Input Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot

Transcription

1

2

3 Input Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot community Airport Advisory Board meetings Elected Officials briefings FAA/NDOT collaboration Project website at

4 Category Airfield Facilities Landside Facilities Airspace System Airport Setting Environmental Setting Other Data Elements Runway, taxiways, lighting Terminal building, aprons, tiedowns, cargo/other operations, airfield maintenance equipment, fuel farm, access roadways, auto parking, and other facilities Air traffic service area, communications, airspace, navigational aids, airspace surfaces Socioeconomic, land use, future development initiatives, area geopolitical topics Air quality, noise, biological resources, cultural resources, etc. Operational data, financial data, aerial survey/agis

5 TAF Terminal Area Forecast AAGR Average Annual Growth Rate 1 Based Aircraft and Operations form 2015, Enplanements from 2014

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 Reviewed key Airport documents Interviewed Airport management Analyzed historical and current operating revenues and expenses Reviewed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), cost opinions, and development schedule Analyzed sources and timing of capital funding Reviewed rates and charges Provided revenue enhancement recommendations

21 Aeronautical: landing, tie-down, fuel flowage fees, FBO, hangar and terminal rental, etc. Non-Aeronautical: auto parking, rental cars, concessions, nonaviation land rental, advertising, etc. Non-Aeronautical Revenue Sources By Airport Classification Large Medium Small Non-Hub EKO 2017 Parking and Ground Transportation 39% 50% 45% 27% 14% Rental Cars (excludes Customer Facility Charges) 19% 24% 26% 24% 35% Retail Stores and Duty Free 11% 6% 4% 2% -- Other 9% 6% 5% 10% 5% Food and Beverage 8% 5% 4% 2% -- Terminal Services 7% 3% 3% 3% -- Land and Non-Terminal Facility Leases and Revenues 6% 6% 13% 32% 46% Hotel 1% 0% 0% 0% % 100% 100% 100%

22 The Airport has a full range of rates and charges in place Airport operating revenue and expenses has been relatively stable over the past 3 years The largest single revenue category is Rentals and Leases followed closely by Rental Car Fees It is anticipated that operating revenues will continue to track closely with aviation activity measures at similar rates, between 2.0 and 2.4 percent per year

23 Project National Priority Rating* Total Project Cost Funding Sources Federal (93.75%) Local (6.25%) Other Phase I ( ) A. Security Fence & Gate Access Upgrade SA EQ SE = 83 $2,880,000 $2,700,000 $180,000 B. Taxiway A OFA mitigation (move headwalls outside OFA) SA TW OB = 95 $330,000 $309,375 $20,625 C. Taxiway B Extension ST TW EX = 41 $1,600,000 $1,500,000 $100,000 D. Runway Obstruction Removal and Grading SA RW OB = 100 $2,293,333 $2,150,000 $143,333 E. Runway Safety Area (RSA) Stabilization - South of Runway 6/24 SA RW SF = 94 $1,600,000 $1,500,000 $100,000 F. Runway Drainage Improvements (Between A4 & A5) & Safety Area Grading; Frangible Windsocks G. Runway/Taxiway/Apron Rehab (Pavement Preservation & Remark) ST RW SF = 48 $426,667 $400,000 $26,667 RE RW IM = 72 $426,667 $400,000 $26,667 H. Electrical Vault RE RW LI = 70 $906,667 $ 850,000 $56,667 I. Construct ARFF Training Facility ST OT RR = 47 $1,973,333 $1,850,000 $123,333 J. Update Traffic Forecast PL PL MA = 60 $197,333 $185,000 $12,333 K. Rehabilitate Commercial Service Apron RE AP IM = 60 $906,667 $850,000 $56,667 SUBTOTAL Phase I $13,540,667 $12,694,375 $846,292

24 Project National Priority Rating* Total Project Cost Funding Sources Federal (93.75%) Local (6.25%) Other Phase II ( ) L. Perimeter/Access Road OT GT SE = 21 $3,200,000 $3,000,000 $200,000 M. Eastside General Aviation Development CA BD CO = 50 $8,213,333 $920,000 $61,333 $7,232,000 N. Hangar Development along Taxiway A CA BD CO = 50 $15,133,333 $5,000,000 $333,333 $9,800,000 O. Crack Seal/Seal Coat Movement Area Pavement with Rubber Removal and Repaint and Rehabilitate Airfield Pavements P. AGIS Airspace Survey for WASS enabled LPV GPS Approach to RWY 6/24 RE RW IM = 70 $2,200,000 $2,062,500 $137,500 SP OT IN = 72 $213,333 $200,000 $13,333 Q. Land Acquisition (Jennings Property Acres) ST LA DV = 40 $1,066,667 $1,000,000 $66,667 SUBTOTAL Phase II $30,026,666 $12,182,500 $812,166 $17,032,000

25 Project National Priority Rating* Total Project Cost Funding Sources Federal (93.75%) Local (6.25%) Other Phase III ( ) R. Extend Runway 6/24 and Taxiway A (689 feet) CA RW EX = 54 $14,933,333 $14,000,000 $933,333 SUBTOTAL Phase III $14,933,333 $14,000,000 $933,333 TOTAL $58,500,666 $38,876,875 $2,591,791 $17,032,000 *Definitions for the coding of the National Priority Ratings can be found in FAA Order A Projects shown in BOLD are recommended Master Plan projects. Those not in bold are included on the current, on-going CIP.

26 Prepared by Ekay Economic Consultants, Inc., in cooperation with the Center for Regional Studies at the University of Nevada, Reno There are approximately 189 developable acres situated on-airport that could accommodate aeronautical and non-aeronautical development Acquisition of the Jennings property would provide another 60 acres EKO currently leases property for non-aeronautical commercial land uses, and has five parcels that are available for lease Only a single non-airport-related ground lease parcel is currently available (in the City of Elko). The lack of competitive ground leases will make the Airport an attractive location for industry growth

27 10.77 JOBS $1.83 MILLION ECONOMIC IMPACT Current JOBS $3.12 MILLION ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACT Fully Leased & Developed Airport Land (including Jennings Property) JOBS $4.95 MILLION ECONOMIC IMPACT Potential Economic Impact

28

29

30 Finalize Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Coordinate comments from FAA and Nevada DOT Formal adoption of Master Plan Report by City Council Submittal to FAA for ALP approval Questions, Comments: Jim Foster, Airport Director