Annual Report 2017 KPI
|
|
- Patrick Leonard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Annual Report 2017 KPI
2 Version History: Version Date Remark Author /02/18 Initial Draft Barboff /02/18 Data analysis, first conclusions Editorial Board /02/18 Inserted first charts Barboff /03/18 Completed charts, adjusted layout Barboff /04/18 Edited Editorial Board /04/18 Added latest data, outlook Barboff, Hilger /05/18 Added source attribution Barboff, Hilger /05/18 Final version Barboff Annual KPI Report Page 2 of 25
3 Imprint Publisher: DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH on behalf of Initiative Deutsche Harmonisierung Am DFS-Campus 10 D Langen GERMANY Contacts: Erik Sinz & Sebastian Barboff, TWR/M Tower Management Services Editorial Board: Sebastian Barboff DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH Am DFS-Campus 10 D Langen GERMANY Boris Breug Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg GmbH D Berlin GERMANY Stefan Hilger Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide D Frankfurt am Main GERMANY Nico Ruwe Flughafen Stuttgart GmbH Flughafenstraße 32 D Stuttgart GERMANY Date: 08 May 2018 Pages: 25 All rights reserved. Any use outside of the limits set by the German Urheberrechtsgesetz requires written permission of the publisher. Violations will be prosecuted in civil and criminal court. This includes copying, translating, microfiching, and storing and processing in electronic systems. DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2018 Annual KPI Report Page 3 of 25
4 Content 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 2 GERMAN HARMONISATION INITIATIVE ACDM@GER 6 3 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 8 4 RESULTS GENERIC NUMBER OF IFR DEPARTURES SHARE OF REGULATED IFR DEPARTURES SHARE OF IFR DEPARTURES REQUIRING DE-ICING PROCEDURE ADHERENCE ASAT QUALITY AORT QUALITY PROCEDURE PLANNING TSAT QUALITY AND DEVIATION EDIT QUALITY AND DEVIATION CONNECTION TO NETWORK MANAGEMENT ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE AND DEVIATION AVERAGE ATFM DELAY 23 5 OUTLOOK 24 LIST OF SOURCES 25 Annual KPI Report Page 4 of 25
5 1 Management Summary Introduction This report covers a set of general Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that were deemed by the Editorial Board to be comparable among the A-CDM airports Munich, Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Berlin-Schönefeld, and Stuttgart. Hamburg Airport fully implemented A-CDM during the course of the reporting period 2017, its data will be included for the first time in the subsequent Annual KPI Report The KPIs contained within this report serve to continuously monitor the A-CDM process and usually portray only individual parts of the overall process. The KPIs allow a measurement of A-CDM uses and steering of the process. They are the basis for local reporting at the individual airports. The KPIs were defined using input from EUROCONTROL s A-CDM Implementation Manual, experiences of the local German Airport CDM airports, as well as local and future necessities. The report is intended to provide a general overview of KPI trends at the A-CDM airports, as well as serve as basis for decisions regarding adjustments to or steering of the A-CDM process. This report describes the experiences, measurements and results of the calendar year It utilises regular evaluations and measurements on a monthly basis, the conclusions that are drawn address points that were mutually agreed by ACDM@GER which are reflected in the ACDM@GER KPI Concept. Summary of Results and Tendencies Compared to the preceding year, 2017 has shown a marked increase in the share of regulated flights, while the overall number of flights only shows a slight increase. Individual airports, especially Frankfurt Airport, also experienced much more frequent CTOT updates during the summer season. This seems to indicate that the European ATM Network approached its saturation limit during that period. In this state, each additional quantum of demand increases the network load exponentially. This development is expected to continue in the summer flight plan period Annual KPI Report Page 5 of 25
6 2 German Harmonisation Initiative 2.1 European A-CDM Concept Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) is the operational approach (idea/concept/process) to achieving an optimal turnaround process at airports. A-CDM covers the period from EOBT -3 h until take-off. It is a continuous process beginning with processing of the ATC flight plan, via landing of the inbound flight, the turnaround process on the ground, to departure. By exchanging estimated landing and take-off times between the A-CDM airports and Network Management Operations Centre (NMOC), airports can be further integrated into the European ATM Network EATMN. A-CDM improves operational collaboration between the partners: Airport Operator, Aircraft Operators, Handling Agencies, Ground Handling Agencies, Air Navigation Service Provider, and European Air Traffic Flow Management (NMOC). A-CDM in Germany is based upon the European A-CDM spirit, the Community Specification of A-CDM, as well as recommendations by the German Harmonisation Initiative ACDM@GER. A-CDM aims to optimise utilisation of available capacity and operational resources at airports and within European airspace through high-quality target times and efficiency increases in the individual steps of the turnaround process. 2.2 German Harmonisation Initiative for A-CDM European A-CDM fundamentally relies on Community Specification EN However, development of A- CDM in Germany has shown a need of harmonisation to a level of detail that is beyond the Specification s scope. The A-CDM partners recognised this need and founded the German Harmonisation Initiative ACDM@GER. Collaboration within the Initiative is determined by a Letter of Intent that was signed by all partners. Partners within ACDM@GER are currently: Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH (DFS) Munich Airport (FMG) Frankfurt Airport (Fraport) Berlin Airports (FBB) Düsseldorf Airport (FDG) Stuttgart Airport (FSG) Hamburg Airport (FHG) Annual KPI Report Page 6 of 25
