A e r o n a u t i c s C o m m i s s i o n

Transcription

1 W y o m i n g D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n s A e r o n a u t i c s C o m m i s s i o n B u s i n e s s M e e t i n g P a c k e t I n - F a c e B u s i n e s s M e e t i n g June 19, 218 at 1: P.M. in Cheyenne, Wyoming WYDOT Auditorium, 53 Bishop Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 829

2 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S A E R O N A U T I C S C O M M I S S I O N C O M P L E T E P A C K E T I N D E X Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) Index Item Order Index Tab Title Index Tab Contents 1 st Item Itinerary & Agenda Itinerary & Agenda 2 nd Item Explanation of Agenda Explanation of Agenda 3 rd Item 1 Minutes (April 9, 218) 4 th Item 2 Minutes (April 24, 218) 5 th Item 3 Budget Forecast Report 6 th Item 4 Percent of Grant Projects by City Report 7 th Item 5 Change Orders Report 8 th Item 6 Statewide Line Items Update Report 9 th Item 7 Administrative Approvals Report 1 th Item 8 Recovered State Funds Report 11 th Item AIP Priority Rating Model Updates 12 th Item 1 FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications 13 th Item 11 FY19 WACIP Budget 14 th Item 12 FY2-23 WACIP Plan 15 th Item 13 Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame Induction 16 th Item 14 Cheyenne s ASEP Grant Application

3 I t i n e r a r y & A g e n d a

4 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission TENTATIVE ITINERARY Aeronautics Commission Business Meeting, held in Cheyenne, Tuesday, June 19, 218 Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) Day One (1) Tentative Schedule of Events Event Timeline: Event Description: Event Location: Attire = Business Formal (Suit & Tie) Various 11:45 A.M. Fly/Drive to Cheyenne Various Airport Locations & Car 11:45 A.M. 12: P.M. Drive to WYDOT (Expeditions at Hangar) 12: P.M. 1: P.M. Commission Lunch (Catered Lunch) 1: P.M. 3:15 P.M. Commission Business Meeting WYDOT Headquarters Auditorium 53 Bishop Blvd. Cheyenne, WY 829 3:15 P.M. 3:3 P.M. Drive to WYDOT Hangar 158 Airport Parkway Cheyenne, WY 821 3:3 P.M. Various Fly/Drive Home Various Airport Locations & Car Page 1 of 3

5 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission TENTATIVE BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA Business Meeting, held June 19, 218 1: P.M. WYDOT Auditorium, 53 Bishop Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 829 Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) I. CALL TO ORDER II. III. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Roll Call Introductions V. Adjustments to Agenda VI. Minutes A. Consideration of the Draft Meeting Minutes dated April 9, 218 (Index Tab 1) Vote B. Consideration of the Draft Meeting Minutes dates April 24, 218 (Index Tab 2) Vote VII. Updates/Discussions A. Chairman s Update Chair DeVore B. Director s Update Director Panos C. Administrator s Update Interim Administrator Olsen 1. General Matters D. Air Service Enhancement Program Update Mr. Burke 1. General Matters 2. Standard Reports a. Budget Forecast Report (Index Tab 3) b. Percent of Grant Projects by City Report (Index Tab 4) E. Engineering & Construction Program Update Mr. Olsen 1. General Matters 2. Standard Report a. Change Orders Report (Index Tab 5) b. Statewide Line Items Update Report (Index Tab 6) Page 2 of 3

6 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission TENTATIVE BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA Business Meeting, held June 19, 218 1: P.M. WYDOT Auditorium, 53 Bishop Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 829 Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VII. Updates/Discussions (continued) F. Federal Aviation Policy & UAS Program Update Ms. Taylor 1. General Matters G. Planning & Programming Program Update Ms. Yaffa & Ms. Porter 1. General Matters 2. Standard Report a. Administrative Approvals Report (Index Tab 7) b. Recovered State Funds Report Ms. Yaffa (Index Tab 8) H. Commission Secretaries Update Secretary Pfister VIII. Old Business A. Consideration of the 218 AIP Priority Rating Model Updates (Index Tab 9) Ms. Yaffa Vote IX. Regular Business (FY19 had no modifications and doesn t require a vote, and FY2-23 provided for informational purposes only) A. Consideration of the FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications (Index Tab 1) Ms. Yaffa Vote B. Consideration of the FY19 WACIP Budget (Index Tab 11) C. Consideration of the FY2-23 WACIP Plan (Index Tab 12) X. New Business A. Consideration of Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame Induction (Index Tab 13) Mr. Waggener Vote B. Consideration of Cheyenne s ASEP Grant Application (Index Tab 14) Mr. Burke Vote XI. XII. Executive Session Announcements/Reminders A. None XIII. Adjournment A. Consideration of Adjournment Vote Page 3 of 3

7 I n d e x T a b 1 : D r a f t M e e t i n g M i n u t e s d a t e d A p r i l 9, 2 1 8

8 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) I. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Aeronautics Commission was held in Casper on Monday, April 9, 218. Chair DeVore presided, calling the meeting to order at 1: P.M. 1 II. ROLL CALL The following Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum: Bill DeVore, Chair, District 3 John Newton, Vice Chair, District at Large Chuck Brown III, Commissioner, District 1 Doyle Vaughan, Commissioner, District 2 Bruce McCormack, Commissioner, District 4 Pete Schoonmaker, Commissioner, District 5 (via telephone) Sigsbee Duck, Commissioner, District at Large III. IV. INTRODUCTIONS Staff Present: Amy Surdam, Division Administrator Sheri Taylor, Fed. Aviation Policy & UAS Manager Christy Yaffa, Planning & Programming Manager Melissa Palka, Engineer Shawn Burke, Air Service Development Analyst Cheryl Porter, Grants & Programming Specialist Guests Present: Cheryl Bean, GDA Engineering Glenn Januska, Casper Airport Bucky Hall, CYAir ADJUSTMENTS TO AGENDA There were no adjustments made to the agenda. Katie Pfister, Commission Secretary Brian Olsen, Engineering & Construction Manager Phillip Hearn, Project Engineer Greg Hampshire, Analyst Adam Schutzman, Senior Planner Melissa DeFratis, WYDOT s Legislative Liaison Mike Kahler, GDA Engineering Devon Brubaker, Rock Springs Airport Pat Sweeny, Representative V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Approval of the Draft Meeting Minutes dated February 22, 218 Motions: It was moved by Commissioner Newton and seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve the Draft Meeting Minutes dated February 22, 218. Discussions: As there were no adjustments, the Commission voted on the approval of the Draft Meeting Minutes dated February 22, 218. Motion Carried. 1 Administrator Surdam provided a short presentation prior to the business meeting at 11: A.M. in order to educate the Commission on the statutes relating to the newly created Commercial Air Service Improvement Council. This presentation was also open to the public. Page 1 of 7

9 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VI. UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS A. Chairman s Update 1. General Matters Chair DeVore update included expressing his appreciation for everyone s travel to Casper for the meeting, conveying that the meeting was moved to a centralized location, as the Airport Improvement Priority Rating Model Task Force would be meeting to complete their update over the next two (2) days. He also conveyed his support to staff and future appointees of the Air Service Improvement Council due to the recent passage of Senate Enrolled Act 4. This concluded the Chairman s General Matters Update. B. Administrator s Update 1. General Matters Administrator Surdam s update included information relating to the passage of Senate Enrolled Act 4, explaining that the governor would soon make his appointment recommendations for the Air Service Improvement Council, and a timeline had been strategized to meet all statutorily mandated requirements. She also explained that given the expedited timeline of the Council, that the Summit for aviation education would be postponed. Next she provided an update on Cheyenne air service, conveying that weekly meetings are ongoing in efforts of supporting the community in securing a new airline partner. Administrator Surdam s final item was to highlight the hard work and dedication of staff, conveying that four (4) staff members had recently received the departments Extra Mile Award, including AJ Schutzman, Shawn Burke, Cheryl Porter, and Melissa DeFratis. This concluded the Administrator s Update. C. Air Service Development Program Update 1. General Matters Administrator Surdam did not have any additional updates regarding air service. 2. Standard Monthly Reports a. Budget Forecast Report The Budget Forecast Report reflected no changes. b. Percent of Grant Projects by City Report The Percent of Grant Projects by City Report reflected no changes. D. Engineering & Construction Program Update 1. General Matters Mr. Olsen s update included welcoming Ms. Melissa Palka, the division s newly hired engineer. He also updated the Commission on the Crack Seal and Seal Coat and Mark projects, noting that crack sealing would occur in the southeast corner of the state within the next two (2) weeks, and that the competitive bidding process was underway for the Seal Coat and Mark project. This concluded the Engineering & Construction Program General Matter s Update. D. Engineering & Construction Program Update 2. Standard Monthly Report a. Change Orders Report Mr. Olsen reviewed the Change Orders Report, which reflected five (5) updates: Gillette: Upgrade Electrical Vault, Rehab Airside Pavement, and Replace Auto gates, one (1) change Page 2 of 7

10 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VI. UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS (CONTINUED) E. Engineering & Construction Program Update (Continued) 2. Standard Monthly Report (Continued) a. Change Orders Report (Continued) Gillette (Continued): Upsize ATCT feed, add light indicator to sump pump, add PAPI disconnects, add underground J-boxes for PAPI, Add MALSR control on ALCMS, add siren sensor to Gate 7, Add card reader/key pad lights to gate controller. Rock Springs: Construct GA Terminal, Phase II, three (3) changes Septic System Construction and Sewer system upgrades; reduction in concrete panel replacement, and various sewer upgrades. Saratoga: Rehabilitate Runway 5/23, one (1) change Because the runway designation change was not approved by the FAA, the guidance signs need not be changed. b. Statewide Line Items Update Report Mr. Olsen reviewed the Statewide Line Items Report, which reflected four (4) new projects being added to the WACIP for FY218, leaving the following remaining balances: Aviation Encouragement $29,526 Marketing $85,429 NAVAID $12,389 E. Federal Aviation Policy & UAS Program Update 1. General Matters Ms. Taylor s General Matter s Update included highlighting recent travel to various educational conferences and workshops. She also provided updates on the recent passage of the Omnibus Aviation Bill, which included an extension for federal aviation programs through September 3, 218, as well as the following appropriations: $18B Appropriated to Federal Aviation Programs $1M Appropriated to Small Community Air Service Development Program $3.35B to the Airport Improvement Program (also $1B in General Funds) $155M to the Essential Air Service Program $165M to the Contract Tower Program $ Increase on Passenger Facility Charges Her final item was to apprise the Commission that the Aeronautics website would soon contain educational information related to unmanned aircraft, and that an educational outreach workshop may be on the horizon as well. The concluded the Federal Aviation Policy & UAS Program General Matters Update. F. Planning & Programming Program Update 1. General Matters Ms. Yaffa s update included informing the Commission that the Priority Rating Model Task Force would likely complete their analysis at their next meeting, and that a final report of findings would likely be presented to the Commission at June s business meeting. She also highlighted AJ Schutzman s recent certification and membership to the American Association of Airport Executives. Page 3 of 7

11 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VI. UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS (CONTINUED) F. Planning & Programming Program Update (Continued) 1. General Matters (Continued) Mr. Schutzman then provided an update on recent travel to the Ellsworth Air Force Base regarding the Powder River Training Complex and issues relating to radar and communications coverage, followed by Ms. Porter giving a brief demonstration on the WING s Database System. The concluded the Planning & Programming Program General Matters Update. 2. Standard Monthly Report a. Recovered State Funds Report Ms. Yaffa reviewed the Recovered State Funds Report, which reflected state funds recovered from 36 existing projects or statewide line items, for a total of $276, G. Commission Secretary Update 1. General Matters Secretary Pfister did not have a General Matters Update. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. No old business matters were discussed. VIII. REGULAR BUSINESS Ms. Yaffa reviewed the WACIP Modifications. 2 A. FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: FY18 s WACIP Budget Modifications consist of a number of changes, including recovered funds being added to two (2) statewide line items, adjustments to the federal match on two (2) projects, and changes in total project cost on a few projects. This resulted in an increase of $152,167 in state funds allocated to projects, leaving a remaining balance of $659,59 for FY18. As the Commission is aware, staff recommends a reserve of approximately $4, in state funds as the construction season begins, for use on emergency projects, or higher than anticipated bid pricing. The current remaining balance of almost $66, clearly exceeds staff recommendation, and staff is currently working to identify likely projects that could make use of these additional funds. Recommendation: Ms. Yaffa recommended approval of the FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications as presented. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner McCormack, and seconded by Commissioner Newton to approve the FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications as presented. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of the FY18 WACIP Budget Modifications as presented. Motion Carried. 2 The WACIP, as reviewed in its entirety by Division Staff and the Commission, may be obtained at: Page 4 of 7

