Aviation Capital Improvement Program DRAFT August Aviation Division
|
|
- Marybeth Harvey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Aviation Capital Improvement Program August 218 Aviation Division
2 Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218
3 Executive Summary The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Aviation Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a plan for general aviation airport development in Texas. It is a detailed listing of potential projects based on the anticipated funding levels of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Improvement Program and the Texas Aviation Facilities Development Program. The Aviation CIP facilitates general aviation airport development in Texas. Through multi-year programming, the FAA, TxDOT and airport sponsors are able to anticipate airport needs and accommodate changes in project scope, cost, and schedule more easily. The project participants know when projects are scheduled and they can plan for implementation. Background Since 1966, the State of Texas has participated in the development of a statewide system of airports by providing grants and loans to communities for aviation facility improvements. In October 1989, the state legislature created the Texas Department of Aviation (TDA) along with an aviation financial aid program, significantly improving the potential for airport development in the state. In 1991, the legislature created TxDOT and the TDA became the TxDOT Aviation Division. The Texas Transportation Commission (TTC) directs the actions of TxDOT through policy and program decisions. By law, the TxDOT is the agent of the state and each political subdivision for the purpose of applying for, receiving, and disbursing federal funds for the benefit of general aviation airports. The legislation allows state funding assistance on federally-funded projects. The state may also fund projects not eligible for federal funding at publicly owned facilities. In addition, the state was selected in 1993 to participate in the State Block Grant Pilot Program, which is a federal program giving the state the lead in carrying out the Improvement Program for the non-reliever general aviation airports. In 1996, the State Block Grant Program was made permanent and TxDOT s responsibility was expanded to include the reliever airports as well. TxDOT identifies aviation facility requirements, airport locations, and timing for development of general aviation airports. Under the State Block Grant Program, the department refines the projects and determines funding eligibility. The chart on the next page shows the project development process and how the airport sponsor works with TxDOT and the FAA to complete capital improvement projects at their airport. The Program The TxDOT Aviation CIP includes all of the Texas General Aviation airports included in the Texas System Plan (TASP), including those designated by the FAA as relievers. Certain airports in metropolitan areas are classified as relievers to enhance capacity at Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 2
4 major commercial airports. The TxDOT Aviation Division has the programming responsibility for reliever airports. Development Process Sponsor TxDOT Federal Aviation Administration Planning Programming Prepares airport master plan which includes short-, intermediate-, and long-term development program. Requests that a specific project be included in the state s Aviation Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Prepares Letter of Interest with project description and cost estimate. Comments on the tentative Aviation CIP. Enters into an intergovernmental agreement authorizing the TxDOT as agent. Selects qualified consultant for project. Reviews project development. Prepares and continually updates Texas System Plan which establishes state aviation priorities. Evaluates the proposed project in terms of its consistency with state aviation policies and investment priorities, federal eligibility, and compliance with federal regulations. Prepares Aviation CIP for general aviation airports. The Texas Transportation Commission approves the Aviation CIP and funding for each project. Issues a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for consultant selection. Reviews consultant selection for general compliance. Provides technical assistance to consultant and reviews project results. Maintains an updated National System Plan which outlines development and identifies airports eligible for federal funding. Provides support and technical assistance as requested. Assists with acquisition of property and easements needed for projects. Receives requests for payment, disburses project funds, reviews project development and approves project. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 3
5 The Aviation CIP is a tentative schedule of federal and state airport development projects for the years needs are categorized by the objective they address. The following objectives, in order of importance, are assigned by the Texas Transportation Commission: Enhance safety Preserve existing facilities Respond to present needs Provide for anticipated needs The Aviation CIP is developed based on the following assumptions about future annual federal and state funding: Approximately $19 million annual federal Improvement Program funding throughout the period, plus $24 million in Non-Primary Entitlement Funds. Approximately $1 million average annual federal discretionary funding throughout the period. Approximately $16 million annual Texas Aviation Facilities Development Program funding throughout the period. Because of year-to-year funding uncertainties, the TxDOT Aviation Division may program slightly more dollars during a fiscal year than can be funded. During project development, technical analysis may lead to significant changes in project scope, cost, timing, and funding source. Some projects may require additional time for development before implementation or sponsor funding delays, causing them to be postponed. By allowing a small amount of leeway for flexibility, the Aviation Division is able to replace postponed projects with welldeveloped projects to best use available funding. Inclusion of a project in the CIP is not a commitment for future funding; however, projects in the CIP are under strong consideration for funding. The Aviation Division will work with the sponsor to develop an acceptable project, assuming the project is consistent with planning and programming standards and priorities. From the Aviation CIP, an annual program of projects is identified. The annual program includes the projects programmed from the first year of the CIP. These projects will be submitted to the Texas Transportation Commission for funding in the upcoming fiscal year. Generally, projects will progress forward through the CIP until actual implementation. The CIP The CIP represents a significant investment in preserving and expanding the Texas System. Approximately 85% of the funds programmed for this plan is allocated for Safety and Preservation of system airports; primarily projects designed to meet design/safety standards, security enhancements and pavement preservation. Approximately 15% of the CIP is currently programmed to enhance our system in the form of new or Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 4
6 extended runways, expanded aircraft parking aprons, terminal buildings and aircraft hangar developments - all based on local demand for increased capacity. This continues TxDOT s ambitious vision of preserving system assets while dramatically enhancing safety, capacity and function. The CIP currently includes about $211 million of general aviation airport improvement projects. Over the three-year period, this represents programmed project funding of about $153 million federal, $31 million state, and $27 million in local contributions. The Aviation CIP presented here is subject to change. It is based on a series of assumptions regarding future funding, airport sponsor actions, and aviation activity. To the extent that the basis for these assumptions changes, the CIP will require adjustment. To continue to have the most current program information available, the Current CIP is continually updated and made available via the TxDOT website ( The Annual CIP will continue to be published for Transportation Commission approval once a year. The Aviation Division continually receives input from sponsors regarding their airport needs and plans. This information is used in the development of the next CIP. TxDOT welcomes your comments on this document and the Aviation CIP process. Please contact the TxDOT Aviation Division at the following address: TxDOT Aviation Division 125 E. 11 th Street Austin, Texas (512) (512) (fax) (8) 68-PILOT Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 5
