Monthly Network Operations Report

Transcription

1 Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis June 217 NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 1

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 NOTICE 2 1. TOTAL TRAFFIC 3 2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS 6 3. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAYS 7 En-Route ATFM Delay per Location 7 En-Route ATFM Delay per Delay Group 8 En-Route ATFM Delay per Flight 9 En-Route ATFM Delay Year-To-Date 1 4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAYS 11 Airport/TMA ATFM Delay per Location 11 Airport/TMA ATFM Delay per Delay Groups 11 Airport/TMA ATFM Delay per Flight 12 Airport/TMA ATFM Delay Year-To-Date DAILY EVOLUTION ALL AIR TRANSPORT DELAYS (SOURCE: CODA) ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ISSUES 14 Planned Events 14 ACC 14 Airports 15 Disruptions NM ADDED VALUE 16 NOTICE Traffic and Delay Comparisons All traffic and delay comparisons are between report month and equivalent month of previous year, unless otherwise stated. Graphics All graphs in chapter 3 and chapter 4 are in average minutes of ATFM delay per day, unless otherwise stated. NM Area All figures presented in this report are for the geographical area that is within Network Manager s responsibility (NM area). For further information on the NM Area go to the Reporting Assumptions and Descriptions document available on the EUROCONTROL website at Regulation Reason Groupings The table below shows the colour coding used in the report charts. EN-ROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) EN-ROUTE STAFFING (ATC) EN-ROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) EN-ROUTE CAPACITY EN-ROUTE DISRUPTIONS EN-ROUTE EVENTS EN-ROUTE WEATHER AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT EVENTS AIRPORT WEATHER For further information on the regulation reason groupings, go to the Reporting Assumptions and Descriptions document available on the EUROCONTROL website at NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 2

3 1. TOTAL TRAFFIC 6, 5, 4, 3, 2,2% 2, 1,5% 1,, 3,5% 3,3% 2,6% 2,8% 2,9% 4,6% 4,8% Traffic increased by 5.1% in June 217 i Monthly traffic trend 3, 4,5% 3,3% 5,1% 4,6% The traffic increase of 5.1% for June was above the high forecast updated in February 217. There were 35,937 flights on 3 June, which is a record for the network. Comparison to same month last year Rolling 12 month trend Average daily traffic in June for last 5 Years Forecast dated BASELINE FORECAST LOW FORECAST HIGH FORECAST 3,7% Average daily traffic for last 5 Years Average daily traffic in June 217 was the highest for June in the last five years. This graph shows the variation in average daily traffic for the last 12-month period relative to the previous 12-months. The average daily traffic from July 216 to June 217 was 3.7% higher than the average from July 215 to June 216. The trend shows a continuous growth in traffic , 3,7% 2,7% 2,6% 2,8% 3, 3, 3,2% 3,4% 3,2% 3,5% 3, 2,2% 2,3% 2,4% 2,5% 2,5% 2, 1,5% 1,,5%, 12 months rolling traffic trend Thirteen states contributed most to the European local traffic ii growth in June, adding more than 5 daily flights to the network. Spain (excl. Canary Islands) was the top contributor with 36 extra daily flights mainly due to increased flows to/from North-West Europe (UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden). UK came next with 247 extra daily flights mainly due to increased flows to/from South- West Europe (Spain, Italy, Portugal, Canary Islands, France). Ex-aequo with UK, Turkey benefited from a bounce back (Russian ban on charter flights in 216) and was among the top three contributors for the first time in 15 months adding 246 daily flights to the network; its international departures/arrivals increased by 15%. Italy added 221 daily flights owing partly to its dynamic internal flow which was up 6.3%. Three states (Germany, Greece, Portugal) added a combined 381 daily flights to the network. The following states: the Netherlands, Ukraine, Sweden, Romania and Poland added together 395 daily flights. Croatia entered the top contributors for the first time in 217 with the addition of 56 daily flights to the network in June. Charter was the strongest market segment with a growth rate of 7.9% mainly due to flows between the Russian Federation and Turkey which added 132 flights/day compared to June last year when Russian charter flights to Turkey were banned. The allcargo segment maintained a dynamic growth and was up 7.7%. The low-cost, business aviation and traditional scheduled segments grew 7.3%, 5.3% and 3.8% respectively. The top three extra-european partners in average daily flights in both directions were the United States (1,174 flights, up 6%), the Russian Federation (1,15 flights, +32.3%) and the United Arab Emirates (34 flights, up 1%). Traffic flows between Europe and North Africa showed a robust progression and increased by 41% to 174 flights per day for Egypt and by 18% to 128 flights per day for Tunisia. The aircraft operators that added the most flights to the network on a daily basis were Ryanair (+199 flights/day), easyjet plc (+125 flights/day), Wizz Air (+71 flights/day) and Turkish Airlines (+7 flights/day). For more information on EUROCONTROL Forecasts, go to NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 3

