Aviation Capital Improvement Program August 2013 DRAFT Aviation Division

Transcription

1 Aviation Capital Improvement Program August 213 DRAFT Aviation Division

2 DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213

3 Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 Background... 2 The Program... 3 The CIP... 5 PLANNING... 6 Background... 6 Texas System Plan TASP Objectives Development Worksheets Priorities PROGRAMMING Aviation Capital Improvement Program... 1 Annual Program PROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONN Assistance Financial Assistance CIP PROJECTS About the s Financial Summary Index Aviation CIP s Fiscal Year 214 s Fiscal Year 215 s Fiscal Year 216 s DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Aviation Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a plan for general aviation airport development in Texas. It is a detailed listing of potential projects based on the anticipated funding levels of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Improvement Program and the Texas Aviation Facilities Development Program. The Aviation CIP facilitates general aviation airport development in Texas. Through multineeds year programming, the FAA, TxDOT and airport sponsors are able to anticipate airport and accommodate changes in project scope, cost, and schedule more easily. The project participants know when projects are scheduled and they can plan for implementation. Background Since 1966, the State of Texas has participated in thee development of a statewide system of airports by providing grants and loans to communities s for aviation facility improvements. In October 1989, the state legislature created the Texas Department of Aviation (TDA) along with an aviation financial aid program, significantly improving the potential for airport development in the state. In 1991, the legislature created the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the TDA became the TxDOT Aviation Division. The Texas Transportation Commission directs the actions of thee Texas Department of Transportation through policy and program decisions. By law, the TxDOT is the agent of the state and each political subdivision for the purpose of "applying for, receiving, and disbursing " federal funds for the benefit of general aviation airports. The legislation allows state funding assistance on federally-funded projects. The state may also fund projects not eligiblee for federal funding. In addition, the state was selected in 1993 to participate in the State Block Grant Pilot Program which is a federal program giving the state the lead in carrying out thee Improvement Program for the non-reliever general aviation airports. In 1996, the State Block Grant Program was made permanent and TxDOT's responsibility was expanded to include the reliever airports as well. The TxDOT identifies aviation facility requirements, airport locations, and timing for development of non-reliever general aviation airports. Under the State Block Grant Program, the department refines the projects and determiness funding eligibility. The chart on the next page shows the procedures used for project development. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 2

5 The Program The TxDOT Aviation Capital Improvement Program includes all off the Texas General Aviation airports, including those designated by the FAA as relievers. Certain airports in metropolitan areas are classified as relievers to enhance capacity at majorr commercial airports. The TxDOT Aviation Division has the programming responsibility for reliever airports. Development Process Planning Sponsor Prepares airport master plan which includes short-, intermediate-, and long-term development program Requests that a specific project be included in the state's Aviation Capital Improvement Program (CIP). TxDOTT Prepares and continuallyy updates Texas System Plan which establishes state aviationn priorities. Evaluates the proposed project in terms of its consistency with state aviation policies and investment priorities, federal eligibility, and compliance with federal regulations. Federal Aviation Administration Maintains an updated National System Plan which outlines development and identifies airports eligible for federal funding Programming Prepares Letter of Interest I with project description and cost estimate. Comments on the tentative Aviation CIP. Prepares Aviation CIP forr general aviation airports. The Texas Transportationn Commission approves the Aviation CIP and funding for eachh project. Provides support and technical assistance as requested. Enters into an intergovernmental agreement authorizing the TxDOT as agent. Selects qualified consultant for project. Reviews project development. Issues RFQ for consultant Selection Reviews consultant selection for general compliance. Provides technical assistance to consultant and reviews project results. Assists with acquisition of property and Easements needed for projects. Receives requests for payment, disbursess project funds, reviews project development andd approves project. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 3

6 The Aviation CIP is a tentative schedule of federal andd state airport development projects for the years needs are categorized by the objective they address. The objectives, in order of importance assigned by the Transportation Commission are: Enhance safety Preserve existing facilities Respond to present needs Provide for anticipated needs The Aviation CIP is developed federal and state funding: based on the following assumptions about future, annual Approximately $ 19 million annual federal Improvement Program funding throughout the period, plus $26 million in Non-Primary Entitlement Funds. Approximately $ 1 million annual federal discretionary funding throughout the period. Approximately $ 16 million annual Texas Aviation Facilities Development Program funding throughout the period. Becausee of year-to-year funding uncertainties, overalll the TxDOTT Aviation Division programs slightly more dollars during each fiscal year than can be funded. During project development, technical analysis may lead to significant changes in project scope, cost, timing, and funding source. Some projects may require additional time for development before implementation, causing them to be postponed. By allowing a small amount of leeway for flexibility, the Aviation Division is able to replace postponed projects with well- Division will work with the sponsor to develop an acceptable project, assuming the project is developed projects to best use available funding. Inclusionn of a project in the CIP is not a commitment for future funding; However, projects in the CIP are under strong consideration for funding. The Aviation consistent with planning and programming g standardss and priorities. From the Aviation CIP, an annual program of projects is identified. The annual program includes the projects programmed from the first year of the CIP. These projects will be submitted to the Texas Transportation Commission for funding in the upcoming fiscal year. Generally, projects will progresss forward through the CIP until actual implementation. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 4

