PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

Transcription

1 PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY December 2018

2 Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 6 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 7 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 8 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 9 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) 10 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 11 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 12 Glossary 13 Page: 2

3 Description & Analysis Europe Traffic in December 2018 increased by 5.2% compared to December 2017 and was in line with the baseline forecast. Eleven states added more than 50 flights daily to the network with Germany, Spain and Italy as the top contributors. Germany was the main contributor, adding 470 flights per day. Additional traffic is generated by its internal flow (+128 flights/day) as some airlines have now filled the gaps left following airberlin s failure at the end of October Germany also gained flights on its flows to and from Spain (+51 flights/day), Italy (+41 flights/day) and Austria (+28 flights/day). Spain and Italy were the next two contributors adding respectively 257 and 208 flights per day to the network. Both States recorded additional traffic on their flows from and to Germany (above mentioned) but also thanks to increase on their internal flow (+51 flights/day for Spain and +56 flights per day for Italy). Additional traffic between the two States was recorded too (24 flights/day). On the other end of the list, a few States have been recording a decline in local traffic, amongst which Turkey (-32 flights/day) affected by a general reduction of domestic traffic. The low-cost segment recorded the fastest growth with an 8.7% increase. Traditional scheduled and non-scheduled (charter) segments grew by 5% (each). On the other hand, the all-cargo and business aviation segments declined by 9.3% and 3.1% respectively. The airlines which added the most flights to the European network on a daily basis compared with December 2017 were, Easyjet UK (+193 flights), Ryanair (+130 flights), Lufthansa (+99 flights), Eurowings (+71 flights) and LOT (+49 flights). The average en-route ATFM delay per flight in the NM area in December was 0.71 min/flt, which is above the corresponding monthly guideline value of 0.30 min/flt. The average YTD en-route ATFM delay per flight in 2018 in the NM area is 1.73 min/flt, which is more than three times the corresponding guideline value of 0.50 min/flt. (Source: NM). FABEC In the FABEC area, traffic increased by 7.2% in December 2018 compared to the same month in This traffic growth is significantly above the STATFOR baseline scenario published in March All FABEC ANSPs recorded a traffic increase above 5% in December, the highest increase for DFS with 8.6%. The landings in the FABEC area (only the airports included in the performance plan) recorded an increase by 7.0%. The 2018 YTD arrival traffic evolution is now 2.2% higher than in DFS continued to record an exceptional increase of landings (+12.1% this month, partly recovering from AirBerlin end of activity last year). All the other FABEC members recorded an increase of landings as well but to a lesser extent: LVNL (+4.4%), DSNA (+4.0%), skyguide (+3.2%), skeyes (+2.6%). The units with the highest ATFM en-route delay in December 2018 are Karlsruhe ( min.), Marseille ( min.) and Maastricht ( min.). In Karlsruhe, delays were due to 'ATC-Capacity' (65%), 'Staffing' (31%), 'Airspace Management' (2%), 'Other' (1%) and 'Weather' (1%); in Marseille, 'Staffing' (55%), 'Industrial Action' (35%, 14 Dec.), 'ATC-Capacity' (8%) and 'Technical' (1%). in Maastricht, 'Staffing' (39%), 'Special Event' (22%, Free Route implementation Phase 2), 'Other' (16%, SAIP - AD4 Swanwick Airspace Improvement Programme), 'ATC-Capacity' (13%), 'Weather' (10%) and 'Airspace Management' (1%). Brest, Reims, Zurich and Bordeaux also induced delays in December 2018, but to a lower extent; Brest ( min.; 57% due to 'Industrial Action', 36% 'Staffing'), Reims (52% due to 'Staffing', 31% 'ATC-Capacity' and 11% 'Weather'); Zurich ( min.; 90% due to 'Staffing', 10% 'ATC-Capacity'); Bordeaux ( min.; 69% due to 'Staffing', 30% 'Industrial Action'). The en-route ATFM delay per flight all causes reached 0.87 min/flt in December 2018 compared to 0.29 min/flt in The YTD en-route ATFM delay per flight shows a deterioration compared to last year (2.12 min/flt vs min/flt in 2017). This result is far above the 2018 capacity target (0.42 min/flt). The YTD en-route ATFM delay CRSTMP causes reaches 1.40 min/flt. This corresponds to a performance drop compared to last year (0.76 min/flt); this value is, as well, far above the 2018 CRSTMP target (0.33 min/flt). The Arrival ATFM delay per arrival movement all causes decreased in December from 1.25 min/flt in 2017 to 0.82 min/flt in 2018 (a performance improvement by 34%). The arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight CRSTMP causes increased from 0.07 min/flt in December 2017 to 0.09 min/flt in The airports with the highest ATFM delay in December 2018 more than 10% of the total FABEC arrival delay were Amsterdam/EHAM ( min.) and Paris-Orly/LFPO ( min.). In Amsterdam, delays were due to 'Weather'(85%) and Aerodrome capacity' (14%); in Paris-Orly, 'Aerodrome capacity' (48%), 'Weather' (31%), 'Industrial Action' (18%) and 'ATC- Capacity' (3%). Before applying the post-ops adjustment process, LVNL is the only ANSP to reach its CRSTMP en-route target in 2018; no other FABEC members achieved their respective CRSTMP en-route ATFM delay target in For skyguide, the expected application of the post-adjustment process should lead to just achieve the target. On the other hand, all FABEC members achieved their respective CRSTMP Arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight target in P.S.: In the context of the post-ops performance adjustment process, delays figures for all ANSPs are not consolidated yet. Page: 3