7 s goals are, among others: Exchange of information and best practices between the various A-CDM airports, Common understanding of A-CDM in Germany and common representation towards international partners (Eurocontrol, EU, ICAO, IATA) Harmonisation in the interest of partners and customers ( one face to the customer ) Best Practices developed within ACDM@GER can be provided to other European A-CDM projects and working groups to advance harmonisation. Creation and coordination of harmonised procedures and documentations are achieved within ACDM@GER s working groups and regular harmonisation meetings. Annual KPI Report Page 7 of 25
8 3 Purpose of the Report This document shows A-CDM KPIs that are generally comparable across A-CDM airports in Germany. KPIs fit for inclusion in this report were selected by a working group with participation of all A-CDM airports as well as DFS. The group also defined required data to be gathered and calculation rules. This report is not intended to replace local KPIs, nor does it pre-empt local KPI reporting routines. It is designed as a baseline to which local KPI concepts and reports can add additional indicators or even measure the same KPIs using different criteria. The common reporting that serves as basis for the KPIs contained within this report provide A-CDM airports with the opportunity of highlighting changes and developments, recognising potential for improvements, and developing harmonised A-CDM subprocesses. Further details regarding the A-CDM process and its specifics at the individual airports are described within the local A-CDM procedure descriptions and publications. Annual KPI Report Page 8 of 25
9 4 Results In order to achieve the local operational and network benefits associated with A-CDM, the quality of target times and process adherence are essential. For this reason, commonly available indicators from the following categories were selected: Generic Traffic Numbers Procedure Adherence of A-CDM partners Procedure Planning Connection to Network Management Generic Procedure Adherence Procedure Planning Connection to Network Management Number of IFR Departures A-CDM Alerts DPI Quality (E/T/S/A) ATFM Slot Adherence/ Deviation Share of Regulated IFR Departures ASRT Quality SOBT Quality CTOT Quality/ Deviation/ Stability Share of IFR Departures Requiring De--Icing ASAT Quality TSAT Quality/ Deviation/ Stability Average ATFM Delay AORT Quality EIBT Quality EDIT Quality/ Deviation Position Change On Short Notice The KPIs coloured in light grey are not yet part of this report but are planned for inclusion in the subsequent Annual KPI Report Annual KPI Report Page 9 of 25
10 4.1 Generic Number of IFR Departures Description Number of IFR departures within the calendar year as well as the previous calendar year Goal Show the amount of traffic and its trend Charts Figure 1: Number of IFR departures 2017 (dark green) and 2016 (light green) Annual KPI Report Page 10 of 25
11 Conclusion In the year 2017, the six German A-CDM airports generated 66.5% of all IFR departures within Germany. Airport CDM Hamburg was fully implemented in August Over the whole year of 2017, the largest A-CDM airports showed only slightly higher or stagnant traffic numbers compared to However, individual months showed significant increases or decreases. Düsseldorf Airport saw considerably lower traffic numbers in the last months of the year due to its main carrier Air Berlin ceasing operations. Annual KPI Report Page 11 of 25
12 4.1.2 Share of Regulated IFR Departures Description Share of IFR departures with ATFM slot (CTOT) Goal Illustrate the monthly share of IFR departures that were subject of an air traffic flow measure by NMOC. Charts Figure 2: Share of unregulated (light green) and regulated (dark green) IFR departures 2017, and 2016 share (yellow) Annual KPI Report Page 12 of 25
13 Conclusion Compared to the previous year, the share of regulated flights increased substantially. This is due to Traffic growth above predictions while capacities in airspace and airports remained essentially unchanged, Significant weather events in airspace and at airports, and Shortage of operational staff at European Air Navigation Service Providers. Aside from a generally higher number of regulated flights all over Germany, especially Frankfurt Airport saw a considerable increase in the frequency of CTOT updates per flight. This resulted in operational problems with planning and provision of start-up and off-block clearances, as well as in high utilisation of parking positions. During sequence planning, the many regulated flights and CTOT updates affected TSAT stability of both regulated and non-regulated flights and pushed it to levels below what was desired. Due to this observation, the editorial board intends to extend this report in the future by additional KPIs that show CTOT and TSAT stability. Annual KPI Report Page 13 of 25