7 The CIP The CIP represents a significant investment in preserving and expanding the Texas System. Approximately 8% of the funds programmed for this plan are allocated for Safety and Preservation of system airports, primarily s designed to meet Design/Safety Standards, Security Enhancements and Pavement Preservation. 2% of the CIP is currently programmed to enhancee our system in the form of New or Extended Runways, Expandedd Aircraft Parking Aprons and Aircraft Hangar Developments - all based on local demand for increased capacity. This continues our ambitious vision of preserving our system assets while dramatically enhancing safety, capacity and function. The CIP currently includes about $27 million of general aviation airport improvement projects. Over the three-year period, this represents programmed project funding of about $147 million federal, $33 million state, and $27 million in local contributions. The Aviation CIP presented heree is subject to change. It is based on a seriess of assumptions regarding future funding, airport sponsor actions, and aviation activity. To the extentt that the basiss for these assumptions s changes, the CIP will require adjustment. To continue to have the most current program information available, the Current CIP is updated monthly and the most current working version is available via the TxDOT website ( The Annual CIP will continue to be published for Transportation Commission approval once a year. The Aviation Division continually receives input from sponsorss regardingg their airport needs and plans. This information is used in the development of the next CIP. The Texas Department of Transportation welcomes your comments on this document and the Aviation CIP process. Please contact the TxDOT Aviation Division at the following address: TxDOT Aviation Division 125 E. 11 th Street Austin, Texas (512) (512) (fax) (8) 68-PILOT DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 5

8 PLANNING Planning provides a framework within which prudentt aviation investment decisions can be made. System-level l planning activities are the basis for the Aviation CIP. Background The geographic size of Texas and the distance between population centers make air travel in the state a necessity. In addition to serving business and recreational needs, air transportation offers many opportunities for development and diversification of the Texas economy. General Aviation plays a crucial role in supporting local economies. A growing number of communities have realized that airports are no longer a luxury, but a necessary accesss link to business and industry. In addition to access benefits, general aviation as an industry has an annual impact exceeding $14.5 billion in Texas. A recently completed analysis of the economic impacts of general aviation estimates that in 21 the industry generated approximately 56,6 jobs annually in Texas, making general aviation a strong economic contributor. Texas System Plan The TxDOT, in cooperation with local airport sponsors and the FAA, has developed a statewide airport system plan--the Texas System Plan (TASP). The TASP includes airports in the FAA National Plan of Integrated Systems (NPIAS), plus other airports deemed necessary for the system. The goal of the plan is to develop a statewide system of airports providing air access to the population and economic centers of Texas. All projects contained in the CIP are first identified inn the state plan. The TxDOT regularly updates its listing of specific airport needs through regional planning meetings held with airport sponsors across the state. A Development Worksheet is maintained for each airport in the state system. These worksheets identify anticipated short-, intermediate-, and long- at any time. During the process of updating the TASP, important aviation-related information is collected, including operations levels and facility conditions.. This information also is used in term improvements. sponsors may request changes to the development worksheets developing the CIP, as is the level of sponsor responsibility regarding airport maintenance and grant compliance. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 6

9 The state system plan: Provides data and justification to the FAA for including airports in the NPIAS, thereby making them eligible for federal financial assistance. Provides a basiss for coordinated airport planningg and development throughout Texas, reflecting the overall airport system goals. Indicates the role that aviation should play as ann element of the Texas transportation system in connecting population and economic centers. Identifies the general locations, types, and sizes of airport facilities to enhance air transportation access in Texas communities. The TASP development process results information, including: in the collection of important aviation-related An inventory of existing airport facilities, services, and traffic volumes. Analysis of the existing capacity of airports and forecast activity levels. An airport classification system with appropriate facility standards. A general estimate of neededd improvements and their costs at each airport. Alternatives for implementation of airport improvements. Recommended state legislation and funding for airport improvements. The current TASP system includes 2 heliports, 292 existing and 4 proposed airports. Improvements at each airport are identified in three time frames, based on expected aviation activity: Short term; -5 years. Intermediate term; 6-1 years. Long term; 11-2 years. TASP Objectives The objective of the state airport system is to provide adequate an, access to the population and economic centers of Texas. Adequatee access is expressed in terms of the driving time between activity centers and appropriate airport facilities: Scheduled air carrier service should be within a 6-minute drive for virtually all Texas residents. Business jet aircraft access should be with a 3-minute drive of significant population and mineral resourcee centers. Light piston-engine aircraft access should be within a 3-minute drive of agricultural centers. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 7

10 Development Worksheets A development worksheet is maintained for each airport in the TASP. The Aviation CIP is assembled from projects listed on these worksheets. s must be shown on a development worksheet to be included in the CIP. The worksheets containn important data about the facility: role and classification Planned airport improvements by time frame Cost estimates for improvement projects sponsors may request changes to the development worksheet at any time. The TxDOT Aviation Division reviews these requests for compatibility with the airport role and classification. Appropriate changes are then made onn the worksheet. By maintaining an up- to-date worksheet for each airport, the Aviation Division has current knowledge of the aviation improvements needed for the TASP system att any time. Priorities In order to make the best use of limited state and federal airport development funds, the Texas Transportation Commission establishes a priority system that allows the TxDOT Aviation Division to identify projects that meet present system needs. Current priorities are: Safety --- s needed to make the facility safe for aircraft operations. Preservation --- s to preserve the functional or structural integrity of the airport. Standards --- Improvements required to bring the airport up to design standards for current user aircraft. Upgrade --- Improvements equired to allow the airport to accommodate larger aircraft or longer stage lengths. Capacity --- Expansion required to accommodate more aircraft or higher activity levels. New Access --- A new airport providing new air access to a previously unserved area. New Capacity --- A new airport needed to add capacity or relieve congestion at other area airports. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 8

11 PROGRAMMING The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is an organized statement of the scope and timing of planned improvements at general aviation airportss in Texas. The CIP identifies projects eligible for the federal Improvement Program (AIP), and projects eligible for the state facilities development program. The program consists of a Three-Year CIP. ss in the second and third years of the program are less defined than projects in the first year of the CIP.. The process of developing the program is continuous. Through the CIP and other efforts, the TxDOT Aviation Division resolves investmentt issues and makes programmingg decisions. The programming process is conducted on an annual cycle and includes the following elements: Obtaining public comments on the program and thee process Identifying neededd projects Developing alternative project solutions Evaluating and selecting elements of projects Evaluating and selecting a program of projects Finalizing the program consistent with available funding The Three-Year CIP provides the basis for the airport investment scheduling activities of the FAA, the TxDOT Aviation Division, and local governments. The program also provides the flexibility needed to deal with a variety of technical changes that become necessary throughout the development of projects. Changes in both project scope and achievable schedulee can be accommodated within the CIP. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 9

