Social Impact Assessment

Transcription

1 Appendix D 41/15762/09/ R0 Notional Seaway Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2 Coordinator General Report for Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project August 2006

3 Important Notice Disclaimer SIA on a Notional Project including a Concept Design The (SIA) has been developed and conducted to address the Terms of Reference of the Notional Seaway Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS is based on a concept developed by GHD Pty Ltd (GHD). The concept design is based on a brief provided by the Queensland Government (Initial Advice Statement) and relevant design codes. Because this SIA has not been undertaken on a real Project much of the information that is usually available to identify and assess social impacts is not present, therefore case studies and industry (both cruise ship and super yacht) information have been heavily relied upon. Participation of Notional Seaway Project Stakeholders Any participation in the SIA by Notional Seaway Project Stakeholders has been on a voluntary basis. Their participation in the SIA does not condemn nor advocate the development of the Project, rather it states the social impacts they have identified with the information they had at the time.

4 Contents Executive Summary Introduction Methodology Community Profile Community Services and Facilities Existing Social Environment Identification of Social Impacts Significance of Social Impacts Mitigation/Management and Enhancement Strategies Monitoring of Social Impacts Summary xvi xvi xvi xvi xviii xviii xix xx xxiii xxiv xxvi 1. Introduction Overview The Project The Project Concept Design The Environmental Impact Statement 1 2. Methodology Introduction Project Study Areas Variables and Social Indicators SIA and Community Consultation Stakeholder Identification SIA Consultation Tools Case Studies Introduction Port Botany Expansion Port of Airlie 24 i

5 3.4 Summary Community Profile Introduction Population and Age Income Education Housing Industries Labour Force Family Structure Transport Crime Cultural Diversity Tourism Gold Coast Beaches Summary Community Facilities and Services Introduction Checklist of Community Services and Facilities Summary Existing Social Environment of The Spit Introduction History of The Spit General Character of The Spit Current Use of The Spit Community Values of The Spit Current planning and policies that impact on The Spit Summary of Existing Social Environment of The Spit Identification of Social Impacts Introduction 76 ii

6 7.2 Social Impacts and Issues Identified by SIA Stakeholders Social Impacts as identified by GHD Population Impacts Community/Institutional Arrangements Communities in Transition Individual and Family Level Impacts Community Infrastructure Needs Summary Significance of Impacts Introduction Significance of Social Impacts Prior to Mitigation and Enhancement Ranking of Social Impacts Population Impacts Ranking of Social Impacts Community/Institutional Arrangements Ranking of Social Impacts Communities in Transition Ranking of Social Impacts Individual and Family Level Impacts Ranking of Social Impacts Community Infrastructure Needs Summary Mitigation/Management and Enhancement of Social Impacts Introduction Alternatives Mitigation/Management and Enhancement Strategies Significance of Social Impacts After Mitigation and Enhancement Strategies Employed Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Population Impacts Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Community/Institutional Arrangements Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Communities in Transition 190 iii

7 9.8 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Individual and Family Level Impacts Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Community Infrastructure Needs Summary Monitoring of Social Impacts Introduction Social Indicator Analysis Community Monitoring Program Summary Conclusion References 212 Table Index Table 1 Monitoring Programs for the Proposed Project xxiv Table 2 Summary of Issues, Identified Social Impacts and Mitigation/Enhancement Strategies xxvi Table 3 Proposed Cruise Ship Terminal Elements 2 Table 4 Proposed Marina Precinct Elements 3 Table 5 Proposed Boar Ramp Facility Elements 5 Table 6 Improved Public Facilities and Amenities Elements 6 Table 7 Methodology 4 Table 8 Table 9 Variables and Social Indicators 12 Community Consultation and SIA Consultation Differentiators 19 Table 10 SIA Consultation Tools 20 Table 11 Social Impacts and Mitigation Strategies for Port Botany Expansion 22 Table 12 Social Impacts for Port of Airlie 25 Table 13 Summary of Case Study Impacts and Mitigation Port of Botany Expansion and Port of Airlie 28 iv

8 Table 14 Study Area ERP 30 Table 15 Comparison of 2001 Family Incomes and the Poverty Line 32 Table 16 Average Household Size, All Study Areas, Table 17 Gold Coast Key Industries 34 Table 18 Checklist of Community Services and Facilities 42 Table 19 Results of the Observational Mapping All Sites 53 Table 20 Description of The Spit User Groups 61 Table 21 Events around The Spit/Seaway/Broadwater for Table 22 Estimated Usage of the Seaway 66 Table 23 Table 24 Recreational Boats Registered in the Gold Coast (June 2005) 66 Summary of Community Values for the Project Area Components 67 Table 25 Impacted Land Tenure 69 Table 26 Table 27 Table 28 Desired Standards of Service for Public Open Space Quantity (ha/1000) 74 Perceived Social Impacts/Issues Identified by SIA Stakeholders 76 Summary of Construction and Operational Social Impacts 80 Table 29 Estimated Project Workforce 83 Table 30 Potential Beneficiaries of the Cruise Ship Industry 86 Table 31 Poverty Lines: Australia, December Quarter, Table 32 Summary of Impacts on Daily Living and Movement Patterns 107 Table 33 Changes in Leisure Opportunities 111 Table 34 Table 35 Table 36 Summary Social Impact Significance Prior to Mitigation and Enhancement 117 Mitigation and Enhancement Strategies for Social Impacts 157 Summary Social Impact Significance After Mitigation and Enhancement 177 Table 37 Monitoring Programs for the Proposed Project 209 v

9 Table 38 Cross Reference SIA TOR and SIA Report 210 Table 39 Project Stakeholders and their involvement 219 Table 40 Study Area ERP 223 Table 41 Proportion of Population 225 Table 42 Population Density 226 Table 43 Proportion of Population in Remoteness Area 228 Table 44 Table 45 Table 46 Table 47 Index of Socio Economic Advantage and Disadvantage 229 Weekly Household Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B Weekly Family Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B Comparison of 2001 Family Incomes and the Poverty Line 236 Table 48 Source of Personal Income (2001) 238 Table 49 Selected Income Support Customers (2003) 240 Table 50 Wage and Salary Earners (2002) 241 Table 51 Table 52 Table 53 Table 54 Attendance at Educational Institutions Comparison, 2001 Census 242 Median House Sale Prices for Immediate Study Area suburbs, 2002 Financial Year 245 Median House Sale Price, Immediate Study Area, September 2005 Quarter 245 Median Weekly Rent, Immediate Study Area Suburbs (June 2003 quarter) 246 Table 55 Average Household Size, 2001 Census 247 Table 56 Value of residential and non residential building approvals, Gold Coast (C) and State quarter ended December Table 57 Unemployment Rates, Table 58 Unemployment Rates, Table 59 Medical and Health Care Facilities 263 Table 60 Childcare Facilities 263 Table 61 Police Stations within the Immediate Study Area 264 Table 62 Police Stations Located within the Gold Coast region 265 vi

10 Table 63 Ambulance Stations within the Gold Coast Region 265 Table 64 Gold Coast Fire Stations 266 Table 65 Crisis and Counselling Services 266 Table 66 Immediate Study Area Aged Care 267 Table 67 Gold Coast Region 267 Table 68 Immediate Study Area Schools 268 Table 69 Gold Coast Region Schools 268 Table 70 Further Education 272 Table 71 Youth Services 273 Table 72 Gold Coast Sporting Facilities 274 Table 73 Swimming Enclosures 274 Table 74 Skate Parks 274 Table 75 VMR Seaway Tower Southport Operational Statistics Table 76 Observational Dates and Times 286 Table 77 Observational Sites and Description 286 Table 78 Focus Group Participants 292 Table 79 Key Stakeholders and Comments 301 Table 80 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Surfers 310 Table 81 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Divers 316 Table 82 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance 321 Table 83 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Gecko 329 Table 84 Table 85 Table 86 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association 343 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Nerang Community Association 350 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Gold Coast City Council 358 Table 87 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Education 364 Table 88 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Economic/Business 370 Table 89 Results of Impact Mapping, Friends of Federation Walk 376 vii

11 Table 90 Results of Impact Mapping, Dog Walkers 380 Table 91 Different Types of Cruise Ships 382 Table 92 Different Types of Ports 383 Table 93 Cruise Ships Type of Expenditure 387 Table 94 Cruise Ships Estimated Revenue based on 1,200 passengers (i.e. Sky Princess) 387 Table 95 Potential Beneficiaries of the Cruise Ship Industry 388 Table 96 Sensitivity of the Socio Economic Environment 406 Table 97 Magnitude of Impact on the Socio Economic Environment 407 Table 98 Table for Assessment of Overall Significance 407 Figure Index Figure 1 Community Values of The Spit xix Figure 2 Notional Seaway Project Concept Design 1 Figure 3 Immediate Study Area 8 Figure 4 Regional and State Study Areas 9 Figure 5 Social Indicators Flow Chart 12 Figure 6 Integration Model of SIA and Community Consultation 19 Figure 8 Occupational Growth for Gold Coast City Figure 10 Average Daily Beach Usage by Most Popular Beaches, Gold Coast City, Figure 15 The Spit from 1865 to Figure 16 The Spit Figure 17 The Spit Figure 23 People in Boats fishing in the Seaway 51 Figure 24 The Marine Stadium 51 Figure 25 Surfers crossing the Seaway 51 Figure 26 The Marine Stadium 51 Figure 27 View looking north from the western arm of The Spit 51 viii

12 Figure 28 Doug Jennings Park 51 Figure 29 Figure 30 Person fishing from the southern training wall (looking west) 52 People fishing on the southern training wall (looking east) 52 Figure 31 Fish in the Seaway 52 Figure 32 Turtle in the Seaway 52 Figure 33 Observational Survey Results Recreation 57 Figure 34 Observational Survey Results Sporting 58 Figure 35 Results of Observational Mapping All Sites 59 Figure 36 Results of Observational Mapping All Sites 60 Figure 37 Community Values of The Spit 69 Figure 38 Recreation Facilities as a Component of the Public Open Space Network 74 Figure 39 Population Growth of Immediate Study Area, 2000 to Figure 40 Gold Coast City Council area ERP Projections 224 Figure 41 Age Cohorts of the Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas 225 Figure 42 Percentage of Population in Area of Remoteness 228 Figure 43 Figure 44 Figure 45 Figure 46 Figure 47 Figure 48 Figure 49 Level of Advantage/Disadvantage in the Immediate Study Area (ABS 2001) 231 Weekly Household Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B Weekly Family Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B Individual Weekly Income, Immediate Study Area, Educational Qualifications, Immediate and Regional Study Areas, Number of People, Percentage of Educational Qualifications, All Study Areas, Dwelling Type Comparison, Immediate Study Area and Gold Coast Region, Figure 50 Dwelling by Tenure Type, All Study Areas, ix

13 Figure 51 Median Unit and Townhouse Sale Price, Immediate Study Area, Comparison September 2000 and Figure 52 Average Household Size, 1991 and 2001 Census 247 Figure 53 Labour Force Breakdown by Study Area, Figure 54 Figure 55 Occupation by Study Areas as a Percentage of Total, Industry Sector by Study Areas as a Percentage, Figure 56 Family Type by Study Areas, Figure 57 Figure 58 Figure 59 Number of Motor Vehicles per Occupied Dwelling by Study Area, Offences Against Property, Gold Coast and Queensland, 2000 to Offences Against the Person and Other Offences, Gold Coast andqueensland, 2000 to Figure 60 Country of Birth by Study Area, Figure 61 Figure 62 Figure 63 Figure 64 Religious Affiliations, 1991 to 2001, Gold Coast Region 257 Domestic Overnight Visitor Source, Gold Coast, 2001/ International Visitor Source Markets, Gold Coast Region, 2001/ Average Daily Beach Usage by Most Popular Beaches, Gold Coast City, Figure 65 Recreation Facilities Network Local Study Area 276 Figure 66 The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour) Local Area Plan 280 Figure 67 Site Plan for the Observational Mapping 288 Figure 68 Observational Survey Recreational Results 289 Figure 69 Observational Survey Sporting Results 290 Figure 70 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing EIS Process 294 Figure 71 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Safety 295 Figure 72 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Benefits 296 x

14 Figure 73 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Community Amenity 297 Figure 74 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Construction and Operation 298 Figure 75 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Cost 299 Figure 76 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Environment 300 Figure 77 Focus Group Surfers: Impact Webbing Exercise 307 Figure 78 Focus Group Surfers: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 309 Figure 79 Focus Group Divers: Impact Webbing Exercise 313 Figure 80 Figure 81 Figure 82 Focus Group Divers: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 315 Focus Group Save Our Spit: Impact Webbing Exercise 319 Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 320 Figure 83 Focus Group Gecko: Impact Webbing Exercise 326 Figure 84 Figure 85 Figure 86 Figure 87 Figure 88 Figure 89 Figure 90 Figure 91 Figure 92 Focus Group Gecko: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 328 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (EIS Process) 333 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Safety) 334 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Benefits) 335 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Community Amenity) 337 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Construction and Operation) 338 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Cost) 339 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Environment) 341 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 342 xi

15 Figure 93 Figure 94 Figure 95 Figure 96 Figure 97 Figure 98 Figure 99 Figure 100 Figure 101 Figure 102 Figure 103 Focus Group Nerang Community Association: Impact Webbing Exercise 348 Focus Group Nerang Community Association: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 349 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council: Impact Webbing Exercise 355 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 357 Focus Group Education: Impact Webbing Exercise 361 Focus Group Education Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 363 Focus Group Economic/Business: Impact Webbing Exercise 367 Focus Group Economic/Business Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 369 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk: Impact Webbing Exercise 373 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise 375 Focus Group Dog Walkers: Impact Webbing Exercise 379 xii

16 Appendices A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Terms of Reference SIA Consultations Detailed Community Profile Detailed Community Services and Facilities GCCC Local Area Plan for The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour) VMR Statistics on Use of the Seaway Observational Mapping Results of SIA Consultations Focus Group Surfers Focus Group Divers Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance Focus Group Gecko Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association Focus Group Nerang Community Association Focus Group Gold Coast City Council Focus Group Education Focus Group Economic/Business Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk Focus Group Dog Walkers Review of the Cruise Ship Industry Surfing Survey Social Impact Significance Matrix External Review xiii

17 Acronyms ABS AS CD CHMP CPTED DLGSR EMP EIS GCCC LAP LAT MBPA MCU MES MSQ NCA NMES OESR PIFU SIA SLA SOSA SSD VMR Australian Bureau of Statistics Australian Standard Collection District Cultural Heritage Management Plan Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Queensland Department of Local Government, Sport and Recreation Environmental Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement Gold Coast City Council Local Area Plan Lowest Astronomical Tide Main Beach Progress Association Material Change of Use Main English Speaking Maritime Safety Queensland Nerang Community Association Non Main English Speaking Office of Economic and Statistical Research (Queensland Treasury) Planning Information and Forecasting Unit (DLGSR) Statistical Local Area (ABS) Save Our Spit Alliance Statistical Sub Division (ABS) Volunteer Marine Rescue xiv

18 Acknowledgements GHD would like to acknowledge the participation of the Notional Seaway Project Stakeholders throughout the SIA process. The Notional Seaway Project Stakeholders provided their time and information on a voluntary basis. Without their participation the SIA would be less accurate and limited in detail. xv

19 Executive Summary Introduction GHD was contracted by the Queensland Coordinator General to undertake an EIS for the Notional Seaway Project. This (SIA) is one of the technical studies completed to address the Terms of Reference developed by the Coordinator General for the Project. Methodology GHD developed a Project specific methodology for the SIA, incorporating:» Desk based research (demographic analysis, review of community services and facilities, analysis of case studies);» Field research (observation mapping);» Consultation with Project Stakeholders (impact webbing and impact mapping);» Working closely with the Community Consultation Program (information from the newsletter feedback forms and attendance at community information days); and» Review of other technical studies. For the purposes of the SIA, GHD defined the following study areas:» Immediate Study Area ABS Statistical Local Areas (SLAs) of: Labrador; Southport; and Main Beach Broadwater.» Regional Study Area Gold Coast City Council area (or ABS statistical sub division Gold Coast City Part B)» State Study Area Queensland Community Profile Gold Coast City Council (regional study area) had the second largest population increases over the year to June 2005 was ranked second in Australia in terms of population increase 1. In 2005, the estimated resident population of the immediate study area was 46, 168 people (1% of the State s population) and the regional study area was 482,566 people (12% of the State s population). 1 OESR (2006) Information Brief Regional Population Growth: (downloaded ) xvi

20 The State Government (PIFU) has predicted that the population of the regional study area will be between 563,400 and 587,900 by In the immediate study area there is an higher percentage of younger (14 years and younger) and older (65 years and older) compared to the regional and state study areas. The population density of the immediate study area is significantly higher than the regional and state study areas. All of the immediate study area population is in a major city area with only a small percentage of the regional study area population in an inner regional area. The immediate and regional study areas are ranked highly on the index of socioeconomic advantage. Over half of the populations in the immediate and regional study areas are wage earners with only 17% and 14% respectively having an income of a Government cash benefit. The average total income of the population living in the immediate study area is $31,703 and in the regional study area it is $32,328. The majority of couples (with or without) children in the Gold Coast SSD are above the poverty line. However the majority of one parent families are under the poverty line. In 2001, there were 20,795 dwellings in the immediate study area with an even distribution of separate houses, townhouses and units/apartments, with 2,198 dwellings unoccupied. In 2003, the median sale price for a house in the immediate study area was between $338,500 and $412,000; and the median sale price for a townhouse/unit was between $242,000 and $560,000. The median weekly rent was between $260 and $350 in the immediate study area for a 3 bedroom house and $200 and $260 for a unit or townhouse. The average household size in the immediate study area was 2.1 people compared to 2.4 for the regional study area and 2.6 for the State. At the time of the 2001, the immediate study area had similar percentages of people with educational qualifications to the regional and study area. There was an exception however with a significantly higher percentage of people without educational qualifications (over 60%) in the immediate study area compared to the regional study area (30%) and the State (25%). The immediate study area has higher percentages of people working as labourers, associate professionals and professionals compared to the regional and state study areas. In general the immediate study area follows the trends of occupation type in the regional and state study areas. The Gold Coast SSD is attracts a high percentage of domestic and international tourists and employment in related industries reflects this. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach (located within the immediate study area) account for 9% of the daily usage of Gold Coast beaches. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach should be considered as a xvii

21 priority when assessing the impacts of the proposed Notional Seaway on the Gold Coast Spit. Community Services and Facilities Both the immediate and regional study areas are well serviced for community services and facilities, however based on consultations with stakeholders, there are areas that require attention, including:» The requirement for more pubic open green space in the immediate study area; and» The requirement for a substantial increase in affordable housing in the regional study area. Existing Social Environment The social environment of the project area can be summarised as a high use recreational area for the purposes of achieving increased health and well being outcomes connected to the natural environment 2. The Project area provides different qualities for different people. It is utilised by a large variety of people for a large variety of uses (all with a recreation focus), both marine and land based. These uses include (but not limited to:» Diving;» Surfing;» Recreational fishing;» Dog walking;» Swimming;» Boating;» BBQs, picnics and general relaxing;» Walking/running and» Educational. There is more use of the land component of the project study area during the day compared to night. There are strong and passionate values held by SIA stakeholders for The Spit based on how they, their family and friends use the area. 2 As opposed to using a man made environment (e.g. swimming pool) to achieve the some outcomes. xviii

22 SIA stakeholders defined the existing social environment of The Spit as an area for all people and a place that anyone could go to and enjoy, regardless of background or physical abilities. Figure 1 illustrates the community values associated with The Spit. Figure 1 Community Values of The Spit Identification of Social Impacts There are a number of social impacts identified with the proposed Project, including but not limited too:» The balance of the economic and social gains of the construction and operation of the proposed Project versus the loss of public open space, access to the project area (and associated recreational activities) and opportunities for businesses that currently use the project area.» A change in the amount of people who use of the area and the activities they undertake.» The potential change of employment opportunities and business opportunities from existing local businesses (e.g. dive industry and glass bottom boat tours versus the potential economic benefit and employment from the visiting cruise ships and the marina precinct.» The reduction in the amount of public open space which is freely accessible to all members of the community pre project.» The change in general public access to the project area. A change from the preproject area which was fully accessible to all members of the community. To only allowing access to certain sections of the community to certain areas (those that are employed or who utilise the area as part of the construction and/or operation of the proposed Project).» Impacts on associated traffic volumes and congestion not only on Seaworld Drive, but also in the immediate study area (in particular including the Gold Coast Highway and the Sundale Bridge. xix

23 » Safety impacts in relation to: Access to the Seaway and Broadwater for surfers, divers, small boats and other users; Potential pollution of the waterways from the cruise ships and the vessels using the marina precinct; Diseases and potential violence created by cruise ship passengers and military personnel. There appears to be a polarization of attitudes toward the proposed Project, with most people in the immediate and regional study areas having an opinion on whether the Project should go ahead or not. Based on SIA consultations, it has become evident that the proposed Project needs to be broken down into its key components:» The Cruise Ship Terminal With the most polarization on the cruise ship terminal whether it should be constructed and operated or not;» Marina precinct Most people agree with the concept of the marina precinct, but the issue of contention is where it could be relocated, or whether the berths should be absorbed into existing marinas;» The Boat Ramp Facility Upgrading of the boat ramp facility received little opinion; and» Upgrade of the Public Facilities The majority of people agreed with the need to upgrade the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. Significance of Social Impacts There are a range of significant social impacts for the proposed Project, from not significant to highly significant impacts. After application of the mitigation and enhancement strategies there were some amendments to the significance of some social impacts. Highly Significant Impacts Highly significant impacts after the application of mitigation/management and enhancement strategies are (in no particular order):» Involvement of interest group activity (in particular the SOSA), in relation to the: Dredging (capital and maintenance); Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» The industrial diversification and changes in the commercialisation/industrial focus of the Project area, in particular: Cruise ship terminal (and associated infrastructure); and Marina precinct (and associated infrastructure). xx

24 » Impacts on families and individuals, in particular as a result of the: Cruise ship terminal (and associated infrastructure for both operation and construction);and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» Impacts on the perception of public safety associated with the cruise ship terminal (and associated infrastructure); and» Changes in leisure opportunities in the project area, in particular the area associated with the cruise ship terminal (and associated infrastructure). Moderately Significant Impacts Moderately significant impacts after the application of mitigation/management and enhancement strategies are:» The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct.» Relocation of individuals and families as associated with the marina precinct.» Formation of community attitudes towards the Project, in particular the: Dredging (capital and maintenance); Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» Interest group activity associated with the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» Changes to land use planning and zoning associated with the: Cruise ship area; Marina precinct; and» Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» Changes in occupational opportunities in relation to the changes created by the: Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» Presence of an outside agencies, in particular those associated with the cruise ship terminal (construction and operation).» Impact on weekend residents, particular in relation to those impacted by the construction and operation of the: Cruise ship terminal; and Marina precinct.» The potential for the disruption to social networks as associated with the marina precinct.» The perception of public safety as associated with the marina precinct. xxi

25 » Changes in leisure opportunities associated with the: Dredging of the Seaway (capital and maintenance); Marina precinct (construction and operation); and» Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance). Slightly Significant Impacts Slightly significant impacts after the application of mitigation/management and enhancement strategies are:» The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» Formation of community attitudes the Project in relation to the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» The change in land use planning and zoning associated with the dredging of the Seaway (both capital and maintenance).» The potential for enhanced economic inequalities associated with: Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» Changes in occupation opportunities associated with the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» Presence of an outside agencies, in particular those associated with the marina precinct (construction and operation).» The inter organisational cooperation required for: Dredging (capital and maintenance); Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Marina precinct (construction and operation).» The introduction of new social classes associated with the operation of the: Cruise ships; Marina precinct and Upgrade of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» The change in the commercial/industrial focus of the Project area associated with the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» The change in the presence of weekend residents associated with the upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities.» The impacts on families and individuals associated with the: Dredging of the Seaway (capital and maintenance); and Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance). xxii

26 » The disruption to daily living and movement associated with: Dredging (capital and maintenance); Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); Marina precinct (construction and operation); and Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance).» The potential disruption to social networks associated with: Cruise ship terminal (operation and construction); and Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance).» The perception of public safety associated with the: Marina precinct (construction and operation); and Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance).» Change in community infrastructure associated with the Marina precinct (construction and operation); and Upgrading of Doug Jennings Park and public boat ramp facilities (construction and maintenance). Mitigation/Management and Enhancement Strategies Not all of the social impacts caused by the proposed Project can be mitigated, managed or enhanced. In particular:» The reduction of public open space for the cruise ship terminal;» The loss of public access to the Project area; and» Changes to the Project area which is a unique environment for the immediate, regional and state study areas and lack of suitable alternative areas. There are however mitigation and management measures recommended ensuring that any Project is developed (including detailed design, construction and operation) in a way that minimises the impact on the community living in the immediate and regional study areas. Key components of this include:» The development of a Community Engagement Charter (including a Community Consultation Program and Community Monitoring Program) to be developed between the Project developers/owners/contractors, the State Government, GCCC and the community organisations that have an interest in the Project;» For compensatory habitats to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies to be put in place. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses; xxiii

27 » Tourism Queensland and GCCC to support the development of new industries in the Project area, to act as facilitators between the cruise ship operators and the local businesses;» For the construction of the proposed infrastructure to meet the Queensland Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (either as required or on a voluntary basis);» Development and implementation of a comprehensive Traffic Management Plan for both construction and operation. The Traffic Management Plan should include all transport routes (not just access to Sea World Drive) and address safety concerns for cyclists and pedestrians;» Revegetating areas of open space surrounding the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct with native species (similar to those found on South Stradbroke Island); and» To actively promote when (dates and times) the cruise ships and military vessels will be using the cruise ship terminal. Monitoring of Social Impacts GHD has recommended two interrelated monitoring programs:» Social indicator analysis; and» Community monitoring program. An outline of these interrelated monitoring programs and their techniques are summarised in Table 1. Table 1 Monitoring Program Monitoring Programs for the Proposed Project Techniques Timing Responsibility Social Indicator Analysis Review of relevant demographic statistics At the release of census data (every 5 years) The developer/ owner/contractor 3 in consultation with community organisations, GCCC and the Department of Communities Regional Planner. Community Monitoring Program As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the 3 This includes the relevant port authority. xxiv

28 Monitoring Program Techniques Timing Responsibility developer/owner/ contractor 4 developer/owner/ contractor 5 developer/owner/ contractor 6 4 This includes the relevant port authority. 5 This includes the relevant port authority. 6 This includes the relevant port authority. xxv

29 Summary Table 2 sets out a summary of the issues raised by Project Stakeholders, a response from the EIS technical reports, social impacts and mitigation and/enhancement strategies. Table 2 Summary of Issues, Identified Social Impacts and Mitigation/Enhancement Strategies Issues Raised by Stakeholders Relevant EIS technical report Response from EIS technical report Social Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Strategy Safety of people who currently use the project area (land and water) EIS Safety of people who currently use the project area (land and water) this is considered to be a highly significant impact.» Active communication of changes to the Seaway and Broadwater Access;» Construction Traffic Management Plan; and» EMP Loss of Public Open Space SIA and Planning Loss of public open space, this is considered to be a moderately to highly significant impact. Can not be directly mitigated, however there are enhancement strategies through concept design Loss of public access to the marine stadium SIA and Planning Loss of public access to the marine stadium, this is considered to be a highly significant impact. Can not be directly mitigated, however there are enhancement strategies through concept design Commercialisation of The Spit SIA and Planning Both positive and negative impacts depending on the user group. Involves support from Queensland Tourism and GCCC. Impacts on boating SIA Impacts from change in access to the Seaway and Broadwater Clear communication of the restricted access to the Broadwater and the Seaway. Impacts on surfing Safety impacts of surfers crossing the Seaway and subsequent reduced access Clear communication of the restricted access to the Broadwater and the Seaway. xxvi

30 Issues Raised by Stakeholders Relevant EIS technical report Response from EIS technical report Social Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Strategy Impacts on diving Impacts on the aquatic ecosystem and local businesses Clear communication of the restricted access to the Broadwater and the Seaway. Refer to the EMP Impacts on swimming Impacts on families and reduced access with reduced access to the Marine Stadium Can not be directly mitigated, however there are enhancement strategies through concept design Impacts on educational programs Limited impacts Establishment of an educational and Indigenous cultural centre as part of the development. Impacts on health and wellbeing Highly significant impact Promotion of another area which promotes health and well being outcomes similar to The Spit (access needs to be strongly considered) Target for terrorism Not significant impact Enforcement of Commonwealth Government security legislation. Increased Crime Not significant impact Detailed design to include Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles Decrease in property values in the surrounding suburbs Cost to the tax payer Question financial benefits Economic Impact assessment Economic Impact Assessment Economic Impact Assessment Environmental Impacts» Visual Refer to EMP xxvii

31 Issues Raised by Stakeholders Relevant EIS technical report Response from EIS technical report Social Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Strategy» Odour Refer to EMP» Traffic Refer to EMP» Marine ecology Refer to EMP» Terrestrial ecology Refer to EMP» Diminished natural resources and natural space Dredging Impacts Dredging Report Refer to EMP xxviii

32 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview The (SIA) has been conducted as one of the technical studies for the Notional Seaway Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The SIA has been conducted to address Section 4.10 of the Coordinator General s Terms of Reference for the preparation of the EIS. 1.2 The Project 7 GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) has been appointed by The Coordinator General to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Notional Seaway Project at The Spit (Gold Coast). The Notional Seaway Project is part of the overall Gold Coast Marine Development described in the Initial Advice Statement for the Project. To assist in the EIS investigations, a preliminary design concept has been prepared for the Notional Seaway Project. This preliminary design concept as shown in Figure 2). The Government has defined the Notional Seaway Project so that it may receive independent professional advice on the environmental aspects (including social, cultural and economic) of this element of the wider Gold Coast Marine Development. The findings of the investigation will inform future Government decision making. The Government has established the Gold Coast Marine Development Project Board to act as proponent for the Project. On the advice of the Board, the Government has appointed GHD o prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Notional Seaway Project with a cruise terminal at the northern end of The Spit and a marina in the Marine Stadium. The Project was declared to be a Significant Project under Section 26 of the Queensland State Development and Public Works Organisations Act 1971 (SDPWOA) by the Coordinator General on 17 October The SDPWOA requires the Coordinator General to consider information in an Initial Advice Statement, the level of investment necessary for the Project, potential impact on the environment, potential effects on relevant infrastructure and the significance of the Project to the region and the State prior to declaring a project a Significant Project. 7 Information contained in this section is from the Project TOR and the GHD Project website 1

33 The declaration initiates the statutory environmental impact assessment procedure of Part 4 of the SDPWOA, which requires the proponent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project. The Coordinator General developed a draft Terms of Reference for the Project in late 2005, which were finalised after consultation with the community and stakeholders in January The scope of the technical studies for the EIS is based on the that final Terms of Reference. 1.3 The Project Concept Design The Queensland Government s Cruise Shipping Plan indicates that additional infrastructure is required to assist the growth of cruise shipping in Queensland waters. To encourage this growth the Queensland Government announced the Gold Coast Marine Development Project, which is anticipated to develop The Spit and surrounding areas (including waters). The project vision includes a cruise ship terminal, a Marina Precinct, and enhanced Boat Ramp Precinct and improved public facilities and amenities. The concept design can be found in Figure The Proposed Cruise Ship Terminal The proposed cruise ship terminal is to be established on the north west tip of The Spit, allowing cruise ships to enter the seaway, turn around in front of Wave Break Island and berth at the terminal, elements of the precinct are set out in Table 3. Table 3 Element Proposed Cruise Ship Terminal Elements Detail Wharf and mooring requirements» The wharf is to be accessible to cruise ships up to 300m in length.» The wharf is orientated at 60 0 north.» Two mooring dolphins at the each end of the wharf.» The wharf is 200m in length and 30m wide.» Access for wharf service vehicles is made available. Cruise Passenger terminal» Footprint of terminal is 4,000m 2.» The terminal is two storeys high.» Ground floor support facilities, baggage service counter, offices, toilets and baggage operations and loading.» First floor departure and arrival lounges, customs, quarantine, offices and toilets.» An atrium will provide a vertical communication space 2

34 Element Detail between the ground floor and the first floor.» An area has been designated for vehicle and coach set down as well as taxi pick up.» Parking for 161 cars is available within close vicinity of the terminal with an overflow in the car park on the eastern side of Doug Jennings Park.» Queuing space for 30 coaches and 15 taxis is available.» 20 VIP/hire spaces are also available within close vicinity of the terminal. Entrance channel» A 12m (LAT) declared depth is required in the entrance channel.» A 130m wide channel needs to be maintained (to be cantered on the existing leads). Swing basin and berth pocket» A 10m (LAT) declared depth is required in the turn basin and berth pocket.» A 500m diameter turn basin is required The Proposed Marina Precinct The proposed marina precinct is to be located within the Marina Stadium on the western side of The Spit, the elements are set out in Table 4. Table 4 Element Proposed Marina Precinct Elements Detail Marina Berths» Marina layout (fairway and berth dimensions) to meet AS » Provision for 319 vessels.» Recreational vessel size distribution: 10m 15.7% 12m 39.8% 15m 28.8% 20m 11% 24m 4.7% This distribution is based on the Southport Yacht Club distribution however, was adjusted after the review of Gold Coast 8 AS 3962 Australian Standard As Guidelines for the Design of Marinas 3

35 Element Detail City Council s registration distribution.» Provision for 26 super yacht vessels.» Super yacht vessel size distribution: 24m 57.7% 25m 7.5% 30m 11.5m 40m 11.5% 50m 11.2%» Provision for 22 commercial vessels. Public Marina Support Facilities» Commercial /retail and marina support facilities (a foot print of 2,250m 2 and 2 storeys), including: Chandlery; Retail facilities; Fish market; Resturant; Marina management; Public toilet amenity; Limited commercial office accommodation for tourism and boat brokers etc.» Public parking for commercial and retail 104 bays. Marina Berths» Amenities (toilets) have been located in the secure car parks and the boat maintenance hard stand.» Refuelling 10,000l diesel tank and 5,000 petrol tank.» Pontoon for refuelling and sewerage pump. The pontoon in 40m wide by 5 m wide.» Secure parking for 350 bays.» Super yacht crew recreational area of 1,000m 2.» Commercial fishing area of 5,700m 2 for support facilities. Ferry Terminal» Pontoon layout is to AS3962.» Pontoon is 40m long and accessible to vessels up to 60m in length.» Associated on shore buildings for passengers will have a footprint of 350m 2. This area will also contain public toilet amenities. Dredging and physical works» A 4.5m(LAT) min depth is required in Marina Stadium for super yacht facilities, commercial vessels, Police and VMR 4

36 Element Detail vessels.» A 3m(LAT) min depth is required in Marina Stadium for general marina facilities.» A 50m wide channel needs to be maintained between the proposed superyacht berths and the western arm of The Spit The Proposed Boat Ramp Facility The boat ramp precinct is proposed to remain in its current location just south of the Marine Stadium on the western side of the main Spit. At present there is a small carpark and two boat ramps provided for public access. The elements of the boat ramp facility are set out in Table 5. Table 5 Element Proposed Boar Ramp Facility Elements Detail Additional boat ramp and upgrading of existing boat ramps» One additional two lane boat ramp with the lanes separated by a pontoon 9.» Upgrade one existing ramp to two lanes with the lanes separated by a pontoon 10.» Incorporate one existing two lane ramp unmodified 11. Car and trailer parking» Required car and trailer parking bays for three Category C ramp facilities 135 bays 12. Car and trailer parking bays provided 160 bays 13. Onshore amenities» Kiosk for public convenience.» Future possible link to southern sites.» Public toilet and amenities block in the car park Improved Public Facilities and Amenities At present there are limited public facilities at the northern end of the spit. Doug Jennings Park provides a large open space for recreational facilities and there is a small kiosk close by. This component of the project aims at improving the current 9 Designed to AS 3962 and Queensland Transport Guidelines. 10 Designed to AS 3962 and Queensland Transport Guidelines. 11 Designed to AS 3962 and Queensland Transport Guidelines. 12 Queensland Transport Guidelines 13 Queensland Transport Guidelines 5

37 facilities by introducing enhanced landscaping and revegetated bushland to improve current park facilities and to create new public parks. The elements of the improved public facilities and amenities are set out in Table 6. Table 6 Element Improved Public Facilities and Amenities Elements Detail Reduction of Doug Jennings Park Parking for Doug Jennings Park New park Enhanced Beach Area South tip of the western arm upgraded Promenade and bike path New Amenities Entry to Federation Walk Public toilets and amenities Doug Jennings Park will be reduced by <1 ha however enhanced landscaping of the park will improve its appearance. Increased and improved parking around Doug Jennings Park and along the small west spit will improve this facilities accessibility. A new park will increase the allocation of public space by 4,000m 2 Waterside Park The beach and surrounding park located between the commercial fishing facilities and the boat ramp facility will be enhanced and revegetated (approx 2.3 ha). The southern tip of the small western spit (approx 9,000m 2 ) will be landscaped and revegetated for public use. A promenade and bike path will improve public access around the northern end of the spit and along the small western spit. New amenities at the Waterside Park and the small western spit will improve the areas useability for the public. The northern walk entry to Federation Walk will be enhanced for public access. Through out the concept Construction and Operational Details As the SIA (and EIS) have been conducted on a concept plan, the construction an operational details usually known about a project are not known, these include:» Construction works, for example: number of truck movements and preferred travel paths; specific employment numbers and types; sources of materials etc.» Operational works, for example: navigational restrictions who will operate/manage the cruise ship terminal and wharf (and associated infrastructure); The origin of cruise ships, size and number of passengers; who will operate/manage the marine precinct and the associated procedures and protocols. 6

38 7

39 Figure 2 Notional Seaway Project Concept Design 1

40 1.4 The Environmental Impact Statement GHD will follow the EIS process as specified in the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 and meet Commonwealth regulations as specified in the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act The EIS shall provide:» A description of the relevant aspects of the existing social, economic, natural and built environment» A description of the development proposal and means of achieving the development objectives» Definition and analysis of the likely impact of the development on the environment» A framework against which Government decision makers can consider the environmental aspects of the proposal and set conditions for approval to enable environmentally sound development» A definition of all significant impacts and a consolidated list of measures proposed to mitigate adverse effects» Recommendations on the need for and contents of any environmental management plans and/or operational plans to mitigate adverse effects The objectives of the EIS (as set out in the final Terms of Reference) are:» To provide information on the proposal and development process to the community and decision makers» To comprehensively identify and evaluate all relevant issues associated with the proposal» To identify all potential environmental, cultural, social, transport and land use planning impacts of the preferred concept, and recommend infrastructure and facilities needs together with other design and operational measures required to minimise or compensate for adverse impacts and enhanced benefits» To consult with the community and relevant stakeholders in the process of identifying, assessing and responding to the impacts of the proposal» To identify all necessary licenses, planning and environmental approvals including approval requirements pursuant to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995, Integrated Planning Act 1997, Environmental Protection Act 1994, Fisheries Act 1994, Nature Conservation Act 1992, Vegetation Management Act 1999 and other legislation and the Gold Coast Planning Scheme» To provide input to the decision making process, assisting with the determination of whether to refuse, accept or modify the proposal, approve it with conditions or carry out further studies 1

41 » Pursuant to the foregoing, to provide a copy to each of the short listed bidders to enable them to incorporate such provisions as may be applicable to them in their respective submissions 2

42 2. Methodology 2.1 Introduction GHD has developed the methodology for the Notional Seaway Project SIA taking into consideration:» Accepted and published SIA methodology;» The sensitive nature of the Project; and» Links with other EIS studies and the community consultation program. Although the Project methodology is shown as a linear process, the actual work were undertaken as an iterative process, utilising three types of research methods (both qualitative and quantitative) creating a combination of analytical and participatory research methods (refer to Table 7):» Desk based research;» Field based research; and» Consultation. Due to the participatory nature of the SIA methodology, the SIA team has worked closely with the Community Consultation Team to ensure that all interaction with stakeholders and the community provides a consistent message and accurate information about the proposed Project. 3

43 Table 7 Methodology Step in SIA methodology Section of SIA Report Desk Based Research Field Based Research Consultation TOR addressed Scoping Methodology Review TOR, methodology (linkages with community consultation), timeframe and budget. Identify SIA variables and social indicators. Identify who leases the land on The Spit from the Queensland Government Develop SIA database Site visit Problem Identification Introduction Workshop with Community Consultation Team to review the list of stakeholders and develop an issues matrix. Establish Alternatives Project Alternatives Review any prefeasibility reports to identify alternatives and undertake an initial impact assessment on the Project alternatives. Profiling Demographic Profile Undertake demographic profiling based on 2001 Census, PIFU statistics and statistics held by GCCC. GCCC Description of Environmental Values Community Profile Community Profile to identify: The current and potential future recreational uses of the study areas; and goods and services provided in the study areas Site Visit GCCC Description of Environmental Values 4

44 Step in SIA methodology Section of SIA Report Desk Based Research Field Based Research Consultation TOR addressed Local and Regional Profile A development history of the study areas (provides context to the Project) GCCC Description of Environmental Values Projection Identification of impacts if the Project does or does not go ahead. Impact Identification Undertake Case Study Analysis of at least one other cruise terminal development (Comparative Study) Observational Mapping One on one meetings with identified stakeholders (will include cognitive mapping) refer to Table 3. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Review of other EIS specialist reports: Survey of identified stakeholders» Cultural Heritage;» Economic Impact Assessment; Review results of the community consultation program» Flora and Fauna;» Amenity (visual, noise and air quality);» Health and Safety;» Transport; and» Land. Assessment Prioritisation of impacts Significance of Impacts Workshop significance of impacts based on GHD social impact assessment significance matrix. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Evaluation Re check the impacted stakeholder s concerns and needs and (accuracy of identified impacts) identify indirect and cumulative impacts Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures 5

45 Step in SIA methodology Section of SIA Report Desk Based Research Field Based Research Consultation TOR addressed Mitigation Mitigation Strategies Identify possible mitigation measures and assess their likely impacts. Monitoring Monitoring Develop ongoing monitoring strategies. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Management Management of Impacts Develop management strategies for social impacts to be included in the EMP. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures 6

46 2.2 Project Study Areas This SIA encompasses three study areas:» Immediate;» Regional; and» State. The immediate study area is comprised of the ABS Statistical Local Areas (SLAs) of Labrador, Southport and Main Beach Broadwater (refer to Figure 3). These areas have been identified as those within close proximity to The Spit and therefore likely to be the impacted as a result of the Project. The regional study area is defined as the ABS Gold Coast City Part B Statistical Sub Division 14, while the State study area is Queensland (refer to Figure 4). 14 This is the same area as the Gold Coast City Council area. 7

47 Figure 3 Immediate Study Area 8

48 Figure 4 Regional and State Study Areas 9

49 2.3 Variables and Social Indicators Introduction According to the Queensland Government 15, SIA has three broad functions:» Identifying social issues and potential social impacts relevant to particular policies for particular communities and circumstances;» Assessing those impacts, in terms of their magnitude, duration and the probability of their occurrence; and» Recommending measures that will reduce negative impacts and enhance positive impacts of a decision. In order to identify social impacts, an examination and assessment of the existing or pre impacted conditions in the community is required to provide baseline data against which the subsequent social changes can be assessed 16. Burdge s (2004) SIA variables and associated specific social indicators (based on Queensland Health s social indictors) have been adopted to guide the development of the base line conditions, so to provide the ability to identify and predict the potential social impacts, their management and monitoring Variables According to Burdge (2004) 17, SIA variables point to measurable change in human populations, communities and social relationships resulting from a development Project or policy change. Burdge (2004) has developed a list of 28 social impact variables representing the types of effects arising from planned changes in both rural and urban communities 18. In summary SIA variables:» Assist in understanding how a community may be altered by a Project development and policy change. SIA variables explain only the consequences of the Project impact event;» Will tell the decision maker or planner a specific consequence of the proposed action;» Must have discrete, nominal or continuous empirical indicators that can be measured, collected and interpreted within the context of a social setting; 15 Department of Families, Youth and Community Care 2000 in Queensland p Department of Families, Youth and Community Care 2000 in Queensland p Burdge, R. J A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p Burdge acknowledges that this list of social impact variables is continuing and not all are appropriate for each Project on which an SIA is undertaken (pers comms) 10

50 » Are based upon data that can be collected or made available during the planning and decision stage as well as other stages in the development of the Project or policy;» Does not require, but may utilise information from surveys of the general population; and» Are not to be confused with such sociological labels as middle class, ethnicity or small groups Social Indicators Social indicators are used to state and measure the subsequent changes of impacts on human wellbeing (refer to Figure 5). According to Queensland Health 19 :» Socio economic factors have been shown to have clear association with health status of lower socio economic groups having poorer health than those who are better off. Appropriate indicators include health outcomes or health determinants affected by education, employment status and income.» Community capacity incorporates information on characteristics that can influence health such as housing, community support services and transport. It also includes measures of local services. The socio economic and community indicators describe the social conditions of the population. To measure change in any particular context, there is a requirement to track performance of the indicators being affected. Queensland Health 20 lists possible uses of social indicators to include:» Providing baseline information on health determinants from which progress can be measured;» Assisting with future planning of health and community services;» Developing policy and informing resource allocation decisions; and» Monitoring and evaluating government policies and practices for their impact on communities. Social indicators will be used in this SIA to assist in:» identifying the existing environment (providing baseline information on factors currently impacting on social wellbeing); and» as a tool to evaluate the impacts of the Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project and their subsequent management and monitoring of the Gold Coast community. 19 Queensland Health 2003 Social Indicators for Addressing Health Inequalities p Queensland Health 2003 Social Indicators for Addressing Health Inequalities p. 8 11

51 Figure 5 Social Indicators Flow Chart Social Indicators for the Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project Table 8 provides an overview of which SIA variables and associated social indicators will be used in the SIA. The generic list of 28 social variables has been used as a starting point, then once more research and consultation is undertaken, the list will be adjusted to be project and community specific (more variables may be added and others not used). Table 8 Variables and Social Indicators 22 Variables Social Indicators Source of Data Population Impacts means the changes in the number, density and distribution of people, the rate of influx or out migration and any changes in the composition in residence and age and gender 1 Population Change The magnitude and rate of population change is a driving force behind community infrastructure and service Births, deaths, ethnicity, geography, population counts and projections, estimated resident population (ERP) OESR Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data 21 This flowchart has been based on Queensland Health 2004 A Framework for Addressing the Social Determinants of Health and Wellbeing downloaded from This table is composite of Burdge (2004) and data from Queensland Health (2003), ABS, PIFU and OESR Research 12

52 Variables requirements and may be a major determinant of other financial and social impacts. 2 Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers Many social impacts can be traced to the number and occupational composition of construction, operational and/or decommissioning projects. 3 Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents refers to a permanent but seasonal increase or decrease in population resulting from opening or closing an existing recreational facility or seasonal home development. 4 Relocation of individuals and families The number of persons who will be relocated from their present homes, either voluntary or involuntary, as a result of the proposed project or development. 5 Dissimilarity in age, gender, racial or ethnic composition The introduction into the project area of a sizable category of persons dissimilar to the resident population in one or more of the characteristics of age, gender, race or ethnicity. Social Indicators Employment predictions for construction and operation Demographics of seasonal (leisure) residents Number of people who would relocate to or from the immediate and regional study area. Employment predictions for construction and operation Predictions of people using the facilities provided as part of the Project (particularly the cruise ship terminal and marina precinct) Source of Data Case study research GCCC statistics Community Consultation database Case study research Community/Institutional Arrangements means changes in attitudes and values, the emergence of interest groups as well as changes in local government and employment opportunities for all citizens 6 Formation of attitudes towards the Project (including community values) Attitudes means the positive and negative feelings, beliefs or positions expressed by residents in the community regarding the proposed project or development. 7 Interest group activity Interest groups and organisations are identifiable forces active in the community that represent the views of their membership which Current values of the Project area Favourable and unfavourable attitudes towards the Project Number of interest group actively participating in the EIS process Community Consultation database SIA interviews and focus groups Media review Community Consultation database SIA interviews and 13

53 Variables views of their membership which stand to gain or lose by the proposed action. Interest groups play an important role in shaping community responses and may also assist community leaders in the mitigation/enhancement process. 8 Alteration in size and structure of local government The increase or decrease in the number and type of positions necessary to run local government activities. This SIA variable applies to the construction, operation, decommissioning of a project and should not be confused with change in community infrastructure. 9 Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) Refers to the presence (or absence) of legal mandates for development, planning, zoning, local, State and Commonwealth governments that have jurisdiction within the proposed project area. 10 Industrial diversification Industrial diversification refers to the number and variety of private sector industries within a project area. 11 Living/Family Wage A living/family wage refers to the amount of money required for a family of four to live above the poverty line in a community/region or country where the proposed change is located. 12 Enhanced economic inequalities Enhanced inequalities refers to the degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed project or development match the job skills of the unemployed in the project area. Social Indicators n/a for this Project it is not expected for GCCC to significantly change in size or structure as a result impact of this Project The existence of relevant GCCC policies and plans Trends in proportion of employed persons by industry, by gender and age Socio Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Unemployment Benefits by region by sex Source of Data focus groups Media review Current GCCC policies and plans Census and OESR data Current number and variety of private sector industries in the Project area Census OESR 14

54 Variables 13 Change in employment equity of minority groups The degree to which job opportunities of the proposed project match the job skills of the unemployed, disadvantages and minority groups, including lowincome, young people, ethic and racial minorities and women. 14 Change in occupational opportunities The degree to which the proposed project or development will alter the occupational profile of the impacted community. Social Indicators Labour force status by gender and age for persons aged 15 years and over Labour force status by gender and age for persons aged 15 years and over Source of Data Census and OESR data Census and OESR data Communities in Transition refers to changes in community image, the alteration in community power structure with the arrival or departure of business or government agencies and any conflict that might arise between local residents and newcomers or even outsiders as the result of a development project or policy change 15 Presence of an outside agency The taking up permanent (or departure) in the project area of a government agency or private sector business which has not previously been in the community and whose management and control comes from outside the area. 16 Inter organisational cooperation The degrees to which regulatory, planning and proponent organisations and agencies are able to work together and share common developmental policy goals. 17 Introduction of new social classes The appearance (or disappearance) of a group of people that either expand an existing social class or establish a new social class (based on education and income levels occupation or lifestyle) in the community as a result of the proposed action. 18 Change in the commercial/industrial focus of the area The change in the traditional Will there be an introduction of a new developer/operator into the Project area? Requirement for and identification of an approvals process Labour force status by gender and age for persons aged 15 years and over Proportion of highest level of schooling completed (highest educational attainment) by age and gender for persons aged 15 years and over Change in land use Case study research Dependant on the developers design and the State Government. Census, PIFU and OESR data Concept design 15

55 Variables commercial/industrial (private) or public sector focus of the community as a result of the proposed project. A change in focus would apply once a project is in operation or after the abandonment phase. 19 Presence of weekend residents (recreational) The influx of weekend or short term visitors who do not have a permanent home in the community. Social Indicators Predicted statistics of usage of the proposed Project Source of Data Case study analysis Individual and Family Level Impacts means changes to family structure, individual social relations and how an impact even is perceived to change the daily lives of individuals and families 20 Disruption in daily living and movement patterns The changes or disruptions in routine daily living and work activities caused by alteration to the visual environment, noise and odour levels, transportation routes or the amount of vehicular traffic resulting from the proposed project or development. 21 Dissimilarity in religious and cultural practices The introduction of a new group of persons with religious or cultural values, beliefs and practices dissimilar to those of the present population. 22 Alteration in family structure Alteration of family structure involves an increase or decrease in one or more of the family status categories (e.g. married, never married, female head a household, with/without children). 23 Disruption to social networks Change in social values of the Project area Impacts (land and marine) of:» Traffic (land and marine)» Noise» Air (inc. odour)» Dust» Visual (including light) Dwelling Structure by Tenure type Monthly Housing Loan Repayment: occupied private dwellings being purchased Birthplace (country) Religious affiliation Family Type Community values and access Community Consultation database SIA interviews and focus groups Other EIS reports Australian Bureau of Statistics REIQ property data Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data REIQ property data Census Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data Community Consultation 16

56 Variables networks The termination or disruption of normal community social interaction patterns (including friendship and kin relations) by the project activity. 24 Perceptions of public health and safety A perception, attitude or belief on part of community residents that their physical health and safety as well as their mental well being will be affected by the proposed action. Perceptions, attitudes and beliefs must be treated as real with real consequences as they may occur at any stage. 25 Change in leisure opportunities An increase or decrease in leisure/recreational opportunities within the community due to a change in the management of a natural resource area or the development of a new recreation facility. Social Indicators Including community cohesion; community identity; generalised trust; tolerance of diversity; community involvement; informal social networks. Length of residence in an area or neighbourhood Membership of clubs/groups e.g. recreational and sporting clubs, community organisations SEIFA indices Impacts (land and marine) of:» Traffic (land and marine)» Noise» Air (inc. odour)» Dust» Visual (including light)» Health (disease) The existence of relevant GCCC policies and plans Access Current use Source of Data Consultation database SIA interviews and focus groups See ABS Social Capital Survey Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data GCCC data Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data Community Consultation database SIA interviews and focus groups Other EIS reports GCCC policies and plans Community Consultation database SIA interviews and focus groups Other EIS reports Community Infrastructure Needs means changes in everything from kilometres of roads to greater sewerage capacity to the need for more police units that might be altered as a result of a development project. 26 Change in community infrastructure The increase or decrease in the requirements for and supply of basic infrastructure services and Current community infrastructure and facilities Usage of community infrastructure and facilities GCCC Community Consultation database 17

