UNCLASSIFIED FY Exhibits Schedule Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total. Total Cost ($ M)

Transcription

1 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March A: Procurement of W&TCV, Army / BA 01: Tracked Combat Vehicles / BSA 20: Modification of Tracked Combat Vehicles ID Code (A=Service Ready, B=Not Service Ready) : A Program Elements for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements: Resource Summary Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Procurement Quantity (Units in Each) Gross/Weapon System Cost ($ in Millions) 5, , , Less PY Advance Procurement ($ in Millions) Net Procurement (P1) ($ in Millions) 5, , , Plus CY Advance Procurement ($ in Millions) Obligation Authority ($ in Millions) 5, , , (The following Resource Summary rows are for informational purposes only. The corresponding budget requests are documented elsewhere.) Initial Spares ($ in Millions) Flyaway ($ in Thousands) Gross/Weapon System ($ in Thousands) # The Request will be submitted at a later date. Description: The Abrams Tank Fleet Modification Program applies Materiel Developer and Combat Developer approved modifications to the fielded Abrams family of vehicles either through field modifications at the unit or through application during vehicle recapitalization. Common Abrams modifications included Vehicle Health Management, Blue Force Tracking, and Power Train Improvement & Integration Optimization Program (i.e. Integrated Engine Revitalization (TIGER) and Transmission Enterprise) which provide more reliability, durability, and a single standard for the vehicle's power train. Survivability improvements include Frontal Armor upgrades. Key safety improvements include the loaders tray modification, ammunition rack upgrades, and Rear View Sensing System (RVSS). The Abrams program must execute a series of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) to address capability gaps on the Tank fleet. These technology upgrades will be integrated through a recapitalization program under a public private partnership (P3) between Anniston Army Depot and General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS). This effort addresses: (1) interoperability on the new network and system shortfalls in electrical power to enable integration of approved directed requirements, (2) survivability improvements and (3) an electronics refresh to address obsolescence and significantly improve sustainability. Specifically, the upgrades include an updated communications system: Joint Tactical Radio System Handheld Manpack Small Form Fit (JTRS HMS); a new power management distribution system: a 1,000 amp alternator, a new slip ring, and a battery monitoring system; an Auxiliary Power Unit; the Integration Kit for the Counter Radio-Controlled IED Electronic Warfare (CREW/Duke 3); Next Generation Armor; an Ammunition Data Link (ADL) which will enable the system to fire a smart round currently under development; and upgrade of eight (8) Line Replaceable Units to Modules. Exhibits Schedule Title* Exhibits ID CD Cost Army Page 1 of 14 P-1 Line #12 Cost P-3a - P-3a - - 5, Gross/Weapon System Cost - - 5, Cost Cost Cost Cost

2 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March A: Procurement of W&TCV, Army / BA 01: Tracked Combat Vehicles / BSA 20: Modification of Tracked Combat Vehicles ID Code (A=Service Ready, B=Not Service Ready) : A Program Elements for Code B Items: Other Related Program Elements: Exhibits Schedule FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Title* Exhibits ID CD Cost Cost P-3a - P-3a , , Gross/Weapon System Cost , , *For the P-3a, Title represents the Modification Number / Title. Note: s in this Exhibit P-40 set may not be exact or add due to rounding. Justification: base procurement dollars in the amount of $ million support the procurement and field application of the following: Blue Force Tracking 2 to enable network interoperability and resolve electronic obsolescence; Direct Support Electrical System Test Sets (DSESTS) and upgrades to Training Aids, Devices, Simulators and Simulations (TADSS). Funding will continue the support of the Integrated Engine Revitalization (TIGER) and Transmission Enterprise programs which provide more reliability, durability, and a single standard for the vehicle's power train. This funding supports the continued need to maintain the armor facility at a sustainable level and minimizes the loss of skilled labor as well as optimizing the production facility to support the start of the future production to produce efficiently at low volumes. Government and contractor salaries will be funded from this line. Supports the Active Army. In accordance with Section 1815 of the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L ), this item is necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities. Cost Cost Cost Cost Army Page 2 of 14 P-1 Line #12