14 4.1.3 Share of IFR Departures Requiring De-Icing Description Share of IFR departures that required aircraft de-icing Goal Show the monthly share of IFR departures whose turnaround process was prolonged by de-icing. Charts Figure 3: Share of IFR departures 2017 requiring aircraft de-icing on stand (dark green) and remotely (light green) Conclusion This KPI provides context for further KPIs below (e.g. TSAT Quality). Most airports only do remote de-icing, i.e. on designated de-icing areas. In this case, de-icing takes place after TSAT. In the case of on-stand de-icing the flight are de-iced on their parking stands, i.e. after TOBT, but before TSAT. Planned de-icing begin and duration are included in the TSAT calculation. In Munich, a vast majority of flights is de-iced remotely, only very few aircraft types on stand. Annual KPI Report Page 14 of 25
15 4.2 Procedure Adherence ASAT Quality Description Percentage of IFR departures that received start-up approval (ASAT) within TSAT ± 5 min via radio Goal Measure procedure adherence of Air Traffic Control (Tower) Charts Figure 4: Percentage of IFR departures that received start-up approval within TSAT ± 5 min via radio Conclusion Especially airports with a lower number of movements show a bigger share of flights that received start-up approval outside of TSAT ±5 min. One reason might be that small violations of the TSAT tolerance are more readily accepted there, as ATCOs feel sufficient capacity is available to accommodate flights that operate slightly outside of planned parameters. Annual KPI Report Page 15 of 25
16 4.2.2 AORT Quality Description Percentage of IFR departures that asked for their off-block clearance (AORT) within the window of 1. ASAT + 5 min (start-up via radio) 2. TSAT ± 5 min (start-up via datalink) Goal Measure procedure adherence of the Flight Crew Charts Munich did not provide data for the year Berlin-Schönefeld did not provide data for AORT quality. Figure 5: Percentage of IFR departures 2017 with conformant AORT (green) compared to 2016 (grey) Conclusion AORT quality after start-up approvals via datalink is much lower in Frankfurt und Düsseldorf compared to start-up approvals via radio. Datalink clearances are often requested long before ground handling is actually finished, which makes later adherence to the TSAT tolerance less reliable as TSAT seems not immediately relevant. Requests via radio, however, mostly take place after ground handling is complete, which makes it more likely that off-block clearance is also requested soon thereafter. Annual KPI Report Page 16 of 25
17 4.3 Procedure Planning TSAT Quality and Deviation TSAT Quality Description Monthly share of last TSATs that were equal to TOBT, in % per airport Goal Operational adherence to planning on the day of operations. Charts Figure 6: Percentage of regulated (light green) and unregulated (dark green) IFR departures 2017 where last TSAT = TOBT Annual KPI Report Page 17 of 25
18 TSAT Deviation Description Monthly mean deviation of TOBT and last TSAT Goal Show mean deviation of planning on day of operations versus actual operations Charts Figure 7: Mean deviation of last TSAT and TOBT for regulated (light green) and unregulated (dark green) flights Conclusion In the case of unregulated flights, a low TSAT quality shows that local capacity constraints have caused delays. For regulated flights, TSAT is calculated based on CTOT and therefore correlates more with ATFM delay. Annual KPI Report Page 18 of 25
19 4.3.2 EDIT Quality and Deviation EDIT Quality Description Monthly percentage of IFR departures 1. with on-stand de-icing 2. with remote de-icing whose EDIT was within ADIT ±3 min, per airport Goal Verify the reliability of estimated de-icing duration as input parameter for A-CDM. Charts Figure 8: Percentage of flights with remote (light green) and on-stand de-icing (dark green) where EDIT = ADIT±3 min Annual KPI Report Page 19 of 25
20 EDIT Deviation Description Monthly mean deviation of ADIT and EDIT in minutes for IFR departures 1. with on-stand de-icing 2. with remote de-icing per airport Goal Verify the accuracy of estimated de-icing duration as input parameter for A-CDM. Charts Figure 9: Mean deviation of EDIT and ADIT for on-stand (dark green) and remote de-icing (light green) Conclusion At most airports, the first prediction of the de-icing duration (EDIT) is based on aircraft type and weather conditions. De-icing requested during the warmer months is usually due to very cold aircraft surfaces, so de-icing duration can usually only be determined when the concrete extent of required de-icing is communicated by the flight crew. This results in a lower EDIT quality for planning purposes. Annual KPI Report Page 20 of 25
21 4.4 Connection to Network Management ATFM Slot Adherence and Deviation ATFM Slot Adherence Description Level of adherence to Slot Tolerance Window prescribed by NM Goal Measure procedure adherence when regulated flights are concerned, i.e. flights with ATOT within the Slot Tolerance Window (STW, usually CTOT -5/+10 min but may be extended in special conditions). Adjustment of the CTOT to the local TTOT within the A-CDM process improves ATFM slot adherence, pre-departure sequence and procedure adherence. To better identify the relation of ATOT to CTOT, two supporting measurements were made. Early flights have an ATOT before the STW begin, late flights have their ATOT after the STW end. Charts Figure 10: Share of flights with ATOT before (dark green left), within (light green) and after (dark green right) STW Annual KPI Report Page 21 of 25
