue

97 AOP10 Time Based Separation Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 0% Planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPO Paris Orly Airport Work in progress in its definition phase 31/12/2023 REG (By:12/2023) DGAC Need for AMAN evolution V3 to be planned: in the Planned 0% definition phase. 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Because of the higher efficiency it would have, DSNA Planned proposed to deploy TBS in CDG instead of Orly in the PCP revision. No progress has been made in Orly in that perspective. Need for AMAN evolution V3 and SYSAT systems to be DSNA planned: in the definition phase. 0% The deployment status and planning of this 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 0% No Plan Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac Implementation of the objective under study. ASP (By:12/2021) AOP deployment is not yet planned at LFBO: No Plan Implementation of the objective under study. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac Implementation of the objective under study with DSNA. 0% No Plan LSSIP Year 2017 France 85 Released Issue

98 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry DSNA and Aeroports de Lyon provide AOP information thanks to CDM implemention. 14/11/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA provides initial AOP information to ADL within CDM deployment project. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 14/11/2017 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroports de Lyon Aeroports de Lyon provides AOP information within CDM deployment project 100% 14/11/2017 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 0% Planned Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFML Marseille Provence Implementation of the objective under study 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) AOP deployment is not yet planned at LFML: No Plan Implementation of the objective under study. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de Marseille Implementation of the objective under study with DSNA 0% Provence Planned 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2017 France 86 Released Issue

99 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur A part of AOP information will be provided within CDM deployment project. Nice Côte d Azur plans to integrate the relevant information to AOP by end /12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA will provide initial AOP to ACA information within Ongoing CDM deployment project. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 50% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2018 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur A part of AOP information will be provided within CDM deployment project. Nice Côte d Azur plans to integrate the relevant information to AOP by end % Ongoing 31/12/2021 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFPG Paris CDG Airport Initial Airport Operations Plan has been launched in This project is currently under a Call INEA decision. A close coordination will be taken in place with all concerned stakeholders 31/12/2020 Groupe ADP. The full functionalities should be fully implemented by the end of ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA already provides initial AOP information within CDM systems. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 28/02/2013 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been Groupe ADP launched in The FOC is expected by the end of 7% Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 France 87 Released Issue

100 AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFPO Paris Orly Airport Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been launched in The FOC is expected by the end of /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA already provides initial AOP information within CDM systems. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 15/11/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been Groupe ADP launched in The FOC is expected by the end of 7% Ongoing 31/12/2020 AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) 5% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented by the end of 2022 in Nice Côte d Azur. 31/12/2022 ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented by the end of 2022 in Nice Côte d Azur. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 7% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/09/2022 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Aéroports de Nice Under DSNA responsibility 0% Côte d'azur Late 31/12/2022 LSSIP Year 2017 France 88 Released Issue

101 AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) 23% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFPG Paris CDG Airport The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented at mid 2021 in Paris CDG Airport. 30/06/2021 ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented at mid 2021 in Paris CDG Airport. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 30% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/06/2021 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Groupe ADP Under DSNA responsibility 0% Planned 30/06/2019 AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) 23% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFPO Paris Orly Airport The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented for summer 2022 at Paris Orly Airport. 30/06/2022 ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented for summer 2022 in Paris Orly Airport. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 30% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/06/2022 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Groupe ADP Under DSNA responsibility 0% Planned 30/06/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 France 89 Released Issue

102 AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) DGAC 0% Planned 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully DSNA consolidated yet. 0% The deployment status and planning of this 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPG Paris CDG Airport Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part DGAC of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of 0% the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for 31/12/2023 SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this 0% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2023 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 90 Released Issue

103 AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPO Paris Orly Airport Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part DGAC of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of 0% the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for 31/12/2023 SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this 0% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2023 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. ATC02.8 Ground Based Safety Nets Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 France has developed and implemented its own APW on 17 APPs. 31/12/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) France has developed and implemented its own APW on 17 APPs. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 91 Released Issue