12 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VIII. REGULAR BUSINESS (CONTINUED) B. FY19 Proposed WACIP Budget The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: The final FY19 Proposed WACIP budget contains the Division s recommended modifications, resulting from airport sponsor comments. The remaining balance of $34,712 is below the normally desired reserve of $4,. However, the Division is satisfied that the budget as it is constructed funds the highest and most urgent projects, while still allowing for some investment in airport infrastructure for the future. Recommendation: Ms. Yaffa recommended approval of the FY19 Proposed WACIP Budget as presented. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner Duck, and seconded by Commissioner Newton to approve the FY19 Proposed WACIP Budget as presented. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of the FY19 Proposed WACIP Budget as presented. Motion Carried. C. FY2-23 Proposed WACIP Plan The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: The remaining years of the WACIP have been revised as necessary to reflect sponsor comments and Division recommendations. Recommendation: Ms. Yaffa recommended approval of the FY2-23 Proposed WACIP Plan as presented. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner Duck, and seconded by Commissioner Schoonmaker, to approve the FY2-23 Proposed WACIP Plan as presented. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of the FY2-23 Proposed WACIP Plan as presented. Motion Carried. IX. NEW BUSINESS Ms. Yaffa and Mr. Olsen reviewed Commission Policy Amendments. A. Consideration of Commission Policy Amendment for Administrative Approval The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: Remove requirement that administratively approved grants and amendments be presented to the Commission for concurrence. Recommendation: Approve Commission policy modifications to remove the requirement that remove the requirement that administratively approved grants be presented to the Commission for concurrence administratively approved grants be presented to the Commission for concurrence. Discussions: Discussion amongst the Commission ensued relating to what constitutes an emergency, which includes items impacting the operation of an airport. Additionally, concerns were raised that as the Commission is fiscally responsible for the distribution of those state appropriated funds, that either the chair or vice chair should be notified of all administrative approvals exceeding $25,. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner Duck, and seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve Commission policy modifications to remove the requirement that administratively approved grants be presented to the Commission for Concurrence at the next scheduled business meeting, and add to the Commission policy that the administrator will notify the chair or vice chair in writing or by electronic means when the administrative approval dollar amount exceeds $25,.. The Commission then voted on the approval of approving Commission Policy changes as amended. Motion Carried. Page 5 of 7

13 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) IX. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) B. Consideration of Commission Policy Amendment for Hazardous Waste Material The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: Current WAC policy prohibits use of state grant funds for removal of hazardous material. Staff supports removing this limitation. It was clarified during the meeting that the requested change only allows that future requests for hazardous waste removal be eligible to receive state funding through the application process. Recommendation: Approve Commission policy modifications to remove the prohibition against using state grant funds to remove hazardous materials associated with an airport project. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner McCormack, and seconded by Commissioner Vaughan to approve Commission policy modifications to remove the prohibition against using state grant funds to remove hazardous materials associated with an airport project. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of Commission Policy changes as presented. Motion Carried. Mr. Burke reviewed the ASEP Grant Applications. C. Consideration of Cody s ASEP Grant Application The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: Cody-Yellowstone Air Improvement Resources (CY-AIR) is requesting a state match of 4%, not to exceed $134,4 in state support for summer seasonal service to Chicago O Hare International Airport, and San Francisco International Airport. Schedules are still pending, but would follow similar patterns of previous years; service would be 1-2 times weekly, beginning in June and ending in August. Recommendation: Mr. Burke recommended approval of Cody s Grant Application as presented. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner McCormack, and seconded by Commissioner Duck to approve the Cody s ASEP Grant Application as presented. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of the Cody s ASEP Grant Application as presented. Motion Carried. D. Consideration of Jackson s ASEP Grant Application The following is taken from the Explanation of Agenda: Jackson Hole Air Improvement Resources (JH AIR) is requesting a state match of 4%, not to exceed $25, in state support for winter seasonal service to Newark Liberty International Airport on United Airlines. This request represents a $2, increase from previous years awarded grants, and Commission practice has typically been to cap grants for additional or growth service at previous awarded dollar levels. However, JH AIR did request a lesser amount for the 216/217 season, and has seen more than 5% of awarded funds returned to the program on strong visitor spend and sales tax returned to the state. Staff also believes reasonable grant increases are expected, as associated operational and opportunity costs for airline service continue to increase. Recommendation: Mr. Burke recommended approval of Jackson s Grant Application as presented. Motions: It was moved by Commissioner Newton, and seconded by Commissioner Schoonmaker to approve the Jackson s ASEP Grant Application as presented. Discussions: As there were no major questions or comments, the Commission then voted on the approval of the Jackson s ASEP Grant Application as presented. Motion Carried. Page 6 of 7

14 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) XI. ANNOUNCEMENTS/REMINDERS The following announcement was provided: A. Our next regularly scheduled business meeting shall be held June 18-19, 218. XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was no need for an Executive Session. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion: It was moved by Commissioner Newton, and seconded by Commissioner McCormack to adjourn the April 9, 218 business meeting. The Commission then voted on the adjournment of the April 9, 218 business meeting at 3:24 P.M. Motion Carried. Page 7 of 7

15 I n d e x T a b 2 : D r a f t M e e t i n g M i n u t e s d a t e d A p r i l 2 4, 2 1 8

16 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) I. CALL TO ORDER A supplemental meeting of the Aeronautics Commission was held via Teleconference on Tuesday, April 24, 218, to provide concurrence with Governor Mead s recommendation for appointments to the Air Service Improvement Council. The Legislature called for the creation of the council as part of Senate File 4, enrolled during the 218 budget session, to develop a plan to stabilize, improve and decrease the cost of commercial air service in Wyoming. The council will serve until March 15, 219. Chair DeVore presided, calling the meeting to order at 3:2 P.M. II. ROLL CALL The following Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum: Bill DeVore, Chair, District 3 John Newton, Vice Chair, District at Large Chuck Brown III, Commissioner, District 1 Doyle Vaughan, Commissioner, District 2 Bruce McCormack, Commissioner, District 4 Pete Schoonmaker, Commissioner, District 5 Sigsbee Duck, Commissioner, District at Large Bill Panos, Ex Officio, WYDOT Director III. IV. INTRODUCTIONS Staff Present: Amy Surdam, Division Administrator Sheri Taylor, Fed. Aviation Policy & UAS Manager Shawn Burke, Air Service Development Analyst Guests Present: Mike Kahler, AG s Office Sam Voyles, AG s Office Jay Lundell, Gillette Airport ADJUSTMENTS TO AGENDA There were no adjustments made to the agenda. Katie Pfister, Commission Secretary Melissa DeFratis, Legislative Liaison Devon Brubaker, Rock Springs Airport John Stopka, Sheridan Airport Katie Rennick, Riverton Ranger V. NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration of Appointments to the Wyoming Commercial Air Service Improvement Council The Commission provided their consent in three (3) separate motions; thus allowing proposed Commission Member appointees an opportunity to recuse themselves during consideration. Consent List 1: Representing ENDOW: Cy Lee & Cindy DeLancey Representing the Wyoming Association of Municipalities: John Lars Baker Representing the Wyoming County Commissioners Association: Steve Maier Representing the Wyoming Airport Operator s Association: Jay Lundell Representing the Public at Large for Critical Air Service: Devon Brubaker Representing the Public at Large for Growth Air Service: Kari Cooper Motion: It was moved by Commissioner Vaughan, and seconded by Commissioner Brown to concur with Consent List 1 for Governor appointments to the Air Service Improvement Council. Motion Carried. Page 1 of 2

17 Matthew H. Mead Governor William T. Panos Director Wyoming department of transportation Aeronautics commission M E E T I N G M I N U T E S Bill DeVore Chairman Telephone No.: (37) VI. XII. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) A. Consideration of Appointments to the Wyoming Commercial Air Service Improvement Council (Continued) Consent List 2: Representing the Aeronautics Commission: Bruce McCormack Motion: It was moved by Commissioner Vaughan, and seconded by Commissioner Schoonmaker to concur with Consent List 2 for Governor appointments to the Air Service Improvement Council. Motion Carried. Consent List 2: Representing the Aeronautics Commission: Sigsbee Duck Motion: It was moved by Commissioner Vaughan, and seconded by Commissioner Schoonmaker to concur with Consent List 3 for Governor appointments to the Air Service Improvement Council. Motion Carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was no need for an Executive Session. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion: It was moved by Commissioner Schoonmaker, and seconded by Commissioner Brown to adjourn the April 24, 218 business meeting. The Commission then voted on the adjournment of the April 24, 218 business meeting at 3:1 P.M. Motion Carried. Page 2 of 2

18 I n d e x T a b 3 : B u d g e t F o r e c a s t R e p o r t

19 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: (includes prior fiscal years) $3,,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: (includes prior fiscal years) $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: (includes prior fiscal years) $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: (includes prior fiscal years) $. Funding Notes: Beginning Balance: $3,,. Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): (includes prior fiscal years) $. Grant Support: (includes prior fiscal years) $34,. Carryover Balance: $2,966,. Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Beginning Balance: $2,966,. Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $. Grant Support: $38,. Carryover Balance: $2,658,. Senate file 12 (Enrolled Act 81) appropriated $3M ($2.5M from the budget reserve account and $5k from the transportation trust fund) to the WBC on March 17, 23. On June 3, 25, the balance of the Air Service Enhancement account ($2,848,4) was transferred to WYDOT when the program was moved to Aeronautics. Page 1 of 9

20 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 25 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 26 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $3,,. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Beginning Balance: $5,658,. Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $12,5. Grant Support: $2,229,66.59 Carryover Balance: $3,416, Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $715,86. Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $4,132, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $27,59.54 Grant Support: $265,6. Carryover Balance: $3,839, House Bill 53 (Enrolled Act 9 - Session Chapter 13) appropriated $3M (General Funds) to the ASE Account to carry out the ASE act. A consortium of airports and WYDOT received a SCASDP Grant from the USDOT. This money was used to conduct the 'Fly Wyoming' campaign. Page 2 of 9

21 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 27 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 28 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $3,,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: ($122,862.) Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $6,716, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $. Grant Support: $1,19, Carryover Balance: $5,697,13.39 Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $3,,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $8,697,13.39 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $176, Grant Support: $99,62.37 Carryover Balance: $7,611,19.45 Standard Budget Appropriation Transfers to Program 7721 (Admin) to pay for data purchases and other necessary info. Standard Budget Appropriation B-11 Transfer from Program 7741 of $169 was removed due to transfer error. Page 3 of 9

22 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 29 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 21 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 211 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: ($12,.) Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $8,991,19.45 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $37,175.4 Grant Support: $2,518, Carryover Balance: $6,435, Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Beginning Balance: $7,935, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $616,92.6 Grant Support: $2,685, Carryover Balance: $4,633,798.5 Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Beginning Balance: $6,133,798.5 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $. Grant Support: $4,196, Carryover Balance: $1,937,83.68 Standard Budget Appropriation. The appropriation was reduced by half by Gov. Freundenthal. Transfers to Program 7721 to pay for data purchaces and other necessary purchases. Standard Budget Appropriation Standard Budget Appropriation Page 4 of 9

23 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 212 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 213 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $3,949,668. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $7,386, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $126,3. Grant Support: $3,466,961.3 Carryover Balance: $3,793,49.38 Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $3,,. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $8,293,49.38 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $8,28. Grant Support: $2,315, Carryover Balance: $5,969, Standard Budget Appropriation of $1.5M. And a supplemental appropriation of $3.949M. Supplemental appropriation of $3.949M. Standard Budget Appropriation This budget adjustment was due to a B-11 from Kevin - $82,881 was for the local share of the SCASDP project, and $49,637 was an increase due to the accounting of the local share for projects in RKS and GCC. This B-11 was removed due to double counting the of local share. Page 5 of 9

24 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 214 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 215 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,5,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: ($12,.) Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $7,349, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $325,5. Grant Support: $1,349, Carryover Balance: $5,674, Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,44,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $3,548,565. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $1,963. Funding Notes: Adjustment Notes: Beginning Balance: $1,664,82.14 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $1, Grant Support: $1,618, Carryover Balance: $9,35,682.9 Standard Budget Appropriation minus a budget cut of 8% for one year. 8% Budget reduction for the year. New Standard Budget Appropriation including budget cuts of 8% for two years (215 and 216). Also includes Exception request of $3,798,565 minus $25, legislative cut initiated by JAC. $1, adjustment made to reconcile with SOF. Page 6 of 9

25 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 216 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 217 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,44,. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Funding Notes: Beginning Balance: $1,475,682.9 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $185,735. Grant Support: $4,136,83.86 Carryover Balance: $6,153,144.4 Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,312,45. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Beginning Balance: $7,465,594.4 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $175,. Grant Support: $1,947, New Standard Budget Appropriation including budget cuts of 8% for two years (215 and 216). Funding Notes: ($2,397.) general funds cut per legislature, ( $17,152.5 ) reduction per Gov. Adjustment Notes: Carryover Balance: $5,342,61.12 N/A Page 7 of 9

26 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 218 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) 219 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,312,45. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Beginning Balance: $6,655,51.12 Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $15,. Grant Support: $3,391,989. Carryover Balance: $3,113,62.12 Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,312,45. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Beginning Balance: $4,425, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $15,. Grant Support: $2,268,164. Funding Notes: ($2,397.) general funds cut per legislature, ( $17,152.5 ) reduction per Gov. Funding Notes: Assumes ($2,397.) general funds cut per legislature, ( $17,152.5 ) reduction per Gov. Adjustment Notes: Carryover Balance: $2,7, N/A Page 8 of 9