57 Variables facilities within the community as a result of the proposed action. 27 Land acquisition and disposal The total number of acres (hectares) of land that will change from present use classification or ownership as a result of the proposed project. This variable may involve land transfers form one government jurisdictional unit to another or from private to public or public to private. 28 Effects of known cultural, historical, sacred and archaeological resources The possible destruction, diminution or alteration of one or more of the known cultural/historical/sacred or archaeological resources within the assessment area as a result of the proposed action. Social Indicators The existence of relevant GCCC policies and plans Current land uses and ownership Refer to Cultural Heritage Report Source of Data SIA interviews and focus groups IAS EOI CHMP and Non Indigenous Heritage Report. 2.4 SIA and Community Consultation Introduction The SIA and Community Consultation program have been integrated as set out in Figure 6 (as requested in Section of the TOR). It is important for the SIA and Community Consultation to be integrated as both serve different purposes. The Community Consultation program is used to provide the information/education of the community, where as the SIA consultation is used to ask the questions (in order to respond to the Terms of Reference) Distinction between SIA Consultation and Community Consultation The Queensland Government (Department of Communities 23 ) state that community consultation is needed as part of the approach taken to identify and respond to social impacts that may arise from a Project. SIA requires that the outcomes of consultation and other specific research techniques be effectively incorporated into the Project and in management, mitigation and monitoring of impacts. GHD has employed both community consultation and SIA consultations throughout the EIS process, with both processes working closely together (refer to Figure 6). Both are 23 Queensland Department of Communities (published under the Department of Families, Youth and Community Care 2000 in Queensland p. 7 18

58 equally important with the differentiators being the purpose and target audience (refer to Table 9). Figure 6 Integration Model of SIA and Community Consultation Table 9 Community Consultation and SIA Consultation Differentiators Community Consultation SIA Consultation Purpose To provide information and gather feedback from the community about the Project. To seek the input from identified stakeholders to develop a response to the TOR (including identification of impacts). Audience The general community Identified stakeholders 19

59 2.5 Stakeholder Identification The Department of Communities 24 define stakeholders as those people and organisations that identify themselves as having an interest in a Project, whether they will be impacted directly or indirectly by the Project activities or outcomes. The definition of community can be based on a geographic location e.g. Main Beach community or issue based e.g. surfing community. Stakeholders listed in Appendix A have been identified through:» Consultations with The Coordinator General;» Media monitoring;» Internet research; and» Results of the observational mapping. 2.6 SIA Consultation Tools Table 10 sets out the tools and timeframe for implementing the SIA consultation process. Table 10 SIA Consultation Tools Timeframe Community/Stakeholder Group Tool April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 Identification of stakeholder groups Focus groups with stakeholder groups. Focus groups with stakeholder groups.» Consultations with The Coordinator General» Media monitoring;» Internet research; and» Results of the observational mapping.» Focus group impact webbing and impact mapping.» One on one meetings» Focus group impact webbing and impact mapping.» One on one meetings» Follow up phone calls or one on one meetings 24 Queensland Department of Communities (published under the Department of Families, Youth and Community Care 2000 in Queensland p. 8 20

60 3. Case Studies 3.1 Introduction A case study approach utilised in this methodology aids in identifying impacts and mitigation strategies for previous projects that may be relevant to the Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project. Due to the uniqueness of The Spit and the propose project, it was difficult to source a case study that demonstrated features as those that may occur as a result of this Project. As such, the chosen case studies represent the generic impacts likely from a port and marina. The following sections discuss the case study of the Port of Botany Expansion in Sydney, New South Wales as a case study of a cruise ship terminal and the Port of Airlie, Queensland as a case study of a marina development. The information presented in these case studies is limited to the publicly available EIS reports. During the SIA focus groups, a variety of case studies were recommended (especially from the international experience) including Fort Lauderdale (in the United States) and Bora Bora (in Tahiti). These case studies have not been included because of the:» Different legislative requirements; and» Difficulty in accessing previous studies. 3.2 Port Botany Expansion Background to the Project Port Botany is located in Sydney, New South Wales and it is the major seaport facility servicing the Sydney region. The Port of Botany Expansion once completed will consist of the construction and operation of additional container handling facilities within Port Botany. The site is located on the northeastern edge of Botany Bay, in the suburb of Banksmeadow (12 kilometres south of Sydney s CBD). The development will comprise two phases; the construction of additional terminal area and associated port infrastructure; and the progressive development of terminal facilities for operations within the additional terminal area. 25 Based on EIS prepared by URS Australia Pty on behalf of Sydney Ports Corporation (2003). 21

61 3.2.2 Port of Botany Expansion Potential Impacts and Mitigation Strategies Potential social impacts and mitigation strategies were identified through the SIA prepared as a component of the EIS. Table 11 presents both the identified impacts and mitigation strategies suggested through this process. Table 11 Social Impacts and Mitigation Strategies for Port Botany Expansion Identified Impact Public Open Space and Recreational Facilities Visual Amenity Air Quality Description of Impact Reduction in the amount of accessible public open space Ability for continuation of dogwalking activities along Foreshore Beach; Restrictions of access to areas of the beach and estuary; The impact of the new terminal and associated infrastructure on the ambience of Foreshore Beach; Dredging and construction work affecting the short term accessibility of the beach, estuary and Bay; Enhancement of walking and cycling opportunities by design; Operational impacts on the form of, and access to parts of Foreshore Beach; New boat ramp to provide enhancement to fishing and boating community Presence of construction equipment and associated infrastructure; Operation will impede some views of the Bay from the immediate vicinity; The new terminal will impact on views of Foreshore Beach users Not expected to be an issue during construction; Operationally, impacts may include small increases in particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide concentrations in surrounding areas. Mitigation Strategies Revegetating the open space areas surrounding the new terminal Limiting the height of cranes and other terminal equipment Selecting colours and materials that are in keeping with the existing environment. Construction Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to manage earthworks and construction Terminal designed with the capacity to utilise alternative energy sources for ships at berth for future. 22

62 Identified Impact Description of Impact Mitigation Strategies Water Quality Dredging works causing turbidity Turbidity reduced through the use of silt curtains around the dredge discharge area. Use of a cutter suction dredge and the placement of dredged material directly at required location. Stormwater Management System in place to minimise the contaminated runoff into Botany Bay. Waste Employment Opportunities Noise Traffic and Transport Light Generated through the construction phase including construction materials, dredged materials, road and rail, domestic, human and green waste as well as excavated soil and contaminated materials. Creation of substantial number of jobs. Sources of noise would include dredging, piling and general construction activities Potentially affect those residents in close proximity to the port. Increase in road traffic travelling to Port Botany during the construction phase Increases in road and rail traffic due to increased container handling capacity Increased luminance emanating from Port Botany once the new terminal is in operation. Development and Implementation of a Construction Waste Management Plan for construction phase and a Waste Management Plan as part of the Operational EMP. Noise Management Plan during both construction and operation Comprehensive Traffic Management Plan Noise barriers erected along the northern and eastern boundaries of the new terminal Mitigation strategies relating to the design and placement of light sources All light sources will comply with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Hazard and Risk Potential accidents on site Hazard Analysis and subsequent satisfying of the PlanningNSW risk criteria Implications for the Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project Parallels exist between this case study and the Notional Seaway Project, particularly in relation to the community values associated with the two areas. Consultation activities conducted during the Port Botany EIS revealed several values that were relevant, these included (URS 2003:26 6): 23

63 » The essentially natural looking/concrete free character of the Foreshore Beach area, which is not overcrowded;» The suitability of the Bay for recreational boating, fishing, dog walking and windsurfing activities which are seen to be part of the local and regional culture; and» The Bay s long standing history and the community s access to the waters of the Bay and surrounding foreshore environment. The issues identified by the community are similar to those likely to affect The Spit if the Notional Seaway Project is developed. Similarly, the impacts such as access to public open space and recreational activities and traffic and transport are relevant to this SIA. 3.3 Port of Airlie Background to the Project The Port of Airlie Project is located in Boathaven Bay at the eastern end of the tourist commercial and retail precinct of Airlie Beach. The Project site lies within a Permit to Occupy (No ) over the seabed below the high water mark, issued by the then Queensland Department of Lands in January The Port of Airlie integrates boating, marine and tourism facilities with a mix of residential and commercial developments. The main components of the development include:» 240 berth marina;» Passenger ferry terminal for inter island ferries and tourist charters;» Maritime Training Academy;» Public boat ramp with 45 cars/trailer parks;» Public transportation interchange tourist buses, local buses, taxis and pedestrians;» A pedestrian village square linking the harbour to the existing commercial and tourist precinct of Airlie Beach;» Public open space including landscaped parklands, a beach, harbour promenades and boardwalks around the marina foreshore;» A footpath/cycleway linked with the existing town centre;» 4,400m 2 of marina retail and commercial space;» A 170 bed hotel;» Approximately serviced tourist apartments and residential apartments;» 16 villas and 7 detached residences; 26 Based on EIS prepared by SKM (2002) on behalf for Windward AB Pty Ltd 24

64 » A 3 ha reclaimed area for disposal of spoil from the entrance channel dredging and soft surface mud from the excavation of the marina basin. This area is intended for future use; and» A 1.5 ha area for disposal of dredged spoil for maintenance dredging operations. The project has received at Federal and State approvals and has begun construction Port of Airlie Potential Impacts and Mitigation Strategies Potential Impacts Potential social impacts and mitigation strategies were identified in the SIA prepared as a component to the EIS. Table 12 presents both the identified impacts and mitigation strategies. Table 12 Social Impacts for Port of Airlie Identified Impact Demographic Profile Description of Impact Increased number and variety of dwellings may alleviate some existing and developing housing shortages. No evidence to suggest that population growth will result in any major change to the age and gender distribution of the population. Increase in employment opportunities. Stimulation of indirect employment in the local, regional and state context. Social wellbeing The potentially positive impacts of the development on the social well being of the Airlie Beach community are evident when considering the variables used to develop the Relative Socio Economic Disadvantage and Index of Relative Socio Economic Advantage. Community and Affected Stakeholders Local Community Increased amenity of having a large working harbour and commercial precinct adjacent to the main street is likely to benefit residents and visitors. Increase in facilities for a population with a major focus on boating and water activities is a significant benefit. Increase in a variety of residential accommodation types available for purchase or rental. Increased public facilities such as the beach area, parks, boardwalks and the town square. An integrated transport system. Impacts on the community during construction, including traffic disruptions. Impacts on public safety 25

65 Identified Impact Description of Impact Impact on the character of Airlie Beach (building heights). Impact of increased sewerage. Business Community Increase in the amount of retail space available in Airlie Beach. Increase in accommodation for visitors. Increase in restaurants. Environmental Groups Impacts on:» Seagrass» Mangroves» Acid sulphate soils» Marine life» Quality and source of sand and rocks to be imported for the development. Education, Training and Employment Services Health, community services and housing Recreation and Tourism The construction and operation of the marina, hotel and other commercial facilities provides significant opportunities for traineeships and permanent employment as well as casual employment. Increased pressure on health and community services as a result of the increase visiting and permanent populations. Increased stress on housing associated with the influx of external workers requiring accommodation during construction and operation. Provision of significant expansion in the number of marina berths available to residents and visitors of Airlie Beach. Enhanced tourism potential through the operation of the ferry terminal out of the harbour. Enhanced maintenance facilities for boats. Provision of an efficient public boat ramp creating more opportunities for sailing, boating and recreational fishing. Impact of noise and/or pollution caused by boat maintenance. Protection of boats in the marina during a storm. Mitigation Strategies The following recommendations were made to address impacts and concerns:» Members of the community are advised that there will be further opportunities to discuss the issues, which were raised during the consultation process. Future editions of the information bulletin will be used to provide such information and enable feedback. 26

66 » Managers of nearby island resorts are advised of the development proposal so that they can make plans to respond to any flow on effects resulting from the proposed development.» Retail providers are encouraged to fill gaps in the market rather than duplicate existing businesses, products and services.» Strong links are forged with TAFE and the local high schools to ensure an integrated approach to accredited training and employment opportunities for local residents in construction and operational phases of the development.» Local participation during the construction phase is maximised.» Need for sufficient lighting to ensure public safety in community spaces.» Contracted builders are advised that they will be required to include workforce management plans, ensure adequate housing is available for their staff and that a policy is adopted of employing local people where ever possible.» Information is made available about the environmental management of the development and that consideration is given to the creation of further boardwalks through the mangrove area Implications for the Gold Coast Notional Seaway Project Parallels exist between the Port of Airlie case study and the Notional Seaway Project, with Airlie Beach and the Gold Coast both having a strong focus on tourism and associated industries. Similarities include:» The increase in marine activities and associated industries.» Potential to build on the strong existing marine industry in the Gold Coast region. 3.4 Summary Case studies are a useful tool in identifying impacts and mitigation strategies that may anticipate potential impacts or mitigate impacts of the Notional Seaway Project. Examining the impact and mitigation strategies from the Port of Botany Expansion and Port of Airlie development have produced similarities that are relevant for this SIA. Table 13 provides a synthesis of the impacts and mitigation strategies that parallel the Notional Seaway Project. 27

67 Table 13 Summary of Case Study Impacts and Mitigation Port of Botany Expansion and Port of Airlie Identified Impact Public Open Space and Recreational Facilities Impacts of Local Community Visual amenity Air Quality Description of Impact Reduction in the amount of public open space Restrictions of access to certain areas of foreshore and beach Enhancement of walking and cycling opportunities Operational impacts in the form of and access to parts of the foreshore Significant expansion of number of marina berths available to residents and visitors Enhanced tourism potential through the operation of the ferry terminal out of the harbour Provision of an efficient public boat ramp which would create more opportunities for sailing, boating and recreational fishing Need for sufficient lighting to ensure public safety in community spaces Presence of construction equipment and associated infrastructure New terminal impacting on views Impact on character of the area Operationally, impacts may include small increases in particulate matter and emissions from vessels Mitigation Strategies No mitigation strategies accounted for the loss of open space Revegetating open space areas surrounding the new terminal Construction Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Water Quality Dredging works causing turbidity Turbidity reduced through the use of silt curtains Use of a cutter suction dredge and correct placement of dredged material Waste Employment opportunities Construction wastes including dredged materials, construction materials, road, human and green waste Creation of jobs Stimulation of indirect employment in the local, regional and State context Development and implementation of a Construction Waste Management Plan and a Waste Management Plan as part of the Operational EMP 28

68 Identified Impact Noise Traffic and Transport Lighting Description of Impact Sources include dredging, cruise ship, and other construction activities Increase in road traffic during both construction and operation Increased luminance of the new terminal Mitigation Strategies Noise Management Plan during both construction and operation Traffic Management Plan Compliance of lights with Civil Aviation Safety Authority and relevant Maritime Authority Hazard and Risk Potential accidents on site Hazard analysis and report 29

69 4. Community Profile 4.1 Introduction This section provides a summary of the key demographic trends and comparisons of the immediate, regional and State study areas. Refer to Appendix C for the detailed Community Profile. 4.2 Population and Age The total estimated resident population (ERP) of the study areas at June is provided in Table 14. Table 14 Study Area ERP ERP % of State ERP Immediate Study Area 46,168 persons 1% Regional Study Area 482,566 persons 27 12% State Study Area 3,963,968 persons % Of the local government areas in Queensland, the largest population increases over the year to June 2005, occurred in Brisbane City and the Gold Coast City. Brisbane City and Gold Coast City were ranked first and second in Australia in terms of population increase 29. In particular, the Gold Coast region is expected to reach a population of between 563,400 and 584,900 people by the year By the year 2026, the population is expected to have grown to between 713,900 and 814,500 people 30. Population predictions indicate that by 2026, the population of the Gold Coast SSD will grow to between 713,900 and 814,500 people. Peaks are evident in the 0 14, and age cohorts. There is a high population density in the immediate and regional study areas with 448 people/km 2 in the immediate study area and 336 people/km 2 in the regional study area. 27 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City 28 OESR (2006) Estimated Resident Population, Queensland Cities 2000, 2004 and 2005 (Projected) (downloaded ) 29 OESR (2006) Information Brief Regional Population Growth: (downloaded ) 30 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City 30

70 Based on the ABS Remoteness Structure, the immediate study area has 100% of its population in a major city area and the regional study area has 95.8% of it population in a major city area and 4.2% in the inner regional areas. This reflects the increased ability of people to access types and varieties of services and is higher than in a remote or very remote area because of distance to travel. Both the immediate and regional study areas scored highly on the Index of Socio Economic Advantage and Disadvantage, however it is appreciated that there may be pockets within the immediate study area that would not score as highly. 4.3 Income Weekly Individual Income The median individual weekly income of residents within the immediate study area varied between $300 $399 for Southport SLA and Labrador SLA and $500 $599 for Main Beach Broadwater SLA. Nearly 60% of the immediate population had a wage or salary as their type of personal income (an average annual income of $29,370) with 17% reliant on government cash benefits. Of these 17% of people in the immediate study area, the majority were on an aged pension, with the next highest percentage receiving a Newstart Allowance Family Income and the Poverty Line Table 15 provides a comparison between the 2001 Census data for the Gold Coast SSD and the Melbourne Institute Poverty Line levels Poverty lines are income levels designated for various types of income units. If the income of an income unit is less than the poverty line applicable to it, then the unit is considered to be in poverty. An income unit is the family group normally supported by the income of the unit ((e.g. couple, couple plus 2, single parent). For more information refer to 31

71 Table 15 Comparison of 2001 Family Incomes and the Poverty Line Poverty Line Census 33 Couple family with Children $ , families with children. 1,136 (23%) families under the poverty line. 3,744 (77%) families above the poverty line. Couple family without Children $ , families without children 874 (24%) of families under the poverty line 2721 (76%) of families above the poverty line One parent family $ , one parent families 1,519 (70%) of families under the poverty line 669 (30%) under the poverty line. The majority of couples (with or without) children in the Gold Coast SSD are above the poverty line. However the majority of one parent families are under the poverty line. 4.4 Education The immediate study area has a higher percentage (5%) of the population attending university when compared with the region and state (3% and 4%). All other attendance rates at educational facilities indicate consistent trends across all study areas. Eighteen percent of the population within the immediate study area held a trade certificate at the time of the 2001 Census. This figure is much lower than that of the region (38.5%) and the State (37%). Gold Coast region contained higher proportions of certificate qualifications that the State but a lower proportion bachelor degree when compared to State. The immediate 32 Based on the September Quarter for Based on ABS 2001 Census B30 Family Income by Family Type for the Gold Coast SSD (30510) 34 Couple (head in the workforce) with two children, including housing 35 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 36 Couple (head in the workforce) without children, including housing 37 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 38 Single parent (head in the workforce) with 2 children, including housing 39 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 32

72 study area had lower proportions across qualification categories when compared to both the regional and State study areas. 4.5 Housing Dwelling Type Flats, units and apartments made up 37% of the dwelling types across the immediate study area. The Gold Coast SSD had a considerably higher percentage (59%) of separate houses, followed by flats, units and apartments at 22%. This trend is reflected in the State data where 70.5% of dwellings are separate houses. These trends are consistent with the large numbers of units and apartments that are located in the immediate study area Dwelling Tenure Forty four point five percent of dwellings in the immediate study area are rented; significantly higher than both the Gold Coast SSD (34.7%) and the State (30.1%). In contrast, the immediate study area had lower rates of fully owned properties (29.6%) when compared to the regional (33.3%) and the State (33.6%). Main Beach Broadwater SLA has considerably higher rents for both 3 bedroom houses and townhouses compared to Labrador SLA and Southport SLA. Such higher rental prices are consistent with the beachfront real estate associated with the Main Beach Broadwater area SLA, which has increased dramatically over the past five years. Southport SLA saw a 12.9% increase in median house prices, while Labrador SLA saw a decrease of 3.3% since the June quarter of No data was available for Main Beach Broadwater SLA. Median townhouse and unit sales however saw decreases across the study area with the exception of Southport SLA. The median sale prices in Labrador SLA decreased by 5.8%, while Main Beach SLA sale prices fell by 2.9%. In contrast, the median unit and townhouse sale price in Southport increased by 16.6% Average Household Size The average household size of the immediate study area is considerably lower than both the region and the State. Table 16 illustrates a comparison across all study areas. 33

73 Table 16 Average Household Size, All Study Areas, 2001 Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region State 2.1 people/household 2.4 people/household 2.6 people/household The decline in average household size has been aligned with an increase in single person households and increases in units and apartments. 4.6 Industries According to State Development Trade and Innovation 40, the key industries of the Gold Coast region are:» Biotechnology;» Food and Beverage;» Marine;» Nutraceuticals;» Sport; and» Tourism (refer to Section 4.12 for this information). A summary of these key industries is provided in Table 17. Table 17 Gold Coast Key Industries 41 Key Industry Biotechnology Food and Beverage Brief Substantial research capability exists in therapeutic and biotechnologies. Production, processing and distribution of wholesale food. $240 million revenue and 1,400 jobs. Significant beverage producers such as Carlton United Beverages and growing wine industry. Marine Recreational boat building facilities with a marine precinct with national and international reputation. Over 400 marine business are established on the Gold Coast, employing 4,200 staff and generating $500 million annually. 70 marine related companies are established, employing approximately 2,750 people. Nutraceuticals Sport Established research capability and ready availability to agricultural inputs. Motor racing, international golfing events, surf life saving, horse racing and other major sporting events including: 40 refer to for more details. 41 Source: 34

74 and other major sporting events including:» Lexmark Indy 300 (including the V8 Supercar Championship);» Gold Coast Airport Marathon;» Gold Coast Bike Week;» Pan Pacific Games;» Conrad Jupiters Magic Millions Horse Racing Carnival and Sales;» ANZ Ladies Masters Golf;» Uncle Toby s Women s Hardcourt Tennis Championships; and» Surf Lifesaving Championships. Surfing The Gold Coast has around 36% of the national market share for surfing products and services. Exports are valued at over $4 million. 24 surf board manufactures produce approximately 30,500 boards valued at over $13 million. Super yachts are another important driver of the Gold Coast marine industry. Over 6,000 super yachts currently exist worldwide. Numbers are expected to increase to around 8,500 by Gold Coast City Marina has eight super yacht factories providing refit, repair, maintenance and dry storage facilities. Super yacht owners are estimated to spend around ten percent of the value of their boat (generally over $20 million) on maintenance, crewing, provisioning and entertaining each year. It's estimated that super yachts could inject well over $60 million annually into the Gold Coast economy. 4.7 Labour Force Figure 7 Super Yacht under construction A total of 19,511 people (or 52.6% of the population) within the immediate study area participated in the labour force at the time of the 2001 Census. This figure is slightly lower than the Gold Coast SSD in which 59.1% of residents indicated they were participants in the labour force. This was also lower than the State, which registered 61.3%. A higher percentage of people are employed full time in Queensland when compared to the Gold Coast SSD and immediate study area. At a regional level, there was a 7% increase in people working part time between the years 1991 to

75 4.7.1 Occupation The workforce in the immediate study area is spread across all ABS defined occupation types. The highest percentages are in intermediate clerical, sales and services (18%), followed by professionals (16%) and associate professionals and elementary clerical (14%). The immediate study area is similar to the Gold Coast SSD and the State where the majority of occupations were described as intermediate clerical, sales and services. The second and third most common occupations for the Gold Coast region and State were professionals (14% and 16% respectively) and trades (14% and 13% respectively). These trends are likely to be related to the large tourism industry in the Gold Coast region, where both the immediate and regional study areas show a higher percentage of people working in the retail industry (18% each) when compared to the State (16%). This can also be said for accommodation, café and restaurant industries as well as the property and business industries (12% and 9% and 12% and 12% respectively). The Queensland Department of State Development, Trade and Innovation considers the Gold Coast region to have a growing population and a young workforce, making it an attractive location for new businesses to establish or existing businesses to expand 42. Figure 8 shows the percentage of change in the ABS occupational types from 1991 to Each of the occupational types has had positive change, except for advanced clerical and service workers. Figure 8 Occupational Growth for Gold Coast City source: 43 source: 36

76 4.7.2 Unemployment In 2001, the immediate study area had an unemployment rate 3.6% higher than the State, and 2.1% higher than the Gold Coast SSD. In 2003, the unemployment rate for the immediate and regional study areas decreased. Based on anecdotal evidence from Project Stakeholders, some of the decrease in unemployment percentages can be attributed to the establishment and growth of the marine industry at Coomera. 4.8 Family Structure The majority of families were comprised of couples with children for the immediate, regional and State study areas (42.5%, 40.6% and 44.7% respectively). 4.9 Transport Forty seven percent of the immediate study area population own one motor vehicle; higher than both the Gold Coast SSD (40.9%) and Queensland (40.1%). The immediate study area also has a higher percentage (13.7%) of people who do not own a motor vehicle. This may be consistent with the higher densities in the immediate study area, which shows much lower percentages of 2 or more vehicles per occupied dwelling Crime Gold Coast SSD has shown consistently higher rates of offences against property than Queensland since Overall rates for these offence types have decreased for both study areas. Conversely, offences against the person in Gold Coast SSD have remained lower than Queensland, however rates for both study areas have been steadily increasing, with the exception rates of other offences have also been increasing for both study areas, with Queensland having higher rates Cultural Diversity The majority of the population (65%) within the immediate study area was born in Australia at the time of the 2001 Census. The immediate study area has a significantly higher percentage of people born in NMES countries than the Gold Coast SSD (3.5% higher), while it is 5.2% higher than Queensland. Conversely, the immediate study area has 13.2% less people born in Australia than Queensland and 8.9% less than the Gold Coast SSD. The immediate study area is much more culturally diverse than at the regional and State study areas with:» 1.6% of the population speaking Chinese;» 1.4% speaking Japanese; 37

77 » 0.8% speaking Korean; and» 0.8% speaking Italian. This trend echoes the majority of migrants being born in NMES countries such as South East Asia. In the Gold Coast SSD, similar trends are apparent, however they are at lower percentage rates, with:» 1.1% of the population speaking Chinese (1.0% in Queensland);» 0.9% speaking Japanese (0.2% in Queensland);» 0.3% speaking Korean (0.1% in Queensland); and» 0.6% speaking Italian (0.7% in Queensland) Tourism The Gold Coast is one of Australia s premier tourist areas for both domestic and international visitors, attracting 3.5 million visitors who spent a total of 17.4 million nights in the City (in the more than 13,0000 guest rooms). This generated 44,200 fulltime equivalent jobs were created during the 1998/99 financial year. According to State Development, Trade and Innovation, the Gold Coast is the most popular Queensland tourism location and one of Australia's most significant global attractions, with a gross output $2.5 billion. It attracts both more international and domestic visitors than any region outside Brisbane. Attractions include world famous surf beaches and pristine rainforest hinterland, and Australia's premier theme parks Movie World, Dreamworld, Wet'n'Wild and Sea World. Outstanding facilities, including:» the world s first Palazzo Versace Resort;» Conrad Jupiters Hotel and Casino; and» the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre, make the Gold Coast a preferred location for meetings and exhibitions. The majority of domestic visitors (33%) come from Brisbane, followed by Sydney (18.2%) and as such intrastate visitors account for 48% of the domestic overnight market. In the year 2001 to 2002, 784,500 people visited the Gold Coast from overseas. The major source countries included Japan, New Zealand, United Kingdom and Korea. State Development, Trade and Innovation list the development of new leisure tourism facilities, and the potential for the development of cruise ship facilities on their website as future growth opportunities. 38

78 4.13 Gold Coast Beaches There are two beaches located within the immediate study area:» Main Beach; and» Sheraton Beach. Together they accounted for 9% of Figure 9 Gold Coast Beaches 1 the daily usage of Gold Coast beaches. Surfers Paradise Burleigh Heads Rainbow Bay Main Beach North Cliff Kurrawa Elkhorn Avenue Greenmount Surfers North North Burleigh Wharf Road St Narrowneck 4th Avenue Mermaid Beach Nobbys Currumbin Collangatta Miami Sheraton Couran Cove ,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Average Daily Number of Beach Users Figure 10 Average Daily Beach Usage by Most Popular Beaches, Gold Coast City, GCCC (2003) Social Profile p

79 4.14 Summary Gold Coast City Council (regional study area) had the second largest population increases over the year to June 2005 was ranked second in Australia in terms of population increase 45. In 2005, the estimated resident population of the immediate study area was 46, 168 people (1% of the State s population) and the regional study area was 482,566 people (12% of the State s population). The State Government (PIFU) has predicted that the population of the regional study area will be between 563,400 and 587,900 by In the immediate study area there is an higher percentage of younger (14 years and younger) and older (65 years and older) compared to the regional and state study areas. The population density of the immediate study area is significantly higher than the regional and state study areas. All of the immediate study area population is in a major city area with only a small percentage of the regional study area population in an inner regional area. The immediate and regional study areas are ranked highly on the index of socioeconomic advantage. Over half of the populations in the immediate and regional study areas are wage earners with only 17% and 14% respectively having an income of a Government cash benefit. The average total income of the population living in the immediate study area is $31,703 and in the regional study area it is $32,328. The majority of couples (with or without) children in the Gold Coast SSD are above the poverty line. However the majority of one parent families are under the poverty line. In 2001, there were 20,795 dwellings in the immediate study area with an even distribution of separate houses, townhouses and units/apartments, with 2,198 dwellings unoccupied. In 2003, the median sale price for a house in the immediate study area was between $338,500 and $412,000; and the median sale price for a townhouse/unit was between $242,000 and $560,000. The median weekly rent was between $260 and $350 in the immediate study area for a 3 bedroom house and $200 and $260 for a unit or townhouse. The average household size in the immediate study area was 2.1 people compared to 2.4 for the regional study area and 2.6 for the State. At the time of the 2001, the immediate study area had similar percentages of people with educational qualifications to the regional and study area. There was an exception however with a significantly higher percentage of people without educational 45 OESR (2006) Information Brief Regional Population Growth: (downloaded ) 40

80 qualifications (over 60%) in the immediate study area compared to the regional study area (30%) and the State (25%). The immediate study area has higher percentages of people working as labourers, associate professionals and professionals compared to the regional and state study areas. In general the immediate study area follows the trends of occupation type in the regional and state study areas. The Gold Coast SSD is attracts a high percentage of domestic and international tourists and employment in related industries reflects this. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach (located within the immediate study area) account for 9% of the daily usage of Gold Coast beaches. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach should be considered as a priority when assessing the impacts of the proposed Notional Seaway on the Gold Coast Spit. 41

81 5. Community Facilities and Services 5.1 Introduction This section discusses the community facilities and services that are located within the study areas. The identification of the community facilities and services provides baseline characteristics that can be used when assessing potential need or subsequent impacts of the proposed seaway on the social infrastructure of the immediate study area. Community services and facilities are critical to the overall health and wellbeing of a community, and can be identified in the community context part of the Social Indicators Flow Chart (Figure 5). A summary of the community services and facilities in the immediate and regional study areas is provided in this section, a detailed listing of community services and facilities is provided in Appendix D. 5.2 Checklist of Community Services and Facilities Table 18 outlines a summary of the community services and facilities that are accessible to people living in the immediate and regional study areas. Table 18 Checklist of Community Services and Facilities Community Service or Facility Accessible from the immediate and regional study areas Medical and Health Hospital Mental General Practice Specialists Dentists Alternative medicine practitioners Emergency Services Police Ambulance Fire and Rescue State Emergency Service 42

82 Community Service or Facility Accessible from the immediate and regional study areas Child Care Youth Specific services Aged Care and Respite Education and Training Prep Primary/Middle Secondary Tertiary (including universities and TAFE) Community Centres/Meeting Places Community based organisations Sporting and Recreational Facilities Public Transport and Accessibility Buses Trains Bicycle/ Cycleways Footpaths/Boardwalks Shopping (retail and commercial) Trade Services Cultural Centres Places of Worship Library Parks and Gardens 43

83 5.3 Summary Both the immediate and regional study areas are well serviced for community services and facilities, however based on consultations with stakeholders, there are areas which require attention:» The requirement for more pubic open green space in the immediate study area; and» The requirement for a substantial increase in affordable housing in the regional study area. 44

84 6. Existing Social Environment of The Spit 6.1 Introduction This section of the SIA provides a discussion on the existing social environment of The Spit. It includes a consideration of the uniqueness of The Spit in terms of recreational amenity and usage on the Gold Coast. Understanding the existing use of an area is vital in assessing the social impacts of any changes that may be imposed upon an area. This section has been split to address a number of topics:» History of The Spit;» Current landscape character and use;» Community values of The Spit; and» Current planning for The Spit What is A Spit? 46 A spit is a long narrow accumulation of sediment (sand or pebbles) with one end attached to the land and the other projecting into the sea or across the mouth of an estuary. Typically, on the east coast of Australia, the sediment that feeds spits is sourced from long shore movement northwards up the coast. The sediment accumulates where the flow from rivers is not strong enough to push the material back out to sea. 6.2 History of The Spit 47 The Spit is a relatively young landform feature, and not centuries old, since it did not extend much beyond Main Beach and Southport Yacht Club marina at the turn of the 19 th century. In 1840, the Southport Bar was located south of where the current location of the Southport Yacht Club. Since then, the Southport Bar (mouth of the Nerang River) has 46 Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 47 Sources:» Hatye, C Cruise Ship Terminal the Spit» Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 45

85 slowly been moving north, with successful break throughs in 1936 and 1951 north of Main Breach. The Spit is a very dynamic landform, to be expected given its runoff events remoulding the unconsolidated sandy embankment quite dramatically from time to time, e.g. as took place in the 1930 s with the rapid northern expansion of The Spit at the expense of the southern portion of South Stradbroke Island. Figure 11 The Spit Area in 1964 The Spit (as it is today) was created by a rare cyclonic activity that forced through Jumpinpin on Stradbroke Island in 1897 and This action divided Stradbroke Island into two now North and South Stradbroke Island. The breakthrough created a new sea passage into Moreton Bay changing the ebb and flow of tides through the southern reaches of Moreton Bay. These geographic changes resulted in the erosion of sand from South Stradbroke resulting in the disappearance of the Moondarewa township in the 1940 s. Figure 13 Marineland 1960s In addition natural changes, like the breaching of Jumpinpin in the late 1800s, and man made changes, (like the construction of training walls on the Tweed River in restricted sediment supply to Gold Coast Beaches and The Spit), have also brought about significant geomorphological adjustments of The Spit in recent times. Figure 12 Southport Seaway prior to the construction of the seawall A low sand spit developed to the north of Main Beach Point and this permanent sand isthmus continued to edge across the mouth of the Nerang River until the construction of the Gold Coast Seaway (and associated sand bypassing system) in The purpose of the works was to stablise the entry to the Broadwater for commercial and recreational boats following several major coastal engineering studies by the Delft Figure 14 The Spit 46

86 Hydraullics Laboratory in the Netherlands in the 1970s. Wave Break Island was built at the time, mainly from dredged material, to block storm waves and protect the western shores of the Broadwater. The sand bypass pumping associated with the operation of the Gold Coast Seaway to pump sand from offshore so that it can continue its northerly progression along the shore of South Stradbroke Island is vital to the ongoing maintenance of the coastline. With the stabilization of the of the entrance to the Broadwater and the construction and operation of the sand bypass system, The Spit developed into a permanent landform, and the Broadwater area became a safe and calm waterway with a navigable passage to the ocean. Refer to Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17 for a comparison of The Spit from 1865, 1996 and Figure 15 The Spit from 1865 to Source: Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 47

87 Figure 16 The Spit Figure 17 The Spit The Spit has been the home of the local prawn trawling industry since the 1950s and 60s. By 1952, the Southport Yacht Club and John Humphrey s engineering work shop and slip way on The Spit attracted an ever increasing number of private boats to the 49 Source: Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 50 Source: Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 48

88 Yacht Basin and the eastern side of the Broadwater. Ski Land and Marineland (one of the first tourist attractions, now called Sea World) in the 1960s was the first of the future resort development and tourist attractions along The Spit. 6.3 General Character of The Spit The general character of The Spit in its current condition is described below. The Spit is approximately 500m wide and separates the Broadwater from the Pacific Ocean. The GCCC Local Area Plan for The Spit states that approximately 25% (45 hectares) of the Spit has been developed with tourist related activities surrounding the marine nature of the area. The remaining 75% of The Spit area provides open space for mostly passive and informal activities. This area of open space is landscaped to varying degrees with formal picnic and barbeque facilities mixed with natural areas of grass or sand. The naturalness of the Spit provides for a space where people can relax and enjoy the ocean or beaches or engage in some of the Gold Coast s premier designer retail outlets located along Seaworld Drive. Seaworld Drive The Spit is accessed via Seaworld Drive. Seaworld Drive is heavily developed with tourism and government related facilities. Tourism facilities include 5 star hotels (Vasace, Marina Mirage and Sea World Nara Resort) and a dating World Class Marine Based Theme Park (Seaworld). Seaworld occupies a large parcel of land on the Western Side of the Spit and the eastern side is undeveloped vegetated sand dunes and beach and contains Federation Walk. Federation Walk is part of the Gold Coast City Council s Oceanway 51. Federation Walk and the sand dunes are currently being revegetated by The Friends of Federation Walk. Figure 18 Gold Coast Oceanway, The Spit Federation Walk, Main Beach to the Seaway 51 The Oceanway is a 36 kilometre network of pathways along beaches from the Gold Coast Seaway (The Spit) to the Point Danger Lighthouse (Coolangatta) and is part of the GCCC Foreshoreways program. Source: 49

89 Seaway The Seaway is a man made safe access to the ocean and is also used by surfers to access South Stradbroke Island. Recreational fishers use the rock wall to sit and fish from, and divers use the rock wall to access dive spots (including the sand pipeline). The Seaway has views out to the ocean, to South Stradbroke Island and the Broadwater. Doug Jennings Park Doug Jennings Park is a 10 ha piece of land located on the north western side of The Spit. The park contains some established trees. It is currently under utilised and lacks appropriate facilities to attract active usage (e.g. shade, seating, BBQs, play equipment). Views from the Park are of the Broadwater, South Stradbroke Island and the Seaway. Broadwater The Broadwater is a relatively calm body of water. It is heavily used by recreational and commercial boating of various vessel types from jet skis and small tinnies to water taxis, trawlers and ocean cruising yachts. Car Park/Kiosk Views from this area extend to Doug Jennings Park, the Broadwater and the Seaway. Marine Stadium The marine stadium is a smooth water area with significant shade areas close to the water. It is used as a safe anchorage for vessels using the Broadwater and a destination for weekend boat travel. It is a popular family swimming and recreation spot. It is surrounded by revegetated dunes and a roadway. This area takes in views of Seaworld and the Gold Coat high rises. The GCCC is planning to construct a new Foreshoreway at the Marine Stadium Broadwaterway 52. Figure 20 Figure 19 Figure 21 The Seaway Doug Jennings Park The Broadwater (looking south) 52 Source: Figure 22 The Marine Stadium 50

90 Figure 23 People in Boats fishing in the Seaway Figure 24 The Marine Stadium Figure 25 Surfers crossing the Seaway Figure 26 The Marine Stadium Figure 27 View looking north from the western arm of The Spit Figure 28 Doug Jennings Park 51

91 Figure 29 Person fishing from the southern training wall (looking west) Figure 30 People fishing on the southern training wall (looking east) Figure 31 Fish in the Seaway Figure 32 Turtle in the Seaway 6.4 Current Use of The Spit To define the current use and to identify which groups of people use The Spit a number of exercises were undertaken:» Observational mapping to identify user groups;» Review of Events Planned for The Spit in 2006; and» Consultations with SIA stakeholders Observational Mapping Observational mapping is a technique utilised to determine the use of an area by observing how people use the area. The observational mapping methodology can be found in Appendix G. 52

92 There were 6 sites chosen to undertake the observational mapping exercise (each site was piloted prior to the survey taking place). The six sites were (actual locations can be seen on Figures 33 and 34:» Site A Hollindale Park;» Site B Phillip Park;» Site C Boat Ramp» Site D Seaway;» Site E Marine Stadium; and» Site F Island View. This section provides a discussion of the results. Results have been reported on Site and by Use. A summary of the results are in Table 19. The results of the observational mapping by site have been split into recreational and sporting for ease of presentation of results (refer to Figure 33 and 34). The results of the observational mapping by use are summarised in Figure 35 and Figure 35. Table 19 Results of the Observational Mapping All Sites Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E Site F Total Sporting Diving (# individuals) Tinny (# boats) Motor Boat (# boats) Sailing Boat (# boats) Jet Skis (# of boats) Surfing/Board Riding Surf Life Saving Water Skiing Kayak/row boat Collecting Bait Recreational Walking Dog walking Cycling Running

93 Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E Site F Total Fishing (from land) BBQ, picnics (# groups) Swimming Eating lunch Relaxing Going to the Beach Business Trawlers (# boats) Tourism (# operators) Other Helicopters Sea planes Buses Mopeds Summary of Results By Site Site A Hollindale Park Hollindale Park was utilised mostly as a recreational space, with the majority of people observed walking, cycling or running:» 170 people were observed walking;» 137 people cycling; and» 41 people running. Morning and afternoon periods (particularly weekends) were identified as having the highest frequency of use. Site B Phillip Park Phillip Park is located further north along Seaworld drive than Site A. Observations for this site included similar results to Site A, with high numbers of people participating in recreational activities:» 83 people walking;» 55 people cycling) and;» 25 people running. People were also observed using this site as an access point to the Main Beach located on the eastern side of the site. Ninety six people were observed as beach 54

94 goers, with an additional 20 identified as surfers. Weekends were noted as the most popular time of usage for this site when people were observed relaxing in vehicles. Site C Boat Ramp The boat ramp was observed as a point of entry to the water for motor craft such as small tinnies and jet skis. Small tinnies and jet skis were the most highly recorded activities within the site:» 77 tinnies; and» 46 jet skis. There were numerous cars with boat trailers parked in the car park. This site also identified the large number of boats (particularly sailing boats) moored/anchored in the southern end of marine stadium. At most survey times (5 out of 7), more than 30 boats were counted as being moored/anchored within this area. Fishing was also identified as a popular activity with a total of 18 people using the area for fishing. The weekend, particularly Sunday, was observed to have the highest amount of boat users (a total of 43) during the survey times. Site D Seaway Recreational uses such as walking ranked very highly at this site with a total of 241 people counted. Weekends recorded higher counts of walkers, however Thursday lunchtime was also popular. Walking of dogs was also popular with a total of 28 people counted. Surfing was observed as the next most popular activity at this site, with a total of 118 people counted. Weekends were most popular times, however high counts were also recorded throughout the weekday survey times. Other activities observed included people relaxing, on their way to or from the beach (beach goers) and using the seawall to fish from. Fishing was recorded the most counts during afternoon periods when the tide was ebbing to a low. Site E Marine Stadium Marine Stadium recorded very low levels of activity across all survey periods. A cool breeze affected the weekdays, with many areas observed to be in shade, which may have influenced usage. Of those recorded, activities included:» 20 people walking» 20 people walking dogs» 19 people as beach goers ; and» 27 people swimming. 11 divers were also counted on Sunday. The majority of use occurred on weekends, particularly Sunday during the early afternoon. 55

95 By far the most usage of this site is as a mooring point for boats (particularly sailing boats):» 214 sailing boats;» 38 motor boats; and» 21 tinnies. An average of 31 sailing boats, 5 motor boats and 3 tinnies for each survey period was calculated. Site F Island View Site F provided visibility of the passing boat traffic as it travelled past on the way to the seaway entrance. A total of 62 jet skis were counted, with the majority on both Saturday and Sunday mornings. This site also recorded high counts of tinnies (a total of 95 across all survey times). Fishing from the seawall at this site was also popular with a total of 54 people observed, mostly on Saturday afternoon and Sunday morning. Other activities observed included relaxing, beach going and swimming. 56

96 Figure 33 Observational Survey Results Recreation 57

97 Figure 34 Observational Survey Results Sporting 58

98 Summary of Results By Use The Spit is an important area for people to exercise (surfing, dog walking, diving and swimming) and relaxing (fishing, swimming), which impacts on an individual s overall health and well being The highest user groups of The Spit (all sites combined) were (refer to Figure 35):» Walking 20%;» Boating 18%;» Swimming and Beach Go ers 16%;» Cycling and running 10%;» Surfing 5%;» Fishing 5%; and» Diving 3%. Figure 35 Results of Observational Mapping All Sites 59

99 Number Diving (# individuals) Tinny (# boats) Motor Boat (# boats) Sailing Boat (# boats) Jet Skis (# of boats) Surfing/Board Riding Surf Life Saving Water Skiing Kayak/row boat Walking Dog walking Cycling Running Fishing (from land) BBQ, picnics (groups of people) Swimming Relaxing/Eating Lunch Going to the Beach Trawlers (# boats) Tourism (# operators) Helicopters Sea planes Buses Mopeds 0 Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E Site F Site Figure 36 Results of Observational Mapping All Sites 60

100 Based on the observational survey and consultations with the SIA stakeholders, Table 20 provides a description of the user groups of the northern end of The Spit. Table 20 User Group Diving Description of The Spit User Groups Description of Use Both commercial diving operations (an estimated 10 companies) and recreational divers use The Broadwater (specifically Wave Break Island) and the Seaway (in particular the sand bypass pipeline and training walls). Divers accessing the Seaway enter from the parking area surrounding Doug Jennings Park (specifically the sewerage outfall on the southern training wall). Divers diving near Wave Break Island access the sites via boats. The diving in the Seaway and near Wave Break Island is claimed to be the best dive location in any city in Australia for its accessibility and variety of fish species. Surfing Surfers surf at the northern end of Main Beach (near the sand pumping jetty) and off South Stradbroke Island. Surfers surfing off South Stradbroke Island need to cross the Seaway. There are a number of alternatives to cross the Seaway:» Paddle across the Seaway (entering of the southern training wall, the location depends on the tidal flow);» Water taxi (there is a surfing specific water taxi operating); or» Personal boat/jet ski. The waves off South Stradbroke Island are claimed to be some of the best in Australia, with surfers travelling domestically and internationally to surf the waves. Recreational Fishing Recreational fishing is undertaken at various locations including:» Off the southern training wall;» In tinnies in the Seaway and the Broadwater;» Off the sandbanks in the Broadwater (accessible by boat at low tide); and» The western arm of The Spit. Dog Walkers Main Beach (accessed at the northern end of The Spit) and the marine stadium is a popular area for people to take their dogs. The Marine Stadium (referred to as the bay area adjacent to Doug Jennings Park ) and Main Beach between the Seaway to signed boundary in line with Muriel Henchman Drive (roughly Sea World) is a dedicated dog exercise area (off leash and supervised) 53. Both areas are popular with a distinction made:» The marine stadium is used by people with small and young dogs (i.e. puppies);» Main Beach is used for larger and older dogs. 53 Source: 61

101 User Group Swimming Description of Use The marine stadium is a popular swimming location for families. Families are attracted to the area because of:» Smooth and protected water;» Access to shade close to the waters edge;» Accessible with vehicles and prams; and» Parking availability. People also swim off the southern tip of western arm of The Spit and access Main Beach from the car park adjacent to Doug Jennings Park. Boating 54 There are a number of different types and sizes of boats utilising the Marine Stadium, Broadwater and Seaway. Marine Stadium is a safe short term anchorage, however there are boats anchored within the stadium for longer than what is legally allowed 55. There is also evidence of people living on their boats within the Marine Stadium. The Broadwater is the main channel to access most areas on the Gold Coast (e.g. Nerang and Coomera Rivers). It contains a north south channel which is considered by the Volunteer Marine Rescue (VMR) to be the busiest channel for number and types of vessels in Australia. The Seaway provides access to the Pacific Ocean from the Broadwater. According to VMR in , vessels would have accessed the Seaway. Relaxing, BBQ, Picnicing Walking/ Running Education Many people use The Spit to relax, have a BBQ or picnic (this includes Phillip and Hollindale Park). The area is known for its naturalness (in comparison to the build up urban features of Main Beach and other surrounding areas) and the views of South Stradbroke Island, the Pacific Ocean and the Broadwater. Some stakeholders reported the unique opportunity on the Gold Coast to be able to sit on the beach and watch the sun set (i.e. sit on the western arm of the Spit). The area is popular for people who have troubles with mobility, they can stay in the car and still experience similar conditions to others. A significant number of people were observed walking or running along Seaworld Drive. There is a footpath for the majority of Seaworld drive that allows people to exercise in relative safety. BeachCare and CoastEd are two educational programs which utilise the dune areas on the eastern side of The Spit and the Seaway.. These groups do not use the Marine Stadium area. CoastEd are run through a partnership of GCCC and Griffith University (Coastal Management Centre) and is a program that delivers a range of educational services to school and community groups through out the year. BeachCare is a program run by the 54 includes tinnies, sailing boats, motor boats, kayaks and outriggers. 55 Anchoring and mooring of boats in the Broadwater between the boat ramp near the Southport Olympic Pool and the north east tip of Wavebreak Island, whether at one or more locations, is restricted to a maximum pf seven days in any 60 day period (Queensland Transport, ( 56 VMR provided their statistics of 10,151 vessels which reported into the Seaway Tower, however not all vessels report in. VMR estimated that only 50% of vessels using the Seaway reported to the Seaway Tower. Based on this they said to double their numbers to gain a more accurate number. 62

102 User Group Description of Use GCCC to involve the community in decision making about the management of the ocean beaches on the Gold Coast. Primary and Secondary Schools also use the northern end of The Spit for educational purposes. Homeless People A number of SIA stakeholders reported homeless people camping in the sand dunes on the eastern side of The Spit. Consultations were held with GCCC and the St John s Drop In Centre. There is limited information available about the people camping in the sand dunes as the people camping there do not tell others where they sleep, however it is known that they camp in a different location each night. This secrecy and movement is apparently for safety reasons. Timings of Use of The Spit Based on feedback from SIA stakeholders, The Spit area (on land and water) is mainly used during the day (as described in this section). There is some usage of the water surrounding the water at night:» Boats entering or leaving the Seaway (both recreational and commercial) and people fishing from tinnies;» Boats travelling in the north south Broadwater channel (both recreational and commercial) or fishing in the Broadwater; and» People staying on their boats over night in the marine stadium. There is only limited land usage at night. The reduced use of the land at night is based on safety and security concerns. Anchoring and Mooring of Boats in the Southern Broadwater Queensland Transport (MSQ), based on the Transport Infrastructure (Gold Coast Waterways) Management Plan 2000 has released a fact sheet Anchoring, mooring and living aboard boats which states: Anchoring and mooring of boats in the Broadwater between the boat ramp near the Southport Olympic Pool and the north east tip of Wavebreak Island, whether at one or more locations, is restricted to a maximum pf seven days in any 60 day period. Under the Transport Infrastructure (Gold Coast Waterways) Management Plan 2000 anchoring does not include genuine transient anchoring (Schedule 6), examples provided of genuine transient anchoring are:» Anchoring to fish from watercraft; and» Anchoring for 15 minutes to buy or unload gear. Living aboard a boat in all Gold Coast waters is not permitted for more than seven consecutive days in any 60 day period, at or within three nautical miles of one place. However, all anchoring and mooring restrictions apply regardless of whether someone 63

103 is living aboard the boat. This does not apply to boats moored in marinas with shower and toilet facilities. There are enforcement powers under the Transport Infrastructure (Gold Coast Waterways) Management Plan Review of Events Planned for The Spit in 2006 The Spit also plays a part in the hosting of events throughout the year. Table 21 presents a summary of the events that are held in The Spit and surrounding areas throughout the year. Table 21 Events around The Spit/Seaway/Broadwater for 2006 Event Location Time Summafieldayze outdoor concert Doug Jennings Park, The Spit January GCCC Clean Waters Surfing Challenge Sizzle n Jazz at the VMR Narrowneck, Main Beach Vounteer Marine Rescue (VMR) Muriel Henchman Drive (behind Seaworld Nara Resort) January January Surf to City Yacht Race QCYC January Jet Ski National Titles Marine Stadium, The Spit February to March Yalumba Summer Offshore Regatta Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach February Gold Coast Triathlon Luke Harrop Memorial Julian Rocks Coastal Passage Race Try Sailing Day a day where anyone can enjoy the experience of sailing Burleigh Bash offshore sailing event Club Marine Commodore s Cup offshore regatta Broadwater Events Parkland, Southport Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach Southport Yacht Club, Hollywell Sailing Squadron Southport Yacht Club, Macarthur Parade, Main Beach Southport Yacht Club, Macarthur Parade, Main Beach March March April April April Commodore s Trophy Regatta Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach April Brisbane to Gladstone Yacht Race QCYC Brisbane April Australian Outrigger Canoe Ultra Marathon April Four Corners Event Southport Yacht Club May Bay to Bay Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach May 64

104 Event Location Time Paradise Challenge The Broadwater, Southport May Gold Coast Marathon Runaway Bay to Marine Parade Miami. Track includes Main Beach Parade and the Esplanade adjacent to Broadwater. June Sydney to Gold Coast Yacht Race The Broadwater/Seaway July Southport to Mackay Yacht Race The Broadwater/Seaway July Tasman Yachts Winter Offshore Rally Series offshore regatta Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach July, August Yalumba Winter Offshore Regatta Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach August Lexmark Indy 300 Straddie Assault Surfing Team Event Surfers Paradise (areas adjacent to Main Beach and Surfers Paradise Beach). Track includes Main Beach Parade and the Esplanade adjacent to Broadwater. October October Dragon Boat Regatta Pacific Fair Waterways, Broadbeach October Ted Elkes Memorial Offshore Regatta Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach November Cook Island Coastal Passage Race Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach November Bosuns Locker and Gill Australia Offshore Rally Southport Yacht Club, Main Beach September, October, November, January, February, May, June Table 21 was developed from the Gold Coast City Council website. It is acknowledge that the list is not extensive and not all events are covered in the table Use of the Seaway Volunteer Marine Rescue (VMR) provided detailed statistics of the use of the Seaway for VMR also provided some statistics of the use of the Seaway for These statistics are available in Appendix F). Because the VMR statistics are based on radio transmissions or phone calls to the Seaway Tower and not all vessels contact the tower (e.g. trawlers/commercial fleet and charter boats have their own reporting and communication channels), VMR representatives recommended to double the number of vessels for a more accurate representation (refer to Table 22). VMR representatives explained that the Broadwater Entrance to and from the Seaway was the most used boating area for the most variety of boats in Australia. 65