22 ATFM Slot Deviation Description Mean Deviation from the STW prescribed by NM Goal Measure the level of slot deviations for regulated flights. This measurement counts only flights whose ATOT was outside of the Slot Tolerance Window, and measures the distance in minutes between ATOT and the STW limit. Early flights have an ATOT before the STW begin, late flights have their ATOT after the STW end. Charts Figure 11: Mean deviation of ATOT and STW for early (light green) and late (dark green) departures Conclusion ATFM slot adherence at German A-CDM airports is significantly above the European average. Although a larger percentage of flights was started up outside of their TSAT tolerances at airports with lower traffic levels (see chapter 4.2.1), this does not translate into lower ATFM slot adherence there. This seems to indicate that mainly unregulated flights are started up outside of the TSAT tolerance. Annual KPI Report Page 22 of 25
23 4.4.2 Average ATFM Delay Description Average ATFM delay per regulated departure Goal Measure the average ATFM delay for regulated departures Charts Figure 12: Average ATFM Delay per airport Conclusion Compared to a selection of airports without Airport CDM, the German A-CDM airports show a lower ATFM delay per flight especially during the summer months. Annual KPI Report Page 23 of 25
24 5 Outlook During the reporting year 2017, a higher traffic demand both locally and within the ATM Network has influenced the dynamics of target time calculation. Based on the available forecasts, this tendency will likely continue in the year Therefore, one goal of ACDM@GER is to find a harmonised way of compensating the increased dynamics in the planning systems. This will ensure more reliable planning across the entire A-CDM process for all partners. Stability-related KPIs shall be added to the report that allow to measure the effectiveness of measures that target this area. In particular, indicators related to stability of TSAT and CTOT seem promising. Regarding data related to ASRT quality, DFS is planning to implement an updated version of its Tower Flight Data Processing System which will enable a valid calculation of that indicator. The software update will be rolled out sequentially to all A-CDM airport towers, and as this roll-out progresses, the indicator will be added for each airport. The year 2018 will be the first complete year with full A-CDM implementation at Hamburg Airport. Starting with the Annual KPI Report 2018, KPIs for Hamburg will be available as well. Annual KPI Report Page 24 of 25
25 List of Sources CHAPTER KPI SOURCE Number of IFR Departures DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung Share of Regulated IFR Departures NM ATFCM Monthly Summary per Airport Share of IFR Departures Requiring De-Icing Airports ASAT Quality Airports AORT Quality Airports TSAT Quality and Deviation Airports EDIT Quality and Deviation Airports ATFM Slot Adherence and Deviation NM ATFCM Monthly Slot Adherence Average ATFM Delay NM ATFCM Monthly Summary per Airport Annual KPI Report Page 25 of 25
Key Performance Indicators 2016
A-CDM@FRA Key Performance Indicators Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the most important Key Performance Indicators comparing the years and. For further information, questions, comments
More informationKey Performance Indicators 2017
A-CDM@FRA Key Performance Indicators Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the most important Key Performance Indicators comparing the years and. For further information, questions, comments
More informationKey Performance Indicators 2015
A-CDM@FRA Key Performance Indicators Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the most important Key Performance Indicators comparing the years and. For further information, questions, comments
More informationFRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) CDM Airport @ FRA Flight Crew FRANKFURT AIRPORT Table of contents: 1. General... 3 2. Target Off Block Time (TOBT)... 4 2.1 Automatically generated TOBT...
More informationAIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
Airport CDM Flight Crew Briefing Deutsche Harmonisierung AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING AIRPORT CDM at Hamburg Airport (HAM) Flight Crew Briefing English Version: 0.1 Author: Airport CDM Team HAM
More informationChangi Airport A-CDM Handbook
Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook Intentionally left blank Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. What is Airport Collaborative Decision Making?... 3 3. Operating concept at Changi... 3 a) Target off Block Time
More informationHosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)
ICAO ATFM Seminar Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) DFS experience related to ATFM from an individual state point of view Integration with the Network Manager Operation Center (NMOC, former
More informationAirport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version Date: 2017/07/21
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version 01.10 Date: 2017/07/21 Airport Authority Hong Kong owns the copyright subsisting in this material. Except as permitted under
More informationImplementation, goals and operational experiences of A-CDM system
Implementation, goals and operational experiences of A-CDM system A-CDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Increasing airport effectiveness Decreasing delays Forecast of flight events Optimization of
More informationThe Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.