27 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Air Service Budget Forecast Budget Fiscal Year 22 (Forecasted) (Forecasted) Standard Budget Appropriations to ASEP: $1,312,45. Supplementals to ASEP Budget: $. Exceptions to ASEP Budget: $. Adjustments to ASEP Budget: $. Beginning Balance: $3,319, Add'l Expenses (Data Purchase, Consulting, Marketing): $15,. Grant Support: $2,268,163.8 Carryover Balance: $91, Funding Notes: Assumes ($2,397.) general funds cut per legislature, ( $17,152.5 ) reduction per Gov. Page 9 of 9

28 I n d e x T a b 4 : P e r c e n t o f G r a n t s R e p o r t

29 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Percent of Grant Projects by City Status Project Number Start FY Start CY Airline Maximum State Share Project Recoveries Community: Casper Finaled ASE Northwest Airlines 1,633,52 Finaled ASE ,3 Finaled ASE Allegiant Air 26,99 Finaled ASE United Airlines 32, Finaled ASE United Airlines 27, Sub-total: $2,12, % Community: Cheyenne Finaled AMERAIR American Eagle 1,4, Finaled ARASE American Eagle 85, Sub-total: $2,25, 6.67% Page 1 of 5

30 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Percent of Grant Projects by City Status Project Number Start FY Start CY Airline Maximum State Share Project Recoveries Community: Cody Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN 19,4 Finaled WBC SkyWest - DEN 117,6 Finaled AERE SkyWest - DEN 165,6 Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN 114,4 Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN 49,796 Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN Finaled ASE ,5 Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN 28,551 Finaled ASE SkyWest - SLC 97,97 Finaled ASE SkyWest - SLC 24, Finaled ASE SkyWest - DEN 32, Finaled ARASE SkyWest - DEN 382,5 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - DEN 233,978 Finaled ARASE ,599 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - DEN 28,764 Finaled ASCOD SkyWest - DEN 14,44 Finaled ASCOD United Airlines 8,384 Finaled ASCOD United Airlines Finaled ASCOD United Airlines 53,749 Finaled ASCOD United Airlines 33,864 Approved United Airlines 128, 128, Sub-total: $2,564, % $128, Page 2 of 5

31 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Percent of Grant Projects by City Status Project Number Start FY Start CY Airline Maximum State Share Project Recoveries Community: Gillette Finaled ASE Great Lakes Airlines 128,127 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 799,36 Finaled ARASE , Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 771,445 Finaled ASE , Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 615,398 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 1,186,23 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 619,996 Finaled ASGCC SkyWest - SLC 1,52,48 Finaled ASGCC SkyWest - SLC 836,812 Finaled ASGCC SkyWest - SLC 641,581 Finaled ASGCC SkyWest - SLC 1,14, Sub-total: $7,883, % Community: Jackson Finaled ASE American Airlines 125, Finaled AERE American Airlines 1, Finaled ASE American Airlines 117,828 Finaled ASE American Airlines 2, Finaled ASE American Airlines 2, Finaled ARASE American Airlines 2, Finaled ARASE American Airlines 15, Finaled ARASE American Airlines 168,515 Finaled ARASE United Airlines 9,677 Finaled ASJAC United Airlines Finaled ASJAC United Airlines 1,373 Finaled ASJAC United Airlines 111,63 Finaled ASJAC United Airlines 94,169 Granted ASJAC United Airlines 173, ,956 Sub-total: $1,831, % $173,956 Page 3 of 5

32 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Percent of Grant Projects by City Status Project Number Start FY Start CY Airline Maximum State Share Project Recoveries Community: Laramie Finaled ASE ,45 Sub-total: $186,45.55% Community: Riverton Finaled CASE Great Lakes Airlines 128,934 Granted ASRIW Key Lime Airlines (d 1,193,9 148,556 Granted ASRIW Key Lime Airlines (d 1,134, ,485 Granted Key Lime Airlines (d 596, ,937 Sub-total: $3,53,42 9.6% $1,316,978 Community: Rock Springs Finaled ASE Great Lakes Airlines 99,86 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 79,568 Finaled ARASE , Finaled ASE ,953 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 57,847 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 1,177,342 Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 613,84 Finaled ARASE , Finaled ARASE SkyWest - SLC 1,233,452 Finaled ASRKS SkyWest - SLC 1,32,347 Finaled ASRKS SkyWest - SLC 54,692 Finaled ASRKS SkyWest - SLC 876,38 Finaled ASRKS SkyWest - DEN 54,78 Finaled ASRKS SkyWest - DEN 626,87 Granted ASRKS SkyWest - DEN 949, ,348 Sub-total: $9,125, % $747,348 Community: Sheridan Granted CSSHR Key Lime Airlines (d 2,327,212 Granted CSSHR Key Lime Airlines (d 1,134, ,485 Granted Key Lime Airlines (d 596, ,937 Sub-total: $4,58, % $1,168,422 Page 4 of 5

33 Created: 6/13/218 STATE OF WYOMING Wyoming Air Service Enhancement Program Percent of Grant Projects by City Status Project Number Start FY Start CY Airline Maximum State Share Project Recoveries Community: Statewide Finaled SHE , Finaled SCAS ,86 Sub-total: $749, % Grand Totals: $33,715,619 1.% $3,534,73 Page 5 of 5

34 I n d e x T a b 5 : C h a n g e O r d e r s R e p o r t

35 Date prepared: 6/12/218 Change Orders Report WACIP Construction Projects Airport State Project Number FY Grant Project Description Change Order Date Change Order Number Supplemental Agreement Number Change Order Explanation Change Order Amount Revised Contract Amount Buffalo ABYG12A 216 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements 9/29/216 1 Additional obliteration to existing flaking paint. $2,532. $17,756. ABYG13B 217 Construct Wildlife Fencing 11/7/217 1 Replace 4' gate with 6' gate. $93. $243,623. Casper ACPR66C 216 Construct SRE Building, PH II 9/28/216 1 Repair/upgrade sanitary sewer $32,39. $5,311, ACPR38B 216 Construct Customs Office 6/2/217 1 Include floor drains in restrooms. $1,796. $592, /2/217 2 Upgrade electrical, additional framing. $8, ACPR66C 216 Construct SRE Building, PH II 1/9/217 2 Removal of contaminated soils. $6,753. $5,311, ACPR38B 216 Construct Customs Office 8/16/217 3 Plumbing access panel, add HVAC transfer ducts $3,26.63 $592, ACPR66C 216 Construct SRE Building, PH II 12/13/216 3 Addition of floor drains and door. $5,937. $5,311, /23/217 4 Remove precast concrete screen wall, add security cameras, plywood backing in shops, liner panels in vehicle storage bays, vestibule window pass thru, door hardware and access control changes, parapet insulation, mezzanine railing upgrade. ($3,911.37) ACPR38B 216 Construct Customs Office 9/11/217 4 Upgrade office wall furring, grading at public entrance, roof flashing. $4, $592, ACPR66C 216 Construct SRE Building, PH II 7/13/217 5 Earthwork on west side of building, existing sewer and storm drain work, additional site concrete, fire sprinkler flushing valve connections, fuel transfer area concrete, perimeter fence modifications, additional framing in admin office and shop area. $93, $5,311, Page 1 of 4

36 Date prepared: 6/12/218 Change Orders Report WACIP Construction Projects Airport State Project Number FY Grant Project Description Change Order Date Change Order Number Supplemental Agreement Number Change Order Explanation Change Order Amount Revised Contract Amount Casper ACPR38B 216 Construct Customs Office 2/7/218 6 Change door hardware, replace glass and seals on windows, add window coverings, change light fixtures, change flush valves to battery operated, additional painting, add lockable access panel in office ceiling, relocate two security cameras. $16,785. $592, ACPR66C 216 Construct SRE Building, PH II 7/28/217 6 Additional paving. $25, $5,311, /18/217 7 Sanitary sewer adjustments, fuel tank adjustments, window shades, backsplash. $98, /13/217 8 Final quantity adjustments. $43,735.8 Cheyenne ACYS51A 217 Construct Commercial Apron 2/21/217 1 Storm drain, water line, trail, and landscape island upgrades as required by City Planning and Engineering. $32,345.2 $5,422, /1/217 2 Change concrete mix to use fly ash, remove deicing diversion and collection system from contract, and reduction of P29. ($17,875.3) 9/12/217 3 Replace 2 KW Regulator with 3 KW regulator to meet requirements and replace regulator that has surpassed design life. $35,346. Evanston AEVW11C 216 Reconstruct GA Apron, Ph II 12/8/216 1 Quantity adjustment for Cement Treated Base. $ $89, /19/217 2 Taxiway A3 was bid as being 6" thick. Existing pavement is 12" thick; milling/mobilization/mix design cost changed. $22,35.76 Page 2 of 4

37 Date prepared: 6/12/218 Change Orders Report WACIP Construction Projects Airport State Project Number FY Grant Project Description Change Order Date Change Order Number Supplemental Agreement Number Change Order Explanation Change Order Amount Revised Contract Amount Gillette AGCC64A 217 Upgrade Electrical Vault, Rehab Airside Pavement, & Replace Auto Gates 2/27/218 1 Upsize ATCT feed, add light indicator to sump pump, add PAPI disconnects, add underground J-boxes for PAPI, Add MALSR control on ALCMS, add siren sensor to Gate 7, Add card reader/key pad lights to gate controller $23, $1,426, AGCC59A 216 Upgrade Visual Guidance, Repair Airside Pavements 1/31/216 1 New sign bases are required. $73,8. $95,55. Greybull AGEY14C 216 Reconstruct Main Apron, PH II (Federal PH I) 8/23/216 1 Reconciliation of final as-constructed quantities. ($68,889.) $1,78,646. Jackson AJAC18C 216 Reconstruct Commercial Apron, Ph III 2/6/217 1 Extension of current work items at contract unit prices. $15, $4,415, AJAC18E 217 Reconstruct Commercial Apron, Ph V 3/28/218 1 Unsuitable subgrade soil discovered, $17,51. $5,51,684.9 remediation required to continute project. AJAC18D 217 Reconstruct Commercial Apron, PH IV and Expand GA Apron 4/21/217 1 Unanticipated asbestos mitigation. $4,981. $5,769,764. 5/5/217 2 Remove PCC pavement, add tie downs, drain cleanout ($8,24.) Lander ALND25X 216 Acquire SRE 11/12/215 1 Changed tires to snow tires. $3,15. $29, ALND26C 217 Reconstruct R/W, Rehabilitate R/W Lighting, Install T/W Lighting, PH II 7/11/217 1 Additional marking removal, temporary markings. $41,237. $5,297, /6/217 2 Additional offsite haul, apron repair, removal of electrical handhole item. $45,13. Laramie ALAR26A 216 Mark R/W 3/21 9/13/216 1 Added final paint quantities. $1,62.23 $38,78.34 ALAR23B 216 Rehabilitate Commercial Apron, PH II 8/19/216 1 Replace concrete panels with reinforced concrete panels, upgrade joints accordingly. $6, $2,3,98.25 Page 3 of 4

38 Date prepared: 6/12/218 Change Orders Report WACIP Construction Projects Airport State Project Number FY Grant Project Description Change Order Date Change Order Number Supplemental Agreement Number Change Order Explanation Change Order Amount Revised Contract Amount Pinedale APNA38A 217 Acquire RPZ Land and Install Approach Lights 12/2/217 1 Rebuild Shields to make them frangible per FAA specifications. $7,781. $316,56. Riverton ARIW28A 216 Expand ARFF Building 1/18/217 1 Add 4 data outlets and associated cabling to mezzanine prior to finishing. $1,541. $311,53. ARIW29A 216 Acquire ARFF Equipment 1/14/216 1 Addition of undercarriage spray nozzles. $1,48. $666,41. Rock Springs ARKS31B 216 Rehabilitate R/W 9/27 12/15/216 1 Rehab additional connector taxiway area, increase amount of asphalt and bituminous material for additional connector taxiway rehab and because milling operations required deeper cuts in some areas. $257, $4,573, ARKS37C 217 Construct GA Terminal, PH II 1/5/217 1 Septic System Construction and Sewer system upgrades. $75, $4,85, /4/218 2 Reduction in concrete panel replacement. ($7,978.16) 1/5/218 3 Various sewer upgrades. $67, Saratoga ASAA13B 217 Rehabilitate R/W 5/23 12/29/217 1 Because the runway designation change was not approved by the FAA, the guidance signs need not be changed. ($8,4.) $3,191,595. Sheridan ASHR58A 216 Remove Obstruction (Trees) 1/19/216 1 Field observations showed an additional tree needed removal $57. Page 4 of 4