4 Nine of the top ten airports had positive traffic growth. Overall, the largest traffic increases in June 217 were at Antalya, Tel Aviv/Ben Gurion, Birmingham, Milano/Malpensa and Lisbon airports. The largest traffic decreases were at Istanbul/Sabiha Gökcen, Rome/Fiumicino, Copenhagen, Berlin/Tegel and Lyon airports. Antalya traffic increase is due to the comparison with June 216 when there was a clear drop in tourism due to the unstable political situation. Tel Aviv/Ben Gurion traffic increase was due to increase in tourism. The increase of traffic in Birmingham airport is due to the opening of new routes. The traffic growth at Milano/Malpensa is in line with passenger traffic growth forecast. Nine of the top ten aircraft operators had more traffic compared to June 216. The operators with the highest traffic growth were Eurowings, FlyNiki, Norwegian Air International, Olympic and SunExpress airlines. Air Berlin, Germanwings, Aegean, Norwegian Air Shuttle and HOP airlines recorded the highest traffic decrease. Norwegian Air International traffic variation comes from a change in fleet size following new aircraft deliveries, as well as aircraft moving from using NAX to the IBK callsign. The traffic variation of Olympic and Aegean is due to Aegean flights operated with Olympic callsign. Airberlin has transferred its 16 European holiday destinations to FlyNiki which will operate from Dusseldorf to destinations in Spain, the Canary Islands, Portugal and the Greek islands from the start of the summer schedule. The traffic variation of Eurowings follows the continued integration of Germanwings and some Lufthansa routes into the Eurowings operation. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 4

5 The Lisbon, Santa Maria, Madrid, Casablanca, Canarias and Bordeaux ACCs variation is due to increased traffic in the South/West axis. However, the highest relative traffic increases in June 217 were in Yerevan, Chisinau, Kiev, Odessa and Skopje ACCs. Traffic increase between Europe and Egypt/UAE explained the variation of Cairo ACC. Reykjavik ACC traffic variation is due to an increase usage of northern routes between US and Europe. Traffic increase in French ACCs is due partly to the comparison with June 216 during which several French industrial actions took place. Tel Aviv ACC variation is due to increase in tourism and increase of domestic flights. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 5

6 2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS Total ATFM delays decreased by 24.8% in June 217. Note that June 216 experienced high delay due to French industrial action and en-route weather ,8% ,9% ,3% , Average daily ATFM delays Monthly ATFM delays trend -5,6% 11,6% -43,2% -12,4% -13,4% -16,1% Comparison to same month last year EN-ROUTE AIRPORT/TMA , ,4% -12,1% -17,9% -24,8% Rolling 12 month trend Average daily ATFM delays ,2% 3,8% 69,1% 3,9% EN-ROUTE AIRPORT/ TMA En-route ATFM delays decreased by 25. and airport ATFM delays decreased by 24.4%. Proportion of ATFM delays in June 217 AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT EVENTS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE EVENTS AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT WEATHER ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) The rolling 12-month trend shows continuous improvement since June 216. ATFM delay was 14.4% lower during the period July 216 June 217 compared to July 215 June 216. % total ATFM delay 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 8246 MAASTRICHT UAC 6573 KARLSRUHE UAC 4318 SEILLE ACC 328 BREST U/ACC BARCELONA ACC BORDEAUX ALL ACC AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL En-route ATC capacity (28.4%), en-route weather (27.5%) and airport weather (13.4%) were the main causes of ATFM delays in June 217. Top 2 delay reference locations in June 217 WIEN ACC LONDON/GATWICK NICOSIA ACC LONDON ACC These are the top 2 delay generating locations for the reporting month with respect to total ATFM delays. Figures are the average daily delays in minutes for the individual locations. En route weather delays in Maastricht, Karlsruhe, Marseille and to a lesser extent in Barcelona, Bordeaux, Vienna and London ACCs; En-route ATC capacity issues in Maastricht, Karlsruhe, Marseille, Brest, Barcelona, Bordeaux and Nicosia ACCs; En-route ATC staffing issues in Karlsruhe and Nicosia ACCs; Trials of New Voice Control System (NVCS) in Maastricht ACC. ATC equipment issues in Bordeaux, Brest and Marseille ACCs; Capacity issue at Amsterdam/Schiphol, London/Gatwick and both Istanbul airports; Seasonal weather impacted Amsterdam/Schiphol, London/Gatwick, London/Heathrow, Frankfurt and Zurich airports; LONDON/HEATHROW LANGEN ACC ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN PARIS ALL ACC BARCELONA/EL PRAT LONDON TMA TC ISTANBUL-ATATURK FRANKFURT MAIN ZURICH AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT EVENTS AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 6

