RE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design
|
|
- Chad Moore
- 10 months ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Aeronautical Repair Station Association 121 North Henry Street Alexandria, VA T: F: Sent Via: Sarbhpreet S Sawhney Aircraft Certification Service Aircraft Engineering Division Certification Procedures Branch, AIR L'Enfant Plaza, SW 5th Floor Washington, DC Dear Mr. Sawhney, The Aeronautical Repair Station Association (ARSA) respectfully requests consideration of its following comments to draft Advisory Circular (AC) ARSA is the principal association for the international aviation maintenance industry. Established in 1984, our members include aircraft operators and aviation maintenance facilities in locations around the world. As such, its members are directly impacted by the guidance contained in the AC. We appreciate FAA s effort to clarify changes to type design, however the positions taken in the draft AC conflict with the existing rules. Although, we suggest several specific changes in this letter, we are unable to fully address the draft as written, since the conceptual differences between the draft and the rules forms the basis of the proposed AC. Our comments, and suggested changes, are aimed at the statements and content we feel are at the root of the disconnection. Since this is such an important topic, which affects many segments of the industry, we request that the FAA reconsider the draft AC. In its place, we suggest that FAA consult with industry groups, such as ARSA, in a cooperative effort to create guidance to 14 CFR
2 Page 2 Chapter 1 The introduction to the draft AC is disconnected from the regulatory basis for considering a change to type design the type design itself. Instead, paragraph 4(b) briefly mentions type design as part of the type certificate (TC). As a result, focus is shifted away from the proper subject - type design - when it should be at the heart of the analysis. Type design is a discrete element in 14 CFR part 21, subpart B. 1 Since the aim of 14 CFR and therefore the draft AC, is to classify changes in type design, it follows that a narrow focus must be applied. The draft AC, in chapter 1, paragraph 4(b) presently states that: When we find that a product is properly designed and manufactured, complies with the applicable airworthiness standards, we issue a design approval in the form of a TC. A TC, as defined in 14 CFR 21.41, includes the type design, the type certificate data sheet and any limitations established for the product by the FAA. This ensures the product complies with the certification basis of the type certificate. We suggest the following revision: When we find that a product is properly designed and manufactured, complies with the applicable airworthiness standards, we issue a design approval in the form of a TC. A TC, as defined in 14 CFR 21.41, includes the type design, the type certificate data sheet and any limitations established for the product by the FAA. This ensures the product complies with the certification basis of the type certificate. 14 CFR 1 14 CFR Type Design The type design consists of (a) The drawings and specifications, and a listing of those drawings and specifications, necessary to define the configuration and the design features of the product shown to comply with the requirements of that part of this subchapter applicable to the product; (b) Information on dimensions, materials, and processes necessary to define the structural strength of the product; (c) The Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness as required by parts 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 33 and 35 of this subchapter, or as otherwise required by the Administrator; and as specified in the applicable airworthiness criteria for special classes of aircraft defined in 21.17(b); and (d) For primary category aircraft, if desired, a special inspection and ive maintenance program designed to be accomplished by an appropriately rated and trained pilot-owner. (e) Any other data necessary to allow, by comparison, the determination of the airworthiness, noise characteristics, fuel venting, and exhaust emissions (where applicable) of later products of the same type.
3 Page defines type design as the drawings and specifications necessary to define the configuration and design features of the product shown to comply with certification requirements, which includes information on dimensions, materials, and processes necessary to define the structural strength of the product. Although our concerns are much deeper than this simple addition to an introductory paragraph, we feel the issues are rooted in the missing association with the applicable rules. Chapter 2 The goal of the system safety approach introduced in chapter 2 is admirable in that it attempts to optimize safety. However, this chapter diverts the focus away from existing rules. Specifically, paragraph 3(d) of chapter 2 misreads the rule. It states that: 14 CFR (a) requires that we consider appreciable effect on characteristics affecting airworthiness. It should be noted that the regulatory language does not just stop at considering the appreciable effect on the weight, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics, or other characteristics but continues on to define these characteristics as those that affect the airworthiness of the product. Therefore, an appreciable effect s final impact on the airworthiness of the product is what determines if the change is major or minor. The ultimate objective being the safety of the product. (Emphasis added) For comparison, the relevant regulatory language states that: A minor change is one that has no appreciable effect on the weight, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics, or other characteristics affecting the airworthiness of the product. All other changes are major changes Clearly the rule states that the weight, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics or other characteristics are the characteristics affecting airworthiness. The impact of the change must be evaluated for its appreciable effect on those elements and thus the product.