39 I n d e x T a b 6 : S t a t e w i d e L i n e I t e m s U p d a t e R e p o r t

40 Statewide Line Item Balances FY218 June 218 Beginning Balance: Changes to Line Item: Recoveries as of April 218 Projects: Balance Balance on WACIP Aviation Encouragement Marketing NAVAID 25, 175, 152,5 19,225 15,623 8,469 44,225 19,623 16,969 (31,5) (125,) (148,572) 12,725 65,623 12,397 Airport Project # Grant Description Afton AAFO37X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,769 Afton AFO3X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 2,542 Afton AFO4X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Big Piney ABPI23X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Casper ACPR83X 218 Marketing 25, Cheyenne ACYS57X 218 Marketing 25, Cody ACOD49X 218 Marketing 25, Cody ACO9X 218 Marketing 2,5 Cowley AU6815X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 7,979 Dixon ADWX16X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Dubois ADUB17X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Dubois ADUB19X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 6,68 Dubois ADUB19X Amendment #1 2,13 Ft. Bridger AFBR17X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Gillette AGC6X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Gillette AGCC68X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 25,248 Greybull AGEY2X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 4,353 Glendo A761X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Hulett AW4325X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Hulett AW42X 218 Aviation Encouragement 1,5 Kemmerer AEMM21X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Lander ALND29X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Lusk ALSK15X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,769 Newcastle AECS12X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,769 Pine Bluffs A82V22X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Pinedale APNA42X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 7,979 Pinedale APN6X 218 Marketing 2,5 Powell APOY26X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Powell APOY27X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 7,979 Riverton ARIW36X 218 Marketing 25, Rock Springs ARK1X 218 Marketing 25, Rock Springs ARKS41X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Saratoga ASAA17X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 7,979 Saratoga ASAA18X Repair NAVAIDS 8, Sheridan ASH8X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Thermopolis AHSG5X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Thermopolis AHS3X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Torrington ATOR15X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 4,353 Upton A761X 218 Aviation Encouragement 2,5 Wheatland AEAN11X 218 NAVAID Maintenance 5,77 Total 31,5 125, 148,572 Note: Shaded projects have been added since the last commission meeting. \\CHEYENNE AERO\Data\shared\AIP PROJECT MASTER\WAC_Statewide_Line_Item_Report

41 I n d e x T a b 7 : A d m i n i s t r a t i v e A p p r o v a l s R e p o r t

42 Administrative Approvals FY218 May June 218 Airport Project # Grant Description Form State Funds Lander ALND26C Reconstruct R/W, Rehab R/W Lighting, etc. Amendment #2 6,978 Total Note: Shaded projects have been added since the last commission meeting. 6,978 \\CHEYENNE AERO\Data\shared\AIP PROJECT MASTER\WAC_AdministrativelyApproved

43 I n d e x T a b 8 : R e c o v e r e d S t a t e F u n d s R e p o r t

44 Date Recovered City State Project Number Original FY Project Description Recovered State Funds Report Recovery Type State Funds Transportation Funds General Funds Total State Funds Balance Available FY18 FY18 Beginning Balance $ 7,144,139. $ $ 7,144,139. $ 7,144,139 Correction from last report $ (15,447) (15,447.) 1/22/218 Laramie ALAR19A 213 Wildlife Hazard Assessment FINAL 75. 3,135. 3,885. 1/22/218 Rawlins ARWL15B 215 Expand Auto Parking/Access Road and Seal Coat. FINAL 7, , ,663. 1/23/218 Pine Bluffs A82V12A 214 Master Plan FINAL /24/218 Rock Springs ARKS34B 216 Improve Runway 9/27 Safety Area FINAL /25/218 Big Piney ABPI16A 214 Master Plan & AGIS Survey FINAL /25/218 Cody ACOD39A 215 Rehabilitate T/W A & Upgrade Lighting, Design FINAL /25/218 Cody ACOD39B 216 Rehabilitate T/W A & Upgrade Lighting FINAL /25/218 Cody ACOD4A 215 Acquire SRE & Install Passenger Loading Bridge FINAL /25/218 Casper ACPR51A 212 Wildlife Hazard Assessment & Master Plan Update FINAL January SOF Various Various Various Marketing FINAL 1,429. 1,429. January SOF Various Various Various Aviation Encouragement FINAL 16, ,243. January SOF Various Various Various NAVAID FINAL 6,73. 6,73. Total State Funds Recovered this Period (1/1/17 to 1/3/18) 41, , ,56. 7,212,195 2/1/218 Casper ACPR74A 216 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL 1,757. 1,757. 2/1/218 Newcastle AECS6A 214 Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 Pavement and Associated Work FINAL 11, ,986. 2/1/218 Evanston AEVW11B 215 Reconstruct GA Apron, Ph I FINAL 146, ,887. 2/1/218 Lander ALND26A 217 Reconstruct R/W, Rehabilitate R/W Lighting, Install T/W Lighting, Preliminary Design FINAL /1/218 Laramie ALAR2A 214 Install New R/W 3 PAPI, R/W 3 REILS and Supplemental Windcones FINAL /1/218 Laramie ALAR25X 216 Acquire SRE FINAL 2,363. 2,363. 2/2/218 Cheyenne ACYS44A 214 Sustainable Management Plan FINAL /14/218 Riverton ALSK12A 216 Install PAPI's FINAL /14/218 Riverton ARIW21A 213 Wildlife Hazard Assessment FINAL 177. $ /14/218 Riverton ARIW26A 214 LOC Relocation, Design & Construct, PH I FINAL /14/218 Riverton ARIW31A 216 Acquire Mowing Equipment FINAL 1,585. 1,585. 2/14/218 Rock Springs ARKS32A 214 Acquire ARFF Truck FINAL /14/218 Rock Springs ARKS38A 216 Acquire Mowing Equipment FINAL 1,37. 1,37. 2/14/218 Rawlins ARWL9B 215 Rehabilitate R/W 1/28, Construction FINAL 2,112. 2,112. 2/15/218 Rawlins ARWL15A 215 Expand Auto Parking and Access Road FINAL /15/218 Saratoga ASAA5C 215 Reconstruct, Rehabilitate and Extend Hangar T/Ls and Rehabilitate T/W C, PH II FINAL 5,41.25 $ 5, ,459. 2/15/218 Saratoga ASAA11A 215 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL 5,62. 5,62. 2/15/218 Sheridan ASHR43A 212 Acquire RPZ Easement off R/W 23 End & Land off R/W 14 End FINAL /15/218 Sheridan ASHR5A 214 SRE Building Expansion FINAL /15/218 Sheridan ASHR46A 213 Master Plan FINAL /16/218 Sheridan ASHR51A 214 Rehab Taxilane to Business Park Ramp FINAL 11,71.12 $ 2, ,839. 2/16/218 Sheridan ASHR56A 216 Rehabilitate Wildlife Fencing FINAL /23/218 Sheridan ASHR58A 216 Remove Obstruction (Trees) FINAL 1,73. 1,73. 2/23/218 Thermopolis ATHP11D 213 Contruct New Airport, PH II FINAL /23/218 Thermopolis ATHP11E 213 Construct New Airport, Ph II FINAL 23, ,311. \\CHEYENNE AERO\Data\shared\AIP PROJECT MASTER\Status of Funds\WACIP_Recon\Recoveries Tracking\Recoveries Tracking Sheets Page 1 of 2

45 Date Recovered City State Project Number Original FY Project Description Recovered State Funds Report Recovery Type State Funds Transportation Funds General Funds Total State Funds Balance Available FY18 2/23/218 Thermopolis ATHP11F 215 Construct New Airport, PH III FINAL 14, ,549. 2/23/218 Thermopolis ATHP11G 215 Construct New Airport, AWOS Upgrade FINAL /23/218 Thermopolis ATHP17A 215 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL 17, ,872. 2/23/218 Buffalo ABYG11A 215 Conduct Master Plan FINAL /23/218 Buffalo AFBR1A 213 Master Plan, AGIS FINAL /23/218 Riverton ARIW24A 214 Rehab & Recon R/W 1/28, Design FINAL /23/218 Torrington ATOR11A 214 Rehab R/W 1/28, Design FINAL /23/218 Torrington ATOR11B 215 Rehabilitate R/W 1/28, Const. FINAL 5,171. 5,171. February SOF Various Various Various Marketing FINAL.. February SOF Various Various Various Aviation Encouragement FINAL February SOF Various Various Various NAVAID FINAL 2,388. 2,388. Total State Funds Recovered this Period (2/1/18 to 2/28/18) $ 268, $ 7, $ 276,169.1 $ 7,488,364 3/1/218 Dubois AU258B 213 R/W Realignment, Design FINAL /1/218 Hulett AW4319A 214 Pavement Maintenance FINAL $ /1/218 Worland AWRL8A 213 Wildlife Hazard Assessment FINAL $ 75. 1,387. 2,137. 3/1/218 Worland AWRL11A 216 Acquire SRE FINAL $ /1/218 Worland AWRL11B 216 Acquire SRE FINAL $ 1,59. 1,59. 3/5/218 Cowley AU681D 216 Reconstruct Taxilane, PH II FINAL $ /6/218 Afton AAFO33A 216 Acquire Mowing Equipment FINAL $ /6/218 Cody ACOD35A 214 Rehab R/W Pavement & Lighting and T/W A Lighting FINAL $ 1,63. 1,63. 3/8/218 Douglas ADGW22A 214 Recon Portion of Main Apron, Design FINAL $ /8/218 Dixon ADWX8A 214 Seal Coat & Mark Pavements FINAL $ 1,39. 1,39. 3/12/218 Greybull AGEY19A 217 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL $ 1,845. 1,845. 3/12/218 Laramie ALAR21A 214 Seal Coat and Mark RW 3/21 FINAL $ 24, , /13/218 Riverton ARIW2A 213 Rehab T/W C and Recon Apron FINAL $ 1,432. 1,432. 3/13/218 Rock Springs ARKS2A 212 Wildlife Hazard Assessment FINAL $ /3/218 Big Piney ABPI21A 217 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL $ 11, ,342. 4/4/218 Riverton ARIW27A 215 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL $ 4,746. 4,746. 4/5/218 Worland AWRL12A 217 Seal Coat and Mark Airside Pavements FINAL $ 34, ,498. March SOF Various Various Various Marketing FINAL 4,219. 4,219. March SOF Various Various Various Aviation Encouragement FINAL 1,476. 1,476. March SOF Various Various Various NAVAID FINAL April SOF Various Various Various Marketing FINAL April SOF Various Various Various Aviation Encouragement FINAL Total State Funds Recovered this Period (3/1/18 to 4/3/18) $ 93, $ 1,387. $ 95, $ 7,583,694 Total State Funds Recovered for FY218 44, , , ,583,694 \\CHEYENNE AERO\Data\shared\AIP PROJECT MASTER\Status of Funds\WACIP_Recon\Recoveries Tracking\Recoveries Tracking Sheets Page 2 of 2

46 I n d e x T a b 9 : A I P P r i o r i t y R a t i n g M o d e l U p d a t e s

47 Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218 Wyoming Aeronautics Commission Wyoming Aeronautics Division

48 Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218 The purpose of the priority rating model is to evaluate and rank projects for planning, budgeting, and granting by utilizing objective information to make decisions considering the collective needs of the state s aviation system. Developed by the Aeronautics Division of the Wyoming Department of Transportation Approved by the Wyoming Aeronautics Commission Date: Priority Rating Task Force: Wyoming Aeronautics Commission: Bill Devore, Chuck Brown III Airport Representatives: Glenn Januska, Casper/Natrona County International Airport James Parker, Ralph Wenz Field - Pinedale Devon Brubaker, Southwest Wyoming Regional Airport - Rock Springs Lori Olson, Upton Municipal Airport RaJean Strube Fossen, Hunt Field - Lander GDA Engineers: Cheryl Bean Wyoming Aeronautics Division: Christy Yaffa, Brian Olsen

49 Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218 Table of Contents Purpose of the Priority Rating Model 1 Development and Organization of the Priority Rating Model 1-3 Use of the Priority Rating Model 4 Categories Weights Descriptions Category: Purpose of Project 5-8 Category: Project Component 8-9 Category: Type of Federal Funding 9-1 Category: Systems Impact 1 Project Timing Category: Airport Usage 12 Category: Status of Airport Protection Conclusions from the Priority Rating Model Acronyms and Definitions 16-21

50 Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218 Purpose of the Priority Rating Model The stated purpose of the priority rating model is to evaluate and rank airport projects for planning, budgeting, and granting by utilizing relevant information to make objective decisions considering the collective needs of the state s aviation system. Development and Organization of the Priority Rating Model The Wyoming Aeronautics Commission is responsible, by Wyoming Statute and Commission Policy, for the disbursement of state funds for airport improvements. Commission Policy also ensures that the disbursement of funds be accomplished through consistent application. To meet this policy, the Commission has designated a priority rating system as a tool to maximize the use of available airport funding and assist in the evaluation of all airport projects proposed for state or federal funding. Historically, the evaluation of projects for Aeronautics Commission funding has followed a defined process eligibility, state evaluation, priority rating model - administered by the Wyoming Aeronautics Division, for consideration and acceptance by the Commission. Those projects that met both eligibility and state evaluation requirements were then ranked using evaluation categories outlined in the Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation February 26 (26 PRM). Those seven categories represented important project objectives with each category weighted to recognize differing levels of importance in an overall evaluation and ranking of eligible projects. The Aeronautics Commission, in 213, directed the Aeronautics Division to establish a Task Force to review the 26 PRM. This review was to determine if that Model could be improved and also address specific recommendations that resulted from a program evaluation completed by the Legislative Service Office, State of Wyoming. A Task Force was established and completed its review of the priority rating model in early 214. The Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 214, as approved by the Aeronautics Commission, evaluated projects requested by airport sponsors, for State and Federal funding, using six weighted categories. These six categories represented the important project evaluation criteria with each category weighted to recognize differing levels of importance in an overall evaluation and ranking of eligible projects. The Priority Rating Model Task Force recommended that the Task Force be reconvened after the first year of implementation of the new Model in order to evaluate its performance and Page 1