7 3. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAYS EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY PER LOCATION % total ATFM delay 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% Top 2 delay locations for en-route delays in June ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) MAASTRICHT UAC KARLSRUHE UAC SEILLE ACC BREST U/ACC BARCELONA ACC BORDEAUX ALL ACC WIEN ACC NICOSIA ACC LONDON ACC LANGEN ACC PARIS ALL ACC LONDON TMA TC REIMS U/ACC BRUSSELS CANAC ZURICH ACC ATHINAI CONTROL GENEVA ACC WARSZAWA ACC BREMEN ACC MADRID ALL ACC These are the top 2 en-route ATFM delay generating locations for the reporting month with respect to total ATFM delays. Figures are the average daily delays in minutes for the individual locations. The top 2 en-route ATFM delay locations generated 63.7% of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. The top 5 en-route ATFM delay locations generated 38.3% of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. More detailed information available in the Monthly per ACC Summary Report via the NM ATFCM Statistics website. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 7

8 EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY PER DELAY GROUP ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) % total En-route Capacity (ATC) delays Reasons for en-route delays in June 217 ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) 25% 2 15% 1 5% 3992 MAASTRICHT UAC 2455 BREST U/ACC,5% 1,5% 1,7% 2,2% 7,4% Maastricht, Brest and Marseille were the biggest generators of en-route ATC capacity delays in June. 27,5% 28,4% 5% 1 15% 2 25% 3 Top en-route Capacity (ATC) delays in June SEILLE ACC BARCELONA ACC KARLSRUHE UAC 996 BORDEAUX ALL ACC 757 NICOSIA ACC LONDON ACC LANGEN ACC REIMS U/ACC En-route ATFM delays accounted for 69.1% of all ATFM delays. Most of this delay was caused by en-route ATC capacity, en-route weather and en-route ATC staffing as explained in detail below. The other causes were: En-route events; Increase demand in Brest and London ACCs due to final of the Champions League on 3 June; trials of New Voice Control System (NVCS) in Maastricht UAC; En-route ATC disruptions; radar failure in Brussels ACC on 6 June; Flight Data Processing System (FDPS) issue in Bordeaux ACC on 13 June; radio frequency issues in Paris ACC on 19 June; technical issue with ATC frequencies in Brest ACC on 22 June; radio frequency issues in Marseille ACC on 25 June; ATC equipment issues throughout the month; En-route capacity; Military activities in Nicosia, Brest and Karlsruhe ACCs; En-route disruptions; Telecommunication failure in Gander Oceanic generated delays in Shanwick Oceanic ACC on 21 June. % total en-route Weather delays 2 15% 1 5% 3421 Top en-route Weather delays in June 217 KARLSRUHE UAC 2831 MAASTRICHT UAC 2266 SEILLE ACC 148 WIEN ACC Thunderstorms generated delays in several ACCs. Karlsruhe, Maastricht and Marseille ACCs were the most impacted throughout the month. The worst day for en-route weather was on 22 June with a total of 21,71 min of delay in Karlsruhe ACC and 33,342 min of delay in Maastricht ACC. LONDON ACC BORDEAUX ALL ACC BARCELONA ACC LONDON TMA TC PARIS ALL ACC LANGEN ACC % total En-route Staffing (ATC) delays 35% 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% Top en-route Staffing (ATC) delays in June KARLSRUHE UAC NICOSIA ACC ATHINAI CONTROL BRUSSELS CANAC WIEN ACC MAKEDONIA CONTROL MAASTRICHT UAC GENEVA ACC WARSZAWA ACC LANGEN ACC Nr of flights Average daily flights >= 15 min en-route delay ATFM delays due to staff shortage in Karlsruhe UAC and, to a lesser extent, in Nicosia and Athens ACCs. The average daily flights with an en-route ATFM delay of at least 15 minutes decreased from 1,436 flights/day in June 216 to 1,49 flights/day in June 217. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 8