104 ATC02.9 Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Enhanced STCA were implemented in France end /12/2011 ASP (By:12/2020) DSNA long standing concerns about safety in terminal areas led to the early development and commissioning of safety nets in the most relevant TMAs. According to local business needs, DSNA TMAs within the scope of the STCA implementation, along with the implementation date, are the following: LFPG CDG, 2002 DSNA LFPO ORY, 2002 LFLL Lyon, % 30/12/2011 LFSB Bâle Mulhouse, 2009 LFBO Toulouse, 2009 LFMN Nice, 2009 LFML Marseille, 2010 LFBD Bordeaux, 2010 LFST Strasbourg, 2011 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur France has already implemented this tool in Paris CDG, Paris Orly, Lyon and Nice. 22/06/2015 ASP (By:12/2019) DSNA France has implemented this tool in Paris CDG, Paris Orly and Lyon Saint Exupérys and TMAs. Extra deployment has been achieved at Nice in June The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. 4Flight / 4Flight Defence / COFLIGHT / Extended Arrival Managemen t 100% 22/06/2015 LSSIP Year 2017 France 92 Released Issue

105 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFPG Paris CDG Airport France has already implemented this tool in Paris CDG, Paris Orly, Lyon and Nice. 31/03/2012 ASP (By:12/2019) DSNA The arrival management tools have been implemented at the CDG Airport. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. 4Flight / 4Flight Defence / COFLIGHT / Extended Arrival Managemen t 100% 31/03/2012 ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFPO Paris Orly Airport France has already implemented this tool in Paris CDG, Paris Orly, Lyon and Nice. 31/03/2012 ASP (By:12/2019) DSNA Arrival management tools are implemented at Orly Airport. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. 4Flight / 4Flight Defence / COFLIGHT / Extended Arrival Managemen t 100% 31/03/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 93 Released Issue

106 ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring 36% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 The implementation of this objective is planned together with the deployments of ERATO in 2015 and 2016 in Brest ACC and Bordeaux ACC and 4FLIGHT in Paris ACC, Reims ACC and 31/12/2021 Marseille ACC before end ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA The scenario for commissioning of automated support within DSNA ACCs is as such: Brest and Bordeaux ACCs to be provided with ERATO (including MTCD and MONA) between 2015 and Reims, Marseille and Paris ACCs to be provided with 4 FLIGHT (including MTCD, MONA and TCT) later on, but before 31/12/2021. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. 4Flight Defence 36% Ongoing 31/12/2021 ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En route in Support of AMAN Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 MAESTRO is already compliant to use in En Route and is a level1 system, already implemented in the Paris ACC to support AMAN operations of CDG and Orly. Implementation is being 31/12/2018 considered in Marseille ACC for Lyon and Nice TMA by end ASP (By:12/2017) DSNA DSNA has already implemented MAESTRO in Paris ACC to support AMAN operations of CDG and Orly TMA for many years (1999). Implementation is being considered in Marseille ACC for Lyon and Nice TMA by end The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. AMAN. / Extended Arrival Managemen t 78% Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 94 Released Issue

107 Arrival Management Extended to En route Airspace ATC % Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 The objective should be fully implemented by the end of /12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Reims UAC: "4Me" system is ready to accommodate Ongoing any XMAN data provided via webservice. It already serves XMAN LHR and XMAN ZRH, XMAN EGKK is planned in Paris ACC: the current situation (Paris CDG/ORY AMAN extended into Paris ACC) is already compliant with the PCP and the operational needs. For Milano, Paris ACC is a potential candidate. Concerning Brussels, planning for definition of implementation schedule is not yet completed by Belgocontrol Marseille ACC: the deployment of AMAN2SE in Marseille ACC guarantees PCP compliance except for the flow coming from North East via Milano ACC. Milano and Roma, Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona: Marseille ACC is a potential candidate. Contact with ENAIRE and ENAV has been established Q4/2016 under the umbrella of FABEC XMAN. Brest ACC: London LHR: Brest ACC is planned for DSNA 73% Bordeaux ACC: Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona: 31/12/2023 Bordeaux ACC is a potential candidates. Contact with ENAIRE has been established Q4/2016 under the umbrella of FABEC XMAN. Paris CDG/ORY APP: DSNA considers that the current situation (AMAN extended into Paris ACC) is already compliant with the PCP and the operational needs. Nice APP: the deployment of AMAN2SE in Marseille ACC guarantees PCP compliance, except for the flow coming from North East via Milano ACC. Initiation of an XMAN project with ENAV is ongoing to cover this North East flow. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 95 Released Issue