51 recommend any necessary adjustments to the Aeronautics Commission. The Task Force met August 6, 215, to complete the Model review. Overall, the Task Force agreed that the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 214, is performing as anticipated and only minor adjustments were recommended. To assure that the Priority Rating Model continues to best meet the needs of the state aviation system, the Aeronautics Commission and Aeronautics Division determined that the Model should be reevaluated and updated during the 218 fiscal year. A taskforce was established to assist in the reevaluation and make recommendations to improve Model performance. The 218 Priority Rating Model (PRM) Task Force members were: Wyoming Aeronautics Commission: Bill Devore, Chuck Brown III Airport Representatives: Glenn Januska, Casper/Natrona County International Airport James Parker, Ralph Wenz Field - Pinedale Devon Brubaker, Southwest Wyoming Regional Airport - Rock Springs Lori Olson, Upton Municipal Airport RaJean Strube Fossen, Hunt Field - Lander GDA Engineers: Cheryl Bean Wyoming Aeronautics Division: Christy Yaffa, Brian Olsen A.J. Schutzman and Cheryl Porter, from the Aeronautics Division, provided professional services to assist the Task Force. Galen Hesterberg provided consultant services to the Aeronautics Division and assistance to the Task Force. The PRM Task Force completed its review of the priority rating model in early May, 218. The review process focused on identification of issues concerning use of the 214 PRM and subsequent recommendations for updating and restructuring that Model to better support the stated purpose of the priority rating model as a tool to assist in the evaluation of all airport projects proposed for state or federal funding. The evaluation of projects by the Aeronautics Division will continue to use an initial review for eligibility to assure that each project meets state statute, Commission policies, grant assurances, regulations and precedence. Eligible projects will then be assessed and ranked by the Aeronautics Division using evaluation categories as presented in the updated 218 PRM. The Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218, as approved by the Aeronautics Commission, will evaluate projects requested by airport sponsors, for State or Federal funding, using seven weighted categories. These seven categories represent important project evaluation criteria with each category weighted to recognize differing levels of importance in an overall evaluation and ranking of eligible projects. The seven categories, with weights and brief descriptions, as recommended by the Task Force are: Page 2

52 Purpose of Project 5 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, is recognized as one of the most important individual categories as it defines the primary purpose of each project: Safety, Security, Maintenance, Airport Enhancement, or Planning. Project Component 3 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, continues to prioritize those projects that are directed to preservation and enhancement of airside facilities. Type of Federal Funding 5 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, is one of the most important individual categories as, in general, federal funds provide the majority of financial assistance to airport sponsors for airport improvement projects. Systems Impact 4 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, has been restructured into two categories, Systems Impact and Project Timing, to better support project evaluation, ranking, and selection. Systems Impact will continue to allow the Aeronautics Division to consider an individual project s overall impact to the Wyoming State Aviation System Plan (WySASP). Project Timing 4 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, was restructured with Systems Impact to better support project evaluation, ranking, and selection. Project Timing allows the Aeronautics Division to match a project s schedule for delivery to the availability of funding and funding requirements of state and federal programs and/or community funding. Airport Usage 3 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, continues to prioritize projects based on the airport s benefit to the most airport users/citizens. It uses the airport s state system plan classification, which is assigned based on the airport s type and level of usage, the role of the airport in the overall system, and the facilities and services offered at the airport. Status of Airport Protection 1 point weight this category, previously used in the 214 PRM, recognizes the importance of safeguarding airport operations and minimizing impact to properties in proximity to the airport by implementing land use protections. The Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218, using each of these seven categories, will result in a numerical rating for each project; the process of matching a project proposal to a numerical rating is later defined for each category. The numerical rating is assigned, and then multiplied by the category weight to determine a final category numerical value. The seven category values are then summed to conclude the final priority model ranking for those projects proposed for State or Federal funding. A maximum of 15 points are available for a project that meets the highest value for each of the seven categories. Page 3

53 Use of the Priority Rating Model The Wyoming Aviation Capital Improvement Program (WACIP) represents the State s funding plan for airport improvement projects. Individual airport projects are outlined by location, program year, project status, project description, priority model rating, and proposed funding source/sources. The WACIP is developed annually, with frequent updates by the Aeronautics Division for Aeronautics Commission approval. Airport sponsors evaluate their airport needs and initiate projects designed to address those needs. The sponsors then propose their projects for inclusion in the WACIP; their evaluation of proposed projects should consider eligibility of the project against the requirements of the proposed funding sources. The airport sponsor should also consider the likely priority model ranking when evaluated against other proposed projects statewide, using the seven weighted categories of the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218. The Aeronautics Division evaluates all proposed projects for eligibility and, if eligible, evaluates each project as outlined in the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218. As presented earlier, the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218 will result in a numerical rating for each project; that rating is summarized for proposed projects. The proposed projects are subsequently shown by ranking, based on the numerical rating, in the WACIP. The Aeronautics Commission designates the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218 as a tool to assist in the evaluation of all airport projects proposed for State or Federal funding. This evaluation is needed as available funding for airport improvements generally does not allow for funding of all proposed projects. The Aeronautics Commission applies the Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218, to ensure that the disbursement of funds is accomplished through consistent application, but reserves its authority to make decisions considering the collective needs of the state s aviation system. Managers and administrators using this PRM should note that Italized Words or Terms are defined in the Acronyms and Definitions, pages Categories Used by the Priority Rating Model The Wyoming Priority Rating Model 218 will be used to establish a numerical rating for evaluation of proposed projects with the numerical rating based upon the following seven categories, weights, and descriptions. Page 4

54 Purpose of Project (Weight of 5) The Purpose of Project category receives a weight of 5, and is one of the most important individual categories in the priority rating model. The Purpose of Project category identifies the type of project and provides for five general purposes and awards the following points: 4 = Safety 3 = Security, Maintenance 2 = Airport Enhancement and Planning 1 = This numerical rating is not used to award points = Not Used The Airport Sponsor should note that preparation of planning studies, engineering documents, and land acquisition, as required for development of a specific capital improvement project, will be awarded points according to the purpose of the overall project. Safety (4 points) is the most important project purpose and includes many different project types. These projects are seen as highly important as they are consistent with the Aeronautics Commission s overall mission to provide a safe and efficient aviation system. Safety projects are generally defined as improvements to existing infrastructure, facilities and equipment, which support the daily functions of the airport, support the short-term and long-term operations of the airport, and provide for the safety of airport personnel and airport users. The final determination if a project meets the definition of Safety will be made by the Aeronautics Division. Key considerations to be used by the Division in this determination include, but are not limited to: o Potential, likelihood, and severity of property damage, personal injury and/or loss of life. o Necessary to support safe operations pertaining to current aircraft activity. o FAA Airport Design Standards. Project types include, but are not limited to: Emergency repair of isolated areas of severe pavement deterioration, as safe operation of aircraft is impaired Airside lighting Visual Approach Aids including: runway end identifier lights (REIL), precision approach path indicators (PAPIs), beacons, approach lighting Snow and ice control and snow removal equipment Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) equipment, training, and training facilities Automated Weather Observation Systems (AWOS) Page 5

55 Airside fencing Airside signage Wildlife hazard management Navigational hazard removals/markings Equipment purchase: Any equipment purchase required for airport safety Airside pavement markings Air traffic control towers Acquire terminal backup generator as needed for critical system operations and/or life safety Fire protection systems Rubber removal Removal of identified obstructions with priority to Runway Protection Zones Improvements to the Runway or Taxiway Safety Area, Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ), Object Free Area (OFA), runway site distance, separation standards etc., to comply with Airport Design Standards for current aircraft activity* Structures to house and protect equipment identified for Safety * Note that current aircraft activity must be verified, ongoing activity and identified in the airport s current Airport Master Plan. Security (3 points) is an important project purpose as these projects provide for facilities or equipment that are designed to prevent or deter persons or vehicles from unauthorized access to airside operations, and provide facilities or equipment designed to aid in providing secure (and safe) movement in and around all airport facilities. Security fencing New, expanded, or upgraded lighting landside for public spaces including parking lots Closed-Circuit television/cameras TSA required security components Access Control systems/equipment fences, gates, locks, alarms, guards and badge systems Advisory/directional signing Fingerprinting machines Maintenance (3 points) is an important project purpose as it accomplishes essential projects that facilitate the existing operations of the airport. The maintenance purpose, as a high priority, is consistent with the Commission and Division s overall philosophy of maintain before build. (Sponsors should note that maintenance/preservation type projects which extend the service life of existing infrastructure are given a higher category weighted point than those projects in the Airport Enhancement project purpose that require a significant expenditure of funds.) These Page 6

56 projects include a range of different project types: Pavement Preservation, including but not limited to, crack and joint sealing, seal coat, minor concrete pavement repair (CPR) and any preservation strategy in an airport s approved pavement management program (PMP) Pavement Rehabilitation or Pavement Reconstruction when identified in an airport s approved pavement management program (PMP) for the purpose of pavement preservation Maintenance/Repair to airport facilities and infrastructure (non-safety): Nonroutine maintenance/repair Maintenance/repair/replacement/relocation of NAVAIDs Equipment purchase: Airside maintenance (marking equipment, brush hog, crack seal equipment, etc.) Airport Enhancement (2 points) includes projects directed towards creating new or expanded facilities that accommodate more passengers, cargo, aircraft operations, or based aircraft; or the enhancement of airport use and efficiency. Pavement strengthening Airport must have implemented an approved PMP New pavement construction such as runway and taxiway extension or widening, apron expansion Airport must have implemented an approved PMP Equipment purchases: Other than for Safety or Maintenance purposes Noise monitoring, including equipment purchase New NAVAIDs Building remodel Building construction: New, replacement, or expansion Acquire backup generator for terminal Land use protection: Fee title or full control of lands within the RPZ; directed to the removal of incompatible land uses with priority to the removal of wildlife attractions and facilities that serve congregations of people New or expanded deicing containment facilities Identified Non-Standard Conditions that do not meet the Safety project purpose as determined by the Aeronautics Division Planning Projects (2 points) are directed to a comprehensive or specific issue/location study of short-term or long-term airport needs; resultant recommendations support the development of a project or program of projects. Planning projects include, but are not limited to, the following studies/analyses: Master Plans Page 7

57 Airport Layout Plans: Complete drawing set and narrative or stand-alone components such as Terminal Area Plans, Land-use Plans, other adopted plans NEPA compliance: Required environmental documentation and related analyses and reports including public involvement Special studies, such as Noise Analysis and Safety Management Systems, Security Systems, Sustainability Analysis, Instrument Approach Analysis Obstruction Survey and AGIS submittal Activity counting/recording Wind analysis Wildlife assessments and plans Occasionally a project has more than one purpose. For example, the reconstruction of an apron (purpose=maintenance) may also include a reconfiguration or expansion to accommodate changed or increased activity (purpose=airport enhancement). In these circumstances, the Division staff will identify the largest portion of the project (typically based on cost) and assign the Purpose of Project accordingly. The Project Purpose category is given a weight of 5, with sub-category points from 4 to, resulting in a range of 2 to 1 points depending on the airport s proposed project purpose (there are no 1 or point awards for the category). Project Component (Weight of 3) The Project Component category receives a weight of 3. This category prioritizes those projects from the Purpose of Project Category that are directed to preservation and enhancement of airside facilities and infrastructure and also prioritizes those facilities that have regular/daily use, with a lower priority for secondary use facilities. 4 = Airside Primary Runway or Taxiway 3 = Airside Secondary Runway or Taxiway 2 = Airside Aprons, Structures, and Equipment 1 = Airside Taxilanes (other than Apron), Landside and Other (Any Purpose of Project without an identified Component) = This numerical rating is not used to award points Projects that preserve or enhance the use of primary runways and/or taxiways are given preference with a 4 point ranking; four project purposes, listed in Purpose of Project Safety Category, will always receive the Project Component 4 point ranking. These projects purposes are: Airside perimeter fencing to support regular use of the primary runway Page 8

58 Snow and ice removal equipment Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) equipment, training, and training facilities Equipment purchases when required for airport safety Secondary runways and/or taxiways are given preference with a 3 point ranking. Aprons, Structures/Facilities, and Equipment Purchases are awarded a 2 point ranking. These facilities and equipment purchases support aviation traffic. Airside Taxilanes, Landside (see Definitions) and Other projects are awarded 1 point rankings. Other projects include planning projects or any proposed project that cannot be directly assigned to a specific component/location. Operations and Administrative Vehicles are classified as Other projects because they do not directly support aviation traffic. As with Purpose of Project, occasionally a project may include more than one component. For example, a project to extend a runway (component=airside primary runway or taxiway, airside fencing) may also include the construction of a taxilane (component=airside taxilane, landside and other). In these circumstances, the Division staff will identify the largest portion of the project (typically based on cost) and assign the Project Component accordingly. The Project Component category is given a weight of 3, with sub-category points from 4 to 1, resulting in a range of 12 to 3 points. Type of Federal Funding (Weight of 5) The Type of Federal Funding category receives a weight of 5, and is one of the most important individual categories in the priority rating model. In general, federal funds provide the majority of financial assistance to airport sponsors for airport improvement projects. Federal funding comes into the State for use on in-state projects and the use of State and Local funds to match federal funds is given a high priority and resultant high weight. The number of points awarded for this category is by type of federal funding available: 4 = Discretionary Funding 3 = State Apportionment Funding 2 = Entitlement Funding 1 = This numerical rating is not used to award points = No Federal Funds Discretionary Funding (4 points) including any Congressional allocation is given the highest priority as it is based on Federal legislative requirements, is additional funding to the State, is Page 9

