SOUTH DUBLIN COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT DRAFT REPORT V2.10

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SOUTH DUBLIN COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT DRAFT REPORT V2.10"

Transcription

1 SOUTH DUBLIN COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT DRAFT REPORT V2.10

2 Introduction Transport Insights, on behalf of South Dublin County Council, has undertaken a study of public transport provision within the County. The study has emerged as an action of County s Local Economic and Community Plan to undertake a local transport feasibility study to address difficulties in securing and accessing employment. compounded by a lack of public transport. The study has incorporated a full review of the public transport network and infrastructure, accessibility analysis, a survey of local residents and consultation with local businesses. The findings of this review have been used to identify key public transport accessibility challenges and to recommend potential future improvements. This report outlines the analysis underpinning the study, the challenges identified and the emerging recommendations. Study Approach The flow chart below outlines the basic approach and methodology to the study. The study consisted of an initial desktop data gathering exercise before further analysis was undertaken in order to identify deficits in public transport provision within the County. Consultation with both the general public and businesses community throughout the study was key to identifying the challenges unique to South County Dublin, and how these might be addressed. SDCC Engagement Desktop Study Network Mapping & Accessibility Analysis Public Transport Gaps & Constraints Identification Public & Business Consultation Option Development & Appraisal Recommendations & Phasing South Dublin County Transport Report

3 South Dublin County Background South Dublin County, along with the Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown and Fingal administrative areas, was formed on the 1 st of January 1994 when the Local Government Act of 1993 came into effect. The County has an approximate area of 223 square kilometres and is bounded by the River Liffey to the north and the Dublin Mountains to the south. There are a number of large residential/ employment areas within the County such as Tallaght (the County Town), Lucan, Clondalkin, Jobstown, Firhouse, Ballyboden, Templeogue, Rathfarnham, Rathcoole, Citywest, Palmerstown, Adamstown and Saggart. In transport terms, the County is served by a both a heavy and light rail line as well as a network of bus services. There are a number of strategic national roads running through the County namely the N4, N7 and N81 which are linked by the M50 and two outer orbital regional routes.

4 Population The total population of South Dublin County, as per the 2011 Census, was 265,205. Preliminary results from the 2016 Census indicate that the County s population has increased to 278,749, representing growth of 5.1% in just 5 years. The map to the right illustrates the approximate population distribution throughout the County. As illustrated, the vast majority of the County s population is centred on a number of urban centres, namely Lucan, Clondalkin, Tallaght, Firhouse and Templeogue. Approximately 96% of the population resides in only 29% of the total County land area. South Dublin County 2011 Population Distribution Note: Each Dot shown represents 10 people Employment The total number of people employed in South Dublin County is approximately 78,110, according to 2011 Census figures. The distribution of jobs throughout the County is shown in the map to the left. Nearly half (48%), of these workers also resided within South Dublin County. It should be noted that unemployment in South Dublin (11.6%) is significantly higher than that of the other local authorities surrounding Dublin City, i.e. Fingal at 9.8%, and Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown at 6.0%. South Dublin County 2011 Employment Distribution Note: Each Dot shown represents 5 people By comparing the map on the left with the above population map, the distinct separation of residential areas and employment areas is apparent suggesting there a lack of mixed development within the County.

5 % of Total Population Population Demographics In order to fully understand the public transport needs of the residents of South Dublin County, it important to understand the social demographics of the population. Age, employment status, and level of car ownership all play a part in determining the public transport needs of the County. The population demographics for South Dublin have been extracted from the 2011 Census data and compared against that of Fingal and Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County, where relevant, in order to assess how the needs of South Dublin differ to the other counties surrounding Dublin City. Population Age The Census data shows that South Dublin County has a comparatively lower proportion of older residents than Dun Laoghaire which is in part due to the levels of new development in the County attracting younger families. However, South Dublin does have an older population than that of Fingal. 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% South Dublin Fingal Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Age Band The location of older residents within the County is particularly important when considering public transport needs due to lower levels of private car ownership amongst older people and their resulting higher dependency on public transport and other means of non-private car travel. South Dublin County 2011 Population Density Over 65s The map to the left shows the population density of over 65s living within South County Dublin. As illustrated, the older population of South Dublin is largely concentrated in the Templeogue, Knocklyon and Ballyboden areas with additional older communities in well-established residential areas of Lucan, Tallaght, Clondalkin and Palmerstown.

6 % of Households Car Ownership Information on car ownership was also extracted from the 2011 Census data for South Dublin, Fingal and Dun Laoghaire- Rathdown. The data shows that South Dublin has a higher proportion of households with no car than either Fingal or Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown, as shown in the graph to the right. This would suggest that public transport has a more significant role to play in accommodating the transport needs of South Dublin residents. 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% No motor car One motor car Two motor cars Three motor cars Four or more motor cars South Dublin Fingal Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Mode Share As part of the national Census, information is gathered on commuting to work and education, including choice of mode. The mode shares by each mode for South Dublin is presented in the pie chart below which shows a mode share of 61.9% for road based modes (i.e. car driver or passenger). This road mode share is higher than both Fingal (59.5%) and Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown (55.2%). Walking Cycling Bus Rail Road Other 61.9% 1.5% 17.3% 3.1% 14.3% 2.0% South Dublin County 2011 Public Transport Mode Share The County s combined public transport mode share, including both bus and rail, is 16.3%. This is significantly lower than those of Fingal (20.5%) and Dun Laoghaire- Rathdown (22.5%), both of which have more extensive high quality heavy rail coverage than South Dublin. As a result, South Dublin is more dependent on bus, with its bus mode share higher than both of the other two local authority areas. The map to the left shows the public transport mode share across South Dublin (darker areas indicating greater levels of use).

7 Transport Network Review As mentioned previously South Dublin is located between a number of strategic national roads namely the M50, N4 and N7. These roads are among the busiest national roads in the country with the section of the M50 between the N4 and N7 the most trafficked section of road nationally. The congestion along these routes is exacerbated by the significant increase in traffic volumes as they pass through South Dublin. The image below extracted from Google Maps shows the congestion during the AM peak along the M50, N4, N7 and N81, in addition to non-national roads such as Fonthill Road and Nangor Road. Existing AM Congestion Levels ( 2016 Google Maps) According to Transport Infrastructure Ireland traffic counter data, traffic on the N4 increases by 79% as it passes through South Dublin County, which would suggest that strategic routes intersecting South Dublin are being heavily used by residents to undertake more localised trips around Dublin. This is likely to be in part due to the lack of viable public transport options available to residents making these trips. The public transport network is discussed in detail later in this report. Considering the current levels of congestion and demand management proposals for the M50, N4 and N7, public transport will likely need to play an increasingly important role in accommodating South Dublin County s transport needs.

8 Policy Context South Dublin County Council Development Plan The SDCC Development Plan was adopted earlier this year and has highlighted two long term public transport corridors, one extending radially through the north of the County and one orbital route from Tallaght up to west of Liffey Valley, with the two interchanging at what is currently St. Loman s Roundabout. The Plan also contains a proposal to develop an additional link road between the N4, N7 and N81. In terms of land use planning, there are large residential areas planned for Adamstown and Clonburris and employment development zoned around the existing employment centres of Citywest, Greenogue Business Park, Grange Castle and Nangor/ Longmile Road as shown below. South Dublin County Local Economic & Community Plan South Dublin County Local Community Development Committee was established in 2013, and a 6-year Local Economic and Community Plan ( ) was produced in The Plan contains a series of goals and objectives under seven thematic headings. In promoting enterprise and employment, the Plan recognises that large scale inward investment projects have key physical requirements including. accessibility to a large pool of potential employees.

9 To address poverty and inclusion challenges, the Plan recognises the difficulties in securing and accessing employment can be compounded by a lack of public transport... and contains an objective to increase accessibility to existing services, and an action to undertake a local transport feasibility study Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy The Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy sets out proposed transport infrastructure schemes to be built by Early this year the Strategy was approved by the Minister for Transport, making the document statutory. Key public transport schemes included in the Strategy include metro, light rail and high quality bus corridors as outlined in the map below. The schemes include a light rail scheme to Lucan and an orbital bus corridor running through South Dublin County which would provide a high quality public transport link between the north and south of the County. A cross-city bus rapid transit (BRT) scheme linking Clongriffin to Tallaght is also included. Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy Public Transport Infrastructure

10 Public & Business Consultation As part of study, consultation with both residents and businesses within South Dublin County was undertaken in order to better understand the public transport needs of each group. Public Consultation Public consultation was undertaken by means of an online survey prepared and issued by the South Dublin County Public Participation Network (PPN), within inputs from the study team. The survey took place during October 2016 and was available online for approximately 2 weeks. The survey received over 400 responses from residents across the County. The survey consisted of eight questions which aimed to identify the key challenges/ limitations of public transport within South Dublin from the perspective of its residents. The first question identified the where respondents lived, as detailed below. Q1. Where do you live? Lucan Rathfarnham Tallaght Clondalkin Other Knocklyon Ballycullen Rathcoole Walkinstown Palmerstown Templeogue City West Kingswood 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 6% 8% 11% 13% 16% 32% As shown on the above graph, the highest number of responses come from residents of Lucan, 126 in total. There were also high responses from Rathfarnham, Tallaght and Clondalkin. In order to understand how views varied throughout the County, the above settlements were grouped into similar areas geographically and/ or areas served by the same public transport corridor. The results for these areas were analysed individually, in addition to the County as a whole to allow key problems unique to specific areas within South Dublin to be identified. The relevant differences are presented after the County-wide survey results.