108 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer 25% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Based on implementation of 4 FLIGHT and ERATO by end of /12/2022 ASP (By:12/2018) Due date in: Late 2018 for BREST ACC and BORDEAUX ACC (ERATO) for REIMS ACC and MARSEILLE ACC (4 FLIGHT), 2022 for PARIS ACC (4 FLIGHT), DSNA The deployment status and planning of this ERATO 25% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2022 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Initial operational capability: 01/12/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 French ANSP: Migration from AFTN to extended AMHS achieved through MESANGE system commissioned by end of /12/2018 Gateways on the Algerian side planned mid ASP (By:12/2018) Basic and extended ATSMHS capabilities are available in DSNA MESANGE system procured jointly with Skyguide. CSSIP 100% Gateways on the Algerian side planned mid /12/2017 Mil. Authority Following the civil aviation, Defence will implement the CADAS software, accessing to MESANGE. Procurement has been launched in summer 2013, implementation should be quick. 48% Ongoing 31/12/2018 COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Process of implementation of VoIP has started in order to be fully compliant before end of Implemented by DSNA end /12/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) VoIP implemented by DSNA in main ATS units end The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also 100% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 31/12/2016 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Mil. Authority For the military, deployment is planned with implementation of Descartes tool 60% Ongoing 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 France 96 Released Issue

109 COM12 New Pan European Network Service (NewPENS) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 7% Late Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020 DSNA is associated to NewPENS procurement. CDG will be connected to NewPENS before /12/2024 ASP (By:12/2024) DSNA is associated to NewPENS procurement. Ongoing The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also 5% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 30/11/2019 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2024) Groupe ADP 10% Ongoing 31/12/2024 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% not applicable LFBO Toulouse Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) CDA implemented in Toulouse since /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) CDA are completed and in force at LFBO ATCC. Statistics available since 12/2012 and radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 100% with statistics reporting) 31/12/ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Aéroport de Toulouse CDO implementation managed by DSNA 100% Blagnac 31/12/2012 DSNA 100% 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 97 Released Issue

110 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry CDA implemented in Lyon since /12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) CDO are in force at LFLL ATCC PansOps procedures in AIS Radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 100% with statistics reporting) 31/12/ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP. APO (By:12/2013) Aéroports CDO implementation Managed by DSNA. 100% de Lyon 31/12/2012 DSNA 100% 31/12/2012 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFML Marseille Provence CDA implemented in Marseille since /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) CDA are completed and in force at LFML ATCC Statistics available since 12/2012 and radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 100% with statistics reporting) 31/12/ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) DSNA 100% 31/12/2012 Aéroport de Marseille CDO implementation managed by DSNA 100% Provence 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 98 Released Issue

111 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur CDO are implemented in Nice since /12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) Radar vectored CDO with DTG completed at LFMN ATCC Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication. 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields DSNA with statistics reporting). 100% 3 Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP 31/12/2013 publication. Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) DSNA CDO implementation managed by DSNA. 100% 31/12/2012 Aéroports de Nice 100% Côte d'azur 31/12/2012 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFPG Paris CDG Airport CDA implemented AT CDG since /12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) 3 Pans Ops CDA under development STAR LORNI in AIS Radar vectored CDA with DTG completed at LFPG ATCC Performance indicators reported Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 100% with statistics reporting) 31/12/ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) DSNA CDO implementation Managed by DSNA. 100% 31/12/2012 Groupe ADP 100% 31/12/2011 LSSIP Year 2017 France 99 Released Issue

112 ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFPO Paris Orly Airport CDA implemented at Orly since /12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) Pans Ops CDA under development for RWY 26 CDA ODRAN ILS 06 in AIS Radar vectored CDA with DTG completed at LFPG ATCC Performance indicators reported Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1 Close path design with AIP publication DSNA 2 Open path design (This is the main reason for which LSSIP France is green ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 100% with statistics reporting) 30/06/ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Groupe ADP 100% 31/12/2010 DSNA CDO implementation managed by DSNA. 100% 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 100 Released Issue

113 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFBO Toulouse Blagnac Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de l'environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFBO ATCC active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 101 Released Issue

114 APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac LFBO active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 31/10/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 102 Released Issue

115 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de l'environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFLL ATCC active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 103 Released Issue

116 APO (By:12/2016) Aéroports de Lyon LFLL active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 104 Released Issue

117 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFML Marseille Provence Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de l'environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFML ATCC active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 105 Released Issue