12 Aviation Capital Improvement Program The Aviation CIP identifies specific projects for development over the next three years. s are selected from the developmen nt worksheets and evaluated based on need. Due to funding limitations, not all items contained in the development worksheets are included in the CIP. The CIP does not reflect all of the known airport needs and deficiencies, but primarily those which have been identified as needed by sponsors and the TxDOT Aviation Division and which are found to be consistent with the goals of the TASP. Inclusionn of a project in the Aviation CIP is not a commitment forr future funding; however, it is an indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for funding at a future date. Sponsors will receive a more definite commitment of state funding when a project moves into the first year of the program and is approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. Generally, projects are expected to move forward until entering the first year of the program; however, nonrealization of anticipated funding and increases in project costs may hinder this forward progression. Annual Program The Annual Program is identified from projects in the Aviation CIP. The Annual Program includes the projects programmed for the first year of the CIP. The Texas Transportation Commission determines that these projects should be funded during the upcoming fiscal year. Preliminary implementation begins in the first year forr projects to be approved in the second year, including: Environmental assessments Plans and specifications Land acquisition Layout Plan and Property Map Preparation The Annual Program coincides with the FAA schedulee for funding availability. s that are ready will be moved into the annual program. s that are not ready may remain in the second year. Sponsors know in advance whetherr the projectt is likely to be funded by its inclusionn in the first year of the CIP. Once a project moves into the first year of the CIP, project implementation begins and overlaps the programming process for the next two years. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 1

13 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION The role of the TxDOT in implementing airport improvement projects is established by the state enabling legislation and departmentt rules. Thee TxDOT is the agent of the state and sponsor for the purpose of applying for, receiving, and disbursing federal airport development funds. Contracts for project planning, engineeringg and construction may be negotiated and executed by the department as the sponsor's agent. The departmentt may manage many of the project details. In addition to working closely with the department, sponsorss may continue to select consultants. When a project is moved into the Annual Program it becomes eligible for funding. The program is based on the funding levels authorized by the Texas Legislature and the most likely federal funding levels that can be anticipated. Implementation of the entire program is dependent upon actions and funding that occur at thee local, state, and federal levels. Assistance Accomplishment of the programmed projects depends on airport sponsor actions, funding availability, priorities, and actual project costs. As a participant in the State Block Grant Program, the TxDOTT takes a predominant role in the implementation of federal projects. In compliance with state legislation, the department may act as the agent of the sponsor for both state and federal projects, managing many of thee project details including: Assisting with consultant selections Assisting with the property acquisition process Reviewing and approving project designs and specifications Advertising for bids Awarding construction contracts Coordinating activities with the FAA as necessary Inspecting construction Applying for and disbursing funds Sponsorss may continue to select consultants for airport development projects. A TxDOT planner or engineer is assigned to each project for oversight purposes. On-site management of the project is the responsibility of the consultant who submits required progress reports to the department. Contractor requestss for payment come to the TxDOT staff who determine the validity of each billing and authorize payment from the project account. expenses on federally- funded projects are paid by the department from a letter of credit established with the FAA. The TxDOT is responsible for the project audit. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 11

14 Financial Assistance When projects move into the Annual Program theyy become eligible for state or federal funding. For the majority of projects the local contribution for both federal and state grants is 1%, although other grant programs have cost-share provisions that require a larger local contribution (e.g. for terminal buildings, the local share is 5 percent and the maximum state share is $5,). Typical Federally- State-Funded Cost Distribution Funded and DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 12

15 CIP s The following listing presents the projects containedd in the Aviation Capital Improvement Program. This list represents the TxDOTT Aviation Division's current knowledge of airport needs and potential projects. The projects are organized by year and airport location, indicating the type of work to be performed at each location and the estimated project cost. About The s The program presented here is the result of a series of projections, judgements, and choices in both policy and technical areas, including: Federal policies, laws and regulations Policies of the department Definition of needs and/or priorities Assumptions about future state and federal airportt improvement funding Assessment of current airport deficiencies Anticipation of local airport sponsor actions The projects in this listing are due to: constantly undergoingg further development and refinement Refined project scope Refined cost estimates Scheduling changes due to unforeseenn delays or complications such as: Changes in the rate of physical deterioratio n of facilities Land acquisition problems Environmental problems New standards, policies, rules, laws, etc. Requirements of the FAA, the Texas Transportation Commission, or other agencies For these and other reasons, the following projects are subject to change. If funding levels differ from those assumed here, there will be impacts on both the project scope and the implementation schedule. scope and implementation year may be revised to best fit the overall system needs and existing funding availability. DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 13

16 Justification may be required for some projects in keeping with the TxDOT Aviation Policies and Standards approved by the Texas Transportationn Commission. Some projects listed in this table may not be implemented due to lack of justification, funding restrictions, or other reasons. The Aviation Capital Improvement Program is revised and updated continually. Printed versions of the Annual CIP are available annually for public distribution and are also available via the TxDOT websitee ( Financial Summary Of the approximate ely $27 million of total project costs, the FAA share epresents about $147 million. The state share of these costs is approximately $33 million, with local airport sponsorss responsible for the remaining $27 million. The following table summarizes the CIP costs: (Rounded to Thousands of Dollars) Fiscal Year Total (Rounded) FAA Share TxDOT Share 214 $ 94,1 $ 68,9 $ 12,3 $ Sponsor Share 12, ,8 53,9 15,7 8, ,2 24,2 4,9 5,9 Total $ 27,1 $ 147,2 $ 32,9 $ 27, DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,213 14