105 Table 22 Month Estimated Usage of the Seaway VMR 2005 Statistics (# of vessels) Estimated Usage (# of vessels) January 923 1,846 February 972 1,944 March 715 1,430 April 559 1,118 May 750 1,500 June 831 1,662 July 1,142 2,284 August 788 1,576 September 865 1,730 October 817 1,634 November 647 1,294 December 1,142 2,284 Total 10,151 20,302 Monthly Average 846 1,692 According to Queensland Transport (2005) 57 as of June 30, 2005 there were over 24,000 registered recreational boats on the Gold Coast with adjoining regions (Brisbane, Logan and Redland Shire) accounting for a further 35,500 boats. Refer to Table 23 the breakdown of recreation boats according to size. Table 23 Recreational Boats Registered in the Gold Coast (June 2005) Boat Size (m) Number Registered 4m and under 9, m to 8m 12, m to 15m 2,126 Over 15m Community Values of The Spit A series of stakeholder focus groups and one on one meetings were held as a component of this SIA. A strong message from the interactions with stakeholders was 57 Sourced from Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications 66

106 the strong values held for The Spit and surrounding areas (i.e. South Stradbroke Island, Wave Break Island and the Broadwater). SIA stakeholders defined the existing social environment of The Spit as an area for all people and a place that anyone could go to and enjoy, regardless of background or physical abilities. During the SIA stakeholder focus groups, the participants were very passionate about The Spit and what it means for them as individuals, their lifestyles and for their family and friends. There were many common values that community members identified, these included:» The Spit as a free recreational area of open space that can be accessed by anyone regardless of their income or status;» The Spit provides for a diverse range of activities (e.g. diving, dog walking, fishing, recreating, surfing)» Family oriented space, with access to the calm waters of Marine Stadium;» A space where people can go to escape the City, recreate and relax amongst an accessible natural setting;» A public space that is natural and provides for a safe swimming environment and relaxation for families;» An area that is used by various environmental and educational groups (including primary and secondary schools, universities and the community environmental education groups Beachcare and CoastEd.» Important area in terms of community well being, mental health and relieving psychological stress for Gold Coast residents; and» Marine stadium as a source of affordable housing for Gold Coast residents and a safe haven for boats along the coast 58. The Spit was identified through observational surveys and consultations with Project Stakeholders as a popular recreational area for both land (passive and active) and marine based activities. Community values of the different areas in the Project area are summarised in Table 24. Table 24 Summary of Community Values for the Project Area Components Project Area The Seaway Community Value The community values of the Seaway extend from a location to access the Broadwater to the Pacific Ocean (recreational (including outriggers), charter 58 Anchoring and mooring of boats in the Broadwater between the boat ramp near the Southport Olympic Pool and the north east tip of Wavebreak Island, whether at one or more locations, is restricted to a maximum pf seven days in any 60 day period (Queensland Transport, ( 67

107 Project Area The Broadwater The Marine Stadium Community Value and commercial vessels), a place to fish (both off land and in small tinnies), a dive location for drift diving, a business area for the glass bottom boat and ferry taking surfers to South Stradbroke Island, a scenic area for the general public to view the surrounds and an access point to South Stradbroke Island for surfers. The community values of the Broadwater extend from a place for recreational, commercial and charter vessels to traffic between the northern and southern end of the Broadwater (and access areas in between), a place to fish (both off land and small tinnies), dive locations off Wave Break Island, a business area for the glass bottom boat and ferry taking surfers to South Stradbroke Island, a scenic area for the general public to view the surroundings (especially watching the sun set from the western arm), swimming in the still waters (for both families and their pets). The community values of the Marine Stadium extend from a place for recreational vessels to moor and anchor for a short and long term stay, a scenic area for the general public to view and relax (picnics in the shade of the trees), and safe swimming location in the still waters (for both families and their pets). There is the perception of some members of the community and Project Stakeholders that the Marine Stadium is an eye sore and needs to be developed. Some community members and Project stakeholders referred to the Marine Stadium as Bum s Bay). The Spit The community values of the Spit generally relate to a relatively natural piece of land that provides the opportunity for passive and active recreation. It allows residents of the immediate and regional study area (plus South East Queensland) to get away from the city and urban life and relax. An important element to the value of The Spit is its accessibility via a number of transport modes (including public transport) and is free to use, allowing it to be accessed by all socio economic groups. The importance of the area as an dog leash free area increasing the accessibility of people and their dogs. The Spit is also accessible to people who have mobility changes (e.g. elderly or people with disabilities), the area can currently be enjoyed from the inside of a car you don t have to get out of your car to enjoy the area. The Spit also feeds into and is a critical component of the overall natural feel of the Gold Coast, it is the northern end of the Ocean Way, walking path that runs nearly the full length of the Gold Coast. It is clear that The Spit provides different qualities for different people. Figure 37 illustrates the community values associated with The Spit. 68

108 Figure 37 Community Values of The Spit 6.6 Current planning and policies that impact on The Spit There are a number of documents relating to the management of The Spit:» Land Tenure;» SEQ Regional Plan;» Gold Coast City Council Local Area Plan (The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour)) 59 ;» Gold Coast City Council Local Area Plan (South Stradbroke Island) 60 ;» Gold Coast City Council s Tourism Strategy (The Broadwater); and» Gold Coast City Council s Planning Scheme (Policy 16 Infrastructure (Recreation Facilities Network Developer Contributions) Land Tenure of The Spit All land on The Spit is owned by the State with all current land tenures held by term lease. The land tenure described in Table 25. Table 25 Impacted Land Tenure Lot Number Land Tenure Impacted By Lot 528 on WD6624 Reserve for Port and Harbour Purposes (Doug Jennings Park) Cruise Ship Terminal 59 Part of the Gold Coast City Council Planning Scheme. 60 Part of the Gold Coast City Council Planning Scheme. 69

109 Lot Number Land Tenure Impacted By Lot 1 on SP Reserve for Park and Recreation Marina precinct According to the GCCC LAP for The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour)) Doug Jennings Park is crown land that is either under the trusteeship or vested in the Harbours Corporation of Queensland, under the trusteeship of the Department of Transport, or under trusteeship of Council. The proposed changes in land tenure are contained in the EIS SEQ Regional Plan The Gold Coast City is part of the SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Regional Plan provides the framework for managing growth, change, land use and development in the SEQ region to the year Any plans, policies and codes that relate to the SEQ region being prepared or amended by state agencies must reflect and align with the Regional Plan. Regional policies set out the desired regional outcomes, principles and policies to address growth management issues in SEQ. The policies guide State and local government planning processes and decision making. The relevant desired regional outcome that relates to this SIA is Policy 6, Strong Communities. The desired regional outcome of Strong Communities is cohesive, inclusive and healthy communities with a strong sense of identity and place, and access to a full range of services and facilities that meet diverse community needs. Strong communities includes:» Access to social infrastructure;» Social planning;» Addressing disadvantage;» Safe and healthy communities;» Community engagement and capacity building;» Community, place and identity; and» Cultural heritage, arts and cultural development. The relevant sections of Strong Communities that relate to this SIA are social planning and safe and healthy communities. The project assists in achieving this DRO by providing enhanced marine based recreational facilities, including boat ramps and car parking for the community. However there will be a social impacts through the perceived health impacts, change in use of the area from a health/recreational focus to a commercial focus, and reduction in access and restrictions to public open space and waterways for health, recreational and commercial purposes which relates to the social planning and safe and healthy communities (components of the strong communities DRO). 70

110 6.6.3 GCCC Local Area Plan (The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour)) The GCCC LAP for The Spit(Gold Coast Harbour) refers to the area as:» An important component feature of the coastal landform that constitutes the Gold Coast City Broadwater; and» A significant area of open space that is very close to the major population areas of the Gold Coast, such as Main Beach, Labrador and Southport. It currently provides relief to residents and visitors from the nearby urban landscape. The LAP lists a number of important features of The Spit:» The Gold Coast Spit holds significant values for Gold Coast locals, residents of South East Queensland and tourists (both interstate and international).» Many of the Gold Coast region s most important tourist establishments (such as Seaworld, Marina Mirage and Palazzo Versace) are located along The Spit.» The green space provided by The Spit fulfils a broad range of functions when compared to beach space. For example, green open space breaks up the built environment predominant along the coastal strip of the Gold Coast. It also provides a balance to the high density form in the Main Beach and Broadwater areas and also facilitates numerous recreational opportunities.» The landscape quality of The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour) is very high, particularly in terms of its role in framing distinct views from the western shore of the Broadwater. In order to achieve planning outcomes for the LAP area, the GCCC has divided The Spit into 6 precincts (refer to Appendix D):» Precinct 1: Philip Park and Environs» Precinct 2: The Seaway Park» Precinct 3: Beach Front Park» Precinct 4: Seaworld Drive Central» Precinct 5: Seaworld» Precinct 6: Southport Boat Harbour. Because the proposed Project will have the most significant impact on Precinct 2, this section will be focused on. Precinct 2 The Seaway Park It is important to note that the LAP only refers to the land associated with The Spit and not the water surrounding it (i.e. the Seaway and the Broadwater). The GCCC considers the primary intent of the Seaway Park to provide for the protection of land in public ownership, for the purposes of landscape preservation and natural hazard management, in association with the Seaway, while facilitating and controlling opportunities for passive outdoor and active water based recreation usage. The Broadwater shores are to remain available for public passive recreation. 71

111 GCCC states that the precinct should be preserved and enhanced as public open space, in view of its environmental significance and its role in the maintenance of the Seaway. Within the precinct, GCCC has planned to maintain and enhance the sand bypass and public safety, in association with the Seaway. The GCCC in the Local Area Plan have made provision for:» Car parking and ancillary facilities for passive recreational use of the precinct;» A comprehensive pedestrian walkway system within the precinct to connect with existing and proposed walkways within Phillip Park Precinct to the south Gold Coast City Council s Tourism Strategy (The Broadwater) According to the Gold Coast City Council s Tourism Strategy, the Broadwater is popular as a major recreational zone, particularly among maritime users who make extensive use of the Broadwater for recreational boating. The Broadwater has diverse land use opportunities (e.g. coastal, still water, land and sea access), has a well established popularity and high recognition particularly because of its visually iconic landscape and relative proximity to major source of populations for Gold Coast City s tourism market (e.g. Brisbane day trip visitors) and tourism localities (particularly Surfers Paradise and Main Beach). The Strategy states that there is a perceived lack of established planning framework leading to ad hoc decision making, this is partly due to the split of planning control between Local and State Government authorities. Planning control also overlaps between authorities vested with an interest in marine activities and those who control land based activities. There is recognition of poor environmental management practices and traffic congestion. The strategic planning focus for the Broadwater (as outlined in the GCCC Tourism Strategy) is for it to be positioned as a major recreational zone within the City, through a planning framework that supports a hierarchy of development that places priority on public assets and public accessibility (ocean side environmental parklands) and works down to more costly and essentially privately funded development proposals. Open space should remain as the feature, particularly as a means towards encouraging greater usage of the beaches along the eastern foreshore of the Spit. Development should in particular reflect the City s commitment to the fundamentals of ecological sustainability and Local Agenda Planning Scheme Policy 16 Infrastructure (Recreation Facilities Network Developer Contributions) The Gold Coast City Council has a policy for the provision of recreational facilities through developer contributions. This policy is Planning Scheme Policy 16, and is a policy for infrastructure (Recreation Facilities Network Developer Contributions). The 72

112 purpose of this Policy is developer contributions for the Gold Coast City Council Recreation Facilities Network. The Policy applies to all development applications for material change of use (MCU) 61 that results in an increase in potential users of recreation facilities from within a site that is subject to a development application for any commercial use, and which, in the opinion of GCCC, may impact the existing standards of service to the Recreation Facilities Network. As the development of the proposed project will require a MCU and is a commercial use the GCCC Planning Scheme Policy will apply. Four categories of recreation facility are subject to infrastructure charges in this policy they are outlined below:» Recreation Parks comprise Local, District and Citywide Recreation Parks, Linkage Parks and associated works.» Sporting Parkland comprises District or Citywide Sporting Parks, and associated works.» Land for Community Facilities is land and associated with works for community centres and halls, swimming pools, changing facilities, libraries, clubhouses, and scout and guide halls.» Outdoor Recreation Parks comprise Citywide Outdoor Recreation Parks, Recreational trails, and associated works. Other forms of open space are not subject to infrastructure charges in this policy (refer to Figure 38). These areas include: ecological and conservation areas, scenic amenity, water bodies and buffer areas. Therefore the marine stadium considered public open space. 61 GCCC Planning Scheme, 73

113 Figure 38 Recreation Facilities as a Component of the Public Open Space Network 62 Table 26 shows the desired amount of recreational facilities based on ha/1000 people, with variance between Planning Zones. The Spit is in the Coastal Zone. The desired Standards of Service for public open space in this zone is 3.7 ha/1000 people. Table 26 Desired Standards of Service for Public Open Space Quantity (ha/1000) 63 Given the uniqueness of The Spit it is difficult to calculate the provision of public open space on the above mentioned desired standards of service. It is estimated that the proposed project would result in a net loss of approximately 9 ha of land. This loss will affect a section of Doug Jennings Park. An area that is not included in open space provisions is the Marine Stadium. This area is a water body and is therefore not included as part of recreational facilities as a component of public open space. However, it does play a valuable role in the recreational use by the local and regional community for swimming, fishing and boating activities. This form of open space would be lost as a result of the proposed marina precinct component of the project. 62 Source: Planning Scheme Policy 16 infrastructure (Recreation Facilities Network Developer Contributions) 63 Source: Planning Scheme Policy 16 infrastructure (Recreation Facilities Network Developer Contributions) 74

114 6.7 Summary of Existing Social Environment of The Spit The social environment of the project area can be summarised as a high use recreational area for the purposes of achieving increased health and well being outcomes connected to the natural environment 64. The Project area provides different qualities for different people. It is utilised by a large variety of people for a large variety of uses (all with a recreation focus), both marine and land based. These uses include (but not limited to:» Diving;» Surfing;» Recreational fishing;» Dog walking;» Swimming;» Boating;» BBQs, picnics and general relaxing;» Walking/running and» Educational. There is more use of the land component of the project study area during the day compared to night. There are strong and passionate values held by SIA stakeholders for The Spit based on how they, their family and friends use the area. SIA stakeholders defined the existing social environment of The Spit as an area for all people and a place that anyone could go to and enjoy, regardless of background or physical abilities. 64 As opposed to using a man made environment (e.g. swimming pool) to achieve the some outcomes. 75

115 7. Identification of Social Impacts 7.1 Introduction This section of the SIA identifies the social impacts of the Project. Identification of social impacts have been based on the information contained in the previous sections 65. Due to each component of the Project having different social impacts (i.e. cruise ship terminal, marina precinct, upgrading of the boat ramp and upgrading of existing facilities), each component has been assessed for both construction and operation. 7.2 Social Impacts and Issues Identified by SIA Stakeholders Table 27 summarises the social impacts and issues identified by the SIA stakeholders in the focus groups and one on one meetings. It should be noted that the social impacts identified by SIA stakeholders were based on the information presented to them at the focus group or the one on one meetings. The SIA stakeholders also had identified a number of other environmental impacts. The SIA stakeholder had a number of issues and concerns about the EIS process and the concept design, their identification of impacts is also based on other information they received outside the EIS process (e.g. after seeing the developers proposed master plans) which is outside the EIS process. A summary of the focus groups and one on one meetings are in Appendix I to S. Table 27 Perceived Social Impacts/Issues Identified by SIA Stakeholders Social Impact Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Safety Boating (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Surfing (C and O) (C and O) O O Increased traffic O (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Increased crime O (O) O O Diving (C and O) (C and O) O O Target for terrorism O (O) O O 65 Including Appendices. 76

116 Social Impact Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Fire management O (C and O) O O Swimming O O (C and O) (C and O) Security O (O) (O) O Community Amenity Loss of public open space O (C and O) (C and O) O Commercialisation of public open space O (O) (O) O Loss of visual amenity (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Odour impacts O (O) O O Increased parking and traffic O (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Overcrowding of The Spit O (O) (O) O Decrease in surrounding property values O (C and O) (C and O) O Construction Impacts Infrastructure requirements Types of vehicles required Terrestrial impact Aquatic impacts Noise Pollution O O O O O O Operational Impacts Types of vehicles required Maintenance operations O O Cruise ship refueling O O O Security concerns O O O Restricted access O O Cruise ship frequency O O O Cost Impact on local businesses Impact on diving industry O 77

117 Social Impact Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Alienation and segregation of the community O Dredging costs (capital and maintenance) O Purchase of area for loss of public open space O Question the financial benefits O Provision of essential and municipal services to The Spit O Tax payer costs O Security costs O Reduction in the viability of the Brisbane cruise ship terminal O Cost to park Environment Pollution impacts (O) (O) (O) O Dredging impacts (C and O) O O Inability to service recreational demand (O) Boating operations (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Sets the precedent for other development on The Spit Diminished natural resources and natural space Disturbance to sensitive areas in the Broadwater O (C and O) (C and O) O (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Cumulative impacts (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Impacts on Federation Walk (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Benefits Economic O (C and O) (C and O) O Employment O (C and O) (C and O) O 78

118 Social Impact Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Long term OO (O) (O) O Educational (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O EIS Process Public mistrust n/a n/a n/a n/a Deficient alternative options n/a n/a n/a n/a EIS process under one year n/a n/a n/a n/a EIS will be flawed because of the concept Flawed data and methodology n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a impact identified C Construction O no impact identified O Operation 7.3 Social Impacts as identified by GHD Table 28 provides a summary of the social impacts (for construction and operation) across all the key components of the proposed Project and by SIA variable:» Dredging and the associated area of the Seaway;» Cruise ship terminal and the associated area of the Seaway» Marina precinct and the associated area of the Marine Stadium and the Broadwater;» Other (upgrading of the boat ramp and upgrading of existing facilities) and the associated area of Doug Jennings Park and the Broadwater. Each of the social impacts (as split by SIA variable (refer to Section 2.3) have been described in more detail further in this section after Table

119 Table 28 Summary of Construction and Operational Social Impacts SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina Precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Population Impacts Population Impacts O O O O Construction and operational workforces O O O O Cruise ship passengers and military personnel (O) (O) O O Cruise ship passengers and military personnel on housing and community services O O O O Community/Institutional Arrangements Formation of attitudes towards the project (interest group activity) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Community values of The Spit (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Relocation of families and individuals (vessels on the Marine Stadium) O O (C and O) O Change in use of The Spit (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Change in use of the Seaway» Loss of access to water and land areas» Change in use (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Change in use of Doug Jennings Park» Loss of access» Loss of public space (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Change in use Change in use of the Broadwater» Change in access (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) 80

120 SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina Precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater» Change in use» Potential to bottleneck the north south channel Change in use of the Marine Stadium» Change in access» Change in use (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Industrial diversification (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Living and family wage O O O O Enhanced economic inequalities O O O Changes in occupational opportunities O (C and O) (C and O) O Communities in Transition Presence of an outside agency (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Inter organisational cooperation (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Introduction of new social classes O O O O Changes in commercial/industrial focus (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) O Presence of weekend residents (C and O) (O) (O) (O) Individual and Family Level Impacts Current impacts on individuals and families (planning, C and O) (planning, C and O) (planning, C and O) O Disruption to daily living and movement» Land traffic (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Marine traffic (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Marine environment (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) 81

121 SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina Precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater» Air impacts (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Visual impacts (including light) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Disruption to social networks (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Perception of public safety» Health and wellbeing of Spit users (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Cyclists and pedestrians (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O)» Surfers crossing the Seaway (C and O) (C and O) O O» Divers (C and O) (C and O) O O» Pollution O (O) (O) O» Transmittable diseases O O O O» Violence O O O O» Terrorism O O O O Changes in leisure opportunities (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) (C and O) Community Infrastructure Needs Changes to community infrastructure O O O O Land acquisition and disposal O Impact on indigenous and non indigenous cultural heritage O O O O impact identified C Construction O no impact identified O Operation 82

122 7.4 Population Impacts Population impacts include the changes in the number, density and distribution of people, the rate of influx or out migration and any changes in the composition in residence and age and gender Population Change The magnitude and rate of population change is a driving force behind community infrastructure and service requirements and may be a major determinant of other financial and social impacts. The impact of an estimated 255 construction workers (and possibly their families) then the estimated operational workforce of 60 (and possibly their families) will not have a significant impact 67 on the population of the immediate study are (ERP of 46,168) and the regional study area (ERP 482,566). It is expected that the estimated workforce would be sourced from the immediate and regional study areas or from South East Queensland. If there is a need to source workers from outside the immediate and regional study area, the potential increase in population would be absorbed in the already high domestic migration rate to the immediate and regional study area Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers Construction and Operational Workforces Many social impacts can be traced to the number and occupational composition of construction, operational and/or decommissioning projects. Table 29 Estimated Project Workforce 68 Dredging Cruise Ship Terminal Marina precinct Other Total Construction Operation Based on the estimated workforce numbers and type of workforce provided in Table 29, it isn t anticipated that either the construction or operational workforces will have a significant permanent or negative impact on the immediate and regional study area demographics. 66 Burdge, R. J. (2004) A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p A significant population impact is an increase or decrease of a population of 5% or 500 people (Burdge 2004 p. 63). 68 These figures are estimates only and should be used for indicative purposes only. 83

123 This is because of the similarities of key industries already identified on the Gold Coast by the 2001 Census and Queensland State Development, Trade and Innovation as listed in Section 4 of the SIA (i.e. food and beverage, marine and tourism industries). Dredging Employment of the dredge during capital and maintenance dredging will be dependent on the type of dredge and whether it is an Australian or international vessel. International vessels must use Australian Maritime Union labour, with only a skeleton international crew, depending on the size of the dredge the Australian complement could be between 50 70%. Direct Employment/Unemployment Construction/ Capital Dredging It is predicted that a dredge undertaking the capital works will be sourced from overseas. There is a requirement that there is a percentage of Australian Maritime Workers Union employment of all international dredges working in Australia. While dredging is taking place the employees stay on board the dredge and do not disembark. It is predicted that the dredge will bunker at the Port of Brisbane (as it is the closest fuelling facility). Whether an international or an Australian dredge is contracted will depend on availability and tender price. Seaway A landside crew of approximately 10 people (including surveyors) and dredge crews between 8 50 (could be more than one plant operating). It is estimated that the capital dredging will take up to 3 months. Marine Stadium Dredge crews (could be more than one plant operating), as little as 4. Operation/ Maintenance Dredging Maintenance dredging will be required and it is estimated in this EIS that maintenance dredging will be required on an annual basis with one emergency dredge required per year. An overseas dredge maybe required, however it would be unviable for the international dredges unless they are in the region for other works. It is expected however that a dredge can be sourced locally to undertake the maintenance dredging. For example Port of Brisbane or McQuade Dredging for maintenance only (both trailer suction hopper dredges). A landside crew of about 4 (including surveyors) with a Seaway dredge crew of up to 20. The maintenance and emergency dredging is estimated to take up to 6 84

124 weeks. Other Port Authority 69 Monitoring 3 contractors twice a year for 2 weeks at a time. Could be zero if operated by existing port authority (e.g. Port of Brisbane Corporation, Ports of Corporation Queensland, etc). If a Port Authority of Gold Coast created, up to 5 people employed full time. Extension of Gold Coast Sand Bypass Up to 20. Relocation of the cross seaway bypass pipeline and works on the low pressure intake facility Up to 16 (likely to be the same workforce undertaking the extension of the Gold Coast Sand Bypass). Indirect Employment/Unemployment There will be limited, if any indirect employment from the dredging activities, as the maintenance crews working already exist for the dredges. There may be indirect unemployment as a negative impact of the dredging in the Seaway. This is due to the reduced access to the Seaway (although only temporary) and alteration to the marine ecosystem (permanent). There are a number of businesses relying on the access to the Seaway to view marine ecosystem and if it and access is altered, there will be an impact on the viability of the business. Businesses which could potentially impacted by the change in the access to the Seaway and the marine ecosystem include (but not limited too):» Commercial diving businesses (10 businesses operate in the regional study area);» Glass Bottom Adventures;» Extreme Jet Boating;» Ferry/Charter vessels; and» Commercial vessels (including trawlers). Cruise Ship Terminal It is yet to be determined if the proposed cruise ship terminal will be a transit or base port. The direct and indirect employment and associated flow on economic impacts vary between the two, with higher economic benefits flowing from the base ports to the local and regional economies Refer to EIS for the management options of the cruise ship terminal and the associated land and waters. 70 Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.22 23, source: 85

125 Direct Employment/Unemployment The following sets out the potential direct employment for a transit port. Construction Ship handling 4 people, provedoring assumed to be local businesses, passenger and landside facility (up to 10, including customs and quarantine) The estimated construction workforce for the cruise ship terminal will be 65 over 12 to 18 months. Piling works 8, top side structures (inc. fabricated steel works), terminal building 25 people Operation It is estimated that the operational workforce of the cruise ship terminal will be 15 incorporating customs, quarantine, administration etc. There may also be unemployment as an impact of the cruise ship terminal and the swing basin as described in the previous section. Indirect Employment/Unemployment Indirect employment opportunities have been outlined in the Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan. These opportunities have been amended to reflect the Notional Seaway Project (and associated concept plan) refer to Table 30. Table 30 Potential Beneficiaries of the Cruise Ship Industry 71 Potential Beneficiary The Cruise Ship Company The Inbound Tour Operator Explanation A good itinerary with destinations that provide passenger satisfaction will result in high passenger loadings, high yield and repeat visitation. Satisfied passengers generally spend more money on board and on shore excursions offered by the cruise company. Benefits are dependant upon the number of passengers who look organised shore tours. The greater the number of tours the greater the number of passengers and hence the inbound tour operator s fee and commission. The Destination Local operators Local shops Such as coaches, limousines, taxis and tour guides. Those that go out of their way for the nationality of passengers on each different cruise and present high class, well priced merchandise will benefit more than most, especially if the merchandise has local flavour or significance. 71 Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.22 23, source: 86

126 Potential Beneficiary Hotels Restaurants Tourist attractions Port Service Suppliers Shipping agents Towage companies Baggage handlers and stevedores Provedores Fuel suppliers The port operator Local Councils The Government Explanation There is an increasing trend for passengers to stay away from their prepaid lunch aboard the cruise ship and savour the taste of the local food at the destination. This has obvious benefits for local restaurants and cafes. Which tourists visit. Generally only benefit in base ports where passengers will often stay one more nights either before joining or after leaving their cruise ship. During this time they will often take a number of pre or post cruise land tours. Hotels often also benefit from Australian military vessel visits as the families of military personnel often come to visit and need hotel accommodation while the vessel is in port. These include services other than from the port corporations. Who derive their commission on a fee base service. For the use of tugs, although today many modern very manoeuvrable cruise ships do not require tugs. Queensland Transport regional harbour masters set towage requirements. Principally at base ports where they are engaged to handle passenger baggage and loading of ship provisions. In many ports stevedores also supply the linesmen. Supply of food and hotel supplies required by a ship throughout its voyage. There are opportunities for marketing Australian goods to international cruise shipping companies, and base porting vessels in Australia would generate increased opportunities for the provision of domestic products. When the cruise ship takes on bunker fuel. From port charges which may include berth charges and terminal charges. It is worth noting, especially in Queensland ports, that very few port operators receive sufficient revenue from cruise ships to cover the cost of the infrastructure and services provided, particularly when welcoming and farewell services are supplied for passengers. Some ports charge cruise ships nothing at all in a bid to attract them to their destination, the thought being that the local community benefits from the visit. Principally benefit from the supply of water which is the most common commodity taken on at all ports, and the disposal of garbage, wastewater and sewerage. They also benefit from the rates paid by any business established to services the cruise ship industry. Both State and Federal governments derive benefits from cruise shipping from revenue related to navigation charges, oil spill levies, GBRMPA permit and environmental management conservancy charges, QNPWS permit and passenger charges, and indirectly through dividends returned from port operations. 87

127 There may be indirect unemployment as a negative impact of the cruise ship terminal. This is due to the reduced access to the Seaway (although only temporary) There are a number of businesses relying on the access to the Seaway if and access is altered, there will be an impact on the viability of the business. Businesses which could potentially impacted include (but not limited too):» Commercial diving businesses (10 businesses operate in the regional study area);» Ferry/Charter vessels; and» Commercial vessels (including trawlers). Marina precinct Direct Employment/Unemployment Construction The estimated construction workforce for the marina precinct will be 85 over 6 to 12 months. Opportunities for existing local business/contractors:» Pontoon manufacture up to 8 people» Piling and installation of marine works up to 8» Construction of the commercial wharf up to 12 (could be the same contractors as the above)» Revetment of the marine stadium up to 15 people (excluding people employed indirectly in the quarry)» Earthworks and car parks etc up to 20 people» Structures up to 20 people Operation The estimated operational workforce of the marina precinct and associated business will be 15 full time positions (this does not include the direct employment of people for the super yachts and the commercial vessels) 72. Up to 4 people, plus who are engaged in the retail sector and a security contractor Because the marina berths for the recreational and commercial vessels are expected to be filled by vessels from the regional study area, there isn t expected to be any net increase in the number of vessels in the regional study area. Because of this, there isn t expected to be any direct employment from this section of the marina. However, an increase in employment for the management and operation and associated commercial/retail outlets of the marina and the super yachts is anticipated. 72 Based on information from the Horizon Shores Marina (northern end of the Gold Coast) by Meridien Marinas per comm

128 Employment from the commercial berths will increase if the additional commercial vessels are introduced to the immediate study area. Direct unemployment as a result of the marina precinct is expected to be nil because there are not any businesses operating out of or using the Marine Stadium. Indirect Employment/Unemployment Similar to the cruise ship transit port, the indirect employment from the marina precinct will focus on:» Local operators;» Local shops;» Restaurants;» Tourist attractions;» Provedores;» Fuel suppliers;» The marina operator;» Maintenance services; and» The government (both local and state). The marina precinct is not expected to cause any indirect unemployment, because there are not any businesses operating out of or using the Marine Stadium. Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities Direct Employment/Unemployment Construction Operation The construction workforce for the upgrading of the boat ramp facility and other areas (including Doug Jennings Park) is estimated at 45 over 6 months. The operational/maintenance workforce for the upgrading of the boat ramp and other areas (including Doug Jennings Park) is estimated to be 2 full time positions per year. Unemployment as a direct impact of the upgrading of the boat ramp and other public facilities is expected to be nil. Indirect Employment/Unemployment With the upgrading of the boat ramp and other public facilities there may be indirect employment opportunities created through businesses and organisations utlising these areas, continuing their existing services (e.g. bus tour companies, the local businesses on The Spit) or businesses and organisations taking up new services. Unemployment is unlikely to be an indirect impact of the upgrading of the boat ramp and other public facilities. 89

129 7.4.3 Population Impacts Presence of Seasonal (leisure) residents The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents refers to a permanent but seasonal increase or decrease in population resulting from opening or closing an existing recreational facility or closing an existing recreational facility or seasonal home development. This section describes the population impacts on the people using the proposed Project facilities (cruise ship terminal, marina precinct, and upgrading of the boat ramp and other public facilities). Dredging There will be no presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with dredging (both capital and maintenance dredging). Cruise Ship Terminal The estimated 2,000 passengers per cruise ship and 20 ships arriving annually will have a temporary impact on the accommodation and tourism facilities and services available in the immediate and regional study area. This impact has the potential to be economically positive depending on the availability of a range of accommodation types and costs. This impact on accommodation is dependant on whether the cruise ship terminal is to be transit or base port. If the terminal is a base port there will an increase in the impact, if it is a transit port there will be limited impact. At the time of writing the SIA, there were no available estimates of the types of military vessels that may utilise the cruise ship terminal, and no details of where they would be from and how many personnel they would carry. The impact of passengers from cruise ships (and military vessels) would be increased during peak tourism events held in the immediate and regional study areas (and associated cumulative impacts (e.g. traffic), for example:» Indy (October);» Large sailing regattas with vessels travelling through the Broadwater and Seaway and back to their berths (held throughout the year);» Summafieldayze (January);» Gold Coast Triathlon (March);» Gold Coast Marathon (June);» Australian Outrigger Canoe Ultra Marathon (April); and» Dragon Boat Racing (October). The impact on these events could vary depending on if a cruise ship or a military vessel was utilising the cruise ship terminal at the time. 90

130 There will be daily localised population impacts caused by regional residents and residents of South East Queensland that visit the cruise ships as a tourism activity on a day trip basis or as part of a holiday experience within the regional study area. There were concerns raised by some SIA stakeholders regarding the potential poor conduct of cruise ship passengers and military personnel while in the Gold Coast region. This poor conduct was described by SIA stakeholders as being violence perpetrated by the cruise ship passengers or military personnel against residents in the immediate and regional study areas. Marina precinct It is expected that the majority of the 319 recreational berths at the marina will absorb a large proportion of boats already owned by residents in the regional study area but are not already located in existing marinas. This is based on the limited marina berths available in the immediate and regional study area 73. The number of commercial vessels in the regional study area will absorb the 22 commercial vessel berths. As such it is not anticipated to be any net increase in the number of commercial vessels. There may be an increase in the level of vessel density in the Broadwater and the Seaway as more boat owners have better access to the area and to their vessels. There isn t expected to be a significant impact on population from the super yacht owners or lessees as these vessels are luxury vessels and are not designed to carry a large number of people (including staff). There may be localised population impacts caused by regional residents and residents of South East Queensland to visit the super yachts as a tourism activity on a day trip basis or a part of a holiday experience in the regional study area. There will be a change or impact on the types of people that utilise the Maine Stadium area if the Project is constructed and operated. This is because of the change in opportunities in use the area. For example the removal of the Marine Stadium as an ad hoc public swimming facility used by families with small children and/or dogs and changing it into a restricted access marina where boat owners and their employees, friends and family have access only. Surrounding proposed marina is a publicly accessible promenade/boardwalk and retail and commercial facilities, which is predicted to attract people who wish to utilise the facilities. Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities The usage of the other parts of the proposed Project, that is the upgrading of the boat ramp facility and the public facilities will attract people to the area. There may be an 73 Southport Yacht Squadron has a waiting list for berths, the wait is for between 3 6 months depending on the size of berth required. There are limited berths available at Horizon Shores and Runaway Bay Marina. 91

131 increase in the number of people using the upgraded areas, for example Doug Jennings Park because of the increase in type and number of public facilities and amenities provided (e.g. public toilets). There may also be a change in the times of day when people use the area. Anecdotal evidence from Project stakeholders suggests the area is not highly used at night because of safety concerns. With the increase in lighting and number of people in the area, it may be frequented more at night Relocation of Individuals and Families The number of persons who will be relocated from their present homes, either voluntary or involuntary, as a result of the proposed project or development. There will be no direct relocation of individuals or families who live on land at the northern end of The Spit. However, there will be the requirement to relocate people who live on vessels permanently moored or anchored in the Marine Stadium. The Marine Stadium is meant to be used as a short term anchorage 74. There are also people who anchor or moor their vessels in the Marine Stadium for a temporary period in line with the legislative requirements, these people will no longer have access to this area. There will also be negative cumulative impacts associated with the relocation of vessels to other safe anchorages with similar features of the Marine Stadium, for example crowding of other safe anchorages and pressure on affordable accommodation if there isn t other options for people who live in the Marine Stadium due to it being cost free. Based on comments received on the community feedback sheets and in consultations held at the second community information day (June 2006), some people are considering leaving the immediate and regional study areas because of the increase in development and the loss of public open space. With the potential of employment in different industries, there is the potential for the relocation of people to the immediate and regional areas for employment purposes. Individuals may be attracted to relocate to the immediate and regional study area with the hope of employment and be reliant on affordable accommodation until the gain employment (this will add extra pressure to the lack of affordable housing in the immediate and regional study areas at the moment). 74 Anchoring and mooring of boats in the Broadwater between the boat ramp near the Southport Olympic Pool and the north east tip of Wavebreak Island, whether at one or more locations, is restricted to a maximum pf seven days in any 60 day period (Queensland Transport, ( 92

132 7.4.5 Population Impacts Impact on Housing Construction and Operational Workforces It is expected that the housing market in the immediate and regional study area has the capacity to accommodate the influx of construction and operational workforces (if they are not already residing in the regional study area). There are accommodation pressures in the immediate study area, however these may be offset by the relatively high wages paid to construction employees/contractors. There is less pressure on accommodation the further the distance travelled from the immediate study area, with easy access (travel time in a vehicle of under 1 hour) from surrounding local government areas such as Logan City. Cruise Ship Passengers and Military Personnel Impacts on hotels for the pre and post cruise passengers (and military personnel 75 ) should not be unmanageable unless there is a large event at the time, for example Indy or Schoolies week. Homeless People and People Living on their boats in the Marine Stadium There may be a negative and permanent indirect impacts:» On the homeless people camping in the sand dunes on the western side of The Spit. This indirect impact would be created through the increased use of the northern end of The Spit. However there would also be increased public amenities (public toilets) available to people camping in the sand dunes, potentially increasing health and hygiene.» On the people living on their boats in the marine stadium who will have to relocate if the marina precinct is constructed. Both of these impacts relate to the lack of affordable housing available on the Gold Coast. 7.5 Community/Institutional Arrangements Impacts on community/institutional arrangements includes changes in attitudes and values, the emergence of interest groups as well as changes in local government and employment opportunities for all citizens And families of Australian military vessels traveling to the Gold Coast. 76 Burdge, R. J. (2004) A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p

133 7.5.1 Formation of Attitudes towards the Project (including community values) Attitudes means the positive and negative feelings, beliefs or positions expressed by residents in the community regarding the proposed project or development. The formation of attitudes towards the proposed project are based in the strong and passionate values of The Spit, as set out in Section 6.5. There appears to be a polarisation of attitudes toward the proposed Project, with most people in the immediate and regional study areas having an opinion on whether the Project should go ahead or not. Based on SIA consultations it has become evident that the proposed Project needs to be broken down into its key components:» With the most polarisation on the cruise ship terminal whether it should be constructed and operated or not;» Most people agree with the concept of the marina precinct, but the issue of contention is alternative locations or the berths absorbed into existing marinas;» Upgrading of the boat ramp facility received little opinion; and» The majority of people agreed with the need to upgrade the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. The values that the community holds for the northern end of The Spit will be permanently impacted by the proposed project. The proposed project may:» increase the value of the area for some community members through the increase in level and type of services (from commercial and retail through to public amenities); or» decrease the value of the area for some community members through the development and loss of the natural feel of the area and reduced access to the area to undertake recreational activities Interest Group Activity Interest groups and organisations are identifiable forces active in the community that represent the views of their membership which stand to gain or lose by the proposed action. Interest groups play an important role in shaping community responses and may also assist community leaders in the mitigation/enhancement process. There are a number of interest groups participating in the EIS process (predominantly through the SIA consultations and Community Consultation). These interest groups are represented by the Save Our Spit Alliance. 94

134 Save Our Spit Alliance (SOSA) The following information was provided by SOSA as background to their organisation, the organisation s official position on the Project and activities they have undertaken. The SOSA originally started as "Save Our Spit" a one issue organisation looking at the negative impacts of the proposed cruise ship terminal. The organisation then grew into the SOSA in response to the realisation that the community has been fighting unsuitable developments proposed for The Spit once every 2 to 3 years for the last 50 years (Main Beach Progress Association started to collect media articles about the developments proposed and the community fight against them in 1961). SOSA believes that Governments at all levels (local, state and federal) should protect public open space as a moral obligation, especially in a city like the Gold Coast which has relatively little open space compared to other city's in Australia. SOSA is made up of individual members of the general public, families, businesses and a number of long standing community organisations:» Main Beach Progress Association;» Nerang Community Association;» Coomera Valley and Hinterland Residents Association;» GECKO» Friends of Federation Walk;» Surfers Against Ships;» Surfrider Foundation.» Devocean Dive» Atlantis Scuba» Ian Banks Diving» Sunfish» Gold Coast Dive» Gold Coast Diving» Gold Coast Kayaking» John Wayne Design SOSA have been active the community promoting their cause since their first public meeting in December They have:» Held a public meeting every 2 weeks since January 2005;» Met with Queensland Government Ministers and senior staff to discuss the proposed project and the negative impacts from an environmental, social and economic perspective (with little or no response to their concerns particularly in relation to the navigational study)» Held two public rallies: 95

135 April 2005 attended by over 2,000 people February 2006 attended by over 3,000 people (including 82 watercraft, 50 divers, 120 surfers and 24 dogs).» SOSA have also held a People and Parks Day in July 2005 on The Spit which was attended by over 1,500 people participating in tree planting, introductory dives, snorkelling, surf school lessons, tree planting, fishing instruction, children's sea creature poster display, surf photography display, Northend Boardriders 'A' Grade 'Save Our Spit' Surf Classic Competition and Tai Chi Classes.» SOSA held an open public meeting at Albert Waterways Hall, Broadbeach in October 2005, attended by over 200 people at which it was resolved to incorporate the alliance, and a committee of management was duly elected.» SOSA held an open public meeting and information night at the same hall in May 2006 attended by over 100 people as a response to GHD's reluctance to hold a Public Meeting Re: EIS Gold Coast Marine Development Project at a time and venue more suitable than GHD's Information days for those who work or have family commitments 77. SOSA does not want any further development north of Sheraton Mirage on the eastern side of The Spit and no further development north of Sea World Nara Resort on the western side of The Spit. They believe that there should be no more loss of public open space at the northern end of The Spit or restrictions to access at any time to the Seaway, Broadwater or Ocean by current water users, or any degradation of water quality or surf quality through capital dredging or construction of any kind. SOSA does not object to development south of Seaworld Nara on the western side of The Spit, conditional on the developments meeting existing GCCC Planning Scheme, LAP's, appropriate building regulations, State Environment Laws and Federal Environment Laws. Also any marine developments west or south of Seaworld Nara ie Superyacht berthing or marina would have to go through a rigorous EIS process. GHD has received a large proportion (approximately 73%) of feedback forms generated through the SOSA networks objecting to the proposed project. GHD also received 1,454 submissions as part of one feedback form from SOSA. The submissions were letters to the Premier generated through the SOSA website. 77 GHD did not receive any formal request to hold a public meeting on the EIS process from SOSA. GHD did conduct Community Information Days for the EIS at The Spit on Friday 21 April noon 7.00pm (introduction to the EIS), Thursday 15 June noon 7.00pm (update on EIS). 96

136 7.5.3 Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) The presence (or absence) of legal mandates for development, planning, zoning of local, State and Commonwealth jurisdictions within the project area. This section has been expanded to address the change in land and water use associated with the proposed project. Changes will be required to the current planning and zoning activity (refer to the EIS), however how the use of the space will change has been documented per the areas to be impacted:» Doug Jennings Park;» Marine Stadium;» The Broadwater; and» The Seaway. As the development of the proposed project will have to address the GCCC Planning Scheme because a there will be a material change in use (MCU) and it is for a is a commercial use. The Spit is classified to be in a coastal zone, therefore the desired standards of service for public open space in this zone is 3.7 ha/1000 people. Given the uniqueness of The Spit it is difficult to calculate the provision of public open space on the above mentioned desired standards of service. It is estimated that the proposed project would result in a net loss of approximately 9 ha of land. This loss will affect a section of Doug Jennings Park. An area that is not included in open space provisions is the Marine Stadium. This area is a water body and is therefore not included as part of recreational facilities as a component of public open space. However, it does play a valuable role in the recreational use by the local and regional community for swimming, fishing and boating activities. This form of open space would be lost as a result of the proposed marina precinct component of the project. Change in Public Space Doug Jennings Park The change in the use of Doug Jennings Park is expected to be minimal. The cruise ship facilities should not result in a net reduction of more than one hectare of the park area. It is expected that there will be an increase in the usage of Doug Jennings Park with the upgrading of facilities. The proposed project will not have an impact on access to Doug Jennings Park. There is the concern that the surrounding development (that is the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct) will take away the natural feel of the area. Project stakeholders have raised concerns about the public access to the area when a cruise ship is docked at the wharf, through:» Increased traffic; 97

137 » Reduced parking capacity (as the spaces will be filled with vehicles related to the cruise ship and its passengers);» Loss of access to the proposed wharf and surrounding seawall for fishing; and» Loss of access to the seawall for access to the Seaway for surfers to paddle to South Stradbroke Island. Change in Public Space Marine Stadium Changes to how the Marine Stadium is currently used will be a permanent and significant impact of the proposed Project. The area is currently used for a number of recreational activities:» Mooring and anchoring of vessels for short and long term periods 78 ;» Swimming, especially for children with the smooth waters; and» Picnicking, as the area provides shade and access to the water. With the proposed change to a marina precinct, many of the current activities that occur in the area will cease or be restricted by access. For example, the only access for swimming will be from the western arm of the western arm of The Spit and north of the current boat ramp facilities. There is a perception that there will be a loss of public space surrounding Marine Stadium as a result of the development of the marina and associated facilities. There won t be a loss of public open space, however the area will be altered (e.g. construction of a promenade and rock wall) that will change the use and access to the Marine Stadium. The construction of the promenade may increase access to the area through creating a more user friendly environment for those have mobility impairments (e.g. wheel chairs and prams). Change in Public Space The Broadwater The usage of the Broadwater will be changed through the number and type of vessels travelling through the area (for both construction and operation). During construction there will be temporary impacts with the dredging vessels 79 during the construction period. During the operational period of the proposed project, there will be:» Dredges present temporarily for maintenance dredging (at least once a year);» Increase in the size of vessels in the Seaway and Broadwater cruise ships and super yachts, increasing the level of congestion; 78 Some vessels are moored or anchored for long periods (i.e. longer than one week) although the area is meant for short terms stays only (i.e. 3 nights). 79 It is not yet known how many dredges will be required for the capital dredge. 98

138 » Potential bottlenecks when the cruise ship is in the swing basin. This will be a temporary negative impact as it is estimated that the ships will only be in the swing basin for 30 mins however the impacts could be permanent through safety concerns of the potential bottlenecking. Change in Public Space The Seaway The Seaway will be most affected during its closure for the cruise ships to enter and exit the area, impacting on access to the area for marine traffic (recreational, commercial and charters), divers and surfers who cross the Seaway to access South Stradbroke Island. The proposed Project will also have an impact on the various environmental and educational groups (including primary and secondary schools, universities and the community environmental education groups Beachcare and CoastEd. There will be restrictions on access to the wharf for recreational activities (such as fishing) while the cruise ship is berthing, in berth or exiting. This impact will be temporary as the wharf will be open to the public at other times. Community members will still have access to the southern training wall even if a cruise ship is berthing, at berth or exiting. Change in Public Space Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities The boat ramp facilities and other areas associated with the project will have short term temporary impacts during the construction stage. There are not plans to hinder the access to the areas at any other time Industrial Diversification Industrial diversification refers to the number and variety of private sector industries within a project area. The proposed Project will significantly amend the industrial diversification of the Project area (that is the number and variety of private sector industries). At the moment, the Project area has limited development, with only one commercial outlet north of the Seaworld Nara Resort. However the area is used by a number of commercial businesses, such as tourist buses and diving operators. Cruise Ship Terminal The cruise ship terminal will introduce a number of industries to the area including:» Local operators;» Customs;» Quarantine; 99

139 » Port administrative services; and» Associated provedores. The Marina precinct The marina precinct is expected to introduce a number of different industries to the area:» Marina administration;» Chandlery; and» Other associated marine industries. The marina precinct is expected to provide an increased boost to the marina precinct at Coomera (however this is subject to access by water and the dredging requirements for the super yachts to access the precinct) Living/Family Wage A living/family wage refers to the amount of money required for a family of four to live above the poverty line in a community/region or country where the proposed change is located. The majority of couple families in the Gold Coast SSD in 2001 were above the poverty line. The type of work offered by the different elements of the project for both the construction and operational phases are not expected to pay workers below the most recently released poverty line levels (December Quarter ), refer to Table 31 Poverty Lines: Australia, December Quarter, Income Unit Head in the Workforce Including Housing $ per week Other than housing $ per week Couple Couple Plus Couple Plus Couple Plus Couple Plus Single Person Single parent plus The Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research 2005 Poverty Lines: Australia, December Quarter 2005 The University of Melbourne Based on a seasonally adjusted household disposable income per head for the December quarter 2005 of $ All figures refer to income after tax. 100

140 Income Unit Including Housing $ per week Other than housing $ per week Single parent plus Single parent plus Single parent plus Head not in workforce Couple Couple Plus Couple Plus Couple Plus Couple Plus Single Person Single parent plus Single parent plus Single parent plus Single parent plus Enhanced Economic Inequalities The enhanced economic inequalities refer to the degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed Project or development match the job skills of the unemployed in the Project area. There will be a number of skilled and unskilled positions required to construct and operate the proposed Project components, these present opportunities for the unemployed in the immediate and regional study areas. Estimates of the type of employment surrounding the development of the proposed project is set out in Section It is expected that the employment opportunities will arise through the construction of the cruise ship terminal and marina facilities. At this stage it is not known the specific employment requirements, however it is expected to be limited. These impacts are considered to be slightly significant with the type, limited number and duration of employment to be a mix of temporary and permanent Changes in Occupational Opportunities The degree to which job opportunities of the proposed project match the job skills of the unemployed, disadvantaged and minority groups, including low income, young people, ethnic and racial minorities and women. 101

141 There will be changes in the occupational opportunities as a direct result (and indirect result) of the cruise ship terminal and marina precinct. These opportunities include the requirements to support the cruise ship terminal and marina precinct:» Local operators;» Customs;» Quarantine;» Port administrative services; and» Associated provedores.» Marina administration;» Chandlery; and» Other associated marine industries. These impacts are considered to be slightly significant with the type, limited number and duration of employment to be a mix of temporary and permanent. During consultations with Project stakeholders, there were a number of businesses who identified use of the Project area 82 during the operation of their businesses. These businesses include, Glass Bottom Adventures and the local dive businesses 83. Project stakeholders also identified other businesses who use the proposed Project area, including the trawlers and charter boat vessels (including water taxis and ferry services). There may also be other businesses who use the proposed project area which have not been directly identified by this SIA. As there are a number of different type and size of businesses using the proposed Project area, there is the potential for these businesses to be negatively impact on through:» Loss of access to the area; and» Changes in the qualities of the area (e.g. water quality, noise and ecosystem composition. If the businesses are negatively impact on, there will be a flow on impact to their employees, creating a negative impact on number and type of occupational opportunities in the local and regional study area. 7.6 Communities in Transition Communities in transition refers to changes in community image, the alteration in community power structures with the arrival or departure of business or government 82 Including the Seaway, Broadwater, Marine Stadium and The Spit in the Project Study area, not just the location of the proposed cruise ship terminal and wharf. 83 Based on anecdotal evidence there are up to 10 local dive businesses who use the Project area. 102

142 agencies and any conflict that might arise between local residents and newcomers or even outsiders as the result of a development Project or policy change Presence of an Outside Agency The taking up of permanent (or departure) in the project area of a government agency or private sector business which has not been previously in the community and whose management comes form outside the project area. There will be a number of new businesses associated with the proposed Project, at this stage it is not known who will;» Develop the proposed Project;» Own the proposed Project;» Operate the proposed Project;» Which companies will utilise the proposed Project (both the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct); and» How the businesses will operated the facilities (outside of the legislative and regulatory requirements). Based on the level of opposition to the proposed Project the introduction of new or the growth of existing businesses in the immediate and regional study areas will need to take into consideration this history of the Project. These impacts are considered to be a mix of moderately significant (for the cruise ship terminal) and slightly significant for the marina precinct, the boat ramp facilities and other works because of the permanency of the impacts Inter organisational cooperation The degrees to which regulatory, planning and proponent organisations and agencies are able to work together and share common development policy goals. For the Project to be successfully implemented, it will require a high level of interorganisation cooperation. There are still major decisions to be made in relation to the Project including:» Who is going to develop the proposed Project;» Who is going to own the proposed Project facilities;» Who is going to operate the proposed Project facilities;» Which companies will utilise the proposed Project (both the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct); and 84 Burdge, R. J. (2004) A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p

143 » How the businesses will operated the facilities (outside of the legislative and regulatory requirements).» Who will have the responsibility of maintaining the Project facilities (including the maintenance dredging);» Who will police the closure of the seaway and ensure that people/vessels do not enter or cross the seaway when a cruise ship is entering or leaving;» What (if any) legislative powers will there be to prevent ensure that people/vessels do not enter or cross the seaway when a cruise ship is entering or leaving. These decisions will need to be made in as part of the Detailed Feasibility Assessment required for any large project prior to financial close. The impacts of these decisions will be significant because of the number of type of government and non government agencies that will need to be involved Introduction of new social classes The appearance (or disappearance) of new social classes or establishment of a new social class (based on education, income levels, occupation or lifestyle) in the community as a result of the proposed project. There won t necessarily be an introduction of new social classes as based on the demographics of cruise ship passengers and the existing demographics of the immediate and regional study area provided in Section 4, as the immediate and regional study areas are representative of all social classes in the State. However there will be an increase in the numbers/proportion of some of the social classes, there will be an impact. Cruise Ship Terminal Based on statistics provided by the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) 85, the median age respondent was 44, representing an annual household income of US $71,000. Nearly two thirds work full time and one in eight (13%) is retired. Over half (58%) are college graduates and Caucasian (93%). Of the respondents, 49% were male and 51% female. Based on the demographic analysis of the immediate and regional study areas, the introduction of the cruise ship passengers and staff will have a limited impact as an introduction of a new social class into the immediate and regional study area. The Marina precinct Anecdotal evidence suggests that the demographics of people using the marina precinct will be in the average and upper echelons of income at the immediate and 85 CLIA (2005) The Overview Spring

