Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue
|
|
- Jessie O’Neal’
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue Michael J. Walk, Chief Performance Officer Larry Jackson, Directory of Treasury Maryland Transit Administration March 2012 Fare Collection Workshop & TransITech Conference Forth Worth, TX Disclaimer: Primary author is solely responsible for all content. Content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the MTA or its management.
2 Agenda Agency Overview Farebox Overview Farebox Maintenance Models Pilot Program & Regained Revenue Next Steps
3 Agency Overview Multi-modal state-wide transit administration Commuter Rail Commuter Bus Heavy Rail Light Rail Local Bus Paratransit Local agency grantor
4 Agency Overview (cont d) Average weekday ridership System-wide: 371,000+ Local bus: 241,000+ (65% of all boardings) Typical yearly revenue: $143M+ Flat-fee core service fare structure: $1.60 one-way / $3.50 day pass for HR, LR, Bus Bus peak vehicles: 590
5 Bus Farebox Overview GFI Odyssey farebox by Cubic Main forms of payment accepted: cash, mag-strip ticket, smart card Other pass types (rider counts w/o revenue) Student tickets (paper stubs) Flash passes Image obtained from: /Odyssey.pdf
6 Farebox Malfunctions the Problem (Sh!) It happens Lost revenue Lost ridership data Lost confidence in your transit system Bus operators Riding public Non-riding public What should we do?
7 Vocabulary OOS (out-of-service): Whenever a farebox is unable to collect fares and/or count riders Downtime: the time that passes from the point of a farebox malfunction until the point of repair (or end of revenue service) Coverage: the portion of all malfunctioning fareboxes that can be repaired Travel costs: costs (in distance and time) associated with transportation of repair staff and parts to the point of repair Coordination costs: costs (in time) associated with coordinating repair of an OOS farebox that would otherwise be used Technician: any person (mechanic or otherwise) that can reliably put an OOS farebox back in service Lost revenue: all fare dollars that would have been collected if the farebox was not OOS Service delay: any delay to revenue service that is caused by repair of an OOS farebox
8 Farebox Repair The Price Point How much do you invest in your farebox repair program before you actually LOSE money as a result of your efforts?
9 Usual Farebox Repair Goals Program coverage Farebox reliability Lost revenue Travel costs Coordination costs Downtime
10 MAINTENANCE MODELS
11 Farebox Malfunctions Repair Options Process: Flag farebox as needing repair at pull-in Repair during coach yard time PM fareboxes on fixed schedule Pros: No delay to revenue service Centralization of parts, labor No maintenance travel costs Full-repair services available Full coverage of all fareboxes Cons: Potential for farebox to be out-of-service for duration of work block Communicating need for repair sometimes lost
12 Farebox Malfunctions Repair Options Process: Operator notifies control center of malfunction Control center coordinates bus replacement New operator or mechanic takes new bus to replacement point Return malfunctioning bus to base for repair Pros: If replacement points are termini, delay to revenue service is minor Reduces total down-time of sub-set of fareboxes Cons: Travel costs Coordination costs: requires several coordinating steps between operator, control center, bus base Need a spare bus and driver available
13 Farebox Malfunctions Repair Options Process: Station mechanics at key locations Service fareboxes during revenue service (usually random) Pros: If locations are layovers, delay to revenue service is minor Reduces total down-time of sub-set of fareboxes Cons: Limited impact: fixed locations cannot service ALL buses Travel costs: must transport parts and labor to fixed locations Can produce minor delay Non-productive time
14 Farebox Malfunctions Repair Options Process: Station technicians at key locations Dispatch technicians upon report of malfunction Mechanics intercept coaches during revenue service Pros: Potential to repair large portion of disabled fareboxes Reduces total down-time of many fareboxes Can address problems on any bus line Cons: Large travel cost: must drive around to intercept points with labor and parts Increased potential for service delay Large coordination cost: Operator, control center, and field technician must work together to select intercept point and time
15 Farebox Repair Models Minimize Costs Minimize Service Delays Overall Fixed-base Great for farebox reliability but not for real-time fixes Fixed-field Low-cost and helpful if locations ensure coverage Bus replacement Too costly Model Coverage Minimize Downtime Dispatchedfield Great for real-time but costly and difficult
16 Hybrid Model Fixed-base Fixed-field Bus Coverage Revenue Coverage Reliability Downtime No Travel Costs Low Travel Costs No Coordination Costs No Coordination Costs
17 MTA S MOBILE FAREBOX REPAIR PILOT
18 How to choose fixed-field locations / times? Regained Revenue Definition: for any OOS farebox, all fare collected from time of repair through the end of the service day (for us, midnight was chosen) Note: if you have a robust fixed-base program for pre-pm pullout, midnight might not be best cut-off
19 Regained Revenue Bus Leaves Division Farebox Malfunction Farebox Repaired by field tech Midnight Bus Collects Fares Bus Boards Customers (no fares) Bus Collects Fares Regained revenue Chose the locations and times where Maximize bus throughput (bus coverage) Maximize incoming revenue (revenue coverage) Minimize service delay Parking / storage available
