MASON COUNTY. Recreation Plan: Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission. prepared by the. with assistance by Spicer Group, Inc.

Transcription

1 MASON COUNTY Recreation Plan: prepared by the Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission with assistance by Spicer Group, Inc.

2 Mason County Recreation Plan: Board of Commissioners Lewis Squires Chair Joe Lenius Vice-Chair Susan Boes Robert Erickson Charles Lange Rich Morong Thomas Posma Mary Nichols Curtis VanderWall Jeffrey Barnett Parks and Recreation Commission Donald Gall - Chair David MacClean Vice Chair David Hasenbank Secretary Steve Begnoche Steve Dvorak Bruce Patterson Nick Matish Ed McCumber Jeffrey Schwass Curtis VanderWall Debbie Roberts Park Manager Prepared by: Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission 304 East Ludington Avenue Ludington, MI (231) With assistance by: Spicer Group, Inc. 230 South Washington Avenue Saginaw, MI (989) SG2012

3 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1 II. Community Description... 3 III. Administrative Structure... 7 IV. Recreation and Resource Inventories V. Public Input VI. Action Program VII. Planning Process VIII. Appendix A Sports Participation Trends IX. Appendix B Public Input Documentation X. Appendix C Adoption Documentation XI. Appendix D Post-Completion Self-Certification Report Mason County Recreation Plan: i

4 Introduction This Recreation Plan is a guide for action. Mason County endeavors to fulfill the changing recreational needs of its residents. Quality development and efficient management of its parks and recreational facilities is a priority. To that end, this document forms the basis to guide policy for implementation of improvements and new initiatives that will meet the recreational goals and interests of the Mason County community. Before any recreation plan is adopted and enacted, it is first important to understand what the needs of the residents are, what recreational opportunities already exist, and what sort of projects are relevant for residents based on age, ability, population, density, and the availability of recreational opportunities in neighboring communities. This plan, through the cooperation of Spicer Group and the Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission, has carefully considered input and suggestions via active communication from County residents, County officials, and other community stakeholders. This input is a critical Mason County Recreation Plan:

5 component to this plan, and, together, the voices of Mason County have united to develop a recreation plan to enhance the quality of life for everyone. Broadly speaking, Mason County officials intend to use this plan to guide their work on all future recreational and parks projects within the county. It is also a strategic document that articulates specific goals to various agencies and organizations that fund local recreational and parks improvement projects. Specifically, this plan is developed in accordance with the guidelines for Community Park, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Plans published by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR). A five-year, DNRapproved recreation plan is necessary for Mason County to pursue DNR-administered grants. This Recreation Plan is written for a single county, Mason County. It covers all aspects of recreation within the community. Visitors to the Mason County Picnic Area learn about the Ludington Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Plant Reservoir. Mason County Recreation Plan:

6 Community Description Mason County is located on the shore of Lake Michigan in central lower Michigan, at approximately N (latitude), W (longitude), occupying 1,241 square miles. See Figure 1. The county is approximately 70 miles south of Traverse City and about 90 miles north of Grand Rapids. Adjacent counties include Manistee County to the north, Lake County to the east, Newaygo County at the southeast corner, and Oceana County on the south. Lake Michigan forms the western boundary for Mason County, providing residents with over 28 miles of freshwater shoreline. Organized in 1855, Mason County was named after the first Governor of Michigan, Stevens Thomas Mason. The City of Ludington is the county seat. Prominent features of the landscape include the aforementioned 28 miles of Lake Michigan shoreline and large areas of farmland and forest. The Lake Michigan shoreline features extensive bluff and dune areas. Rivers and streams flow through Mason County, from east to west, and empty into Lake Michigan. There are also many small lakes scattered throughout the county. Hamlin Lake, the largest lake in Mason County, sits behind a dam Mason County Recreation Plan:

7 Mason County Figure 1: Mason County is located in central lower Michigan on Lake Michigan. (Data: Michigan Geographic Data Library) Mason County Recreation Plan:

8 and the dunes at Ludington State Park. Small wetlands dot the landscape. Many other wetlands in the agricultural areas were drained long ago. Most of the privately owned shoreline of Lake Michigan and the inland lakes are developed with cottages, seasonal and year-around homes. The City of Ludington is a small port city, where tourists and industry co-exist. Ludington s waterfront is largely dedicated to deep water facilities and industry, but is converting to marinas, parks, and some residential uses. Highways are also important in Mason County with US-31 running north and south, US-10 extending east to west. People Mason County has a population of 28,705 according to the 2010 U.S. Census. This is a slight increase over 2000, when the population was 28,274 people. This growth of 430 people is an increase of 1.5%. During this same period, Michigan s population decreased by 0.6%. Figure 2 shows the distribution of population and the median age throughout Mason County. Four of the twenty communities in the county comprise over half (57%) of the county s population. Those communities are the City of Ludington (8,076), Hamlin Township (3,408), Pere Marquette Charter Township (2,366), and Amber Township (2,535). The median age of Mason County residents is 45.1 years. This is considerably older than the median age for the state of Michigan, which is 37.6 years. An older population may have different needs in terms of recreational programs and facilities. Housing According to the 2010 U.S. Census, there are 17,293 housing units in Mason County. More than 4,000 of these (4,051) are designated for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. This number is significant because it means that the population of the County can swell be several thousand during peak vacation times. Further, seasonal residents of the community are another special population with unique needs in terms of recreational facilities. Most of these seasonal residents have chosen their second homes because of the recreational and natural resource opportunities that are available nearby. It is very important to these seasonal residents that those facilities and resources by preserved and maintained. Mason County Recreation Plan:

9 Income The median household income in Mason County was $40,039, according to the American Community Survey Estimates. This compares to $48,432 for the state of Michigan. Approximately 15% of the County population had income that fell below the poverty level. Population Percent of County Total Median Age Amber Township 2, % Branch Township 1, % Village of Custer % Balance of Custer Township* % Eden Township % Village of Free Soil % Balance of Free Soil Township* % Grant Township % Hamlin Township 3, % Logan Township % Meade Township % Pere Marquette Charter Township 2, % Riverton Township 1, % Village of Fountain % Balance of Sheridan Township* 1, % Sherman Township % Summit Township % Victory Township 1, % City of Ludington 8, % City of Scottville 1, % Mason County 28, % * Village listed immediately above is included in official census count for the township Data: U.S. Census Figure 2: Median age and distribution of population in Mason Mason County Recreation Plan:

10 Administrative Structure The Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission is a 10-member body established as provided by state law and has been delegated the responsibility for planning and administration of recreational services by and for the county. Members include the chairman of the Road Commission, the Drain Commissioner, Chair of the Planning Commission, a member of the County Board, and six members from the public at large appointed by the County Board whose terms are for three years. Generally, at the first meeting of each year, a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, and a Secretary are elected to act for the Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission lays out the capital improvement plans for the parks. The Commission holds four meetings a year, and if needed, the Chairperson will call special meetings. The Parks and Recreation Commission is responsible for maintenance and development of the parks in Mason County and employs two seasonal full time staff members and three part time employees. Seasonal employees include a Manager, Ranger, and three Assistant Rangers who work at Mason County Recreation Plan:

11 the Campground and Picnic Area. Volunteers provide crucial support to many programs and activities in the county. The Commission uses volunteers throughout the year to maintain facilities at the Campground and the Disc Golf Course. The organizational chart in Figure 3 shows the structure of parks and recreation administration in Mason County. The budgets for operations & maintenance and capital improvements are shown in Figure 4. Funding for these operations comes from registrations, user fees, and annual contributions from the Ludington Pumped Storage Plant. The Ludington Pumped Storage Plant owns two parks in Mason County and has a long-term agreement with the Parks and Mason County Board of Commissioners County Administrator Parks and Recreation Commission Parks Manager Buildings, Grounds, Airport, Zoning, Planning, Agriculture, Equalization Town, Tax, Liaison to Fairgrounds Committee Full Time Seasonal Employees Disc Golf Organization Campground R/C Flying Field Picnic Area Volunteers Figure 3: Parks and recreation administration in Mason County. Mason County Recreation Plan:

12 Recreation Commission that guaranteed, beginning in 2000 when the 20-year lease was signed between the county and the pumped storage plant, an annual donation of $10,000 for capital improvements and $20,000 for park operations. These monies are to be used by the county only for park operations and improvements, and are adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In 2012, the Ludington Pumped Storage Plant donated $6,891 for capital improvements and $59,347 for park operations. The Parks and Recreation Commission does not provide any programming services. Figure 4: Mason County parks and recreation budget. Operation & Maintenance Programming Capital Improvements 2011 $62,602 $0 $9, $59,347 $0 $6,891 The Mason County Campground is located at 5906 West Chauvez Road approximately five miles south of Ludington. Mason County Recreation Plan:

13 Recreation and Resource Inventories An inventory of the existing Mason County parks and natural resources was completed using the information provided by the county. It was verified with field checking and review from the Parks and Recreation Commission. The county operates two park facilities that are owned by the Ludington Pumped Storage Plant. Mason County also owns the Mason County Fairgrounds and two parcels of property that are not currently developed. Figure 5 shows generalized locations of parks, facilities, and undeveloped land currently owned and administered by Mason County. Included is the Community Ice Arena at West Shore Community College in Victory Township. An inventory of all county-owned parks and facilities is provided on page 12. Part of this section of the plan includes additional information to support the inventory, each contributing to a broader understanding of recreation available in Mason County. Included are park descriptions, a recreation grant history, accessibility analysis, other parks and facilities, comparison to standards, sports participation trends, inventory of natural resources, and tourism impacts. Mason County Recreation Plan:

14 Classification of County Parks A recommended classification system for local and regional recreation open space includes the following four types of parks. In Mason County, there are two developed park properties, both of which are considered Large Urban Parks. The Community Ice Arena at West Shore Community College is also considered a Community Park. Figure 5: Generalized locations of parks, facilities, and undeveloped land currently owned and administered by the Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission. Mason County Recreation Plan:

15 Mason County Parks and Recreation Inventory Acreage Classification Service Area Owner Disc Golf Playground Pavilion Restrooms Ice Skating Nature Trail Grills Campsites Camper Cabins Beach Area River Access Location Other Accessibility* County Parks Mason County Campground 60 UP County & Beyond Ludington Pumped Storage Plant 1 1 X X X 56 2 Pere Marquette Charter Tw p Field for radio controlled airplanes 2 Mason County Picnic Area 150 UP County & Beyond Ludington Pumped Storage Plant X X Pere Marquette Charter Tw p 2 Big Sauble River Property 6 un N/A Mason County X Free Soil Tw p N/A Inman Road Property 34 un N/A Mason County Pere Marquette Charter Tw p N/A Mason County Fairgrounds 50 N/A Other County & Beyond Mason County (leased to Western Michigan Fair Association) X 115 Pere Marquette Charter Tw p Community center, three horse arenas, grand stand w ith 3,500 seats 2 West Shore Community Ice Arena CP County & Beyond Mason County 1 X 1 Victory Tw p Gym, sw imming pool 3 Totals Yes 1 2 Yes Classification: * See plan narrative under "Accessibility" for explanation of numeric code. CP = Community Park NP = Neighborhood Park MP = Mini-Park UP = Large Urban Park un = undeveloped Mason County Recreation Plan:

16 Mini-Parks address limited, isolated, or unique recreational needs. They are usually between 2,500-square feet and one acre in size. Neighborhood Parks are often considered the basic unit of a park system. They serve as the recreational and social focus of the neighborhood. Their intended service area is ¼ to ½ mile distance and uninterrupted by non-residential roads and other physical barriers. They are generally 5 to 10 acres in size. Community Parks serve a broader purpose than neighborhood parks. Their focus is on meeting community-based recreation needs, as well as preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. They are usually between 30 and 50 acres and serve a radius of ½ to 3 mile distance. The Community Ice Arena at West Shore Community College in Victory Township is considered a Community Park. Large Urban Parks serve a broader purpose than community parks and are used when community parks and neighborhood parks are not adequate to serve local needs. They generally serve the entire community and are a minimum of 50 acres. The Mason County Campground and the Mason County Picnic Area are considered Large Urban Parks. Description of County Park Lands Mason County Campground and the Mason County Picnic Area The Ludington Pumped Storage Plant, jointly owned by Consumers Energy and Detroit Edison, owns these two parks and has a 20-year lease agreement with the Parks and Recreation Commission requiring each party to certain terms. The original lease term began in 1974, upon the completion of construction of the two parks. This lease expired in December of 1999 and was extended for 20 more years, ending in Written into the1999 lease was an agreement that the Ludington Pumped Storage Plant would complete three improvement projects. First, it would rebuild the bath house at the Mason County Campground and bring it into ADA compliance. Second would be an upgrade to the pavilion at the Mason County Picnic Area, bringing that building up to ADA specifications. And finally, the Ludington Pumped Storage Plant will increase the size and number of campsites at the Mason County Campground, improve electric service to camp Mason County Recreation Plan:

17 sites, and overall, improve the entire campground. Upgrades to the campground were completed in 2002 with the addition of five new camp sites. Another improvement to the campground was the installation of a septic tank and drain field for the host site. In 2010 camping cabins were added to the campground. The Mason County Campground (Figure 6) includes 56 wooded campsites and the aforementioned camping cabins. The campground also features a pavilion playground and a nature trail that connects it to the Picnic Area. Hull Field, a flying field for radio controlled model airplanes is located just west of the campground. The Twisted Sticks Radio Control Club operates Hull Field on land just west of the campground. This field was built and is maintained by the club, with ultimate oversight by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The field is open to the public, but in order to use it, pilots must possess an appropriate license. Figure 6: General location of the Mason County Campground, at 5906 West Chauvez in Pere Marquette Charter Township. Mason County Recreation Plan:

18 The Mason County Picnic Area includes a large pavilion that seats 350 people and can be rented for public and private functions. Also located in this area are three 24-goal disc golf courses, which are operated by the Mason County Disc Golf Organization. These courses were built entirely with volunteer help and they have been the site of several tournaments held by the Michigan Disc Golf Organization. The three courses combined are advertised as the 3 rd largest disc golf course in the world. They are open to the public for a donation of $1.00. Figure 7 show the general location of the Mason County Picnic Area. Figure 7: General location of the Mason County Picnic Area, at 6501 West Chauvez in Pere Marquette Charter Township Inman Road Property Located near the intersection of West Bradshaw Road and Inman Road just north of the Mason County Campground in Pere Marquette Charter Township, this 34-acre county-owned parcel is currently undeveloped. Its proximity to the Lake Michigan shoreline, the Mason County Campground, and the Mason County Picnic Area lends itself to many possibilities for new facilities and to potentially connect the available Mason County Recreation Plan:

19 recreation sites in this area of Mason County. Figure 8 shows the general location of the Inman Road Property. Figure 8: General location of the Inman Road property, near West Bradshaw and Inman in Pere Marquette Charter Big Sauble River Property This six-acre riverfront property is actually two separate parcels situated on the north and south sides of the Big Sauble River in Free Soil Township. This scenic undeveloped property has direct access from US-31 and is an ideal location to provide canoeing, kayaking, and fishing access to the Big Sauble River. Figure 9 provides context for the general location of this property. Mason County Fairgrounds The fairgrounds property is owned by the county and is leased to the Western Michigan Fair Association. Located on the north side of US-10 in Pere Marquette Charter Township, this 50-acre site features 115 camp sites, a community center, three horse arenas, several barns and a grand stand with 3,500 seats. Figure 10 shows its location. Mason County Recreation Plan:

20 Figure 9: General location of the Big Sauble River property, on the east side of US-31 in Free Soil Township Figure 10: General location of Mason County Fairgrounds, on the north side of US-10 in Pere Marquette Charter Township Mason County Recreation Plan:

21 Recreation Grant History Mason County has received two grant from DNR-administered grant programs. In 2000, the county submitted a grant for the Community Ice Area at West Shore Community College in Victory Township. The project title was Regional Ice Arena, project number CM00-198, with a closed project status since the ice arena was completed in In 2010, Mason County received a $320,000 development grant (TF10-061) for improvements to the Mason County Fairgrounds. As of October 2012, the improvements have not yet been constructed. Accessibility Creating a park system that is safe, accessible and usable to all individuals within the community, including those with disabilities, is essential. A grading system has been developed by the DNR to easily identify those parks and facilities which are most, and least, handicapped-accessible and usable, based on ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) guidelines. The following accessibility grading system uses a five-point system ranging from 1: None of the facilities/park areas meet accessibility guidelines, to 5: The entire park was developed/renovated using the principles of Universal Design. An ADA compliance assessment of county facilities was conducted during the summer of 2007 and consisted of a visual inspection of each park and facility in regards to access and circulation. As noted in the inventory listing on page 12, some of the parks do not meet all criteria for handicap accessibility. The Parks and Recreation Commission will continue its efforts towards improving accessibility at each of the parks when improvements are made. This includes accessible parking, paths, restrooms, activity areas, amenities, and signage. Accessibility Grade Definition 1 None of the facilities/park areas meet accessibility guidelines 2 Some of the facilities/park areas meet accessibility guidelines 3 Most of the facilities/park areas meet accessibility guidelines 4 The entire park meets accessibility guidelines 5 The entire park was developed/renovated using the principles of Universal Design Mason County Recreation Plan:

22 Other Parks and Facilities Within Mason County are twenty local municipalities, which include two cities, three villages, and fifteen townships. Each provides local parks and community recreational facilities. School districts also provide recreation amenities, as well as state and federal agencies. The management of these facilities is the responsibility of the elected boards and commissions of the respective entity. While this recreation plan does not inventory and map each of the parks and recreational facilities under the ownership of other agencies and governmental entities, the county recognizes the health benefits and overall contribution to quality of life these local recreational assets provide to communities. The Parks and Recreation Commission supports efforts to improve all recreational facilities and services within the county. The county is committed to cooperating with communities and agencies on recreation projects when goals identified within this plan can be satisfied. Recreation facilities in the county are identified and inventoried in Table 7-5 of the Mason County Data Book, available on the Mason County website (masoncounty.net). Select state and federal recreation sites are shown in Figure 11. Figure 12 summarizes those parks and facilities. Figure 11: Select state and federal recreational sites in Mason County. Mason County Recreation Plan:

23 Name of Park Acreage Ownership Ludington Municipal Marina N/A City of Ludington Senior Citizens Center N/A City of Ludington Stearns Park 4.5 City of Ludington Cartier Park N/A City of Ludington Loomis Street Park N/A City of Ludington Peter Copeyon Park 5.0 City of Ludington Dow Field N/A City of Ludington James St. Playfield N/A City of Ludington Waterfront Park 5.3 City of Ludington City Park 3.0 City of Ludington Leveaux Park 0.51 City of Ludington Community Pool N/A Ludington School District Oriole Field 23 Ludington School District Custer Township Park N/A Custer Township River Park 10 Custer Township DNR Nature Study Platform 1.5 Department of Natural Resources Ludington State Park 5,400 Department of Natural Resources Fountain Ball Fields N/A Fountain Village Peak Playground N/A Fountain Village Wilson Hill N/A Hamlin Township South Bayou Park N/A Hamlin Township White Pine Village 9 Pere Marquette Township Buttersville Park 18.5 Pere Marquette Township Sutton's Landing Park 34 Pere Marquette Township Pere Marquette Shrine 2.4 Pere Marquette Township Memorial Tree Park 27 Pere Marquette Township Riverton Ball Team 40 Riverton Township McPhail Field N/A City of Scottville Scottville Riverside Park N/A City of Scottville Sheridan Township Park N/A Sheridan Township Gunn Lake N/A Sherman Township Summit Park 5.4 Summit Township Kibby Creek Park 1 Summit Township Marrison Road Park 0.5 Summit Township Lake Michigan Recreation Area US Forest Service North Country National Scenic Trail US Forest Service Nordhouse Dunes US Forest Service Pere Marquette Natural and Scenic River Corridor US Forest Service Victory Park 40 Victory Township West Shore Community College 360 West Shore Community College Figure 12: Partial list of other parks and recreation located within Mason County. Please read accompanying narrative for additional park information. Mason County Recreation Plan:

24 The following overview summarizes some of the parks and recreational facilities within Mason County that are owned and operated by other agencies and governmental entities. Federal The United State Forest Service operates several facilities within Mason County. Nordhouse Dunes: A hiking trail begins at the end of Nurnburg Road on the north side of Hamlin Lake and continues for a distance of 14.5 miles through the Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area north of Ludington State Park and touches Lake Michigan, finally ending at the Lake Michigan Recreation Area. Pere Marquette River: A popular fishing and canoeing stream, classified as a National Scenic River and State Natural River. The Forest Service controls much of the river and provides various landings and facilities for those who navigate the stream. North Country Trail: The North Country Trail Association describes the North Country National Scenic Trail (NCT) as a premier footpath that stretches for about 4,600 miles across seven northern states. From the getoffthecouch.info website, the NCT segment in Mason County is entirely within the Manistee National Forest and maintained by the Spirit of the Woods chapter of the North Country Trail Association. There are no official NCT trailheads in Mason County, but some parking at Tyndall Road is available with public access at Nine Mile Bridge to the north in Manistee County. As shown in Figure 12, the NCT is in Meade Township and heads east to Lake County and north to Manistee County. Lake Michigan Recreation Area: This popular area is comprised of family and group campsites that are both scenic and natural. The area adjoins Lake Michigan to the west and Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area to the south. It is located about 15 miles north of the City of Ludington on Forest Trail 5629, and has for public use 99 paved spur campsites each of which has a fire ring and picnic table with a lamp holder, half of which are barrier free. The area also has Lake Michigan swimming beaches, observation decks, picnic sites with playground, and over three miles of graveled bicycle and hiking paths. State Ludington State Park is located on M-116, approximately 8 miles north of Ludington, and is situated so that it boasts long water frontages on both Lake Michigan and Hamlin Lake. This park has 344 modern campsites, two ski trails, encompasses the Sauble River Mason County Recreation Plan:

25 between Hamlin Lake and Lake Michigan, a camp store and restaurant, along with boat rental and launching facilities. Ludington State Park is undoubtedly the largest visitor attraction to the county. Cities and Villages The following municipalities operate a number of parks and recreational facilities in Mason County. Ludington: Located at the western extremity of the county, along with the Ludington Area School District, has for many years given the youth and adults alike their formal recreation programming and will continue to serve the township populace that embraces the school district. Although some financial changes have been made to this program in the past two years, there continues to be a very good and active recreation program in this area. Ludington is able to optimize its many recreational resources and this avoids a costly duplication of services by the county. Scottville: Located near the center of the county, and eight miles east of Ludington, Scottville operates a summer recreation program for the surrounding community in addition to owning and operating Riverside Park on the south side of the Pere Marquette River at the southern edge of the city. The city has recently installed a swimming pool at the park but this pool is at the present time only for the use of registered campers at the park. Scottville Riverside Park and the Old Engine Club use property owned by the City of Scottville, which is located on south Scottville Road on the south side of the Pere Marquette River. Originally the campground was built over a period of time and has now become an excellent campground with a swimming pool and modern bathhouse and toilets. This facility is quite often used to capacity during the camping season. Villages of Custer, Fountain, and Free Soil These communities have active volunteer recreation associations that provide primarily softball and baseball activities. Townships The following townships own and operate their own recreational facilities. Branch Township: Has an active volunteer recreation association that provides softball and baseball activities, inclusive of ball diamonds owned by the township. Mason County Recreation Plan:

26 Custer Township: Ownership of primarily unimproved area on the south shore of the Pere Marquette River about two miles south of the Village of Custer. This area is open to the public for boat and canoe access to the river. Hamlin Township: Operates three main parks, all day use parks and heavily used. Wilson Hill Park is located on the south shore of upper Hamlin Lake and has a ball diamond, picnic area, and a boat launch ramp for small boats. South Bayou Park is located on the west side of Lakeshore Drive on the south side of the south bayou of Hamlin Park. This park appears to be heavily used for picnicking and has nearby access to Hamlin Lake. Long Skinny Park on Lakeshore Drive provides fishing access. The Township also operates North and Middle Bayou Parks. Pere Marquette Charter Township: Operates a very active parks and recreation program. The township has four parks and is the only township to pay a per-capita fee to the City of Ludington for their children to attend activities sponsored by the Ludington Recreation Department. The township parks commission operates a 44- site campground on the high banks above Lake Michigan and has several hundred feet of beach on Lake Michigan for public use. Memorial Tree Park on Lincoln Lake is a 37-acre day use park and has a ball diamond and a large picnic shelter with a building containing flush toilets. Suttons Landing Park, located on the Pere Marquette River near Old Highway 31 has a large modern picnic shelter with flush toilets, a boardwalk on the river with handicap fishing positions, and a boat launch ramp on the river that connects to Lake Michigan. Pere Marquette Shrine located on Lakeshore Drive has been recently rebuilt, and the area provides parking and a boat launch ramp on the east side into Pere Marquette Lake. Riverton Township: Has an active volunteer recreation association that provides softball and baseball activities, inclusive of ball diamonds owned by the township. Sheridan Township: Operates a swimming area and picnic area on the north end of Round Lake. Sherman Township: Picnic and swimming area on the south side of Gun Lake. Summit Township: Operates Summit Park located at the south end of the high banks area on the Lake Michigan shoreline in the southwest corner of the county. Located at the site of a former fish tug base, this park has a modern toilet structure and includes a large pavilion for group use, a ball diamond, and tennis courts. The Township also has a park on the northwest corner of Bass Lake. Mason County Recreation Plan:

27 Victory Township: Has an active volunteer recreation association that provides softball and baseball activities, inclusive of ball diamonds owned by the township. Also, Victory Park, is located on the east end of Hamlin Lake, with 30 acres for day use, fishing, picnicking, boating, lake access, and hiking trails. Other West Shore Community College, which is located near the geographical center of the county in Victory Township, has many facilities that are made available to the Mason County community. Included is a swimming pool, a large field house that includes gyms, handball courts, and many other sport and health-related and recreation related activities. The college has been a leader in recreation since it was established over 30 years ago. The West Shore Community Ice Arena was completed in 2003 on its campus and has been very popular with Mason County residents. In 2012, the college added a disc golf course. Also in Mason County is the White Pine Village, which is a historical site operated by a non-profit organization. In addition, there is the West Michigan Old Engine Club, operated by a non-profit organization, located at the Scottville River Park, and provides educational programs for fifth graders. Comparison to Standards To help analyze the adequacy of parks and recreation facilities owned and operated by Mason County, it is helpful to compare the county s system to various standards and benchmarks. Overall Quantity Mason County has 300 acres of park land to serve about 28,000 people. This equates to approximately 10.6 acres of park land per 1,000 residents. General recreation guidelines suggest there should be 5 to 10 acres of park land per 1,000 residents. This means the county should have at least 141 acres of park land and as much as 282 acres to meet the general guidelines. The county exceeds these recommendations. Facility Standards The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) has published typical recreation facility standards that specify facility service area, the number of facilities needed to service the population, and the land area needed. These standards can be used in conjunction with the acreage standards to further identify Mason County s recreation Mason County Recreation Plan:

28 needs. Figure 13 provides a comparison of the county s public facilities against published recreation facility standards. Based on the standards, some deficiencies are apparent. Deficiencies can be seen in basketball courts, tennis courts, baseball fields, softball, football, soccer, golf courses, and playgrounds. The resulting deficiencies, as determined by this NRPA standards evaluation, does not account for the recreational facilities owned and operated by other agencies and governmental entities that service local populations. Mason County can optimize the recreational resources available to all residents in the county by supporting recreation provided by the local municipalities. Recommended Recommended County Public Surplus/ Standard 1 Facilities Need 2,4 Deficiency Basketball Courts 3 1/5, Tennis Courts 1/2, Baseball Fields 1/5, Lighted Fields 1/30, Softball 1/5, Football Fields 1/20, Soccer Fields 1/10, Golf Courses 9 hole 1/25, hole 1/50, Swimming Pool Indoor 1/20, Outdoor 1/40, Ice Rinks Indoor 1/50, Outdoor 1/20, Playgrounds 1/3, Trails 1 system per region Recommended number of each facility per unit of population (National Recreation and Park Association/Michigan Recreation Opportunity Standards). 2 Population of of 28,274 28,705 based based on 2000 on Census 2010 Census data data. 3 Two backboards were considered to be equal to one (1) court for the purposes of this analysis 4 Rounded to the nearest whole number Figure 13: Comparison to Standards for Park and Recreational Facilities. Mason County Recreation Plan:

29 Level of Service More recent park guidelines indicate that one must also consider the Level of Service desired by the community. If Mason County residents needs are met with the existing amount of park land and facilities, then that amount is sufficient. This is why the community input portion of a recreation plan is so important. The Parks and Recreation Commission needs to understand the wishes of the community it serves in order to provide the Level of Service desired by the residents. Sports Participation Trends While the analysis under the previous sections provides an excellent start in understanding how the county s recreation facilities stack-up against the DNR-recommended standards, it does not provide a complete picture. For example, some facilities offered in the county, such as the disc golf course, do not appear on the list of recommended standards. As a supplement to the DNR-recommended standards, data from the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA) is another way to help understand recreation trends. It is important to be aware of national recreation trends because this information can enable a place like Mason County to anticipate activities that have a large number of participants and show a growth in popularity. The SGMA conducts an annual survey that analyzes the size of sports product markets in order to determine sports participation trends. Detailed results of the 2011 Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Participation Report are given in Appendix A. This report describes the overall participation figures for 119 sports in 9 different categories: Aerobic activities, Conditioning activities, Strength activities, Individual sports, Racquet sports, Team sports, Outdoor sports, Winter sports, and Water sports. The most popular sports and recreational activities in the United States for 2010, as measured by people who participate at least once a year in any given activity (overall participation), are: 1. Walking for Fitness (114.1 million participants) 2. Bowling (55.9 million) 3. Treadmill (53.1 million) 4. Running/Jogging (49.4 million) 5. Hand Weights (45.9 million) 6. Billiards/Pool (39.4 million) 7. Bicycling (39.3 million) Mason County Recreation Plan:

30 8. Freshwater Fishing (38.9 million) 9. Weight/Resistance Machines (38.6 million) 10. Dumbells (37.4 million) Natural Resource Inventory A natural resource inventory is used to identify open space areas that may be desirable for protection and/or public access through acquisition or other means. There are many significant natural resources in the county, including over 27 miles of Lake Michigan shoreline, 9,700-acres of inland lakes, 59,000-acres of forest in the Manistee National Forest, approximately 238-miles of rivers and streams, and 6,440-acres of protected sand dunes. It s worthwhile to note that Mason County ranks 44 th among the 83 counties in Michigan regarding the total number of lakes and ponds within its boundaries, and ranks 36 th in total acreage. Figure 15 details the types of lakes and ponds in the county. Figure 15: Types of Lakes and Ponds in Mason County Type Number Acres Natural lakes & ponds 193 3,660 Natural lake with dam 4 5,934 Artificial ponds Marl lake Settling pond Fish breeding pond Figure 16, on the next page, shows the location of lakes, rivers, streams, wooded areas, and sand dunes in Mason County. Also shown are some of the wetlands in Mason County. A more detailed account of wetlands in Mason County is described on Map 3-2 ( Floodplains and Wetlands ) of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, adopted in A partial inventory of inland lakes in Mason County, indicating which ones have public access, is listed in Figure 17. Most of the rivers and streams in Mason County are of very high quality and support desirable species of game fish. Major rivers in the county include the Pere Marquette, Lincoln (north and south branches), Little Manistee, and the Big Sauble. The Pere Mason County Recreation Plan:

31 Marquette River is the major west-east river on the southern side of the county. The Lincoln River is the primary river running west to east on the county s northern side. Streams and rivers in the county, classified by their size, are listed below in Figure 18. A map showing the locations of these rivers is provided in Figure 19. Figure 18: Types of Streams and Rivers in Mason County Stream Size Characteristics Mileage Very Small Not canoeable at average water level 174 Miles Small Canoeable with difficulty 3 Miles Medium Readily canoeable 5 Miles Large Handles small to medium outboard motors 60 Miles Very Large Handles large outboard motors 10 Miles Source: Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Recreation Services Division Of the 251-miles of inventoried rivers and streams in Mason County, approximately 133- miles are designated state or federal wild/natural/scenic/natural river. The Pere Marquette River is designated as a state Natural River, and also as a federal Scenic River. These designations mandate certain provisions to help retain the naturalness of the shoreline and to help protect river water quality. Provisions of this sort typically include deeper setbacks for buildings, greater minimum lot widths, limitations on the size of signs, deeper setbacks for septic systems, a natural vegetative buffer strip, limitations on the clearing of shoreline vegetation, and control of access to the river. Earlier, Figure 16 showed the location of sand dunes in the county. Some of the dunes are designated critical dune areas, which run along the shore from the City of Ludington north into Grant Township. Much of this area is in public ownership, either through Ludington State Park or the Manistee National Forest. Sand dune protection and management is administered by the MDEQ s Land & Water Management Division. A more detailed account of sand dunes in the county is described in Chapter 3 ( Future Land Use ) of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, available on the county s website (masoncounty.net). Mason County Recreation Plan:

32 - +#3 # + + 1(2 0 / $ )( + #. %!* +, * )( $ '( %& "#$! G D H F C DE >C >= 9: 7< ;6 9: MK M M J O N J K J L

33 Inland Lake Surface Area (acres) Public Access Allen Lake Augustine Lake 9 Bachelor Lake Barton Lake 37.2 Bass Lake 524 yes Blue Lake 69 Casin Lake 48 Emerson Lake 55 Ford Lake 208 yes Gooseneck Lake 77 yes Gun Lake 219 yes Hackert Lake (Crystal) 125 yes Hamlin Lake 4,990 yes Hoags Lake 35 yes Hopkins Lake Lake Eden 64.4 Lincoln Lake 155 yes Long Lake 136 yes Mud Lake 5.7 North Oxbow Lake Pere Marquette Lake 554 yes Pleiness Lake 81 yes Pond Augustine Lake 5.4 Round Lake 571 yes South Oxbow Lake St. Mary's Lake 113 yes Tallman Lake 170 yes Thunder Lake Vogel Lake Watassa Lake 6.2 Whelan Lake 13.2 yes Woodruff Lake 20 Figure 17: Partial inventory of inland lakes in Mason County. Mason County Recreation Plan:

34 Figure 19: Map of major rivers in Mason County. Impact of Tourism Commercial lodging visitors are generally the group that most businesses think of as the tourist population. This group includes visitors staying in campgrounds, motels, hotels, and resorts. Vacationing commercial lodging visitors are probably the most significant tourist group in Mason County. Generally, this group uses the western half of the county and the City of Ludington, where well-developed lodging facilities cater to them. A visitor s guide to Mason County of commercial lodging tallies 20 motels, 15 resorts, six bed and breakfasts, four inns, and approximately 20 campgrounds that are available for visitors to the county. In terms of overall camping sites in the county, Figure 20 (Number of Mason County Recreation Plan:

35 Campgrounds), shows that 25 campgrounds are available, of which 80% are privately owned and operated. Figure 21 (Number of Campsites) summarizes the total number of campsites available in the county. About 71% are commercial and the other 29% are from federal, state, and local agencies. The data in Figures 20 and 21 are from a 2000 inventory included in the Mason County Data Book, on the county s website at masoncounty.net. Some subgroups of these tourists to Mason County could be considered a seasonal resident population and can have a substantial impact on the economy in Mason County. This group is important because it tends to have a higher level of income than the overall resident population and spends dollars over a longer period than visiting tourists. Two other groups also make up tourist populations in the county. Day trippers consist of area or regional residents that use attractions and services for a single day and may drive up to three hours to fish, canoe, ski, attend festivals, or shop. The size of this group has increased due to the completion of US-31 to US-10 just two miles east of Ludington. In addition, the five lanes of US-10 between Ludington and the northbound bypass of US-31 near Scottville provides ease of access to many points within Mason County. Data in the Number of Campgrounds Figure National Forest State Park Municipal Township County Commerical Mason County Recreation Plan:

36 Number of Campsites Figure National Forest State Park Municipal Township County Commerical Mason County Tourism Profile compiled by Michigan State University Extension shows Mason County as having one of the highest market shares in terms of expenditures by tourists destined for the five northern counties of the West Michigan Regional Planning area. The Mason County Campground has 56 modern camp sites. Mason County Recreation Plan:

37 Public Input To comply with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Guidelines for the Development of Community Park, Recreation Open Space and Greenway Plans, Mason County provided three public input opportunities during this planning process. This included an online survey, and an invitation to the public to attend the August 20, 2012 Mason County Parks and Recreation meeting in Scottville and share their input, and the required 30-day period for review and comment, with public meeting, on the draft plan. A compilation of all of the input received from all sources is contained in Appendix B. What follows is a summary of the input and feedback received during the planning process. To encourage participation in the online survey, the County released an article in the Ludington Daily News, promoted the survey on the project website ( engaged in Facebook networking, and sent various flyers and messages to members of the community. Together, these channels for discussion led to more than 123 responses that the County can use as a baseline level of information for supporting the ideas outlined in this Recreation Plan. Mason County Recreation Plan:

38 Providing Access to Online Information About the Recreation Plan Shortly after the planning process began, an informational website on Facebook was created, as shown below in Figure 22. It was developed to serve as an online presence that would display public information, describe the process, provide photos, interactive maps, and be a place for interested parties to comment on recreation in Mason County. The Facebook page was an important communication and outreach effort to community groups because it had the effect of encouraging them to take the online survey, described in more detail below. Figure 22 Screenshot of Mason County s Facebook page for the recreation plan, located online at: Mason County Recreation Plan:

39 Overview of the Online Survey The online survey was made available from June 25 through August 1, 2012, complete with 20 questions each of which can be seen in Appendix B of this document. The intent of the survey was to establish an easy means of communication where residents and stakeholders of Mason County could provide input about the existing parks and ideas for future recreational improvements. Public announcements to encourage survey participation took the form of an article in the Ludington Daily News, a link on the project website, Facebook networking with related organizations, flyers and postcards printed in color, and various messages sent to members of the community. More details about responses are given below. Survey Summary During the public input period, the County collected many great ideas and suggestions for Mason County parks and recreation. The following information is a summary of the major ideas the County received from the online survey and the Facebook page. The complete data is included in Appendix B of this document. About the Respondents The survey response data indicates that over three-quarters of the responses from the survey were completed by residents of Mason County. Figure 23, indicating responses to Question #18, shows the percentage of responses from the listed locations. Also, from Figure 24, more than 63% of the respondents were over the age of 50, as documented in Question #20. Please note that this survey received only one comment from youth under the age of 18. From Question #19, most of the responses were submitted by individuals living in a two-person household. More specific information follows in Figures 24 and 25 below. Figure 23: Location of Respondents What statement best describes your role in Mason County? I live in Mason County 78.9% My family owns a seasonal home in Mason County 7.3% I have visited Mason County 11.9% Mason County Recreation Plan:

40 Figure 24: Age of Respondents What is your age? Age Response Percent Under % % % % % 65 and older 12.6% Figure 25: Household Size How many people live in your household? Number in Household Response Percent 1 9.0% % % 6 or more 0.0% About the Parks Question 1 asked the respondents to indicate the number of times they visited a Mason County park in the past year. A graph of the data is shown below in Figure 26. Figure 26 How many times have you or your family used a Mason County park in the past year? (Q1) Mason County Recreation Plan:

41 Question 2 asked respondents which Mason County park they have visited in the past year. Figure 27 shows that over 73% of the respondents visited the fairgrounds in the past year. Figure 27 Which of the following Mason County parks have you visited in the past year? (Q2) Question 3 asked respondents if they have camped in Mason County s parks in the past year. Figure 28 shows the Mason County Campground is the clear favorite for respondents. Figure 28 Please indicate if you have camped in any of the following Mason County parks during the past year. (Q3) Mason County Recreation Plan:

42 Question 4 asked respondents why they visit parks operated by Mason County. The top choices were for casual and informal uses such as picnics or taking pictures (48%), and to enjoy nature (47%). See Figure 29. Other Responses include: Fishing, attend events at the fairgrounds Figure 29 Why do you and/or your family visit Mason County parks? (Q4) Big Sauble River Improvements Regarding the Big Sauble River property, Question 5 asked respondents if they have ever used the Big Sauble River property as a boat or kayak launch. Over 83% of the respondents indicated that they have not. In Question 6, respondents were given an opportunity to state whether or not they would visit the Big Sauble River property more often if it were to be improved to enhance water access. Here, only 45% of the respondents said they would visit the park if there were improvements made. Question 7 was a follow-up and asked if respondents had any specific ideas or suggestions for improving the Big Sauble River property. Some of the suggestions were to protect the site from erosion, keep it rustic, have a minimally-designed parking lot, have portable toilets, have a small boat launch, keep the area natural, have a couple of picnic tables. Disc Golf Course Improvements Regarding the three disc golf courses located at the Mason County Picnic Area, Question 8 asked respondents if they have ever used them. Only 18% of the respondents indicated that they had. Question 9 was aimed to determine Mason County Recreation Plan:

43 how many times in the past year respondents used those disc golf courses. About 82% had said they had not used them at all in the past year. Put another way, the responses indicated that 18% had used the disc golf courses at least once in the past year, which follows the responses from Question 8. Question 10 was a follow-up and asked if respondents had any specific ideas or suggestions for improving the disc golf courses. Some of the suggestions were advertise them more, poison ivy removal, and workshops to introduce families to the sport. New Facilities and Amenities Question 11 provided a list of recreational features and amenities. The respondents were asked to check those they felt were most needed in Mason County and provide their own answers in the other box, if applicable. The top choice, at 59%, among respondents was the desire for more walking and biking paths. A graph of the responses can be seen in Figure 30 below. Other Responses include: Fish cleaning station, snowmobile trails, mountain bike single track, soccer fields, bigger camp sites Figure 30 What additional facilities/amenities would you like to see added to Mason County parks and recreational areas? (Check all that apply.) (Q11) Mason County Recreation Plan:

44 Prioritizing Future Improvements Question 12 gathered information about the quality of existing Mason County parks and recreational areas. Participants of the survey were asked to rank the following features on a scale of 1 (Very Good) to 5 (Very Poor). The results shown in Figure 31 indicate high levels of satisfaction with the Variety of Facilities/Amenities, Maintenance and Appearance, Safety and Security, and Quality/Friendliness of Staff. Responses show a moderate level of satisfaction with Water Accessibility. Figure 31 Please evaluate the following aspects of Mason County parks and recreational areas. (Q12) Mason County Recreation Plan:

45 Recreational Participation in Mason County in General While previous questions in the online survey focused on specific aspects of the parks operated by the Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission, Question #13 asked respondents about the things they do in Mason County already, regardless of property ownership or which agency operates a recreational amenity. The top recreational activities people participate in include using a hiking or biking trail (66.7%), boating (56.8%), picnicking (57.7%), attending festivals and special events (53.2%), and fishing on Lake Michigan or at an inland lake (52.3%). Overall results are shown below in Figure 32. As a companion to this question, Question #14 asked respondents to evaluate and rate those existing recreational features in Mason County. Those receiving the highest rating include Lake Michigan swimming access, fall color tours, public campgrounds, and places to go picnicking. Figure 32 I have participated in the following recreational activities in Mason County in the past year: (check all that apply) (Q13) Mason County Recreation Plan:

46 Accessibility Question 6 asked, If there is a person with a disability in your family, please indicate which of the following would make Mason County parks more user-friendly for you and your family member (check all that apply). Results were as follows: 81.9% of participants responded with No one in my family with a disability The most common suggestions for accessibility (in order) were: 1. Accessible waterfront access 2. Paved trails 3. Accessible restrooms 4. Accessible parking 5. Flatter, easier grades 6. Accessible playgrounds Open-Ended Questions Question 16 asked participants what they liked best about Mason County parks and recreational areas. Some of the most common answers were: Variety, quality of the staff, clean parks, quiet, low cost, and the parks are beautiful natural areas. Question 8 asked participants the one thing they would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas. Common answers included: Need more parks, a fish cleaning station is needed, more paved walking and biking paths, and more playgrounds. Draft Plan and Public Meeting After the draft Recreation Plan was completed, it was made available for public review for 30 days. Interested persons could view the plan in person at the County Building in Scottville, the Mason County District Library in Ludington, and online at The 30 day Notice of Review was published in the Ludington Daily News on 10/13/2012. The second and final opportunity for community input occurred at the advertised public hearing held prior to adoption of the plan, which was held on November 12, 2012, with the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mason County passed a resolution to adopt this Recreation Plan at the Board of Commissioners meeting on December 11, Copies of the Recreation Plan were transmitted to the West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Copies of the notification advertisements, the public hearing minutes, the resolution, and the transmittal letters are included in the appendix. Mason County Recreation Plan:

47 Action Program Developing goals and objectives is an important part of the recreation planning process. The overall goal of the Parks and Recreation Commission is to provide recreation opportunities for the community or region it serves, and possibly for tourists. More specific goals must be based on the demographic characteristics of the population served and other physical and environmental characteristics of the county. Goals are the broadest level. They are overreaching and general. Objectives carry out the purpose of the goal. Action items are the last level, and they identify specific projects and programs to be pursued over the next five years. Action items can include organizational, staffing, programming, public information, and operation and maintenance actions. The Mason County Parks and Recreation Commission formulated the following goals and objectives based upon the characteristics of the overall community, the online survey, and other factors such as sports participation trends. Mason County Recreation Plan:

48 Goal A: Promote and provide diverse recreational opportunities to satisfy all age groups and levels of ability. While Mason County is rich in the amount of park land it has available, residents in the county rely mostly on locally-owned municipal parks for public recreational opportunities. Based on the general input received from residents and the evaluation of County recreational facilities shown earlier in Figure 30 compared to the growing sports activities noted page 26, it is apparent there are some unmet needs in Mason County. Furthermore, the vast amount of natural resources present in Mason County that are ideal for recreational purposes, as identified in Figures 16, 17, 18, and 19, provide unique destinations that can be enhanced by the county. Objective Develop a funding program for enhancing recreational programs and facilities throughout the county. Objective Promote opportunities for tourism. Goal B: Promote and create community awareness of Mason County as an all-seasons sporting and recreation destination. To improve support for parks and recreation in Mason County, it is important to create community awareness of county parks and their offerings. Using parks and recreation as a tourism draw, the public needs to be informed of recreational activities that are available across the differing seasons. Objective Work with local media to provide coverage of improvements, events, and activities at the parks. Objective Take advantage of the county s website and social networking opportunities to communicate to residents about Mason County parks and activities. Objective Work with local schools, governmental units, and non-profit organizations to share information regarding Mason County parks and other recreational opportunities in the county. Goal C: Enhance access to the variety of water, trail, and natural forest resources in Mason County and the recreational opportunities that they provide. Taking advantage of the vast amount of natural resources present in Mason County would provide unique opportunities for new recreational facilities and may contribute to Mason County Recreation Plan:

49 enhanced tourism. Furthermore, by setting aside portions of its park lands to remain undeveloped, the county would be providing unique passive outdoor experiences that can be appreciated by many by enabling them to view wildlife or to just have an escape from the routines of everyday modern life. Objective Explore the feasibility of developing existing county-owned property into passive recreational destinations. Objective Develop a funding program for the enhancement of county-owned property lands where a special opportunity exists for developing passive recreational amenities. Objective Investigate opportunities for partnering with other groups and agencies to offer programs and events in Mason County. Goal D: Develop non-motorized trails and other park connections to promote healthy lifestyles throughout Mason County. The results from the online survey sent a clear message Mason County needs more nonmotorized trails. With the scenic views afforded by Lake Michigan and the existence of non-motorized trails elsewhere in the region, it is obvious why there is such a pent-up demand in Mason County. Adding non-motorized trails in strategic locations would provide for an alternative mode of transportation, improve the environment, and promote health and physical fitness. Furthermore, maps included in the Mason County Comprehensive Plan identify possible future locations for bike trails. Objective Link existing county and municipally-owned recreational facilities with non-motorized trails. Objective Develop a feasibility plan for a regional non-motorized trail plan. Objective Support trail links throughout the county with a special focus on preservation of any abandoned railroad right-of-way. Goal E: Continue to improve accessibility at all parks by incorporating Universal Design in all new amenities and updating existing amenities as appropriate. Existing facilities in Mason County already provide some level of handicap accessibility. Comments from the online survey suggest a need to improve the accessibility of existing facilities in the county, based on Census estimate data that show 16.5% of the civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 5 and over in Mason County has a disability. Mason County Recreation Plan:

50 Objective Improvements to existing facilities should be designed to exceed minimum requirements of the Michigan barrier-free code. Goal F: Partner with other units of government and recreation providers to further promote broad-based recreation throughout Mason County. In the spirit of responsible regional planning and fiscal responsibility, the Parks and Recreation Commission believes it is important to cooperate and work with other recreation providers in the county. This includes local governmental units, school districts, federal and state agencies, and non-profit organizations. Objective Identify and explore new opportunities for recreational projects with local jurisdictions as a means of better serving residents and enhancing tourism. Objective Give priority to seeking funding of recreational projects that utilize existing facilities and underutilized facilities. Objective Support efforts of Ludington State Park to maintain and improve its facilities through coordination of public and private partners and the schools. Goal G: Acquire, retain, and develop appropriate property for public recreational purposes. Mason County recognizes that parks and recreational amenities contribute to the quality of life for its residents. When access to open spaces and natural areas is enhanced, these areas are a draw for not only residents, but also for tourists. New lands may need to be acquired so specific facilities can be added or so that special natural features can be preserved. Objective Retain and enhance existing park land to meet the recreational needs of the county and for tourism. Objective Partner with other recreation providers within Mason County to support opportunities for new and expanded recreational facilities. Objective Seek and apply for grants to support recreational initiatives through the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and local foundations. Mason County Recreation Plan:

51 Action Program With goals and objectives in place, Mason County was able to develop a five-year Action Program to work toward accomplishing the goals and objectives. The Action Program details the direction the County wishes to take over the next five years in order to maintain and improve the quality and diversity of area park and recreation opportunities. Projects were assigned a priority of 1 through 5 with 1 being most important and 5 being least important. Each action item relates to one or more of the lettered goals described earlier. Potential projects described in this plan have been established not only to provide a framework for decision-makers but also to enable the County to apply for grant funding. The project list is not a fixed element and it is not either all-inclusive or exclusive. The project list reflects the results of the input received from the online survey, County officials, and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Future circumstances, especially availability of funding, may change priorities or require reprioritization of items. Before proceeding with any potential project, the County will require further study, such as though not limited to developing conceptual plans, seeking additional community input, or the development of operation and maintenance plans. The proposed Action Items are shown in this table. Top priorities are indicated with a 1 while lower-ranking priorities are indicated by a 3. Mason County Recreation Plan Action Items Project Priority Goal(s) Enhance access to the Big Sauble River 2 A, C, E, G Improve camp sites at the Mason County Campground. Plan for a non-motorized trail system in Mason County 1 A, E, G 3 A, D, E Reach out and promote the disc golf courses 2 A, B, E Upgrade restroom facilities at County recreational facilities Add park amenities to other County-owned property 2 E, G 3 A, C, E, F, G Mason County Recreation Plan:

52 Funding Potential Improvements Funding for the projects described under the Action Program can come from a range of local, state, and federal programs. Grant funding is available for parks and recreation projects. However, applicants need to target potential funding agencies and programs very carefully so as to meet the specific criteria required. What follows is a current listing of programs and agencies that can provide funding for parks and recreation projects. Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) Match requirement minimum of 26% Development grants Minimum Grant Request $15,000 Maximum Grant Request $300,000 Acquisition grants No minimum or maximum Goals of MNRTF Board Resource Protection very important Water Access Community Recreation Urban Recreation Economic Development Due annually on April 1 Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Administered by MNRTF, applications due annually on March 1 50% match required Minimum grant request $30,000 ($60,000 project total) Maximum grant request $75,000 ($150,000 project total) Funds a wide variety of outdoor recreation projects Mason County Recreation Plan:

53 Michigan Department of Transportation - Transportation Enhancement Funds For non-motorized transportation and rehabilitation & operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (bridges, railroad depot, etc.) Eligible applicants include county road commissions, cities, and villages. Other organizations may sponsor applications (i.e. County Road Commission or local MDOT office sponsors an application) Rolling online application process - Go to Projects and Programs. Other Programs to Consider: Coastal Program Great Lakes US Fish and Wildlife Service Grants to conserve fish and wildlife and their habitats and to support healthy coastal ecosystems Rolling application process Specific sports and sports foundations United States Tennis Association (USTA) - funding for tennis courts and programs - Major League Baseball - Baseball Tomorrow Fund, more info at United States Soccer - Safe Routes to School For projects near elementary and middle schools: - Sidewalks and off-street pedestrian facilities - On-street and off-street bicycle facilities - Traffic calming and speed reduction - Pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements - Traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools Need to complete the safe routes planning process to apply Mason County Recreation Plan:

54 Trust for Public Land (TPL) Conservation Transactions: TPL helps structure, negotiate, and complete land transactions that create parks, playgrounds, and protected natural areas. TPL serves as an independent agent, buying land from willing landowners and then transferring it to public agencies, land trusts, or other groups for protection. In some instances, TPL will protect land through conservation easements, which restrict development but permit traditional uses such as farming and ranching. More information at Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grants Must be part of a watershed management plan Projects aimed at reducing nonpoint source pollution (streambank and shoreline stabilization, rain gardens, erosion control, conservation easements) - Go to Surface Water and then to Nonpoint Source Pollution. Community Forestry Grant Program Projects that develop or enhance urban and community forestry resources in Michigan. Project categories are: Management and Planning, Education and Training, Library Resources and Tree Planting. 50% match required. - Go to Community Forestry Grants. Community Foundations, Private Foundations, and Endowments Community Foundation for Mason County Mason County Recreation Plan:

55 Planning Process In its continuing effort to provide quality recreational opportunities for its citizens, Mason County has developed this Recreation Plan as a tool to guide the development of community parks and locations over the next five years. This plan is the latest effort by governmental officials in Mason County to establish recreational goals and objectives for the community. The plan will also provide the County with eligibility for grants from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to assist the community in reaching its recreational goals. Mason County contracted with Spicer Group of Saginaw, Michigan, to assist them with completion of the Recreation Plan. The consultant worked with the Parks and Recreation Commission through the course of the plan. Data was collected about the County including maps, demographics, park information, and an inventory of existing facilities. This data was collected from a number of resources Mason County Recreation Plan:

56 such as other relevant planning documents, various websites, field observations, and conversations with County officials. Community input was collected via an online survey conducted in the summer of Based upon the existing information and the community input, Mason County developed goals and objectives for parks and recreation. Then, action plan items were written that would work toward accomplishing the goals and objectives. Spicer Group completed the Recreation Plan document and it was made available for review at County Building in Scottville, the Mason County District Library in Ludington, and online at for at least 30 days beginning on October 12, This reviewing opportunity was advertised in the Ludington Daily News. The final opportunity for community input occurred at the advertised public meeting held prior to the adoption of the plan. This meeting was on November 12, 2012, with the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting at the County Building in Scottville at 7:00 pm. On December 11, 2012, the Mason County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution adopting the recreation plan. Copies of the advertisements and resolutions are included in Appendix C. Views of Lake Michigan from the Mason County Picnic Area are exceptional. Mason County Recreation Plan:

57 Appendix A Sports Participation Trends Mason County Recreation Plan:

58 The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation Report 2011

59 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Table of Contents 1 METHOD OVERVIEW AND INSIGHT FROM THE PAC REPORT PARTICIPATION TRENDS ADDITIONAL FINDINGS ACTIVITIES AT SCHOOL AGE THE P.E. PATHWAY PATHWAYS TO PARTICIPATION CASUAL SPORTS PARTICIPATION AMONG THE GENERATIONS INTEREST AMONG NON-PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPATION DATA NEWS AND NOTES PARTICIPATION DATA The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA), the #1 source for sport and fitness research, is the leading global trade association of manufacturers, retailers, and marketers in the sports products industry. SGMA helps lead the sports and fitness industries by fostering participation through research, thought leadership, product promotion, and public policy. More information about SGMA membership and SGMA's National Health Through Fitness Day can be found at Disclaimer: While proper due care and diligence has been taken in the preparation of this document, The Physical Activity Council cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information contained and does not accept any liability for any loss or damage caused as a result of using information or recommendations contained within this document Physical Activity Council No part of the report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, without the written permission of The Physical Activity Council, any application for which should be addressed to The Physical Activity Council. Written permission must also be obtained before any part of the report is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Contact: Sports Marketing Survey USA ( ) usa@sportsmarketingsurveysusa.com 2011 SGMA Research Page 1

60 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report 10 PARTICIPATION DATA Throughout the report significant changes have been highlighted in orange. Note: The population from 2000 to 2009 increased by 9% - so sports that have increased 9% have shown no significant change since the year Aerobic Activities Definition year change 10 year change Aerobics (High impact) Total participation 1+ times 11,790 11,287 12,272 13,269 15, % 34.6% Casual 1 49 times 5,004 5,765 5,935 7, % Regular times 2,156 2,299 2,658 3, % Frequent 100+ times 4,127 4,208 4,676 5, % CORE 50+ times 6,283 6,507 7,334 8, % Aerobics (Low impact) Total participation 1+ times 21,384 22,397 24,168 25,685 27, % 27.1% Casual 1 49 times 9,341 11,021 11,034 12, % Regular times 4,523 5,064 5,313 6, % Frequent 100+ times 8,533 8,083 9,338 8, % CORE 50+ times 13,056 13,147 14,651 14, % Aerobics (Step) Total participation 1+ times 10,867 8,528 10,318 10,784 11, % 3.8% Casual 1 49 times 4,454 6,021 5,475 6, % Regular times 1,647 1,891 2,340 2, % Frequent 100+ times 2,427 2,406 2,969 2, % CORE 50+ times 4,074 4,297 5,309 5, % Aquatic Exercise Total participation 1+ times 9,303 9,757 9,267 8,662 9, % 0.8% Casual 1 49 times 5,993 5,794 5,027 5, % Regular times 1,789 1,809 1,853 1, % Frequent 100+ times 1,975 1,664 1,782 1, % CORE 50+ times 3,764 3,473 3,635 3, % Cardio Kickboxing Total participation 1+ times 8,765 4,812 4,997 6,002 6, % 25.0% Casual 1 49 times 2,987 3,273 3,571 4, % Regular times ,266 1, % Frequent 100+ times ,165 1, % CORE 50+ times 1,825 1,724 2,431 2, % Cross-Country Ski Machine Total participation 1+ times 6,541 3,696 3,490 3,097 3, % 52.9% Casual 1 49 times 1,857 1,981 1,512 1, % Regular times % Frequent 100+ times 1, , % CORE 50+ times 1,839 1,508 1,585 1, % Elliptical Motion Trainer Total participation 1+ times 7,371 23,586 25,284 26,521 28, % 281.5% Casual 1 49 times 10,972 11,728 12,085 13, % Regular times 4,968 5,464 5,349 5, % Frequent 100+ times 7,646 8,092 9,087 8, % CORE 50+ times 12,614 13,556 14,436 14, % Other Exercise to Music Total participation 1+ times 16,065 22,294 21,893 22,045 22, % 42.9% Casual 1 49 times 9,661 9,504 9,740 11, % Regular times 4,560 4,620 4,423 4, % Frequent 100+ times 8,073 7,769 7,882 7, % CORE 50+ times 12,633 12,388 12,305 11, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 15