11 % of Responses % of Responses Q2. Outside your local area and WITHIN South County Dublin, what type of services do you have the greatest difficulty in accessing by public transport? 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% The above graph indicates that public transport access to health and hospital facilities along with public transport stations are the most difficult for residents to access within the County itself. In addition, access for commuting purposes to employment and education is considered difficult, along with access to retail and cultural centres. Q3. Outside your local area and WITHIN South County Dublin, what destinations do you have the greatest difficulty in accessing by public transport? 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% In terms of specific destinations within South Dublin County (and noting high response rate from Lucan), Liffey Valley Town Centre and Lucan Village are considered the most difficult to access by public transport. This is likely reflective of both difficulty accessing and higher potential demand for travel to these locations but it does indicate that access to the north of the County is a particular issue. In addition, Tallaght Town Centre, Clondalkin, Citywest and Ballymount are also perceived as difficult to access by public transport by residents of South Dublin.

12 % of Responses % of Responses Q4. Outside your local area and OUTSIDE South County Dublin, what destinations and services do you have the greatest difficulty in accessing by public transport? 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% City Centre Destinations around M50 Education Employment Health / hospitals Train / bus stations Destinations around the M50 are considered the most difficult to access outside the County itself by residents of South Dublin reflecting the lack of orbital public transport options in Dublin. Also ranked highly in terms of difficulty to access using public transport are health and hospital facilities closely followed by train/ bus stations. Q5. What is the greatest obstacle(s) for you in using public transport? 25% Other 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Lack of choice of destinations is considered by residents of South Dublin to be the greatest obstacle in using public transport followed by unpredictable journey times, unreliable services and fare costs. This is reflective of the lack of orbital services with most services routed to/ from the City Centre via the most direct route, and with few other destinations being served by frequent services.

13 % of Responses % of Responses Q6. What is your age bracket? 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 17 or under or over As shown above, the response rate from younger (<34) residents of the County was relatively low, with a peak in responses from residents aged between 35 and 54. There were less responses from older people which may be reflective of the method of survey (online survey) though approximately 30% of responses were from over 55s. As older people, 65 or over, may be more reliant on public transport due to declining car use and reduced mobility, the responses from this age bracket have been analysed separately to identify issues unique to older public transport users. The results of this analysis is presented after the County-wide survey results. Q7. What is your background? 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Working Retired Studying Job seeking Disability Stay at home parent Other Overall, the majority of responses came from working residents of South Dublin with high responses also received from retired residents and stay at home parents. Unemployed or job seeking residents represent 5% of responses which is under representative based on the employment figures previously presented for South Dublin. This may be partly due to a bias in the demographics of the members of the PPN or a greater interest from those who are required to commute to work every day. Some unemployed residents who are part of community employment schemes may also identify as working, however they would be considered unemployed in Census data.

14 Q8. Is there anything else you want to say about using public transport in South Dublin County? While it is not possible to detail all responses to this survey question, the broad points made by residents are as follows: Orbital services linking destinations within the County; Feeder bus services to key destinations, particularly hospitals, and public transport hubs; Dedicated bus lanes are currently underutilised and improvements to stop infrastructure needed; Unreliable journey times which are significantly higher than competing car journey times; New public transport options including opening of Kishogue train station, new Luas line to Clondalkin-Lucan, park and ride facilities and cycle parking at stations; Information on available services in the area is not readily available; Security issues and anti-social behaviour; Improvement to school bus network; Inadequate space for wheelchair users when more than one user or buggies on board; The majority of services are routed through the City Centre resulting in increased/ uncompetitive journey times; and Comments on individual bus services in particular the 15, 25, 76 and 16. Below is a sample of comments made in the survey by individual residents. Like most of South Dublin, Knocklyon is well served by public transport to the City Centre. However, there are very few links between the main urban centres in South Dublin. This means that even the short journey from Knocklyon to Tallaght requires 2 buses, making it an unreasonable journey compared with driving (10 minutes vs 1 hour). More of these routes would make the whole of South Dublin and beyond accessible for work, education, etc. I use the Luas to and from work an hour each day. My biggest concern is safety. The red line is not safe. Despite a network of bus specific lanes, there are no direct bus services between Lucan & Clondalkin and Lucan & Tallaght. If such services were introduced, they could help reduce traffic levels and provide viable options for people in those areas to commute by bus. I live in Bawnogue and there is no connecting bus to Liffey Valley or the Square. My daughter is disabled and when going into town if there is a buggy or another wheelchair I can't get on the bus. I live in hillcrest Lucan. I cannot get my children to the hospital in Crumlin unless I walk all the way over to the other side of Lucan...to get the 25a over to the 151 stop then get that bus to the hospital it's a disgrace... Most bus services within Dublin go via the City Centre. So it takes hours to make journeys that would take half an hour by car. I would like to have a feeder bus to Luas and local bus to Liffey Valley and the Square. Work in Sandyford and public transport options are not good. Luas to town and Luas out hours. 75 bus - between 40 minutes and 60 minutes. Driving usually minutes.

15 % of Responses Survey Results By Area As discussed earlier, the results were broken down by area in order to examine whether responses differed significantly from the County as a whole. A total of five areas were identified, the table below show the grouping of settlements into these areas. SDC North SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West Lucan Clondalkin Tallaght Rathfarnham Rathcoole Palmerstown Walkinstown Ballycullen Citywest Knocklyon Kingswood Templeogue Newcastle Saggart It was found that responses only varied significantly for questions 2 and 3 of the survey which related to access to services and destinations within South Dublin. These questions are presented below broken down by area. Q2. Outside your local area and WITHIN South County Dublin, what type of services do you have the greatest difficulty in accessing by public transport? 25% SDC North SDC South SDC Central SDC East SDC West 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Residents of SDC North, which compromises Lucan and Palmerstown, have much greater difficulty, relative to other parts of the County, in accessing health facilities/ hospitals and some difficulty accessing other services such as banking/ post office, community centres as well education and employment. However, they have comparatively less difficulty accessing shopping facilities and train/ bus stations.

16 % of Responses Residents of SDC South, i.e. Tallaght, have the greatest perceived difficulty in accessing services such as banking/ post offices, community centres and parks as well as education and employment. Services such as shopping, hospitals and public transport stations are considered easier to access by the residents of Tallaght, relative to the rest of the County. SDC Central residents, those living in Clondalkin or Walkinstown, have the greatest perceived difficulty in accessing health facilities by public transport and considerable difficulty accessing cultural centres, education, employment and public transport stations. Those living in SDC East also have significant difficulty in accessing health facilities by public transport and the greatest difficulty accessing public transport stations. Other services such as shopping, cultural centres and employment are also considered as difficult to access. SDC East & SDC North are the only areas with any responses indicating difficulty in accessing a place of worships by public transport which may be reflective of the older population of these areas. Residents of SDC West, those residing in Rathcoole, Newcastle, Saggart, Kingswood & Citywest, have the greatest difficulty in accessing many local services such as banking, cultural centres, community centres, parks and shopping which may be indicative of the more rural nature of some settlements within the area. However, their stated difficulty in accessing education, employment and health facilities by public transport is less than many other parts of the County. Q3. Outside your local area and WITHIN South County Dublin, what type of services do you have the greatest difficulty in accessing by public transport? 30% SDC North SDC South SDC Central SDC East SDC West 20% 10% 0% Residents of SDC North have the greatest difficulty in accessing areas to the south of the County such as Tallaght and Citywest, in addition to closer areas such as Clondalkin. Interestingly residents also view Lucan Village, one of the main urban centres in the area, to be difficult to access by public transport which suggests a clear lack of local bus services serving the village and its surrounding residential neighbourhoods.