20 MTA s Pilot Program 2 locations chosen Mondawmin bus loop serves 10 bus lines with transfer to Metro subway Most lines have layover here Patapsco Light Rail Serves 5 bus lines with transfer to Light Rail Most lines have layover here 2 shifts per location per day (4 technicians) 5:00 am 12:30 pm 12:00 pm 8:30 pm 2 trucks with modular parts
21 Mondawmin Bus Loop
22 Mondawmin Bus Loop
23 Basic Process Technicians arrive on-location at 5 AM Spend entire shift in location (less lunch) Board coaches as they arrive (as many as possible) Note whether problem found If problem Record nature of problem Record repair time (or if not repaired) Record auxiliary data (bus line, coach number, work block, etc.) Return truck to base for parts, fueling Next shift takes truck to location Etc
24 Performing an Inspection
25 How to Maximize Regained Revenue? Regained revenue is a function of Total number of boardings from point of repair to end of service day Portion of boardings that pay fare Cash fare payments SmartCard cash payments
26 Regained Revenue Analysis Focus repair program during morning Largest regained revenue for AM hours Large variation across bus lines
27 Regained Revenue Num. of Repairs Hour of Day Hourly Regained Revenue and Repair Frequency Regained Revenue Num. of Repairs $10, $9, $8, $7, $6, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $ Hour of Day 0
28 Weighted Regained Revenue Because of our operational definition of regained revenue, early hours have advantage, because more in-service hours follow repair than for late hours Weighted regained revenue: Treats all hours of the day as equals, based on average hourly regained revenue
29 Regained Revenue (weighted) $14, Hour of Day (Weighted Regained Revenue) Weighted Hourly Regained Revenue $12, $10, $8, $6, $4, $2, $ Hour of Day
30 Regained Revenue Number of Repairs Bus Lines Regained Revenue and Repairs by Bus Line Regained Revenue Number of Repairs $7, $6, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $ Bus Line 0
31 Overall Summary About 208 inspections performed per day 7% problem rate 85% repair rate Total regained revenue Jan Feb: $42,228 Total program cost: ~ $36,317 Net regained revenue: ~$6,000 Total regained riders Jan Feb: 43,535 Average weekday regained riders: 1,036 (<1% of total)
32 Recommendations & Next Steps Use actual fare collection data to target locations and hours Highest-ridership lines (our locations failed to cover most heavily utilized lines) Highest-revenue lines Highest-revenue hours Cycle-time analysis Depending on schedule design, probability of seeing newly broken farebox decreases over time Day analysis Likely that certain days exhibit more revenue than others
33 Conclusion A hybrid model achieves Full coverage of buses Targeted coverage of revenue Minimized downtime Minimized service delays Minimized cost Intangibles Operator confidence Public confidence
34 Thank you Michael J. Walk
APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW
APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW The following pages are excerpts from a DRAFT-version Fare Analysis report conducted by Nelson\Nygaard
More informationSound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Dec-13 Dec-14 % YTD-13 YTD-14 % ST Express 1,266,130 1,396,787 10.3% 16,605,299 17,661,976 6.4% Sounder 248,710 285,016 14.6% 3,035,735 3,361,317 10.7% Tacoma Link
More informationRegional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit
Regional Fare Change Overview Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit Committee of the Whole April 5 th, 2017 Today s Presentation Fare change goals and considerations Public engagement
More informationQuarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR
Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR A Arlington Transit ART 1) Introduction The purpose of ART is to provide
More informationCURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards
CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE Outline 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards 3. Current Practice in SRTP & Critique 1 Public Transport Planning A. Long Range (>
More informationFiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Fiscal Management and Control Board Fare Policy October 16, 2015 1 Components of Fares Fare Level Different types of pricing by: By mode By time of day By distance By rider type (reduced fare) Subscription
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study Maryland House Bill 300 Table of Contents Page 2 Executive Summary Slide 3 Notes Slide 4 Metro Systemwide Fact Sheet Slide 5 How
More informationSound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Aug-14 Aug-15 % YTD-14 YTD-15 % ST Express 1,534,241 1,553,492 1.3% 11,742,839 12,354,957 5.2% Sounder 275,403 326,015 18.4% 2,139,086 2,463,422 15.2% Tacoma Link
More informationSAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES
SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require
More informationAtt. A, AI 46, 11/9/17
Total s San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 Date: 11/8/17 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity
More information2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview
2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview Miami-Dade Transit operates the 14 th largest transit system in the United States and is the largest transit system in the State of Florida. MDT is one of the largest
