Prince Albert Road Towpath Ramp, Camden Feasibility Report
|
|
- Russell Pearson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Prince Albert Road Towpath Ramp, Camden Feasibility Report Function Location: RE-004 Date: 25 October 2012 Report No: 5016-UA UT31R-03
2
3 Prince Albert Road Towpath Ramp, Camden Feasibility Report Name Signature Prepared By: Andrew Branch Checked By: Andrew Branch Approved By: Clive James Report No 5016-UA UT31R-03 Date 25 October 2012 Issue Status: Issue Status Dates 01 First Issue 24/02/ Draft Incorporating client comments 26/03/ Final issue 25/10/ UA UT31-R-01
4 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES Topographical Existing Pedestrian Ramp Pedestrian Crossing Facilities Environment and Heritage Utilities and Services within the site Improvement in Wayfinding REVIEW OF DESIGN STANDARDS RAMP OPTIONS Option 1: Refurbishment of Existing Ramp Option 2: 2m Wide Ramp Option 3: 3m Wide Ramp Option 4: Do Nothing Option Other Considerations Access for Cyclists Access for Vehicles Signage Proposed Materials, Aesthetics and Construction Methods SUMMARY OPTIONS TABLE RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX A: OUTLINE DETAILS FOR PREFERRED OPTION APPENDIX B: SERVICES SEARCH RESULTS 5016-UA UT31-R-02 i
5 1 INTRODUCTION Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd was appointed by the Canal and River Trust to carry out a feasibility report to review options for the improving the existing pedestrian ramp adjacent to Prince Albert Bridge, Camden in order to improve ease of use and safety for cyclists and pedestrians. The canal towpath is a popular route used by both cyclists and pedestrians and the existing ramp forms a link from the towpath up onto Prince Albert Road. At present there is a perception that the steepness of the ramp is discouraging cyclists from using it and they are choosing to remain on the towpath heading eastwards into the congested Camden Town area. This report will examine the options for rebuilding the ramp to make it more attractive to cyclists and to enable them to join the highway cycle route adjacent on Prince Albert Rd. There is also an existing stair flight from the Prince Albert Road down to the towpath which is located adjacent to the canal bridge abutment. There is restricted visibility for pedestrians to see cyclists on the towpath as they emerge from under the bridge, and there is little time for cyclists to react. As a result this report will also consider options for relocating the staircase further away from the abutment of the road bridge. 2 CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES 2.1 Topographical The existing site comprises a sloped plot of land between the road and the canal. The plan length of the slope varies from between 15m at the existing steps to 23m adjacent to St Mark s Bridge (see sketch below). The length of the plot is approximately 48m. The levels of the footway adjacent to Prince Albert road vary between m at Prince Albert Bridge to m at St Mark s Bridge. The towpath levels through the site vary from m to m. Prince Albert Road Existing steps St Mark s bridge Existing ramp Regents Canal 5016-UA UT31-R-02 1
6 2.2 Existing Pedestrian Ramp The existing pedestrian ramp is approximately 2.0m wide. The overall rise of the ramp is 4.0m and the plan length is 40m, of which 36m is inclined. The resulting average gradient is 1 in 9 (11%) and a maximum gradient of approximately 1 in 7 (14%). There are no intermediate landings. 2.3 Pedestrian Crossing Facilities An existing pedestrian crossing is located on Prince Albert road adjacent to St Mark s Bridge, which provides access to Regent s Park and London Zoo. 2.4 Environment and Heritage The site is located adjacent to the north-east abutment of St. Mark s Bridge, which is a listed heritage structure and the solutions proposed must be separate from this structure. Tarmac Surfacing will not be used for any ramp elements. Trees are present on site however, whilst there are no Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) in place on the site, the site is within a Conservation Area so it is desirable that the options presented minimise the amount of trees that will need to be removed. In addition, no safety railings may be placed adjacent to the canal at the base of the ramp as they are liable to be used by canal users to tie up their vessels UA UT31-R-02 2
7 2.5 Utilities and Services within the site Details of the services search carried out by Canal and River Trust are included in Appendix B. Two above-ground brickwork service boxes believed to contain Low Voltage (220V) power cables are located within the north-west area of the site at the top of the slope adjacent to St. Mark s Bridge. Two Thames Water manholes are located on the embankment slope adjacent to St Mark s Bridge A High Voltage electric cable is located in a buried duct in the towpath. A gas main is located in the footway of Prince Albert Road 2.6 Improvement in Wayfinding There is currently very little signage for pedestrians and cyclists on the towpath or at street level. This project would give the opportunity to improve wayfinding by providing signage which could also be linked into wider wayfinding projects such as Legible London. 3 REVIEW OF DESIGN STANDARDS When designing ramps for mobility impaired users it is often stated that the ramp should be DDA compliant. In fact the DDA regulations were introduced to ensure that mobility impaired or disabled users are not restricted from using or accessing places and property but it does not specify minimum standards, such as gradients etc., and hence no design can be DDA compliant. A numbers of standards and guidance documents are available to help ensure designs take sufficient account of mobility impaired users. BS8300 is generally quoted when designing ramps and disabled access. However this was primarily aimed for buildings and hence the recommendations can be very onerous when they are applied to outdoor ramps, bridge accesses etc. In this case there are other documents which give guidance more relevant to the design situation. Three main design standards were reviewed in order to prepare preliminary options for this project as follows: BS8300: 2009 including Amendment No (BSI) A Disabled People s Access to the Countryside (DPAC). London Cycling Standards (TfL) A summary of the key design criteria for ramps and stairs is summarised in Table 1 overleaf. The table shows certain design criteria have significant differences depending on which standard is used. For the ramp design options (options 2 and 3) discussed in section 4, generally the recommendations set out in the DPAC were used as this aligns the closest with the design situation. Recommendations in BS8300 were found to be too onerous and it would not be possible to provide a compliant solution with the constraints of this site. The London Cycling Standards do not give recommendations on ramp design but where possible, geometric layout guidance was followed. The DPAC recommendations were treated as minimum standards and where possible these were exceeded as far as was possible UA UT31-R-02 3
