UNITED STATES PARACHUTE ASSOCIATION 5401 Southpoint Centre Blvd., Frederickaburg, VA Phone: Fax:
|
|
- Milo French
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNITED STATES PARACHUTE ASSOCIATION 5401 Southpoint Centre Blvd., Frederickaburg, VA Phone: Fax: December 20, 2011 John Dermody, Manager Federal Aviation Administration Airport Engineering Division (AAS-100) 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington DC Dear John, I understand you were only recently assigned responsibility for developing parachute landing areas (PLAs) on airports, but in our conversation with you last Friday about the revised draft Appendix 18 language, we learned some disturbing new information that causes us to have deep concern about the FAA Airports Division s ( Airports ) approach to the concept of skydiving on public airports. I m taking the liberty of cc ing others within Airports that have been involved, so they may understand the gravity of our concern. We learned from you on Friday that it is Airports intent to conduct an aeronautical study each time a skydiving business is proposed at a federally-obligated airport. And we heard you declare that skydivers are hazardous to aircraft on taxiways and runways; that taxiways and runways are only to accommodate aircraft and skydivers are not to be allowed on them. These two new elements give us great concern that Airports efforts to define and restrict PLAs will result in second-class status for skydiving and result in reduced access to public airports. It will force many existing skydiving operators who have operated safely on airports for years to close their doors. Airport Management Approval vs. Aeronautical Study For the first time on Friday, it became known to us that the intent of Airports is to conduct an aeronautical study each time a skydiving business is proposed at a federallyobligated airport. When asked why a proposed use of an airport skydiving would require an aeronautical study, you said that an accommodating airport s Airport Layout Plan (ALP) would need revision to include a PLA, and that any revised ALP would require Airports to conduct an aeronautical study to approve the PLA. This is shocking news to us and would be a profound change in the way skydiving businesses have accessed airports over the past 60 years. Currently, as has been the case for the past several decades, 14 CFR (b) requires a skydiving proponent to simply obtain prior approval from airport management before conducting operations. We estimate some dozen such requests are made of airport
2 managers in a typical year, and the majority of such requests are granted. Approvals are often verbal, but approvals also take the form of written operating agreements and lease agreements. Parachute landing areas are worked out by the skydiving proponent and the airport manager. Where approvals are granted, there is almost never any FAA involvement, because none is called for by regulation or by procedures. It is only when approvals are denied that the FAA Airports Division becomes involved, usually when the skydiving proponent asks for assistance in ensuring that the airport sponsor is meeting its grant obligations. Fairly recently, Airports itself has ruled that skydiving proposals do not trigger studies under either Part 77 or Part 157. The March 21, 2011 memo authored by Paul Friedman (then-manager of the Airport Engineering Division) states the establishment of a parachute drop zone does not require notification under part 157. Additionally the memo adds the establishment of a parachute drop zone is not considered a construction or alteration under part and does not require form to be submitted by the airport. The August 5, 2010 memo authored by Rick Marinelli (then-manager of the Airport Engineering Division) states that the establishment of a parachute drop zone does not require notification under part 157. It also states that Flight Standards has determined that it is acceptable for parachutists to land in the OFA. This sentence refers to the Skydive Paris v. Henry County Part 16 final determination, in which the FAA (both Airports and Flight Standards) disagreed with an airport sponsor s assertion that skydivers could not land in an object-free area on the airport. In fact, in a memo for that Part 16 record, Peter Dula, then-manager of the General Aviation and Commercial Division for FAA s Flight Standards Service stated, there exists a long-standing precedent for affording skydivers the same operational latitude given to an aircraft in flight or while taxiing. For example, a skydiver is expected to see and avoid other air traffic. The Part 16 final determination which was issued and signed by David L. Bennett, then-director of the Office of Airport Safety and Standards, also goes on to state Flight Standards Service also noted that in certain cases, it is operationally sound and not inherently unsafe for flight operations to take place in the OFAs. Among other examples Flight Standards Service referenced that banner towing operations and airship ground handling sometimes take place in areas adjacent to runways and taxiways. They asserted It seems only logical that if the guidance provided in AC 150/ permits these types of operations in the OFAs, skydiving operations could also be safely accommodated. We note that OFAs are defined as an area on the ground centered on a runway, taxiway, or taxilane centerline which means an OFA includes the runway and taxiway itself. In