7 Planning Planning provides a framework within which prudent aviation investment decisions can be made. System-level planning activities and close coordination with local airport sponsors are the basis for the Aviation CIP. Background The geographic size of Texas and the distance between population centers make air travel in the state a necessity. In addition to serving business and recreational needs, air transportation offers many opportunities for development and diversification of the Texas economy. Texas airports play a crucial role in supporting local economies. A growing number of communities have realized that airports are no longer a luxury, but a necessary access link for business and industry. The 217 Texas Aviation Economic Impact Study determined that Texas airports had a total annual economic impact exceeding $94 billion and created nearly 78, jobs, making Texas airports an important contributor to the overall state economy. Texas System Plan TxDOT, in cooperation with local airport sponsors and the FAA, has developed a statewide airport system plan--the Texas System Plan (TASP). The TASP includes airports in the FAA National Plan of Integrated Systems (NPIAS), plus other airports deemed necessary for the system. The goal of the plan is to develop a statewide system of airports providing air access to the population and economic centers of Texas. All projects contained in the CIP are first identified in the state plan. TxDOT regularly updates its listing of specific airport needs through continuous dialog and planning meetings held with airport sponsors across the state. Each airport in the TASP has an assigned TxDOT planner who works closely with the sponsor to identify and understand their unique needs. A Development Worksheet is maintained for each airport in the state system. These worksheets identify anticipated short-, intermediate-, and long-term improvements. sponsors may request changes to the development worksheets at any time. During the process of updating the TASP, important aviation-related information is collected, including operations levels and facility conditions. This information also is used in developing the CIP, as is the level of sponsor responsibility regarding airport maintenance and grant compliance. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 6
8 The state system plan: Provides data and justification to the FAA for including airports in the NPIAS, thereby making them eligible for federal financial assistance. Provides a basis for coordinated airport planning and development throughout Texas, reflecting the overall airport system goals. Indicates the role that aviation should play as an element of the Texas transportation system in connecting population and economic centers. Identifies the general locations, types, and sizes of airport facilities to enhance air transportation access in Texas communities. The TASP development process results in the collection of important aviation-related information, including: An inventory of existing airport facilities, services, and traffic volumes. Analysis of the existing capacity of airports and forecast activity levels. An airport classification system with appropriate facility standards. A general estimate of needed improvements and their costs at each airport. Alternatives for implementation of airport improvements. Recommended state legislation and funding for airport improvements. The current TASP system includes 2 heliports and 292 existing and 2 proposed airports. Improvements at each airport are identified in three time frames, based on expected aviation activity: Short term; -5 years. Intermediate term; 6-1 years. Long term; years. TASP Objectives The objective of the state airport system is to provide adequate access to the population and economic centers of Texas. Adequate access is expressed in terms of the driving time between activity centers and appropriate airport facilities: Scheduled air carrier service should be within a 6-minute drive for virtually all Texas residents. Business jet aircraft access should be with a 3-minute drive of significant population and mineral resource centers. Light piston-engine aircraft access should be within a 3-minute drive of agricultural centers. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 7
9 Development Worksheets A development worksheet is maintained for each airport in the TASP. The Aviation CIP is assembled from projects listed on these worksheets. s must be shown on a development worksheet to be included in the CIP. The worksheets contain important data about the facility: role and classification. Planned airport improvements by time frame. Cost estimates for improvement projects. sponsors may request changes to the development worksheet at any time. The TxDOT Aviation Division reviews these requests for compatibility with the airport role and classification. Appropriate changes are then made on the worksheet. By maintaining an upto-date worksheet for each airport, the Aviation Division has current knowledge of the aviation improvements needed for the TASP system at any time. Priorities In order to make the best use of limited state and federal airport development funds, the TTC establishes a priority system that allows the TxDOT Aviation Division to identify projects that meet present system needs. Current priorities are: Safety s needed to make the facility safe for aircraft operations. Preservation s to preserve the functional or structural integrity of the airport. Standards Improvements required to bring the airport up to design standards for current user aircraft. Upgrade Improvements required to allow the airport to accommodate larger aircraft or longer stage lengths. Capacity Expansion required to accommodate more aircraft or higher activity levels. New Access A new airport providing new air access to a previously unserved area. New Capacity A new airport needed to add capacity or relieve congestion at other area airports. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 8
10 Programming The Aviation CIP is an organized statement of the scope and timing of planned improvements at general aviation airports in Texas. The CIP identifies projects eligible for the federal Improvement Program (AIP), and projects eligible for the state facilities development program. The process of developing the program is continuous. Through the CIP and other efforts, the TxDOT Aviation Division resolves investment issues and makes programming decisions. The programming process is conducted on an annual cycle and includes the following elements: Obtaining public comments on the program and the process. Identifying needed projects. Developing alternative project solutions. Evaluating and selecting elements of projects. Evaluating and selecting a program of projects. Finalizing the program consistent with available funding. The Three-Year CIP provides the basis for the airport investment scheduling activities of the FAA, the TxDOT Aviation Division, and local governments. The program also provides the flexibility needed to deal with a variety of technical changes that become necessary throughout the development of projects. Changes in both project scope and achievable schedule can be accommodated within the CIP. Aviation Capital Improvement Program The Aviation CIP identifies specific projects for development over the next three years. s in the second and third years of the program are less defined than projects in the first year of the CIP. s are selected from the development worksheets and evaluated based on need. Due to funding limitations, not all items contained in the development worksheets are included in the CIP. The CIP does not reflect all of the known airport needs and deficiencies, but primarily those which have been identified as needed by sponsors and the TxDOT Aviation Division and which are found to be consistent with the goals of the TASP. Inclusion of a project in the Aviation CIP is not a commitment for future funding; however, it is an indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for funding at a future date. Sponsors will receive a more definite commitment of state funding when a project moves into the first year of the program and is approved by the TTC. Generally, projects are expected to move forward until entering the first year of the program; however, nonrealization of anticipated funding and increases in project costs may hinder this forward progression. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 9