17 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY ALBANY ALBANY MUNI 634,8 571,32 63, PENDING ALICE ALICE INTL 4,562, 4,15,8 456,2 214 PENDING ANGLETON/LAKE JACKSON TEXAS GULF COAST RGNL 2,415, 2,173,5 241,5 214 PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 12, 18, 12, 214 PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 13,6 117,54 13,6 215 PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 1,733,6 1,56,24 173, PENDING ATLANTA HALL-MILLER MUNI 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING ATLANTA HALL-MILLER MUNI 645, 516,5 128,5 215 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI 1,19, 999, 191, 214 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI 18, 162, 18, 214 PENDING BEEVILLE BEEVILLE MUNI 94,5 85,5 9, PENDING BEEVILLE BEEVILLE MUNI 1,42, 913,8 128,2 215 PENDING BIG LAKE REAGAN COUNTY 2,21, 1,989, 221, 214 PENDING BISHOP BISHOP MUNI 5, 45, 5, 216 PENDING BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI 15, 135, 15, 214 PENDING BROWNFIELD TERRY COUNTY 82, 738, 82, 214 PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 222, 199,8 22,2 214 PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 94, 837, 5, 98, 215 PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 1,235, 1,111,5 123,5 216 PENDING BURNET BURNET MUNI KATE CRADDOCK FIELD 2,397,664 2,157, , PENDING BURNET BURNET MUNI KATE CRADDOCK FIELD 746, ,575 74, PENDING CALDWELL CALDWELL MUNI 4, 36, 4, 214 PENDING CASTROVILLE CASTROVILLE MUNI 2,226,533 1,963, , PENDING CENTER CENTER MUNI 195, 175,5 19,5 214 PENDING CENTER CENTER MUNI 1,645, 1,48,5 164,5 215 PENDING CHILDRESS CHILDRESS MUNI 629, ,31 62, PENDING CISCO CISCO MUNI 5, 45, 5, 216 PENDING CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI 396,75 357,75 39, PENDING CRANE CRANE COUNTY 75, 67,5 7,5 216 PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 6,23, 5,67, 623, 214 PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 6,265, 5,638,5 626,5 215 PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 5,5, 4,95, 55, 216 PENDING DELL CITY DELL CITY MUNI 5, 45, 5, 216 PENDING DENTON DENTON MUNI 5, 25, 25, 214 PENDING Page 15 Status

18 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY DENTON DENTON MUNI 35, 175, 175, 215 PENDING DENTON DENTON MUNI 316,49 25,718 11, PENDING DENTON DENTON MUNI 6,657,93 4,386,924 2,27, PENDING DEVINE DEVINE MUNI 44, 39,6 4,4 214 PENDING DEVINE DEVINE MUNI 294,77 264,668 29, PENDING DILLEY DILLEY AIRPARK 75, 67,5 7,5 216 PENDING DRYDEN TERRELL COUNTY 75, 67,5 7,5 214 PENDING DRYDEN TERRELL COUNTY 641,94 576,984 64, PENDING DUBLIN DUBLIN MUNI 136, 122,4 13,6 216 PENDING EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE 14, 15, 35, 214 PENDING EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE 95, 85,5 9,5 215 PENDING EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE 1,2,5 91,845 1, PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 878,575 46, , PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 64, 57,6 6,4 215 PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 645, ,151 64, PENDING FABENS FABENS 75, 67,5 7,5 216 PENDING FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY 235, 211,5 23,5 214 PENDING FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY 1,545, 1,39,5 154,5 215 PENDING FORT STOCKTON FORT STOCKTON-PECOS COUNTY 175, 157,5 17,5 216 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 15, 135, 15, 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 3,43,1 3,62,79 34, PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 7, 63, 7, 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 6, 54, 6, 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 225, 22,5 22,5 215 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 1,54, 1,386,2 153, PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 1,985, 1,786,5 198,5 216 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 1,, 5, 5, 216 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 152,2 136,98 15, PENDING FREER DUVAL-FREER 18, 162, 18, 216 PENDING GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING GATESVILLE GATESVILLE MUNI 1, 9, 1, 216 PENDING GEORGE WEST LIVE OAK COUNTY 75, 67,5 7,5 216 PENDING GEORGETOWN GEORGETOWN MUNI 1,135, 1,21,5 113,5 214 PENDING GEORGETOWN GEORGETOWN MUNI 6,23, 5,67, 623, 215 PENDING Status Page 16

19 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY GIDDINGS GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY 184,8 166,32 18, PENDING GOLDTHWAITE GOLDTHWAITE MUNI 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING GOLDTHWAITE GOLDTHWAITE MUNI 1,1, 95, 15, 215 PENDING GONZALES ROGER M. DREYER MEMORIAL 129,8 116,82 12, PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 12,83,1 9,228,542 3,61, PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 1,222,222 1,99, , PENDING HALLETTSVILLE HALLETTSVILLE MUNI 5, 45, 5, 216 PENDING HEBBRONVILLE JIM HOGG COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 216 PENDING HEREFORD HEREFORD MUNI 4, 36, 4, 214 PENDING HEREFORD HEREFORD MUNI 5,285, 4,756,5 528,5 215 PENDING HOUSTON HOUSTON-SOUTHWEST 2,388,889 2,15, 238, PENDING HOUSTON HOUSTON-SOUTHWEST 2,317,682 2,149, , PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 2,94, 2,646, 294, 214 PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 8,395, 7,555,5 839,5 215 PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 7,1, 6,39, 71, 216 PENDING INGLESIDE MCCAMPBELL-PORTER 826,4 743,76 82, PENDING JACKSBORO JACKSBORO MUNI 328,64 295,776 32, PENDING KENEDY KARNES COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING KENEDY KARNES COUNTY 991, ,334 99, PENDING KERRVILLE KERRVILLE MUNI/LOUIS SCHREINER FIELD 71, 639, 71, 214 PENDING LA GRANGE FAYETTE RGNL AIR CENTER 745, 67,5 74,5 214 PENDING LA GRANGE FAYETTE RGNL AIR CENTER 88, 792, 88, 215 PENDING LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 55, 49,5 5,5 214 PENDING LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 69, ,856 6, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 3,356,6 2,992,95 363, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 385, 288,75 96, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 1,13, 565, 565, 214 PENDING LEAKEY REAL COUNTY 3, 27, 3, 216 PENDING LEVELLAND LEVELLAND MUNI 774, ,218 77, PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 75, 67,5 7,5 215 PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 529,68 476,644 52, PENDING LUFKIN ANGELINA COUNTY 175, 157,5 17,5 214 PENDING LUFKIN ANGELINA COUNTY 2,6, 1,854, 26, 215 PENDING MADISONVILLE MADISONVILLE MUNI 65, 58,5 6,5 215 PENDING Status Page 17