118 APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Marseille Provence LFML active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 106 Released Issue

119 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFMN Nice Côte d Azur Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de l'environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFMN active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 107 Released Issue

120 APO (By:12/2016) Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur LFMN active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 108 Released Issue

121 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPG Paris CDG Airport Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de l'environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFPG ATCC active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 100% 31/12/ /12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 109 Released Issue

122 APO (By:12/2016) LFPG active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of Groupe ADP municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residentsassociations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. 100% 31/12/2009 LSSIP Year 2017 France 110 Released Issue

123 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 100% Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPO Paris Orly Airport Objective mainly achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2013 l'environnement". ASP (By:12/2016) LFPO active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. LSSIP Year 2017 France 111 Released Issue

124 APO (By:12/2016) LFPO active participation in formal partnership and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents Groupe ADP associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal Public Inquiries consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. Creation of a prototype "Filter Marsh" for a bio filtration of the deicing contaminated waters since end % 31/12/2013 FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 France participates to this objective for those tasks which are already completed. Processing of FPLs derived from RPLs, of APL and ACH messages already implemented. Full implementation 30/06/2018 of the objective is planned with the new version of ATC system June ASP (By:12/2017) Processing of FPLs derived from RPLs, of APL and ACH Late messages is already implemented. Some messages are completed but the sending of them has been suspended because of validation issues with CFMU. Implementation of AFP is implemented in new version of ATC system that will be installed in Q1/2018 and DSNA subsequently activated progressively during Q2/ % The deployment status and planning of this 30/06/2018 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 112 Released Issue

125 FCM04.1 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 1 Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/10/2017 Full implementation is expected in all ACCs by October 2018 (Marseille ACC). 31/10/2018 ASP (By:10/2017) Process is completed in 4 ACCs, and work is ongoing in Late the last one. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 97% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/10/2018 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) Phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 DSNA has launched a program named SALTO to cover the need of local tool. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA has launched a program named SALTO to cover Ongoing the need of local tool. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 28% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2021 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 113 Released Issue

126 FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Practical implementation of this ESSIP objective by all concerned stakeholders is ongoing. However, the provision of AOP to NM to perform the integration of the AOP with the NOP is 31/12/2021 only planned in a second phase for ASP (By:12/2021) Mil. No Plan 0% Authority The deployment status and planning of this Ongoing implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also 25% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 31/12/2021 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de Marseille Provence Aéroports de Lyon Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac % 0% Aéroports de la Côte d Azur is advanced ATC Tower since 2016 and will be CDM by end Moreover, at this stage AOP/NOP integration is planned for end % Within the CDM study project framework (see AOP05). % Groupe ADP 55% Not Applicable Planned 31/12/2021 Planned 31/12/2021 Not Applicable Ongoing 31/12/2021 FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Implemented through the framework of SALTO project. 31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2021) To be implemented through the framework of SALTO Ongoing project. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 80% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 114 Released Issue

127 FCM08 Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 5% Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Strategical discussions are ongoing in DSNA as to define FF ICE implementation projects wrto the new versions of ATM systems: En route (4Flight), Approaches (SYSAT) and continental and 31/12/2024 overseas ATM systems & ARO tools. ASP (By:12/2021) Strategical discussions are ongoing in DSNA as to define Late FF ICE implementation projects wrto the new versions of ATM systems: En route (4Flight), Approaches (SYSAT) and continental and overseas ATM systems & ARO tools. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this 5% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2024 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The French regulator has already defined a national TOD policy and translated it into a national regulation for all parties to implement. 31/12/2020 The tools for the provision of collected TOD to third parties in compliance with data exchange regulatory requirements will be implemented as from January REG (By:05/2018) The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in DGAC two orders relating to aeronautical information which 50% were published the 23rd of March Late 31/12/2018 ASP (By:05/2018) DSNA DSNA defined years ago a roadmap related to current Late 70% national TOD policy requirements. 01/01/2019 APO (By:05/2018) Aéroport de Marseille Provence Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur Aéroports de Lyon Letters of Agreements between SNA SSE and AMP has been signed during December 2017 / Requirements and adjustments implementation in progress. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in two orders relating to aeronautical information which were published the 23rd of March Agreements between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in two orders relating to aeronautical information which were published the 23rd of March Agreements between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. 70% 0% 0% Ongoing 31/05/2018 Late 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 115 Released Issue