61 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Aerobic Activities (cont.) Definition year change 10 year change Running/Jogging Total participation 1+ times 31,398 41,064 41,130 43,892 49, % 57.4% Casual 1 49 times 16,824 17,728 18,333 21, % Regular times 8,237 8,428 9,113 9, % Frequent 100+ times 16,003 14,974 16,446 18, % CORE 50+ times 24,240 23,402 25,559 27, % Stair Climbing Machine Total participation 1+ times 15,282 13,521 14,204 13,101 13, % 12.1% Casual 1 49 times 7,107 8,017 7,004 7, % Regular times 2,651 2,702 2,581 2, % Frequent 100+ times 3,763 3,485 3,516 3, % CORE 50+ times 6,414 6,188 6,097 5, % Stationary Cycling (Recumbent) Total participation 1+ times 8,810 10,818 11,389 11,208 11, % 32.9% Casual 1 49 times 5,261 6,020 5,550 6, % Regular times 2,331 2,090 2,230 2, % Frequent 100+ times 3,226 3,279 3,428 3, % CORE 50+ times 5,557 5,369 5,658 5, % Stationary Cycling (Group) Total participation 1+ times 4,709 6,314 6,693 6,831 8, % 88.5% Casual 1 49 times 3,371 3,868 3,820 5, % Regular times 1,221 1,078 1,316 1, % Frequent 100+ times 1,722 1,747 1,695 2, % CORE 50+ times 2,943 2,825 3,011 3, % Stationary Cycling (Upright) Total participation 1+ times 27,159 24,531 25,304 24,528 24, % 9.3% Casual 1 49 times 11,581 12,653 11,795 12, % Regular times 5,210 4,738 5,097 4, % Frequent 100+ times 7,740 7,913 7,636 7, % CORE 50+ times 12,950 12,651 12,733 12, % Swimming (Fitness/Competition) Total participation 1+ times 16,144 18,368 19,041 17,443 17, % 6.2% Casual 1 49 times 11,131 11,741 11,024 10, % Regular times 3,946 4,322 3,471 3, % Frequent 100+ times 3,291 2,978 2,948 3, % CORE 50+ times 7,237 7,300 6,419 6, % Treadmill Total participation 1+ times 37,287 50,073 49,371 51,418 53, % 42.5% Casual 1 49 times 20,891 21,262 21,060 22, % Regular times 10,728 10,353 10,571 10, % Frequent 100+ times 18,454 17,756 19,787 19, % CORE 50+ times 29,182 28,109 30,358 30, % Walking for Fitness Total participation 1+ times 90, , , , , % 25.4% Casual 1 49 times 31,903 35,293 33,746 35, % Regular times 20,045 20,164 19,898 20, % Frequent 100+ times 56,792 56,211 56,451 58, % CORE 50+ times 76,837 76,375 76,349 78, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 16

62 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Conditioning Activities Definition year change 10 year change Abdominal Machine/Device Total participation 1+ times 21,354 20,426 19,917 19,465 18, % 13.4% Casual 1 49 times 7,625 7,939 6,957 7, % Regular times 4,319 4,224 4,364 3, % Frequent 100+ times 8,482 7,754 8,144 6, % CORE 50+ times 12,801 11,978 12,508 10, % Calisthenics Total participation 1+ times 7,758 8,629 9,147 9,106 9, % 17.1% Casual 1 49 times 2,041 3,037 3,226 3, % Regular times 1,787 2,021 1,826 1, % Frequent 100+ times 4,801 4,080 4,054 4, % CORE 50+ times 6,588 6,101 5,880 5, % Pilates Training Total participation 1+ times 1,556 9,192 8,886 8,653 8, % 424.2% Casual 1 49 times 5,085 5,348 4,805 4, % Regular times 1,920 1,516 1,839 1, % Frequent 100+ times 2,187 2,022 2,009 1, % CORE 50+ times 4,107 3,539 3,848 3, % Rowing Machine Total participation 1+ times 9,407 8,782 9,021 9,174 9, % 3.8% Casual 1 49 times 4,451 4,776 4,725 5, % Regular times 1,609 1,850 1,806 1, % Frequent 100+ times 2,722 2,395 2,643 2, % CORE 50+ times 4,331 4,245 4,449 4, % Stretching Total participation 1+ times 24,613 36,181 36,288 36,310 35, % 42.7% Casual 1 49 times 7,863 8,669 8,784 8, % Regular times 5,906 6,106 6,105 5, % Frequent 100+ times 22,412 21,513 21,421 20, % CORE 50+ times 28,318 27,619 27,526 26, % Tai Chi Total participation 1+ times 3,424 3,205 3, % Casual 1 49 times 1,827 1,843 1, % Regular times % Frequent 100+ times 1, % CORE 50+ times 1,597 1,362 1, % Yoga Total participation 1+ times 17,758 20,109 21, % Casual 1 49 times 10,736 11,549 12, % Regular times 2,808 3,786 3, % Frequent 100+ times 4,214 4,774 5, % CORE 50+ times 7,022 8,560 9, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 17

63 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Strength Activities Definition year change 10 year change Free Weights (Barbells) Total participation 1+ times 24,800 25,499 26,142 27,048 27, % 10.2% Casual 1 49 times 8,181 8,727 8,329 9, % Regular times 4,950 5,402 5,470 5, % Frequent 100+ times 12,368 12,013 13,249 12, % CORE 50+ times 17,318 17,415 18,719 17, % Free Weights (Dumbells) Total participation 1+ times 27,470 32,371 34,391 35,744 37, % 36.1% Casual 1 49 times 10,797 11,814 11,452 13, % Regular times 6,594 6,997 7,666 7, % Frequent 100+ times 14,980 15,580 16,626 15, % CORE 50+ times 21,574 22,577 24,292 23, % Free Weights (Hand Weights) Total participation 1+ times 33,784 43,821 42,997 45,934 45, % 35.9% Casual 1 49 times 15,635 16,070 15,563 17, % Regular times 8,819 8,884 9,562 9, % Frequent 100+ times 19,367 18,043 20,809 19, % CORE 50+ times 28,186 26,927 30,371 28, % Home Gym Exercise Total participation 1+ times 20,626 25,823 24,514 24,762 24, % 19.2% Casual 1 49 times 9,577 9,604 9,615 9, % Regular times 5,313 4,907 4,843 4, % Frequent 100+ times 10,933 10,003 10,304 10, % CORE 50+ times 16,246 14,910 15,147 14, % Weight/Resistance Machines Total participation 1+ times 32,144 39,290 38,397 39,752 38, % 20.1% Casual 1 49 times 14,555 14,929 13,892 15, % Regular times 8,012 8,063 8,382 7, % Frequent 100+ times 16,723 15,405 17,478 15, % CORE 50+ times 24,735 23,469 25,860 23, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 18

64 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Individual Sports Definition year change 2011 SGMA Research Page year change Adventure Racing Total participation 1+ times ,089 1, % Casual 1 time % Regular 2 9 times % Frequent 10+ times % CORE 2+ times % Archery Total participation 1+ times 6,285 5,950 6,409 6,326 6, % 0.5% Casual 1 25 times 4,839 5,300 5,371 5, % Regular times % Frequent 52+ times % CORE 26+ times 1,111 1, % Billiards/Pool Total participation 1+ times 46,336 51,089 49,018 43,005 39, % 15.0% Casual 1 12 times 30,795 31,840 27,303 25, % Regular times 6,824 5,823 5,574 4, % Frequent 25+ times 13,470 11,355 10,128 8, % CORE 13+ times 20,294 17,178 15,702 13, % Bowling Total participation 1+ times 51,938 60,184 58,650 57,293 55, % 7.6% Casual 1 12 times 44,762 45,167 43,997 43, % Regular times 5,225 4,458 4,394 4, % Frequent 25+ times 10,197 9,025 8,902 8, % CORE 13+ times 15,422 13,482 13,296 12, % Boxing for Fitness * Total participation 1+ times 4,788 Casual 1 12 times 2,495 Regular times 605 Frequent 25+ times 1,688 CORE 13+ times 2,293 Boxing for Competition * Total participation 1+ times 855 Casual 1 12 times 598 Regular times 104 Frequent 25+ times 153 CORE 13+ times 257 Darts Total participation 1+ times 24,709 23,451 20,022 18, % Casual 1 12 times 16,106 15,584 13,281 12, % Regular times 2,951 2,817 2,286 2, % Frequent 25+ times 5,652 5,050 4,455 4, % CORE 13+ times 8,603 7,866 6,741 6, % Golf (9/18 Hole Course) Total participation 1+ times 28,844 29,528 28,571 27,103 26, % 9.4% Horseback Riding Total participation 1+ times 12,098 10,816 9,755 9, % Casual 1 12 times 8,330 7,384 6,883 6, % Regular times 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,739 2,461 2,109 2, % CORE 13+ times 3,768 3,432 2,872 2, % Ice Skating Total participation 1+ times 11,835 11,430 10,999 10,929 12, % 1.6% Casual 1 12 times 9,514 9,598 9,361 10, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times 1, , % CORE 13+ times 1,916 1,401 1,568 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over * Boxing category was split into 2 to now cover: Boxing for fitness and Boxing for competition, so comparisons with the previous boxing category cannot be made.

65 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report 1 year change 10 year change Individual Sports (cont.) Martial Arts * Definition Total participation 1+ times 6,161 6,865 6,770 6,516 5, % 10.9% Casual 1 12 times 1,366 1,495 1,374 1, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times 4,808 4,653 4,582 3, % CORE 13+ times 5,499 5,276 5,142 4, % Mixed Martial Arts for Competition Total participation 1+ times 910 Casual 1 12 times 528 Regular times 124 Frequent 25+ times 258 CORE 13+ times 382 Mixed Martial Arts for Fitness Total participation 1+ times 1,745 Casual 1 12 times 577 Regular times 219 Frequent 25+ times 949 CORE 13+ times 1,168 Roller Skating (2x2 wheels) Total participation 1+ times 7,746 8,921 7,855 8,147 8, % 4.9% Casual 1 12 times 7,004 6,291 6,357 6, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times 1,242 1,108 1,244 1, % CORE 13+ times 1,917 1,564 1,790 1, % Roller Skating (Inline wheels) Total participation 1+ times 21,912 10,814 9,608 8,276 7, % 63.6% Casual 1 12 times 6,094 5,909 5,234 5, % Regular times 1,365 1,228 1,090 1, % Frequent 25+ times 3,355 2,471 1,952 1, % CORE 13+ times 4,720 3,699 3,042 2, % Scooter Riding (Non-motorized) Total participation 1+ times 9,968 6,782 6,394 5,064 4, % 51.2% Casual 1 12 times 2,971 2,168 1,676 1, % Regular times 927 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,884 3,216 2,704 2, % CORE 13+ times 4,460 4,233 3,388 3, % Skateboarding Total participation 1+ times 9,859 8,429 7,807 7,352 6, % 30.9% Casual 1 25 times 4,589 4,074 3,937 3, % Regular times 1,491 1,444 1,130 1, % Frequent 52+ times 2,349 2,289 2,285 1, % CORE 26+ times 3,840 3,733 3,415 3, % Trail Running Total participation 1+ times 4,167 4,216 4,857 4,833 5, % 23.3% Triathlon (Non-Traditional/Off Road) Total participation 1+ times % Casual 1 time % Regular 2 9 times % Frequent 10+ times % CORE 2+ times % Triathlon (Traditional/Road) Total participation 1+ times 798 1,087 1,208 1, % Casual 1 time % Regular 2 9 times % Frequent 10+ times % CORE 2+ times , % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over * Martial Arts category was split into 3 to now cover Martial Arts, MMA for fitness and MMA for competition so this will have impacted the total numbers for the pure Martial Arts category SGMA Research Page 20

66 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Racquet Sports Definition year change 10 year change Badminton Total participation 1+ times 8,769 7,057 7,239 7,699 7, % 13.4% Casual 1 12 times 4,785 5,089 5,156 4, % Regular times , % Frequent 25+ times 1,362 1,245 1,449 1, % CORE 13+ times 2,272 2,150 2,543 2, % Cardio Tennis Total participation 1+ times 830 1,177 1, % Racquetball Total participation 1+ times 4,475 4,229 4,993 4,575 4, % 3.5% Casual 1 12 times 2,292 2,914 2,699 2, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times 1,393 1,430 1,238 1, % CORE 13+ times 1,937 2,079 1,876 1, % Squash Total participation 1+ times , % Casual 1 7 times % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times % Table Tennis Total participation 1+ times 12,712 15,955 17,201 19,301 19, % 53.0% Casual 1 12 times 10,865 12,196 13,351 13, % Regular times 1,787 1,892 2,008 2, % Frequent 25+ times 3,303 3,113 3,942 4, % CORE 13+ times 5,090 5,005 5,950 6, % Tennis Total participation 1+ times 12,974 16,940 18,558 18,534 18, % 45.7% All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 21

67 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Team Sports Definition year change 10 year change Baseball Total participation 1+ times 15,848 16,058 15,020 13,837 14, % 8.1% Casual 1 12 times 4,493 4,854 4,424 4, % Regular times 2,780 2,422 2,352 2, % Frequent 25+ times 8,785 7,744 7,061 7, % CORE 13+ times 11,565 10,166 9,413 9, % Basketball Total participation 1+ times 26,215 25,961 26,254 24,007 26, % 0.3% Casual 1 12 times 7,956 8,582 7,558 8, % Regular times 4,279 3,997 3,961 4, % Frequent 25+ times 13,726 13,675 12,488 13, % CORE 13+ times 18,005 17,672 16,449 17, % Cheerleading Total participation 1+ times 2,634 3,279 3,104 3,036 3, % 22.7% Casual 1 25 times 1,144 1,357 1,260 1, % Regular times % Frequent 52+ times 1,485 1,023 1, % CORE 26+ times 2,135 1,746 1,776 1, % Field Hockey Total participation 1+ times 1,127 1,118 1,066 1, % Casual 1 7 times % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times % Football (Flag) Total participation 1+ times 7,310 6,553 6, % Casual 1 12 times 4,001 3,551 3, % Regular times 1,169 1,304 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,140 1,698 1, % CORE 13+ times 3,309 3,002 3, % Football (Touch) Total participation 1+ times 10,493 8,959 8, % Casual 1 12 times 6,199 5,100 4, % Regular times 1,562 1,401 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,732 2,458 2, % CORE 13+ times 4,294 3,859 3, % Football (Tackle) Total participation 1+ times 8,229 7,939 7,692 6,794 6, % 16.1% Casual 1 25 times 3,700 3,470 3,112 3, % Regular times 1,578 1,740 1,205 1, % Frequent 52+ times 2,661 2,482 2,477 2, % CORE 26+ times 4,239 4,221 3,682 3, % Gymnastics Total participation 1+ times 4,876 4,066 3,883 4,021 4, % 1.2% Casual 1 49 times 2,262 2,379 2,542 2, % Regular times % Frequent 100+ times % CORE 50+ times 1,804 1,504 1,479 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 22