3 Resource Summary Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Procurement Quantity (Units in Each) Gross/Weapon System Cost ($ in Millions) 5, , , Less PY Advance Procurement ($ in Millions) Net Procurement (P1) ($ in Millions) 5, , , Plus CY Advance Procurement ($ in Millions) Obligation Authority ($ in Millions) 5, , , (The following Resource Summary rows are for informational purposes only. The corresponding budget requests are documented elsewhere.) Initial Spares ($ in Millions) Gross/Weapon System ($ in Thousands) # The Request will be submitted at a later date. Description: Modifications to the Abrams program. Support the procurement and field application of the following: Blue Force Tracking 2 to enable network interoperability and resolve electronic obsolescence; Direct Support Electrical System Test Sets (DSESTS) and upgrades to Training Aids, Devices, Simulators and Simulations (TADSS). Funding will continue the support of the Integrated Engine Revitalization (TIGER) and Transmission Enterprise programs which provide more reliability, durability, and a single standard for the vehicle's power train. This funding supports the continued need to maintain the armor facility at a sustainable level and minimizes the loss of skilled labor as well as optimizing the production facility to support the start of the future production to produce efficiently at low volumes. Government and contractor salaries will be funded from this line. Supports the Active Army. Army Page 3 of 14 P-1 Line #12

4 Models of Systems Affected: Abrams Tanks Modification Type: Increase Performance Related RDT&E PEs: Procurement Financial Plan Modification Item 1 of 8: Prior Year Closed Mods Non-Recurring FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Other 0 / 3, / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / 3, Subtotal: Non-Recurring - / 3, / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / 3, Subtotal: Prior Year Closed Mods 0 / 3, / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / 3, Modification Item 2 of 8: Abrams Field Upgrades Recurring Low Profile CROWS-B Kits - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / / / / / - 1,440 / Vehicle Health and Embedded Training - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / / / / / - 1,080 / Ammunition Data Link (ADL) - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / / / - - / - - / / Blue Force Tracking (BFT) 2 - / - - / - - / / / / / / / / / - 1,620 / Safety/Operational Mods 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / Support Equipment and TPF 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Recurring - / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Non-Recurring Installation Kits 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / Low Profile CROWS Engineering Support - / - - / - - / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / Subtotal: Non-Recurring - / / - - / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / Subtotal: Abrams Field Upgrades 0 / / / / / / ,080 / ,160 / / / / ,860 / 1, Modification Item 3 of 8: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1 Recurring ECP Modification Kits - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 45 / / / / ,320 / 10, Subtotal: Recurring - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / / / / 10, Subtotal: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1 - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 45 / / / / ,320 / 10, ,605 / 11, / 11, ,605 / 11, Army Page 4 of 14 P-1 Line #12

5 Models of Systems Affected: Abrams Tanks Modification Type: Increase Performance Related RDT&E PEs: Financial Plan Modification Item 4 of 8: Armor Recurring Army Page 5 of 14 P-1 Line #12 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Armor Sets 46 / / / / / - 20 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / / ECP 1 Next Generation Armor - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 45 / / / / ,320 / - 1,605 / Subtotal: Recurring - / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Non-Recurring Installation Kits 821 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / / Subtotal: Non-Recurring - / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / Subtotal: Armor 867 / / / / / - 20 / / / / / ,320 / - 2,536 / 1, Modification Item 5 of 8: Program/Engineering Support Recurring System Technical Support 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Government Program Support - / - - / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Contractor Program Support - / - - / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Government Test Support - / - - / - - / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Recurring - / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Program/Engineering Support 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Modification Item 6 of 8: Power Pack Improvement & Integration Optimization Recurring System Technical Support 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Recurring - / / / / / - - / / / / / / - - / Non-Recurring Installation Kits 2,691 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 2,691 / Subtotal: Non-Recurring - / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / Subtotal: Power Pack Improvement & Integration Optimization Modification Item 7 of 8: Training Devices 2,691 / / / / / - - / / / / / / - 2,691 / 1,

