A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?

Transcription

1

2 A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?

3 CANSO report on A-CDM Download it for free at: Basic A-CDM processes, principles and benefits for managers and operational staff Useful, easy to understand, relevant to all ANSPs

4 Presentation of our Panel Eugene Tuinstra (ex Eurocontrol, senior aviation consultant at To70Aviation) Antonio Nuzzo (A-CDM Implementation Manager / ATM Operational and Technical Expert at ENAV S.p.A) Phil Marques (Head of air traffic control, Dubai Air Navigation Services) Moderator: Bastien Bernard (DSNA, France)

5

6

7

8

9

10 DANS ACDM JOURNEY FROM 2013 TO PRESENT To CANSO Ops Conference Prepared by: Philip Marques Head of ATC Dubai Approach

11 CONTENTS... THE CATALYST BEGINNERS STEPS TO A-CDM WHERE WE ARE CURRENTLY / BENEFITS DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES A-CDM 11

12 THE CATALYST... DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 12

13 THIS... DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 13

14 AND THIS... DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 14

15 POST MORTEM... In 2013, Dubai experienced extreme delays due to fog. With increased traffic levels, the delays reached a point where the airport experienced gridlock. No one was speaking to each other which resulted in chaos at: Towers Approach ACC Airline ACC s Ground handling Various inquisitions were held, and one of the key actions that came out was that the stakeholders (Dubai Airports, dans, Emirates ACC, Emirates / Fly Dubai Airlines) needed a communication forum when things like this would happen. The airport was planning an 80 day closure of one of it s 2 runways during the summer of 2014 (Called the NRR Northern Runway Rehabilitation) DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 15

16 BEGINNER S STEPS... DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 16

17 KEY STEPS TO KICK OFF A-CDM FOR DUBAI One common forum where all stakeholders meet regularly which opens up communication at a management level. For DXB the first step was the seasonal Runway Scheduling Committee set up for capacity issues. 2. Conference Calls held by ATC twice a day. 3. NRR had its own subgroup where a play book was prepared and agreed to by all stakeholders on how a runway blockage at DXB would be handled. 4. All stakeholders further agreed to an APF (Airfield Performance Forum) to be held monthly. 5. Further forums were still needed to address things that happen (in our case, disruptions) that feed back into a main forum (APF). 6. A Disruption and Resilience Workgroup (DRWG) was formed and chaired by dans. It meets every 2 months and each disruption that happened over the last 2 months is reviewed and any lessons learned captured. The DRWG then reports to the APF if any issues require escalation. DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 17

18 WHERE WE ARE CURRENTLY / BENEFITS... DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 18

19 WHERE WE ARE NOW, BENEFITS With the results and benefits seen from the DRWG, in 2017 the DRWG has gone national and is now a subgroup of a National Committee. Stakeholders now attending have more then doubled. 2. Despite all this we still have our daily conference calls, and are now finally ready to capture requirements for a common picture tool (A CDM tool) that all stakeholders will use. 3. Airport company setting up an AOCC which all stakeholders will have a place at. 4. No more gridlock with increased capacity. 5. LVO movements doubled with the introduction of dual runway procedures. 6. Much calmer workforces / stakeholder trust / combined disruption training for our respective management teams. 7. Only cost so far has been the manpower, and a monthly conference call fee. DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES CANSO 19

20 THANK YOU

21 A-CDM ENAV Approach Antonio Nuzzo A-CDM Implementation Manager Airport Operations Dept. - ENAV S.p.A. Madrid, enav.it

22 A-CDM in Italy Roma Fiumicino: Full A-CDM on 03 March 2014 Milano Malpensa: Full A-CDM on 07 October 2014 Venezia Tessera: Full A-CDM on 20 January 2015 Milano Linate: Full A-CDM on 3 May 2016 Napoli Capodichino: Operations planned end 2017 Bergamo Orio al Serio: Operations planned

23 A-CDM Implementation Approach A-CDM Operational Procedure Common Set of Operational procedures tailored to specific Airport Operational needs Data Exchange Common Data Exchange Protocol between ENAV and all Airport Operators 23

24 A-CDM Architecture 1/2 24

25 A-CDM Architecture 2/2 Centralized Architecturte Pros: All technical expertise in one site Cons: Complex architecture. Initially not always easy to identify fault sources. 25

26 A-CDM HMI 1/2 26

27 A-CDM HMI 2/2 De-icing TOBT TSAT 27

28 Main problems Fiumicino - Complex airport A-CDM Initial Phase Unstable PDS (Pre-Departure Sequence) - Too many updates A-CDM data not integrated in ATC operational system WIP on RWY25 during first A-CDM Trials Malpensa Taxi time update due to RWYs rotation Venice First Single RWY Ops Linate - General Aviation Enablers Automatic ARDT Procedure for aircraft release from Airport Operator to ENAV already in place when A/C is fully ready TOBT cancelled if A/C not ARDT within TOBT+5 AZA123 28

29 A-CDM Benefits Taxi Time pre A-CDM A-CDM Example of a typical Winter week of operations for FCO Pre and Post A-CDM 29

30 A-CDM Benefits Taxi Time FCO MXP VCE LIN Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (January 2013) average 3 minutes less taxi time per flight Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (January 2014) average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (June 2014) average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (July 2015) average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight 30

31 New start up procedure Operational Benefits In FCO pilots monitor ATC frequency for Start Up clearance, no need to call. ATCO calls pilot for Start Up according TSAT (-5 /+5 ) after ARDT Less workload No need for REA After the reception of ARDT, A-CDM platform triggers a new DPI message to NMOC acting as an automatic REA message Better CTOT allocation process Sending accurate TTOTs NMOC adapt CTOTs according TTOTs provided by the airport Estimated Landing Time Accurate estimated landing time provided to AO and Handling Agents Information sharing Information sharing among all airport partners provide benefits to all (at moment not fully quantified) 31

32 A-CDM Key Success Factors Strong commitment from Top Management All Airport Stakeholders part of the process Right communication with different Airlines actors Maximum transparency on processes Frequent Meetings between partners to identify problems and find shared/balanced solutions Information sharing and coordination among all A-CDM Airports Incremental Stepwise approach 32

33 A-CDM next STEPS Italian A-CDM HTF New Procedure to manage double FPs Improved Data Analysis Improved A-CDM support in airport contingencies 33

34 Any questions Contact: Antonio Nuzzo