civil air navigation services organisation CANSO Global Vision on the Future of Air Navigation Services

Transcription

1 civil air navigation services organisation CO Global Vision on the Future of Air Navigation Services

2 GLOBAL VISION Introduction Today s airspace is highly fragmented. Image courtesy of ICAO. CO unites the world s air navigation service providers and their industry partners. CO is the global voice of air traffic management (ATM). The organisation serves as a platform for discussion and debate on ATM issues. CO members seek to exercise leadership in shaping the future of the industry. Commercial aviation is in transition from a strictly governmentcontrolled transport sector to a much more competitive, liberalised operating environment. For many years the industry has been under pressure to adapt to new institutional arrangements and increased operational requirements. ATM must meet the challenges of the twenty-first century - in which a global, seamless airspace is developed, based on cost-effective and efficient services, with sufficient capacity to meet the world s air transport needs. CO s Global Vision on the future of air navigation services supports the creation of a harmonised ATM service, much in line with ICAO s Global ATM concept. But CO s Global Vision adds new thinking on the institutional and operational changes that must be accommodated by all stakeholders. The Global Vision was completed in May 2007 with input from all CO Members. The Vision identifies areas of change needed within the regulatory and operational domains and the issues we must address if we are to achieve a truly global ATM system. The CO Global Vision will assist everyone in the industry confront the critical issues and questions while proposing solutions to support us all in achieving lasting improvements to global ATM performance. 2

3 Understanding the Vision Description of current situation. Description of desired future situation. RESPONSIBILITY Government is primarily responsible for the delivery of this future situation. Industry carries the prime responsibility to deliver this future situation. Creation of this future situation is the joint responsibility of government and industry. Who is the Vision for? The Global Vision is intended for everyone in Air Traffic Management CO Global Vision on the Future of CO Members: harmonise and coordinate views - call to action. Governments / Regulators: Influence positions (institutional focus). Other stakeholders Customers, Suppliers, non-member Providers gain support and buy-in. 3

4 GLOBAL VISION Industry Drivers FORCES DRIVING CHANGE FORCES RESISTING CHANGE Demand for greater capacity A naturally conservative industry Airspace users need higher performance: Minimum delay Optimum flight profiles Lower prices High standards of safety Cultural differences at all levels Strong governmental control organised on a national level Regulatory initiatives Increasing National issues al pressures Increasing business orientation Over-/inappropriate Different standards Domestic economic growth Highly engineered solutions Collaboration and integration Outdated charging systems Financial pressures Inefficient operational concepts Potential for service differentiation Working practices 4

5 The CO Global Vision More information about each segment can be found on the following pages: p14 p15 p13 p7 p8 p11 p9 p10 p12 CO Standing Committees policy (PSC) The CO Policy work programme identifies and creates tools and guidance materials in all areas of ATM governance and management, to help Ps become more -focused, better performing organisations. Policy Workgroups currently focus on: Business Performance Global Benchmarking Human Resources Quality Management People Customer Focussed Regulation People Regulation Civil-Military Cooperation Customer Focussed Optimised ATM Systems SAFETY (SSC) Safety is one of the vital issues facing Air Traffic Management. Air traffic management seeks to reduce incidents that compromise safety while accommodating an ever-increasing number of flights and improvements in airspace efficiency. CO s safety work programme helps Ps improve safety through elements such as safety culture, safety management systems, runway safety, safety metrics and benchmarking. Operations (OSC) CO s Operations Standing Committee (OSC) works to facilitate the promotion and exchange of industry best practice in operations and technical areas. 5

6 GLOBAL VISION & Efficient Airspace National focus of airspace management derived from strong emphasis on sovereignty. While national sovereignty prevails it is exercised in a way which effectively results in the airspace being managed as a common resource. Increased & effective cross border cooperation. Supplier driven network design, fragmented airspace, different operational concepts, routes based on national boundaries, restricted areas and infrastructure location. Customer / Demand focused network design. Airspace organised to provide safe and efficient service to and optimise capacity, irrespective of national boundaries. Isolated decision making, prescriptive and unable to respond quickly. Collaborative decision making across all sectors to provide a dynamic response to needs. 6

7 2 Legal framework impedes systematic and effective reporting and investigation of safety occurrences. Legal framework supporting a Just Culture to promote systematic and effective incident reporting and investigation. Prescriptive, excessively complex safety. Simplified, performance based safety covering the whole aviation chain. systems unable to meet safety requirements in specific regions of the world. systems to meet specific needs in all areas of the world. Infrastructures in under equipped areas of the world to be up-graded, harmonised, and, where appropriate, shared regionally. Investments to be subject to rigorous risk analysis. ICAO Safety Management Systems requirements not applied consistently around the world. Safety Management System implementation consistent with the operating environment. Fragmented language environment. One common language for the System worldwide: English. 7