20 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY MADISONVILLE MADISONVILLE MUNI 575, 517,5 57,5 216 PENDING MARFA MARFA MUNI 165, 148,5 16,5 214 PENDING MARFA MARFA MUNI 1,27, 1,143, 127, 215 PENDING MARSHALL HARRISON COUNTY 839, ,987 83, PENDING MASON MASON COUNTY 24, 216, 24, 214 PENDING MASON MASON COUNTY 1,612,222 1,45, , PENDING MESQUITE MESQUITE METRO 1,82, 1,638, 182, 214 PENDING MEXIA MEXIA-LIMESTONE CO 2,33, 2,97, 233, 214 PENDING MINERAL WELLS MINERAL WELLS 1,9, 981, 19, 214 PENDING MOUNT PLEASANT MOUNT PLEASANT RGNL 1,61,2 1,435,58 174, PENDING MOUNT VERNON FRANKLIN COUNTY 66, 594, 66, 214 PENDING MOUNT VERNON FRANKLIN COUNTY 78, 72, 78, 215 PENDING MOUNT VERNON FRANKLIN COUNTY 365, 328,5 36,5 216 PENDING MULESHOE MULESHOE MUNI 47, ,388 47, PENDING OZONA OZONA MUNI 57,32 456,588 5, PENDING PALACIOS PALACIOS MUNI 948,3 853,47 94, PENDING PALACIOS PALACIOS MUNI 534,1 48,69 53, PENDING PALESTINE PALESTINE MUNI 31, 279, 31, 214 PENDING PALESTINE PALESTINE MUNI 2,935, 2,641,5 293,5 215 PENDING PAMPA PERRY LEFORS FIELD 4,374,6 3,937,14 437, PENDING PLAINVIEW HALE COUNTY 3,844, 3,459,6 384,4 214 PENDING PLEASANTON PLEASANTON MUNI 83, 74,7 8,3 214 PENDING PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH 88, 792, 88, 214 PENDING PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH 2,854,388 2,568,95 285, PENDING PORT ISABEL PORT ISABEL-CAMERON COUNTY 96, 864, 96, 214 PENDING PRESIDIO PRESIDIO LELY INTL 45, 4,5 4,5 214 PENDING PRESIDIO PRESIDIO LELY INTL 313,88 281,779 31, PENDING QUANAH QUANAH MUNI 6, 54, 6, 216 PENDING ROBSTOWN NUECES COUNTY 1,295, 1,165,5 129,5 214 PENDING ROBSTOWN NUECES COUNTY 8, 72, 8, 215 PENDING ROBSTOWN NUECES COUNTY 1, 9, 1, 216 PENDING ROCKPORT ARANSAS CO 2, 18, 2, 214 PENDING ROCKPORT ARANSAS CO 2,13, 1,917, 213, 214 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 1,754,584 1,579, , PENDING Status Page 18

21 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 3,13, 2,817, 313, 214 PENDING SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS MUNI 3, 27, 3, 214 PENDING SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS MUNI 1,169,266 1,52, , PENDING SEYMOUR SEYMOUR MUNI 72, ,37 72, PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 775, 697,5 77,5 214 PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 175, 157,5 17,5 214 PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 522,9 47,61 52, PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 653, ,463 65, PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 1,398, 82,2 595,8 216 PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 552,51 497,25 55, PENDING SLATON SLATON MUNI 635, 571,5 63,5 214 PENDING SONORA SONORA MUNI 22, 198, 22, 214 PENDING SONORA SONORA MUNI 3,225,98 2,93, , PENDING SPEARMAN MAJOR SAMUEL B CORNELIUS FIELD 1,835, 1,651,5 183,5 214 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 35, 315, 35, 214 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 4,287,929 3,859, , PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 12, 18, 12, 216 PENDING TERRELL TERRELL MUNI 1,155, 927, 228, 214 PENDING TULIA CITY OF TULIA/SWISHER COUNTY MUNI 332, ,46 33, PENDING UVALDE GARNER FIELD 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING UVALDE GARNER FIELD 18, 162, 18, 215 PENDING UVALDE GARNER FIELD 65, 585, 65, 215 PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 1,339,72 1,25, , PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 2,392,366 2,77,13 315, PENDING WACO TSTC WACO 1,615, 1,453,5 161,5 214 PENDING WACO TSTC WACO 1,298,1 1,168,21 129,8 215 PENDING WICHITA FALLS KICKAPOO DOWNTOWN 1,121,1 1,8,99 112, PENDING WICHITA FALLS KICKAPOO DOWNTOWN 3,22,2 2,898,18 322,2 215 PENDING WILLS POINT VAN ZANDT COUNTY RGNL 585, 526,5 58,5 214 PENDING ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY 24, 216, 24, 216 PENDING Status Totals: $27,7,779 $147,162,649 $32,89,412 $26,954,718 Page 19