4 Page 4 Stated slightly differently for clarification, the characteristics listed in the rule are those that materially contribute to the certification level of safety of the product. Instead of analysis contemplated by the rule, the result of the paragraph 3(d) interpretation, cited above, is ultimately a concentration on the potential risk inherent in the original design instead of the change to that design. Such an outcome is illustrated in chapter 3, Figure 3 of the draft AC, reproduced below: The illustration, above, is clearly focused on the original design, and not the change to that design as required by the rule. Under this example, it would appear that substituting a heavier gauge wire, covered with the same insulation material, in the fuel system wire replacement is automatically assessed as a major change. No consideration is given to the appreciable effect on the airworthiness of the product that results from installing the thicker wire. Chapter 3 This chapter is rife with the notion that any change, no matter how slight, to certain items will inevitably result in a determination of a major change to type design. Unfortunately, the bright-line determinations of major and minor changes contained in Figure 4 of the draft AC are at odds with the existing rule.
5 Page 5 Figure 4: Severity level determination: This chart describes the severity levels that may be assigned to identified undesired events (failure conditions) at the product level. Use the criticality of the affected system to determine the appropriate severity level for an identified undesired event (failure condition) at the product level. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Failure will have LITTLE to NO effect on flight and other operational phases. Green - Low Failure will not flight and landing; however, resulting MAY reduce the capability of the aircraft or the ability of the crew to cope with adverse operating conditions or subsequent failures. Failure will not flight and landing; however, resulting WILL reduce the capability of the aircraft or the ability of the crew to cope with adverse operating conditions or subsequent failures. Yellow - Medium Increasing Severity Failure MAY flight and landing. Resulting MAY reduce safety margins, degrade performance, or cause loss of capability to conduct certain flight and/or passenger safety operations Failure WILL operation. Resulting WILL reduce safety margins, degrade performance, or cause loss of capability to conduct certain flight and/or passenger safety operations. Red - High Instead of focusing on the elements of the rule, Figure 4 introduces separate concepts of flight and landing, degraded performance, reduced safety margins and the inability of the flight crew to cope with adverse operating conditions or subsequent failures, as the principal elements in analyzing any change to type design. These elements are equated with appreciable effects, as stated in paragraph 3(f), which provides, in part, that: Determine type design change classification The classification of major or minor is assigned based on the assessed severity levels. The system
6 Page 6 safety assessment process concludes with a severity level for each undesired event. This severity level determination is a measure of the appreciable effect stated in 14 CFR and therefore there is a direct correlation made between these two terms in this AC. Based on Figure 4, if at any point in this assessment a severity level of 4 or 5 is identified, then the subject change is a major change to type design and no further assessment of any remaining identified hazards is required. (Emphasis added) Under that new rationale any change to certain items will automatically result in major change determinations, no matter how slight the change in type design. The fundamental elements of the analysis in the draft AC are based entirely upon the original design, without regard for the appreciable effect of the design change, as required by the rule. Conclusion We respectfully ask the FAA to reconsider the draft AC, in favor of a complete revision that is developed based upon the plain language of the regulation in consultation with industry group memberships impacted by the guidance. Additionally, this guidance must be coordinated among and between the numerous other ACs that deal with the supplemental type certification process, the changed product rule and the field approval process. Issuing the draft AC (as proposed) would create diverse and contradictory guidance to the FAA s employees and the public. ARSA would spearhead an effort to coordinate this activity with the FAA. Respectfully submitted, Craig L. Fabian Associate Counsel
Submitted Electronically to the Federal erulemaking Portal:
121 North Henry Street Alexandria, VA 22314-2903 T: 703 739 9543 F: 703 739 9488 arsa@arsa.org www.arsa.org May 9, 2011 Docket Operations, M-30 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
October 19, Multiple part identification issue. Dear Steve and Terry:
121 North Henry Street Alexandria, VA 22314-2903 T: 703 739 9543 F: 703 739 9488 arsa@arsa.org www.arsa.org October 19, 2011 Delivery by electronic mail: terry.allen@faa.gov steven.w.douglas@faa.gov Original
Aero Design Battery Shop
Aero Design Battery Shop A HEICO COMPANY August 30, 2017 Subject: Instructions for Continued Airworthiness To Whom It May Concern: Aero Design ensures that our Parts Manufacture Approval (PMA) parts meet
2. CANCELLATION. AC 39-7B, Airworthiness Directives, dated April 8, 1987, is canceled.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Date: 11/16/95 AC No: 39-7C Initiated by: AFS-340 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-108-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 83662-83665] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