6 Models of Systems Affected: Abrams Tanks Modification Type: Increase Performance Related RDT&E PEs: Recurring Financial Plan FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Training Equipment Modifications 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / / Subtotal: Recurring - / / / / / - - / / / / / / / Subtotal: Training Devices 0 / / / / / - - / / / / / / / Modification Item 8 of 8: Line Optimization for Low Rate Production Recurring Production Optimization - / - - / - - / - - / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Recurring - / - - / - - / - - / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Line Optimization for Low Rate Production - / - - / - - / - - / / - - / / / / / / - - / Subtotal: Procurement, All Modification Items 3,558 / 5, Installation 24 / / / / / ,170 / ,280 / / / ,640 / 11, Modification Item 1 of 8: Prior Year Closed Mods 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 2 of 8: Abrams Field Upgrades 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 3 of 8: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 33 / - 57 / - 1,515 / - 1,605 / - Modification Item 4 of 8: Armor 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 5 of 8: Program/Engineering Support 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 6 of 8: Power Pack Improvement & Integration Optimization 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 7 of 8: Training Devices 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Modification Item 8 of 8: Line Optimization for Low Rate Production 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - Subtotal: Installation 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 33 / - 57 / - 1,515 / - 1,605 / - Cost (Procurement + Support + Installation) 5, , , ,692 / 19, Army Page 6 of 14 P-1 Line #12

7 Modification Item 1 of 8: Prior Year Closed Mods Manufacturer Name: x Administrative Leadtime (in Months): Contract Dates Delivery Dates Manufacturer Location: x Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Method of Implementation: x FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 7 of 14 P-1 Line #12

8 Modification Item 2 of 8: Abrams Field Upgrades Manufacturer Name: Various Administrative Leadtime (in Months): Manufacturer Location: Various Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Contract Dates Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2017 Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Delivery Dates Method of Implementation: Contractor Teams FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 8 of 14 P-1 Line #12

9 Modification Item 3 of 8: Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1 Manufacturer Name: General Dynamics and Anniston Army Depot Manufacturer Location: ANAD, AL and JSMC Lima, OH Administrative Leadtime (in Months): 6 Production Leadtime (in Months): 18 Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Contract Dates Apr 2016 Apr 2017 Apr 2018 Apr 2019 Delivery Dates Jan 2017 Jan 2018 Jan 2019 Jan 2020 Method of Implementation: X FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 33 / - 12 / - - / - 45 / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 45 / - 15 / - 60 / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 90 / - 90 / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 90 / - 90 / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 1,320 / - 1,320 / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 33 / - 57 / - 1,515 / - 1,605 / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In ,433 1,605 Out ,515 1,605 Army Page 9 of 14 P-1 Line #12

10 Modification Item 4 of 8: Armor Manufacturer Name: Department of Energy Manufacturer Location: Various Administrative Leadtime (in Months): 3 Production Leadtime (in Months): 12 Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Contract Dates Apr 2013 Jan 2015 Jan 2016 Jan 2017 Jan 2018 Jan 2019 Delivery Dates Apr 2014 Jan 2016 Jan 2017 Jan 2018 Jan 2019 Jan 2020 Method of Implementation: X FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 10 of 14 P-1 Line #12

11 Modification Item 5 of 8: Program/Engineering Support Manufacturer Name: x Administrative Leadtime (in Months): Contract Dates Delivery Dates Manufacturer Location: x Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Method of Implementation: x FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 11 of 14 P-1 Line #12

12 Modification Item 6 of 8: Power Pack Improvement & Integration Optimization Manufacturer Name: Honeywell and Allison Transmission Administrative Leadtime (in Months): 5 Contract Dates Delivery Dates Manufacturer Location: Phoenix, AZ and Indianapolis, IN Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Method of Implementation: Contractor Support FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 12 of 14 P-1 Line #12

13 Modification Item 7 of 8: Training Devices Manufacturer Name: PEO Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Administrative Leadtime (in Months): Manufacturer Location: Orlando, FL Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Contract Dates Mar 2012 Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2017 Mar 2019 Delivery Dates Method of Implementation: Contractor Support FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 13 of 14 P-1 Line #12

14 Modification Item 8 of 8: Line Optimization for Low Rate Production Manufacturer Name: X Administrative Leadtime (in Months): Contract Dates Delivery Dates Manufacturer Location: Joint Systems Manufacturing Center Lima, OH Production Leadtime (in Months): Dates FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Method of Implementation: Various FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - 0 / / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - - / - FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PYS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TC t In Out Army Page 14 of 14 P-1 Line #12