INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION

Transcription

1 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION REPORT OF THE TENTH MEETING OF THE ASIA PACIFIC REGIONAL AVIATION SAFETY TEAM (APRAST/10) BANGKOK, THAILAND, 17 TO 21 APRIL 2017 The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the Meeting and not the Organization Approved by the Meeting and published by the ICAO Asia and Pacific, Bangkok

2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Meeting and Registration... i Opening Session... i Agenda Item 1: Plenary Session Adoption of Agenda... 1 Agenda Item 2: Workshop on SMS Acceptance and SEI Implementation... 1 Agenda Item 3: Update of RASG-APAC/6 Decisions and Work Programme... 1 Agenda Item 4: Update and Review of Progress of APRAST Activities... 1 Agenda Item 5: Presentation State / Industry / ICAO... 6 Agenda Item 6: Breakout Sessions... 8 Agenda Item 7: Any Other Matters Agenda Item 8: Review and Adoption of Decisions and Conclusions including Items for Consideration and Approval at RASG-APAC Agenda Item 9: Presentation of APRAST/10 Draft Report Agenda Item 10: Date and Venue of Next Meeting Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G List of Participants Summary of discussions of the Workshop Status of the Decisions and Conclusions from RASG-APAC/6 Status of RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Work Programme APRAST/8 and APRAST/9 Status of the Decisions and Conclusions Update of the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets List of APRAST/10 Decisions and Conclusions

3 Report of the Meeting i 1. Meeting and Registration 1.1 The 10 th Meeting of the Asia Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team (APRAST/10) was held at the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office in Bangkok, Thailand from 17 to 21 April The APRAST/10 Meeting was attended by 94 participants from 19 States/ Administrations and 8 International Organizations and Industry Partners viz. Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong China, Macao China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Maldives, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, the United States, Vietnam, Airports Council International (ACI), Airbus, Boeing, Global Civil Aviation Training Solutions (CAE), Civil Air Navigation Services Organization (CANSO), Flight Safety Foundation (FSF), International Air Transport Association (IATA) and International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations (IFALPA). The list of participants is at Appendix A. 1.3 Mr. Kong, Cheong Tuck, Flight Safety Expert of the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office acted as Secretary to the Meeting supported by Capt. Pu Fang Hui, Associate Safety Oversight Officer. 2. Opening Session 2.1 Mr. Arun Mishra, Regional Director of ICAO Asia and Pacific Office welcomed participants, introduced the new Deputy Regional Director, Dr. Manjit Singh and provided a brief update on the events and changes for He informed the Meeting that the RASG-APAC/7 would be held on 3-5 July 2017 separately from the DGCA Conference. RASG-APAC/7 would include a half-day workshop conducted by ICAO Headquarters on ICAO Global Aviation Safety Plan. 2.2 Mr. Tay Tiang Guan, APRAST Co-chair (States), Deputy Director General, Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) updated on the progress of APRAST since its inception in He highlighted the need for States Administrations and Industry to step up their involvement in APRAST/ RASG-APAC and take concrete measures to improve overall regional safety performance. APRAST/10 would also prepare for RASG-APAC/7 and work on improving States/Administrations USOAP CMA EI scores, particularly for AGA and AIG areas. 2.3 Mr. Gerardo Hueto, APRAST Co-chair (Industry), Assistant Director, Safety and Flight Operations Asia-Pacific, IATA, thanked the various working bodies for their contributions and looked forward to further cooperation between States/Administrations and Industry to advance aviation safety in the region.

4 Report of the Meeting 1 REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS 1. AGENDA ITEM 1: PLENARY SESSION ADOPTION OF AGENDA 1.1 Adoption of the Provisional Agenda WP/ The Secretariat presented the Provisional Agenda, which was adopted by the Meeting. 2. AGENDA ITEM 2: WORKSHOP ON SMS ACCEPTANCE AND SEI IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Workshop on SMS Acceptance and SEI Implementation The Workshop on SMS Acceptance and SEI Implementation was successfully held on April Mr. Charles A. Galea, Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Australia and Mr. Zainul Abidin Maslan, Department of Civil Aviation (DCA) Malaysia, presented their experience in evaluating Safety Management System (SMS) and in selecting Safety Performance Indicators for the purpose of setting the Acceptable Level of Safety Performance (ALoSP) respectively. Mr. Greg Marshall, FSF, presented the FSF s report on Go-Around Decision Making & Execution Project, relevant to Safety Enhancement Initiative (SEI) RE/1 on promoting pilot adherence to Standard Operating Procedures for approaches which include go-around decision making. Mr. Xavier Lesceu, Airbus, presented the guidance material on Basic Flying Skills and Upset Prevention and Recovery Training, relevant to SEI LOC/6 on Airplane Upset Prevention & Recovery Training Aid (AUPRTA). The summary of discussions of the workshop is at Appendix B. 3. AGENDA ITEM 3: UPDATE OF RASG-APAC/6 DECISIONS AND WORK PROGRAMME 3.1 Update of RASG-APAC/6 Decisions and Conclusions WP/ The Secretariat presented the progress of RASG-APAC/6 Decisions and Conclusions. The Meeting noted the updates and supported the recommendations on the status of the Decisions and Conclusions, as reflected at Appendix C. 3.2 Progress of RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Work Programme WP/ The Secretariat presented the progress of RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Work Programme which was approved at RASG-APAC/6 in August The Meeting noted the updates provided by the Secretariat and the various champions during the course of Meeting and accepted the status of work programme, as shown in Appendix D. 4. AGENDA ITEM 4: UPDATE AND REVIEW OF PROGRESS OF APRAST ACTIVITIES 4.1 Update of APRAST/8 and APRAST/9 Decisions and Conclusions WP/ The Secretariat presented the progress of outstanding Decisions and Conclusions adopted at APRAST/8 and APRAST/9. The Meeting noted the updates provided by the Secretariat and the various champions during the course of Meeting.

5 Report of the Meeting As a follow-up to Decision APRAST 9/21, SEI WG Co-chair (States) presented the analysis of AGA EI scores and identified the crucial critical elements (CEs) that may contribute to the low AGA EI scores The Meeting noted that Decision APRAST 8/6 should be kept open until Secretariat includes the process on the use of the online portal in the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook. Therefore, except for Decision APRAST 8/6, the Meeting accepted the recommendations on the status of the Decisions and Conclusions as reflected at Appendix E. The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/1 Inclusion of the online portal procedures in the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook That, Secretariat update the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook to include the use of the online portal which monitors the implementation of RASG-APAC endorsed safety tools, with the aim of seeking approval at RASG-APAC/7. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Update the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook When: July 2017 (RASG-APAC/7) Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: 4.2 Update of the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets WP/ APRAST Co-chair (States) presented an update of the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets, which can be found at Appendix F. He noted the progress made in a number of areas but stressed the need for States/Administrations and Industry to continue making efforts to achieve these priorities and targets With insight gained on the rate of progress and potential challenges in implementation, the Meeting agreed for some targets to be revised for clarity and their deadlines extended. Airbus highlighted that IOSA, ISSA and ISAGO registrations were industry standards which should not be confused with States safety oversight and compliance with ICAO standards. It suggested that the Regional Aviation Safety Priority 2 on improvements to safety oversight and compliance be rephrased for clarity. The Meeting therefore agreed on the following Conclusion:

6 Report of the Meeting 3 Conclusion APRAST 10/2 Proposed Revisions to the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets (WP/5) That, RASG-APAC/7 approve the proposed changes to Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets as shown below: a. Title of Regional Priority 2 - Improvements to safety oversight and compliance/industry safety certification audits ; b. First target under Regional Priority 1 - RASG-APAC to complete the development of current identified priority SEIs by end 2016 end ; c. Fourth to sixth targets under Regional Priority 2 - By end of (1) maintain at least 60% of increase the number of IOSA registered applicable APAC airlines to be IOSA certified by 50% over end-2016 figures; (2) achieve at least 15% of increase the number of ISSA registered applicable APAC airlines to be ISSA certified by 15% over end-2016 figures; (3) pursue at least a 50% increase in ISAGO registrations over end-2016 figures ; and d. Third target under Regional Priority 4 - By 2020, pursue 50% increase in participation in flight data sharing initiatives by of APAC air operators, with aircraft of mass 27,000kg and above, over end-2016 figures participating in flight data sharing initiative by Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Update the regional aviation safety priorities and targets When: July 2017 (RASG-APAC/7) Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: RASG- APAC In time for reporting at RASG-APAC/7, the Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/3 Update of the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets (WP/5) That, States/Administrations and Industry provide information on the progress of the APAC Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets to the ICAO APAC Regional Office with an aim of updating RASG-APAC/7. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration

7 Report of the Meeting 4 Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve the tracking of implementation status of regional aviation safety priorities and targets When: 31 May 2017 Who: Status: on-going APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: IATA, AAPA, Industry 4.3 Presentation on the Safety Tools Implementation Monitoring Mechanism and online submission/update of the Safety Tool Implementation status The Secretariat presented updates on the development of the online portal to monitor the implementation of RASG-APAC endorsed safety tools. Given that only four States/ Administrations had thus far responded on the online portal, the Meeting urged more States/ Administrations to submit their status of implementation through the online portal. The Meeting noted that the online portal can be improved by including an option which allows States/Administrations to indicate 100% implementation for RASG-APAC endorsed safety tools and agreed to the following Decision: Decision APRAST 10/1 - Safety Tools Implementation Monitoring Mechanism That, the online portal for monitoring the implementation of RASG-APAC endorsed safety tools, be enhanced with an option for States/Administrations to indicate 100% implementation. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Monitoring the implementation of SEIs and safety tools When: 31 May 2017 Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: Bangladesh 4.4 Update of APAC-AIG Activities WP/ Mr. Chan Wing Keong, Chairman APAC-AIG, presented updates on the APAC-AIG activities and work plan, as well as the follow-ups to the Decisions made at the APRAST/9. The Meeting noted the following training which aims to assist States/Administrations in achieving better AIG EI scores: i) ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Workshop on Protection of Safety Information in Bangkok on 2-4 May 2017; ii) Airbus training in Toulouse on May 2017; iii) TSIB s Annual Training in Singapore on May 2017; iv) APAC-AIG/5 Meeting in Singapore on 1-2 August 2017;

8 Report of the Meeting 5 v) ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Accident Investigation Workshop in Singapore on 3-4 August 2017; and vi) ISASI Annual Seminar in San Diego, California, USA on August The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/4 - Update of APAC-AIG Activities (WP/6) That, States/Administrations be strongly encouraged to actively participate in the training identified by the APAC-AIG, which has the potential to enhance their USOAP AIG EI. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve APAC USOAP AIG EI scores When: 31 December 2017 Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: 4.5 Survey on Training Demands for Accident Investigation Topics WP/ Secretariat presented the results of the survey on training demands for AIG topics conducted in December The Meeting noted that a few of the training topics desired by States/Administrations had already been included in the APAC-AIG work plan. The Meeting noted that APAC-AIG would follow up to coordinate the organization of training and agreed to the following Decision: Decision APRAST 10/2 - Training on Accident Investigation That, APAC-AIG review the training needs of States/Administrations and, where necessary, develop additional training, taking into consideration experience and feedback from training conducted in Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve APAC USOAP AIG EI scores When: Late 2017 (APRAST/11) Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other:

9 Report of the Meeting 6 5. AGENDA ITEM 5: PRESENTATION STATE / INDUSTRY / ICAO 5.1 Coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC Subsidiary Bodies WP/ The Secretariat presented the coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies as an update to Decision APRAST 9/12. The Meeting noted the existing efforts within APRAST and existing mechanism for the exchange of information and issues between relevant APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies via Secretariat. The Meeting also noted the progress of a related Decision APRAST 9/11, where SRP WG would coordinate with IATA to get updates on two issues (large height deviations and English language proficiency) discussed at APANPIRG and its subsidiary bodies, to support the coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC. 5.2 Update of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) WP/ The Secretariat highlighted the changes in the Edition of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) which was endorsed at the 39 th Session of the ICAO Assembly (27 September 7 October 2016). The inclusion of a new Global Aviation Safety Roadmap in the GASP provided a structured and common frame of reference for all relevant stakeholders to ensure that safety initiatives deliver the intended benefits associated with the GASP objectives. The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/5 - Update of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) (WP/9) That States be encouraged: a) to develop a national safety plan in line with the GASP objectives and based on their operational safety needs; and b) to provide feedback to ICAO on the new Global Aviation Safety Roadmap and suggestions for the future Edition of the GASP via to: GASP@icao.int. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Implement GASP When: On-going Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: 5.3 Update of ICAO Support for Safety Management Implementation WP/ The Meeting noted Secretariat s presentation on the list of initiatives undertaken by ICAO to assist States in implementing their State Safety Programme. 5.4 Enhancements to Singapore s Aerodrome Certification Framework WP/ Singapore shared the enhancements made to its aerodrome certification framework for significant new aerodrome developments and modifications. Indonesia shared that it had a similar process requiring aerodrome operators to submit designs and to seek approval for completed aerodrome infrastructure. The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion:

