Procedure Design Concepts for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction
|
|
|
- Posy King
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Procedure Design Concepts for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction R. John Hansman Technical support from MIT students, HMMH, and Massport
2 RNAV Track Concentration
3 Noise Complaints at BOS: One Dot per Address Each dot represents an address that registered at least one complaint during period Departures Arrivals Complaint Data: August 2015 July 2016 Track Data: ASDE-X from 12 days of operation,
4 Technical Approach Collect Data and Evaluate Baseline Conditions Pre and Post RNAV Community Input (Meetings and MCAC) Identify Candidate Procedure Modifications Block 1 Clear noise benefit, no equity issues, limited operational/technical barriers Block 2 More complex due to potential operational/technical barriers or equity issues Model Noise Impact Standard and Supplemental Metrics Evaluate Implementation Barriers Aircraft Performance Navigation and Flight Management (FMS) Flight Crew Workload Safety Procedure Design Air Traffic Control Workload Recommend Procedural Modifications to Massport and FAA Repeat for Block 2 4
5 Outreach (Partial List) Community Community Meetings Massport Community Advisory Committee Public Officials ASCENT FAA ATO Air Traffic (HQ, TRACON, Tower, Center, Region) AJV Flight Procedures AFS Flight Standards AEE Environment and Energy Airlines Technical Pilot Group 5
6 Procedures Under Consideration Block 1 Departure Mods 33L and 27 Reduced speed departures (1-D1) 15R RNAV waypoint relocation (1-D2) 22L/R RNAV waypoint relocation Climb to intercept course (1-D3a) Climb to altitude then direct (1-D3b) Heading-based departure (1-D3c) Arrival Mods 33L Low-noise overwater approach procedures Overwater RNAV Instrument Approach Procedure with RNP Overlay (1-A1a) Overwater RNAV Visual Procedure (1-A1b) Block 2 Departure Mods 33L and 27 Introduce dispersion with Open SID or direct-to flexibility on RNAV procedures Arrival Mods Low-noise overwater approach procedures 4R RNAV approach to 4R with RNP Overlay RNP approach to 4R 22L RNAV approach to 22L with RNP Overlay Preliminary/Subject to Change
7 Block 1: Reduced Speed Departures (1-D1) 7
8 Proposed Modification Standard departure procedures vary by airline Baseline: Typical profile includes thrust reduction at 1,000 AGL followed by an acceleration to 250 kt climb speed and flap retraction Proposal: Thrust reduction at 1,000 AGL followed by an acceleration to 220 kt climb speed or minimum clean operating speed, whichever is greater until a TBD altitude (i.e. 6,000 or 10,000 ) 220 KIAS on BLZZR3 RNAV SID Simulator Tested for Flyability 8
9 Increasing Speed Increases Airframe Noise DEPARTURES Boeing Boeing KTAS 190 KTAS Boeing Boeing KTAS 250 KTAS 9
10 Reduced-Speed Departures Summary: Limit climb speed on RNAV SID departures to reduce airframe noise contribution (i.e. 220 Knots through 10,000 ) Boeing Departure Boeing Departure 160 Knots: Engine Noise Dominates LMAX Contours Blue: 250 Knot Target Climb Speed Red: 220 Knot Target Climb Speed 250 Knots: Airframe Noise Dominates Benefits Mechanism Reduced noise along centerline of departure Effect observed for most aircraft types (single speed limit for all types) Potential Operational Constraints Increased fuel burn Increased flight time Potential implications for departure throughput 10
11 : Delayed Acceleration Climb 220 knots Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX ANOPP Runway 33L: Maintain Standard Climb Thrust & 220 KIAS to 10,000 Population Exposure 60dB 65dB 70dB Standard Departure 237, ,869 38,599 Delayed Acceleration 190,128 75,469 28,239 Reduction 47,824 30,401 10,359 11
12 : Delayed Acceleration Climb 220 knots Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX ANOPP Runway 33L: Maintain Standard Climb Thrust & 220 KIAS to 10,000 Population Exposure 60dB 65dB 70dB Standard Departure 455, , ,685 Delayed Acceleration 437, , ,182 Reduction 18,331 13,569 13,502 12
13 E-170: Delayed Acceleration Climb 220 knots Aircraft E-170 Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX ANOPP Runway 33L: Maintain Standard Climb Thrust & 220 KIAS to 10,000 Population Exposure 60dB 65dB 70dB Standard Departure 147,222 58,441 10,437 Delayed Acceleration 97,728 33,306 9,298 Reduction 49,493 25,135 1,139 13
14 Runway 27 Departures:
15 Runway 27 Departures:
16 Delayed Acceleration Climb 220 knots Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX ANOPP Runway 27: Maintain Standard Climb Thrust & 220 KIAS to 10,000 Population Exposure 60dB 65dB 70dB Standard Departure 200, ,274 37,078 Delayed Acceleration 187,400 76,261 21,066 Difference 13,177 26,014 16,011 Preliminary 16
17 Fuel Burn and Time Impact Reduced speed climb profiles impact total trip fuel burn and flight time Magnitude varies by speed and aircraft type B738 E170 B773 Climb Speed Fuel Burn Increase (kg) Time Increase (s) Fuel Burn Increase (kg) Time Increase (s) Fuel Burn Increase (kg) Time Increase (s) 180 kts kts kts kts
18 Open Issues Issues Increased fuel burn and flight time Potential throughput reduction Nonstandard relative to normal operating procedures Pending Analysis Determining minimum clean operating speed for set of representative aircraft types Historical radar analysis for throughput impact assessment Comparing noise impact of NADP-1 relative to proposed procedure Will recommend NADP-1 adoption if benefits are equivalent 18