9 EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY PER FLIGHT En-route delay per flight (min) 2, 1,5 1,,5, 1,63 1,47 1,19 1,15 Top 2 delay locations for en-route delays in June 217,87,8,76,73,44,37,35,33,3,28,27,26,26,25,24,22 ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) NICOSIA ACC MAASTRICHT UAC SEILLE ACC KARLSRUHE UAC BREST U/ACC BARCELONA ACC WIEN ACC BORDEAUX ALL ACC BRUSSELS CANAC ATHINAI CONTROL LANGEN ACC GENEVA ACC ZURICH ACC BREMEN ACC REIMS U/ACC MAKEDONIA CONTROL PARIS ALL ACC LONDON ACC WARSZAWA ACC AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) These are the top 2 average en-route ATFM delay per flight generating locations for the reporting month. Figures are the average en-route ATFM delay per flight in minutes for the individual locations. With a bigger impact of en-route weather throughout the month compared to May 217, ATFM delay/flight increased for all ACCs except Geneva where en-route ATFM delay/flight decreased from.59 min/flt in May 217 to.33 min/flt in June 217. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 9

10 EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY YEAR-TO-DATE Proportion of total ATFM delay 1 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% Top 2 delay locations for year-to-date en-route ATFM delays ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) MAASTRICHT UAC BREST U/ACC KARLSRUHE UAC SEILLE ACC BORDEAUX ALL ACC NICOSIA ACC BARCELONA ACC LANGEN ACC LISBOA ACC/UAC GENEVA ACC LONDON ACC WIEN ACC These are the top 2 en-route delay locations for 217 with respect to the total ATFM delay. Figures are the average daily en-route delay in minutes for the individual locations. The top 2 en-route delay locations generated 49.1% of the total ATFM (network) delay. The top 5 en-route delay locations generated 3.7% of the total ATFM (network) delay. En-route delay per flight (min) 1,,8,6,4,2,,9 NICOSIA ACC,77 BREST U/ACC,63 MAASTRICHT UAC,56 SEILLE ACC,46 BORDEAUX ALL ACC Top 2 delay locations for year-to-date en-route delays,42 KARLSRUHE UAC,36,33,31 CANARIAS ACC/FIC LISBOA ACC/UAC BARCELONA ACC,27 GENEVA ACC These are the top 2 average en-route ATFM delay per flight generating locations for 217. Figures are the average daily en-route delay in minutes per flight for the individual locations. REIMS U/ACC PARIS ALL ACC CANARIAS ACC/FIC ZURICH ACC AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) MADRID ALL ACC LONDON TMA TC BREMEN ACC,19,17,15,15,15,14,13,11,1,1 WIEN ACC LANGEN ACC SEILLE TMA AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) REIMS U/ACC ZURICH ACC ATHINAI CONTROL PALMA ACC BREMEN ACC PARIS ALL ACC ENROUTE WEATHER ENROUTE EVENTS ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE STAFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) En-route delays per flight 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,,8,6,4,2, Monthly en-route delay per flight monitoring MONTHLY GUIDELINE DLY/FLT YTD GUIDELINE DLY/FLT Reporting month: The average en-route ATFM delay per flight in the NM area iii in June was 1.35 min/flt,which is above the corresponding monthly guideline iv value of.81 min/flt. Year To Date: The average YTD en-route ATFM delay per flight in 217 in the NM area iii is.64 min/flt which is above the corresponding guideline value of.41 min/flt. 2 of en-route delays are due to disruptions.,5 MONTHLY ENROUTE DLY/FLT YTD ENROUTE DLY/FLT Average daily traffic Year-to-date daily flights >= 15 min en-route delay Year to date: An average of 42 flights/day had an en-route ATFM delay of at least 15 minutes in June 217. The corresponding figure in 216 was 563 flights/day NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 1

