New Restaurant & Retail Available

Transcription

1 New Restaurant & Retail Available S/SWC Power Rd & Ray Rd Gilbert, AZ OPENING Q1 019 Available: Rates: ±1,00 SF up to 8,000 SF, drive-thru pad Please call Demograhics: 1 Mile 3 Miles 5 Miles 018 Population 8,397 69,356 1, Population 9,375 79,614 37, Avg HH Income $91,380 $101,641 $99,318 Comments: New construction adjacent to two large power centers anchored totaling ±710,000 SF GLA of national retail/ restaurants (<1% vacant). New construction end caps and drivethru opportunity. Great street exposure available. Loop 0 access. At The Intersection: Traffic Counts: N: ±30,800 VPD (NB & SB) S: ±6,100 VPD (NB & SB) E: ±9,300 VPD (EB & WB) W: ±15,689 VPD (EB & WB) *Mesa 015 / Gilbert 015 Loop 0 E: ±50,000 VPD (EB & WB) W: ±48,400 VPD (EB & WB) *ADOT East Camelback Road, Suite 340 Phoenix, Arizona Phone: Fax: Teale Bloom tbloom@pca .com Lance Umble lumble@pca .com The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only, and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. The value of this transaction to you depends on tax and other factors which should be evaluated by your tax, financial and legal advisors. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. [35] JAN, 019