17 Residents of SDC South have significant difficulty in accessing areas to the north and centre of the County such as Clondalkin, Liffey Valley and Lucan. This would suggest that there is strong disconnect in the public transport network between areas along the N4, N7 and N81. Those living in SDC Central have great difficulty travelling to north and south of the County by public transport with Lucan, Citywest, Liffey Valley and Tallaght all considered more difficult to access. This is a similar trend to other areas of the County and highlights the lack of internal/ orbital service in the County. SDC East & West residents also have more difficulty accessing areas to the north by public transport which indicates a public transport disconnect between the Lucan/ Liffey Valley area and the remainder of the County. Survey Results Older Residents As mentioned previously, the survey responses for older residents, 65 and over, have been analysed separately to the overall results in order to identify issues unique to this age bracket. The following points identify key differences in responses from older residents observed: Greater difficulty accessing health facilities and hospitals reflecting the importance of these services to older people; Noting high response rate from Lucan, access to Liffey Valley was still considered more difficult across the County as a whole with one response citing the walk from the stop to the centre as a possible reason for this; Initial walking access to stops more of a problem for older users due to reduced mobility; Greater concern for personal safety and disability access; and Less concerned with journey times, reliability and frequencies than younger residents. Survey Results Residents with a Disability In addition, survey responses from those with a disability were also analysed separately to help understand challenges in using public transport that are unique to this group of residents. The following points summarise the key issues identified: Greater difficulty accessing health facilities and hospitals as well as local community services and recreational facilities; Liffey Valley and Lucan Village considered particularly difficult to access by public transport; 33% citied disability access on public transport services as an obstacle; Lack of spaces on buses for two wheelchairs or one wheelchair when a buggy is occupying the space; and Less concerned with journey times, reliability and frequencies.

18 Business Consultation Complimenting public consultation activities described previously, the business community within South Dublin County was consulted in undertaking the study. Consultation focused on the South Dublin Chamber as the representative organisation for businesses within the County. The management of a limited number of key employment and retail destinations within the County were also consulted to ascertain their views on issues and priorities. The findings of consultation with South Dublin's business community can be can be summarised as follows: An Economic Profile and Survey of South County Dublin undertaken in 2014 on behalf of South Dublin Chamber, South Dublin County Council and the Local Enterprise Office, found the following profile of businesses:- retail - 36%; transportation & distribution - 14%; professional & financial services - 12%; industrial & manufacturing - 12%; medical & healthcare - 9%; and others - 17%. Major employers within the County, in particular those with a high proportion of professional staff living within a wide catchment area, are presently dependent on car as a means of access to work. One of the exceptions is The Square Tallaght, where the majority of staff and customers access by either public transport, walk or taxi from a relatively local catchment. As the majority of staff/ customers presently travel by car, peak period traffic congestion (including M50 and key radial corridors) and journey time reliability negatively impacts on business operations. With the exception of The Square Tallaght, public transport coverage is seen as inadequate. Services are generally considered to serve an important role along radial corridors to/ from the City Centre, but are otherwise considered either deficient or unavailable. Current South Dublin County Council Development Plan maximum car parking standards are considered excessively onerous in the absence of a comprehensive network of orbital bus services within the County, and between South Dublin County and other parts of Dublin. The standards are deemed by some businesses to represent a particular impediment to new office based development in parts of the County. A mismatch between bus priority provision and existing public services was noted as both a point of frustration, and an opportunity to address identified deficiencies in orbital bus service provision. Orbital bus service delivery within the County is seen as the highest priority for the County, with bus connections to Dublin Airport a further priority. The challenges of delivering orbital bus services, with potentially relatively limited passenger demand (initially) was recognised, as was the need for public subvention to ensure their viability. Continued development of transport hubs (including provision of real-time information) and replacement/ upgrade of the bus fleet is also seen as important. Local street design, including lighting and other measures to enhance perception of personal security are also coincided beneficial.

19 Public Transport Network & Services South Public Transport Network Information on the routes all public transport services, bus and rail, was collated from various data sources and a simplified network map created for all services passing through South Dublin County. The map below shows each route and principal stops along the route. Regular Public Transport Routes Serving South Dublin County As the map above shows, the vast majority of bus services from South Dublin County are radial services converging on the City Centre. There is just one orbital service, the 76, which links Tallaght, Clondalkin, Liffey Valley and Palmerstown. Only one route, the 239, provides connections to the north, linking Liffey Valley with Blanchardstown via Lucan. There are two orbital services towards the south/ east of Dublin, the 18 and 75, terminating in Sandymount and Dun Laoghaire respectively.

20 High Frequency Public Transport Network The previous map shows all regular services passing through South Dublin County with frequencies of up to just one bus per hour. The map below shows high frequency bus services only and the Luas and heavy rail networks. These routes have frequency of between minutes during peak hours. High Frequency Public Transport Routes Serving South Dublin County As shown, all of high frequency bus services are radial and run from South Dublin through the City Centre with the exception of the 18, which links Palmerstown with Sandymount. There are limited opportunities to interchange between high frequency buses within the County itself.

21 Stop Locations & Type The locations of all bus, rail and Luas stops was mapped using open source data available online, as shown in the map below. In total within South Dublin County there are 2 heavy rail stops, 11 Luas stops and approximately 870 bus stops. Existing Public Transport Stops The stop infrastructure at each if the 870 Dublin bus stops was also mapped as shown in the map below. The majority, 51%, of the bus stops only have a pole with no timetable or route information. A total of 23% of stop have a pole with timetable/ route information and the remaining 26% have a full bus shelter with timetables and route information. Just 5.3% of stops have real-time information, of which 4.6% are sheltered stops. Existing Bus Stop Types The areas around Tallaght and Lucan have the most sheltered stops with notably poor quality stops along the length of the New Nangor Road. There also appears to be proportionally less shelters in the Walkinstown/ Templeogue area where there is an increased proportion of older residents who would benefit from access to sheltered stops with seating.

22 Public Transport Accessibility Analysis Public Transport Stops Accessibility Using GIS software the approximate coverage of all public transport stops across the County was estimated based on assumed walking distances and mapped as shown below. Using these walk times and population data from the 2011 Census the proportion of the population within 5, 10 & 15 minutes walk any public transport stop was estimated and is outlined in the table beneath the map. Coverage of all Public Transport Stops by Walk Time Proportion of Population & Jobs within Walking Distance to a Public Transport Stop Walk Times Population % of Total % of Total Jobs Population Jobs 0-5mins 147,226 56% 42,242 54% 0-10mins 242,950 92% 65,002 83% 0-15mins 255,293 96% 71,393 91%

23 As outlined in the previous table, approximately 96% of the population and 91% of all jobs in South Dublin are located are within 15-minutes walk of a public transport stop. However, numerous studies have shown that the maximum acceptable walk time for public transport is usually around 5-7 minutes (500m) for bus and up to minutes (1,000m) for rail. The graph below shows the distance travelled by passengers to a bus stops across numerous locations in the US and indicates a very low percentage of passengers travelling greater than 500m to the stop. Max Walk Dist. Proportion of Passengers by Distance Walked to Stop Based on the above information the population was estimated again based on 500m & 1,000m walking distance for bus and rail respectively. The table below shows the percentage of population with access to stops based on these revised maximum walk times. These distances are also mapped on the following page. Proportion of Population & Jobs within Maximum Walking Distance Population % of Total Population Jobs % of Total Jobs 191,149 72% 52,832 68% Based on these maximum walk distances, 28% of the population and 32% of job locations have deficient access to a public transport stop. It should be noted that these are maximum distances and many residents will not be willing to walk this distance.

24 Coverage of All Public Transport Stops based on Maximum Walking Distance Based on the above analysis, it appears there are gaps in the public transport stop coverage in the following areas, as numbered in the maps above: No. Location Description No. Location Description 1 Residential Area around Beech Park/ Grove 11 Broomhill Industrial Estate 2 Residential Area around Liffey Valley Park both sides of St.Loman s Rd. 12 Wainsfort Manor 3 Residential Area South of Sean Balgaddy Road East 13 Walsh Memorial Park 4 Residential Area around Residential Areas around Cypress 14 Collinstown Park Drive 5 Residential Areas East of Kennelsfort Rd Upper 15 North and South of Old Court Rd. 6 Clondalkin Industrial Estate 16 Woodstown Park 7 JFK Industrial Estate 17 Orlagh Residential Area 8 Mount Alton, Knocklyon Court & Western Business Park/ Ind. Estate 18 Idrone Drive Residential Areas 9 Ballymount Industrial Park 19 Templeroan Ave. Residential Area 10 Magna Business Park 20 Whitecliff Residential Area

25 Rail & Luas Stop Accessibility Rail, heavy or light, is generally considered to be a better quality public transport option as it offers more reliable and predictable journey/ wait times. It is also generally faster than the bus alternative as congestion has no or little impact on its operation. South Dublin is served by two rail corridors, one light and one heavy. The map below shows the coverage from the rail stops within the County up to a 1,000m maximum walking distance. Coverage of Rail Stops based on Maximum Walking Distance As shown the current level of rail infrastructure results in an imbalance in service coverage between the north and south of the County. However, the areas surrounding the heavy rail stops located in the north of the County are not yet fully developed and coverage will increase once the local street networks for Adamstown and Clonburris are expanded. Kilshoge Rail Station was constructed as part of the Kildare Route Project, and has yet to be opened pending construction of an access road. Opening of this station would enhance rail coverage to the north of the County. In population and employment terms, rail coverage shown in the figure above and the table below provides access for 10% of residents and 20% of jobs, which indicates that Luas is driven more towards providing access for those wishing to travel into the County for employment purposes based on current land uses. Max Walk Dist. Proportion of Population & Jobs Served by Rail Population % of Total Population Jobs % of Total Jobs 27,010 10% 15,310 20%