11 Annual Program The Annual Program is identified from projects in the Aviation CIP. The Annual Program includes the projects programmed for the first year of the CIP. The TTC determines that these projects should be funded during the upcoming fiscal year. Preliminary implementation begins in the first year for projects to be approved in the second year, including: Environmental assessments. Plans and specifications. Land acquisition. layout plan and property map preparation. The Annual Program coincides with the FAA schedule for funding availability. s that are ready will be moved into the annual program. s that are not ready may remain in the second year. Sponsors know in advance whether the project is likely to be funded by its inclusion in the first year of the CIP. Once a project moves into the first year of the CIP, project implementation begins and overlaps the programming process for the next two years. Implementation The role of the TxDOT in implementing airport improvement projects is established by the state enabling legislation and departmental rules. TxDOT is the agent of the state and sponsor for the purpose of applying for, receiving, and disbursing federal airport development funds. Contracts for project planning, engineering and construction may be negotiated and executed by the department as the sponsor s agent. The department may manage many of the project details. In addition to working closely with the department, sponsors may continue to select consultants. When a project is moved into the Annual Program it becomes eligible for funding. The program is based on the funding levels authorized by the Texas Legislature and the most likely federal funding levels that can be anticipated. Implementation of the entire program is dependent upon actions and funding that occur at the local, state, and federal levels. Assistance Accomplishment of the programmed projects depends on airport sponsor actions, funding availability, priorities, and actual project costs. As a participant in the State Block Grant Program, TxDOT takes a predominant role in the implementation of federal projects. In compliance with state legislation, the department may act as the agent of the sponsor for both state and federal projects, managing many of the project details including: Assisting with consultant selections. Assisting with the property acquisition process. Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 1
12 Reviewing and approving project designs and specifications. Advertising for bids. Awarding construction contracts. Coordinating activities with the FAA as necessary. Inspecting construction. Applying for and disbursing funds. Sponsors may continue to select consultants for airport development projects. A TxDOT planner or engineer is assigned to each project for oversight purposes. On-site management of the project is the responsibility of the consultant who submits required progress reports to the department. Contractor requests for payment come to the TxDOT staff who determine the validity of each billing and authorize payment from the project account. expenses on federallyfunded projects are paid by the department from a letter of credit established with the FAA. TxDOT is responsible for the project audit. Financial Assistance When projects move into the Annual Program they become eligible for state or federal funding. For the majority of projects the local contribution for both federal and state grants is 1%, although other grant programs have cost-share provisions that require a larger local contribution (e.g. for terminal buildings, the local share is 5% and the maximum state share is $5,). Typical Federally-Funded and State-Funded Cost Distribution Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 11
13 CIP s The following listing presents the projects contained in the Aviation Capital Improvement Program. This list represents the TxDOT Aviation Division s current knowledge of airport needs and potential projects. The projects are organized by year and airport location, indicating the type of work to be performed at each location and the estimated project cost. About The s The program presented here is the result of a series of projections, judgments, and choices in both policy and technical areas, including: Federal policies, laws and regulations. Policies of the department. Definition of needs and/or priorities. Assumptions about future state and federal airport improvement funding. Assessment of current airport deficiencies. Anticipation of local airport sponsor actions. The projects in this listing are constantly undergoing further development and refinement due to: Refined project scope. Refined cost estimates. Scheduling changes due to unforeseen delays or complications such as: Changes in the rate of physical deterioration of facilities. Land acquisition problems. Environmental problems. New standards, policies, rules, laws, etc. Requirements of the FAA, the Texas Transportation Commission, or other agencies. For these and other reasons, the following projects are subject to change. If funding levels differ from those assumed here, there will be impacts on both the project scope and the implementation schedule. scope and implementation year may be revised to best fit the overall system needs and existing funding availability. Justification may be required for some projects in keeping with the TxDOT Aviation Policies and Standards approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. Some projects listed in this table may not be implemented due to lack of justification, funding restrictions, or other reasons. The Aviation Capital Improvement Program is revised and updated continually. Printed versions of the Annual CIP are available annually for public distribution and are also available via the TxDOT website ( Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 12
14 Financial Summary Of the approximately $211 million of total project costs, the FAA share represents about $153 million. The state share of these costs is approximately $31 million, with local airport sponsors responsible for the remaining $27 million. The following table summarizes the CIP costs. (Rounded to Thousands of Dollars) Fiscal Year Total Total (Rounded) FAA Share TxDOT Share Sponsor Share $ 64,791 $ 41,38 $ 11,353 $ 12,131 67,951 47,617 13,364 6,971 78,772 63,784 6,776 8,213 $ 211,514 $ 152,79 $ 31,493 $ 27,315 Aviation Capital Improvement Program August,218 13
15 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY ALPINE ALPINE-CASPARIS MUNI 7, 63, 7, 219 PENDING ALPINE ALPINE-CASPARIS MUNI 9, 81, 9, 221 PENDING ANGLETON/LAKE JACKSON TEXAS GULF COAST RGNL 3, 27, 3, 22 PENDING ANGLETON/LAKE JACKSON TEXAS GULF COAST RGNL 1,999,27 1,799, , PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 1,488,125 1,339, , PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY RGNL 795, 715,5 79,5 219 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY RGNL 21, 189, 21, 22 PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY RGNL 3,173, 2,855,7 317,3 221 PENDING BONHAM JONES FIELD 1,465, 1,318,5 146,5 219 PENDING BONHAM JONES FIELD 29, 261, 29, 219 PENDING BONHAM JONES FIELD 2,58, 2,322, 258, 22 PENDING BORGER HUTCHINSON COUNTY 5,975, 5,377,5 597,5 22 PENDING BORGER HUTCHINSON COUNTY 74, 666, 74, 221 PENDING BOWIE BOWIE MUNI 1,453,6 1,38,24 145, PENDING BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS COUNTY 112, 1,8 11,2 219 PENDING BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS COUNTY 1,23, 1,17, 123, 22 PENDING BRENHAM BRENHAM MUNI 334,5 31,5 33, PENDING BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI 12, 18, 12, 219 PENDING BROWNWOOD BROWNWOOD RGNL 1,362,4 1,226,16 136, PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 2, 18, 2, 22 PENDING BRYAN COULTER FIELD 2,25, 1,822,5 22,5 221 PENDING CAMERON CAMERON MUNI AIRPARK 1,2, 1,8, 12, 22 PENDING CANADIAN HEMPHILL COUNTY 75, 562,5 187,5 22 PENDING CHILDRESS CHILDRESS MUNI 25, 184,5 2,5 219 PENDING CHILDRESS CHILDRESS MUNI 2,595, 2,335,5 259,5 221 PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 125, 93,75 31, PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 258, 232,2 25,8 219 PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 2,27, 2,43, 227, 22 PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 294, 264,6 29,4 22 PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 571,7 514,53 57, PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 2,586,9 2,328,21 258, PENDING CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI 75, 67,5 7,5 219 PENDING CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD 15, 112,5 37,5 219 PENDING CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD 3, 15, 15, 219 PENDING Page 14 Status
16 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status COLEMAN COLEMAN MUNI 2,415, 2,173,5 241,5 22 PENDING COLUMBUS ROBERT R WELLS JR 28, 252, 28, 22 PENDING COLUMBUS ROBERT R WELLS JR 89, 81, 89, 221 PENDING COMANCHE COMANCHE COUNTY-CITY 166,666 15, 16, PENDING COMMERCE COMMERCE MUNI 666,666 6, 66, PENDING CORSICANA C DAVID CAMPBELL FIELD-CORSICANA MUNI 15, 135, 15, 22 PENDING CORSICANA C DAVID CAMPBELL FIELD-CORSICANA MUNI 4,3, 3,87, 43, 221 PENDING CROCKETT HOUSTON COUNTY 855, 769,5 85,5 219 PENDING DALHART DALHART MUNI 5, 45, 5, 22 PENDING DALHART DALHART MUNI 861, ,294 86, PENDING DALLAS ADDISON 2,122,844 1,91, , PENDING DALLAS ADDISON 5,684,7 4,576,19 1,18, PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 175, 157,5 17,5 22 PENDING DALLAS DALLAS EXECUTIVE 2,265,5 2,38,95 226, PENDING DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 22, 198, 22, 219 PENDING DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 3, 27, 3, 219 PENDING DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 4,, 3,6, 4, 221 PENDING DELL CITY DELL CITY MUNI 274, ,199 27, PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 185, 166,5 18,5 219 PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 638,2 536,13 12,7 219 PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 4,333,42 3,899, ,34 22 PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 3,582,548 3,224, , PENDING DENVER CITY DENVER CITY 375, 337,5 37,5 219 PENDING DENVER CITY DENVER CITY 2,593,5 2,333, ,35 22 PENDING DENVER CITY DENVER CITY 2,262, 2,35,8 226,2 221 PENDING DUBLIN DUBLIN MUNI 136, 122,4 13,6 219 PENDING DUBLIN DUBLIN MUNI 1,341,8 1,26, ,18 22 PENDING DUMAS MOORE COUNTY 1,3, 1,17, 13, 219 PENDING EAGLE LAKE EAGLE LAKE 666,667 6,1 66, PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 1,279,7 1,151,73 127, PENDING EDNA JACKSON COUNTY 1, 9, 1, 219 PENDING EDNA JACKSON COUNTY 1,4, 1,26, 14, 22 PENDING FABENS FABENS 833, ,939 83, PENDING FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY 675, 67,5 67,5 219 PENDING Page 15
17 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 2, 18, 2, 22 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH MEACHAM INTL 5,, 4,5, 5, 221 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS 2, 18, 2, 219 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS 2, 18, 2, 219 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS 1,35, 1,215, 135, 22 PENDING FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 2,221,4 1,999,26 222, PENDING FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 15, 135, 15, 22 PENDING FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 1,56, 1,44, 156, 221 PENDING FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 12, 18, 12, 221 PENDING GAINESVILLE GAINESVILLE MUNI 877, 789,3 87,7 219 PENDING GAINESVILLE GAINESVILLE MUNI 845,7 761,13 84,57 22 PENDING GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON 2, 18, 2, 22 PENDING GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON 325, 292,5 32,5 22 PENDING GALVESTON SCHOLES INTL AT GALVESTON 2,118,1 1,96,29 211, PENDING GEORGETOWN GEORGETOWN MUNI 1,287,562 1,158,84 128, PENDING GIDDINGS GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY 1,725,496 1,552, , PENDING GIDDINGS GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY 75, 675, 75, 22 PENDING GONZALES ROGER M DREYER MEMORIAL 11, 99, 11, 219 PENDING GONZALES ROGER M DREYER MEMORIAL 975, 793,5 181,5 22 PENDING GRAFORD POSSUM KINGDOM 391,2 348,64 42,56 22 PENDING GRAHAM GRAHAM MUNI 1,563,5 1,47,15 156, PENDING GRAHAM GRAHAM MUNI 245, 122,5 122,5 221 PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 7,894,736 3,, 4,894, PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 3,, 3,, 22 PENDING GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 3,7, 3,7, 221 PENDING GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE MUNI 1,245,3 996,24 249,6 219 PENDING GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE MUNI 166, ,999 16, PENDING GREENVILLE MAJORS 1,11, 999, 111, 22 PENDING GROVETON GROVETON-TRINITY COUNTY 26, ,62 2, PENDING GRUVER GRUVER MUNI 3, 27, 3, 22 PENDING GRUVER GRUVER MUNI 862,71 775,863 86, PENDING HAMILTON HAMILTON MUNI 3, 27, 3, 22 PENDING HAMILTON HAMILTON MUNI 8, 72, 8, 221 PENDING HASKELL HASKELL MUNI 259, 233,1 25,9 219 PENDING Page 16
18 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status HEARNE HEARNE MUNI 1,36, 1,224, 136, 22 PENDING HILLSBORO HILLSBORO MUNI 716,7 645,3 71, PENDING HILLSBORO HILLSBORO MUNI 67,7 546,93 6, PENDING HOUSTON CONROE-NORTH HOUSTON RGNL 1,277,778 1,15,1 127, PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 2,6, 2,34, 26, 219 PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 2,5, 2,25, 25, 22 PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 4,93, 4,437, 493, 221 PENDING HUNTSVILLE HUNTSVILLE MUNI 1,349, 1,214,1 134,9 22 PENDING INGLESIDE MCCAMPBELL-PORTER 1,185, 618,5 566,5 219 PENDING JACKSONVILLE CHEROKEE COUNTY 6, 54, 6, 219 PENDING JEFFERSON CYPRESS RIVER 39, 351, 39, 219 PENDING JEFFERSON CYPRESS RIVER 295, 265,5 29,5 22 PENDING JUNCTION KIMBLE COUNTY 5, 45, 5, 22 PENDING JUNCTION KIMBLE COUNTY 831,45 748,35 83, PENDING KENEDY KARNES COUNTY 15, 135, 15, 219 PENDING KIRBYVILLE KIRBYVILLE 276, ,881 27, PENDING LA PORTE LA PORTE MUNI 2,465,1 2,218,59 246, PENDING LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 257, ,566 25, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 16, 14, 56, 219 PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 28, 252, 28, 219 PENDING LIVINGSTON LIVINGSTON MUNI 518,77 466,268 51,89 22 PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 15, 112,5 37,5 219 PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 6, 54, 6, 22 PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 6, 54, 6, 221 PENDING LULING THE CARTER MEMORIAL 7, 63, 7, 22 PENDING LULING THE CARTER MEMORIAL 26, 234, 26, 221 PENDING MADISONVILLE MADISONVILLE MUNI 15, 135, 15, 22 PENDING MADISONVILLE MADISONVILLE MUNI 1,355, 1,219,5 135,5 221 PENDING MASON MASON COUNTY 86, 774, 86, 219 PENDING MESQUITE MESQUITE METRO 1,2, 1,8, 12, 219 PENDING MEXIA MEXIA-LIMESTONE CO 3, 27, 3, 22 PENDING MEXIA MEXIA-LIMESTONE CO 473, ,136 47, PENDING MIDLOTHIAN/WAXAHACHIE MID-WAY RGNL 237,6 213,84 23, PENDING MIDLOTHIAN/WAXAHACHIE MID-WAY RGNL 472,4 425,16 47, PENDING Page 17
19 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status MINERAL WELLS MINERAL WELLS 98,7 817,83 9, PENDING MINERAL WELLS MINERAL WELLS 639,6 575,64 63,96 22 PENDING MONAHANS ROY HURD MEMORIAL 3,172,5 2,855,25 317, PENDING MUNDAY MUNDAY MUNI 677, 69,3 67,7 219 PENDING NAVASOTA NAVASOTA MUNI 2, 15, 5, 221 PENDING NEW BRAUNFELS NEW BRAUNFELS RGNL 1,49,685 1,341, ,69 22 PENDING OLNEY OLNEY MUNI 3, 15, 15, 219 PENDING OLNEY OLNEY MUNI 549, 494,1 54,9 22 PENDING PECOS PECOS MUNI 1,8, 54, 54, 219 PENDING PECOS PECOS MUNI 5,47, 4,923, 547, 22 PENDING PERRYTON PERRYTON OCHILTREE COUNTY 84,5 724,5 8, PENDING PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH 2,854, 2,568,6 285,4 219 PENDING PORT ISABEL PORT ISABEL-CAMERON COUNTY 816,32 734,688 81, PENDING PORT MANSFIELD CHARLES R JOHNSON 185, ,921 18, PENDING REFUGIO ROOKE FIELD 3, 27, 3, 219 PENDING REFUGIO ROOKE FIELD 3, 27, 3, 22 PENDING REFUGIO ROOKE FIELD 599,57 539,15 59, PENDING ROCKWALL RALPH M HALL/ROCKWALL MUNI 666,667 6, 66, PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 18, 162, 18, 219 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 1,5, 1,35, 15, 22 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 5, 45, 5, 221 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 1,896, 1,76,4 189,6 221 PENDING SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS MUNI 15, 135, 15, 22 PENDING SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS MUNI 2,6, 2,34, 26, 221 PENDING SEYMOUR SEYMOUR MUNI 166,667 15,1 16, PENDING SMITHVILLE SMITHVILLE CRAWFORD MUNI 681, 51,75 17, PENDING SPEARMAN MAJOR SAMUEL B CORNELIUS FIELD 5, 45, 5, 22 PENDING SPEARMAN MAJOR SAMUEL B CORNELIUS FIELD 1,134,256 1,2, , PENDING STANTON STANTON MUNI 396, 356,4 39,6 219 PENDING STANTON STANTON MUNI 1,83, 1,647, 183, 22 PENDING STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE CLARK RGNL 2,691,7 2,422,53 269, PENDING STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE CLARK RGNL 1,433,1 1,289,79 143,31 22 PENDING SWEETWATER AVENGER FIELD 1,984,75 1,786, , PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 15, 94,5 1,5 219 PENDING Page 18
20 INDEX BY CITY - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 75, 37,5 37,5 219 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 69, 345, 345, 22 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 1,6, 1,44, 16, 22 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 1,192,673 1,35,81 156, PENDING TEMPLE DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS RGNL 32, 288, 32, 219 PENDING TEMPLE DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS RGNL 2,37, 2,133, 237, 22 PENDING TERRELL TERRELL MUNI 2,35,328 2,115, ,34 22 PENDING VAN HORN CULBERSON COUNTY 847, 762,3 84,7 221 PENDING VEGA OLDHAM COUNTY 497,24 447,483 49, PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 1,118,8 1,6,92 111, PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 97,6 816,84 9,76 22 PENDING VICTORIA VICTORIA RGNL 1,712,5 1,541,25 171, PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 76,1 68,49 7, PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 792,4 713,16 79,24 22 PENDING WESLACO MID VALLEY 85, 76,5 8,5 219 PENDING WESLACO MID VALLEY 185, 138,75 46, PENDING WINK WINKLER COUNTY 1,37, 1,233, 137, 219 PENDING WINNSBORO WINNSBORO MUNI 15, 94,5 1,5 219 PENDING ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY 1,16, 1,44, 116, 219 PENDING Totals: $211,515,181 $152,78,363 $31,492,9 $27,314,89 Page 19