22 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY ALBANY ALBANY MUNI 634,8 571,32 63, PENDING ALICE ALICE INTL 4,562, 4,15,8 456,2 214 PENDING ANGLETON/LAKE JACKSON TEXAS GULF COAST RGNL 2,415, 2,173,5 241,5 214 PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 12, 18, 12, 214 PENDING ATLANTA HALL-MILLER MUNI 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI 1,19, 999, 191, 214 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI 18, 162, 18, 214 PENDING BEEVILLE BEEVILLE MUNI 94,5 85,5 9, PENDING BIG LAKE REAGAN COUNTY 2,21, 1,989, 221, 214 PENDING BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI 15, 135, 15, 214 PENDING BROWNFIELD TERRY COUNTY 82, 738, 82, 214 PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 222, 199,8 22,2 214 PENDING BURNET BURNET MUNI KATE CRADDOCK FIELD 2,397,664 2,157, , PENDING CALDWELL CALDWELL MUNI 4, 36, 4, 214 PENDING CASTROVILLE CASTROVILLE MUNI 2,226,533 1,963, , PENDING CENTER CENTER MUNI 195, 175,5 19,5 214 PENDING CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI 396,75 357,75 39, PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 6,23, 5,67, 623, 214 PENDING DENTON DENTON MUNI 5, 25, 25, 214 PENDING DEVINE DEVINE MUNI 44, 39,6 4,4 214 PENDING DRYDEN TERRELL COUNTY 75, 67,5 7,5 214 PENDING EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE 14, 15, 35, 214 PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 878,575 46, , PENDING FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY 235, 211,5 23,5 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 15, 135, 15, 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 3,43,1 3,62,79 34, PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 7, 63, 7, 214 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 6, 54, 6, 214 PENDING GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING GEORGETOWN GEORGETOWN MUNI 1,135, 1,21,5 113,5 214 PENDING GOLDTHWAITE GOLDTHWAITE MUNI 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 12,83,1 9,228,542 3,61, PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 1,222,222 1,99, , PENDING HEREFORD HEREFORD MUNI 4, 36, 4, 214 PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 2,94, 2,646, 294, 214 PENDING INGLESIDE MCCAMPBELL-PORTER 826,4 743,76 82, PENDING KENEDY KARNES COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING KERRVILLE KERRVILLE MUNI/LOUIS SCHREINER FIELD 71, 639, 71, 214 PENDING Status Page 2

23 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY LA GRANGE FAYETTE RGNL AIR CENTER 745, 67,5 74,5 214 PENDING LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 55, 49,5 5,5 214 PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 3,356,6 2,992,95 363, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 385, 288,75 96, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 1,13, 565, 565, 214 PENDING LUFKIN ANGELINA COUNTY 175, 157,5 17,5 214 PENDING MARFA MARFA MUNI 165, 148,5 16,5 214 PENDING MARSHALL HARRISON COUNTY 839, ,987 83, PENDING MASON MASON COUNTY 24, 216, 24, 214 PENDING MESQUITE MESQUITE METRO 1,82, 1,638, 182, 214 PENDING MEXIA MEXIA-LIMESTONE CO 2,33, 2,97, 233, 214 PENDING MINERAL WELLS MINERAL WELLS 1,9, 981, 19, 214 PENDING MOUNT PLEASANT MOUNT PLEASANT RGNL 1,61,2 1,435,58 174, PENDING MOUNT VERNON FRANKLIN COUNTY 66, 594, 66, 214 PENDING PALACIOS PALACIOS MUNI 948,3 853,47 94, PENDING PALESTINE PALESTINE MUNI 31, 279, 31, 214 PENDING PAMPA PERRY LEFORS FIELD 4,374,6 3,937,14 437, PENDING PLAINVIEW HALE COUNTY 3,844, 3,459,6 384,4 214 PENDING PLEASANTON PLEASANTON MUNI 83, 74,7 8,3 214 PENDING PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH 88, 792, 88, 214 PENDING PORT ISABEL PORT ISABEL-CAMERON COUNTY 96, 864, 96, 214 PENDING PRESIDIO PRESIDIO LELY INTL 45, 4,5 4,5 214 PENDING ROBSTOWN NUECES COUNTY 1,295, 1,165,5 129,5 214 PENDING ROCKPORT ARANSAS CO 2, 18, 2, 214 PENDING ROCKPORT ARANSAS CO 2,13, 1,917, 213, 214 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 1,754,584 1,579, , PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 3,13, 2,817, 313, 214 PENDING SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS MUNI 3, 27, 3, 214 PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 775, 697,5 77,5 214 PENDING SHERMAN/DENISON NORTH TEXAS RGNL/PERRIN FIELD 175, 157,5 17,5 214 PENDING SLATON SLATON MUNI 635, 571,5 63,5 214 PENDING SONORA SONORA MUNI 22, 198, 22, 214 PENDING SPEARMAN MAJOR SAMUEL B CORNELIUS FIELD 1,835, 1,651,5 183,5 214 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 35, 315, 35, 214 PENDING TERRELL TERRELL MUNI 1,155, 927, 228, 214 PENDING UVALDE GARNER FIELD 1, 9, 1, 214 PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 5, 45, 5, 214 PENDING WACO TSTC WACO 1,615, 1,453,5 161,5 214 PENDING Page 21 Status

24 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM July 11, 213 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY WICHITA FALLS KICKAPOO DOWNTOWN 1,121,1 1,8,99 112, PENDING WILLS POINT VAN ZANDT COUNTY RGNL 585, 526,5 58,5 214 PENDING Totals: $94,65,915 $68,92,34 $12,273,688 $12,871,887 Status Page 22