68 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Team Sports (cont.) Definition year change 10 year change Ice Hockey Total participation 1+ times 2,432 1,840 1,902 2,134 2, % 11.8% Casual 1 12 times , % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times 1, % CORE 13+ times 1,282 1,014 1,188 1, % Lacrosse Total participation 1+ times 518 1,058 1,127 1,197 1, % 218.1% Casual 1 12 times % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times % CORE 13+ times % Paintball Total participation 1+ times 3,615 5,476 4,857 4,552 3, % 1.1% Casual 1 7 times 3,195 2,929 2,842 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times 1,546 1, % CORE 8+ times 2,281 1,929 1,710 1, % Roller Hockey Total participation 1+ times 3,888 1,681 1,456 1,397 1, % 65.3% Casual 1 12 times , % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times % CORE 13+ times % Rugby Total participation 1+ times , % Casual 1 7 times % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times % Soccer (Indoor) Total participation 1+ times 4,237 4,737 4,913 4, % Casual 1 12 times 1,866 2,099 2,002 2, % Regular times , % Frequent 25+ times 1,566 1,791 1,865 1, % CORE 13+ times 2,371 2,638 2,911 2, % Soccer (Outdoor) Total participation 1+ times 13,708 14,223 13,691 14, % Casual 1 25 times 7,342 7,742 7,347 7, % Regular times 3,536 3,647 3,376 3, % Frequent 52+ times 2,830 2,834 2,968 3, % CORE 26+ times 6,366 6,481 6,344 6, % Softball (Fast Pitch) Total participation 1+ times 2,693 2,345 2,316 2,636 2, % 11.3% Casual 1 25 times 1,013 1,096 1,236 1, % Regular times % Frequent 52+ times % CORE 26+ times 1,332 1,220 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 23

69 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Team Sports (cont.) Definition year change 10 year change Softball (Slow-Pitch) Total participation 1+ times 13,577 9,485 9,835 8,525 8, % 37.9% Casual 1 12 times 3,415 3,929 3,388 3, % Regular times 2,121 2,104 1,898 1, % Frequent 25+ times 3,949 3,802 3,239 3, % CORE 13+ times 6,070 5,906 5,137 4, % Track and Field Total participation 1+ times 4,691 4,516 4,443 4, % Casual 1 25 times 1,977 2,204 2,145 1, % Regular times 1,152 1,045 1,049 1, % Frequent 52+ times 1,562 1,267 1,249 1, % CORE 26+ times 2,714 2,312 2,298 2, % Ultimate Frisbee Total participation 1+ times 4,038 4,879 4,392 4, % Casual 1 12 times 2,720 3,520 3,119 3, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times % CORE 13+ times 1,318 1,359 1,273 1, % Volleyball (Beach) Total participation 1+ times 5,248 3,878 4,171 4,476 5, % 4.2% Casual 1 12 times 2,439 3,091 3,215 3, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times % CORE 13+ times 1,330 1,080 1,261 1, % Volleyball (Court) Total participation 1+ times 6,986 8,190 7,283 7, % Casual 1 12 times 2,930 3,491 3,297 3, % Regular times 1,182 1,206 1,115 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,874 3,493 2,871 2, % CORE 13+ times 4,056 4,699 3,986 4, % Volleyball (Grass) Total participation 1+ times 4,940 5,086 4,853 4, % Casual 1 12 times 3,280 3,840 3,558 3, % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times % CORE 13+ times 1,660 1,246 1,295 1, % Wrestling Total participation 1+ times 3,743 3,313 3,358 2,982 2, % 44.2% Casual 1 25 times 1,736 1,877 1, % Regular times % Frequent 52+ times % CORE 26+ times 1,458 1,481 1,226 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 24

70 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Outdoor Sports Definition year change 10 year change Backpacking Overnight - More Than 1/4 Mile From Vehicle/Home Total participation 1+ times 6,637 7,867 7,647 8, % Bicycling - BMX Total participation 1+ times 3,213 1,887 1,904 1,811 2, % 26.3% Casual 1 12 times , % Regular times % Frequent 25+ times , % CORE 13+ times 1,137 1,143 1,087 1, % Bicycling (Mountain/Non-Paved Surface) Total participation 1+ times 6,892 7,592 7,142 7, % Casual 1 12 times 3,051 3,491 3,296 3, % Regular times 1,003 1,274 1,015 1, % Frequent 25+ times 2,838 2,827 2,831 2, % CORE 13+ times 3,841 4,101 3,846 3, % Bicycling (Road/paved surface) Total participation 1+ times 38,940 38,114 40,140 39, % Casual 1 25 times 17,789 18,164 18,906 19, % Regular times 8,669 8,456 8,991 8, % Frequent 52+ times 12,482 11,494 12,243 11, % CORE 26+ times 21,151 19,950 21,234 20, % Birdwatching More Than 1/4 Mile From Home/Vehicle Total participation 1+ times 13,476 14,399 13,294 13, % Camping (Recreational vehicle) Total participation 1+ times 17,893 16,168 16,517 17,436 15, % 11.3% Casual 1 7 times 7,942 8,019 8,782 8, % Regular 8 14 times 3,032 3,476 3,356 2, % Frequent 15+ times 5,194 5,022 5,298 4, % CORE 8+ times 8,226 8,498 8,654 7, % Camping Within 1/4 Mile of Vehicle/Home Total participation 1+ times 31,375 33,686 34,338 30, % Climbing (Sport/Indoor/Boulder) Total participation 1+ times 4,514 4,769 4,313 4, % Climbing (Traditional/Ice/Mountaineering) Total participation 1+ times 2,062 2,288 1,835 2, % Fishing (Fly) Total participation 1+ times 6,717 5,756 5,941 5,568 5, % 18.4% Casual 1 7 times 2,923 3,113 3,084 2, % Regular 8 14 times 975 1, % Frequent 15+ times 1,858 1,661 1,515 1, % CORE 8+ times 2,833 2,828 2,484 2, % Fishing (Freshwater-Other) Total participation 1+ times 43,696 43,859 40,331 40,961 38, % 11.1% Casual 1 7 times 20,145 18,916 20,082 19, % Regular 8 14 times 8,262 7,387 7,454 7, % Frequent 15+ times 15,452 14,028 13,425 12, % CORE 8+ times 23,714 21,415 20,879 19, % Fishing (Saltwater) Total participation 1+ times 14,739 14,437 13,804 12,303 11, % 19.9% Casual 1 7 times 8,460 8,415 7,316 6, % Regular 8 14 times 2,169 2,050 1,741 1, % Frequent 15+ times 3,808 3,339 3,246 2, % CORE 8+ times 5,977 5,389 4,987 4, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 25

71 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Outdoor Sports (cont.) Definition year change 10 year change Hiking (Day) Total participation 1+ times 30,051 29,965 32,511 32,572 32, % 8.1% Hunting (Bow) Total participation 1+ times 4,633 3,818 3,722 4,226 3, % 15.6% Casual 1 7 times 1,718 1,742 2,133 1, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times 1,504 1,325 1,309 1, % CORE 8+ times 2,100 1,980 2,093 2, % Hunting (Handgun) Total participation 1+ times 2,595 2,873 2,276 2, % Casual 1 7 times 1,572 1,776 1,451 1, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,023 1, % Hunting (Rifle) Total participation 1+ times 10,635 10,344 11,114 10, % Casual 1 12 times 6,960 6,958 8,056 7, % Regular times 1,742 1,848 1,712 1, % Frequent 25+ times 1,933 1,538 1,346 1, % CORE 13+ times 3,675 3,385 3,058 2, % Hunting (Shotgun) Total participation 1+ times 8,545 8,731 8,490 8, % Casual 1 7 times 4,171 4,473 4,767 4, % Regular 8 14 times 1,797 1,835 1,635 1, % Frequent 15+ times 2,577 2,423 2,088 2, % CORE 8+ times 4,374 4,258 3,723 3, % Shooting (Sport Clays) Total participation 1+ times 4,437 4,115 4,282 4,182 4, % 0.9% Casual 1 7 times 2,596 2,773 2,674 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,519 1,509 1,508 1, % Shooting (Trap/Skeet) Total participation 1+ times 3,416 3,376 3,669 3,368 3, % 5.7% Casual 1 7 times 2,051 2,212 2,171 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,325 1,457 1,197 1, % Target Shooting (Handgun) Total participation 1+ times 11,736 13,365 12,473 12, % Casual 1 7 times 6,222 7,305 7,253 7, % Regular 8 14 times 2,090 2,342 1,886 1, % Frequent 15+ times 3,424 3,718 3,334 3, % CORE 8+ times 5,514 6,060 5,220 5, % Target Shooting (Rifle) Total participation 1+ times 10,022 12,436 13,102 12,730 12, % 25.2% Casual 1 7 times 6,743 7,399 7,530 7, % Regular 8 14 times 2,097 2,057 1,854 1, % Frequent 15+ times 3,596 3,646 3,346 2, % CORE 8+ times 5,693 5,704 5,200 4, % Wildlife Viewing More Than 1/4 Mile From Home/Vehicle Total participation 1+ times 22,974 24,113 21,291 21, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 26

72 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Winter Sports Definition 2006/2007 season 2007/2008 season 2008/2009 season 2009/2010 season 1 year change 3 year change Skiing (Alpine/Downhill) Total participation 1+ times 10,362 10,346 10,919 11, % 11.0% Skiing (Cross-country) Total participation 1+ times 3,530 3,848 4,157 4, % 28.3% Skiing (Freestyle) Total participation 1+ times 2,817 2,711 2,950 3, % 29.5% Snowboarding Total participation 1+ times 6,841 7,159 7,421 8, % 19.8% Snowmobiling Total participation 1+ times 4,811 4,660 4,798 5, % 6.3% Casual 1 7 times 2,814 2,917 2,995 3, % 12.9% Regular 8 14 times % 11.2% Frequent 15+ times 1,198 1, , % 2.7% CORE 8+ times 1,997 1,743 1,803 1, % 2.9% Snowshoeing Total participation 1+ times 2,400 2,922 3,431 3, % 59.3% Telemarking (Downhill) Total participation 1+ times 1,173 1,435 1,482 1, % 55.2% All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 27

73 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Water Sports Definition year change 10 year change Boardsailing/Windsurfing Total participation 1+ times 1,739 1,118 1,307 1,128 1, % 7.0% Casual 1 7 times , % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times % Canoeing Total participation 1+ times 10,880 9,797 9,935 10,058 10, % 3.0% Jet Skiing Total participation 1+ times 9,475 8,055 7,815 7,724 7, % 18.2% Casual 1 7 times 4,919 5,135 5,140 5, % Regular 8 14 times 1,217 1,037 1,116 1, % Frequent 15+ times 1,919 1,643 1,468 1, % CORE 8+ times 2,727 2,680 2,584 2, % Kayaking (Recreational) Total participation 1+ times 5,070 6,240 6,212 6, % Kayaking (Sea/Touring) Total participation 1+ times 1,485 1,780 1,771 2, % Kayaking (White Water) Total participation 1+ times 1,207 1,242 1,369 1, % Rafting Total participation 1+ times 5,259 4,340 4,651 4,318 4, % 15.2% Sailing Total participation 1+ times 4,405 3,786 4,226 4,342 3, % 12.2% Casual 1 7 times 2,264 2,640 2,733 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,421 1,586 1,609 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 28

74 2011, SGMA Participation Topline Report Water Sports (cont.) Definition year change 10 year change Scuba Diving Total participation 1+ times 4,305 2,965 3,216 2,723 3, % 26.8% Casual 1 7 times 1,947 2,183 1,847 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,018 1, % Snorkeling Total participation 1+ times 10,302 9,294 10,296 9,358 9, % 9.7% Casual 1 7 times 7,168 7,968 7,464 7, % Regular 8 14 times 1,142 1,232 1,106 1, % Frequent 15+ times 984 1, % CORE 8+ times 1,919 2,328 1,894 2, % Stand-Up Paddling Total participation 1+ times 1,050 Casual 1 7 times 819 Regular 8 14 times 121 Frequent 15+ times 109 CORE 8+ times 230 Surfing Total participation 1+ times 2,191 2,206 2,607 2,403 2, % 26.3% Casual 1 7 times 1,256 1,559 1,298 1, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 950 1,048 1,105 1, % Wakeboarding Total participation 1+ times 4,558 3,521 3,544 3,577 3, % 20.0% Casual 1 7 times 2,405 2,413 2,423 2, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times % CORE 8+ times 1,116 1,131 1,154 1, % Water Skiing Total participation 1+ times 8,765 5,918 5,593 4,862 4, % 44.8% Casual 1 7 times 3,811 3,781 3,308 3, % Regular 8 14 times % Frequent 15+ times 1, % CORE 8+ times 2,107 1,812 1,554 1, % All participation figures are in 000s for the US population ages 6 and over 2011 SGMA Research Page 29