EUROPEAN MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS EMAR 21 SECTION A
EUROPEAN MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS EMAR 21 SECTION A CERTIFICATION OF; MILITARY AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS, PARTS AND APPLIANCES, AND DESIGN AND Edition Number 1.0 Edition Date 18 April 2012
series airplanes with modification and Model A321 series airplanes with modification
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/18/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-25605, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NATA Aircraft Maintenance & System Technology Committee Best Practices. RVSM Maintenance
NATA Aircraft Maintenance & System Technology Committee Best Practices Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Airspace reduces the vertical separation above flight level (FL) 290 from 2000-ft minimum
BOMBARDIER, INC (FORMERLY CANADAIR)
Page 1-08-06 BOMBARDIER, INC (FORMERLY CANADAIR) Docket No. FAA--0408; Directorate Identifier -NM-068-AD; Amendment 39-15458 PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective April 21,. Affected ADs
Feasibility of Battery Backup for Flight Recorders
KEYWORDS Aviation Cockpit Voice Recorder Flight Data Recorder Battery backup Feasibility of Battery Backup for Flight Recorders Duncan W. Schofield AlliedSignal Inc., Air Transport & Regional Avionics
BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Page 1 2010-10-22 BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Amendment 39-16301 Docket No. FAA-2008-0909; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-363-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective June 25, 2010.
Major Repairs & Major Alterations MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS TO PROVIDE AVIATION TECHNICIANS A FRANK DISCUSSION ON MAJOR ALTERATIONS
MAJOR REPAIRS AND MAJOR ALTERATIONS TO PROVIDE AVIATION TECHNICIANS A FRANK DISCUSSION ON MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS PROVIDE THE AVIATION TECHNICIANS WITH A GOOD REVIEW OF THE FAA POLICY ON MAJOR REPAIRS
Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-122-AD
Page 1 2011-14-06 AIRBUS Amendment 39-16741 Docket No. FAA-2011-0257; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-122-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 22, 2011.
Memorandum of Understanding
Memorandum of Understanding In Accordance with Section V of the U.S./Canada Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement Implementation Procedures for Design Approval, Production Activities, Export Airworthiness
[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-SW-004-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Type Certificate
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/03/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-23201, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE REGULATORY SUPPORT DIVISION P.O. BOX 26460 OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73125-0460 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration The following Airworthiness Directive
Advisory Circular. Canada and United States Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement Maintenance Implementation Procedures
Advisory Circular Subject: Issuing Office: Canada and United States Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement Maintenance Implementation Procedures Aircraft Maintenance and Manufacturing Activity Area: Rulemaking
EASA PART 21 + AMC/GM. Syllabus
EASA PART 21 + AMC/GM Syllabus PART 21 Certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, and of design and Production Organizations Contents 21.1 General SECTION A TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
AIRCRAFT SERVICE CHANGE
AIRCRAFT SERVICE CHANGE NUMBER 077 SUBJECT NAVIGATION (ATA 34) TCAS 7.1 INSTALLATION JUNE 12, 2012 PILOTS INFORMATION SHEET TCAS 7.1 INSTALLATION This service change upgrades TCAS 2000 or 3000SP systems
Advisory Circular. Exemption from subsection (2) and paragraph (1)(e) of the Canadian Aviation Regulations
Advisory Circular Subject: Exemption from subsection 604.140(2) and paragraph 604.143(1)(e) of the Canadian Aviation Regulations Issuing Office: Civil Aviation, Standards AC No.: AC 604-003 File Classification
BOMBARDIER, INC
Page 1 2010-18-08 BOMBARDIER, INC Amendment 39-16421 Docket No. FAA-2009-1110; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-116-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October
RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective
RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective Presented to: ICAO Introduction to Performance Based Navigation Seminar The statements contained herein are based on good faith assumptions and provided
Signature: Signature:
Application for ETOPS approval Applicants Statement The undersigned certifies the following information to be correct and true and that aeroplane system installation, continuing airworthiness of systems,
Policy Letter (PL) Global Positioning System (GPS) Equipment and Installation Approval
Policy Letter (PL) Global Positioning System (GPS) Equipment and Installation Approval File No. 5009-32-0 PL No. 551-003 RDIMS No. 1019349-V5 Issue No. 01 Issuing Branch Aircraft Certification Effective
Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-189-AD
Page 1 2010-11-03 AIRBUS Amendment 39-16308 Docket No. FAA-2010-0172; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-189-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 25, 2010.