BOBASIO 3-WP/10 22-24/10/2013 The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013. Agenda 7: Green Initiatives
More informationTarget Off-Block Time (TOBT)
Target Off-Block Time (TOBT) What is TOBT? TOBT Definition (EUROCONTROL, A-CDM Manual version 4): The time that an Aircraft Operator (AO) or Ground Handler (GH) estimates that an aircraft will be ready,
More informationAirport Collaborative Decision Making. Dublin A-CDM Operational Procedures
Dublin Airport Airport Collaborative Decision Making Dublin A-CDM Operational Procedures Final Document CONTENTS 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL... 4 1.1 CHANGE RECORD... 4 1.2 REVIEWERS... 4 1.3 APPROVALS... 4 2 INTRODUCTION...
More informationCan elements of the A-CDM milestone approach be automated? Bob Graham Head of Airport Research for Alan Marsden TAM Manager
EUROCONTROL Stand Can elements of the A-CDM milestone approach be automated? Bob Graham Head of Airport Research for Alan Marsden TAM Manager Airport challenges? Multiple stakeholders and systems Poor
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management
L 80/10 Official Journal of the European Union 26.3.2010 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN
More informationIntentionally left blank
Intentionally left blank Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. What is Airport Collaborative Decision Making?... 3 3. Operating concept at Changi... 3 a) Target off Block Time (TOBT)... 3 Who is responsible
More informationLeveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations. Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group
Leveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group Singapore Changi Airport Quick fact sheet 4 Terminals 2 Runways 113
More informationDELHI AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (DA-CDM) INDIRA GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEW DELHI
AIRAC AIP SUPPLEMENT TEL: 91-11-24632950 Extn: 2219/2233 AFS : VIDDYXAX FAX : 91-11-24615508 Email: gmais@aai.aero INDIA AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN
More informationA-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA)
A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA) This document and the information contained herein is the property of Saab AB and must not be used, disclosed or altered without Saab AB prior written consent.
More informationA-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO
A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION 1 DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO GAMING A-CDM ALICANTE Agenda 1.INTRODUCTION TO ALICANTE AIRPORT 2.OBJECTIVES 3.CONCEPT DEFINITION (DIFFERENCES WITH CURRENT A-CDM) 4.VALIDATION
More informationIntegration of the Airport and the Network DPI/FUM Messages Management Overview
Integration of the Airport and the Network DPI/FUM Messages Management Overview Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network Operations Services Edition March 2013 Introduction Purpose The purpose of this presentation
More informationUltra s Experience with A-CDM
Ultra s Experience with A-CDM Simon Wilkins Chief Technology Officer ICAO A-CDM Workshop 20 October 2016 Objectives of A-CDM Improve predictability of operations Improve on-time performance Optimise utilisation
More informationINTRODUCTION OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT
Telephone: (65) 6595 6051 AFS: WSSSYNYX Facsimile: (65) 6441 0221 caas_singaporeais@caas.gov.sg www.caas.gov.sg REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE
More informationCANSO view on A-CDM. Case study on A-CDM at HKIA. Change management & human factors
CANSO view on A-CDM Case study on A-CDM at HKIA Change management & human factors What is A-CDM? ARRIVAL TAXI IN TURN AROUND TAXI OUT DEPARTURE Lack of shared awareness and collaboration Shared Processes
More informationGuide for. A-CDM in CPH
Guide for A-CDM in CPH Version 3: May 3 rd 2018 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1. Milestones 4-5 4. TARGET TAKE-OFF TIME (TTOT) 9 4.1. What is TTOT? 9 2. TARGET OFF-BLOCK TIME (TOBT) 6 2.1. What is TOBT?
More informationThe SESAR Airport Concept
Peter Eriksen The SESAR Airport Concept Peter Eriksen EUROCONTROL 1 The Future Airport Operations Concept 1.1 Airports The aim of the future airport concept is to facilitate the safe and efficient movement
More informationFRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) BRIEF DESCRIPTION Frankfurt Airport Version 4.0. German Harmonisation
German Harmonisation ACDM Brief Description Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) CDM Airport @ FRA BRIEF DESCRIPTION Frankfurt Airport Version 4.0 Contents: 1. General... 4 1.1. Purpose of the
More informationDFS Aviation Services GmbH. A brand of experience. Aviation Services
DFS Aviation Services GmbH A brand of experience Aviation Services Who we are Company profile DFS Aviation Services GmbH offers a wide range of products and services related to air navigation services
More informationSeen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally
Seen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally A-CDM Basics ATM Perspective Airport CDM is a part of the broader Collaborative Decision Making Focus: managing the turnaround of the aircraft fully transparent
More informationREPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE
Telephone: (65) 6595 6051 AFS: WSSSYNYX Facsimile: (65) 6441 0221 caas_singaporeais@caas.gov.sg www.caas.gov.sg REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE
More informationANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...
Ref. Ares(2018)5478153-25/10/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2018) XXX draft ANNEX ANNEX to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../... laying down a performance and charging scheme in
More information2nd forum. Airport FRA. procedure
2nd Airport-CDM@FRA forum Airport CDM @ FRA procedure procedure schema Take Off Outstation TFO F U M Estimated Landing time (CFMU/DFS) Approach to FRA TMI TSAT Issue (-40min) Final SEQ approach TMO Landing
More informationAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM. (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY
12 th Meeting of Arabian Sea-Indian Ocean ATS Coordination Group ASIOACG/12) & 8 th Meeting of Indian Ocean Strategic Partnership to Reduce Emissions (INSPIRE/8) New Delhi, India, 20-21 September 2017
More informationAirport Collaborative Decision Making Michael Hoehenberger, (Munich Airport) on behalf of ACI World
A-CDM Seminar Bahrain, 11-13 October 2015 The ACI View Airport Collaborative Decision Making Michael Hoehenberger, (Munich Airport) on behalf of ACI World SCOPE OF PRESENTATION Need for A-CDM What it is
More informationAir Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq
Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq www.thalesgroup.com Why Do We Need ATFM/CDM? www.thalesgroup.com OPEN Why do we need flow management? ATM Large investments in IT infrastructure by all
More informationICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016
ICAO ATFM SEMINAR Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016 ICAO ATFM Seminar Session 2.2: ATFM Sub-regional and Regional Solutions Brian Flynn EUROCONTROL Network Manager Directorate 12 th December 2016 Central Flow
More informationDFS Aviation Services GmbH. A brand of experience
EN DFS Aviation Services GmbH A brand of experience Published by DFS Aviation Services GmbH Heinrich-Hertz-Straße 26 63225 Langen Germany www.dfs-as.aero Photo credits DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH,
More informationA-CDM from the Flight Crew Perspective. Francisco Hoyas
A-CDM from the Flight Crew Perspective Francisco Hoyas A-320 pilot 22 September 2015 Impact of A-CDM during different phases of flight Before getting to the aircraft Climb, En_route, Descend, Approach,
More informationCombined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013
IP/2 Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013 Agenda Item 2: Action Item from ASIOACG/7 Indian Ocean RNP4 (Presented by Airservices Australia) SUMMARY
More informationWakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop
WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop Benefits of Conditional Reduction of Wake Turbulence Separation Minima London, 09.02.2011 Jens Konopka (jens.konopka@dfs.de) DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2 Outline
More informationWorkshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory
SESAR 2020 Concept A Brief View of the Business Trajectory 1 The Presentation SESAR Concept: Capability Levels Key Themes: Paradigm change Business Trajectory Issues Conclusion 2 ATM Capability Levels
More informationInternational Civil Aviation Organization
International Civil Aviation Organization ATFM/SG/4 WP/06 01-05/12/2014 The Fourth Meeting of ICAO Asia/Pacific Air Traffic Flow Management Steering Group (ATFM/SG/4) Bangkok, Thailand, 1 5 December 2014
More informationHOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT
1. Introduction HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT When an air traffic controller has such an amount of traffic in his approach area that he cannot handle more traffic for a determined or non-determined period of
More informationDMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport
DMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport Giovanni Pavese, Maurizio Bruglieri, Alberto Rolando, Roberto Careri Politecnico di Milano 7 th SESAR Innovation Days (SIDs) November 28 th 30 th 2017
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization AN-Conf/12-WP/8 7/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 3: Interoperability and data through globally
More informationFollow-the-Greens: The Controllers Point of View Results from a SESAR Real Time Simulation with Controllers
Follow-the-Greens: The Controllers Point of View Results from a SESAR Real Time Simulation with Controllers AHFE 2016, Human Factors in Transportation Orlando 30th July 2016 Karsten Straube 1, Marcus Roßbach
More informationAN-Conf/12-WP/162 TWELFTH THE CONFERENCE. The attached report
29/11/12 TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE TO THE CONFERENCE ON AGENDA ITEM 2 The attached report has been approved by thee Committee for submission
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY
PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 CAPACITY June 2018 Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled
More informationAERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 1/19
NAV CANADA 31 JAN 19 AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 1/19 NOTICE OF MANDATE TO APPLY AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) PROCEDURES AT TORONTO/LESTER B. PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1.0 Date
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization 17/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 4: Optimum Capacity and Efficiency through global collaborative
More informationAcronyms. Definition. Explanation. All coloured Acronym rows are time parameters which have a standard length of four characters.
