AD-A PEAT MARWICK( MITCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF F/ 1/I2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3.

Transcription

1 AD-A PEAT MARWCK( MTCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCSCO CALF F/ 1/2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3. -ETCU) MAR 8 DOT-FA77WA-3962 UNLSSFED NL

2 LAMESRT-=STr LOCUS NTE=RNATOCNAL. ARPOC3RT DATAr PACKA CEr '3- ARPORT!JVPROVEMENT TASK FORCE DELAY STUDES. -: R T ECTE prepared... f.. r ~~~.2~~~~ E.ADEAT Di~lO EN.FTRNPRTTO Approved... bc reee or... FEEALA TNAD... T...TO Dr~~~tr~~ut... d... ndrco tr... A..A.-396 PMM... Pet.ri~ Mitchel & Co C )~E X... ~ w E u..... ~1 7.../...

3 DSCLAMER NOTCE THS DOCUMENT S BEST QUALTY PRACTCABLE. THE COPY FURNSHED TO DTC CONTANED A SGNFCANT NUMBER OF PAGES WHCH DO NOT REPRODUCE LEGBLY.

4 Attachment A EXPERMENTAL DESGN AND TABLE OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Acc sion For Prepared by TYS GRA& Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California " on March 198 Dis tribution/ Availbiblity Codes Av,l a~nd/or D i,-. pecinl =... l.... -' i. -". ". '.'

5 DESCRPTON OF EXPERM ENT5 T-mbert-St. louis nternational Airport A-1 Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment Arrival Departure number Model runways runways Weather Demand ATC mprovements 1 ASM a 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Presentb Baseline 2 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L FRl 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 3 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 4 ASH 3R,3CL 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 5 ASK 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 6 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 7 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 7a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline.8 ASM 12R,12L 6,12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 9 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L R 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 1 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L nfr Demand and Mix Present Baseline 11 ASH FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 12 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 13 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 14 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and mix Present A/F Development 15 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 16 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 17 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L EFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 18 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L F'R Demand and Mx Present A/F Development 18a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 19 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 2 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FRi 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 21 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 22 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 23 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 24 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R, 3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present LDA Approach 24a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present DA Approach 25 ASM 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present LDA Approach 26 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 27 ASM 12R.12L i2r,12l FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 28 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 29 ASM 3R,3L 3R, 3L VTR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 3 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 31 ASH 3R,3L 3R, 3L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 32 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FRi 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 33 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 34 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 35 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 36 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FRl 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 17 AS1 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 38 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L LR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 39 ASA 3R,3L,24 3R,3L PP Demand and Mix Present AF Development 4 AS.! 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FRl 1985 Demand and nix Present K/F Development 41 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 42 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 43 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present LA Approach 44 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Terminal Expansion 45 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 46 ASV 3OR,3CL,24 3R,3L FR 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development.1 AS. 3SOR,3L 3R,3L TRi 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present LDA Approach 43 AS. 3R,3L 3R,2CL FRi 1985 Decrease GA mix Present A/F Development 49 AS:: 3R,3CL,24 3R,3CL fr 1985 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Develo=ment 5. AS:.: 3R,3CL 3R,3L FR 1985 Decrease GA Mix Present DA A.croach -1 AS:. 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and *:ix Present A/F Development -2 AS:: 12R,1L 12R,,121 FR 199 Derand and Mix Present A/F Developren: =2 AS: 12R,121 12,1:1 -P.T 19.. Derand and :ix Present A/F Develc=ment Z-A:H 2P,3L 3R,3CL %7, 199 Demand and mix Present A/F :evelcpmen: "5 AS-! 3CR.3L 37,3L FR 199 Demand and Mi:: Present A/F Zevelcpment AS:.: 2C.,3CL 3.,3CL :F e.'.and and ::ix Present A/F Develocrent, As::.4,3.,3cL 3-, 3Z Demand and 'ix Present A/7.Develcp.ent 21.,L,L, 6 :Fl "?9 er. and ani -:ix -resent A/F Develcc..ent.. A::...,. F 199C eand sn "x Present A/F Develcpent. A:.: -:F.,ZCL :p S F1 1 9 Oemand ard nix Zresent- LZA A-.-ct-ch al ASM Z4,2,3:. 3F, :FPR1 199' Demand and Mix.resent.rca-h..:..: " - "....1 i r i - - l l...

6 Tab.e 1 (continued) A-2 DESCRPTON OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment Arrival Departure n mber Model runways runways Weather Demand ATC mprovements 63 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VrR 199 Demand and Mix Present Terainal Expansion 64 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Present Relocate Midcoast Aviation 64a ASM 12R,12L,1 12R,12L WFR 199 Demand and Mix Present Relocate Midcoast Aviation 65 AS 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 66 ASM 24,2R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 67 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present LDA Approach 68 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Development 69 ASM 24,3R,36L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Development 69a ASH FR2 199 Decrease GA Mix Present Baseline 7 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present DA Approach 71 ASM 1ZR,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Futurec A/F Development 72 ASH 12R;12L 12R,12L R 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 73 ASH 12$,12L 12R,12L FR2 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 74 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 75 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 76 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR2 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 77 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 78 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 79 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development a. Airfield Simulation Model. b ATC Separatic-! o VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. c. 199 ATC Separatic.nts or VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A.

7 Table la A-3 DESCRPTON OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment number Model Demand mprovements ATC 81 ADM a 1979 Demand and Mix Baseline Presentb 81a ADM 1979 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 82 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix Baseline Present 83 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 84 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix LDA Approach Procedures Present 85 ADM 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix A/F Development Present 86 ADM 1985 Decreased GA Mix A/F Development Present 87 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Baseline Present 88 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 89 ADM 199 Demand and Mix LDA Approach Procedures Present 9 ADM 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Airfield Development Present 91 ADM 199 Decreas GA Mix Airfield Development 92 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present Futurec 93 ADM 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Airfield Development Future 94 ADM 199 Decrease GA Mix Airfield Development Future a. Annual Delay Model. b ATC Separations for VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. c. 199 ATC Separations for VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. L

8 PRFJ 1979 DEMAND 1985 DEMAND 1979 MX 1 4 MX N(_ tlasl tlavy D z z z - <, = - -= -'== < -JJ Kv 1 f 1_ F2< 2, _ 6326 _ lver 891 [.1 L-_+2736:- -{{ 2Aj d FH T F f?4al BA_24 i <~A18~ H - l,_ l { S FNR2flFSPYALPVM.N3N L LCE N11 N F R