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-220-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 51074-51077] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
3. Cancellation. This AC cancels AC , Issue Paper Process, dated 6/15/2010.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: ISSUE PAPER PROCESS Date: x/xx/2014 Initiated by: AIR-110 AC No: 20-166A 1. Purpose. a. This advisory circular
April 3, Subject: Instructions for Continued Airworthiness. To Whom It May Concern:
April 3, 2012 Subject: Instructions for Continued Airworthiness To Whom It May Concern: Aero Design ensures that our Parts Manufacture Approval (PMA) parts meet or exceed the requirements of the Original
Operational impact of and Appendix O
Operational impact of 25.1420 and Appendix O Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Background New regulation, CFR 25.1420 and associated Part 25, Appendix
SERVICE ADVISORY. NO.: 0608 Revision A. All Garmin Aviation Service Centers
SERVICE ADVISORY NO.: 0608 Revision A TO: All Garmin Aviation Service Centers DATE: 9 May 2006 SUBJECT: Applicability of Service Bulletins 0530 and 0532 appropriate to TERRAIN functionality of Garmin 400
MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES
MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES Recurring topics emerged in some of the comments and questions raised by members of the
BOMBARDIER, INC.
Page 1 2011-24-03 BOMBARDIER, INC. Amendment 39-16867 Docket No. FAA-2011-0720; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-252-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-30-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 134 (Friday, July 14, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 32447-32450] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-130-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 66801-66804] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-087-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register: May 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 87)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 21251-21254] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr07my09-4] DEPARTMENT OF
BOMBARDIER INC. (FORMERLY CANADAIR)
Page 1 2009-10-10 BOMBARDIER INC. (FORMERLY CANADAIR) Amendment 39-15906 Docket No. FAA-2009-0448; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-052-AD. PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY
Page 1 2012-23-01 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY Amendment 39-17257 Docket No. FAA-2010-1084; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-056-AD PREAMBLE (a) Effective Date This AD is effective December 26, 2012. (b) Affected
DOWTY PROPELLERS
Page 1 2011-19-02 DOWTY PROPELLERS (FORMERLY DOWTY AEROSPACE; DOWTY ROTOL LIMITED; AND DOWTY ROTOL) Amendment 39-16807 Docket No. FAA-2011-0735; Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-01-AD PREAMBLE Effective
Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-197-AD
Page 1 2008-25-06 AIRBUS Amendment 39-15764 Docket No. FAA-2008-1274; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-197-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 26,
ATR-GIE AVIONS DE TRANSPORT RÉGIONAL (FORMERLY AEROSPATIALE)
Page 1 2009-12-12 ATR-GIE AVIONS DE TRANSPORT RÉGIONAL (FORMERLY AEROSPATIALE) Amendment 39-15935 Docket No. FAA-2009-0524; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-030-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-011-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 18, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 71586-71589] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
TCAA-AC-AWS007C. March 2013 CERTIFICATION OF A FOREIGN APPPOVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION (AMO) 1.0 PURPOSE
Advisory Circular TCAA-AC-AWS007C March 2013 CERTIFICATION OF A FOREIGN APPPOVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION (AMO) 1.0 PURPOSE This Advisory Circular (AC) is issued to provide information and guidance to
GUERNSEY AVIATION REQUIREMENTS. (GARs) CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT PART 21
GUERNSEY AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (GARs) PART 21 CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT Published by the Director of Civil Aviation, Guernsey First Issue Second issue Third issue Fourth issue Fifth issue December 2013
ORDER National Policy Effective Date: 10/15/2015. Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) Notes SUBJ:
ORDER 8110.121 National Policy Effective Date: 10/15/2015 SUBJ: Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) Notes 1. Purpose. This order clarifies the purpose and authority of the notes used in a TCDS and provides
EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GmbH (ECD)