26 Bus Stop Accessibility Despite recent improvements to rail services and the introduction of light rail services in Dublin 67% of public transport passengers nationally still travel on bus with the majority, 55%, using Dublin Bus according to 2015 figures from Transport for Ireland. As discussed early in the report, 14.3% of commuting journeys within South County Dublin are made by bus which represents 83% of all public transport commuting journeys. The map below shows the coverage of Dublin bus stops within the County up to a maximum walking distance of 500m. Coverage of Bus Stops based on Maximum Walking Distance The proportion of population and jobs within a 500m walking distance to a bus stop is outlined in the table below. A higher proportion of older residents, 75%, have access to a stop however car ownership levels amongst this age group is also lower resulting in a higher dependency on public transport. Proportion of Population & Jobs Served by Bus Max Walk Dist. Population % of Total Population Jobs % of Total Jobs 184,047 69% 48,964 63%

27 As outlined, 69% of the population has access to a bus stop however only 35% have access to a sheltered stop with a further 18% have access to a stop with timetable information. The remaining 16% have access to a pole only stop. A total of 15.9% of the population has access to a stop with real-time information. High-Frequency Bus and Rail Accessibility The analysis thus far has considered access to all public stops based on walk time only, i.e. not considering the frequency or quality of services. Public transport service frequency is however a key factor in the desirability of public transport particularly when choosing to use public transport over the private car. In order to estimate accessibility to quality public transport services, access to stops served by a high frequency bus and rail service has therefore been assessed. The map below shows the coverage of stops served by a high frequency bus or rail service, and table beneath associated proportion of the population and jobs served directly by a high frequency service. Max Walk Dist. Coverage of High Frequency Bus and Rail Proportion of Population & Jobs Served by High Frequency Bus or Rail Population % of Total Population Jobs % of Total Jobs 148,001 56% 40,088 51%

28 Origin Public Transport Origin-Destination Matrix While basic accessibility to public transport stops is the first step in providing good connectivity by public transport, the choice of destination, ease of interchanging between services and service frequency also determines the quality of the public transport network. In order to assess the connectivity of the public transport network in South Dublin, the areas outlined previously in the public consultation survey analysis were analysed to ascertain the quality of public transport options available to residents of these areas in travelling to other key destinations within the County and further afield. The settlements included in each is outlined again in the table below. SDC North SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West Lucan Clondalkin Tallaght Rathfarnham Rathcoole Palmerstown Walkinstown Ballycullen Citywest Knocklyon Kingswood Templeogue Newcastle Saggart The ease of movement between each of these areas and two key locations within the County (Liffey Valley Town Centre and Tallaght Hospital were chosen based in the outcomes of the survey results) by public transport was assessed and graded as per the table below. Interchanges are categorised as direct or indirect based on the interchange is located along a logical route to the route to the desired destination. For examples if a trip made from Lucan to Tallaght required an interchange in the City Centre this would be considered an indirect interchange. Accessibility Rating Very Poor Poor Average Good Very Good Description Indirect or multiple interchanges Direct interchange between low frequency services Direct between high frequency services Direct low frequency service (30min+ frequency) Direct high frequency service (<30min frequency) The accessibility between areas and key destinations based on the above grading is shown below for journeys within the County. For some areas, different options are available depending on the origin within the area and the results below have been averaged based on all options. Origin/Destination Matrix SDC North SDC North SDC Central SDC South Destination SDC SDC East West Tallaght Hospital Liffey Valley SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West

29 Origin The above table shows that SDC North is the most inaccessible area of the County by public transport, with poor-very poor accessibility from SDC South, East and West. This highlights once again the lack of local orbital services and disconnect between the north and south of the County. The only orbital bus route, the 76, travels along the east of the County and does not serve Lucan. Liffey Valley, which was highlighted in the survey results as difficult to access for many residents, also has poor accessibility to areas which are not directly served by the 76, i.e. SDC East and West. SDC South and Tallaght Hospital are the easiest to access by public transport with direct links to most of the County with the exception of SDC North see below for impacts of future public transport schemes. The above analysis is shown below for journeys external to the County using the same grading system. Services running through the City Centre have not been considered for destination around the M50 North and South as journey times are significantly greater than by car despite the interchange between high frequency bus services and would not be a realistic option for most residents. Origin/Destination Matrix M50 North M50 South Destination City Centre Airport James' Hospital Crumlin Hospital SDC North SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West The table above clearly demonstrates the lack of direct service to destinations around the M50 North and South with only the 239 and 75 providing infrequent access to parts of the north and south respectively. By comparison, the City Centre is very accessible with high frequency direct routes serving most of the County. The Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy is noted to contain orbital bus corridor proposals see below for impacts of future public transport schemes. The two hospitals are accessible to SDC Central and South as they are located on the radial corridors running into the City Centre from these areas however access from the rest of the County by public transport is difficult with interchanges required which may not always be possible for those needing access to hospitals. The airport is reasonably accessible to SDC South which is directly served by the Airport Hopper 777 Service which also partially serves SDC Central. However, the rest of the County relies on interchanging between services. Impact of Planned Future Public Transport Schemes As outlined earlier in the report, an orbital bus corridor is included in Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy Although this scheme has not yet advanced to the route selection process, the indicative route shown in the Strategy will directly link SDC North and SDC South, and South County Dublin to destinations around the M50 (Blanchardstown in north and Dundrum/ UCD in the southeast), while also providing interchange points between a number of high frequency bus and rail routes. This scheme is understood to be currently scheduled for medium-term delivery (post 2020).

30 Key Challenges Strategic/ County Wide Challenges Local Challenges Strategic/ County Wide Challenges The findings of public and business consultation activities, supplemented with a review of public transport accessibility has informed the identification of following priority challenges for the County: Public transport network coverage, with only 72% of the County s population, and 68% of its jobs located within the walking catchment of bus and rail services. Specific gaps include: o Local bus service provision, with limited areas such as Lucan Village poorly connected to its surrounding residential areas, and numerous employment centres outside the walking catchment of public transport; and o Access to rail and Luas, which offer high quality links to Dublin City. Currently only 10% of residents and 20% of jobs are located within walking distance of a rail stop and interchange facilities and feeder bus services are either inadequate or not provided. Orbital public transport connectivity, with poor links both: o Within the County, with only the no 76 bus service providing an infrequent service from Tallaght to Palmerstown via Clondalkin and Liffey Valley; and o Between the County and areas to the north and south/ east of the County, with the 239, 18 and 75 routes providing infrequent, indirect, slow and unreliable connections. Meeting the needs of older residents and those with reduced mobility, with deficient access by public transport to healthcare (Tallaght, Crumlin, St. James's hospitals), retail etc. Supporting sustainable future development in key development areas, namely Adamstown and Clonburris, which although located adjacent to rail services to Dublin City, and poorly connected to the remainder of the County. The above challenges, and the local challenges which follow are complimentary to the Transport and Mobility policies and objectives of County Development Plan (Chapter 6). Local Challenges SDC North SDC North, encompassing Lucan and Palmerstown, is characterized by a series of radial bus services, with the Kildare Rail Line to the south. Specific identified public transport challenges are: South/ west of Lucan Village around Beech Park/ Grove (identified early as having a proportionally high older population); Poor stop coverage to residential areas within Liffey Valley Park estate between Ballyowen and Fonthill Roads south of St Lomans Road, and residential Areas around Collinstown Park; and Poor connectivity between Lucan Village and residential areas to the south. SDC North has also been identified to be poorly connected to other parts of the County, with limited or no realistic means of travelling by public transport to SDC Central, South, East or West. Key development areas of Adamstown and Clonburris are located in SDC North, and ensuring the public transport needs of these areas are addressed is essential to their sustainable future development.

31 Local Challenges SDC Central SDC Central, encompasses the areas of Clondalkin and Walkinstown. The Kildare Rail Line runs to the north of the area with a series of radial bus services routing through it. Specific identified public transport challenges include accessibility to key employment centres to the east if the area, including Clondalkin Industrial estate, JFK Industrial Estate, Western Business Park/ Industrial estate and Ballymount Industrial Estate. Limited bus stop provision in the Walkinstown area, has also been identified as a challenge older residents. Those living in SDC Central have identified significant difficulty travelling to north and south of the County by public transport with Lucan, Citywest, Liffey Valley and Tallaght all considered difficult to access. They have also identified difficulties in accessing education, employment, health and other services within the County, likely due to the limited mixed residential/ employment development, and less extensive high frequency public transport options compared to other parts of the County. Local Challenges SDC South SDC South, encompasses the County Town of Tallaght and the surrounding predominantly residential areas (some long established with older populations). In terms of public transport provision, the area is served by Luas, a series of high frequency radial bus services and some low frequency orbital services. Identified challenges include: Employment centres of Broomhill Industrial Estate and Magna Business Park; Residential areas south of Sean Walsh Memorial Park; and Predominantly residential north and south of Old Court Road and Woodstown Park. Compared to other parts of the county, residents of SDC South have the greatest perceived difficulty in accessing education and employment opportunities, and other services this reflects the outlying nature of parts of South Dublin, and more limited public transport services away from the Town Centre. Mirroring the views of residents elsewhere in the county, those in SDC South have identified clear difficulties in travelling by public transport to areas in the north and centre of the county such as Clondalkin, Liffey Valley and Lucan. Local Challenges SDC East SDC East covers the more established and largely residential areas of Rathfarnham, Knocklyon, Templeogue and Ballycullen. As a result, these areas tend to have substantially higher proportion of older residents compared to elsewhere in South Dublin. Similarly to other areas within the County it is characterised by a series of radial bus services. Specific identified public transport challenges include: Wainsfort Manor and residential areas around Cypress Drive in Templeogue; Templeroan Avenue, Orlagh and Whitecliff residential areas in Ballyboden; and Mount Alton, Knocklyon Court and Idrone Drive residential areas in Knocklyon; and Limited bus stop shelter provision in the Templeogue area. Residents of SDC East also have identified the significant difficulty they face in accessing the north of the County, and in accessing health facilities by public transport. Other services such as shopping, cultural centres and employment have also been identified by residents as difficult to access.

32 Local Challenges SDC West SDC West encompasses much of rural South Dublin County and the urban areas of Rathcoole, Citywest, Kingswood and Newcastle. In addition to Luas, a number of radial bus services serve the area. The most notable challenge faced by SDC West arises from its remote location relative to other parts of South Dublin County and Dublin City. As a result, residents within this area experience the greatest difficulty in accessing many local services such as banking, cultural centres, community centres, parks and shopping etc. They have also identified significant challenges in accessing the north of the County by public transport. Businesses within SDC West (Citywest area) have identified the limited extent of public transport coverage, and lack of orbital bus services as particular constraints to expansion, given restrictions imposed by local authority development parking standards.

33 Option Identification & Appraisal Strategic/ County Wide Options The following options have been identified as potentially beneficial to addressing the priority strategic or County-wide challenges: New intra-county north-south orbital bus service(s):- New bus service or services connecting SDC North and SDC South, and other SDC areas with identified accessibility challenges. New/ enhanced public transport interchange facilities on Luas Red and Kildare Line Rail Lines:- Public transport interchanges play an important role in the public transport network, by either facilitating access to public transport services, and/ or change between services where a direct connection is unavailable. Public transport interchange facilities could include bus facilities, park & ride and cycle parking provision, fixed and real time passenger information etc., and be served by complimentary feeder bus services (see below) to surrounding areas. New feeder bus services to rail and Luas:- Local bus services connecting key residential and commercial centres with key public transport interchange facilities in the County. New orbital bus services around M50 North and South:- To cater for orbital public transport demand at a strategic level, the Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy contains proposals to develop two Core Orbital Bus Corridors in South Dublin, which would connect Tallaght to Dundrum/ UCD and Tallaght to Blanchardstown. These schemes are understood to be currently programmed for delivery beyond Local Options The following options have been identified as potentially beneficial to addressing key local challenges: Option Option Description Real Life Example Bus stop facility improvements Enhancements to bus stop infrastructure within the County, through provision of bus shelters, with seating, fixed and real time passenger information. Local permeability enhancements Retrofitting of existing areas with a view to creating more sustainable neighbourhoods by developing new pedestrian links and reducing walk distances to public transport. High quality bus stop (Stillorgan Road) Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (Figure 3.12)

34 Option Option Description Real Life Example New local bus services within key areas (Lucan, Tallaght etc.) Local bus services connecting key town centres with their surrounding residential catchment areas. Private shuttle bus services to key employment and retail centres Implementation of shuttle bus services from high quality public transport nodes to new or expanded commercial centres in the County. Image courtesy of Bus Éireann Publicly funded social bus services to key health facilities and town centres Accessible transport services for people with mobility impairments, including the elderly and disabled. Image courtesy of Citywest Business Campus Demand responsive transport service Demand responsive transport services already play an important role within the Rural Transport Programme. They deviate off a fixed route to pick up and drop off passengers at the door; they can be operated by large PSVs, hackneys or community cars. Image courtesy of Vantastic Image courtesy of Strengthening the Connections in Rural Ireland (National Transport Authority)

35 Local Strategic Option Appraisal The effectiveness of each of the identified options have been strategically appraised against the extent to which they address the various challenges at a strategic/ County-wide level and local level in accordance with the following scoring system. Appraisal Scoring Very Good Good Average Poor Very Poor Description Strong contribution to addressing the identified challenge Contributes towards addressing the identified challenge Limited contribution towards addressing the identified challenge Partly hinders addressing the identified challenge Hinders addressing the identified challenge Using the above strategic appraisal scoring system, the options have been assessed, with the outcomes shown in the following table. Option Strategic/ County Wide Challenges Local Challenges PT Network Coverage Orbital PT Connectivity New intra-county north-south orbital bus service(s) New/ enhanced public transport interchange facilities New feeder bus services to rail and Luas New orbital bus services around M50 North and South Bus stop facility improvements Local permeability enhancements New local bus services in key urban areas Private shuttle bus services (employment, retail) Publicly funded social bus services (health, retail etc.) Demand responsive transport services Older Residents / Reduced Mobility Supporting Sustainable Future Development Local Public Transport Accessibility As can be seen from the table above, each of the options contribute towards addressing some of the identified challenges, which is not surprising, given that the identified options all relate to measures that will enhance public transport accessibility. It is apparent however that a package of measures will be required, with the specific choice of intervention subject to more detailed local area consideration.

36 Deliverability Assessment Having assessed the effectiveness of potential options in addressing the identified challenges, the next step is to consider potential applications for each of these measures, and deliverability issues. An outline deliverability assessment is set out in the following two tables for strategic and local options. Strategic Options Deliverability Assessment Option New intra- County north-south orbital bus service(s) New/ enhanced public transport interchange facilities New feeder bus services to rail and Luas New orbital bus services around M50 North and South Potential Application Lucan to Tallaght via Citywest Liffey Valley to Tallaght via Clondalkin. Clondalkin Fonthill and Adamstown Stations Identified Luas stops - Tallaght, Red Cow etc. Identified public transport interchanges on Kildare Rail Line and Luas Red Line (areas not served by other measures). As per Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy potential to extend Blanchardstown to Airport to be explored with National Transport Authority. Feasibility Discontinuous bus lanes in place along Belgard Road (R113) Bus lanes on place Outer Ring Road (R136). To be considered with orbital M50 bus services. Dependent on location, however measures can be tailored to suit specific local constraints, e.g. land availability. No known barriers, however subject to planning at a local level. Known feasibility challenges along corridor include Liffey crossing (to north) possibly requiring M50 routing, and lack of direct corridors to southeast. Affordability (Low, Medium or High Cost) Medium cost existing bus lane infrastructure should minimise capital costs. Passenger demand levels likely to necessitate an ongoing operating subvention. Low-Medium cost depending on scale of facilities proposed. Medium cost infrastructure requirements dependent on routing. Ongoing subvention may be required to passenger demand levels. High cost extensive new bus lane infrastructure likely to be required. Operating. Passenger demand levels likely to necessitate an ongoing operating subvention. Responsibility National Transport Authority, given its role in planning, funding and delivering public transport, including new and enhanced bus infrastructure, and planning/ licensing bus services. The National Transport Authority s responsibilities include to undertake strategic planning of transport and to promote the development of an integrated, accessible public transport network. As a result, it will have primary responsibility for taking forward the identified measures to delivery. The Authority is due to undertake a Dublin Area Bus Network Redesign during 2017, and the outputs of this report can input to the redesign process.

37 Local Options Deliverability Assessment Option Potential Application Feasibility Affordability (Low, Medium or High Cost) Bus stop facility improvements Local permeability enhancements New local bus services in key urban areas Private shuttle bus services (employment, retail) Publicly funded social bus services (health, retail etc.) Demand responsive transport service Areas with a higher proportion of older residents (Walkinstown/ Templeogue etc.), who may most benefit. 20 areas with identified accessibility challenges where lack of direct pedestrian links is a factor. Connecting residential areas to the south of Lucan Village and the Village. Connecting residential areas surrounding Tallaght to Tallaght Town Centre. Numerous employment areas outside the maximum walking distance from PT, e.g. Clondalkin, JFK, Western, Broomhill Industrial Estates etc. and key retail centres. Connecting more established residential areas in SDC Central and East with older populations to key health facilities (Tallaght Hospital) and retail centres. Outlying parts of the County SDC West Areas with higher proportions of older residents. No known feasibility challenges, although specific local ones may exist. Subject to planning at a local level. No known barriers, however subject to planning at a local level. No known barriers, however subject to planning at a local level. No known barriers, however subject to planning at a local level. No known barriers, however subject to planning at a local level. Low cost measures can be phased to further reduce annual outlay. Low cost targeted measures to PT reduce walk times. Medium cost infrastructure requirements dependent on routing. Ongoing subvention may be required to passenger demand levels. Low-Medium cost depending on no, length and frequency of routes. Low-Medium cost limited capital cost, but services would require ongoing subvention. Low cost, but dependent on scale of measures introduced. Responsibility National Transport Authority. SDCC, via National Transport Authority grants. National Transport Authority. South Dublin businesses through agreement and/ or condition of planning by SDCC. SDCC. National Transport Authority and/ or SDCC.