11 4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAYS AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER LOCATION Proportion of total ATFM delay 4% 3% 2% 1% Top 2 delay locations for airport delays in June AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT EVENTS AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL LONDON/GATWICK LONDON/HEATHROW ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN BARCELONA/EL PRAT ISTANBUL-ATATURK FRANKFURT MAIN ZURICH ADOLFO SUAREZ MADRID-BARAJAS PALMA DE MALLORCA DUESSELDORF IRAKLION/NIKOS KAZANTZAKIS WIEN SCHWECHAT GENEVA LISBOA MUENCHEN SANTORINI MIKONOS CHANIA/IOANNIS DASKALOGIANNIS PARIS LE BOURGET AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER DELAY GROUPS Reasons for airport delays in June 217 AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC),3% AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS,3% AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC),7% AIRPORT EVENTS,7% AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) 3,8% AIRPORT CAPACITY 11,8% AIRPORT WEATHER 13,4% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% % total Airport Weather delays 2 15% 1 5% Top Airport Weather delays in June LONDON/HEATHROW AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL FRANKFURT MAIN LONDON/GATWICK ZURICH ADOLFO SUAREZ MADRID- BARAJAS MUENCHEN BARCELONA/EL PRAT WIEN SCHWECHAT PALMA DE MALLORCA Airports accounted for 3.9% of all ATFM delays in June 217, mainly due to airport weather and aerodrome capacity. Thunderstorms and strong winds impacted operations at London/Heathrow and Amsterdam/Schiphol airports throughout the month. % total Airport Capacity delays 2 15% 1 5% Top Airport Capacity delays in June ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL LONDON/GATWICK ISTANBUL-ATATURK BARCELONA/EL PRAT DUESSELDORF PALMA DE MALLORCA MIKONOS ZURICH LISBOA % total Airport Capacity (ATC) delays 2 15% 1 5% Top Airport Capacity (ATC) delays in June IRAKLION/NIKOS KAZANTZAKIS ATHINAI/ELEFTHERIOS VENIZELOS SANTORINI CHANIA/IOANNIS DASKALOGIANNIS TEL AVIV/BEN GURION RODOS/DIAGORAS ZAKINTHOS/DIONISIOS SOLOMOS LONDON/GATWICK FIGARI-SUD-CORSE 36 THESSALONIKI/MAKEDONIA Capacity issues at Amsterdam/Schiphol and London/Gatwick airport due to high demand. Greek island airports generated delays due to high demand relative to their capacity. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 11