Page 1 2011-21-13 EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GmbH (ECD) Amendment 39-16836 Docket No. FAA-2011-1075; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-011-AD. PREAMBLE Applicability: Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters, certificated
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
ORDER 8110.RC RESTRICTED CATEGORY AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION Month dd, 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Distribution: Initiated by: AIR-110 RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE
NUMBER 008 PLACARDS AND MARKINGS (ATA 11) MAXIMUM ZERO FUEL GROSS WEIGHT - 48,000 POUNDS PLACARD INSTALLATION
NUMBER 008 PLACARDS AND MARKINGS (ATA 11) MAXIMUM ZERO FUEL GROSS WEIGHT - 48,000 POUNDS PLACARD INSTALLATION December 15, 2004 PILOTS INFORMATION SHEET MAXIMUM ZERO FUEL GROSS WEIGHT - 48,000 POUNDS PLACARD
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-046-AD; Amendment. Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH Airplanes
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/23/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-14336, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY & AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS LEGISLATIVE & REGULATORY ADVOCACY NETWORKING & COMMERCE EDUCATION & CAREER DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES
DEDICATED TO HELPING BUSINESS ACHIEVE ITS HIGHEST GOALS. NBAA RESOURCE Integrated Operational Management and Oversight for suas May 13, 2016 Disclaimer: This NBAA publication is intended to provide members
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-027-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 21253-21255] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-014-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 52827-52830] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR
BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Page 1 2009-15-08 BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED (FORMERLY BRITISH AEROSPACE REGIONAL AIRCRAFT) Amendment 39-15971 Docket No. FAA-2009-0398; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-193-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-053-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register: July 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 128)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 37783-37786] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr02jy08-5] DEPARTMENT OF
Logging Time on ELITE Aviation Training Devices
Logging Time on ELITE Aviation Training Devices Maximum FAA credits allowed for BATD: 2.5 hours toward Private Rating 10 hours toward Instrument Rating Recency of Flight Experience for Instrument (*see
Adding your Aircraft to a 14CFR 135 Operating Certificate
Adding your Aircraft to a 14CFR 135 Operating Certificate Adding your aircraft to an existing 14CFR 135 operating certificate doesn t need to be difficult. The most important thing is to know and understand
CERTIFICATE OF AIRWORTHINESS ISSUE
AIRWORTHINESS Civil Aviation Authority of Botswana ADVISORY CIRCULAR CAAB Document AAC-007 CERTIFICATE OF AIRWORTHINESS ISSUE AAC-007 Revision: Original March 2013 Page 1 of 13 Intentionally left blank
Certification Memorandum. Guidance to Certify an Aircraft as PED tolerant
Certification Memorandum Guidance to Certify an Aircraft as PED tolerant EASA CM No.: CM-ES-003 Issue 01 issued 23 August 2017 Regulatory requirement(s): CS 23.1309(b)(1), CS 25.1309(a)(1), CS 27.1309(a),
C LINDSTRAND HOT AIR BALLOONS LTD
Page 1 CORRECTION: Federal Register Volume 78, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 27, 2013); Pages 18533-18534. 2013-03-10 C LINDSTRAND HOT AIR BALLOONS LTD Amendment 39-17345 Docket No. FAA-2012-1134; Directorate
SECTION TRAINING HELO. Date: 01/08/16 Page: 1 of Table of Contents Training, Helicopter
Date: 01/08/16 Page: 1 of 10 1. Table of Contents Training, Helicopter 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS TRAINING, HELICOPTER... 1 2. HELICOPTER POLICY... 2 1. SCOPE... 2 2. ORGANISATION & STRUCTURE... 2 3. RESPONSIBLE
CAAC Continuing Airworthiness of Domestic Designed Transport Airplanes
CAAC Continuing Airworthiness of Domestic Designed Transport Airplanes By: Sun Yingjun 2015 Content 1 Basic Regulation Frame 2 Introduction of CAAC AC-21-19 3 Organization 4 Working Documents 2 1. Basic
Advisory Circular. Flight Deck Automation Policy and Manual Flying in Operations and Training
Advisory Circular Subject: Flight Deck Automation Policy and Manual Flying in Operations and Training Issuing Office: Civil Aviation, Standards Document No.: AC 600-006 File Classification No.: Z 5000-34
CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS
CHAP 5-1 CHAPTER 5 PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS 5.1 GENERAL 5.1.1 Aeroplanes shall be operated in accordance with a comprehensive and detailed code of performance established by the Civil Aviation
-212/-212A Airplanes; Seats with Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panels
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/29/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-17846, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Chief Counsel. Re: Clarification of voluntary distance learning during a rest period under 14 C.F.R
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration JUM.1 ~ i~n Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Mr. Henry Putek, Jr. Allied Pilots Association
IDWEST FLYER AGAZINE DECEMBER 2009/JANUARY midwestflyer.com. Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978
M IDWEST FLYER AGAZINE DECEMBER 2009/JANUARY 2010 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com SPORT PILOT LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT (Aerotrek): Failure to maintain a SLSA in
THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015
LEGAL NOTICE. THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015 Citation GN. No. of 20 Citation 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Civil
Premier Avionics, LLC.
FAA APPROVED REPAIR STATION NO. 7PMR634B Premier Avionics, LLC. FORT WAYNE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 11007 WEST PERIMETER ROAD FORT WAYNE, INDIANA 46809 1-260-747-4810 MANUAL CONTROL NO.: ASSIGNMENT: Section
AVOX SYSTEMS AND B/E AEROSPACE
Page 1 2009-21-10 AVOX SYSTEMS AND B/E AEROSPACE Amendment 39-16049 Docket No. FAA-2009-0915; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-224-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective
Chapter 5 Center of Gravity Change After Repair or Alteration
Chapter 5 Center of Gravity Change After Repair or Alteration The largest weight changes that occur during the lifetime of an aircraft are those caused by alterations and repairs. It is the responsibility
Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport
APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section
According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:
4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity
Dassault Aviation (Formerly Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation (AMD/BA))
Page 1 2008-04-14 Dassault Aviation (Formerly Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation (AMD/BA)) Amendment 39-15386 Docket No. FAA-2007-28941; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-276-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-017-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 1595-1598] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No:
Commercial Parts. Submitted by the Aviation Suppliers Association 2233 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Suite 503 Washington, DC 20007
.gmail Commercial Parts Comments on the Draft Advisory Circular Submitted to the FAA by email via 9-AWA-AVS-AIR-110-HJL@faa.gov Submitted by the Aviation Suppliers Association 2233 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Suite
RECOMMENDED FIELD APPROVAL APPLICATION Portland Flight Standards District Office
RECOMMENDED FIELD APPROVAL APPLICATION Portland Flight Standards District Office I. Instructions: Print or type all entries. This information should be as complete as possible prior to your initial submission
PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A.
Page 1 2010-21-08 PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Amendment 39-16468 Docket No. FAA-2010-0737; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-037-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
PBN Operational Approval The Process. ICAO PBN Operational Approval Course
PBN Operational Approval The Process What is a PBN Operations Approval? Does it include approval of routes? How do I approve PBN Ops? 2 Why Operational Approval? Early Area Navigation operations based
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-068-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Northrop Grumman LITEF GmbH LCR-100 Attitude
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/05/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-11132, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRATT & WHITNEY
Page 1 2011-07-02 PRATT & WHITNEY Amendment 39-16639 Docket No. FAA-2010-0452; Directorate Identifier 98-ANE-80-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 2011.
AVOX SYSTEMS AND B/E AEROSPACE
Page 1 2010-11-05 AVOX SYSTEMS AND B/E AEROSPACE Amendment 39-16310 Docket No. FAA-2010-0272; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-009-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective on July 6, 2010.