10 Report of the Meeting 7 Conclusion APRAST 10/6 ICAO guidance on aerodrome certification That, ICAO consider developing guidance material in the area of new aerodrome developments and modifications as part of aerodrome certification. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Enhance aerodrome certification When: 31 August 2017 Status: on-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: 5.5 Review of Description of Terminologies related to Aeronautical Study, Safety Assessment and Safety Reviews WP/ The Meeting discussed WP/13 prepared by Pakistan, requesting for clarity on 3 terms related to safety management in ICAO documents: safety review, safety assessment and aeronautical study. The Meeting noted that there was a similar request made by Nepal which led to the adoption of Conclusion APRAST 8/7. The Meeting requested the Secretariat to check with ICAO on the status of this matter. 5.6 Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing Status WP/ Flight Safety Foundation and MITRE presented WP/14 on Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing for Aviation Safety, which was supported by Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, AAPA, Airbus and IATA. FSF updated that preparations are underway for the first Governing Board and Technical Working Group Meetings to be held later in APRAST Cochair (States) highlighted that the finalized Governance Plan provides a set of core principles guiding this project, to ensure non-punitive use of safety information and to preserve data confidentiality. Japan also strongly encouraged States/Administrations and industry to consider participating in the Demonstration Project. The Meeting agreed to this Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/7 - Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing Status (WP/14) That, States/Administrations and Industry be strongly encouraged to participate in the Demonstration Project for Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing for Aviation Sharing, by submitting Statement of Intent (Appendix B of the Governance Plan) to FSF/MITRE. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve regional data collection, analysis and information sharing When: On-going Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: Industry

11 Report of the Meeting 8 6. AGENDA ITEM 6: BREAKOUT SESSIONS 6.1 SEI WG and SRP WG held their coordination Meeting prior to the breakout sessions, and updated each other on work priorities. 6.2 The Capacity building Task Force, SEI WG and SRP WG held breakout sessions which included review of the work items in the RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Work Programme, past and emerging issues. 6.3 Update of Capacity Building Task Force Breakout Session The Task Force developed and presented a Standardized Capacity Building Programme (SCBP) (see WP/7), based on the information collected from the CE-4 gap analysis questionnaire and the istars data on CE-4 compliance by the APAC region. States/Administrations were encouraged to use the SCBP for their capacity building efforts. The Meeting agreed to the following Decision: Decision APRAST 10/3 - Update of Capacity Building Task Force Breakout Session That, APRAST/10 approve the Standardized Capacity Building Programme developed by the Capacity Building Task Force. Why: Capacity Building When: 21 Apr 2017 Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Status: Closed Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: 6.4 Update of SRP WG Breakout Session The Meeting noted that with regard to Decision APRAST 8/21 1, SRP WG had completed and published both the public and member versions of the Annual Safety Report The Meeting noted that with regard to Decision APRAST 9/4 2, the relationship between aircraft types, equipage and accidents related to CFIT had been rigorously studied through existing SEIs that had been developed on CFIT. In reducing CFIT occurrences, Airbus opined that besides aircraft equipage, it is also important for States to ensure the accuracy of terrain/obstacle databases. IATA supported Airbus s views and urged States/Administrations which have yet to comply with ICAO WGS-84 standard to do so. The Meeting noted that this issue on terrain data falls under the ambit of APANPIRG, and hence coordination is needed between APANPIRG and RASG- APAC subsidiary bodies. 1 Decision APRAST 8/21: That, The AP-SRP WG complete the APAC Annual Safety Report 2016 by APRAST/9. 2 Decision APRAST 9/4: That, SRP WG is to study the relationship between aircraft types, equipage and accidents related to CFIT, and provide recommendations to APRAST on further development of SEIs by SEI WG as needed.

12 Report of the Meeting 9 Conclusion APRAST 10/8 - Coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies - terrain/obstacle databases and WGS-84 That, Secretariat, with the assistance of Airbus and IATA, emphasize the importance of accurate terrain/obstacle databases and compliance of ICAO WGS-84 standard by States/Administrations, in support of the use of Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS), to APANPIRG. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Address CFIT operational risks When: end May 2017 Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: Airbus, IATA The Meeting noted that Decisions APRAST 8/4 3, 8/23 4, 9/11 5 and 9/20 6 commonly required coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies, and identified three issues for coordination: large height deviations, English language proficiency and terrain/obstacle databases. IATA is currently reviewing the geographical correlation between large height deviations and TCAS RAs and preparing a report on English language proficiency issues. SRP WG will review the analyses done by IATA when completed, and determine the next course of action. The Meeting agreed to the following Decision: 3 Decision APRAST 8/4: That, with reference to APRAST Decision 6/2, IATA work with AAPA to follow up to define the extent of the issues related to English Language Proficiency and determine the next course of action, and provide an update at APRAST/9. 4 Decision APRAST 8/23: That, AP-SRP WG provide an update at APRAST/9 on the information to be shared with RASMAG of APANPIRG for further analysis (refer to ASBU Block 0 Modules and APAC Seamless ATM items as safety barriers to CFIT, RS and LOC-I occurrences). 5 Decision APRAST 9/11: That, SRP WG coordinate with IATA to get updates on relevant issues discussed at APANPIRG and its subsidiary bodies. 6 Decision APRAST 9/20: That, SEI WG, with the assistance from Secretariat, obtain information from APANPIRG on any work that had been developed in the areas of CFIT, Fatigue Risk Management, Laser Attack and State Safety Programme, for which RASG- APAC is the lead regional group.

13 Report of the Meeting 10 Decision APRAST 10/4 Issues of Coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies That, Decisions APRAST 8/4, 8/23, 9/11 and 9/20 be consolidated (and superceded by this Decision), such that APRAST focuses on the following three issues: large height deviations, English language proficiency and terrain/obstacle databases, with respect to coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Address CFIT and LOC operational risks in coordination with APANPIRG When: 21 April 2017 Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: APANPIRG subsidiary bodies With regard to the timeline of 2017 APAC Annual Safety Report, the Meeting noted the following timeline: Timeline Item Action by 1 May 2017 Draft predictive analysis to be provided for SRP WG s Boeing review Data to be provided to Australia and Singapore for IATA, Boeing, ICAO reactive analysis 3 rd week of Draft analysis to be completed Boeing, Singapore, Australia May 12 Jun 2017 Draft Presentation on key highlights of the annual Boeing, Singapore, Australia safety report to RASG-APAC/7 to be submitted to APRAST Co-chairs 3-5 Jul 2017 Presentation at RASG-APAC/7 SRP WG Vice-Chairs 1 Aug 2017 Draft report produced SRP WG Vice-Chairs Boeing, Singapore, Australia 4 Aug 2017 Circulate to SRP WG for comments Secretariat 11 Aug 2017 Final comments from SRP WG SRP WG 22 Aug 2017 Revised report produced SRP WG Vice-Chairs Boeing, Singapore, Australia 25 Aug 2017 Circulate to APRAST Co-chairs for comments Secretariat 9 Sep 2017 Final comments from APRAST Co-chairs APRAST Co-chairs 23 Sep 2017 Provide final draft to ICAO APAC Regional Office SRP WG Vice-Chairs Boeing, Singapore, Australia 24 Sep 2017 Final report to be submitted for RASG-APAC Cochairs approval ICAO APAC Regional Office 6 Oct 2017 Approval by RASG-APAC Co-chairs RASG-APAC Co-chairs 11 Nov 2017 Formatting and publication of final report Australia 30 Nov 2017 Publish final report ICAO APAC Regional Office

14 Report of the Meeting Update of SEI WG Breakout Session The Meeting noted the status of development of SEIs to date, in particular the completion of SEI RI/2 (Runway incursion standard operating procedures and pilot training) under the 2016/ 2017 Work Programme. Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Total SEIs Completed SEIs Open SEIs under 2016/2017 Work Programme SEI under emerging issue For SEI LOC/4 (Flight Crew Proficiency), the Meeting noted that draft guidance material had been circulated for comments within SEI WG, and is ready to be submitted to RASG- APAC/7 for approval. The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/9 - SEI LOC/4 (Flight Crew Proficiency) That, RASG-APAC/7 approve the output of SEI Expected impact: LOC/4 (Flight Crew Proficiency) developed by DCA Malaysia and Malaysia Airlines and endorsed by Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets APRAST/10. Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Address LOC operational risks When: Jul 2017 (RASG-APAC/7) Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: RASG-APAC For SEI RE/1 (Causal factors with pilot decision to not go-around), the Meeting agreed to the following Decision: Decision APRAST 10/5 - SEI RE/1 (Causal factors with pilot decision to not go-around) That, FSF, with assistance from Secretariat, Expected impact: disseminate the report on Go-Around Decision Making and Execution Project to APRAST members, Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets to seek comments on the report s recommendations, for discussion on possible next steps at APRAST/11. Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional

15 Report of the Meeting 12 Why: Address RS operational risks When: late-2017 (APRAST/11) Status On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: FSF In addition, the Meeting noted that additional guidance provided by IATA on Unstable Approaches ( which would supplement FSF report on Go-Around Decision Making and Execution Project For SEI LOC/6 (Upset Prevention Recovery Training), the Meeting noted ICAO EB (EB 2017/21 AN 12/11.6) dated 12 April 2017 which notified ICAO Member States about the publication of Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid (AUPRTA) in February 2017 and the impending update of Manual on Aeroplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training (Doc 10011). While the two documents would address SEI LOC/6 to a large extent, the Meeting requested that SEI WG consider providing guidance for regulators to implement ICAO UPRT requirements For SEI LOC/2 (Hazard Identification and Risk Management), the Meeting agreed to combine LOC/2 and LOC/4, as both outputs make use of SMS principles and methodology. As the LOC/2 champion (AAPA) was absent from the Meeting, LOC/4 champion (Malaysia) will coordinate with LOC/2 champion prior to RASG-APAC/7. Decision APRAST 10/6 SEI LOC/2 (Hazard Identification and Risk Management) That, SEI LOC/2 be combined with SEI LOC/4, Expected impact: subject to agreement between the two Champions (AAPA and DCA Malaysia). Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Minimize duplication in LOC SEIs When: 31 May 2017 Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: AAPA, DCA Malaysia SEI WG reviewed other SEIs including emerging issues. For SEI RI/6 (Scenario based training for ATC), CANSO informed SEI WG that due to resource constraint, development on this SEI is not possible at this moment. As such, SEI RI/6 remains on the Registry of Emerging Issues, until a Champion is identified The Meeting noted that for Decision APRAST 9/5 7, US CAST Safety Enhancement (SE/78) on cabin safety is under review for its effectiveness. The Meeting agreed to the following Decision: 7 Decision 9/5

16 Report of the Meeting 13 Decision APRAST 10/7 Cabin safety That, US CAST update SEI WG at APRAST/11 on the review of effectiveness of SE/78 on cabin safety, to enable SEI WG to determine the next course of action. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve cabin safety When: Late 2017 (APRAST/11) Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: US CAST The Meeting noted the existing regional efforts to address low AGA EI scores, in relation to Decision APRAST 9/21 8. ACI provided information on an Aerodrome Certification workshop to be held in late 2017 at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Meeting agreed to the following Conclusion: Conclusion APRAST 10/10 Improve AGA EI scores That, ICAO APAC Regional Office consider organizing suitable activities such as regional/ sub-regional workshops, to address the gaps identified from the analysis of AGA EI scores. Expected impact: Achievement of global and regional aviation safety priorities and targets Enhancement of USOAP Effective Implementation Monitoring and Administration Capacity Building and Sharing of Information Inter-Regional Why: Improve AGA EI scores When: 31 Oct 2017 Status: On-going Who: APRAST APAC-AIG SRP WG SEI WG Capacity Building TF APAC States/ Administrations ICAO APAC RO ICAO HQ Other: That, SEI WG and SRP WG review the US CAST Safety Enhancement (SE/78) on cabin safety and information on cabin safety e.g. turbulence events in the APAC region respectively, for discussion at APRAST/10 on the possible course of action. 8 Decision 9/21 That, SEI WG, with the assistance from Secretariat, identify crucial CE categories which may contribute to the low AGA EI scores among APAC States/Administrations and also existing regional efforts (e.g. COSCAPs, ICAO Combined Action Team) that address low AGA EI scores, and report the outcome of review at APRAST/10.