8 Design Criteria BS8300: 2009 Disabled People s Access to the Countryside (DPAC) London Cycling Standards Ramp Gradient 1:20 to 1:12 1:20 to 1:12 No guidance Maximum Ramp Going Length Varies between 10m for 1:20 gradient to 2m for a gradient of 1:12 Varies between 15m for 1:20 gradient to 9m for a gradient of 1:12 No guidance Maximum Ramp Rise Length Varies between 500mm for 1:20 gradient to 166mm for a gradient of 1:12 750mm between landings No guidance Ramp bend radii No Guidance No Guidance 15m (Clause 4.5.4) Ramp Width Not less than 1500mm Not less than 1200mm 3.0m recommended 2.0 minimum Ramp Landing length 1500mm 1500mm No guidance Stair Design Going: mm Rise: mm Going: mm Rise: mm No guidance Stair Width mm 1200mm minimum No guidance Ramp Landing length 1500mm minimum 1500mm minimum No guidance Max No. of steps between landings 20 Provide landings to limit height of each flight to 2.0m No guidance Visibility S p l a y s No guidance No guidance X = 2.0m Y = 20m (15mph) Table 1: Summary of Key Design Guidance Key Design criteria considered onerous, or where the topography and land availability will make compliance difficult or impossible. Criteria that are contradictory between standards are highlighted in amber. Design criteria which show a good correlation UA UT31-R-02 4
9 4 R A M P O PTIONS 4.1 Option 1: Refurbishment of Existing Ramp The existing ramp connects the towpath adjacent to St Mark s bridge with the footway adjacent to Prince Albert Bridge. The existing ramp has an average gradient of 11% (1:9) and a maximum gradient of 14% (1:7). The ramp is in a fairly poor condition with the surfacing breaking up in places. There are no existing landings, and the ramp height is 4.0m. In order to comply with the recommendations contained in the DPAC code, the ramp would have to be split up into six ramped lengths with rises of 667mm each, and five intermediate landings would be required. The minimum recommended landing length is 1500mm, so the total landing length required would be 7.5m. The existing ramp length is approximately 36m however this would reduce to 28.5m after deductions for landing lengths and the resulting average gradient would be 1 in 7.1 (14%) This solution would require minor benching into the slope and also localised build-out of the embankments at landing positions, which would require small retaining walls to be built. It is also assumed that the ramp width would remain unchanged. In conclusion, there is nothing that can be done with the existing ramp to improve compliance with standards and to improve usability, other than to provide a cosmetic make-over to improve the ramp aesthetics within the wider context of the site s conservation area status and its proximity to St. Marks Bridge. The foot of the existing stair flight should be relocated approximately 10-11m away from the wing wall of Prince Albert Bridge as this will provide adequate visibility for cyclists emerging from under the bridge. The top landing of the stairs would remain at the end of the bridge parapet. A straight flight of stairs could be constructed in between with one landing at mid height. Each flight would require 11 rises of 177mm and 10 goings of 350mm, with a single 1500mm long landing in between to comply with the requirements of BS8300. To comply with the Disabled People s Access to the Countryside Guide, the stairs in the revised location would require two flights comprising 12 goings of approximately 290mm with 13 rises of 150mm would be required. It is not possible to comply with both this guidance and BS8300 for recommended going lengths and riser heights. Either stair solution would require some minor benching and build-out to accommodate the landing within the existing topography. It is also recommended that the existing entry point from the main road footpath is widened to 2.0m to improve accessibility. No buildability issues are anticipated with this option UA UT31-R-02 5
10 4.2 Option 2: 2m Wide Ramp The only way to accommodate a ramp with a compliant gradient and the requisite number of landings that will comply with standards is by increasing the plan length of the ramp. If the access point from the footway on Prince Albert Road is moved adjacent to St Mark s Bridge by creating a new opening in the metal railings then the overall ramp length can be increased to 68m by creating a path with a single hairpin bend halfway along. This provides a single access/egress point at the top and bottom of the ramp which is favoured by the Highways Authority. An indicative outline of this route, with a 2.0m wide footway is shown in Figure 1 below: New TfL signage Figure 1: 2.0m wide ramp route Allowing for upper and lower landings a minimum of 1.5m long, two intermediate landings of 2.0m at the stair interface, two additional 1.5m long intermediate landings, plus a 3.9m long landing at the hairpin, then the total landing length is 13.9m and the remaining plan length for slopes is 54.1m. If the landings are set with a 1 in 40 fall to aid drainage, then this will account for a total height of 350mm, and the remaining 3850mm of drop from pavement to towpath will give an average slope gradient of 3850/54100 = (7.12%, equivalent to 1:14) This represents a substantial improvement from the gradients attainable with Option 1. A two metre wide path is proposed as this is the minimum width recommended by TfL Standards for combined public / cycle path routes. This standard recommends a bend radius of 15m, which is not attainable within the site boundary. However the achievable radius in this layout is considered to be adequate for the majority of competent cyclists. An added advantage of this option is that if by moving the egress for cyclists close to St Mark s Bridge, cyclists will be able to avail of the existing crossing facilities. These facilities could be upgraded by Camden Borough Council to improve facilities for cyclists wishing to cross over the main road and then cycle along it towards Camden. A new staircase would be located as shown between the first upper and lower intermediate landings as shown in Figure 1. This would be 2.0m wide and will require one intermediate landing UA UT31-R-02 6