12 AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER FLIGHT Airport delay per flight (min) 1,2 1,1 1,,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,,84 Monthly average Airport delay (min) per flight Last 12 months =.6 minutes,86,69,57,63,41 Average airport/tma delay per flight decreased from.84 min/flt in June 216 to.61 min/flt in June ,13,83,58,4,35,49,61 Airport delays per flight (min) 5, 4, 3, 2, 1,, Top 1 Airport delay per flight in June 217 YTD Situation 4,33 MIKONOS 2,69 CHANIA/IOANNIS DASKALOGIANNIS 2,14 2,6 ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN LONDON/GATWICK 1,73 1,59 1,4 IRAKLION/NIKOS 1,21 1,13 1,13 Istanbul/Sabiha Gökcen and Amsterdam/Schiphol airports generated an average delay per flight well below their year to date average. KAZANTZAKIS PARIS LE BOURGET AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL RODOS/DIAGORAS ZURICH LONDON/HEATHROW AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY YEAR-TO-DATE Proportion of total ATFM delay 8% 6% 4% 2% 2315 AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL 1676 ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN ISTANBUL-ATATURK LONDON/HEATHROW LONDON/GATWICK Top 2 delay locations for year-to-date Airport ATFM delays FRANKFURT MAIN ZURICH BARCELONA/EL PRAT 413 LISBOA The top 2 Airport/TMA delay locations have generated 36.6% of the total ATFM (network) delay in 217. The top 5 Airport/TMA delay locations have generated 21.6% of the total ATFM (network) delay in 217. WIEN SCHWECHAT ADOLFO SUAREZ MADRID- BARAJAS BRUSSELS NATIONAL OSLO/GARDERMOEN LONDON/CITY ROMA/FIUMICINO GENEVA PARIS CH DE GAULLE PARIS ORLY TEL AVIV/BEN GURION MUENCHEN AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT EVENTS AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) 5. DAILY EVOLUTION 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1,, Average delay (min) per flight in June ENROUTE CAPACITY (ATC) ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS (ATC) ENROUTE DISRUPTIONS ENROUTE WEATHER AIRPORT STAFFING (ATC) AIRPORT CAPACITY AIRPORT EVENTS ENROUTE STAFFFING (ATC) ENROUTE CAPACITY ENROUTE EVENTS AIRPORT CAPACITY (ATC) AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS (ATC) AIRPORT DISRUPTIONS AIRPORT WEATHER There were fourteen days in June 217 when average ATFM delay/flt exceeded 1.5 min/flt. These were the most significant days; 2-3 June; En-route weather delays in Karlsruhe, London, Maastricht, Bordeaux, Langen and Barcelona ACCs; Airport weather issues at Frankfurt, London/Heathrow, Paris/Charles de Gaulle, Munich and Madrid/Barajas airports; En-route ATC capacity delays in Maastricht, Brest, Barcelona and Bordeaux ACCs; En-route events delays due to the final of the Champion League; 22 June; En-route weather impacted operations strongly in Maastricht, London and Karlsruhe ACCs; High delays due to en-route ATC capacity issues in Maastricht ACC and to a lesser extent in Marseille, Barcelona and Nicosia ACCs; Staffing issues in Karlsruhe, Brussels and Warsaw ACCs; Airport weather delays at London airports, Amsterdam/Schiphol and Frankfurt airports; June; En-route ATC capacity issues in Brest, Marseille, Maastricht, Nicosia, Karlsruhe and Barcelona ACCs; En-route weather delays in Karlsruhe, Vienna, Marseille and Barcelona ACCs; ATC staffing issue in Karlsruhe, Nicosia and Vienna ACCs; Radio frequency issues in Marseille ACC; 28 June; High weather delays in Marseille, Vienna, Maastricht and Karlsruhe ACCs; Aerodrome capacity issue at London/Gatwick, Amsterdam/Schiphol and Düsseldorf airports; En-route ATC capacity delays in Maastricht, Geneva, Brest and Madrid ACCs; 29-3June; ATC capacity issues in Marseille, Brest, Karlsruhe, Maastricht and Barcelona ACCs; En-route weather delay in Karlsruhe, Marseille, Paris and Bremen ACCs; Weather impacted operations at Berlin/Tegel, Frankfurt, Zurich, and Palma airports; ATC staffing issues in Brussels, Karlsruhe and Maastricht ACCs. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 12

13 6. ALL AIR TRANSPORT DELAYS (SOURCE: CODA) This section presents the all air transport delay situation as seen from the airlines by using the data collected by Central Office for Delay Analysis (CODA) from airlines. Data coverage is 62% of the commercial flights in the ECAC region for May 217. ATFM delays reported by airlines may be lower than the NM calculated ATFM delays due to difference in methods: ATFM delays of NM are the (flight) planned delays ; the airlines report the actual experienced ATFM delay on departure. For instance, a flight with an ATFM delay may also have a handling delay absorbed within the ATFM delay. For the airline, a part of this delay is the ATFM delay and the remaining amount is the handling delay. Breakdown Average Delay per Flight May 217 Average Departure Delay/Flight (min) Average En-Route Delay/Flight Average En-Route Delay/Flight 6.13 Average primary delay 11.2 Passenger experience Based on airline data, the average departure delay per flight from All-Causes was 11.2 minutes per flight, this was an increase of 2% in comparison to May 216 where the average delay was 1.82 minutes per flight. Primary delays counted for 56% (or 6.13 min/flt ), with reactionary delays representing the smaller remaining share of 44% at (4.89 min/flt). NM reported En-Route ATFM delay Primary Delay (excl En-Route) Airline Reported En-Route ATFM Delay Reactionary delay Average Departure Delay per Flight 216/217 2 Avg departure delay/flight (min) Further analysis of the past 12 months shows that the average All-Causes en-route ATFM delay reported by airlines was.76 minutes per flight. This stable when compared to the NM reported average en-route ATFM delay of.7 minutes per flight in May 217. Average reactionary delay per flight (CODA) Average delay per flight Other Primary delay All Causes (CODA) Average ATFM en-route delay per flight (CODA) Average ATFM en-route delay per flight (NM reported) Percentage of Delayed Flights: ATFM & All Causes % of flights delayed on departure - ATFM NMD 1 8% 6% 4% 2% , 25, 2, 15, 1, 5,, % of flights delayed on departure: All Causes The percentage of flights delayed from All-Causes increased with (those exceeding 15 minutes) increasing by.5 percentage points to 2.. Those (exceeding 3 minutes) however slightly decreased with 9.4% of flights being delayed in May 217. > 15min by ATFM Restrictions (NM) > 3min by ATFM Restrictions (NM) > 15min:All Causes (CODA) > 3min:All Causes (CODA) NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 13

