Overall co-ordination of 2012 testing activities will be achieved via the ICAO secretariat of the INFPL STG.

Transcription

1 1. Introduction This Stress Test Guide outlines the scope, procedures and schedule of activities for the Operational Testing of New FPLs associated with Amendment 1 to PANS-ATM. The Stress Test for the new ICAO FPL 12 Format (FPL) and its associated messages (DLA, CNL, CHG) will take place on October 1st between 08:00 UTC and 12:00 UTC. 2. Scope The testing activities described in this document are intended to address the flight planning changes introduced as a result of Amendment 1 to PANS-ATM, ICAO Doc This document describes only the testing activities involving airspace users. 3. Co-ordination Overall co-ordination of 12 testing activities will be achieved via the ICAO secretariat of the INFPL STG. All testing results and experience will be shared with the INFPL STG participants. 4. Documentation There are three main reference documents for testing purposes: ICAO FITS website ICAO SL 13/2.1-08/0 and SL AN 13/2.1-09/09 MID Test Scripts ICAO EUR Guidance for the provision of NAV/COM/SUR Information in the New Flight Plan IATA Information Paper on 12 FPL These documents are available on the ICAO web-page Objectives a) Demonstrate the new software functionality; b) Enable the new functionality to be tested; c) Enable familiarization of ATCO/Pilots with the new functionality. d) Demonstrate the ability of ATC Units to correctly identify and validate New format flight plan and associated messages; e) Demonstrate the ability of flight plan originators to create New format flight plan and associated messages; MID INFPL TEST Version 2.3 1

2 6. Test Schedules a) Test Scenario #1: Normal Flight Plan ANSP s Involved Number of FPLs / 0 2. Airways. Royal ian 0 6. Air 0 b) Test Scenario #2: Delay Messages ANSP s Involved Number of FPLs / 2. Airways. Royal ian 6. Air c) Test Scenario #3: Change message ANSP s Involved Number of FPLs / 2. Airways. Royal ian 6. Air d) Test Scenario #4: Cancel Message ANSP s Involved Number of FPLs / 2. Airways. Royal ian 6. Air MID INFPL TEST Version 2.3 2

3 7. Stress Test Configuration and Set-up Flight plans should be addressed to all participating ANSPs irrespective if they fly through the FIR or not 7.1 Test Flight Plans Identification Test flight plans should be clearly identifiable so that Operators and recipient addressees can quickly identify them as such and identify their source. The following call-sign logic is proposed: a) Firstly: ICAO three letter designator of the AO b) Followed by: a two digit reference number c) Followed by: the 2 letters 'XX', YY and/or ZZ E.g. RJA01XX Test FPL from Royal ian s, ETD22YY Test FPL from Etihad etc. etc. By following this rule test messages should not accidentally associate to either operational messages copied from the operational system or to other test messages. 7.2 Test Purpose Indication An indication has to be made in Field 18 of the feature being tested e.g. RMK/INFPL TEST. 7.3 Test Addresses Test messages should be sent using the following AFTN addresses; AFTN ANSP Address: a) : OBBBZQZX OBBIZQZX b) : HECCZQZX HEZZNTXX c) : OJAIFPLX d) : OLBAZPZX e) : OTBDNFPL f) SZC: OMAENFPL g) Dubai : OMDBZPZA OMDWZAZX OMDBTEST h) Abu Dhabi : MAAZPZX OMAEAUHY AFTN Originator Address a) Royal ian: OJIFRJAO b) Gulf Air: OBBIZKZX c) Airways: d) Etihad: EDDFETDX e) Emirates: OMDBK f) Air: MID INFPL TEST Version 2.3 3

4 7.4 Contacts ANSP Point of Contact Phone CARC Mona An-naddaf aftn_ais@carc.gov.jo AIS Salah Moh d Alhumood shumood@caa.gov.bh mahmoud mohamed aly Nasreldin ali Moatassem Billah redcoode@yahoo.com Nasreldin.ali@nansceg.net moatassem_@hotmail.com Mr. Saradha or Mr. Tharian Comms@caa.gov.qa Saradha.Pothduwege@caa.gov.qa Mohammed.Nassar@caa.gov.qa Kattiliype.tharian@caa.gov.qa Jagath.Botheju@caa.gov.qa AIS Elie El Khoury kelie@beirutairport.gov.lb U.A.E. SZC Hamad Rashid Al Belushi Muayyed Al Tenaiji hbelushi@szc.gcaa.ae mfarook@szc.gcaa.ae Dubai Reginy Eulenstein reginy.eulenstein@dubaiairnav.gov.ae Abu Dhabi Abdul Rahman Al Obaidli Khalid M. Al Reyaisy aalobaidli@ans.adac.ae kalreyaisy@ans.adac.ae Point of Contact Phone Airways Ndiwa Wachina nwachina@qatarairways.com.qa Gulf Air Peter Green peter.green@gulfair.com Etihad Anton Perera Roshanta Sampath Nuwan Perera Gareth Edwards, aperera@etihad.ae rarachchige@etihad.ae kperera@etihad.ae RArachchige@etihad.ae GEdwards@etihad.ae APerera@etihad.ae TechFlightDispatch@etihad.ae Emirates Ekkehard Gutt ekkehard.gutt@emirates.com Royal ian Suhail Obeidat +962 (6) suheil.obeidat@rj.com Air Hazem shams nav.icoo@gmail.com 7.4 Test Scenarios During the ICAO FPL 12 Stress Test it is emphasized that a high number of Flight Plans in the new ICAO FPL format shall be transmitted and processed to the dedicated AFTN addresses of the associated Air Navigation Service Providers (chapter 7.3 refers). This also includes the processing of the FPL associated messages, such as DLA, CNL, CHG. MID INFPL TEST Version 2.3 4

5 Test scenarios with faulty insertions/content shall also be considered during this stress test in order to analyze, how the systems process/reject/react to these corrupt FPL-messages. Every should explicitly store these faulty FPLs and FPL associated messages separately and review the scenario together with the appropriate ANSPs during the follow-up session. The ANSPs should be aware of the transmission of faulty FPLs and FPL-associated messages and shall activate a protocol in regards to the processing/non-processing of these messages. The GAP between Scenarios is Minutes 7. Feedback Process The ATC Unit will notify the AO with the acceptance or rejection of the generated FPL ; indicating the errors, This will be done through an including the full analysis. - Attached also Message Flow MID INFPL TEST Version 2.3