19 NADP1 vs. 220 Knots to 10,000ft: B Noise Exposure NADP-1 (B ) Noise Model: ANOPP 220kt to 10,000 (B ) Noise Model: ANOPP Baseline Departure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB 234, ,504 46,584 NADP-1 230,253 96,202 26,299 Difference 4,662 21,302 20,285 Baseline Departure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB 234, ,504 46, kt to 10k ft 180,729 74,409 25,634 Difference 54,186 43,095 20,950 19
20 Block 1: Runway 15R RNAV Waypoint Relocation (1-D2) 20
21 Runway 15R SID Modification Summary: Relocate initial waypoint on RNAV SID from FOXXX to BRRRO in order to provide noise relief at Hull Boeing (L A,MAX ) Noise Model: AEDT Population Exposure 60dB 65dB 70dB Baseline RNAV SID 5, Modified Procedure 4, Reduction 1, Benefits Mechanism Reduced noise at Hull due to waypoint relocation Potential Operational Constraints None anticipated 21
22 Block 1: Runway 22L/R RNAV SID Modification 22
23 Runway 22R Departures:
24 Runway 22L/22R SID Modification Options Summary: Relocate initial waypoint on RNAV SID from in order to provide noise relief at Hull while initiating post-takeoff turn as early as practical to reduce impact in South Boston Course-Based Turn Three potential procedure options A. Climb on runway heading to intercept an outbound course B. Climb on runway heading to 500 AGL, then direct to waypoint on SID C. Historical heading-based departure procedure Altitude-Based Turn Potential Operational Constraints Spacing with Runway 27 arrivals Compliance with procedure design criteria due to short leg lengths 24
25 Baseline Procedure Geometry
26 Option A - Climb to Intercept Course (1-D3a): Definition Preliminary Procedure Geometry 45 Simulator Tested for Flyability 26
27 Option A - Climb to Intercept Course (1-D3a): Noise Impact Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Vertical departure profile derived from median or historical radar data Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Baseline RNAV SID Modified Procedure 17,761 6,042 1,802 16,248 5,992 1,802 Reduction 1,
28 Option B - Climb to Altitude Then Direct (1-D3b): Definition Preliminary Procedure Geometry 28
29 Option B - Climb to Altitude Then Direct (1-D3b): Noise Impact Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Vertical departure profile derived from median or historical radar data Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Baseline RNAV SID Modified Procedure 17,761 6,042 1,802 15,445 5,715 1,712 Reduction 2,
30 Option C: Heading-based departure (1-D3c) Definition Concept: During periods where runway 27 not in use for arrivals, issue takeoff clearance with heading (followed by vectors or direct-to on course) 30
31 Open Issues Issues Option A: Climb to intercept course (1-D3a) Waivers required for RNAV SID leg length Option B: Climb to altitude, then direct (1-D3b) Waivers required for RNAV SID turn arc radius Variable track length impacting departure sequencing Option C: Heading-based departure (1-D3c) Only available when Runway 27 arrivals not in use Pending Analysis Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Historical runway configuration analysis to determine when procedure would be available 31
32 Block 1: RNAV Approach Runway 33L 32
33 TM BRIEFING STRIP TM KBOS/BOS LOGAN INTL D-ATIS Arrival MIT BOSTON Approach (R) BOSTON Tower Ground Helicopter Rwys 4L-22R, 14-32, 15L/R, 33L/R Rwys 4R-22L, Final CEIL-VIS RNAV Apch Crs Apt RNAV Elev 20' Visual 331^ Rwy 33L 15' MISSED APCH: jetblueonly No missed approach procedure. Alt Set: INCHES Trans level: FL DME/DME/IRU or GPS required. 2. Radar required. 4. VGSI and RNAV GP not coincident. 6 DEC L Low-Noise Overwater Approach Procedures BOSTON, MASS RNAV VISUAL Rwy 33L Trans alt: 18000' 3. FMS Glide Path 3.00^. 2500' MSA RW33L 1-A1b 1-A1a RNAV (GPS) IAP MISTK MAX 210 Kts At 7000' 116^ REVER At6600' RW33L TCH55' ^ 434' 092^ 485' At1010' WORRN 5.0 No Criteria Compliance Constraints No Current Mechanism for Public Distribution 4.0 VFR Weather Minimums 275^ 520' 174^ CLAWW At 3500' 4.0 HURBE At5000' 4.6 YAWKE At2280' ^ ^ MYNOT 1 1At 4000' RNAV (GPS) Rwy 33L approach under development based on current JetBlue RNAV special procedure Non-Precision Minimums TERPS & PBN Compliance Constraints WEATHER MINIMUMS Ceiling3000'- VIS 5 CHANGES: New tailored chart. 1. On initial contact with ATC request RNAV Visual Rwy 33L. 2. In FMS database select, GPS33L. 3. Advise ATC, "Airport or Preceding Traffic in sight" ASAP. 4. Adhere to all ATC restrictions and clearances. JEPPESEN, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 33
34 Overwater RNAV Instrument Approach Procedure with RNP Overlay (1-A1a) RNAV (GPS) Rwy 33L approach under development based on current JetBlue RNAV special procedure
35 Overwater RNAV Instrument Approach Procedure with RNP Overlay (1-A1a) Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 2, Modified Procedure Reduction 2, Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 35
36 Open Issues Issues Option A: Overwater RNAV Instrument Approach Procedure with RNP Overlay Waiver required for final approach intercept angle (39 vs. 30 criteria) Current draft procedure waypoint JASEP increases noise over Nahant Merging and spacing difficulties may only allow use during low demand periods Lack of vertical guidance in procedure may reduce utilization Option B: RNAV Visual Approach Procedure No current mechanism to allow for public distribution Pending Analysis Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Identify potential JASEP waypoint alternative 36
37 Block 1 Discussion 37