3. ABBREVIATIONS IMPLEMENTATION & ACRONYMS All coloured Acronym rows are time parameters which have a standard length of four characters. Acronyms ACARS ACC ACGT ACISP ACZT ADEP ADES ADEXP ADIT A-DPI AEGT
More informationOperations Control Centre perspective. Future of airline operations
Operations Control Centre perspective Future of airline operations This brochure was developed based on the results provided by the OCC project as part of the SESAR programme. This project was managed
More informationGENERAL 1. What is Airport CDM? 2. What is the aim of A-CDM? 3. Why has A-CDM been implemented at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol?
GENERAL 1. What is Airport CDM? A-CDM stands for Airport Collaborative Decision Making and means that joint decisions are made by all operational partners the airport, air traffic control, the airlines,
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/1-WP/3 7/10/14 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP) FIRST MEETING Montréal, 27 to 31 October 2014 Agenda Item 4: Active work programme items
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN Air Navigation Order No. : 91-0004 Date : 7 th April, 2010 Issue : Two OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. Authority 2. Purpose 3. Scope 4. Operational Control
More informationCooperative traffic management
3/17/2017 Cooperative traffic management Moderated by Peter Alty, SESAR JU #SESAR 2 Cooperative Traffic Management The Airport view 8 th March 2017 Alison Bates Head of Service Transformation and Ops Efficiency
More informationPotential of Dynamic Aircraft to Runway Allocation for Parallel Runways
Potential of Dynamic Aircraft to Runway Allocation for Parallel Runways Martin Fritzsche, Thomas Günther, and Hartmut Fricke Chair of Air Transport Technology and Logistic Technische Universität Dresden,
More informationCATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA. ATFM TF 1 Meeting September 2018
CATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA ATFM TF 1 Meeting September 2018 Topics Topics. The Need C-ATFM Network C-ATFM Operations Current Status and Activities Challenges in Implementation
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY
PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 CAPACITY January 2019 Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled
More informationCENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017
CATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA 1 ATFM Global Symposium-2017 Topics Topics. The Need C-ATFM Network C-ATFM Operations Current Status and Activities Challenges in Implementation
More informationResponsibilities Document for the application of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM)
Responsibilities Document for the application of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) Edition Number : 1.0 Edition Date : 25/10/2012 Status : Released Version Intended for : Category : ATFM IR Responsibilities
More informationFlight Efficiency Initiative
Network Manager nominated by the European Commission EUROCONTROL Flight Efficiency Initiative Making savings through improved flight planning Flight efficiency The Network Manager is playing a pivotal
More informationValidation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR
Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 > Andreas Pick > July 07 1 Contents TOP and TOP
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
9.5.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 128/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 390/2013 of 3 May 2013 laying down a performance scheme for air
More informationSESAR Solutions. Display Options
SESAR Solutions Outputs from the SESAR Programme R&I activities which relate to an Operational Improvement (OI) step or a small group of OI steps and its/their associated enablers, which have been designed,
More informationCASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG)
CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG) Use of ADS-B for Enhanced Traffic Situational Awareness by Flight Crew During Flight Operations Airborne Surveillance (ATSA-AIRB) 1. INTRODUCTION TO ATSA-AIRB In today
More informationAll aviation except commercial aviation. Including but not limited to business aviation, air taxi operations and technical flights.
Capacity declaration Amsterdam Airport Schiphol: Summer 2019 1. Definitions The following definitions apply: Commercial Aviation: General Aviation: Night departure slot: Night arrival slot: Night slot:
More informationICAO EUR Region Performance Framework
ICAO EUR Region Performance Framework Regional Performance Framework Workshop Baku, Azerbaijan, 10-11 April 2014 ICAO European and North Atlantic Office 9 April 2014 Page 1 OUTLINES Why a Regional Performance
More informationEUROCONTROL and the Airport Package
European Economic and Social Committee Public Hearing Brussels, 20 February 2012 EUROCONTROL and the Airport Package François HUET EUROCONTROL Directorate Single Sky, Performance Review Unit The European
More informationMulti Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014
Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014 CANSO Asia Pacific Collaborative ATM Operations Workshop, Colombo 7 May 201 Evolution of the Regional ATFM Concept Research
More informationTowards a Global ATFM Manual. Brian Flynn Head Network Operations
Towards a Global ATFM Manual Brian Flynn Head Network Operations ATM Structure in Europe 41 States One single ATFCM System over Europe >60 En-route centres = 1750 Sectors 1348 Aircraft Operators 450 Airports
More informationGOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI - 110003 CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENT SECTION 8 - AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS SERIES 'S',
More informationManual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima
Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima (PBHSM Manual) Presented to: 2 nd NAT PBCS Workshop By: Christine Falk Date: 17-19 June 2015 Overview Why a PBHSM
More informationINTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS 48 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Dubrovnik, 20 th to 24 th April 2009 Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94 Study Go Around Procedures When on
More informationSAFETY ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM)
Edition Number : 2.0 Edition Validity Date : 01/02/2016 DOCUMENT CHARACTERISTICS Document Title SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A- Document Subtitle (optional) Abstract Edition
More informationDFLEX (DEPARTURE FLEXIBILITY) When Airport CDM becomes a reality!