144 regional levels, usually above average in education, have a family and living in the immediate or regional study area. The anecdotal evidence of the super yacht owners is that they are in the upper echelons of income for the world, and are prepared to spend over $5 million up front capital on a boat that they may only use a few times a year. Based on the demographic analysis of the immediate and regional study areas, the introduction of the cruise ship passengers and staff will have a limited impact as an introduction of a new social class into the immediate and regional study area Change in the commercial/industrial focus of the area The change in the traditional commercial/industrial (private) or public sector focus of the community as a result of the proposed project. A change in focus would apply once a project is in operation or after the abandonment phase. Project Area Impacts There will be a significant change in the commercial/industrial focus of the project area if the proposed Project is constructed and operated. These impacts are considered to be highly significant because of the permanency of the change and the change from a natural area to a commercialised area (even through there are natural areas retained and enhanced). The proposed Project will also have an impact on the various environmental and educational groups (including primary and secondary schools, universities and the community environmental education groups Beachcare and CoastEd through the impacts on the marine ecosystems and potential indirect environmental impacts. Regional Impacts However, at a regional level with the key industries having been identified to include marine and tourism, there isn t a change in the commercial/industrial focus at the regional level Presence of weekend residents (recreational) The influx of weekend or short term visitors who do not have a permanent home in the community. The Gold Coast already has a significant proportion of its population present for weekend recreational purposes and The Spit (land based) and The Broadwater (water based) are two key areas where weekend residents frequent. The proposed development may or may not encourage or hinder weekend residents frequenting The Spit and the Broadwater; this would depend on their purpose for using the area. 105

145 The impacts on weekend residents will be more concentrated on those individuals and families using the marine stadium. Many families use the marina stadium as a weekend anchorage for their vessels. With the high number of vessels using the area on a temporary or long term basis, there will be pressure placed on other safe anchorages in the Broadwater. Many people anchor in the marina stadium because it is protected from winds from the east, west and the north, is still water and provides the opportunities for rafting up (a number of vessels tied together) increasing the social opportunities. 7.7 Individual and Family Level Impacts Individual and family level impacts include changes to family structure, individual social relations and how an impact is perceived to change the daily lives of individuals and families Current Impacts on Individual and Families Impact of individuals and groups either supporting or fighting the Project. It should be noted that the participation of stakeholders in this SIA was undertaken on a voluntary basis and some people had to take time off work or from running their business to participate in the SIA. There is also reported community disillusionment about the State government processes and the perceived lack of community consultation with the proposed Project. There is the perception that the State government has a higher priority on the high market tourism over community values and the importance of public open space (either on land or water). It should also be noted that participating in the process (and the EIS is only part of it) takes a lot of resources, including skills, time and money. Based on stakeholder consultations the process has caused a lot of stress and anxiety. For those stakeholders opposed to the development of The Spit, they have been fighting since At the SIA focus groups and one on one meetings there was a high level of passion for The Spit shown by the majority of stakeholders. The value that it has for them, their families and friends was clearly articulated. The increase in the level of passion for the area can be linked to the increase in the level of impact on individuals and families. 86 Burdge, R. J. (2004) A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p

146 7.7.2 Disruption in daily living and movement patterns The changes or disruptions in routine daily living and work activities caused by alteration to the visual environment, noise and odour levels, transportation routes or the amount of vehicular traffic resulting from the proposed project. There will be significant changes to the current uses of The Spit and the Broadwater if the proposed Project is constructed and operational. These impacts include:» Access (land and marine);» Traffic (land and marine);» Marine environment (inc. water quality and the break off South Stradbroke Island);» Air; and» Visual (including light). Refer to the relevant technical studies of the EIS for the specific impacts. However the impacts have been summarised in Table 32. Table 32 Impact Summary of Impacts on Daily Living and Movement Patterns Explanation Access land Access to the land component of the Project study area will be permanently changed if the Project proceeds, for both the construction an operational stages of the project. Cruise Ship Terminal Access will be restricted during construction for safety and security reasons. Access will be restricted during operation through:» the presence of buildings that were not present pre project;» security requirements of the cruise ship terminal (both when a cruise ship is berthed or not);» security requirements of the wharf area when a cruise ship is berthed). When a cruise ship is not berthed (or in the process of arriving or leaving) it is expected that the wharf area will have public access, this will include for recreational activities such as fishing, walking, dog walking, relaxing etc. Marine Precinct Access will also be changed for the marina stadium, which will no longer be accessible to the general public from the eastern side of the marine stadium due to the construction and operation of the marina precinct. Access during operation to the general public will still remain on the western arm of the Spit, however the landscape will be amended (including the rock wall on the eastern side of the western arm one a 107

147 Impact Access marine Explanation beach area, a rock wall will be required to secure the basin for the proposed marina). Access to the marine component of the Project study area will be permanently changed if the Project proceeds, for both the construction an operational stages of the project. Cruise Ship Terminal Access will be restricted during construction for safety and security reasons. Access will be restricted during the operation of the cruise ship terminal during the entering, leaving and berthing of the cruise ships. This included restricted access to the Seaway and the Broadwater (for the swing basin). This restriction will impact on the current users of the Seaway including surfers (accessing the waves off South Stradbroke Island), recreational and commercial vessels and the diving industry. It is understood that while the cruise ship is berthed at the wharf there will be a 100m restriction zone around the ship. It will be up to the organisation who manages the cruise ship terminal and wharf to set the restrictions to the marine project area during the entering and leaving of the cruise ship. It is not known what restrictions will be required for any military vessels using the cruise ship terminal or wharf facilities. Marina Precinct Access to the marine stadium will be restricted during construction for safety and security reasons. Access to the marina precinct will be restricted during the operation of the marina similar to other marinas in the area. This is essentially entry is for boats who have permanent berths or temporarily accessing the berths or facilities in the area. Access to the water will still be available from the public boat ramp for boats and the general public will still have access to the water for fishing and swimming from the western and eastern side of the western arm of the Spit. Traffic land There will be an increase in the number and type of vehicles using roads in the immediate and regional study areas (Seaworld Drive and the Sundale Bridge in particular). This includes vehicles relating to passengers embarking and disembarking, movement of supplies, people travelling to use the area (including to embark on their cruise, super yacht) and to view the vessels associated with the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct. This will lead to increased congestion and air pollution impacting on people using and living neat the roads most heavily impacted. Impact on recreational users of the road space, e.g. cyclists and pedestrians. Traffic marine There will be significant impacts on the movement of marine traffic (estimated at 20,000 vessels per year, the Broadwater is the highest trafficked area) with the closure of the Seaway (including the north south channel with the swing basin). 108

148 Impact Explanation There will also be an impact on the boating and jet skis who use the area with increased marine traffic and congestion. Access to the Seaway will also be restricted to surfers who swim across the Seaway to access the waves off South Stradbroke Island for the time a cruise ship terminal is entering, leaving or berthed at the wharf. Marine Environment (inc. water quality and the break off South Stradbroke Island); The dredging and the movement of the cruise ships predominantly cause impacts on the marine environment. There will also be an impact on the recreational fishermen and fisherwomen who use the southern seaway walls. Perceived impact of the decrease in water quality (in the marina stadium, the Broadwater, the Seaway and Pacific Ocean) from the vessels using the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct. There is a perception that an impact will be a reduced wave quality off South Stradbroke Island, having cumulative impacts of increased crowding at other surfing beaches on the Gold Coast and northern New South Wales. Noise Noise impacts will be localised to The Spit and during construction, impacting on people using The Spit during the construction phase. There may also be underwater noise impacts on the divers who use the project area during the entering, leaving and berthing of a cruise ship terminal. Air Visual (including light) (refer to EIS for artistic sketches of the proposed project) Air impacts will be cause by both the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct. Indirectly there will be noise impacts from the increase in the number of type of vehicles using the immediate and regional roads. The residents and people using the western side of the Broadwater will be visually impacted (both day and night) by the cruise ship terminal, the cruise ships when they are berthed at the wharf and the marina precinct. Uses of The Spit will also be visually impacted by the development. The visual impact of the upgrading of the public areas and facilities may increase the visual amenity of the area and provide extra safety with the area being light for security purposes at night Disruption of social networks The termination of disruption in normal community social interaction patterns (including friendship and kin relations) by the project activity. There will be a disruption of social networks as a result of the proposed Project. This includes the usage of the Project area for family and social functions. In particular the majority of this impact will be felt by the marina precinct and the loss of access to this area for families (both land and water based). With the increase in amount and type of traffic on the immediate and regional road system, it may prevent people from visiting and spending time with each other. 109

149 There will also be associated impacts on:» The education services provided on The Spit;» Surfing opportunities;» Diving opportunities;» Recreational fishing; and» Dog walking. The impacts on the disruption of social networks is considered to be highest in the marine stadium because of high use of families who use this area Perception of Public Safety A perception, attitude or belief on part of community residents that their physical health and safety as well as their mental well being will be affected by the proposed action. Perceptions, attitudes and beliefs must be treated as real with real consequences as they may occur at any stage. Based on stakeholder consultations, there is the genuine belief that their physical health and safety as well as their mental/psychological well being will be impacted by the proposed Project. There are already impacts on the mental/psychological well being of some stakeholders participating in the Project, with them explaining the social, economic and mental cost of fighting the proposed Project. There is also the concern for people who currently use The Spit and the Broadwater and impacts on their physical safety, in particular:» Cyclists and pedestrian usage;» Surfers crossing the Seaway to access the waves on South Stradbroke Island;» People fishing in small tinnies in the Seaway; and» Drift divers using the Seaway. There are also associated safety impacts with:» The increase in the type and number of vehicles on the roads in the immediate and regional study areas;» Pollution from the cruise ships; and» Pollution from the marina precinct. There is also the concern from VMR with the perception of the closure of the Seaway. According to VMR, the Seaway is unable to be closed as they and other emergency vessels require access at all times in emergency situations. If there is an emergency situation, it is the opinion of VMR representatives that the cruise ship will have to stand off until the emergency rescue has been completed. 110

150 There is also the potential impact of on public safety from the cruise ships caused by:» Disease (sexually transmitted and communicable) from cruise ship passengers mixing with the population in the immediate and regional study areas;» Increased violence potentially caused by cruise ship passengers mixing with the population in the immediate and regional study areas; and» Perception of the Gold Coast becoming a terrorism target if there is a military ship at the cruise ship terminal. All these impacts are considered to be significant, with the highest impact from the cruise ships and associated terminal Changes in leisure opportunities An increase or decrease in leisure/recreational opportunities within the community due to a change in the management of a natural resource area or the development of a new recreation facility. There will be significant changes to leisure opportunities associated with The Spit and the Broadwater. Impacts will be focused on current types of leisure activities taking place on The Spit, in the Broadwater and in the Seaway, refer to Table 33. Table 33 Use The Spit Cyclists Changes in Leisure Opportunities Temporary/Short Term Impact Permanent Impact Pedestrians Swimming Fishing Surfing Diving Dog walking Educational The Broadwater Tinnies Jet skis Sailing boats Powered boats 111

151 Use Diving Outriggers Fishing Swimming The Seaway Tinnies Jet skis Sailing boats Powered boats Outriggers and kayaks Fishing Swimming Diving Surfing Temporary/Short Term Impact Permanent Impact The changes to leisure activities on The Spit are considered to be highest for the cruise ship and associated terminal and the marina precinct. This is because of the permanency and type of impacts (through loss of access and change in use). All of the groups will be impacted by the construction of the proposed project, with variations of impacts during operation:» Cyclists will be impacted through the road works associated with the proposed project. During construction access will be modified to allow for construction to take place, however alternative routes will be provided (as per the Construction Traffic Management Plan). After construction cyclists will be able to cycle the full length of The Spit, with dedicated cycle paths around the northern end of The Spit (refer to the yellow sections on the concept design, Figure 2.» Pedestrians will be impacted similar to the cyclists for construction and operation. Pedestrian access during operation will be restricted in the cruise ship area due to there being a building where previously there wasn t one. Pedestrians will have access to the cruise ship terminal and wharf area as per the safety and security restrictions (these are expected to be similar to an airport where people can walk through the building but restricted from certain areas for safety and security reasons). Pedestrians will have access to the wharf area when a cruise ship is not berthed.» Swimming will be impacted depending on the location of where people are swimming. Swimming in the marine stadium will not be able to take place during the construction of the marina precinct nor during operation making it a 112

152 permanent impact. People will still be able to swim from the western arm of The Spit however this may be impacted during construction.» Fishing will be impacted both from the land and from vessels in the Broadwater and the Seaway. These impacts will vary during the construction and operational phases of the project. Fishing from boats During capital dredging will be taking place limiting access to the Broadwater and Seaway for safety reasons. During operation there will be restricted access to the Seaway and Broadwater when a cruise ship is entering, at the wharf and exiting. Fishing from land During construction access to the southern training wall will be restricted for the construction of the cruise ship terminal. During the operation of the cruise ship terminal access to the wharf will only be restricted when a cruise ship is entering, at the wharf and exiting. The wharf will be accessible for fishing from at all other times (subject to safety and security). Although these impacts are for only short time frames, they are considered permanent due to the loss of access to the southern training wall (where the proposed cruise ship will be).» Surfers who access the waves off South Stradbroke Island (by crossing the Seaway 87 ) will be directly impacted through loss of access during the times a cruise ship is entering, docked and leaving. The access will be temporarily restricted with the Seaway fully accessible at all other times. There may also be access restrictions to the Seaway depending on which organisation manages the area (e.g. a Port Authority). Surfers access the waves off Main Beach will not have their access impacted on.» Diving will be permanently impacted through the restricted access to the Broadwater and the Seaway and also the impacts on the marine ecosystems (refer to the EIS for details on the impact on the marine ecosystem). If diving is still able to be undertaken, it will be restricted during the time that a cruise ship is entering, berthing and existing the area due to the noise.» Dog walking will be impacted similar to the cyclists and pedestrians. Access will still be available to the western arm of The Spit and to Main Beach. There will be a permanent impact with the loss of the dog exercise area (where dogs can be off the leash but under supervision).» Educational programs will be impacted by the construction phase of the project with reduced access to the Seaway and southern training wall. As the educational programs do not use the marine stadium, they will not be impacted by the work. Other educational programs through primary and secondary schools maybe impacted if they utilise the ecosystem associated with the marine stadium.» Tinnies, jet skis, outriggers, kayaks, sailing and motor boats will be impacted through the construction and maintenance of the proposed project through 87 Either by paddling across or by taking the water taxi. 113

153 restricted access to the Broadwater and the Seaway. There may also be access restrictions to the Seaway depending on which organisation manages the area (e.g. a Port Authority). 7.8 Community Infrastructure Needs Community infrastructure needs means changes in everything from kilometres of roads to greater sewerage capacity to the need for more police units that might be altered as a result of a development Project. This cluster includes change in land use Impact on Community Services and Facilities The increase or decrease in the requirements for and supply of basic infrastructure services and facilities within the community as a result of the proposed action. There isn t expected to be a high impact on community services and facilities from either the construction or operational workforces. This is due to the relatively high numbers and variety of service provided in the regional study area Land Acquisition and Disposal Refer to the EIS Report Effects on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage The possible destruction, diminution or alteration of one or more of the known cultural/historical/sacred or archaeological resources within the assessment area as a result of the proposed action. Based on consultations with Kalwun Development Corporation, review of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Report and review of the Non Indigenous cultural heritage report, there will not be any impacts on the Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage of The Spit. 7.9 Summary There are a number of social impacts identified with the proposed Project, including but not limited too:» The balance of the economic and social gains of the construction and operation of the proposed Project versus the loss of public open space, access to the project area (and associated recreational activities) and opportunities for businesses that currently use the project area. 88 Burdge, R. J. (2004) A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press p

154 » A change in the amount of people who use of the area and the activities they undertake.» The potential change of employment opportunities and business opportunities from existing local businesses (e.g. dive industry and glass bottom boat tours versus the potential economic benefit and employment from the visiting cruise ships and the marina precinct.» The reduction in the amount of public open space which is freely accessible to all members of the community pre project.» The change in general public access to the project area. A change from the preproject area which was fully accessible to all members of the community. To only allowing access to certain sections of the community to certain areas (those that are employed or who utilise the area as part of the construction and/or operation of the proposed Project).» Impacts on associated traffic volumes and congestion not only on Seaworld Drive, but also in the immediate study area (in particular including the Gold Coast Highway and the Sundale Bridge.» Safety impacts in relation to: Access to the Seaway and Broadwater for surfers, divers, small boats and other users; Potential pollution of the waterways from the cruise ships and the vessels using the marina precinct; Diseases and potential violence created by cruise ship passengers and military personnel. There appears to be a polarization of attitudes toward the proposed Project, with most people in the immediate and regional study areas having an opinion on whether the Project should go ahead or not. Based on SIA consultations, it has become evident that the proposed Project needs to be broken down into its key components:» The Cruise Ship Terminal With the most polarization on the cruise ship terminal whether it should be constructed and operated or not;» Marina precinct Most people agree with the concept of the marina precinct, but the issue of contention is where it could be relocated, or whether the berths should be absorbed into existing marinas;» The Boat Ramp Facility Upgrading of the boat ramp facility received little opinion; and» Upgrade of the Public Facilities The majority of people agreed with the need to upgrade the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. 115

155 8. Significance of Impacts 8.1 Introduction Each social impact identified in Section 7, has a level of significance. This section applies each social impact against a significance matrix to identify the level of its significance. The social impact significance matrix is in Appendix T. 8.2 Significance of Social Impacts Prior to Mitigation and Enhancement This section sets out the significance of social impacts prior to any mitigation or enhancement strategies being applied. Table 34 provides a summary of the social impact significance, each ranking is then explained in more detail further in the Section. Refer to Appendix V for the SIA Significance Matrix and methodology for ranking social impacts.. Legend for Social Impact Significance Table Code Level of Significance Colour HS Highly Significant Social Impact Red MS Moderately Significant Social Impact Yellow SS Slightly Significant Social Impact Blue NS Not Significant Social Impact Green 116

156 Table 34 Summary Social Impact Significance Prior to Mitigation and Enhancement 89 SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Population Impacts Population Change NS NS NS NS Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers (includes opportunities for employment and unemployment) SS SS NS NS Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents NS MS MS SS Relocation of individuals and families NS NS MS NS Impact on housing NS NS NS NS Community/Institutional Arrangements Formation of attitudes towards the Project (includes community values) MS MS MS SS Interest group activity HS HS HS MS Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) MS MS HS SS Industrial diversification NS HS HS SS Living and family wage NS NS NS NS Enhanced economic inequalities NS SS SS NS Changes in occupational opportunities NS SS SS NS Communities in Transition 89 HS Highly Significant Social Impact; MS Moderately Significant Social Impact; SS Slightly Significant Social Impact; NS Not Significant Social Impact 117

157 SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Presence of an outside agency NS MS SS NS Inter organisational cooperation SS MS MS NS Introduction of new social classes NS SS SS SS Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area HS HS HS NS Presence of weekend residents NS SS MS SS Individual and Family Level Impacts Current impacts on individuals and families MS HS HS SS Disruption in daily living and movement SS MS MS SS Disruption of social networks NS SS MS SS Perception of public safety MS HS SS SS Changes in leisure opportunities MS HS HS MS Community Infrastructure Needs Change in community infrastructure NS NS NS NS Land acquisition and disposal n/a n/a n/a n/a Impact on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage NS NS NS NS 118

158 8.3 Ranking of Social Impacts Population Impacts Population impacts refers to the change in the number, density and distribution of people, the rate of influx or out migration and any changes in the composition in residence, age and gender Population Change The magnitude and rate of population change is a driving force behind community infrastructure and service requirements and may be a major determinant of other financial and social impacts. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Low Low Low Low Magnitude Small Small Small Small Significance NS NS NS NS The population change is considered not to be significant for all components of the proposed project:» A low sensitivity because of the number of people to be employed would not impact on the housing, community services and facilities, schools etc in the immediate, regional or State study areas.» A small magnitude because there would only be minor or temporary impacts on the local and regional economy This equates to a not significant impact. 119

159 8.3.2 Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers Many social impacts can be traced to the number and occupational composition of construction, operational and/or dismantle workers. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Low Low Magnitude Moderate Moderate Small Small Significance SS SS NS NS Dredging/Seaway The influx of a construction and operational dredging workforce received:» A low sensitivity because of the existing and previous dredging programs taking place in the immediate and regional study area (therefore not introducing a new occupation and the low number of people who would be brought into the area due to their employment);» A small magnitude because there would only be minor or temporary impacts on the local and regional economy, because employees stay on the dredging vessels and would only be expected to disembark in Brisbane. This equates to a not significant impact. The outflux of workers (or direct/indirect unemployment) as a result of the capital and maintenance dredging in the Seaway received:» A medium sensitivity because of the impacts on attractions of local significance which relates to local tourism economy; and» A moderate magnitude because of the permanent impacts on the local economy. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact. Because of the variance in significance between the influx and outflux of workers associated with the dredging of the Seaway, the higher level of significance has been chosen to represent the social impact overall. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The influx of a construction and operational cruise ship (and associated industry) workforce received:» A low sensitivity because it is expected that the construction and operational workforces would be sourced from the immediate and regional study areas, and the 120

160 type of employment is consistent with current employment and business types in the immediate and regional study areas.» A small magnitude because there would only be minor or temporary impacts on the local and regional economy This equates to a not significant impact. The outflux of workers (or direct/indirect unemployment) as a result of the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal received:» A medium sensitivity because of the impacts on attractions of local significance which relates to local tourism economy; and» A moderate magnitude because of the permanent impacts on the local economy. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact. Because of the variance in significance between the influx and outflux of workers associated with the cruise ship terminal, the higher level of significance has been chosen to represent the social impact overall. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The influx of a construction and operational workforce (and associated industry) associated with the marina precinct received:» A low sensitivity because it is expected that the construction and operational workforces would be sourced from the immediate and regional study areas, and the type of employment is consistent with current employment and business types in the immediate and regional study areas.» A small magnitude because there would only be minor or temporary impacts on the local and regional economy This equates to a not significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The influx of a construction and operational workforce associated with the upgrade of public facilities received:» A low sensitivity because it is expected that the construction and operational workforces would be sourced from the immediate and regional study areas, and the type of employment is consistent with current employment and business types in the immediate and regional study areas.» A small magnitude because there would only be minor or temporary impacts on the local and regional economy This equates to a not significant impact. 121

161 8.3.3 Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents refers to a permanent but seasonal increase or decrease in population resulting from opening or closing an existing recreational facility or seasonal home development. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High High Medium Magnitude n/a Moderate Moderate Moderate Significance NS MS MS SS Dredging/Seaway There will be no presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with dredging (both capital and maintenance dredging), automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be a presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the cruise ships, this has been interpreted to:» A high sensitivity because of the permanent impact on attractions of national or regional significance (e.g. theme parks 90, casino, beaches, sporting events 91 or Gold Coast Hinterland);» A moderate magnitude because of the: moderate temporary impact on the regional economy including food and beverage, tourism and recreation; and moderate temporary impacts on the local economy (food and beverage, tourism and recreation). This equates to a moderate significant positive impact. However, as the tourism industry on the Gold Coast has been established for years and has limited seasonal impacts, it is expected that these impacts will be able to be managed effectively. 90 Dreamworld, Sea World, Movie World or Wet n Wild 91 Indy and equestrian events 122

162 Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be a presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the marina precinct due to people accessing their boats in the marina or utilising the marina commercial area, this has been interpreted to:» A high sensitivity because of the permanent impact on attractions of national or regional significance (e.g. theme parks 92, casino, beaches, sporting events 93 or Gold Coast Hinterland);» A moderate magnitude because of the: moderate temporary impact on the State and regional economy including marine, food and beverage, tourism and recreation; and moderate temporary impacts on the local economy (marine, food and beverage, tourism and recreation. This equates to a moderate significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be an increase in the number of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the upgrading of public facilities (Doug Jennings Park, associated areas of northern end of The Spit and the boat ramp facilities, this has been interpreted to:» A medium sensitivity because of the impacts on attractions of local significance, public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude because of the substantial impact on local social or cultural impacts. This equated to a slightly significant positive social impact Relocation of individuals and families The number of persons who will be relocated from their present homes, either voluntary or involuntary, as a result of the proposed project or development. 92 Dreamworld, Sea World, Movie World or Wet n Wild 93 Indy and equestrian events 123

163 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a n/a Medium n/a Magnitude n/a n/a Moderate n/a Significance NS NS MS NS Dredging/Seaway There will be no relocations due to the dredging in the Seaway, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be no relocations due to the dredging in the Seaway, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be a requirement to relocate of vessels (and the people who live on them) permanently moored or anchored in the Marine Stadium. The Marine Stadium is meant to be used as a short term anchorage, however based on the observational survey it appears that people are living on their vessels in the area. Therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderate significant negative social impact. There will also be negative cumulative impacts associated with the relocation of vessels to other safe anchorages with similar features of the Marine Stadium, for example crowding of other safe anchorages and pressure on affordable accommodation if there isn t other options for people who live in the Marine Stadium due to it being cost free. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be no relocations associated with the boat ramp facilities and improved public facilities, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. 124

164 8.3.5 Impact on housing Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a Low Low n/a Magnitude n/a Small Small n/a Significance NS NS NS NS Dredging/Seaway There will be no impact on housing in the immediate and regional study area associated with dredging (due to the dredging contractors staying on the dredge during operation) for both capital and maintenance dredging, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be a limited impact on housing from the cruise ship passengers and military personnel. If the port is a transit port this will be due to the limited time it is predicted that the cruise ship/military vessel will be at the wharf. This has been interpreted to:» A low sensitivity because of the impact on businesses (i.e. hotels);» A small magnitude because of the moderate temporary impacts on the local economy. This equates to a not significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be a limited impact on housing from people using the marina precinct due to the boat owners either already living in the immediate or regional study areas, living on their boats. This has been interpreted to:» A low sensitivity because of the impact on businesses (i.e. hotels);» A small magnitude because of the moderate temporary impacts on the local economy. This equates to a not significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be no impact on housing in the immediate and regional study area associated with upgrading of public facilities based on the assumption that the people 125

165 undertaking this work will already be accommodated, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. 8.4 Ranking of Social Impacts Community/Institutional Arrangements Impacts on community/institutional arrangements refers to the changes in attitudes and values, the emergence of interest groups as well as in local government and employment opportunities for all citizens Formation of attitudes towards the project Attitudes means the positive and negative feelings, beliefs or positions expressed by residents in the community regarding the proposed project or development. The formation of attitudes towards the proposed project are based in the strong and passionate values of The Spit, as set out in Section 6.5:» With the most polarisation on the cruise ship terminal whether it should be constructed and operated or not;» Most people agree with the concept of the marina precinct, but the issue of contention is alternative locations or the berths absorbed into existing marinas;» Upgrading of the boat ramp facility received little opinion; and» The majority of people agreed with the need to upgrade the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Large Significance MS MS MS SS Dredging/Seaway Due to the identified community value of the Seaway as identified by SIA stakeholders, the impact of the proposed dredging (both capital and maintenance):» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent (through the required maintenance dredging) impacts on the national, State and regional economy (including tourism and recreation). This equates to a moderately significant negative impact. 126

166 Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Due to the identified community value of the Seaway and the proposed cruise ship terminal (there is cross over with Doug Jennings Park):» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent (through the required maintenance dredging) impacts on the national, State and regional economy (including tourism and recreation). This equates to a moderately significant negative impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the identified community value of the Marine Stadium:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent (through the required maintenance dredging) impacts on the national, State and regional economy (including tourism and recreation). This equates to a moderately significant negative impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Due to the identified community value of the Doug Jennings Park and the Broadwater:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderate significant positive impact Interest group activity Interest groups and organisations are identifiable forces active in the community that represent the views of their membership which stand to gain or lose by the proposed action. Interest groups play an important role in shaping community responses any also assist community leaders in the mitigation/enhancement process. There has been one interest group set up based on the proposed development at The Spit, Save Out Spit Alliance. SOSA has been actively protesting against the propose Project. The significance of impacts is based on their participation in SIA focus groups. 127

167 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity High High High Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Large Significance HS HS HS MS Dredging/Seaway Based on feedback from SOSA:» A high level of sensitivity due to impacts on national or regional significance;» A large magnitude to the substantial permanent social impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Based on feedback from SOSA:» A high level of sensitivity due to impacts on national or regional significance;» A large magnitude to the substantial permanent social impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Based on feedback from SOSA:» A high level of sensitivity due to impacts on national or regional significance;» A large magnitude to the substantial permanent social impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Based on feedback from the SOSA:» A medium sensitivity due to the impacts on public open spaces and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent social impacts at the State and regional level. 128

168 This equates to a moderate significant impact Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) The presence (or absence) of legal mandates for development, planning, zoning by local, State and Commonwealth governments that have jurisdiction within the proposed project area. This section has been expanded to address the change in land and water use associated with the proposed project. While taking into consideration that the development of the proposed project will have to address the GCCC Planning Scheme because of the material change in use (MCU) and it is for a is a commercial use (refer to the EIS for further details). Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium High Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Moderate Significance MS MS HS SS Dredging/Seaway Due to the change in public use of the seaway caused by dredging:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent impacts on the State and regional economy (annual maintenance dredging will be required). This equates to a moderately significant negative impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Due to the change in public use of the seaway caused by cruise ship terminal:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent impacts on the State and regional economy. This equates to a moderately significant negative impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the change in public use of the Marine Stadium and the Broadwater cause by the marina precinct:» A high sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of regional significance; 129

169 » A large magnitude due to the substantial permanent impacts on the State and regional economy (annual maintenance dredging will be required). This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the change in public use of the Doug Jennings Park and the Broadwater caused by the upgrading of public facilities:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial social impacts. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact Industrial Diversification Industrial diversification refers to the number and variety of private sector industries within a project area. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High High Medium Magnitude n/a Large Large Moderate Significance NS HS HS SS Dredging/Seaway Dredging of the Seaway already occurs, so is not a diversification of industry. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Due to the dramatic change (development) of the area from a public open space used for various recreation purposes to a cruise ship terminal:» A high sensitivity due to the impact as a national and regional significant attraction;» A large magnitude due to the substantial, permanent impact on the national, State and regional economy (including tourism). This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the change in the use of the area from a public open space used for various recreation purposes to a marina precinct: 130

170 » A high sensitivity due to the impact as a national and regional significant attraction;» A large magnitude due to the substantial, permanent impact on the national, State and regional economy (including tourism). This equates to a highly significant negative impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the upgrading of the public facilities and associated increase in use of the Broadwater (with the upgrading of the boat ramp facilities):» A medium sensitivity due to impacts on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent impacts on State and regional economy (including tourism and recreation) This equates to a slightly significant positive impact Living and Family Wage A living/family wage refers to the degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed project or development match the job skills of the unemployed in the project area. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Significance NS NS NS NS Dredging/Seaway Due to the limited employment and the expectation that any of the wages associated with the dredging (capital and maintenance) of the Seaway would be less than the average total average income for the regional study area $32,328, therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impact on residents;» A negligible magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impact for the regional and local economy. Equating to a not significant impact. 131

171 Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Due to the limited employment and the expectation that any of the wages associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal would be less than the average total average income for the regional study area $32,328, therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impact on residents;» A negligible magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impact for the regional and local economy. Equating to a not significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the limited employment and the expectation that any of the wages associated with the construction and operation of the marina precinct would be less than the average total average income for the regional study area $32,328, therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impact on residents;» A negligible magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impact for the regional and local economy. Equating to a not significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the limited employment and the expectation that any of the wages associated with the upgrading of public facilities (construction and maintenance) would be less than the average total average income for the regional study area $32,328, therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impact on residents;» A negligible magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impact for the regional and local economy. Equating to a not significant impact Enhanced Economic Inequalities The enhanced economic inequalities relates to the degree to which the employment opportunities of the proposed project match the job skills of the unemployed in the immediate and regional study area. 132

172 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity High High High High Magnitude Negligible Small Small Negligible Significance NS SS SS NS Dredging/Seaway Due to the limited and restricted employment on the dredges for capital and maintenance dredging:» A high sensitivity due impact on vulnerable people (i.e. unemployed);» A minor or no social impacts. This equates to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be opportunities for the employment of skilled and unskilled unemployed people from the immediate and regional study area as part of the construction of the cruise ship terminal (and associated industries). There may also be limited employed associated with the operation of the cruise ship terminal (and associated industries):» A high sensitivity due impact on vulnerable people (i.e. unemployed);» A small magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impacts of the regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be opportunities for the employment of skilled and unskilled unemployed people from the immediate and regional study area as part of the construction of the marina precinct (and associated industries). There may also be limited employed associated with the operation of the marina precinct (and associated industries):» A high sensitivity due impact on vulnerable people (i.e. unemployed);» A small magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impacts of the regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. 133

173 Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the limited opportunity for employment associated with the upgrading and maintenance of the public facilities:» A high sensitivity due impact on vulnerable people (i.e. unemployed);» A minor or no social impacts. This equates to a not significant impact Changes in Occupational Opportunities The degree to which the proposed project or development will alter the occupational profile of the impacted community. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Negligible Moderate Moderate Negligible Significance NS SS SS NS Dredging/Seaway There will be limited change in the occupation opportunities associated with the capital and maintenance dredging due to the limited and restricted employment opportunities, so:» A medium sensitivity due to impacts on employment;» A negligible magnitude due to the negligible or undetectable social impacts and the regional economy. This equates to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be greater opportunity for direct and indirect occupational opportunities associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal (and associated industries), therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impacts on employment;» A moderate magnitude due to the moderate temporary or permanent impact on the State and regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. 134

174 Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be greater opportunity for direct and indirect occupational opportunities associated with the construction and operation of the marina precinct (and associated industries), therefore:» A medium sensitivity due to impacts on employment;» A moderate magnitude due to the moderate temporary or permanent impact on the State and regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be limited change in the occupation opportunities associated with the upgrading of the public facilities, so:» A medium sensitivity due to impacts on employment;» A negligible magnitude due to the negligible or undetectable social impacts and the regional economy. This equates to a not significant impact. 8.5 Ranking of Social Impacts Communities in Transition Communities in transition refers to changes in community image, the alteration in community power structure with the arrival or departure of business or government agencies and any conflict that might arise between local residents and newcomers or even outsiders as of the result of a development project or policy change Presence of an Outside Agency The taking up permanent (or departure) in the project area of a government agency or private sector business which has not been previously been in the community and whose management and control comes from outside the area. There will be a number of new businesses associated with the proposed Project, at this stage it is not known who will;» Develop the proposed Project;» Own the proposed Project;» Operate the proposed Project;» Which companies will utilise the proposed Project (both the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct); and» How the businesses will operated the facilities (outside of the legislative and regulatory requirements). 135

175 The following significance of social impacts has been based on the following assumptions:» The developer of the project will be Australian based;» The owner of the proposed project will be Australian based;» The operators of the project will based in the regional study area;» The companies utilising the proposed cruise ship terminal will be internationally based (due to the size of the cruise ships) and the people utlising the marina precinct will be both Australian and international; and» The businesses and agencies operating in the facilities will be Australian based (e.g. customs, quarantine, chandlery, cafés etc). Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Low High Medium n/a Magnitude Small Moderate Moderate n/a Significance NS MS SS NS Dredging/Seaway The presence of an international based dredge for the capital dredging and an Australian dredge for the maintenance and emergency dredging:» A low sensitivity due to the type business and limited employment from the immediate and regional study areas;» A small magnitude due to the minor temporary or permanent impacts on the regional economy. This equates to a not significant social impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The presence of international owned cruise ships:» A high sensitivity due to the cruise ships passengers utilisation of attractions of national and regional significance;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent impacts on the regional economy. This equates to a moderately significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The presence of an Australian based developer and operator, plus usage of the marina precinct of local to international vessels: 136

176 » A medium sensitivity due to the impact on residents, impacts on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent impacts on the local economy. This equates to a slightly significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) It is assumed in this SIA that the upgrading of the public facilities (both construction and operation) will be undertaken by existing businesses in the immediate and regional study area or the Gold Coast City Council will be funded to undertake the works. This makes the ranking of the impact of an outside agency for this component not applicable and the ranking to be not significant in relation to the impacts associated with the presence of an outside agency Inter organisational cooperation The degrees to which regulatory, planning and proponent organisations and agencies are able to work together and share common developmental policy goals. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Moderate Medium Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Moderate Small Significance SS MS MS NS Dredging/Seaway Due to the legislative requirements (e.g. the requirement to obtain a permit to remove seagrass and associated environmental monitoring regimes), there will need to be high level of inter agency coordination for the dredging of the seaway at the State level:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the moderate, temporary or permanent impact on the regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway Due to the requirement of regular participation in the running of the cruise ship terminal of commonwealth and state agencies, there will need to be high level of inter agency coordination: 137

177 » A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial, permanent social impacts at national, State and regional level. This equates to a moderately significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the legislative requirements (e.g. the requirement to obtain a permit to remove seagrass and associated environmental monitoring regimes), there will need to be high level of inter agency coordination for the dredging of the marina precinct and its operation at the State level:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the moderate, temporary or permanent impact on the regional economy. This equates to a slightly significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be less legislative requirements for the upgrade of public facilities at the northern end of The Spit, there will a requirement to meet GCCC policies and plans and the associated State policies and legislation:» A medium sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A small magnitude due to the permanent local impacts. This equates to a not significant impact Introduction of new social classes The appearance (or disappearance) of a group of people that either expand an existing social class or establish a new social class (based on education and income levels, occupation or lifestyle) in the community as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High Medium Medium Magnitude n/a Small Moderate Moderate Significance NS SS SS SS 138

178 Dredging/Seaway Due to the limited and restricted employment on the dredge for capital and maintenance dredging, there will be no interaction with the immediate and regional study area automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway Based on the demographic analysis of the immediate and regional study areas, the introduction of the cruise ship passengers and staff will not have an impact as an introduction of a new social class into the immediate and regional study area. Due to the demographics of the cruise ship passengers:» A high level of sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of national or regional significance;» A small magnitude due to the moderate temporary economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the demographics of the immediate and regional study area (people likely to have their boats at the proposed marina) and advice provided by SIA stakeholders on the demographics of super yacht owners:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the use of public space and waterways and impacts of local significance;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial permanent social and economic impacts at the regional level. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the current usage of Doug Jennings Park, the boat ramp and other public facilities at the northern end of The Spit there isn t expected to be any impact of the introduction of a new social class to these facilities. However there may be a change in the type and density of people using the facilities if the proposed project is developed:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the use of public space and waterways and impacts of local significance;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial permanent social and economic impacts at the regional level. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. 139

179 8.5.4 Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area The change in the traditional commercial/industrial (private) or public sector focus of a community as a result of the proposed project. A change in focus would apply once a project is in operation or after the abandonment phase. These impacts have been ranked based on the impacts at the project area level (not the regional) Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity High High High Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Small Significance HS HS HS NS Dredging/Seaway Due to the introduction of major dredge works and an annual maintenance dredging program (for 6 weeks) and provision for one emergency dredge per year:» A high level of sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of national or regional significance (i.e. the seaway);» A large magnitude due to substantial permanent social and economic impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant impact. There are positive impacts through increased access through the Seaway after dredging has occurred however the negative impacts include reduction in the variety of marine ecosystems in the swing basin (in front of Wave Break Island) and in the Seaway, reducing the existing commercial opportunities for diving, fishing and other tourist activities (e.g. glass bottom boat). Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway Due to the change of a perceived natural environment focus to a commercialised or industrial focus:» A high level of sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of national or regional significance (i.e. the seaway);» A large magnitude due to substantial permanent social and economic impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant impact. There are both positive and negative impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed cruise ship terminal and associated cruise ships. The area 140

180 will undergo a much needed upgrade, allowing access to the northern end of The Spit 24/7 through increased security. However this will be at the cost of the existing natural values SIA stakeholders described so passionately through their participation in the SIA focus groups. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the change of a perceived natural environment focus to a commercialised or industrial focus:» A high level of sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of national or regional significance (i.e. the seaway);» A large magnitude due to substantial permanent social and economic impacts at the State and regional level. This equates to a highly significant impact. There are both positive and negative social impacts associated with the change of industrial focus of the marine stadium, they are reflective of those set out for the cruise ship terminal. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the upgrade of facilities at Doug Jennings Park, the boat ramp facilities etc will retain the same industrial/commercial focus:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A small magnitude due to a permanent social impacts. This equates to a not significant impact Presence of weekend residents The influx of weekend and short term visitors who do not have a permanent home in the community. The Gold Coast already has a significant proportion of its population present for weekend for tourism and recreational purposes. In 2001 to 2002 the Gold Coast region attracted 3.5 million domestic (mainly Brisbane and Sydney) and international visitors. 141

181 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Small Moderate Large Moderate Significance NS SS MS SS Dredging/Seaway Dredging will impact on the presence of weekend residents due to the assumption that a proportion of them will use the Seaway during their stay, however due to the frequency (annually) and time frames (6 weeks) of maintenance dredging there is not expected to be a high impact:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A small magnitude due to a permanent social impacts. This equates to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The cruise ship terminal will impact on the type of visitor and their purpose for using the northern end of The Spit. There will be a reduction in the presence of weekend residents during construction however, weekend will be attracted to see or use the proposed cruise ship terminal:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The marina precinct will impact on the type of visitor and their purpose for using the northern end of The Spit. There will be a reduction in the presence of weekend residents during construction however, weekend will be attracted to see or use the proposed the marina precinct and associated facilities:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. 142

182 This equates to a moderately significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The upgrades of the public facilities will have a negative impact during construction however it is expected that there will be an increase in weekend residents using the areas after construction:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant positive impact. 8.6 Ranking of Social Impacts Individual and Family Level Impacts Individual and family level impacts refers to changes to family structure, individual social relations and how an impact even is perceived to change the daily lives of individuals and families Current impacts on individuals and families This section focuses on the impact of participation of individuals and families in the EIS (as recorded in the community consultation database and participation in the SIA focus groups) process and associated government processes and the identified community values. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High High Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Large Moderate Significance SS HS HS SS Dredging/Seaway There has been a moderate level of impact due to the participation relating to the dredging of the Seaway:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways; 143

183 » A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway There has been a high level of impact due to the participation relating to the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal:» A high level of sensitivity due to the impact on attractions of regional significance;» A large magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a highly significant negative social impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There has been a high level of impact due to the participation relating to the construction and operation of the marina precinct:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There has been a moderate level of impact based on participation relating to the upgrading of public facilities at the northern end of The Spit:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact Disruption in daily living and movement The changes or disruptions in routine daily living and work activities caused by alteration to the visual environment, noise and odour levels, transportation routes or the amount of vehicular traffic resulting from the proposed project or development. The disruption of daily living relates to the environmental impacts of the proposed project and how they will impact on people s day to day living in the immediate and regional study areas. 144

184 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Large Moderate Significance SS MS MS SS Dredging/Seaway There will be a moderate level of impact due environmental impacts relating to the dredging (capital and maintenance) of the Seaway:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway There will be a moderate level of impact due to environmental impacts relating to the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be a moderate level of impact due to environmental impacts relating to the construction and operation of the marina precinct:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be a moderate level of impact due environmental impacts relating to the upgrading and maintenance of the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit: 145

185 » A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open space and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the impact of substantial social and economic impacts. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact Disruption of social networks The termination or disruption of normal community social interaction patterns (including friendship and kin relations) by the project activity. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Small Moderate Large Moderate Significance NS SS MS SS Dredging/Seaway Due to the frequency (annually) and time frames (6 weeks) of maintenance dredging there is not expected to be a high impact on the disruption of social networks associated with the dredging:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A small magnitude due to a permanent social impacts. This equates to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway Due to the construction of the cruise ship terminal and its operation having an impact on an area which is used by families and other groups of people to continue their social networks:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent social impacts This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the impact of construction and operation of the marina precinct on an area which is used highly for maintaining social networks: 146

186 » A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the construction and maintenance of the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit, there will be an impact on an area which is used by families and other groups of people to continue their social networks, initially it could be a negative impact during construction however a permanent long term positive impacts are expected:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent social impacts This equates to a slightly significant positive impact Perception of public safety A perception, attitude or belief on part of community residents that their physical health and safety as well as their mental well being will be affected by the proposed action. Perceptions, attitudes and beliefs must be treated as real with real consequences as they may occur at any stage. Based on SIA stakeholder consultations there is a genuine belief that their physical health and safety as well as their mental/psychological well being will be impacted by the proposed project. These impacts relate to the change in use of The Spit and their associated impact. While the SIA stakeholders perception of risk associated with public safety is perceptual in nature, their fears should not be dismissed as irrational and therefore unimportant. If there is a wide spread belief that the project will endanger the mental and physical health of present and future generations, community acceptance of and support for the project will be less enthusiastic. Citizens will weigh the potential benefits of the project to the community against their perceptions of associated risk Burdge, R.J. (2004) A Community Guide to (3 rd edition) Social Ecology Press p

187 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High Medium Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Moderate Significance MS HS MS SS Dredging/Seaway There is a moderate level of concern for public safety associated with the dredging, in particular the safety of surfers crossing the seaway to access South Stradbroke Island and divers who dive in the seaway and associated Broadwater:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway There is a very high level of concern for public safety associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal. In particular:» The safety of surfers crossing the seaway to access South Stradbroke Island;» Divers who dive in the seaway and associated Broadwater (e.g. Wave Break Island)» The potential closure of the Seaway when a cruise ship is entering impacts on the requirement of VMR and other emergency organisations to undertake rescues etc;» An increase in the number of type of vehicles using the roads in the immediate and regional study areas;» The health impacts of cruise ship passenger and military personnel on the immediate and regional study areas;» The potential increase in violence from cruise ship passenger and military personnel on the immediate and regional study areas; and» Pollution from the cruise ships. Therefore:» A high sensitivity due to the impacts on health and safety;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a highly significant negative social impact. 148

188 Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There has been less concern about the public safety associated with the marina precinct as compared to the cruise ship terminal, however there are some public safety fears associated with:» The potential pollution impacts from the vessels in the marina;» An increase in the number of vessels using the Broadwater and Seaway; and» An increase in the number and type of vehicles using the roads in the immediate and regional study areas. Therefore:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There was little concern about the public safety associated with the upgrading of public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. These equated to:» An increase in the number of vessels using the Broadwater and Seaway; and» An increase in the number and type of vehicles using the roads in the immediate and regional study areas. It was also identified that there would be a increase in safety of The Spit due to the increased usage of the area for both night and day purposes (including increased lighting for building and vessel security). Therefore:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways;» A moderate sensitivity due to the substantial permanent social impacts. This equates to a slightly significant negative social impact Changes in leisure opportunities An increase or decrease in leisure/recreational opportunities within the community due to a change in the management of a natural resource area or the development of a new recreational facility. The number and type of leisure recreational opportunities available to a community has an important influence on resident s satisfaction. Natural resource based recreation may add to or change the nature available leisure opportunities. 149

189 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High High Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Large Significance MS HS HS MS Dredging/Seaway The dredging of the Seaway (both capital and maintenance) will have an impact leisure opportunities, due to the:» Change in access;» Change in environmental qualities;» Impacts on local businesses; and» Change in hydrodynamics. Therefore:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways and businesses;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderately significant negative social impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The cruise ship terminal (construction and operation) will have an impact on the current leisure opportunities associated with the Seaway, Doug Jennings Park and the Broadwater:» Surfing;» Diving;» Dog walking;» Recreational activities (e.g. relaxing);» Fishing;» Etc Therefore:» A high sensitivity due to the impacts on health and safety and attractions of regional significance;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a highly significant negative social impact. 150

190 Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Similar to the cruise ship terminal, the marina precinct will have an impact on the current leisure opportunities associated with the Marine Stadium:» Boating;» Swimming;» Dog walking;» Recreational activities (e.g. relaxing);» Etc. Therefore:» A high sensitivity due to the impacts on health and safety and attractions of regional significance;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a highly significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be an increase in the number of people using Doug Jennings Park and the Broadwater due to the upgrade of public facilities at the northern end of The Spit, therefore:» A medium level of sensitivity due to the impact on public open spaces and waterways and businesses;» A large magnitude due to the substantial and permanent social impacts. This equates to a moderately significant positive social impact. 8.7 Ranking of Social Impacts Community Infrastructure Needs Impacts on community infrastructure needs refers to changes in everything from kilometers of roads to greater sewerage to the need for more police units that might be altered as a result of a development project. 151

191 8.7.1 Change in community infrastructure The increase or decrease in the requirements for and supply of basic infrastructure services and facilities within the community as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a Low Low Medium Magnitude n/a Small Small Moderate Significance NS NS NS SS Dredging/Seaway There will be no impact on community services and infrastructure in the immediate and regional study area associated with dredging (due to the dredging contractors staying on the dredge during operation) for both capital and maintenance dredging, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be a limited impact on community services and infrastructure from the cruise ship passengers and military personnel. If the port is a transit port this will be due to the limited time it is predicted that the cruise ship/military vessel will be at the wharf. This has been interpreted to:» A low sensitivity because of the impact on businesses (i.e. hotels);» A small magnitude because of the moderate temporary impacts on the local economy. This equates to a not significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater There will be a limited impact on community services and facilities from people using the marina precinct due to the boat owners either already living in the immediate or regional study areas, living on their boats. This has been interpreted to:» A low sensitivity because of the impact on businesses (i.e. hotels);» A small magnitude because of the moderate temporary impacts on the local economy. This equates to a not significant impact. 152

192 Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The upgrade of the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit has a direct positive impact on community services and facilities:» A medium sensitivity due to the impacts on attractions of local significance;» A moderate magnitude due to the substantial, permanent social impacts. This equates to a slightly significant impact Land acquisition and disposal Refer to the EIS report Impact on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage The possible destruction, diminution or alteration of one or more of the known cultural/historical/sacred or archaeological resources within the assessment area as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a n/a n/a n/a Magnitude n/a n/a n/a n/a Significance NS NS NS NS Based on consultations with Kalwun Development Corporation there are no areas of Indigenous cultural heritage that will be impacted by the project. There are not structures listed on heritage registers for the northern end of The Spit. There for the impacts are not significant. However the SOSA Tree planted at Doug Jennings Park should be taken into consideration when upgrading the park facilities. 8.8 Summary There are a range of significant impacts for the proposed Project, from not significant to highly significant impacts. After application of the mitigation and enhancement strategies there was some amendments to the significance of some social impacts. Not all social impacts can be mitigated or enhanced. In particular, the removal 14 hectares of public open space (for the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct) of the type contained in the Project area can not be replaced. 153

193 Highly significant impacts after the application of mitigation/management and enhancement strategies are:» Presence of zoning and planning/change in use (includes changes of use) for the marina precinct;» Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area for the dredging, cruise ship terminal and marina precinct; and» Impacts on individuals and families for the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct. 154

194 9. Mitigation/Management and Enhancement of Social Impacts 9.1 Introduction This section of the SIA sets out:» Potential alternatives to each component of the proposed project (based on consultation with SIA stakeholders);» Identified social impacts and recommended mitigation and enhancement strategies; and» Identification of social impacts if the mitigation/management or enhancement strategies are applied. 9.2 Alternatives As set out in Section the Project Stakeholders raised a number of alternatives for the Notional Seaway Project. These alternatives are listed below and have not undergone any environmental, social or economic analysis Alternatives for the Cruise Ship Terminal There were two alternatives recommended for the cruise ship terminal:» Not to build the cruise ship terminal; and» To promote the advantages of the cruise ship terminal in Brisbane due to it facilities, close proximity to the Gold Coast and access to the international airport Alternatives for the Marina precinct There were a number of alternatives for the marina precinct:» To relocate the marina to the western side of Sea World;» To relocate the marina to the western side of the Broadwater, opposite Australia Fair shopping centre; and» To allocate the recreational, commercial and super yacht berths to other existing marinas Alternatives for the upgrading of the boat ramp and other public facilities There were no alternatives recommended for the upgrade of the boat ramp and the upgrading of other public facilities. All Project Stakeholders agreed that the facilities 155

195 required upgrading and were supportive of it. There were a number of recommendations made in relation to the upgrading, including:» Redesign the boat ramp car park so it is not used by local and regional youth as a racing car track; and» Reduce the amount of traffic on Seaworld Drive by incorporating hard stand facilities into the Marina precinct. 9.3 Mitigation/Management and Enhancement Strategies Table 35 sets out recommendations for the mitigation/management and enhancement strategies for the social impacts identified in Section 7. A mitigation/management strategy is something that the proposed developer/operator can undertake to minimise the negative impacts and improve the positive impacts. The mitigation and management strategies are transferred from the SIA and included in the Draft Environmental Management Plan (EMP). The Final EMP comprises part of the approvals documentation. A enhancement strategy is something that is outside of the scope of a developer/operator but will also assist in minimising the negative impacts and improved the positive impacts. Because these are not part of the scope of the developer/operator they are not included in the EMP. However, they could be implemented by a government or non government agency to further minimise negative impacts or improve positive impacts. 156