2

3 1. EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE TO REMAIN.. EXISTING DRIVE ENTRY TO REMAIN. 3. EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. 4. EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA TO REMAIN. 5. EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN. 6. NOT USED. 7. ENHANCED DRIVE W/ STAMPED ASPHALT PAVING TO MATCH EXISTING. 8. ENHANCED CONCRETE CROSSWALK PAVING FLUSH WITH DRIVE, COLOR/FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING, SEE CIVIL DWGS. 9. ASPHALT PAVING IN ALL PARKING AREAS, SEE CIVIL DWGS. 10. PAINTED PARKING STALL STRIPING. 11. LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS. 1. "FUTURE PAD" AREA TO BE PROVIDED WITH DUST PROOFING, SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS " CONCRETE CURB, SEE CIVIL DWGS. 14. CONCRETE SIDEWALK W/ ACID WASH & SALT FINISH. 15. CONCRETE HARDSCAPE W/ ACID WASH & SALT FINISH. 16. NOT USED. 17. NOT USED. 18. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHOWN DASHED. 19. ADA COMPLIANT ACCESSIBLE RAMP, SEE DETAILS 05/A ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL, SEE DETAIL 01/A NOT USED.. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT. 3. FIRE HYDRANT. 4. FIRELANE- 6-FEET WIDE MINIMUM, 14-FEET MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE, 35-FOOT MINIMUM TURNING RADIUS. 5. BUILDING MOUNTED F.D.C. 6. FIRE RISER. 7. KNOX BOX LOCATION. 8. 3'-4" HIGH MASONRY SITE SCREEN WALL, SEE DETAIL 16/A MASONRY REFUSE ENCLOSURE W/ 6-FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL, SEE DETAIL 06/A NOT USED. 31. ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER ON CONC. PAD, SEE ELECT. DWGS. 3. S.E.S., SEE ELECTRICAL DWGS. 33. POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, SEE DETAIL 10/A0.4 AND ELECTRICAL DWGS. 34. NOT USED. 35. LOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGN (N.I.C.), MONUMENT SIGN UNDER SEPARATE REVIEW/APPROVAL/PERMIT. 36. "R3-5" RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN " STOP SIGN. BUILDING CODES: 01 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 01 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 01 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 01 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 006 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSTRUCTION CODE 01 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSTRUCTION CODE AS A VOLUNTARY CODE 01 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 010 A.D.A. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN INCLUDING ALL TOWN OR GILBERT AMENDMENTS AND ORDINANCES A. REPLACE/REPAIR ANY EXISTING DAMAGED OFFSITE RIGHT-OF-WAY SIDEWALK AND/OR CURBS WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXISTING. A. G.C. TO COORDINATE WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL AND PROVIDE FIRE LANE NO PARKING SIGNS AND/OR RED PAINTED CURBS ALONG ALL FIRE LANES AT ALL LOCATIONS REQUIRED IN THE TOWN OF GILBERT FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL RULES AND REGULATIONS #1-D103.6R. B. FIRE LANE TURNING RADIUS: 35-FEET MINIMUM INSIDE RADIUS, 55-FEET MINIMUM OUTSIDE RADIUS. FIRE LANE WIDTH: 6-FEET WIDE MINIMUM. C. FIRE RISER ROOM SHALL HAVE IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE PER TOWN OF GILBERT REQUIREMENTS, G.C. TO COORDINATE WITH FIRE MARSHAL. PROJECT ADDRESS: 5498 S. POWER ROAD - GILBERT, AZ 8595 BUILDING 1 ADDRESS: 5498 S. POWER ROAD - GILBERT, AZ 8595 BUILDING ADDRESS: 5484 S. POWER ROAD - GILBERT, AZ 8595 DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: LGE DESIGN BUILD 740 NORTH 5ND STREET PHOENIX, AZ LGE DESIGN GROUP 740 NORTH 5ND STREET PHOENIX, AZ BEN McRAE - PROJECT DIRECTOR benm@lgedesigngroup.com PROJECT SCOPE: NEW COMMERCIAL MIXED USE RETAIL CENTER ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: X CURRENT ZONING: BP NET SITE AREA: 78,83 S.F. (1.79 AC.) LANDSCAPE AREA: 51,634 S.F. (1.0 AC.) LOT COVERAGE: 10.1% 740 N. 5nd Street Phoenix, AZ P: BUILDING 1: STORIES: BUILDING AREA S.F.: COVERED PATIO S.F.: OCCUPANCY: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: ONE STORY (+4'-0" A.F.F.) 8,737 S.F.,097 S.F. M V-B W/ A.F.E.S. BUILDING : NOT A PART ZONING BP ZONING BP NOT A PART STORIES: ONE STORY (+4'-0" A.F.F.) BUILDING AREA S.F.: 4,168 S.F. COVERED PATIO S.F.: 1,481 S.F. OCCUPANCY: M CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B W/ A.F.E.S. TOTAL BUILDING 1 & AREA S.F.: 1,905 S.F. REQUIRED PARKING CALCS: SQUARE FT. FACTOR TOTAL ENTIRE SITE 1,905 S.F. 1 / 00 S.F. 65 SPACES ZONING BP NOT A PART ' '-6" O.H '-6" 140'-0" BUILDING TO LOT LINE 9 54'-0" 14'-4" 7'-0" 34'-7" 6'-0" FIRE LANE 6'-0" 16'-10" 7'-0" 13'-0" 36'-0" 6'-0" LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION '-6" 16'-6" 6'-6" '-3" 9 0'-0" '-6" 16'-6" 0'-0" '-0" '-6" BUILDING 1 8,737 S.F. 5'-0" BUILDING & LANDS. SETBACK 70'-0" R.O.W. 5 5'-0" EXCEPTED PARCEL 7 10'-10" '-4" 6' 0'-4" 9 3 BUILDING 4,168 S.F '-0" BUILDING & LANDS. SETBACK 16'-6" BUILDING TO PROP.LINE 45'-0" TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1'-0" WATER EASEMENT FUTURE PAD 63'-0" 11' 6' 11' 36'-0" 5' 7'-0" 6' 7' 6' 50'-0" 7'-0" 11' 5' 11' 99'-7" 6' 13'-5" 36'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" FIRE LANE 7 FIRE LANE 63'-0" 6' 7'-0" 6' 36'-0" 14'-8" 14'-8" 36'-0" 6' 54'-0" 54'-0" 6' 6' 54'-0" 3 6'-0" '-6" 16'-6" '-0" 9' 11 41'-8" BUILDING TO LOT LINE 16'-6" BUILDING TO PROP.LINE 9 FIRE LANE 45'-0" 6' 63'-0" 8' ' 16'-0" BUILDING TO BUILDING 41'-8" BUILDING TO LOT LINE 19 14'-3" 50'-0" 11'-" 6' 7'-4" 8' 7'-0" 6'-4" 18'-0" 0'-0" '-0" 11 6' 3'-0" 6' 11'-0" 6' 7 0'-0" 7 5'-6" 16'-6" 9' 9' 45 18'-0" '-6" 16'-6" '-6" 16'-6" 6'-0" 31 VAN 9' '-0" FIRE LANE 3 93'-0" 1 194'-0" BUILDING TO LOT LINE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT S. POWER ROAD 133'-0" 5 4 FIRE LANE '-0" 6' 7'-0" 13'-3" 6'-0" '-6" '-6" O.H. 11 0'-0" B.S.L. L.S. 1 EXISTING COMMON DRIVE ZONING RC EXISTING ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT PARKING PROVIDED TOTAL REGULAR SPACES TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES TOTAL SPACES PARKING RATIO E. RAY RD S. POWER RD 14 SPACES 10 SPACES 4 SPACES 65 SPACES 9.90 CARS FOR 1,000 S.F. ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATION: TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED 5 SPACES TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED 4 SPACES TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES FUTURE **1 SPACES TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES 5 SPACES ** NOTE: DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE PAD TO INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACE (NEAR MAIN ENTRY) OR AS REQUIRED BASED ON OVERALL ADJUSTED FUTURE PARKING TOTAL. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF TWO MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDINGS AND A FUTURE PAD. THE DESIGN OF THESE BUILDINGS CONSIST OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONCRETE WALLS, EIFS, METAL PANELS, AND BRICK VENEER PLACED TO PROVIDE AN AESTHETIC TEXTURE AND INTEREST WHILE COMPLIMENTING THE EXPOSED STEEL STRUCTURE THAT SUPPORTS THE UNIQUELY DESIGNED ENTRIES. THERE ARE GENEROUS LANDSCAPE AREAS SURROUNDED BY PEDESTRIAN HARDSCAPES THAT TIE THE PROJECT TOGETHER WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS. DRIVES ARE PROVIDED WITH ACCENTED ENTRIES FOR A SENSE OF ARRIVAL TO THE SITE. ALL THE UTILITIES WILL BE AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDINGS AND FULLY SCREENED. S. SOSSAMAN RD NUMBER REVISION DATE CITY COMMENTS 1ST REVIEW PROJECT LOCATION SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ZONING C- EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ZONING LC E. GALVESTON ST. GILBERT HOSPITAL ISSUE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT No.: MLK VJD SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/3" = 1'-0" SHEET:

4

5

6

7

8

9 AERIAL ±48,400 VPD ±50,000 VPD ±30,800 VPD ±30,800 VPD S/SWC Power Rd & Ray Rd Gilbert, AZ ±9,300 VPD POWER RD GILBERT GATEWAY TOWNE CENTER RAY RD ±6,100 VPD ±15,689 VPD SANTAN VILLAGE Loop 0 & Williams Field Rd GILBERT, AZ PHOENIX COMMERCIAL ADVISORS N This map was produced using data from private and governmental sources deemed to be reliable. The information is provided without representation or warranty.

10 S/SWC Power Rd & Ray Rd Gilbert, AZ HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL 3091 STU MULBERRY 1094 UNITS GUADALUPE RD VAL VISTA DR AERIAL SUNLAND SPRINGS EAST 3300 UNITS LA ALDEA 35 UNITS HIGLEY RD ELLSWORTH RD SOSSAMAN RD MORRISON RANCH 546 UNITS WARNER RD ELLIOT RD POWER RD GREENFIELD RD ELLIOT RD EASTMARK UNITS COPPER RANCH 459 UNITS CASCADE 35 UNITS RECKER RD HIGLEY PARK 611 UNITS GILBERT GATEWAY TOWNE CENTER WILLIAMS FIELD HIGH SCHOOL 1871 STU LYONS GATE 164 UNITS BELLA VIA 600 UNITS RAY RD RAY RD THE WILLOWS 586 UNITS SANTAN VILLAGE GATEWAY 100 UNITS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY (POLYTECHNIC) 4173 STU COOLEY STATION - SOUTH 00 UNITS WILLIAMS FIELD RD HIGHLAND RIDGE 800 UNITS WARNER RD COOLEY STATION 106 UNITS SIGNAL BUT TE RD GUADALUPE RD PHOENIX-MESA GATEWAY AIRPORT POWER RD D AN R AM SS HIGLEY HIGH SCHOOL PECOS MANOR 1683 STU 56 UNITS MPC/Housing Data SO HIGLEY RD SANTAN VILLAGE MARKETPLACE "Active" "Future" PECOS RD STRATLAND ESTATES 857 UNITS Power Rd & Ray Rd GILBERT, AZ GERMANN RD 700- acre plot of land Mixed use - Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Provides 10,000+ jobs Brings in $1.3 billion annually Last year,,000 landings and takeoffs makes Gateway busier than Portland International Airport East Valley itself is a market Near Apple s $ billion data center Y KW US EP SOMERSET 86 UNITS RAN CAMPO VERDE HIGHGATEWAY SCHOOL GILBERT 089 STU GREENFIELD RD N Future Development WHITEWING AT HIGLEY 151 UNITS H CH O PHOENIX COMMERCIAL ADVISORS LA JARA FARMS This map was produced using data from private and governmental sources deemed GERMAN SHEA HOMES (018)to be reliable. The information is provided without representation or warranty. N RD