38 Block 1 Procedures: Recommendation Status as of 9/22/2017 Proc. ID Procedure Issues Pending Analysis 1-D1 Reduced-speed departures (modified to 220 knots or minimum clean maneuvering speed, whichever is higher) 1-D2 Runway 15R RNAV waypoint relocation 1-D3a 1-D3b 1-D3c 1-A1a 1-A1b Runway 22L/R RNAV waypoint relocation (climb to intercept course) Runway 22L/R RNAV waypoint relocation (climb to altitude then direct) Runway 22L/R heading-based departure Runway 33L overwater RNAV instrument approach procedure with RNP overlay Runway 33L overwater RNAV visual procedure Increased fuel burn and flight time Potential throughput reduction Nonstandard relative to normal operating procedures Determining minimum clean operating speed for set of representative aircraft types Historical radar analysis for throughput impact assessment Comparing noise impact of NADP-1 relative to proposed procedure No significant issues Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Waivers required for leg length criteria Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Waivers required for turn arc criteria Variable track length impacting departure sequencing Only available when Runway 27 arrivals not in use Waiver required for final approach intercept angle (39 vs. 30 criteria) Current draft procedure waypoint JASEP increases noise over Nahant Merging and spacing difficulties may only allow use during low demand periods Lack of vertical guidance in procedure may reduce utilization No current mechanism for public distribution Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Historical runway configuration analysis to determine when procedure would be available Potential TARGETS assessment of criteria compliance Identify potential JASEP waypoint alternative 38
39 Block 2: Runway 33L and 27 Departures Introduce Dispersion 39
40 Runway 33L Departures: Using Open SIDs or Flexible SIDs to Re-introduce Dispersion
41 Dispersion Concepts: Open SID or Increased Controller Flexibility 1. Open SIDs are RNAV departure procedures that include ATC radar vector segments. Authorized by FAA in 2015 Proven in operation (e.g. CLT, LAX) 2. Dispersion may also be introduced by direct ATC instruction (vector-based or direct-to) based on aircraft altitude or other criteria Allows greater ATC flexibility based on traffic levels and flows Would result in track length reduction with corresponding fuel savings Initiate Turn: 2000 AGL Example Only Dispersion from 2000 Turn Altitude Preliminary 41
42 Open Issues: Departure Track Dispersion Issues Impact of noise redistribution Pending Analysis Developing analysis method for dispersed departure tracks under Open SID and Flexible SID options 42
43 Block 2: Runway 4R & 22L Arrivals Low-Noise Overwater Approach Procedures 43
44 Runway 4R Arrivals:
45 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNAV Approach with RNP Overlay Simulator Tested for Flyability 45
46 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNAV Approach with RNP Overlay: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 30,239 7, Modified Procedure 18,283 5, Reduction 11,956 1,676 1 Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 46
47 Runway 4R Departures:
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 22L Low-Noise Offset RNAV Approach with RNP Overlay Overlaying arrival corridor on existing 4R RNAV SID for 22L arrivals: Existing 22L Straight-in Route 22L Proposed Route Simulator Tested for Flyability 51
52 22L Low-Noise Offset RNAV Approach with RNP Overlay: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 70,469 21,335 6,807 Modified Procedure 28,204 15,566 6,677 Reduction 42,265 5, Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 52
53 Canarsie RNAV (RNP) Special Figure: Honeywell 53
54 Notional Low-Noise Overwater RNP: BOS Rwy 4R 0.95 nmi final 2.1 nmi radius RF Matched to Canarsie RNP 13L Special 54
55 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNP Approach: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 30,239 7, Modified Procedure 6,887 2,161 0 Reduction 23,352 5, Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 55
56 Open Issues: Block 2 Low-Noise Overwater Approach Procedures Issues RNAV Procedures Potential waiver requirements for final approach segment length and intercept angle Merging and spacing difficulties may only allow use during low demand periods RNP Procedures Equipage and training levels prevent use by all operators Pending Analysis Developing analysis method to evaluate tradeoffs between final approach design criteria and noise reduction potential 56
57 Project Schedule/Work Plan Outline Updated September 28, 2017 Overview of Work Plan FAA/ Massport Discussions Winter Fall 2016 Announcement Oct 2016 Consultant Team Organization Fall 2016 Historical Flight Comparison\Analysis Dec to Feb 2016 Block 1 Procedure Opportunity Feb 2017 Lower complexity w/ benefits, minimal/no impacts DNL and alternative metrics (e.g. single event above) Block 1 Preliminary Recommendations Apr-May 2017 Feedback from the Massport CAC Block 1 Detail Analysis/Implementation Barriers Aug 2017 Block 2 Procedure Opportunity Jun 2017 More complex, benefits\negative impacts, noise equity DNL and alternative metrics (e.g. single event above) Schedule Block 2 Preliminary Recommendations Summer 2018 FAA Review Process Ongoing Finalize Recommendations Fall 2018 Implementation/Final Report Fall 2018 WORK IN PROGRESS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Today Public Engagement Press Event with Elected Officials, Massport, FAA, MCAC Leadership Briefings to MCAC Aviation Subcommittee, Executive Committee, and General Meeting Public Hearing, 2/22 Briefing to Aviation Subcommittee, 5/5 Summer 2017 Aviation Subcommittee Fall 2017 Aviation Subcommittee Fall 2017 MCAC Winter\Spring 2018 Aviation Subcommittee