196 Table 35 Mitigation and Enhancement Strategies for Social Impacts SIA Variable and Impact Population Impacts Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party) Population Change Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers» Construction and operational workforces» Direct employment and unemployment 95 Refer to There is not requirement for a mitigation/management strategy as the population change impacts are considered not significant To ensure that companies and contractors from the immediate and regional area have a higher priority over companies and contractors from interstate (as long as they are matched for skills and experience). This can be achieved by meeting the Queensland State Development, Trade and Innovation s Local Industry Policy 95. For the construction of related infrastructure to meet the Queensland Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (2000) 96, particularly in the areas of:» Environmental management;» Workforce management training and skills development State Government Building and Construction Contracts Structured Training Policy (10% Policy) Workplace health and safety To ensure that companies and contractors from the immediate and regional area have a higher priority over companies and contractors n/a n/a For the compensatory habitats to be developed and introduced in consultation with local 96 Refer to 157

197 SIA Variable and Impact unemployment» Indirect employment and unemployment Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) regional area have a higher priority over companies and contractors from interstate (as long as they are matched for skills and experience). This can be achieved by meeting the Queensland State Development, Trade and Innovation s Local Industry Policy 97. For the construction of related infrastructure to meet the Queensland Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (2000) 98, particularly in the areas of:» Environmental management;» Workforce management training and skills development State Government Building and Construction Contracts Structured Training Policy (10% Policy) Workplace health and safety For compensatory habits to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies employed. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses, e.g. the diving industry and glass bottom boat. To ensure that companies and contractors from the immediate and regional study area have a higher priority over companies and contractors from interstate (as long as they are matched for skills Enhancement (Other Party) and introduced in consultation with local businesses directly impacted by the proposed Project (i.e. diving and glass bottom boat). For Queensland Tourism and GCCC to support the businesses in the transition period through promotional activities to inter and intra state and international tourists (and possibly to the cruise ship operators and the marina managers). For the compensatory habitats to be developed and introduced in consultation with local businesses directly impacted by the proposed 97 Refer to 98 Refer to 158

198 SIA Variable and Impact Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents» Seasonal (leisure) residents utilising the attractions of local, regional and State significance.» Increase in people using the Project area during different times of the day Relocation of families and individuals» Displacement of people living in the Marine Stadium Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) and experience). This can be achieved by meeting the Queensland State Development, Trade and Innovation s Local Industry Policy 99. For compensatory habits to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies to be put in place. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses, e.g. the diving industry and glass bottom boat. For cruise ship passengers and military personnel to sign a Code of Conduct. The proposed Code of Conduct will set out guidelines for interactions with the local and regional permanent population and advise of local laws and customs. To employ CPTED principles in the detailed design of the Project area (as per the GCCC policy in the Planning Scheme). For a reasonable amount of time be provided to people to relocate their vessels from the Marine Stadium. For the operators of the proposed marina to market their services to the vessel owners who currently use the Marina Stadium. For the operators of the proposed marina to allow a number of berths, of various sizes to be leased out on a short term basis for Enhancement (Other Party) Project (i.e. diving and glass bottom boat). For Queensland Tourism and GCCC to support the businesses in the transition period through promotional activities to inter and intra state and international tourists. n/a For the appropriate government services to be made available for the increased number of people using the area (e.g. Police). For the creation of a similar safe anchorage in the Broadwater and for it to remain free of charge for short term stays. Queensland Transport to promote other safe anchorages with similar conditions in the Broadwater where people can stay on their 99 Refer to 159

199 SIA Variable and Impact Impact on housing» Impact on the homeless people living in the Federation Walk Area» Accommodation pressures in immediate study area Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) berths, of various sizes to be leased out on a short term basis for boats travelling through the Broadwater on longer range passages and ocean/coastal yacht races. There is no mitigation/management strategies within the scope of the Developer/Operator, except to follow the EMP. For Tourism Queensland to work with GCCC, the accommodation and tourist facilities to ensure they maximise the benefits of the cruise ships, military vessels and super yachts. vessels for short stays. Enhancement (Other Party) For further investment to be made into affordable housing by the relevant State Government agencies in the immediate and regional study areas. n/a Community/Institutional Arrangements (including community values) Formation of attitudes towards the Project» Impact on community values For there to be an acknowledgement of the range of community values associated with the Project area, and to take these values into consideration when undertaking the detailed planning of the Project. To include the community organisations participating in the EIS and other government process in the detailed design of the Project. Increased feedback to community organisations on submissions provided to the State government in relation to the Project. To include the community organisations participating in the EIS and other government process in the detailed design of the Project. Interest group activity» Formation of interest groups n/a 100 n/a Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning 100 The creation of project specific interest groups and the participation of existing interest groups in an EIS process is evidence of social impacts but itself is not a social impact to be mitigated or enhanced. 160

200 SIA Variable and Impact and zoning activity) Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party)» Change planning and zoning activity Refer to EIS» Loss of public open space The loss of public open space (technically) only relates to the proportionally small loss of space from Doug Jennings Park. This is being mitigated through the upgrading of the Park facilities and other public facilities at the northern end of The Spit (e.g. upgrading of the boat ramp). n/a» Loss of opportunities for events and future use Change in how people use the Project area The companies (and/or port authority) to acknowledge the events that are currently taking place in the Project area and to encourage and support these and other events taking place in the future.» To promote the activities that can still be carried out in the Project area and any changes to that may have occurred. For example:» fishing is welcomed on the cruise ship wharf, except when a cruise ship in berthing, at the wharf or disembarking the wharf); and» There will be continued access to Doug Jennings Park (accept for some restrictions during construction for safety reasons).» Access will remain to the southern training wall (north of the proposed cruise ship terminal); and» Access will remain to the western arm of The Spit (accept during upgrade construction for safety reasons).» The increase in the facilities as part of the Project: n/a n/a 101 CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, this is a policy included in GCCC Planning Scheme. 161

201 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator)» Provision of boardwalk facilities around the marine stadium;» Extension and upgrading of cycleways and footpaths along Seaworld Drive;» Increase in the number of boat ramps and parking facilities; and» Increased safety of the area using CPTED 101. Enhancement (Other Party)» Closure of the Seaway It will be a responsibility of the vessel owners to check if there is a cruise ship or military vessel planned to enter the Seaway. There should be easily accessible information for when cruise ships or military vessels will be entering and leaving the seaway and the details of the reduced access. For the channel on the western side of Wave Break Island to be dredged and used as an alternative route to the main north south channel in the Broadwater 102.» Increased usage of Doug Jennings Park» Loss of access to public areas when a cruise ship is docked at the wharf For VMR and other emergency vessels to have priority access to the Seaway even when a cruise ship is planned to enter or leave this is for emergency purposes. To ensure there is sufficient space for parking for people using the upgraded Doug Jennings Park regardless of whether there is a cruise ship/military vessel in or not. To ensure that Doug Jennings Park remains accessible regardless of the type of vessel using the cruise ship terminal (including the military vessels). There is no mitigation for the loss of access while a cruise ship is at the cruise ship terminal (and the reduction in space in the Seaway). It will be a responsibility of the vessel owners to check if there is a cruise ship or military vessel planned to enter the Seaway. There should be easily accessible information available for when cruise ships or military vessels will be entering and leaving the seaway and n/a MSQ Notice to Mariners, boat owners can register to receive e mail updates of Notice to Mariners through the MSQ website This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 162

202 SIA Variable and Impact» Potential bottleneck in the north south channel of the Broadwater the details of the reduced access. Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Clear communication could include (but not limited to:» Advertisements in the local newspapers;» Notices sent to marinas (with the request that they are displayed and published through marina marketing material (e.g. members newsletters) It will be a responsibility of the vessel owners to check if there is a cruise ship or military vessel planned to enter the Seaway. There should be easily accessible information for when cruise ships or military vessels will be entering and leaving the seaway and the details of the reduced access. Enhancement (Other Party) For the channel on the western side of Wave Break Island to be dredged and used as an alternative route to the main north south channel in the Broadwater 103. Industrial diversification» Change in the variety of private sector industries» Introduction of new industries into the Project area For compensatory habitats to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies to be put in place. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses, e.g. the diving industry and glass bottom boat. For there to be an acknowledgement of the range of community values associated with the Project area, and to take these values into consideration when undertaking the detailed planning of the For the compensatory habitats to be developed and introduced in consultation with local businesses directly impacted by the proposed Project (i.e. diving and glass bottom boat) For Queensland Tourism and GCCC to support the businesses in the transition period through promotional activities to inter and intra state and international tourists. Tourism Queensland and GCCC to support the development of new industries in the Project area, to act as facilitators between the cruise ship 103 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 104 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 163

203 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management Enhancement Project. (Developer/Operator) (Other Party) operators and the local businesses. Living and family wage Enhanced economic inequalities» Opportunities for the unemployed To include the community organisations participating in the EIS and other government process in the detailed design of the Project. To ensure that the wages paid are equal to or higher than the industry standard, decreasing the chance of families being below the poverty line. To ensure that the wages paid are equal to or higher than the industry standard. For potential businesses and contractors to have policies of employing local apprentices and trainees from the immediate and regional study area for both the construction and operational stages of the proposed Project. For the construction of related infrastructure to meet the Queensland Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (2000) 105, particularly in the areas of:» Environmental management;» Workforce management training and skills development State Government Building and Construction Contracts Structured Training Policy (10% Policy) Workplace health and safety Where new employees are required, businesses and contractors to work with the Job Network Providers to ensure the unemployed in the immediate and regional study areas have increased opportunities for employment. n/a n/a n/a 105 Refer to 164

204 SIA Variable and Impact Changes in occupational opportunities Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party)» Opportunities for local businesses to support the cruise ships and the marina precinct» Potential loss of existing businesses Communities in Transition Presence of an outside agency» Introduction of businesses or expansion of existing businesses Tourism Queensland and GCCC to support the development of new industries in the Project area, to act as facilitators between the cruise ship operators and the local businesses. For compensatory habitats to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies to be put in place. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses, e.g. the diving industry and glass bottom boat. For new and existing businesses to work with the community organisations through the detailed design, construction and operational stages of the Project. For the construction of related infrastructure to meet the Queensland Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (2000) 107, particularly in the areas of:» Environmental management; n/a For the compensatory habitats to be developed and introduced in consultation with local businesses directly impacted by the proposed Project (i.e. diving and glass bottom boat) For Queensland Tourism and GCCC to support the businesses in the transition period through promotional activities to inter and intra state and international tourists. n/a 106 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 107 Refer to 165

205 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator)» Workforce management training and skills development State Government Building and Construction Contracts Structured Training Policy (10% Policy) Workplace health and safety Enhancement (Other Party) Inter organisational cooperation Introduction of new social classes» Increase in the proportion of some socio economic groups Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area» Change in the focus of the Project area, from natural to industrial/commercial For the management of the Project area to be finalised including policing and maintenance dredging to be finalised as much as possible prior to construction taking place. This is part of a required Detailed Feasibility Assessment required for any large project prior to financial close. To ensure that all public space areas in the Project area remain free of charge and accessible to all members of the immediate and regional community, e.g. don t have to pay to enter or use Doug Jennings Park or the western arm of The Spit. Revegetating areas of open space surrounding the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct with native species (similar to those found on South Stradbroke Island). For an environmental/educational facility to be constructed as part of the cruise ship terminal, highlighting:» The history of The Spit and organisations and key individuals that have been associated with it; and» The environmental qualities of the area and environmental n/a n/a n/a 166

206 SIA Variable and Impact Presence of weekend (leisure) residents» Relocation of vessels from the Marine Stadium» Change in use of the Project area of weekend (leisure) residents Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) management programs in place. For a reasonable amount of time be provided to people to relocate their vessels from the Marine Stadium. Queensland Transport to promote other safe anchorages with similar conditions in the Broadwater where people can stay on their vessels for short stays. For the operators of the proposed marina to market their services to the vessel owners who currently use the Marina Stadium. For the operators of the proposed marina to allow a number of berths, of various sizes to be leased out on a short term basis for boats travelling through the Broadwater on longer range passages and ocean/coastal yacht races. To promote the activities that can still be carried out in the Project area and any changes to that may have occurred. For example:» Fishing is welcomed on the cruise ship wharf, except when a cruise ship in berthing, at the wharf or disembarking the wharf); and» There will be continued access to Doug Jennings Park (accept for some restrictions during construction for safety reasons).» Access will remain to the southern training wall (north of the proposed cruise ship terminal); and Enhancement (Other Party) For the creation of a similar safe anchorage in the Broadwater and for it to remain free of charge for short term stays. For the creation of another smooth water swimming area with shade (including off leash dog area) to replace the loss of the Marine Stadium. For this area to have similar access qualities as the current Marine Stadium. 108 CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, this is a policy included in GCCC Planning Scheme. 167

207 SIA Variable and Impact Individual and Family Level Impacts Current impacts on individuals and families Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator)» Access will remain to the western arm of The Spit (accept during upgrade construction for safety reasons). The increase in the facilities as part of the Project:» Provision of boardwalk facilities around the marine stadium;» Extension and upgrading of cycleways and footpaths along Seaworld Drive;» Increase in the number of boat ramps and parking facilities; and» Increased safety of the area using CPTED 108. Enhancement (Other Party)» Participation in the EIS Increased feedback to community organisations on submissions provided to the State government in relation to the Project. n/a To include the community organisations participating in the EIS and other government process in the detailed design of the Project.» Community disillusionment in the Queensland State government» Potential increase of people suffering from n/a There is no replacement for the Project area in regard for mental/psychological and general healthy well being. Increased feedback to community organisations on submissions provided to the State government in relation to the Project. To include the community organisations participating in the EIS and other government process in the detailed design of the Project. For GCCC and Queensland Health to promote other locations with the similar health and well being factors as The Spit. To promote local 168

208 SIA Variable and Impact mental/psychological and general health problems Disruption in daily living and movement Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Development of a Project Community Engagement Charter. The Community Engagement Charter is to be signed by the developer/ owner/contractor 109 GCCC and the relevant department(s) of the State Government. Invite the community organisations that have been involved in the EIS process and other government process to develop the Community Engagement Charter in partnership, so all community issues can be addressed. The Community Engagement Plan is to have a number of components:» An overriding Charter that is to be signed;» A Community Consultation Plan (that will contract all parties involved in the Project for both the construction and operational stages (including sub contractors) and will include an implementation plan; and» A Community Monitoring Program (refer to Section 10.3) It is critical that the Project Stakeholders are actively included in the development of the Project Community Engagement Charter. Enhancement (Other Party) being factors as The Spit. To promote local health and well being courses being offered by Queensland Health and GCCC. For GCCC to open up more areas for off leash dog parks that include access to the surf beaches. n/a 109 This includes the relevant port authority. 169

209 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party)» Traffic land Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP. Involvement of Main Beach Progress Association in the development and implementation of the Traffic Management Plan for both construction and operation.» Traffic marine Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP.» Noise impacts Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP.» Impacts on the marine environment (including water quality and South Stradbroke Island surfing break) Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP.» Air impacts Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP.» Visual impact (including light) Refer to EMP. Refer to EMP. Disruption of social networks» Usage of Project area for family and social functions» Loss of access to the Marine Stadium For the operating businesses and GCCC to promote the upgrade of Doug Jennings Park, its accessibility, car parking once the upgrade is complete. There is no mitigation for the loss of this area, however there are some alternatives in the concept design:» Retained access to the western arm of The Spit;» Provision of boardwalk facilities around the marine stadium; n/a For the creation of another smooth water swimming area with shade (including off leash dog area) to replace the loss of the Marine Stadium. For this area to have similar access qualities as the current Marine Stadium CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, this is a policy included in GCCC Planning Scheme. 111 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 170

210 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator)» Extension and upgrading of cycleways and footpaths along Seaworld Drive;» Increase in the number of boat ramps and parking facilities; and» Increased safety of the area using CPTED 110. Enhancement (Other Party)» Increase in type and level of traffic Perception of public safety» Impacts on the well being of people who current use The Spit» Safety of cyclists and pedestrians» Safety of surfers crossing the Seaway Refer to EMP. Involvement of Main Beach Progress Association in the development and implementation of the Traffic Management Plan for both construction and operation. There is no replacement for the Project area in regard for mental/psychological and general healthy well being. For the safety of cyclists and pedestrians to be given a high priority in the Traffic Management Plan. Continuation and upgrading to existing cycleway and walkways to the northern end of The Spit and around the Marine Stadium. To actively promote when (dates and times) the cruise ships and military vessels will be using the cruise ship terminal. Refer to EMP For GCCC and Queensland Health to promote other locations with the similar health and well being factors as The Spit. To promote local health and well being courses being offered by Queensland Health and GCCC. For GCCC to open up more areas for off leash dog parks that include access to the surf beaches 112. Refer to EMP Refer to EMP 112 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 171

211 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party)» Safety of drift divers For drift divers requirements to be taken into consideration when locating compensatory habitats. Refer to EMP» Increase in the type and level of vehicles on the roads in the immediate and regional study areas» Pollution from the cruise ships and the vessels in the marina precinct» Temporary closure of the seaway» Perceived/potential for sexual transmitted diseases and communicable diseases from cruise ship passengers and military personnel» Perceived/potential increased violence from cruise ship Refer to EMP. Involvement of Main Beach Progress Association in the development and implementation of the Traffic Management Plan for both construction and operation. Refer to EMP. It will be a responsibility of the vessel owners to check if there is a cruise ship or military vessel planned to enter the Seaway. There should be easily accessible information available for when cruise ships or military vessels will be entering and leaving the seaway and the details of the reduced access. For VMR and other emergency vessels to have priority access to the Seaway even when a cruise ship is planned to enter or leave this is for emergency purposes. For Queensland Health to undertake random environmental health audits of the cruise ships. For medical staff on the cruise ships and military vessels to report any diseases required to be reported by a General Practitioner in Australia under current legislation. n/a Refer to EMP Invite the community organisations who have been involved in the EIS process and other government process to be involved in the hazard and risk assessments.. For the channel on the western side of Wave Break Island to be dredged and used as an alternative route to the main north south channel in the Broadwater 113. The development of Cruise Ship Passenger and Military Vessel Personnel Code of Conducts for visiting the Gold Coast. The development of Cruise Ship Passenger and Military Vessel Personnel Code of Conducts for visiting the Gold Coast. 113 This enhancement strategy has not undergone any assessment or investigation, either environmental, economic, social or engineering. 172

212 SIA Variable and Impact passengers and military personnel» Perceived/potential of military vessels as targets for terrorism Changes in leisure opportunities» Change to current types of leisure activities Community Infrastructure Needs Change in community infrastructure Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Development of Maritime Security Plan as per the Maritime Transport Security Act 2003 Where possible for compensatory habitats and locations to be provided by the relevant Local and State Governments. It is not possible to mitigate for the loss of public open space and the specific recreational (leisure) opportunities that are provided in the Project area. However there are some alternatives in the concept design:» Retained access to the western arm of The Spit;» Provision of boardwalk facilities around the marine stadium;» Extension and upgrading of cycleways and footpaths along Seaworld Drive;» Increase in the number of boat ramps and parking facilities; and» Increased safety of the area using CPTED 114. As there will be no impacts on the change in community infrastructure no mitigation/management will be required. Enhancement (Other Party) visiting the Gold Coast. Refer to EMP n/a n/a Land acquisition and disposal n/a 115 n/a CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, this is a policy included in GCCC Planning Scheme. 173

213 SIA Variable and Impact Mitigation/Management (Developer/Operator) Enhancement (Other Party) Impact on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage To investigate the possibility of incorporating an Indigenous cultural centre in to the design of the proposed project. n/a 115 Refer to the EIS Report 116 Refer to the EIS Report 174

214 9.4 Significance of Social Impacts After Mitigation and Enhancement Strategies Employed This section sets out the significance of social impacts after the mitigation or enhancement strategies being applied (refer to Table 36). It is important to note that the movement in significance is dependant on the implementation of the mitigation/management and/or enhancement strategy. If the mitigation/management and/or enhancement strategy is not developed and implemented then the significance rating will revert back to that determined in Table 34. Refer to Appendix V for the SIA Significance Matrix. Legend for Social Impact Significance Table Code Level of Significance Colour HS Highly Significant Social Impact Red MS Moderately Significant Social Impact Yellow SS Slightly Significant Social Impact Blue NS Not Significant Social Impact Green 175

215

216 Table 36 Summary Social Impact Significance After Mitigation and Enhancement SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Population Impacts Population Change NS NS NS NS Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers (includes opportunities for employment and unemployment) NS NS NS NS Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents NS MS MS SS Relocation of individuals and families NS NS MS NS Impact on housing NS NS NS NS Community/Institutional Arrangements Formation of attitudes towards the Project (includes community values) MS MS MS SS Interest group activity HS HS HS MS Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) SS MS MS MS Industrial Diversification NS HS HS NS Living and family wage NS NS NS NS Enhanced economic inequalities NS SS SS NS Changes in occupational opportunities NS MS MS SS Communities in Transition Presence of an outside agency NS MS SS NS 177

217 SIA Variable Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Inter organisational cooperation SS SS SS NS Introduction of new social classes NS SS SS SS Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area HS HS HS SS Presence of weekend residents NS MS MS SS Individual and Family Level Impacts Impacts on individuals and families SS HS HS SS Disruption in daily living and movement SS SS SS SS Disruption of social networks NS SS MS SS Perception of public safety MS HS SS SS Changes in leisure opportunities MS HS MS MS Community Infrastructure Needs Change in community infrastructure NS NS SS SS Land acquisition and disposal n/a n/a n/a n/a Impact on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage NS NS NS NS 178

218 9.5 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Population Impacts Population impacts refers to the change in the number, density and distribution of people, the rate of influx or out migration and any changes in the composition in residence, age and gender Population Change The magnitude and rate of population change is a driving force behind community infrastructure and service requirements and may be a major determinant of other financial and social impacts. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Low Low Low Low Magnitude Small Small Small Small Significance NS NS NS NS The original ranking of population change as a social impact was considered to be not significant for all components of the project. Therefore no recommendation for a mitigation/management or enhancement strategy was made, resulting in the ranking after the mitigation/management or enhancement strategy to remain the same Influx or outflux of temporary and permanent workers Many social impacts can be traced to the number and occupational composition of construction, operational and/or dismantle workers. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Low Low Low Low Magnitude Small Small Small Small Significance NS NS NS NS The original ranking of the outflux temporary and permanent workers as a social impact was considered to be negative slightly significant for the dredging of the Seaway and the cruise ship terminal because of the impact on local businesses using these areas. 179

219 After the application of the compensatory habitats mitigation strategy, the impact is expected to be reduced to a not significant negative social impact for the dredging and cruise ship terminal. These impacts could be turned into a slightly significant positive social impact by the State Government (Queensland Tourism) and the Gold Coast City Council supporting the impacted businesses in the transition period from using the proposed dredged area to the compensatory habitats through supported promotions of the business to existing markets and the potential cruise ship operators. The mitigation strategy of ensuring that companies and contractors from the immediate and regional study areas to have priority over those from inter state is to ensure the proposed project will maintain the not significant impacts by:» Consistent with the Queensland State Development, Trade and Innovation s Local Industry Policy;» To support the economic growth in the Gold Coast region (e.g. food and beverage, marine and tourism); and» To maximise economic benefits to the immediate and regional study areas Presence of seasonal (leisure) residents The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents refers to a permanent but seasonal increase or decrease in population resulting from opening or closing an existing recreational facility or seasonal home development. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High High Medium Magnitude n/a Moderate Small Moderate Significance NS MS SS SS Dredging/Seaway There will be no presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with dredging (both capital and maintenance dredging), automatically allocating it to a not significant impact and not having a mitigation strategy. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the cruise ship terminal was originally considered to be a moderately significant positive social impact, to address the concern of some SIA stakeholders about the potential poor conduct of the cruise ship passengers and military personnel, the mitigation strategy of developing a Code of Conduct has been recommended as a mitigation strategy. 180

220 The Code of Conduct will be a set of guidelines for each cruise ship passenger or military personnel wishing to disembark to enjoy the attractions of local and regional significance. The Code of Conduct could outline:» Queensland laws;» Gold Coast history, norms and customs; and» Expected behaviour during the passengers stay in the Gold Coast region. The Code of Conduct could be developed into a welcoming event for all cruise ships and military vessels. The welcoming event could include a welcoming ceremony and guided tours from the local Indigenous groups and community organisations. Marina precinct/marine Stadium/ Broadwater The presence of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the cruise ship terminal was originally considered to be a moderately significant positive social impact and with no mitigation/management or enhancement strategy recommended, the rating has remained the same. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original rating of significance of impacts of seasonal (leisure) residents associated with the upgrading of other facilities was a slightly significant positive impact. To ensure this remains a slightly significant social impact it is recommended that Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles to be employed when undertaking the detailed design for the areas. This is to ensure the safety of the increased number and variety of users of the areas during the day and night Relocation of individuals and families The number of persons who will be relocated from their present homes, either voluntary or involuntary, as a result of the proposed project or development. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a n/a Medium n/a Magnitude n/a n/a Moderate n/a Significance NS NS MS NS 181

221 Dredging/Seaway There will be no relocations due to the dredging in the Seaway automatically allocating it to a not significant impact so no mitigation strategies have been developed. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway There will be no relocations associated with the cruise ship terminal automatically allocating it to a not significant impact so no mitigation strategies have been developed. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The impact of relocating vessels permanently or temporarily anchored or moored in the Marina Stadium is considered to be a moderately significant negative social impact prior to the application of mitigation strategies. The mitigation/management strategies recommended for this impact are limited for the developers in relation to the people who have their vessels permanently moored or anchored and who live on their vessels in the Marine Stadium. The strategies are limited due to the assumption that people have their vessels in the marine stadium because it is free and the costs associated with taking up berths at the proposed marina. There will also be cumulative impacts if the enhancement strategies are developed, with potential crowding at other safe anchorages with similar features as the Marine Stadium. After the application of the mitigation/management and enhancement strategies the impact will still remain a moderately significant negative impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be no relocations associated with the boat ramp and improved public facilities automatically allocating it to a not significant impact so no mitigation strategies have been developed Impact on housing Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a Low Low n/a Magnitude n/a Small Small n/a Significance NS NS NS NS 182

222 Dredging/Seaway There will be no impact on housing in the immediate and regional study area associated with dredging (due to the dredging contractors staying on the dredge during operation) for both capital and maintenance dredging, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact and no mitigation strategies have been developed. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway After the mitigation strategies have been applied for the population impact on housing, there is still expected to be a limited impact on housing from the cruise ship passengers and military personnel and to remain a not significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater After the application of mitigation strategies for the population impact on housing, it is expected that there will be a limited impact on housing from people using the marina precinct due to the boat owners either already living in the immediate or regional study areas, living on their boats. Therefore it will remain a not significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) There will be no impact on housing in the immediate and regional study area associated with upgrading of public facilities based on the assumption that the people undertaking this work will already be accommodated, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact and mitigation strategies have not been developed. 9.6 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Community/Institutional Arrangements Impacts on community/institutional arrangements refers to the changes in attitudes and values, the emergence of interest groups as well as in local government and employment opportunities for all citizens Formation of attitudes towards the project Attitudes means the positive and negative feelings, beliefs or positions expressed by residents in the community regarding the proposed project or development. The formation of attitudes towards the proposed project are based in the strong and passionate values of The Spit, as set out in Section 6.5:» With the most polarisation on the cruise ship terminal whether it should be constructed and operated or not;» Most people agree with the concept of the marina precinct, but the issue of contention is alternative locations or the berths absorbed into existing marinas;» Upgrading of the boat ramp facility received little opinion; and 183

223 » The majority of people agreed with the need to upgrade the public facilities at the northern end of The Spit. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Moderate Significance MS MS MS SS Dredging/Seaway The impact on community values for the Seaway and the impact dredging (both capital and maintenance) will have on them will remain a moderately significant negative impact, even after the application of mitigation strategies. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The impact of the construction and maintenance of a cruise ship terminal and associated cruise ships and their passengers will remain a moderately significant negative impact, even after the application of mitigation strategies. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The impact of the construction and operation of the marina precinct and associated loss of the Marina Stadium as a publicly accessible area (and the associated recreational activities that take place there) will remain a moderately significant negative impact, even after the application of mitigation strategies. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the upgrade of public facilities was a slightly significant positive impact, and this will remain the same even after the application of mitigation strategies Interest group activity The creation of a project specific interest group and their participation in the EIS process is evidence of social impacts, but is not a social impact to be mitigated or enhanced. 184

224 9.6.3 Change in land and marine use including (presence of planning and zoning activity) The presence (or absence) of legal mandates for development, planning, zoning by local, State and Commonwealth governments that have jurisdiction within the proposed project area. This section has been expanded to address the change in land and water use associated with the proposed project. While taking into consideration that the development of the proposed project will have to address the GCCC Planning Scheme because a there will be a material change in use (MCU) and it is for a is a commercial use (refer to the EIS for further detail). Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Large Large Significance SS MS MS MS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the impact the dredging would have on the current use of the Seaway was a moderately significant negative impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, it is considered to be a slightly significant negative impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway After the application of mitigation strategies, the impact of change of public use of the seaway caused by cruise ship terminal and cruise ships will remain moderately significant negative impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater After the application of mitigation strategies, the impact on the change in public use of the Marine Stadium and the Broadwater caused by the marina precinct will be decreased from a highly significant negative impact to a moderately significant negative impact due to the benefits of the marina and associated services. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) After the application of mitigation strategies it is expected that the original ranking of a slightly significant positive impact could be increased to a moderately significant positive impact. 185

225 9.6.4 Industrial Diversification Industrial diversification refers to the number and variety of private sector industries within a project area. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High High Medium Magnitude n/a Large Large Low Significance NS HS HS NS Dredging/Seaway The dredging of the Seaway is not a new industry as dredging already occurs in the Seaway. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The original ranking of the social impact of the industrial diversification caused by the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal was a highly significant negative social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies is still considered to be a highly significant negative social impact due to the impacts on high sensitivity and large magnitude of impacts. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impact of the industrial diversification caused by the construction and operation of the marine precinct was a highly significant negative social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies is still considered to be a highly significant negative social impact due to the impacts on high sensitivity and large magnitude of impacts. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impact of the industrial diversification caused by the upgrade of public facilities was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact, with the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to remain the same. 186

226 9.6.5 Living and Family Wage A living/family wage refers to the degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed project or development match the job skills of the unemployed in the project area. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Significance NS NS NS NS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the living and family wages associated with dredging was considered to be not significant and after the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be not significant. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The original ranking of the living and family wages associated with cruise ship terminal (construction and operation) was considered to be not significant and after the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be not significant. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the living and family wages associated with construction and operation of the marina precinct was considered to be not significant and after the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be not significant. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the living and family wages associated with construction and operation of the upgrading of public facilities was considered to be not significant and after the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be not significant. 187

227 9.6.6 Enhanced Economic Inequalities The enhanced economic inequalities relates to the degree to which the employment opportunities of the proposed project match the job skills of the unemployed in the immediate and regional study area. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity High High High High Magnitude Negligible Small Small Negligible Significance NS SS SS NS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the impact of enhanced economic inequalities for capital and maintenance dredging was considered to be not significant, after the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to remain the same. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The original ranking of the impact of enhanced economic inequalities for the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal was considered to be a slightly significant social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to remain the same. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the impact of enhanced economic inequalities for the construction and operation of the marina stadium was considered to be a slightly significant social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to remain the same. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the impact of enhanced economic inequalities for the construction and operation of the upgrade of public facilities was considered to be not significant, after the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to remain the same. 188

228 9.6.7 Changes in Occupational Opportunities The degree to which the proposed project or development will alter the occupational profile of the impacted community. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Negligible Large Moderate Moderate Significance NS MS SS SS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the changes in occupation opportunities related to the capital and maintenance dredging was considered to be not significant, after the application of mitigation strategies, it is still considered to be not significant. Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The original ranking of the changes in occupation opportunities related to the cruise ship terminal was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. After the application of mitigation and enhancement strategies it is considered to be a moderately significant positive impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the changes in occupation opportunities related to the marina precinct was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, it is still considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the changes in occupation opportunities related to the upgrade of public facilities was considered to be not significant. After the application of mitigation strategies it is considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. 189

229 9.7 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Communities in Transition Communities in transition refers to changes in community image, the alteration in community power structure with the arrival or departure of business or government agencies and any conflict that might arise between local residents and newcomers or even outsiders as of the result of a development project or policy change Presence of an Outside Agency The taking up permanent (or departure) in the project area of a government agency or private sector business which has not been previously been in the community and whose management and control comes from outside the area. There will be a number of new businesses associated with the proposed Project, at this stage it is not known who will;» Develop the proposed Project;» Own the proposed Project;» Operate the proposed Project;» Which companies will utilise the proposed Project (both the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct); and» How the businesses will operated the facilities (outside of the legislative and regulatory requirements). The following significance of social impacts has been based on the following assumptions:» The developer of the project will be Australian based;» The owner of the proposed project will be Australian based;» The operators of the project will based in the regional study area;» The companies utilising the proposed cruise ship terminal will be internationally based (due to the size of the cruise ships) and the people utlising the marina precinct will be both Australian and international; and» The businesses and agencies operating in the facilities will be Australian based (e.g. customs, quarantine, chandlery, cafés etc). 190

230 Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Low High Medium n/a Magnitude Small Moderate Moderate n/a Significance NS MS SS NS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts of the presence of an outside agency for capital and maintenance dredging was considered to be not significant and no mitigation strategies were developed, therefore it remains a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal and the presence of an outside agency was considered to be a moderately significant impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, it is still considered to be moderately significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and operation of the marine precinct was considered to be a slightly significant impact. After the application of the mitigation strategies, it is still considered to be slightly significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and operation of the upgraded public facilities was considered to be not applicable therefore not significant, no mitigation strategies were developed, so the ranking remains the same. 191

231 9.7.2 Inter organisational cooperation The degrees to which regulatory, planning and proponent organisations and agencies are able to work together and share common developmental policy goals. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Moderate Medium Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Moderate Small Significance SS SS SS NS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with inter organisational cooperation for capital and maintenance dredging was considered to be slightly significant. After the application of mitigation strategies it was still considered to be slightly significant. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the inter organisational cooperation for the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal was considered to be moderately significant. After the application of mitigation strategies it has been reduced to a slightly significant impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the inter organisational cooperation for the construction and operation of the marina precinct was considered to be moderately significant. After the application of mitigation strategies it has been reduced to a slightly significant impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the inter organisational cooperation for the construction and maintenance of the upgraded public facilities was considered to be not significant. After the application of mitigation strategies, it remains a not significant social impact. 192

232 9.7.3 Introduction of new social classes The appearance (or disappearance) of a group of people that either expand an existing social class or establish a new social class (based on education and income levels, occupation or lifestyle) in the community as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a High Medium Medium Magnitude n/a Small Moderate Moderate Significance NS SS SS SS Dredging/Seaway Due to the limited and restricted employment on the dredge for capital and maintenance dredging, there will be no interaction with the immediate and regional study area automatically allocating it to a not significant impact, this will remain the same even after the application of mitigation strategies. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the impact of the introduction of new social classes associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal, cruise ship passengers and military personnel was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. After the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the impact of the introduction of new social classes associated with the construction and operation of the marina precinct and associated vessels (including super yachts) was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. After the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the impact of the introduction of new social classes associated with the construction and maintenance of the upgraded public facilities and the people who could potentially use them was considered to be a slightly significant positive impact. After the application of mitigation strategies it is still considered to be a slightly significant positive impact (especially with the detailed design incorporating crime prevention through environmental design principles). 193

233 9.7.4 Changes in the commercial/industrial focus of the area The change in the traditional commercial/industrial (private) or public sector focus of a community as a result of the proposed project. A change in focus would apply once a project is in operation or after the abandonment phase. These impacts have been ranked based on the impacts at the project area level (not the regional). Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity High High High Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Small Significance HS HS HS NS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the dredging of the Seaway was highly significant, however there were both positive and negative impacts associated with it. After the implementation of mitigation strategies, there will still be positive and negative impacts and due to the high value the community places on the project area, they the ranking remains highly significant. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal and the presence of the cruise ships was considered to be highly significant with both positive and negative impacts. After the implementation of mitigation measures, there will still be positive and negative impacts, however due to the high value of the community places on the project area and the permanency of the impacts, the ranking remains highly significant. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and operation of the marine stadium was considered to be highly significant with both positive and negative impacts. After the implementation of mitigation measures, there will still be positive and negative impacts, however due to the high value of the community places on the project area and the permanency of the impacts, the ranking remains highly significant. 194

234 Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the upgrade of facilities at Doug Jennings Park, the boat ramp facilities etc will retain the same industrial/commercial focus. This equated to a not significant impact, this will remain the same even after the application of mitigation strategies Presence of weekend residents The influx of weekend and short term visitors who do not have a permanent home in the community. The Gold Coast already has a significant proportion of its population present for weekend for tourism and recreational purposes. In 2001 to 2002 the Gold Coast region attracted 3.5 million domestic (mainly Brisbane and Sydney) and international visitors. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Small Moderate Large Moderate Significance NS MS MS SS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the impacts associated with the presence of weekend residents was considered to be not significant in relation to the dredging of the Seaway. After mitigation strategies it remains to be a not significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the presence of weekend residents was considered to remain a moderately significant positive social impact after the application of the mitigation strategies, even though there will be temporary negative impacts during construction. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the presence of weekend residents was considered to remain a moderately significant positive social impact after the application of the mitigation strategies, even though there will be temporary negative impacts during construction. 195

235 Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the presence of weekend residents was considered to be slightly significant positive impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies for construction and operation, it is still considered to remain a slightly significant social impact. 9.8 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Individual and Family Level Impacts Individual and family level impacts refers to changes to family structure, individual social relations and how an impact even is perceived to change the daily lives of individuals and families Current impacts on individuals and families This section focuses on the impact of participation of individuals and families in the EIS (as recorded in the community consultation database and participation in the SIA focus groups) process and associated government processes and the identified community values. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High High Medium Magnitude Moderate Large Large Moderate Significance SS HS HS SS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the current impacts on individuals associated with the dredging of the seaway was a moderately significant negative social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, the ranking is reduced to a slightly significant impact. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the current impacts on individuals and families associated with the construction and operation of the proposed cruise ship terminal, associated cruise ships (military vessels) and cruise ship passengers (and military personnel) was considered to be a highly significant negative social impact. Because of the permanency of the proposed changes and their impact on the strongly held community values for the project area, it will remain a highly 196

236 significant negative social impact even after the implementation of mitigation strategies. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the current impacts on individuals and families associated with the construction and operation of the proposed marina precinct was considered to be a highly significant negative social impact. Because of the permanency of the proposed changes and their impact on the strongly held community values for the project area, it will remain a moderately significant negative social impact even after the implementation of mitigation strategies. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the current impacts on individuals and families associated with the upgrading of the public facilities was considered to be a slightly significant negative impact. This was because of the perception of linking of the potentially positive impacts to broader negative impacts of the other components of the proposed project. After the implementation of the mitigation strategies, the impacts will still remain slightly significant and negative impacts Disruption in daily living and movement The changes or disruptions in routine daily living and work activities caused by alteration to the visual environment, noise and odour levels, transportation routes or the amount of vehicular traffic resulting from the proposed project or development. The disruption of daily living relates to the environmental impacts of the proposed project and how they will impact on people s day to day living in the immediate and regional study areas. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Significance SS SS SS SS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the interruptions to the daily living and movement associated with the proposed dredging of the seaway was considered to be a slightly significant negative social impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies (as set out in the Environmental Management Plan, EMP), the 197

237 impacts will remain to be slightly significant negative social impacts, for both the capital and maintenance dredging. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the interruptions to the daily living and movements associated with the construction and operation of the proposed cruise ship terminal and associated cruise ships and cruise ship passengers was considered to be a moderately significant negative impact. After the implementation of mitigation measures (as set out in the EMP), the impacts will be reduced to slightly significant negative social impacts for both the construction and operational phases of the proposed project. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the interruptions to the daily living and movements associated with the construction and operation of the proposed marina precinct was considered to be a moderately significant negative social impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies (as set out in the EMP), the impact will be reduced to slightly significant negative impacts for both the construction and operational phases of the proposed project. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the construction and maintenance of the proposed upgraded public facilities was considered to be a slightly significant negative social impact. After the implementation of the mitigation strategies (as set out in the EMP), the impacts will remain to be slightly significant for both the construction and maintenance phases of the proposed project Disruption of social networks The termination or disruption of normal community social interaction patterns (including friendship and kin relations) by the project activity. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium Medium Medium Medium Magnitude Small Moderate Large Moderate Significance NS SS MS SS 198

238 Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the disruption of social networks associated with the dredging of the seaway were considered to be not significant, after the application of mitigation strategies, they are still considered to be not significant. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the disruption of the social networks associated with the construction and operation of the proposed cruise ship terminal and associated cruise ships and cruise ship passengers was considered to be a slightly significant negative social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, the impact is still considered to be a slightly significant negative impact due to the permanency of the impacts and uniqueness of the area and the social activities that revolve around using it. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of social impacts associated with the disruption of the social networks associated with the construction and operation of the proposed marina precinct was considered to be a moderately significant negative social impact. After the application of mitigation strategies, the impact is still considered to be a moderately significant impact because of:» Loss of space for families and friends who would use the marine stadium in a way that was unique to the space causing a negative social impact; and» The creation of areas for families and friends to maintain social networks through the development of the area into a different space, causing positive social impacts. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of social impacts associated with the disruption of the social networks associated with the construction and maintenance of the upgraded public facilities was considered to be a slightly significant positive social impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies, the social impact remains a slightly significant positive social impact Perception of public safety A perception, attitude or belief on part of community residents that their physical health and safety as well as their mental well being will be affected by the proposed action. Perceptions, attitudes and beliefs must be treated as real with real consequences as they may occur at any stage. Based on SIA stakeholder consultations there is a genuine belief that their physical health and safety as well as their mental/psychological well being will be impacted by 199

239 the proposed project. These impacts relate to the change in use of The Spit and their associated impact. While the SIA stakeholders perception of risk associated with public safety is perceptual in nature, their fears should not be dismissed as irrational and therefore unimportant. If there is a wide spread belief that the project will endanger the mental and physical health of present and future generations, community acceptance of and support for the project will be less enthusiastic. Citizens will weigh the potential benefits of the project to the community against their perceptions of associated risk 117. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High Medium Medium Magnitude Large Large Large Moderate Significance MS HS MS SS Dredging/Seaway Due to the perception of social impacts associated with the perception of public safety and the association with mental and physical safety, the original ranking of the moderately significant negative social impact associated with the capital and maintenance dredging of the seaway will remain the same, even after the implementation of mitigation strategies. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway Due to the perception of social impacts associated with the perception of public safety and the association with mental and physical safety, the original ranking of the highly significant negative social impact associated with the construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal, associated cruise ships (and military vessels) and cruise ship passengers (and military personnel) will remain the same, even after the implementation of mitigation strategies. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Due to the perception of social impacts associated with the perception of public safety and the association with mental and physical safety, the original ranking of the moderately significant negative social impact associated with the construction and operation of the marina precinct will remain the same, even after the implementation of mitigation strategies. 117 Burdge, R.J. (2004) A Community Guide to (3 rd edition) Social Ecology Press p

240 Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) Due to the perception of social impacts associated with the perception of public safety and the association with mental and physical safety, the original ranking of the slightly significant negative social impact associated with the construction and operation of the upgraded public facilities will remain the same, even after the implementation of mitigation strategies Changes in leisure opportunities An increase or decrease in leisure/recreational opportunities within the community due to a change in the management of a natural resource area or the development of a new recreational facility. The number and type of leisure recreational opportunities available to a community has an important influence on resident s satisfaction. Natural resource based recreation may add to or change the nature available leisure opportunities. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity Medium High High Medium Magnitude Large Large Moderate Large Significance MS HS MS MS Dredging/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the changes in leisure activities associated with the capital and maintenance dredging of the seaway was a moderately significant negative social impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies, the social impacts are still considered to be moderately significant and negative. Cruise Ship Terminal/Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the changes in leisure activities associated with the construction and operation of the proposed cruise ship terminal, cruise ships and associated cruise ship passengers was a highly significant negative social impact. After the implementation of the mitigation strategies, the social impacts are still considered to be highly significant and negative due to the permanency of the impacts and the number of people that will be impacted by them. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of social impacts associated with the changes in leisure activities associated with the construction and operation of the proposed marina precinct was 201

241 considered to be a highly significant negative impact. After the implementation of mitigation strategies and the introduction of positive changes to the boating and recreational facilities associated with the marine stadium, the impact rating has changes from highly significant to moderately significant negative social impact. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of social impacts associated with the construction and maintenance of the proposed upgrading of the public facilities was considered to be a moderately significant positive impact. After the implementation of mitigation and enhancement strategies, the ranking will still remain a moderately significant positive social impact. 9.9 Ranking of Social Impacts after mitigation and enhancement Community Infrastructure Needs Impacts on community infrastructure needs refers to changes in everything from kilometers of roads to greater sewerage to the need for more police units that might be altered as a result of a development project Change in community infrastructure The increase or decrease in the requirements for and supply of basic infrastructure services and facilities within the community as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a Low Medium Medium Magnitude n/a Small Moderate Moderate Significance NS NS SS SS Dredging/Seaway There will be no impact on community services and infrastructure in the immediate and regional study area associated with dredging (due to the dredging contractors staying on the dredge during operation) for both capital and maintenance dredging, automatically allocating it to a not significant impact therefore no mitigation strategies have been developed. 202

242 Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway The original ranking of social impacts associated with the change in community infrastructure as a result of the proposed construction and operation of the cruise ship terminal, cruise ships and associated cruise ship passengers was considered to be not significant. No mitigation strategies have been developed, therefore the ranking remains the same. Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the change in community infrastructure as a result of the proposed construction and operation of the marina precinct, was considered to be not significant. After the implementation of mitigation strategies there social impacts are considered to be slightly significant and positive, due to the upgrading of the surrounding areas of the marine stadium through increased tree planting and dedicated car parking on the western arm of The Spit. Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater (Other Boat Ramp Facilities and Improved Public Facilities and Amenities) The original ranking of the social impacts associated with the change in community infrastructure as a result of the upgrade of public facilities was considered to be a slightly significant positive social impact. After the implementation of mitigation and enhancement strategies, the ranking will remain the same Land acquisition and disposal Refer to EIS Report Impact on Indigenous and non Indigenous cultural heritage The possible destruction, diminution or alteration of one or more of the known cultural/historical/sacred or archaeological resources within the assessment area as a result of the proposed action. Dredging/ Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal/ Seaway Marina precinct/ Marine Stadium/ Broadwater Other/ Doug Jennings Park/ Broadwater Sensitivity n/a n/a n/a n/a Magnitude n/a n/a n/a n/a Significance NS NS NS NS Based on consultations with Kalwun Development Corporation there are no areas of Indigenous cultural heritage that will be impacted by the project. There are not 203

243 structures listed on heritage registers for the northern end of The Spit. There for the impacts are not significant and a mitigation strategy has not been developed Summary Not all of the social impacts caused by the proposed Project can be mitigated, managed or enhanced. In particular:» The removal of public open space for the cruise ship terminal;» The loss of public access to the marina precinct) of public space in the unique environment and location of The Spit. There are however mitigation and management measures recommended ensuring that any Project is developed (including detailed design, construction and operation) in a way that minimises the impact on the community living in the immediate and regional study areas. Key components of this include:» The development of a Community Engagement Charter (including a Community Consultation Program and Community Monitoring Program) to be developed between the Project developers/owners/contractors, the State Government, GCCC and the community organisations that have an interest in the Project;» For compensatory habitats to be created and established in appropriate smooth water areas prior to any Project associated works taking place and appropriate management strategies to be put in place. These compensatory habitats aim to support the local businesses that would lose marine habitat critical to the successful running of their businesses;» Tourism Queensland and GCCC to support the development of new industries in the Project area, to act as facilitators between the cruise ship operators and the local businesses;» Development and implementation of a comprehensive Traffic Management Plan for both construction and operation. The Traffic Management Plan should include all transport routes (not just access to Sea World Drive) and address safety concerns for cyclists and pedestrians;» Revegetating areas of open space surrounding the cruise ship terminal and the marina precinct with native species (similar to those found on South Stradbroke Island); and» To actively promote when (dates and times) the cruise ships and military vessels will be using the cruise ship terminal. 204

244 10. Monitoring of Social Impacts 10.1 Introduction The monitoring of social impacts is an important process to:» Validate if the social impacts predicted in this SIA actually occurred;» If social impacts other than those predicted in this SIA occur;» Provide a mechanism for the community organisations and others interested in the project (including State Government and GCCC) to check if mitigation strategies reduced the significance of social impacts; and» Provide a mechanism for the community organisations and others interested in the project (including State Government and GCCC) to check if enhancement strategies increased the positive impacts of the Project. GHD has recommended two monitoring programs that should be implemented together as they produce different results through different techniques, however all results are important Social Indicator Analysis Social indicator analysis relies on the demographic data collected and distributed in the Census by the ABS. The GCCC currently reviews this data and is documented in the Our Living City Report (GCCC 2005). Critical to the analysis of the social indicators used for the monitoring of social impacts is the review of the SIA variables and social indicators provided in this SIA. The SIA variables and social indicators in this report provide the base line data for which the monitoring of social impacts can be applied. Because of the significance of impacts on social well being related to this Project, GHD has identified a number of social indicators to be reviewed in the Social Indicator Analysis:» Community participation and social capital;» Community access;» Housing Choice; and» Crime. As the review of the social indicators is recommended to be the responsibility of the Project developer/ owner/contractor 118 in consultation with community organisations, 118 This includes the relevant port authority. 205

245 GCCC and the Department of Communities Regional Planner, it is recommended that a review of these social indicators takes place prior to any assessment is undertaken. As the census is undertaken and results released every 5 years, it is recommended that the Social Indicator Analysis also take place when the Census results are released Community Participation and Social Capital Trends in community participation provide an indication of levels of social capital of a community. GCCC recognise the importance of art, culture and recreation as contributors to social capital. Participation rates in art, culture and recreational activities across the Gold Coast region have remained stable over the last five years, however the rates of involvement in Surf Life Saving have experienced minor declines. Over 2150 community groups are established on the Gold Coast and include environmental, sporting, senior citizens and community service groups. Recreational and sporting groups account for the majority of members (56 percent), followed by community groups (33 percent), cultural groups (7 percent) and art and hobbies (4 percent). No data was available to terms of participation rates amongst the Gold Coast population, however Queensland recorded one of the lowest with 39.6 percent of the population. Trends in participation rates of surf lifesaving clubs remained steady between 1993 and 1999, however a drop in membership was evidenced for the year 1999 to This steady decline can be attributed to a reduction in the membership of senior age groups across the period 2001/02 and 2003/04. Utilisation rates of community centres have shown a usage rate of 30 percent that has remained steady between 2001 and In addition, membership of the Lions Club (which indicates community participation) has also remained steady with around 300 maintaining membership over the 1998 to 2000 period. Further, the number of residents who visit the Gold Coast Arts Centre remains stable. Overall, the social capital of the Gold Coast can be viewed as being in relatively good condition, with several points (such as the decline in surf lifesaving participation) that require monitoring. With the pressures of population growth and associated issues, improving levels of social capital will be an important focus for governments Community Access Accessibility to required community facilities and services is an important measure of social well being and the resilience of a community to withstand pressures. Issues of access have also been linked to social interaction and participation in the community. Library memberships can be used to indicate the proportion of people who access public facilities. In the Gold Coast region, library memberships have remained stable at around 40 percent of the total population. Comparatively, memberships amongst 206

246 Gold Coast residents are low. Data suggests an increase of 13.9 percent of people aged 17 years and younger for the year 2003/04. This may indicate an increase in levels of participation across the community. Gold Coast City has a higher rate (than both Queensland and Australia) of people receiving government pensions and allowances. In addition, the number of single parent families is increasing, while numbers receiving aged pensions have remained comparably stable. Accessibility becomes an increasingly important issue the further people live outside the coastal areas of the Gold Coast due to reduced servicing of such areas by public transport infrastructure. At present, accessibility of the more populated areas across the Gold Coast is adequate, however servicing of the areas on the urban fringe evidence lower rates of accessibility than the more densely populated areas. As such access to community resources is distributed in an ad hoc fashion, which has the potential to influence the overall provision of social infrastructure. This issue will be further impacted by the continued increases in population growth across the City Housing Choice Diversity of dwellings across Gold Coast City is clear, however the uneven distribution of housing types influences the affordability of housing and leads to additional flow on effects such as overcrowding. The utilisation 119 of housing in Gold Coast City has decreased from 47 percent to 43 percent over the period 1996 to Shortages in housing availability are seen in both the younger and older residents. In addition, households in Gold Coast City under housing stress 120 equates to 35 percent or 24,490 dwellings. In summary, housing availability, in particular affordable housing is an issue that reflects the growing diversity of the Gold Coast in terms of income. The Gold Coast can be viewed as a LGA that has the potential for a significant percentage of its residents to become increasingly deprived by the lack of choice of appropriate housing. Such deprivation has implications for other aspects of community including further reductions in affordable housing stock Crime Crime rates and perceived fear of crime has the potential to impact on participation rates on community members. Such reductions permeate all aspects of community life and affect people s willingness to become involved in an active community life. 119 Measured by Census data number of persons per dwelling by the number of bedrooms in dwelling 120 Refers to low income households (bottom 40 to 50 percent of household income) that spend more than 30 percent of their income on purchasing a home or refers to 25 percent of rental costs (GCCC 2005 p.58). 207