75 The SGMA Survey Says Social Networking Has Significant Impact on Sports Participation Page 1 of 3 Search SGMA.com for Go Advanced Search About SGMA Join SGMA SGMA Committees Press Releases Industry Press Releases New Product Press Releases Legal Task Force Articles SGMA Press Releases Research Reports Public Policy Education and Resources Newsletter Events Calendar Contact Us My SGMA Home >> Press Releases >> The SGMA Survey Says Social Networking Has Significant Impact on Sports Participation The SGMA Survey Says Social Networking Has Significant Impact on Sports Participation Date: 4/13/11 Generation Y Is Most Active Part of Population SILVER SPRING, MD April 15, 2011 Social networking is having a major impact on sports participation patterns in the U.S. particularly for those aged 12 to 30 ( Generation Y ). According to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association s (SGMA) Sports & Fitness Participation Topline Report (2011 edition), the approach of Generation Y toward athletic activity and exercise is changing because of the influences of Twitter, Texting, Facebook, and YouTube. The True Impact of Generation Y In all areas of exercise, those who are Generation Y (born between 1980 and 1999) outnumber both the Baby Boomers (born between 1945 and 1964) and Generation X (born between 1965 and 1979) in every area of sports participation individual sports, racquet sports, team sports, outdoor sports, winter sports, water sports, and fitness sports. The most popular category for Generation Y is fitness sports where 51.3 million of them are engaged in some type of fitnessoriented pursuit. Those in the Generation Y segment of the population have the strongest social mindset which is influencing what they do with their free time. As a result of their strong social attitudes, the Generation Y portion of the population is strongly gravitating toward group exercise. The social mindset of Generation Y is the reason why health club memberships are picking up and group-oriented exercise classes are gaining in popularity. Generation Y enjoys working out and exercising with friends, whereas Generation X has been focused more on individual pursuits, said SGMA President/CEO Tom Cove. For Generation Y, it s as much about the socialization as it is the perspiration. Since 2009, a few group exercise activities have experienced double-digit gains in overall participation. This growth has been affected by the Generation Y philosophy on exercise: Group Exercise Activities Showcasing Increases in Overall Participation Since 2009: 1.) Group Cycling up 29.9% 2.) Cardio Tennis up 27.7% 3.) High Impact Aerobics up 19.6% Team Sports News In team sports, there is good news to report. Many traditional endeavors such as outdoor soccer, indoor soccer, tackle football, baseball, basketball, cheerleading, and court volleyball have experienced small degrees of growth in overall participation since 2009 reversing a recent trend in the other direction. The other good news on team sports is that overall participation in some niche team sports activities has showcased dramatic increases since 2009, such as rugby up 50.7%, lacrosse up 37.7%, field hockey up 21.8%, and beach volleyball up 12.3%. After analyzing team sports participation patterns at the core level, four team sports have had doubledigit percentage increases in participation since They are lacrosse (13+ times/year.up 33.1%), rugby (8+ times/year.. up 20.3%), ultimate frisbee (13+ times/year.up 19.2%), and beach volleyball (13+ times/year..up 18.9%). Endurance Activities 9/7/2011

76 The SGMA Survey Says Social Networking Has Significant Impact on Sports Participation Page 2 of 3 There are two other sports which have risen in popularity: (1) triathlon and (2) adventure racing. Since 2009, overall participation in traditional triathlons is up 63.7%, up 39.5% in non-traditional triathlons, and up 23% in adventure racing. Those who have made a commitment to triathlons and adventure racing are doing so for fitness, fun, and the thrill of the finish. It appears that this trend is tied to a basic desire to belong to a group and identify with a team or club, said Steve Furniss, founder of TYR Sport, a manufacturer of products and accessories for swimming and endurance sports. The triathlon is unique in its ability to couple a person s fitness routine with a strong sense of community and social interaction, particularly for those not inclined to traditional sports. Other appeal factors include the fact that it is an adult sport, it appeals to both genders, it offers training diversity (swimming, cycling and running) and has the cachet of being the latest Everest fitness endeavor, much like accomplishing a marathon was for many in the 1970s and 1980s. However, unlike a marathon, triathlons and adventure racing have so many formats that it can encompass a greater participant base. At the end of the day, triathlons and adventure racing offer social interaction and a sense of community while providing the ability to stay fit. That s a powerful formula. America s Top Ten Sports & Fitness Activities The most popular sports and activities in the U.S. as measured by people who participate at least once a year in any given activity, i.e. overall participation have a strong focus on fitness as seven out of the top ten activities are fitness-related: RANK ACTIVITY 1 Walking for Fitness 2 Bowling 3 Treadmill 4 Running/Jogging 5 Hand Weights 6 Billiards/Pool 7 Bicycling 8 Freshwater Fishing 9 Weight/Resistance Machines 10 Dumbells # of PARTICIPANTS million 55.9 million 53.1 million 49.4 million 45.9 million 39.4 million 39.3 million 38.9 million 38.6 million 37.4 million Finally, in a survey of non sports participants, they were asked which sports they would be most interested in participating..and swimming and weight training were most frequently mentioned. This year s Sports & Fitness Participation Topline Report has overall participation figures for 119 sports in 14 different categories (fitness activities, equipment exercise, team sports, racquet sports, outdoor activities, fishing, winter sports, personal contact sports, indoor sports, wheeled sports, hunting, shooting sports, water sports, and other sports/activities). Copies of the Sports & Fitness Participation Topline Report (2011 edition) are available from This year s study has been done as a joint effort of The Physical Activity Council, a collaboration of sports associations that have been doing participation research separately for a number of years: Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association, Tennis Industry Association, National Golf Foundation, IHRSA, Snowsports Industries America, The Outdoor Foundation, and the United States Tennis Association. 9/7/2011

77 The SGMA Survey Says Social Networking Has Significant Impact on Sports Participation Page 3 of 3 The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA), the #1 source for sport and fitness research, is the leading global trade association of manufacturers, retailers, and marketers in the sports products industry. SGMA helps lead the sports and fitness industries by fostering participation through research, thought leadership, product promotion, and public policy. More information about SGMA membership and SGMA's National Health Through Fitness Day can be found at 9/7/2011

78 Appendix B Public Input Documentation Mason County Recreation Plan:

79 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 1. How many times have you or your family used a Mason County park in the past year?

80 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 2. Which of the following Mason County parks have you visited in the past year? (Check all that apply.)

81 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 3. Please indicate if you have camped in any of the following Mason County Parks during the past year.

82 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 4. Why do you and/or your family visit Mason County parks? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify): See following sheets.

83 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 5. Have you ever used the Big Sauble River property as a boat or kayak launch?

84 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 6. If the Big Sauble River property was improved to enhance water access, would you visit this park more often? 7. Do you have any specific ideas or suggestions for improving the Big Sauble River property See following sheets.

85 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 8. Have you ever used any of the 3 disc golf courses located at the Mason County Picnic Area?

86 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 9. How many times in the past year have you used one of the disc golf courses located at the Mason County Picnic Area? 10. Do you have any specific ideas or suggestions for improving the disc golf courses? See following sheets.

87 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 11. What additional facilities/amenities would you like to see added to Mason County parks and recreational areas? (Check all that apply.)

88 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 12. Please evaluate the following aspects of Mason County parks and recreational areas.

89 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 13. I have participated in the following recreational activities in Mason County in the past year: (check all that apply)

90 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 14. Please rate the quality of the following existing recreational features in Mason County:

91 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 15. If there is a person with a disability in your family, please indicate which of the following would make the Mason County parks more user-friendly for you and your family member. (Check all that apply). 16. What do you like best about Mason County parks and recreational areas? See following sheets. 17. What is one thing you would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas? See following sheets.

92 MASON COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2012 INPUT SUMMARY (123 survey responses) 18. What statement best describes your role in Mason County? 19. How many people live in your household? See following sheets. 20. What is your age? See following sheets.

93 Mason County Parks and Recreation Survey 1. How many times have you or your family used a Mason County park in the past year? Response Percent Response Count Never 23.1% 28 1 time 19.0% times 38.0% times 5.0% 6 More than 10 times 14.9% 18 answered question 121 skipped question 2 2. Which of the following Mason County parks have you visited in the past year? (Check all that apply.) Response Percent Response Count Mason County Campground 43.4% 43 Mason County Picnic Aera 46.5% 46 Mason County Fairgrounds 73.7% 73 answered question 99 skipped question 24 1 of 26

94 3. Please indicate if you have camped in any of the following Mason County Parks during the past year. Response Percent Response Count Mason County Campground 87.1% 27 Mason County Fairgrounds 16.1% 5 answered question 31 skipped question Why do you and/or your family visit Mason County parks? (Check all that apply.) Response Percent Response Count Fitness and exercise (walking, hiking, bicycling) 42.0% 42 Particpate in/watch athletic events 17.0% 17 Casual/informal use (picnic, playground, take pictures) 48.0% 48 To enjoy nature 47.0% 47 To use the camping facilities 31.0% 31 Other (please specify): 25.0% 25 answered question 100 skipped question 23 2 of 26

95 5. Have you ever used the Big Sauble River property as a boat or kayak launch? Response Percent Response Count Yes 16.4% 19 No 83.6% 97 answered question 116 skipped question 7 6. If the Big Sauble River property was improved to enhance water access, would you visit this park more often? Response Percent Response Count Yes 45.0% 50 No 55.0% 61 answered question 111 skipped question Do you have any specifc ideas or suggestions for improving the Big Sauble River property? Response Count 18 answered question 18 skipped question of 26

96 8. Have you ever used any of the 3 disc golf courses located at the Mason County Picnic Area? Response Percent Response Count Yes 18.3% 21 No 81.7% 94 answered question 115 skipped question 8 9. How many times in the past year have you used one of the disc golf courses located at the Mason County Picnic Area? Response Percent Response Count % % % % % % 0 6 to 10 times 1.1% 1 More than 10 times 4.4% 4 answered question 91 skipped question 32 4 of 26

97 10. Do you have any specifc ideas or suggestions for improving the disc golf courses? Response Count 14 answered question 14 skipped question What additional facilities/amenities would you like to see added to Mason County parks and recreational areas? (Check all that apply.) Response Percent Response Count More Park Land 18.3% 19 Walking/Biking Paths 59.6% 62 Pavilions/Picnic Areas 24.0% 25 Beach Volleyball Courts 5.8% 6 Ball Diamonds 5.8% 6 Playgrounds 14.4% 15 Skate Park 1.0% 1 Basketball Courts 8.7% 9 Dog Park 26.0% 27 Drinking Fountains 21.2% 22 Restrooms 46.2% 48 Canoe/Kayak Rental 16.3% 17 Fish Cleaning Station 26.0% 27 Tennis Courts 5.8% 6 Cross Country Skiing/Snowshoeing Trails 26.9% 28 5 of 26

98 Cabin Rentals 13.5% 14 Other (please specify amenity and at which park): 18 answered question 104 skipped question Please evaluate the following aspects of Mason County parks and recreational areas. Very Good Good Neutral Poor Very Poor Don't know Response Count Variety of Facilities/Amenities 14.2% (16) 41.6% (47) 23.0% (26) 6.2% (7) 1.8% (2) 13.3% (15) 113 Maintenance and Appearance 26.3% (30) 41.2% (47) 18.4% (21) 1.8% (2) 0.0% (0) 12.3% (14) 114 Safety and Security 25.4% (29) 36.0% (41) 21.1% (24) 1.8% (2) 0.0% (0) 15.8% (18) 114 Quality/Friendliness of Staff 27.7% (31) 30.4% (34) 20.5% (23) 0.0% (0) 0.9% (1) 20.5% (23) 112 Water Accessibility (if applicable) 12.0% (13) 30.6% (33) 27.8% (30) 6.5% (7) 2.8% (3) 20.4% (22) 108 answered question 114 skipped question 9 6 of 26

99 13. I have participated in the following recreational activities in Mason County in the past year: (check all that apply) Response Percent Response Count Boating 56.8% 63 Rode an ORV (Off Road Vehicle) on a trail 18.0% 20 Rode a snowmobile on a trail 10.8% 12 Used a hiking or biking trail 66.7% 74 Canoed or kayaked on a Mason County river 38.7% 43 Fished on a Mason County river 27.9% 31 Fished on Lake Michigan or a Mason County inland lake 52.3% 58 Picnicked at a park or some other public land 57.7% 64 Camping at a public park 28.8% 32 Hunting 26.1% 29 Fall color tours 45.0% 50 Birding 18.9% 21 Festivals and special events 53.2% 59 Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing 20.7% 23 Other park uses (Sporting events, playgrounds, swimming, etc.) 45.0% 50 answered question 111 skipped question 12 7 of 26

100 14. Please rate the quality of the following existing recreational features in Mason County: Very Good Good OK/Average Poor Very Poor Don't Know Response Count ORV trails 1.9% (2) 7.8% (8) 12.6% (13) 8.7% (9) 6.8% (7) 62.1% (64) 103 Snowmobile trails 1.0% (1) 7.0% (7) 12.0% (12) 10.0% (10) 7.0% (7) 63.0% (63) 100 Hiking/biking paths 15.0% (16) 30.8% (33) 29.0% (31) 4.7% (5) 2.8% (3) 17.8% (19) 107 Canoe/kayak launches and access points 5.7% (6) 24.5% (26) 32.1% (34) 5.7% (6) 0.0% (0) 32.1% (34) 106 Fishing access 12.1% (13) 43.0% (46) 20.6% (22) 3.7% (4) 0.0% (0) 20.6% (22) 107 Public campgrounds 21.9% (23) 41.9% (44) 16.2% (17) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 20.0% (21) 105 Picnicking/Outdoor gathering spots 20.4% (21) 50.5% (52) 19.4% (20) 1.9% (2) 0.0% (0) 7.8% (8) 103 Lake Michigan swimming access 43.0% (46) 35.5% (38) 10.3% (11) 3.7% (4) 0.0% (0) 7.5% (8) 107 Inland lake and river swimming access 16.3% (17) 30.8% (32) 25.0% (26) 9.6% (10) 1.0% (1) 17.3% (18) 104 Hunting 12.4% (13) 30.5% (32) 13.3% (14) 1.9% (2) 1.0% (1) 41.0% (43) 105 Fall color tours 29.9% (32) 38.3% (41) 10.3% (11) 1.9% (2) 0.9% (1) 18.7% (20) 107 Birding 14.4% (15) 25.0% (26) 13.5% (14) 1.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 46.2% (48) 104 Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing 10.6% (11) 24.0% (25) 22.1% (23) 2.9% (3) 0.0% (0) 40.4% (42) 104 answered question 112 skipped question 11 8 of 26

101 15. If there is a person with a disability in your family, please indicate which of the following would make the Mason County parks more user-friendly for you and your family member. (Check all that apply). Response Percent Response Count No one with a disability in our family 81.9% 68 Flatter, easier grades 9.6% 8 Accessible playgrounds 6.0% 5 Accessibile parking 10.8% 9 Accessible waterfront access 14.5% 12 Accessible restrooms 13.3% 11 Paved trails 14.5% 12 answered question 83 skipped question What do you like best about Mason County parks and recreational areas? Response Count 43 answered question 43 skipped question 80 9 of 26

102 17. What is one thing you would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas? Response Count 48 answered question 48 skipped question What statement best describes your role in Mason County? Response Percent Response Count I live in Mason County 78.9% 86 My family owns a seasonal home Mason County 7.3% 8 I have visted Mason County 11.9% 13 None of the above 1.8% 2 answered question 109 skipped question How many people live in your household? Response Percent Response Count 1 9.0% % % 48 6 or more 0.0% 0 answered question 111 skipped question of 26

103 20. What is your age? Response Percent Response Count under % % % % % and older 12.6% 14 answered question 111 skipped question of 26