More information2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road
2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service s Supplemental Information 2010 MTA Financial Plan Declining Tax Revenues Since July, there has been a $750 million shortfall in tax revenues. $669 million
More informationSound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Jun-15 Jun-16 % YTD-15 YTD-16 % ST Express 1,622,222 1,617,420-0.3% 9,159,934 9,228,211 0.7% Sounder 323,747 361,919 11.8% 1,843,914 2,099,824 13.9% Tacoma Link 75,396
More informationSound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership
March 218 Service Performance Report Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mar-17 Mar-18 % YTD-17 YTD-18 % ST Express 1,622,116 1,47,79-4.6% 4,499,798 4,428,14-1.6% Sounder 393,33 39,6.% 1,74,96 1,163,76 8.3%
More informationBristol Virginia Transit
Bristol Virginia Transit 1 Transit Overview Bristol Virginia Transit (BVT) is a Federally Funded and certified urban area transit system. BVT began operation in its current form in 1982. In Fiscal Year
More informationTransit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)
Transit Performance Report FY 2006-2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) J ANUARY 2008 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report I SSUED: JANUARY 2008 The Transit Performance Report
More informationSound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode
January 217 Service Performance Report Ridership ST Express Sounder Tacoma Link Link Paratransit Jan-16 Jan-17 % 1,433,7 1,3,33 4.9% 331,27 7,121 98,411 3,633 Total Boardings by Mode 363,6 74,823 1,76,914
More informationFollow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013
Finance & Administration Committee Information Item I-A January 19, 2012 Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013 1 of 22 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationDate: 11/6/15. Total Passengers
Total San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity and service
More informationGeneral Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy
General Issues Committee Item 4.1 2017 Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy January 27, 2017 Presentation Outline 2017 Operating Budget Overview Ten Year Local Transit Strategy 2 2017
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017
PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Keith
More informationSound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Jan-13 Jan-14 % YTD-13 YTD-14 % ST Express 1,343,290 1,426,928 6.2% 1,343,290 1,426,928 6.2% Sounder 245,135 256,775 4.7% 245,135 256,775 4.7% Tacoma Link 86,229
More informationBoard of Directors Information Summary
Regional Public Transportation Authority 302 N. First Avenue, Suite 700, Phoenix, Arizona 85003 602-262-7433, Fax 602-495-0411 Board of Directors Information Summary Agenda Item #6 Date July 11, 2008 Subject
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017
PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND In June
More informationExisting Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018
Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report June 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: Contents Overview of Existing Conditions... 1 Fixed Route Service... 1 Mobility Bus... 34 Market Analysis... 41 Identification/Description
More informationSound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership
January 218 Service Performance Report Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Jan-17 Jan-18 % YTD-17 YTD-18 % ST Express 1,3,33 1,7,91.3% 1,3,33 1,7,91.3% Sounder 367,33 416,8 13.3% 367,33 416,8 13.3% Tacoma
More informationRACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:
RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: 2013-2017 Recommended Transit Service Improvement Plan NEWSLETTER 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 This newsletter describes the final recommended public transit plan for the City of
More informationAPPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum
APPENDIX B Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum Arlington County Appendix B December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF PEER ANALYSIS PROCESS... 2 1.1 National Transit Database...2 1.2
More informationPUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES
PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES #118404v1 Regional Transit Authority June 19, 2006 1 Presentation Overview Existing Public Transit Transit System Peer Comparison Recent Transit
More informationSeptember 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES
September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management 2013 Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES RTA staff has undertaken the development of a performance
More informationFare Policy Discussion Background and History
Fare Policy Discussion Background and History Transportation Committee Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations February 27 th, 2017 2013 Fare Policy Analysis Report Cross-functional group comprised
More informationAll Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3
All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis Appendix P.3 Metro Board Report Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles,
