Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Transcription

1 Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

2 Agenda Welcome / Introductions Master Plan Process and Project Status Forecast of Aviation Demand Overview of Facility Requirements Next Steps Open Discussion

3 Public Involvement Program Technical Advisory Committee Meetings Airport Advisory Committee Briefings Tallahassee City Commission Briefings Public Open House Airport Website

4 Technical Advisory Committee Community leaders that provide input into long-range planning for City consideration. Intended as a forum to freely present issues, ideas, and provide guidance in planning for future aviation facilities. Provide diverse representation of community interests and opinions relative to airport development to address all issues of concern to the community and region. Provide input related to aviation, community, political, planning and legal issues. Public Involvement Role

5 Master Planning Process

6 Major Objectives Optimize the operational efficiency, effectiveness, capability and safety of the airport; Enhance the economic and social value of the airport; Meet the long-range aviation needs of the community; Ensure that current and future airport plans are environmentally compatible and in harmony with local and regional plans and objectives; and Provide planning options that are consistent with these project goals.

7 Existing Facilities

8 Importance of Forecasts To develop a realistic assessment of market conditions and market performance. To address unique local conditions not fully considered in national, macro level forecast efforts. To provide a benchmark for comparing current facilities against a reasonable estimate of future demand to define potential future facility needs.

9 Passenger Enplanements Forecast 700,000 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 600, , , , , ,000 0

10 Year Airline Operations Forecast Total Passengers Scheduled Operations Turboprop Jet Total Airline Scenario 1 % Total Operations Unscheduled Operations Jet % Total Operations Total Operations ,144 2,292 10,936 13, % % 13, ,803 2,411 11,638 14, % % 14, ,295 2,569 12,401 14, % % 15, ,617 2,738 13,213 15, % % 16, ,295 2,917 14,079 16, % % 17,116 AAGR % 1.21% 1.27% 1.26% 0.00% 1.74% 0.47% 1.26% Airline Scenario ,144 2,292 10,936 13, % % 13, ,787 2,411 13,481 15, % % 15, ,011,109 2,569 16,086 18, % % 18, ,087,388 2,738 16,898 19, % % 19, ,170,136 2,917 17,764 20, % % 20,801 AAGR % 1.21% 2.46% 2.26% 0.00% 1.74% -0.51% 2.26%

11 Combined Operations

12 Combined Operations Forecast Year Airline Cargo Military General Aviation Operations % Total Operations % Total Operations % Total Operations % Total Total Operations , % 1, % 13, % 30, % 57, , % 1, % 13, % 31, % 60, , % 1, % 13, % 33, % 62, , % 1, % 13, % 34, % 65, , % 1, % 13, % 36, % 68,122 AAGR % 0.45% 1.00% 0.18% 0.00% -0.81% 0.92% 0.11% 0.81%

13 Facility Requirements Critical Aircraft Identification Airfield Capacity and Configuration Airfield Design Standards Runway Length Analysis Runway Strength Analysis Airfield Lighting, Markings and Signage, and Navigational Aids Instrument Approaches Transient Apron and Based Aircraft Storage Airport Support Facilities Land Use Considerations Airport Security Analysis

14 Critical Aircraft Identification Aircraft Approach Category (AAC) Airplane Design Group (ADG) Category Approach Speed (Knots) Group Tail Height (Feet) Wingspan (Feet) A <91 I <20 <49 B 91 to <121 II 20 to <30 49 to <79 C 121 to <141 III 30 to <45 79 to <118 D 141 to <166 IV 45 to < to <171 E >166 V 60 to < to <214 VI 66 to < to <262 Critical Aircraft Aircraft Type Aircraft Approach Category/Approach Speed Airplane Design Group/Wingspan Runway Design Code (RDC) Tail Height Taxiway Design Group (TDG) Max Takeoff Weight (MTOW) Max Landing Weight (MLW) Boeing Freighter Twin-Engine Jet C / 137 Knots IV / 125 Feet RDC C-IV 125 Feet TDG-4 255,000 Pounds 210,000 Pounds

15 Airfield Capacity TLH Airfield Capacity Calculations Annual Hourly Year % ASV % VFR Capacity % IFR Capacity Operations VFR Peak Hour IFR Peak Hour (195,000) (74) (57) , % % % , % % % Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., % Threshold Plan Improvement 90% Threshold Construct Improvements Consider a by-pass taxiway at Runway 9 end

