AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PIERCE COUNTY AIRPORT-THUN FIELD (PLU)

Transcription

1 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PIERCE COUNTY AIRPORT-THUN FIELD (PLU) DECEMBER, 2017 DRAFT REPORT CHAPTER 1 (AIRPORT INVENTORY) DRAFT: FAA REVIEW The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (AIP Project Number ) as provided under Title 49 U.S.C., Section The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws.

2 CHAPTER 1 AIRPORT INVENTORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW (WORKING PAPER #1)

3 INTRODUCTION Overview An Airport Master Plan ( Plan ) is being prepared by Pierce County for the Pierce County Airport-Thun Field ( Airport or PLU ) to identify the 20-year facility improvements and funding resources. The Plan serves as a roadmap for documenting the orderly development of Airport infrastructure, equipment, and services. The formalization of the Plan brings projects, people, and funding resources together in a coordinated manner. The Plan allows Pierce County to satisfy federal grant assurances, and seek project funding eligible under the respective Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) airport aid programs. This Plan is funded by Pierce County, with federal and state grant participation. Plan Purpose The previous Plan was approved in 2000, which is now outdated per activity trends, and FAA design standards, and does not identify important developments envisioned by the County. This updated Plan assesses Airport improvements with respect to current user activity levels, facility conditions, community trends, and FAA design standards. The following are the Plan s strategic initiatives: Position the Airport to meet community growth; be responsive to community interests Accommodate existing and future aviation demands as envisioned by the County Align with Airport revenues and benefits, and County capital spending Meet FAA safety standards and grant assurances Master Plan Deliverables The Plan results in four primary products that are used to describe and illustrate the Airport s 20-year facility development needs. These documents provide the basis for justifying projects as identified by the County, Airport stakeholders, and members of the community. Plan Deliverable #1: Narrative Report Plan Deliverable #2: Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - official record drawings Plan Deliverable #3: FAA Airports GIS (AGIS) survey and mapping data Plan Deliverable #4: Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FAA and WSDOT programming Plan Focus The Plan has a focus to resolve key planning issues and provide project recommendations. The following items, as coordinated between the Airport and the FAA, are the major planning actions addressed as part of this Plan: Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 1

4 Airfield and Airspace o Runway length options o Runway width options o Taxiway system improvements meet FAA geometry standards o Airspace obstruction mitigation o Instrument approach procedure improvements FAA NextGen minimums Terminal and Landside o Facility disposition - Aircraft hangars - Aircraft apron parking / tie-downs - Aircraft fueling facilities - Auto access, parking, and circulation - Airport operations/admin building - Infrastructure and support facilities o West-side terminal facility layouts to encourage investment o East-side terminal facility feasibility and development options Land Use and Property o Determine on-airport aeronautical area and best land uses o Identify future Airport property interests Plan Coordination and Public Involvement The Plan structure actively encourages stakeholder and community involvement. The public outreach process engages the public with the intent of, We want to hear from you. The purpose is to build understanding of the Plan process, and establish realistic expectations for what will be accomplished. To bring about a more successful Plan, the County recognizes the need to be inclusive of broader community considerations, which builds a wider support for Plan recommendations and helps facilitate acceptance. Therefore, the public outreach includes meetings and status updates held at key milestones, using various informational materials for public announcement and review. The following are the key public coordination and participation efforts: Airport Stakeholders: The Plan involves coordination and input from multiple local governmental interests, organizations, and constituencies. These key stakeholders are directly engaged as part of the Plan: Pierce County Planning and Public Works, Airport & Ferry Division PLU Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Thun Field Advisory Commission (TFAC) Agencies FAA-Seattle Office and WSDOT-Aviation Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 2

5 Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC): The County assembled a technical advisory committee specifically for this Plan, comprising individuals with various aviation and community perspectives. This standing committee reviews interim materials, attends project meetings, comments on project findings, and encourages awareness and adoption of the Plan recommendations. The committee makes decisions regarding Plan considerations for official recommendation to the TFAC, per acceptance by Pierce County and review by the FAA and WSDOT. Agency Coordination (FAA and WSDOT): The Plan involves agency coordination primarily with the FAA and WSDOT-Aviation. The FAA is the lead agency for this Plan, involved with the review of Plan documentation and formal approval of the aviation forecasts and ALP drawings. This agency coordination facilitates dialogue as the Plan progresses, to allow communication of shared interests, and to mutually make key Plan decisions that require FAA and WSDOT input and future consideration. Public Involvement (Community): Public outreach serves as the opportunity for the public-atlarge to be informed about the Plan s progress and findings. Public meetings are held at key project milestones to interact with stakeholders and communicate ideas, which provides an understanding of public sentiment towards the Plan recommendations. Public outreach efforts include a dedicated master plan website portal, social media broadcasts, notifications, direct mail postcard notifications, civic event appearances, and monthly project status updates. AIRPORT INVENTORY SECTIONS The inventory documents information about the Airport facilities, services, and conditions that form the basis for recommendations made throughout the Plan. Project data was primarily collected from a review of Airport records, FAA published data, and stakeholder interviews. This information provides a baseline for establishing Airport activity and conditions. The Inventory Chapter contains the following sections: 1. Airport Characteristics 2. Airfield and Airspace Facilities 3. Terminal and Landside Facilities and Support Services 4. Climate and Wind Conditions 5. Airport and Vicinity Land Use and Operating Regulations 6. Regional and Airport Economic Patterns 7. Airport Economic and Financial Profile 8. Environmental Overview 9. Inventory Summary Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 3

6 1. AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS This section provides an understanding of the Airport s functional and operational characteristics. 1.1 Airport Location The Airport is in north-central Pierce County, situated 30 miles south of downtown Seattle, and six miles south of Puyallup, the Airport s associated city. The airfield is situated within the South Hill Community, a census dedicated place. Highway 161 (Meridian Avenue), the major north-south thoroughfare in the South Hill area, is the primary Airport access route. 1.2 Airport Governance The Airport is a publicly owned facility operated by Pierce County, the governmental entity responsible for administering and financially supporting the Airport in accordance with FAA and WSDOT grant assurances. Pierce County operates under a council form of government (seven-member district), with the County Executive Office providing administrative oversight of County departments. The Pierce County Planning and Public Works Department, Airport and Ferry Division, provides staff for airport administration and day-to-day operations. The Airport TFAC is an eight-member advisory commission, appointed by the Pierce County Executive and confirmed by the County Council. The TFAC provides formal advice to Pierce County regarding Airport property matters within two miles of Airport, including planning recommendations from the MPAC. Exhibit 1.1 depicts the Airport s organizational structure. EXHIBIT 1.1: AIRPORT GOVERNANCE AND MASTER PLAN COORDINATION Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 4