11

12

13 Located in the East Valley of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is a former military airfield that has successfully made the transition to a full service commercial passenger airport. Regularly scheduled commercial service began in October of 007 with initial service from Allegiant Air to 13 destinations. As of January 009, a total of 15 destinations are supported. Allegiant Air accounted for 174,50 enplanements in calendar year 008. An additional 3,399 enplanements were realized from air taxi and charter operations. Approximately 355,000 passengers utilized the airport in 008. Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is operated and maintained by the Williams Gateway Airport Authority (WGAA), a Joint Powers Airport Authority comprised of the Cities of Mesa and Phoenix, the Towns of Queen Creek and Gilbert, and the Gila River Indian Community. The Airport Authority was formed to develop, reuse, operate, and maintain the airport property and facilities at the former Williams Air Force Base, which closed in September Initially operated as a reliever general aviation airport, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport now provides regularly scheduled commercial passenger air service in its own right. In this capacity, the airport provides a much needed alternative for passengers who might otherwise utilize busy Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport as a non-hub commercial service airport. The airport has over 100 based general aviation aircraft, including many business aircraft owned or leased by corporations and major employers in the metropolitan area. The following are the major facilities at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport: Three parallel commercial capable runways: 1) Runway 1R-30L: 10,401 x 150 ) Runway 1C-30C: 10,01 x 150 3) Runway 1L-30R: 9,301 x 150 Airport traffic control tower. 33,000 sq. ft. terminal building with 4 gates. 33,000 sq. yd. aircraft parking apron. Over 30,000 sq. yd. cargo ramp. Full-service fixed base operator and other specialty operators. Four business jet service centers (Embraer, Cessna, Hawker Beechcraft, and Crownair) MASTER PLAN PREPARATION The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Master Plan is the second update to the original master plan undertaken in 1994 and first updated in Proactive airport sponsors will periodically update their airport s master plan to ensure that the airport can continue to adapt to developments in the local and national aviation economies. Updates every five to seven years are particularly important at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport as it has evolved from a military airfield to a public commercial service airport. This study was financed with assistance from the FAA. The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Master Plan is of interest to many within the local community. This includes local citizens, community organizations, airport users, airport tenants, area-wide planning agencies, and aviation organizations. To assist in the coordination and development of the Master Plan, the Williams Gateway Airport Authority identified a cross-section of these persons and groups to serve on a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC). The committee met six times over the course of the study to review and discuss draft working chapters of the master plan. In addition, four public information workshops were held to provide information to and solicit input from other interested citizens. One workshop was held in the Town of Gilbert, one in the Town of Queen Creek, and the remaining two were held at the airport. The same draft working papers that were provided to the PAC were also made accessible to the public via the consultant and airport web sites. DEMAND-BASED PLANNING Facility planning begins with a definition of demand that may reasonably be expected in the future. For Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, this involved updating forecasts to identify potential future aviation demand. Recognizing the realities of year-to-year fluctuations in activity, the Master Plan is keyed to potential demand levels rather than specific future dates in time. These planning horizons were established as levels of aviation activity that, when reached, trigger consideration by airport management of the next step in the Master Plan program. By developing the airport to meet the aviation demand as those indicators are reached instead of specific points in time, the airport will be able to implement development needs which will meet the operational demands of its users in a cost-efficient and well-planned manner. This program also provides the Airport Authority the flexibility to accelerate or delay project implementation based on actual need or unanticipated changes in needs or demand. The forecast planning horizons are summarized in the accompanying table. Planning Horizon Enplanements Air Carrier Operations Air Cargo Operations Air Taxi Operations Military Operations General Aviation Operations Total Operations Enplaned Air Cargo (Tons) Based Aircraft * 008 Enplanement Short Intermediate Long Baseline Term Term Term ,649* 1, ,675 9,380 76,670 96, ,000 9, ,77 1,500 31, ,000 10, AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Several significant changes and events have occurred since the completion of the 1999 Master Plan Update. First, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 001 utilizing commercial airplanes, placed an economic and security strain on the aviation industry. At the time, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport was positioned to welcome commercial passenger service. These events directly contributed to airlines shifting priorities away from expansion. Second, the City of Phoenix was officially given a seat on the Board of Directors. Third, the launch of regularly scheduled commercial service in October 007 has led to a need to reconsider the development priorities of the airport. Fourth, from a socioeconomic standpoint, the East Valley region has continued to grow substantially, often leading the nation in some growth measures. Finally, airport design standards as developed by the FAA have gone through nine different revisions since the completion of the previous master plan. With consideration of these factors a new master plan concept was developed. The new concept preserves all three runways as potential commercial service runways. Runway 1L-30R would be the primary commercial passenger departure runway, Runway 1C-30C would be the primary arrival runway, and Runway 1R-30L would be the general aviation and air cargo runway. The recommended airfield layout was developed in a fashion that would minimize or eliminate the need for additional property acquisition or surface road alterations. 850,000 0,806 1,700 16,171 1, ,83 415,000 1,000 41,00,000 48,166 3,500,866 1, , ,000 44, This was accomplished without any negative impact to current or future operations. The taxiway system was redesigned to meet an FAA recommendation that increases safety by reducing the potential for runway incursions. This redesign creates staggered taxiway exits from the runways that reduce the possibility of an aircraft crossing the runways without being forced to make turns.