effect both Flight Standards and Airports agreed that it is operationally sound for skydivers to land in an OFA, including the runway and taxiway, otherwise the final determination would have contained a qualifier. But it did not. Of course, this makes sense when an airport approves skydiving, since as Peter Dula stated, both aircraft and skydivers have the responsibility of seeing and avoiding each other. Not only has it been that way for 65 years, but the lack of an accident history reflects that it works. Now though, Airports proposes conducting an aeronautical study each time an airport receives a skydiving business proposal, based on the need to study the placement of a PLA and approve a revised ALP. First, this is in direct conflict with 14 CFR (b), so it would seem that rulemaking would be required to achieve this change. Beyond that, a requirement for an aeronautical study will increase FAA workload, create unacceptable delays, and will give any skydiving opponents an opportunity to foment airport user and public opinion against the skydiving proposal. Finally, it costs the airport sponsor to revise an ALP what happens if the airport sponsor delays an ALP revision due to the cost? Skydiving businesses have accessed many hundreds of airports over the past six decades without the necessity of FAA involvement. No one has presented a valid reason why this should change.
3 Does Airports currently evaluate all other proposed aeronautical uses at an airport whether for helicopter, ultralight, glider, flight school, or airship use? If not, then Airports should cede to 14 CFR (b) and allow airport management alone to evaluate the proposal and grant approval, and only get involved if the airport sponsor and the skydiving proponent cannot agree to terms allowing access to a federally-obligated airport. Skydivers and Taxiways and Runways John, you asserted that Airports considers skydivers to be a hazard to taxing aircraft because skydivers can t communicate with aircraft. You also said that skydivers should not be allowed access to taxiways because skydivers are not aircraft. You cited these conclusions as the reasons that Airports does not want a PLA to encompass taxiways. If these are Airports conclusions, then it appears that Airports is engaged in an effort to make skydiving a lesser class of aeronautical activity than all other aeronautical activities by denying skydiving access to a significant portion of any airport. These conclusions also ignore current regulatory provisions that allow aircraft to not be radio-equipped and still use airports, and that allow non-radio-equipped ultralights (which are not considered to be aircraft ) access to taxiways and runways. (We note that the 1980 s FAA decision to allow ultralight use of taxiways and runways was met with an outcry from some aviation groups that safety would be diminished. Although there have been some accidents over the years, they have had an overall good safety record. Yet the ultralight safety record pales by comparison to the safety record of skydiving operations on airports.) While there is a long history of aircraft repeatedly colliding with other aircraft on airports, as shown by this video of a near-hit between a taxiing aircraft and taxiing helicopter, we see no action by Airports to restrict helicopters from taxiways. When any other aeronautical activity accesses an airport, whether airplane, helicopter, glider, non-radio-equipped homebuilt aircraft, ultralight, balloon, or airship, there is no restriction placed on use of airside facilities, including taxiways and runways. As an aeronautical activity of equal stature, skydiving does not deserve efforts to restrict our use of facilities when necessary. USPA takes great exception to any assertion that skydivers are hazardous to aircraft, and to any specific assertion that skydivers are a hazard to taxiing aircraft. Taxiways are a slow-speed environment where see and avoid requirements prevail, regardless of whether radio-equipped or not. Any assertion by Airports that skydivers are a hazard to taxiing aircraft ignores the decades-long history of tens of millions of parachute jumps at airports with no known instance of a skydiver colliding with a taxiing aircraft. Airports efforts to create and enforce a separation standard regarding skydivers and taxiways are not supported by any history of such accidents, incidents, or other precursors of unsafe conditions. Such efforts by Airports display a tendency to economically discriminate against skydiving by denying public airside facilities to a legitimate aeronautical activity. 65 Years of Exemplary History In this, the 65 th anniversary of the formation of USPA, we can point to over six decades of parachuting activity on public airports with no derogation of safety to aircraft operating on those airports. Since 2000, there have been nearly 2.5 million jumps made at U.S. airports each year; in earlier years there were anywhere from 1 million to 1.5 million jumps made each year. And yet, USPA knows of no instance where a skydiver and a nonparticipating aircraft have collided on the ground in all of that time. We also know of no