9 LAMBERT ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT EXPERMENTAL DESGN (DRAF1 Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. February 198 ESENT ATC 199 DEMAND 1979 DEMAND DEC RLA1A.A 1)( MX in blasl HEAVY DECREASE GA 1979 MX " z z z z z z d. xu x x L -1,, i , k l t... l_ LL L~ i ll L l i _ ~

10 18) FUTURE ATC 1q85 DEMAND 19Q DEMAND 1985 MX N(HLAS[ ie AVY AL( Pt 19' M ' A,it LC t 2 " ' - - C.,2 27-4" ' _ i J.- -J!' - S : 1 _1_ _ l l i l t l l l,

11 EL [?L A'~L ~A C -ii-- ~ - - T1 *rzii 4

12 C) rz o LU C..V CN N

13 C4C ui -LLJ Uf) -~w - J z -j wu

14 /. wz 6 EL - M < L LU ai 'ogr L 44. X Qo)?~ iw \cc q C) (CZZZK

15 J Awl*.M Z - CLZ L.~w~ L.9 91 j ~ _ us Oc A~~ ~-.., ~ cc V E w c '- V ~ u ~ /.L LUcc -. Lc,,

16 x Z < CC:~ u. z -J (n g -.

17 4-o ca coc' 5Z i V) E -4 ii

18 A-li The following schedule (Table 2) was used to calibrate the Airfield Simulation Model for use at Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport. Card column Data item 3-4 Airline code Flight number (not used) Terminal gate code 24 Flight type (unspecified) 32 Aircraft class 1-Widebodies 2-Large passenger jets 3-Props and small jets 4-Single-engine props Arrival time (hours and minutes) Departure time (hours and minutes) Arrival runway 64 Arrival fix code 72 Departure runway 8 Departure fix code

19 Table 2 A-12 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies!! A Y aa 1o m GA i GA 9 a? i5 4S 1 9 GA g OZ GA ' rl is OZ i GA OZ o Tw FA GA 9Q A 3 16 S 2 9 SO GA 9 a GA ia GA GA nl GA GA A A Tid AA OL GA z go T CA a A GA 9 a A, ' 2 9 AA Gh Aa FA o 4 2 m 17 1s 1 9 F& 9 A AA 9o MA '1 2 9 &A & 2 16 &S 1 9 A GA go a A Tw ra A ao T W o so 1 9 1o $W oq 1 2 a 6 5' So oa q A cc A S 2 9 o A o 12 2 j7 1 - S

20 Table 2 (continued) A-13 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies oz 9a 13 f GA QZ 9a z Q OZ ra 9 * OZ OZ TW Gi rs G, ' 2 GA CA 9Q AA GA AL * AA Tw LA GA rl GA A TW TW W L #s 1 ra 99 A a* AL nz LA A Q L GA SS 2 A GA ra GA a S oo q A A ra No Q GA A FA 9 A AL 9 4 GA '% AL 9 GA A Ga O %i a o z A

21 Table 2 (continued) A-14 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies A L 9 A Tw 9q GA Tw TW go '? 1 1 6L TW TW S 1 1 AA Ga is OZ 99 A W ra ra g ra TW GA OZ A 1 1 GA F 9 A rl i811 Q 1 4 TW il W ra TW QQ 1 2 is SA ' 1 9 GA o9 A SO GA S S GA 8 3 is r, go A 9Q GA A GA A A A go A a 1 3 fl so 1 2 La S W is so 1 3 Tw OZ S SS 1 3 ia ML P A R 1 1 OZ? ( g &L cc @ lb z go

22 Table 2 (continued) A-15 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Tw z fa 3o T. 4q ' 1 3 So GA Tw !A ki 9q OZ OZ L oa & ia OZ A o GA A aa GA A ao q T q TV FL oi? G is 2 2 GA GA Q Gi aq Tw 9a 1 2 1T L 9Q z Qo P GA qq

23 A-16 Question LAMBERT EXPERMENTAL DESGN Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. March 198 Relevent Experiments 1. Airport Development 1 and 14, 2 and 15, etc %, +4% 14 and 35, 14 and 51, etc. 3. Mixes A and B 38 and 45, 38 and 48, etc. 4. Future ATC 51 and 71, 54 and 74, etc. 5. LDA 17 and 23, 18 and 24, etc. 6. Reduced GA Mix B 7. 17/35 1 and 12, 14 and 21, etc. 8. Terminal Expansion 35 and 44, 51 and 63, etc. 9. Optimum Runway Use All 1. Extend West Most 11. 3/24 5 and 7, 17 and 18, etc. Airline Gate Service Times All A/C Lateness Distribution All Schedule-1979 Demand and Mix All Runway Crossing Times Experiment 4, 12 Crossing Links B,17-35,J,B, 17-35,Midcoast, F,K,A Gate Hold Controls Experiment 14 Departure Queue Controls Experiment 14 Exit Taxiway Utilization - A/F Development Experiment 14 Arrival Runway Occupancy Time - Airfield Development Experiment 14 Exit Utilization in FR2 Experiment 3 Airfield Network With Relocated Midcoast Experiments 64, 64a GA Basing Areas All!

24 Attachment B NPUT DATA SUMMARY SX BASELNE SCENAROS - ARFELD SMULATON Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198

25 B-1 Attachment B NPUT DATA SUMMARY SX BASELNE SCENAROS--ARFELD SMULATON Summaries of the data inputs necessary to run the airfield simulation model have been included for the following experiments: Experiment 1--Arrivals and Departures on Runways 12R and 12L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 4--Arrivals and Departures on Runways 3R and 3L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 7A--Arrivals on Runways 3R, 3L, and 24, Departures on Runways 3R and 3L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 8--Arrivals on Runways 12R and 12L, Departures on Runways 12R, 12L, and 6, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 11--Arrivals and Departures on Runway 24, FR2 Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures * Exeriment 12--Arrivals on Runways 12R, 12L, and 17, Departures on Runways 12R and 12L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures

26 B-2 Experiment 1--Runways 12R and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 1 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 12R and 12L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 12R and 12L

27 Experiment 1 (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing times link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R G R E R Midcoast R C L Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 12R 12R R ,59 7,28 12R 12R J G 6,975 6,5 12R B 4,91 12R E 3,51 12L R 6,63 12L P 4,56 12L G 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1, Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13

28 Experiment 1 (continued) B-4 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 6a and 6b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 6a and 6b.

29 t a', C. -. / r /Z

30 Si LU U CC c2'- -/ m.-.

31 Experiment 1 (continued) B Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, Vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 12R and exceeds 4 on Runway 12L. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 12R and exceeds 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class R J G B E 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A 99 1 B C D 1!

32 Experiment 1 (continued) B Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Weighted R J G B E average 12R A B C D Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (Figure 6c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.

33 CCZ- Lit N co 4 L -- -"'- > ca N < 'V / r / /CC w Em 91 '"p /

34 Experiment 1 (continued) B-1 Table 3 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 1 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 12R K R K R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V

35 B-L. Experiment 4--Runways 3R and 3L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 4 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 3R and 3L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 3R and 3L

36 Experiment 4 (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing times way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 3R B R To be provided L B To be provided L E L G L J 3L L Midcoast To be provided 14. Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 3R 3R B G 4,745 3,325 3R ,99 3R ,225 3L 3L A ,935 7,78 3L 3L E B-left 6,2 4,8 3L B-right 4,8 3L G 3,75 3L J 2,735 3L , Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - Supplemental - 6 6

37 Experiment 4 (continued) B General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Lead Aircraft Class Trail Aircraft Class A B C D A B C D * Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class, A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 7a and 7b Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 7a and 7b.

38 < z r < con CCYO 4. & p d - 15 ;z < a 11 S: :E z x uj.2 Un U. m Z _j C. LL. >- ci- x z a ss: - z UJ LU cc z Z CA _j < > cc VC

39 C- _ o i 4C 1E z U

40 Experiment 4 (continued) B Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A B C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 3R queue exceeds 6, when Runway 3L queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 3L and exceeds 4 on Runway 3R. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 3L and exceeds 2 on Runway 3R. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B G R A 1 99 B C D 1!

41 Experiment 4 (continued) B-17 Runway Class Exit B- B- A 6-24 E left right G J L A 5 5 B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted B G average 3R A 4 4 B C D 5 5 B- B- Weighte7 A 6-24 E left right G J average 3L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 7c).

42 Experiment 4 (continued) B Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.

43 Lu~ - OZ Z= / :'/ -t > UJ J U) 2Mh C-4- CL.,' JeAe \~O /Vl

44 i Experiment 4 (continued) B-2G Table 4 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 4 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 3R K R K R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V 4 --

45 B-2 Experiment 7A--Runways 3R, 3L, and 24 VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 7A 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 3R, 3L, and Departure Runway End Links: 3R and 3L

46 Experiment 7A (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 3R North To be provided R B To be provided R South To be provided R P To be provided L R L 3L B Midcoast To be provided To be provided L E L To be provided L G L J To be provided A F To be provided R-12L P Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 3R B 4,745 3R G 3,325 3R ,99 3R ,225 3L A 8,935 3L 3L 6-24 E 7,78 6,2 3L 3L B-left B-right 4,8 4,8 3L G 3,75 3L J 2,735 3L ,43 24 C 7,62 24 P 3,42 24 L 6,35 24 A 5,19 24 A-south 5,55

47 Experiment 7A (continued) B Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - Braniff - 3 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - TWA- 5 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trbil Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D J Lead Aircraft Class A B C D

48 Experiment 7A (continued) B-24 Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 8a and 8b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 8a and 8b. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report Sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 3R queue exceeds 6, when 3L exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in #18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 3L and 4 on Runway 3R. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in #18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 3L and 2 on Runway 3R.

49 < <. CC x* EU z U..7 L4U 6/Q~i 1 CC V

50 Ut 2 ). *o o*4 o" 4- KP. - CD U. o CV gz _ CA, 4- LU G 4 L4 N.

51 Experiment 7A (continued) B Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B G R A 1 99 B C D 1 C A L P 24 A 99 1 B C D B- B- A 6-24 E left right G J L A 5 5 B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted B G average 3R A 4 4 B C D 5 5 B- B- Weighted A 6-24 E left right G J average 3L A B C D Weighted C A L P average 24 A B C D

52 Experiment 7A (continued) B-2 P 3. Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (Figure 8c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.

53 - No - -' 1~~1A, /' - N.f -% 48( S CAl d C m Au.\~%%~) -/J2 > > 2 ~ %L7 ~ dwoz L > :1 Z -n a.r,o>n' M/ Or~ / - > /c > ' 's >c*' 1mp )- C rom O",'

54 Experiment 7A (continued) B-3 Table 5 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 7A Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway Fix Travel tim name code Class (minutes)- 24 K K K K B 1-24 B B B 4-24 F F F F 4-24 V 1-24 V V V 4-3CR K 1-3CR K R K R K R B 1-3CR B CR B R B 4-3CR F 1-3CR F CR F CR F 4-3CR V CR V 2-3CR V CR V 4-3L K L K L K L K 4-3L B L B L B L B 4-3L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V 4 -

55 B-3j Experiment 8--Runways 6, 12R, and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedure A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 8 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable.

56 Experiment 8 (continued) B-32 B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 12R, 12L, and Departure Runway End Links: 12R, 12L, and Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R M To be provided R G R E R B To be provided R Midcoast R L L B To be provided F To be provided A To be provided To be provided L To be provided Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold i 12R R 9,59 12R ,28 12R J 6,975 12R G 6,5 12R B 4,91 12R E 3,51 12L R 6,63 12L 12L P G 4,56 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1,945

57 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3, 15. Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air- Ozark- 1 6 Republic - TWA - 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D

58 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3. Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 9a and 9b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 9a and 9b. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds 1, and when Runway 6 queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue is greater than 6 on Runway 12R and 6, and grea-er than 4 on Runway 12L.

59 cdl >t- 6 X Ez w in o U 4- A,5 7-,',

60 L-J w w C -i /1A L) > L

61 Experiment 8 (continued) B Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue is greater than 4 on Runways 6 and 12R, and greater than 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit R J G B E 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted R J G B E average 12R A B C D Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D 39 4

62 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3P 32. Taxi Sgeeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 9c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix

63 ao ozc.5w o u, a. ~C (V t, /- <'~ Li Z W < -- cl /u 127.

64 Experiment 8 (continued) B-4; Table 6 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL Tl2E--EXPERENT 8 Lam art-st. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time -name code Class (minutes) 12R K R K R K R K 4-12R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F 4-12R V R V R V R V 4-12L K 1-12L K L K L K L B 1-12L B L B L B L F 1-12L F L F L F L V 1-12L V L V L V

65 B-4: Experiment 11--Runway 24 FR2 Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable

66 Experiment 11 (continued) B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: Departure Runway End Links: Runway Crossing Links: None 14. Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 24 C A-South 7,62 5,55 L 6,35 A 5,19 E-South 3, Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air -, 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13

67 Experiment 11 (continued) B-4! C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-FR2 (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 1a and 1b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 1a and 1b.

68 C K 2 /_1 ss-,- N C CZ,./E

69 r- cc> -' z m C) LL ~ %L / ~ K oln '~- -'~ ~cc 7L;C c

70 Experiment 11 (continued) B- 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) FR2 A 6. B 6. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 24 queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway Runway Crossing Delay Control: No runway crossing links. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit A P C L 24 A B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted A P C L average 24 A B C D

71 Experiment 11 (continued) B Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 1c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix

72 o C4 3 e- /u z EZ / ij 2 u- 2 'V o ~ Qj -,< -4 rv ~. ~Z E '~; N / / ~//9N V,/ / 1f) /J /1 ~-4L 'V V/

73 Experiment 11 (continued) B-49 Table 7 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 11 Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 24 K K K K B B B B F F F F V V V V 4 --

74 B-5S Experiment 12--Runways 17, 12R, and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - SS - General Aviation Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable i

75 Experiment 12 (continued) B-53 B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 17, 12R, and 12L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 12R and 12L 13. Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R M R G R Midcoast R E R R C R D To be provided L L B To be provided 12L P To be provided 17 K To be specified 17 F To be specified 14. Exit Taxiwav Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold! 12R R 9,59 12R 12R J 7,28 6,975 12R G 6,5 12R 12R B E 4,91 3,51 12L 12L R P 6,63 4,56 12L G 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1, F 2,37 17 K 2,

76 Experiment 12 (continued) B Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D A Lead B Aircraft C C Class D

77 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5 Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures lla and llb. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures lla and llb. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A B C 6. D Vectorin Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue is greater than 6 on Runway 12R and greater than 4 on Runway 12L.

78 <O. C x ' z u. / j ' -

79 zo co a 4 z x w cc o Z _j 5P LL. > U--.T Z z UJ 2 W cc ul cc z V) CL LU CC il Sao:

80 Experiment 12 (continued) B-!, 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue is greater than 4 on Runway 12R and greater than 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B- B- R J G left right 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A B C D F K 17 A B C 1 D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit B- B- Weighted R J G left right average 12R A B C D

81 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5- Runway Class Exit Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D F K 17 A B C D To be provided 3. Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure lic). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D 14 1

82 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5, 34. Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix

83 xcm /3 z /1~~~ 7,., * OuC'4 > - r- -. wj >. = -z z -,~ / - r -z R/ -- 'CL 4,, ~ rv(v C).\ OA -C'! 'i'~ / -~ 7 / / - 1/ N * \*\ \\\' / C> 1"1

84 Experiment 12 (continued) B-6 Table 8 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TLME--EXPERMENT 12 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time rame code Class (minutes) 12R K R K 2 1?. 12R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V K 1 i7 K 2 17 K 3 17 K 4 17 B 1 1. B 2 i B 3 i B 4 17 F 1 17 F 2 17 F 3 17 F v V 4!V

85 Attachment C NPUT DATA CHANGES ARFELD MPROVEMENT DELAY EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198 j

86 C-4 Table 1C FR2 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY T24ES-PESENT ATC (SECOS) Lambert-St. Lcuis nternational Airport Airport improvement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 12R Exit Class F J G B-left B-right Weichted average A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class R P G B Weighted average A B C D Runway 3CR Exit Class B G Weighted average A 5 5 B C D 6 6 Runway 3L Exit Weighted Class A 6-24 E B-left Brht G J average A B C D as Runway 24 Exit Class C A L P Weighted average A B ' C Runway 17 Exit Class F K Weighted averaae A B C D To be provided

87 . a 4 a, C C *3. Os U C C U. Os U 5-. U - a - a a 4 s U - a- U - ~ U, j. ~. ~ ~.~ U 4.. * C -. ~ - C ; - 4, 4 * sq.~ o * - - U a U 3 * ~ a C " *, 4.4, M ~ O 4 -o O"O~JA ~ * Erp. 1,4.4,. - S U 44 a., S ~. :545-V 2. ~*S * *to ~ ~ C 4 U 444. ~ i 5S~4~*4, ~1O ~ 54 * * S.5,4 C 4 C.654;.,, 4, 4.~ S S V V C. 44V-. *"~* ijs**.j.*; ~ fl.54 girt '.~-'44 1,41,4.~ so r.1.41,. ~ 1 ma~t.g. a ~ ~4... S., - S ~ Al C. a '.4 U d C " ~ - U ~ - a OS ~.. U U OS i ' v - " a,.., - 4) C C U. ' - S U - * L 4 ) -. U) a a. ~ 4, 5. U) ' a U * 1 j15 ~ v'; ~ 1 -. *~. C U 95 4.') 4, r L ~ ::u7.yz

88 S "rn, 4 ~t i *.a. *h - o z. - - a O a- - h. U a C - c 4, -. a ~. a S C ~ S CO 4 ~ C - - C,. - ; ~ a* - -, C - a S. a a -. S. -.~..'~n. C at - C CC ~ *J * a a - A * C**CaU - C SD 4-4,54, U C M C. U. a SD 4' C. a... ~ 6 ~ - -- "--~SS.-.S... A? CA v-r -~ S r~ a' a C: C. Z a C O r.. C- 5. O a. C C, C CCC - -~ S t. o - a C. ~ u a CC -~ Co g - :2:: a ai.a:;:.:: C-,, OS 4.1..', C-C. *- CUS 4, CC j 4 ' '''H U " -. S-a $1

89 S - ~ i V... +, )t :.....

90 C-12 Table 11 ESTMATED RUNWAY EXT DSTANCES (N FEET) FOR ARFELD MPROVEMENT EXPERMENTS Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 3R Exit R Midcoast & 6 B A 2,5 4,6 5,25 7,25 8,95 Runway 3L Exit R Midcoast J G B E C A 1, 2,4 3,25 3,7 4,5 5,8 7,3 8,3 9,9 Runway 12R Exit R J G B E "Alla 9,59 7,28 6,975 6,5 4,91 3,57 11, Runway 12L Exit R P G B "A" pob 6,63 4,56 3,465 3,465 1,945 7,63 9,12 a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "P" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L. i!

91 C-13 Table 12 ARRVAL RUNWAY EXT UTLZATON (PERCENT) Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 3R Exit Class R Midcoast G B 6-24 A B C D Runway 3L Exit Class Midcoast J G B E C A B C D Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class B G P R "A" a.plob A 99 B C D a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "P" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L.

92 C-14 Table 13 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TMES FOR ARFELD MPROVEMENTS (ESTMATED SECONDS) Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies VFR-Runway 3R Exit Class R M1idcoast B G 24-6 A B C D Runway 3L Exit Class Midcoast J G B E C A B C D Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class B G P R "Ala "p"b A B C D a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "B" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L.

93 EmlEmp.. UuP*sW.m...m.M ~.lalum. -!!! * ~ 1: Ol 43 ~! ~x '4 S ~ $ U $4; a 4. - *. - K ~ ~ s-c ~ 4' s~ 4~ A , l.a 4. 4P 449~.~4 " a.., ~4. *. ii C.. ~' c a gi - * A $4 4,416 i * 4' 44444, $4.. - * * C o t-~i-;~4.ij~us ~~4,1 44.1, ~.1,. *.Oa$4., 44~t~$4. $ $4.. O ~aaaaaaaa- L ' ""'~''~ nfl $ '4 ' o 4,.$,~.~ $444 $4 : N Nfl U $44 $4.4. ~. ~.14 $42 $44 *4 4 4J.,~ 4 4 *. 4 4 l (' ~lo 3[ - i $4114 ~~4'*, '

94 2 Li 4.2 a Si. 2 ~ a Si S Nfl N -~44 44 N - N... N * a a a a a ii Si~ 4. a Wa ~. -- Si, u a a a a.o.o V a Si a. a * N a a a. Si t Si SilSil a a2 a " ~44W a a W s.s 4..Li a ~l ~- Si *. Si - ii Si Si Si., ii 'U Si ,. U S. - * c a Si C - Si Si U i Si a. - a ~ - Si * U -'U Si * Si - Si Si, Si Si. -,, -~,, ~ - ".., 4. NUN U Si U U Si Si. Si - - Si N ' a. Si a t4 Si ~ Si44.SiiaSi a Si s~ a - *l.. - a., - - 'S Si U Si U,, - U C Si ~ N * -a". '; F- ~ :~... - ~ ON,.' 2 bsi. i.s ~ Si U Si * a. Si. a -a Si - -..* i, Si~Si ,.. Si SD UCS Si**Si SC. C Si S 'U - N.' Si. - Si* C Si.4 USi~SiJ ii Si Si N CS..,.. :1 Si. Si., Si... Si...a Si ~i. U Sii~ Si * U S - Si U - Si Si Si Si U a,:a, U- Si.;;-a ~ Si. 5. *~ Si Si~O Si Si ~ MCi is A, SiSiSi. Si ii '~'.~i,~i fl,**i a.si., '.1 U".:,,.. ~ U,.USiuUU-.,i~U..' U..,i* SC~4flN~Sit~N S a5.n'sisi.a. *. - a.., Si... ~ 'S Ni.4 4. N.. U ' U a ~ S U a N N N 44 N 4 U a., i a. Na o - N a US U V Si :1 'Si Si 4, Li 1 J 1 4..' 2 ~ ~ ~,~.:: Si~lj.Li4 *isin~ i~ N t 1 '

95 41,. r. 1. C * u u d 3 41' 41~4353 4' o

96 1"1"rFTrr'rv.EhE.p.. U U U ~ ~ j~.i~iiiiieu~ j - ~ '44 - leo GE K - N EN tee N EN 41 GE - 4GE SE o - U 4 U 4 4 GE ~E UL. 4 C El 14 ' Z.. -- '4 - L' 4.41 GE GE GE GE.. GE ~J o.o GE.o GE. GE -- - GE GE 6 OlE GE 14 GE GE 4. -' En V EE~WW 41 GE l ~1 GE GE. U. 4. GE O GE.. -.~.E - -' - GE GE 4 GE GE GE EEl -, - GE GE 4 E~GEt~ - GE GE GE GE C GE GE - GE 4 GE 4. GE ~44 GE A GEEJGE4GE4. GE -, - 4E - GE EE 4 - WEE 1, GE EG.EE ~ 4 GE GE GE * A Ga ' GE -~ 4 GA4.GEE4.*GE4E4. ~ ~4 OE 6 :~ "4 4. GE - GE,.4 ~ 4~GE4 4 ~4 4 '~ t. 4' 4 *~ 4' GE ~ ~ U - 4 a U.E GE GE. El 4 GE 4 4 Elf.' EE GE '444 G4.GE - O g.~ge~.ebouq ~i'4ge 4i U E' GE ii. GE a GE o. E 4,. 4EE. 14 GE GE 4 4 ~J - GE ~ ~*~44.~ * U E.G GO ~4E. EEGE4ELGE., GE GE 4 4 LEO EE LEGE *4E4E. El. 44 GE 4~ a 8~4E GEl E4 fl tutu GE.%o....~ * i. o. EJ O En F. ~4EG~4EE~EG4G Al EEl GEl ~ ~ ~ U. i GE.44 - U. z '4'4 '4 '4 N E.ENN N Nfl GE GE GE GE GE lee GE GE C GE 4 GE 44 t..~ GE~. ci ~ K 1 4 " K,. 4 ~ ~ 4 4. T J 4'4' 4 ' O' EO.4ha -i. 44~E *GE 4.1 4, C "GE. rlge4-4 4 GE 4 ~' "~~ P E..1 i

97 ~. - M, r - UEUH * E k - r w u u w v c m

98 AD-A PEAT MARWCK MTCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCSCO CALF F/6 1/2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3. --ETC(U) MAR 8 DOT-FA77WA-3961 UNCLASSFED NL 1 ////l//l///lll /2ff/ff/fllfllflfflf EEEEEEEE//h

99 444 4.c A w 1" ! ~4 u. c Zlr 2;'

100 ' a M a. 3. ~i;j u M a S ~. S.. *~ ~3 - a * - - '. - C - a K * o a. S. '.3 C.) S. U) 3. ra3 ~4' ~ a U. 3- C a.~ ~ a a - a.. S 3. a. 33 p a 3a - a 4i *~ t~a a.~ a.. a a. ~. a a a a. S *4 a a a 34 - C a, 3. :~-~- ~ a. : a;aa.*o,~.. aa -~ ~ - -~ ** ~ :.a.3.a a.aa.., -, ~ U 4 U 4 a. a~* a sit a ~ ~ * - ~ *a. a. a * 4 3.aS,.a. a. Ca. U O.a,,.a.aaa.a. r HOVEl A, as. S a - a a a.~.3 - U *.3 a. 4) - -~ ~ 3 a..3 3%a..~ ~ ~ ~a, a. a a.a.a a a. -~ , a 'C * a 1.1 N '.3 S. C-.3 t~ La F 3* - - ~ a a C., -. a a S. 4'., C ~ a. a r. ~ a, ~ C,) A, U S. -a. - ' as. U d2. "2 > -~1 - a a -. it - a a a. a - a a. r a a a. ca. * a - A * * Pa * 6 ' U a a a a- a a a a. a a a. r a.,.,.'a.j.~). a. a p a ~. ia,,.,.. a., * a a). a a..:: ' V a a. a. a ~ ~ a.,. a... a "... a ~? ~: (P ** *.. a asa a. p a a t~ a -,.. a 'ii" a L *~ ad.. lit, a - a. r a.,,,~ au*'13-'a a * F,, ~ ado Oo,, d..,,.~.'

101 ji i.....o - C : ~ UC'C, - * C. -',C. - *, 1 Cr..... C. U.. j8 nl4 i

102 C U a a ~ - 2~ *.9 S.4 - b' o U ~ U 49 J. g 42 k * hi ~ 4. Q.94 a..4 C '~ A. K ~ 1 C.. p a. 4. * S *u * C = ~ ~ - C - 49 C ** c ~ *.9.4 C- Si ~ - * C )99.4 ~ S 4. 2 C AC 9:4.~ C 99C99'*C* 4.t 4 au., C ' '~ w 4 ~ 9.9 * Wa *ft~ a. n U) C ~l a as a 49 9'. C U 9: ~ t ~ * C 2 ' a r.. g ~.4 9' a * o C ) b9 *.. C - a. C - - p C. - C C * 4., C A.9 C -C :3C~S4 C C C 994." 9. (C C 4.9.9j hi 42~i ~ q

103 431 hil a ' A - a a v'1a a, hi V

104 a1 ~ t * ~ - " * 4 ~ '4 ~ a 4' 4, U - - T a ~ ~j S.4 4. ~ ~ g ~ * o 4 *,, ~ wo.f~~! ~ ~ - 8 a~1 : : : ~., 49'. & *i. *.* Lw.. flw4w~t. a ~ *.4,41,4~C44 1 '.4 * ,4*C4 ~'' "~ ' ~O 4 C -.. *, 9 4~ ~ 4. r 4 t C~.44.1',.4' 4.4' *.~4w-,. a ' - m , ~ ~4* flflflfll444fl 4. K F *i , 4..4,, * U a' '4 - a ~ j i '.4 -t 9 C 4.4, ) a ' ~' * * ~ ~ 4~.~ 4 - '~'4~~.~ -~p 4,.~., 4 * C Ct L *1 4a 4-, 4 r.,, = ;~.. ~, os... -,. -M 44C4.~ 4. Cat, ~ 4' U ~.4. (U~L '4

105 * 4. 4*h - 4, -; a'l a.! ' 1 4 : a 44 4 Vai.. - a U *4* 4 4 W4. a a *.,

106 U -, b4 U ~ 44 A. ~.4 - ~4 U z h4 - i. z~ C 4! a 4.4 * ~ 4; ~ -. U.444 * C 4', *4 44 ~1. - *4-4 4J - a 4~ * * 44 a. a - ti 4 ~. *, ~11~. - * ~ * *44 Or ~ h ha ~...:so.. ~*.~..*. ~ ~ ~ oo 4~ ~44e. 4~) 4 4 * ~ :A a os - ~ in p. j3~o[~ a E * ~ ~CS44t , U44~.41*4) *JE... r 44 4.,44 ~44,. - - S ~44 *~~~~* C ha * a 1 U C 44.4 A. 'a Z C a -. 44' ' 44,4 44 * ~.,4 ' 14 U 444 U.4 4.J U' 4 C ~4.4~ U * * ~. a a 4. ~U4...~ 4 14M. t o44~ ~ , 444~4~ ,44 - a,a, , W * ~.4., ~*,. -~ fl~ , 44 4~ 44,, 44 U ~ 4.. ~ 4o ~ U 44j ~~44 ~::;;,~ ,., ~4.;1.j - -, ~* ~ '4

107 M -. 4 C - i2. " :: ,! 41; 4, 1 o " "-".. i. ' ' 4, a.,.4i 4 " 1 A - - ',i U, ',,-,,

108 q~ - U - '~1 '.4 w * i..g CS CS C 2 U U * E. U.5, * ~ a. -. C U 'p ~ ~ * ~ C.5 2 C - ' ~ s S A - C C 4 - o Us-S. ~ ~ ~1~. 5*. 5s S CS C ~ V. *.4flflV X.. 4,...'5'.. ~'! ~'.5 -. hi., p C S hi U - '5 1.. CS45 *~ C ~ Z C.555 U 9 G S 55 2 p * M U *~.5.5 " C.5.. S *'1 n.5, 5,.5.) ~

109 w - - ~p /.~.. a A C.i C Z C - - (4 -.. a -.4-4( 4' a ~ * - o. Al A 44 4' g U 4' 4 CA 44 C C'.4 U Al C q - A U.4, C S 48** fl A V 44 :'..4 * ~O 44)4 7~* C. 44 = * C C S M~44~ **4~4. 4.s (48 *4~4.*~ A 8 4* V.a44(4. * P at * ~* A 48 a 4 4..* 444.4' 2 do..., ~ 4.~,.. 4o,. C 6 UsEs S 64O.~A..4 CC 4844, = ,4.44' a C C UeaA..4~flnr A~4 4.- U 4. ~,,, ~,, ~ 4 a.1.,! - - -r *-.- *' *.*~.. C *8 p. z * 4'.4 C a. a -~.4 4 AS J a - a '.~ ~ a * O~' 5.4 ~ ' ~!. H _

110 'A. JO -, 4 K - r.j~ K ~; 4.~ ~- 4, -) C lb U.4 - ~ S E o ~.' c B 4,l C).4 4, U,.4, -.4 * 1 l C. * 4 * 4 * ~. - ~ **'i - C 1 - C 4 K * * f-ella S 'C.' - ~ ~ 6 - ~ C 44 4b*. U). 4 S 4db 44 -.oe~.*s4,* - *),1,,.. c 4 U a.. '. a C Cl..1 ** U.'C)14 ot.. C' -, -.~ ~ a, ~. ~ S 4 Al Th. CU K '1 2 ~.2 C U z 4 44 Cl Cl..~ 1.1-4, C ~ S S * ~. o - 4 C. ~ 41 U 4' 4. - C - Cfl.4 4. Cl? -' 4 a a rl C l U, - 4 CC a*, C C K '.4 r. lc*co sa.' 4.1!J ~j *~l ~? ~ 4 a *~ ''~. CC j J 11 ~

111 4 J C4~ a hl~.4 a 4, ~ - - a 1 4-4, ~.' A. C Z a 4, - - U , w - * a. '4* - a 'a, ~ ' C.C - U '4 C - U 4, 4,, C. ~ - C 4. C U *.. ~ i~ 3:! * 1..4 c 4, ~ C 4 C C. ~. ~1 -, u 'a CA C 'A *C.CC.~ S i *C.CC - C,' C. 3: 43.~ -~ -~ A - 44C...~a S., G3") ~ =. ~ ~.* 5.., 4C.,~ C'C413 ~C-J.. -.,a~ C a z ~ ~ ~ C ;. L~U t..co 4,.4,: ej.. 5 CUCC ) 44 4 O4S44HCp1 *.J ~ 4. 44, 4. 4' 'a a U.4 4, a '4 a. C a 3-. r.. - ~, U, ,p. A z - C- S a. a 2 A Cl-...- C *.. o C A, 3, CCC ~ 3-C*~ * C.5 C *OflS.4 V *, C a -' A C A 4 C 4 a r U , 4 " o.4..,3- C.,., ' U.4 O~C O.,4~ C----

112 C6 4, -4. i ~ t. ~ a. ~ CL 1.2 "U U~ i'i

113 gn uk. og or n 64, C 5. V.5

114 - a C oa 44.. t C Z C * - K W.3 4 to 'A 'A luu 4, c a 41 a aw wa X~ "Orn w. * 3. * f f ~ ~ p...,.

115 .4D. Cl 4.. :2 A a n Z Z a ) 1. -'1.A i4 1 see WA LD Ln. aw

116 be * ~ N N U - N * be o - be ~ g N * hi U. C N ~ a' A U -- be S A - S S - 3 4j - U *. *.~ * - - ' S C. ' ~ o - S.C b o~@ 1 A S - * ~ ''*' : fl C.U S 44 C... C * S - Oil,. bem..4 NO S S *4 - hi q. U ma a 55. S - C, -. * * C C. U.4 ~ :: N*M - C a C. **~ - S 3 L 5:. ~ ~ *i~: *-~~ * ~ iiij ~ * e hi be * a4. C. be C t1 ~ C C Z. N. be o -. w be g C a -. C S. * a 144. be Wa.e St ;~ : : ~ ~ u a.4 *a ~ 1~...4 C U C SCa.4 ~i.eo-... a *,,bfl~*:, *~,,.e.4.ei Z r * ~ ~ji Cl,i;

117 - - - lb hi ii M 4. ~ a. lb A. 1 - lb - A. hi z A lb 14 * A. M A o lb hi - lb o 44. A. 44 -, 4 *.. * -~ ~ ~ C ii - C U ii. *lb - 4.,. ' 3 lb ij * A. DWh4itU USC * '.1 - S.5 g~ U. U lb lb lb Al ~ 44. lb~ a a lb a'.. N. Al lb - = U, U A. - A - - A. 1. ~ lb ~ A S - lb. ~ -. U ~ inal A U' - C -'~1 U. *U. ~ 2..i.2 - ulo * ~ ~. lk ~ t 7.7<2 ~

118 ~mhmm*pmh * * ~ ' C ~ ~ * * s. 4 5 * 45 o *1 U *1 Sc 4 r *4 C * 3 5'.4 *. '-.1 5 t j 5. 5s 4 55 ~. ~. 4 a a C * C z i..~* - a a = e.g * *a V - U * * - Slit -, 'S Ca *~ 4 - * - is U - * -.5: a * u -.s.~i ~ 5' U 5555 a *b5..5 5*..55. it S..wp U ~,4 *5s 5'~ 5e S - * 55 - *ii - ' *---T. -~ -. ~ Sc U C C Li C 'C ~ U * ~ -. 1 :!:j ii ;J a p. ~ j, 5 Sj~* U ~ * - ~' -s.' 55 S it ~ U "'a

119 - - - a - a 44 4' U - 4' d. a * 14 C 4' -4' a ~ -4 4' A. 4' a = C f~ U U z o - ~ A * L 4'. * C 14 C CC o - in 4' a..4 U 44 u 41W ~ a '4 * A U 4' C 4 a. a ' * * 4 :~ '4 4 4 el.. 4' : : U.. ~ a ~ 4'.. : ~ u * a ,. a.~. ~ - A - 4,*~ 4.~ 444tU (1 :~ ~i2 ~ a~ ~; : Or US 5444)4 44 *4U4) V 4,C444~44' f..; ~ '~. g~*~* & a **.,. 4~4.~ 4*~ a * ~ * ~ - C ~:s ~ ~ s ) ~.4. ~?g*~"~~ 44.4 ~ *VOflV, Va r ~ 44U , 4..))).4 ~ g ~ a a ' 4flS.4 4). 4 a. 14) C a a )1 4' C 4. V J 4~ , '4 ~ A * *.4 -., o 4. -~ 444 4,. - a P LU ,4 V 444 L..a,4.4a... 4,4. o., ' ~ 4 *4~

120 ' S S S 5' -~ w~. - 4 S '~ S A C.5 ~ 5' 5 e h. H -~ 5 * ~ o -. '.5' 5' 5 K U 4. :1 ~j~ ~;,~f ju~,,, Ce.. 5:.tp.. 5 *55'~4J4*~ 554 ~ 4O5~ ~ V.,.; 5'sC - *5*5 s' ~ 1 ~ *q. u -S s.5... j.d 5,4 - -,1 -. U a. a.5. 5' 5' 4 C 2 - U S s ' S 4. ~ 4* - - E S - 4 S A a ' ~ 4. g U A 4..Q.~ S * ~ S ~ U. C *~ ,,' - * ~ -. *. a, o 6 ~a.-s ~.~45 S U a, **4* o ~ ~ ''s'' V -, ( ** ~, 4,4.,~', U ' 5.,' "4 e - -. s ni.j...1. * - * i '~1, ', 4. '1' '',.,.-

121 ~ 4. 'a - C M.q = U 44 Ca ' 'a A. 'a Z S.. - U- a. a ~. o - a a!*!~ ~ '4' 4. 4 a w ~ C' a, :~ =.aa..a - a - * 4- 'C a 1. t ~ 14?88~~On s.c * 44 a a 4 *1 a 44, * *, ~.8 6~ ~a ~ ~m a ~ ~ ~ : : L ~ 5 4 * - * a C. *@~ ~ ** ~ 4)~ S -.4,, O~.. r 4. SC. a.,.1 So ~ L ' a 44 a ~.~ 'C C 4' C C r.. a - a ~ A a ~ ~ u U, 44 S 44 4' o C n. - C. -. : ~.~ ~ * "C. a S..4 wry-v.

122 'a ' S a hi U C C. a *i fl C Z C 4, -. *~ S S - h. U a - - S * w * ~ C., a - U a. C is. *ii ~. s ~~ C. 2 * *1 5,.. ~ S. - ~ *... z~.2 3 ~. * *SL. *S.C S. ~ C~)C 4 4 SC H H *~ = - P4 e ~ L ~ C) U U Li - Ct* ~6.4 C).4 ~C4 ~., flsi a Al * - - is. a. C CJ 4, s. 4, -.~ S ~ C C - = C a ~ ~, 3 U ' C' -- C t C *1-3). *9 5. -' C C C C. ~S.~ C - C 21.~ ~. C S S. - ~ ~':q:~

123 C ha 4 - C ha~ 4 - C * 4 U - - a - o 4 b. a -9.. a. a o - ha a 'a u a z C - 6J. m. - a, 4 ii -, a a, * ~*'!~ -. N C e.,.'., a, ~ M C. C C C - C C N - *C A 'a C*CC *'"~ N * A C CANON C C N U - NOC.aC, H 1 * *.3 *C 4b4 -' C ~. N 'EL..1 i~j ~ 'a. 4CTh. - - z a C C 'a C C C C C * C.S ~ ~ a,'ac~a* ~L ~.3CC ~C *Cha*'A~'N ~C' CalM * -, C CCa~ S C C - ha C s a, 4...' Thor a.. Uina..anin.r. - C U * tal,, 4 a. 'a K ha 4 a.. a C C C - - a -, a, - a..c.. U ~. 4 h N a * Ci. * - C C ~ "A.,-. * 'a ac4. -. '~ ~' Th ~ ~ 9. "i A - N 3 1.S'CC - N*aa-.~4 ~.' U Ut' *j a ~ ';:~~J 4 t ~ S a C- SaaC ~ ~z 4 9, 1 NNCb~CO~ 3 1 r U 4 -~ ~.ai ;ji

124 a. 1 a,. - -a = N E C Ca Z a N Ca B - lag N 14 C a, - 14 N t *. C ~ U La 2 a. C. B S a) * a. o C ac U a.. ~. *.1 -, a a, a. a - 5a. - C C U a U a. C S - e~ S - a. a. 'a a,, * a 7',.a 'au.o 5*C a, a a a c.3 - 'a a, a' a. a, C, a - - a'. - ~ ~ 6~;'a ~ N ~ aa*4 aaa..t~ja' ~ a.a'. 5a ~ a) asl - S...~ : ~ - ~ a; - - ~ * *. a ad., - age r ) a.'. LS.. ',.a. La. a a gal ~ 'a*' - w o 65. ~ U a N ~ N a a, a. a-a - - i a, - Ca. - La C. 54 N a, N C a a B Ca - B 14 a, -~ a a. -. 5'.. aa-a.g.~a, ' ~ - 2 ' - *1 Na-lis ~ 2 a' i~i~ ~ja-a a

125 Table 14 AXRCRAFT SPARATOlS WTH 199 ATC Lamhert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies VFR A rival-arrival Semarations (nautical miles)- Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Denarxture-Devarture Separations (seconds): Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D FR Arrival-Arrival Semarations (nautical miles): Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Devarture-Deoar.are Semarations (seconds): Trail Aircraft Class A B C Lead Air:Traf: Class A M C D 6 6c 6,3 e

126 C-79 Table 15 FUTURE FR2 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TMES Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right Weighted average A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class R P G B A B C D 7 Runway 3R Exit Class R G A 45 B C D 55 Runway 3L Exit Class A 6-24 E B-left B-right G J A 5 35 B C D i

127 c m U Si K j. 1 -"....,.. hi K S i h *i " i ' iiai n ' w v 96 -!,- in C.~ ' in t i,, u 1, 2.1.

128 -c 96 to M. R.' C l k. K o - C UU.1. " w n R V

129 *1.S a.c S 'a A.. r. V....*.. '.Sa-.

130 Attachment D NPUT DATA SUMMARY ANNUAL DELAY EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198

131 D-1 ANNUAL DELAY MODEL Experiment Annual Demand: 336, Group Specification: 3 day groups - high, average, low 12 week groups - 12 months, January through December (1978) 3 weather groups - VFR, FR, FR2 and 3 6 runway uses Annual runways Departure runways 1. 12R, 12L 12R, 12L 2. 3R, 3L 3R, 3L 3. 3R, 3L, 24 3R, 3L 4. 12R, 12L 12R, 12L, R, 12L, 17 12R, 12L 4. Traffic Distributions: Week group Jan. Feb. Mar. A M June Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one month Percent of annual in one month Week group J A Sept. Nov. Dec. Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one month Percent of annual in one week

132 D-2 S& 6. Daily Traffic Distribution (August 1978 combined 2-week period 8/18/78 to 8/31/78): Day group High Average Low Percent of weekly in one day Number of days in day group Percent of weekly traffic in day group Weather Occurrences: Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June Percent VFR Percent FR Percent FR2& July Au Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Percent VFR Percent FRl Percent FR2& Hourly Runway Capacity Parameters: Hourly Capacity (Ops/hr) Runway use VFR FR FR2&3 1 To be developed

133 D-3 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factors: VFRl FR FR2&3 For all runways Runway Use Occurrence: Percent occurrence Rna.VFR FR FR2 & To be provided Hourly Traffic: Percent Percent Percent Percent daily daily daily daily Hour traffic Hour traffic Hour traffic Hour traffic & 13. Delay Curve Specifications: To be determined after airfield simulation runs 14. Percent Arrivals - Daily percentage % Percent Percent Percent Percent Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Cancellzition Diversion Specification: To be provided by Task Force 16. Title: St. Louis Annual Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix

134 Annual Demand , ,578 Revised 1979 a - 344,6 Traffic Ostribution: 1978! Table 16 D-4 DAD A:M TRAFFC DSTRBUTZON Lamert-St. Louis nterrational Airport Airport r.provement Task Force Delay Studies Week acuo Jan. Feb. Mar. Ar.?4av June July Au. so. Oct. nov. Dec. Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one onth Percent of an.ual in one month Percent of annual in one week Nbrof weeks in one =c.%_t Percent of annual in one Zcnth CO C Revised 1979 a Percent of annual in one week :u.uber of weeks in one month Per:ent of annual in one month a. Assumes no C-ark Airlines strike. O:ark Airlines has an esti.,ated 4,7 operations per month at St. Louis. Strike afftcted September, October, and Uovenber traffic fiqr!es ar.d lasted 52 days.

135 D-5 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 81A

136 D-6 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 82

137 D-7 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Defand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 83

138 D-8 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Larbert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 84

139 D-9 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 85

140 D-1 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 86

141 D-11 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand- 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport _Experiment 87

142 D-12 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic i Delay Curve Specification 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification To.be determined by airfield simulatior 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport _Experiment 88

143 D-13 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand- 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 89 V

144 D-14 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic 12. Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 9

145 D-15 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 91

146 D-16 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 92

147 D-1 7 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 93

148 D-18 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 94

149 rim