7 1.3 Airport Roles and Classification Table 1.1 lists the defining Airport general aviation service and classification attributes. The airfield is designed to accommodate small piston- and turbine-powered aircraft. TABLE 1.1: AIRPORT SERVICE ROLE AND CLASSIFICATIONS AIRPORT ROLE AND CLASSIFICATIONS Airport Attributes Description Airport Owner Pierce County, Washington FAA Airport Classification General Aviation Regional (FAA NPIAS/Asset Report ) FAA Airport/Runway Reference Code Critical/Demanding Aircraft WSDOT Airport Category Airport Traffic Control Tower Airport Property Runway Type Weather Station Communications ARC/RDC: B-II King Air Model (Twin Turboprop) General Aviation Regional (FAA NPIAS/Asset Report) None 240± Acres (Total Fee Ownership) Non-Precision GPS RNAV (LPV) Automated Weather Observation Service (AWOS-3) Approach/Departure Control (Seattle Center ARTCC) Seattle Flight Service Station (FSS) Note: See Appendix for List of Acronyms. Note: FAA ARC/RDC classification from 2000 PLU Master Plan/ALP. Sources: FAA Publications and Airport Records Obtained September Airport Aviation Activity Table 1.2 summarizes aircraft operational activity by aircraft types, user categories, and runway end. The Airport is, on average, the sixth busiest general aviation airport in the State of Washington. Aircraft Operation: The number of aircraft takeoffs and landings, classified as local for aircraft operating from the same airport and itinerant for aircraft operating to or from a different airport. Airport activity totals 106,300 annual aircraft operations and 260 based aircraft. Runway 17 (north end) experiences about 40 percent of the traffic and Runway 35 (south end) about 60 percent. Itinerant aircraft operations account for nearly 61 percent of the Based Aircraft: Aircraft stored in hangars or on tie-downs as part of a rental or lease agreement; excludes temporary visiting aircraft or aircraft registered at another airport. traffic, and local flight pattern operations about 39 percent. The peak-month activity typically occurs during June, July, and August, with daytime operations constituting 96 percent of the traffic. Nearly 99.0 percent of the traffic is conducted by piston-engine aircraft, 0.5 percent by turbine-engine aircraft, and 0.5 percent by helicopters. Flight training activities total approximately 70,000 annual operations, with 20 to 40 percent being touch and go operations. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 5

8 TABLE 1.2: AIRPORT ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2017) RUNWAY UTILIZATION - AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS Runway Utilization Operations % Operations Runway 17 Runway 35 Aircraft Operations - Airport Total (%) 106, % 40% 60% Aircraft Operations - Runway End ,520 63,780 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS BY TYPE AND RUNWAY END USE Operation Type 106, % Runway 17 Runway 35 Itinerant Operations 65,240 61% 26,090 39,140 Recreational-Sport 16,150 15% 6,460 9,690 FBO/SASO Business 8,400 8% 3,360 5,040 Flight Training 38,910 37% 15,560 23,350 Sherriff Department 1,200 1% Medical 580 1% Military 0 0% 0 0 Local Operations 41,060 39% 16,430 24,640 Recreational-Sport-Business 7,880 7% 3,150 4,730 Flight Training 33,180 31% 13,270 19,910 Military 0 0% 0 0 Fleet Mix Operations-Aircraft Type 106, % 42,520 63,770 Single Piston 103, % 41,410 62,120 Twin Piston 1, % Turboprop % Small-Cabin Business Jet % Helicopter % Fleet Mix Operations-FAA Category 106, % 42,520 63,780 AAC Total 106, % 42,520 63,780 AAC A 104, % 41,670 62,500 AAC B 1, % Helicopter % ADG Total 106, % 42,520 63,780 ADG I 104, % 41,920 62,890 ADG II % Helicopter % Note: Totals subject to rounding. Source: PLU Traffic Count (April, 2016 to November, 2017), Tenant Interviews, FAA TAF Obtained January, Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 6

9 2. AIRFIELD AND AIRSPACE FACILITIES This section summarizes Airport assets to quantify existing facilities and infrastructure condition, and to note operational deficiencies. Table 1.3 describes the major runway features. The airfield facilities include the runway, taxiway, and navigational aid systems that directly support aeronautical activities. Exhibit 1.2 illustrates the airfield layout, a single runway configuration with the terminal area and roadway entrance located on the west side of the airfield. Table 1.4 describes the taxiway features. TABLE 1.3: RUNWAY SYSTEM Facility Component FAA Runway Design Code (RDC) RUNWAY SYSTEM Runway 17/35 Runway End 17 Runway End 35 FAA Taxiway Design Group (TDG) Group 1A to 2 Critical Design Aircraft Design Aircraft B-II Twin-Turboprop Beechcraft King Air Series Runway Length x Width 3,650 x 60 Runway Type Runway Paved Shoulder Width Primary Not Installed Runway Blast Pad Not Installed Not Installed Runway Displaced Threshold Not Applicable Not Applicable Runway Stopway Not Applicable Not Applicable Land & Hold Short (LASHO) Not Applicable In-Line Taxiway Not Applicable Not Applicable Pavement Surface Course Pavement Markings Asphalt (Not Grooved) Basic Distance-to-Go Markers Not Installed Not Installed Pavement Strength Pounds Runway Edge Lights 12,500 (Single Wheel Gear-SWG) MIRL (Medium Intensity) Runway Lighting Systems PAPI-4L, REIL PAPI-4L, REIL Runway Type Visual Approach Vertical Guidance Instrument Approach Navigation None GPS (RNAV-LPV) Runway Visibility Range (RVR) Not Installed Not Installed Approach Minimums (Lowest) None RUNWAY NAVIGATIONAL AID SYSTEMS 1-⅛ Mile 339 Feet NAVAID Systems (On-Airport) GPS (RNAV) Note: See Appendix for definitions and acronyms Source: FAA Form , FAA AVN Database (Obtained October 2017). Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 7

10 EXHIBIT 1.2: AIRPORT DIAGRAM Source: Google Aerial (Obtained September 2017). Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 8

11 TABLE 1.4: TAXIWAY SYSTEM Taxiway Segment TAXIWAY SYSTEM TWY A TWY A (North Entry) TWY A (South Entry) Type Parallel Entrance Entrance Dimension (Length x Width) 3,650 x x x 35 Taxiway Design Group (TDG) Paved/Stabilized Shoulder Width None None None Pavement Surface Course Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Edge Lighting Reflectors Reflectors Reflectors Pavement Strength (Gear Type) 12,500 (SWG) 12,500 (SWG) 12,500 (SWG) Runway-Taxiway CL Separation Hold Short Separation Taxiway Signs Yes Yes Yes Taxiway Segment TWY B TWY C TWY D Type Exit/Connector Exit/Connector Exit/Connector Dimension (Length x Width) 240 x x x 35 Taxiway Design Group (TDG) Paved/Stabilized Shoulder Width None None None Pavement Surface Course Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Edge Lighting Reflectors Reflectors Reflectors Pavement Strength (Gear Type) 12,500 (SWG) 12,500 (SWG) 12,500 (SWG) Hold Short Separation Taxiway Signs Yes Yes Yes Note: See Appendix for definitions and acronyms 2.1 Airfield Pavement Conditions Exhibit 1.3 depicts the airfield pavement conditions and rated values. Pavement maintenance represents one of the largest airport capital investments and is monitored using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), a standard system for visual analysis of surface distresses. The following summarizes aviation pavement areas: Airport pavement = 956,700 square feet (22 acres) o Runway and Parallel Taxiway = 450,000 square feet (10 acres) o Aircraft Apron and Hangar Taxilanes = 506,700 square feet (12 acres) The PCI, conducted by WSDOT about every five years, assesses usable runway, taxiway, and apron pavement and rates them in numerical terms, ranging from 100 (excellent) to 0 (failed), and indexed by color-code to correspond with the types of pavement repairs anticipated. In total, 19 percent of pavement areas are rated as preventative maintenance, 27 percent major rehabilitation, and 54 percent reconstruction. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 9