58 RNAV MOU Study-Process Next Steps Brief Massport CAC Aviation Operations Sub-Committee 9/28 Finalize Block 1 ideas Fall 2017 MIT to make technical feasibility recommendation to FAA and Massport Continue work on Block 2 ideas Finalize Block 2 ideas by early/mid 2018 MIT to make technical feasibility recommendation to FAA and Massport Final Report with recommendations to FAA and Massport Summer/Fall 2018 Seek FAA input and review along the entire study process Continue briefing MCAC, seek MCAC review\feedback FAA will evaluate final procedure recommendations from Study based on Standard procedure design criteria Safety and efficiency impacts on Logan and the NAS (National Airspace System) NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) requirements Preliminary/Subject to Change
59 Community Suggested Procedures Under Review Departure Mods 27 inclusion Included in Block 1 and 2 4R conformance Under review Arrival Mods 4R alternative alignment Under review Note: Team also reviewed and rejected based on environmental or safety grounds - Steeper approaches on arrivals - R4R Arrivals Expressway alignment Preliminary/Subject to Change
60 Procedure Concepts Found to Have Limited Benefit and/or Significant Operational Constraints 60
61 Community Proposed Procedures for 4R 4R ILS/RNAV Track A 4R Proposal 61
62 Community Proposed Procedures 2015 Flight Track Density 4R ILS/RNAV Track A 4R Proposal (4.4 offset) 62
63 Community Proposed Procedures for 4L 4L Visual 4L ILS/RNAV 4L Proposal 63
64 4R Community Proposed Procedure: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 30,239 7, Modified Procedure 29,424 7,677 0 Reduction Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 64
65 4L Community Proposed Procedure: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Straight In 40,702 19,074 4,500 Modified Procedure 84,483 43,471 11,814 Reduction -43,781-24,397-7,314 Aircraft B Metric Noise Model Notes L A,MAX AEDT Standard AEDT arrival profile 65
66 Community Proposed Procedure: Waypoint Locations 66
67 Notional 4R Expressway Approach Path Concept: move arrival flows over regions of higher ambient noise o Highways o Industrial areas Currently developing prototype arrival profile definitions 24 Hour Equivalent Noise Level 4.7 nmi final RF: 1.5 nmi rad 45 turn Transportation Noise Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics 67
68 60 MIT Noise Exposure: 4R Expressway Approach 4R Expressway Approach Aircraft: B Metric: LAMAX Noise Model: AEDT Potential environmental justice issues Baseline ILS Flight Track Baseline ILS Noise Contours Expressway Flight Track Expressway Noise Contours Population Exposure 60 60dB 65dB 70dB 60 Baseline 46,039 21,207 5, Expressway 66,417 32,879 5,945 Difference -20,377-11,
69 3 and 3.77 Continuous Descent Approach Comparison BADA-4 model indicates that steeper glideslopes may be feasible for some aircraft types Feedback from operators: Airbus aircraft in planned descent autoflight mode cannot exceed 3.77 glideslope angle B Steep Approach Significant Concerns from Airline Technical Pilots and ATC for Operational Feasibility 69
70 Two-Segment Approach Concept B Two Segment Steep Approaches Significant Concerns from Airline Technical Pilots and ATC for Operational Feasibility 70
71 Safety Concerns - High-Energy Approaches Runway Excursions Figure source: The Boeing Company 71
72 Addendum A: Track Density Plots Presented in Average Daily Flights per Acre 72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85 Addendum B: Quantified Track Density vs. Raw Track Plots 85
86 July
87 July
88 Addendum C: Runway 27 Flight Tracks with ROD Corridor 88
89 % Jet Departures Within ROD Corridor 89
90 % Jet Departures Within ROD Corridor 90
Procedure Design Concepts for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction
Procedure Design Concepts for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction R. John Hansman rjhans@mit.edu Technical support from MIT students, HMMH, and Massport RNAV Track Concentration 2010 2015 2 Performance
BLOCK 1 PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LOGAN AIRPORT COMMUNITY NOISE REDUCTION
BLOCK 1 PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LOGAN AIRPORT COMMUNITY NOISE REDUCTION Prof. R. John Hansman Luke Jensen Jacqueline Thomas Greg O Neill Alison Yu Report No. ICAT-2017-08 December 2017 MIT International
Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Public Briefing. February 22, 2017 State Transportation Bld. Boston, MA
Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Public Briefing February 22, 2017 State Transportation Bld. Boston, MA As of 02/10/2017 Agenda Welcoming Remarks Tom Glynn (Massport CEO) David Carlon (Massport
Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Briefing to Massport CAC. December 8, 2016
Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Briefing to Massport CAC December 8, 2016 Contents FAA/Massport RNAV MOU Context Boston Logan Context FAA RNAV MOU, Overview Q&A 12/8/2016 2 FAA/Massport RNAV
Massport CAC Meeting December 07, 2017
Massport CAC Meeting December 07, 2017 12/07/2017 Massport CAC 1 Agenda 1. Welcome and Introduction of New Members [5 minutes] 2. Public Comment [10 minutes] 3. Approval of the Minutes of the October 12,
Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis
Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis February 23, 2005 Jeppesen Boeing Jeppesen Government / Military Services Group Airspace Services Division AIRSPACE
Analytical Approach for Quantifying Noise from Advanced Operational Procedures
Twelfth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2017) Analytical Approach for Quantifying Noise from Advanced Operational Procedures Luke Jensen, Jacqueline Thomas, Callen
Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals
Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals From an ATC Perspective Presentation to: CDA Workshop GA Tech Name: Don Porter RNP Project Lead FAA, RNAV RNP Group Date: 18 April 2006 My Background 22 years Terminal
Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Design in Context TFC Where does the traffic come from? And when? RWY Which
Honeywell.com PBN Concepts Krakow, Poland
PBN Concepts Krakow, Poland EPKK (KRK) Current Operational Environment Current Operational Environment : Runways: 07/25 8,366 ft (2550m) Approaches: ILS or LOC 25 RNAV (GNSS) 07, 25 VOR 07, 25 NDB 25 Departure
PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931
International Civil Aviation Organization PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP SIDs/STARs/HOLDS Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931 Design in context Methodology STEPS TFC Where does the traffic
Required Navigation Performance (RNP) in the United States
Required Navigation Performance (RNP) in the United States Overview FAA Roadmap for Performance-Based Navigation Moving to Performance-Based Navigation (RNAV and RNP) Definitions Operational attributes
Part 150 Update Status and Recommendation
Part 150 Update Status and Recommendation Presentation to: Noise Compatibility Committee October 26, 2010 Ted Baldwin 2 Topics Part 150 background Project status Noise Exposure Map Noise Compatibility
Watertown Airplane Noise Meeting
Watertown Airplane Noise Meeting July 25, 2017 Myron Kassaraba Town of Belmont Rep, Massport CAC 1 Topics June Stats & Construction Update 33L RNAV SID & RNAV Study Runway Selection Overnight Procedure
Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal
Performance Based Navigation Introduction to PBN Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal 1 Performance Based Navigation Aviation Challenges Navigation in Context Transition to PBN Implementation
Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport
October 10, 2017 Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport This document provides notice of upcoming changes to instrument procedures being implemented by NAV CANADA at the St. John s International
Project Consultant (PC) Alternative 5 Runway 22R/L RNAV Departures
VIA E-MAIL Date: To: From: Subject: Boston Technical Advisory Committee (BOS/TAC) Project Consultant (PC) Alternative 5 Runway 22R/L RNAV Departures At the February 17, 2006 BOS/TAC meeting several issues
FAA Research on Aviation Noise
FAA Research on Aviation Noise To: By: 32 nd Annual Aviation Noise and Emissions Symposium Dr. James I. Hileman Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor for Environment and Energy Office of Environment and
MHTG (Toncontin Intl)
Airport Information MHTG (Toncontin Intl) General Info Tegucigalpa, HN N 14 03.6' W 87 13.0' Mag Var: 1.6 E Elevation: 3297' Public, IFR, Control Tower, Rotating Beacon, Customs, Landing Fee Fuel: 100LL,
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW RNAV STAR updates and RNP AR approaches at Edmonton International Airport NAV CANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5L6 January 2018 The information
Safety Enhancement RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures
Safety Enhancement Action: Implementers: Statement of Work: Safety Enhancement 213.5 RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures To mitigate errors on Standard Terminal Arrival
Overview of Boston Logan Operations and Noise from Overflights. Presentation to Massport Board March 19, 2015
Overview of Boston Logan Operations and Noise from Overflights Presentation to Massport Board March 19, 2015 Contents How the Airport Operates Massport s Noise Abatement Program for Logan Recent Trends
EXPLANATION OF TPP TERMS AND SYMBOLS
U.S. TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION 52 EXPLANATION OF TPP TERMS AND SYMBOLS The discussions and examples in this section will be based primarily on the IFR (Instrument Flight Rule) Terminal Procedures
RNP Solutions in Australia Australia s PBN Transition brings Opportunities for Active Noise Abatement.
RNP Solutions in Australia Australia s PBN Transition brings Opportunities for Active Noise Abatement. Simon Young Strategy, Innovation and Service Performance Manager Australian Environment and PBN Drivers
KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION
Delta Air Lines - Noah Flood GLS GLS DTT 1.9 DTT 1.9 GLS1 GLS1 KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION Key Components Three Key Components 1. Global Navigation Satellite System A. GPS/Galileo/GLONASS 2. Ground
Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record
Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record Date: Flight Time: Sim. Inst. Time: Pilot Name: Aircraft Type: Aircraft Tail Number: Act. Inst. Time: Instructor Name: Holding Procedures Task Notes N/A Satisfactory
Yellowstone Regional Airport Operational Capability Assessment
Yellowstone Regional Airport Operational Capability Assessment Agenda Introductions Project Review Geographic & Operational Challenges Current Approach Baseline & Test Flight Procedures Safety and Operational
Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should understand: The different
Considerations for. RNP to xls. Operations. Juergen Ruppert. Regional Director Air Traffic Optimisation Services GE Aviation
Considerations for RNP to xls Operations Juergen Ruppert Regional Director Air Traffic Optimisation Services GE Aviation RNP to ILS 2 Content Why RNP to XLS What is the technology How does it work now?