247 Suburbs such as Southport (located within the immediate study area) experienced high levels of crime during 1999/2000. It is interesting to note that there were no noteworthy changes in occurrences of crime between 1991 and Since the year 2002 crime against the person and property have shown declines. Subsequent reductions in crime rates or perceived crime rates have the potential to influence participation rates amongst the Gold Coast population. Crime rates have been linked to levels of socio economic disadvantage. The Gold Coast experienced higher levels of socio economic disadvantage in 1996 compared with both Queensland and Australia, with Labrador recording the fifth highest level. Improvements were noted in 2001 when Gold Coast encountered levels of socioeconomic disadvantage in line with both Queensland and Australia. In the same year the Gold Coast was ranked 260 out of 630 Australian LGAs. Approximately 16 percent of the population of Gold Coast is viewed a most disadvantage, with the total population being distributed widely across the levels of socio economic disadvantage Community Monitoring Program Aside from the purely statistical based social impact monitoring techniques of Social Indicator Analysis, GHD also recommends a more iterative process that collects both quantitative and qualitative data through a community lead Community Monitoring Program. The Community Monitoring Program should be one component of the Community Consultation Charter as recommended as a mitigation and enhancement strategy in Section 9. Decisions of the Community Monitoring Program techniques and timings should determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the Project developer/owner/ contractor 122. The role of the GCCC and the Department of Communities Regional Planner is to guide the processes used to monitor social impacts (to ensure they are rigorous and stand up to scrutiny) and to provide a direct link back in the Local and State government planning for the Project area. The Community Monitoring Program would happen on a more regular basis (perhaps annually) than the Social Indicator Analysis. As the community organisations operate on a volunteer basis, it is a recommendation that the Project developer/owner/ contractor 123 support the community organisations through donations to the organisation (or funding community initiatives) as payment for the time and resources provided by them. 121 OESR (2003) Gold Coast (C) LGA, Small Area Crime Profile, 2002/ This includes the relevant port authority. 123 This includes the relevant port authority. 208

248 10.4 Summary The two monitoring programs and their techniques are summarised in Table 37. Table 37 Monitoring Program Monitoring Programs for the Proposed Project Techniques Timing Responsibility Social Indicator Analysis Review of relevant demographic statistics At the release of census data (every 5 years) The developer/ owner/contractor 124 in consultation with community organisations, GCCC and the Department of Communities Regional Planner. Community Monitoring Program As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the developer/owner/ contractor 125 As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the developer/owner/ contractor 126 As determined by the community organisations, GCCC and Department of Communities Regional Planner in consultation and with support of the developer/owner/ contractor This includes the relevant port authority. 125 This includes the relevant port authority. 126 This includes the relevant port authority. 127 This includes the relevant port authority. 209

249 11. Conclusion This section provides a cross reference to the SIA Terms of Reference. Table 38 Cross Reference SIA TOR and SIA Report TOR # TOR Description Section in SIA Description of Environmental Values 1 Community infrastructure and services, access and mobility 2 Population and demographics of the affected community 3 Local community values, vitality and lifestyles 6 4 Recreational, cultural, leisure and sporting facilities and activities in relation to the affected area, including but not limited to diving, fishing, surfing, boating and dog walking 5, 6 and Appendix C 4 and Appendix B 6 and Appendix C 5 Health and educational facilities 4 and Appendix B 6 Current property values 4 and Appendix B 7 Number of properties directly affected by the Project 4 and Appendix B 8 Number of families directly affected by the Project 4 and Appendix B 9 Describe the social values for the affected area in terms of: 9a 9b The recreational amenity of the existing public access to the coast, parklands and tidal waterways within the Project area The integrity of social conditions, including amenity and liveability, harmony and well being, sense of community, and access to social and community services and infrastructure 9c Public health and safety 7, 8 and 9 Potential impacts and mitigation measures 10 The increasing demand for public open space driven through population growth and the impact of the loss of public open space for the proposal. 11 The loss of existing public access (including by recreational fishers and surfers) to coastal areas and waterways including the proposed site if the cruise terminal and the marina, with particular reference to policy of the State Coastal Management Plan. 12 The loss of existing and furture recreational opportunities in, and adjacent to, the Project area including Doug Jennings Park, South Stradbroke Island, Wave Break Island and the marina stadium. This should take into account organised events such as concerts, swimming, triathlons, dragon boat racing, power boat racing etc , 7 (7.3, 7.4, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 6, 7 (7.4 and 7.6), 8 and 9 6, 7 (7.4, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 210

250 TOR # TOR Description Section in SIA 13 The short term, ongoing and cumulative impacts of interruption to navigational or other uses (e.g. boating, swimming, surfing, fishing and diving) of waterways associated with dredging and navigation/security requirements for cruise ships. 7 (7.3, 7.5 and 7.7), 8 and 9 14 Impact associated with altered marine habitat areas, surfing conditions and loss of public open space. 15 Traffic and car parking related impacts including noise, congestion etc. 16 Impacts on demographic, social, cultural and economic profiles. 17 Impacts on local residents, current land uses and existing lifestyles and enterprises. 18 Impacts on local and state labour markets, with regard to the source of the workforce. This information is to be presented in according to occupational groupings of the workforce. 19 The impacts of both construction and operational workforces and associated contractors on housing demand, community services and community cohesion are to be addressed. 20 The capability of the existing housing stock, including rental accommodation, to meet any additional demands created by the Project is to be discussed. 21 Comment should be made on how much service revenue and work from the Project (e.g. provisioning, catering and site maintenance) would be likely to flow to existing communities in the area of the Project. 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3 and 7.4), 8 and 9 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 7 (7.3 and 7.4), 8 and 9 22 Impacts on local resident s values and aspirations. 7 (7.3, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 23 In regard to affected indigenous and non indigenous communities respectively, particular attention should be paid to the effects on:» the ability of both indigenous and non indigenous people, to live in accordance with their own values and priorities;» the use and access to culturally important areas and landscapes;» the access to existing human and commercial services and housing;» the ability to participate in regional and local employment and training opportunities; and» the new Project workforce and their families. 7 (7.3 and 7.8), 8 and 9 24 Educational impacts 7 (7.3, 7.6 and 7.7), 8 and 9 211

251 12. References ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) BREA 2005 The Contribution of the North American Cruise Industry to the U.S. Economy in 2004 source Burdge, R. J A Community Guide to Social Ecology Press CLIA 2005 The Overview Spring 2005 source Gration, S (2006) various documents provided as information for the Notional Seaway EIS:» Correspondence (no date) from Environmental Defenders Office (Qld) Inc. to (no name or organisation on the document)» Correspondence ( ) from Steve Gration to Coordinator General» Gold Coast Harbour Vision 2020 Report 22, Attachment A Recommendations reflecting councillors directions workshop of 14 July 2003» A summary of the local area plan The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour), Gold Coast Planning Scheme» Correspondence ( ) from Lyn Wright to Steven Gration» Correspondence ( ) from Beach Protection Authority to Main Beach Progress Association» Correspondence ( ) from Lois Levy to Hon. Margaret Keech, Minister for Tourism» Correspondence ( ) from Steven Gration (Main Beach Progress Association) to Hon. Anna Bligh, Minister for Education and the Arts» Correspondence (no date) from Gecko Management Committee to Hon Desley Boyle, Minister for Environment» Correspondence ( ) from Gecko to Hon Desley Boyle, Minister for Environment and Local Government» Courier Mail ( ) Sailing into murky waters Hayte, C. (2006) Cruise Ship Terminal the Spit Main Beach Progress Association (2006) Response to : SIA Focus Group Melbourne Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research (2005) Poverty Lines: Australia December Quarter 2005 The University of Melbourne. 212

252 OESR (2006) Estimated Resident Population, Queensland Cities 2000, 2004 and 2005 (Projected) PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City Queensland Department of Families, Youth and Community Care 2000 Social Impact Assessment in Queensland Queensland Health 2003 Social Indicators for Addressing Health Inequalities Queensland Tourism 2006 Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan source: Whitlow, R A geomorphological outline of the Spit and the southern Broadwater, Gold Coast, Queensland: their environmental history and modifications prepared for Gold Coast Combined Chamber of Commerce (available from 213

253 Appendix A Terms of Reference 214

254 The following terms of reference for the for the Notional Seaway project was developed by the Coordinator General (Section 4.10). It is GHD s responsibility to address these terms of reference in the Report. Description of environmental values This section describes the existing social values that may be affected by the proposal and should also include future social benefits resulting from the project. The social amenity and use of the proposal area and adjacent areas for fishing, recreational, tourism, industrial or educational purposes shall be described. Consideration should be given to:» community infrastructure and services, access and mobility;» population and demographics of the affected community;» local community values, vitality and lifestyles;» recreational, cultural, leisure and sporting facilities and activities in relation to the affected area, including but not limited to: diving, fishing, surfing, boating and dog walking;» health and educational facilities;» current property values;» number of properties directly affected by the project; and» number of families directly affected by the project. Describe the social values of the affected area in terms of:» the recreational amenity of the existing public access to the coast, parklands and tidal waterways within the project area;» the integrity of social conditions, including amenity and liveability, harmony and well being, sense of community, and access to social and community services and infrastructure; and» public health and safety. Social, economic and cultural values are not as easily separated as physical and ecological values. Therefore is may be necessary for some material in this section to be cross referenced with in section 4.8 Cultural Heritage and Section 4.11 Economy. Potential impacts and mitigation measures This section defines and described the objectives and practical measures for protecting or enhancing social values, described how nominated quantitative standards and indicators may be achieved for social impact management, and how the achievement of the objectives will be monitored, audited and managed. 215

255 The social impact assessment of the project should consider the information gathered in the community consultation program and the analysis of the existing socio economic environment, and describe the project s impact, both beneficial and adverse on the local community. The impacts of the project on local and regional residents, community services and recreational activities are to be analysed and discussed for all stages of the development. The nature and extent of the community consultation program are to be described and a summary of the results incorporated into the EIS. The social impact assessment should include sufficient data to enable State authorities, such as Queensland Transport, Queensland Health and Education Queensland, to plan for the continuing provision of public services in the region of the project. The summary should discuss how the impacts of population increase on public services, particularly health, recreation and education, would be mitigated. The social impact assessment of the project is to be carried out in consultation with the Department of Communities. The assessment of impacts should describe the likely response of affected communities and identify possible beneficial and adverse impacts (both immediate and cumulative). These impacts should be considered both at the regional and local level. Attention should be paid to:» the increasing demand for public space driven by population growth and the impact of the loss of public open space by the proposal;» the loss of existing public access (including by recreational fishers and surfers) to coastal areas and waterways including the proposed site of the cruise terminal and the marina, with particular reference to policy of the State Coast Management Plan);» the loss of existing and future recreational opportunities in, and adjacent to, the project area including Doug Jennings Park, South Stradbroke Island, Wavebreak Island and the marine stadium. This should take into account organised events such as concerts, swimming, triathlon, dragon boat racing, power boat racing etc;» the short term ongoing and cumulative impacts of interruption to navigation or other uses (e.g. boating, swimming, fishing and diving) of waterways associated with dredging and navigation, security requirements of the cruise ships;» impacts associated with altered marine habitat areas, surfing conditions and loss of public open space;» traffic and car related impacts including noise and congestion;» impacts on demographic, social, cultural and economic profiles;» Impacts on local residents, current land uses and existing lifestyles and enterprises;» Impacts on local and state labour markets, with regard to the source of the workforce. This information is to be presented in according to occupational groupings of the workforce; 216

256 » The impacts of both construction and operational workforces and associated contractors on housing demand, community services and community cohesion are to be addressed;» The capability of the existing housing stock, including rental accommodation, to meet any additional demands created by the project is to be discussed;» Comment should be made on how much service revenue and work from the project (e.g. provisioning, catering and site maintenance) would be likely to flow to existing communities in the area of the project;» Impacts on local resident s values and aspirations;» In regard to affected indigenous and non indigenous communities respectively, particular attention should be paid to the effects on: the ability of both indigenous and non indigenous people, to live in accordance with their own values and priorities; the use and access to culturally important areas and landscapes; the access to existing human and commercial services and housing; the ability to participate in regional and local employment and training opportunities; and the new project workforce and their families. The effects of the proposal on local and regional residents, including land acquisition and relocation issues and property valuation and marketability, community services and recreational activities should be described for the construction and operations phases of the development. The potential environmental harm on the amenity of adjacent areas used for recreation, tourism, industry, education, aesthetics or scientific or residential purposes should be discussed. The implications of the proposal for future developments in the local area including constraints on surrounding land uses should be described. The educational impacts of the proposed development, is to be analysed and described, particularly in regard to:» primary, secondary and tertiary education sectors;» improved appreciation of conservation areas; and» environmental education for the general public.» For identified impacts of social values, suggest mitigation and enhancement strategies and facilitate initial negotiations towards acceptance of these strategies. Practical monitoring regimes should also be recommended. 217

257 Appendix B SIA Consultations Identification of Stakeholders 218

258 Stakeholders were identified through:» Consultation with the Coordinator General s department;» Media monitoring;» Internet research; and» Results of observational mapping. Table 39 outlines the stakeholders who were involved in the SIA process and how they were involved. It was originally planned to conduct focus groups with all stakeholders, however not all stakeholders were available to participate in the focus groups (e.g. because of other commitments). Because of this GHD followed up with those individual stakeholders who were unable to participate. GHD was also contacted for the SIA team to meet with stakeholders. Table 39 Project Stakeholders and their involvement Stakeholder Date of Involvement Type of Involvement Save Our Spit Alliance 16/05/2006 Focus Group Divers» Diving Industry Representatives 15/05/2006 Focus Group» Individual Divers Surfers» Narrowneck Club 15/05/2006 Focus Group» Northend Club» Surfing Aust» Surfing Qld Main Beach Progress Association 23/05/2006 Focus Group Nerang Community Association 07/06/2006 Focus Group Economic/Business» Queensland Charter Vessel Assoc 25/05/2006 Focus Group» Southport Yacht Club» Queensland Seafood Industry Association» Gold Coast Marina and Shipyard» Combined Chamber of Commerce Gecko 15/05/2006 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk 28/05/2006 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council 06/06/2006 Focus Group 219

259 Stakeholder Date of Involvement Type of Involvement» Gold Coast Water» Engineering Services» Community Services» Economic Development and Major Projects» Planning, Environment and Transport Education 26/05/2006 Focus Group» Beachcare» CoastEd Dog Walkers 13/06/2006 Focus Group Kalwun Development Corporation 03/06/06 One on one meeting State Government Gold Coast Marine Industry Association TBC 07/06/2006 One on one meeting Paradise Jet Boating 06/06/2006 One on one meeting The Sand Pumping Jetty and Kiosk 18/05/2006 One on one meeting St John s Drop In Centre 06/06/2006 One on one meeting Gold Coast City Council Social Planning Group 18/05/2006 One on one meeting Peter s Fish Market 07/06/2006 One on one meeting Volunteer Marine Rescue 13/06/2006 One on one meeting South Stradbroke Island Ferry Service 07/06/2006 One on one meeting 220

260 Appendix C Detailed Community Profile 221

261 Community Profile The detailed community profile consists of statistical data to describe the existing community (all three study areas) from a demographic perspective. It details key demographic data and trends at the immediate, regional and state study areas. This profile is one source of data by which the social impacts will be identified and measured by adopting and implementing the SIA variables and social indicators as set out in Section 2. Study Areas and Data Sources Study Areas The immediate study area is made up of the ABS defined SLA s of Labrador, Southport and Main Beach Broadwater (refer to Figure 3). The regional study area has been identified based on the ABS Gold Coast City Part B Statistical Subdvision (which is the same area as the Gold Coast City Council) (refer to Figure 4). Data Sources Data used in this profile is sourced mostly from Gold Coast City Council (GCCC) social documents available through the Council website ( specifically:» Our Community: A Social Profile of Gold Coast City (GCCC 2003); and» Statistical profiles for the Labrador, Southport and Main Beach Broadwater Statistical Local Areas (SLAs) based on data collated by the Queensland Government s Planning Information and Forecasting Unit (PIFU). In addition to these documents prepared by the GCCC, other more recent materials were sourced directly from PIFU and the OESR (Queensland Treasury). Due to the Census data now being almost five years old and considered out of date, the information and analysis provided herein should be considered indicative only. The more recent PIFU data, including population forecasts, however is more recent and can be viewed with more accuracy. 222

262 Population The immediate, regional and state study areas have all experienced high levels of population growth in recent years. The total estimated resident population (ERP) of the study areas at June is set out in Table 40. The concept of ERP links people to a place of usual residence within Australia. Usual residence is defined as that place where each person has lived or intends to live for six months or more in the reference year 128. Table 40 Study Area ERP ERP % of State ERP Immediate Study Area 46,168 persons 1% Regional Study Area 482,566 persons % State Study Area 3,963,968 persons % Immediate Study Area Population Growth Figure 39 illustrates the population growth within the immediate study area for the period June 2000 to June There was an estimated 10% increase in the population of the immediate study area over the 5 year period. 47,000 46,000 45,000 Population 44,000 43,000 42,000 41,000 40,000 39, Year Figure 39 Population Growth of Immediate Study Area, 2000 to ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 129 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City 130 OESR (2006) Estimated Resident Population, Queensland Cities 2000, 2004 and 2005 (Projected) (downloaded ) 131 Gold Coast Preliminary ERP as at 30/06/05 (Data was unavailable for the year 2003) 223

263 Regional Study Area Population Growth At 30 June 2005, the regional study area (Gold Coast City) had an estimated resident population of 482,566 people. The population increase 132 was attributed to an additional:» 2,447 people though natural increase; and» 10,169 people relocating to the region. Population growth of 2.7 % was recorded for the 2004/05 financial year 133. The Gold Coast region is expected to reach a population of between 563,400 and 584,900 people by the year By the year 2026, the population will have grown to between 713,900 and 814,500 people 134 (refer to Figure 40). Figure 40 Gold Coast City Council area ERP Projections 135 Of the local government areas in Queensland, the largest population increases over the year to June 2005, occurred in Brisbane City, Gold Coast City then Ipswich City. Brisbane City and Gold Coast City were ranked first and second in Australia in terms of population increase PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet 133 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet 134 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City 135 PIFU (2006) Population and Housing Fact Sheet, Gold Coast City 136 OESR (2006) Information Brief Regional Population Growth: (downloaded ) 224

264 Age Structure Table 41 and Figure 41 sets out the breakdown of the age structure for the immediate, regional and state study areas. From this table it can be seen that the immediate study area has a significantly lower proportion of people in the 14 years and under cohort compared to the state study area. The proportions of people in the 15 to 44 and 46 to 64 age cohorts are similar across all three study areas. There are however, a higher proportion of people in the immediate study area in the 65 years and over age cohort compared to the regional and state study areas. Table 41 Proportion of Population 137 Age Cohort Immediate 138 Regional State 14 years and under 13% 18% 21% % 43% 43% % 25% 24% 65 years and over 17% 14% 12% Pecentage of Population 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 14 years and under years and above Age Cohorts Immediate Regional State Figure 41 Age Cohorts of the Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas 137 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 138 The results are the average of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 225

265 Population Density The population density for a region is calculated by dividing the estimated resident population (ERP) by the land area to obtain the number of persons per square kilometre 139. Table 42 Population Density 140 Study Area Land Area (km 2 ) Population 141 Population Density (persons/km 2 ) Immediate , Regional 1, , State 1,734,156 3,801, There is a significantly higher population density in the immediate and regional study areas compared to the State of Queensland. Proportion of Population in Remoteness Area 143 The percentages shown indicate the proportion of the population living in each category of Remoteness for the selected region. The proportions are based on where people were on the night of the 2001 Census of Population and Housing. The Remoteness Structure was added to the ASGC in 2001 in order to provide a standard geographical structure describing Australia in terms of a measurement of remoteness or distance from services. It is designed to allow quantitative comparisons between 'city' and 'country' Australia. The Remoteness Structure is based upon the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) developed for the former Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care (now Department of Health and Ageing) by the National Key Centre for Social Applications of Geographical Information Systems (GISCA). ARIA measures the remoteness of a point based on the road distances to the nearest town (service centre) in each of five population size classes. The basic premises of ARIA are that there are more services available in larger towns than small towns and that remoteness is a factor of the relative distance one must travel to access a full range of services. 139 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 140 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 141 Based on ABS population statistics for 2003 contained in the ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 142 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 143 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 226

266 The Remoteness Structure contains the following categories that provide a measurement of whether geographic distances impose restrictions on the accessibility to the widest range of goods, services and opportunities for social interaction: Major Cities of Australia imposes minimal restriction e.g. Sydney, Newcastle, Wollongong, Melbourne, Geelong, Brisbane, Gold Coast, Adelaide, Perth and Canberra. Inner Regional Australia imposes some restriction e.g. Tamworth, Wagga Wagga (New South Wales), Ballarat, Bendigo (Victoria), Rockhampton, Bundaberg, Gladstone (Queensland), the Adelaide Hills (South Australia), Bunbury (Western Australia), Hobart and Launceston (Tasmania). Outer Regional Australia imposes a moderate restriction e.g. Broken Hill, Griffith, Gunnedah (New South Wales), Horsham, Swan Hill, Traralgon (Victoria), Roma, Cairns (Queensland), Port Augusta, Mount Gambier (South Australia), Albany (Western Australia) and Burnie (Tasmania), and Darwin (Northern Territory). Remote Australia imposes a high restriction e.g. Cobar (New South Wales), the northern Wimmera district (Victoria), Charters Towers and Cooktown (Queensland), Port Lincoln (South Australia), the Kalgoorlie gold fields (Western Australia), parts of the West Coast (Tasmania), Alice Springs and Katherine (Northern Territory). Very Remote Australia imposes the highest restriction e.g. The far west parts of New South Wales and Queensland, northern South Australia and Western Australia, most of the Northern Territory and Flinders and King Islands in Bass Strait (Tasmania). Table 43 and Figure 42 show all of the immediate population live in an area defined as a major city, so there should be minimal restriction for access to services (in terms of distance) and more services will be available. 227

267 Table 43 Proportion of Population in Remoteness Area 144 Study Area Immediate 145 Regional State Major Cities 100% 95.8% 52.5% Inner Regional 0% 4.2% 25.9% Outer Regional 0% 0% 17.7% Remote 0% 0% 2.5% Very Remote 0% 0% 1.4% Percentage of Study Area Immediate Regional State 0 Major Cities Inner Regional Outer Regional Remote Very Remote Area of Remoteness Figure 42 Percentage of Population in Area of Remoteness 144 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 145 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 228

268 Index of Socio Economic Advantage and Disadvantage 146 The Index of Relative Socio Economic Advantage/Disadvantage is derived from the 2001 Census of Population and Housing and measures aspects of social and economic conditions in an area. The measure presented in the profiles is a decile, which is derived from the index values for all areas. The Index of Advantage/Disadvantage is a continuum of advantage to disadvantage. Low values indicate areas of disadvantage; and high values indicate areas of advantage. A decile is obtained by ranking all areas according to their index value (low numbers to high numbers), then dividing the ranking into ten equal groups, each group comprising 10% of the areas. Deciles are named from 1 (lowest decile) to 10 (highest decile). If a Statistical Local Area (SLA) has a decile ranking of 1 then it would fall within that group of SLAs that comprise the lowest 10% of SLAs in terms of its Index of Relative Socio Economic Advantage/Disadvantage. Conversely, if a SLA has a decile ranking of 10 then it would fall within that group of SLAs that comprise the highest 10% of SLAs in terms of its Index of Relative Socio Economic Advantage/Disadvantage. The index value of an area is constructed from attributes of the population in that area such as educational attainment, income, employment and occupation. A higher index value indicates that an area has attributes such as a relatively high proportion of people with high incomes or a skilled workforce. It also means an area has a low proportion of people with low incomes and relatively few unskilled people in the workforce. Conversely, a low index value indicates that an area has a higher proportion of individuals with low incomes, more employees in unskilled occupations, etc.; and a low proportion of people with high incomes or in skilled occupations. The measures presented in Table 44 are deciles, which are derived from the index values for all areas. Table 44 Index of Socio Economic Advantage and Disadvantage 147 Study Area Index of Socio Economic Advantage/Disadvantage Immediate Regional 8 State n/a 146 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 147 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ), the statistics reflect the 2001 Census. 148 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 229

269 The immediate study area had an average decile of 9, which can be interpreted as the area has attributes such as a relatively high proportion of people with high incomes or a skilled workforce. It also means an area has a low proportion of people with low incomes and relatively few unskilled people in the workforce. To show the differences of the Socio Economic Index in more detail in the immediate study area, Figure 43 illustrates the level of advantage/disadvantage for the collection districts (CD) based on the index values. Analysis shows a higher index values in the southern region of Southport and Main Beach Broadbeach, while the further north and west a CD is located, the lower the index value. These results suggest higher proportions of individuals with low incomes and unskilled workforce in the immediate study area to the north and west. These results indicate a mixed level of advantage/disadvantage throughout the immediate study area, with the social mix of people varying with location. Waterfront areas, and those closer to Surfers Paradise (south of the immediate study area) have higher scores illustrating higher levels of skilled workers and people with high incomes. 230

270 Figure 43 Level of Advantage/Disadvantage in the Immediate Study Area (ABS 2001) This figure was calculated from the ABS (2001) Socio Economic Indices for Areas (SEIFA) 231

271 Income Income has been reported on in three different ways:» Weekly household income;» Weekly family income (including a comparison to the poverty line); and» Weekly individual income (including income support customers, wage and salary earners). Weekly Household Income Table 45 and Figure 44 show the weekly household income for the immediate, regional and state study areas. In the immediate study area the highest percentage of households (10%) were in the $300 $399 income group. In the regional study area the highest percentage of households (10% each) were in the $300 $399 and $800 $999 income groups. In the state study area, the highest percentage of households were in the $800 $999 income group. Table 45 Weekly Household Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B31 Income Group Immediate Study Area Regional Study Area State Study Area # % # % # % Negative/Nil , ,803 1 $1 $ , ,119 4 $200 $299 1, , ,530 8 $300 $399 1, , ,458 9 $400 $499 1, , ,114 8 $500 $599 1, , ,586 6 $600 $699 1, , ,859 7 $700 $ , ,142 5 $800 $999 1, , , $1,000 $1,199 1, , ,765 8 $1,200 $1, , ,433 8 $1,500 $1, , ,215 9 $2,000 or more , ,549 6 Partial Incomes Not Stated All Incomes Not Stated , , , ,233 4 Total 17, , ,275,

272 Percentage of Study Area Negative/Nil $1 199 $200 $299 $300 $399 $400 $499 $500 $599 $600 $699 $700 $799 $800 $999 Income Group $1,000 $1,199 $1,200 $1,499 $1,500 $1,999 $2,000 or more Partial income stated All incomes not stated Immediate Regional State Figure 44 Weekly Household Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B31 Weekly Family Income 233

273 Table 46 and Figure 45 show the weekly family income for the immediate, regional and state study areas. In the immediate study area there was a cluster of families between the $300 $399 and the $600 $699 income groups. After the $1,000 $1,199 income group, the percentage of the families in the immediate study area are under the regional and state study areas. There is a more consistent spread of families across the regional study area in terms of weekly family income, with peaks at the $300 $399, $800 $999 and $1,200 $1,499 income groups. The state study area predominantly mirrors the trends occurring in percentage of families in the various income groups for the regional study area. 234

274 Table 46 Weekly Family Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B30 Income Group Immediate Study Area Regional Study Area State Study Area # % # % # % Negative/Nil ,594 1 $1 $ ,542 1 $200 $ , ,603 2 $300 $399 1, , , $400 $499 1, , ,887 8 $500 $ , ,364 5 $600 $ , ,243 7 $700 $ , ,803 5 $800 $999 1, , , $1,000 $1, , ,084 9 $1,200 $1, , , $1,500 $1, , , $2,000 or more , ,283 7 Partial Incomes Not Stated All Incomes Not Stated , , , ,347 3 Total 9, , ,

275 16% Percentage of Study Area 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Negative/Nil $1 $199 $200 $299 $300 $399 $400 $499 $500 $599 $600 $699 $700 $799 $800 $999 $1,000 $1,200 $1,500 $2,000 or Partial All incomes Immediate Regional State Income Group Figure 45 Weekly Family Income (Immediate, Regional and State Study Areas) B30 Set out below is a comparison between the 2001 Census data for the Gold Coast SSD and the Melbourne Institute Poverty Line levels 150. Table 47 Comparison of 2001 Family Incomes and the Poverty Line Poverty Line Census 152 Couple family with Children $ , families with children. 1,136 (23%) families under the poverty line. 3,744 (77%) families above the poverty line. Couple family without Children $ , families without children 874 (24%) of families under the poverty line 2721 (76%) of families above the poverty line 150 Poverty lines are income levels designated for various types of income units. If the income of an income unit is less than the poverty line applicable to it, then the unit is considered to be in poverty. An income unit is the family group normally supported by the income of the unit ((e.g. couple, couple plus 2, single parent). For more information refer to Based on the September Quarter for Based on ABS 2001 Census B30 Family Income by Family Type for the Gold Coast SSD (30510) 153 Couple (head in the workforce) with two children, including housing 154 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 236

276 Poverty Line Census 152 One parent family $ , one parent families 1,519 (70%) of families under the poverty line 669 (30%) under the poverty line. The majority of couples (with or without) children in the Gold Coast SSD are above the poverty line. However the majority of one parent families are under the poverty line. Weekly Individual Income In 2001, the median individual weekly income of residents within the immediate study area varied between $300 $399 for Southport and Labrador and $500 $599 for Main Beach Broadwater. Figure 46 illustrates the individual weekly income for the immediate study area with a peak evident in the $200 $399 income bracket. The Gold Coast region recorded similar trends with higher proportions of people earning between $300 and $599 per week. The median individual income of the region is $360 per week compared to Queensland at $361 per week Number of People $119 $120 $199 $200 $399 $400 $599 $600 $799 $800 $999 $ Figure 46 Individual Weekly Income, Immediate Study Area, Couple (head in the workforce) without children, including housing 156 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 157 Single parent (head in the workforce) with 2 children, including housing 158 Does not include partial incomes or all incomes not stated. 159 GCCC suburb profiles 237

277 Source of Personal Income 160 Experimental estimates of personal income brings together aggregated from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and from the Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS), which was responsible for income support payments for the years shown. The income received by individuals have been grouped into six main categories:» Wage and salary income (data source ATO)» Own unincorporated business income (data source ATO)» Investment income (data source ATO)» Superannuation and annuity income (data source ATO)» Government cash benefit income (data source FaCS)» Other income (data source ATO) Total gross income is the sum of the income from all these sources before income tax and the Medicare levy have been deducted. Data are for the 2000/2001 financial year ended 30 June. Table 48 Source of Personal Income (2001) 161 Source of Personal Income Immediate 162 Regional State Wage and Salary (%) Own incorporated business (%) Investment (%) Superannuation and annuity (%) Government cash benefit (%) Other (%) Total personal income from all sources ($m) 751 6,586 64, ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 161 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 162 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 238

278 Selected Income Support Customers 163 The term 'Selected income support customers' has been used to define persons receiving specific payments from various Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS) programs for the years shown. (In 2004 the responsibility for some payments were transferred from FaCS to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations and to the Department of Education, Science and Training). The statistics shown have been compiled from data collected by Centrelink which is the government agency delivering income support payments and services to eligible members of the community on behalf of FaCS for the years shown. Centrelink customers complete claim forms in order to determine their eligibility for payments and services. The type of payment being claimed determines what form is used and how frequently claim forms need to be submitted. People receiving more than one payment are only counted once by using the main payment type. Data for Age Pension, Disability Support Pension, Newstart Allowance, Parenting Payment Single and Youth Allowance are shown separately while the following main payment types have been grouped in the "other pensions and allowances" category: Austudy, Carer Allowance, Carer Payment, Double Orphan Pension, Exceptional Circumstances, Mobility Allowance, Newstart Mature Age Allowance, Parenting Payment Partnered, Partner Allowance, Sickness Allowance, Special Benefit, Widow Allowance, Wife Pension and Widow Class B. Excluded from the data presented in this profile are persons whose main payment type is Bereavement Allowance, Childcare Benefit, Farm Family Restart or Family Tax Benefit Part A or B. Counts of income support customers include those receiving a payment and those customers temporarily suspended from payment or not paid in the fortnight (zero paid) due to income/assets test provisions or other administrative procedures. Age Pension counts exclude payments made to persons overseas and age pensions paid by the Department of Veterans' Affairs. The percentage of long term Newstart Allowance customers and the number of Newstart Allowance customers come from different Centrelink databases. The data used to calculate the percentage of long term Newstart Allowance customers exclude those persons temporarily suspended from payment or zero paid. Consequently, the percentages should not be applied to the Newstart Allowance numbers. Data are for the fortnightly pay period closest to the end of June 2002 and the end of June The statistics shown have been provided to the ABS in aggregated form only. No information about individual income support customers has been released to the ABS. A geographic concordance has been used in order to present the original postcode 163 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 239

279 data on ASGC 2003 boundaries. Note that the use of this concordance may lead to total numbers for States/Territories that differ slightly from State/Territory totals published by Centrelink. Further information on geographic concordances can be found at Table 49 Selected Income Support Customers (2003) 164 Pension/Allowance Immediate 165 (persons) Regional (persons) State (persons) Age Pension 5,403 38, ,337 Disability Support Pension 89 12, ,409 Newstart Allowance 2,509 14, ,622 Parenting Payment Single 1,450 10,886 97,728 Youth Allowance 1,314 8,134 80,166 Other Pensions and Allowances 1,699 14, ,796 Wage and Salary Earners 166 The estimates for Wage and salary earners have been compiled by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) from the Individual Income Tax Return Database. The main functions and responsibilities of the Australian Taxation Office are to administer taxation legislation and to collect a wide variety of taxes. The ATO therefore collects data from its reporting population as part of its processes to calculate income tax liability for those persons who are required to lodge an income tax return. Individuals who submit an individual income tax return report their income from one or more of a range of sources such as wages and salary, own business, superannuation, investments and government pensions, benefits or allowances. As the ATO's income tax return is designed to obtain a person's total income from various sources over a financial year, and not the employment status of a person at a particular point in time, wage and salary earners have been defined as 'persons aged 15 years and over who have submitted an individual income tax return and for whom wage and salary income was the principal (or main) source of income for the financial year'. 164 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 165 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 166 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 240

280 Wage and salary income, as reported on the income tax return, includes gross income as shown on the 'PAYG payment summary individual non business' as well as allowances, commissions, bonuses, tips, gratuities, consultation fees, honoraria and other payments for services. Allowances and other earnings may include car, travel or transport allowances, allowances for tools, clothing or laundry and dirt, risk, meal or entertainment allowances. The data to define and compile counts of wage and salary earners have been sourced from questions 1 and 2 on the individual income tax return (Note: PAYG (Pay as You Go) payment summaries were previously known as Group Certificates). All individual income tax statistics provided to the ABS by the ATO have been in aggregated form only, at the Statistical Local Area (SLA) level. Information about individual taxpayers has not been released to the ABS. The statistics are based on individual income tax returns lodged for the financial year ended 30 June, regardless of the year in which they were processed. A geographic concordance has been used in order to present the data on ASGC 2003 boundaries. Further information on geographic concordances can be found at Table 50 Wage and Salary Earners (2002) 167 Immediate 168 Regional State Wage and Salary Earners (persons) 14, ,802 1,397,930 Wage and Salary Income ($m) 434 4,270 46,121 Total Income ($m) 457 4,519 48,368 Average wage and salary income ($) 29,940 30,550 32,993 Average Total Income ($) 31,703 32,328 34,600 Education The immediate study area has a higher percentage (5 %) of the population attending university when compared with the region and state (3 and 4 %). All other attendance rates at educational facilities indicate consistent trends across all study areas. Table 51 presents the comparative attendance rates at educational institutions across all study areas. 167 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 168 The results are the total of the statistics provided by the ABS for the three SLA areas in the immediate study area. 241

281 Table 51 Attendance at Educational Institutions Comparison, 2001 Census 169 Education Type Immediate Study Area Region State Preschool 404 5,773 52,616 Primary 2,437 36, ,666 Secondary 2,108 23, ,821 TAFE 926 7,454 73,161 University (FT/PT) 1,879 13, ,021 Other 346 3,046 22,706 Not Attending 29, ,459 2,509,175 Not Stated 2,966 23, ,878 Total 40, ,987 3,492,044 18% of the population within the immediate study area held a trade certificate at the time of the 2001 Census. This figure is much lower than that of the region (38.5%) and the State (37%). Figure 47 shows a comparison of educational qualifications of the immediate and regional study areas. Population Immediate Study Area 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Postgraduate Degree Grad Diploma & Certificate Bachelor Degree Advanced Diploma and Diploma Trade Certificate Region Not Applicable 169 GCCC Social Profile 242

282 Figure 47 Educational Qualifications, Immediate and Regional Study Areas, Number of People, Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Not Applicable Trade Certificate Advanced Diploma and Diploma Bachelor Degree Grad Diploma & Certificate Postgraduate Degree Percentage Figure 48 Percentage of Educational Qualifications, All Study Areas, 2001 At the time of the 2001 Census, 1.4% of people in Queensland had attained a postgraduate degree, 1.1% had a graduate certificate or diploma, and 8.3% had a bachelor degree. Those with an advanced diploma or diploma were 5.5% and 16% had gained a certificate. Gold Coast region recorded higher levels of certificate qualifications but lower proportions of residents with a bachelor degree when compared to Queensland. The immediate study area had lower proportions across all categories when compared to both the regional and State study areas. Figure 48 presents a comparison of educational qualifications across all study areas. Housing The immediate study area has a relatively even split between dwelling types, with flats, units and apartments being slightly more prominent (37 %). The Gold Coast region has a considerably higher percentage (59 %) of separate houses, followed by flats, units and apartments at 22 % and is also reflected in the State data where 70.5 % of dwellings are separate houses. These trends are consistent with the large amounts of units and apartments that are located in the immediate study area. Refer Figure 49 for more detail. Rental properties dominate the tenure type across the immediate study area (44.5 %). This is significantly higher than both the Gold Coast region (34.7 %) and the State (30.1 %). In contrast, the immediate study area had lower rates of fully owned properties (29.6 %) when compared to the regional (33.3 %) and the State (33.6 %). Refer to Figure 50. The rental property market is also reflected in the percentage of 170 GCCC Community Profile 243

283 properties that are being purchased (15.4 %) in the immediate study area. The Gold Coast region and State both show higher rates of home purchasing (22.8 % and 25.8 % respectively) Population Separate House Townhouse Immediate Study Area Flat, Unit or Apartment Other Gold Coast Region Figure 49 Dwelling Type Comparison, Immediate Study Area and Gold Coast Region, Percentage Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Queensland Fully Owned Being Purchased Rented (incl. State Housing) Other Not Stated Figure 50 Dwelling by Tenure Type, All Study Areas, The median house sale price for the 2002/03 financial year was similar across the suburbs within the immediate study area. Main Beach Broadwater consists of mostly commercial enterprises with limited residential properties remaining. As a result of limited sale stock, Main Beach Broadwater has not recorded adequate sales to 171 GCCC (2003) Social Profile p.101 and suburb profiles 172 GCCC (2003) Social Profile p.101 and suburb profiles 244

284 determine a median. In the 2002 calendar year 19 sales were recorded with a median house sale price of $950,000, well in excess of the sale price of both Labrador and Southport. Table 52 presents the median house price for each of the suburbs within the immediate study area for the 2002/03 financial year. Table 52 Median House Sale Prices for Immediate Study Area suburbs, 2002 Financial Year 173 Labrador Southport Main Beach Broadwater $271,000 $268,625 No median available. Main Beach Broadwater has considerably higher rents for both 3 bedroom houses and townhouses compared to Labrador and Southport. Table 54 shows a comparison of weekly rents between the immediate study area suburbs. The higher rents are contributable to the beachfront real estate associated with the Main Beach Broadwater area, which has increased dramatically over the past five years 174. Median house sale prices across the study area (excluding Main Beach Broadwater) vary widely. Southport saw a 12.9 % increase in median house prices, while Labrador saw a decrease of 3.3 % since the June quarter of Median townhouse and unit sales however saw decreases across the study area with the exception of Southport. Labrador median sale prices decreased by 5.8 %, while Main Beach sale prices fell by 2.9 %. In contrast, the median unit and townhouse sale price in Southport increased by 16.6 %. Refer to Table 53 below for more detail. Table 53 Median House Sale Price, Immediate Study Area, September 2005 Quarter 175 Labrador Southport Main Beach Broadwater Median House Sale Price Median Unit/Townhouse Sale Price $338,500 $412,000 No data available. $242,000 $285,000 $560, REIQ website community profiles 174 REIQ website Main Beach Community Profile 175 REIQ (2006) Summer 2006/

285 Table 54 Median Weekly Rent, Immediate Study Area Suburbs (June 2003 quarter) 176 Labrador Southport Main Beach Broadwater 3 bedroom House $260 $260 $350 Unit/Townhouse $200 $200 $260 It is interesting to note that 90 % of the unit and townhouse market and around half of the housing market is comprised of investors. In addition, restrictions on spread of Main Beach and vacant land being almost non existent in Labrador, growth in the housing market occurring as a result of upward apartment development. These trends can only be anticipated to increase the cost of renting or purchasing a house in the study area. The growth in rental unit properties across the immediate study area is reflected in Figure 51, which illustrates the increase in median sales for units and townhouses for the period end September 2000 to September , , ,000 Dollars 300, , ,000 0 Labrador Southport Main Beach Broadwater Figure 51 Median Unit and Townhouse Sale Price, Immediate Study Area, Comparison September 2000 and 2005 Average Household Size The average household size of the immediate study area is considerably lower than both the region and the state (Table 55). Data also suggests that there has been a 176 REIQ (2006) website community profiles 246

286 steady decline in average household size across the study area since the 1991 Census (Figure 52) 177. Table 55 Average Household Size, 2001 Census 178 Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region State The decline in average household size has been aligned with an increase in single person households and increases in units and apartments. This trend is occurring throughout the Gold Coast region and particularly along coastal areas including Labrador (2,788.6 density of residents per km 2 ) and Southport (1,663.1 density of residents per km 2 ) Queensland Gold Coast Region Immediate Study Area Average Household Size Figure 52 Average Household Size, 1991 and 2001 Census The Gold Coast as a whole has residents per km 2 compared with Queensland at 2.1 residents per km 2. While the nature of Queensland as a large state has an effect on the population density, the Gold Coast still maintains a considerably high population density even when compared to Australia (2.6 residents per km 2). Building Approvals Residential building approvals at the end of December 2005 quarter were $354.5 million, while Queensland approvals was $2,062.4 million. Table 56 shows a breakdown of values of residential and non residential building approvals in the Gold Coast region, with comparison to Queensland. 177 GCCC suburb profiles 178 GCCC suburb profile and PIFU Gold Coast City data 247

287 Table 56 Value of residential and non residential building approvals, Gold Coast (C) and State quarter ended December Region State Region as % of State Total residential dwelling units (number) Total residential building value ($000) Total non residential building value ($000) Total building value ($000) 6,008 37, ,670,675 8,968, ,337 5,195, ,267,012 14,163, Labour Force A total of 19,511 people (or 52.6 % 180 ) within the immediate study area participated in the labour force at the time of the 2001 Census. This figure is slightly lower than the Gold Coast region in which 59.1 % of residents indicated they were participants in the labour force. This was also lower than the State, which registered 61.3 %. The lower percentage of residents in the labour force within the immediate study is reflected in the high unemployment rate as indicated in Table OESR (2006) LGA Profile, The Gold Coast Region 180 This figure is based on a total that includes people who did not state an answer to this question and those who indicated they were not part of the labour force at the time. 248

288 Figure 53 shows a breakdown of the labour force by study areas. A higher percentage of people are employed full time in Queensland when compared to the Gold Coast region and immediate study area. At a regional level, the percentage of people working part time increased by 7 % between the years 1991 to In addition, part time employment is highest amongst females, with males showing the highest unemployment rate. Unemployed Employed Part Time Employed Full Time Queensland Gold Coast Region Immediate Study Area Percentage Figure 53 Labour Force Breakdown by Study Area, 2001 Employment and Occupation The most widespread occupation across the immediate study area is intermediate clerical, sales and services (18 %), followed by professionals (16 %) and associate professionals and elementary clerical (14 %). These trends are mirrored at a regional and State level; with the majority of occupations described as intermediate clerical, sales and services in the Gold Coast region (18 %) and Queensland (16 %). The second and third most common occupations for the region and State were professionals (14 and 16 % respectively) and trades (14 and 13 % respectively). Refer to Figure 54 for more detail. These trends are likely to be related to the large tourism industry in the Gold Coast region and can be seen in Figure 55, where both the immediate and regional study areas show a higher percentage of people working in the retail industry (18 % each) when compared to the State (16 %). This can also be said for the accommodation, cafes and restaurants as well as the property and business (12 and 9 % and 12 and 12 % respectively). A peak at the immediate study area level for health and community services (11 %) is largely a result of the location of the Gold Coast Hospital located in the area. 181 GCCC (2003) Social Profile p

289 20 Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Percentage Labourers Elementary Clerical, Sales, Service Intermediate Production, Transport Intermediate Clerical, Sales, Services Advanced Clerical, Service Trades, Related Associate Professionals Professionals Managers, Adminstrators Figure 54 Occupation by Study Areas as a Percentage of Total,

290 20 Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Percentage Personal, Other Cultural, Recreational Health, Community Education Gov't Admin, Defence Property, Business Finacne, Insurance Communication Transport and Storage Accn, Cafes, Restaurants Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Construction Elec, Gas, Water Manufacturing Mining Agri, Forestry, Fishing Figure 55 Industry Sector by Study Areas as a Percentage, Unemployment In 2001, the immediate study area had an unemployment rate that was 3.6 % higher than the State, and 2.1 % higher than the Gold Coast Region (refer to Table 57 for more detail). The lifestyle associated with the Gold Coast as a whole is one that has perceived employment opportunities; an issue that coupled with the inward migration has the potential to effect levels of unemployment. Table 57 Unemployment Rates, Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland 11.9 % 9.8 % 8.3 % In 2003, the immediate study are had an unemployment rate of 10%, again higher than the region or state unemployment rates, however this is nearly a 2 % decrease since GCCC (2003) Social Profile 183 GCC suburb info and Social Profile 251

291 Table 58 Unemployment Rates, Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland 11.9 % 9.8 % 8.3 % Families There was a mix of family type recorded across the three study areas at the time of the 2001 Census (refer to Figure 56). The majority of families were comprised of couples with children for the immediate, regional and state study areas (42.5, 40.6 and 44.7 % respectively). Percentage Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Couple with Children Couple without Children One Parent Family Other Figure 56 Family Type by Study Areas, The next highest category was a couple without children, however the immediate study had a considerably lower percentage (33.7 %) than both the Gold Coast region (40.2 %) and Queensland and (37.4 %). These figures indicate that the immediate study has a higher level couples without children than compared to both the region and state, and is perhaps a result of the lifestyle characteristics associated with the larger numbers of units and apartments located within the immediate study area. In addition, the immediate study area has a higher percentage of people living in single persons households (17.9 %), which further supports this trend. 184 ABS (2005) National Regional Profile (ABS catalogue number ) 185 GCCC (2003) Social Profile and Suburb Statistical Profile 252

292 Transport The percentage of people in the immediate study area who own one motor vehicle (47.1 %) is higher than both the Gold Coast (40.9 %) and Queensland (40.1 %). The immediate study area also has a higher percentage (13.7 %) of people who do not own a motor vehicle. This may be consistent with the higher densities in the immediate study area which shows much lower percentages of 2 or more vehicles per occupied dwelling. Refer to Figure 57. The Gold Coast region has lower percentages of vehicle ownership compared with Queensland, which has higher rates of both two (2) and three (3) or more motor vehicles. Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Not Stated 3 or more Motor Vehicles 2 Motor Vehicles 1 Motor Vehicle No Motor Vehicles Percentage Figure 57 Number of Motor Vehicles per Occupied Dwelling by Study Area, 2001 Crime Gold Coast City has shown consistently higher rates of offences against the property than Queensland since Figure 58 illustrates a comparison between the two study areas. While overall rates for these offence types has decreased for both study areas, Gold Coast still expressed a rate 2,596 higher than Queensland at the end of

293 Rate expressed per 100,000 persons 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Gold Coast Region Queensland Figure 58 Offences Against Property, Gold Coast and Queensland, 2000 to The rate of offences against property in Gold Coast has declined considerably since 2001/02. Conversely, offences against the person in Gold Coast have remained lower than Queensland (refer to Figure 59) however rates for both study areas have been steadily increasing, with an exception Rates of other offences have also been increasing for both study areas, with Queensland having higher rates. 186 OESR (2003) Gold Coast (C) Local Government Area (LGA) Small Area Crime Profile, 2002/03 254

294 Offences Against Person (Gold Coast) Other Offences (Qld) Offences Against Person (Qld) Other Offences (Gold Coast) Rate expressed per 100,000 persons Figure 59 Offences Against the Person and Other Offences, Gold Coast andqueensland, 2000 to 2003 Over the period 2002/03, the Gold Coast experienced higher rates of robbery (both armed and unarmed) than Queensland. Extortion was also at a higher rate than Queensland. Cultural Diversity At the time of the 2001 Census, the majority of the population (65 %) within the immediate study area was born in Australia (refer to Figure 60). There was a relatively even split of people born in main English speaking countries such as the UK and USA (15 %) and non main English speaking countries (13 %). These figures suggest a significant migrant population of 28 % of the total population. Compared to the Gold Coast region and State, the immediate study area has a significantly higher percentage of people born in NMES countries (3.5 % higher), while it is 5.2 % higher than Queensland. Conversely, the immediate study area has 13.2 % less people born in Australia than Queensland and 8.9 % less than the Gold Coast region. 255

295 Percentage (a) Main English Speaking Countries: UK, USA, Ireland, South Africa, New Zealand and Canada b) Non Main English Speaking Countries: Countries other than MES Australia MES (a) NMES (b) Not Stated Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region Queensland Figure 60 Country of Birth by Study Area, The majority of residents in all study areas speak English only, however the percentage varies across these levels. For example, 92.2 % of the immediate study area speaks only English, compared to 94.8 % of the Gold Coast region and 96.3 % of Queensland. Overall, the immediate study area is much more culturally diverse than at the regional and State level with 1.6 % of the population speaking Chinese, 1.4 % speaking Japanese, 0.8 % speaking Korean and 0.8 % speaking Italian. This trend echoes the majority of migrants being born in NMES countries such as South East Asia. In the Gold Coast Region, similar trends are apparent, however they are at lower percentage rates, with 1.1 % of the population speaking Chinese (1.0 % in Queensland), 0.9 % speaking Japanese (0.2 % in Queensland), 0.3 % speaking Korean (0.1 % in Queensland) and 0.6 % speaking Italian (0.7 % in Queensland). Of those people that speak a language other than English at home, 54.1 % of those in the immediate study area indicated that they spoke well or very well in comparison to the Gold Coast region with 53.7 %. The immediate study area has a slightly higher proficiency in English compared with the Gold Coast region, however Queensland has the highest level with 56.8 % of people speak English well or very well. In contrast, the immediate study area has the highest level of people who do not speak English well (9.6 % of those that speak another language), followed by Queensland with 7.7 % of people speaking another language and the Gold Coast region with 6.9 %. Religion Religious affiliations across the Gold Coast region have varied during the decade from 1991 to The percentage of people of the Christian faith has decreased 5.5 % to 79.1 % of people since 1991, while religions such as Buddhism and Islam have increased (0.9 % and 0.4 % respectively). Refer to Figure 61 below. 187 GCCC (2003) Social Profile 256

296 Percentage Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Other Religion No Religion Figure 61 Religious Affiliations, 1991 to 2001, Gold Coast Region Tourism The immediate study area is located within one of the major tourist areas of the Gold Coast, The Spit. Tourism is a vital component of the economy of the Gold Coast region (including Gold Coast and Beaudesert Shire LGAs) generating income for the City and providing a larger number of jobs. During the financial year 1998 to 1999, the Gold Coast tourism industry generated 44,200 full time equivalent jobs in the region 188. The Gold Coast is one of Australia s premier tourist areas for both domestic and international visitors. Over the period 2001 to 2002 the Gold Coast region attracted 3.5 million visitors who spent a total of 17.4 million nights in the City. Figure 62 details the breakdown of domestic visitors to the region by place of visitor home. 188 GCCC (2003) Social Profile 257

297 Other WA TAS Perth Adelaide Melbourne Other Queensland Brisbane Percentage Figure 62 Domestic Overnight Visitor Source, Gold Coast, 2001/ The majority of domestic visitors (33 %) come from Brisbane, followed by Sydney (18.2 %) and as such intrastate visitors account for 48 % of the domestic overnight market. In 2001 to 2002, the majority of total visitors journeyed to the Gold Coast for holidays (66 %), while 20 % visited friends and relatives and 10 % came for business reasons. International visitors also make up a large component of visitors to the Gold Coast region. In the year 2001 to 2002, 784,500 people visited the Gold Coast from overseas. The major source countries are shown in Figure 63 and represent people from Japan, New Zealand, United Kingdom and Korea. 189 GCCC (2003) Social Profile p

298 Other Gold Coast Sources Other Europe Korea Singapore China UK NZ Japan Percentage Figure 63 International Visitor Source Markets, Gold Coast Region, 2001/02 These figures further support the Gold Coast as a holiday destination for Australians and international visitors alike. Gold Coast Beaches The Gold Coast region is renowned for its beaches that stretch the coastline of Gold Coast City. Figure 64 presents the average daily usage of 20 Gold Coast beaches 190. Two of the most popular beaches, Main Beach and Sheraton Beach are located within the immediate study area. These two beaches account for 9 % of the usage at these twenty beaches, further supporting the importance of these beaches to the people that visit them. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach should be considered as a priority when assessing the impacts of the proposed Notional Seaway on the Gold Coast Spit. Refer to the Community Facilities section for further information on recreational facilities and activities carried out in the Gold Coast region. 190 This data should be viewed as indicative only based on potential data estimates included for some beaches. Data was collected over the period January 2002 to December