17 Report of the Meeting The Meeting discussed possible workshop topics at APRAST/11 and APRAST/12. The Meeting noted that the next workshop should include SSP implementation as previously scheduled, as well as a topic on runway safety, given that there were no APAC workshops/ seminars for runway safety this year, required by the Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets. The Meeting also noted suggestions for topics on large height deviations and TCAS-RA. The Meeting agreed to the following topics: APRAST/5, Sept APRAST/6, Apr APRAST/7, Aug APRAST/8, Apr APRAST/9, Oct./Nov APRAST/10, Apr APRAST/11, late 2017 APRAST/12, early 2018 Proposed Workshop Topic(s) Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT), Loss of Control (LOC) and Runway Safety (RS) Implementing an Effective National and Organizational Safety Management Framework Pragmatic Approach to SMS and SSP SSP/SMS Integration and Measurement Implementation of SEIs with focus on Runway Safety SMS Implementation - Acceptance and review of SMS SEI Implementation SEI Implementation - Runway Safety SSP Implementation - Experiences in developing SSP SEI Implementation TCAS-RA, LHD Champion; Workshop contributors COSCAP-CTAs; Aviation Performance Solutions LLC, CAE, CANSO, United States APRAST Co-Chairs; ACI, Australia, COSCAP-NA, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Singapore, Singapore Airlines AAPA; Australia, Macau, NokScoot Airlines, Singapore Australia; Biman Bangladesh Airlines, India, Singapore, Singapore Airlines ACI, Avisure, CANSO, COSCAP- SEA; FAA Australia, Malaysia, Flight Safety Foundation, Airbus ACI, CAA Thailand, CANSO To be confirmed The Meeting agreed for SRP WG to work with IATA to obtain more information on issues related to TCAS-RA and Large Height Deviations for further discussion at APRAST/11. The Meeting also noted the concern raised with regard to wake turbulence by large aircraft and agreed to await further information before tabling for discussion at future APRAST Meetings.

18 Report of the Meeting AGENDA ITEM 7: ANY OTHER BUSINESS 7.1 APRAST Co-chair (States) informed the Meeting that his second two-year term as Co-chair would end in August As such, there will be an election for APRAST Co-chair (States) at APRAST/11. States/Administrations are requested to consider putting up nominations for this election and inform the Secretariat before APRAST/ In relation to an action item in the RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Work Programme, States/Administrations are encouraged to nominate a point of contact (PoC) for RASG-APAC/ APRAST activities, if they have not done so. The PoC details are to be submitted to the Secretariat. 8. AGENDA ITEM 8: REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF DECISIONS AND CONCLUSIONS INCLUDING ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL AT RASG-APAC 8.1 A list of APRAST/10 Decisions and Conclusions can be found at Appendix G to this Report. 9. AGENDA ITEM 9: PRESENTATION OF APRAST/10 DRAFT REPORT 9.1 The Meeting reviewed and adopted the APRAST/10 Report. 10. AGENDA ITEM 10: DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT MEETING 10.1 The Meeting noted that APRAST/11 Meeting would be tentatively scheduled for 27 November to 1 December 2017 at Bangkok, Thailand The Meeting also noted that the following dates and venues of related Meetings: Meetings RASG-APAC/7 RASMAG/22 APAC-AIG/5 Date / Venue 3-5 July 2017, Bangkok, Thailand 6-7 July 2017, July 2017, Bangkok, Thailand 1-2 August 2017, Singapore 54 th DGCA Conference 7-11 August 2017, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

19 Report of the Meeting The Meeting also noted the following upcoming Regional and ICAO events: Meetings / Seminars / Workshops ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Workshop on Protection of Safety Information Date / Venue 2-4 May 2017, Bangkok, Thailand ICAO/ACI Wildlife Strike Hazard Reduction Symposium May 2017, Montreal, Canada ICAO Cabin Safety Investigation Workshop ICAO Regional Safety Management Symposium for APAC and MID Regions May 2017, Singapore September 2017, Singapore 2 nd Global Runway Safety Symposium November 2017, Lima, Peru 10.4 The APRAST Co-chairs thanked the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office for hosting this Meeting, all the delegates for their active participation and contribution, and the Secretariat for its strong support for the Meeting.

20 Appendix A to the Report LIST OF PARTICIPANTS STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 1. AUSTRALIA (2) 1. Mr. Charles A. GALEA Safety Performance Management Specialist Safety Systems Branch Civil Aviation Safety Authority GPO Box 2005 Canberra ACT Mr. Richard GREGOR Section Manager, Operational Safety Analysis Safety Systems Civil Aviation Safety Authority GPO Box 2005 Canberra ACT BANGLADESH (6) 3. Capt. Salahuddin M. RAHMATULLAH Senior Consultant/FOI Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Kurmitola, Dhaka 4. Mr. S M Lutful KABIR Assistant Director(IR & Regulations) & APRAST-SARAST Coordinator Flight Safety & Regulations Division Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Kurmitola, Dhaka 5. Mr. Tareq Md MUNEEM Junior Consultant & DGI Flight Safety & Regulations Division AOC Cell Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Kurmitola, Dhaka 6. Ms. Quazi Fozia NAHER Administrative Officer & Cabin Safety Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Kurmitola, Dhaka Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Charles.galea@casa.gov.au; Richard.Gregor@casa.gov.au; smr@bdcom.net; smrahmatullah2148@gma il.com; kabircaab@gmail.com; tareq.muneem@gmail.com; foziacaab@gmail.com; fozia@dfsrcaab.gov.bd; A- 1

21 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 7. Mr. Shoaib CHOWDHURY Chief of Flight Safety Flight Safety Department Biman Bangladesh Airlines Hazrat Shahjalal Int l Airport Dhaka Mr. Enamul Haque TALUKDER 3. BHUTAN (3) Deputy Chief of Flight Safety Flight Safety Department Biman Bangladesh Airlines Hazrat Shahjalal Int l Airport Dhaka Mr. Bap TOPGAY Chief Flight Safety Bhutan Civil Aviation Authority 10. Mr. Sangay WANGDI Head of Aerodrome Bhutan Civil Aviation Authority 11. Mr. Kelzang JAMTSHO Line Captain / Safety Manager Bhutan Airlines Thimpu 4. CAMBODIA (4) 12. Mr. Sophondarith TAN Director of Security / Safety Management and Quality Assurance Department State Secretariat of Civil Aviation Phnom Penh Capt. Khelen THACH Deputy Director of Flight Standards and Safety Department State Secretariat of Civil Aviation Phnom Penh Mr. Samreth ENG Deputy Director of DASS State Secretariat of Civil Aviation Phnom Penh Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: fsbiman@bdbiman.com; captshoaib@gmail.com; dcsafety@bdbiman.com; trailblazer138@ho tmail.com; btobgay@bcaa.gov.bt; swangdi@bcaa.gov.bt; Kelzang.jamtsho@bhutanairlines.bt; kelzan g@gmail.com; Sophondarithtan@civilaviation.gov.kh; khelennavy@gmail.com; engsamreth@gmail.com; A- 2

22 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 15. Ms. Long Hay Kampoul Chief of Legal Affairs Bureau State Secretariat of Civil Aviation Phnom Penh CHINA (1) 16. Mr. RUI JIANG Assistant Division Chief Civil Aviation Administration of China NO. 155 Dongsi Xidajie Beijing HONG KONG, CHINA (3) 17. Mr. Michael LAU Acting Chief, Flight Standards Civil Aviation Department Headquarters Hong Kong International Airport Lantau 18. Mr. Sanjeev GROVER Flight Operations Inspector Civil Aviation Department Headquarters Hong Kong International Airport Lantau 19. Mr. Keith CH CHAN Operations Officer (Strategic Safety) Civil Aviation Department Headquarters Hong Kong International Airport Lantau 7. MACAO, CHINA (7) 20. Mr. PUN Wa Kin (Stanley) (Principal Delegate) Acting Director Flight Standards & Licensing Civil Aviation Authority of Macao Alameda Dr. Carlos D Assumpcao Centro, Commercial Cheng Feng 21. Mr. WONG Weng Kei (Ray) Safety Officer (Flight Standards) Flight Standards & Licensing Civil Aviation Authority of Macao Alameda Dr. Carlos D Assumpcao Centro, Commercial Cheng Feng Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: jiangrui@caac.gov.cn; msllau@cad.gov.hk; Sgrover@cad.gov.hk; kchchan@cad.gov.hk; stanleypun@aacm.gov.mo; aacm@aacm.go v.mo; raywong@aacm.gov.mo; aacm@aacm.gov. mo; A- 3

23 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 22. Ms. DE SOUSA Antonia Safety Officer (Airworthiness) Flight Standards & Licensing Civil Aviation Authority of Macao Alameda Dr. Carlos D Assumpcao Centro, Commercial Cheng Feng 23. Mr. LAO Weng Kin (Tony) Assistant Safety Officer (Air Traffic Control) - Flight Standards & Licensing Civil Aviation Authority of Macao Commercial Cheng Feng 24. Mr. LI Hang General Manager Aviation Safety Air Macau Company Limited 25. Mr. CHU Pak Keong Head of OPS Administration of Airports Ltd., Macau Macau International Airport 26. Ms. CHEONG Kit Meng Senior Air Traffic Control Supervisor Administration of Airports Ltd., Macau Macau International Airport 8. INDIA (1) 27. Mr. Naresh Kumar CHAUDHARY 9. INDONESIA (3) Joint GM (ATM-SQMS) Airports Authority of India New Delhi Ms. Wahyu Dwi AGUSTINI Chief of Airport Standardization and Certification Directorate General of Civil Aviation Ministry of Transportation Central Jakarta 29. Ade Patra MANGKO Air Navigation Inspector Directorate General of Civil Aviation Ministry of Transportation Central Jakarta Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: antoniasousa@aacm.gov.mo; aacm@aacm. gov.mo; tonylao@aacm.gov.mo; aacm@aacm.gov.m o; linhang@airmacau.com.mo; chupakkeong@yahoo.com; dickychu@ada. com.mo; pricillacheong@yahoo.com; atcso@ada.co m.mo; nkchaudhary72@gmail.com; wahyudwiagustini@dephub.go.id; A- 4

24 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 30. Ms. Ade TRISETYO Aerodrome Inspector Directorate General of Civil Aviation Ministry of Transportation Central Jakarta 10. JAPAN (1) 31. Mr. Daisuke KOMINE Unit Chief, Aviation Safety and Security Planning Division Japan Civil Aviation Bureau Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Tokyo MALAYSIA (4) 32. Ms. Siew-Huang TAY Director, Air Traffic Inspector Department of Civil Aviation Federal Government Administration Centre Putrajaya 33. Mr. Zainul Abidin MASLAN Assistant Director Department of Civil Aviation Federal Government Administration Centre Putrajaya 34. Mr. Poh Keat TAN Assistant Director, Flight Operation Sector Department of Civil Aviation Federal Government Administration Centre Putrajaya 35. Mr. Jacob KURIEN Safety and Operational Risk Manager Corporate Safety Oversight Malaysia Airlines Kuala Lumpur International Airport Sepang Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Cell: Ade_trisetyo@dephub.go.id; adeth_rossi@y ahoo.com; Komine-d2ay@mlit.go.jp; taysh@dca.gov.my; tsiewhuang@hotmail.c om; luniaz@dca.gov.my; tanpk@dca.gov.my; jacob.kurien@malaysiaairlines.com; jacob2 606@yahoo.com; A- 5

25 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 12. MALDIVES (7) 36. Ms. Fathimath RAMIZA Director, Air Navigation & Aerodromes Maldives Civil Aviation Authority Male Mr. Ismail Amrah UMAR Head of Safety and Security Island Aviation Services Limited Male Ms. Mariyam NASIHA Assistant Manager-Safety Villa Air Male Mr. Mohamed HUSNEE Maldives Airports Company Ltd. Valana International Airport Hulhule Mr. Ahmed FASEEL Manager, Safety Maldives Airports Company Ltd. Valana International Airport Hulhule Mr. Ali RASHEED Maldives Airports Company Ltd. Valana International Airport Hulhule Mr. Abdul Majeed YOOSUF Trans Maldivian Airways Valana International Airport Hulhule PAPUA NEW GUINEA (1) 43. Mr. Lei DO'O Senior SMS & Risk Management & ICAO Liaison Officer Safety and Future Direction Civil Aviation Safety Authority Boroko, NCD Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Ext. 536 ramiza@caa.gov.mv; simana@caa.gov.mv; amrah@iasl.aero; amrah.umar@gmail.com; Mariyam.nasiha@flyme.mv; mnasiha@gma il.com; husnee@macl.aero; Ahmed.faseel@macl.aero; ahmedfasyl@gm ail.com; Ali.rasheed@macl.aero; Abdul.majeed@transmaldivian.com; ldoo@casapng.gov.pg; leidoo4@gmail.com ; A- 6

26 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 14. PHILIPPINES (3) 44. Mr. Deogracias A. PULMANO Jr. Division Chief IV Aerodrome and Air Navigation Safety Oversight Office Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Metro Manila Ms. Arlene B. GENTICA ATMO V / Acting Chief SMS Air Traffic Service Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Metro Manila Mr. Jaime M. COSEP CNS Systems Office V / Chief, Admin. Staff Air Navigation Service Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Metro Manila REPUBLIC OF KOREA (2) 47. Mr. Byungwoo MIN Deputy Director of Flight Standard Div. Korea Office of Civil Aviation Sejong Special Self-governing city Mr. Jong Woo KIM Manager, Aviation Investigation Team Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board Sejong Special Self-governing city SINGAPORE (9) 49. Mr. Tiang Guan TAY (APRAST Co-chair) Deputy Director-General Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Mr. Rick, Hock Choon TAN Flight Operations Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Mr. Nick LEOW Senior Inspector (Aerodromes) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Atm.aansoo@gmail.com; djunp2@yahoo.c om; arlenegentica@gmail.com; atssms@gmail.c om; Jmcosep35@yahoo.com; jaimecosep@gmai l.com; secureavsec@korea.kr; ddoong82@korea.kr; Tay_tiang_guan@caas.gov.sg; Rick_tan@caas.gov.sg; Nick_leow@caas.gov.sg; A- 7

