LifeWatch, costing and funding. The LifeWatch e-infrastructure financial issues

Transcription

1 LifeWatch, costing and funding The LifeWatch e-infrastructure financial issues

2 LIFEWATCH architecture providing infrastructure services to users User groups can create their own e- laboratories or e-services within a common architecture of the infrastructure The e-laboratories are the community driven infrastructure, which promotes innovation. Sharing data and algorithms, scientists can address questions not otherwise accessible

3 LifeWatch vs. a single sited R.I. No large capital investments Not in one place, mainly virtual Can operate on partial construction Number of users is infinite Decommissioning not a major issue

4 Investments Development of software etc. as main task Outsourcing of specific services Mainly personnel costs These are all risk-mitigating ways to invest

5 A Virtual R.I. No need for large buildings/equipment Profit from existing e-infrastructure (Géant, Prace, EGI etc.)

6 Operations Like software, operate with releases. software requires maintenance, updates and upgrades Start small, create more functionality while in operation However, there is a need for a minimal critical mass

7 Users Number of users is 'infinite' Except for users with heavy computing requirements and for users who need new functionality, new virtual lab development Extra budget generates extra users and extra functionality Interesting proposition for countries: Investment immediately leads to functionality

8 Decommissioning No nuclear waste, no large equipment, no buildings, no large fixed assets ERIC poses issues on contractual matters (fixed term vs. permanent). IPR can be an issue (but no large costs)

9 Operational costs Software based, so developments move fast High level of uncertainty about future beyond 5 years 'Rule of Thumb': operational costs are about 15% of total construction Critical mass and economies of scale to be taken into consideration!

10 Construction vs. operation LifeWatch ocnstruction will last 5 years Estimated costs: 220 M As said, operations will already start with partial construction Total construction costs also contain operational costs in the first 5 years

11 Spending pattern

12 LifeWatch Funding Considerations on the funding of the RI: ESFRI process requires us to convince individual countries to invest Completely new concept, difficult to understand for countries Virtual, distributed, so lots of investment possible accross Europe, and not in one place No need for the full amount of construction costs to start operating

13 Funding mechanism Countries contribute 15% of their funding in cash to the central operations of the ERIC Countries invest 85% of their contribution as in-kind investments/projects in their own countries the 85% in-kind has to match the identified construction items in the cost-book (which add up to 220 M )

14 Advantages of this mechanism A relatively small percentage of the contribution is 'leaving the country' Countries have a big influence on prioritizing the needs of their scientific community (through the 85% national projects) The ERIC can coordinate the construction through Service Level Agreements with the countries

15 Determining Country contributions Based on GDP of all 27 EU countries Considering that only if all EU countries contribute, the 220 M is needed Minimal threshold of 2.5 M per country (for less one cannot really do relevant work) Little discount for the 5 largest countries in Europe, to facilitate their entrance Spain, The Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, Greece, Sweden and Romania will be the first countries to enter the ERIC, which makes the total construction budget 70 M

16 Country contributions GDP average GDP average Contribution In-kind to be Contribution In-kind to be (million ) 15% in cash realized (million ) 15% in cash realized Malta 5, ,000 2,125,000 Finland 178, ,774 2,730,050 Estonia 15, ,000 2,125,000 Denmark 227, ,668 3,483,116 Cyprus 16, ,000 2,125,000 Greece 231, ,416 3,538,356 Latvia 20, ,000 2,125,000 Austria 276, ,970 4,227,164 Lithuania 29, ,000 2,125,000 Sweden 320, ,312 4,903,435 Bulgaria 33, ,000 2,125,000 Poland 328, ,578 5,018,275 Slovenia 35, ,000 2,125,000 Belgium 339, ,708 5,194,677 Luxembourg 38, ,000 2,125,000 Netherlands 579,993 1,564,922 8,867,891 Slovakia 60, ,000 2,125,000 Spain 1,065,192 2,531,315 14,344,121 Hungary 100, ,000 2,125,000 Italy 1,544,966 3,671,449 20,804,877 Romania 127, ,000 2,125,000 United Kingdom 1,811,338 4,304,453 24,391,898 Czech Republic 137, ,000 2,125,000 France 1,916,980 4,555,500 25,814,502 Portugal 169, ,615 2,593,151 Germany 2,436,900 5,791,035 32,815,867 Ireland 176, ,786 2,696,120 Total 12,225,487 32,986, ,923,500