4 instance where a skydiver has collided with and damaged an on-airport navaid. We believe there are a number of factors that contribute to this excellent safety record including: The overwhelming majority of skydiving activities occur during daylight hours in weather conditions that greatly exceed visual meteorological conditions, i.e ft. ceiling and three mile visibility, and generally occur in either calm or light wind conditions. Such conditions promote visual conspicuity and enable both skydivers and pilots to recognize potential conflicts before they occur and take any necessary evasive actions to eliminate the potential conflict. This is consistent with FAA regulations based upon see and avoid that prevail on and over general aviation airports. Under these visual conditions and light winds pilots are generally able to keep their aircraft on the centerline while taxiing or operating on the runway, as opposed to operating in instrument conditions that often are accompanied by blustery winds and contaminated pavement surfaces that heighten the possibility of aircraft departing the centerline or the pavement altogether. The maneuverability of modern parachutes allows the skydiver to control his/her flight path with precision. The desire of the skydiver to avoid landing on paved areas of the airfield since such landing can result in damage to the skydiver s equipment by pavement scuffing. The cost associated with such damage is borne by the individual skydiver. Yet Airports apparently believes there is an unsafe condition that needs to be addressed by separating a skydiving hazard from aircraft on a taxiway. The record reflects otherwise. No FAA Data USPA has asked multiple times for any data being used by Airports to justify these actions. We ve never received an acknowledgment, let alone a response. The Technical Center report that was commissioned by Airports refers to data collection as a basis for its recommendations but the report provides no data to support its recommendations. It would seem that, if the Tech Center collected information about accidents, incidents, near-hits, and precursors to unsafe conditions, that information would have been provided or at least referenced. The only response to our request for data is the answer We are being proactive. At this point, we must question whether Airports has any data reflecting that skydiving on any airport has produced a hazard. Nor has Airports provided any data suggesting that above ground navigation aids such as edge lights, airfield signs, PAPI s, VASI s, AWOS equipment, ILS antennas, etc. have been or are being damaged by skydivers. USPA does not believe that being proactive negates the need for any supporting data, especially when being proactive means restricting the activity, whether it is skydiving or any other aviation use. Conclusion In view of this exemplary 65-year safety record, it is questionable as to why any safety buffers need to be instituted in establishing standards for PLAs on airports. However, USPA is willing to consider that a PLA should not include any portion of an airport s primary runway(s) and that some buffer may appear to be beneficial between the edge of the primary runway(s) and the PLA. However, Airports has not provided any data to support why this buffer concept should also be applied to secondary runways, taxiways,
5 and above ground navigational equipment other than the rationale that this is the way we always do it. Further, Airports has done nothing to assess the impact of their proposed measures on skydiving operations. We re convinced and we ve shown that skydiving businesses will be negatively affected and will either have to close or relocate their decades-long parachute landing area to a remote part of the airport, if such an area is even available. Basically, under the guise of improving safety, Airports is instituting a measure that will close general aviation businesses and eliminate general aviation jobs without showing that any of the current operations are unsafe. USPA is preparing comments to your revised Appendix 18 draft and will provide those to you by next week. Sincerely, Ed Scott Executive Director The United States Parachute Association is a voluntary, not-for-profit association dedicated to the safe enjoyment of skydiving.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS
Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Airport Master Plan Santa Barbara Airport As part of this Airport Master Plan, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the development
More informationAddendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)
Bowers Field Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) This addendum to the Airport Development Alternatives chapter includes the preferred airside development alternative and the preliminary
More informationCHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3.0 ALTERNATIVES The 2010 Stevensville Airport Master Plan contained five (5) airside development options designed to meet projected demands. Each of the options from
More informationAERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES
AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES Current as of November 2012 ALASKA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Division
More informationNational Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C
E PLURIBUS UNUM NATIONAL TRA SAFE T Y N S PORTATION B OAR D National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Recommendation Date: June 25, 2004 In reply refer to: A-04-48 through -50
More informationSPONSOR OBLIGATIONS PART 1: NAVIGATING COMPLIANCE ISSUES
33 rd Annual Basics of Airport Law Workshop and 2017 Legal Update Session #3 SPONSOR OBLIGATIONS PART 1: NAVIGATING COMPLIANCE ISSUES Lorraine M. Herson-Jones Susan Mowery-Schalk W. Eric Pilsk October