[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NE-23-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Zodiac Seats France, Cabin Attendant Seats
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/11/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-26571, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION
A35-WP/40 17/06/04 English only ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Agenda Item 17: Enhancement of ICAO standards HARMONIZING STATES REGULATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL FRACTIONAL OWNERSHIP OPERATIONS
Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005 Section 3 - Refinement of the Ultimate Airfield Concept Using the Base Concept identified in Section 2, IDOT re-examined
Reciprocal Acceptance Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Federal Aviation Administration Reciprocal Acceptance Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1) What is reciprocal acceptance? Reciprocal Acceptance actually has two parts. First, in plain language acceptance
REIMS AVIATION S.A.
Page 1 2011-07-03 REIMS AVIATION S.A. Amendment 39-16640 Docket No. FAA-2011-0058; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-071-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI 110 003 TELEPHONE: 091-011-4635261 4644768 FAX: 091-011-4644764 TELEX:
EUROCOPTER FRANCE HELICOPTERS
Page 1 2012-23-03 EUROCOPTER FRANCE HELICOPTERS Amendment 39-17259 Docket No. FAA-2012-0339; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-051-AD PREAMBLE (a) Applicability This AD applies to Model SA.315B Alouette III,
STEMME GMBH AND CO. KG
Page 1 2010-11-08 STEMME GMBH AND CO. KG Amendment 39-16313 Docket No. FAA-2008-0788; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-039-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
Navigation 101 Chapter 3 RNP-10
853d Electronic Systems Group Navigation 101 Chapter 3 RNP-10 853 ELSG/NT Electronic Systems Center Hanscom AFB, MA 20 Mar 07 ESC 07-0399 Briefing Overview RNP-10 Fundamentals Avionics Systems Qualifications
BF Goodrich Avionics Systems, Inc. SKYWATCH SKY497
Página 1 de 6 RGL Home Airworthiness Directive Federal Register Information Header Information DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [63 FR 66746 No. 232 12/03/98]
,... '.':!.'.''-.; Office of the Chief Counsel
,... '.':!.'.''-.; U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration AUG - 5 20\6 Captain Derry Anderson 1645 Thunder Gulch Pass Suwanee, GA 30024 Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence
Mauritius Civil Airworthiness Requirements. MCAR-Part-21. Certification of Products and Articles and Of Design and Production Organisations
Mauritius Civil Airworthiness Requirements MCAR-Part-21 Certification of Products and Articles and Of Design and Production Organisations INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 12 July 2013 Page 1 FOREWARD Regulation
International Civil Aviation Organization. ICAO Updates. 13 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting
International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO Updates 13 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting ICAO Updates Airworthiness Manual DOC 9760 Annex 1 Pilot Upper Age Annex 2 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Annex
Submitted electronically via
Docket Operations, M-30 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: DOCKET NUMBER FAA-2010-0997, NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING, SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CERTIFICATED
AIR NAVIGATION ORDER
AIR NAVIGATION ORDER VERSION : 2.0 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION : 20-11-2009 20/11/2009 ANO-013-XXLC-2.0 OFFICE OF PRIME INTEREST : FLIGHT ENGINEER LICENCE (FEL) Personnel Licensing Office 30/03/200 CAAO-001-XXMS-1.0
Glossary and Acronym List
AFS Safety Assurance System (SAS) Overview Glossary and Acronym List This document lists and defines many SAS acronyms and terms. This is not intended to be a complete list of terms and definitions. TERM
C DASSAULT AVIATION
Page 1 CORRECTION: [Federal Register: May 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 85)]; Page 23579-23580; www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html] 2002-23-20 C DASSAULT AVIATION (FORMERLY AVIONS MARCEL DASSAULT-BREGUET
APPLICATION GUIDE FOR OBTAINING A SUPPLEMENTAL TYPE CERTIFICATE
AC 21-40 APPLICATION GUIDE FOR OBTAINING A SUPPLEMENTAL TYPE CERTIFICATE May 6, 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Airworthiness Directive
Airworthiness Directive Federal Register Information Header Information DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [59 FR 23150 NO. 86 05/05/94] Docket No. 94-ANE-12; Amendment
[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-03-AD; Amendment ; AD ]
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 35191-35192] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc