Fire Station No. 1 Presentation MAY 16, 2016

Transcription

1 Fire Station No. 1 Presentation MAY 16, 2016

2 AGENDA Background Alternatives Schedule Cost Direction moving forward 2

3 COUNCIL DIRECTION LOCATION OPTION Existing station Parking lot STATION OPTIONS (7 9 5) TEMPORARY LOCATION DURING CONSTRUCTION (parking lot vs old solid waste) ADDITIONAL FUNDING (2.5m; 4.1m, 4.0m) CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Oct 2017 start 3

4 Major issues to consider Unsafe environment with carcinogens from diesel engines near Bunker Gear and fitness areas No gender separation in sleeping quarters Quality of the air conditioning and air quality throughout the building is poor evidence of mold throughout building Not enough space to facilitate current operation ADA general compliance - not accessible to the public 4

5 Major issues to consider Inadequate bathrooms and showers facilities Overall water leaking from plumbing, piping, fittings and fire lines. Inability to operate during a major storm event - FEMA Flood Zone compliance Inefficient building configuration two buildings Lack of storage room for critical equipment 5

6 CURRENT STATION #1 LOCATION 6

7 2015 DESIGN 6/10/15 City Council authorized design Architects Design Group ADG Phase 1 Programming Projecting 2015, 2035, 2060 Phase 2 - Conceptual Design Develop Alternatives Phase 3 Detail Design 7

8 PROGRAMMING/CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Visited 7 Fire Stations around the State Collier County, Ft. Lauderdale, Coco Beach Developed detailed questionnaire for Fire Staff Meetings with Planning, Zoning and Building, Utilities, Streets and Drainage 8 Departments

9 PROGRAMING Consolidated Operations Station #1 Administration Fire prevention ,386 Sq Ft ,504 Sq Ft ,016 Sq Ft Crew quarter 12 Bunkrooms 9

10 EXISTING FACILITIES SPACE Station # 1 9,100 Sq Ft 8th Street S Administration 2,500 Sq Ft Riverside Circle Fire Prevention 800 Sq Ft Riverside Circle Crew Quarters 12,400 Sq Ft Station # 1 11 Bunks Administration 1 Bunk 12 Bunks 10

11 BUILDING STANDARDS Elevation FEMA +2 8th Ave South dividing line Existing station Elevation 10 Parking lot Elevation 9 Construction CATEGORY 5 11

12 POTENTIAL STATION LOCATIONS 8 th St S/8th Ave S PARKING LOT CURRENT LOCATION 12

13 OPTION 4 23,016 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $7.4 million 13

14 OPERATIONAL ADJACENCIES - OPTION 4 ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP

15 OPTION 5 20,034 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $6.5 million 15

16 OPTION 7 13,778 sq. ft. EL $5.0 million 16

17 OPTION 9 18,944 sq. ft. EL $6.6 million 17

18 CURRENT LOCATION TEMPORARY FACILITY PARKING LOT RIVERSIDE CIRCLE Baker Park old solid waste building 18

19 TEMPORARY RELOCATION AT PARKING LOT $476,000 AT RIVERSIDE CIR $100,000 19

20 SCHEDULE Council Direction May 16, 16 Complete conceptual design phase Sept 16 Return to Council final design October 16 Complete final design July 17 Return to Council / Award construction October 17 Complete construction May 19 20

21 SUMMARY CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION OPTION 7: existing location 13,778 SQ. FT. Meets current needs Admin and Fire Prevention not included Ability for future expansion. $5 million OPTION 9: existing location 18,944 SQ. FT. Meets 2060 needs All inclusive $6.6 million 21

22 SUMMARY CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION OPTION 5: 20,034 SQ. FT. Meets 2060 needs All Inclusive Ability for future expansion. $6.5 million 22

23 COST SUMMARY OPTION LOCATION COST 7 EXISTING $5.0 M 9 EXISTING $6.6 M 5 PARKING LOT $6.5 M 4 PARKING LOT $7.5 M Cost is based on 2016 $ 23

24 FUNDING CURRENT CIP (5 $2,500,000 NEW FUNDING REQUIRED Option 7 Option 9 Option 5 $2.5 million $4.1 million $4.0 million 24

25 Discussion 25

26 COUNCIL DIRECTION LOCATION OPTION Parking lot Existing station STATION OPTION (7 9 5) TEMPORARY LOCATION DURING CONSTRUCTION (parking lot vs old solid waste) FUNDING (2.5m; 4.1m, 4.0m) CONSTRCTION SCHEDULE Oct 2017 start 26

27 Supporting Slides 27

28 FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION 28

29 PROGRAMING 29

30 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 30

31 PROGRAM PUBLIC ACCESS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 31

32 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 32

33 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 33

34 PROGRAM MULTIPURPOSE & TRAINING AREAS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 34

35 PROGRAM CREW QUARTERS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 35

36 PROGRAM CREW QUARTERS ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 36

37 PROGRAM APPARATUS BAYS & SUPPORT ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 37

38 PROGRAM FACILITY SUPPORT ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 38

39 PREVIOUS STUDY June 7, 2010 study New 24,872 sq. ft. Cost estimate was $96 per sq. ft. Budget $4,000,000 39

40 OPTION 1 23,016 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $7.4 million 40

41 OPTION 2 23,016 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $7.4 million 41

42 OPTION 3 23,016 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $7.4 million 42

43 OPTION 6 11,737 sq. ft. EL $4.4 million 43

44 OPTION 8 13,778 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $4.7 million 44

45 OPTION 10 18,944 sq. ft. EL. 9.0 $6.3 million 45

46 COST COMPARISON Based on 2016 $$ 46

47 COST COMPARISON ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP 47

48 NEW STATION AT PARKING LOT ADVANTAGES NO IMPACT ON CURRENT OPERATION NO MOVEMENT OF EQUIPMENT 10 APPARATUS ARE HOUSED IN BAY EXISTING STATION BECOMES PARKING LOT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING SITE 48

49 NEW STATION AT PARKING LOT DISADVANTAGES HIGHER COST BIGGER STATION ADJACENT TO MORE HOMES LESS PARKING THAN CURRENT 49

50 NEW STATION AT CURRENT LOCATION ADVANTAGES LOWER COST SMALLER STATION NO NEW IMPACT TO ADJACENT HOMES MAINTAIN CURRENT PARKING AREA 50

51 NEW STATION AT CURRENT LOCATION DISADVANTAGES LESS BAYS AND SHORTER - 3 APPARATUS STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SLIGHTLY LONGER RESPONSE IF RIVERSIDE CIRCLE IS USED FOR TEMPORARY OPERTION 51

52 TEMPORARY FACILITY RIVERSIDE CIRCLE SOLID WASTE BUILDING ADVANTAGES MINOR MODIFICATIONS LESS COST THAN TEMPORARY TRAILERS 52

53 TEMPORARY FACILITY RIVERSIDE CIRCLE SOLID WASTE BUILDING DISADVANTAGES SLIGHTLY LONGER RESPONSE APPROXIMATLY 2 MINUTES DURING CONSTRUCTION MAY IMPACT BAKER PARK CONSTRUCTION 53