27 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 52. Mr. Michael, Tze Leong PANG Head (School of Aviation Safety and Security) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Mr. Chee Seng MAK Deputy Head (Continuing Airworthiness - Airlines) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Ms. Elizabeth CHAU Manager (Strategy & Intelligence) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Singapore Mr. Wing Keong CHAN Advisor Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) Passenger Terminal Building 2 Singapore Mr. Alexander LEONG Air Safety Investigator Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) Passenger Terminal Building 2 Singapore Mr. Paul J. H. AU Deputy Chief Pilot Flight Operations Control and Technical Singapore Airlines Limited Singapore THAILAND (17) 58. Mr. Jakrin KUTANTHAM Air Navigation Services Standards Officer Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Ms. Haruethai PATTANAPISUDTICHAI Air Navigation Services Standards Officer Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Mr. Sutat JONGSINTAWEE Officer, Navigation Aids Division Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Ext Tel.: Tel.: Michael_pang@caas.gov.sg; Mak_chee_seng@caas.gov.sg; Elizabeth_chau@caas.gov.sg; Chan_wing_keong@mot.gov.sg; Alexander_leong@mot.gov.sg; Jinhoe_au@singaporeair.com.sg; Jakrin.k@caat.or.th; Haruethai.p@caat.or.th; Sutat.j@caat.or.th; A- 8

28 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 61. Ms. Waritha KULKUSOL Flight Operation Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Mr. Buntoeng MEGCHAI Aviation Safety Management Group Manager Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Mr. Pongsakorn SAMAKSAMOSORN Aviation Safety Management Group Officer Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Ms. Mariam SIRIKUL Airworthiness Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Ms. Piyapatch CHAIPRAPAR Airworthiness Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand Bangkok Mr. Thirapat BUAKHAO Air Traffic Control Manager (Safety Management System) Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Bangkok Ms. Oranee PHIPHITAPHANDA Air Traffic control Manager (Safety Management System) Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Bangkok Ms. Bongkochrat KRIDGAEW Transport Technical Officer Department of Airports Bangkok Ms. Ploykaprib SORALUMP Transport Technical Officer Department of Airports Bangkok Mr. Chaiyuth YUKTIRAT Aviation Safety Inspector Department of Airports Bangkok Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Ext Tel.: Ext Waritha.k@caat.or.th; k.waritha@gmail.co m; Buntoeng.m@caat.or.th; marchingflying@yahoo.com; Mariam.s@caat.or.th; Piyapatch.c@caat.or.th; Thirapat.bu@aerothai.co.th; baccop@aerothai.co.th; oranee.ph@aerothai.co.th; Bongkochrat.k@airports.go.th; ploy_dca@h otmail.com; Ploykaprib.s@airports.go.th; ploykaprib.s@ gmail.com; Chaiyuth.y@airports.go.th; A- 9

29 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 71. Mr. Paytye JUNPHUANG Deputy Vice President, Aviation Services Standard Department Airports of Thailand Bangkok Mrs. Darina KUASAKUL Director of Aerodrome Standardization Division Aerodrome Standardization and Safety Dept. Airports of Thailand Bangkok Capt. Archpol SUWANPRASOP Chief (Specialist), Research and Strategic Management Department Thai Airways International PCL Bangkok Mr. Chairat SRIVILAS Chief, Flight Data Monitoring Programme Dept. Thai Airways International PCL Bangkok UNITED STATES (2) 75. Mr. Chris COLLINS Senior FAA Representative North Asia Federal Aviation Administration US Embassy Beijing No 55 An Jia Lou Lu Beijing, China 76. Mr. Chad BREWER Safety Programme Manager Federal Aviation Administration Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: + Paytye.j@airportthai.co.th; Darina.k@airportthai.co.th; Archpol.s@thaiairways.mail.go.th; Chairat.s@thaiairways.com; chris.collins@faa.gov; Chad.brewer@faa.gov; 19. VIET NAM (1) 77. Hai Hanh Thi LUONG Assistant AIG Director Flight Safety Standard Department Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam Long Bien district, Hanoi Tel.: hanhlth@caa.gov.vn; A- 10

30 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 1. ACI (1) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 78. Mr. SL WONG (Principal delegate) 2. AIRBUS (3) Head Technical & Industry Affairs Airports Council International Hong Kong International Airport Hong Kong, China 79. Mr. Hugues LALOË Senior Director International Safety Programs Airbus SAS 1 rond point Maurice Bellonte Blagnac, France 80. Mr. Xavier LESCEU Head of Flight Operations and Training Policy Airbus 1 rond point Maurice Bellonte Blagnac, France 81. Mr. Michel MENESTROT Regional Senior Director SE-ASIA and Pacific Flight Operations Support & Flight Safety Airbus Airbus Services Asia Pacific Pte Ltd Singapore BOEING (1) 82. Mr. Gunter ERTEL Senior Program Manager Safety Boeing Seattle, USA 4. CAE (2) 83. Mr. Stephane CLEMENT Director of Regulatory Affairs, Global Civil Aviation Training Solutions Saint-Laurent, Quebec Canada H4T 1G6 Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Cell: Tel.: Tel.: Ext Fax: sl@aci-asiapac.aero; hugues.laloe@airbus.com; xavier.lesceu@airbus.com; michel.menestrot@airbus.com; Gunter.Ertel@boeing.com; Stephane.clement@ce.com; A- 11

31 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 84. Mr. Peter-J. WEISS Head of Regulatory Affairs Asia Civil Aviation Training Solutions 59000, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Tel.: Ext Fax: peterj.weiss@cae.comexperts.de; peter.weiss@aviation- 5. CANSO (1) 85. Mr. Dolsarit SOMSEANG Systems Engineer (Safety Management System) The Monitoring Agency Asia Region and Safety Management Department Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Bangkok FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION (1) 86. Mr. Greg MARSHALL Vice President Global Programs Flight Safety Foundation Inc. 701 N Fairfax Street Alexandria, VA United States 7. IATA (5) 87. Mr. Gerado HUETO (APRAST Co-chair, Industry) Assistant Director, Safety and Flight Operations ASPAC IATA 111 Somerset Road Singapore Mr. Aric OH Senior Vice President, Flight Operations IATA/Asiana Airlines Singapore Mr. Hakimuddin PATANWALA Manager, Safety and Flight Operations ASPAC IATA 111 Somerset Road Singapore Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Dolsarit.so@aerothai.co.th; marshall@flightsafety.org; huetog@iata.org; aricoh@flyasiana.com; patanwalah@iata.org; A- 12

32 Appendix A to the Report STATE/NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION TEL/FAX 90. Mr. Verapon TUSSANATHRONE Senior Safety Manager Bangkok Airways PCL Bangkok Mr. Somchai SOPANON Airbus-Pilot Bangkok Airways PCL Samutprakarn IFALPA (1) 9. ICAO 92. Capt. Bhudhibhuntu TEINWAN Technical Advisor IFALPA / Thai Pilot Association Bangkok 10900, Thailand 93. Mr. KONG, Cheong Tuck Flight Safety Officer ICAO Asia and Pacific Office Bangkok 10900, Thailand 94. Mr. PU, Fanghui Associate Safety Oversight Officer ICAO Asia and Pacific Office Bangkok 10900, Thailand Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Tel.: Fax: Tel.: Fax: verapon@bangkokair.com; safetybureau@b angkokair.com; somchai@bangkokair.com; Bhudhibhuntu@gmail.com; APAC@icao.int; CKong@icao.int; APAC@icao.int; fpu@icao.int; A- 13

33 Total Participants = States/Administrations 8 International Organizations and Industry Partners APRAST/10 Summary of Participants Australia 2 Bangladesh 6 Bhutan 3 Cambodia 4 China 1 Hong Kong, China 3 Macao, China 7 India 1 Indonesia 3 Japan 1 Malaysia 4 Maldives 7 Papua New Guinea 1 Philippines 3 Republic of Korea 2 Singapore 9 Thailand 17 USA 2 Viet Nam 1 International Organizations and Industry Partners ACI 1 Airbus 3 Boeing 1 CAE 2 CANSO 1 FSF 1 IATA 5 IFALPA 1 ICAO APAC 2 A- 14

34

35 Safety Management Systems Assessment - Workshop Debrief ICAO APRAST 10 Bangkok, April 2017 Presented by Charles Galea

36 Task Apply PSOE in relation to 4 performance markers for Bush Aviation. How was your assessment achieved? Make a comment perhaps list some questions you may ask the operator in order to assist with your judgement?

37 Exercise 1 - Element 1.3: Appointment of key safety personnel Compliance + Performance P S O E How it is achieved Remarks Markers A competent person with the appropriate knowledge, skills, attitudes and experience has been nominated to manage the operation of the SMS and fulfils the required job functions and responsibilities? Flying Instructor. Mentioned she had studied as part of masters degree. Good attitude. Good examples of commencing SMS initiatives reports, trolley inspections, safety meetings FRMS. A safety officer has been trained on Safety management, however no direct experience. Qualifications? How long has she been with the company? Is there a paper trail? E: Not enough evidence

38 Exercise 2 - Element 2.1: Hazard identification process Compliance + Performance P S O E How it achieved Remarks Markers The organisation has a safety reporting system that is simple to use and accessible to all staff and third parties? Open reporting system with guaranteed feedback to all staff Examined previous incidents and put in place the mitigation Need more evidence. Are the safety controls being put in place having the desired effectiveness or is it introducing new hazards? O. Not enough evidence, e.g. no evidence of proper documentation and follow up of hazards reported. E: not enough evidence.

39 Exercise 3 - Element 3.1: Safety performance monitoring and measurement Compliance + Performance Markers Safety audits and surveys are carried out that focus on the safety performance of the organisation P S O E How it is achieved Remarks???? they checked the aircraft equipment before loading in to the aircraft Trolley checking and repair program Do you conduct an internal audit/inspection? If so, how? What is the procedure? No evidence of audits conducted

40 Exercise 4 - Element 4.2 Safety communication Compliance + Performance Markers P S O E How it is achieved Remarks Safety initiatives and strategies are communicated throughout the operation? Pilots team meeting Fatigue recovery initiative Room for pilots Through Safety meetings and briefings by the safety officer. Appears to be encouraged - input throughout the organization from all employees. Operating Appears to be. Effective Not sure? Documentation?

41 Any questions?

42 Appendix C to the Report STATUS OF RASG-APAC/5 DECISION Decision Ref Description Status Decision RASG-APAC 5/6 WP/5 Implementation of ICAO Runway Safety Go-Teams in the ICAO Asia Pacific Region That, ICAO APAC RO, with assistance from the COSCAP Chief Technical Advisors, coordinate the implementation of ICAO Runway Safety Go-Teams in the APAC region, and share relevant information on implementation with States/ Administrations and industry. Propose to Close. In consultation with ICAO Runway Safety Go-Team partner, ACI, ICAO APAC RO invited four APAC States (Bangladesh, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand) in Feb 2016 to host an ICAO Runway Safety Go-Team. Only the Philippines responded, informing that it has established Local Runway Safety Teams at major airports and would notify ICAO APAC RO if assistance was needed. Following RASG-APAC/6, a State Letter [T 6/8.4-AP095/16 (FS) dated 12 September 2016] was issued to inform APAC members of the ICAO Runway Safety Go-Team methodology and related information on the Go-Team Programme. C-1

43 Appendix C to the Report STATUS OF RASG-APAC/6 DECISIONS AND CONCLUSIONS RASG-APAC Decision Ref Description of Decision Status Decision 6/1 - Review of Progress of RASG-APAC/5 Decisions (WP/2) Decision 6/2 - Review of Progress of APRAST/8 Conclusions (WP/2) Decision 6/3 - Update of RASG- APAC 2015/2016 Work Programme (WP/3) Decision 6/4 - Update on Asia Pacific Regional Priorities and Targets (WP/7) Decision 6/5 - Implementation of SMS Go-Teams in the ICAO Asia Pacific Region (WP/5) That, with the exception of RASG- APAC Decision 5/6 (Implementation of ICAO Runway Safety Go-Teams), the other 25 RASG-APAC/5 Decisions in Attachment A to WP/2 is closed as actions have been carried out to meet the intent of these Decisions. That, APRAST/8 Conclusions as described in paragraphs 2.4 to 2.9 of WP/2 and highlighted in Attachment B is endorsed. That, the eight out of 19 items of the RASG-APAC 2015/2016 Yearly Work Programme that have been listed in Attachment to WP/3 is closed and removed from the RASG-APAC 2015/16 Yearly Work Programme. That, the deadline for the Regional Aviation Safety Target Implement structures between RASG and APANPIRG to facilitate collection and sharing of ATM data is revised from end 2015 to mid That, the proposed recommendation for the establishment of SMS Go-Teams in the APAC Region as specified in WP/5 and SMS Go-Team Concept and Methodology is approved. Propose to close. Noted Noted. Propose to close. Noted. Propose to close. Propose to close. The changes to the Asia and Pacific Regional Priorities and Targets were updated and kept in the Secretariat common server. Secretariat will update the Regional Priorities and Targets on RASG-APAC/APRAST website. Propose to close. SL T 6/6.3 AP0099/16 (FS) dated 14 Sep 2016 was issued to inform States/Administrations and Industry of the approved SMS Go-Team Concept and Methodology. C-2