8 GLOBAL VISION 3 Regulation Inadequate regulatory and supervisory resources (quantitative & qualitative). Regulatory and supervisory resources aligned with effective requirements. Fragmented approach to and oversight. Harmonised and consistent approach to. Fewer regulators & fewer oversight authorities. Over-: Inappropriate & excessively complex. Fit for purpose based on industry consultation. Rule based. Performance / output based, self (e.g. technology / interoperability / environment). Lack of uniform application of separation of provision and regulatory functions. Harmonised and consistent application of separation of provision and regulator functions. 8

9 4Civil-Military Collaboration Capacity restrictions resulting from competitive use of airspace. Globally airspace management to release available capacity Flexible Use of Airspace. Military to be treated as s in all aspects. National organisation of military training zones. Integrated cross-border civilmilitary environment. Location of military training areas irrespective of civil traffic patterns. Direct defence & security needs clearly distinguished from training needs. Training areas not located in dense civil traffic areas. 9

10 GLOBAL VISION 5People Bureaucratic Governmental orientation. Market driven, performance based culture. Nationally inward looking. Internationally outward looking. National training standards. Globally harmonised training standards. Safety culture based on national systems and inadequate legal protection. Global legal and institutional arrangements based on encouragement and trust supported by just culture principles. Availability of with the right skills is unbalanced globally. National mobility with limited flexibility. Balanced availability of staff supported by processes and automation tools that improve safety, efficiency and capacity. International mobility founded on a one language working environment that supports balanced availability of staff globally. Human resources overloaded and limited. Automation solutions to improve productivity to address shortages. 10

11 6 National monopolies, with politically driven plans & strategies. Performance driven cooperation between Ps. Competition: For the market (e.g. ATS, TWR, AIS). In the market (COM, NAV, Flight calibration, Training independent of national politics). Complex structures & interfaces based on national boundaries. National Ps delivering all air navigation services. Horizontal & vertical integration leads to new opportunities & dynamics in the industry. Segmentation and specialisation in service provision. pricing governed by strict cost recovery. Financial practices in line with normal business practices. Financial sustainability required. Performance related financial risks & rewards. Widespread cross-subsidies among all groups. Price aligned with the service provided to each category of users, as far as practicable. Economic oversight to drive value & transparency: Ps not compelled but free to select their business, and compulsory Public services to be financed under public service rules. Financial framework reflects duality of market: contestable and noncontestable. 11

12 GLOBAL VISION 7Customer Administrative, monopolistic behaviours and relationships. Transparent orientated business behaviours and relationships. Isolated, rigid, focused approach. Integrated, system, flexible responsive, value added approach. Sub-optimal economic & operational performance. Performance driven: operational efficiency economic efficiency Performance & service levels supported by s Performance driven by best practices. Uncoordinated & inconsistent performance indicators. One global performance measurement system. 12

13 8Optimised Disjointed approach to systems technology. Extensive customisation of R&D & national systems. Technology developments based on common operational concepts. Technical systems based on interoperability System life-cycle cooperation. Cooperation and coordination in developing common systems on a regional basis. Off-the shelf systems. Procurement driven by national industry preferences. Independent procurement, free from national industry preference. Lack of systematic Cost Benefit Analysis. Systematic Cost Benefit Analysis. Overlap & Suboptimal use of existing infrastructures. Optimised use of infrastructure at global level. Insufficient use of existing technologies. Ps optimise performance by making effective and coordinated use of the capability of existing technologies. Automation increases productivity. Performance improved by automation in the cockpit, where appropriate. 13

14 GLOBAL VISION 9 1 Regulation: aviation discriminated against other industries. Fragmented aviation environmental. Regulation: harmonised s for all industry sectors. Aviation singled out as the most visible & political target for constraint. Aviation consistent with the actual environmental impact. Interdependencies between safety, capacity, cost and environment not addressed. Interdependencies between safety, capacity, cost & environmental targets decided at the political level. Little recognition of the role & contribution of to address environmental issues. Full Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) throughout the value chain in addressing environmental issues. 14

15 0 Fragmented security governance across aviation sectors (national & cross border). Clearly allocated responsibilities within the security domain (civil & military). Still an emerging area not consistently applied throughout the different regions. Mature security applications across all. Trade-offs not addressed. Trade-offs at the political level. financed by industry. financed by States. 15