299 Surfers Paradise Burleigh Heads Rainbow Bay M ain Beach North Cliff Kurrawa Elkhorn Avenue Greenmount Surfers North North Burleigh Wharf Road St Narrowneck 4th Avenue M ermaid Beach Nobbys Currumbin Collangatta M iami Sheraton Couran Cove ,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Average Daily Number of Beach Users Figure 64 Average Daily Beach Usage by Most Popular Beaches, Gold Coast City, Summary Gold Coast City Council (regional study area) had the second largest population increases over the year to June 2005 was ranked second in Australia in terms of population increase 192. In 2005, the estimated resident population of the immediate study area was 46, 168 people (1% of the State s population) and the regional study area was 482,566 people (12% of the State s population). The State Government (PIFU) has predicted that the population of the regional study area will be between 563,400 and 587,900 by GCCC (2003) Social Profile p OESR (2006) Information Brief Regional Population Growth: (downloaded ) 260

300 In the immediate study area there is an higher percentage of younger (14 years and younger) and older (65 years and older) compared to the regional and state study areas. The population density of the immediate study area is significantly higher than the regional and state study areas. All of the immediate study area population is in a major city area with only a small percentage of the regional study area population in an inner regional area. The immediate and regional study areas are ranked highly on the index of socioeconomic advantage. Over half of the populations in the immediate and regional study areas are wage earners with only 17% and 14% respectively having an income of a Government cash benefit. The average total income of the population living in the immediate study area is $31,703 and in the regional study area it is $32,328. The majority of couples (with or without) children in the Gold Coast SSD are above the poverty line. However the majority of one parent families are under the poverty line. In 2001, there were 20,795 dwellings in the immediate study area with an even distribution of separate houses, townhouses and units/apartments, with 2,198 dwellings unoccupied. In 2003, the median sale price for a house in the immediate study area was between $338,500 and $412,000; and the median sale price for a townhouse/unit was between $242,000 and $560,000. The median weekly rent was between $260 and $350 in the immediate study area for a 3 bedroom house and $200 and $260 for a unit or townhouse. The average household size in the immediate study area was 2.1 people compared to 2.4 for the regional study area and 2.6 for the State. At the time of the 2001, the immediate study area had similar percentages of people with educational qualifications to the regional and study area. There was an exception however with a significantly higher percentage of people without educational qualifications (over 60%) in the immediate study area compared to the regional study area (30%) and the State (25%). The immediate study area has higher percentages of people working as labourers, associate professionals and professionals compared to the regional and state study areas. In general the immediate study area follows the trends of occupation type in the regional and state study areas. The Gold Coast SSD is attracts a high percentage of domestic and international tourists and employment in related industries reflects this. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach (located within the immediate study area) account for 9% of the daily usage of Gold Coast beaches. Main Beach and Sheraton Beach should be considered as a priority when assessing the impacts of the proposed Notional Seaway on the Gold Coast Spit. 261

301 Appendix D Detailed Community Services and Facilities 262

302 Community Facilities The immediate study area is located within one of Queensland s premier regions, Gold Coast City (GCC), and as such is well serviced in terms of availability of facilities and services providing for diverse needs across the region. Many of the key social infrastructure facilities are located within the suburbs of the immediate study area such as Labrador and Southport. These lists have been developed based on information available on the Gold Coast City Council website and other internet sources, the list is not exhaustive and may not contain all service providers/facilities. The lists should be read as indicative only. Medical and Health Care The immediate study area is well serviced medically, with the Gold Coast Hospital located in Southport. Table 59 presents the medical and health care services of the immediate and Gold Coast regions. Table 59 Medical and Health Care Facilities Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Gold Coast Hospital» Affinity Health Pindara Private Hospital» Allamanda Private Hospital» Hopewell Hospice Services Inc.» Spendlove House Private Hospital» John Flynn Gold Coast Private Hospital» Pacific Private Hospital» Palm Beach Currumbin Clinic» Gold Coast Hospital Robina Campus» Gold Coast Sexual Health Clinic» Ozcare Gold Coast Upper Coomera Coolangatta Childcare Table 60 shows the day care facilities of the immediate and regional study areas. Table 60 Childcare Facilities Immediate Study Area» Bauer Street Community Children s Centre» Olsen Avenue Community Children s Centre» Railway Kindergarten and Child Care Centre Gold Coast Region» Albert Waterways Children s Centre» Ashmore Community Children s Centre» Gold Coast YMCA Family Day and In Home Care 263

303 Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Trinity Child Care Centre» Martin Street Community Childcare Emergency Services Centre» Miami Community Children s Centre» Musgrave Hill Community Children s Centre» Honey Jumble Playgroup» Nerang Playgroup» Palm Beach Neighbourhood Centre Playgroup» Studio Village Community Centre Playgroup» Varsity Lakes Community Centre Playgroup» Nerang Neighbourhood Centre Vacation Care» Robina Surfers Paradise Uniting Church Playgroups This section provides a brief introduction of the emergency services provided for in the study areas. Police There are a total of 18 police stations throughout the Gold Coast region including the regional headquarters and district office. In addition to these stations, 4 Police Beats are located at the major shopping centres. Table 62 lists the locations of each of the stations within the respective study areas. Table 61 Police Stations within the Immediate Study Area» Broadbeach Police Station Philip Ave, Broadbeach (cnr Surf Pde)» Southport Police Station 96 Scarborough St, Southport» Police Beat Australia Fair Shopping Centre Scarborough St, Southport» Main Beach Water Police Sea World Drv, Main Beach 264

304 Table 62 Police Stations Located within the Gold Coast region Gold Coast Region» Mudgeeraba Police Station 18 Railway St, Mudgeeraba» Nerang Police Station 32 Cotton St, Nerang» Palm Beach Police Station 1042 Gold Coast Hwy, Palm Beach» Robina Police Beat Robina Town Centre, Robina» Runaway Bay Police Station Morala Ave, Runaway Bay» Surfers Paradise District Office Surfers Paradise» Surfers Paradise Police Beat Paradise Centre, Surfers Paradise» Beenleigh Police Station cnr James St & Kent St, Beenleigh» Burleigh Heads Police Station 4 Matilda St, Burleigh Heads» Coolangatta Police Station Musgrave St, Coolangatta» Coomera Police Station Dreamworld Parkway, Coomera» Eagleby Police Beat Eagleby Shopping Plaza Riverhills Rd & Cnr Fryar Rd, Eagleby» Surfers Paradise Police Station 68 Ferny Ave, Surfers Paradise» Surfers Paradise Regional Headquarters South Eastern Region Ambulance The Gold Coast has a 9 Ambulance Stations within the region. The Gold Coast Area Office (2 Binstead Dr, Southport) and the Southport Ambulance (237 Nerang Rd, Southport) are located within the immediate study area. Table 63 lists the location of each station in the Gold Coast region. Table 63 Ambulance Stations within the Gold Coast Region» Coolangatta Ambulance Station Coolangatta Rd, Coolangatta» Burleigh Heads Ambulance Station West Burleigh Rd, Burleigh Heads» Helensvale Ambulance Station 28 Kingston Dr, Helensvale» Mudgeeraba Ambulance Station 30 Mudgeeraba Rd, Mudgeeraba» Runaway Bay Ambulance Station Morala Ave, Runaway Bay» Coral Gardens Ambulance Station Cnr Markeri & Alandale Sts, Mermaid Waters» Beenleigh Regional Office 32 Tansey St, Beenleigh Fire and Rescue The Gold Coast region has 8 Fire and Rescue stations, with one of these located in the immediate study area (Southport Fire Station, Cnr Prince St & Nerang Rd, Southport). Table 64 lists the locations within the region. 265

305 Table 64 Gold Coast Fire Stations» Beenleigh Fire Station Brigade Drive, Beenleigh» Helensvale Fire Station Cnr Gold Coast Highway and Discovery Drive, Helensvale» Hollywell Fire Station 318 Bayview St, Hollywell» Bilinga Fire Station Coolangatta Rd, Bilinga» Burleigh Fire Station 164 West Burleigh Rd, Burleigh Heads» Robina Fire Station Investigator Drive, Robina» Surfers Paradise Fire Station 2792 Gold Coast Hwy, Surfers Paradise Crisis and Counselling Services Crisis and counselling services include emergency accommodation and assistance services, support services and victim and help facilities. Table 65 lists those in the immediate and regional study areas. Table 65 Crisis and Counselling Services Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Gold Coast Project for Homeless Youth» Bravehearts Inc.» Ozcare Gold Coast Housing Program» Carearm» Salvation Army Still Water» Celebration House Churches Gold Coast» Meals of Wheels» Centacare Gold Coast» Alcoholics Anonymous Southport» Compassion Connection» Crossroads Recovery Association Inc» Dementia and Memory Community Centre» Lifeline Gold Coast» Gambling Help Services» Multicultural Families Organisation Inc» Gold Coast Youth Service» Relationships Australia» Newlife Care Inc.» Salvation Army Southport» Victims Counselling and Support Service» Vietnam Veterans Counselling Service Aged Care Accommodation and Respite Aged care services and facilities are well catered for at both a local suburb level within the immediate study area and across the Gold Coast region. Table 66 and Table 67 present the available services. 266

306 Table 66 Immediate Study Area Aged Care Immediate Study Area» Blue Care Allied Health Services» Eric Franks Nursing Home» Abri Home for the Aged» Golden Grove Hostel» Blue Nursing Southport/Surfers Paradise Centre» Gold Coast Community Housing Association Inc.» Leamington Nursing Home» Villa La Salle» Robert Ashton Residential Care Centre Table 67 Gold Coast Region Gold Coast Region» Coastal Home Share» Ken Hancock Home (Supported Accommodation Program)» Department of Aged Disability and Home Care» Beenleigh Neighbourhood Centre» 501 Respite and Care Services» Care Givers» Alzheimers Australia Gold Coast Inc» Kalwun Aged Care» Beenleigh and District Respite Centre» Ozcare Home Nursing» Blue Care Respite Accommodation» RSL Homecare» Commonwealth Carer Respite Centre South Coast Region» St Lukes Nursing Service» Tricare Ltd. Labrador Nursing Centre» Roslyn Lodge Aged Persons Complex» Multicultural Communities Council Gold Coast Inc Aged/Disability Day Respite» Nerang Community Respite Care Association Inc.» Ashmore Lodge Home Care Services» Amaroo Residential Care Centre» Ozcare De Paul Day Respite Centre» Amit at Merrimac» Tricare Ltd. Mermaid Beach» Beenleigh Nursing Home» Home Care Bundall» Elouera Residential Care Centre» Melody Park Retirement Resort» Gold Coast Homestead Nursing Centre» Mudgeeraba Nursing Centre» Hibiscus House Nursing Home (Earle Haven)» Nerang Nursing Centre» Jimbelunga Nursing Centre» Paradise Lakes Care Centre» Lady Small Haven» Roslyn Lodge Aged Persons Complex» St Andrews Lutheran Aged Care 267

307 Gold Coast Region» RSL Care» St James Park Care Centre» Star Gardens» Tricare Ltd. Mermaid Beach» Tricare Ltd. Bayview Place» Tricare Ltd. Pimpama Nursing Centre» Tricare Ltd. Cypress gardens Retirement Community Education Both the immediate study area suburbs and the Gold Coast region in general are well services in terms of educational facilities, both public and private there are 192 in total. Table 68 lists the schools, including primary and secondary school facilities of the immediate study area. Table 69 presents the school listing for region. Table 68 Immediate Study Area Schools» Broadbeach State Preschool Centre (4420)» Southport Secondary Special Education Unit (2302)» St Hilda's School (Southport) (5457)» Southport Special Education Unit (3477)» Broadbeach State School (1381)» Southport State High School (2037)» The Southport School (5453)» Southport State Preschool Centre (4353)» Labrador Special Education Unit (3533)» Southport State School (0368)» Musgrave Hill State School» Bellevue Park State Preschool» Kumbari Avenue Special School» Labrador State School (0443)» Labrador State Preschool Centre (4025)» Musgrave Hill Special Education Unit (2301)» Musgrave Hill Special Education Developmental Unit (3385)» Musgrave Hill State Preschool Centre (4246) Table 69 Gold Coast Region Schools» A B Paterson College (5817)» Palm Beach Currumbin Secondary Special Education Unit (5442)» All Saints Anglican School (Merrimac) (5452)» Palm Beach Currumbin State High School (2129)» Aquinas College (5316)» Pimpama State Preschool Centre (4427)» Arundel Special Education Unit (3288)» Pimpama State School (0081)» Arundel State Preschool Centre (4622)» Rivermount College (5593)» Arundel State School (1997)» Robina State High School (0195)» Ashmore State Preschool Centre (4310)» Robina State Preschool Centre (4586) 268

308 » Ashmore State School (1871)» Robina State School (1982)» Assisi Catholic College (5313)» Saint Stephen's College (0268)» Beenleigh Special School (3051)» Silkwood Steiner School (Nerang) (0738)» Beenleigh State High School (2084)» Somerset College (Mudgeeraba) (5811)» Beenleigh State High School Secondary Special Education Unit (2281)» Beenleigh State Preschool Centre (4282)» South Coast Region (5602)» South Coast School Sport (2276)» Beenleigh State School (0006)» Springbrook State School (1931)» Bellevue Park State Preschool Centre (4474)» St Andrew's Lutheran College (Andrews) (5771)» Bellevue Park State School (1925)» St Augustine's Parish Primary School (Currumbin Waters) (5119)» Benowa Special Education Developmental Unit (2300)» St Brigid's Catholic Primary School (Nerang) (5522)» Benowa State High School (2150)» St Francis Xavier School (Runaway Bay) (5121)» Benowa State Preschool Centre (4043)» St Joseph's Tobruk Memorial School (Beenleigh) (5079)» Benowa State School (0481)» St Kevin's School (Benowa) (5136)» Bethania Lutheran Primary School (5491)» Biggera Waters State Preschool Centre (4145)» St Michael's College (Carrara) (5378)» St Vincent's Primary School (Surfers Paradise) (5135)» Biggera Waters State School (0065)» Surfers Paradise Special Education Unit (ESL) (3544)» Burleigh Heads Special Education Developmental Unit (3342)» Burleigh Heads Special Education Unit (3262)» Surfers Paradise State Preschool Centre (4230)» Surfers Paradise State School (1295)» Burleigh Heads State School (1568)» Tallebudgera State Preschool Centre (4587)» Burleigh Heads State Preschool Centre (4073)» Caningeraba State Preschool Centre (4554)» Tallebudgera Beach Outdoor Education School (3555)» Tallebudgera State School (0201)» Caningeraba State School (1967)» Toogoolawa School (1802) 269

309 » Canterbury College (Waterford) (5445)» Trinity College (Beenleigh) (5367)» Cedar Creek State Preschool Centre (4534)» Trinity Lutheran College (Ashmore Road Campus) (2442)» Cedar Creek State School (0160)» Trinity Lutheran College (Cotlew Street Campus) (2443)» Clover Hill State Preschool Centre (5410)» Upper Coomera State College (2340)» Clover Hill State School (2345)» Upper Coomera State College Preschool (5154)» Coolangatta Special School (3043)» Upper Coomera State College Special Education Unit (5297)» Coolangatta State Preschool Centre (4370)» Varsity College (1759)» Coolangatta State School (1630)» Varsity College State Preschool Centre (2336)» Coombabah Secondary Special Education Unit (5294)» VSS Elanora (5564)» Coombabah State High School (2166)» Waterford Special Education Unit (2394)» Coombabah State Preschool Centre (4447)» Waterford State Preschool Centre (4549)» Coombabah State School (1909)» Waterford State School (0130)» Coomera Anglican College (0594)» William Duncan Special Education Unit (3548)» Coomera Special Education Unit (3272)» William Duncan State Preschool Centre (4560)» Coomera State Preschool Centre (4373)» William Duncan State School (1972)» Coomera State School (0124)» Windaroo Special Education Unit (3481)» Currumbin State Preschool Centre (4253)» Windaroo State Preschool Centre (4609)» Currumbin State School (1168)» Windaroo State School (1990)» Currumbin Valley State School (0775)» Windaroo Valley State High School (2189)» Eagleby Learning Centre Centre for Continuing Secondary Education (3711)» Eagleby South Special Education Unit (3263)» Woongoolba State School (0039)» Worongary Special Education Unit (3289)» Eagleby South State Preschool Centre» Worongary State Preschool Centre 270

310 (4339) (4617)» Eagleby South State School (1876)» Worongary State School (1993)» Eagleby State Preschool Centre (4579)» Pacific Pines State Preschool Centre (2341)» Eagleby State School (1974)» Pacific Pines State School (1744)» Edens Landing State Preschool Centre (0611)» Palm Beach State Preschool Centre (4205)» Edens Landing State School (0301)» Palm Beach State School (0240)» Elanora Secondary Special Education Unit (5543)» Mount Warren Park State School (1906)» Elanora Special Education Unit (3443)» Mudgeeraba Creek State Preschool Centre (0428)» Elanora State High School (2183)» Mudgeeraba Creek State School (0159)» Elanora State Preschool Centre (4551)» Mudgeeraba Special Education Unit (0272)» Elanora State School (1923)» Mudgeeraba Special School (3049)» Emmanuel College (Carrara) (5814)» Mudgeeraba State Preschool Centre (4438)» Gaven State Preschool Centre (4628)» Mudgeeraba State School (0663)» Gaven State School (1752)» Nerang Secondary Special Education Unit (2303)» Gilston State Preschool Centre (4544)» Nerang State High School (2169)» Gilston State School (0050)» Nerang State Preschool Centre (4286)» Gold Coast Christian College (5477)» Nerang State School (0218)» Gold Coast District Office (5624)» Numinbah Valley Environmental Education Centre (3558)» Gold Coast International Student Centre (5485)» Numinbah Valley State School (0785)» Gold Coast Montessori College (5484)» Ormeau State Preschool Centre (4537)» Gold Coast Positive Learning Centre (5673)» Guardian Angels' Catholic Primary School (S'port) (5113)» Helensvale Secondary Special Education Unit (1643)» Ormeau State School (0336)» Oxenford State Preschool Centre (4562)» Oxenford State School (1970)» Helensvale State High School (2184)» Pacific Pines State High School (1745)» Helensvale State Preschool Centre» Mount Warren Park State Preschool 271

311 (4471) Centre (4416)» Helensvale State School (1929)» Merrimac State High School (2147)» Hillcrest Christian College (5571)» Merrimac State Preschool Centre (4317)» Ingleside State School (0661)» Merrimac State School (1586)» Jacobs Well Environmental Education Centre (3552)» Miami Secondary Special Education Unit (3236)» Jubilee Primary School (2263)» Miami Special Education Unit (3464)» Keebra Park Special Education Unit (ESL) (3256)» Miami State High School (2086)» Keebra Park State High School (2046)» Miami State Preschool Centre (4437)» King Solomon College (0382)» Miami State School (1890)» King's Christian College (5582)» Marymount Primary School (Burleigh Heads) (5115)» Livingstone Christian College (2417)» Merrimac Secondary Special Education Unit (0280)» Logan Albert Beaudesert District Office (5625)» Lutheran Ormeau Rivers District School (5529)» Mount Warren Park Special Education Unit (2390)» Mount Warren Park Special Education Developmental Unit (3390)» Marymount College (Burleigh Waters) (5381) Table 70 Further Education Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Central Queensland University» Bond University» Griffith University Gold Coast Campus» Australian International College of Art» Gold Coast Institute of TAFE Community Centres and Meeting Spaces Two community centres are located in the immediate study area including Southport Community Centre and Southport Rotary Youth Centre. The Gold Coast region is generally well serviced in community centres and meeting spaces, with the following facilities.» Gold Coast Arts Centre» Numinbah Valley School of Arts Hall» Helensvale Community Centre» Palm Beach Neighbourhood Centres Inc» Marg Shipman Community Centre» Paradise Point Community Centre» Mermaid Beach Community Centre» Oakwood/Arundel Community Centre 272

312 » Gold Coast Arts Centre» Numinbah Valley School of Arts Hall» Mount Nimmel Community Hall» Pimpama School of Arts» Nerang Bicentennial Community Centre» Robina Community Centre» Nerang Community Centre» Jacobs Well Community Centre» Nerang Neighbourhood Centre» Kerrydale Community Centre» Runaway Bay Community Centre» Share n Care Centre Inc.» Studio Village Community Centre Inc.» Bert Swift Community Centre» Tallebudgera Valley Community Hall» Bethania Community Centre» Tugun Village Community Centre» Burleigh Waters Community Centre» Albert Waterways Community Centre» Carrara Community Centre» Banksia Park Hall Community Centre» Eagleby Community Centre Association» Beenleigh Community Centre» Elanora Community Centre» Coomera QCWA Hall» Fradgley Hall Community Centre» Gilston Community Hall» Silverbridle Community Centre Inc.» Mudgeeraba Memorial Hall» Springbrook Hall» Tugun Community Centre» Yawalpah Community Centre Youth Activities and Services The youth population of the Gold Coast region is serviced by a range of providers offering drug and alcohol counselling, youth accommodation and health services. Table 71 lists the services available within the immediate and regional study areas. Table 71 Youth Services Immediate Study Area» Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Services Northside Clinic Southport (Gold Coast Hospital) Gold Coast Region» Beenleigh Area Youth Service» Child & Youth Mental Health Southport» Multicultural Families Organisation» Broadbeach Waters Police Youth Club» Al Anon & Alateen Family Groups» Community Child Health Centres Main Centre» Gold Coast Eating Disorders Association Inc.» Gold Coast Youth Services Inc.» Ashmore Police Youth Club 273

313 » Nerang Police Youth Club» Anglicare Beenleigh Youth Accommodation & Support Service Sporting and Recreational Facilities The Gold Coast region boasts several world class sports facilities. While none are located within the immediate study area they are well spread across the region and accessible for various sporting types. Table 72 lists them and Figure 65 provides the location. Table 72 Gold Coast Sporting Facilities Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Gold Coast Regatta Centre» Gold Coast Athletics Track» Carrara Indoor Stadium» Beenleigh Indoor Stadium» Carrara Stadium» Gold Coast Cycle Centre» Runaway Bay Indoor Stadium» Palm Meadows Baseball Facility The GCCC provides swimming enclosures to supplement to open beaches and to provide a relatively safe swimming environment for less confident and younger paddlers. Table 73 lists the swimming enclosures. These swimming enclosures are often incorporated into the Gold Coast s open space networks of parks and recreational facilities such as barbeques. Table 73 Swimming Enclosures Immediate Study Area Gold Coast Region» Southport Swimming Enclosure» Paradise Point Swimming Enclosure» Broadwater Parklands Wet Play area» Jacobs Well Swimming Enclosure» Harley Park Swimming Lagoon» Evandale Swimming Lagoon» Murlong Swimming Enclosure The recreational facilities within the immediate and regional study areas cater for all levels and ages of people wishing to be active. The immediate study area has a skate park located on Musgrave Avenue at Labrado. Table 74 lists the skate parks located within the regional study area. Table 74 Skate Parks Gold Coast Region» Firth Park Somerset Drive Mudgeeraba» Olsen Avenue, Arundel» Arthur Earle Park, Nerang» Ashmore Village Park, Ashmore 274

314 Gold Coast Region» Brockman Way Reserve Cnr Brockman Way & Pitcairn Way, Pacific Pines» Doug Larsen Park, Beenleigh» Pizzey Park, Miami» Oppermann Park, Bethania» Silver Bridle Park, Molendinar» Betty Diamond Sports Complex, Bilinga» Elanora Oval Park Court, Elanora» Goodwin Park, Coolangatta» Salk Oval, Palm Beach» Viney Park, Coomera» Runaway Bay Sports Complex, Runaway Bay» Discovery Park, Helensvale» Janette Green Park, Varsity Lakes» Chatfield Park Edens Landing 275

315 Figure 65 Recreation Facilities Network Local Study Area 276

316 Public Transport The public transport network in Gold Coast City offers a variety of travel options including taxi services, bus and rail. Surfside Busline services Southport to Tweed along the coastal strip with additional services travelling to other parts of the coast. Regular trains run from Brisbane to the Gold Coast, with bus connections available from Helensvale and Robina stations and Nerang railway station running to Surfers Paradise. Coach travel is provided at the Surfers Paradise Transit Centre, and water taxis and ferries operate from the Runaway Bay Marina. Shopping Facilities The immediate study area is located in one of the tourist desitnations within the Gold Coast region hosting several large shopping centre precincts including Marina Mirage, Broadbeach Mall, Pacific Fair, Australia Fair, Main Beach, Oasis Shopping Centre and Niecon Plaza. Shopping facilities are also located throughout the remainder of the Gold Coast region an include Surfers Paradise Mall, Sanctuary Cove, Chevron Renaissance, Coolangatta Showcase, Robin Town Centre, Harbour Town, Runaway Bay Shopping Village and Q Superstore. Cultural Centres Libraries The immediate study area is well serviced by library infrastructure, with facilities located at Cascade Gardens, Broadbeach, Southport and Local Studies Library Southport. Branches can be found at Robina, Beenleigh, Helensvale, Nerang, Mudgeeraba, Elanora, Burleigh Waters, Burleigh Heads, Palm Beach, Coolangatta, Runaway Bay and Mermaid Waters. Mobile Libraries also service the region at locations in Surfers Paradise, Miami, Merrimac, Carrara, Clear Island Waters and Main Beach. Cultural Facilities The GCCC s Cultural Vision is reflected in the variety of arts and cultural facilities planned for in the region, with Gold Coast becoming a centre for cultural activities. Facilities include:» Gold Coast Arts Centre» Hinterland Heritage Museum» Robina Gallery» Historical Museum» Mudgeeraba troop 14 th Light Horse Regiment Museum» Gold Coast Sporting Hall of Fame» Yugambah Museum Overall, the Gold Coast region is home to 84 art galleries, 22 drama theatre organisations including 11 producing companies and 2 theatre venues, and over 300 cultural groups and organisations. 277

317 Places of Worship GCC has 116 places of worship crossing all Christian denominations, including 20 located within the immediate study area. (Australian Churches.net) Cemeteries GCCC operates 10 cemeteries and burial services at the following locations. Two of these are located within the immediate study area.» Alberton Cemetery» Mudgeeraba Cemetery» Beenleigh Cemetery» Nerang Cemetery» Coomera Cemetery» Pimpama Cemetery» Upper Coomera Cemetery» Southport General Cemetery» Eagleby Cemetery» Southport Lawn Cemetery Parks and Gardens GCC offers a wide array of parks and gardens to suit the varying recreational needs of the community. Facilities at the parks include amenities, picnic and barbeque facilities, play equipment, sporting facilities and beach and boat access. There immediate study area has 12 parks including Harley Park in Labrador, Washington Water Park (ANZAC Park) in Southport and Cascade Gardens in Broadbeach. The remainder of the Gold Coast region has a total of 76 parks. Summary The Gold Coast region is well serviced in social infrastructure including community services and facilities. Gold Coast and in particular the immediate study area is provided with many support services including crisis and counselling services, aged care and childcare facilities. The immediate study area in particular hosts numerous educational facilities including government and non government schools, TAFE and some of Queensland s leading University campuses. In terms of community centres, the region is well equipped, with many of these centres providing spaces for local groups to meet. Arts and cultural activities and events play a large part in shaping the identify of the Gold Coast and the area is well supplied with both venue for performance and exhibition in addition to art activities people can participate in. Open space is one of the reasons many people travel to the Gold Coast for its large network of beaches, parks and gardens. In addition, the sporting facilities located throughout the region are of a professional standard. The Gold Coast is a major tourist destination and its shopping facilities are well renowned with Marina Mirage and Australia Fair some of the larger precincts. 278

318 Appendix E GCCC Local Area Plan for The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour) LAP Precinct 279

319 Figure 66 The Spit (Gold Coast Harbour) Local Area Plan 280

320 Appendix F VMR Statistics on Use of the Seaway 281

321 VMR volunteered this information to be included in the. According to VMR representatives, the actual number of seaway users should be doubled because not all vessels radio into the seaway tower to log their journey (including the trawlers and charter boat vessels who have their own reporting requirements). 282

322 Table 75 VMR Seaway Tower Southport Operational Statistics 2005 Month 27 Mhz HF VHF UHF Total Radios Vessels Phone Ins Phone Outs May days Pan Pans Securit ies Seaway Report Assist s Weather Reports Radio Checks Watch Hours Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Totals , Month Ave

323 In 2006, VMR reported the following number of vessels leaving the seaway:» Jan 990» Feb 716» March 423» April 1142» May 979 These numbers:» Does not count the number of crossing not reported to the Seaway Tower, nor those for other ports; and» Does not include return journey through Seaway. 284

324 Appendix G Observational Mapping Methodology Site Maps Observational Mapping Results Recreation Observational Mapping Results Sporting 285

325 Methodology The methodology the observational surveys were based on identifying various ways of how the Spit is used at different times throughout the day. Table 76 lists the observational survey times and days. Table 76 Observational Dates and Times Day/Date Session Time Tuesday 18 April 1 6 am 8.30 am Thursday 20 April 2 11 am 1.30 pm pm 6 pm Saturday 22 April am 10 am pm 6 pm Sunday 23 April am 10 am pm Six sites were chosen for this observational study. A pilot survey was carried out prior to the implementation of the surveys to ensure the appropriateness of the observational sites. Table 77 lists the site and a brief description, while Appendix A illustrates graphically the site locations and field of observation. The order presented in Table 77 is the site order employed when conducting the observational surveys. Table 77 Site Observational Sites and Description Description A Hollindale Park B Phillip Park C Boat Ramp D Seaway E Marine Stadium F Island View This site was located in Hollindale Park overlooking the main entry roundabout to Seaworld Drive at the furthest point from the seaway. From this position, people travelling past the roundabout and travelling north and those walking through and past the park to the right were recorded. This site was located in the car park adjacent to Phillip Park. People accessing the beach through access tracks as well as those moving through the park or parking their cars were recorded. This site included the boat ramp and adjacent beachfront. Researchers were placed in the car park were people using the car park or travelling nearby were recorded. This site involved the researchers positioning themselves on the rock wall facing north to South Stradbroke Island. From here the researchers were able to view up the seawall in both directions. This site located the researchers facing south as they were positioned on the pump station platform. This viewpoint allowed sight in both directions around the stadium foreshore. This site involved research positioning themselves facing west to observe the activities along the seawall and foreshore to the left in addition to water activities taking place as people travelling past. 286

326 Two GHD researchers travelled to the Spit to undertake the observational mapping. To ensure quality data was recorded, both researchers recorded counts of people as they were observed in carrying out activities that coincided with the key categories of interest on the survey form from which an average of count was taken. To differentiate the uses at specific times, additional information such as tidal information and weather including temperature were also recorded. Particular weather types were assumed to influence the numbers of people participating in specific activities. Each site was surveyed for a total of twenty minutes during the times indicated in Table 76. In addition, the surveys were carried out in the same sequence to ensure consistency in data gathering. It should be noted that the results obtained through these observational surveys are indicative only and represent a snapshot of the types of use observed at the times recorded. 287

327 Figure 67 Site Plan for the Observational Mapping 288

328 Figure 68 Observational Survey Recreational Results 289

329 Figure 69 Observational Survey Sporting Results 290

330 Appendix H Results of SIA Consultations Summary of Focus Groups Participants and Results One on One Meeting Results 291

331 Focus Groups Introduction Focus Groups are a qualitative technique used in to aid in structured discussion and qualification of social impacts (Barrow 2000). Focus groups were employed in this instance to identify the social impacts (positive, negative, direct, indirect and cumulative) of the Notional Seaway Project. Focus groups are usually comprised of between 5 and 15 people of similar commonality such as association with a particular group. The focus groups conducted as part of this SIA utilised tow techniques for focused discussion of social impacts, they include impact webbing and impact mapping. Impact Webbing Impact webbing is a type of brainstorming, which links the predicted cause of effects of the Project. The process is particularly helpful to identify the complex links between the impacts particularly from the biophysical and the social realm. Impact Mapping Impact mapping is an exercise where the stakeholders will identify on the concept plan, geographical areas of impact and provide a description of the impacts. This information will be entered in a Geographical Information System, where impacts can be identified by type, stakeholder and location. Participants The following table illustrates the participants involved in the focus groups as part of this SIA. The table also shows reference to the individual results in associated appendices. Table 78 Focus Group Participants Focus Group Date Time Divers 15/05/ am 1 pm Surfers 15/05/ pm 2.30 pm Gecko 15/05/ pm 7 pm Save Our Spit Alliance 16/05/ pm 8 pm Main Beach Progress Association 23/05/ pm 4 pm Economic/ Business 25/05/ pm 2 pm Education (CoastEd and Beachcare) 26/05/ am am Friends of Federation Walk 28/05/ am 12 noon Gold Coast City Council 06/06/ pm 3.30 pm Nerang Community Association 07/06/ pm 10 pm Dog Walkers 13/06/ pm 7 pm 292

332 Summary of Results For each focus group exercise the results were collated using computer software and a synthesis of the results was generated. The following figures illustrates the summary of the 13 focus groups conducted. Due to the large size of the figure, it has been split into the various subheadings:» EIS process;» Safety;» Benefits;» Community Amenity;» Construction and Operation;» Cost; and» Environment. 293

333 Figure 70 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing EIS Process 294

334 Figure 71 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Safety 295

335 Figure 72 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Benefits 296

336 Figure 73 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Community Amenity 297

337 Figure 74 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Construction and Operation 298

338 Figure 75 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Cost 299

339 Figure 76 Summary of Focus Group Impact Webbing Environment 300

340 One on one Meetings with Stakeholders As part of the consultation for the SIA, GHD conducted one on one meetings with stakeholders who could either not attend the organised focus groups or were deemed important to consult with. The following table presents the key comments from each of these one on one meetings. Table 79 Key Stakeholders and Comments Stakeholder Gold Coast Marine Industry Association Key Comments or Concerns» Dredging Concerns over the need to ensure adequate depth of water to allow larger vessels to utilise the seaway The onset on dredging costs How far out will it be required to dredge Maintenance dredging erosion of Doug Jennings Park (reinforce existing rock wall)» Current constraints on the availability of marina berths in the Gold Coast area. Providing additional berths will attract more people to the area.» GCMIA would be happy with the cruise terminal if it meant a means to get the super yacht berths at marine stadium» The availability of safe anchorage is important» The development would make the Gold Coast a more vibrant and exciting experience» What would the security requirements for the terminal be (exclusion zone)» Will it be a Port of Destination? Will the general public be able to use Doug Jennings Park?» Increases in the volume of traffic through the district, a massive load on the road infrastructure» The costs associated with this Project will never be recouped. Who will pick up the costs?» Marine stadium is financially viable as a stand alone Project. Is there a possibility of the cruise terminal and marine stadium being separated?» Super yachts are better located at Versace.» What will be the legacy of this Project? Paradise Jet Boating» Positive elements of the Project a chance to attract extra business from the cruise ship (a new source of supply)» Potential to increase the aesthetics of the area» Negative aspects include disruption to the Broadwater (main channel and behind Wave Break Island) 301

341 Stakeholder Key Comments or Concerns» Worse case is if the area is closed. Will the swing basin be closed during the one hour exclusion? Does not want to be excluded from the main channel.» A lot of the vessels in marine stadium are there illegally it is meant to be a short term safe haven not permanent The Sand Pumping Jetty and Kiosk» Not really worried about the development.» Currently have the only public toilets on The Spit» Doug Jennings Park is not patronised a lot at present. Except for a couple of concerts a year, not many people use the park» Current parking situation is ugly» Could be an opportunity to beautify the area a lot more and attract tourists» Progress is okay if it is done right St. John s Drop in Centre» The Seaway area is a place to relax» Homeless people camping in the dunal bushes in tents. This practice is secret due to safety concerns. Trend is to walk from The Spit to Surfers Paradise for services.» Homeless people are there by choice. It is attractive for homeless because it is free; close to the surf for cleanliness. Most (up to 80% have some sort of mental illness).» 90% men between 25 and 45 years. Very limited accommodation for them. They are dependent on services Gold Coast City Council Social Planning Group» Natural area within an urban one. This development changes the focus of what can be done with the area. Changing the environmental values of the area.» Project commercialises family friendly is still water environment» Affordable housing source in terms of people living in their boats» Marine Stadium displacement of users i.e. dogs, shade, events and the subsequent impact on other sites» Loss of opportunity for what could be generated in the future» Increasingly important space it is different from the beaches allows a release from daily pressures» People with disabilities can enjoy the space» An upgrade of Federation Walk is needed with quality facilities; an investment in rehabilitation; multi million $ reinvestment to support the urban use of the area» Community Values: Large space 302

342 Stakeholder Key Comments or Concerns Accessible Different to rest of the Gold Coast no urban form Fishing, family and recreation Driving around to enjoy the views Dog walking Looking into the area you get green space» Displaced activity of hoons as area becomes more urban Peters Fish Market» Will there be upgrading of the road by the Government or Developer?» Things should be kept for the public stolen public before and given to developers» Need another bridge Traffic is bad up to the Sundale Bridge Main Beach is currently strangled by current traffic issues Bottleneck is already here» Services for marina are needed Facilities for charter buses at the marina and they are currently creating a hazard parking along the side of the road at present Ability for semi trailers unload tuna from boats is needed Unloading, re fuelling and maintenance facilities» Federation walk needs upgrading but should remain. It could potentially be a beautiful walkway» Development will increase the number of people travelling to The Spit» Erosion factor of when super yachts are backed into berths Volunteer Marine Rescue» A very large number of vessels utilise the area; it is the busiest waterway in Australia with a high diversity of craft» Seaway mouth changes quickly it can fill overnight. The costs of ongoing dredging» Cannot close the seaway it can only be recommended» Safety aspects: Safety of attempting to close the seaway and the measures that would need to be put in place Who will police the changes? Increased safety issues with cruise ship People come in and go out when it suits; the are not going to wait for a cruise ship to dock Restrictions in the width of the channel when the ship is in 303

343 Stakeholder Key Comments or Concerns This will lessen extensively the safety of the Seaway» Cannot stop marine safety vessels coming in and out of the seaway» There is enough trouble maintaining the water depth as it is without further dredging of the area» 3 knot current to North/South. Within an hour it can be over knots and from a whole different direction» There will be no pressure on resources unless VMR are given the authority to enforce. They are a non authoritative volunteer body» Marine Stadium is necessary given the inadequacy of number of berths People will spend money from the super yachts not the cruise ship 365 berths will not increase water traffic» Currently the safest harbour between Gold Coast and Brisbane for small craft» The navigable speed to get into the Seaway and then pull up comes down to a tug (6 8 hours to dispatch from Brisbane)» VMR take patients to VMR if immediate emergency care is needed they take patients to the Grand. Ambulance access is required. South Stradbroke Island Ferry Service» The development of Marine Stadium would improve the area. The area needs something done to it.» The additional berths are a good idea it will fill without any problems» The Spit is dangerous at night development could chase out criminal activity (rally track at night; hoon carpark)» Would it be possible to dredge the back channel as a safe deep alternative» Ferry terminal is a good idea but public access must be maintained» Lighting will highlight the river bank and make it safer to cross at night» It would give the cruise ship terminal passengers the opportunity to be transferred to wherever they want to go via ferry. This could offset the road traffic. Interested in setting this up running a service» Minimal employment opportunities at the super marina» A monopoly of The Spit should be avoided. It could be dangerous if one developer gets to build on The Spit. It should not be exclusive.» More marina area could be provided at Southport opposite Pacific Fair as an alternative to Marine Stadium. Kalwun Development Corporation» The development is a good idea.» Potential for employment for local Indigenous people in construction and operation. 304

344 Stakeholder Key Comments or Concerns» The inclusion of an Indigenous Cultural Centre (links to Paradise Dreaming).» For Paradise Dreaming to be marketed to the cruise ship passengers» Issue of having the commercial vessels and the super yachts so close together.» Safety associated with the cruise ships coming in.» Concern about congestion in the marina.» The proposed development does not have any impacts on the ability of Indigenous people on the Gold Coast to live in accordance with their own values and priorities.» The proposed development does not impact on Indigenous people to use and access culturally important areas and landscapes.» The proposed development does not hinder the ability of Indigenous people to access existing human and commercial services and housing.» The proposed development does not hinder the ability of Indigenous people to participate in regional and local employment and training opportunities, it may increase the opportunities to do so.» There is a seasonal increase in the population of Indigenous people on the Gold Coast in the summer months, with the project, more people might relocate to the Gold Coast, possibly putting pressure on Kalwun and the services they provide: Community Development Housing and long term rental for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people HACC and aged care Environmental advisory Social support and emergency relief Cross cultural police liaison Aboriginal culture/radio program Medical and dental clinic Legal support/preventative/diversionary rehabilitation/education Sports promotion Cultural tours Aboriginal child care agency/foster care (Indigenous Child Care Centre) 305

345 Appendix I Focus Group Surfers Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 306

346 Figure 77 Focus Group Surfers: Impact Webbing Exercise The cost of surfing has been estimated at $20,000,000 by a recent university study. 307

347

348 Figure 78 Focus Group Surfers: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 80) 309

349 Focus Group Surfers: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: Monday 15/05/2006 Time: 2:00 2:30 pm Table 80 AREA Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Surfers FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin Interruption of natural longshore sand transport due to dredging, loss of bombie and banks at South Stradbroke, Erosion of South Stradbroke Island Have seasonal variations to surf been taken into account? Is it still viable in 20 years due to sea level rises? No area to paddle from Permanent Barge in the seaway taking up area, which is a concern for public safety Risk of fuel spill due to collision Visual impact of ships and terminal Where are the Elected substation and waste treatment plant, what are the emergency procedures for confining hazardous materials/spillage Dredging will destroy seagrass, fish nursery and dugong nursery No sand movement north Loss of $20 Million recreational asset Loss of sand, build up of sand on South Stradbroke Island What are the wall lengths? If extended what will happen to current dredging/bypass system? Waves at South Stradbroke Island are unique due to outside banks/shoals. Dredging will impact significantly on wave quality Concerns for erosion on South Stradbroke Island Tidal flow and wind activity in initial studies, completely incorrect Tidal flow affected in coastal crossing and at all locations in Nerang River/Broadwater/Sand Banks/Sea life in Broadwater Loss of popular fishing locations within seaway Entry point on outgoing tide is lot Boat access during mooring to seaway will be a no go zone while cruise boats are mooring Occasional surf spot at wave break (in cyclonic conditions) will be lost Wave break is a popular day trip destination i.e. loss of amenity Impact of very large exclusion zones associated with military ship visits have not been mentioned 310

350 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS the severe impact of construction on users of the Spit area. Loss of visual impact and sense of place will be significant over a long construction period. 2. Doug Jennings Park Restriction in events within Doug Jennings Park 3. Marine Stadium Where do all the people go that use this area? 4. Trailer Boat Area Water affected by antifouling from super yachts and cruisers. Health concerns for public swimming Access to the Marine Stadium currently a great family location How many public boats do you expect to moor here with a ramp boat access within metres? What about Boats, ski s, unpowered craft the severe impact of construction on users of the Spit area. Loss of visual impact and sense of place will be significant over a long construction period. 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Sand build up from wall extension (should this be included in this area?) Waves also affected from long break wall i.e. loss of waves, more aggravation/abuse, safety concerns in existing surf spots (should this be included in this area?) More people utilising the beach if clam water access taken, which will lead to more damage to spit reserve When are the main beach residents going to be consulted? Acoustic amenity impact during construction and general operation of terminal Northern beaches affected by dredging Should be a focus on enhancing the area for Public use not the minority use. This is the Governments opportunity to give something back to the public. 6. Broadwater Erosion at wave break island loss of recreational amenity Visual impact on Labrador residents 7. General Gold Coast is the world hub of surf manufacture. Massive economic loss to local business Residential developments in the future not shown in concept, all other plans show that they want it? Construction traffic impacts Increase in local traffic at main beach during construction and in the future? What infrastructure? Surfers seeking high quality waves displaced to other areas, increasing crowding and tension Impact of very large exclusion zones associated with military ship visits have not been mentioned the severe impact of construction on users of the Spit area. Loss of visual impact and sense of place will be significant over a long construction period. 311

351 Appendix J Focus Group Divers Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 312

352 Figure 79 Focus Group Divers: Impact Webbing Exercise 313

353

354 Figure 80 Focus Group Divers: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 81) 315

355 Focus Group Divers: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 15/05/2005 Time: pm Table 81 AREA Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Divers FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin Drift Dive site, some Green Turtles may be disturbed as well as all marine life. Concern for access for boat rides to surf on Stradbroke Island no access for people to paddle cross to Stradbroke Noise is impossible when diving Loss of sand pipe. Best artificial reef in a suburban area in a city. We should be proud of it and promoting it not destroying it. QLD Grouper habitat lost (protected species) ornate ghost pipe fish. Loss of reef which is a cleaning station for eagle rays, manta rays and giant Queensland groper. Entry and exit point for divers Pollution of air, water, visual and noise Disturbed coffee rock with increased iron sulphate Loss of Dive sites on Wave Breaks at two points No access at all when Boats are moored in the Seaway Cost to the community of ongoing Dredging Effect of ongoing dredging, it is well documented that ongoing dredging will stop regeneration of area. Dredge plumes repel pelagic fish and retard aquatic plant growth. A distance of between 2 and 10 metres will be required for a wall? Increased tidal flow Seagrass beds lost Swimming safety decreased in and around the seaway including the effect on safety at surf beaches Extended south wall could potentially mean the loss of the Scottish Prince a protected wreck dive site. Barramundi Cod (protected species) Nursery lost Seahorse and Marine Nursery lost Entry and exit point for divers affected lost Fishing spots lost 2. Doug Jennings Park No access during construction 316

356 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Loss of Marine habitat, extensive dive spots lost 3. Marine Stadium Pollution air, water, visual and noise 4. Trailer Boat Area Loss of safe swimming beach Loss of diver training area Loss of public boating moorings, the proposed Marine Stadium is okay for the wealthy Loss of heavily used public area, families, tourists, boats and relaxation. 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Increased business for kiosk Loss of public space, loss of green space Loss of sporting event access Loss of concert area for youth Impact of changed water flow will impact negatively, that is unsafe swimming and surf beaches Loss of dive wreck Scottish Prince protected wreck due to sand coverage 6. Broadwater Loss of pristine broadwater through pollution, fuel spills, rubbish dumped. Visual, water, air and noise pollution. 7. General Loss of Dive business Loss of income Loss of variety for Tourists Loss of major ecosystem experience for tourists Loss of flow of income to supporting businesses Keeping it to an eco tourism area makes better sense Decimate the dive industry at this end of the Gold Coast 317

357 Appendix K Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance Impact Mapping Exercise Impact Webbing Exercise 318

358 Figure 81 Focus Group Save Our Spit: Impact Webbing Exercise 319

359 Figure 82 Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 82) 320

360 Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 16/05/2005 Time: pm Table 82 AREA Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Save Our Spit Alliance FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin Council plans for sewerage settlement ponds on South Stradbroke the whole area becomes a toilet Surfers prevented from crossing the Seaway 100 metre exclusion zone which will require restricted access A minimum of 500 metre foreshore will be lost Loss of surfing opportunities on South Stradbroke Island as a result of walls and dredging Concern for South Stradbroke Island when the mass of dredging is done. How will South Stradbroke wall be reinforced? Increased pollution risks and introduction of dominent species (need to learn from the past) The antifouling chemicals on the bottom of the ship can be lethal to marine life, how can we check each and every ship? Initial dredging and ongoing dredging due to seasonal conditions will decimate marine life and fish stocks (continual dredging not just as a result of seasonal changes daily movement of waves and tides) The dive industry will be economically decimated due to the con(de)struction of their dive area. A dive area that meets our diving regulations as PADI instructors. Currently, the dive area enables diving for 6 hours a day in the seaway entry and 3 hours in the Swing Basin all year round as the water temperature is so mild. Also loss of only dive area where divers who are travel sick or fear boarding boats, can walk in from shore. Removal of sand pipe or relocation will also decimate marine life This area can only be dived at high tide. A diverse experience is available. Taking away freedom of access to diving, surfing, emergency services and fishing Concern about the severe dredging and the devastation of the marine life Ports are dirty, unclean and unsafe areas. We don t want the area to change Used by dive businesses that are catered to pre planned international tourists will be economically damaged. A now safe swimming and boating area will become dangerous with increased tidal flow from the north wall and movement in and out of large cruise and cargo ships. Dredging this will kill the marine life and the sand bank (from dredging) will make the area too dangerous anyway. Constant dredging of this area based on tidal, wave, wind, storm, etc will be an 321

361 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS economic ongoing cost to local ratepayers and should be the developer s (or beneficeries of the profits) liability. Currently the sand bank in front of the wave break creates protection for the beach for beach access. Dredging will destroy this. Concern for wave break whether it will be subject to reinforced concrete, which is not desirable Destruction of seahorse habitat and fish breeding area These waters will never be decent again Entry area is safe and clean haven for migrating whales this will be destroyed 2. Doug Jennings Park Doug Jennings Park will have restrictions, when a ship is in dock Area is used by all socio economic groups therefore all people have access, no matter what their income. Many from Brisbane. Loss of quiet status of park plus increased air pollution from ships Is more of the Doug Jennings Park going to be taken for the kiosk? Not all the required infrastructure is on the notional plan. More park land will be lost through the nibble affect as is the case of MacIntosh Park for Indy. Residents who utilise DJ Park will have less parking spots due to spaces taken up for buses and coaches. Doug Jennings Park is earmarked for protection 100% of it If access to the water is hindered due to the shipping terminal position how do uses of the park access to and from the water? The park is used for its multiple experiences. 3. Marine Stadium Negative impacts of increased population to a currently quiet area Total loss of public open space, not just Doug Jennings Park Potential future development risk Sullage and pollutant issues (who polices this?) Access conflict to public moorings (have current residents been advised?) I can no longer bring my children to the safe haven of the marine stadium because there will be so many super yachts/cruisers berthed there The loss of the marine stadium cannot be replaced Only safe(non Ocean) and accepted area to take dogs for swim and leashed run. Where will current boaty residents be relocated to? On the notional drawing they are at the entrance to the Marine Stadium which is not safe and manageable. Safe boating swimming area that will no longer be accessible Once this area is destroyed it can never ever be taken back 4. Trailer Boat Area Increased usage contradicts restricted access Cost for kiosk and possible link to southern site? 322

362 AREA 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Second kiosk will impact on existing kiosk We don t want this waterside park (No. 15 of proposal) 6. Broadwater Erosion Loss of revenue for the kiosk as it is not in the line of local traffic Recreational areas are free, International athletes train here and bring more athletes to use these facilities Loss of athletes training route Increased risk of further fires due to increased traffic flow 7. General Flooding and erosion upstream in the Coomera and Nerang Rivers as a result of impacts from increased tidal flows Ruin best diving in any city in Australia No one wants it it benefits a select few but the ongoing costs are born on the residents and rate payers Most people (approximately 99%) that use the area, just don t want it Over 15,000 residents have signed the petitions usually enough for a referendum so why not have one Traffic chaos, but businesses on Main Beach will get traffic Increased accidents and congestion. Increased cost of improvements and widening of roads in quiet residential area. Increased hazards of fuel transportation and water and waste disposal Based on International Maritime Law we believe there will be no access due to security issues as an International Port due to customs issues. Loss of eco tourism opportunities all year walk in dive spot Loss of educational opportunities for all levels of education who currently utilise the area for marine biology and tourism Loss of the opportunity to have the Spit as a world class ocean side park. The loss of the largest public open space on the Gold Coast visited by ALL residents of the GC hence the emotional and social impacts especially to those living in high density areas. Contravenes basic town planning requirements which state adequate open space must be provided to residents. The social impact upon the community cannot be measured by cost Community Groups are being financially effected as the are giving up their own time and money to fight this and only being given short response times Increased safety and crime rate issues with naval vessels Increased concerns with vessels carrying nuclear capabilities Unacceptable EIS time frame of 4 months which does not take into account all four seasons, weather conditions, peak tourist times and festivities. So many prior proposals been submitted and fought by residents why are we being 323

363 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS forced through this again? Bottlenecks for traffic and the impact the proposed works will have? (this section?) People are getting very stressed already, even before the development has begun Cruise ships run unto a law of their own and do not contribute to Country s taxes but use our resources Proven to promote severe passenger intoxication. Size of Port area unsuitable for docking of super cruisers so visitors arriving/departing will be Budget travellers who spend very little on Local Trade precisely what Gold Coast Tourism DON T want. Our Police force are already over taxed on the GC unable to handle the increased risk of terrorism, issues of date rape, theft and violence Visitors who break laws protected under separate laws. 324