14 7. ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE Average daily evolution of early and late flights , 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1,, The percentage of early departures for June 217 is 4.5% of regulated flights, which is a decrease of.8 percentage points compared to June 216. The percentage of late departures for June 217 is 5. of regulated flights, which is a decrease of.3 percentage points compared to June 216. Nº OF EARLY DEPARTURES Nº OF LATE DEPARTURES % EARLY DEPARTURES % LATE DEPARTURES The chart below shows the airports that have more than 3 regulated flights during the month with their average daily number and proportion of regulated flights that departed outside of the Slot Tolerance Window (STW). Any airport above the red line is non-compliant with the threshold (2). Those airports with a number of departures outside the slot tolerance window can reduce network predictability. Proportion of regulated flights outside the Slot Tolerance Window in June BEAUVAIS-TILLE ANKARA-ESENBOGA ZAKINTHOS/DIONISIOS CASABLANCA/MOHAMM IZMIR-ADNAN-MENDERES SANTORINI ANTALYA CHANIA/IOANNIS LTFE - MUGLA/MILAS- PISA SAN GIUSTO THESSALONIKI/MAKEDO BALE-MULHOUSE MUGLA-DALAMAN ISTANBUL-ATATURK SEILLE PROVENCE ISTANBUL/SABIHA GOKCEN LARNAKA/INTL NICE-COTE D'AZUR CARDIFF LUXEMBOURG LEEDS AND BRADFORD KYIV/BORYSPIL BRISTOL ZAGREB/PLESO SALZBURG PARIS ORLY PAFOS/INTL BORDEAUX-MERIGNAC AJACCIO-NAPOLEON- PARIS CH DE GAULLE CATANIA FONTANAROSSA LILLE/LESQUIN BERLIN-TEGEL PARIS LE BOURGET BIRMINGHAM VENEZIA TESSERA TEL AVIV/BEN GURION AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL FRANKFURT MAIN FARNBOROUGH 8. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ISSUES PLANNED EVENTS ACC MAJOR AIRSPACE OR ATM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PLANNED EVENTS Two ACCs carried out projects involving ATM system changes/upgrades, or airspace reorganisations, during this reporting period. Tirana ACC, after implementing significant modifications/improvements to their ATM system on 25 May, went through a postimplementation shadow phase until the end of June without generating ATFM delays. Previously, no capacity reductions had been estimated for this reporting period. Maastricht UAC carried out NVCS trials on 1 June, generating 28,421 minutes of ATFM delay, and on 15 June, generating 1,634 minutes of ATFM delay. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Palma and Barcelona ACCs generated some ATFM delay at the end of June: 79 min and 1,43min respectively due to the implementation of the new RNAV procedures at Ibiza airport, and the implementation of new sector in Barcelona ACC. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 14