21 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY ALPINE ALPINE-CASPARIS MUNI 7, 63, 7, 219 PENDING ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI 1,488,125 1,339, , PENDING BAY CITY BAY CITY RGNL 795, 715,5 79,5 219 PENDING BONHAM JONES FIELD 1,465, 1,318,5 146,5 219 PENDING BONHAM JONES FIELD 29, 261, 29, 219 PENDING BOWIE BOWIE MUNI 1,453,6 1,38,24 145, PENDING BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS COUNTY 112, 1,8 11,2 219 PENDING BRENHAM BRENHAM MUNI 334,5 31,5 33, PENDING BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI 12, 18, 12, 219 PENDING BROWNWOOD BROWNWOOD RGNL 1,362,4 1,226,16 136, PENDING CHILDRESS CHILDRESS MUNI 25, 184,5 2,5 219 PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 125, 93,75 31, PENDING CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL 258, 232,2 25,8 219 PENDING CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI 75, 67,5 7,5 219 PENDING CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD 15, 112,5 37,5 219 PENDING CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD 3, 15, 15, 219 PENDING COMANCHE COMANCHE COUNTY-CITY 166,666 15, 16, PENDING CROCKETT HOUSTON COUNTY 855, 769,5 85,5 219 PENDING DALLAS ADDISON 2,122,844 1,91, , PENDING DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 22, 198, 22, 219 PENDING DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 3, 27, 3, 219 PENDING DELL CITY DELL CITY MUNI 274, ,199 27, PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 185, 166,5 18,5 219 PENDING DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE 638,2 536,13 12,7 219 PENDING DENVER CITY DENVER CITY 375, 337,5 37,5 219 PENDING DUBLIN DUBLIN MUNI 136, 122,4 13,6 219 PENDING DUMAS MOORE COUNTY 1,3, 1,17, 13, 219 PENDING EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI 1,279,7 1,151,73 127, PENDING EDNA JACKSON COUNTY 1, 9, 1, 219 PENDING FABENS FABENS 833, ,939 83, PENDING FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY 675, 67,5 67,5 219 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS 2, 18, 2, 219 PENDING FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS 2, 18, 2, 219 PENDING FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 2,221,4 1,999,26 222, PENDING GAINESVILLE GAINESVILLE MUNI 877, 789,3 87,7 219 PENDING GIDDINGS GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY 1,725,496 1,552, , PENDING GONZALES ROGER M DREYER MEMORIAL 11, 99, 11, 219 PENDING GRAHAM GRAHAM MUNI 1,563,5 1,47,15 156, PENDING Status Page 2
22 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status GRANBURY GRANBURY RGNL 7,894,736 3,, 4,894, PENDING GRAND PRAIRIE GRAND PRAIRIE MUNI 1,245,3 996,24 249,6 219 PENDING GROVETON GROVETON-TRINITY COUNTY 26, ,62 2, PENDING HASKELL HASKELL MUNI 259, 233,1 25,9 219 PENDING HILLSBORO HILLSBORO MUNI 716,7 645,3 71, PENDING HOUSTON CONROE-NORTH HOUSTON RGNL 1,277,778 1,15,1 127, PENDING HOUSTON SUGAR LAND RGNL 2,6, 2,34, 26, 219 PENDING INGLESIDE MCCAMPBELL-PORTER 1,185, 618,5 566,5 219 PENDING JACKSONVILLE CHEROKEE COUNTY 6, 54, 6, 219 PENDING JEFFERSON CYPRESS RIVER 39, 351, 39, 219 PENDING KENEDY KARNES COUNTY 15, 135, 15, 219 PENDING LA PORTE LA PORTE MUNI 2,465,1 2,218,59 246, PENDING LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 257, ,566 25, PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 16, 14, 56, 219 PENDING LANCASTER LANCASTER RGNL 28, 252, 28, 219 PENDING LLANO LLANO MUNI 15, 112,5 37,5 219 PENDING MASON MASON COUNTY 86, 774, 86, 219 PENDING MESQUITE MESQUITE METRO 1,2, 1,8, 12, 219 PENDING MIDLOTHIAN/WAXAHACHIE MID-WAY RGNL 237,6 213,84 23, PENDING MINERAL WELLS MINERAL WELLS 98,7 817,83 9, PENDING MUNDAY MUNDAY MUNI 677, 69,3 67,7 219 PENDING OLNEY OLNEY MUNI 3, 15, 15, 219 PENDING PECOS PECOS MUNI 1,8, 54, 54, 219 PENDING PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH 2,854, 2,568,6 285,4 219 PENDING PORT ISABEL PORT ISABEL-CAMERON COUNTY 816,32 734,688 81, PENDING REFUGIO ROOKE FIELD 3, 27, 3, 219 PENDING SAN ANTONIO STINSON MUNI 18, 162, 18, 219 PENDING SMITHVILLE SMITHVILLE CRAWFORD MUNI 681, 51,75 17, PENDING STANTON STANTON MUNI 396, 356,4 39,6 219 PENDING STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE CLARK RGNL 2,691,7 2,422,53 269, PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 15, 94,5 1,5 219 PENDING TAYLOR TAYLOR MUNI 75, 37,5 37,5 219 PENDING TEMPLE DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS RGNL 32, 288, 32, 219 PENDING VEGA OLDHAM COUNTY 497,24 447,483 49, PENDING VERNON WILBARGER COUNTY 1,118,8 1,6,92 111, PENDING VICTORIA VICTORIA RGNL 1,712,5 1,541,25 171, PENDING WACO MC GREGOR EXECUTIVE 76,1 68,49 7, PENDING WESLACO MID VALLEY 85, 76,5 8,5 219 PENDING WESLACO MID VALLEY 185, 138,75 46, PENDING Page 21
23 INDEX BY YEAR - AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM August 7, 218 Estimated Costs and Fiscal Year in Which Will Be Implemented Associated City Facility Name FY Status WINK WINKLER COUNTY 1,37, 1,233, 137, 219 PENDING WINNSBORO WINNSBORO MUNI 15, 94,5 1,5 219 PENDING ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY 1,16, 1,44, 116, 219 PENDING Totals: $64,791,422 $41,38,35 $11,352,55 $12,13,837 Page 22
24 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 ALPINE ALPINE-CASPARIS MUNI ARLINGTON ARLINGTON MUNI BAY CITY BAY CITY RGNL BONHAM JONES FIELD 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Engineering/Design MIRL Replacement & PAPI Install Conduct Drainage Study on South Property Install new gates Install security barbwire and predator barrier to existing chainlink fence (6,5') Refurbish, repair fence to 6' securitiy chainlink w/ predator barrier (2,') Install Wildlife Perimeter Fence 8' w/ predator barrier and four manual swing gates ('NPE '19, '18) Contingency, RPR, Admin, mobilization, etc for fencing project Engineering and Design for Runway Rehabilitation and Perimiter wildlife fencing Clear brush along fence alignment (1 AC) Rehabiliate and mark RWY 16/34 (6,8' x 1') Construction MIRL, threshold lighting, relocate and replace PAPI-2 system, replace airfield signs, replace rotating beacon, and electrical vault replacement MIRL Construction Admin/Drainage Study Rehabilitate partial parallel & cross TXWYs Extend parallel taxiway to RW-35 Rehabilitate apron & stub TXWY Construct auto parking (3 sy) Construction contingency (parallel taxiway extension) Rehabilitate hangar access TXWYs 7, 63, Totals: $ 7, $ 63, $ 25, 22,5 35, 31,5 97,5 87,75 5, 45, 25, 225, 375, ,63 9, 81, 65, 58,5 5, 45, Totals: $ 1,488,125 $ 1,339,313 $ Page , 517,5 22, 198, Totals: $ 795, $ 715,5 $ 9, 81, 1,, 9, 4, 36, 25, 22,5 2, 18, 11, 99, Totals: $ 1,465, $ 1,318,5 $ 7, $ 7, 2,5 3,5 9,75 5, 25, 37,562 9, 6,5 5, $ 148,812 57,5 22, $ 79,5 9, 1, 4, 2,5 2, 11, $ 146,5
25 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 BONHAM JONES FIELD BOWIE BOWIE MUNI BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS COUNTY BRENHAM BRENHAM MUNI BRIDGEPORT BRIDGEPORT MUNI 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Engineering & Design Phase II (RW overlay & MIRL replacement) Mark RW (23,599 sf) Rehabilitate apron and hangar access TWs (17,65 sy) Mark parallel taxiway Mark apron and hangar access taxiways Rehabilitate & mark TWs (36 x 35) Mill and overlay RW (36 x 6) (NPE '19, '18, '17, '16) Contingency, RPR, Admin, Fees runway rehab Engineering and Design Airfield Pavment Rehabiltation Contingency Construction - 16',17',18' NPE - Mobilization Permanent runway taxiway painting Reconstruct 4' Section of Rwy 16/34 for grades Obstruction Survey 29, 261, Totals: $ 29, $ 261, $ 23,6 21,24 86,5 77,85 2,1 1,89 2,1 1,89 87,9 79,11 976,4 878,76 275, 247,5 Totals: $ 1,453,6 $ 1,38,24 $ 112, 1,8 Totals: $ 112, $ 1,8 $ 22,5 2,25 3, 27, 5, 4,5 277, 249,3 Totals: $ 334,5 $ 31,5 $ 12, 18, Totals: $ 12, $ 18, $ 29, $ 29, 2,36 8, ,79 97,64 27,5 $ 145,36 11,2 $ 11,2 2,25 3, 5 27,7 $ 33,45 12, $ 12, Page 24
26 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 BROWNWOOD BROWNWOOD RGNL CHILDRESS CHILDRESS MUNI CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL CLEBURNE CLEBURNE RGNL CLEVELAND CLEVELAND MUNI CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Rehabilitate Apron area asphalt Contingency, RPR, Admin, etc. Taxiway and Apron Rehabilitation Rehabilitate Taxiway A, Cross-taxiways NPE '16-'19 Apron Concrete Joint Seal Replacement (33,72 LF) NPE '16-'19 Concrete Crack Sealing Main Apron Areas Engineering/Design for airfield rehabilitiation Replace AWOS Engineering and Design Taxiway Alpha Rehabilitation ALP Narrative Install AWOS 282, 253,8 272, 244,8 244,4 219,96 282, 253,8 282, 253,8 Totals: $ 1,362,4 $ 1,226,16 $ 25, 184,5 Totals: $ 25, $ $ 184,5 125, 93,75 Totals: $ 125, $ $ 93,75 258, 232,2 Totals: $ 258, $ 232,2 $ 75, 67,5 Totals: $ 75, $ 67,5 $ 15, 112,5 Totals: $ 15, $ $ 112,5 28,2 27,2 24,44 28,2 28,2 $ 136,24 2,5 $ 2,5 31,25 $ 31,25 25,8 $ 25,8 7,5 $ 7,5 37,5 $ 37,5 Page 25