128 Groupe ADP Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in two orders relating to aeronautical information which were published the 23rd of March Agreements between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in two orders relating to aeronautical information which were published the 23rd of March Agreements between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. 55% 50% Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2018 ITY ACID Aircraft Identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/ % Late System capability: 02/01/2020 Main implementation completed mid /01/2025 ASP (By:01/2020) DSNA Downlinked aircraft identification is in operational use in 100% the 5 ACCs. 01/06/2017 Mil. Authority Deferred compliance will be achieved in % Late 31/01/2025 ITY ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/ % Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be done considering the number of parties involved, including parties outside the scope of the oversight of the NSA. 31/07/2022 The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 will support the momentum already initiated towards compliance. REG (By:06/2017) The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination Late with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be DGAC done considering the number of parties involved, 10% including parties outside the scope of the oversight of 31/12/2021 the NSA. The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 support the momentum already initiated towards compliance. Mil. Authority Partially compliant with the requirements of July % Late 30/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 116 Released Issue

129 ASP (By:06/2017) The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also DSNA provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. FABEC AIM Task Force / SOFIA 41% Late 31/07/2022 Late Mil. Authority APO (By:06/2017) DSNA Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac Aéroports de Nice Côte d'azur Aéroports de Lyon Aéroport de Marseille Provence Groupe ADP The French regulatory framework complementing IR ADQ related to the implementation or revision of the requirements required a national consultation of the concerned parties run during The complexity of the regulation has led to multiple understanding, more harmonized understanding is expected, and meanwhile the EASA is addressing the subject. The system supporting the ADQ requirement must be upgraded or changed with a significant financial, human and technical impact. The two previous points show that the planning aiming at the full compliance was note achieved in July 2017 as scheduled. More delay seems to be needed. No deadline at the moment. APO's conformity with ADQ IR depends closely on the conformity of French AISP. APO's conformity with ADQ IR depends closely on the conformity of French AISP. APO's conformity with ADQ IR depends closely on the conformity of French AISP. APO's conformity with ADQ IR depends closely on the conformity of French AISP. APO's conformity with ADQ IR depends closely on the conformity of French AISP. 47% FABEC AIM Task Force / SOFIA 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 Late 31/12/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 France 117 Released Issue

130 ITY AGDL Initial ATC Air Ground Data Link Services Entry into force: 06/02/ % Late ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 A revised scenario for phased deployment of the DLS in DSNA airspace has been constructed jointly with the European Commission, EUROCONTROL and DSNA Clients (airlines). Full capability will be achieved through the commissioning of new French ATM system (4 31/12/2022 Flight) from 2018 (including ACL availability in all centers) to REG (By:02/2018) The change related to the introduction of DLS is DGAC reviewed by DSAC but must take into account the last 62% DSNA plan of implementation. Ongoing 05/02/2018 ASP (By:02/2018) A revised scenario for phased deployment of the DLS in DSNA airspace has been constructed jointly with the European Commission, EUROCONTROL and DSNA Clients (airlines). This revised scenario, finalized in June 2013, was based on the legacy system upgrade, the new 4 Flight system development and implementation program and the results of a costs benefit analysis. Because of technical difficulties both in on board and ground equipment, the dates planned in the IR 29/2009 were not able to be kept in a general way in Europe. A technical report asked by the European Commission from EASA has led to propose a new date for the DLS: February DSNA DSNA will provide Data Link Service from FL195 and above. An initial set of AGDL services (DLIC, AMC, ACM) has been commissioned for partial compliance at the end of 2015 in western ACCs and extended to the entire airspace since May Full compliance (addition of ACL service) will begin end of 2018 (Western ACCs) and will be completed with the 4 Flight implementation. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Authority According to IR EC 29/2009, DLS equipage is not mandatory for State aircraft. Next aircraft equipped with a DLS will be compliant VDL2 4Flight / 4Flight Defence / COFLIGHT 4Flight Defence 91% % Late 31/12/2022 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2017 France 118 Released Issue