12 EXHIBIT 1.3: AIRFIELD PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) Source: WSDOT Aviation, Airport Pavement Management Database (2012) 2.2 Airspace System Airspace Navigation Structure Exhibit 1.4 depicts the surrounding airspace system, including airways, navigational aids, and surrounding airports. The Airport is under the Seattle air route traffic control center jurisdiction, and the Seattle flight service station (FSS) center. The Class B airspace shelf associated with the Seattle- Tacoma International Airport (SEA) extends over the Airport, down to 4,000 feet towards the north and 5,000 feet towards the south. Aircraft operating in the Class B airspace require communication with Seattle approach/departure control. The Airport is subject to the 30-nautical mile Mode C veil associated with Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, which requires all aircraft to be equipped with an altitude encoding transponder for radar identification purposes. The Airport local traffic pattern is below the Class B airspace and beyond the McChord AFB Class D control zone. Airport Traffic Patterns An airport traffic pattern is the standard path aircraft utilize when taking off or landing while maintaining visual contact with the Airport. The visual traffic pattern at the Airport is standard left-hand arrivals to Runways 17 and 35. The FAA 5010 Form publishes Noise Sensitive All Quadrants, with surrounding Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 10

13 noise sensitive areas mapped by the County (Ordinance s2, page 12). Ultralight use of the airfield is prohibited. EXHIBIT 1.4: AERONAUTICAL/AIRSPACE CHART Source: VFRMap.com Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 11

14 2.3 Instrument Procedures Table 1.5 identifies instrument approach procedures by navigational equipment type, allowable aircraft approach categories, and lowest approach minimums. The Airport has one instrument approach procedure, which involves varying minimums depending on aircraft equipment and landing direction. Runway 17 is a visual approach, not established with an instrument approach procedure from the north, as a factor of Class B airspace altitudes and alignment with SEA arrival and departure routes. Visual: No instrument approach procedures. Non-Precision: Horizontal runway approach guidance only. Minimums: The lowest visibility or descent altitude. TABLE 1.5: INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Runway End None Procedure Type RUNWAY INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES Procedure Aircraft Approach Categories Minimum Descent Altitude (Feet AGL) Visibility Minimums (Statute Mile) LPV Non-Precision 339' 1-⅛ Mile RNAV LNAV/VNAV 452' 1-½ Mile Approach LNAV MDA A and B Vertical 1,000' 1-Mile Guidance Circling (APV) 1,080' 1 Mile RNAV (GPS): Area Navigation (Required Navigation Performance) LNAV: Provides Lateral Navigation VLNAV: Provides Vertical Navigation LPV: Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance AGL: Above Ground Level Source: FAA Terminal Procedures Publication, September TERMINAL AND LANDSIDE FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES The terminal area, located on the west-side of the airfield, contains facilities to serve pilot and aircraft. These facilities include buildings, hangars, aircraft parking, fuel, support structures, and vehicular parking. The terminal occupies 50 acres, of which 23 acres is occupied by aircraft hangar storage. Nearly 90 percent of terminal area property is built-upon or occupied. Exhibit 1.5 is a summary of the terminal structures, cataloged by County building number. There are 43 building structures totaling 325,800 square feet, owned by a combination of the County, private business, and community-condo associations. The County-owned buildings and hangars, some of which were built in the early 1960s, are primarily rented, under which the County assumes maintenance responsibility. The private owners lease Airport land, and are responsible for building maintenance. The east-side area provides aircraft and vehicle access to the Clover Park College flight school complex. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 12

15 EXHIBIT 1.5: TERMINAL AREA BUILDING/STRUCTURE LOCATIONS Sources: 2014 PLU County Building Map Revised Per September, 2017 Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 13

16 3.1 General Aviation Terminal Area Facilities and Services Terminal area buildings and facilities are occupied under lease and rent by aircraft business operators and private entities. The Airport businesses, which offer commercial aeronautical services, include Fixed Base Operators (FBO) and various Special Aviation Service Operators (SASO). The tenant services are oriented towards small Fixed Base Operator (FBO): Provides pilot and aircraft aeronautical support services. Specialized Aviation Service Operators (SASO): Provides unique, or single-service aviation support or provisions. piston- and turbine-engine aircraft, and are offered to support general aviation aircraft and pilots, patrons, government services, and the public. Aircraft line services are provided by the FBO tenants, with professionally certified staff and equipment. These general aviation services are offered under the current FBO arrangement: FBO Services o Aircraft fuel and oil sales o Aircraft parking, tie-down o Aircraft temporary hangar storage as available o Aircraft major and minor maintenance repair (airframe and engine powerplant) o Aircraft avionics station (parts, repair, installation) o Flight training, ground school (FAA Part 91 and Part 141) o Aircraft rental o Aircraft brokerage o Aircraft passenger charter o Aircraft parts and equipment sales o Pilot supplies o Courtesy car (provided by FBOs) SASO/Other Services o Aircraft hangar storage o Aircraft parts and refurbishment o Airport restaurant o Support for medical flights (fixed-wing and helicopter: not based at Airport) General Aviation Aircraft Parking Aprons Combined, the two main, public-use general aviation aprons total 360,000 square feet and provide 94 marked tie-down/parking positions to accommodate small, fixed-wing piston aircraft. There are no dedicated aircraft parking positions for large turbine aircraft or helicopters. Aircraft parking aprons are described below in Table 1.6. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 14

17 TABLE 1.6: AIRCRAFT APRONS (PUBLIC USE) APRON AREAS (PUBLIC ACCESS) Apron Area (Designation) Apron Function Apron Dimension (SF) Surface Parking Spaces (Marked/Tie-Downs) Main Apron (Apron-AP1) Temporary Transient Parking, Fuel Parking, FBO/SASO Transient and Flight Training Parking, Terminal Access 400' x 500' 200,000 SF Asphalt 32 Spaces (Small Piston Aircraft) Main Tie-Down (Apron-AP2) Parking Long-Term, Parking FBO/SASO 400' x 400' 160,000 SF Asphalt 72 Spaces (Small Piston Aircraft) (Typ. 30% to 50% Full) TOTAL , Source: Airport Site Inspection and Aerial Image (Obtained September/October 2017). 104 Parking Positions (Small Piston Aircraft) General Aviation Aircraft Hangars Table 1.7 lists the Airport hangars by type and aircraft stored. The hangar types include T-hangars, box hangars, and common hangars, used for individual aircraft storage, business use, and commercial aircraft maintenance/repair. The hangars are owned and operated by the County and under lease by private entities. The hangar waiting list typically totals between 15 and 25 planes, mostly single-engine piston aircraft. TABLE 1.7: AIRCRAFT HANGAR STORAGE Hangar Type Building Units HANGAR STORAGE Hangar Size (SF) Percent Hangar Allocation Stored Aircraft Percent Stored Aircraft T-Hangar ,300 74% % Box Hangar 3 20,250 7% 9 4% FBO/SASO 9 56,650 19% 4 2% TOTAL , % % Note: Hangar size includes entire building dimensional footprint. Note: Hangar size estimated from aerial mapping. Source: Airport Records and Aerial Mapping (Obtained September 2017). General Aviation Aircraft Fuel Storage/Dispensing Table 1.8 summarizes the aircraft fuel storage facilities, dispensing, and volumes. The total nonproprietary bulk fuel storage capacity is 20,000 gallons. The 100LL Avgas is dispensed from a pump station on the apron. Jet-A fuel has historically not been provided. The peak fuel sale months are June and July. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 15

18 TABLE 1.8: AIRCRAFT FUEL STORAGE FUEL SYSTEMS Storage and Dispensing Storage Type Lessee/Owner Facilities Fuel Storage Tanks SIM Flight Center (Non-proprietary) Community College (Proprietary) (2) 10,000 Gallon Tanks (100LL) Type/Location: Underground; Main Apron Dispensing: Aircraft Self-Serve (1) 2,500 Gallon Tanks (100LL) Type/Location: Aboveground; College Apron Annual Fuel Volume Sales (Airport Average Total) 100LL 22,500 Gallons (Airport Total) Jet-A Jet-A Fuel Not Provided Source: Airport Staff Records (Obtained September/October 2017). General Aviation Vehicle Circulation and Public Auto Parking The Airport auto access is east off Meridian Avenue, at the intersection of 168 th Street E, along 1,000 linear feet of entrance roadway leading to the west-side terminal area. The public paved parking lots total 125 marked parking spaces, with additional secured vehicle parking available adjacent to the hangars and buildings located beyond the gated-fenced operations area. The Fixed Base Operators occupy approximately 55 parking positions. Non-paved areas are used for overflow parking. 3.2 Airport Support Facilities and Utilities Airport Maintenance/Equipment Storage The Airport has an 875-square-foot equipment storage building, which houses airfield equipment and supplies. Airport Utilities Table 1.9 summarizes the on-airport utilities in terms of the types, location, and capacities. The table also recognizes service deficiencies and potential improvements. Pierce County, through adoption of County-Wide Planning Policies 35-42, has implemented policies designed to promote the contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services. These policies are designed to govern the vision, design, transportation, parking/circulation, and implementation strategies for manufacturing centers. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 16

19 TABLE 1.9: AIRPORT UTILITIES\ Utility Electric Power Water Sanitary Sewer Gas Stormwater Systems Solid Waste Removal Communications (Telephone) Communications (Data) Service Provider Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Firgrove Mutual Pierce County Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Pierce County Murrey's Disposal CenturyLink UTILITIES System/Capacities/Remarks Power lines are underground on the south end of the field. The central and populated north end have above-ground lines. 12-inch main line connects just south of Building (or Thun Office Buidling). Main connects to the former well building with galvanized pipe leading to Building and Spanaflight. Restaurant and newer buildings connect directly to main. Oneinch line goes across entry parking lot to maintenance shop and CAP building. 8-inch line tees off main to serve buildings to the north of entrance. 8-inch PVC Gravity sewer line runs from Meridian to the Airport office, restaurant and adjacent buildings. 6-inch line connects builds north of Building A separate 8-inch line connects from Meridian to residential development east of the Airport. Four airport buildings to the far southwest connect to this line. Gas service lines are underground and serve some buildings at the airport. Gas meters are throughout the airport main entrance. No stormwater detention or retention facilities. On-field are numerous catchbasins and drainage swales. Stormwater facilities are directly tied to filtration systems on site. Solid waste disposal pickup is once a week at Airport businesses and dumpsters. Phone lines with DSL are available to airport businesses. None Source: County Airport Staff Information and 2009 PLU Airport Landside Study Appendix B. Condition/ Deficiencies Galvanized pipe sections coming off former well connection. Now connected to water main - serving Building and Spanaflight - will need to be replaced. Two drywells adjacent to former Thun home and Spanaflight would likely be replaced by infiltration trenches when the parking lot is repaved. Airport does not have fiber-optic connectivity for high-speed data. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 17

20 Airport Energy Supply and Natural Resources As part of the Pierce County Sustainability 2020 program, the County has set the goal of reducing energy use in County-owned buildings by 30 percent based on 2009 levels. The Public Works Department is responsible for inputting Airport utility information into the Pierce County Energy Star Portfolio Manager Account. The County sustainability workplan is to implement cost-effective building system upgrades and integrate energy efficiency improvements into all applicable capital improvement projects. 4. CLIMATE AND WIND CONDITIONS Climatic Conditions Meteorological conditions impact aircraft performance and influence aviation activities, largely by winds, temperature, cloud conditions, and precipitation types. Table 1.10 summarizes the climatic weather characteristics for the Airport region. It is estimated the Airport is closed approximately 7 percent of the time due to weather conditions (visibility or ceiling) below the instrument approach minimums, with most instances of weather-related airport closure occurring during the night and early morning hours. TABLE 1.10: CLIMATIC/METEOROLOGICAL SUMMARY CLIMATE SUMMARY Climate Event Climate Description Value Annual Mean 51 F Annual Monthly Mean Maximum 60 F Temperature Annual Monthly Mean Minimum 42 F Mean Month Maximum (Month) 75 F Hottest Month (Extreme) 100 F July Average Annual Days with Precipitation 156 Days Average Annual Mean Rainfall Total 40.0" Precipitation Mean Maximum Monthly Precipitation 12.37" Annual Days More Than.01" 156 Snowfall Average Annual Mean Total 9.4" Snowfall Mean Maximum Month 30" (January) Visual Flight Rule (VFR) Conditions 82% (295 Days) Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) Conditions 18% (70 Days) Sky Conditions Low Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) Conditions 1,000'/2 7% (26 Days) Days with Fog 164 Days Days with Thunderstorms 12 Days Winds Prevailing Wind Direction (From) 170 to 200 Degrees Average Prevailing Wind Direction (From) South Source: NOAA Climatic Meteorological Data, NOAA Website Data, Obtained September Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 18

21 Wind Patterns and Crosswind Conditions Wind patterns are important for assessing runway utilization, traffic levels and operational utility during various weather conditions. Prevailing winds influence runway takeoff and landing usage, proportionally impacting smaller-lighter aircraft. The runway alignment should be oriented with the prevailing winds to minimize crosswinds. Crosswind coverage, expressed as a percent of time, is the speed and direction of the wind blowing relative to the runway alignment. The FAA s desirable crosswind coverage is 95 percent, meaning an aircraft should be able to land and takeoff on a runway more than 95 percent of the time without exceeding the aircraft s crosswind component. The applicable crosswind threshold coverage is determined by FAA aircraft classification: 10.5 knots for ARC A-I and B-I aircraft, and 13 knots for ARC A-II and B-II, and 16 knots for ARC A-III, B-III (Runway is a B-II classification). Exhibit 1-6 graphs the all-weather wind observations, with the strongest winds occurring as peaks. The prevailing all-weather winds are from the southwest and the northwest, with the peak-gusty winds from the southwest. Annually, calm winds (0-3 knots) occur 78 percent of the time, and light winds (0-11 knots) occur 85 percent of the time. Gusty winds (greater than 16 knots) occur less than 1 percent of the time. EXHIBIT 1.6: WIND DIAGRAMS (ALL WEATHER AND INSTRUMENT) Source: FAA AGIS Site, PLU Airport Wind Observations (AWOS: 2013, 2014 and 2015 Only Years Available) Data Obtained September Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 19

22 Table 1-11 summarizes the percent crosswind coverage for Runway 17/35, as broken-down for the 10.5-, 13-, 16-, and 20-knot components during all-weather weather conditions. Runway 17/35 attains 99.7 percent at 10.5 knots during all-weather conditions. Runway 17/35 achieves sufficient wind coverage without consideration for a crosswind runway. TABLE 1.11: CROSSWIND WIND COVERAGE Runway and Crosswind Component CROSSWIND COVERAGE ANALYSIS 10.5-Knots 13-Knots 16-Knots 20-Knots Single/Twin Piston Small Jets & Turboprops Large Jets & Turboprop Large Jet Transports All Weather - Runway % 99.87% 99.99% % Instrument (IFR) - Runway % 99.89% % % Visual (VFR) - Runway % 99.85% 99.99% % Note: FAA AGIS wind data file available for years 2013, 2014, Note: Crosswind component computed using true runway bearing (180.6 degrees). Note: Crosswind component computed using FAA wind rose calculation program. All weather conditions: period of record: 2013 to 2015 with 50,051 observations IFR conditions: period of record: 2013 to 2015 with 3,097 observations VFR conditions: period of record: 2013 to 2015 with 24,967 observations Source: FAA AGIS Wind Data Observations (Obtained September 2017) 5. AIRPORT AND VICINITY LAND USE AND OPERATING REGULATIONS The Airport has an area of influence extending beyond airfield property ownership interests. Therefore, Airport land use compatibility is regulated through comprehensive planning and zoning ordinances adopted by Pierce County and surrounding communities to control property development consistent with aviation facilities and operations. These regulations govern the height of structures, runway safety zones, and noise areas for protecting public safety and to regulate compatible development. 5.1 Pierce County Adopted The following County land use ordinances pertain to the Airport: Ordinance (June 2016): Adopts the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan, which establishes the Airport Overlay Small Airports Designation for the Pierce County-Thun Field Airport (Ordinance 18A.60), as consistent with the Revised Code of Washington (RCW ). The Pierce County Comprehensive Plan, originally adopted in November 1994, is a policy document which guides growth and future land use decisions in Pierce County. The Plan was developed to address growth over a 20- year period. The most recent Growth Management Act update to the Comprehensive Plan was adopted June 30, 2015, and became effective June 30, Ordinance s: Combine the Planning and Land Services and the Public Works Departments into a single department to be named "Planning and Public Works." Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 20

23 5.2 South Hill Community The following South Hill land use ordinances pertain to the Airport: Ordinance s, Adopted Effective 6/16/2003 (in process of update): South Hill Community Plan (SHCP). The Airport is within the South Hill Community and within the planning jurisdiction of the SHCP. The SHCP, which is part of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan, is a more detailed sense of future community growth and development. The SHCP has adopted the Pierce County Airport Overlay Zone to utilize airport overlays to protect the public s health, safety, and welfare and to address incompatible uses with airport operations. The SHCP designates land uses adjacent to the Airport that are compatible with aviation activity and complement the SHCP goals. As stated, residential and commercial development shall not impact airport operations or the safety of citizens, and the surrounding Employment Center industrial activities shall not impact the safety of airport operations. Land uses around the Airport should not concentrate people or buildings in the airport's safety zones or under the flight path for take-offs and landings at the Airport. 5.3 Pierce County Airport Adopted The following are Airport land use and operating related ordinances: Pierce County Code (PPC Chapter 18A.60): Establishes an Airport Overlay Zone (AOZ) for the Pierce County-Thun Field Airport to minimize land use incompatibility with regards to 1) height, 2) safety zones, and 3) noise. The AOZ establishes property performance and intensity criteria for providing special zoning considerations based on unique airport characteristics of the land, environment, or economy. The purpose of the Airport Overlay is to minimize land use incompatibilities for Pierce County Airport/Thun Field. Exhibit 1.7 displays the map for the Airport Overlay extents. Provisions of this Section address reduction of incompatibilities with these airports through performance standards, building coverages, limitations on the number of persons on site at any one time, limitations on allowed uses and/or construction of buildings with noise attenuation features, depending upon the situation. Ordinance s2 / : Creating a new Chapter 2.46 of the Pierce County Code, Pierce County Airport/Thun Field Advisory Commission, as amended by Ordinance Ordinance No s2: Created the PLU Airport Rules and Regulations (AR&R): Pierce County regulatory ordinance No s was adopted in 2014, including Airport Rules and Regulations (AR&R) to regulate the conduct of airport users at Pierce County Airport and Tacoma Narrows Airport. The Airport Rules and Regulations are designed to protect the public health, safety, interest, and welfare on both Pierce County Airport-Thun Field and the Tacoma Narrows Airport and to restrict (or prevent) any activity or action that would interfere with the safe, orderly, and efficient use of the Airport by its operators, lessees, consumers, and users. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 21

24 EXHIBIT 1.7: PLU AIRPORT OVERLAY ORDINANCE HEIGHT AND SAFETY ZONES Source: Pierce County Ordinance 18A , Dated October 02, Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 22

25 Ordinance No S (April 2000): repealed the existing Chapter 5.40 PCC, "Commercial Use of Pierce County Airport" and adopted the new Chapter 5.40 PCC, "Usage Standards for the Pierce County Airport - Thun Field," and adopted new Rules and Regulations for the Pierce County Airport - Thun Field. 5.4 Surrounding Airport Land Use Exhibit 1.8 shows the current zoning designations near the Airport. The Airport is within the comprehensive urban growth area boundary of Pierce County, with the airfield located approximately 2.5 miles south of the corporate limits of the City of Puyallup. The South Hill area, including the Airport, was initially developed due to the scenic, relatively flat wooded areas having favorable drainage. The unincorporated area comprises mixed land uses, subject to zoning by Pierce County. The Airport has been zoned as an Employment Center. Other designated land use adjacent to the Employment Center include Rural 5 and 20 (MUD) to the north; moderate density, single-family and Rural 20 to the east; mineral resource overlay to the south; and employment-based planned community to the west. Airport Zoning - Employment Center (EC) Pierce County and the South Hill Community have zoned the Airport and adjacent area as an Employment Center (adopted March 25, 1997). The Employment Center designation is the same as within the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan, although the allowed uses are restricted to recognize the need for compatibility with the Airport. The Employment Center, which totals 963 acres, provides land for industrial, manufacturing, and office jobs. Commercial uses that are supportive of employment growth are permitted. The Employment Center is designed to encourage high-wage, light to heavy manufacturing/support industries, because historically, Pierce County has not attracted large-scale manufacturing employment industries. Industrial land, although becoming increasingly scarce, is available for commercial and industrial development in the Airport vicinity. Future Incorporated Areas - South Hill Community The South Hill Community continues to experience a high rate of population increase, as evidence of residential densities and commercial property conversion. Moderate Density Single-Family (MSF) is the dominant land use designation for South Hill, which coincides with the same Pierce County designation for single- or two-family dwellings. The MSF designation allows two to six dwelling units per acre. The large-scale residential developments in the Airport vicinity are Sunrise to the east, Gem Heights to the west, and Rainier Vista/Silver Creek to the west, with over 5,500 combined single-family houses. Multi-family housing (three units and above), commercial, and industrial uses are prohibited within MSF. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 23