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (Metrolink) will hold a Public Hearing concerning potential Fare Policy Changes
More informationPTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting
2016 PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting Sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation Table of Contents PTN-128 WHAT, WHY AND WHO... 6 What is the PTN-128... 13 Why
More informationSound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership
February 218 Service Performance Report Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Feb-17 Feb-18 % YTD-17 YTD-18 % ST Express 1,373,96 1,372,88 -.1% 2,877,294 2,88,719.1% Sounder 314,96 32,187 11.9% 681,923 768,69
More information* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data
LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT September 2016 Performance Report * 29-November-2016 Prior Performance Current Year's % Current Previous % Current Prior % Measure Month Month Change Y-T-D Y-T-D Change 12 Month 12
More informationOctober REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
October 2018 2017 REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS The Council s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Alene Tchourumoff
More informationJuneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014
Juneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014 Tonight s Agenda System Strengths & Weaknesses Service Improvement Objectives Draft Recommendations
More informationEL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY
EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY Sponsored by: El Paso County Funding Support: Texas Department of Transportation Technical Assistance to the County: Texas A&M Transportation
More informationScorecard Key Performance Indicators
Scorecard Key Performance Indicators 1 st Quarter 2013 NICE Bus Fixed Route NICE Bus Fixed Route Definitions Scheduled Revenue Hours Full Trip Revenue Hours Lost Runs Missed Revenue Hours Lost Actual Hours
More informationSound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode
March 217 Service Performance Report Ridership ST Express Sounder Tacoma Link Link Paratransit Mar-16 Mar-17 % 1,83,4 1,621,49 2.4% 37,496 82,631 1,264,47 3,821 Total Boardings by Mode 389,98 87,39 1,89,43,297
More informationTransit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide
Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide January 2017 translink.ca Table of Contents How should we determine transit fares in Metro Vancouver? 1 Varying fares by distance travelled 2 Varying fares
More informationMTA Bus Network Improvement Project July 22, 2013
3 TRAVEL PATTERNS 3.1 Key Locations within Service Area Outside of the Maryland suburbs of DC, the Baltimore region forms Maryland s economic and population center. Central Baltimore is home to many of
More informationWhy does 2010 feel like the dark ages for fare collection? Fred Combs Lextran, Planning and Technology Manager Lexington, Kentucky
Why does 2010 feel like the dark ages for fare collection? Fred Combs Lextran, Planning and Technology Manager Lexington, Kentucky Outline Lexington and Lextran s Fixed-Route System Technology and fare
More informationThe Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting
The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience This will cover: 1) Eco Pass Revenues to RTD 2) Public
More informationOzaukee County Transit Development Plan
Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan Record of Public Comments and Recommended Transit Service Plan June 5, 2018 Kevin Muhs Deputy Director #242846 Status of the Transit Development Plan Existing Conditions
More informationOrange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach
Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach APTA Fare Collection Workshop and TransITech Conference March 2012 Agenda Review our Regional Efforts Describe the Southern
More information2017 LRT Passenger Count Report
Urban Form & Corporate Strategic Development City Planning City of Edmonton 8 Floor, Edmonton Tower 10111 104 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5J 0J4 Tel: 780-496-6086 Email: varjinder.chane@edmonton.ca 2017 LRT Passenger
More informationFIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018
FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Non-Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Total Incidents per 10,000 Boardings 1.6 1.3 0.8 2.63 2.1 2.0 1.60
More informationKING STREET TRANSIT PILOT
KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT Update toronto.ca/kingstreetpilot #kingstreetpilot HIGHLIGHTS TRANSIT RIDERSHIP TRANSIT CAPACITY To respond to this growth in ridership, the TTC has increased the capacity of
More informationII. Terminology and Basic
II. Terminology and Basic Relationships Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction II-1 Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Schedule Building Cost Analysis and Financial Planning Performance
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014 DATE: January 23, 2014 SUBJECT: Request to authorize advertisement of a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending
More informationHOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING
HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING Ms. Grace Fattouche Abstract This paper outlines a scheduling process for improving high-frequency bus service reliability based
More informationEstablishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.