131 ITY AGVCS2 8,33 khz Air Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/ % Late All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Compliance with the requirements on 8,33 khz frequency conversions is scheduled. 01/03/2026 REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Late 38% Authority 31/12/2025 Process is ongoing for ensuring compliance with the DGAC requirements on 8,33 khz frequency conversion by 70% Late 31/12/2025 ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Late 0% Authority 31/12/2025 DSNA Upgrading of radio stations is scheduled. 34% Late 01/03/2026 MIL (By:12/2020) Mil. Authority In accordance with IR EC 1079/2012, some State aircraft and equipment will be upgraded. Some military frequencies will remain on 25kHz according on art 6 paragraph10b. 5% APO (By:12/2018) Aéroport de Toulouse Blagnac 7% Aéroports de Lyon 0% Aéroports de Nice 0% Côte d'azur Groupe ADP 67% Mil. Authority Aéroport de Marseille Provence The process is ongoing 13% 3% Ongoing 31/12/2020 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Late 31/12/2025 Ongoing 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 119 Released Issue

132 ITY FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/ % Late Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Full compliance to the FMTP is expected by end /12/2018 ASP (By:12/2014) Ongoing work within the French program CSSIP. Late The current migration is organized in coordination with the neighboring centers and formalized by means of Letters of Agreement notified to the EC. The new transmission protocol is operational with all DSNA the neighboring centers from first quarter % For security reasons, it is considered preferable to first 31/12/2018 carry out the transition of all PLN messages from the TDM networks (e.g. SETINET Swiss network) to PENS before carrying out the transition of all PLN messages using PENS from IPv4 format to IPv6 format. Mil. Authority MIL (By:12/2014) Mil. Authority IR FMTP doesn't apply to the Military. Nevertheless, technical system has been updated to IP in Military are compatible to IPV6, and all new equipment is IPv6 compatible. Full migration will be completed 31 January IR FMTP doesn't apply to the Military. Nevertheless, technical system has been updated to IP in Military are compatible to IPV6, and all new equipment is IPv6 compatible. Full migration will be completed 31st January % 75% Late 31/01/2018 Late 31/01/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 120 Released Issue

133 ITY SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS B Out in transport type State aircraft : 07/06/ % Ongoing ELS in transport type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Surveillance performance and interoperability implementation is planned in France and is progressing accordingly with the Implementing Rule schedule. 07/06/2020 REG (By:02/2015) As far as the oversight of interoperability is concerned, DSAC applies its own ANSP IOP oversight procedure. DSAC monitors the implementation of each IR through the oversight of DSNA IR synthesis file, DSAC has initially DGAC requested DSNA for a SPI synthesis file for 04/ % DSNA addressed SPI synthesis file and its conformity 22/01/2015 plan in 10/2013. IR SPI conformity has been accordingly reviewed by DSAC and the final result has been transmitted to DSNA 22nd January ASP (By:02/2015) Mil. Ensuring safety of Radar data is one of the highest 100% Authority priorities for DSNA and DIRCAM. 31/10/2013 Ensuring safety of Radar data is one of the highest priorities for DSNA and DIRCAM. Technical agreements have been in force with our partners from a long time ago for the most critical sensors. A standardized document, (Memorandum of Cooperation between ANSPs) merging all technical agreements dealing with DSNA data exchanges, studied within AEFMP group, was 100% signed in 2012 between ENAIRE (Ex AENA) and DSNA 31/10/2013 and updated and signed June 2014 to comply with IR SPI. Thanks to close cooperation with DFS, an improved document was signed end 2015 between DFS and DSNA. Work is in progress to sign such agreements with others neighbors. MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Authority Equipage is in progress, following the SPI IR requirements. 53% Ongoing 07/06/2020 LSSIP Year 2017 France 121 Released Issue

134 NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Arrival and departures procedures based on RNAV have been established on main airports. For relevant aircraft, implementation of RNAV1 is considered as achieved. 31/12/2011 ASP (By:12/2023) Mil. 100% Authority 31/12/2011 Arrival and departures procedures based on RNAV have been established on major airports. Overall implementation is a continuous action. Military aerodromes are not concerned by congestion. Military aircraft are progressively equipped, following national equipage plans. However equipage is not mandatory. Implementation of RNAV procedures on some military DSNA airbases is an ongoing progress. So for military part, this 100% item can be considered as completed. 31/12/2011 The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 0% No Plan Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 The performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure should be studied further before planning the implementation of RNP1 + RF ASP (By:12/2023) The performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure No Plan should be studied further before planning the implementation of RNP1 + RF. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. LSSIP Year 2017 France 122 Released Issue

