State Aviation System Plan, Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2

Transcription

1 Stat Aviation Systm Plan, Tchnical Advisoy Committ Mting #2 Fbuay 28 th, :00am-12:00pm Aonautics Building Plato Blvd, St Paul, MN Agnda 1) Wlcom a. Mting Ovviw b. Intoductions 2) Assssmnt of Pio Effots a. Pio Effots Outach b. What wok wll c. Challngs 3) Objctivs and Statgis a. Evaluation of Past SASP Statgis b. SASP Objctivs c. Objctivs Nxt Stps 4) Tnds a. Why Tnds b. Poposd SASP Tnds c. Exampl of Commcial Svic Tnd 5) Dfining th Systm a. Minnsota s Systm of Aipots Sis of Maps b. SAC conclusion on Dfining th Systm 6) Aipot Classification Rviw a. Ovviw of Classification i. What w had on Cunt Classification Systm 7) Bak 8) Tchnical Advisoy Committ a. Pupos and Rol 9) Aipot Classification Rviw a. NPIAS/ASSET b. How Oth Stats Classify Aipots c. Cunt Classification Systm 10) Small-goup Discussion i. Discussion about Futu Classification Systm ii. Discussion about Potntial Classification Systm Uss 11) Nxt Stps and Wap-up

2 Rcommndations on Pvious Tasks

3 MnDOT SASP Phas 1 Assssmnt of Pio Effots Summay Outach Summay Th following goups w consultd and outach mtings hld to gath input on th assssmnt of pio SASP ffots. MnDOT Aonautics Staff SASP Advisoy Committ (SAC) Tchnical Advisoy Committ (TAC) Aviation Consultant Community Wokshop Aviation Community (Minnsota Aipots Confnc, Pilot Focus Goups, Don Focus Goup, Numous aishows and fly-ins) What w land What wokd wll: Economic Impact Calculato tool is usful fo aipots and stakholds Map gaphics in th plan SASP lvl focast infomation Rpot cad (5-sht aipot infomation) What could us impovmnt: Dos not aduatly includ dons Could btt ducat public Could us additional infomation on NxtGn ollout and impact on Minnsota SASP could includ a packag of tools fo sponsos to sha sults of SASP and its ancillay studis. Matials should b synthsizd and focusd. Also, asi wb accss fo sponsos to gath infomation about thi aipot (pot cads, PCI pots, conomic impact, tc.). Compaison tools/infomation fo aipots to compa against avag o oth aipots in thi classification. Claification on which objctivs a uimnts vsus commndations. Includ backgound on th ational as to why ach objctiv is appopiat/was chosn fo ach classification. Not how SASP objctivs compa to FAA guidanc. Th plan is vy lngthy SASP did not contain up to dat infomation aft initial publication. SASP could includ commndations fo funding which would hlp th stat pioitiz funding dcisions. Cla zon policy should b intgatd into SASP High lvl commndations on th siz of th systm, is cunt siz aduat, too small, too big? Evaluation of past SASP Statgis Th following summaizs TAC input on th past SASP statgis associatd with ach objctiv (goal). Ovall, it sms th a too many statgis. Som statgis appa too spcific; high lvl statgis may b mo ffctiv and povid mo flxibility

4 Rcommndd SASP Objctivs Black txt is fom SMTP Gn txt is fdback fom SAC and oth goups on objctivs Opn Dcision-Making Mak tanspotation systm dcisions though pocsss that a inclusiv, ngaging and suppotd by data and analysis. o Lvag data and tchnology not cuntly bing usd o Finding btt and consistnt ways to tack opations statwid is impotant Povid fo and suppot coodination, collaboation and innovation. Ensu fficint and ffctiv us of soucs. o Having a link btwn th plan and funding is impotant Tanspotation Safty Safguad tanspotation uss as wll as th communitis th systms tavl though. Apply povn statgis to duc fatalitis and sious injuis fo aviation. Fost a cultu of aviation safty in Minnsota. o Safty gading don intgation Citical Connctions Maintain and impov multimodal tanspotation connctions ssntial fo Minnsotans pospity and uality of lif. o Aipot accssibility as of aching valud dstinations o Ensu gional connctions o Multimodal connctions o Patn with oth oganizations to pomot aviation touism connctions o Last mil aipot accssibility Statgically consid nw connctions that hlp mt pfomanc tagts and maximiz social, conomic and nvionmntal bnfits. Systm Stwadship Statgically build, manag, maintain and opat all tanspotation assts. o Rasonably picd aviation xpincs including ctification, ful puchass, maintnanc, and hanga cost o Cat a NAVAIDS plan to addss ag of infastuctu and nw tchnology Rly on systm data and analysis, pfomanc masus and tagts, agncy and patns nds, and public xpctations to infom dcisions. Us tchnology and innovation to gt th most out of invstmnts and maintain systm pfomanc. o Cativ solutions o Intgating mging tchnologis