27 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 CLIFTON CLIFTON MUNI/ISENHOWER FIELD COMANCHE COMANCHE COUNTY-CITY CROCKETT HOUSTON COUNTY DALLAS ADDISON DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Construct new Terminal Building / Pilot's Lounge Engineering and Design for Hangar and access taxiway Replace MIRLs Rehab partial parallel and connecting TWs Contingency for TW/Pvmt Rehab Rehabilitate apron Mark RW 2-2 (26,5 sf) Rehabilitate RW 2-2 (4x75) Regrade RW 2/2 Shoulders 3, 15, Totals: $ 3, $ $ 15, 166,666 15, Totals: $ 166,666 $ 15, $ 21, 189, 35, 31,5 16, 144, 95, 85,5 3, 27, 235, 211,5 9, 81, Totals: $ 855, $ 769,5 $ Land Reimbursement acres (438 Wiley Post) Land Reimbursement acres (Curtiss Drive Lots 1, 2 & 3) Clean/Fill/Joint Seal TXWY B, B-2, B-4, and North ramp (~113, LF) 762,6 686,34 1,36,244 1,224,219 Totals: $ 2,122,844 $ 1,91,559 $ 22, 198, Totals: $ 22, $ 198, $ 15, $ 15, 16,666 $ 16,666 21, 3,5 16, 9,5 3, 23,5 9, $ 85,5 76,26 136,25 $ 212,285 22, $ 22, Page 26
28 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 DALLAS MCKINNEY NATIONAL DELL CITY DELL CITY MUNI DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE DENTON DENTON ENTERPRISE DENVER CITY DENVER CITY 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Engineering/Design RSA Drainage Improvements Rehabilitate apron & TW (9,111 sy) Engineering/design for rehab (Statewide Program) Rehabilitate RW 8-26 (4685 x 55) Rehabilitate west apron (52 sy) Mark RW 8-26 (14,8 sf) Rehabilitate & mark west stub TW (135 x 45) Engineering/design for Phase 2 relign Parallel TW B and expand apron Contingencies, RPR, Admin, Fees, etc for MIRL and electrical improvements West RWY Install MIRLs west RW (45 lf) & electrical vault Install MIRLs West RWY (5 lf) (1% Sponsor Share) Install new electrical vault for west side RW Relocate/protect utilities Engineering & Design - reconstruction 3, 27, Totals: $ 3, $ 27, $ 54,666 5, 131, 25, 9, 5, 49,199 45, 117,9 22,5 8,1 4,5 Totals: $ 274,666 $ $ 247, , 166,5 Totals: $ 185, $ 166,5 $ 148,2 133,38 382,5 344,25 42,5 15, 13,5 5, 45, Totals: $ 638,2 $ 536,13 $ 375, 337,5 Totals: $ 375, $ $ 337,5 3, $ 3, 5,467 5, 13,1 2,5 9 5 $ 27,467 18,5 $ 18,5 14,82 38,25 42,5 1,5 5, $ 12,7 37,5 $ 37,5 Page 27
29 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 DUBLIN DUBLIN MUNI DUMAS MOORE COUNTY EASTLAND EASTLAND MUNI EDNA JACKSON COUNTY FABENS FABENS 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Engineering/design for rehab Rehabilitate west hangar access TW (9,327 sy) Rehabilitate north hangar access TW (63 sy) Partial reconstruct & mark parallel TW RW 1-19 (648 x 35) Rehabilitate RW (5 x 6) Contingency, RPR, Admin, Fees, testing, (etc) Expand apron (8 sy) Rehab cross TW Mark RW and apron Construct TW from north apron to RW (875 sy) Rehab apron Engineering Design Runway/Taxiway Rehab (16 NPE) 136, 122,4 Totals: $ 136, $ $ 122,4 325, 292,5 325, 292,5 65, 585, Totals: $ 1,3, $ 1,17, $ Rehabilitate Terminal Apron NPE Install Perimeter Fencing Along West, North, and East (7, lf) Construction Admin, RPR, and Contingency Mark RW 8-26 (42x6) Rehabilitate and Mark Taxiways A, B, and C Page 28 2, 18, 317,9 286,11 66, 545,4 3,5 3,15 31,6 28,44 65,7 59,13 55, 49,5 Totals: $ 1,279,7 $ 1,151,73 $ 1, 9, Totals: $ 1, $ 9, $ 11, 99, 15, ,599 72, 64,8 2, 18, 11, 99, 13,6 $ 13,6 32,5 32,5 65, $ 13, 2, 31,79 6,6 35 3,16 6,57 5,5 $ 127,97 1, $ 1, 11, 15,67 7,2 2, 11,
30 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 FABENS FABENS FALFURRIAS BROOKS COUNTY FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS FORT WORTH FORT WORTH SPINKS FREDERICKSBURG GILLESPIE COUNTY 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Mark RW add alt Rehabilitate RW (23 x 35) -- add alt Rehabilitate and Mark TW D -- add alt Rehabilitate RW 8-26 (42 x 6) Install Electronic Gate at Entrance NPE Contingency, admin. fees, RPR, etc. Replace Runway 17/35 MIRLs LEDs (6 x 75), airfield signs and PAPI's Engineering Design to Rehab Runway, Taxiways Alpha, Bravo, and Connector Update Master Plan 1, 9, 9, 81, 25, 22,5 235,6 212,4 1, 9, Totals: $ 833,266 $ 749,939 $ 75, 6, 67,5 54, Totals: $ 675, $ $ 67,5 2, 18, Totals: $ 2, $ 18, $ Detention Pond and Drainage Improvements (17, 18, 19 NPE) Mobilization, construction admin, RPR, and testing for apron and drainage improvements Contingency Construct Apron (3x22) 2, 18, Totals: $ 2, $ 18, $ 99, 891, 31,4 271,26 3, 27, 63, 567, Totals: $ 2,221,4 $ 1,999,26 $ 1, 9, 2,5 23,56 1, $ 83,327 7,5 6, $ 67,5 2, $ 2, 2, $ 2, 99, 3,14 3, 63, $ 222,14 Page 29
31 AVIATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations, s, and Costs August 7, 218 GAINESVILLE GAINESVILLE MUNI GIDDINGS GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY GONZALES ROGER M DREYER MEMORIAL GRAHAM GRAHAM MUNI 219 Federal FY 219 (October September 219)/State FY 219 (September August 219) Costs Mark RW (14,725 sf) Rehabilitate RW (43 x 75) Rehabilitate RW (6 x 1) Mark RW (32,95 sf) Contingency, RPR, Admin, Fees, Rehabilitate RWY 18/36 RWY 13/31 Mill and overlay stub TW (583 sy) Mark RW 17/35, taxiway, apron, and turnarounds. Mill and overlay apron (5,573 sy) Mill and overlay RW 17/35 (4 x 75) 12,5 # (17,18 NPE) Mill and overlay turnarounds RW 17/35 Contingency, RPR, Admin for airfield pavement mill and overlay Engineering/design for rehab Rehabilitate parking apron (1,3 sy) Construct west hangar access taxiway with Drainage improvements Rehabilitate RW (3317 x 5) Rehabilitate terminal apron (3 sy) Rehabilitate hangar TW F (23 sy) Rehabilitate existing TWs (585 x 4) Rehabilitate hangar TW C ( 5 sy) Mark RW (5362 sf) 11,4 1,26 215,4 193,86 4, 36, 3, 27, 22,2 198,18 Totals: $ 877, $ 789,3 $ 18,73 16,265 17, 15,3 192, 172,8 1,26,774 1,134,696 65,1 58,59 172, ,294 Totals: $ 1,725,496 $ 1,552,945 $ Page 3 11, 99, Totals: $ 11, $ $ 99, 53,3 47,97 172,3 155,7 172,4 155,16 12,9 92,61 11,9 1,71 254,5 229,5 25,9 23,31 17,2 15,48 1,14 21,54 4, 3, 22,2 $ 87,7 1,88 1,7 19,2 126,78 6,51 17,255 $ 172,551 11, $ 11, 5,33 17,23 17,24 1,29 1,19 25,45 2,59 1,72
Aviation Capital Improvement Program August 2013 DRAFT Aviation Division
Aviation Capital Improvement Program 214-216 August 213 DRAFT Aviation Division DRAFT Aviation Capital Improvement Program 214-216 August,213 Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 Background...
More informationChapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL
Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL This chapter delineates the recommended 2005 2024 Sussex County Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It further identifies probable construction
More informationTXDOT AVIATION DIVISION
TXDOT AVIATION DIVISION Airport Project Development & Selection Process Today s Topics Project Development Process Working with TxDOT Aviation Division Funding Sources National Plan of Integrated Airports
More information10.1 INTRODUCTION NORTH PERRY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE SECTION 10: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
10.1 INTRODUCTION Based on the findings from the Facility Requirements and the combined plan recommended in the Alternative Analysis, a capital improvement program for North Perry Airport has been developed
More informationChapter 9 Airport Financial Plan
Chapter 9 Airport Financial Plan Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to present the projects identified in the twenty-year Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) that have been developed and
More informationAviation Planning in Maine and Our Region. Stacie Haskell Aviation Coordinator & Study Manager Maine Department of Transportation April 27, 2011
Aviation Planning in Maine and Our Region Stacie Haskell Aviation Coordinator & Study Manager Maine Department of Transportation April 27, 2011 Overview The National Aviation System Maine s Economic Dependence
More informationBOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS
1 8/17/2018 8/21/2018 8/16/2018 i ElY MY Y I : JH MT BY...01,, III1*.ji,"1.111Los Angeles World Airports REPORT TO THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS Meeting Date: la Approved by: e1. "ampbell, Chief Airports
More information6.0 Capital Improvement Program. 6.1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
6.0 The addresses the phased scheduling of projects identified in this Master Plan and their financial implications on the resources of the Airport and the City of Prescott. The phased Capital Improvement
More informationKittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016
Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016 Project Team Kittitas County, WA Airport Owner (Sponsor) and Operator, Land Use Century West
More informationB GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:
2014 GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD B + RECOMMENDATIONS Plan and Fund for the Future: While the system continues to enjoy excess capacity and increased accessibility it still needs continued focus
More informationJACIP-AIRPORT PROJECT DETAIL REPORT August 15, 2007
JACIP-AIRPORT PROJECT DETAIL REPORT August 15, 27 11242 1 of 14 Sponsor: City of Naples Airport Authority NPIAS No.: 12-53 Sponsor ID: 122 Airport ID: APF Site No.: 3379.*A 11242 Airport Project ID: 1
More informationChapter 8.0 Implementation Plan
Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan 8.1 Introduction This chapter is the culmination of the analytical work accomplished in the previous chapters. The result is a prioritized list of the essential projects.
