Optimized Profile Descent (OPD) Site Evaluations and Benefits Analysis

Transcription

1 Optimizd Profil Dscnt (OPD) Sit Evaluations and Bnfits Analysis Jff Formosa July 29, Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

2 Intgration of Procdurs FAA s RNAV and RNP Group and Airspac Stratgy Intgration of Procdurs Consists of 4 dsign mthods Optimizd Profil Dscnts SID/STAR concurrnt dsign and implmntations Dcoupling of adjacnt airport flows City-pair combinations (SID, nrout, STAR, approach) Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

3 Background OPD Dmonstrations at ATL and MIA MIA Flights Analysis MIA OPD ATL Flights ATL Analysis OPD 3 Atlantic Introprability Initiativ to Rduc Emissions (AIRE) Signd Jun 07 Administrator's Goal: Complt dmos at ATL and MIA by May 08 (AJP and AJR collaboration) FAA, Industry, and CAASD tams formd for ATL and MIA. Kickoff mting occurrd in Spt dmo flights flown at ATL and MIA in May 08 Savings: Ful (48-52 gals/flt.), CO2 ( kg/flt.) ATL and MIA continu plans for gratr us and oprational impact mitigations Hank Krakowski and Jo McCarthy brifd Mr. Sturgll in July, h said acclrat! FY09 CAASD analysis to nabl FAA sit prioritization. Followd by sit modling, analysis procdur dsign and implmntation tasks in FY09 and FY Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

4 Sit Analysis Ovrviw Dscription: A data-drivn mthodology for prioritizing OPD implmntation sits s sits in 3 catgoris: a) High Rlativ Bnfits Highr dgr of procdur dsign difficult and longr lad tims b) Modrat Rlativ Bnfits - lowr dgr of dsign complxity, shortr lad tims c) PBN Implmntation Status Sits within FAA and/or Industry xisting RNAV plans Offrs a flxibl foundation for OPD sit prioritization Enabls FAA/Industry dcision making Enabls sit prioritization basd on arrival flows Sit-spcific analysis provids advancd information on spcific arrival flows Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

5 Candidat s 5 Analyzd 1800 airports Filtrd basd on oprational statistics: IFR arrival count gratr than 40 pr day Mor than 35% jt or commrcial traffic Modl addrsss: 118 airports 4091 arrival flows Latral and vrtical track analysis for spcific arrival flows and runways Gographical distribution of 118 candidat airports ABE Allntown PA FRG Long Island, NY PDK Pachtr, GA ABQ Albuqurqu, NM GAI Gaithrsburg, MD PDX Portland, OR ALB Albany, NY GYY Gary, IN PHL Philadlphia, PA ALN Alton, IL HND Hndrson, NV PHX Phonix, AZ ATL Atlanta, GA HOU Houston, TX PIE Portland, OR AUS Austin, TX HPN Wstchstr, NY PIT Pittsburgh, PA BDL Hartford, CT IAD Washington, DC PTK Pontiac, MI BED Bdford, MA IAH Houston, TX PVD Providnc, RI BFI King County, WA ICT Wichita, KS PWK Pal Wauk, IL BHM Birmingham, AL ILM Wilmington, NC PWM Portland, ME BKL Clvland, OH IND Indianapolis, ID RDU Raligh-Durham, NC BNA Nashvill, TN JAX Jacksonvill, FL RIC Richmond, VA BOI Bois, ID JFK Nw York, NY RNO Rno, NV BOS Boston, MA LAS Las Vgas, NV RNT Rnton, WA BTV Burlington, VT LAX Los Angls, CA ROC Rochstr, NY BUF Buffalo, NY LBB Lubbock, TX RSW Fort Myrs, FL BUR Burbank, CA LCK Columbus, OH SAN San Digo, CA BWI Baltimor, MD LEX Lxington, KY SAT San Antonio, TX CAE Columbia, SC LGA LaGuardia, NY SAV Savannah, GA CHA Chattanooga, TN LGB Long Bach, CA SBA Santa Barbara, CA CHS Charlston, SC LIT Littl Rock, AR SBD San Brnardino, CA CLE Clvland, OH MCI Kansas City. MO SBN South Bnd, IN CLT Charlott, NC MCO Orlando, FL SDF Louisvill, KY CMH Columbus, OH MDT Harrisburg, PA SEA Sattl, WA CVG Cincinnati, OH MDW Chicago, IL SFB Orlando, FL DAB Daytona Bach, Fl MEM Mmphis, TN SFO San Francisco, CA DAL Dallas, TX MHT Manchstr, NH SHV Shrvport, LA DAY Dayton, OH MIA Miami, FL SJC San Jos, CA DCA Washington, DC MKE Milwauk, WI SLC Salt Lak City, UT DEN Dnvr, CO MLE Millard, NE SMF Sacramnto, CA DET Dtroit, MI MSN Madison, WI STL St. Louis, MO DFW Dallas, TX MSP Minnapolis, MN SUS St. Louis, MO DPA Du Pag, IL MSY Nw Orlans, LA SYR Syracus, NY DSM Ds Moins, IL MYR Myrtl Bach, SC TEB Ttrboro, NY DTW Dtroit, MI OAK Oakland, CA TPA Tampa, FL ELP El Paso, TX OKC Oklahoma City, OK TUL Tulsa, OK EMT El Mont, CA OMA Omaha, NE TUS Tucson, AZ EWB Nw Bdford, MA ONT Ontario, CA TYS Knoxvill, TN EWR Nwark, NJ ORD Chicago, IL FLL Fort Laudrdal, FL ORF Norfolk, VA Alphabtical list of 118 candidat airports 2009 Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

6 a) High Rlativ Bnfit Catgory A s s sits by bnfit potntial - ful and mission savings Arrival flows that top this list tnd to hav many oprations, high prcntag of commrcial or jt traffic, and numrous long lvl-offs Avrag daily arrival count along flow * Prcnt Part121 Ops at th airport ** Prcnt Jt Ops at th airport ** Tim in lvl flight pr aircraft along flow * 142 arrivals 76% 84% 585 s PHL wst arrival to runway 27R * 6 Sit Impact and Rlativ Bnfit fit n B r h ig H 1 PHL Philadlphia, PA 2 ORD Chicago, IL 3 EWR Nwark, NJ 4 LGA Nw York, NY 5 IAH Houston, TX 6 DTW Dtroit, MI 7 DFW Dallas, TX 8 CVG Cincinnati, OH 9 IAD Washington, DC 10 DCA Washington, DC * Basd on radar tracks from 7 NAS-wid VMC days in 2007 ** Basd on ETMS data 1 st Quartr Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

7 b) Modrat Rlativ Bnfits Catgory B s s sits basd on lowr complxity of Implmntation Expctd fastr tim to th fild, gratr numbrs of procdurs in th NAS Arrival flows that top this list hav lowr controllr workload, fwr handoffs, fwr lvl-offs, and lss vctoring Avrag daily arrival count at airport ** Avrag numbr of cntrs along flow * Avrag numbr of lvl-offs along flow * Prcnt vctoring along flow * 91 arrivals % PWM southwst arrival to runway 29 * 7 Complxity of Implmntation ity x l p m o C r w o L 1 PWM Portland, ME 2 MSN Madison, WI 3 RNO Rno, NV 4 JAX Jacksonvill, FL 5 PVD Providnc, RI 6 DAY Dayton, OH 7 RSW Fort Myrs, FL 8 MSY Nw Orlans, LA 9 AUS Austin, TX 10 ROC Rochstr, NY * Basd on radar tracks from 7 NAS-wid VMC days in 2007 ** Basd on ETMS data 1 st Quartr Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

8 c) PBN Implmntation Status Catgory C s s airports by how prpard th sit is to bgin planning Idntifis sits that hav stakholdr awarnss for RNAV implmntation Sits within FAA xisting RNAV plans s that top this list hav high RNAV quipag rats and ar schduld for procdur dsign in th following yars 8 s in d a R r h ig H Rsourc Radinss 1 BWI Baltimor, MD 2 ATL Atlanta, GA 3 CVG Cincinnati, OH 4 RDU Raligh-Durham, NC 5 MHT Manchstr, NH 6 BUR Burbank, CA 7 BOS Boston, MA 8 PWM Portland, ME 9 MEM Mmphis, TN 10 PIT Pittsburgh, PA RNAV quipag rat ** Chart dat * BWI 94% SID 4/8/2010 ATL 91% STAR 2/11/2010 CVG 90% SID 10/22/2009 RDU 88% STAR 4/8/2010 * NAPT Production Schdul Fbruary 2009 ** Basd on ETMS data 1 st Quartr Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

9 Compiling a Singl List Plac wights on th mtric catgoris: Wights can b chosn to rflct implmntation prioritis Priority dcisions can b basd on a mix of complxity, bnfit, and radinss: Exampl: 45% 45% 10% a) Sit High Impact Rlativ and Rlativ Bnfits Bnfit b) Complxity Modrat of Rlativ Implmntation Bnfits c) PBN Rsourc Implmntation Radinss Status fit n B r h ig H 1 PHL Philadlphia, PA 2 ORD Chicago, IL 3 EWR Nwark, NJ 4 LGA Nw York, NY 5 IAH Houston, TX 6 DTW Dtroit, MI 7 DFW Dallas, TX 8 CVG Cincinnati, OH 9 IAD Washington, DC 10 DCA Washington, DC ity x l p m o C r w o L 1 PWM Portland, ME 2 MSN Madison, WI 3 RNO Rno, NV 4 JAX Jacksonvill, FL 5 PVD Providnc, RI 6 DAY Dayton, OH 7 RSW Fort Myrs, FL 8 MSY Nw Orlans, LA 9 AUS Austin, TX 10 ROC Rochstr, NY s in d a R r h ig H 1 BWI Baltimor, MD 2 ATL Atlanta, GA 3 CVG Cincinnati, OH 4 RDU Raligh-Durham, NC 5 MHT Manchstr, NH 6 BUR Burbank, CA 7 BOS Boston, MA 8 PWM Portland, ME 9 MEM Mmphis, TN 10 PIT Pittsburgh, PA Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

10 Sampl Prioritizd List Wighting Emphasis on: a) High Rlativ Bnfits (45%) b) Modrat Rlativ Bnfits (45%) c) PBN Implmntation Status (10%) Diffrnt wighting systms can mphasiz diffrnt prioritis 45% Complxity, 45% Bnfit, 10% Rsourc 1 STL St. Louis, MO 2 MHT Manchstr, NH 3 PIT Pittsburgh, PA 4 CVG Covington, KY 5 RDU Raligh-Durham, NC 6 FLL Fort Laudrdal, FL 7 PHX Phonix, AZ 8 MCO Orlando, FL 9 SAN San Digo, CA 10 SLC Salt Lak City, UT 11 RSW - Fort Myrs, FL 12 BNA Nashvill, TN 13 CLE Clvland, OH 14 CMH Columbus, OH What is th bnfit potntial at th first 10 sits on this list? 15 TUS Tucson, AZ 16 SAT - San Antonio, TX 17 SDF - Louisvill, KY 18 PWM Portland, ME 19 JAX Jacksonvill, FL 20 BOS Boston, MA 21 MCI - Kansas City, MO 22 LAS Las Vgas, NV 23 BUR - Burbank, CA 24 MEM Mmphis, TN 25 TPA - Tampa, FL Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

11 Bnfits Analysis Bnfit analysis Oprational data from ths 10 airports combind with bnfits stimats yild significant montary and carbon savings 5 gal pr flight 15 gal pr flight Savings (Gal/day) $3 / Gal ($/day) $21,973 $65,919 Annual Savings $8,020,093 $24,060,279 CO2 Rduction (tons/yar) Cars off road (cars / yar) Cumulativ savings: $200,502,321 $601,506, Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

12 Bnfit analysis OPD Bnfits Analysis Top Tn s Oprational data from ths 10 airports combind with bnfits stimats yild significant montary and carbon savings Top Tn of th 34 continntal OEP s, by Traffic Volum 1 ATL Atlanta, GA 2 ORD Chicago, IL 3 DFW Dallas, TX 4 DEN Dnvr, CO 5 LAX Los Angls, CA 6 IAH Houston, TX 7 CLT Charlott, NC 8 PHL Philadlphia, PA 9 EWR Nwark, NJ 10 PHX Phonix, AZ 5 gal pr flight 15 gal pr flight Savings (Gal/day) $3 / Gal ($/day) $35,841 $107,524 Annual Savings $13,082,121 $39,246,364 CO2 Rduction (tons/yar) Cars off road (cars / yar) Cumulativ savings: $327,053,036 $981,159, Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

13 Summary OPDs can produc significant cost and nvironmntal savings Cross agncy and industry collaboration W ar work locations today lik CHS, SDF, LAX, STL Modl provids a mans to us oprational data for prioritization and bnfits assssmnts MITRE to nhanc th analysis and rporting capability mor dtaild analysis and sits Nxt Stps Crat a consolidatd list basd on EC priority and lins of businss Coordinat with Industry PARC, CNS TF, JPDO EWG, tc. NOTE: Implmntation risks includ nvironmntal studis, facility radinss and sit spcific airspac dsign/r-dsign Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.

14 2009 Th MITRE Corporation. All rights rsrvd.