38 Origin Origin Accessibility Assessment Internal The identified options have been subject to assessment against the identified challenges, and subject to further deliverability consideration. Following high-level consideration of the impacts of the emerging measures against existing accessibility levels, the table below sets out the anticipated impact of the measures in enhancing accessibility within the County. The table demonstrates that the measures will be particularly beneficial in addressing very poor levels of accessibility from SDC North to SDC East and West, and poor accessibility from SDC North to SDC South and Tallaght Hospital. Origin/Destination Matrix SDC North SDC North SDC Central SDC South Destination SDC SDC East West Tallaght Hospital Liffey Valley SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West Accessibility Assessment External A similar assessment to that undertaken for internal origins and destinations has been undertaken for journeys with destinations outside the County. The output of this assessment is presented in the following table. The emerging packages of measures is particularly effective in addressing poor to very poor levels of public transport accessibility to areas around the M50 North and South. Due to existing adverse operating conditions on the M50, the measures will therefore provide an alternative means of travel not presently available to residents in South Dublin, and simultaneously enhance accessibility to employment and retail centres within the County from areas around the M50. Phasing Origin/Destination Matrix SDC North SDC Central SDC South SDC East SDC West M50 North M50 South Destination City Centre Airport James' Hospital Crumlin Hospital The imminent Dublin Area Bus Network Redesign by National Transport Authority will have implications for the emerging strategic interventions. A range of local interventions have been identified, however these will require further consideration and development to ascertain the most suitable intervention type in a particular context. As such, development of a detailed phasing plan is considered most appropriate following engagement with the National Transport Authority regarding strategic interventions, and further development of local interventions.

39 Summary & Next Steps Summary Transport Insights has undertaken a review of public transport accessibility within South Dublin County. The study has emerged as an action of County s Local Economic and Community Plan to undertake a local transport feasibility study to address difficulties in securing and accessing employment. compounded by a lack of public transport. In undertaking the review, the existing distribution of population and employment throughout the County has been subject to review, alongside detailed analysis of public transport networks, services and travel options available to people travelling both within the County, and from South Dublin to other areas. Public consultation has formed a key part of the project, and was completed via a questionnaire of over 400 residents throughput the County supported by the South Dublin County Public Participation Network. The South Dublin Chamber and key businesses were also consulted to identify public transport accessibility issues affecting commercial operations and expansion aspirations. Research Consult Analyse Prioritise Key findings of the evidence base review include: Poor public transport coverage within South Dublin, with only 72% of residents and 68% of jobs located within the maximum walking distance of public transport (56% and 51% respectively to high frequency bus/ rail); Deficient north-south connectivity, with areas to the north, i.e. Lucan, Liffey Valley and Palmerstown poorly connected to the remainder of the County; and Very poor orbital public transport connectivity to destinations along the M50 North and South. Options Recommendations The above identified deficiencies in public transport within South Dublin contribute to performance issues affecting the road network within the County, including on the strategic road network (M50, N4 and N7), which intersects the County. The evidence base review has informed the identification of priority strategic or County-wide challenges, and local challenges. Options to address these challenges have been identified, and subject to strategic appraisal, and consideration of deliverability constraints. Emerging strategic options from the review are: new intra-county north-south orbital bus service(s), enhanced public transport interchange facilities; feeder bus services to rail and Luas; and orbital bus services around M50 North and South. Complimenting the above strategic interventions, a range of more locally focussed options have also been identified, including bus stop facility improvements, local permeability enhancements, new local bus services in key urban areas, private shuttle bus services (to employment and retail destinations), and other services to meet the needs of older residents and those with reduced mobility.

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney 5 Rail demand in Western Sydney About this chapter To better understand where new or enhanced rail services are needed, this chapter presents an overview of the existing and future demand on the rail network

More information

Submission to Infrastructure Victoria s Draft 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy

Submission to Infrastructure Victoria s Draft 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy Submission to Infrastructure Victoria s Draft 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy 1. Introduction This submission is a response to Infrastructure Victoria s assessment of the need to construct a heavy rail

More information

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter twelve Social impact Chapter content Social impact assessment process...235 Existing community profile...237 Consultation...238 Social impacts and mitigation strategies...239

More information

N4 Carrick-on-Shannon to Dromod Road Project. 2.1 Introduction

N4 Carrick-on-Shannon to Dromod Road Project. 2.1 Introduction Chapter 2 Need for the Scheme 2.1 Introduction The National Primary Route N4, Dublin to Sligo is a strategic corridor from Dublin to the northwest and border counties (See RCSR 101 in Volume 2). The National

More information

Bus and Community Transport Services in Wales

Bus and Community Transport Services in Wales Bus and Community Transport Services in Wales Call for evidence The Enterprise and Business Committee of the National Assembly for Wales is carrying out an inquiry into Bus and Community Transport Services

More information

Kilometres. Blacktown. Penrith. Parramatta. Liverpool Bankstown. Campbelltown

Kilometres. Blacktown. Penrith. Parramatta. Liverpool Bankstown. Campbelltown 0 5 10 15 20 Kilometres Penrith Blacktown Parramatta Liverpool Bankstown Campbelltown accessibility outcomes Legend Outcomes targeted in Western Sydney are: public transport that is accessible throughout

More information

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018 Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report May 2018 This report has been prepared by Enterprise Marketing and Research Services 60 Main Road, Moonah TAS 7009 All enquiries

More information

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 THE SUBJECT SITE 4 3.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING CONTEXT 6 4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

More information

CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011

CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011 CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011 CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 Cairns Regional Council September 2011 Coffey

More information

East Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers)

East Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers) Report to the Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Report submitted by: Director of Corporate Commissioning Date: 1 June 2015 Part I Electoral Divisions affected: All East Lancashire Highways and

More information

Airport Planning Area

Airport Planning Area PLANNING AREA POLICIES l AIRPORT Airport Planning Area LOCATION AND CONTEXT The Airport Planning Area ( Airport area ) is a key part of Boise s economy and transportation network; it features a multi-purpose

More information

JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH AND SOUTH NORFOLK EXAMINATION MATTER 3C EASTON/COSTESSEY

JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH AND SOUTH NORFOLK EXAMINATION MATTER 3C EASTON/COSTESSEY Matter 3C Easton/Costessey Representor No. 8826 JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH AND SOUTH NORFOLK EXAMINATION MATTER 3C EASTON/COSTESSEY SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF TAYLOR WIMPEY DEVELOPMENTS AND

More information

Lansdowne Wetton BRT Public Transport Corridor Trunk Route: Planning Analysis

Lansdowne Wetton BRT Public Transport Corridor Trunk Route: Planning Analysis Lansdowne Wetton BRT Public Transport Corridor Trunk Route: Planning Analysis 1. Introduction The purpose of this report is to detail the planning evaluation for the trunk route alignment alternatives

More information

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT Tiffany Lester, Darren Walton Opus International Consultants, Central Laboratories, Lower Hutt, New Zealand ABSTRACT A public transport

More information

As part of our transport vision, Leeds City Council, working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Leeds Bradford Airport Company, is

As part of our transport vision, Leeds City Council, working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Leeds Bradford Airport Company, is As part of our transport vision, Leeds City Council, working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Leeds Bradford Airport Company, is considering options for improving surface access and connectivity

More information

PLANNING THE SUNBURY GROWTH CORRIDOR

PLANNING THE SUNBURY GROWTH CORRIDOR SUNBURY GROWTH CORRIDOR NOVEMBER 2016 PLANNING THE SUNBURY GROWTH CORRIDOR Sunbury Planning Background The Victorian Planning Authority, in consultation with Hume City Council, is undertaking a number

More information

PART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT

PART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT PART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared in support

More information

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016 Perth & Kinross Council Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016 Contents Foreword... 3 Section 1: Spring 2016 destination follow up of 2014/15 school leavers... 4 Background... 4 Section A: Initial

More information

ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY

ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY Revitalising Passenger Transport Increasing traffic congestion in our cities and a lack of transport services in our regional towns is frustrating

More information

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter content. Chapter four Route selection and staging

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter content. Chapter four Route selection and staging Chapter four Route selection and staging Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter four Route selection and staging Chapter content Route selection...73 Section one: Helensvale to Griffith University...74 Section

More information

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018 Lead officer: Chris Tunstall GCP Director of Transport A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub 1. Purpose 1.1 The list of

More information

EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth

EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION prospectus for growth September 2018 executive summary The East West Rail Consortium, a partnership of local authorities, rail operators and Network Rail, continues to promote

More information

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine Transit service consists of two fundamental elements: frequency (how often service operates) and service span (how long service runs during the day). Combined, these two factors measure how much service