59 typically dedicated to a location/airport or project improvement type, and must be expended in a timely manner. State Apportionment Funding (3 points) is an annual allocation of funds that is assigned to each state for airports; the State s non-primary, federally eligible airports compete within the State for these funds. Entitlement Funding (2 points) is guaranteed to airports in the federal NPIAS (National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems) plan. Entitlement funding is non-competitive and receives a lesser number of category points. No Federal Funding ( points) is awarded points, under this category. The Type of Federal Funding category is given a weight of 5, with sub-category points from 4 to, resulting in a range of 2 to points for an airport s proposed project, depending on the type of federal funds directed to the project. Any project receiving multiple types of federal funding is awarded the highest sub-category point for the type of federal funding used. Systems Impact (Weight of 4) The Systems Impact category is directed to addressing issues identified in the Wyoming State Aviation System Plan (WySASP) and Wyoming Aeronautics Commission s priorities. This category receives a weight of 4. The number of points awarded for this category is based on a project meeting identified criteria. 3 = Three Criteria are met 2 = Two Criteria are met 1 = One Criteria is met = No Criteria are met The Criteria are: Achieving or Maintaining a WySASP State goal Achieving or Maintaining a WySASP local goal Achieving or Maintaining a Wyoming Aeronautics Commission Priority The Systems Impact category is given a weight of 4, with sub-category points from 3 to 1, resulting in a range of 12 to 3 points for an airport s proposed project, depending on the extent to which the project meets identified criteria. Page 1

60 Project Timing (Weight of 4) This category receives a weight of 4, with points awarded based on a selected year for funding; the selected year may be the Airport Sponsor s proposed year to construct the project, or may be a different year (project moved forward or delayed) if determined by the Aeronautics Division or Commission to be advantageous based on available funds or other budgeting or programming analyses. Project timing is an indicator of the importance of accomplishing the project in the time frame requested. The need to complete a project within a defined time frame may be due to a number of reasons: an emergency repair to assure safe operation of aircraft; a relationship between project completion and regulatory compliance, licensing, or certification (such as an inspection requirement or recommendation); a relationship between project completion and potential loss/expiration of secured funding; condition of the facility/component; projects closely tied to Commission priorities, special recommendations, or other special conditions tying project completion to a fiscal year or contract completion date. Additional considerations that will be evaluated during the award of points are: implementation of Pavement Management Plan recommendations and timing of that work if critical; funding timing (lose of entitlements, entitlement transfer agreement, close-in discretionary); economy of scale making the project whole; cycle optimization on regularly occurring project (pavement preservation, planning, etc.). The number of points awarded for this category are based on the following levels of urgency: 5 = Urgent as determined by Aeronautics Division based on pre-application and/or other information 4 = Group Maintenance 3 = Time sensitive based on Airport Sponsor request and supporting information 2 = Medium Urgency (within 2-3 years of requested year) 1 = Low Urgency (within 5 years of request) = No Urgency (as funding allows) Points will be awarded based on the professional judgment of the Aeronautics Division staff. Timing evaluation is heavily dependent on sponsor s justification typically on the project preapplication and other communication with the Aeronautics Division. It is the sponsor s responsibility to ensure that the urgency is conveyed to the Division for proper evaluation. Phased or multi-year projects are evaluated as one project. Timing will be determined for the project as a whole and applied uniformly to all phases. Page 11

61 The Project Timing category is given a weight of 4, with sub-category points from 5 to, resulting in a range of 2 to points for an airport s proposed project, depending on the urgency of project timing. Airport Usage (Weight of 3) The Airport Usage category receives a weight of 3. This category recognizes that Wyoming s larger airports typically benefit the most users/citizens. It uses the airport s state system plan classification, which is assigned based on the airport s type and level of usage, the role of the airport in the overall system, and the facilities and services offered at the airport. The Wyoming State Aviation System Plan (SASP) establishes four airport classifications: Commercial Service Airports, Business Airports, Intermediate Airports, and Local Airports. The number of points awarded for this category are based on the airport classification: 4 = Commercial Service Airport 3 = Business Airport 2 = General aviation airport - Intermediate Airports 1 = General aviation airport - Local Airports = This numerical rating is not used to award points The Airport Usage category is given a weight of 3, with sub-category points from 4 to 1, resulting in a range of 12 to 3 points for an airport s WySASP classification. Status of Airport Protection (Weight of 1) The Status of Airport Protection Component category receives a weight of 1. This category recognizes the importance of safeguarding airport operations and minimizing impact to properties in proximity to the airport by implementing land use protections and airspace protections for the runway protection zone (RPZ) and/or the airport influence area (AIA). Development of property in proximity to an airport can result in non-compatible uses that diminish the utility of the airport, reduce safety for both aircraft in the air and persons on the ground, reduce the value of the public s investment in the airport, and potentially risk both State and Federal funding for the airport. The Airport Protection Component category is given a weight of 1 as this category accumulates points, based on the result of an airport s efforts to work with private land owners and/or government agencies Municipal, County, State or Federal to effect land use protections. There are three acceptable legal documents to provide RPZ protections: Ownership in fee title; Lease with a federal or state government agency that provides for a minimum lease Page 12

62 period greater than 2 years; Easements must limit the height of vegetation and structures and limit the allowable land uses within the boundaries (acreage) of the easement. Land Ownership Control (4 points maximum) 4 Points Airport Owner owns 1% of the acreage in runway protection zone in fee title. For purposes of RPZ protection, a Lease with a federal or state government agency is considered equal to ownership; the Lease agreement must provide for a minimum lease period equal to or greater than 2 years. 3 Points Airport Owner has 1% land use protections and airspace protections for the RPZ through any combination of ownership, lease, or easements. 2 points Airport Owner has greater than 75% to 99% land use protections and airspace protections for the RPZ through any combination of ownership, lease, or easements. 1 point Airport Owner has greater than 25% to 75% land use protections and airspace protections for the RPZ through any combination of ownership, lease, or easements. For Land Use Protection, the accumulation of points, up to 4 points maximum, will be based on submittal of supporting documents to the Aeronautics Division. The documents to be submitted are copies of deeds identifying the individual parcels owned in fee title, copy of lease, and/or copies of easements identifying boundaries of easements and height restrictions. Airspace Protections (3 points maximum) 1 Point Airport Owner has an adopted zoning ordinance (overlay zoning) approved by the Wyoming Aeronautics Division with height restrictions in the Approach Zone of the AIA. 1 Point Airport Owner has an adopted zoning ordinance (overlay zoning) approved by the Wyoming Aeronautics Division with height restrictions for the AIA. 1 Point Airport Owner has an adopted zoning ordinance (overlay zoning) approved by the Wyoming Aeronautics Division that restricts non-compatible land uses in the AIA. For Airspace Protection, the accumulation of points, up to 3 points maximum, will be based on submittal of supporting documents to the Aeronautics Division. The documents to be submitted are copies of adopted zoning ordinances. Plan Integration (1 point) 1 Point The airport zoning ordinance is incorporated into a municipality and/or county Page 13

63 comprehensive land use plan. It is desirable that the municipality and/or county provide an opportunity for the airport representative to review and comment on all variance requests for properties within the AIA. For Plan Integration, the 1 point will be based on submittal of supporting documents to the Aeronautics Division. The documents to be submitted are copies of the municipal and/or county comprehensive land use plan. Disclosure Statement (1 point) 1 Point The municipality and/or county has passed a resolution and adopted an ordinance requiring that a Real Estate Disclosure Statement be provided to the purchaser of any property within the AIA. Sample wording is provided in Definitions for Real Estate Disclosure Statement. For Disclosure Statement, the 1 point will be based on submittal of supporting documents to the Aeronautics Division. The documents to be submitted are copies of adopted resolutions and ordinances requiring a Real Estate Disclosure Statement. The Airport Protection category is given a weight of 1, with sub-category points accumulating from to 9, resulting in a range of 9 to points for those land use efforts directed to protecting airport operations. Conclusions from the Priority Rating Model The Priority Rating Model Task Force concluded its efforts to develop the Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation at their April 1 th and 11 th, 218 meeting. Their efforts resulted in a rating/ranking model that will assist the Wyoming Aeronautics Division and Aeronautics Commission in their mission to produce a safe and efficient aviation system, through funding of airport capital improvement projects. The Model is summarized in the following table. Category Category Weight Maximum Points Available Percent of Total Points Available Purpose of Project Project Component Type of Federal Funding Systems Impact Project Timing Airport Usage Status of Airport Protection Summary 15 Points 1% Page 14

64 To further support use of the Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation 218, airport sponsors and other users are encouraged to periodically review Grant Information, State Systems Plan Documents, and the current Wyoming Aviation Capital Improvement Program (WACIP) located at: Page 15

65 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS Acronyms - - used in the Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation ACIP AGIS AIP ALP ARFF AWOS CPR FAA NAVAID NEPA NPIAS OFA OFZ PAPIs PMP PRM REIL RPZ RSA TSA WACIP WySASP Federal Airports Capital Improvement Plan Airport Geographical Information System Airport Improvement Program Airport Layout Plan Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Automated Weather Observation System Concrete Pavement Restoration Federal Aviation Administration Navigational aids National Environmental Policy Act National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems Object Free Area Object Free Zone Precision approach path indicators Pavement Management Program Priority Rating Model Runway end identifier lights Runway Protection Zone Runway Safety Area Transportation Security Administration or Taxiway/Taxilane Safety Area Wyoming Aviation Capital Improvement Program State Aviation System Plan Definitions The following definitions are provided to gain a better understanding of the Wyoming Priority Rating Model for Project Evaluation (PRM). These definitions are referenced to source documents, but do not present a full definition as may be used for regulatory purposes. As a result, they are not intended to be used as regulatory, rather are intended to be used to guide the development of a capital improvement project, evaluated with the PRM for State funding. PRM Category Purpose of Project Airport Facilities and Infrastructure Airports eligible for Federal/State funding are public use airports that serve civil aviation and used for landing and takeoff of aircraft. Airport facilities and infrastructure are those permanent buildings, installations, and equipment that are needed to support airport use for commercial service, cargo service, or general aviation. (FAA and industry literature). Page 16

66 Airside and Landside The Airside of an airport is the portion where aircraft operations occur, including runways, taxiways, aprons, aircraft parking, and facilities to service and maintain aircraft; the airside is separated from other areas of the airport by fencing or other boundaries. The airside generally includes those areas beyond security checks and passport and customs control in an airport terminal. The Landside of an airport is the remaining portion of the airport property not defined as airside; it typically includes all public areas such as portions of the terminal, access roadways, rental car facilities, vehicle parking facilities, and taxi and ground transportation areas. Critical Operation Systems A limited number of power-supplied airport operations required to protect and/or evacuate the airport population in an emergency, including fires and earthquakes, and less critical events, such as extended power failures. These operations/systems include, but are not limited to, access control systems, passenger boarding bridges, fire alarm/suppression systems, emergency lighting systems, security screening systems, in-line baggage systems, and elevators. Navigation Aid (NAVAID) Electronic and visual air navigation aids, lights, signs, and associated supporting equipment (FAA AC 15/53.13A). Pavements: Runway, Taxiway, and Apron Bituminous Asphalt (HMA or Flexible) and Concrete Cement Pavement (Concrete or Rigid) including Pavement Structure (subgrade-earth, subbase-earth or aggregate, base-aggregate or HMA) and Pavement Surface (HMA or Concrete). Reference: FAA Order 51.38C & AIP Handbook, and industry literature. Emergency Repair (Safety): Any strategy up to reconstruction of sections of pavement structure or pavement surface, to resume or assure airport operations. Preservation (Maintenance): Any strategy, typically a continuous treatment on a selected facility such as the full length of a runway, taken from the Statewide Pavement Management Program or documented by the sponsor that extends the service life of an existing pavement. HMA strategies could include, but are not limited to, crack sealing, seal coats, patching, and friction surface treatments. Concrete strategies could include, but are not limited to, joint sealing, spall or slab repair, and friction surface treatments. Pavement Strengthening (Airport Enhancement): A strategy, from an approved PMP, required to serve heavier aircraft and/or more frequent operations than the existing pavement design supports. This project type would often be combined with a reconstruction or rehabilitation project but could be a stand-alone project. Work would typically result in an increased thickness of the pavement structure, but could require construction of rigid (PCCP) rather than flexible (HMA) pavement, or modifications to pavement mix designs. A pavement strengthening project changes the Airport s Layout Plan and FAA s Airport Master Record (Form FAA 51). Rehabilitation (Maintenance): Any strategy, typically a continuous treatment on a selected facility such as the full length of a runway, taken from the Statewide Pavement Management Program or documented by the sponsor that extends the existing pavement surface life. HMA strategies could include, but are not limited to, milling, and thin Page 17