4 IFR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) FABEC YTD 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 2.7 % 2.3 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 0.9 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 3.0 % 2.9 % 4.6 % 5.8 % 7.2 % 3.2 % FPP RP / RP2 (%) - Monthly 5.1 % 5.0 % 6.0 % 10.2 % 9.4 % 11.7 % 13.0 % 13.9 % 12.5 % 12.9 % 8.2 % 10.7 % 2018 / RP2 (%) - Cumulated 5.1 % 5.0 % 5.4 % 6.7 % 7.3 % 8.2 % 9.0 % 9.7 % 10.0 % 10.3 % 10.2 % 10.2 % 2017 Monthly and 2018 Monthly values represent actual movements (source: PRU). RP represents the traffic forecast (STATFOR low- growth 02/2015) underpinning the FABEC Performance Plan, split into monthly values on the basis of a FABEC consolidated methodology Monthly 2018 Monthly FPP RP YTD skeyes 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 3.3 % 4.9 % 2.4 % 4.4 % 2.3 % 3.7 % 3.9 % 4.2 % 2.5 % 1.8 % 1.0 % 5.0 % 3.2 % 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 2.4 % 3.1 % 2.5 % 3.7 % 2.6 % 3.4 % 3.3 % 4.1 % 2.6 % 5.2 % 7.1 % 8.6 % 4.0 % 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 3.1 % 2.2 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 1.5 % 1.9 % 3.1 % 4.2 % 4.8 % 5.5 % 2.7 % 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 3.2 % 3.7 % -0.2 % -4.5 % -1.4 % 0.1 % -0.1 % -0.7 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 1.2 % 5.2 % 0.6 % 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 1.7 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.7 % -0.4 % 1.4 % 3.6 % 6.0 % 1.3 % 2017 Monthly Monthly DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide Growth (%) 3.6 % 2.5 % 2.9 % 4.9 % 4.3 % 5.7 % 5.2 % 6.8 % 5.5 % 5.3 % 5.3 % 6.0 % 4.9 % Source: EUROCONTROL - PRU / Performance Plan RP1 Page: 4

5 IFR ARR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) FABEC YTD 2017 Monthly Monthly Growth (%) 1.7 % 0.7 % 0.5 % 1.2 % -1.0 % 1.0 % 1.7 % 2.3 % 1.9 % 4.0 % 5.8 % 7.0 % 2.2 % 2017 Monthly and 2018 Monthly values represent actual arrivals (source: PRU) Monthly 2018 Monthly Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) YTD ANA LUX % 10.0 % 6.9 % 8.3 % 4.2 % 5.5 % 3.8 % 5.0 % 5.9 % 4.6 % 3.6 % 2.9 % 5.9 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) skeyes % 0.1 % -2.1 % 2.5 % -3.1 % -1.7 % 1.2 % 1.0 % -1.1 % -2.9 % 1.5 % 2.6 % -0.3 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) DFS % 1.4 % 0.9 % 3.5 % 0.5 % 2.1 % 2.9 % 4.2 % 3.2 % 7.1 % 10.5 % 12.1 % 4.0 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) DSNA % -1.4 % 0.0 % -1.4 % -2.5 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 1.7 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 3.4 % 4.0 % 1.0 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) LVNL % 4.6 % 1.9 % -0.2 % -1.6 % -1.0 % -1.8 % -2.2 % -0.1 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 4.4 % 0.6 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) skyguide % 0.1 % -0.3 % 1.3 % -0.1 % 1.1 % 1.3 % 1.5 % -0.1 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 3.2 % 1.1 % Page: 5

6 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD En-route Delay All causes En-route Delay CRSTMP causes FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.42 FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.33 Guideline 0.42 Guideline 0.33 Minute ('000) ALL causes Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes Diff % Diff % Traffic ('000) Potential savings (*) due to underbid the delay Target Diff % (all Causes) in Mio EURO (YTD) * Cost of ATFM-delay per min = Yearly Value (RP 1) All Delay Causes (All Causes) Guideline (All Causes) 2018 (All Causes) Target (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) YTD FABEC yearly Target ,42 0,33 Yearly Value (RP 1) CRSTMP Delay Causes (CRSTMP) Guideline (CRSTMP) 2018 (CRSTMP) Target (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) YTD FABEC yearly Target monthly ADM 2018 monthly ADM 2017 monthly CRSTMP 2018 monthly CRSTMP Monthly Monthly The guideline for the en-route ATFM delay per movement is a basic cumulative extrapolation of the previous three years monthly allocation and is designed to give an impression, how the YTD figures should be, in order to reach the yearly 2018 published targets (0.42 min per flight for all delay causes and 0.33 min per flight for the delay causes CRSTMP). Page: 6