26 EXHIBIT 1.8: COUNTY ZONING MAP (AIRPORT VICINITY) Source: Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 24

27 Ground Transportation Access/Planned Roadway Improvements There are currently no specific projects for improvements on Meridian Avenue other than connectivity to access new land use development. The SHCP states, Complete improvements to Meridian Avenue that support the desired land use pattern and allow the corridor to be more pedestrian accessible while still conveying regional transportation. Improvements to the Meridian Avenue corridor will provide non-motorized facilities, transit services and facilities, and access management strategies. 6. REGIONAL AND AIRPORT ECONOMIC PATTERNS Socioeconomic data provides an understanding of demographic profiles and commerce trends. This data quantifies community development characteristics and socioeconomic indicators connected with Airport activity patterns. Data was obtained for Pierce County and the South Hill Community. 6.1 Commerce Trends Pierce County Population is the primary indicator as to regional demographics. The Pierce County population is projected by the Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) to increase from 795,225 in 2015, to between 865,500 (OFM Low Projection) to 1,179,500 (OFM High Projection) by Exhibit 1.9 shows Pierce County population has increased 5 to 8 percent annually in the past ten years, and is projected by the OFM to grow 3.5 to 5 percent over the next ten years. From 2000 to 2015, unincorporated Pierce County has grown more than incorporated municipal areas. The County total unincorporated population is larger than any individual city, and larger than the top five cities combined (Tacoma, Lakewood, Puyallup, University Place and Bonney Lake). Population is concentrated in west and central Pierce County. By 2030, growth is anticipated to intensify in eastern Pierce County. The communities with the most planned growth are South Hill, Graham, and Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. The majority of County new housing and job creation is to be located within the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), which include most of the Pierce County population and economic base, and in which the Airport is located. Public spending for facilities, services, and open space is to be focused in the UGA to promote efficient use of public improvements and services, and enhance community diversity and livability. Pierce County and its cities and towns were challenged to identify a 20-year, countywide population forecast within the OFM range and then disaggregate the total to individual UGAs and the rural area of the County. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 25

28 EXHIBIT 1.9: PIERCE COUNTY POPULATION (1960 TO 2014) Source: Washington OFM Pierce County s economy is anchored by three main industry clusters: 1) healthcare/medical services, 2) Port of Tacoma commerce; and 3) Joint Base Lewis-McChord military activities. Manufacturing has steadily increased as a proportion of total employment in the last four decades. The challenges facing Pierce County s economy, such as lower levels of educational attainment, lower concentrations of high-paying industries and lower average wages contribute to a high level of out-commuting by the local labor force. The County economic focus is to enhance the ability of businesses to operate profitably, increase employment opportunities, and improve the jobs-housing balance. 6.2 Commerce Trends South Hill Community The South Hill area, reflective of a bedroom community, is heavily concentrated in the retail trade and services sectors, which account for nearly 78 percent of all employment. Relative to the State, South Hill has a higher concentration of employment in the construction, finance, insurance and real estate, and retail sectors. Relative to Pierce County, South Hill has higher concentrations of employment in construction, insurance and real estate, and retail trade. 6.3 Commerce Trends Airport The County is interested in attracting job-generating businesses to the Airport. Aeronautical companies include those engaged in manufacturing, assembling, refurbishment, and overhauling of air transportation systems. Based on findings from the 2007 Marketing & Economic Analysis Report (Elesco, Ltd.), the Airport is well-positioned geographically to serve both the large Puget Sound aerospace market cluster and the emerging growth of companies moving south of Seattle. The market analysis found the Airport has the potential to attract aerospace industry commerce and non-aviation Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 26

29 companies, with a target towards 1- to 2-acre sites, and firms employing 10 to 50 people. Smaller office-hangar buildings are well-suited to accommodate these types of light-industrial aeronautical businesses. In addition, the high demand and a shortage of good industrial land in the Kent Valley and other areas of south Puget Sound favor business recruitment to the Airport area. Some of this is being driven by increased container traffic at the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma. This has driven up the demand for land to accommodate warehousing and distribution facilities and inland locations, which in turn makes land scarcer and more expensive for manufacturing companies. 7. AIRPORT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL PROFILE This section presents a snapshot of the Airport s economic significance, financial structure, historical budgeting patterns, and other influencing factors regarding the Airport s revenue position. Airport Economic Significance Table 1.12 quantifies the Airport s annual economic impact, measured in jobs, spending, and sales. The Airport has a total annual economic impact of $9.7 million. The Airport is the base for 14 on-airport businesses (tenants), totaling about 188 full-time equivalent jobs, of which most are directly related to aviation activities at the Airport. The Airport businesses with full-time equivalent employees are: Airport Administration/Operations SpanaFlight Spencer Aircraft Services / SIM Avstar Aircraft Northwest Propeller Seattle Turbine Wings West Clover Park Technical College (Off-Airport) Central Pierce Fire and Rescue Station #69 (Off-Airport) Pierce County Sheriff Civil Air Patrol Hangar Inn Restaurant Weed Control Board (through July, 2017) Colors Custom Aircraft Refinishers Cascadia Subduction Zone Impact The Airport is a part of the WSDOT statewide emergency management system for the Cascadia Subduction Zone, as both Emergency Support Function and Search and Rescue. The Washington State Emergency Management Office and WSDOT have designated airport locations for distribution of personnel and materials in the event other transportation and infrastructure modes become unusable. The Airport is designated a Tier III facility, meaning small cargo aircraft and helicopters could use the field for re-distribution of materials from larger airports capable of handling heavy cargo aircraft. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 27

30 TABLE 1.12: AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACT (WSDOT REPORT) AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACT Economic Impact Category Jobs from Airport Business Jobs from Visitor Spending Wages from Airport Businesses Wages from Visitor Spending Total (Annual) Direct Impact $4,292,600 $831,000 $5,123,600 Indirect Impact $3,962,400 $681,300 $4,643,700 Individual Total (Per Job) $8,255,000 $1,512,300 $9,767,300 $60,700/Job $37,800/Job $54,500/Job Total 176 Jobs $9.7 Million in Economic Impact Note: 2012 WSDOT reported dollars adjusted to 2016 dollars using Washington State inflation index. Note: Airport reports 188 employees as of September Direct Impact: amount of initial purchase that remains within the local economy. Indirect Impact: result from a purchase made to another industry and expenditures of employee wages. Source: WSDOT Aviation Website (2012) 7.1 Airport Financial Structure The Airport operates from a dedicated Airport Fund, which provides for the operation, maintenance, and capital improvement of airport-related project development. The Pierce County Executive is the authorizing body responsible for the financial obligations to own, manage, and improve Airport facilities. The County Executive approves of the annual budgets for maintenance and operation, and for capital expenditures. As a publicly operated facility, fiscal duties must be conducted in accordance with the federal grant assurance agreements and compliances, and other local and state business requirements. 7.2 Airport Financial Overview (Fiscal Years 2014 to 2016) Airport income statements identify financial trends, income patterns and major operating revenue and expense factors. Exhibit 1.10 shows that, from 2014 to 2016, Airport operating revenues averaged $490,000 annually, while operating expenses (excluding depreciation) averaged $640,000, with net profit/loss operating deficit averaging $150,000 per year. Nearly 90 percent of the Airport s operating revenue is generated from building/hangar/tie-down rents, of which 97 percent is derived from aviation tenants and 3 percent from non-aviation tenants. Nearly 12 percent of the Airport s operating expenses are dedicated to salaries, benefits, and taxes. From 2014 to 2016, the Airport has shown an operating deficit, in which the County contributions have averaged $150,000. Capital expenditures have averaged $540,000 over the same period, primarily funded with FAA and WSDOT grants, and County real estate excise tax revenue. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 28

31 EXHIBIT 1.10: PIERCE COUNTY REVENUES AND EXPENSES Note: Airport/County fiscal year is January to December. Source: Airport Income Statements (Fiscal Years 2014 to 2016) 8. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW The Environmental Overview is a preliminary review and initial screening of critical environmental resources, intended to assist in the avoidance and minimization of environmental effects considered through the Plan process. Environmental overview conditions were assessed primarily through research of existing studies and documents, agency database searches, local inquiry, and with limited field investigation and agency coordination. Table 1.13 summarizes the effects per environmental category (#1 to #15). TABLE 1.13: ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW SUMMARY # Environmental Category Regulatory Context Effect 1 Air Quality Pursuant to FAA s Airport Environmental Handbook, no environmental analysis is required at general aviation airports that anticipate fewer than 180,000 flights annually, Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 29 No