16 Runway 9-27 Design Standards Airfield Design Standards Analysis (Runway 9-27) Design Standard Required Dimension Runway 9 Runway 27 Runway Design Code (RDC) RDC C-IV Taxiway Design Group (TDG) TDG-4 RW Approach Visibility Minimums Varies by End 1 Mile CAT II Runway (RW) Width 150 Feet Meets Standards RW Safety Area (RSA) Width 500 Feet RSA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet Meets Standards RW Object Free Area (ROFA) Width 800 Feet ROFA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet Meets Standards RW Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ) Width 400 Feet ROFZ Length Beyond RW End 200 Feet Meets Standards RW Protection Zone (RPZ) Inner Width 9 (500 Feet) 27 (1,000 Feet) RPZ Outer Width 9 (1,010 Feet) 27 (1,750 Feet) Meets Standards Extends Off Airport (23.9 Acres) RPZ Length 9 (1,700 Feet) 27 (2,500 Feet) RW Blast Pad Width 200 Feet RW Blast Pad Length 200 Feet Meets Standards RW Shoulder Width 25 Feet Meets Standards Taxiway (TW) Width 50 Feet Meets Standards TW Safety Area (TSA) Width 171 Feet Meets Standards TW Object Free Area (TOFA) Width 259 Feet Meets Standards Taxilane (TL) Object Free Area Width 225 Feet Meets Standards TW Shoulder Width 20 Feet No Paved Taxiway Shoulders RW Centerline to Parallel TW Centerline 400 Feet Meets Standards RW Centerline to Holdline 250 Feet Meets Standards RW Centerline to Aircraft Parking Area 500 Feet Meets Standards TW Centerline to Parallel TW/TL Centerline 215 Feet Meets Standards TW Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object Feet Meets Standards TL Centerline to TL Centerline 198 Feet Meets Standards TL Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object Feet Meets Standards RW Surface Gradient and Line of Sight Max ±1.5% Meets Standards Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

17 Runway Design Standards Airfield Design Standards Analysis (Runway 18-36) Design Standard Required Dimension Runway 18 Runway 36 Runway Design Code (RDC) RDC C-IV Taxiway Design Group (TDG) TDG-4 RW Approach Visibility Minimums Varies by End ¾ Mile ½ Mile Runway (RW) Width 150 Feet 150 (Meets Standards) RW Safety Area (RSA) Width 500 Feet RSA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet Meets Standards RW Object Free Area (ROFA) Width 800 Feet ROFA Length Beyond RW End 1,000 Feet Meets Standards RW Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ) Width 400 Feet ROFZ Length Beyond RW End 200 Feet Meets Standards RW Protection Zone (RPZ) Inner Width 18 (500 Feet) 36 (1,000 Feet) RPZ Outer Width 18 (1,010 Feet) 36 (1,750 Feet) Meets Standards RPZ Length 18 (1,700 Feet) 36 (2,500 Feet) RW Blast Pad Width 200 Feet RW Blast Pad Length 200 Feet Meets Standards RW Shoulder Width 25 Feet Meets Standards Taxiway (TW) Width 50 Feet Meets Standards TW Safety Area (TSA) Width 171 Feet Meets Standards TW Object Free Area (TOFA) Width 259 Feet Meets Standards Taxilane (TL) Object Free Area Width 225 Feet Meets Standards TW Shoulder Width 20 Feet No Paved Taxiway Shoulders RW Centerline to Parallel TW Centerline 400 Feet Meets Standards RW Centerline to Holdline 250 Feet Meets Standards RW Centerline to Aircraft Parking Area 500 Feet Meets Standards TW Centerline to Parallel TW/TL Centerline 215 Feet Meets Standards TW Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object Feet Meets Standards TL Centerline to TL Centerline 198 Feet Meets Standards TL Centerline to Fixed or Movable Object Feet Meets Standards RW Surface Gradient and Line of Sight Max ±1.5% Meets Standards Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

18 Airfield Design Standards Analysis

19 Runway Length Analysis Boeing Freighter Runway Length Requirements Operation Runway Condition Pratt & Whitney Rolls Royce (PW2040) (RB E4) Takeoff Runway 9-27 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 59 F 7,569 Feet 7,369 Feet Takeoff Runway 9-27 MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 84 F 7,969 Feet 7,669 Feet Takeoff Runway MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 59 F 7,667 Feet 7,467 Feet Takeoff Runway MTOW, 83 Feet AMSL, 84 F 8,067 Feet 7,767 Feet Landing MLW, Dry Runway, 59 F 5,100 Feet 4,700 Feet Both Landing MLW, Wet Runway, 59 F 5,900 Feet 5,400 Feet Sources: Boeing Aircraft Performance Manual and Michael Baker International Inc., MTOW Maximum Takeoff Weight MLW Maximum Landing Weight

20 Airfield Pavement Conditions

21 Airfield Lighting Maintain runway lighting (HIRLs) Taxiway and apron edge lighting is reaching end of useful service life Upgrade taxiway lighting system to LED Upgrade apron edge lights to LED Rotating beacon near end of useful service life

22 Airfield Markings Existing markings consistent with FAA standards Maintain existing airfield marking and surface painted holding position signs Consider taxiway edge markings in conjunction with airfield improvements

23 Airfield Signage Maintain existing signage Consider signage improvements in conjunction with future airfield development projects Replace older signs with LED type

24 Apron and Aircraft Storage Additional 4,266 SY of transient apron required Construct 16 additional t-hangars Additional 25,000 SF of conventional hangar space required

25 General Aviation Terminal General Aviation Terminal Demand Year Factor Square GA Existing Terminal Required Building Peak Hour Operations Feet Square Footage Square Footage Surplus (Deficit) ,400 SF 5,250 SF 6,150 SF ,400 SF 5,750 SF 5,650 SF ,400 SF 6,250 SF 5,150 SF ,400 SF 6,750 SF 4,650 SF ,400 SF 7,250 SF 4,150 SF Source: Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016

26 Demand/ Year Fuel Storage Projected Demand and Fuel Storage Requirements Commercial Demand GA Demand Total Demand 7-Day Demand Available Capacity Surplus/ Deficit Jet A ,280,915 1,184,428 3,465,343 66, ,000 53, ,497,950 1,220,011 3,717,961 71, ,000 48, ,742,422 1,257,236 3,999,658 76, ,000 43, ,016,241 1,296,233 4,312,474 82, ,000 37, ,323,366 1,337,069 4,660,435 89, ,000 30,376 AvGas 2015 N/A 139, ,445 2,682 25,000 22, N/A 150, ,081 2,886 25,000 22, N/A 157, ,150 3,022 25,000 21, N/A 164, ,546 3,164 25,000 21, N/A 172, ,293 3,313 25,000 21,687 Source: Michael Baker International, Inc. 2016

27 Air Cargo Year Total Cargo (lbs.) Air Cargo Facility Space Requirements Total Approximate Cargo (Tons) Space Ratio Projected Space Demand (Square Feet) Existing Available Space (Square Feet) Surplus/ Deficit ,045, ,000 13, ,780,325 10, ,890 23,000 12, ,891,341 11, ,446 23,000 11, ,059,029 12, ,030 23,000 10, ,286,281 12, ,643 23,000 10,357 Source: 2013 Airports Council International- North America (ACI-NA) Air Cargo, Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

28 Terminal Access Year Total Peak Hour Passengers Terminal Access Roadway Capacity Demand 80% Automobile Other Avg. Day Peak Hour Vehicles 1 Existing Roadway Capacity (VPH) 2 VPH Surplus/ (Deficiency) , ,100 1, , ,210 1, , ,320 1, ,420 1, ,562 1, Source: FAA AC 150/ , Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities, Michael Baker International, Notes: 1) ADPH vehicles includes all arriving and departing passenger traffic. Other includes higher occupancy vehicles and an allowance of an additional 20% for vehicles serving non-passenger traffic. 2) Capacity per lane at grade primary access road at or below 30 mph = 900 Vehicles per Hour. Estimate that 80 percent of users arrive by private vehicle. Remaining 20 percent arrive via higher occupancy commercial vehicles.

29 Curb Frontage Terminal Passenger Curb Frontage Requirements Requirement Peak Hour Total Passengers 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,420 Vehicle (Lin Ft) Demand ,117 Existing Curb Length (Lin. Ft.) Existing Double Parking Capacity (Lin Ft) 1 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 Surplus/(Deficiency) (Lin Ft) 1,113 1, Source: FAA AC 150/ , Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities; ACRP Report 25, Airport Passenger Terminal Planning and Design; Michael Baker International, Inc., 2016.

30 Public Parking Public Parking Requirements ITEM Peak hour Passengers 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,420 Total Public Parking Space Demand 1 1,500 1,650 1,800 2,030 Long-Term Parking Space Demand 2 1,125 1,237 1,350 1,522 Short-Term Parking Space Demand Existing Parking Space Capacity (LT/ST) 1,330/307 1,330/307 1,330/307 1,330/307 Public Parking Surplus / (Deficit) (LT/ST) 170/(68) 93/(105) (20)/(143) (192)/(201) Source: FAA AC 150/ , Planning and Design Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities; Michael Baker International, Inc Note: 1) 1.5 times Peak Hour Passengers 2).Long-term demand =.75 * Total Parking Space Demand 3) Short-term demand =.25 * Total Parking Space Demand

31 Landside Evaluation Areas

32 Next Steps FAA Forecast Review Under review Facility Requirements Under review Sustainability Visioning Jan 2017 Airport Alternatives Jan 2017 Public Information Meetings Jan/Feb 2017 Alternatives Refinement, ALP, Financial Analysis/CIP May 2017 Draft Deliverables June 2017

33 Open Discussion