44 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC Decision Ref Description of Decision Status Decision 6/6 - Safety Enhancement Initiative (SEI) Output (RI/2) for RASG Consideration and Approval (WP/6) Decision 6/7 - Regional Capacity Building Action Plan (WP/20) Decision 6/8 - RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook (WP/8) Decision 6/9 - Proposed RASG- APAC 2016/2017 Yearly and Standing Work Programmes (WP/17) That, the output of the Safety Enhancement Initiative RI/2, a Model Advisory Circular on Runway Incursion Prevention and Pilot Training, is approved. That, the proposed Regional Capacity Building Action Plan as presented in Attachment B to WP/20 is approved. That, the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook is approved. That, the proposed RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Yearly and Standing Work Programme consisting of the items presented at Attachment A of WP/17, is approved. Propose to close. Secretariat uploaded the approved RI/2 Model Advisory Circular onto the APAC website. SEI included in the monitoring mechanism to track the implementation of RASG-APAC safety tools by States/ Administrations and Industry. Propose to close. The Capacity Building Task Force updated at APRAST/9 of its progress. Propose to close. The approved RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook is available on the RASG-APAC/APRAST website. Propose to close. The approved RASG-APAC 2016/2017 Yearly and Standing Work Programme is available on the RASG-APAC/APRAST website. C-3

45 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/1 - Update on Work done by APAC-AIG (WP/4) 6/2 - Update on Work done by APAC-AIG (WP/4) 6/3 - Update on Work done by APAC-AIG (WP/4) That, ICAO APAC Office remind States/Administrations to provide their response to the following ICAO APAC State Letters dated 21 September 2015 [Ref.: T 10/8.4-AP136/15 (FS)]; dated 29 January 2015 [Ref.: T 10/5.3-AP021/15 (FS)]; and dated 2 August 2013 [Ref.: T 6/13.9- AP053/13 (FS)] if the States have not yet provided a response. (Conclusion APRAST 8/4) That, a) States/Administrations take early actions to implement the new ICAO requirements in Annex 13, particularly to establish an independent accident investigation authority as soon as possible; b) Secretariat include the establishment of independent accident investigation authority in the monitoring mechanism on the compliance to ICAO SARPs. (Conclusion APRAST 8/5) That States/Administrations is encouraged to attend: a) the APAC-AIG/4 meeting hosted by the Japan Transport Safety Board on 1 2 September 2016 and contribute to the discussion on how to improve accident investigation capabilities and USOAP AIG EI rates for States/ Administrations in the APAC Region; b) the AsiaSASI Accident Investigation Workshop on August 2016 hosted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in conjunction with the APAC-AIG/4 meeting; and c) the ICAO Regional Workshop in the Asia Pacific region on implementation of Amendment 15 to Annex 13 which ICAO had scheduled for April C-4 Propose to close. SL T 6/8.3 AP103/16 (FS) dated 19 September 2016 was issued to States/ Administrations to provide their response to the ICAO APAC State letters. Note: SL T 6/13.9-AP053/13 (FS) dated 2 Aug 2013 should read as T 6/13.9-AP109/13 (FS). Propose to close. a) SL T 6/8.3-AP104/16 (FS) dated 19 September 2016 was issued to urge States/Administrations to establish an independent accident investigation authority as soon as possible. b) Establishment of independent accident investigation authority included in the monitoring mechanism. See Propose to close. a) The APAC-AIG/4 meeting was completed as scheduled. b) The AsiaSASI Accident Investigation Workshop was completed as scheduled. c) SL T 6/8.1.1 AP-FS112/16 (FS) dated 20 September 2016 was issued to inform States/ Administrations of ICAO Regional Workshop in the Asia Pacific region on implementation of Amendment 15 to Annex 13. This workshop is scheduled for May 2017.

46 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/4 - Update on Asia Pacific Regional Priorities and Targets (WP/7) 6/5 - Update of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) WP/10 6/6 - Aircraft Tracking during Abnormal Operations (WP/23) That, all APAC States/Administrations and Industry are encouraged to provide information to Secretariat for the monitoring of APAC Regional Aviation Safety Targets, and to attain these Targets, noting the upcoming deadlines in 2016 and That States/Administrations are: a) encouraged to support the endorsement of the Edition of the GASP (Doc 10004) during the next Assembly; b) requested to establish national priorities and targets consistent with the RASG-APAC endorsed regional priorities and targets, the GASP objectives and the operational safety needs; and c) invited to provide ICAO feedback on the new Global Aviation Safety Roadmap and suggestions for the future edition of the GASP. That, ICAO is requested to expedite the development of guidance material for aircraft tracking during abnormal operations. Propose to close. For reporting at APRAST/9, SL T 6/8.10 AP- FS111/16 (FS) dated 20 September 2016 was issued collect information for the monitoring of APAC Regional Aviation Safety Targets and to remind the upcoming deadlines in 2016 and Propose to close. SL T 6/11.1 AP-FS105/16 (FS) dated 20 September 2016 was issued to inform States/ Administrations to follow up on the items. Propose to close. A memo (IOM T 6/8.1.1 AP-FS105/16) dated 21 September 2016 was sent to HQ on expediting the development of guidance material for aircraft tracking during abnormal operations. C-5

47 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/7 - Enhancing support for Safety Management Implementation (WP/11) That States/Administration are urged to: a) continue the implementation of SSP, report the progress by using the SSP Gap Analysis Tool on istars/space and completing the USOAP PQ self-assessments on the OLF; b) identify any additional areas of clarification needed or additional subjects that are needed to be covered in the 4th edition of the SMM; c) assist the Secretariat in identifying appropriate SSP examples and tools for inclusion in the update to the ICAO safety management website; d) identify potential instructors for the ICAO Safety Management Courses that meet the qualifications; e) inform ICAO of any additional activities which could be provided to support the implementation of SSP. Propose to close. SL T 6/6.3 AP115/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued to urge States/ Administrations to act on the items. 6/8 - Enhancing support for Safety Management Implementation (WP/11) 6/9 - Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing for Aviation Safety (WP/21) That, ICAO hold a Regional ICAO Safety Management for Practioners Course by early That, States/Administrations and Industry provide comments on the Governance Plan to FSF/MITRE, through the Secretariat by 17 October Propose to close. The regional ICAO Safety Management Training Programme for Practitioners Course will take place from Feb SL T 6/13.1 AP087/16 (FS) dated 24 Aug 2016 was issued to encourage attendance from States/ Administrations. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP092/16 (FS) dated 5 Sep 2016 was issued to seek comments on the Governance Plan. As of 5 Oct, Macao, China responded with further comments. C-6

48 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/10 - Regional Data Collection, Analysis and Information Sharing for Aviation Safety (WP/21) 6/11 - Establishing a New Safety Reporting System in the Republic of Korea (WP/25) 6/12 - Progress Report of the Implementation of the ICAO USOAP CMA (WP/12) That, States/Administrations and industry organisations that are interested to participate in the demonstration project, attend the Coordination Meeting organised by FSF/MITRE, which will be held in the 4 th quarter of That, States/Administrations are encouraged to: a) note the experience of the Republic of Korea in establishing a new improved safety reporting system; and b) share experience in implementing safety reporting systems with other States/Administrations. That States/Administrations are encouraged to: a) prioritise and take action as needed to improve safety oversight systems, with particular attention to the implementation of Corrective Action Plans (CAP), completion of self-assessments and reporting the progress, uploading the relevant evidence on the On-line Framework (OLF); b) notify ICAO USOAP to trigger validation upon completion of the CAP implementation; and c) request assistance from the ICAO Regional Office, COSCAPs, PASO and RASG-APAC, if required. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP092/16 (FS) dated 5 Sep 2016 was issued to invite States/Administrations and Industry to participate in the demonstration project and to attend the Coordination Meeting organised by FSF/MITRE. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.4 AP124/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/ Administrations to: a. note the experience of the Republic of Korea in establishing a new improved safety reporting system; b. and share experience in implementing safety reporting systems with other States/Administrations. Propose to close. SL T 6/7.1 AP116/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/ Administrations to act on the items. C-7

49 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/13 - Progress Report of the Implementation of the ICAO USOAP CMA (WP/12) 6/14 - Safety Oversight Challenges Against the Backdrop of Increasing Transparency (WP/13) 6/15 - Safety Oversight Challenges Against the Backdrop of Increasing Transparency (WP/13) That, a) Nepal and Thailand direct resources as required for the resolution of the SSCs in the two countries; and b) Nepal and Thailand request assistance from ICAO Regional Office, COSCAPs and RASG-APAC, if required. That, States/Administrations: a) note the work of the ICAO to enhance transparency of States safety oversight information, in recognition of the need to provide the public with accurate, dependable and reliable information on their choice of air transportation; b) share experience on conducting safety oversight on foreign operators and managing public perception on safety in an increasingly transparent environment with information on SSCs; and c) support closer collaboration and communication amongst CAAs, including the plans or basis for imposing operational restrictions on those foreign operators. That, ICAO is requested to review the current disclosure system and FAQ on public website, with a view to developing measures to better support the CAAs and industry in responding to or managing public perception on safety, as well as the travelling public. Propose to close. SL T 6/7.1 AP116/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued so that: a) Nepal and Thailand direct resources as required for the resolution of the SSCs in the two countries; and b) Nepal and Thailand request assistance from ICAO Regional Office, COSCAPs and RASG- APAC, if required. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP117/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued for States/Administrations to note the items. Propose to close. IOM T 6/8.1.1 AP-FS0106/16 was sent to HQ to request the review of current disclosure system and FAQ on the public website. C-8

50 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/16 - ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Continuous Monitoring Approach (USOAP CMA) Proposal for the Post-Implementation Review (WP/14) 6/17 - The Benefits of General Administration of Civil Aviation, DPR Korea from COSCAP-NA Programme WP/16 6/18 - Japan s Safety Rules on Unmanned Aircraft (UA) WP/18 6/19 - Micro-Unmanned Aircraft System Operation and Supervision (IP/20) That, States/Administrations: a) consider the proposal for a Post Implementation Review of the Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Continuous Monitoring Approach as described in WP/14; and b) advise Australia if they wish to co-sponsor this paper when submitted to the Assembly. That, the COSCAP-NA members are encouraged to continue to ensure the safety, regularity and efficiency of international civil aviation by enhancing the cooperation with COSCAP-NA in the future. That, States/Administrations are encouraged to exchange information on safety rules for unmanned aircraft with other States in the APAC Region, including taking challenges of proposing further safety requirements for such unmanned aircraft. That, States/Administrations note the information provided by China related to UAS classification, regulatory system and policies, certification and issuance of licenses with a view to promote unification of standards. Propose to close. a) The conclusion was disseminated through an broadcast (dated 13 Sep 2016) to all APAC States/Administrations. b) Samoa s, Fiji s and Vanuatu s wish to cosponsor the paper was conveyed to Australia. Propose to close. SL T 6/7.10 AP113/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued to encourage COSCAP-NA members to enhance the cooperation with COSCAP-NA in the future. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP114/16 (FS) dated 21 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/Administrations to exchange information on safety rules for unmanned aircraft with other States in the APAC region. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP118/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued to inform States/ Administrations of the information provided by China related to UAS classification, regulatory system and policies, certification and issuance of licenses. C-9

51 Appendix C to the Report RASG-APAC/6 Conclusion Ref Description of Conclusion Status 6/20 - Industry Standards: Tools to Support Appropriate Regulation (WP/19) 6/21 - Proposed Framework for the Establishment of Safety Performance Indicators Approved Maintenance Organization (AMO) WP/22 6/22 - Preventing Runway Incursion: Lessons Learnt from Past Occurrences (WP/24) 6/23 - Runway Excursions Causes and its Mitigation (IP/7) That, States/Administrations are encouraged to consider incorporating use of industry standards such as International Standards for Business Aircraft Operations (IS-BAO) and International Standards for Business Aircraft Handling (IS-BAH) when building regulatory capacities, including using them as guides in the development of appropriate regulatory environments for respective sectors of the aviation industry. That, the States/Administrations are encouraged to share their experience and process for the review and acceptance of SPIs for AMOs as part of their SMS implementation, taking into consideration the complexity and diversity of this sector. That, States/Administrations are encouraged to share their experience on runway incursion and excursion prevention, as well as exchange information and analysis of runway incursions and excursion at their airports, such as, through the use of ICAO Accident Reporting (ADREP) system. That States/Administrations are, a) invited to take note of the contents of this paper; and b) encouraged to consider the provision of Minimum Equipment List (MEL) with regard to the availability of Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) during flight operations. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP120/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/Administrations to consider incorporating use of industry standards when building regulatory capacities. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.1.1 AP119/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/Administrations to share their experience and process for the review and acceptance of SPIs for AMOs as part of their SMS implementation. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.9 AP122/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued to encourage States/Administrations to share their experience on runway incursion and excursion prevention. Propose to close. SL T 6/8.9 AP121/16 (FS) dated 22 September 2016 was issued for States/ Administrations to: a) take note of the contents of RASG-APAC/6 IP/7; b) consider the provision of Minimum Equipment List (MEL) with regard to the availability of Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) during flight operations. C-10