5 Incas th silincy of th aviation systm and adapt to changing nds. o Cat mo uss o Educating th public about th impotanc of GA and oppotunitis o Mo inclusiv and opn o Systm that sponds uickly Flxibl systm o Pomot silincy though aipot slf-sufficincy Halthy Communitis Mak fiscally-sponsibl dcisions that spct and complmnt th natual, cultual, social and conomic contxt. o Minimal impact to th nvionmnt Intgat land uss and tanspotation systms to lvag public and pivat invstmnts.

6 Poposd SASP Tnds Aging Infastuctu Updat SMTP Aipot Sction ENVIRONMENT Nw Logistics Updat Ai Cago potions of SMTP Tnd Tanspotation Bhavio - Updat SMTP Ai Svic Sction Pilot Tnds Pojctd Rvnus Aviation Pojctd Rvnus Commcial Svic Aging Aicaft/Flt Changs BEHAVIOR Pojct Funding ECONOMY Aviation Wokfoc Elctification & Altnativ Fuls Add sction on Aviation Ful Typ Changs Navigation Tchnologis POPULATION Unmannd Aicaft Systms/Dons Rplac SMTP Tnd Pap TECHNOLOGY Not: bold and undlind tnds will b studid mo in-dpth

7 71% No 29% Had of th SASP bfo? Ys How much dos aviation contibut to th conomic vitality of you community? On a scal of 1-10, avag spons was 8 Stat Aviation Systm Plan Outach Suvy Rsults: Fly-ins, Aishows, & Convntions What do you consid whn dciding which aipot to visit? Coutsy Ca Ful Pic Quality of A/D Building Aviation Tnds ankd by impotanc: 1. Cost of bcoming a pilot 2. Funding fo aipot impovmnts 3. Pilot Shotag 4. Community dvlopmnt ncoaching on aipots 5. Dons What is th most impotant bnfit of you local aipot? 33% 30% 20% 15% 3% OtSasonal Svics (Ag Spaying, Rcational Chats) Emgncy Svics Accss to & fom My Community 100% Local Attactions 90% of spondnts think th stat aviation systm is saf o vy saf Economic Dvlopmnt / Nav Aids happoachs

8 !( Gand Rapids Pilot Focus Goups Idas fo a btt aviation systm... What w v had - GA thms Incasd hanga accssibility Rsoucs fo aipot impovmnts Aviation ducation and pomotion Rmov bais to Gnal Aviation Fost aviation oppotuntis What w v had - Don thms Poactiv, concis don policy Aispac intgation Don ducation Don gulation clainghous!( St. Paul