16 CO GLOBAL VISION Members CO The Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation is the global voice of the companies that provide air traffic control, and represents the interests of Air Navigation Services Providers worldwide. CO members are responsible for supporting over 85% of world air traffic, and through our Workgroups, members share information and develop new policies, with the ultimate aim of improving air navigation services on the ground and in the air. CO also represents its members views in major regulatory and industry forums, including at ICAO, where we have official Observer status. For more information on joining CO, visit joiningcanso. Full Members - 76 Aeronautical Radio of Thailand (AEROTHAI) Aeroportos de Moçambique Air Navigation and Weather Services, CAA (ANWS) Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic ( Czech Republic) Air Traffic & Navigation Services (ATNS) Airports and Aviation Services Limited (AASL) Airports Authority of India (AAI) Airports Fiji Limited Airservices Australia Airways New Zealand Angkasa Pura I Austro Control Avinor AS AZ Azerbaijan Belgocontrol Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority (BULATSA) CAA Uganda Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh (CAAB) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission (CARC) Department of Airspace Control (DECEA) Department of Civil Aviation, Republic of Cyprus DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH (DFS) Dirección General de Control de Tránsito Aéreo (DGCTA) DSNA France Dutch Caribbean Air Navigation Service Provider (DC-P) ENANA-EP ANGOLA ENAV S.p.A: Società Nazionale per l Assistenza al Volo Entidad Pública Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (Aena) Estonian Air Navigation Services (E) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Finavia Corporation GCAA United Arab Emirates General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority (HCAA) HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co. Israel Airports Authority (IAA) Iran Airports Co Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) ISAVIA Ltd Kazaeronavigatsia Kenya Civil Aviation Authority (KCAA) Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme (LGS) Letové prevádzkové Služby Slovenskej Republiky, Štátny Podnik Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (LVNL) Luxembourg ANA Maldives Airports Company Limited (MACL) Malta Air Traffic Services (MATS) NATA Albania National Airports Corporation Ltd. National Air Navigation Services Company (NC) NATS UK NAV CANADA NAV Portugal Naviair Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) Office de l Aviation Civile et des Aeroports (OACA) ORO NAVIGACIJA, Lithuania PNG Air Services Limited (PNGASL) Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PA) Prishtina International Airport JSC PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero) ROMATSA Sakaeronavigatsia Ltd S.E. MoldATSA SENEAM Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services Agency (SMATSA) Serco skyguide Slovenia Control State Airports Authority & P (DHMI) State ATM Corporation Tanzania Civil Aviation Authority The LFV Group Ukrainian Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) U.S. DoD Policy Board on Federal Aviation Gold Associate Members - 14 Abu Dhabi Airports Company Airbus ProSky Boeing BT Plc FREQUENTIS AG GE Air Traffic Optimization Services GroupEAD Europe S.L. ITT Exelis Lockheed Martin Metron Aviation Raytheon SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A. Telephonics Corporation, ESD Thales Silver Associate Members - 62 Adacel Inc. ARINC Lighter areas represent airspace covered by CO Members ATCA Japan ATECH Negócios em Tecnologia S/A Aviation Advocacy Sarl Avibit Data Processing GmbH Avitech AG AZIMUT JSC Barco Orthogon GmbH Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Brüel & Kjaer EMS Comsoft GmbH CGH Technologies, Inc Abu Dhabi Department of Transport Dubai Airports EADS Cassidian EIZO Technologies GmbH European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP SAS) Emirates Entry Point North Era Corporation Etihad Airways Guntermann & Drunck GmbH Harris Corporation Helios Honeywell International Inc. / Aerospace IDS Ingegneria Dei Sistemi S.p.A. Indra Navia AS Indra Sistemas INECO Inmarsat Global Limited Integra A/S Intelcan Technosystems Inc. International Aeronavigation Systems (I) Iridium Communications Inc. Jeppesen JMA Solutions LAIC Aktiengesellschaft LEMZ R&P Corporation LFV Aviation Consulting AB Micro Nav Ltd The MITRE Corporation CAASD MovingDot New Mexico State University Physical Science Lab NLR Northrop Grumman NTT Data Corporation Project Boost Quintiq Rockwell Collins, Inc. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG RTCA, Inc. Saab AB Saab Sensis Corporation Saudi Arabian Airlines SENASA SITA STR-SpeechTech Ltd. TASC, Inc. Tetra Tech AMT Washington Consulting Group WIDE 16 Correct as of 16 January For the most up-to-date list and organisation profiles go to