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope The information presented in this report represents the study findings for the 2016 Ronan Airport Master Plan prepared for the City of Ronan and Lake County, the
More informationBuchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. Steering Committee. December 14, Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan
Airport Planning Program Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan Steering Committee December 14, 2006 Airport Planning Program Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business
More informationCHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3.0 ALTERNATIVES The 2010 Stevensville Airport Master Plan contained five (5) airside development options designed to meet projected demands. Each of the options from
More informationFinancial Plan/Capital Improvements - DRAFT 6-1
The analyses completed in previous chapters evaluated development needs at McKinney National Airport (TKI or Airport) over the next 20 years, based on forecast activity, facility requirements, safety standards,
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 1
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 1 Districts The Texas Department of Transportation (department) is authorized under Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 21 and Chapter
More informationSTUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION An Airport Master Plan provides an evalua on of the airport s avia on demand and an overview of the systema c airport development that will best meet those demands. The Master Plan establishes
More informationCurrent list of entities that have an MOU with TxDOT
Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (RMA) 6/29/2009 Bexar County 7/23/2007 Bowie County 1/19/2011 Brazoria County 5/9/2011 Brownsville Navigation District 9/28/2016 Bryan / College Station Metropolitan Planning
More informationNantucket Memorial Airport Commission. Master Plan Workshop. October 26, 2012
Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission Master Plan Workshop October 26, 2012 Agenda Introductions Master Plan 101 Airport Planning Issues Noise Abatement Activities Environmental Monitoring Public Outreach
More informationDallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014
Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014 Background 1,040 acre general aviation facility owned and operated by the City of Dallas 150 based aircraft including business jets and helicopters,
More informationCollier County Airport Authority. Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program
Collier County Airport Authority Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program (JACIP) What is the JACIP? Financial planning process supported by Web-based computer
More informationInput Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot
Input Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot community Airport Advisory Board meetings Elected Officials
More informationPORT OF PORTLAND. Chapter Seven CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PORT OF PORTLAND Chapter Seven CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CHAPTER SEVEN PORT OF PORTLAND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The analyses conducted in the previous chapters evaluated airport development needs
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE 2015 MILITARY
More informationExecutive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport
Executive Summary MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport As a general aviation and commercial service airport, Fort Collins- Loveland Municipal Airport serves as an important niche
More informationCurrent Airport Roles
Chapter Four: Current Airport Roles Introduction Current airport roles are defined differently from national, state, and local perspectives. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established two
More informationMassDOT Aeronautics Division Capital Improvements Presentation
MassDOT Aeronautics Division Capital Improvements Presentation MassDOT Board Retreat October 27, 2011 Presentation Agenda Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Overview Airports Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP)
More informationAPPENDIX B: NPIAS CANDIDATE AIRPORT ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B: NPIAS CANDIDATE AIRPORT ANALYSIS The National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) is the Federal Aviation Administration s (FAA) national airport plan. The NPIAS includes nearly 3,500
More informationChapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview
Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview Kittitas County in cooperation with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is updating the Airport Master Plan for Bowers Field Airport (FAA airport identifier
More informationFinance and Implementation
5 Finance and Implementation IMPLEMENTATION The previous chapters have presented discussions and plans for development of the airfield, terminal, and building areas at Sonoma County Airport. This chapter
More informationChapter Seven Implementation Plan. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update
Chapter Seven Implementation Plan Master Plan Update This chapter presents the 20-year improvement program for the continued development of the. The objectives of this chapter are to identify projects
More informationAviation and Heliport Use Survey
Aviation and Heliport Use Survey December 2009 1 AVIATION AND HELIPORT USE SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Methodology... 3 B. Survey Instrument... 6 C. Survey Findings Among All Groups... 7 Aircraft Purpose
More informationChapter 1: Introduction Draft
Chapter 1: Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1... 4 1.6.1 Stakeholder Engagement Plan... 10 Chapter 1 Page 2 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.1-1 ABIA Annual Growth Since 1993... 5 Exhibit 1.4-1: ABIA Location Map...
More informationChapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 1: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1... 4 1.1 Master Plan Study Content... 4 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Master Plan Study... 4 1.3 Airport History and Role... 6 1.4 Airport Location and Service Area... 6 1.5 ABIA
More informationDALLAS LOVE FIELD MAY 2015 DRAFT
8. Funding Plan This section presents a potential funding plan for implementing the CIP projects recommended in the Master Plan Update, along with an assessment of the ability of the Airport sponsor (i.e.,
More informationChapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview
EPHRATA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview The Port of Ephrata in cooperation with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is updating the Airport Master Plan for Ephrata Municipal
More informationCHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) is located approximately three miles west of the city of Port Angeles, Washington. The airport
More informationChapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS 2.01 GENERAL Dutchess County acquired the airport facility in 1947 by deed from the War Assets Administration. Following the acquisition, several individuals who pursued
More informationMilton. PeterPrinceAirportislocatedinSantaRosaCounty, approximatelythreemileseastofmilton.
Milton GeneralAviationAirport PeterPrinceAirportislocatedinSantaRosaCounty, approximatelythreemileseastofmilton. Existing Facilities Peter Prince Airport is served by one runway, Runway 18/36, 3,700 feet
More informationRio Vista Municipal Airport Potential Alternatives for the Future Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of the Airport
Rio Vista Municipal Airport Potential Alternatives for the Future Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of the Airport Prepared for City of Rio Vista Prepared by Aries Consultants Ltd. March 2015 Rio Vista
More informationNotice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application
July 3, 2018 Notice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application The City of Kansas City (City), Missouri through its Aviation Department ( the Department
More informationCHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION
CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the effects of a proposed Federal action on the surrounding environment and is prepared in compliance
More informationPassenger Facility Charge Application #1
Passenger Facility Charge Application #1 February 2017 APPLICATION PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned Chair of the Charlotte County Airport Authority assures
More informationFEDERAL AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (AIP) PRE-APPLICATION FFY 2017 CHECKLIST
Form 291111wd (09-15) Storm Lake Municipal Airport Airport FEDERAL AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (AIP) PRE-APPLICATION FFY 2017 SLB FAA Identifier CHECKLIST Please attach the following documents with your
More informationTECHNICAL REPORT 2018
TECHNICAL REPORT 2018 Texas Aviation Economic Impact Study August 2018 Prepared for: TxDOT Aviation Division 125 E. 11th St. Austin, TX 78701 Phone: 512-416-4500 Prepared by: Texas A&M University System
More informationFort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study. Executive Summary
Fort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study Executive Summary March 2012 Introduction Airport Background Forecast of Aviation Activity Development Plans Recommended Airfield & Access Development
More informationPresented to the: NCTCOG Air Transportation Advisory Committee. Presented to the: NCTCOG Air Transportation Advisory Committee
...while at FAA By: Kelvin L. Solco, P.E., MBA, President, The Solco Group Presented to the: NCTCOG Air Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to the: NCTCOG Air Transportation Advisory Committee
More informationDocument prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN
LAST UPDATE JULY 2013 Acknowledgements The preparation of this document was financed in part by a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project No: 3-27-0000-07-10), with the financial support
More informationPULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project
PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project GENERAL AIRPORT INFORMATION AIRPORT USERS Airport ownership: Public, owned by the Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport Board Year opened: February
More informationAirport. Improvement Program (AIP) Overview. Federal Aviation Administration. Texas Aviation Conference Ben Guttery, Texas ADO April 2017
Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Overview Texas Aviation Conference Ben Guttery, Texas ADO April 2017 Objectives Status of AIP Legislative Authority History and Summary of AIP AIP funding formulas 2 AIP
More informationRecommended Performance Measures
Recommended Performance Measures January 2009 1 RECOMMENDED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance measures are utilized by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) to monitor the performance
More informationINDEPENDENCE STATE AIRPORT (7S5)
INDEPENDENCE STATE AIRPORT (7S5) Airport Master Plan Update 2018 Planning Advisory Committee PAC Meeting #3 April 11, 2018 1994-2016 AGENDA The second PAC workshop will cover the following topics: Recap
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE ***************************** New Castle Airport. Intention to File a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application
PUBLIC NOTICE ***************************** New Castle Airport Intention to File a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application The Delaware River & Bay Authority (DRBA), the sponsor of the New Castle Airport
More informationFORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE) is known as a gateway into the heart of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, providing access to some of the nation s top ski resort towns (Vail, Beaver
More informationWestover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update
Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update June 2008 INTRODUCTION Westover Metropolitan Airport (CEF) comprises the civilian portion of a joint-use facility located in Chicopee, Massachusetts. The
More informationPFC NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ST. THOMAS CYRIL E. KING AIRPORT SEPTEMBER 26, 2018
PFC NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ST. THOMAS CYRIL E. KING AIRPORT SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 Table of Contents Section Page I. Overview 2 II. Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment 3 III. Application
More informationCasper/Natrona County International Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Two - October 14th, :30 PM
Casper/Natrona County International Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Two - October 14th, 2014 1:30 PM Casper/Natrona County International Airport Master Plan Update Policy
More informationVista Field Airport. Master Plan Update. February, Prepared for: Port of Kennewick One Clover Island Kennewick, Washington
Vista Field Airport February, 2006 Prepared for: Port of Kennewick One Clover Island Kennewick, Washington 99336 Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 Kennewick, Washington
More informationBeginning balance available for Priority I Projects: $1,737,029
2016 COAR Grant Cycle Priority I Projects Airport Name Project Name Requested Grant Amount Match % of Grant Match Total Project Cost or Total FAA Grant Match Amount required RUNNING TOTAL (Available Balance)
More informationMOST aircraft need a runway for landing and takeout.