Challenges in Complex Procedure Design Validation
Challenges in Complex Procedure Design Validation Frank Musmann, Aerodata AG ICAO Workshop Seminar Aug. 2016 Aerodata AG 1 Procedure Validation Any new or modified Instrument Flight Procedure is required
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW RNAV STAR updates and RNP AR approaches at Winnipeg James Armstrong Richardson International Airport NAV CANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5L6 November
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. MIT Lincoln Laboratory
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction Hamsa Balakrishnan, R. John Hansman, Ian A. Waitz and Tom G. Reynolds! hamsa@mit.edu, rjhans@mit.edu, iaw@mit.edu,
Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE
ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change ICAO ICAO Colloquium Colloquium on Aviation Aviation and and Climate Climate Change Change Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE Célia
RNP AR RWY 16 in Vienna Schwechat (LOWW) PBN based Noise Abatement
RNP AR RWY 16 in Vienna Schwechat (LOWW) PBN based Noise Abatement Dr. Philipp Daniel Schaad Head of Instrument Flight Procedures (ATM/IFP) ICANA, Frankfurt, November 2016 DIESER TEXT DIENT DER NAVIGATION
Naples Airport Authority Board of Commissioners and Noise Compatibility Committee Special Meeting on Central/South Florida Metroplex
Naples Airport Authority Board of Commissioners and Noise Compatibility Committee Special Meeting on Central/South Florida Metroplex March 16, 2017 Ted Baldwin and Robert Mentzer Metroplex Overview: From
Benefits Assessment for Tailored Arrivals
Benefits Assessment for Tailored Arrivals A Year at San Francisco (Dec 3 rd 2007 Dec 31 st 2008) 2009 Environmental Working Group Operations Standing Committee July 28 29, 2009 Kevin Elmer BOEING is a
RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective
RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective Presented to: ICAO Introduction to Performance Based Navigation Seminar The statements contained herein are based on good faith assumptions and provided
AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 18/18
NAV CANADA 19 JUL 18 AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 18/18 GUIDANCE FOR STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL (STAR) PROCEDURES The guidance currently published in the Transport Canada Aeronautical Information Manual
Analyzing & Implementing Delayed Deceleration Approaches
Analyzing & Implementing Delayed Deceleration Approaches Tom G. Reynolds, Emily Clemons & Lanie Sandberg R. John Hansman & Jacquie Thomas 12 th USA/Europe ATM Research & Development Seminar, Seattle, WA
Phase 1 PROJECT CONSULTANT SCOPE OF SERVICES AMENDMENT #1 FOR BOS/TAC REVIEW
Phase 1 PROJECT CONSULTANT SCOPE OF SERVICES AMENDMENT #1 FOR BOS/TAC REVIEW September 30, 2005 Project Consultant Amendment #1 DRAFT FOR BOS/TAC REVIEW 9/30/2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 STUDY DESIGN... 3
AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION
AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION Thomas Prevot Todd Callantine, Jeff Homola, Paul Lee, Joey Mercer San Jose State University NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett
Have Descents Really Become More Efficient? Presented by: Dan Howell and Rob Dean Date: 6/29/2017
Have Descents Really Become More Efficient? Presented by: Dan Howell and Rob Dean Date: 6/29/2017 Outline Introduction Airport Initiative Categories Methodology Results Comparison with NextGen Performance
Federal Aviation Administration. Air Traffic 101. By: Michael Valencia & Dianna Johnston Date: Feb. 26, 2017
Presented to: UC Davis Aviation Symposium By: Michael Valencia & Dianna Johnston Date: Overview Part 1 Air Traffic Controllers History Safety and Navigation Terminology Air Traffic Facility Types Equipment
Takeoff/Climb Analysis to Support AEDT APM Development Project 45
FAA CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR ALTERNATIVE JET FUELS & ENVIRONMENT Takeoff/Climb Analysis to Support AEDT APM Development Project 45 Project manager: Bill He, FAA Lead investigator: Michelle Kirby, Georgia
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES
1. Introduction NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES Many airports today impose restrictions on aircraft movements. These include: Curfew time Maximum permitted noise levels Noise surcharges Engine run up restrictions
Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures
Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures Implications of a Pilot Survey and Laboratory Simulations Dr. Anand M. Mundra
RNP AR and Air Traffic Management
RNP AR and Air Traffic Management BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Expanding the Utility of RNP AR Sheila Conway RNP AR User s Forum Wellington,
Buchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. FAR Part 150 Meeting. September 28, Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan
Airport Planning Program Master Plan FAR Part 150 ise Study Strategic Business Plan FAR Part 150 Meeting September 28, 2006 Agenda Introduction Part 150 Study Working Paper Two Operational Alternatives
Optimized Profile Descents A.K.A. CDA A New Concept RTCA Airspace Working Group
Optimized Profile Descents A.K.A. CDA A New Concept RTCA Presented to Environmental Working Group December 05, 2007 Outline RTCA Charter and Terms of Reference Objectives Membership and Organization Activities
Naples Noise and FAA Updates
Naples Noise and FAA Updates Presentation to NCC January 31, 2019 Mary Ellen Eagan, HMMH Agenda FAA Reauthorization Update FAA South Central Florida Metroplex Update Analysis of Departure Altitudes 2 3
Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex
Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex Administration SoCal Metroplex Project Overview Brief To: By: Los Angeles World Airport Rob Henry, Manager SoCal Metroplex Jose Gonzalez, SoCal
COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS
COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS Toronto Pearson is one of North America's fastest growing global hub airports, handling nearly 40 million passengers today, and well on its way to reaching greater
Controller Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA
Controller Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA Disclaimer This presentation is for information purposes only. It should not be relied on as the sole
Single Engine Instrument Training Record I PREFLIGHT PREPARATION WEATHER INFORMATION weather reports and forecasts. pilot and radar reports.