52 Appendix D to the Report RASG APAC 2016/2017 YEARLY AND STANDING WORK PROGRAMME S/N Decision RASG- APAC APRAST Ref 1 4/10 Conclusion APRAST 5/13 Decisions APRAST 7/35, 8/12 APRAST/10 Report para RASG APAC YEARLY WORK PROGRAMME ( ) Subject Ref (if Champion Brief Description Status any) LOC 6 COSCAP-NA Upset Prevention Recovery Training (UPRT) APRAST/10 noted ICAO EB (EB 2017/21 AN 12/11.6) dated 12 April 2017 which notified ICAO Member States about the publication of Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid (AUPRTA) by ICAO (and OEMs) in February 2017 and the impending update of Manual on Aeroplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training (Doc 10011). While the two documents would address SEI LOC/6 to a large extent, APRAST/10 requested that SEI WG consider providing guidance for regulators to implement ICAO UPRT requirements. 2 2/2 Conclusion APRAST 2/51 Decision APRAST 8/10 Decision APRAST 10/6 LOC 2 AAPA Hazard Identification and Risk Management. The implementation of safety management practices (hazard identification and risk management) into operational processes & decision making. (Paragraph 3.2 of LOC working group report refers.) Propose to close and remove from work programme if endorsed by RASG- APAC/7 to merge LOC/2 into LOC/4. APRAST/10 agreed to combine LOC/2 and LOC/4, as both outputs make use of SMS principles and methodology. As the LOC/2 champion (AAPA) was absent from the Meeting, LOC/4 champion (Malaysia) will coordinate with LOC/2 champion prior to RASG-APAC/7. 3 2/2 Conclusion APRAST 2/53 Decision APRAST 8/11 LOC 4 DCA Malaysia LOC 4 -- Flight Crew Proficiency. The appropriate use of trend information from Safety Management Systems (SMS) in the training and qualification processes to mitigate risk that could lead to a LOC event. (LOSA, non-punitive reporting systems, FDA, etc). (Paragraph 3.4 of LOC working group report refers.) APRAST/10 noted that draft guidance material for LOC/4 had been circulated for comments within SEI WG, and is ready to be submitted to RASG-APAC/7 for approval. Conclusion APRAST 10/9 4 5/7 Decision APRAST 7/29 Conclusion APRAST 8/10 RI 2 Bangladesh Runway Incursion Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Pilot Training Reduce the risk of Runway Incursions (RI) by incorporating RI training into pilot qualification and training programmes and by developing SOP on RI. Propose to close and remove from work programme The detailed implementation plan (DIP) was approved at RASG-APAC/5. The Model Advisory Circular was reviewed and discussed at APRAST/8 and was approved at RASG/6. Decision RASG-APAC 6/6 refers. APRAST/9 agreed for the SEI RI/2 to be removed from the Yearly Work Programme. Secretariat will upload the approved RI/2 Model Advisory Circular onto the APAC website. D-1

53 Appendix D to the Report S/N Decision RASG- APAC 5 4/23 5/5 6/5 APRAST Ref Conclusions APRAST 5/17, 7/6 Decisions APRAST 6/23, 7/24, 8/19 Subject Ref (if any) Champion Brief Description Status - Australia, Macao China, Papua New Guinea, AAPA, Biman Bangladesh Implementation of Go-Teams Implementation of Go-Teams particularly in the area of establishment of runway safety teams and implementation of SMS in air operators. APRAST will work out the modalities of the Go-Team implementation. Propose to close and remove from work programme Rwy Safety Go-Team: The establishment of Runway Safety Go-teams was approved at RASG-APAC/5. Following RASG-APAC/6, a State Letter [T 6/8.4- AP095/16 (FS) dated 12 September 2016], was issued to inform all APAC members on the implementation of Runway Safety Go-Team. ICAO APAC will continue to monitor for requests for a Runway Safety Go-Team from APAC States/Administrations or airport operators, with the help of COSCAP CTAs. SMS Go-Team: SMS Go-Team Concept and Methodology was approved at RASG-APAC/6. SL T 6/6.3 AP0099/16 (FS) dated 14 Sep 2016 was issued to inform States/Administrations and Industry of the establishment of SMS Go-Team. 6 6/7 Decisions APRAST 7/12 Conclusions APRAST 7/4, 8/8 7 4/4, 4/23 Decisions APRAST 5/9, 6/28 and 7/23 Conclusion APRAST 5/4 Decision APRAST 10/4 - APRAST Co- Chairs - APRAST Co- Chairs Action plan for Capacity Building Propose to close and remove from work programme Develop an action plan for capacity building to strengthen responses to The Capacity Building Action Plan was approved at RASG-APAC/6. the ICAO USOAP Critical Element 4 "Technical personnel qualification and training", in relation to the APAC Regional Priority on "Improvements to safety oversight and compliance" Coordination with APANPIRG and its sub-groups Pursue the development of the coordination mechanism between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC at the next APANPIRG RASG-APAC coordination meeting in The coordination mechanism should address issues such as: a. the attendance of RASG-APAC /APRAST representatives at relevant APANPIRG bodies and vice versa; b. the development of an analysis body (similar to the RMA/EMA models that report to RASMAG for vertical and horizontal safety analysis) that manages ATS safety concerns/occurrences for onward reporting to APRAST/RASG-APAC; and c. the review and endorsement of subsequent versions of the APAC Seamless ATM Plan by APANPIRG and RASG-APAC. a. Representatives from China Regional Monitoring Agency which are also from RASGMAG attended APRAST/8. APRAST/9 noted the practical challenges of SRP WG members participating in RASMAG/APANPIRG sub-bodies, given the limited resources.as IATA also participated actively in APANPIRG and had the relevant ATM expertise, APRAST/9 requested SRP WG to coordinate with IATA to get updates on relevant issues discussed at APANPIRG and its subsidiary bodies. APRAST/10 identified three issues for coordination: large height deviations, English language proficiency and terrain/obstacle databases. b. The 2nd APANPIRG/ RASG-APAC Coordination Meeting agreed that the meeting agreed that such new analysis group would not be needed and relevant groups in APANPIRG/ RASG-APAC should collaborate as opportune. c. The APAC Seamless ATM Plan Version 2 was shared at RASG-APAC/6 in August 2016 for review. APANPIRG/27 subsequently approved the Seamless ATM Plan Version 2 in September APRAST/9 noted the presentation by ICAO APAC Regional office on the updated APAC Seamless ATM Plan. 8 2/3, 4/23 Conclusions APRAST 2/2 and 5/2 - Secretariat Nomination of a point of contact (PoC) for RASG-APAC/APRAST activities SL T 6/8.7 - AP0009/16(FS) was sent in Jan 2016 to seek updates on the nominated point-of-contacts (PoC). Reminders were sent to those States without nominees. There are still States without nominees. Reminders for nomination of PoC were sent to six remaining States in Feb D-2

54 Appendix D to the Report S/N Decision RASG- APAC APRAST Ref 9 Decisions APRAST 7/9, 8/5, 8/6, 8/20 Conclusion APRAST 8/2 10 Decisions APRAST 7/3, 8/24 Subject Ref (if Champion Brief Description Status any) - Secretariat Online survey tool for responses to the monitoring of State Propose to close and remove from work programme implementation of safety tools The online monitoring mechanism for submission/update of RASG-APAC Explore an online survey tool to allow States/Administrations to complete endorsed safety tools and selected ICAO SARPs is now available on ICAO APAC and submit information on the level of implementation of safety tools website. developed by APRAST/RASG more efficiently. The monitored Usernames and passwords have been issued to nominated Point-of-Contact for information enables RASG-APAC to know the usefulness of its endorsed submission/update of respective implementation progress. safety tools and the compliance of States/ Administrations to ICAO SARPs. - Secretariat Nokscoot Dedicated web portal for RASG-APAC/APRAST Develop a two-tier online access to RASG-APAC website to allow for: a. A documents management system for public view; and b. A protected workspace to allow APRAST members to collaborate and exchange working information. NokScoot and Secretariat have outlined the scope and contents of the two-tier website. NokScoot will continue to develop the website and later its website user guide. This item aims to enhance access and visibility of RASG-APAC/ APRAST work and for more efficient collaboration among its members Decisions APRAST 5/10, 8/6, 8/17 Conclusion APRAST 8/1 12 Decision APRAST 8/8 Decision APRAST 9/2 Decision APRAST 9/3 Decision APRAST 10/2 Conclusion APRAST 10/4 - Secretariat RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook Develop a Procedural Handbook for RASG-APAC, which will among other things, document the APANPIRG RASG-APAC coordination mechanisms and framework. - APAC-AIG Initiatives to improve accident investigation capabilities Identify potential initiatives to help improve accident investigation capabilities and USOAP AIG EI rates of States/ Administrations Propose to close and remove from work programme First Edition of the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook was approved at RASG- APAC/6 (Decision RASG-APAC 6/8 refers) and available on the RASG- APAC/APRAST website. Based on the results of the survey on training demands for AIG topics conducted in December 2016, APRAST/10 noted that a few of the training topics desired by States/Administrations had already been included in the APAC-AIG work plan. APAC-AIG identified possible training for States/Administrations, with the aim of achieving USOAP AIG EI rates, including the ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Accident Investigation Workshop which will be organised by APAC-AIG on 3-4 August APAC-AIG will review the training needs of States/Administrations, and where necessary, develop additional training, taking into consideration experience and feedback from training conducted in Decisions APRAST 7/31, 8/13 Decision APRAST 10/5 14 Decision APRAST 8/21 Conclusions APRAST 8/11, 8/12 RE 1 FSF and IFALPA Causal factors with pilot decision to not go-around Promote pilot adherence to SOPs for approaches including go-around decision making - AP-SRP WG Production of APAC Annual Safety Report Produce the 2016 APAC Annual Safety Report by the APRAST/9 meeting; and Produce the 2017 APAC Annual Safety Report for submission to RASG- APAC/7 for appoval. FSF presented to APRAST/10 its report on Go-Around Decision- Making and Execution Project Report related to SEI RE/1. FSF, with assistance from Secretariat, will disseminate the report to APRAST members, to seek comments on the report s recommendations, for discussion on possible next steps at APRAST/11. SRP WG had completed and published both the public and member versions of the Annual Safety Report The timeline of producing 2017 APAC Annual Safety Report was agreed at APRAST/10. APRAST/10 Report para D-3

55 Appendix D to the Report S/N Decision RASG- APAC APRAST Ref 15 Decision APRAST 8/18 APRAST/9 Report para Subject Ref (if any) - SEI WG Work Processes on the creation of SEIs Champion Brief Description Status Review work processes for the creation of SEIs, to take into account the need to address both operational and organizational risks in the region Propose to close and remove from work programme SEI WG provided an update on the review of its work processes for the creation of SEIs at APRAST/9. APRAST/9 noted that the current SEI development process already catered for the creation of SEIs to address both operational and organisational risks in the region, based on analytical information provided by SRP WG and/or issues as directed by APRAST. S/N Decision RASG- APAC RASG APAC STANDING WORK PROGRAMME APRAST Ref Subject Ref Champion Brief Description Status Nil D-4

56 Appendix E to the Report OPEN APRAST/8 DECISIONS Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 8/1 (SMS/SSP Integration and Measurement Workshop para 2.2) That, Australia and ACI develop a survey, to be disseminated by Secretariat, to ascertain the perceived value of a training/education programme, specifically targeting development of SSP and integration with SMS, for CAAs and service providers; and to identify potential Subject Matter Experts to develop this programme. Closed. Australia and Malaysia conducted a SMS/SSP workshop at APRAST/10 Australia provided the information regarding availability of such SMS/SSP course during the SMS Acceptance Workshop at APRAST/10. Decision APRAST 8/2 (SMS/SSP Integration and Measurement Workshop para 2.2) Decision APRAST 8/4 (WP/5 Update of APRAST/6 and APRAST/7 Decisions and Conclusions) That, a detailed training/education programme be developed by identified Subject Matter Experts, with an update on the progress at APRAST/10. That, with reference to APRAST Decision 6/2, IATA work with AAPA to follow up to define the extent of the issues related to English Language Proficiency and determine the next course of action, and provide an update at APRAST/9. Information on the ICAO and ACI SMS/SSP training programmes can be found in the following links: Management-Training-Programme-(SMTP).aspx Information/Course-Categories/Safety/GSN-1-Safety- Management-Systems Information/Course-Categories/Safety/GSN-5-- Advanced-Safety-Management-Systems Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/4. Decisions APRAST 8/4, 8/23, 9/11 and 9/20 are consolidated (and superceded by Decision APRAST 10/4). E-1