9 Aipot Classifications

10 Minnsota s Aipots MnDOT Offic of Aonautics 222 East Plato Boulvad St. Paul, Minnsota (651) Gygla CNB L Montvido MVE Ganit Falls L Q P Y M Mashall MGG L R RWF Buffalo S A Fost Lak AnokaBlain 25D CFE Cystal W Winstd H Flying 10D Cloud Glnco HCD FCM C M- 1D6 Litchfild Hcto OVL GDB Rdwood Falls R Mapl Lak LJF Hutchinson BDH PNM CBG I PEX M Olivia Rush City JMR 18Y Pincton Cambidg ROS GYL MIC MSP Ailak ANE St. Paul S W Lak Elmo C Moa S AQP DXX Canby K Mudock BBB Willma 23Y Madison Applton VVV K Milaca B STC Paynsvill MZH S Otonvill DYT P M L S Duluth Sky Habo C D32 GHW MOX P Bnson 6D1 B S S HZX A St. Cloud D39 Bootn COQ Moos Lak BRD LXL Sauk Cnt 14Y AXN Glnwood Stabuck Mois T Littl Falls G 06Y ETH Alxandia C AIT M 8Y5 Long Paii D Y63 9Y2 SAZ Claissa T Hman Whaton FFM Elbow Lak East Gull Baind Lak Stapls ADC 05Y O T Aitkin C W C Wadna Hnning Clout McGgo BFW TWM DLH Duluth 07Y Pin Riv PWC W 16D Fgus Falls 7Y3 Two Habos S L Hill City 52Y XVG W Backus PKD DTL Pham 47Y Dtoit Laks 04Y Plican Rapids Y49 Pak Rapids B Hawly GPZ Silv Bay EVM HIB Rm Longvill C H CKC ELO 12D 21D STP SGS S. St. Paul 3N8 Gand Rapids Walk C Hibbing Evlth I 9Y0 BJI Gand Maais Ely L Mahnomn D00 7Y4 Tow M Cook CQM FOZ Bowsting Bmidji D14 Ada ORB Bigfok 43Y Bagly FSE N JKJ Fosston Ftil P C D81 K Nothom R L O 7Y9 VWU CKN Big Falls Waskish P TVF Rd Lak Falls Cookston INL 13Y B 3G2 Thif Riv Falls D37 Littlfok Intnational Falls M L W D41 Wan Moohad BDE D LVN L Suu 23D Baudtt R Kalstad Stphn RRT ROX HCO 48Y Hallock K Waoad Rosau Pinck Rd Wing RGK Faibault G 12Y Slpy Ey N R Mankato Spingfild L W 63Y ULM FBL Owatonna P M TKC Y58 B D42 Wasca Winona MKT CPipston Dodg Cnt Slayton St. Jams Rochst ONA B E Windom OWA O ACQ WPQN TOB JYG DVP Rushfod W S W D MWM R Wlls Wothington H Albt La RST Pston Austin Faimont F Jackson Luvn 55Y Caldonia M N Blu Eath 68Y J M F AEL LYV OTG FKA FRM MJQ F CHU AUM SBU Ky - Ailin Svic Ky Stat Only Intmdiat Stat Classifications Govnmnt Rol Stat & Fdal (NPIAS*) L S MML Tacy Tyl Nw Ulm Landing Stip *National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms

11 AIRPORT CLASSIFICATIONS As dictd by Minnsota Statut ( Subdivision 3), systm aipots a catgoizd in th classifications: Ky, Intmdiat, o Landing Stip aipots. Th numb of aipots in ach of th classifications shifts ov tim along with th total numb of systm aipots. Sinc 1974 Ky Aipots hav gown fom 18 to 30; Landing Stips hav dcasd fom 67 to 22; Intmdiat Aipots hav gown fom 53 to 83. Th total numb of aipots in th stat s systm has dcasd fom 138 to 135 sinc th 1974 SASP was compltd. Figu 1-4 dpicts ths changs in th systm ov th past 20 yas. Figu1-4: Aipot Classification Tnds Landing Stips Intmdiat Aipots Ky Aipots An aipot, dpnding upon its classification, can b xpctd to hav a ang of xisting and plannd infastuctu as wll as a uniu ol in th stat s conomy. Th th aipot classifications a dscibd on th following pags in tms of thi aonautical us and potntial conomic ol. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND SYSTEM GOALS PAGE 9

12 Ky Aipots: Ky Aipots hav a pavd and lightd pimay unway 5,000 ft o gat in lngth. Ky Aipots sv as th pimay landing facilitis fo businss jts, and a th only aipot classification that suppots gulaly schduld aifight and ailin svic. Thy a capabl of accommodating most businss jts, all singl-ngin aicaft and lag multi-ngin aicaft. Ths aipots tnd to b locatd na lag population and conomic cnts. Ky Aipots oftn hous copoat flight and maintnanc divisions fo majo mploys, allowing businsss to connct to national and som global makts dictly. Th a cuntly 30 Ky Aipots in th stat s systm. ROCHESTER Intmdiat Aipots: Intmdiat Aipots hav a pavd and lightd pimay unway that is lss than 5,000 ft in lngth. Ths aipots a capabl of accommodating all singl-ngin aicaft, som multi-ngin aicaft, and som businss jts. Intmdiat Aipots sv as landing facilitis fo flight taining, aicaft maintnanc, and gnal aviation aicaft up to th small businss jt siz. Intmdiat Aipots sv many ols in communitis anging fom mgncy mdical tanspots to manufactud pats distibution. Intmdiat Aipots nabl dict connctions acoss Minnsota and th Cntal US gion. Th a cuntly 83 Intmdiat Aipots in th stat s systm. RUSHFORD PAGE 10 MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN

13 LL L L Landing Stips: Landing Stips hav on o mo tuf unways which can accommodat most singl-ngin aicaft and som twin-ngin aicaft. This typ of aipot may b unusabl duing ctain conditions such as wt wath, wint months, and duing th sping mlt. A ky function of ths aipots is suppoting th agicultual industy with cop sding and spaying svics. Th a cuntly 22 Landing Stip Aipots in th stat s systm. MILACA NATIONAL PLAN OF INTEGRATED AIRPORT SYSTEMS Th National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms (NPIAS) idntifis aipots that a significant to national ai tanspotation. Aipots dsignatd as pat of th NPIAS a ligibl fo FAA Aipot Impovmnt Pogam (AIP) funding. Th NPIAS is updatd by th FAA vy two yas and compiss all commcial ailin svic aipots, liv aipots and ualifying gnal aviation aipots. Sinc th pvious SASP was ppad in 2006, Cook and Glnco Municipal Aipots hav bn addd to th NPIAS. Th a 97 Minnsota aipots in th cunt ( ) NPIAS. As a sult, th a 38 aipots in Minnsota which do not ualify fo fdal funds and must ly compltly on stat and local funding. Figu 1-5 idntifis Minnsota s aipots includd in th NPIAS. Chapt 7: Invstmnt Plan and Systm Rcommndations includs futh discussion concning changs to th NPIAS. FAA ASSET STUDY In May 2012 th FAA lasd sults of th Aipot Systm Statgic Evaluation Task (ASSET) study, which classifis aipots in th NPIAS. Th nw systm uss function and conomic impact to plac aipots into on of fou catgois: National, Rgional, Local, o Basic. Th FAA will incopoat th nw catgois in th NPIAS Rpot to Congss. Although this 2012 SASP dos not fnc th nw goups, MnDOT will valuat th ASSET catgoy assignd to ach aipot in Minnsota and us th nw catgois to hlp guid futu systm and aipot planning dcisions. May 2012 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND SYSTEM GOALS PAGE 11

14 Minimum Systm Objctivs As notd abov, th pimay baslin usd to dtmin aipot facility uimnts is a comphnsiv list of minimum systm objctivs. Ths minimum objctivs align with Fdal Aviation Administation (FAA) aipot uimnts as wll as Minnsota s statuts on aipot dvlopmnt. Wh nith stat no fdal guidanc is availabl, commonly accptd industy standads a usd. Th minimum systms objctivs a not intndd to pomot unncssay aipot dvlopmnt; ath, thy a dvlopd to nsu Minnsota s aipots hav th ncssay facilitis to b saf and conomically comptitiv, nationally and intnationally. Tabl 5-2: Minimum Systm Objctivs by Aipot Class FACILITY KEY AIRPORTS INTERMEDIATE AIRPORTS LANDING STRIPS Pimay Runway Lngth & Width 5,000 Ft 100 Ft 2,400 Ft 75 Ft 2,000 Ft 75 Ft Paalll Taxiway Lngth Full Paalll Full Paalll if Aipot Has Mo Than 20,000 Annual Ops No Minimum Pimay Runway Appoachs Pcision Non-Pcision Visual Navigation Systms Wind Con, Rotating Bacon, PAPIs, REILs & MALSR o Oth Appoach Lighting Systm Wind Con, Rotating Bacon, PAPIs, REILs o Gat Appoach Lighting Systm Wind Con & Rotating Bacon if Aipot is Lightd Runway Lighting HIRL fo Ailin Svic and MIRL fo All Oth LIRL o Gat LIRL Wath Rpoting AWOS/ASOS AWOS/ASOS as Ndd No Minimum Hangas (Fo Basd Aicaft) 100 pcnt of Jts/TP 95 pcnt of SEP & MEP 100 pcnt of Jts/TP 95 pcnt of SEP & MEP - 95 pcnt of SEP & MEP Apons (Fo Basd & Tansint Aicaft) All Basd Aicaft Not In Hangas + Pak Hou Itinant Opations All Basd Aicaft Not In Hangas + Pak Hou Itinant Opations All Basd Aicaft Not In Hangas + Pak Hou Itinant Opations Tminals & GA/Administation Buildings Tminal at Ailin Svic Aipots & GA/Administation Building at Non-Ailin Svic GA/Administation Building Rstoom Automobil Paking 1 Spac fo Each Basd Aicaft & 50 pcnt Incas fo Employ and Visito Paking 1 Spac fo Each Basd Aicaft and 25 pcnt Incas fo Employ and Visito Paking 1 Spac fo Each Basd Aicaft Pimt Fncing Enti Aipot Enti Aipot Dsiabl Spaat Auto fom Aisid Ful Facilitis 24 H. 100LL & Jt A 24 H. 100LL Dsiabl 100LL as Ndd Not: HIRL = High Intnsity Runway Lights, MIRL = Mdium Intnsity Runway Lights, LIRL = Low Intnsity Runway Lights, AWOS = Automatd Wath Obsvation Systm, ASOS = Automatd Sufac Obsvation Systm, GA = Gnal Aviation, SEP = Singl Engin Piston, MEP = Multi-Engin Piston, TP = Tubopop, PAPI - Pcision Appoach Path Indicato, REIL - Runway End Indntifi Lights, MALSR - Mdium Intnsity Appoach Lighting Systm Souc: MnDOT Offic of Aonautics PAGE 78 MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN

15 Classification within th National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms (NPIAS) Th National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms (NPIAS) includs both xisting and poposd (nw) aipots dmd significant to th nation s aipot systm. Of th 135 aipots in th Minnsota systm, 97 a includd in th NPIAS. Th NPIAS classifis aipots basd on svic lvl. Th svic lvl flcts th typ of svic th aipot povids to th community and th funding catgois authoizd by Congss. Th a th svic lvl catgois in th NPIAS: 1. Commcial Svic (CS) Aipots Commcial svic aipots a publicly-ownd aipots that nplan 2,500 o mo passngs annually and civ schduld passng aicaft svic. Commcial svic aipots, as dfind in th NPIAS, a futh dividd into th following Pimay and Non-Pimay svic lvl ols: Pimay Commcial Svic Lag Hubs (L) Mdium Hubs (M) Small Hubs (S) Non-Hubs (N) Non-Pimay Commcial Svic 2. Rliv (R) Aipots Rliv aipots a dsignatd by th FAA as high-capacity GA aipots that povid attactiv altnativs to congstd hub aipots and povid GA accss in majo mtopolitan aas. Rliv aipots must hav 100 o mo basd aicaft o 25,000 annual itinant opations. 3. Gnal Aviation (GA) Aipots Aipots that do not mt th commcial svic o liv aipot classification citia a classifid as GA. Th FAA ASSET study compltd in 2015 aimd to mo accuatly dfin th ols of non-pimay aipots (non-pimay commcial svic, liv and gnal aviation) within th national systm. Th following ols w dvlopd. National National aipots a locatd in mtopolitan aas na majo businss cnts and suppot flying thoughout th Nation and th wold. Ths aipots povid pilots with attactiv altnativs to th busy pimay aipots. In fact, FAA has dsignatd 65 of ths facilitis as livs fo pimay aipots. National aipots hav vy high lvls of activity with many jts and multingin popll aicaft. Rgional Rgional aipots a also in mtopolitan aas and sv lativly lag populations. Ths aipots suppot gional conomis with intstat and som long-distanc flying and hav high lvls of activity, including som jts and multingin popll aicaft. About 50 of ths aipots hav limitd ai cai svic, and FAA has dsignatd 151 gional aipots as livs fo pimay aipots. Local Local aipots a a citical componnt of ou gnal aviation systm, poviding communitis with accss to local and gional makts. Typically, local aipots a locatd na

16 lag population cnts but not ncssaily in mtopolitan aas. Thy also accommodat flight taining and mgncy svics. Ths aipots account fo 38 pcnt of all NPIAS aipots and hav modat lvls of activity with som multingin popll aicaft. Basic Basic aipots fulfill th pincipal ol of a community aipot poviding a mans fo pivat gnal aviation flying, linking th community with th national aipot systm, and making oth uniu contibutions. In som instancs, th aipot is th only way to accss th community and povids mgncy spons accss such as mgncy mdical o fifighting and mail dlivy. Ths aipots hav modat lvls of activity with an avag of 10 popll-divn aicaft and no jts. Unclassifid - Th a aipots in th NPIAS that w not classifid into on of th abov classifications and a considd Unclassifid. Ths aipots hav limitd activity. Th following figu outlins th NPIAS Aipots by Catgoy and Rol. Souc: FAA National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms ( )