135 APV Procedures NAV10 Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 National deployment plan of APV/SBAS (supported by EGNOS) and APV/Baro has been launched and is ongoing. Consistency with ICAO 3711 has been reached end This implementation Phase ending 2016 has enabled full consistency with ICAO Full deployment, strictly speaking, of remaining APV will be finished by end REG (By:04/2016) DGAC EASA material applied to regulatory activities 100% ASP (By:12/2016) In line with the ICAO 37th assembly resolution, a national deployment plan at all IFR runways has been set up, and is in progress. Full implementation by the end of The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. PBN APV 70% 78% Late 31/12/ /11/2011 Late 31/12/2018 LSSIP Year 2017 France 123 Released Issue

136 SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The applicable recommendations have been disseminated to the concerned parties in the end of 2013 and will be monitored through the regular reviews of the State Safety Plan 31/12/2019 REG (By:01/2018) Through its State Safety Plan, DGAC analyzed in early Ongoing 2013 the applicability of the action plan in order to decide the actions to implement, with associated timeframe to monitor. The applicable measures related to ATM/ANS and airport operators domains have been DGAC already implemented. The applicable recommendations 100% have been disseminated to the concerned parties in the 31/01/2018 end of 2013 and will be monitored through the regular reviews of the State Safety Plan. However, no oversight activities are planned for the time being to ensure the implementation of the applicable measures. ASP (By:12/2014) Mil. 100% Authority 31/12/2014 EAPPRE was approved in January 2013 by DSNA CEO. For the military, through DGAC's State Safety Plan, as far DSNA as relevant, Armed Forces take account EAPPRE only for 100% military airfield with civilian traffic through the regular 31/12/2014 reviews of DSAC. APO (By:12/2014) Aéroports 100% de Lyon Groupe ADP 38% Late 31/12/2019 Aéroports de Nice 100% Côte d'azur 31/12/2013 Aéroport de Toulouse 100% Blagnac 31/12/2014 LSSIP Year 2017 France 124 Released Issue

137 Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 for en route operations 100% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 STCA implemented in the five ACCs and majors TMAs. Implementation in smaller TMAs is also a major program. 31/12/2010 ASP (By:01/2013) STCA is implemented in all ACCs and 9 major APPs. DSNA Implementation in smaller APPs is under consideration 100% for the next generation of ATM systems. 31/12/2010 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/ % Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Objective has been implemented for DSNA. For the military, equipage is in progress for aircraft that should be still in service after 2020 (older aircraft are not planned to be equipped). 30/12/2018 REG (By:12/2015) DGAC Handled through aircraft operators continuous 100% oversight. 31/12/2015 ASP (By:03/2012) A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS is in DSNA place for many years. Each TCAS occurrence is recorded 100% and analyzed. If necessary, pilots/companies are 30/11/2011 informed in case of a non conformity. MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Authority Equipage of ACAS II will be conducted for modern transport type aircraft. However, aircrews are trained to react, using or not ACAS. 100% Late 30/12/2018 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 France participates to the ETFMS programme. Main goals of this objective have been achieved. 31/12/2006 ASP (By:07/2014) Transmission of CPR and FSA messages implemented. FSA messages for route changes are implemented. DSNA There is no intention to implement FSA messages for 100% holding and FDPA re routing updates. 31/12/2006 DPI messages at LFPG since LSSIP Year 2017 France 125 Released Issue

138 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/ % Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing functions are available for aircrews 31/01/2003 ASP (By:12/2012) Integrated briefing called OLIVIA is available and compliant with Level 4 (application integration). Mil. Authority For the military, on airbases, integrated briefing function is available for military crews. On airbases receiving civil air traffic, only MET information is proposed to civilian aircraft, ensured by Meteo France. 100% DSNA 100% 31/01/2003 ITY COTR Implementation of ground ground automated co ordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/ % For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Compliance to the COTR Implementing Rule is globally achieved (only one minor noncompliance is identified and cannot be done in the legacy system, mainly due to lack of 30/06/2016 specification), except for compliance regarding 29/2009 which is addressed under ITY AGDL ASP (By:12/2012) for the original set of processes, and planned for LOF and NAN processes. DSNA Fully compliant with COTR Implementing Rule (except 100% for compliance regarding 29/2009 which is addressed 30/06/2016 under ITY AGDL) with all neighbors when operationally relevant and when their system capability is achieved. MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Authority Flight data process is done. 100% 31/12/2012 LSSIP Year 2017 France 126 Released Issue