364 Appendix L Focus Group Gecko Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 325

365 Figure 83 Focus Group Gecko: Impact Webbing Exercise 326

366

367 Figure 84 Focus Group Gecko: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 83) 328

368 Focus Group Gecko: Impact Mapping Exercise: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 15/05/2006 Time: pm Gecko members are very strongly opposed to the alienation for commercial purposes of public open space it has been a foundation policy of Gecko. We also strongly oppose the cruise ship terminal and marina because of the many negative impacts and few positives for the community as a whole. It is very clear that one sector of the community (namely developers) will benefit substantially to the cost of the whole community. Table 83 AREA Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Gecko FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin Safety issues for small craft entering while access is blocked by a cruise liner Concern for Loggerhead Turtles (Threatened Species). South Stradbroke Island is the most southern nesting area that is probable Effects of dredging on marine species as well as introduced species from cruise liners Effects of dredging on Subsidence of Stradbroke Island Its only a Broadwater, not a harbour Loss of free access anytime Ports are dirty It takes approximately 1.5 hours to take tourists to the Barrier Reef to snorkel and dive. The dive sites on the Gold Coast are close to the shore, so there is no need to take lengthy boat trips. The dive and snorkel industry has huge potential and appeals to Asian tourists who get sea sick on boat trips Seaway dredging will lead to loss of biodiversity (fishing stocks and Diving stocks). Pollution also from breaking of coffee rock. Risk of fuel spills/pollution from ships Impact on the RAMSAR site. Loss of international representation. Loss of public open space that can never be replaced Havens and habitat: loss for possible increase of marine and animal use eg Turtles, Dugongs Loss of safe haven for sea creatures, birds, seabirds and migratory birds Shipping accidents and grounding leaks Rehabilitation costs when no longer viable Loss of visual amenity as the area is currently open Potential flooding from dredging velocity/volume Loss of safe port Loss of aquatic activity 329

369 AREA 2. Doug Jennings Park FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Loss of huge family/ies picnic and activity area 3. Marine Stadium Loss of access to our public open space, especially marine stadium. The total area in question would be 9 10 hectares. 4. Trailer Boat Area Pollution potential from spillage of fuels Loss of public open space Marine Stadium as Public Open Space for all, will become for wealthy boat owners only Congestion log jam in channel Loss of sense of place the public open space at the Spit is part of our city identity Issues associated with pollution Traffic congestion in immediate local area and whole of Gold Coast, with added stressors to the community 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Public Open Space near to high density development and readily accessible by everyone will be lost 6. Broadwater Loss of visual amenity, loss of public open space, loss of community amenity, loss of family amenity. More people coming to the Gold Coast need more public open space Loss of cultural identity and sense of place My property in Main Beach will be worthless when the trucks, dust and pollution start to go past for 2 years. Am I going to be compensated? Progressive encroachment (i.e. loss of public open space) Loss of public open space will set a dangerous precedent for other parks and open space 7. General Loss of seats of Southport and Broadwater for Labour 90% of the residents on the Gold Coast don t want this Project No public consultation prior to Project announcement Extra stress on infrastructure, roads, electricity, water, sewage as well as from pollution of air and water Continuing and growing distrust of Government The opportunity to make the spit a world class ocean side park, will be lost Mental health impacts through local of public open space to recreate We don t need no cruise ship terminal, we don t need no Port control, the docks are hazardous to our seaway, Beattie leave our spit alone, hey Beattie leave our spit alone. All in all its just another Beattie bad call. Loss of faith in the Government, which is not listening to the community 330

370 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS The opportunity to make the Spit a world class ocean side park will be lost Social Impacts are serious. 15,000 people have signed a petition saying No Shipping Terminal for the Spit, No Marine Stadium Yacht Marina. The Gold Coast will have its heart ripped out. Nothing, no amount of money can ever replace a broken heart. Once built cannot be undone precautionary and intergenerational equity principles must apply Loss of opportunity to have a world class ocean side park and reserve which can also generate tourism When I talk to people at the Spit, out of every 100 people, 98 say they don t want it Potential security threats as a result of Military/Naval usage Government has a conflict of interest, being both the proposer and the assessor Questionable long term viability Cost to Gold Coast people from loss of business and maintenance of terminal infrastructure The city s population growth is putting pressure on this community to establish an identity and cohesion Need a breakdown between the nexus of common good and politics We are not interested in mitigation. We don t want a cruise ship terminal. Military Ship access would close the whole Spit in crisis times EIS is based on flawed navigational study and not a real Project 331

371 Appendix M Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 332

372 Figure 85 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (EIS Process) 333

373 Figure 86 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Safety) 334

374 Figure 87 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Benefits) 335

375

376 Figure 88 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Community Amenity) 337

377 Figure 89 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Construction and Operation) 338

378 Figure 90 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Cost) 339

379

380 Figure 91 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Impact Webbing Exercise (Environment) 341

381 Figure 92 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 84) 342

382 Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association Date: 23/05/2006 Time: pm MBPA believes that there are many other matters which should be included [in the focus group documents]. But as a volunteer run community group, we lack the resources and time to record all such issues. It is the responsibility of GHD, as consultants to the government, to fully investigate and report all social, economic and scientific aspects of the notional seaway project, together with such conditions and qualifications upon their data and findings as are required. MPBA reiterates that given its significance to the Gold Coast, the community deserve a best practice EIS into this project. Any departures from that should be clearly states in the Report and findings qualified accordingly. Table 84 AREA Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Main Beach Progress Association FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin 300 metre ship berthing could entail fatal consequences for surfers and young people in underpowered boats Failure to depict Sea wall extension at all whether as a part or potential part is deceptive to public understanding of the project. EIS is deficient this environmental impact is not being fully assessed Dredging, Diving and Economic Impact on Secondary Industry is serious Loss of views across open space areas including to the green hinterland and cityscape Questions about the cost of ongoing dredging who is to bear this cost and what happens when the developer refuses to pay ongoing costs? Security issues Non access issues Loss of fishing and other access to sea wall including for disabled people to enjoy view from car Danger to surfers crossing the Seaway danger regarding access for divers and boats of Dive industry; and damage to marine flora and fauna. Loss of recreational view View that there shouldn t be a terminal here no need, use Brisbane as a hub for Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast Travel times will be comparable to major attractions like Movieworld, Dreamworld etc Risk of accidental discharge and pollution whilst in port or seaway could lead to environmental devastation Devastation of Australia s number 1 inner city dive site and loss of potentially huge international industry 343

383 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Where are the infrastructure requirements regarding oil, petrol, waste storage, parking etc? Why is this not on the concept plan? Road corridor (adjacent to Marine Stadium) too narrow why is this plan deficient in not depicting where and how the traffic will flow? 2. Doug Jennings Park Loss of our park, that is the loss of a peaceful quiet haven, damage to flora and fauna, noise, pollution, waste central, excess trucks/traffic Subject to potential ongoing land grabs by developers (eg additional parking or project extensions, etc Eg. Indy) Neglected for deliberate political reason of making Spit appear rundown and lacking in facilities 3. Marine Stadium Loss of public free access Loss of safe harbour Loss of Jet Ski racing Loss of open water swimming Loss of access to safe swimming haven and free mooring Loss of pristine natural sea Car park runoff Environment turning into a car park Super Yachts, Berths and Private Marina are great but build next to Seaworld where the marine precinct is located 4. Trailer Boat Area Loss of public open space Infringement of land by commercial concerns Ongoing dredging 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Intolerable traffic increase along roads leading to traffic deadlock Potential environmental damage to Federation Walk air pollution and potential waste Loss of educational opportunities for children, students and general public Elite athletes safety cyclists, triathlon (local, national and international) Issues of safety and access on spit roads and Federation walk Loss of sections of federation walk reserve to re align road/widen road What is planned? Loss of scenic and recreational amenities Potential environmental disaster due to marine dumping of grey water and oil, sewerage, petrol etc 6. Broadwater Dredging will impact upon RAMSAR area Pollution will impact on RAMSAR area Impact on Wave break island, the many boats who moor there and campers on island 344

384 AREA FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 7. General The equivalent of an industrial factory noise all the time the ship is in dock, especially west of the dock Ship pollution inclusive of nitrogen oxide/sulphur oxide. Fumes will equal 12,000 car emissions per day over Southport and Labrador when ships are docked Traffic congestion and related pollution on Labrador, Southport side and Sundale bridge both during construction and for service vehicles of dock etc Negative impact on Education, particularly school groups of Biology, Geography, Science classes. Insufficient police and other security to deal with terrorism, military visits, naval visits etc Nothing has ever been invested in maintenance/facilities for the Northern end of the Spit which should have been maintained and improved within its present use parameters. Large monies from existing private businesses (leases) on public land on South point of the spit which yield $11M pa are being TAKEN by state govt Safety of residents especially Main Beach both for traffic and physical risks with cruise ship, naval and personnel traffic Approximately $11 Million of income (over last 20 years) per year to State Government Where is the west of Seaworld super yacht, south of Seaworld options as provided in the Terms of Reference? The plan is deficient and misleading. Destruction of Main Beach village life due to tourist numbers, Indy, traffic as well as air, noise and water pollution Tax payer costs of water, sewerage etc Huge construction disruption and pollution The navigational simulation study is flawed both in base figures and methodology. Therefore the dock may only be used rarely if ever. That is, it is an excuse for commercial/private development of public land including that south of Nara which is earmarked for developers Morally indefensible to use any public land/waterway for commercial/private use in this day and age community values Failure to include all parking requirements (IAS). Noted that Parking spaces for 30 coaches, 12 tour/shuttle buses, 200 visitors cars and 50 taxi spaces. No facility for waste management trucks, refuelling bunkers, water provision have been indicated on the notional plan Community is being misled by the notional plan, the notional project and the notional EIS. It is improper and wrong to impose this upon the community without using the final plan so that a final decision is duly made The history of attempted land grabs of the Spit is a long litany of deceit and secret deal attempts at the expense of the community; mostly all in pursuit of residential driven development, under the guise of almost anything else. The Main Beach and Gold Coast community are sick and tired of defending its public land from rapacious developers and governments. See the document annexed which summarises the extent of this ongoing battle. It is time the government protected the Spit and ceased allowing this stream of public land grab attempts. Failing that Gold Coasters will vote accordingly. 345

385 Appendix N Focus Group Nerang Community Association Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 346

386

387 Figure 93 Focus Group Nerang Community Association: Impact Webbing Exercise 348

388 Figure 94 Focus Group Nerang Community Association: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 85) 349

389 Focus Group Nerang Community Association: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 07/06/06 Time: 7 10 pm The general overview of our input is that we think it is morally indefensible to take away public open space and that should be it. However we also say unanimously "No further development north of Seaworld Nara eastern or western side of The Spit" Table 85 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Nerang Community Association FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin Safety concerns for entry of small boats when larger ships are docking Ongoing dredging costs Loss of world class surf break Loss of quality of South Stradbroke waves There should be no further development north of Seaworld Nara With storms, there will be a build up of silt; Increased tidal flow Loss of international growth potential for international diving and surfing break on South Stradbroke island Compromised safety of Surfers crossing to South Stradbroke Island Dive companies will be affected Bow Thrusters cruise ship damage to walls No terminal or there will be alienation of Marine Stadium Water pollution in swing basin and at waters edge Restricted access especially with security All the good waterfront places for the average person have been sold off for units and motels. This is our last piece of untouched land Dredging to accommodate coffee rock is much more expensive. This has not been factored into costs; Loss of swimming areas for families Healthy outdoor lifestyle of families of families impacted as no longer able to swim 2. Doug Jennings Park Restricted access with security Loss of access to public waterfront Impact on mental health of the community Want a natural waterfront not manicured 1 kilometre of waterfront taken from community and given to private developers this is 350

390 a betrayal by the government 3. Marine Stadium High pollution of water with super yachts etc are moored in an area with confined water turn over, because of tidal flush Local community values, vitality and lifestyle destroyed When large cruise ships lose their popularity which is inevitable we then have a white elephant Whole way around the boardwalk will allow a 10 minute walk in the area where previously we have spent all day picnics and swimming Lying about the extent of buildings Waterfront is mainly in private ownership from Hinze Dam to Spit what little we have protected Marina will cause 100% alienation of my family who currently boat, swim, and canoe in the Marine Stadium Loss of Marine Stadium is totally unacceptable. Initial advice statement said two options for Super Yacht term. Other one is west of Seaworld. Why wasn t this in the EIS? Loss of pleasure boating for the residents of the Gold Coast and loss of the use of a safe harbour and beach for families Loss of character of Burns Bay Shipping terminal plus Super Yacht terminal in Marine Stadium equates to total loss of around 70 80% of total area. It is totally unacceptable to north of Seaworld Nara Concern over sewerage and Grey water Interstate and International tourist user group Loss of a natural area and safe swimming beaches for families Grey water, sewerage, stormwater impacts for boat harbour, cafes, shops Spatial conflict and congestion Loss of character Bum s Bay Where are all the boats that now use this facility going to moor? Foreign ships will bring foreign main species which have potential to destroy local marine species Children love the spit, children are very concerned about losing the spit Bad impact on the natural non urban environment for safe children recreational use Super yachts don t like to be near ocean liners as they get scum on their hulls and pollution on their decks from the ocean liners Anyone who can t afford a boat can benefit from access to the Marine Stadium for swimming via land, car. It will be lost forever for these families Visual amenity will be impacted by Marine Stadium Marine and ship terminal will block hinterland views etc 4. Trailer Boat Area 351

391 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Cruise companies shaft local businesses Why can t we have a open public meeting so all participants can be exposed to all input from all individuals Most of the land being taken is water frontage leaving very little useable land for the people Increased traffic parking for public? Loss of magnificent natural vista for relaxing, unwinding Loss of waterfront recreation for people from Brisbane to Gold Coast, plus tourists who prefer the natural environment Damage to fish stocks Loss of free fishing There should be no development north of Seaworld Nara; Last survey on width of the spit since the earliest know survey? 6. Broadwater Erosion of Wave Break Island Loss of boating, fishing and family usage Loss of diving industry Impact on Fish habitat Flooding to all inner waterways will increase Change of tidal prism will increase erosion What happens with a cyclone environment, a cruise ship waiting to come in, high seas, and strong winds. What sort of a disaster are we looking at 7. General No value to the community, possible no value to businesses as cruise ships are self sufficient in terms of food, drinks, tours etc Should be a world class coastal park Description of lifestyle to Main Beach and Spit users Increased burden on already overloaded utilities water, wastewater, electricity, fuel. Can t supply enough water for ourselves Cruise ships have to keep engines running the whole time they are in the Port to keep functioning. This will pollute the whole of the Gold Coast Quality of life destroyed by Government elected to serve the needs of people Loss of belief in people, power, feel disenfranchised; will also affect psychological mental health West of Seaworld Nara is okay for Super Yacht Marin. This was in initial advice Statement. Why wasn t this in Terms of Reference for the EIS instead of, or as well as Marine Stadium Destruction of lifestyle for Main Beach residents and visitors due to traffic etc Parking is already difficult on weekends. This terminal Project will increase the impact on parking and traffic jams 352

392 Increased flooding risk across coast from dredging Sailors Increased risk of sexual assault and violence and sexually transmitted diseases Community disillusionment, hatred of the labour government it once supported won t vote for them again; Natural beauty gone for good for the whole area at the spit Stealing food from the poor to give to the rich All development should be kept south of Seaworld, there is availability there Any thought about disaster planning, fuel spills, waste management It is morally corrupt and indefensible to take away public open space from an already overcrowded city with ever disappearing parks and open spaces already happening Huge increasing population needs more public open space not less Exploitation Cruise ships will demand more and more once they set in here, hold us to ransom Brisbane terminal is only 50 minutes from here Feeling that the government will continually sell out the people in favour of wealthy developers belief in continually corruption 353

393 Appendix O Focus Group Gold Coast City Council Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 354

394 Figure 95 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council: Impact Webbing Exercise 355

395

396 Figure 96 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council: Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 86) 357

397 Focus Group Gold Coast City Council: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: Tuesday 6 th June 2006 Time: 2:00 2:30 pm Table 86 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Gold Coast City Council AREA 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Increased tidal flow and impacts on swimming, boating etc. Dredging: Who pays? What volume will be dredged? Impact on marine life? Prime fishing location at certain times. Impacts on recreational fishing. Energy consumption associated with dredging? Environmental costs? Loss of marine habitat and lower end of the food chain Effect dredging will have on the amenity, wave quality on south Stradbroke? Will the seawall need to be extended to maintain the depth of the channel? Will this impact on the quality of surf on south Stradbroke? Dive, fishing and surfing areas 2. Doug Jennings Park Visual amenity views from the spit Loss of fishing Can wharf have public access (fishing access to water) is community off set? Impact of pump out of waste from boats into marina? Scale of Development of commercial facilitator? How many storey s? 2? 3? Doug Jennings park has potential for ideal events space Project community off set should include support infrastructure, eg. Services: water, sewer, power Efficient and effective use of additional infrastructure: sewage, water, services required for developments to improve surrounding areas 3. Marine Stadium Why position the marina here? Opportunities can be provided further south. Lack of shade trees in car parking (1 per 4 spaces) Displacement of current recreational opportunities and impact on alternative area. Eg. SSI: wave break east of Seaworld Drive Will Project make area less accessible and affordable as a recreational outlet Loss of parkland will cost $30 million/ha to replace Environmental impacts on boats in low tidal flow area Who will manage of the marina berths? 345 and boats impacts on water quality Loss of aquatic based activities/events Loss of affordable activities in a sheltered safe environment 358

398 Loss of still water environment with excellent accessibility Where will marine events be put? 4. Trailer Boat Area Concerns that car parking needs more shade Public amenities need to be upgraded Loss of public space to enjoy sunsets over water. Health Wellbeing and economies benefit 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Rehabilitation of federation walk Loss of unmet opportunity and ability to meet future demand Area is in need of significant rehabilitation (fire and weed impacts) and should be a community benefit off set What is the short and long term community benefits? Is there any? Use beach expansions and associated rehabilitation as some compensation Costs of maintenance asset management need to be considered Potential displacement of off leash dog area 6. Broadwater Shift of recreation demand to Southport foreshore Shift of recreation demand to wave break Loss of snorkelling as the environment is suitable for beginners and families Shift of demand to south Stradbroke Recreational demand pushed to other areas with less of limited management, i.e. wave breaks and SSI Capital dredge material place as far south as possible to expand beach Use of dredged sand to replenish south to narrow neck and potentially create more recreational space and public amenities Storm event erosion mitigation both at the spit and further south for major infrastructure and developments at Surfers Paradise etc. See policy 16 for open space standards Any requirement to increase sand pumping volume provision of funds for such limit need requirements for expensive dredging Use beach expansions and associated rehab as some compensation 359

399 Appendix P Focus Group Education Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 360

400 Figure 97 Focus Group Education: Impact Webbing Exercise 361

401

402 Figure 98 Focus Group Education Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 87) 363

403 Focus Group Education (CoastEd and Beachcare): Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 26 /05 /2006 Time: am Table 87 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Education AREA 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Impacts to surf quality Dredging will lead to increased tidal velocity, ability for surfers to cross the seaway Impact to surfer access to TOS Dredging impacts to seaway ecology Waste disposal Introduction of foreign species Fresh drinking water needs Dredging will lead to tidal velocities the issue of flooding and storm surge to Nerang River and canals Improvements to uses and maintenance of Wave Break Island Snorkelling and diving loss of access and natural environment (ie fish species in seaway) 2. Doug Jennings Park Concerts and use of Doug Jennings Park Access for fishing 3. Marine Stadium Native flora and fauna in all landscaping Loss of public beach / swimming area Current mooring facilities and fishing from boats Access for fishing, swimming and small dogs Loss of open space if road needs upgrading in the future Access for cyclists 4. Trailer Boat Area Traffic, noise and pollution during construction Access during construction period 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Visual aesthetics Access to training wall Parking currently easy to park compared to all other Gold Coast beaches Free education facility /cultural centre including information on and access to new infrastructure 364

404 Development increases will set precedent for further development, any guarantee for no further development to open spaces in current GHD concept plan? Fire Hazard assistance to Federation Walk? Revegetation contributions or assistance? Safety for families, cyclists and pedestrians along road Access and security for Federation Walk 6. Broadwater Snorkelling and diving loss of access and natural environment (ie fish species in seaway) 7. General Traffic at Sundale Bridge 365

405 Appendix Q Focus Group Economic/Business Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 366

406 Figure 99 Focus Group Economic/Business: Impact Webbing Exercise 367

407

408 Figure 100 Focus Group Economic/Business Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 88) 369

409 Focus Group Economics/Business: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 25/ 06/ 2006 Time: 12 2 pm Table 88 Results of Impact Mapping, Focus Group Economic/Business AREA 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Shift terminal to an alternative location Dredging This location (will have the biggest impact on Doug Jennings Park) Catering for surfers to and across South Stradbroke Island This is a natural sand deposition arm worst possible location for a swing basin Commercial fishing area, Shelring Beach needs to retained no rock walls Drop off/pick up point for surfers If you put the swing basin in front off the wave break, you will need to put in a rock wall 2. Doug Jennings Park 3. Marine Stadium Marina as a habitat Marina for boats above 12 metres Concentrate on Super Yachts not small berths Do not waste sand resource could be used for maintenance of waterways Alternative traffic service is light rail to bus terminal Commercial fishing marina needs to cater for full fleet and at a cost we can afford Fish market concept for fishing fleet Design Super Yachts fire fighting 4. Trailer Boat Area Fuel storage must be adequate for fishing fleet and other usage need to assess quantities Move cruise ship to a western point i.e. opposite super yacht area Trailers, Boats, Cars, storage 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach This design is not security friendly Highway Ring road for traffic requirements, must parking islands within Federation Walk One way ring road safety and traffic movement Must incorporate an upgrade of the whole Federation walk area 6. Broadwater Must have western boat channel behind wave break running north and south 370

410 Open up western channel, west of wave break island Dredge swing basin right across this area Massive increase in cross Broadwater ferry activity Boat liner swing area 7. General Impact of increased in high or low 371

411 Appendix R Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 372

412 Figure 101 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk: Impact Webbing Exercise 373

413

414 Figure 102 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk Photo of Impact Mapping Exercise (detail provided in Table 89) 375

415 Focus Group Friends of Federation Walk: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 28/05/2006 Time: 10 12:00 pm Table 89 Results of Impact Mapping, Friends of Federation Walk AREA 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Impact of dredging/wind prevailing conditions Needs full 12 month study of weather patterns i.e. summer storms Ships bringing in disease on hulls The different species of seahorses will disappear Impacts on birds flying from Stradbroke Island to the mainland How much dredging? Impacts on migratory bird species Wave Break Island damage dredging will lead to loss of sand bars, shifting sandbanks, effecting crabbing, oysters, seahorses and fishing Where do you fish? Where is Tug, Water Police or Customs? Less freedom of access to seaway time limit Flora and fauna displacement How deep is dredging? Provision for containing disease? Fuel and sewerage spillage scare clean up program? 2. Doug Jennings Park Reduced public access Sewerage depot 3. Marine Stadium Recreational fishing access? Setting a precedent for development in the area Noise pollution/ traffic pollution Refer to media on save our spit website Sewerage fallout from boats Water pollution kills fish, sea life, seagrasses, bird life Not enough public mooring in the inlet no money, no freedom Where do the people living in the yachts go? 4. Trailer Boat Area 376

416 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Explain/elaborate number 15 Land grab for developers Fuel depot Impact on visual aesthetics No intrusion into FOFW reserve Future development unknown Fire increased traffic flow, increased risk Change to coastal beach sand tidal and catchment Sick of doing studies year after year Road expansion to be exercised west of Branded Road Noise pollution from extra traffic Air pollution fallout from exhaust fumes, extra traffic Roadway inadequate to handle extra traffic Where is safe cycle path unsafe to use bikeway 6. Broadwater Dredging impacts on wave break and seaway walls Up river tidal impact vegetation and fauna (Aquatic and terrestrial) 7. General We agree that FOFW have cooperated in this process but do not give support (DISCLAIMER) We don t want any change, especially this one 377

417 Appendix S Focus Group Dog Walkers Impact Webbing Exercise Impact Mapping Exercise 378

418 Figure 103 Focus Group Dog Walkers: Impact Webbing Exercise 379

419 Focus Group Dog Walkers: Impact Mapping Exercise Date: 13/06/06 Time: pm Table 90 Results of Impact Mapping, Dog Walkers AREA 1. Seaway Entry and Swing Basin FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS Impact to fish and animals 2. Doug Jennings Park Introduction to Gold Coast of infectious diseases Increased risk of injury Increased risk of illness Increase crime 3. Marine Stadium Lack of boat facilities for the average boatie 4. Trailer Boat Area Increased hooning Marina removes sheltered beach and picnic areas for families and dogs Also removes sheltered bay of boat owners staying over Marina focuses on a small percentage of boat owners (higher end). Not your average boatie. Development will ruin the natural environment 5. Federation Walk and Main Beach Road will support increased activity traffic ++ Decreased accessibility = decreased use. Decreased population physical activity. Increased social isolation, decreased connectedness Less accessibility Decreased use Decreased eyes = decreased safety Unique walking environment. Only off leash area until Palm Beach Not enough parking/ more than double usage Danger to families and dogs of increased traffic flow 6. Broadwater 7. General 380

420 Appendix T Review of the Cruise Ship Industry 381

421 Cruise Ship Industry Introduction This section provides a broad overview of the cruise ship industry as it currently operates in Queensland. This section is heavily reliant on one document, Tourism Queensland s Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan which was released in In 2006 the Queensland Government, through Tourism Queensland (in partnership with the Department of State Development) released a Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan. The Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan is a whole of government framework for developing cruise shipping and sustainability realising Queensland s natural, cultural, social and economic potential. It combines a number of research sources including ideas, initiatives and comments from key cruise industry and government stakeholders, as well as academic research obtained and commissioned by Tourism Queensland. Cruise Ships A definition The notion of cruising can most easily explained by reference to the definition of a cruise ship. The definition of a cruise ship in most common use, and which has been adopted for the purposes of the Tourism Queensland s Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan is: A vessel undertaking schedule, deep water cruises of two days or more with a passenger capacity of 100 or more. There are various types of cruise ships, which range from 2 to 5 star. The higher rated cruise ships are more expensive and generally have a higher spend rate ashore at transit ports and pre and post cruise at base ports. In brief, the differences between each type of cruise ship are set out in Table 91. Table 91 Different Types of Cruise Ships 194 Type of Cruise Ship Adventure Cruise and Expedition Cruise Ships Boutique Cruise Ships Explanation Are the smallest cruise ships, can access more destinations, require less infrastructure and have the least passenger spend while cruising, but can have the highest pre and postcruise expenditure. Return visits by passengers are higher. They are ideally suited to base porting in Queensland for all or part of the year. Are often small, require top quality infrastructure and services, may have the highest passenger spend rate and the highest pre and post cruise expenditure. Return visits by passengers to shore destination may be higher. They have and do use Queensland base ports between cruise sectors. 194 Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.8 9, source: 382

422 Type of Cruise Ship Mid size Cruise Ships Mega cruise Ships Explanation Require adequate shore infrastructure, and greater channel depths and prefer to berth alongside a wharf. They need adequate variety and capacity of shore tours. Some are suited to use Queensland for base ports between cruise sectors. These are probably the optimum and largest cruise ships suitable to be based in Queensland for year round cruising for the foreseeable future. Will normally only use major population centres with adequate shore infrastructure, including a cruise terminal. High passenger numbers mean high expenditure. However, it needs to be recognised that only some ports and anchorages will be suitable for these vessels, from both an infrastructure and excursion point of view. The cruise ship definition does not include vessels carrying less than 100 people and/or that are less than 70m in length, i.e. it does not include super yachts. Types of Ports Transit and Base Ports Most ports of call are transit ports, but where fly/cruise sectors are offered, a small number of ports become base ports for one or more sectors. There are generally limited opportunities for Australasian passengers to cruise on this ships in Australasian waters. Table 92 Different Types of Ports 195 Type of Port Transit Base Explanation Is a port or anchorage at which a cruise ship calls for its passengers to enjoy a shore experience or tour. In general the cruise ship will be in port for a day (very occasionally over night) and passengers can either leave or join the cruise there. The cruise ship generally does not take on stores, exchange crew or undergo maintenance. However, it may take on fuel and fresh water if these are available. A transit port may have limited or no passenger terminal facilities. Is a port at which passengers can both leave a cruise, or join a cruise ship for the next cruise. Consequently, an international airport close by is a prerequisite. Crew may be exchanges, stores taken aboard as well as limited maintenance undertaken. Fuel and fresh water are also taken on. A base port generall signifies the finish of one voyage (or cruise) and the start of the next. The time in port may still be only one day. Although overnight stops do occur. The activity in a base port will be more intense, and dedicated passenger terminal facilities are a decided advantage, if not essential. A base port earns more revenue from a cruise ship, however, the investment in facilities is far greater. Currently in Australiasia, major exchanges of passengers normally only occur in Auckland, Cairns, Christchurch and Sydney. Military Vessels 195 Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.47, source: 383

423 The Tourism Queensland Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan uses the term military vessel in a broader context than naval vessels. In many nations, including Australia, service arms other than the nave operate their own vessels. For instance, the United States Army has a fleet of vessels in the Pacific, while Japanese Customs and Coastguard, among other government agencies operate military style vessels which have visited Queensland destinations. The Tourism Queensland Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan has included military vessels (specifically those on R&R or with an R&R component to their visit) and many of the strategies developed for enhancing the cruising climate have been determined to have equal benefits for attracting the military vessels. The Tourism Queensland Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan acknowledges that while military vessels are by no means cruise ships, they have similar characteristics and needs and offer similar potential for returning economic benefits to Queensland communities. According to the Tourism Queensland Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan, military vessels:» provide significant economic benefit to a destination;» have up to 5,000 crew who have similar needs to cruise ship passengers in they are looking for ways to spend their time and money on land and to purchase local products. (For example, research carried out by Townsville Enterprise Ltd indicated that each visiting serviceman spent $376 per day);» can and do use similar facilities to cruise ships;» have supply requirements similar to cruise ships including towage, fuel, water and supplies; and» in relation to Australian ships, the families of crew often visit the ship for the duration of its stay in port. This is a analogous with pre and post cruise ship touring and equates to increased expenditure on air travel and accommodation at the destination. Overview for Queensland According to Queensland Tourism, the annual world growth of cruising at 8% and an estimated worth of $17 billion per year, making it one of the fastest growing sectors in the international tourism industry. According to Tourism Queensland, Queensland s unique location and features place it in an excellent position to capitalise on the lucrative growth opportunity. Moreover, the economic benefits flowing from cruising are not confined to the duration of a cruise. International studies show that some 70% of the cruise passengers use the safety and comfort of a cruise to investigate future land based vacations. Of these, 68% subsequently return for a land based vacation. Therefore, enhancing a cruise passenger s experience can increase Queensland s land based tourist numbers and revenue. 384

424 Until Tourism Queensland s Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan, Queensland did not have a formal system or coordinated policy upon which all decisions relating to cruising could be based. Queensland is the only Australian State to have both domestic and international cruise operations. Queensland is not considered by most international cruise companies to be a separate itinerary area. It is simply part of the Asia Pacific, South Pacific or Australiasia region, depending on the cruise line s definitions. Other than Captain Cook Cruises with their Cairns based operation running 12 months a year, all other cruise companies which include Queensland in their itineraries do so as part of a regional itinerary. In 2000, Queensland received 74% of the total cruise ship visits to Australia (but it includes the Reef Endeavour which is a domestic operation). Excluding the Queensland based and owned Reef Endeavour, this visits to Queensland by international cruise ships see the reduction in percentage share (down to 31% of the national intake). Factors Influencing Cruise Itineraries The initial selection of a draft itinerary is influenced and decided by a range of different groups. The cruise company board of directors generally makes the final decision following the recommendation of senior management which usually includes marketing, operations and finance directors. The choice of itineraries put forward by senior management is influenced by:» Passengers;» Master, officers and crew;» Itinerary planners who make recommendations based on Their experience; Requirements of the cruise company in terms of time available; The number of times the destination has been used previously; Quality of the shore itineraries and the on board revenue that may be made from these; Shore infrastructure available for the cruise ship; Safety of the passengers; Cost of calling at the destination; Time taken to organise permits and make arrangements at the destination; Comments of previous passengers, masters, officers and crew; Geographical factors, including the optimum distances between ports; Dependability of access e.g. political stability, guaranteed berth, etc; and 385

425 Dependable access to ship repair facilities, local food delicacies and quality perishable supplies, suitable hotels, adequate and safe airline and other transport facilities.» Inbound tour operators Economic Impacts At the Queensland level, the 1999 Cruise Ship Potential in Queensland Waters study estimated the potential benefit for Queensland at $80.2million annually. The following is a list of key areas in which direct and indirect economic benefits from cruise shipping are returned to the community:» Additional foreign exchange earnings;» Economic development and diversification;» Distribution of income directly into regional and local goods and services;» The tendency for greater expenditure by cruise tourist (compared to tourists generally);» Increased regional and city specific profile globally;» High likelihood of repeat and referral domestic and international tourist visitation;» Infrastructure development opportunities; and» Development of additional employment, particularly through base porting. Estimates of the economic impact of cruising depend on:» The potential to increase the number and duration of vessels visiting Queensland destinations;» The potential to establish base port operations from Queensland destinations; and» The potential to increase the number of transit calls to Queensland destinations. The establishment of base port operations for cruise ships is important for the creation of additional employment in the region and in Queensland. Base port operations create employment from:» Provision of pilotage, towage, and linesman services on a regular basis;» Provision of crew, administration, sales and marketing staff;» Provision of stores, beverages and other goods for passengers; and» Expenditure on accommodation, tours and shopping from pre and post cruise visits. The expenditure on cruise tourism can be divided into 3 categories (refer to Table 93). 386

426 Table 93 Cruise Ships Type of Expenditure 196 Type of Expenditure Passenger Expenditure Crew Expenditure Cruise Operators Explanation Includes expenditure incurred as part of the cruise port (port visitation expenditure) and also that which is associated with making the cruise happen. Expenditure, relevant to estimating the economic impacts of cruising to the Queensland economy, includes all associated pre and postcruise expenditure on accommodation, food and beverages, shopping, sight seeing and entertainment. Is incurred on items purchased in port and includes local transport, food and beverages, shopping and entertainment. Have a range of expenditures. They pay charges associated with the use of the port. These include charges for pilotage, the berth, towage and linesmen. There may also be charges for the terminal used. In addition, they pay statutory charges to both the Federal and Queensland Governments for navigational aids, oil pollution levies, quarantine and customs services and conservancy charges. The cruise operator will purchase goods and services to provision vessels. These include supplies of food and beverages, fuel and service to enable ship operations such as waste disposal and water. Operators have expenditure on ship maintenance. They may also have business expenditure in designated ports, such as the cost of operating an office and marketing. For cruise ships, the economic impact for the region is considerably greater when a cruise ship is based at ports in the region (refer to Table 94). In this situation, the cruise ship takes on supplies and the passengers have the opportunitiy to make visits to the region either before or after the cruise. Before developing a base port operation, the cruise line usually requires a period during which transit calls are undertaken to the port to test the port s capabilities and to evaluate its suitability as a base port. Table 94 Cruise Ships Estimated Revenue 197 based on 1,200 passengers (i.e. Sky Princess) Type of Expenditure Transit Port Revenue Base Port Revenue Passenger Expenditure $114,000 $424,000 Crew Expenditure $19,000 $541,000 Cruise Operators $18,000 $18,000 Total Estimated Revenue $151,000 $983, Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.18 19, source: Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.19, source: 387

427 Major benefits of cruising are both direct and indirect and that to achieve long term sustainability for the industry the benefits of cruise shipping must be clearly enunciated so that the indirect benefits can be easily identified. Some beneficiaries are set out in Table 95. Table 95 Potential Beneficiaries of the Cruise Ship Industry 198 Potential Beneficiary The Cruise Ship Company The Inbound Tour Operator Explanation A good itinerary with destinations that provide passenger satisfaction will result in high passenger loadings, high yield and repeat visitation. Satisfied passengers generally spend more money on board and on shore excursions offered by the cruise company. Benefits are dependant upon the number of passengers who look organised shore tours. The greater the number of tours the greater the number of passengers and hence the inbound tour operator s fee and commission. The Destination Local operators Local shops Restaurants Tourist attractions Hotels Port Service Suppliers Shipping agents Towage companies Pilotage companies Such as coaches, limousines, taxis and tour guides. Those that go out of their way for the nationality of passengers on each different cruise and present high class, well priced merchandise will benefit more than most, especially if the merchandise has local flavour or significance. There is an increasing trend for passengers to stay away from their prepaid lunch aboard the cruise ship and savour the taste of the local food at the destination. This has obvious benefits for local restaurants and cafes. Which tourists visit. Generally only benefit in base ports where passengers will often stay one more nights either before joining or after leaving their cruise ship. During this time they will often take a number of pre or post cruise land tours. Hotels often also benefit from Australian military vessel visits as the families of military personnel often come to visit and need hotel accommodation while the vessel is in port. These include services other than from the port corporations. Who derive their commission on a fee base service. For the use of tugs, although today many modern very maneuverable cruise ships do not require tugs. Towage requirements are set by Queensland Transport regional harbour masters. For port pilotage and on the Great Barrier Reef, both of which are compulsory. 198 Tourism Queensland (2001) Queensland Cruise Shipping Plan p.22 23, source: 388

428 Potential Beneficiary Baggage handlers and stevedores Provedores Fuel suppliers The port operator Local Councils The Government Explanation Principally at base ports where they are engaged to handle passenger baggage and loading of ship provisions. In many ports stevedores also supply the linesmen. Supply of food and hotel supplies required by a ship throughout its voyage. There are opportunities for marketing Australian goods to international cruise shipping companies, and base porting vessels in Australia would generate increased opportunities for the provision of domestic products. When the cruise ship takes on bunker fuel. From port charges which may include berth charges and terminal charges. It is worth noting, especially in Queensland ports, that very few port operators receive sufficient revenue from cruise ships to cover the cost of the infrastructure and services provided, particularly when welcoming and farewell services are supplied for passengers. Some ports charge cruise ships nothing at all in a bid to attract them to their destination, the thought being that the local community benefits from the visit. Principally benefit from the supply of water which is the most common commodity taken on at all ports, and the disposal of garbage, waste water and sewerage. They also benefit from the rates paid by any business established to services the cruise ship industry. Both State and Federal governments derive benefits from cruise shipping from revenue related to navigation charges, oil spill levies, GBRMPA permit and environmental management conservancy charges, QNPWS permit and passenger charges, and indirectly through dividends returned from port operations. 389

429 Appendix U Surfing Survey This survey was undertaken on line and the aim for the survey was to gather information for the coastal processes technical report. 390

430 Introduction GHD conducted an on line survey which was distributed to surfing representatives that attended the focus group workshops as part of the SIA. The purpose of the on line survey was to gather detailed information about the surfing conditions on the northern side of the seaway by surfers who used the area. Time constraints and technical issues with the website allowed for seven responses to be received. The basis of this survey was to gather detailed information about the surfing break on South Stradbroke Island and given the survey relied on distribution by five surfing representatives the sample size was considered appropriate. All responses are reported back as they were typed into the survey. Results The following section presents the results for each question of the survey. About the Respondents» 2 respondents surfed once or twice weekly, 3 on a fortnightly basis and 2 on a monthly basis.» There was a spread of responses across all months, with the exception of May in which only 5 respondents noted they surfed.» 6 respondents noted that they paddled across the seaway, while 3 used a personal boat or Jet Ski. Respondents liked the following things most able the break at South Stradbroke Island.» Wave shape and remoteness» Great waves, gets more swell than other Gold coast beaches. NO pollution, still natural.» Its a unique A Frame barrelling wave. Not many around like it.» The power and quality of the wave is far superior to all other beach breaks on the gold coast, and on virtually every day of the year, also far better than our famous point breaks. It is an amazing place in the way that it picks up and focuses wave energy, and shapes it into really hollow peaks. I surfed very good 2 3 foot tubes there yesterday ( ) while the rest of the GC was flat and un rideable. I have surfed all over the world and have never found a beach break as good as Straddie. But it's not only the quality of the surf, its because it is a place to escape the urban madness of the gold coast, its a little adventure every time you go there. Even on the days that you don't get good waves, the fact that it's a spot that you have to make an effort to get to makes the trip over satisfying. I never take the ferry and it's a bit of a shame that he operates. With no ferry, the crowd would be less and it would be limited to people who are prepared to make an effort to get there. Mind you, he has helped a lot of injured people over the years so I respect him a lot for 391

431 that. The clarity of the water and the amount of marine life and the views of the dunes all the way to north Stradbroke are all elements of the experience that allow me to feel like I have escaped momentarily.» Peaceful natural setting, quality & consistency of waves, nature of people in area» The power of the wave (is stronger than anywhere else on the gold coast).» The consistency when the rest of the Gold Coast is flat (which is often) there can be nice 3ft waves at Sth Straddie. the unique, powerful, peak (wedge shaped) waves forming big barrels (perfect shape for surfing) Wave Characteristics and Descriptions at South Stradbroke Island The following presents the wave characteristics as described by the survey respondents for each bock as per the map (shown below) which accompanied the survey. 392

432 Block A Wave type» Typical beach break wave, some times there is a right hander into the pumping jetty that can get good» Fun beach break» Barrelling beach break» good left & right next to pier Seabed features Weather conditions» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» Ideal SW to NW winds 0 15 knots, is best.» anything with north in the wind OK Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» Accessibility, supply of sand, pollution.» Fisherman & their lines 393

433 Block B Wave type» Often a good left hander of the Rock wall that is better than normal beach breaks» Barrelling beach break» Left off the wall & left & right in between wall & pier Seabed features Weather conditions» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» Ideal SW to NW winds 0 15 knots, is best.» Anything with north in the wind OK Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» Accessibility, supply of sand, pollution.» fisherman & their lines 394

434 Block C Wave type» This only breaks in large swells. There are outer banks that require sand build up and in a large swell there are world class large right hand waves.» Tidal, outflow waves» was a good wave off the north wall (too much sand build up outside for the wave to break like the 80's Seabed features» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» deed channel, sand bottom» sand, rock & rip Weather conditions» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» swell needs to be 10ft+ Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» not surfable» volume of boats in this area 395

435 Block D Wave type» Above average beach break peaks. Lefts and rights, barrels. Why tourists come to the Gold Coast to surf for south straddie.» A Frame barrelling beach break» Hollow beach break perfect barrels. Wedge shaped peaking powerful waves making the waves makeable more often than not (perfect for surfing) World class beach break. Seabed features» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» Off shore banks focus and amplify swell and break up lines to form more powerful peaks that break left and right. Inshore bars provide the immediate break area. steeper immediate beach profile than other GC beaches, with a corresponding more coarse sand grain size distribution. There are always lots of localised and temporary rips that pop up along the beach and run for 5 10 mins and then dissipate again.» sand banks. offshore bathymetry (ie. zone G) focuses wave energy on this section of beach (D,E,F)(lens effect) regardless of swell direction. Forms wedge shaped waves of increased amplitude. Weather conditions» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» virtually any swell conditions, with a period of 5 seconds and above, will hold up to about m based on wave rider bouy H sig data. when swell is more from south, a wave shadow effect is felt in block d, and best peaks are further north in sector e and f. wind conditions anything nnw to ssw, and even a straight s if it is not too strong will provide good waves.» Ideal SW to NW winds 0 15 knots, is best. 396

436 » needs swell wind can be SE NW» SW NW winds. light winds. calm conditions. Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» Critical issue is sand supply to outer banks, beach orientation, and supply of sand to inner shoals, presence of dunes. Other critical issue is crowds and access. on one hand, there should be no restriction of access to the area due to bans of seaway paddling, however, any attempt to provide additional powered access should be restricted as it will exacerbate a crowding problem being felt on all good quality GC waves. Dredging a huge channel will trap all northward moving sand, leading to starvation of the banks, inshore and offshore. This may lead to increased dune erosion as per Duranbah beach and operation of the TRESBP. Artificial nourishment id very difficult to achieve.» Accessibility, supply of sand, pollution.» The supply of sand from the South (dominant direction) will be blocked by any extension to the wall impacting on sand banks. The dredging will have even greater impact by disrupting the perfect shaped offshore bathymetry (G) and destroying the wave focusing effects and thus the unique, powerful wedge shaped waves will no longer be formed. This will render the surf at Sth Straddie of no worth. 397

437 Block E Wave type» Above average beach break peaks. Lefts and rights, barrels. Why tourists come to the gold coast to surf for south straddie.» A Frame Barrelling Beach break» Barrelling beach break» Hollow beach break perfect barrels. Wedge shaped peaking powerful waves making the waves makeable more often than not (perfect for surfing) World class beach break. Seabed features» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» Sand banks. Offshore bathymetry (ie. zone G) focuses wave energy on this section of beach (D,E,F)(lens effect) regardless of swell direction. Forms wedge shaped waves of increased amplitude. Weather conditions» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» Ideal SW to NW winds 0 15 knots, is best.» light winds or SW NW» SW NW winds. light winds. calm conditions. Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» as above» Accessibility, supply of sand, pollution.» The supply of sand from the South (dominant direction) will be blocked by any extension to the wall impacting on sand banks. The dredging will have even greater impact by disrupting the perfect shaped offshore bathymetry (G) and destroying the wave 398

438 focusing effects and thus the unique, powerful wedge shaped waves will no longer be formed. This will render the surf at Sth Straddie of no worth. 399

439 Block F Wave type» Above average beach break peaks. Lefts and rights, barrels. Why tourists come to the gold coast to surf for south straddie.» Close outs mainly» hollow peaks» Barrelling beach break» Hollow beach break perfect barrels. Wedge shaped peaking powerful waves making the waves makeable more often than not (perfect for surfing) World class beach break. Seabed features» Sand banks/ gutters/ rips» as above» sand banks, gutters, rips» sand & rips» Sand banks. Offshore bathymetry (ie. zone G) focuses wave energy on this section of beach (D,E,F)(lens effect)regardless of swell direction. Forms wedge shaped waves of increased amplitude. Weather conditions» Winds ideal for surfing are offshore winds, so anything from the Southwest to Northwest and preferably light. No wind in early morning is best» as above» Ideal SW to NW winds 0 15 knots, is best.» light winds or SW NW» SW NW winds. light winds. calm conditions. Critical issues impacting the surfing» Jet ski activity 400

440 at this location» as above» Accessibility, supply of sand, pollution.» The supply of sand from the South (dominant direction) will be blocked by any extension to the wall impacting on sand banks. The dredging will have even greater impact by disrupting the perfect shaped offshore bathymetry (G) and destroying the wave focusing effects and thus the unique, powerful wedge shaped waves will no longer be formed. This will render the surf at Sth Straddie of no worth. 401

441 Block G Wave type» NO rideable waves here» bombie» big heavy right» deep water left & right» Offshore Bombie. when the swell is large (6ft +) and of long period you get big, long barrels of very high quality Seabed features» off shore sand bar» sand» Perfect shaped offshore bathymetry as described above (lens effect). When the waves are large enough they aren't focused but break on this lens shaped sand bar, wrapping around the edge of the bank (forming a perfect right hand break) Weather conditions» nw w, light winds. 2.0 and above se e swell, long period.» breaks from 3ft+» SW NW winds. light winds. calm conditions. Large swell of long period. Critical issues impacting the surfing at this location» Jet ski activity» Not removing the bar, or dredging such a deep channel that it prevents natural nourishment of the bar.» accessibility (by paddling) need a boat or jet ski» The supply of sand from the South (dominant direction) will be blocked by any extension to the wall impacting on the formation of the offshore sand banks. The dredging will have even greater impact by disrupting the perfect shaped offshore bathymetry (G) and destroying the perfect right hand offshore break during larger 402

442 swells. This will render the surf at Sth Straddie of no worth. Have there been any noticeable changes impacting surfing conditions at South Stradbroke in the past? Past 2 Years 2 responses were received for this question. In the last 2 years at locations A, B, C D and E there has been the following impacts.» Jet Ski Activity increased population from petrol and fumes.» increase No. of boats Past 5 Years 2 responses were received for this question. In the past 5 years across the entire area, the beach break has expanded northwards. The following changes were noted:» Provided more surfable area, handles greater crowd. Also bombie has got better.» build up of sand Past 10 Years 2 responses were received for this question. A build up of sand was noted. Additional Comments The following additional comments were received from» Determining the relationship between the outer and inner banks and how they contribute to surf quality will be a critical factor in determining the impact on waves. I am very doubtful that a dredging program to create such a vast entrance channel will be able to be undertaken without a very significant change in this condition. There will be a need to ensure that the ebb tide delta is removed to a degree that it will not present a direct navigation hazard, and also so that it does not contribute to sedimentation within the channel itself during northerly conditions. It will not be possible for the existing pipebass pipe land to provide and protect wave quality. Where would the pipe be replaced to seeing as though it would have to be removed from its present location in order to create the channel. The impacts of all of this work will take years to be felt as the system readjusts. Duranbah has been left to erode by well over 50 m so that the tweed channel can be maintained at 6 metres. There is a very low level of commitment and technical capacity for that project to restore surfing and beach amenity that has been lost due to the projects operation.» Numerical modelling of the wave processes will NOT be enough to study the unique individual wave formation (combination of offshore focusing and inshore sand bank configuration) that occurs at Sth Straddie to produce such a unique powerful perfect surfing wave. I doubt that even scaled physical modelling will even be good enough. This wave is an unique, consistent beach break of world class 403

443 and any disruption to the status quo (wall extension or dredging) is likely to ruin the delicate balance of the wave formation processes. 404

444 Appendix V Social Impact Significance Matrix 405

445 Introduction The methodology provides a detailed description of the process used to develop the level of significance for the social impacts identified in Section 8. To accurately assess the level of social impacts identified through the SIA process, GHD have utilised a risk assessment based system for ranking significance. The level of significance is based on two elements, the sensitivity of the receptor or impacted feature (for example, residents, public transport or hospital) and the magnitude of the impact (for example, large, moderate, small or negligible). By combining these two elements a level of significance is generated for each impact. Importance/Sensitivity of Receptor The sensitivity of the receptor refers to how vital and/or vulnerable a feature is to change or alteration. The higher the vulnerability or importance to socio economic wellbeing a feature is, the greater its sensitivity. Table 96 outlines the sensitivity of socio economic receptors in the context of the IAS. Table 96 Sensitivity of the Socio Economic Environment Receptor Sensitivity High Examples Impacts on hospitals and the essential services they provide Impacts on emergency services and how they provide their services Impacts on vulnerable people and the services they access Impacts on prisons Impacts on schools Impacts on utilities and essential communications Impacts on highways and arterial roads Impacts on attractions of national or regional significance Impacts on health and safety Medium Impacts on residents Impacts on child care facilities Impacts on public transport Impacts on attractions of local significance Impacts on public open spaces and waterways Impacts on employment Low Impacts on businesses Impacts on private vehicles and access 406

446 Magnitude of Change The magnitude of impact (or the degree to which an impact influences the environment) on features of the socio economic environment can be described as large, moderate, small or negligible using the criteria set out in Table 97 Table 97 Magnitude Large Magnitude of Impact on the Socio Economic Environment Definitions Substantial, permanent impacts on the national, state or regional economy, including tourism and recreation. Substantial, permanent social or cultural impacts at national, state or regional level. Moderate Moderate temporary or permanent impact on the national, state or regional economy including tourism and recreation. Substantial, permanent impacts on local economy. Substantial, permanent local social or cultural impacts. Small Minor temporary or permanent impacts on the national, state or regional economy, including tourism and recreation. Moderate temporary or permanent impacts on the local economy. Moderate temporary or permanent local or cultural impacts. Negligible Negligible or undetectable impacts on the national, state or regional economy. Negligible or undetectable social or cultural impacts at the national, state or regional level. Significance of Impacts Minor temporary or permanent impacts on the local economy. Minor temporary or permanent local social or cultural impacts. Utilising a result from the previous two elements, an assessment is made of the significance of impacts identified, refer to Table 98. Table 98 Table for Assessment of Overall Significance Sensitivity Magnitude High Medium Low Large Highly significant Moderately significant Slightly significant Moderate Moderately significant Slightly significant Not significant Small Slightly significant Not significant Not significant Negligible Not significant Not significant Not significant 407

447 Appendix W External Review 408

448 THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA School of Social Science HEAD OF SCHOOL Professor Geoffrey Lawrence The Univenity of Queensland Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia Telephone (07) International Facsimile (07) Ernail asofficek3uq.edu.a~ Internet w.ansoc.uq.edu.au Comments on of Notional Seaway Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement The study conducted on the potential social impacts deriving from the proposed seaway project is one of the best examples I have witnessed. Both the methodological framework and its execution are professional and polished. The use of multi-methods for its data collection, including case studies, consultation of and participation by local stakeholders, as well as quanurative and qualitative approaches, is not only approprkar. but also thorough and responsible. The presentation of the report is likewise systematic, organized and easy to read, even for a non-technical reader. Moreover, the contentious issues involved in the proposed project are identified and discussed and suitable mitigation strategies have also been provided. The team members associated with this study should be congratulated for their commitments and efforts in producing an SIA statement that is methodologically sophisticated and professionally responsible. Dr David Ip Associate Professor School of Social Science The University of Queensland July

449 - REPORT n CHECK (Draft or Final) (NOTE: Chec&ers 01 eve1 Principa Proless onal ## aria above are not reqj.;ed lo cornp ete 1n.s chec&'st Ln.ess req.. rea by the Pro:ect D rector, andlor stated on the Job Planning Sneet or Management Plan). to be methodologically rigorous the study should explore further the social impacts of the alternatives as suggested by Stakeholders (p.82). This will ensure the credibility of the study remaining intact should questions are raised as to whether efforts have been made to investigate any alternative to the proposed project at all. Reference: Pmcedure April 2004

450 REPORT CHECK (Draft or Final) (NOTE: Checkers of level Principal Professional and above are not required to complete this checklist unless required by the Project Director, and/or stated on the Job Planning Sheet or Management Plan). Final Report Stage (it'draft was required to besubmitted to client) Item No. 1 Has feedback been incorporated in the final repon where required? 2 1 Has the UT final draft of the comolete document been soell checked. oroof read and I I I Guideline for Use :- Strike out any Item No. that is not applicable to this job Check all applicable items. If follow up action is required, JM to complete actions as indicated by reviewer. Reference: Proccdure April 2004