More information

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Transportation planner/coordinator, designer, builder

More information

PSP 75 Lancefield Road. Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information

PSP 75 Lancefield Road. Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information PSP 75 Lancefield Road Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information September 2017 The northern crossing of Jacksons Creek proposed within the Lancefield Road PSP is a key part of the ultimate

More information

WELLINGTON $422 MILLION $614 MILLION $83 MILLION 22% SPEND $1.9 BILLION

WELLINGTON $422 MILLION $614 MILLION $83 MILLION 22% SPEND $1.9 BILLION WELLINGTON WELLINGTON $1.9 BILLION FORECAST TOTAL WELLINGTON INVESTMENT The Wellington region s transport challenges are dominated by the region s concentration of population in the metropolitan cities,

More information

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results Prepared for the Jackson Area Transportation Authority (JATA) April, 2015 3131 South Dixie Hwy. Suite 545 Dayton, OH 45439 937.299.5007 www.rlsandassoc.com

More information

Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package)

Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package) Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package) 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 Total TOTAL COST Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange 0.5m 0.5m FUNDING CIL 0.05m 0.05m Growth Deal

More information

PERTH-ADELAIDE CORRIDOR STRATEGY

PERTH-ADELAIDE CORRIDOR STRATEGY INTRODUCTION The Royal Automobile Association of SA Inc (RAA), the State s principal advocate for motorists on a broad range of motoring-related issues, represents the views of more than 560,000 South

More information

Forest Hill Society response to the draft London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy (February 2011)

Forest Hill Society response to the draft London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy (February 2011) Forest Hill Society response to the draft London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy (February 2011) 1. The Forest Hill Society represents residents in and around the Forest Hill and Honor Oak Park

More information

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC Chair Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee Office of the Minister of Transport REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC Proposal 1. I propose that the

More information

The performance of Scotland s high growth companies

The performance of Scotland s high growth companies The performance of Scotland s high growth companies Viktoria Bachtler Fraser of Allander Institute Abstract The process of establishing and growing a strong business base is an important hallmark of any

More information

3. Coach Supporting Statement

3. Coach Supporting Statement 3. Coach Supporting Statement Content 1. Setting the Scene 2. Vision 3. Coaches and the Shared Priorities 4. Issues 5. Delivery Programme in the first Plan Period 2001/02 2005/06 6. Good Practice 7. Strategy

More information

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time. PREFACE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has embarked upon a statewide evaluation of transit system performance. The outcome of this evaluation is a benchmark of transit performance that

More information

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require

More information

A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport.

A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport. The Master Plan A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport. A Master Plan is a visionary and a strategic document detailing planning initiatives for the Airport

More information

Public Transport for Perth in 2031

Public Transport for Perth in 2031 South West Group Submission Public Transport for Perth in 2031 October 2011 South West Group Vision and Mission Local Governments in South Metropolitan Perth, through cooperation with industry, community

More information

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: 2013-2017 Recommended Transit Service Improvement Plan NEWSLETTER 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 This newsletter describes the final recommended public transit plan for the City of

More information

Rail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise

Rail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise Rail Delivery Group Response to: Department for Transport Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise Date: 11 October 2017 Rail Delivery Group Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor,

More information

RE: PROPOSED MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AIRPORT CHARGES DRAFT DETERMINATION /COMMISSION PAPER CP6/2001

RE: PROPOSED MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AIRPORT CHARGES DRAFT DETERMINATION /COMMISSION PAPER CP6/2001 RE: PROPOSED MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AIRPORT CHARGES DRAFT DETERMINATION /COMMISSION PAPER CP6/2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bord

More information

South of England north-south connectivity

South of England north-south connectivity South of England north-south connectivity An outline economic case for the inclusion of north-south connectivity improvements to form part of the government s road investment strategy (RIS2) Weston-super-Mare

More information

Consultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England

Consultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England Tony Kershaw Honorary Secretary County Hall Chichester West Sussex PO19 1RQ Telephone 033022 22543 Website: www.gatcom.org.uk If calling ask for Mrs. Paula Street e-mail: secretary@gatcom.org.uk 22 May

More information

A Response to: Belfast On The Move Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre, Sustainable Transport Enabling Measures

A Response to: Belfast On The Move Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre, Sustainable Transport Enabling Measures West Belfast Partnership 218-226 Falls Road Belfast BT12 6AH T: 02890809202 A Response to: Belfast On The Move Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre, Sustainable Transport Enabling Measures Issued

More information

TfL Planning. 1. Question 1

TfL Planning. 1. Question 1 TfL Planning TfL response to questions from Zac Goldsmith MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Heathrow and the Wider Economy Heathrow airport expansion proposal - surface access February

More information

The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands.

The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands. The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands. Connecting People Building Opportunities 198 Brisbane Airport Corporation CHAPTER 10

More information

Team London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise

Team London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise Team London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise 23 August 2012 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction

More information

Bus Statistics for Ireland

Bus Statistics for Ireland Statistical Bulletin Number: 03/2014 June 2014 Statistics for Ireland State Funded Services Bulletin Topics: Total number of passenger journeys patronage and general economic data Total operated kilometres

More information

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY Household Travel Survey i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 SUMMARY OF TRAVEL... 2 2.1 All-Day Travel Patterns... 2 2.1.1 Automobile Availability... 2 2.1.2 Trip

More information

London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team

London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team AERODROME ROAD PEDESTRIAN FACILITY AND BUS STOP INTRODUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT Job Number: 60668 Doc Ref: S106/12-13/60668 Author: Manoj Kalair

More information

The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response

The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response Transport for the North Background Good transport links are a crucial part of a strong economy supporting labour markets and delivering

More information

Living on the edge: The impact of travel costs on low paid workers living in outer London executive summary. living on the edge 1

Living on the edge: The impact of travel costs on low paid workers living in outer London executive summary. living on the edge 1 Living on the edge: The impact travel costs on low paid workers living in outer London executive summary living on the edge 1 introduction key findings London has a world-class public transport system

More information

Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal

Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal Recommendations It is recommended that the Board: Receives the report. Executive summary The removal of the Sarawia Street to Laxon Terrace rail

More information

West London Economic Prosperity Board. 21 March Summary. Title Orbital Rail in West London

West London Economic Prosperity Board. 21 March Summary. Title Orbital Rail in West London West London Economic Prosperity Board 21 March 2017 Title Orbital Rail in West London Report of Status Urgent Enclosures Officer Contact Details Amar Dave (LB Brent) Public No Appendix 1: Specification

More information

HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer Tel:

HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer   Tel: 7. TRAVELLER SITES ALLOCATIONS DOCUMENT REPORT OF: Contact Officer: Wards Affected: Key Decision: Report to: HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer Email: nathan.spilsted@midsussex.gov.uk

More information

BUS USERS MANIFESTO. Background and overview of transport needs, legislation and options

BUS USERS MANIFESTO. Background and overview of transport needs, legislation and options BUS USERS MANIFESTO The purpose of this manifesto is to provide a template for discussion with Dorset County Council about the types of services they will support in future. It sets down a number of basic

More information

Northern Beaches Transport Action Plan

Northern Beaches Transport Action Plan Northern Beaches Transport Action Plan The NSW Government is taking action now to deliver transport improvements for the Northern Beaches, as well as planning for the future growth of the area. $633 million

More information

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Leader and Cabinet 8 May 2008 AUTHOR/S: Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL S RESPONSE TO UTTLESFORD

More information

OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT

OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT AMENDMENT C32 APPLICATION 0873/02 Public Transport Users Association Inc. 247-249 Flinders Lane

More information

UK Experience with Bus Restructuring

UK Experience with Bus Restructuring UK Experience with Bus Restructuring Outline 1. Background 2. Bus Deregulation outside London 3. London strategy 4. Results to date 5. Edinburgh Case Study 1 Background Prior to mid-1980s, UK local bus

More information

Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on?

Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on? STAR 2018 Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on? Rachel Thomas, Peter Brett Associates, Scott Leitham, Peter Brett Associates, and Rebecca Rossi, Transport Scotland 1 INTRODUCTION The Borders

More information

FACILITIES INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT

FACILITIES INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT CURRENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT FACILITIES INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.... INTRODUCTION... 3 2.... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... 3 3.... THE STUDY AREA IN

More information

Bus and Rail Statistics for Ireland State Funded Services

Bus and Rail Statistics for Ireland State Funded Services Statistical Bulletin Number: 02/2017 July 2017 Bus and Rail Statistics for Ireland State Funded Services Bulletin Topics: Total Number of PSO Passenger Journeys PSO Passenger Journeys by Region Total Operated

More information

Your Transport Levy Your Transport Future. Sunshine Coast Council Transport Levy Annual Report

Your Transport Levy Your Transport Future. Sunshine Coast Council Transport Levy Annual Report Your Transport Levy Your Transport Future Sunshine Coast Council Transport Levy Annual Report 2016-2017 www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au T 07 5475 7272 F 07 5475 7277 Locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mail Centre

More information

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT For: Mid North Coast Local Health District Report prepared by: April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Executive Summary 4 Output 5 Value-Added 7 Workforce

More information

Train Stations are not just arrival and departure locations

Train Stations are not just arrival and departure locations Train Stations are not just arrival and departure locations The Railway Study Association Mike Goggin 31 October 2017 Contents Introduction to Steer Davies Gleave The Passenger The Neighbour & Non-Traveller

More information

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE 26 th Australasian Transport Research Forum Wellington New Zealand 1-3 October 2003 By, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand Abstract New Zealand

More information

the square town centre DUBLIN Prime retail and leisure opportunities within a true town centre

the square town centre DUBLIN Prime retail and leisure opportunities within a true town centre DUBLIN Prime retail and leisure opportunities within a true town centre 0 Ireland / Dublin Stats Ireland has been the fastest growing economy in the EU for the past 4 years (014-017) and set to continue

More information

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first National Passenger Survey putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain s rail

More information

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA A note prepared for Heathrow March 2018 Three Chinese airlines are currently in discussions with Heathrow about adding new direct connections between Heathrow

More information

WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE P Ensure Disabled People can Access Public Transport As and When They Need it

WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE P Ensure Disabled People can Access Public Transport As and When They Need it WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE P-05-710 Ensure Disabled People can Access Public Transport As and When They Need it The petition submitted by Whizz Kidz seeking action to ensure that disabled people can access

More information

OUTLINE RESPONSE FROM WELWYN PLANNING & AMENITYGROUP (WPAG) TO CONSULTATION OVER PROPOSED EXPANSION OF LUTON AIRPORT

OUTLINE RESPONSE FROM WELWYN PLANNING & AMENITYGROUP (WPAG) TO CONSULTATION OVER PROPOSED EXPANSION OF LUTON AIRPORT OUTLINE RESPONSE FROM WELWYN PLANNING & AMENITYGROUP (WPAG) TO CONSULTATION OVER PROPOSED EPANSION OF LUTON AIRPORT This draft follows the format of the supplied response booklet. The contents have been

More information

CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS. Project Summary Statement February 2010

CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS. Project Summary Statement February 2010 CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS Project Summary Statement February 2010 Table of Contents 1. Purpose of Document 2. Strategic Context 3. Benefits 4. Project Scope and Economics 5. Implementation Plan 1 ROADS OF

More information

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015 LAND USE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015 EAST MINILANDS EAST MINILANDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DHL eastmidlandsairport.com OUR AIRPORT FOREWORD by Andy Cliffe Managing Director

More information

INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS

INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS Andre Frieslaar Pr.Eng and John Jones Pr.Eng Abstract Hawkins Hawkins and Osborn (South) Pty Ltd 14 Bree Street,

More information

GREATER CHRISTCHURCH METRO BUS NETWORK REVIEW ABSTRACT

GREATER CHRISTCHURCH METRO BUS NETWORK REVIEW ABSTRACT Metro Bus Services Review Aimee Dunne & Connie Hutchinson Page 1 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH METRO BUS NETWORK REVIEW Aimee Dunne - Transportation Engineer MEng Civil & Environmental Engineering, Heriot Watt

More information

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council APPENDIX 8 Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report Report July 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metro and Leeds City Council Steer Davies Gleave West Riding House 67 Albion Street Leeds LS1 5AA +44 (0)113

More information

New 55-Dogpatch Outreach Findings & Route Development

New 55-Dogpatch Outreach Findings & Route Development Executive Summary Based on outreach conducted through Spring of 2018, the SFMTA identified a set of three alternative routes and service plans for a new 55-Dogpatch route. These alternatives respond to

More information

Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan

Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan Submission_id: 31119 Date of Lodgment: 12 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: Serapark Pty Ltd Organisation type:

More information

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Key points The development plan in the Master Plan includes the expansion of terminal infrastructure, creating integrated terminals for international,

More information

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms Presented to: Missouri Department of Agriculture Prepared by: Carla Barbieri, Ph.D. Christine Tew, M.S. September 2010 University of Missouri Department

More information

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16 East Lothian Skills Assessment January 2016 SDS-1154-Jan16 Acknowledgement The Regional Skills Assessment Steering Group (Skills Development Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Funding Council

More information

MODAIR: Measure and development of intermodality at AIRport. INO WORKSHOP EEC, December 6 h 2005

MODAIR: Measure and development of intermodality at AIRport. INO WORKSHOP EEC, December 6 h 2005 MODAIR: Measure and development of intermodality at AIRport INO WORKSHOP EEC, December 6 h 2005 What is intermodality? The use of different and coordinated modes of transports for one trip High Speed train

More information

transport.gov.scot Borders Railway Year 1 Evaluation

transport.gov.scot Borders Railway Year 1 Evaluation transport.gov.scot June 2017 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Background 3 Methodological Approach 4 Investment Objectives 5 Visitor Trips 6 Service Quality and Barriers to Use 2 Transport Research Summary The

More information

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure St. John s Region 1.0 Introduction Newfoundland and Labrador s most dominant service centre, St. John s (population = 100,645) is also the province s capital and largest community (Government of Newfoundland

More information

Submission to. Southland District Council on. Draft Stewart Island/Rakiura Visitor Levy Policy and Bylaw

Submission to. Southland District Council on. Draft Stewart Island/Rakiura Visitor Levy Policy and Bylaw Submission to Southland District Council on Draft Stewart Island/Rakiura Visitor Levy Policy and Bylaw Date: 9 November 2018 Tourism Industry Aotearoa (TIA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on Southland

More information

A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES THE MAYOR'S VISION FOR TRANSPORT A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES VISION We will build a transport system that works for everyone, connecting people to the places they want to go within the

More information

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact January 2019 Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact KEY FINDING: The proposed gondola system, which will connect the A s planned stadium to downtown Oakland, will generate $685 million in total economic benefit

More information

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island Economic Impact Analysis Tourism on Tasmania s King Island i Economic Impact Analysis Tourism on Tasmania s King Island This project has been conducted by REMPLAN Project Team Matthew Nichol Principal

More information

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon Overview of Preferred Alternative April 12, 2011 Presentation Overview Study Goals Quick Review Methodology and Approach Key Findings Results of Public

More information

Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017

Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017 Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017 Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017 Foreword We asked more than 12,800 passengers across the country to rank 31 possible improvements

More information

2011/12 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release

2011/12 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release 6.8 % 5.1 % 3.4 % 1.2 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release Bureau of Transport Statistics The Bureau of

More information

Port Macquarie-Hastings Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan. Working Paper COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Port Macquarie-Hastings Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan. Working Paper COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Port Macquarie-Hastings Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan Working Paper COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT December 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 2 Submissions... 3 2.1 Stakeholder

More information

the UK s most influential, national, environmental campaigning organisation

the UK s most influential, national, environmental campaigning organisation Briefing Northern Ireland Regional Transportation Strategy Reverse Transport Spending Friends of the Earth inspires solutions to environmental problems which make life better for people Friends of the

More information

Consideration of application to change cash, Leap and pre-paid fares including monthlies and annual fares from Dublin Bus for 2017

Consideration of application to change cash, Leap and pre-paid fares including monthlies and annual fares from Dublin Bus for 2017 Consideration of application to change cash, Leap and pre-paid fares including monthlies and annual fares from Dublin Bus for 2017 Determination No. 1-2016 November 2016 1 Table of contents 1 Introduction...

More information

2015 Metro User Christchurch

2015 Metro User Christchurch 2015 Metro User Christchurch Research Report June 2015 www.researchfirst.co.nz Contents 2015 Metro User Christchurch 1 Research Context and Design 03 1.1 Introduction 03 1.2 Research Objectives 03 1.3

More information

New free City connector bus service

New free City connector bus service The Adelaide City Council invites engagement from the community about New free City connector bus service 99C City Loop and Adelaide Connector free bus services to merge: Project Summary Adelaide City

More information

Update on implementation of Taking Revalidation Forward recommendations

Update on implementation of Taking Revalidation Forward recommendations Agenda item: 7 Report title: Report by: Action: Update on implementation of Taking Revalidation Forward recommendations Judith Chrystie, Assistant Director, Registration and Revalidation Judith.Chrystie@gmc-uk.org,

More information

Retail Strategy. Appendix5

Retail Strategy. Appendix5 Retail Strategy Appendix5 Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1/1 68 1.2 Purpose of the Retail Strategy 1/2 68 1.3 Approach 1/3 70 1.4 Preparation of the Retail Strategy 1/4 71 1.5 Structure of the

More information

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers Total San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity and service

More information

CRITICAL FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIRPORT CITIES. Mauro Peneda, Prof. Rosário Macário AIRDEV Seminar IST, 20 October 2011

CRITICAL FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIRPORT CITIES. Mauro Peneda, Prof. Rosário Macário AIRDEV Seminar IST, 20 October 2011 CRITICAL FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIRPORT CITIES Mauro Peneda, Prof. Rosário Macário AIRDEV Seminar IST, 20 October 2011 Introduction Airports are becoming new dynamic centres of economic activity.

More information