7 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD Arrival Delay All causes Arrival Delay CRSTMP causes Diff % Diff % Minute ('000) ALL causes Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes Diff % Diff % Traffic ('000) Diff % All Delay Causes CRSTMP Delay Causes Yearly Value YTD (RP 1) Yearly Value YTD (RP 1) (All Causes) 2018 (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) (CRSTMP) 2018 (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) monthly ADM 2018 monthly ADM Monthly monthly CRSTMP 2018 monthly CRSTMP Monthly Page: 7

8 ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I Delay due to reason code: Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" Page: 8

9 ( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" CRSTMP: TOTAL: (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" CRSTMP: TOTAL: (National) Target CRSTMP causes Page: 9

10 Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich ( YTD value) Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich min. ( YTD value) Movements KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Movements Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 3.00 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () Page: 10

11 ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) M M Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I Delay due to reason code: Capacity "C" Routeing "R" 0 54 Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" Page: 11

12 ( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" 54 Capacity "C" CRSTMP: TOTAL: (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.10 ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" 0.01 (National) Target CRSTMP causes Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" 0.01 Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" CRSTMP: TOTAL: Target values are dependent on traffic evolution In fact Target All causes applies to all 4 airports Page: 12

13 Glossary KPI #1: KPI #1 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, the EU-wide target set for each year of RP2 is 0.50 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (all regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0,48, 2016: 0.42, 2017: 0.42, 2018: 0.42, 2019: 0.43 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (CRSTMP regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0.37, 2016: 0.33, 2017: 0.33, 2018: 0.33, 2019: 0.34 KPI #2: KPI #2 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, no targets have been defined at EU and FABEC level for RP2. The targets have been set at local level. Cause ATC Capacity CODE Guidelines for Application En Route: Demand exceeds or complexity reduces declared or expected ATC capacity Airport: Demand exceeds declared or expected ATC capacity. ATC Industrial Action I Reduction in any capacity due to industrial action by ATC staff ATC Routeings R Network solutions / scenarios used to balance demand and capacity ATC Staffing S Unplanned staff shortage reducing expected capacity. ATC Equipment T Reduction of expected or declared capacity due to the non-availability or degradation of equipment used to provide an ATC service. Accident / Incident Aerodrome Capacity A G Reduction of expected ATC capacity due to an aircraft accident / incident. Reduction in declared or expected capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of infrastructure at an airport. e.g. Work in Progress, shortage of aircraft stands etc. Or when demand exceeds expected aerodrome capacity. Reduced capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of support equipment at an Equipment NON ATC- to be E airport e.g. Fire Service, De-icing / snow removal equipment or other ground handling Aerodrome Services equipment. Industrial Action NON ATC N A reduction in expected / planned capacity due to industrial action by non ATC personnel. Airspace Management Special Event Weather Environmental Issues Other C M P W V O Reduction in declared or expected capacity following changes in airspace / route availability due to small scale military activity. Reduction in planned, declared or expected capacity or when demand exceeds the above capacities as a result of a major sporting, governmental or social event. It may also be used for ATM system upgrades and transitions. Large multinational military exercises may also use this reason. This category should only be used with prior approval during the planning process. Reduction in expected capacity due to any weather phenomena. This includes where weather impacts airport infrastructure capacity, but where aerodrome services are operating as planned / expected. Reduction in any capacity or when demand exceeds any capacity due to agreed local noise, runway usage or similar procedures. This category should only be used with prior agreement in the planning process. This should only be used in exceptional circumstances when no other category is sufficient. An explanatory ANM remark MUST be given to allow post ops analysis. CRSTMP: ATC Capacity (C), ATC Routeings (R), ATC Staffing (S), ATC Equipment (T), Airspace Management (M), Special Event (P); a set of regulation codes which are defined in the Common Charging Scheme Regulation (IR 391/2013) and subject to financial incentive. Note: Arrival figures (traffic and delay) do only include EBBR and EBLG for Belgium and only EHAM for the Netherlands. TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ADM - Average en-route per Movement ATM - Air Traffic Management ANSP - Air Navigation Service Provider PRU - Performance Review Unit ATFM - Air Traffic Flow Management YTD - Year to Date value ANM - Aeronautical Notification Message FPP - FABEC Performace Plan FABEC - Functional Airspace Block Europe Central Page: 13

14 FABEC Performance Report Capacity: Editor: Sources: Status: December FABEC PMG EUROCONTROL PRU, FABEC ANSPs Notice The FABEC PMG has made every effort to ensure that the information and analysis contained in this document are as accurate and complete as possible. Only information from quoted sources has been used and information relating to named parties has been checked with the parties concerned. Despite these precautions, should you find any errors or inconsistencies we would be grateful if you could please bring them to the FABEC PMGs attention. Page: 14