139 Local Objectives Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area. AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local % Planned LFBP PAU PYRENEES A digital advanced tower concept will be implemented at Pau Pyrénées airport (LFBP) in order to facilitate a better coordination for approach ATS with departures from Tarbes Pyrénées 31/12/2020 (LFBT) airport where a camera network will be implemented. AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local % Ongoing LFMD CANNES MANDELIEU In order to better accommodate local helicopters traffic increase at Cannes Héliport Quai du Large (LFTL), a Digital Advanced Tower concept has been developed and the implementation phase has been launched end 2017 at Cannes Mandelieu airport (LFMD) in order to visualize 31/08/2019 and manage heliport movements directly from Cannes Mandelieu (LFMD) tower. AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local LFVM Miquelon Airport % Ongoing Project has been launched in 2016 and implementation date is 31/10/ /10/2018 Miquelon traffic will be handled directly from Pointe Blanche at the end of the project. Multi Sector Planning En route 1P2T Not ATC18 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local No MSP implementation planned. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFBO Toulouse Blagnac CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFLL Lyon Saint Exupéry CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFML MARSEILLE PROVENCE CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. LSSIP Year 2017 France 127 Released Issue

140 ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFMN Nice Côte d Azur CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFPG PARIS CHARLES DE GAULLE CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local 80% Ongoing LFPO PARIS ORLY CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard. Optimised Low Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Not NAV12 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local No Optimised Low Level IFR routes in TMA for Rotorcraft implementation plan to report. LSSIP Year 2017 France 128 Released Issue

141 ANNEXES ANNEX A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Co ordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP National Focal Point for France DTA Jean Jacques BLANCHARD LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA DTA Jean Jacques BLANCHARD Stéphane LAFOURCADE LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP DSAC Bérioska MARCHANT LSSIP Focal Point for Airport DSNA Eric LIEUTAUD LSSIP Focal Point for Military DSAÉ Yann PICHAVANT EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for France DECMA/PEPR Jorge PINTO LSSIP Year 2017 France 129 Released Issue

142 Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator EUROCONTROL Objective Owners National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Estelle LE GUILCHER AOM19.1 AOM19.2 AOM19.3 O. ALFARO O. ALFARO O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / O. MROWICKI Estelle Le GUILCHER Estelle Le GUILCHER Fabrice ETARD AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Jérôme DUFOSSEZ AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Jérôme DUFOSSEZ AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Erwan PAGE AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM Ravo RANDRIA AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Erwan PAGE AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Ravo RANDRIA AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE Erwan PAGE ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Frédéric CHUPEAU ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Frédéric CHUPEAU ATC07.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Ali SAHI ATC12.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Yannick MESTON ATC15.1 L. DELL ORTO pending Ali SAHI ATC15.2 L. DELL ORTO P. HOP Gérald REGNIAUD ATC17 L. DELL ORTO S. MORTON Bruno SPYCKERELLE ATC18 L. DELL ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Bruno SPYCKERELLE COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Philippe KERLIRZIN COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Philippe KERLIRZIN COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Daniel LENNON ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Alain BOURGIN ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY Alain BOURGIN ENV03 A P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN Alain BOURGIN FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI Olivier GELARD FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle LE GUILCHER LSSIP Year 2017 France 130 Released Issue

143 FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI Olivier TEYSSANDIER INF07 A P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Sébastien TANGUY ITY ACID O. CIOARA pending Bruno SPYCKERELLE ITY ADQ A P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Sébastien TANGUY ITY AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Sylvie CHAMBON ATY AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Daniel LENNON ITY FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Philippe KERLIRZIN ITY SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Ravo RANDRIA NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Sophie BARANES NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Sophie BARANES NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Sophie BARANES NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET Sophie BARANES SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending Hervé FORESTIER LSSIP Year 2017 France 131 Released Issue

144 ANNEX B National Stakeholders Organisation charts LSSIP Year 2017 France 132 Released Issue

145 LSSIP Year 2017 France 133 Released Issue

146 LSSIP Year 2017 France 134 Released Issue