More informationFAC Webinar June 29, 2016
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: FAA GUIDANCE AND DIRECTIVES FAC Webinar June 29, 2016 Scott Knight, Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Debra Braga, Jacksonville Aviation Authority Peter J. Kirsch, Kaplan Kirsch
More informationFAC Webinar June 29, 2016
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: FAA GUIDANCE AND DIRECTIVES FAC Webinar June 29, 2016 Scott Knight, Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Debra Braga, Jacksonville Aviation Authority Peter J. Kirsch, Kaplan Kirsch
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND An Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the effects of a proposed Federal action on the surrounding environment and is prepared in compliance with the National
More information** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
Mail Processing Center Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 2601 Meacham Boulevard Fort Worth, TX 76137 Issued Date: 05/16/2011 Aeronautical Study No.
More informationMemorandum City of Lawrence Public Works
Memorandum City of Lawrence Public Works TO: Diane Stoddard, Interim City Manager FROM: Charles F. Soules, Director of Public Works CC: Casey Toomay, Toni Wheeler, Bryan Kidney DATE: January 26, 2016 RE:
More informationCATCODE ] CATCODE
Runways. FAC: 1111 CATCODE: 111111 OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. The runway is the paved surface provided for normal aircraft landings and take offs. Runways are classified as either Class
More information1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.
ALBUQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL SUNPORT AIRCRAFT HOLD LINE LOCATION ANALYSIS WHITE PAPER JUNE 24, 2016 HOLD LINE LOCATION ISSUE The location of many of the taxiway hold lines at the Sunport do not meet current
More informationRE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design
Aeronautical Repair Station Association 121 North Henry Street Alexandria, VA 22314-2903 T: 703 739 9543 F: 703 739 9488 arsa@arsa.org www.arsa.org Sent Via: E-mail: 9AWAAVSDraftAC2193@faa.gov Sarbhpreet
More informationLopez Island Airport Master Plan Update. Public Meeting June 15, 2017
Lopez Island Airport Master Plan Update Public Meeting June 15, 2017 Master Plan Update Team Reid Middleton/Everett, WA Shannon Kinsella, Project Manager Melania Haagsma, Project Engineer Mead & Hunt/Tulsa,
More informationII.B. Runway Incursion Avoidance
References: AC 91-73 Objectives Key Elements Elements Schedule Equipment IP s Actions SP s Actions Completion Standards The student should develop knowledge of the elements related to proper incursion
More informationII. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background
II. 2.1 Background The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority is preparing an Environmental Assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with proposed enhancements to the Runway 4-22 and
More informationJune 12, Dear Administrator Pekoske,
50 F St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, D.C. 20001 T. 202-737-7950 F. 202-273-7951 www.aopa.org June 12, 2018 The Honorable David P. Pekoske Administrator Transportation Security Administration Department of
More informationPreferred Alternative Summary
Tacoma Narrows Airport Master Plan Update Preferred Alternative Summary The Preferred Alternative represents Pierce County s vision for the long-term development of the Tacoma Narrows Airport. This Alternative
More informationICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations
ICAO Standards Airfield Information Signs ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation February 2004 ICAO Standards This
More informationAccording to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:
4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope The information presented in this report represents the study findings for the 2016 Ronan Airport Master Plan prepared for the City of Ronan and Lake County, the
More informationInterim Policy, FAA Review of Solar Energy System Projects on Federally Obligated Airports
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/23/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-24729, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationFAA Draft Order CHG Designee Policy. Comments on the Draft Order published online for public comment
FAA Draft Order 8900.1 CHG Designee Policy Comments on the Draft Order published online for public comment Submitted to the FAA via email at katie.ctr.bradford@faa.gov Submitted by the Modification and
More informationDocument prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN
LAST UPDATE JULY 2013 Acknowledgements The preparation of this document was financed in part by a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project No: 3-27-0000-07-10), with the financial support
More informationNotice of Policy Change for the Use of FAA Approved Training Devices
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/02/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-31094, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationChapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements
Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements Introduction CHAPTER 4 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS MAY 2013-1 Organization of Materials CHAPTER 4 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS MAY 2013-2 RPZ - ROAD RPZ - NON-AIRPORT
More informationRSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY
RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION The FAA Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) is a team of FAA staff that works with airports to address existing and potential runway safety problems and issues. The RSAT
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-037-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 59960-59963] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
More informationPreliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative
Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative The attached drawing provides a schematic layout of the proposed alternative that will be discussed on July 27, 2010. A full report will follow and should be
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-043-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 7975-7979] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationMEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of 5 50178.000 May 26, 2009 PROJECT PROJECT NO. MEETING DATE ISSUE DATE Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting MEETING LOCATION MEETING PURPOSE Amy Eckland ISSUED BY SIGNATURE PARTICIPANT See attached
More informationApril 5, Dear Mr. Ready,
50 F St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, D.C. 20001 T. 202-737-7950 F. 202-273-7951 www.aopa.org Mr. Kenneth Ready U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE. West Building
More informationTRIANGLE NORTH EXECUTIVE AIRPORT SAFETY GUIDELINES
TRIANGLE NORTH EXECUTIVE AIRPORT SAFETY GUIDELINES It is the intention of Triangle North Executive Airport (KLHZ), to provide this advisory guideline to ensure Triangle Skydiving Center, Inc. (TSC), Total
More informationSource: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record
Chapter 1 Inventory Runway wind coverage is the percentage of time a runway can be used without exceeding allowable crosswind velocities. Allowable crosswind velocities vary depending on aircraft size
More informationChapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis
Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis Chapter 1 accumulated the baseline of existing airport data, Chapter 2 presented the outlook for the future in terms of operational activity, Chapter 3 defined the facilities
More informationAviation Legal Update: Policy on the Non-Aeronautical Use of Airport Hangars
Aviation Legal Update: Policy on the Non-Aeronautical Use of Airport Hangars Washington Public Ports Association Aviation Committee Fall Meeting November 16, 2016 Adrian Urquhart Winder 206.447.8972 adrian.winder@foster.com
More informationSUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-217-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[4910-13-U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [65 FR 82901 12/29/2000] [Docket No. 2000-NM-217-AD; Amendment 39-12054; AD 2000-26-04] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness
More informationSUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-115-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register: November 30, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 231)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 59681-59683] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr30no01-7] =======================================================================
More informationAppendix A - Glossary
Appendix A - Glossary The terms and definitions here are relevant to airport design standards and retrieved from AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design. A Accelerate-Stop Distance Available (ASDA). See Declared
More informationThe following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:
Sec. 419 (a) Purpose AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT (AO) The purpose of the Airport Overlay District is to regulate and restrict the height of structures, objects, or natural growth, regulate the locations of
More informationSUPERSEDED. [Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-014-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 28172-28175] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No:
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]
Federal Register: January 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 4)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 1052-1055] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr07ja08-5] DEPARTMENT OF
More informationAerodrome Manual. ICAO/FAA Comprehensive Aerodrome Certification Inspector Workshop. Presented To: Caribbean States By: FAA Office of Airports
ICAO/FAA Comprehensive Aerodrome Certification Inspector Workshop Presented To: Caribbean States By: FAA Office of Airports OBJECTIVE Development of an Aerodrome Manual (AM). 2 ICAO ANNEX 14 - SECTION
More informationRE: Letter of Interpretation regarding instrument time requirements of part Commercial Pilot Certificate
November 1, 2010 Rebecca B. MacPherson Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, AGC-200 FAA National Headquarters 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20591 RE: Letter of Interpretation regarding instrument
More informationAIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY
CHAPTER 7 AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY CHAPTER 7 AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY 7.0 INTRODUCTION On airport aviation related development is typically compatible with aircraft operations. On airport
More informationAVIATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Oakland International Airport 530 Water Street Oakland, CA 94607
AVIATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Oakland International Airport 530 Water Street When Do I Need to File an FAA Form 7460-1? Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace (14CFR77) June 2013 Background The Federal
More informationYolo County Airport. ALP Narrative Report. April Prepared by Mead & Hunt, Inc. for the County of Yolo, California
Yolo County Airport ALP Narrative Report April 2016 Prepared by Mead & Hunt, Inc. for the County of Yolo, California Yolo County Airport ALP Narrative Report Prepared for the County of Yolo Mindi Nunes,
More informationAirport Master Plan. Rapid City Regional Airport. October 2015 FAA Submittal
Airport Master Plan Rapid City Regional Airport October 2015 FAA Submittal Rapid City Regional Airport Master Plan Update Table of Contents Executive Summary... i Scope & Timeline... i Forecasts... i Preferred
More informationSUPERSEDED. [Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-271-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 16143-16145] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No:
More informationAmendment of Restricted Areas R-2907A and R-2907B, Lake George, FL; and R-2910, Pinecastle, FL
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/03/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-16054, and on FDsys.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal
More informationMr. Randall Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance and Field Operations Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591
Mr. Randall Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance and Field Operations Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591 RE: EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION DOCUMENT TITLED
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-CE-038-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 24, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 53573-53575] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
More informationAmendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-12-AD
Page 1 2009-26-03 BOEING Amendment 39-16138 Docket No. FAA-2009-0911; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-12-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective February 1, 2010. Affected ADs (b) None.
More informationSpecific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) EIR Airfield Alternatives Westside Navigational Aids/Lighting Overview
Appendix E1-9 LAX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY REPORT Specific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) EIR Airfield Alternatives Westside Navigational Aids/Lighting Overview October 2011 Prepared for: Los Angeles
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
Advisory Circular Subject: Publication of the Level of Service with Respect to Departure Below RVR 2600 (½ Statute Mile) Issuing Office: Civil Aviation, Standards Document No.: AC 302-001 File Classification
More information** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Aeronautical Study No. 2010-WTE-13969-OE Issued Date: 09/30/2010 Morgan Johnston University
More informationSubmitted electronically via
Docket Operations, M-30 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: DOCKET NUMBER FAA-2010-0997, NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING, SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CERTIFICATED
More informationCOMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
Cornell University UAV Guidelines Office of Risk Management and Insurance Purpose: The Office of Risk Management and Insurance has published guidelines as a resource for members of the University community
More informationDRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE
DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE CHAPTER VI: AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN NARRATIVE DRAFT REPORT APRIL 2017 PREPARED BY: Table of Contents WESTCHESTER COUNTY AIRPORT 6 AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN NARRATIVE REPORT... 6-1 6.1 AGIS
More information50 Ways to Improve Your Airport: Engaging Airport Management on Key Issues
50 Ways to Improve Your Airport: Engaging Airport Management on Key Issues Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. PRESENTED BY: Charles D. Lamb, P.E. Airfield Lighting Image Source: Delta Airport
More information2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015
2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Definition It is a trapezoidal shape formed off the end of a runway and its geometry it a function of the airport s aircraft approach
More informationFAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance
FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance Presentation to: CAAC Engine-out Procedures Seminar Name: Chuck Friesenhahn Date: 11/29/2005 Flight Standards Senior Advisor, Advanced
More informationDallas Executive Airport
648 DECLARED DISTANCE OPTION 1a DISPLACE 31 THRESHOLD BY 97 Considers RSA Limiting Factor No runway extensions 13 31 TORA 6,451 6,451 TODA 6,451 6,451 ASDA 5,958 6,451 LDA 5,958 6,354 Runway 17-35 (3,8
More informationIntroduction. Who are we & what do we do.