DFLEX (DEPARTURE FLEXIBILITY) When Airport CDM becomes a reality! 1 DFlex a step beyond the Airport CDM European Airport CDM: Information Sharing btw airport, aircraft operators, handlers, ATC, NM All
More informationSOUTH AFRICA PBN NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PROJECT
PRE-PLANNING PHASE Nomination of the State Focal Point of Contact Appointment of the South Africa PBN Project Manager and Team Define the goals and objectives of Project Define the Terms of Reference for
More informationTANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 8 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This Advisory Circular provides guidance to personnel involved in construction of instrument and visual flight procedures for publication in the Aeronautical Information Publication.
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization 16/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 5: Efficient flight paths through trajectory-based operations
More informationBasic DMAN Operational Service and Environment Definition (OSED)
Basic DMAN Operational Service and Environment Definition (OSED) Document information Project title Project N 06.08.04 Project Manager Deliverable Name Deliverable ID Coupled AMAN/DMAN DFS Basic DMAN Operational
More informationATFM delay report December Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report December 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe December 2018 December 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 799.102 759.600
More informationATFM delay report October Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report October 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe October 2018 October 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 985.198 946.694
More informationConcept of Operations Workshop
Concept of Operations Workshop CS#2 4DPP 4D Trajectory Calculation for Purposes Bernard Rausch CS2 Project Manager 03 September 2013 On the menu today. 1. Drivers for change 2. Objectives 3. Concept 4.
More informationECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency
ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency Daniel MULLER ICAO APAC/EUR/MID Workshop on Service improvement through integration of AIM, MET and ATM Information Services Brussels, October
More informationATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report November 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe November 2018 November 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 819.421 786.090
More informationAir Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre Annual ATFM delay report 2014 Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe 2014 2013 Trend 13/14 Total Flights 9.740.029 9.568.399 1,8% Regulated
More informationATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report February 2019 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe February 2019 February 2018 Trend 19/18 Total flights 739.524 718.307
More informationAir Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre Annual ATFM delay report 2015 Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe 2015 2014 Trend 15/14 Total Flights 9.889.452 9.740.029 1,5% Regulated
More informationATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report February 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe February 2018 February 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 718.307 693.565
More informationNETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY
NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY "Runway Incursion Serious Incidents & Accidents - SAFMAP analysis of - data sample" Edition Number Edition Validity Date :. : APRIL 7 Runway Incursion Serious Incidents
More informationFuture Network Manager Methods
Future Network Manager Methods Workshop on Emerging Technologies Sonke Mahlich Project Manager, EUROCONTROL ATC Global Beijing, 12. Sep. 2016 Network Management A global scope with regional challenges
More informationATFM delay report January Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report January 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe January 2018 January 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 766.330 731.128
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY
PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 CAPACITY December 2018 Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled
More informationATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report November 2017 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe November 2017 November 2016 Trend 17/16 Total flights 786.090 754.311
More informationATFM delay report July Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report July 2018 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe July 2018 July 2017 Trend 18/17 Total flights 1.083.678 1.045.361 3,7%
More informationReal-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace
Real-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace (WP-E project ERAINT) E. Pastor M. Pérez-Batlle P. Royo R. Cuadrado C. Barrado 4 th SESAR Innovation Days Universitat Politècnica
More informationDisruptive Technologies in Air Traffic Management (ATM) - Example: flight centric operations (sectorless ATM)
8th Florence Air Forum Oktober 21 th 2016 Disruptive Technologies in Air Traffic Management (ATM) - Example: flight centric operations (sectorless ATM) Ralf Bertsch Director Planning and Innovation DFS
More informationTWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE ASIA/PACIFIC AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP (APANPIRG/22)
INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE ASIA/PACIFIC AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP (APANPIRG/22) Bangkok, Thailand, 5-9 September 2011 Agenda
More informationATFM delay report April 2018
LIZ Situation and Information Centre ATFM delay report April 2018 Due to technical issues on April 3, the flight data of this day are not available. Eurocontrol is investigating the situation. A new report
More informationFollow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES
RAAC/15-WP/28 International Civil Aviation Organization 04/12/17 ICAO South American Regional Office Fifteenth Meeting of the Civil Aviation Authorities of the SAM Region (RAAC/15) (Asuncion, Paraguay,
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization AN-Conf/12-WP/13 1/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 4: Optimum capacity and efficiency through
More information