14

15 The west side ramp is separated into functional uses. The north ramp is primarily for use by general aviation aircraft. The middle ramp is primarily for use by commercial passenger aircraft, and the south ramp is primarily utilized by airport maintenance businesses and corporate hangar facilities. This division of activity levels is planned to be maintained until such a time that the commercial service facilities are relocated to the east side of the airport. The southwest portion of the airport has over 30 acres of undeveloped property. This area is planned to support both aviation related businesses (those needing taxiway access) and non-aviation businesses (those not needing taxiway access). A new taxiway is planned to open up this area for aviation related business development. This area provides unique development opportunities as the availability of large parcels at major metropolitan airports is rare. With enplanements (passenger boardings) forecast to reach. million within 0 years and potentially 5 million beyond that, development of the east side of the airport with a replacement passenger terminal is recommended. Based on recent enplanement growth trends, the need for more capacity in the passenger terminal building is immediate. The entire flight line on the east side of the airport is reserved for passenger terminal complex expansion. INTERMEDIATE TERM IMPROVEMENTS Initial construction of the east side terminal building East side aircraft ramp East side fuel farm and other support facilities Extension of Runway1L approximately 1,000 feet to the northwest Relocation of Taxiway G to eliminate the diagonal nature of the existing taxiway East side road construction Alpha apron expansion New approach lights leading to Runway 30C Additional vehicle parking (surface and/or multi-story garage) LONG TERM IMPROVEMENTS Expansion of the east side terminal building New taxiway construction Alpha apron expansion Runway 1R-30L extension southeast Reconstruction of general aviation apron East side ARFF facilities East side parking garage Runway 1R-30L reconstruction The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Aeronautics Division provides.5 percent matching funding on federal grants. ADOT has several additional grant and loan programs available to airport sponsors. The member governments of the Airport Authority Board have also extended long term loans to the airport. The airport also generates revenues on its own through facility rentals and land leases. As a commercial service airport, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is eligible to impose a passenger facility charge of $4.50 per ticket to be used for specific airport improvements. The table outlines the total funding program for the master plan. Projects directly associated with development of the east side terminal complex are estimated to cost approximately $34 million of the $755 million total. Approximately $401 million of the total costs will be eligible for grants-in-aid administered by the FAA. Approximately $11. million is eligible for state aid, and the remaining $34 million would be the responsibility of the airport. Project eligibility does not guarantee funding. CAPITAL FUNDING PLAN (008) Planning Horizon Short Term Intermediate Term Long Term Totals Project Cost $59,865,000 $35,49,000 $59,333,000 $754,67,000 FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport 5835 South Sossaman Road Mesa, Arizona Phone: Fax: website: FAA Eligible ADOT Eligible $191,186,550 $5,661,5 $74,775,450 $1,967,775 $135,331,300 $3,561,350 $401,93,300 $11,190,350 Local Share $63,017,5 $158,685,775 $10,440,350 $34,143,350 As airports are rapidly becoming multi-functional businesses, those areas on the east side that are not reserved for direct aviation related activities are planned for commercial development. The types of development should be keyed to the aviation nature of the facility such as hotels, a convention center, restaurants, and shops. The major development items anticipated for each planning horizon are summarized as follows: ECONOMIC IMPACT As part of the Master Plan study, an Economic Benefit Study of the airport was conducted. The presence of the airport created both tangible and intangible benefits for the airport service area. The airport supports a diverse range of aviation and non-aviation activity. The airport has attracted essential services to the region, including enhanced medical care, such as air ambulance service, support for law enforcement, and air cargo services. In quantifying benefits generated by airports, economists have emphasized indicators of economic activity such as dollar value of output (revenue), number of jobs created (employment), and earnings of workers and business owners (earnings). The total economic benefit (including all multiplier effects) of the Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport was $534.6 million in 007/008, supporting 4,075 jobs in the service area. The following summarizes the economic benefits of the airport currently: SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENTS Expansion of the west side passenger terminal and vehicle parking capacity Alpha apron expansion Completion of the dual west side taxiway system Major Rehabilitation of Runway 1C-30C Construction of Taxiway L across the airfield and into the undeveloped southwest parcels Significant drainage and other infrastructure improvements Rehabilitation of portions of Runway 1R-30L Completion of east side parallel Taxiway C Perimeter service road improvements East side terminal complex planning studies Acquisition of 31 acres on the east side CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING The full implementation of the Master Plan would involve a financial commitment of $755 million over the planning period. Financing for capital improvements can come from several sources. The FAA administers the federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) that provides up to 95 percent funding for eligible capital projects. Funding for this program comes from Congressional appropriations of revenues generated by airport users. This includes taxes on airline tickets, aviation fuel, aircraft registrations, and other aviation related sources. The airport has also benefited from its inclusion in the Military Airport Program, which is a federal set aside of AIP grant funds for aiding conversion of former military airfields to civilian use. DIRECT BENEFITS: Created by suppliers of aviation services located on the airport. $01.3 Million Revenues $73.4 Million Earnings 1,51 On-Airport Jobs INDIRECT BENEFITS: Created by air visitors utilizing Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport. $36.6 Million Revenues $13.3 Million Earnings 57 Off-Airport Jobs INDUCED BENEFITS: Created by multiplier effects as spending reticulates within the regional economy. $96.7 Million Revenues $11.5 Million Earnings,97 Jobs TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS: The sum of Direct, Indirect, and Induced Impacts. $534.6 Million Revenues $09. Million Earnings 4,074 Jobs