Drones and the Law Introduction FAA s Regulations vs. Congress Legislation Recreational Use vs. Academic Use Private Property vs. Public Airspace Flying in Class B Airspace Working with MassPort Helpful
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-049-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 6114-6118] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-033-AD; Amendment 39- Airworthiness Directives; American Champion Aircraft Corp.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/13/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-14686, and on govinfo.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationSafety and Airspace Regulation Group. 31 May Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY.
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 31 May 2018 Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 This Policy Statement (PS) presents CAA policy and guidance to Air Navigation
More informationOffice of the Chief Counsel. Re: Clarification of voluntary distance learning during a rest period under 14 C.F.R
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration JUM.1 ~ i~n Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Mr. Henry Putek, Jr. Allied Pilots Association
More informationAppendix F Cultural Resource Consultation
Appendix F Cultural Resource Consultation FAA Consultation Letter to the California State Historic Preservation Officer Response Letter from the California State Historic Preservation Officer STATE
More informationAGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AT THE TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT
AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AT THE TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT This AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER SERVICES AT TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT ( Agreement ) is made
More informationDraft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005 Section 3 - Refinement of the Ultimate Airfield Concept Using the Base Concept identified in Section 2, IDOT re-examined
More informationPART F SECTION 2 RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACTIONS
F-2-1 AIRPORT OPERATIONS MANUAL AIRFIELD OPERATIONS 31 January 2011 PART F SECTION 2 RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACTIONS 1. Overview 1.1 This section outlines the responsibilities and actions of the airport organizations
More informationACTION: Final rule; notice of policy change and availability. SUMMARY: This action supplements the preamble published in the Federal Register
[4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 121 and 135 [Docket No. FAA-2000-7119] RIN 2120-AG89 Emergency Medical Equipment AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration
More informationAC 91-37A Truth in Leasing
AC 91-37A Truth in Leasing January 16, 1978 Initiated by: AFS-224 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular provides information and guidance for lessees and conditional buyers of U.S.-registered large civil
More informationM7 AEROSPACE LP
Page 1 2011-02-04 M7 AEROSPACE LP (TYPE CERTIFICATE PREVIOUSLY HELD BY FAIRCHILD AIRCRAFT INCORPORATED) Amendment 39-16577 Docket No. FAA-2011-0014 Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-066-AD PREAMBLE Effective
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-031-AD; Amendment. Airworthiness Directives; REIMS AVIATION S.A.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/17/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-19901, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More information2. CANCELLATION. AC 39-7B, Airworthiness Directives, dated April 8, 1987, is canceled.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Date: 11/16/95 AC No: 39-7C Initiated by: AFS-340 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory
More informationROLLS-ROYCE PLC
Page 1 2009-24-05 ROLLS-ROYCE PLC Amendment 39-16092 Docket No. FAA-2009-0674; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-25-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
More informationFederal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration
DCA Presented to: Arlington County By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, 2015 Air Traffic Roles and Responsibilities As aviation technology advances, the FAA is putting in
More informationSeptember 20, Submitted via
Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of Policy and Strategy Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20529-2020 Submitted
More informationEUROCOPTER FRANCE
Page 1 2009-22-04 EUROCOPTER FRANCE Amendment 39-16055 Docket No. FAA-2009-0952; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-04-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective on
More informationSession Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15. Runway Incursions Runway Excursions