57 Appendix E to the Report Decision APRAST 8/6 (para Presentation on the Safety Tools Implementation Monitoring Mechanism and online submission/update of the Safety Tool Implementation status) Decision APRAST 8/22 (AP-SRP WG Breakout Session para 6.4.6) Decision APRAST 8/23 (AP-SRP WG Breakout Session para 6.4.7) That, a) Bangladesh provide the web link of the online monitoring mechanism to the Secretariat, by 15 April 2016 for it to be posted on the RASG- APAC/APRAST public website; and b) Secretariat provide the web link registration information to States/Administrations for them to update their status of implementation, as soon as possible. c) Secretariat include the process on the use of the online monitoring mechanism in the RASG- APAC Procedural Handbook. That, the SEI WG and AP-SRP WG develop coordination processes to ensure relevant safety data and information be utilised to identify SEIs and prioritise their development based on regional risks. To commence, a coordination session between the two groups for information-exchange session should be held in plenary at APRAST/9. That, AP-SRP WG provide an update at APRAST/9 on the information to be shared with RASMAG of APANPIRG for further analysis (refer to ASBU Block 0 Modules and APAC Seamless ATM items as safety barriers to CFIT, RS and LOC-I occurrences). Closed. Items (a) and (b) are completed. Item (c) superseded by Conclusion APRAST 10/1. Secretariat will update the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook to include the use of the online portal. Closed. Coordination sessions between SEI WG and SRP WG were held during APRAST/9 and APRAST/10. Coordination process between SRP WG and SEI WG were also established, Decision APRAST 9/10 and Conclusion APRAST 9/6 refer. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/4. Decisions APRAST 8/4, 8/23, 9/11 and 9/20 are consolidated (and superceded by Decision APRAST 10/4). E-2

58 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/1 Online Portal for Monitoring of Safety Tool/SEI Implementation Decision APRAST 9/2 Survey on AIG Training Demands That, APRAST adopt the online portal developed by Bangladesh for the monitoring of implementation of the safety tools and SEIs by States/Administrations. That, APAC-AIG develop a survey to ascertain the training demands among APAC States/Administrations related to the topics listed in Attachment B of APRAST/9 WP/7 for circulation by ICAO APAC Regional Office. Closed. The online portal for monitoring of implementation of safety tools and SEIs by States/Administrations is now available on ICAO APAC website. Usernames and passwords have been issued to Point-of-Contacts for submission of information. SL Ref.: T 6/8.1.2-AP FS0028/17 dated 21 Feb was issued to inform and remind State to update the monitoring mechanism. Closed. SL survey [T6/8.3.1 AP159/16 (FS) dated 7 Dec 2016] was issued to ascertain the training demands among APAC States/Administrations. Secretariat presented the results of the survey on training demands for AIG topics at APRAST/10. E-3

59 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/3 Improving USOAP AIG EI score Decision APRAST 9/4 Analysis of CFIT That, APAC-AIG organize a five-day training course, to assist APAC States/Administrations in improving their USOAP AIG EI scores, with the facilitation of the ICAO APAC Regional Office. That, SRP WG study the relationship between aircraft types, equipage and accidents related to CFIT, and provide recommendations to APRAST on further development of SEIs by SEI WG as needed. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/2. Based on the results of the survey on training demands for AIG topics conducted in December 2016, APRAST/10 noted that a few of the training topics desired by States/Administrations had already been included in the APAC-AIG work plan. APAC-AIG identified possible training for States/Administrations, with the aim of achieving USOAP AIG EI rates, including the ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Accident Investigation Workshop which will be organized by APAC-AIG on 3-4 August APAC-AIG will review the training needs of States/Administrations, and where necessary, develop additional training, taking into consideration experience and feedback from training conducted in Closed. Superseded by Conclusion APRAST 10/8. APRAST/10 noted that the relationship between aircraft types, equipage and accidents related to CFIT had been rigorously studied through existing SEIs that had been developed on CFIT. In reducing CFIT occurrences, APRAST/10 agreed that besides aircraft equipage, it is also important for States to ensure the accuracy of terrain/obstacle databases. This issue on terrain data falls under the ambit of APANPIRG, and hence coordination is needed between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies. E-4

60 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/5 Cabin Safety Decision APRAST 9/6 Capacity Building Action Plan Decision APRAST 9/7 Standardized Capacity Building Programme That, SEI WG and SRP WG review the US CAST Safety Enhancement (SE/78) on cabin safety and information on cabin safety e.g. turbulence events in the APAC region respectively, for discussion at APRAST/10 on the possible course of action. That, Capacity Building Task Force urge States/ Administrations to respond to the Capacity Building Task Force on the CE-4 gap analysis questionnaire by 25 November 2016, through a reminder to be sent by ICAO APAC Regional Office. That, the Capacity Building Task Force present the Standardized Capacity Building Programme to APRAST/10 for approval. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/7. US CAST Safety Enhancement (SE/78) on cabin safety is under review for its effectiveness. US CAST will update SEI WG at APRAST/11 on the review of effectiveness of SE/78 on cabin safety, to enable SEI WG to determine the next course of action. Closed. SL survey and reminder were sent. [T6/8.1.1 AP101/16(FS) dated 16 Sep 2016] Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/3. APRAST/10 approved the Standardized Capacity Building Programme developed by the Capacity Building Task Force. E-5

61 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/ APAC Annual Safety Reports That, the 2016 APAC Annual Safety Reports, consisting of both member and public versions, be published according to the following timeline: Deadline Item Action by 2 Nov. Circulate drafts (member and public versions) to SRP WG Vice Chairs APRAST Co-Chairs for comments 15 Nov. Provide comments on both APRAST Co- draft versions to SRP WG 21 Nov. Provide final drafts to ICAO APAC Regional Office 22 Nov. Send final drafts to RASG-APAC Chair for comments 6 Dec. Provide comments on both versions to APRAST Co- Chairs /SRP WG Vice- Chairs 13 Dec. Provide final drafts of both versions to Australia for formatting 28 Dec. Provide final reports to ICAO APAC Regional Office for publication 31 Jan Publish final reports Chairs SRP WG Vice- Chairs ICAO APAC Regional Office RASG-APAC Chair SRP WG Vice- Chairs Australia ICAO APAC Regional Office Closed Annual Safety Report was published on 8 Feb and available on the RASG-APAC/APRAST website. States/Administrations were informed of the publication [ref AP-FS0009/ Asia Pacific Safety Report]. Decision APRAST 9/ APAC Annual Safety Reports That, SRP WG finalize the timeline for the development of the 2017 APAC Annual Safety Reports by APRAST/10. Closed Timeline for producing 2017 Annual Safety Report was agreed at APRAST/10 (APRAST/10 Report paragraph refers). E-6

62 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/10 Coordination between SRP WG and SEI WG Decision APRAST 9/11 Coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies Decision APRAST 9/12 Coordination between APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies That, APRAST adopt the following process of coordination between SRP WG and SEI WG on the development of SEIs: 1. SRP WG, while developing and compiling the Annual Safety Report, will identify the safety data and information based on regional risks and outline the same in the ASR for each year; 2. SRP WG and SEI WG would discuss and ascertain the need for the development of a new or amended SEI; 3. SRP WG and SEI WG would jointly present the recommendations to the APRAST plenary for comment and approval That, SRP WG coordinate with IATA to get updates on relevant issues discussed at APANPIRG and its subsidiary bodies. That, Secretariat coordinate with APANPIRG Secretariats to work out a mechanism for better exchange of information and issues between relevant APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies, and present it to APRAST/10 for discussion. Closed. Duplicated in APRAST Con 9/6. Coordination process between SRP WG and SEI WG on the development of SEIs was developed and pending RASG-APAC s approval for incorporation into RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook (Conclusion APRAST 9/6 refers). Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/4. Decisions APRAST 8/4, 8/23, 9/11 and 9/20 are consolidated (and superceded by Decision APRAST 10/4). Closed. Secretariat presented to APRAST/10 the existing efforts within APRAST and existing mechanism for the exchange of information and issues between relevant APANPIRG and RASG-APAC subsidiary bodies via Secretariat. APRAST/10 also noted the progress of a related Decision APRAST 9/11 (APRAST/10 Report paragraph refers). E-7

63 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/13 SEI LOC/2 (Hazard Identification and Risk Management) That, SEI WG circulate to APRAST members the draft guidance material developed by AAPA for SEI LOC/2 (Hazard Identification and Risk Management) for comments, and present the finalized guidance material at APRAST/10, with the aim of seeking approval at RASG-APAC/7. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/6. APRAST/10 agreed to combine LOC/2 and LOC/4, as both outputs make use of SMS principles and methodology. As the LOC/2 champion (AAPA) was absent from the Meeting, LOC/4 champion (Malaysia) will coordinate with LOC/2 champion prior to RASG- APAC/7. Decision APRAST 9/14 SEI LOC/4 (Flight Crew Proficiency) That, SEI WG circulate to APRAST members the draft guidance material developed by Malaysia for SEI LOC/4 (Flight Crew Proficiency) for comments, and present the finalized guidance material at APRAST/10, with the aim of seeking approval at RASG-APAC/7. Closed. Superseded by Conclusion APRAST 10/9. APRAST/10 noted that draft guidance material for LOC/4 had been circulated for comments within SEI WG, and is ready to be submitted to RASG-APAC/7 for approval. Decision APRAST 9/15 SEI LOC/6 (Upset Prevention Recovery Training) That, COSCAP-NA CTA continue to review SEI LOC/6 (Upset Prevention Recovery Training (UPRT)) output (draft model advisory circular), CAST SE 196 and CAST SE 197, based on the Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid (AURTA), and report the progress at APRAST/10. APRAST/10 noted ICAO EB (EB 2017/21 AN 12/11.6) dated 12 April 2017 which notified ICAO Member States about the publication of Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid (AUPRTA) by ICAO (and OEMs) in February 2017 and the impending update of Manual on Aeroplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training (Doc 10011). While the two documents would address SEI LOC/6 to a large extent, APRAST/10 requested that SEI WG consider providing guidance for regulators to implement ICAO UPRT requirements. E-8

64 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/16 SEI RE/1 (Causal factors with pilot decision to not go-around) Decision APRAST 9/17 SEI RI/5 (Scenario based training for pilots) Decision APRAST 9/18 SEI RI/6 (Scenario based training for ATC) Decision APRAST 9/19 RE/5 (Promote/Monitor implementation of RESA including other means such as arresting system) Decision APRAST 9/20 APANPIRG/RASG- APAC Coordination That, FSF update the status of the FSF Go-Around study report at APRAST/10, with the view of developing the DIP for SEI RE/1 (Causal factors with pilot decision to not go-around). That, the SEI RI/5 (Scenario based training for pilots) be closed, as the approved model advisory circular of RI/2 (Runway Incursion Prevention and Pilot Training) already addressed the issues of RI/5. That, CANSO provide more information in relation to SEI RI/6 (Scenario based training for ATC) at APRAST/10 to determine the next steps for SEI RI/6. That, the SEI RE/5 (Promote/Monitor implementation of RESA including other means such as arresting system) be closed, as RESA is under the purview of APANPIRG s Aerodromes Operations and Planning (AOP). That, SEI WG, with the assistance from Secretariat, obtain information from APANPIRG on any work that had been developed in the areas of CFIT, Fatigue Risk Management, Laser Attack and State Safety Programme, for which RASG-APAC is the lead regional group. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/5. FSF, with assistance from Secretariat, will disseminate the report on Go-Around Decision Making and Execution Project to APRAST members, to seek comments on the report s recommendations, for discussion on possible next steps at APRAST/11. Closed. Decision to close SEI RI/5 was noted and the SEI Master Registry was updated. Closed. CANSO updated APRAST/10, that due to resource constraint, development on this SEI is not possible at this moment. As such, SEI RI/6 remains on the Registry of Emerging Issues, until a Champion is identified (APRAST/10 Report paragraph refers). Closed. Decision to close SEI RE/5 was noted and the SEI Master Registry was updated. Closed. Superseded by Decision APRAST 10/4. Decisions APRAST 8/4, 8/23, 9/11 and 9/20 are consolidated (and superceded by Decision APRAST 10/4). E-9

65 Appendix E to the Report Decision No. Description Status Decision APRAST 9/21 Improving AGA EI scores That, SEI WG, with the assistance from Secretariat, identify crucial CE categories which may contribute to the low AGA EI scores among APAC States/Administrations and also existing regional efforts (e.g. COSCAPs, ICAO Combined Action Team) that address low AGA EI scores, and report the outcome of review at APRAST/10. Closed. Superseded by Conclusion APRAST 10/10. ICAO APAC Regional Office will consider organizing suitable activities such as regional/ sub-regional workshops, to address the gaps identified from the analysis of AGA EI scores. E-10