16 ALPHA APRON Airport Consultants

17 Population Summary One Page Summary Power Rd & Ray Rd, Gilbert Prepared By Business Analyst Desktop Latitude: Rings: 1, 3, 5 mile radii Longitude: mile 3 miles 5 miles 000 Total Population 636 9,7 71, Total Population 6,833 48, , Total Population 8,397 69,356 1, Group Quarters Total Population 9,375 79,614 37, Annual Rate.3%.80%.18% 018 Total Daytime Population 7,70 46, ,70 Workers 3,40 1,393 61,67 Residents 4,030 34,71 109,453 Household Summary 000 Households 18,977 3, Average Household Size Households,189 15,57 55, Average Household Size Households,583 1,985 70, Average Household Size Households,884 5,04 78, Average Household Size Annual Rate.3%.77%.15% 010 Families 1,605 1,09 43, Average Family Size Families 1,887 16,955 53, Average Family Size Families,097 19,369 59, Average Family Size Annual Rate.13%.70%.05% Housing Unit Summary 018 Housing Units,687,818 75,851 Owner Occupied Housing Units 69.7% 73.6% 69.6% Renter Occupied Housing Units 6.5%.8% 3.8% Vacant Housing Units 3.9% 3.7% 6.6% Median Household Income 018 $80,1 $86,8 $8, $90,143 $99,393 $9,467 Median Home Value 018 $16,053 $4,864 $6, $50,359 $84,306 $98,636 Average Income Value Average Household Income $91,380 $101,641 $99,318 Per Capita Income 018 $9,144 $3,900 $33,18 03 $34,537 $38,808 $38,814 Median Age Population 5+ by Educational Attainment Total 4,769 40,695 13,15 Less than 9th Grade.0% 1.5% 1.9% 9th - 1th Grade, No Diploma 1.3%.6% 3.% High School Graduate 13.0% 13.7% 16.0% GED/Alternative Credential.%.%.3% Some College, No Degree 9.% 6.4% 6.4% Associate Degree 9.1% 10.6% 9.7% Bachelor's Degree 9.8% 9.5% 7.4% Graduate/Professional Degree 13.3% 13.5% 13.1% Data Note: Household population includes persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households. Persons in families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 010 Data. Esri forecasts for 018 and 03 October 1, 018 Made with Esri Business Analyst 018 Esri Try it Now! Page 1 of 1