Session Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15 Runway Incursions Runway Excursions Annex 15 AIP - Member States Report: Installation of ARRESTOR SYSTEMS Location - Runway End Industry
More informationMemorandum. Federal Aviation Administration. Date: June 19, Richard Doucette, Environmental Protection Specialist. From: To:
Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: June 19, 2008 From: To: Subject: Richard Doucette, Environmental Protection Specialist LaVerne Reid, Airports Division Manager John Donnelly, Regional Counsel
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-049-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 20719-20725] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No:
More informationExplanatory Note to Decision 2017/021/R
CERTIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDANCE MATERIAL FOR AERODROME DESIGN (CS-ADR-DSN) CS-ADR-DSN ISSUE 4 RELATED NPA/CRD 2017-04 RMT.0591 The objective of this Decision is to update the certification specifications
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-178-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register: June 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 118)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 33856-33859] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr20jn07-5] DEPARTMENT
More informationSUMMARY: This action announces the FAA s recommended guidance for the
[4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 77 Docket No: FAA 2010-1326 Marking Meteorological Evaluation Towers AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-025-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2019)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 5587-5589] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationAppendix A - Definitions
Appendix A - Definitions Aeronautical Activity Any activity conducted at airports which involves, makes possible, or is required for the operation of aircraft, or which contributes to or is required for
More informationMANAGING THE RISK TO AVIATION SAFETY OF WIND TURBINE INSTALLATIONS (WIND FARMS)/WIND MONITORING TOWERS.
NATIONAL AIRPORTS SAFEGUARDING FRAMEWORK GUIDELINE D MANAGING THE RISK TO AVIATION SAFETY OF WIND TURBINE INSTALLATIONS (WIND FARMS)/WIND MONITORING TOWERS. REVISION DATE VERSION NUMBER CHANGES MADE APPROVED
More informationHartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper
Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway 11-29 Closure White Paper June 2012 In recent years there has been discussion regarding the necessity of Runway 11-29 to the Hartford- Brainard Airport (HFD)
More informationC DASSAULT AVIATION
Page 1 CORRECTION: [Federal Register: May 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 85)]; Page 23579-23580; www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html] 2002-23-20 C DASSAULT AVIATION (FORMERLY AVIONS MARCEL DASSAULT-BREGUET
More informationSERVICE INFORMATION LETTER Page: 1 of 2
SERVICE INFORMATION LETTER Page: 1 of 2 SERVICE INFORMATION LETTER NO. SILD42L-007 13 Sep 12 NOTE: NOTE: NOTE: Service Information Letters (SIL) are used only: 1. To distribute information from Diamond
More informationRunway Safety through Standardized Stop Bars Practices
Runway Safety through Standardized Stop Bars Practices The UAE National Runway Safety Team (NRST) has identified Management of Stop Bars as one of the highest runway safety priorities in the prevention
More informationFAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference
FAA Update Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference Chris Hugunin & Dave Anderson March 18, 2015 FY 2014 DMA ADO Total AIP Funding $107.2
More informationSTUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION An Airport Master Plan provides an evalua on of the airport s avia on demand and an overview of the systema c airport development that will best meet those demands. The Master Plan establishes
More informationAmendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-122-AD
Page 1 2011-14-06 AIRBUS Amendment 39-16741 Docket No. FAA-2011-0257; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-122-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 22, 2011.
More informationAcronyms. Airport Layout Plan Report Appendix A A-1
Appendix A Acronyms AC... Advisory Circular ADG... Airplane Design Group ADO... Airport District Office AGL... Above Ground Level AIM... Aeronautical Information Manual AIP... Airport Improvement Program
More information[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-047-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register: July 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 138)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 35789-35792] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr21jy09-10] DEPARTMENT
More information