66 Appendix E to the Report LIST OF APRAST/9 CONCLUSIONS Conclusion No. Description Status Conclusion APRAST 9/1 Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets That, States/Administrations and Industry intensify efforts to attain the APAC Regional Aviation Safety Targets and to provide information on the progress of the APAC Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets to the ICAO APAC Regional Office: Priority Area Targets Information/Status to be provided by Reduction in Operational Risks Reduction in the number of fatal accidents in 2018 compared to 2014 irrespective of the volume of air traffic in SRP WG Vice- Chairs (provide 2016 figure) Improvements in Safety Oversight and Compliance the APAC region States and Industry to complete the implementation of all priority SEIs in RASG- APAC work programme by 2018 By end of 2017, (1) maintain at least 60% of applicable APAC airlines to be IOSA certified; (2) achieve at least 15% of applicable APAC airlines to be ISSA certified; (3) pursue at least a 50% increase in ISAGO registrations. States/ Administrations and Industry (provide information on implementation of priority SEIs) IATA (provide percentage of APAC airline IOSA and ISSA registered) IATA (provide 2014 and current ISAGO registration) Propose to close. Information was sought from States/Administrations and Industry on the APAC Regional Aviation Safety Targets prior APRAST/10, through SLs (ref: T 6/8.1.2-AP FS0028/17 dated 21 Feb, SL T 6/8.6- AP034/17 (FS) dated 21 Feb 2017). E-11

67 Appendix E to the Report Conclusion No. Description Status Conclusion APRAST 9/2 Computer-based training for AIG Conclusion APRAST 9/3 Altiport operation Consistent and effective Safety Management Systems (SMS) and State Safety Programmes (SSP) Predictive risk management and advanced regulatory oversight Enhanced Aviation Infrastructure Industry, particularly airlines, aviation training organizations, maintenance and repair organizations, airport operators, air navigation service providers, organizations responsible for the type design or manufacture of aircraft and aviation service providers to implement SMS by % of APAC air operators, with aircraft of mass 27,000 kg and above, participating in flight data sharing initiative by 2016 Implement structures between RASG and APANPIRG to facilitate collection and sharing of ATM data by mid-2017 All aerodromes in APAC region that are used for international operations to have Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) by 2017 E-12 States/ Administrations (provide figures on SMS implementation) IATA, AAPA (provide current percentage of APAC air operators participating) SRP WG (provide update on collection and sharing of ATM data with APANPIRG) States/ Administrations (provide figures on RSTs) That, ICAO be requested to look into computer-based training in the area of aircraft accident and incident investigation. That, ICAO be requested to provide more guidance on the operations at altiports. For RASG-APAC/7 endorsement. For RASG-APAC/7 endorsement. Conclusion APRAST 9/4 Flight Inspections That, ICAO be requested to provide more guidance on the For RASG-APAC/7 endorsement.

68 Appendix E to the Report for MSAW Conclusion No. Description Status Conclusion APRAST 9/5 Guidance on Cabin Safety Conclusion APRAST 9/6 Coordination between SRP WG and SEI WG conduct of flight inspections on Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW). That, ICAO be requested to consider enhancing guidance on cabin safety to encourage harmonization. That, the process of coordination between SRP WG and SEI WG on the development of SEIs as outlined in Decision APRAST 9/10, be incorporated into the RASG-APAC Procedural Handbook. For RASG-APAC/7 endorsement. For RASG-APAC/7 endorsement. E-13

69 Appendix F to the Report UPDATE ON APAC REGIONAL AVIATION SAFETY PRIORITIES AND TARGETS Based on the responses received from 25 States/ Administrations (Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Democratic People s Republic of Korea, Fiji, Hong Kong China, Japan, Kiribati, Lao PDR, Macao China, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands and Thailand), and information collected mainly from ICAO HQ and Industry organisations thus far, the APAC region has varying progress on the APAC Regional Aviation Safety Priorities and Targets. One target has been completed and there has been progress in some of the targets, since the update at APRAST/9. Regional Priority 1: Reduction in Operational Risks Target: RASG-APAC to complete the development of current identified priority SEIs by end 2016 Update at Update at APRAST/9 APRAST/10 Number of Priority Level 1 SEIs 11 No change in status Number of completed Priority Level 1 SEIs 9 from update at Number of Priority Level 1 SEIs to be developed 2 APRAST/9 Table 2.2: Development of Priority Level 1 SEIs 2.2 The two remaining Priority Level 1 SEIs to be developed are SEI LOC/2 on Hazard Identification and Risk Management and SEI LOC/4 on Flight Crew Proficiency. The champions are to present the finalised guidance materials of SEI LOC/2 and SEI LOC/4 respectively at APRAST/10, with the aim of seeking approval at RASG-APAC/7. The deadline for this Regional Target is proposed to be revised to provide more time to develop the guidance materials (see paragraph 2.19a). Target: Reduction in the number of fatal accidents in 2018 compared to 2014 irrespective of the volume of air traffic in the APAC region 19 Number of fatal accidents Year Global fatal accidents APAC fatal accidents Chart 2.3: Number of global and APAC fatal accidents ( ) * Statistics are extracted from ICAO istars, based on accidents as defined in ICAO Annex 13 for scheduled commercial air transport - airplane over 5700kg. F-1

70 Appendix F to the Report 2.3 Chart 2.3 shows the number of global and APAC fatal accidents which occurred from 2006 to There was 1 less fatal accident in 2016 compared to 2015, in the APAC region. Target: States and Industry to complete the implementation of all priority SEIs in RASG-APAC work programme by 2018 SEI Ref SEI outputs No of States/Administrations that have implemented* Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 a. Model regulation to implement equipage of Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) 8 No change in status from update at APRAST/9 CFIT/1 b. Model Advisory Circular for operators to ensure the effectiveness of GPWS Equipment 7 8 c. Model Advisory Circular for operators on training progress on the use of GPWS 9 F-2 No change in status from update at APRAST/9 CFIT/2 & Model Advisory Circular on Standard Operating Not yet LOC/1 Procedures for Flight Deck Crew members monitored. 1 CFIT/3 Model Advisory Circular on Instrument Approach Procedures using Continuous Descent Final Not yet Approach Techniques monitored. 1 CFIT/5 Model Advisory Circular on the development, implementation and assessment of crew resource management training programme for flight crew 7 members and other personnel CFIT/6 Model Advisory Circular on the training of flight No change in status crew in Approach and Landing Accident Reduction from update at 3 (ALAR) and CFIT Prevention APRAST/9 LOC/5 Model Advisory Circular to alert flight crew on Mode Awareness and Energy State Management 4 Aspects of Flight Deck Automation RE/2 Guidance material for air traffic controllers about stabilized approaches and increase air traffic Not yet controllers awareness of the part that ATC can monitored. 1 have in contributing towards unstable approaches RS/1 Runway Safety Maturity Checklist Not yet monitored. 1 Table 2.4: Level of Implementation of Priority SEIs in RASG-APAC Work Programme * Statistics are based on the 14 States/ Administrations (Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Fiji, Hong Kong China, Japan, Macao China, Malaysia, Maldives, Pakistan, the Philippines, Samoa, Singapore and Thailand) that responded to the survey on the implementation of SEI outputs before RASG-APAC/6 in Aug 2016, and/or uploaded implementation information on the website developed by Bangladesh. These statistics include instances where States/ Administrations have existing tools which fulfil similar intentions of the SEI outputs. 2.4 The implementation of SEIs is monitored through the implementation of their outputs. Sparse information has been provided to Secretariat on the implementation of outputs. To aid information collection, Bangladesh developed a website for States/Administrations to submit and update the implementation progress of SEI outputs. Currently, only 3 States (Afghanistan, Pakistan and Singapore) responded on this website. States/Administrations are strongly encouraged to provide information on the implementation progress on this website, using the password and username disseminated by ICAO APAC Regional Office.

71 Appendix F to the Report Regional Priority 2: Improvements in Safety Oversight and Compliance Target: Task force (to be formed by APRAST) to develop an action plan on capacity building by June The Capacity Building Task Force was established at APRAST/8 with a focus on developing an action plan, where specific training requirements that could contribute towards raising the Effective Implementation (EI) of ICAO USOAP Critical Element 4 will be recommended, particularly in the areas of flight operations, airworthiness, air navigation services and accident investigation. The Task Force comprises participants from Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Singapore (Champion) and the United States, with support from the ICAO APAC regional office. The action plan on capacity building, developed by the Task Force, was approved at RASG- APAC/6 in 2016, effectively achieving this target. Target: States to resolve any SSCs identified by the ICAO USOAP CMA programme promptly within the timeline specified in the corrective action plan and agreed to by ICAO 2.6 Same as the update given at APRAST/9, two States, with SSCs in the area of Air Operator Certification, are in the process of resolving the SSCs. ICAO APAC Regional Office will continue to monitor the situation of resolving SSCs for APAC States. Target: States to achieve at least 60% EI in USOAP CMA by 2017 (APAC Overall EI) Global Average: 63.79% Chart 2.7: Ascending overall EI scores by APAC States 2.7 There is an increase in average overall EI in APAC and one more audited States attained at least 60% overall EI, compared to the update given at APRAST/9. Eighteen out of 36 (50%) audited States have at least 60% overall EI while the APAC average overall EI increased from 59.01% to 59.33%, but it is still below the global average overall EI (63.79%). States are strongly encouraged to continue efforts to improve their safety oversight capabilities. F-3

72 Appendix F to the Report Targets: By end of 2017, (1) maintain at least 60% of applicable APAC airlines to be IOSA certified; (2) achieve at least 15% of applicable APAC airlines to be ISSA certified; (3) pursue at least a 50% increase in ISAGO registrations. IOSA ISSA ISAGO Certification/ Registration Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 Current Status 82 APAC airlines certified 94 APAC airlines certified* 6 APAC airlines certified 7 APAC airlines certified* 51 APAC stations registered 59 APAC stations registered* Table 2.8: Status relating to IOSA and ISSA certification for APAC airlines, as well as ISAGO registration for APAC stations * IATA provided these statistics in Apr 2016, before APRAST/10 meeting. 2.8 Compared to APRAST/9, the number of APAC airlines with IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) certification increased by 15% from 82 to 94. The number of APAC airlines with IATA Standard Safety Assessment (ISSA) certification increased by 17% from 6 to 7. The total numbers of applicable airlines in APAC region for IOSA and ISSA certifications are difficult to determine accurately. There is also a 16% increase in IATA s Safety Audit for Ground Operations (ISAGO) registrations from 51 to 59. As it is difficult to determine the number of applicable APAC airlines to be IOSA or ISSA certified and with the benefit of more insight on the rate of progress, these Targets are proposed to be amended (see paragraph 2.19b). Regional Priority 3: Consistent and effective Safety Management Systems (SMS) and State Safety Programmes (SSP) Target: Industry, particularly airlines, aviation training organisations, maintenance and repair organisations, airport operators, air navigation service providers, organisations responsible for the type design or manufacture of aircraft and aviation service providers to implement SMS by 2017 Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 Aviation organisations that have implemented SMS out of those required to implement SMS 69% (1474 out of 2140) 79% (2680 out of 3378) No of States/Administrations that have provided information Table 2.9: Status of SMS implementation for Industry * Statistics are based on the 22 States/ Administrations (Australia, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Democratic People s Republic of Korea, Fiji, Hong Kong China, Japan, Kiribati, Lao PDR, Macao China, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands and Thailand) that responded to the survey to update on the implementation of Regional Safety Priorities numbers 3 and 5. Cases where the regulator cannot validate the implementation of SMS are excluded from these statistics. F-4

73 Appendix F to the Report 2.9 The implementation of SMS for Industry is being monitored by the Secretariat. The implementation of SMS in organisations requiring SMS increased from 69% to 79%, with more States responding to the latest survey before APRAST/10, including responses from 6 more States (Cambodia, China, Democratic People s Republic of Korea, Kiribati, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands) since APRAST/9. The remaining 18 States/ Administrations are strongly encouraged to progress their SMS implementation and provide status updates to the Secretariat. Target: States to implement the full ICAO SSP by 2022 No. of States Implementation Stage Update at APRAST/9 Update at APRAST/10 No of States/Administrations that have provided information to ICAO istars SSP implementation completed 2 2 Implementation Plan Defined 6 7 Gap Analysis completed 4 4 Gap Analysis started 3 3 Table 2.10: Implementation of SSP by APAC States * Statistics are based on the 16 States/ Administrations (Australia, Cambodia, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Sri Lanka and Thailand) that reported the SSP implementation on ICAO istars Since APRAST/9, based on information on ICAO istars self-reported by States, 1 more State has defined the SSP Implementation Plan. The remaining 22 States are encouraged to provide information on the SSP implementation to ICAO. Regional Priority 4: Predictive risk management and advanced regulatory oversight Target: States to achieve at least 60% EI in AIG of USOAP CMA by 2017 (APAC Overall EI) Global AIG Average EI: 55.27% APAC AIG Average EI: 44.49% Chart 2.11: Ascending AIG EI scores by APAC States 2.11 Compared to the update at APRAST/9, the number of audited APAC States which have attained at least 60% EI in AIG remained the same at 13 out of 36 (36.11%). The APAC average AIG EI decreased from 45.76% to 44.49%, below the global average AIG EI (55.27%). APAC-AIG will report the status of their initiatives to improve the score. F-5