RESOLUTION NO. R2013-24 Establish a Fare Structure and Fare Level for Tacoma Link MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Board 09/26/2013 Final Action Ric Ilgenfritz, Executive Director,
More informationTitle VI Service Equity Analysis
Pierce Transit Title VI Service Equity Analysis Pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.1B NE Tacoma Service May 2016 Pierce Transit Transit Development Dept. PIERCE TRANSIT TITLE VI SERVICE EQUITY ANALYSIS TABLE
More informationTRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual
PERFORMANCE REPORT-THIRD QUARTER VISION TO DELIVER REGIONAL MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY AND CONTINUALLY INCREASE TRANSIT MARKET SHARE. MISSION
More informationPublic Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon
Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon Overview of Preferred Alternative April 12, 2011 Presentation Overview Study Goals Quick Review Methodology and Approach Key Findings Results of Public
More informationWelcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form
PROPOSED FARE CHANGES Welcome Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form We re considering a new fare policy The Sound Transit Board of Directors is considering
More informationWhy we re here: For educational purposes only
Transportation 2050 Why we re here: For educational purposes only Transportation 2050 Bus Elements PUBLIC TRANSIT DEPARTMENT City of Phoenix Citizens Committee on the Future of Phoenix Transportation (CCFPT)
More informationAlternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change
Alternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change There is a broad array of options for modification of transit operations to make it more cost effective and efficient. These are typically examined to
More information2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report
2017/2018 - Q1 Performance Measures Report Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership... 1 Revenue Actual vs. Planned... 3 Mean Distance Between Failures... 5 Maintenance Cost Quarter
More informationJanuary 2019 Monthly Performance Report
Date: February 19, 2019 To: From: Subject: General Manager Board of Directors Timothy Kea Budget & Grants Department January 2019 Monthly Performance Report The monthly systemwide ridership decreased 0.5%
More informationTransport. Passenger REACH TARGET ACCESS. Advertising Media Kit
2010 Transport Passenger Advertising Media Kit REACH decision-making public transportation leaders who have more than $13.3 billion in purchasing power TARGET public transportation officials from every
More informationSRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018
SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018 2018 Contents Introduction... 1 A. Key Terms Used in this Report... 1 Key Findings... 2 A. Ridership... 2 B. Fare Payment... 4 Performance Analysis
More informationDecember 2018 Monthly Performance Report
Date: January 16, 2019 To: From: Subject: General Manager Board of Directors Timothy Kea Budget & Grants Department December 2018 Monthly Performance Report The monthly systemwide ridership decreased 1.4%
More informationLA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California
LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Transportation planner/coordinator, designer, builder
More informationFederal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004
U.S. Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004 Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation Executive Summary Recent
More informationFirstGroup plc South Western
FirstGroup plc South Western Rail franchise award Monday 27 March 2017 Overview Delighted to be selected by the Department for Transport (DfT) to operate the South Western franchise for at least seven
More informationFixed-Route Operational and Financial Review
Chapter II CHAPTER II Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review Chapter II presents an overview of route operations and financial information for KeyLine Transit. This information will be used to develop
More informationGreater Portland Transit District
Greater Portland Transit District TO: FROM: Freeport Town Council Greg Jordan - Metro General Manager DATE: September 10, 2014 SUBJECT: Metro Request to Pursue Grant Funding for Trial Express Bus Service
More information8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT
8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated May 27, 2010, from the Commissioner
More informationATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter
TTCHMENT.7 Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year 2012-13 Fourth Quarter Introduction The Orange County Transportation uthority (OCT) operates a countywide network of local, community,
More informationAnnual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018
Annual Route Report 2017 Operating Data Prepared for: Board of Directors Final 4/26/2018 Upon request, alternative formats of this document will be produced for people with disabilities. Please call 325-6094
More informationDemand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM
Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM Buffy Ellis KFH Group, Inc. Presentation Overview Brief introduction to the project DRT in the TCQSM, 1st Edition DRT in the TCQSM, 2nd Edition Key Issues
More informationMONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 215 Table of Contents SEPTEMBER 215 Section Page September Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...
More informationTTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS December 2014 STATUS: TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY Goal: Identify and evaluate different options for a revised fare structure, including pricing strategies
More informationSAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal
SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal Project Status Review of existing services and setting complete
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office
PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2018 Performance Management Office INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Performance Management Office FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD FY 2019 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable Collisions per 100k
More informationCHAPTER 5: Operations Plan
CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan Report Prepared by: Contents 5 OPERATIONS PLAN... 5-1 5.1 Proposed Service Changes... 5-2 5.1.1 Fiscal Year 2017... 5-2 5.1.2 Fiscal Year 2018... 5-6 5.1.3 Fiscal Year 2019...
More informationTable of Contents. List of Tables
Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Service Recommendations... 1 A. Extend Service on Fort Belvoir to New Post Exchange/Commissary Complex... 1 B. Improve Service Frequencies on Sunday from Current
More informationMount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus
Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! Study Overview and Timeline Phase 1: Collect and Analyze Data Project Kickoff, September 2017
More informationFY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission
FY 18-19 Transit Needs Assessment Ventura County Transportation Commission Contents List of Figures and Appendices.. 2 Appendices... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Ventura County Transportation
More informationMETROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES
METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES In the late 1990's when stabilization of bus service was accomplished between WMATA and the local jurisdictional bus systems, the need for service planning processes and procedures
More information2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary
2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary March 2018 2018 SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Executive Summary 2018 Service Implementation Plan Each year, Sound Transit prepares a Service Implementation
More informationDISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com
DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, 2017 FloridaExpressLanes.com This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures... ii List of Tables.... ii
More informationCentral Oregon Intergovernmental Council
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Regional Transit Master Plan (RTMP) Technical Advisory Committee March 8, 2013 Agenda Introductions (5 min) Project Update (5 min) Updated Demand Estimates (5 min)
More informationAppendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group
Appendix 4.1 J May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group CTPS CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF Staff to the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization MEMORANDUM
More informationWATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010
WATERBORNE TRANSIT CONCEPTS STUDY April 21, 2010 1 Overview: Summary of previous 2004/2005 Ferry Service analysis Results of recent study focusing on ferry service from Newport News Conclusions 2 2004/2005
More informationMONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 215 Table of Contents DECEMBER 215 Section Page December Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...
More informationPotomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results
1.1 Introduction The Prince William County Department of Transportation conducted a route proving exercise (RPE) and feasibility study of a proposed commuter ferry service on the Potomac River between
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager
PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY 2018 Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JANUARY 2018 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable
More informationManagement Presentation. November 2018
Management Presentation November 2018 Forward looking statements This presentation as well as oral statements made by officers or directors of Allegiant Travel Company, its advisors and affiliates (collectively
More informationPOLICY PAPER. A Tale of Three Transit Cities: Overview
CBI A Tale of Three Transit Cities: CBI invited transit experts from Paris and Montreal to discuss their experiences with GTHA regional transit officials Anne Golden and Vincent Racine November 7, 2016
More informationAbout This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold
ATTACHMENT A About This Report The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) operates a countywide network of local, community, rail connector, and express bus routes serving over 6, bus stops. OCTA
More informationVCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report
VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report Overview Quarter 2 Fiscal Year 2018-2019 This report provides performance measures for VCTC Intercity Bus Service covering the FY 2018-19
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: May 6, 2010 SUBJECT: LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD STREETCAR SERVICE ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission
More informationCorridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead
Corridor Analysis Outline Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead 1 Stacey Schwarcz, "Service Design for Heavy Demand Corridors: Limited-Stop Bus
More informationMetra Board of Directors. Board Meeting November 11, 2011
Metra Board of Directors Board Meeting November 11, 2011 State of Metra Operations Metra Board of Directors November 11, 2011 Presented by George Hardwidge Deputy Executive Director Operations System On-Time
More informationESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT
ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT November 8, 2017 Meeting Escambia County Area Transit 1515 W. Fairfield Drive Pensacola, FL 32501 850-595-3228 INTRODUCTION 2 Summary Background MTAC ECAT Benchmarks
More informationDial-A-Ride Focus Group Final Report
Dial-A-Ride Focus Group Final Report Prepared by: April 5, 2018 El Dorado County Transit Authority 6565 Commerce Way Diamond Springs, CA 95619 (530) 642-5383 www.eldoradotransit.com DIAL-A-RIDE FOCUS GROUP
More information