32 2 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW SUMMARY # Environmental Category Regulatory Context Effect Biological Resources (Threatened and Endangered Species) US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) database identify habitat for two listed species which may occur in Airport proximity. Federal and state coordination (approval and permits) may be required for Airport development projects. Potential 3 Climate The Airport will not contribute to global climate change. No 4 Coastal Resources The proposed project is located more than 10 miles from coastal resources and outside of any area regulated by an No adopted Coastal Zone Management Plan. 5 DOT, Section 4(f) Section 4(f) land resources not in the Airport proximity. No 6 Farmlands No active or historic farming within Airport property No 7 Hazardous Materials No recorded hazardous materials within Airport property. No 7 Solid Waste Separate Airport Waste/Recycling Plan in progress TBD 7 Pollution Prevention Airport covered under Pierce County s Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit, and does not have a separate stormwater permit or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan No (SWPPP). 8 Historical Resources WISAARD database does not identify historic resources within the Airport property boundary. No 8 Architectural Resources WISAARD database identifies structures greater than 50 years which may be eligible for inclusion on the National Potential Register of Historic Places (NRHP). 8 Archaeological Resources WISAARD database did not identify recorded archeological sites within the Airport boundary. No 8 Cultural Resources WISAARD database did not identify recorded cultural resource sites within the Airport boundary. No 9 Land Use Airport land use complies with federal (FAA) and state (WSDOT-Aeronautics) guidelines per adopted County ordinances, zoning, and community land use planning. Airport controls property interests for all FAA safety areas. No 10 Natural Resources and No adverse impacts on energy supplies or natural resources Energy Supply anticipated from Airport operations. No Noise regulated by Pierce County, per adopted ordinance, 11 Noise in accordance with applicable federal (FAA) and state No (WSDOT-Aeronautics) guidelines. 11 Compatible Land Use Airport is zoned and Employment Center. Land uses surrounding the Airport is currently regulated by Pierce County, per ordinance, in accordance with applicable federal No (FAA) and state (WSDOT-Aeronautics) guidelines. 12 Socioeconomics Airport not anticipated to have a disproportionate demographic effect on social or economic populations. No 12 Environmental Justice No known concentrations of minority or low-income communities in the Airport vicinity. Airport not anticipated to have a disproportionate effect on vulnerable populations. No 12 Children s Environmental Health and Safety Risks Airport not known to contribute to health or safety risks. No Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 30

33 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW SUMMARY # Environmental Category Regulatory Context Effect Visual Effects (Light Emissions / Visual Resources) Water Resources (Wetlands) Water Resources (Floodplains) Water Resources (Surface Waters) Water Resources (Groundwater) Water Resources (Wild and Scenic Rivers) 15 Critical Areas (GMA) As a general aviation facility with minimal lighting aids, Airport is not known to contribute to adverse lighting emissions impacts. Wetlands are present within the Airport boundary, generally located along the eastern portion of the airfield. Future airfield development may involve wetland approval and permitting coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and other county and state agencies. Airport on an elevated plateau and outside of 100-year and 500-year floodplain; not within a flood zone. Airport is covered under Pierce County s Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit, and does not have a separate stormwater permit. Airport within the Chambers-Clover Creek basin. Airport development may require County coordination for aquifer recharge and wellhead protection area review as set forth PCC 18E Airport is covered under Pierce County s Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit, and does not have a separate stormwater permit. The Airport and surrounding site does not contain rivers, and therefore, does not come under restrictions imposed by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Pierce County critical areas are regulated per County Code Chapter Airport development may require coordination per critical areas associated with the Growth Management Act. No Potential No No Potential No Potential Notes: Effect No : Resource is not present or does not have the potential to be affected by the proposed project. Effect Potential Resource is present and could be affected by the proposed project 9. INVENTORY SUMMARY These bullet point items summarize the key inventory components noted per facility condition or functional deficiencies, and serve as the basis for subsequent master plan analysis: Airfield Longer runway (existing is 3,650 feet) Wider runway (existing is 60 feet) Feasibility of instrument procedure to Runway 17 (north approach) Consider runway operational capacity factors Consider potential for future grass strip runway Airspace obstacles; east side tree-wooded area proximity to runway Install taxiway lighting (remove reflectors) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 31

34 Provide runway and vehicle access to develop east side airfield/landside Revised taxiway naming convention and signage Terminal/Landside Area FBO future expansion needs, constraints SpanaFlight FBO future expansion needs, constraints Spencer Aircraft Services FBO future expansion needs, constraints Northwest Propeller Apron pavement (cracking) appearance Pavement condition, grading and drainage improvements around hangars Un-airworthy aircraft occupying tie-down space, remove aircraft Identify dedicated helicopter parking/landing area(s) Identify dedicated apron parking for large (turbine) aircraft Improve front-door appearance of terminal area infrastructure and buildings Improve Hangar Inn Restaurant building appearance County T-hangar age, condition, and appearance Existing hangar conditions (weatherproofing, upgrades, and exterior appearance) Demand for additional aircraft hangars (typical 15 to 25 based aircraft waiting list) Limitations for large aviation hangar development Improve airport entrance route/wayfinding Need a centralized general aviation/airport administrative building Improve public viewing area, construct playground area (like Tacoma Narrows Airport) Bury or relocate above ground power lines within terminal area Improve airport site development and building permitting-approval process Address lack of Jet-A fuel availability Needed improvements (replace/repair) existing aircraft fuel island/tank(s) Use existing airport buildings for aeronautical purposes Provide 24-hour indoor bathroom access Install additional waste and recycling collection units throughout terminal area Improve security, secure controlled fence and gate access Other/Off-Airport Airport impacts from increasing vehicle traffic congestion along Meridian Avenue Consider future aircraft noise impacts Provide new vehicle access from Sunrise Boulevard Improve vehicle entrance signage and wayfinding to airport tenants Install Airport Wi-Fi system for Airport tenants, users, and patrons Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 32

35 ATTACHMENTS

36 WORKING PAPER #1: ATTACHMENTS The following attachments provide additional inventory background and perspective of airport activities. These attachments will be included in the working paper, but removed as part of the final narrative report. ATTACHMENT 1: AIRPORT DEVELOPMENTS ATTACHMENT 2: AIRPORT TENANTS ATTACHMENT 3: AIRPORT LOCATION MAP / AREA OF INFLUENCE ATTACHMENT 4: SURROUNDING AIRPORT COMPARISONS ATTACHMENT 5: PLU AIRPORT TRAFFIC COUNT SUPPORTING DATA ATTACHMENT 6: HISTORICAL AND FAA TERMINAL AREA FORECASTS (1-2007) ATTACHMENT 7: TERMINAL AREA FACILITIES ATTACHMENT 8: AIRPORT SECURITY EXHIBIT (SOURCE: AIRPORT/COUNTY) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 33