38th Annual Concrete Paving Workshop Upcoming Airport Projects January 17, 2017 MOST aircraft need a runway for landing and takeout. 1 Airport Improvement Program AIP Eligibility The federal AIP grants
More informationAIRPORT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA September 06, :00 PM Moorhead Municipal Airport
AIRPORT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA September 06, 2017-4:00 PM Moorhead Municipal Airport 1. Call to Order 2. Agenda Amendments 3. Approval of Minutes A June 14, 2017 4. Citizens to be Heard 5. Airport Capital
More informationAviation, Rail, & Trucking 6-1
6-1 This chapter describes the services, facilities, and condition of air, rail, and trucking as components of the transportation system. These three intermodal areas have an impact on the factors to be
More informationAnn Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, MI Date of Latest ALP ACIP Airport Code - A Airport Identifier - ARB
MICHIGAN AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 20102019 FEDERAL/STATE/LOCAL Ann Arbor, MI Date of Latest ALP 2008 ACIP Airport Code A Airport Identifier ARB Prepared by: MDOTAERO Sponsor:
More informationAddendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)
Bowers Field Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) This addendum to the Airport Development Alternatives chapter includes the preferred airside development alternative and the preliminary
More informationAirport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3
Airport Master Plan for Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3 Public Meeting #1 > 8/24/17 from 5:30 to 8:00 pm > 41 attendees signed-in > Comments: > EAA area > Environmental constraints > Focus
More informationCorrection to Council Resolution No , dated June 25, Please add the following correction as part of the permanent record:
1410 Memorandum 9 DATE October 20, 2014 CITY OF DALLAS TO Rosa Rios City Secretary SUBJECT Correction to Council Resolution No. 14-1030, dated Please add the following correction as part of the permanent
More informationDRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014
DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014 As required by Paragraph 425.B(4) of FAA Order 5100.38C, Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Handbook: The preparation
More informationWyoming Valley Airport Proposed Improvements. Presented June 26, 2012 By The WBW Airport Advisory Board & FBO
Wyoming Valley Airport Proposed Improvements Presented June 26, 2012 By The WBW Airport Advisory Board & FBO Contents Purpose of meeting Airport overview Background of proposed improvements SWOT analysis
More informationRegular Board Meeting August 4, 2015
Regular Board Meeting August 4, 2015 1616 Airport Circle Hailey, ID 83333 208.788.4956 PUBLIC COMMENT FY 16 Rates & Charges FY 16 Budget Approval Rates & Charges will provide the Board the ability to operate
More informationCity of Tallahassee, FL Department of Aviation
City of Tallahassee, FL Department of Aviation Proposed Application to Federal Aviation Administration For Authority to Impose a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Tallahassee International Airport and
More informationYakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Airport Master Plan Update
Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Airport Master Plan Update City of Yakima Work Session July 9, 2013 Meeting Goals Summarize the master plan recommendations. Discuss the decision-making process used
More informationAgenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3
Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3 Date: 04/12/18 Public Involvement Plan Update Defining the System Recommended Classifications Discussion Break Review current system Outreach what we heard Proposed changes Classification
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment
PUBLIC NOTICE The Dallas Department of Aviation (the Department) intends to file an amendment application to increase the PFC amount of one previously approved project at Dallas Love Field Airport (the
More informationDallas Executive Airport Marketing Plan
Dallas Executive Airport Marketing Plan Briefing for the Transportation & Environment Committee Department of Aviation December 13, 2010 Briefing Objectives Review Executive Airport Goals Growth opportunities
More informationJOHNSTON COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
JOHNSTON COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING SERVICES For JOHNSTON REGIONAL AIRPORT (JNX) 3149 Swift Creek Rd. Smithfield, NC 27577 PHIL LANIER AIRPORT DIRECTOR (919)
More informationAppendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update
Appendix D Project Newsletters Tacoma Narrows Airport Master Plan Update This appendix contains the newsletters distributed throughout the project. These newsletters provided updates and information on
More informationOffice of Airports. Overview of the FAA s. Federal Aviation Administration ACI-NA/AAAE Airport Board & Commissioners Conference Indianapolis, IN
Overview of the FAA s Office of Airports Prepared for: Presented by: 2016 ACI-NA/AAAE Airport Board & Commissioners Conference Indianapolis, IN Eduardo Angeles Associate Administrator for Airports Date:
More informationAirport Master Plan Open House Front Range Airport February 23, 2017
Airport Master Plan Open House Front Range Airport February 23, 2017 MASTER PLAN PROCESS AND OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS The Master Plan is a 20-year plan to understand the needs of current and future
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities ACTION TRANSMITTAL 2018-16 DATE: February 9, 2018 TO: Transportation Advisory Board FROM: Technical Advisory Committee PREPARED
More informationFunding Package TOTAL $15,172,000
Funding Package ACT 13 $3,000,000 Transportation Capital Budget $5,000,000 Redevelopment Capital Program(RACP) $3,000,000 Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) $1,500,000 Multimodal Transportation (DCED) $1,500,000
More informationFrom concept through completion, CGA is your AVIATION engineering firm!
The State of Iowa has 120 general aviation airports. Our staff specializes in serving these airports with their engineering needs. Aviation lighting and navigational aids Environmental and financial feasibility
More informationAVIATION. MichiganReportCard.com 5
MichiganReportCard.com 5 GRADE C AVIATION OVERVIEW Michigan s 200+ airports bring $4.3 billion into the economy each year. The state s Tier 1 and Tier 2 airports were evaluated based on six key infrastructure
More informationExecutive Summary This document contains the Master Plan for T. F. Green Airport. The goal of a master plan is to provide a framework of potential future airport development in a financially feasible manner,
More informationGrants Pass Airport Master Plan & Airport Layout Plan Update
Attendees: Grants Pass Airport Master Plan & Airport Layout Plan Update Meeting #3 January 26, 2010 Merlin Community Center 100 Acorn Street, Merlin 5:45 7:15 p.m. Josephine County Department of Airports:
More informationAirports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning
ACRP Problem Statement 17-03-09 Recommended Allocation: $500,000 Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning ACRP Staff Comments This is one of four UAS-themed problem statements
More informationP U B L I C N O T I C E. MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application C-00-MBS
P U B L I C N O T I C E MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application 10-07-C-00-MBS INTRODUCTION: This Public Notice is issued as part of a Federal Aviation
More informationCHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION An implementation plan for Blue Grass Airport (LEX) has been prepared based upon the facility needs identified in the Facility Requirements and the Alternatives
More informationAirport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3
Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3 Agenda > Introductions > Public Meetings Overview > Working Paper 3 - Facility Requirements > Working Paper 4 - Environmental Baseline
More informationHollaway Consulting Engineers, LLC Statement of Qualifications
Deliberate, Strategic, Connected.Delivering tangible solutions for aviation design and construction management. Hollaway Consulting Engineers, LLC Statement of Qualifications Professional Experience Sheri
More informationBlue Grass Airport (LEX) serves the needs of a multi-county area that
SUMMARY BACKGROUND This Master Plan Update balances needed airport improvements with the goals of the community and arrived at a consensus on how to best meet future demand without sacrificing those natural
More informationSECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES
SECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES 5.1 INTRODUCTION This section investigates Airfield Development Alternatives, generalized Land Use Alternatives, and more detailed General Aviation Alternatives.
More informationBremerton National Airport Airport Master Plan Project Update February 12, 2013
Bremerton National Airport Airport Master Plan Project Update February 12, 2013 Project Team Century West Engineering Northwest firm founded in 1969 500+ airport projects completed throughout the Pacific
More informationCHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE
CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE FAA requires that the NEM submitted for review represent the aircraft noise exposure for the year of submittal (in this case 2008) and for a future year (2013 for OSUA). However,
More informationApplication to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges - #16
Application to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges - #16 Submitted to: The Federal Aviation Administration By: The Des Moines International Airport June 23, 2017 Ms. Sheila Bridges PFC Coordinator
More informationPREPARING FOR THE FUTURE
PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE FALL 2016 PEARLAND REGIONAL AIRPORT CONTINUES ITS MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE: PEARLAND REGIONAL AIRPORT CONTINUES ITS MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS 1, 3 DAVE S HANGAR 2 GRANTS
More informationFAA Reauthorization Issues & Impacts on Airports
Issues & Impacts on Airports Presentation to Mid America Association of State Transportation Officials July 21, 2011 Presented by Greta J. Hawvermale Sr. Director of Engineering & Environmental Matters
More informationPENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER 8 FINANCIAL PLAN
PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER 8 FINANCIAL PLAN OCTOBER 2018 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Table of Contents Chapter 8 Financial Plan 8.1 Introduction... 8-1 8.2 Enplanement
More informationBELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW
BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW LOCATION AND HISTORY Belfast Municipal Airport (Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport code BST, International Civil Aviation Organization airport code KBST, FAA
More informationPunta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update
Punta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update Draft Executive Summary Prepared for: The Charlotte County Airport Authority January 2018 Charlotte County Airport Authority James Herston, Chair Robert D. Hancik,
More information