25 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 ALBANY ALBANY MUNI ALICE ALICE INTL 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Mobilization, Testing, RPR, Closeout Rehabilitate apron (9, sy) Rehabilitate parallel TW and stub TXWYs (23,4 sy) Contingency - Pavement Rehabilitation Mark RW 17/35 (11,8 sf) Rehabilitate RW (5, x 75) Replace Windcone Install new equipment vault/regulators - RW Lights, MITLS Mark RW (NPI - 55, sf) Reconstruct South Section TXWY A (near RW 31 end 8 x 5) RW Install MITL on TXWY system (625 CLF) Regrade East Boundary Drainage Ditch RW Install MITL on TXWY system (81 CLF) Contingency, RPR, Eng.,Close Out (RW/MIRL/MITL) Construct Run Up RW 31 Rehabilitate RW (449 x 1) Rehabilitate TXWYs A, B, C, D, E (7, sy) Replace Lighted Windcone, Install 4 Supplemental Wind Cones Install PAPI-4 RW 13 Rehabilitate RW (5997 x 1) Install PAPI-2 RW Reconstruct section of TXWY RW 17 Replace airfield guidance signs Replace MIRL RW (5997 x 1) Reconstruct Fuel Apron (6 x 15) Mark RW (Vis. - 2, sf) Rehabilitate apron (35, sy) Page 23 Costs 9,4 54, 14,4 67,5 27, 252, 3,5 81,36 48,6 126,36 6,75 24,3 226,8 3,15 Totals: $ 634,8 $ $ 571,32 32, 28,8 65, 58,5 285, 256,5 3, 27, 55, 49,5 32, 288, 57, 513, 1, 9, 4, 36, 51, 459, 3, 27, 9, 81, 485, 436,5 18, 162, 7, 63, 12, 18, 33, 297, 65, 58,5 25, 22,5 255, 229,5 9,4 5,4 14,4 6,75 2,7 25,2 35 $ 63,48 3,2 6,5 28,5 3, 5,5 32, 57, 1, 4, 51, 3, 9, 48,5 18, 7, 12, 33, 6,5 2,5 25,5

26 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 ALICE ALICE INTL ANGLETON/LAKE JACKSON TEXAS GULF COAST RGNL ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI ATLANTA HALL-MILLER MUNI BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Replace MIRL RW (499 x 1) Construct terminal apron (525 x 265) (45, DW) Relocate portion of cross TW E (15 sy) Relocate portion of cross TW G (9 sy) Install MITL (2) & signs (4) for TW E & apron Contingency, admin fees, testing, RPR, etc. Development Plan Engineering and Design for Pavement Rehabilitation Rehabilitate Apron TW (4,2 sy) Reconstruct entrance road (12 sy) Rehabilitate hangar access TWs (13,5 sy) 12,5 lbs. Contingency, RPR, Admin, Pavement Rehab Mark RW (18,2 sf) Reconstruct hangar access road Rehabilitate apron (13,2 sy) Repair drainage north taxiway Rehabilitate & mark parallel TW & Cross TW (25,3 sy) Costs 275, 247,5 Totals: $ 4,562, $ 4,15,8 $ 1,85, 1,665, 14, 126, 75, 67,5 5, 45, 3, 27, Totals: $ 2,415, $ 2,173,5 $ 12, 18, Totals: $ 12, $ 18, $ 5, 45, Totals: $ 5, $ 45, $ 35, 5, 11, 15, 3, 4, 11, 15, 21, 31,5 25, 99, 135, 27, 2, 99, 13,5 189, 27,5 $ 456,2 185, 14, 7,5 5, 3, $ 241,5 12, $ 12, 5, $ 5, 3,5 25, 11, 15, 3, 2, 11, 1,5 21, Page 24

27 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI BAY CITY BAY CITY MUNI BEEVILLE BEEVILLE MUNI BIG LAKE REAGAN COUNTY BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI BROWNFIELD TERRY COUNTY 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Rehabilitate RW (42,6 sy) Reconstruct terminal auto parking (18 sy) Master Plan Engineering / Design for pavement rehab Clear and grub 15 acres in RPZ RW 9 Mark RW 9/27 (visual) Administration, RPR, etc for paving RW 9/27 Pave Crosswind RW 9/27 Install Fence (266 lf) Construct Turnaround RW 16 Acquire land for TSS and GQS RW 18 (14.9 acres) Engineering / Design for 9 unit hangar Contingency, admin RPR for 9 unit hangar Construct 9 unit box Hangar Page 25 Costs 35, 9, 315, 45, Totals: $ 1,19, $ $ 999, 18, 162, Totals: $ 18, $ $ 162, 94,5 85,5 Totals: $ 94,5 $ $ 85,5 8, 1, 275, 1,81, 32, 75, 7,2 9, 247,5 1,629, 28,8 67,5 Totals: $ 2,21, $ $ 1,989, 15, 135, Totals: $ 15, $ 135, $ 65, 58,5 75, 67,5 54, 486, 35, 45, $ 191, 18, $ 18, 9,45 $ 9,45 8 1, 27,5 181, 3,2 7,5 $ 221, 15, $ 15, 6,5 7,5 54,

28 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 BROWNFIELD TERRY COUNTY BRYAN COULTER FIELD 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Construct hangar access pavement to 9 unit box hangars (2,15sy) Engineering/design for rehab/drainage project BURNET BURNET MUNI KATE CRADDOCK FIELD Reconstruct/relocate TW & connecting stubs (59 x 4) CALDWELL CALDWELL MUNI CASTROVILLE CASTROVILLE MUNI Contingencies, RPR, admin., etc. Mark Apron, TXWYs (2, lf) Mark RWY (717 lf) Contingency, RPR, Admin, etc. Pavement Rehab Rehabilitate RWY (3,252 x 5) Rehabilitate apron & TWYS (93 sy) Reconstruct South Apron Construction Administration, Testing, RPR, etc Extend & mark parallel TW to RW 15 end (59x35) Install signage Contingency for RW Extension Construct Permanent Run-up Area Install fencing - new boundary Relocate PAPI RW 15 end Costs 14, 126, Totals: $ 82, $ 738, $ 222, 199,8 Totals: $ 222, $ 199,8 $ 1,929,139 1,736, , ,673 Totals: $ 2,397,664 $ 2,157,899 $ 2,2 8, 14,5 191,9 93,4 1,98 7,2 94,5 172,71 84,6 Totals: $ 4, $ $ 36, 514,28 462, , 23,4 225,48 22,868 18, 16,2 228,461 25, ,73 13,257 99, 89,1 2, 18, 14, $ 82, 22,2 $ 22,2 192,913 46,852 $ 239, ,45 19,19 9,34 $ 4, 51,428 25,6 22,54 1,8 22,846 11,473 9,9 2, Page 26