37 ATTACHMENT 1: AIRPORT DEVELOPMENTS Airport Development History The following provides a chronology of Airport historical milestones and improvements: 1944 Puyallup businessmen develop a gravel landing strip on the South Hill plateau along the primary route between the communities of Puyallup and Eatonville Airport purchased by John Thun, Sr. then renamed 'Thun Field.' 1967 Private airport and surrounding land (500 acres) sold to the Puyallup Development Company Pierce County acquires Thun Field (150 acres). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) - Aviation participate in Airport purchase Airport Master Plan completed to guide County and FAA/WSDOT improvement projects Memorial bench of John Thun, Sr. is dedicated next to former Thun home A memorial plaque is added to John Thun's bench. In part, the inscription reads:...john's spirited character, personal integrity, and noted involvement in the community helped make this airport a popular gathering place for many diverse groups of people. Airport Project History The following chronology records major Airport improvement projects from 2001 to 2015, which total approximately $6.0 million in grant-related funding invested into the Airport: 2001 Rehabilitate taxilanes, apron, remove powerlines, install runway end identifier lights (REIL) = $494, Land acquisition = $2,178, Construct taxiway; Install weather station (AWOS-3), remove west side trees = $2,419, Extend parallel taxiway = $227, Extend parallel taxiway = $94, Rehabilitate terminal building = $136, Wildlife hazards assessment = $43, Install visual guidance; rehabilitate runway, apron, and taxiway = $431,566 Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 34

38 ATTACHMENT 2: AIRPORT TENANTS SpanaFlight (fixed base operator [FBO]): Offers flight training service, aircraft rental, scenic flights, aircraft sales and brokerage service, and a full-service aircraft maintenance facility. Spencer Aircraft Services (FBO): Provides aircraft and pilot supplies, hardware, poly-fiber fabric covering, avionics sales and service. Safety in Motion (SIM) Flight Center is a full-service FBO and FAA and VA-approved Part 141 Flight School with aircraft rentals, scenic flights, pilot services, aircraft sales and management, full-service maintenance division, courtesy car, pilot briefing area, CATS/PSI Testing Center, fuel terminal management, pilot lounge/facilities, and pilot support services. Avstar Aircraft: Aircraft maintenance and repair, specializing in Beechcraft aircraft. Northwest Propeller: Provides sales, service, and repair of propeller hub and blade assemblies. Wings West: Aircraft governor exchange and overhaul. Clover Park Technical College (CPTC): Located at southeast corner of the airfield (off-airport), the CPTC offers degrees in aviation flight training and aircraft maintenance. Central Pierce Fire and Rescue Station #69: Located at southeast corner of the airfield (off- Airport), the station provides fire, hazardous material response equipment, and medic support services, including a helipad for airborne emergency medical services (EMS) transport or search and rescue. Civil Air Patrol (CAP): A public service organization conducting air and ground emergency service missions. Hangar Inn Restaurant: A full-service restaurant and lounge. Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 35

39 ATTACHMENT 3: AIRPORT LOCATION MAP / AREA OF INFLUENCE Source: Pierce County (Obtained, June 2017) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 36

40 ATTACHMENT 4: SURROUNDING AIRPORT COMPARISONS Airport Elements Airport Ownership City of Auburn Pierce County Port of Olympia Pierce County Airport Property - Total 111 Acres 568 Acres 1,385 Acres 185 Acres Airport Property - Aeronautical 65 Acres 400 Acres 835 Acres 150 Acres Aircraft Storage - Terminal Area 65 Acres 7 Acres 60 Acres 50 Acres Aircraft Storage - Area (Acres) 23 Acres 24 Acres 33 Acres 22 Acres Aircraft Storage - Units Units Primary Runway Designation Runway Length (Feet) 3,400' 5,002' 5,501 3,650 Runway Width (Width) Crosswind/Secondary Runway No No 8-26 No Pavement Strength (000) lbs (S) (DTWD) 75 (S) 94 (D) 12.5 (S) Full-Parallel Taxiway Yes Yes Yes Yes Dual Airfield-Side Development No No Yes No Approach and Lighting Aids Auburn (S50) VASI/REIL AIRPORT COMPARISON Tacoma Narrows (TIW) Airport Facilities ILS/MALSR / REIL/PAPI ILS/MALSR/PAPI REIL/PAPI-4L Control Tower No Yes Yes None Weather Station No ASOS ASOS ASOS Approach Capability Non-Precision Precision Precision Non-Precision Aircraft Rescue/Fire (ARFF) No No No No AIRPORT COMPARISON Aircraft Activity (2017 FAA TAF) Total Annual Operations 142,000 78,841 52, ,300 PLU % Annual Operations 37% 21% 14% 28% Total Based Aircraft PLU % Total Based Aircraft 34% 16% 20% 30% Operations Per Based Aircraft Aircraft & Pilot Services (On-Airport) Aircraft Fuel 100LL 100LL, Jet A 100LL, Jet A 100LL Aircraft Maintenance Major, Minor Minor, Major Minor, Major Minor, Major Avionics Service No Yes Yes Yes Rental Car No No No No Food No Yes No Yes Aircraft Charter Yes Yes Yes Yes Flight Training Yes Yes Yes Part 141 Air Cargo (Scheduled) No No No No Aircraft Rental Yes Yes Yes Yes Airport Capital Developments Olympia (OLM) 5-Year CIP (FY ) $4,450,333 $2,200,000 $6,555,547 $603,600 Major Airfield Expansion No No No No Note: Airport Property from WSDOT-Aviation Report Note: As of , PLU Reports 260 total based aircraft and 106,300 annual operations. Thun Field (PLU) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 37

41 ATTACHMENT 5: PLU AIRPORT TRAFFIC COUNT SUPPORTING DATA Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 38

42 ATTACHMENT 5: PLU AIRPORT TRAFFIC COUNT SUPPORTING DATA (CONTINUED) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 39

43 ATTACHMENT 5: PLU AIRPORT TRAFFIC COUNT SUPPORTING DATA (CONTINUED) PLU TRAFFIC COUNT EXTRAPOLATION (OCT, NOV, DEC, 2017) 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2, ,436 4,198 2,970 3,030 2,818 Operations - Extrapolated 1,796 Cameras Adjusted 2,438 2,280 3,960 4,940 5,718 5,092 6,430 6,878 8,688 13,516 11,390 8,768 6,228 Extrapolated Months 6,119 7, MONTHS OF COUNTS FOR 2017 Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 40

44 ATTACHMENT 6: HISTORICAL AND FAA TERMINAL AREA FORECASTS (1-2007) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 41

45 ATTACHMENT 6: HISTORICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) TOTAL ANNUAL OPERATIONS Year 2017 PLU Master Plan (Preferred) 2017 PLU Master Plan (Rounded) FAA TAF (2017) % FAA TAF (2017) FAA PLU Master Plan ,606 71,606 71, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 84,710 84, % ,710 86,710 86, % ,710 86,710 86, % -- 90, ,788 93,788 93, % ,579 97,579 97, % , ,608 99,608 99, % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % 100, , , , % 100, , , , , % 100, , , , % 100, Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 42

46 ATTACHMENT 6: HISTORICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS BASED AIRCRAFT (CONTINUED) Year 2016 Master Plan (Total) FAA TAF (2017) Airport Staff (Total AC) FAA 5010 (2017) 2000 Master Plan FAA National Database Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 43

47 ATTACHMENT 7: TERMINAL AREA FACILITIES Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 44

48 ATTACHMENT 8: AIRPORT SECURITY EXHIBIT (SOURCE: AIRPORT/COUNTY) Inventory Chapter: December, 2017 FAA DRAFT REVIEW 45