15 AIRPORTS Local Plans in June A number of airports undertook infrastructure and technical system improvement works during June. These improvements as well as some special events had at most a minor impact on local airport operations, unless otherwise stated. Special Events Paris Air Show at Le Bourget airport from 13 until 25 June generated total of 6,94 minutes of ATFM delay; Art Basel from 11 until 17 June; Preparation and execution of the Grand Depart of the Tour de France from 28 June until 2 July with minor impact on Dusseldorf airport; Le Mans 24H car race between 16 and 19 June with minor impact on operations at Le Mans Arnage and Angers Loire airports; Queen Elizabeth II birthday flypast on 17 June with minor impact on London TMA; Military ceremony at Porto airport on 1 and 23 June generated 1,369 minutes of ATFM delay; People s meeting in Allinge from 15 until 18 June impacting operations at Bornholm airport (Denmark). Completed A-CDM implementation at Stockholm/Arlanda airport on 8 June; Runway maintenance at Budapest and Hamburg (4,632 minutes of ATFM delay) airports; Taxiways and/or aprons improvements at Hamburg and Malta airports; ILS maintenance at Dusseldorf and Paris/Charles de Gaulle airports. Ongoing Runway maintenance at Chisinau, Cologne, Dublin, Gran Canaria, Hannover, Istanbul/Sabiha Gökcen, Krakow, Manchester (3,156 minutes of ATFM delay), Oulu, Stockholm/Arlanda, Tallinn, Tel Aviv/Ben Gurion (2,192 minutes of ATFM delay - in combination with airport capacity constraints), Thessaloniki and Venice airports; Taxiways and/or aprons improvements at Amsterdam, Berlin/Schönefeld, Dublin, Frankfurt/Main, Hamburg, Lisbon, London/Heathrow, Rome/Fiumicino, Stuttgart, Tallinn and Zurich airports; ILS maintenance at Stuttgart airport; Terminal building improvements/works at Barcelona, Belgrade, Bergen, Budapest, Frankfurt/Main, Malta, Manchester and Oslo/Gardermoen airports; DISRUPTIONS Technical Unavailability of the ILS on the RWY 22 at Amsterdam/Schiphol airport on 28 June generated 1,851 minutes of ATFM delay; ILS calibration at Paris Le Bourget on 28 June generated 2,658 minutes of ATFM delay; Radar maintenance impacted operations at Catania/Fontanarossa, Catania/Sigonella and Comiso airports, and generated a total of 5,535 minutes of ATFM delay; Flight Data Processing System (FDPS) failure in Bordeaux ACC on 13 June generated 8,975 minutes of ATFM delay; Frequency issue in Brest ACC on 22 June generated 2,9 minutes of ATFM delay; ATC equipment failure in Brussels ACC on 6 June generated 3,39 minutes of ATFM delay; Frequency issue in Marseille ACC on 25 June generated 4,88 minutes of ATFM delay; Radio frequency problem in Paris ACC on 19 June generated 1,723 minutes of ATFM delay; Reduce capacity due to radar issues throughout the month in Zurich ACC generated ATFM delay. Other Power supply issues affected both approach lighting and navigation aids as well as electrical supply to terminal building at Brussels airport on 15 June (2,16 minutes of ATFM delay). Instability of telecommunication system in Gander Oceanic on 21 June generated 3,488 minutes of ATFM delay in Shanwick Oceanic; Disabled aircraft on runway on 27 June at Tenerife/South airport generated 1,432 minutes of ATFM delay. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 15

16 9. NM ADDED VALUE FLIGHTS WITH DELAY > 3 With a traffic increase of 5.1%, the number of flights with more than 3 minutes of ATFM delay decreased between June 216 and June % of flights with more than 3 minutes of ATFM delay in June 217 were en-route and 32.9% were airport. RRP DIRECT DELAY SAVINGS On average 8 RRPs/day were executed saving 566min/day, accounting for.9% of ATFM delays. This graph shows the actual daily averages for the previous 13 months period v. Average daily traffic Average daily flights > 3 minutes delay Avg daily delay saving (min) ,8% Year-to-date RRP delay saving 1,6% 2,1% 2,4% 1,5% 3,3% 1,3% 1,2% 1,7% 1,9% 3,1% 2,,9% Avg number of accepted RRPs AIRPORT/TMA EN-ROUTE RRP DLY SAVING NR OF ACCEPTED RRP 217 THE EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION (EUROCONTROL) This document is published by EUROCONTROL in the interests of exchange of information. It may be copied in whole or in part, providing that the copyright notice and disclaimer are included. The information contained in the document may not be modified without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL. EUROCONTROL makes no warranty, either implied or express, for the information contained in this document, neither does it assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. Contact Us Operational Analysis & Reporting, Performance, Forecasts and Relations (PFR) Unit, Network Manager Directorate (NMD), EUROCONTROL, 96 Rue de la Fusée, B Brussels nm.ops.perf@eurocontrol.int i See Notice on page 2 for more information on traffic and delay comparison. ii Internals, international departures and arrivals, excluding overflights iii See Notice on page 2 for more information on NM Area. iv NM s calculation that provides the guideline en-route delay (min) requirements to achieve the annual target (.5 min/flight). v NM has revised the delay saving method. Where flights are subject to scenarios, delay savings from RRPs are considered when the RRP is sent 3 hours (or less) in advance of the EOBT. NM Monthly Network Operations Report - Analysis June 217 Page 16