29 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 CASTROVILLE CASTROVILLE MUNI CENTER CENTER MUNI CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE DENTON DENTON MUNI 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Extend MIRL RW 15 end (4 lf) Extend and mark RW 15 end (4 x75) New Road to Fuel System Relocate County Road 4711 Engineering/Design for Rehab Phase 2 Contingency Rehab hangar access TW Rehabilitate main apron Drainage Improvements in Hangar Area Mobilization, Testing, RPR, Closeout Reconstruct RW [south end], TXWY A & A-1; remove TXWY A-2 (Phase I) Contingency Engineering/design for terminal expansion. Costs 41,365 37, , ,971 1, 5, 282, ,39 Totals: $ 2,226,533 $ 1,963,882 $ 195, 175,5 Totals: $ 195, $ $ 175,5 51,75 46, , 148,5 13, 117, 5, 45, Totals: $ 396,75 $ 357,75 $ 4, 36, 4,9, 4,41, 93, 837, Totals: $ 6,23, $ 5,67, $ 5, 25, Totals: $ 5, $ $ 25, 4,136 32,663 5, 28,265 $ 262,651 19,5 $ 19,5 5,175 16,5 13, 5, $ 39,675 4, 49, 93, $ 623, 25, $ 25, Page 27

30 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 DEVINE DEVINE MUNI DRYDEN TERRELL COUNTY EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Engineering / Design for pavement rehab Engineering/design for rehab Install AWOS Construct new entrance road/ auto parking (5) Relocate terminal fence/gate (25 ft) Expand terminal apron (1 x 5) Construct terminal building (15 sf) Install fencing (25 lf) for new southwest property Engineering/design for rehab Conduct RDD and FWD testing on RW Costs 44, 39,6 Totals: $ 44, $ $ 39,6 75, 67,5 Totals: $ 75, $ $ 67,5 14, 15, Totals: $ 14, $ $ 15, 25, 1, 36,75 8, 7,5 12,5 9, 32,468 4, 6,75 Totals: $ 878,575 $ $ 46, , 211,5 Totals: $ 235, $ 211,5 $ 15, 135, Totals: $ 15, $ 135, $ 4,4 $ 4,4 7,5 $ 7,5 35, $ 35, 12,5 1, 3,67 4, 75 $ 417,857 23,5 $ 23,5 15, $ 15, Page 28

31 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON GEORGETOWN GEORGETOWN MUNI 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Contingency, admin., RPR, etc. Replace 2-PAPI-4 RW Replace ALCMS computer system Roto-mill and overlay RW (46 x 75) Overlay portions of TW C (11 sy) between RW & TW B Upgrade RW signage (15) & new regulator Mark RW (NPI w/edge stripes & chevrons) (42,2 sf) Replace MIRLs RW (4 lf) Replace ARFF truck Engineering and Design for Terminal Area Taxilane construction Conduct Wildlife Assessment Replace MIRLs & signage RW (5 lf) Contingency, admin. fees, RPR, etc. Replace MIRLS & signage RW (41 ft) Install new property line fencing & clear TSS on RW 29 (273 lf) Install PAPI-2 RW Page 29 Costs 425, 382,5 181, 162,9 44, 363,6 1,975, 1,777,5 1, 9, 19,5 98,55 5, 45, 158,6 142,74 Totals: $ 3,43,1 $ 3,62,79 $ 7, 63, Totals: $ 7, $ 63, $ 6, 54, Totals: $ 6, $ 54, $ 1, 9, Totals: $ 1, $ 9, $ 48, 432, 14, 126, 38, 342, 25, 22,5 11, 99, Totals: $ 1,135, $ 1,21,5 $ 42,5 18,1 4,4 197,5 1, 1,95 5, 15,86 $ 34,31 7, $ 7, 6, $ 6, 1, $ 1, 48, 14, 38, 2,5 11, $ 113,5

32 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs July 11, 213 GOLDTHWAITE GOLDTHWAITE MUNI GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 214 Federal FY 214 (October September 214)/State FY 214 (September August 214) Engineering/design for hangar & pavement Testing fo RW 1/19 Construction Seeding for RW 1/19 construction Mobilization for RW 1/19 (D) Contingency RW 1/19 Constuction Construct new RW 1-19 (D) Relocate Brazos Electric Co-op transmission powerlines Construct parallel and cross TWs to RW 1-19 Mark Parallel and Connecting TW Relocate UCS Distribution Powerlines Resident Representative Construction RW 1/19 Drainage for RW 1/19 Construct connecting TW from RW19 to RW 14 Install Lighted Wind Cone RW 1/19 Install RW 1 and RW 19 Install MIRL RW 1-19 Advertising for RW 1/19 Construction Site prep, Excavation & Earthwork for RW1-19 Mark RW 1/19 Install RW 1/19 Hold Signs Credit for 211 Land Acquisition for new RW1-19 Costs 1, 9, Totals: $ 1, $ $ 9, 8,5 6, 49, , ,55 1,229,54 1,16,586 3,316,85 2,985, ,78 1,6 417,5 132, 114,8 39,33 24, 42, 285,88 257,292 1,5 5,, 4,5, 25, 12,5 11,25 Totals: $ 12,83,1 $ 9,228,542 $ 1,222,222 1,99,999 Totals: $ 1,222,222 $ 1,99,999 $ 1, $ 1, 8,5 6, 4, ,55 122, , ,78 1,6 417,5 132, 114,8 39,33 24, 42, 28,588 1,5 5, 25, 1,25 $ 3,61, ,223 $ 122,223 Page 3