17 Discussion Qustions Th mting will includ a discussion on aipot classification. W will b collcting th TAC s bst idas on this topic. Plas viw and consid th following ustions and com ppad to sha you thoughts. Rlatd to Potntial MN Classification Systms: Th No-build option What would continu to wok wll if MnDOT kpt its cunt classification systm o mad only mino twaks? What would not wok wll if MnDOT kpt its cunt classification systm lagly unchangd moving fowad? A nw Facilitis-basd systm What would wok wll if MnDOT switchd to an xpandd classification systm volving aound facilitis at aipots? What would not wok wll if MnDOT switchd to an xpandd classification systm volving aound facilitis at aipots? A Rol-basd systm What would wok wll if MnDOT switchd to a classification systm volving aound th ol an aipot plays in its community? What would not wok wll if MnDOT switchd to a classification systm volving aound th ol an aipot plays in its community?

18 If you hav knowldg gading fdal o oth stats classification systms, plas also consid th following ustions. Rlatd to fdal classifications: What woks o dosn t wok about th National Plan of Intgatd Aipot Systms (NPIAS) classifications? What woks o dosn t wok about th ASSET classifications? Rlatd to oth stats: What do you lik about how oth stats us thi classification systm? What challngs do you s with how a paticula stat uss its classification systm? What do you lik about oth stats classification systms? Why? What do you not lik, o think wouldn't wok wll in Minnsota, about how oth stats classify aipots?

19 Th No-build option Guiding Qustions Kping th sam gnal famwok in plac, should MnDOT: Consid splitting th Intmdiat catgoy into two (o mo)? Consid splitting Ky into Ky Commcial Svic and Ky GA? Cat a oadmap fo communitis to chang thi aipot s classification? Hav classifications btt communicat th aipot s ol to a community? B mo xplicit in idntifying appopiat facilitis fo a givn ol? If MnDOT kps th cunt classification systm, what oth mino twaks should b considd? Should MnDOT mov fowad with no changs to th cunt classification systm?

20 Th Facilitis-basd option Guiding Qustions If MnDOT movs fowad with a nw facilitis-basd classification appoach, how should ach of th following paamts b considd? Runway lngth/width Wath poting Appoachs NAVAIDs Hangas A/D building Gound tanspotation Ful availability FBO psnc Runway sufac/stngth Should MnDOT mov fowad with a nw facilitis-basd classification systm?

21 FAA Rcommndd Runway Lngths Minnsota Avag Conditions Aicaft Typ Runway Lngth Small Aiplans with Appoach Spds <30 knots 335 Small Aiplans with Appoach Spds <50 knots 893 Small Aiplans with Appoach Spds >50 knots Small Aiplans with <10 Passng Sats 95% of ths Small Aiplans 3, % of ths Small Aiplans 3,900 Small Aiplans with 10 Passng Sats 4,250 Lag Aiplans 60,000 lbs.¹ 75% of ths Aiplans at 60% Usful Load 4,888 75% of ths Aiplans at 90% Usful Load 7, % of ths Aiplans at 60% Usful Load 5, % of ths Aiplans at 90% Usful Load 8,000 Souc: AC 150/5325-4B, Runway Lngth Ruimnt fo Aipot Dsign Elvation: 1,168 MSL Tmpatu: F (Avag of MN Systm Aipots) 1 Lag Aiplans adjustd fo wt and slippy conditions. Unadjustd fo non-zo unway gadint.

22 Th Rol-basd option Guiding Qustions If MnDOT movs fowad with a nw ol-basd classification appoach, how should ach of th following catgois and paamts b considd? Activity Basd aicaft Opations Enplanmnts Cago tonnag Multi-ngin aicaft (basd o opations) Jt aicaft (basd o opations) Rgistd pilots within a ctain div tim Economics Goss gional poduct Rtail sals Pcnt itinant opations of total opations Accssibility Population within a ctain div tim Employmnt within a ctain div tim Numb of sua mils within a ctain div tim (xcluds wat) Should MnDOT mov fowad with a ol-basd classification systm?