11 In order to accommodate the hairpin part of the ramp within the existing slope, some substantial cutting into the slope and build-out will be required and if the existing slope is reprofiled above and below the new footway, the resulting slope gradients will be too steep. Consequently retaining walls will be required on the upper and lower haves of the path leading into and out of the hairpin and pedestrian railings will be needed to prevent falling from height. This option would require the removal/relocation of the brickwork junction box. A two metre wide path has been selected to minimise the height and extent of retaining walls and also minimises required tree removal. 4.3 Option 3: 3m Wide Ramp This option is similar to Option 2 described however the width of the footway has been increased to 3.0m. (Figure 2) New TfL signage Figure 2: 3.0m wide ramp route The proposed alignment has the same path length and gradients as Option 2. The key difference is that in order to build this option, more cutting will be required into the existing slope and more build out will be required on top of the existing slope to achieve the width, particularly at the hairpin bend. Consequently retaining walls will be required on the upper and lower halves of the path leading into and out of the hairpin and pedestrian railings will be needed to prevent falling from height. The retaining wall structures will be more pronounced and will have a greater visual impact on the site compared to Option 2. It will not be possible to position the layout of the route to avoid trees due to the increased width, particularly on the upper ramp and so the main ramp lengths are straight UA UT31-R-02 7
12 This option would require the removal/relocation of the both junction boxes. A new staircase would be located as shown between the first upper and lower intermediate landings as shown in Figure 1. This would be 2.0m wide and will require one intermediate landing. 4.4 Option 4: Do Nothing Option The existing ramp has a maximum gradient of 14% (1:7) and is 2.0m wide. The surfacing is worn and cracked in places. The top of the ramp is adjacent to Prince Albert Bridge and the opening onto the footpath is 1.2m wide between the railings and the bridge parapet. This narrow opening presents a restriction to pedestrians and cyclists at the top of the ramp. Wayfinding for pedestrians and cyclists is also poor. The exit at the top of the ramp is directly onto the footpath of Prince Albert Road and cyclists heading toward Camden will generally cross the road at this point rather than use the existing pedestrian crossing approximately 25m to the west. It is possible that some minor widening of the opening at the footway fence would improve access to the ramp. Some minor resurfacing work at the top of the ramp would also be required. 5 Other Considerations 5.1 Access for Cyclists A key objective of the project is to encourage cyclists heading east along the towpath to utilise an improved towpath ramp to join the cycle route on Prince Albert Rd in order to travel towards Camden Town. The pedestrian crossing adjacent to St Mark s Bridge would benefit from upgrades in accordance with the London Cycling Design Standards Document if Option 2 or Option 3 is implemented. The crossing and approaches will need to be formally assessed and a suitable arrangement developed. Camden have indicated that ideally they would like to convert the footway between St Marks Bridge and the ramp exit to shared use and delineate with corduroy tactile paving. Additionally a drop kerb would be installed to allow cyclists to access the pavement area. In the longer term either a toucan upgrade would be considered or an entire remodel of the junction. The public footway and crossing areas are outside the site and any improvements are envisaged to be carried out by Camden Council. 5.2 Access for Vehicles Access for vehicles is not considered necessary and will be impossible to achieve due to the hairpin bends on Options 2 & 3. The provision of bollards (possibly removable) should be considered to restrict unauthorised vehicular access UA UT31-R-02 8
13 5.2.1 Signage Encouraging use of the ramp is a major element of this project and signage will be a very important factor in achieving this. The TfL Legible London scheme has recommendations for signage and it is envisaged that a minilith outer type sign would be provided close to the bottom landing of the ramp indicating an alternative cycle route into Camden along borough roads Proposed Materials, Aesthetics and Construction Methods Options 2 and 3 will require the construction of retaining walls to support the revised ramp alignment. The shape of the walls will require significant detailing because the base profile will need to be stepped to allow for the gradient of the ramp and the top of wall will be inclined at its interface with the re-profiled slope. In addition a guardrail will be required to the top of retaining walls to prevent falls. In order to construct the complex wall shapes it is recommended that the retaining walls are built with insitu reinforced concrete. If brickwork cladding is used to finish the front face of the wall, the top courses will need to be cut and dressed to suit the inclined profile of the stringcourse, which will follow the profile of the ramp. It is therefore recommended that a patterned profile concrete finish is adopted for the wall faces, and the upper stringcourse section is given a high-quality plain faced finish. We would consider that a patterned profile rebate finish to concrete faces would resemble normal highway infrastructure, and that a carefully selected pattern profile formwork liner, such as those supplied by Reckli Ltd, should be applied to provide a high-quality finish. Carefully selected climbing plants could be used to disguise the lower sections of the retaining wall. Some over-excavation into the existing slope will be required typically with a temporary cut slope of 1 in 1.5 in order to build the retailing walls, which will then be backfilled with structural grade backfill to the finished profile. The construction of the upper retaining wall adjacent to the footway will likely require temporary sheet piling to support the excavations during construction, because a temporary cut slope will likely undermine the footway. It is assumed that construction will commence at the base of the slope, with the upper sections being built last. Options 2 & 3 are rated equal in this regard, however Option 3 may require the use of sheet piling to support the temporary excavations since this option requires more benching into the existing slope than Option 2. It is assumed that ground conditions will be favourable, however a site investigation within the works will be needed in order to carry out a preliminary design and to prepare a detailed cost estimate. We would recommend that black handrails are fitted on to the retaining walls and that the chosen style is complimentary to the existing railings in place on the footway. In addition handrails should be provided for users so that there is always a handrail on at least one side of the ramp. Tarmac surfacing is not considered desirable in this location however we would recommend a bituminous path construction with a buff coloured anti-skid surface dressing. If this is not acceptable then options for paving the ramp include precast concrete flags or block paving, which are both already in use on the towpath UA UT31-R-02 9
14 The stairs could be built with concrete brick or block risers with precast concrete flagging used to form the goings and edgings. Corduroy blister pavings will be required at all landing positions on the stair flights. The ramp is not currently lit at night but it is understood that there is a certain amount of spill light from the adjacent road. It is recommended that in detailed design an assessment of the ramp is carried out to determine if lighting is required and if to what specification. Access for construction plant and vehicles is envisaged to be primarily by road. Temporary lane and footpath closures may be required for this and will need to be approved by Camden. There is limited scope for water based plant/deliveries however the towpath is weight limited to 1.5 tonnes which will restrict options UA UT31-R-02 10
15 Prince Albert Road Cycle Ramp, Camden - Feasibility Report 6 SUMMARY OPTIONS TABLE Option Construction Cost 1 To be advised by CRT Term Contractor Risks Buildability Maintenance Environment & Heritage Planning Cyclist/pedestrian collision Non-compliant gradients. No construction issues expected from improvements to footway and from relocating the stair flight. Anti-skid surfacing will require replacement. Proposed surfacing to be approved by stakeholders. Planning approval may not be required as the works could be considered to be routine maintenance. 2 Approximately 245k construction cost. 3 Approximately 265k construction cost. 4 No capital costs involved unless minor improvement works are undertaken. Cyclist/pedestrian collision Cyclist/pedestrian collision Cyclist/pedestrian collision Non-compliant gradients. The upper retaining wall excavation will require sheet piled temporary works. Access for construction plant will be limited and may require lane closures. The upper retaining wall excavation will require sheet piled temporary works. Access for construction plant will be limited and may require lane closures. No construction issues expected from improvements to footway access width. Anti-skid surfacing will require replacement. Handrails will require repainting. Graffiti removal from concrete surfaces Anti-skid surfacing will require replacement. Handrails will require repainting. Graffiti removal from concrete surfaces Anti-skid surfacing will require replacement. Proposed surfacing and concrete finish to be approved by stakeholders. Proposed surfacing and concrete finish to be approved by stakeholders. Proposed minor improvements to be approved by stakeholders. Planning approval will be required for this option. Planning approval will be required for this option. Planning approval may not be required as the works could be considered to be routine maintenance UA UT31-R-02 11
16 Prince Albert Road Cycle Ramp, Camden - Feasibility Report 7 RECOMMENDATIONS Option 1 does not provide any immediate benefits other than cosmetic over and above Option 4 (do nothing). Neither option provides a satisfactory solution to the issue of encouraging cyclists to use the ramp. Option 3 will provide a better experience for users due to the increased width compared to Option 2, however, Option 3 will require more extensive earthworks and tree removal than Option 2. Since there are no Tree Preservation Orders within the site, Option 3 is preferable. The retaining walls for Option 3 will be bigger and potentially more visually intrusive than the retaining walls for Option 2, however, if the wall finishes and slope landscaping are carefully considered and developed in sympathy with the adjoining built environment, then there is an opportunity to enhance the appearance and amenity value of the site. We would therefore recommend that Option 3 is developed to detailed design UA UT31-R-02 12
17 APPENDIX A OUTLINE DETAILS FOR PREFERRED OPTION SKETCH NUMBER S001-UA003174
18
19 APPENDIX B SERVICES SEARCH RESULTS
20 British Waterways Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited Professional Services Contract 2011 to 2014 Task Brief Utilities Survey o:\bids and prequals 2011\british waterways tasks\prince albert road cycle ramp\client brief\prince albert road ramp design brief.docx, page 14 of 15, 09/12/2011
21 British Waterways Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited Professional Services Contract 2011 to 2014 Task Brief o:\bids and prequals 2011\british waterways tasks\prince albert road cycle ramp\client brief\prince albert road ramp design brief.docx, page 15 of 15, 09/12/2011
Queen s Circus Roundabout
Stage 2 Road Safety Audit Ref: 1128-RSA-01 Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave By: Capital Traffic Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Andy Haunton, Audit Team Leader Jonathan Thompson, Audit Team Member
More informationYOU! Kensal Town Towpath Public Consultation WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU COULD WIN. Friday 21st December 2012 & Friday 8th February 2013
London s greatest park, the historic canals and rivers, provide a cherished haven for people and wildlife. They are free for everyone to use and provide a welcome relief from busy city streets. We d like
More information5.7 Local road upgrades
5.7 Local road upgrades Local roads around the St Peters interchange and the intersection of Campbell Road and Euston Road would be upgraded to ensure safe and efficient connections with the New M5, and
More informationFelixstowe Branch Line FAQ
Felixstowe Branch Line FAQ How was the location of the track doubling work decided? We undertook a study to identify how to meet the freight demand along the Felixstowe Branch Line by modelling the route.
More informationAppendix C Stage 1 Road Safety Audit
Monaghan County Council N2 Monaghan Town to Emyvale Road Improvements Part 8 Application Description of Proposed Development Appendix C Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Draft 1 11 April 2013 \\DUBNTS03\DUBLIN_JOBS\218000\218692-00\4.