67 overlays (not for increased strength). Concrete strategies could include, but are not limited to, grinding and limited slab replacement. Reconstruction (Maintenance) of the full length of a selected facility. For an existing HMA surface, work could include reconstruction of the pavement structure and pavement surface through removal and replacement. For an existing Concrete surface, work could include reconstruction of the existing Concrete pavement structure and pavement surface (Concrete or HMA) through extensive slab replacement and grinding, or complete removal and replacement. New Construction including extension, widening, and strengthening (Airport Enhancement): Construction of pavement structure (subgrade, sub-base (if required), and base) and pavement surface including site work, earthwork, drainage, paving, erosion control, and other utilities needed for operations of the runway, taxiway, or apron. Compatible Land Uses Those developments that comply with generally accepted restrictions on location, height, and activity that provides for safe aircraft movement and airport operation. Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) The RPZ is an area at ground level prior to the threshold or beyond the runway end to enhance the safety and protection of people and property on the ground. Dimensions of the RPZ for each runway are shown on the approved Airport Master Plan or Airport Layout Plan for the airport. (FAA AC 15/53.13A) Runway Safety Area (RSA) A defined surface surrounding the runway prepared or suitable for reducing the risk of damage to aircraft in the event of an undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway (FAA AC 15/53.13A). Taxiway/taxilane Safety Area A defined surface alongside the taxiway prepared or suitable for reducing the risk of damage to aircraft deviating from the taxiway (FAA AC 15/53.13A). Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ) The OFZ is the three-dimensional airspace along the runway and extended runway centerline that is required to be clear of obstacles for protection for aircraft landing or taking off from the runway and for missed approaches (FAA AC 15/53.13A). Object Free Area (OFA) An area centered on the ground on a runway, taxiway, or taxilane centerline provided to enhance the safety of aircraft operations by remaining clear of objects, except objects that need to be located in the OFA for air navigation or aircraft ground maneuvering purposes (FAA AC 15/53.13A). PRM Category Project Component Movement Area the runways, taxiways, and other areas of an airport that are used for taxiing, takeoff, and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and aircraft parking areas. (FAA AC15/53-13A and 14 CFR Part 139). Page 18

68 Primary Runway A single primary runway; the primary runway provides a runway length for all airplanes that will regularly use it without causing operational weight restrictions. (FAA AC No: 15/5325-4B). Secondary Runway Secondary runway, not primary, to serve as a crosswind runway, to separate general from non-general aviation, or to accommodate existing or forecasted aviation traffic volumes (FAA AC No: 15/5325-4B). Taxilane: A taxiway designed for low speed and precise taxiing. Taxilanes are usually, but not always, located outside the movement area, providing access from taxiways (usually an apron taxiway) to aircraft parking positions and other terminal areas (FAA AC 15/35-13A). Taxiway A defined path established for the taxiing of aircraft from one part of an airport to another (FAA AC15/53-13A). Apron (Ramp) A defined area on an airport intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, refueling, parking, or maintenance. (FAA AC No: 12-57A) The apron area includes the following components: (AIM and AC 15/534-1G) (1) Aircraft Parking Positions: Intended for parking aircraft to enplane/deplane passengers, load or unload cargo. (2) Aircraft Service Area: On or adjacent to an aircraft parking position; intended for use by personnel/ equipment for servicing aircraft and staging of equipment to facilitate loading and unloading of aircraft. (3) Taxilane: Apron areas which provide taxiing aircraft access to and from parking positions. (4) Vehicle Roadways Markings: Identified rights of way on the apron area designated for service and Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) vehicles. Airside Structure Include facilities such as aircraft hangars, equipment buildings, ARFF buildings, and other structures located within the fence. For simplicity s sake, terminals (in their entirety) are considered landside facilities. Airside and Landside Definition presented in PRM Category Purpose of Project PRM Category Type of Federal Funding Entitlement Funds Title 49 apportionment or formula or entitlement funds that are made available, each year, to States or Sponsors based on formulas in a current legislative Act (FAA Order 51.2C). Discretionary Funds Funds remaining, within the obligation limitation, after the formula entitlement funds are made to States or Sponsors. Discretionary funds, subject to restrictions in legislation, are available for distribution at the discretion of the FAA (FAA Order 51.2C). Page 19

69 PRM Category Systems Impact Wyoming State Aviation System Plan (WySASP) the Wyoming Aeronautics Division s State Aviation System Plan (WySASP) provides an inventory and evaluation of the Wyoming Aviation System and establishes four airport classifications for the 4 publicly owned airports in the state. Structured to each of the four airport classifications, the SASP presents Airside, Landside, and Services and Administration Facilities and Services Objectives to meet established System goals and objectives. In the SASP, the airport classification system is further used to: Align airports with similar physical facility and service attributes; Assign roles for each airport classification based on services they provide; Define the types of facilities and services needed at each functional group of airport to meet the existing and future needs of the State of Wyoming; Establish facility and service objectives by classification of airport to meet the system. PRM Category Project Timing Available Funds Federal funds are authorized by Congress in legislation and are subsequently appropriated. These annual (fiscal year) appropriations are made in specific dollar levels and give authority for FAA to enter into contracts (issue grants) that will obligate the federal government to make payments at some future time up to the amount of the contract (grant). State funds are also made available on an annual (fiscal year) basis. Consistent with the dollar amount and fiscal year of available funding, airport sponsors submit proposed projects and the Aeronautics Division develops or updates the Wyoming Aviation Capital Improvement Program (general definition). PRM Category Airport Usage Wyoming State Aviation System Plan (WySASP) The State Aviation System Plan (WySASP) is a component of the Wyoming Aeronautics Division s continuous aviation system planning process. This study provides an inventory and evaluation of the Wyoming Aviation System, the 4 publicly owned airports in the state and an implementation plan, to meet established goals and objectives. This Plan establishes four airport classifications: Commercial Service Airports, Business Airports, Intermediate Airports, and Local Airports. (WySASP) Commercial Service Airports these airports (9 Wyoming airports) are intended to serve major populations, economic centers and areas of tourism providing a connection to national and global economies; they are designed to accommodate commercial air service and business general aviation activity consistent with user demand. (WySASP) Business Airports these airports (11 Wyoming airports) are intended to serve multi-county areas and economic centers providing a connection to state and national economies; they are intended to accommodate larger business jet activity and support tourism and recreational demand. (WySASP) Intermediate Airports these airports (1 Wyoming airports) are intended to serve counties and medium to small communities to support local economies and accommodate medium to small business jet activity and recreational users. (WySASP) Page 2

70 Local Airports these airports (1 Wyoming airports) are intended to serve small communities and have the basic facilities to accommodate business, training, and recreational users and support emergency use. (WySASP) PRM Category Status of Airport Protection Airport Influence Area All lands under the approach surfaces defined in FAA Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, and as shown on an approved Airport Master Plan or Airport Layout Plan drawings. (14 CFR Part 77) Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) see above Definition for PRM Category Purpose of Project Fee Title (Fee Simple) Absolute ownership with title to land, free of any other claims against the title, which one can sell or pass to another by will or inheritance. (general definition) Easement the right to use the real property of another for a specific purpose. The easement is itself a real property interest, but legal title to the underlying land is retained by the original owner for all other purposes. Typical easements are for access to another property, for utility lines, water, entry for maintenance, or a "negative easement" such as a prohibition against a building structure height or use. Easements can be created by a deed to be recorded just like any real property interest, for a number of years, and can be specifically described by boundaries. (general definition) Real Estate Disclosure Statement A statement provided to the purchaser of any property within the boundary of the Airport Influence Area (AIA). A Real Estate Disclosure Statement could read: The property known as (legal description and address) is located with the Airport Influence Area identified in the (name of airport) Zoning Ordinance and may be subject to aircraft overflights both now and in the future; concerns with over-flights may include increased noise levels, air-quality impacts, and light intensity impacts. Airport operations are expected to increase and the fleet mix of aircraft is subject change as industry and community needs change. (general definition) Zoning Ordinance A model zoning ordinance (adopted zoning ordinance (overlay zoning)), to restrict building or vegetation height can be found at: Page 21

71 I n d e x T a b 1 : F Y 1 8 W A C I P B u d g e t M o d i f i c a t i o n s

72

73

74

75 I n d e x T a b 1 1 : F Y 1 9 P r o p o s e d W A C I P B u d g e t

76 1 of 2

77 2 of 2

78 I n d e x T a b 1 2 : F Y P r o p o s e d W A C I P

79 1 of 8

80 2 of 8

81 3 of 8

82 4 of 8

83 5 of 8

84 6 of 8

85 7 of 8

86 8 of 8

87 I n d e x T a b 1 3 : W y o m i n g A v i a t i o n H a l l o f F a m e I n d u c t i o n

88 May 29, 218 To: Wyoming Aeronautics Commissioners From: John Waggener Re: 218 Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame induction process Dear Commissioners: The Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame (WAHF) board appreciates the ongoing relationship with the Wyoming Aeronautics Commission and its involvement in the annual selection process as well as to continue to strive to preserve Wyoming s rich aeronautical history. The WAHF page on the WYDOT website continues to see steady use, and we continue to receive nominations for consideration. You will recall that Rich Sugden of Jackson was the 217 inductee. The Sugden s hosted a very nice induction ceremony at their FBO. We were grateful to see so many aeronautics officials and commissioners in attendance along with about 3 other guests. As you know, each year, the WAHF board selects three nominees from the pool of nomination packets. The WAHF then recommends one individual from this group of finalists and makes its recommendation to the Wyoming Aeronautics Commission for approval. This year the board narrowed the finalists to Jack Duggleby, John B. Cooksey, and Dallas Chopping. From this short list, the WAHF selected Jack Duggleby for recommendation as the 218 inductee into the Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame. Duggleby oversaw the major expansion of the Husky Oil aviation department, and he was instrumental in the expansion of the Cody airport and was chairman of the Yellowstone Regional Airport Board. He meets the criteria for induction, all of which are well described in the nomination packet we received, and we are confident the commission will concur. Enclosed in this packet you will find the basic biographies of all three individuals. Obviously all are worthy of induction and will be recommended in the future. Regarding Chopping and Cooksey (and numerous other nominations), currently the board is seeking additional information about them to compile more complete nomination packets. The WAHF board includes Dean McClain, operator of Ag Flyers in Torrington; and Col. Kent Nelson, Cheyenne, retired USAF and former Wyoming Aeronautics Commissioner. Thank you again for considering Jack Duggleby as the 218 inductee into the Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame. Always feel free to contact us with any questions you have, and we encourage you to alert us of any individuals you believe qualify for consideration. Sincerely, John R. Waggener President, Wyoming Aviation Hall of Fame 1 E. University Avenue, Dept Laramie, WY (home) (work) waggener@uwyo.edu ( )

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101 I n d e x T a b 1 4 : C h e y e n n e s A S E P G r a n t A p p l i c a t i o n

102 WYOMING AERONAUTICS COMMISSION AIR SERVICE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM GRANT REQUEST INITIAL PROJECT SUMMARY ORGANIZATION NAME: Cheyenne Regional Air Focus Team (CRAFT) REQUEST DATE: 6/19/218 SCOPE: AIRPORT: Cheyenne Regional Airport (CYS) Project Echo PROVIDER/HUB: PROJECT NO: ASCYS1 TYPE OF CONTRACT: Minimum Revenue Guarantee (MRG) CONTRACT TERM: NEW OR EXISTING: New request for new service STAFF RECOMMENDATION: PRIORITY RATING MODEL SCORE: 1455/174 INTENDED BENEFITS: Primary Air Service: Yes, this service would be considered primary air service. Economic Benefit: The potential economic impact of this service represents $1.4 million in visitor spending, $8, million in on-airport spending, and $922, in onairport multipliers for a total economic impact of $3.12 million. Enplanements: This project would conservatievly enplane over 1, passengers and would make CYS eligible for $85, in AIP entitlement spending. Passengers Under Contract: The passengers under contract for this service will account for 1% of the airport's annual passenger totals. Passenger Retention: Passenger retention for 217 averaged 1% as Great Lakes Airlines had discontinued all but one weekly flight in 217. With the addition of this service, we anticipate leakage to improve to 7%-1% Capacity: Redacted Air Fares: Fares will be comparable to similar sized markets. BASELINE: 11/1/216-1/3/217* Enplanements: 1,248 Passengers Under Contract: Passenger Retention: <1% Capacity: 2,799 Air Fares: $33 (Per DOT) *Assumes previous year as full 12 month 217/218 numbers are not yet available. THIS APPLICATION STATE LOCAL TOTAL 26.4% 74% 1% $58,. $1,62,. $2,2,. 12 Month term beginning late fall or early 218 Approve at a state match of 26.4% not to exceed $58, NEGOTIATIONS: Negotiations for this contract were conducted by State Aeronautics staff, and local representation from city and county government and local ecnomic interest groups. FLIGHT SCHEDULE: Redacted CONNECTION TIMES MAXIMIZED: BEGIN SERVICE: Late fall 218 or Early 219 AIRCRAFT: OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS: Yes Redacted None PERCENTAGE: AMOUNT: MARKETING FOR THIS SERVICE: A marketing plan is currently being executed by the airport and CRAFT. An initial draft is attached in the application. LOCAL DOLLARS FOR MARKETING: Marketing funds are still being allocated. STANDARDIZED AIRLINE PROFIT %: 1% ADDITIONAL/VETTING NOTES: The proposed service would meet five (5) of the six (6) statutorily mandated benefits, and Division staff regard the project as a good use of funding for the Air Service Enhancement Program's intended benefits. From Aeronautics Database PERCENTAGE: AMOUNT: RECOMMENDATION STATE LOCAL TOTAL 26% 74% 1% $58,. $1,62,. $2,2,.

103 1,62, 58, 2,2,

104

105

106

107 Wendy Volk CRAFT President (37) West 15th St., Suite 34 Cheyenne WY 821 Anja Bendel CRAFT Secretary (37) West 15th St., Suite 34 Cheyenne WY 821 Timothy Barth Cheyenne Regional Airport (37) PO Box 221 Cheyenne WY 823 Nathan Banton Cheyenne Regional Airport (37) PO Box 221 Cheyenne WY 823

108

109 Attachment 2: Forecasted Level of Enplanements and Daily Capacity Month Days Passengers Capacity JUL 31 2,147 1,55 AUG 31 1,957 1,55 SEP 3 1,84 1,5 OCT 31 1,917 1,55 NOV 3 1,834 1,5 DEC 31 1,961 1,55 JAN 31 1,659 1,55 FEB 28 1,558 1,4 MAR 31 1,721 1,55 APR 3 1,599 1,5 MAY 31 1,748 1,55 JUN 3 1,899 1,5 Attachment 3: Additional Airport Revenue There are two sources of additional revenue that the airport may receive as a result of the additional service. 1. The airport receives some additional revenue through car rentals. With the increased passengers using the airport, it is estimated that the airport will receive an additional $18,942 annually. 2. The airport currently has fewer than 1, enplanements annually. The new air service with Project Echo will have over 21, enplanements, thus ensuring that the minimum threshold is met, and the airport is eligible to receive $1 million in FAA airport improvement funds.

110 ATTACHMENT 4: MARKETING PLAN AND STRATEGY CRAFT is a non-profit organization composed of business leaders, local government representatives and Laramie County citizens who are building grassroots support for new commercial passenger air service at the Cheyenne Regional Airport (CYS). SITUATION Situation Cheyenne has a long and proud history of air service. Recent events, however, have brought some unique challenges. The one commercial air carrier, for a variety of reasons, ceased service from Cheyenne to Denver. CRAFT is actively pursuing several initiatives to bring a new commercial carrier to Cheyenne. One of these efforts is an integrated marketing campaign. Messaging strategy and creative advertising tactics have already been approved and are in development. These efforts have largely been funded by the airport board. This application is to pursue additional resources to help with the marketing and promotion of flights from and to Cheyenne Regional Airport. MARKET ANALYSIS According to a detailed analysis from the firm Meade & Hunt (report available separately) the catchment area for the Cheyenne airport is 25, people. These people are largely concentrated Cheyenne in Laramie County. This is where the bulk of marketing efforts needs to be focused. There is some evidence that a limited number of residents in northern Colorado perhaps as far as Fort Collins and western Nebraska might also travel to Cheyenne for the express purpose of flying to and from Cheyenne. Internal projects by Cheyenne Regional Airport (CYS), place the catchment number closer to 45,. While previous commercial passenger air service in Cheyenne with American Airlines only drew.4% of its passenger loads from Fort Collins, the launch of a new terminal has the potential to increase interest and trial. For this reason, we will place limited advertising buys in northern Colorado and western Nebraska with the rollout of the new airport terminal and new passenger air service. Our media buyer will be directed to explore value buys in out-of-home, digital and radio in those markets.

111 MARKETING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals of CRAFT s marketing are 1.) to drive awareness of the new Cheyenne airport terminal and commercial passenger flights service prior to the new terminal s completion and 2.) to help sell tickets and incentivize trial of the Cheyenne airport fly Cheyenne after the new terminal opens and as new flights/ routes are added. To accomplish these goals, marketing will focus on the following objectives: 1. Defining the new brand in the minds of residents and potential passengers. This will involve taking advantage of two significant pieces of news: the construction of the new airport terminal and the introduction of new commercial flights. 2. Emphasizing the benefits of flying from and to Cheyenne both rational and emotional benefits especially compared to flying to and from Denver. 3. Targeting Laramie County residents and, to a lesser degree, residents of western Nebraska and northern Colorado. 4. Realize enough frequency and reach in the marketing place to increase brand awareness and ticket sales. INITIAL MARKET SEGMENTATION AND CUSTOMER PROFILES Like other communities in Wyoming, we have referred to customer data and a WYDOT passenger survey to assess the segments of the population that are most likely to fly from and to the new Cheyenne airport terminal. Primary target: working age, broadly defined as mid 2s to mid 6s. This group travels for both business and recreation and may travel with children during recreational travel. Secondary: College students and college-aged people traveling during the holidays. Also retirees who travel once or twice a year for recreation or to visit family. Geographically speaking, and as referenced earlier in this document, we will primarily be targeting residents of Laramie County. Our media buys will naturally reach residents of adjacent Wyoming counties, such as Albany County. We will also explore limited targeting of northern Colorado and western Nebraska especially business and recreational travelers who are looking for an alternative to the time-consuming prospect of traveling to Denver International Airport.

112 INITIAL MARKET SEGMENTATION AND CUSTOMER PROFILES, CONT. In terms of customer needs and behaviors, our most promising opportunities reside within our primary target, including: Regular business travelers, private and both state and local government employees. Major employers in Laramie County, both private and governmental. Outbound vacation travelers. Inbound vacation travelers. It is customary in a marketing plan to limn psychographic profiles of our target customers. Psychographics relate to the values, feelings and emotional needs and motivations of the people we re seeking to reach, persuade and move. Psychographics for our primary target(s) Convenience customers who want an easier way to travel by air. Choice customers who desire a reliable option for flying to and from Cheyenne. Pride customers who feel it is time for a growing, self-sufficient state capital like Cheyenne to have its own commercial air service options. Sensitive to time and true-cost customers who understand the real costs in time, parking, etc. that attend every trip to fly in and out of Denver International Airport Loyalty customers who prefer local to non-local solutions. KEY BENEFITS The key messages for the new airport and air service are captured in a separate messaging strategy document. We will include highlights in the next few pages in order to provide an overview. The key benefits and messages are ordered around a core story of independence. The new terminal and improved passenger air service are essential to Cheyenne and the region s independence because they will: Bring in/attract more economic development Increase investment in the local community Improve the travel experience Make it easier to travel to and from Cheyenne Connect the people of Cheyenne and Laramie County to more choices and opportunity The launch marketing campaigns included in this plan illustrate how these benefits will be built out and compellingly brought to life.

113 CORE STORY AND MESSAGING STRATEGY This core messaging strategy has been built to focus the public conversation and to organize all creative marketing materials around an emotional core a why. Supporting arguments and customer benefits are organized around this core. Full messaging strategy is available in a separate document. New airport terminal Convenient access to the Front Range Attract Conventions Passengers Tourism New businesses Private aircraft (FBO) Grow the Cheyenne legend Bring in more economic development Improve the travel experience New airport terminal Less traffic and time Bigger planes Free parking Easier check in Easier, faster security Free Wi-Fi Private flights (FBO) New airport terminal New routes, new flights Connect to new hubs Don t have to drive to DIA Loyalty programs Improve travel to and from Essential to Cheyenne s independence Invest in the community Keep more money in town New airport terminal Alternative to Denver Start trip in Cheyenne More money spent locally Loyalty programs New airport terminal Jobs Cheyenne s best kept secret Revenue Gateway to the Front Range Ready for 21st century Marketing opportunities Grow the Cheyenne legend Air Guard location on the grounds

114 ADVERTISING OVERVIEW Real Impact An informational campaign to deliver facts in the form of customer benefits. This campaign is going to help educate the public and public officials about the economic benefits that air service and the new airport terminal will bring to Cheyenne and the region. Creative materials include print, digital, OOH, and social videos that can also serve as TV spots and pre-roll and programmatic video. Here are a few examples of the work. Where every $ 1 invested returns $ 2.5 to the community Air service is good for the economy. Some ask why we re building a new air terminal. Because it supports jobs and economic growth. And because it will attract new routes to new places. Soon we ll have the freedom to fly from Cheyenne rather than fight traffic. Get to know more at craftcys.org The wonderful new CHEYENNE REGIONAL AIRPORT A big obstacle to business is about to be removed People are attracted to Wyoming s independence. Freedom, after all, is why we love it here too. But the lack of reliable air service has sent many businesses looking elsewhere. This is about to change with the new Cheyenne air terminal. It s going to help us attract new businesses and get new routes to more places. Get to know more at craftcys.org The wonderful new CHEYENNE REGIONAL AIRPORT Visitors spend $ 346 million a year here. That s about to go up. The new terminal and air service will make this an even better place to live. Even with construction still underway, the new air terminal is changing how airlines and businesses look at Cheyenne. We re working to bring new routes to new places, attract new businesses and grow visitor spending. Air service is simply good for business and our independence. Find out more at craftcys.org The wonderful new CHEYENNE REGIONAL AIRPORT

115 ADVERTISING OVERVIEW, CONT. Wonder Brand launch campaign for the new Cheyenne Airport terminal. By evoking wonder and delight, this launch campaign will win people over and make them proud of the things that make Cheyenne and Wyoming special. Even while staking important emotional ground, this campaign also provides a platform to tout key features and benefits. It s versatile, effective and conveys the experience of flying Cheyenne. Creative materials include TV, social video, programmatic video, digital banners, print, radio and Out-of-home (OOH). Please see a few select creative examples on the following two pages.

116 ADVERTISING OVERVIEW, CONT. Wonder TV spot Independence or freedom is easier to feel than describe. In Wyoming the feeling is unmistakable. and keep more money in town... Already the new airport is changing the way others see Cheyenne It s why we love it here. It s why Wyoming is home. Protecting and nurturing our independence is why we re building a new airport terminal in Cheyenne. It s really an entirely new airport. It s going to be a modern airport built for modern planes. But it will feel different more delightful. It s going to feel like independence like an airport built for Wyoming. And the things we ll see when it s completed will be wonderful. It will help bring new airlines and flights to new places making it easier to travel and visit and welcome loved ones No lines, no traffic, free parking. CHEYENNE REGIONAL AIRPORT Wonderful flying without having to drive to Denver. New flights will attract new investments and more jobs Draw new businesses The new Cheyenne Airport, opening fall 218. Wonderful flying

117 ADVERTISING OVERVIEW, CONT. Wonder Out-of-home advertising (OOH), billboards

118 MEDIA PLACEMENT, PRE-OPENING This is an outline of the rollout and media placement schedule for the two marketing campaigns: Real Impact and Wonder. This will be adjusted and targeted according to the final media budget and plan. Campaign element June July August September Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Real Stories Video (all versions) on Craft site Social media video 1 Social media video 2 Social media video 3 Social media video 4 Social media video 5 Social media video 6 Social media video 7 Social media video 8 Social media banners/posts Newspaper print ad (as budget allows) Paid digital banners (as budget allows) Wonder Video on website Social media pre-opening message video TV pre-opening message spot (as budget allows) OOH pre-opening message (as budget allows) Social media now open message video TV now open message spot (as budget allows) OOH now open message (as budget allows) Radio now open message (as budget allows) Social media now open banners/posts Newspaper now open print ad (as budget allows) Paid digital banners now open message (as budget allows) MEDIA PLACEMENT, LAUNCH Campaign element October November December January 219 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 3 Real Stories Video (all versions) on Craft site Social media video 1 Social media video 2 Social media video 3 Social media video 4 Social media video 5 Social media video 6 Social media video 7 Social media video 8 Social media banners/posts Newspaper print ad (as budget allows) Paid digital banners (as budget allows) Wonder Video on website Social media pre-opening message video TV pre-opening message spot (as budget allows) OOH pre-opening message (as budget allows) Social media now open message video TV now open message spot (as budget allows) OOH now open message (as budget allows) Radio now open message (as budget allows) Social media now open banners/posts Newspaper now open print ad (as budget allows) Paid digital banners now open message (as budget allows)

119 SPECIFIC MARKETING TACTICS CRAFT will use a mix of owned, earned and paid media to spread the message about the new airport terminal and commercial passenger service. A more detailed media plan is being developed to specify budget allocations against specific tactics. The creative development of these materials are all the responsibility of our agency partner, the Narrator Group. The Narrator Group is well into production of these materials placement will follow quickly, but deliberately and thoughtfully, upon the finalization of a media budget. It is estimated that the initial media buy will total $5,. We estimate these funds will be broadly directed as follows. (Again, exact numbers will be available upon the completion of a media plan.) Traditional media, including Print TV Radio Out-of-home Anticipated media buy, $3, Digital media Banners Programmatic video SEO Anticipated media buy, $2, Community outreach and public relations will be handled by CRAFT volunteers and supporters. CRAFT committee members are also building a public outreach schedule that will include public speaking engagements at different civic and community events.

120 Attachment 5: Local Supporter Signatures The airport has collected 343 signatures on 49 pages in support of air service. One page is included here, and the others are available upon request.