Single Engine Instrument Training Record I PREFLIGHT PREPARATION WEATHER INFORMATION weather reports and forecasts. pilot and radar reports. surface analysis charts. radar summary charts. significant weather
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 3 RD QUARTER 2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP)
3 RD QUARTER 2016 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) PUBLIC INPUT MEETING Metropolitan Airports Commission Noise Program Office July 27, 2016 PUBLIC INPUT MEETING Meeting Goals To hear the
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/23574 SHARE NextGen for Airports, Volume 1: Understanding the Airport s Role in Performance-Based Navigation: Resource Guide DETAILS
Martin County Airport / Witham Field Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) Demonstration Technical Report March 2010
Martin County Airport / Witham Field Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) Demonstration Technical Report March 2010 Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Orlando Airport District Office
FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/18 10/04/15 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL WORKING GROUP MEETING SECOND MEETING Rome Italy, 4 to 8 May 2015 Agenda Item 5 : New Work Programme
Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE
12/10/15 JO 7110.65W Chapter 6. Nonradar Section 1. General 6 1 1. DISTANCE Use mileage based (DME and/or ATD) procedures and minima only when direct pilot/controller communications are maintained. FIG
Near Term Potential for System Capacity Gains from RNP and RNAV Procedures
National Airspace System Performance Workshop Near Term Potential for System Capacity Gains from RNP and RNAV Procedures By Bill Dunlay Leigh Fisher Associates 1 Purpose and Agenda Briefly describe features
Atlanta NextGen PBN Activities
Atlanta NextGen PBN Activities Presentation to: Name: Date: EWG Ops SC Meeting Jim Arrighi RNAV/RNP Group Jim Allerdice A80 May 18, 2010 0 0 Atlanta Performance Based Navigation Project Planning Seven
Don-Jacques OULD FERHAT VP Airspace and Airlines Services. Airbus. PBN Safety programs
Don-Jacques OULD FERHAT VP Airspace and Airlines Services Airbus PBN Safety programs Long term cooperation with China Complex projects in China RNP AR at Kathmandu airport Cochin : First RNP APCH in India
NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures
NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures DFW International Airport Sandy Lancaster, Manager Noise Compatibility October 13, 2008 OUTLINE About DFW Airport
ARRIVALS REVIEW GATWICK
ARRIVALS REVIEW GATWICK BO REDEBORN GRAHAM LAKE bo@redeborn.com gc_lake@yahoo.co.uk 16-12-2015 2 THE TASK Has everything been done that is reasonably possible to alleviate the noise problems from arriving
SoCal Metroplex Study Area
An Update on Southern California Airspace Modernization November 10, 2016 Chart Publication Date Santa Barbara Municipal Airport, Bob Hope Airport, Palm Springs International Airport, Ontario International
PROCEDURES SPECIAL OPERATIONS
Intentionally left blank A318/A319/A320/A321 PRELIMINARY PAGES - TABLE OF CONTENTS PRO-SPO-51 Required Navigation Performance (RNP) General...A RNAV 10 / RNP 10... B RNAV 5 / BRNAV...C RNAV 1 RNAV 2 /
Overview of On-Going and Future R&D. 20 January 06 Ray Miraflor, NASA Ames Research Center
Overview of On-Going and Future R&D 20 January 06 Ray Miraflor, NASA Ames Research Center Outline JPDO and NGATS FAA - Aviation Environmental Design Tool NASA Research Airspace Concept Evaluation System
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Boston-Logan Runway 4 Left Area Navigation (RNAV) Visual Flight Procedure Test
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Boston-Logan Runway 4 Left Area Navigation (RNAV) Visual Flight Procedure Test FAA Order 7400.2 Appendix 5 (Modified) ======================================================================
Review of brisbane Airport Noise Abatement Procedures
Review of brisbane Airport Noise Abatement Procedures 1. Summary This document presents an overview of the findings of the review of the Noise Abatement Procedures in place for Brisbane Airport. The technical
RNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.
RNP OPERATIONS 1. Introduction Planes were made as a means of transport. To successfully fly from a location A to a location B, pilots were first and foremost navigators. Originally relying on visual landmarks
SoCal Metroplex Study Area
An Update on Southern California Airspace Modernization November 10, 2016 Chart Publication Date Long Beach Daugherty, John Wayne Orange County, Los Alamitos, Fullerton Municipal and Zamperini Field Airports
Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Noise Compatibility Committee
Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Presentation to: Noise Compatibility Committee October 29, 2015 Ted Baldwin What are NADPs? Departure
Flight Evaluation and Validation of RNP AR/SAAAR Instrument Flight Procedures
Flight Evaluation and Validation of RNP AR/SAAAR Instrument Flight Procedures Donald P. Pate Consultant Aviation Airspace Consulting, Inc. Edmond, OK, USA E-mail: donppate1@yahoo.com ABSTRACT With the
Name of Customer Representative: Bruce DeCleene, AFS-400 Division Manager Phone Number:
Phase I Submission Name of Program: Equivalent Lateral Spacing Operation (ELSO) Name of Program Leader: Dr. Ralf Mayer Phone Number: 703-983-2755 Email: rmayer@mitre.org Postage Address: The MITRE Corporation,
ICAO PBN CONCEPTS, BENEFITS, AND OBJECTIVES
AFCAC/ICAO Joint Workshop Walter White ICAO PBN CONCEPTS, BENEFITS, AND OBJECTIVES 24 JUNE 2014 Airbus ProSky Corporate Presentation 29/06/2014 PERFORMANCE-BASED NAVIGATION The implementation of Performance-Based
Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology
Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology The Team Noise Abatement Procedures Working Group (NAPWG) has the following
TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.