More informationLondon Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team
London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team AERODROME ROAD PEDESTRIAN FACILITY AND BUS STOP INTRODUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT Job Number: 60668 Doc Ref: S106/12-13/60668 Author: Manoj Kalair
More informationAppendix 6 Fulbourn Greenway Review
Appendix 6 Fulbourn Greenway Review Nigel Brigham & Associates A report for 1 Introduction This report is based on fieldwork carried out in 2016 to review the Greenway network around Cambridge as shown
More informationSpeed control humps - Scotland, England and Wales
Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/91 September 1991 Speed control humps - Scotland, England and Wales Introduction Road humps are an extremely effective means of keeping vehicle speeds low. The standard round
More informationRegulatory Committee
Page 1 - Proposed Turning Movement Bans at South Gate Junction, Dorchester Regulatory Committee Date of Meeting 16 March 2017 Officer Subject of Report Executive Summary Andrew Martin Service Director
More informationACORNS PROJECTS LIMITED
ACORNS PROJECTS LIMITED A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane, Slough, Berkshire Combined Stage 1 and 2 Road Safety Audit For Slough Borough Council Prepared by Acorns Projects Limited Safety Traffic Project
More informationLYNDHURST NEW URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA STRUCTURE PLAN. Lyndhurst New Urban Development Area Structure Plan OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
APPENDIX 15.1-3 LYNDHURST NEW URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Purpose of the Structure Plan Lyndhurst New Urban Development Area Structure Plan OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LSP-P1 The District
More informationUniclass L534+L212. August home zones. paving PRECAST CONCRETE PAVING SOLUTIONS FOR TODAY S RESIDENTIAL STREET ENVIRONMENTS.
August 2005 Uniclass L534+L212 paving home zones PRECAST CONCRETE PAVING SOLUTIONS FOR TODAY S RESIDENTIAL STREET ENVIRONMENTS www.paving.org.uk Home Zone Principles Home Zones are residential streets
More information20mph Speed Limit Zones
Traffic Advisory Leaflet 7/91 May 1991 20mph Speed Limit Zones Summary This leaflet illustrates the main steps in the procedures for the implementation of 20mph zones. It provides brief details on: the
More informationJohn Betts School Crossing Review
John Betts School Crossing Review Paddenswick Road London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham August 2015 DOCUMENT CONTROL Project Centre has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions from the
More informationA63 Castle Street, Hull HullBID Network Lunch 24 August 2017
A63 Castle Street, Hull HullBID Network Lunch 24 August 2017 James D Leeming Senior Project Manager What we will cover today? Introduction to Highways England and the Road Investment Strategy A63 Scheme
More informationLLANBEDR ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
LLANBEDR ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS NON-MOTORISED USER SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT CPF: 5111 Client: Gwynedd Council Document Control Sheet Document Title: Document Author: Project Manager: Project Title: A496 Llanbedr
More informationDate: 11 th January, From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group. Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council
Date: 11 th January, 2017 From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group To: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council Re: Neighbourhood Plan Report to Parish Council Meeting 17 Jan 2017 The Steering
More informationSeek the Board s approval for the Donald Place kerb and channel renewal to progress to final design, tender and construction; and
3. DONALD PLACE - KERB AND CHANNEL RENEWAL General Manager responsible: General Manager City Environment Officer responsible: Transport and City Streets Manager Author: Michelle Flanagan, Streets Capital
More informationMovement Strategy. November On behalf of Barton Oxford LLP
Movement Strategy November 2014 On behalf of Barton Oxford LLP BARTON PARK, OXFORD. Movement Strategy 17/11/2014 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date
More informationHENLEAZE, STOKE BISHOP & WESTBURY-ON-TRYM NEIGHBOURHOOD PARTNERSHIP September Chock Lane Traffic Calming scheme Monitoring Report
HENLEAZE, STOKE BISHOP & WESTBURY-ON-TRYM NEIGHBOURHOOD PARTNERSHIP September 2015 Title: Officer: Chock Lane Traffic Calming scheme Monitoring Report Rob Grieve, Principal Officer, Highways and Traffic,
More informationReport to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub
Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018 Lead officer: Chris Tunstall GCP Director of Transport A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub 1. Purpose 1.1 The list of
More informationBritish Standard Paving
www.rpcltd.co.uk/paving/commercial/british-standard-paving British Standard Paving BS Paving () British Standard Paving Flags RPC Ltd produce BS Flags, to suit every requirement for pavements both commercial
More informationHazardous Cattle Crossing: Use of Flashing Amber Lamps
THE HIGHWAYS AGENCY THE SCOTTISH OFFICE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THE WELSH OFFICE Y SWYDDFA GYMREIG THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR NORTHERN IRELAND Hazardous Cattle Crossing: Use of Flashing Amber
More informationCenturion Way Chichester
Centurion Way Chichester Work book of plans to show details of the Centurion Way, its links, and potential developments and enhancements from linking to the South Downs National Park all the way to the
More informationDATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1
M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1 The purpose of the Accessible Trails Checklist (below) is to help the community review
More information12. Sowter Road Introduction Christchurch Court
12. Sowter Road 12.1 Introduction 12.1.1 The flood defences at Sowter Road are located between St Alkmund s Way and the Silk Mill on the west bank of the River Derwent. 12.1.2 This site is split into the
More informationBridge School, Longmoor Campus, Coppice View Road, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B73 6UE
Committee Date: 22/01/2015 Application Number: 2014/05949/PA Accepted: 08/12/2014 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 02/02/2015 Ward: Sutton Vesey Bridge School, Longmoor Campus, Coppice View
More informationPlanning Committee. Thursday, 26 May 2016
Planning Committee Thursday, 26 May 2016 Attendees: Substitutes: Councillor Lyn Barton (Member), Councillor Helen Chuah (Member), Councillor Theresa Higgins (Chairman), Councillor Brian Jarvis (Member),
More informationPerth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 27 August 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 27 August 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 5(7) 08/414 Erection of kennels and cattery at Baltree Farm, Hatchbank, Kinross, KY13
More informationAppendix 8 Sawston Greenway Review
Appendix 8 Sawston Greenway Review Nigel Brigham & Associates A report for 1 Introduction This report is based on fieldwork carried out in 2016 to review the Greenway network around Cambridge as shown
More informationStainforth & Keadby Canal Installation of Multiuser Path
Stainforth & Keadby Canal Installation of Multiuser Path Introduction North Lincolnshire Council has entered into an agreement with Canal & River Trust to develop proposals to introduce a multiuser path
More informationTo: From: Plans showing the alignments of the routes discussed in this section are presented in Appendix A.