104 Page 1, Q4. Why do you and/or your family visit Mason County parks? (Check all that apply.) 1 Go to the Old Engine club events, Jul 21, :38 AM 2 Camping and salmon fishing!! Jul 19, :54 PM 3 Fishing Recreation Mainly Jul 19, :09 AM 4 Fishing Camp Jul 19, :03 AM 5 salman fishing Jul 19, :10 AM 6 fishing Jul 13, :55 AM 7 Events at the fairgrounds Jul 12, :03 PM 8 went to home show Jul 10, :35 PM 9 attend events held there Jul 9, :35 PM 10 fishing Jul 6, :35 PM 11 participate in horse shows Jul 3, :43 AM 12 To enjoy the gorgeous beach and lake Michigan Jul 2, :16 PM 13 Play Disc golf Jul 2, :16 AM 14 Fishing off of the beaten path, away from developed ramps, launches and access sites Jun 28, :33 PM 15 Salmon fishing Jun 28, :14 PM 16 West Michigan Fair Jun 28, :16 PM 17 to attend the fair Jun 27, :50 PM 18 Fair week Jun 27, :10 PM 19 school field trips Jun 27, :07 PM 20 very quiet and nice Jun 27, :17 AM 21 Fair-watch horse shows, etc. Jun 26, :21 PM 22 reunion Jun 26, :49 PM 23 The annual fair & we anticipate using camping areas now that we have a camper. Jun 26, :03 PM 24 Close to home. Jun 25, :16 PM 25 visit friends camping Jun 25, :14 PM 13 of 26

105 Page 1, Q7. Do you have any specifc ideas or suggestions for improving the Big Sauble River property? 1 Not at this time Jul 18, :29 AM 2 If very large industrial wind turbines were placed there, many more visitors would be attracted to that area and use this park more. 3 Improvements should be relatively rustic while ensuring the site is protected from erosion. Use of a portable toilet and minimally designed parking along with a walk down launch area should be adequate. Jul 10, :31 PM Jul 9, :07 AM 4 need small launch added...maybe small/better parking Jul 8, :45 AM 5 Keep it as natural as possible please. Jul 6, :35 PM 6 make more accessible for beginners Jul 3, :43 AM 7 no Jul 2, :07 PM 8 I think this area should be left as natural as possible. A picnic table or bench with a view of the river would be a nice addition. 2 instream fish structures could be placed in the river on this property to improve the habitat. Big Sable Watershed Restoration Committee is considering installation of instream habitat structures from Darr Rd to US-31 on the Big Sable. This would improve the quality of this area of the river. The problem with developing this site as a canoe/kayak area is the next public access site downstream is located in the Hamlin Marsh off of Nurnberg Rd. A very long float through a braided area of the river. Vehicle access to this site on the south side of the bridge is not very safe with the hill to the south and traffic speeds on the highway. Highway access from Sauble Drive on the north side of the bridge is safer but the north side of the bridge is not the preferred access to the river. I would favor little development of this area. Wayne Andersen, Chairman, Big Sable Watershed Restoration Committee Jun 29, :20 PM 9 no Jun 29, :29 AM 10 This site is one of the top brown-trout fishing spots in the county for a very short period of time because it is adjacent to excellent aquatic insect habitat. It would be criminal to make it more attractive to beer-swilling tubers and canoeists. The logjams downstream make it dangerous for all but the most experienced kayakers, which could be a liability issue. 11 Honestly, I didn't even know it existed until I received this survey. I'm new to kayaking and am looking for safe, accessible places for me to use. I'd like to know more about the county properties available for recreation. Thank you. Jun 28, :33 PM Jun 28, :47 PM 12 not sure haven't been there Jun 28, :44 AM 13 I was/am unaware of where it is and what it can be used for. Jun 27, :41 PM 14 parking & access improvements. Jun 26, :49 PM 15 No Jun 26, :50 PM 16 Several picnic tables, clean up tree debris snd keep area mowed. Jun 25, :38 PM 17 Create a gravel parking lot and a boat launch. Port-o-lets would be nice, and a Jun 25, :14 PM 15 of 26

106 Page 1, Q7. Do you have any specifc ideas or suggestions for improving the Big Sauble River property? picnic table for roadside use would complete the concept. 18 no Jun 25, :14 PM 16 of 26

107 Page 1, Q10. Do you have any specifc ideas or suggestions for improving the disc golf courses? 1 I observe good usage of the facility from passing by often. Jul 20, :56 AM 2 Great Now and is maintained nicely! Jul 19, :09 AM 3 n/a Jul 18, :29 AM 4 If very large industrial wind turbines were placed there, many more visitors would be attracted to that area and use this park more. Jul 10, :31 PM 5 My 4 children all enjoy disc golf and use all the area sites constantly. Jul 5, :14 PM 6 my grandson uses the disc golf courses and really enjoys them Jul 3, :43 AM 7 These are highly regarded courses in the disc golf world - I suggest continue to do some positive promotion of the facility. Jul 2, :29 AM 8 no Jun 29, :29 AM 9 I think the MDGO does an excellent job of maintaining the courses at their expense. I'm not sure the entire county should shoulder the burden of improvements. Jun 28, :33 PM 10 I've never played, so I don't have anything to add. Jun 28, :47 PM 11 offer an intro workshop for families. I have never played but think it looks like it would be a fun sport. Jun 27, :41 PM 12 No Jun 26, :50 PM 13 get rid of all the poison ivy. Advertise it more! Jun 26, :54 AM 14 no Jun 25, :14 PM 17 of 26

108 Page 1, Q11. What additional facilities/amenities would you like to see added to Mason County parks and recreational areas? (Check all that apply.) 1 NO dog parks! It is bad enough their poop is everywhere as it is. Jul 31, :14 PM 2 A fish cleaning station would be ideal. My friends and I spend 8-10 weekends during the summer. Camping, fishing and socailizing are what we go for. So claening staion would be incredible! Jul 19, :54 PM 3 snowmobile or orv trails Jul 10, :35 PM 4 More very large wind turbines for all to enjoy...not just Riverton & Summit residents. 5 Buy more park land and put wind turbines there so I don't have to have them in my backyard. Jul 10, :31 PM Jul 6, :43 PM 6 mason county campground fish cleaning station Jul 3, :32 PM 7 Mountain BIke Single Track Jul 2, :24 PM 8 I would like to see our county retain its rural character. No more pavement of any kind anywhere. Jun 28, :33 PM 9 restrooms at all Jun 28, :44 AM 10 BMX park at the fairgrounds Jun 27, :41 PM 11 benches Jun 27, :40 PM 12 Soccer fields Jun 26, :32 PM 13 bigger campsites for full hook-up at the Mason County Campground Jun 26, :21 PM 14 bmx park! Jun 26, :50 PM 15 A pool at the Mason County Campground. Jun 26, :49 AM 16 any additional areas that would assist the youth in our community Jun 26, :30 AM 17 sled dog trails all parks. Jun 25, :16 PM 18 Mason County Campground Jun 25, :14 PM 19 of 26

109 Page 3, Q16. What do you like best about Mason County parks and recreational areas? 1 the variety Jul 31, :17 PM 2 I haven't used most of them and am not sure where they are. Jul 26, :23 AM 3 We are so close to any of the parks Jul 21, :41 AM 4 Availability Jul 20, :59 AM 5 Quality staff, behaved campers, close to lake Michigan for fishing Jul 19, :01 PM 6 The people we meet their Jul 19, :44 PM 7 We love the staff at Mason County Campground. They go out of their way to be welcoming and provide for whatever is needed such as ice. Love the new cooler with sodas and waters available since there is no pop vending machine available. 8 Friendly Staff and quiet campground, well maintained but needs a fishing station bad since a large fraction of the quests are fisherman that repeat visits yearly to fish Lake Michigan! Jul 19, :57 PM Jul 19, :12 AM 9 friendly staft Jul 19, :13 AM 10 There are lots of options Jul 18, :31 AM 11 The rural, mostly undeveloped nature of the properties. Jul 17, :13 AM 12 Clean Jul 12, :13 PM 13 we go to the UP to ride snowmobiles and orvs. We can ride some at home but only if we go to Lake Co or Manistee Co. Doesn't keep our money at home. Jul 10, :37 PM 14 Natural landscape and good quality facilities at an economical price. Jul 9, :12 AM 15 Clean and well maintained. Jul 6, :44 PM 16 that they are quiet secluded and not overly modernized Jul 6, :39 PM 17 Accessibility Jul 6, :39 PM 18 Our family has vacationed in the area for over 50 years. We usually to the same things every year which we love. We have recently started to explore more of the Mason County parks and it's great to see the things that the parks have to offer. Jul 5, :48 AM 19 They have the potential to be some of the states best parks Jul 5, :15 AM 20 cleanliness, groomed, assessible Jul 3, :46 AM 21 nice people Jul 2, :09 PM 22 Low cost, easy access - great parks and facilities Jul 2, :31 AM 23 variety of park offerings Jun 29, :41 PM 21 of 26

110 Page 3, Q16. What do you like best about Mason County parks and recreational areas? 24 Their rural character. Jun 28, :36 PM 25 The staff Jun 28, :16 PM 26 Availability Jun 28, :56 PM 27 Clean and separated spaces in campground. Jun 27, :07 PM 28 They are in beautiful areas. Jun 27, :05 PM 29 Nature Jun 27, :16 PM 30 Close to home - Jun 27, :12 PM 31 Left more natural Jun 27, :35 PM 32 THE MANY DIFERENT OPTIONS AVAILABLE Jun 27, :17 PM 33 lots of parking and you can take the family there for a low cost family fun filled day Jun 27, :10 PM 34 cleanliness & friendly help. Jun 26, :02 PM 35 Girls Jun 26, :52 PM 36 easy access to water... unlike Holland MI which is much busier and a bottle neck to get to the water, Ludington has the advantage of being able to zip over to the water without parking issues or it taking an hour to get in/out... Jun 26, :11 PM 37 The improvement made to the Mason County Fairgounds. Jun 26, :52 AM 38 friendly staff at campground. Quiet and family friendly Jun 26, :57 AM 39 The natural beauty of the area Jun 25, :42 PM 40 nature Jun 25, :17 PM 41 Quick, local access. Close to home. Jun 25, :19 PM 42 Staff and natural settings Jun 25, :18 PM 43 cleanliness Jun 25, :17 PM 22 of 26

111 Page 3, Q17. What is one thing you would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas? 1 more space--some parks are much too busy. Jul 31, :17 PM 2 More publicity as to what is available. More safe bike trails in Mason County. Jul 26, :23 AM 3 Add more Jul 20, :59 AM 4 FISH CLEANING STATION!!!!! Air conditioning in bathrooms so after a shower you are not sweating from the 100% humidity. Then it wouldnt feel like you never took a shower! Jul 19, :01 PM 5 Need a place to clean fish in the campground Jul 19, :44 PM 6 add vending, although the size of the park may not be able to support this, so that is okay. Jul 19, :57 PM 7 Fish Cleaning Station! Jul 19, :12 AM 8 Fish Cleaning Station at Mason County Campground Jul 19, :05 AM 9 fish cleaning station Jul 19, :13 AM 10 Make better fish cleaning stations Jul 18, :31 AM 11 Contacting the campground and their staff is near impossible. I tried calling numerous times and only got an answering machine. When I left a message, it look 2-3 days to get a call back. I tried sending an , and basically got a response back (a day or two later) that said I needed to call the office. Even when we arrived at the campsite, no one was in the office. Luckily I knew what sites were reserved for us, so we were able to park and start unpacking while I tracked down a ranger to check in. It was also difficult to track someone down to purchase ice (thankfully the firewood was available on the honor system), and I was not able to take advantage of the new Wi-Fi because I was not able to ask anyone for the log in credentials to be able to access it. The website could also be more user-friendly. Nowhere did it mention check-in or check-out times. Also, being able to reserve a site online would make things a lot easier, and you wouldn't have to play phone-tag with the office. Jul 17, :55 PM 12 Some facilities could use updating. Jul 17, :13 AM 13 More paved walking/biking trails Jul 12, :13 PM 14 orv trails or snowmobile trails. to connect with lake, oceana and manistee counties. Jul 10, :37 PM 15 Invite developers to install very large industrial wind turbines. Jul 10, :34 PM 16 Trail development. Jul 9, :12 AM 17 More pavillions or shade shelters Jul 6, :44 PM 18 keeping them as natural and unobtrusive as possible whilst maintaining accessability Jul 6, :39 PM 19 Fish cleaning stations Jul 6, :39 PM 24 of 26

112 Page 3, Q17. What is one thing you would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas? 20 Keeping it as natural as possible but accessible. Jul 5, :48 AM 21 Expand park areas to accommodate more camping near Pere Marquette River south of Ludington. Very little $ is invested in the area that generates most of Mason County's tax dollars Work with the road commission to provide better road biking. Less chip seal and a bigger shoulder to ride on. Jul 5, :15 AM Jul 2, :26 PM 23 more camping Jul 2, :09 PM 24 promotion that they exist, where they are, what they offer Jul 2, :31 AM 25 I would encourage Mason County Parks to work with townships improving their parks. I would encourage Mason County Parks to consider helping Victory Township develop Victory Park on Upper Hamlin Lake. There are other township parks that could be improved. Jun 29, :25 PM 26 water accessibility Jun 29, :41 PM 27 Hide them from other people. Jun 28, :36 PM 28 As I'm a life-long resident, I'm saddened to know that there are so many county properties available that I wasn't aware of. I'm still not sure where the sites noted are or what activities are available at each. I'm going to have to do some investigtating. I think more needs to be done to get the word out to other residents and visitors that the county has recreation areas open for use and enjoyment. Jun 28, :53 PM 29 We could really use a skate park that allowed for bmx bike use. Jun 28, :21 PM 30 A fish cleaning station Jun 28, :16 PM 31 Let's have more of them. Jun 28, :56 PM 32 Bike accessibilty Jun 27, :07 PM 33 Better biking trails---especially along roads. Jun 27, :16 PM 34 Snowmobile Trails Jun 27, :54 PM 35 Add ORV & Snowmobile Trails - we have to send people to Lake and Manistee Counties Jun 27, :35 PM 36 SIGNAGE AND MAPS TO SITES Jun 27, :17 PM 37 improve the dirt hiking trails and broken planks along the way. Jun 27, :10 PM 38 expand them to accommodate more use by more people as funds become available. Jun 26, :02 PM 39 Allow bikes at the skatepark Jun 26, :52 PM 40 publish advantages... even as of now its hard to know what each area has in the Jun 26, :11 PM 25 of 26

113 Page 3, Q17. What is one thing you would do to improve Mason County parks and recreational areas? way of kids playground areas etc... pictures speak a thousand words, have many pics of each area on web instead of just 1 picture-leaving the viewer to guess if that is all there is. You could really better market the already great parks there are. 41 A pool at the Mason County Campgrounds. Jun 26, :52 AM 42 Increase the areas for youth activities in Mason County. The youth are the future for Mason County Jun 26, :43 AM 43 update Jun 26, :57 AM 44 Pock up additional land for future recreational sites Jun 25, :42 PM 45 let dogs be accepted Jun 25, :17 PM 46 Add more. Jun 25, :19 PM 47 updating existing facilities, rest rooms. Jun 25, :18 PM 48 open longer each year Jun 25, :17 PM 26 of 26

114 Appendix C Adoption Documentation Mason County Recreation Plan:

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126 Appendix D Post-Completion Self-Certification Report Mason County Recreation Plan:

127

128

129

130