International Civil Aviation Organization WORKING PAPER 31/10/12 English only TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 5: Efficient flight paths through trajectory-based
Pi Aero Instrument Rating Syllabus
This syllabus was created in order to maintain a high level of positive training as well as meet the minimum hours required by the Federal Aviation Regulations Part 61. There are four sections to this
1 P age CLT ACR - Noise Improvement Combo File - as of
CLT Airport Community Roundtable - Noise Improvement Matrix A) NOISE CATEGORIES B) SPECIFIC CAUSES C) IMPACT D) LOCAL CONTROL E) EXISTING INITIATIVES F) ACR-RELATED SOLUTIONS AND STATUS G) BENCHMARKING
Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration
DCA Presented to: Arlington County By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, 2015 Air Traffic Roles and Responsibilities As aviation technology advances, the FAA is putting in
A Standard for Equivalent Lateral Spacing Operations Parallel and Reduced Divergence Departures
A Standard for Equivalent Lateral Spacing Operations Parallel and Reduced Divergence Departures Dr. Ralf H. Mayer Dennis J. Zondervan Albert A. Herndon Tyler Smith 9 th USA/EUROPE Air Traffic Management
Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update
Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Ultimate ASV, Runway Use and Flight Tracks 4th Working Group Briefing 8/13/18 Meeting Purpose Discuss Public Workshop input
Decisions on which type of approach to use vary with each airline, and sometimes even for each flight. aero quarterly qtr_02 10
Decisions on which type of approach to use vary with each airline, and sometimes even for each flight. 24 Fuel Conservation Strategies: Descent and Approach The descent and approach phases of flight represent
Boston Logan International Airport Operational Overview
Boston Logan International Airport Operational Overview Presentation to the Massport Community Advisory Committee June 8, 2017 Updated 12/07/17 Content Overview of Logan Runway Designations Runway Configurations
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW RNAV STAR updates and RNP AR approaches at Halifax Stanfield International Airport NAV CANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5L6 November 2017 The information
Airservices Australia 2016
Airservices Australia 2016 Airservices Australia 2016 Airservices Australia 2015 Airservices Australia 2016 Airservices Australia 2016 ATIS (H24) (TWR HR) APP TWR SMC ACD FIA (AH) GOLD COAST, QLD (YBCG)
Massport Study Team Evaluation of CAC Noise Study Alternatives. October 2010
Massport Study Team Evaluation of CAC Noise Study Alternatives October 2010 Massport s Evaluation Team Aviation Planning Capital Programs Aviation Operations Environmental Permitting Consultation with
Tailored Arrivals (TA)
Current Status: Tailored Arrivals (TA) Current work is focused on preparing for oceanic TA field trials involving ZOA/NCT, scheduled to begin April 2006. This effort is being led by NASA with support from
MEETING SUMMARY January 12, 2005
Boston Overflight Noise Study BOS/TAC Meeting MEETING SUMMARY January 12, 2005 Attendance: BOS/TAC Members: Gail Lattrell (FAA Airports), Joe Davies (FAA Air Traffic), Toni Dusseault (FAA Air Traffic),
SFO Tailored Arrivals Environmental Analysis
Advanced Air Traffic Management SFO Tailored Arrivals Environmental Analysis by Kevin Elmer, Rob Mead, Louis Bailey, Brad Cornell, Jesse Follet (Boeing) Richard Lanier (NASA Ames Research Center / FAA)
Required Navigation Performance at Alaska Airlines
Required Navigation Performance at Alaska Airlines Sarah Dalton Director, Airspace and Technology Kotzebue Nome Barrow Prudhoe Bay Adak Bethel Dillingham Dutch King Salmon Fairbanks Anchorage Cordova Harbor
Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, I am Chet Fuller, President GE Aviation
Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, I am Chet Fuller, President GE Aviation Systems, Civil. Thank you for the opportunity to testify before the Subcommittee today on the issue of Area Navigation (RNAV)
ICAO Activities. IFPP work on the Manual for Continuous Descent Operations. Federal Aviation Administration
ICAO Activities IFPP work on the Manual for Continuous Descent Operations Presented to: JPDO, EWG, Ops SC Workshop NASA Ames Facility, Moffet Field, CA By: Lynn Boniface, ISI, Supporting AFS-420 Date:
DCA Airport Noise. MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016
DCA Airport Noise MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016 BACKGROUND FAA Next Gen noise Analyzed on macro level Data below 3K Ft under estimated community level impacts Primary focus has been on departure procedures 1 part
TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 8 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This Advisory Circular provides guidance to personnel involved in construction of instrument and visual flight procedures for publication in the Aeronautical Information Publication.
LAX Community Noise Roundtable Work Program A1 Review of SoCal Metroplex Proposed Procedures and Suggestions for Comment Letter.
LAX Community Noise Roundtable Work Program A1 Review of SoCal Metroplex Proposed Procedures and Suggestions for Comment Letter July 8, 2015 Southern California Metroplex Environmental Assessment Presentation
Supplemental Proposals to Revising the
Presentation Summary of the Supplemental Proposals to Revising the Northern California Metroplex For Alameda County/Contra Costa County NEXTGEN SUBCOMMITTEE FOR THE OAKLAND AIRPORT/COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM
IFR 91.157 Must be instrument rated to fly special VFR at Night (civil twilight to civil twilight, sun 6 degrees below horizon) 91.159 Unless in a holding pattern of 2 minutes or less, VFR cruising altitude
MetroAir Virtual Airlines
MetroAir Virtual Airlines NAVIGATION BASICS V 1.0 NOT FOR REAL WORLD AVIATION GETTING STARTED 2 P a g e Having a good understanding of navigation is critical when you fly online the VATSIM network. ATC
CDA Continuous Descent Approach
CDA Continuous Descent Approach Pilots view Cpt. Ir. Dirk De Winter EUROCONTROL - Brussels The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CDA Pilots Perspective What? CDA is all about the ability