Project: Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys To: CCC Subject: Considerations for Corridor Option Plans From: Atkins Date: 1 Sep 2016 cc: 1. Introduction This note summarises considerations undertaken
More informationKent Pedestrian Guard Railing Assessment
Kent Pedestrian Guard Railing Assessment Canterbury Final Report for JTB March 2012 Project Number B1649000 Jacobs Eng UK Ltd, Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent ME15 6GB Document control
More informationProposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:
Proposals for the Harrogate / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme August / September 2016 Supported by: Introduction Key Benefits Proposals are currently being developed for changes to the junction of
More informationPSP 75 Lancefield Road. Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information
PSP 75 Lancefield Road Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information September 2017 The northern crossing of Jacksons Creek proposed within the Lancefield Road PSP is a key part of the ultimate
More informationThe Point Roundabout Improvement Scheme
The Point Roundabout Improvement Scheme Background and Existing Situation The junction of North Wall Quay, East Wall Road and the East Link Bridge, also known as the Point roundabout, is located in the
More informationFinchley and Golders Green Area Committee 27 April 2017
Finchley and Golders Green Area Committee 27 April 2017 Title Report of Wards Status Urgent Key Enclosures Officer Contact Details Junction of Regents Park Road / Tillingbourne Gardens, N3 Commissioning
More informationThe decision on whether to take enforcement action falls outside the scope of delegated powers.
5k 16/0031 Reg d: 19.01.2016 Expires: 15.03.201 6 Ward: Nei. 24.02.201 BVPI Full Number of 11/8 On Con. 6 Target Weeks on Target? Exp: Cttee Day: GE No LOCATION: PROPOSAL: TYPE: Phillips Court, 32 Goldsworth
More informationChapter 6 Route Window NE5 Seven Kings station. Transport for London
Chapter 6 Route Window NE5 Seven Kings station Transport SEVEN KINGS STATION 6 Route Window NE5 Seven Kings Station Transport Introduction 6.1 All construction activities in this route window are associated
More informationTraffic Calming and Road Safety Provision Options Woore Village
Traffic Calming and Road Safety Provision Options Woore Village Contents 1 Executive Summary 4 2 Introduction 6 2.1 Background 6 3 Existing Provisions and Conditions 7 3.1 Background supporting option
More informationAll reports. 1. Governance Service receive draft report Name of GSO DPR
DELEGATED POWERS REPORT NO. SUBJECT: Redevelopment at Grahame Park Estate, NW9, Phase 1B Sub-phase 1 Highways Agreement under Sections 38 and 278 of the Highways Act 1980. Control sheet All of the following
More information3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY
9 3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY 3.1 COLTA The Chain of Lakes Trail Association (COLTA) trail, formerly identified as the Chester Spur Line, was completed and opened for use in June 2011. The
More information03 Opportunities and Strategies Union Canal Study 17
03 Opportunities and Strategies 17015 Union Canal Study 17 Introduction This chapter summarises the issues, opportunities for improvement and proposed strategy outcomes of the study of the towpath. The
More informationUnlocking our Coastal Heritage Strand 2 - Watermouth Bay, nr Ilfracombe
Unlocking our Coastal Heritage Strand 2 - Watermouth Bay, nr Ilfracombe In order to provide a safe route for users of the South West Coast Path this project realigned 265m of the A399 coast road to incorporate
More informationPassenger Focus report to Cheshire County Council on access requirements for. Crewe Railway Station
Passenger Focus report to Cheshire County Council on access requirements for Crewe Railway Station June 2007 Foreword Introduction The purpose of this report is to present the case for improvements to
More informationGold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content
Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter twelve Social impact Chapter content Social impact assessment process...235 Existing community profile...237 Consultation...238 Social impacts and mitigation strategies...239
More informationMajor Scheme Business Case Summary Report for Programme Entry
Paper A Heart of South West Local Transport Board Major Scheme Business Case Summary Report for Programme Entry M5 Junction 25, Taunton July 2016 1 SCHEME SUMMARY Scheme Name M5 Junction 25, Taunton Date
More informationChapter 14 Route Window C12 Mile End Park and Eleanor Street shafts. Transport for London
Chapter 14 Route Window C12 Mile End Park and Eleanor Street shafts MILE END PARK AND ELEANOR STREET SHAFTS 14 Route Window C12 Mile End Park and Eleanor Street shafts Introduction 14.1 Crossrail s twin
More informationEnvironment Committee 24 September 2015
Environment Committee 24 September 2015 Title Enforcement of Single Yellow Lines on Bank Holidays Report of Commissioning Director - Environment Wards All Status Public Urgent No Enclosures Key No Appendix
More informationWELCOME TO PROJECT EVERGREEN 3 CHILTERN S PROPOSED NEW OXFORD TO LONDON ROUTE
PROJECT EVERGREEN 3 WELCOME TO PROJECT EVERGREEN 3 CHILTERN S PROPOSED NEW OXFORD TO LONDON ROUTE Chiltern Railways is proposing a railway improvement scheme between Oxford and Bicester (the Evergreen
More informationSchedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/18/0064/F Great Yarmouth Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:
Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May 2018 Reference: 06/18/0064/F Great Yarmouth Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date: 24-04-2018 Applicant: Proposal: Site: Mr Mavroudis Clear weather hoardings
More informationCITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL WRITTEN SUBMISSION
CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Summary WRITTEN SUBMISSION Waverley and Haymarket are significant stations for Scotland as well as Edinburgh. The number of passengers using them has grown substantially in recent
More informationTraffic Calming. Traffic Calming. Traffic Calming. Traffic Calming. Traffic Calming Traffic Islands - Permanent...174
...173 Traffic Islands - Permanent...174 Traffic Islands - Demountable...175 Protective Guardrailing...176 Traffic Ramps...177 S-Ramp...178 Speed Cushions...179 Speedcheck...180 Keycheck...181 Interlocking
More informationAppendix 9 Melbourn Greenway Review
Appendix 9 Melbourn Greenway Review Nigel Brigham & Associates A report for 1 Introduction This report is based on fieldwork carried out in 2016 to review the Greenway network around Cambridge as shown
More informationPort Macquarie-Hastings Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan. Working Paper COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Port Macquarie-Hastings Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan Working Paper COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT December 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 2 Submissions... 3 2.1 Stakeholder
More informationConstruction Staging Adelaide Street West
REPORT FOR ACTION Construction Staging Adelaide Street West Date: October 6, 2016 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District
More informationScotchbarn Lane, Prescot Accessibility Statement
Scotchbarn Lane, Prescot Accessibility Statement Lancashire Mortgage Corporation Ltd August 2012 Issue R001B 9X0789 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including
More information7. CONSULTATION ON THE TRAVELLER SITES ALLOCATIONS DOCUMENT
7. CONSULTATION ON THE TRAVELLER SITES ALLOCATIONS DOCUMENT REPORT OF: HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Contact Officer: Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer Email: nathan.splistead@midsussex.gov.uk
More informationPART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT
PART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared in support
More informationChapter 26 Route Window SE6A Manor Wharf. Transport for London
Chapter 26 Route Window SE6A Manor Wharf Transport MANOR WHARF 26 Route Window SE6A Manor Wharf Transport Introduction 26.1 The route window lies within the London Borough of Bexley. The works in the
More information1 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE 2 ND CONCESSION FROM BRISTOL ROAD TO DOANE ROAD TOWNS OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND NEWMARKET
Report No. 3 of the Regional Council Meeting of March 28, 2013 1 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE 2 ND CONCESSION FROM BRISTOL ROAD TO DOANE ROAD TOWNS OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND NEWMARKET The recommends: 1. Receipt
More informationBorough High Street Low Emission Neighbourhood
Borough High Street Low Emission Neighbourhood Colourful Crossings Design Brief Better Bankside Business Improvement District Brief for Graphic Consultants December 2017 Page 1 of 10 1. Introduction Borough
More informationNon-technical summary
Introduction NTS1 NTS2 NTS3 Troika Developments Ltd (Troika) has submitted a planning application to Bournemouth Borough Council (BBC) for an extension of time to implement planning permission 7/2004/16450/G,
More informationSpencer Environmental Appendix A: Alternative Analysis for Construction Access Route
Spencer Environmental Appendix A: Alternative Analysis for Construction Access Route February 2015 Valley ine-stage 1 RT EISA Update FINA REPORT Page A1 Memorandum AECOM ConnectEd Transit Partnership 10235
More informationTOWN TRUST. Bury St Edmunds Railway Station
BURY ST EDMUNDS TOWN TRUST conserving buildings of historic interest The future of Bury St Edmunds Railway Station Part I Report October 2015 1 The future of Bury St Edmunds Railway Station NOTE: This
More informationSky Temporary Car Park Transport Statement
001 Issue 26 August 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility
More informationAbbey Chesterton bridge Questions & Answers
Abbey Chesterton bridge Questions & Answers Please click on links below to go to individual subjects: Bridge location and access routes Timescales Bridge details and accessibility Construction compound
More informationCapital & Counties. October 2007
Capital & Counties October 2007 Contents!" # $ % % $ & ' "&( # Appendix 1 Appendix 2 1 Introduction 1.1.1 Wincheap regeneration scheme proposes a 600 space Park and Ride facility to replace the existing
More informationRoundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package)
Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package) 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 Total TOTAL COST Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange 0.5m 0.5m FUNDING CIL 0.05m 0.05m Growth Deal
More informationNOTICE OF REQUIREMENT: NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY: SH6 TARAMAKAU BRIDGE PROJECT
1 July 2016 Planning Manager Westland District Council 36 Weld Street HOKITIKA Attn Alex Dunn Dear Alex NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT: NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY: SH6 TARAMAKAU BRIDGE PROJECT On 15 June 2016 you issued
More informationOpen Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy
Agenda Item 7 Executive Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy Report to: Executive Date: 02 September 2014 Subject: Lincoln East West Link Road Phase 1
More informationArrangements for the delivery of minor highway maintenance services by Town and Parish Councils
Arrangements for the delivery of minor highway maintenance services by Town and Parish Councils Cabinet Date of Meeting 8 March 2017 Officer Cllr Peter Finney, Cabinet Member for Environment, Infrastructure
More informationThe Leeds Railway Station (Southern Entrance) Order
The Leeds Railway Station (Southern Entrance) Order Traffic, Access & Urban Realm Report May 2012 Metro Report 296480/RPT22 Revision B The Leeds Railway Station 296480 BNI EST 22 A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1485302859
More informationDonegal County Council
Donegal County Council Roads & Transportation Directorate PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 (as amended) Nature and Extent of proposed development in accordance with Part 8 requirements of the
More informationProject No Brent Cross, Cricklewood London, UK Phase 1A North RMA
Project No. 431679 Brent Cross, Cricklewood London, UK Phase 1A North RMA River Overshadowing Impact Study For Waterman Energy, Environment & Design 18 th November 2014 431679 Report 2 Rel.3 1 of 23 431679rep2v3.docx
More informationK SIGNAGE & TRAFFIC CONTROL. Table of Contents
Table of Contents K1. ACCOMMODATION OF TRAFFIC... 1 K2. MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION SIGNING... 1 K3. SUBDIVISION SIGNS... 2 K4. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES... 2 K4.1 Traffic Signs Regulations... 2 K4.2 Materials...
More informationAirdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1
Environmental Statement Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Scheme Proposal The scheme proposals are to re-open the Airdrie to Bathgate section of the former Bathgate and Coatbridge Railway (Monklands Railway)
More informationEAST SUFFOLK LINES. Stations Investment Plan. Produced by the East Suffolk Lines Community Rail Partnership
EAST SUFFOLK LINES Stations Investment Plan Produced by the East Suffolk Lines Community Rail Partnership Updated February 2016 1. Introduction 1.1 This document (originally produced in 2010, updated in
More informationNext Generation Cycleway Design. Improving connectivity and cycling behaviours through design
Next Generation Cycleway Design Improving connectivity and cycling behaviours through design Safe segregation between Place Users to offer improved safety and a defined space for each user group Elevated
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS WITHIN BIRMINGHAM
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS WITHIN BIRMINGHAM For services in respect of: Highway Maintenance and Management Car Parking Traffic Management Signatories: For Birmingham
More informationEAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, :30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library
EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, 2013 6:30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Housekeeping and Updates a) Housekeeping b) CLC
More informationLevel Crossings Design and Installation
Discipline: Engineering (Track & Civil) Category: Standard Level Crossings Design and Installation ETD-16-02 Applicability New South Wales CRIA (NSW CRN) Primary Source ARTC NSW Standard XDS 02 Document
More informationGold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter content. Chapter four Route selection and staging
Chapter four Route selection and staging Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter four Route selection and staging Chapter content Route selection...73 Section one: Helensvale to Griffith University...74 Section
More informationDate 24/10/2011. Date 04/11/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 10/11/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 10/11/2011.
DELEGATED POWERS REPORT NO. 1489 SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Review, Junction of Oakleigh Road North and the A1000 Control sheet All of the following actions MUST be completed at each stage of the process
More informationIRISH PARKING ASSOCIATION. The use of Pay and Display in Traffic Management in Kilkenny City
IRISH PARKING ASSOCIATION The use of Pay and Display in Traffic Management in Kilkenny City Kilkenny City and Environs Draft Mobility Management Plan 2009-2014 2014 Draft Mobility Management Plan Background
More informationTHE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW (HOUNSLOW HIGH STREET QUARTER) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2015 THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW
THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW (HOUNSLOW HIGH STREET QUARTER) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 201 THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW RESPONSE TO WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LIMITED
More informationKirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements. Non-technical Summary. For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Non-technical Summary For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme. Kirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements Introduction A concrete sea wall fronts
More informationCommissioning Director - Environment
Finchley and Golders Green Area Committee 27 April 2017 Title Report of Wards Status Urgent Key Enclosures Summers Lane,N12 Request for Pedestrian Improvements Commissioning Director - Environment Woodhouse
More informationBusway between West Cambourne site and the junction of the A1303 / A428
Project: A428 To: CCC Subject: Routes From: Atkins Date: 14 April 2016 cc: This note summarises the policy references to a bus link between Cambourne and Cambridge, in particular references to the route
More informationBlackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL
Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal GENERAL What is the project? The Victorian Government has committed to eliminating a number of the busiest level crossings
More informationMaidenhead Bridge. Proposed Work
W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be
More informationKent Pedestrian Guard Railing Assessment
Kent Pedestrian Guard Railing Assessment Canterbury - Consultation Report November 2010 Project Number B1555300 Jacobs Eng UK Ltd, Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent ME15 6GB Document control
More informationConcept Curtin Precinct Map and Code
Concept Curtin Precinct Map and Code Proposed changes from the revised Curtin Group Centre Draft Master Plan recommendations Disclaimer: This document is intended to show the proposed changes to the existing
More informationIsland Eastern Corridor Boardwalk-Cycleway Feasibility Study
For discussion on 12 January 2012 Island Eastern Corridor Boardwalk-Cycleway Feasibility Study PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to understand and promote the feasibility of incorporating the Harbourfront
More informationProject Planning, Compliance, and Funding
Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding The plans above offer high level guidance to ensure that the A.T. is managed effectively as a whole unit in a decentralized management structure. Cooperative management
More informationSUTTON UNDER WHITESTONECLIFFE PARISH COUNCIL
SUTTON UNDER WHITESTONECLIFFE PARISH COUNCIL A170 Sutton Bank Application for a Permanent Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) for Prohibition of HGVs The purpose of this document is to support a request from
More information2.2 For these reasons the provision of tourist signing will only be considered:
TOURIST SIGNING POLICY 2015 1. DEFINITION 1.1 A tourist destination is defined as a permanently established attraction which attracts or is used by visitors to an area and is open to the public without
More informationOpen Report on behalf of Executive Director for Environment & Economy. Highways and Transport Scrutiny Committee
Agenda Item 9 Policy and Scrutiny Open Report on behalf of Executive Director for Environment & Economy Report to: Date: 13 June 2016 Subject: Summary: Highways and Transport Scrutiny Committee Rail Update
More informationRevalidation: initial consultation
Revalidation: initial consultation During 2009, we will be formulating our proposals for revalidation. Please help us to shape our policy by offering your views. Page 2 GOC revalidation: initial consultation
More informationAGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY
March 19, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY TYPE OF ITEM: Action STATEMENT OF ISSUE The Wakulla Environmental Institute (WEI) Trail is one of several trails
More information