2011/12 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release
|
|
- Tracey Holt
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 6.8 % 5.1 % 3.4 % 1.2 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release
2 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
3 Bureau of Transport Statistics The Bureau of Transport Statistics (BTS) of Transport for NSW provides data on current and future demographic, employment and travel patterns. These data are used as inputs to transport and land use planning and policy making in NSW. The BTS main datasets include: u Personal travel data for the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area from the continuous Household Travel Survey (HTS). u Commercial vehicle travel data for the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area from the Freight Movement Model (FMM). u Journey to Work (JTW) data for NSW derived from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census of Population and Housing. u Travel zone population, workforce and employment forecasts for the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area (5-yearly). u Travel zone trip forecasts for the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area (5-yearly) from the Sydney Strategic Travel Model (STM). COPYRIGHT (FREE TO SHARE) Users are welcome to copy, reproduce and distribute the information contained in this report for non-commercial purposes only, provided acknowledgement is given to the Bureau of Transport Statistics as the source. DISCLAIMER While all care is taken in producing and publishing this work, no responsibility is taken or warranty made with respect to the accuracy of any information, data or representation. The authors (including copyright owners) and publishers expressly disclaim all liability in respect of anything done or omitted to be done and the consequences upon reliance of the contents of this publication. Transport for NSW Bureau of Transport Statistics 2013 ISBN (Paperback) ISBN (PDF) August 2013 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 1
4 2 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
5 Contents 1 About this publication 5 2 Travel in Sydney Key Indicators 9 3 Travel in Sydney Characteristics Travel trends Purpose of travel Mode of travel Purpose by mode Reasons for mode choice Public transport fare and ticket type Trip distance Trip duration Time of day Profile of travellers Vehicles 27 4 Detailed tables Total travel Purpose of travel Mode of travel Trip distance Trip duration Time of day travel Profile of travellers Vehicles 44 5 Appendices About the HTS HTS data items Acronyms Glossary Other BTS Publications 54 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 13
6 4 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
7 1 About this publication This publication is a compilation of annual statistics on the travel behaviour of Sydney residents produced from the Bureau of Transport Statistics continuous Household Travel Survey (HTS). It updates last year s summary report with the addition of the most recent estimates for. The annual estimates reported here are each based on three waves of data pooled and weighted to the latest estimated resident population (ERP). The estimates are based on the, and waves of survey data, weighted to the June 30th 2011 preliminary ERP based on the 2011 Census. The and estimates in previous reports have also been updated based on the more recent preliminary ERP for these years. The HTS is the largest and most comprehensive source of personal travel data for the Greater Metropolitan Area (GMA) see Figure 1 on the following page. In line with previous summary reports, the focus is on travel by residents of Sydney Statistical Division. The remainder of the report is divided into the following sections: Section 2 Travel in Sydney Key Indicators The Key Indicators summarise the main travel trends for to. Section 3 Travel in Sydney Characteristics This section provides more detail on the travel behaviour of Sydney residents in text and graphs on the following topics: u Travel trends u Purpose of travel u Mode of travel u Purpose by mode u Reasons for mode choice u Public transport fare and ticket type u Trip distance and duration u Time of day of travel u Profile of travellers u Vehicle use Section 4 Detailed tables Comprehensive statistics for each of the above topics are provided in Section 4, including historical data and change over time. Section 5 Appendices This section contains background information about the HTS, its methodology, statistical validity and data items, including a glossary of terms and definitions to further clarify the concepts used in this report. Information is also provided on other BTS publications at the end of this report. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 15
8 Figure 1: Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area (GMA) 6 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
9 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 17
10 8 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
11 2 Travel in Sydney Key Indicators This publication presents the key findings from the Household Travel Survey (HTS) on the travel of residents of the Sydney Statistical Division. Broad trends over the past decade, In, there were over 4.5 million people living in the Sydney Statistical Division. They made nearly 16.5 million trips on an average weekday and 14.8 million trips on an average weekend day. Between 2001 and 2011, the population in the Sydney Statistical Division grew by 12%. During this same time period, the number of weekday trips grew at a rate of 8%, while weekend trips grew by 14%. Over the ten-year period, total kilometres travelled across all modes grew in line with population (12%), reaching over 142 million kilometres on an average weekday. Despite a 24% increase in the number of private vehicles (which reached more than 2.6 million in 2011) vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) only rose in line with population (11%). Notably, public transport passenger kilometres grew by 18%. In support of NSW 2021 goals, public transport and walking trips grew at a faster rate (23% for train, 16% for bus, and 15% for walking trips) than private vehicle trips (6% for car driver trips and 6% for car passenger trips) in the past decade. Social/recreational trips and education/childcare trips increased the most (17% for each), while work-related business trips (-17%) and personal business trips (-16%) fell. QuickStats Change over the last decade 1 Growth 12% POPULATION 8% WEEKDAY TRIPS 14% TRIPS WEEKEND 24% VEHICLE OWNERSHIP 35% BICYCLE OWNERSHIP 6% CAR DRIVER TRIPS 23% TRAIN TRIPS 16% BUS TRIPS 15% WALK TRIPS 1 Figures refer to weekday travel, unless otherwise indicated Over the decade, distance travelled for education/childcare grew by 30%, implying children are travelling further and are increasingly less likely to go to their closest school. Distance travelled for personal business decreased by 20% over the same time period, consistent with the growth of the internet and mobile technologies. The total daily travel time per person remained unchanged at 79 minutes. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 9
12 Recent Change: Total Travel Between and, Sydney s population rose by 1.2%, however, the growth in travel slowed. Weekday trips reached nearly 16.5 million per day, an increase of 0.8% from the previous year, while weekend travel fell by 2% to 14.8 million trips, following a period of strong growth previously. In, Sydney residents travelled a total of 142 million kilometres on an average weekday, an increase of over 3% from the previous year. This growth is fuelled by both vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) and public transport kilometres travelled. Since the previous year, the growth in kilometres travelled outpaced the growth in weekday trips and population, indicating that people are travelling further, on average. Purpose of travel Trips for social/recreational and shopping purposes were the largest contributors to the growth in total weekday travel, each increasing by nearly 3% in the year. Associated distances travelled for these purposes also grew substantially, up by roughly 7% for both categories. Education/childcare and serve passenger trips (which tend to be related to each another) also grew, but at the same rate as population million THE NUMBER OF TRIPS MADE IN SYDNEY ON A WEEKDAY IN 79 minutes THE AMOUNT OF TIME SPENT TRAVELLING BY THE AVERAGE SYDNEYSIDER ON A WEEKDAY 23% growth THE AMOUNT THAT WEEKDAY TRAIN TRIPS HAVE GROWN BETWEEN AND 3.63 trips THE NUMBER OF TRIPS MADE BY EACH SYDNEYSIDER ON A WEEKDAY IN For the seventh consecutive year, the number of personal business trips decreased. This sustained trend indicates that mobile technologies are impacting on these types of trips. Furthermore, for the first time in the past decade, commute trips also fell, declining by 2% since the previous year. Work-related business trips also fell. 10 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
13 Mode of travel The growth in public transport trips was higher than the growth in car trips, with train and bus trips increasing by 3.5% and 2.6%, respectively, and vehicle driver trips increasing by 1.2%. However, this growth in public transport usage is not reflected in mode shares in a significant way. The mode share for private vehicle use remained high (68% for vehicle drivers and passengers), compared to walk (18%) and public transport trips (11%). Distance travelled Since the previous year, all HTS distance measures grew faster than the rate of population growth. Public transport passenger kilometres grew at 5.3% and Vehicle Kilometres Travelled (VKT) grew by 3.3%. Following three consecutive years of decline, average weekday distance travelled by train grew by 6% since. Distance travelled by bus continued its steady growth, increasing by nearly 4% over the previous year. This was consistent with the growth in trips made by these two modes. Distance travelled by car drivers and passengers also increased in the past year, but at a slower rate. With one exception distance travelled for all purposes grew. Distance travelled for social/ recreation trips increased the most (7.2%), closely followed by shopping trips (6.6%). Vehicles Growth in the number of private vehicles in Sydney continued to outpace population growth, albeit at a slightly slower pace than in previous years. The number of vehicles per household has remained relatively constant (1.54 vehicles) in recent years. The proportion of households with no vehicles (12%) continued to decline, with a corresponding increase in the proportion of single-vehicle dwellings. In the last decade... GROWTH IN weekend travel outstrips weekdays 8% 14% M T W T F S S TRIPS FOR education & social/recreation growing fastest education & social/ recreation commute serve passenger shopping -16% 17% 12% 11% 9% GROWTH IN bus & train travel surpasses car personal business 23% 16% 6% Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 11
14 Table 2.1: Key Transport Indicators for residents of the Sydney Statistical Division Indicator 1 Persons ('000) 4,067 4,279 4,352 4,420 4,482 4, % 11.6% 2 Population No. of households ('000) 1,499 1,606 1,633 1,659 1,682 1, % 13.6% Total travel Vehicles Bicycles Distance Travel time Purpose 4 of travel (trips) Mode 5 of travel (trips) Purpose 4 of travel (distance) Mode 5 of travel (distance) 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Trips Trips av. weekday ( 000) 15,207 16,263 16,312 16,159 16,322 16, % 8.2% Trips av. weekend day ( 000) 13,013 14,618 14,799 15,073 15,130 14, % 13.9% Trips per capita weekday % -3.0% Trips per capita weekend % 2.1% Trips per household weekday % -4.7% Trips per household weekend % 0.3% Vehicles Private vehicles ( 000) 2,115 2,394 2,465 2,527 2,589 2, % 24.2% Vehicles per household % 9.3% Bicycles Bicycle ownership ('000) 1,203 1,592 1,616 1,641 1,678 1, % 35.2% Bicycles per household % 19.1% Kilometres Total travel ( 000) 127, , , , , , % 11.7% Total travel per capita % 0.1% Av. trip length % 3.2% Vehicle travel (VKT) ( 000) 3 74,091 76,349 77,037 76,776 79,745 82, % 11.1% VKT per capita % -0.4% PT passenger ('000) 19,634 23,315 22,960 22,210 22,035 23, % 18.2% Minutes Av. work trip duration % 11.0% Av. non-work trip duration % 2.4% Daily travel time per capita % 0.3% Trips 000s Social/recreation 3,359 3,659 3,714 3,688 3,837 3, % 17.4% Serve passenger 2,653 2,967 2,932 2,863 2,925 2, % 11.4% Shopping 2,453 2,555 2,554 2,570 2,603 2, % 9.1% Commuting 2,262 2,541 2,559 2,565 2,586 2, % 12.0% Work related business 1,567 1,445 1,440 1,417 1,316 1, % -16.7% Education/childcare 1,279 1,423 1,449 1,432 1,477 1, % 17.0% Personal business 1,198 1,190 1,177 1,121 1,042 1, % -16.4% Other % 25.6% Trips 000s Vehicle driver 7,686 8,080 8,015 7,943 8,062 8, % 6.2% Vehicle passenger 3,462 3,643 3,635 3,610 3,653 3, % 6.2% Train % 22.8% Bus ,007 1, % 15.7% Walk only 2,741 3,035 3,130 3,136 3,139 3, % 15.3% Other modes % 20.5% Kilometres 000s Social/recreation 27,961 26,886 27,169 26,694 29,175 31, % 11.9% Serve passenger 16,016 16,678 17,369 17,107 17,837 18, % 12.9% Shopping 11,812 13,180 12,480 12,275 13,029 13, % 17.5% Commuting 32,398 36,608 37,055 37,498 37,801 37, % 17.1% Work related business 20,522 21,124 20,527 20,210 19,578 20, % -0.7% Education/childcare 8,392 9,609 9,963 9,638 10,605 10, % 30.1% Personal business 8,252 7,673 7,775 7,280 6,898 6, % -19.6% Other 1,675 1,729 1,684 1,722 2,017 2, % 39.4% Kilometres 000s Vehicle driver 74,091 76,349 77,037 76,776 79,745 82, % 11.1% Vehicle passenger 27,684 26,969 27,022 26,938 28,791 29, % 6.6% Train 13,957 17,208 16,628 15,786 15,348 16, % 16.5% Bus 5,677 6,106 6,331 6,423 6,687 6, % 22.4% Walk only 2,497 2,602 2,664 2,643 2,529 2, % -4.1% Other modes 1,802 2,328 2,562 2,521 2,520 2, % 54.6% 12 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
15 Table 2.1 cont d Indicator 1 Purpose 4 of travel (trips %) Mode 5 of travel (trips %) Purpose 4 of travel (distance %) Mode 5 of travel (distance %) Trips % 6 Social/recreation 22.1% 22.5% 22.8% 22.8% 23.5% 24.0% Serve passenger 17.4% 18.2% 18.0% 17.7% 17.9% 18.0% Shopping 16.1% 15.7% 15.7% 15.9% 16.0% 16.3% Commuting 14.9% 15.6% 15.7% 15.9% 15.8% 15.4% Work related business 10.3% 8.9% 8.8% 8.8% 8.1% 7.9% Education/childcare 8.4% 8.8% 8.9% 8.9% 9.0% 9.1% Personal business 7.9% 7.3% 7.2% 6.9% 6.4% 6.1% Other 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% Trips % 6 Vehicle driver 48.4% 47.6% 47.0% 46.8% 46.9% 46.9% Vehicle passenger 21.8% 21.4% 21.3% 21.3% 21.3% 21.1% Train 4.9% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3% 5.4% 5.5% Bus 5.6% 5.7% 5.8% 5.8% 5.9% 5.9% Walk only 17.2% 17.9% 18.3% 18.5% 18.3% 18.2% Other modes 2.1% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% Distance % 6 Social/recreation 22.0% 20.1% 20.3% 20.2% 21.3% 22.1% Serve passenger 12.6% 12.5% 13.0% 12.9% 13.0% 12.8% Shopping 9.3% 9.9% 9.3% 9.3% 9.5% 9.8% Commuting 25.5% 27.4% 27.6% 28.3% 27.6% 26.8% Work related business 16.2% 15.8% 15.3% 15.3% 14.3% 14.4% Education/childcare 6.6% 7.2% 7.4% 7.3% 7.7% 7.7% Personal business 6.5% 5.7% 5.8% 5.5% 5.0% 4.7% Other 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% Distance % 6 Vehicle driver 58.9% 58.0% 58.3% 58.6% 58.8% 58.7% Vehicle passenger 22.0% 20.5% 20.4% 20.5% 21.2% 21.0% Train 11.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.0% 11.3% 11.6% Bus 4.5% 4.6% 4.8% 4.9% 4.9% 5.0% Walk only 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.7% Other modes 1.4% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% NOTES 1 Data are for average weekday unless otherwise indicated. Percentages are calculated from unrounded data. 2 Population and households refer to residents of occupied private dwellings only. 3 VKT Vehicle Kilometres Travelled is based on vehicle driver trips. 4 Trip purpose estimates are based on linked trips, with trips to return home coded to the previous priority purpose. 5 Estimates of trip and distance by mode are based on unlinked trips except for walk only trips. 6 Percentages do not always add to 100 due to rounding. 13
16 14 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
17 3 Travel in Sydney Characteristics 3.1 Travel trends Vehicle ownership double fast Weekend growth accelerated VKT trending upwards Household vehicles (24%) and Gross State Product (GSP) (23%) are growing twice as fast as weekday travel (8%) and population (12%). Over the decade, the growth in weekend trips (14%) outpaced weekday trips (8%). Following a dip in, Vehicle Kilometres Travelled (VKT) is continuing to rise. Figure 3.1.1: Travel trends, to Index of growth / / / / /07 Population Vehicles Vehicle kms travelled Gross State Product Weekday Trips Weekend Trips Total kms travelled Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 15
18 3.2 Purpose of travel Social and recreational trips top the list Commuters travel furthest Personal business trips on the decline The proportion of social/recreation trips made on an average weekday in was close to a quarter, after gradually increasing from previous years. Social/recreation trips also accounted for 24% of time spent travelling (Figures and 3.2.2). The proportion of all distances travelled for commute purposes was 27%, whereas only 15% of trips were for this purpose. The proportion of personal business trips has been steadily falling since 2004/05. Figure 3.2.1: Purpose of average weekday trips over time 25% 20% 22.5% 22.8% 22.8% 23.5% 24.0% 15% 18.2% 18.0% 17.7% 17.9% 18.0% 15.7% 15.7% 15.9% 16.0% 16.3% 15.6% 15.7% 15.9% 15.8% 15.4% 10% 5% 8.9% 8.8% 8.8% 8.1% 7.9% 8.8% 8.9% 8.9% 9.0% 9.1% 7.3% 7.2% 6.9% 6.4% 6.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% 0% Social/ recreation Serve passenger Shopping Commute Work related business Education/ childcare Personal business Other trips to return home recoded to previous priority purpose Refer to Table Figure 3.2.2: Purpose share of trips, distance and time, average weekday, 30% Trips Distance Time 25% 27% 20% 24% 22% 24% 24% 15% 10% 5% 0% Social/ recreation 18% 13% 12% 16% 10% 11% Serve passenger Shopping Commute Work related business 15% 8% 14% 11% 9% 8% 10% Education/ childcare 6% 5% 5% Personal business 3% 2% 2% Other Refer to Tables and Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
19 3.3 Mode of travel Public transport rising Nearing one million train trips each weekday Train (23%) and bus (16%) trips have risen faster than the population in the last decade. There were 952,000 train trips made on an average weekday in. Train accounted for 5% of trips made on an average weekday and 12% of distance travelled. Train trips tend to be used for longer journeys. Figure 3.3.1: Number of trips by mode on an average weekday 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other Unlinked trip legs other includes taxi, bicycle and ferry Refer to Table One in five trips by foot Mode shares unchanged The proportion of walk only trips (18%) was not insignificant, though distances travelled were short. The distribution of trips by mode has been largely stable in the last five years. Figure 3.3.2: Mode share of trips, distance and time, average weekday, 60% Trips Distance Time 50% 40% 47% 59% 51% 30% 20% 10% 0% 21% 21% 20% 5% 12% 8% 6% 5% 7% 18% 2% 10% 2% 2% 4% Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other Refer to Tables and Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 17
20 3.4 Purpose by mode Car dominates all purposes PT on the up for education Walking more for fun For all trip purposes, the main mode of transport was by private vehicle, either as a driver or passenger. Although most trips for education/childcare were made by private vehicle, there has been a growing proportion of trips made by bus or train. However, the proportion of walk trips to education/childcare fell. The proportion of social/recreation trips made by walking increased from 26% to 29% between and. Figure 3.4.1: Mode share 1 of trip purpose, average weekday, and Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other 100% 80% 60% 6% 7% 6% 6% 14% 8% 22% 17% 8% 27% 4% 14% 20% 4% 5% 17% 26% 29% 10% 6% 7% 7% 6% 14% 33% 6% 17% 18% 9% 28% 4% 13% 20% 4% 18% 29% 27% 10% 30% 40% 81% 81% 20% 62% 45% 52% 54% 37% 56% 64% 47% 52% 53% 36% 58% 0% 7% 6% Commute Work related business Education/ childcare Shopping Personal business Social/ recreation Serve passenger Commute Work related business Education/ childcare Shopping Personal business Social/ recreation Serve passenger Refer to Table Proportions of less than 4% are not labeled in the graph but are reported in table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
21 3.5 Reasons for mode choice PT commuters avoid parking problems PT more economical Speed an important factor Those commuting to work by public transport were most likely to do so because they were avoiding parking problems (53%). A third (33%) of PT commuters travelled to work by PT because it was cheaper than travelling by car. Many PT commuters (31%) travelled to work by PT because it was faster than travelling by car. Figure 3.5.1: Reasons for commuting by public transport, 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Avoids parking problems 53% Cheaper Faster Less stressful than other forms 25% 31% 33% Do not have a car 22% Live or work close to public transport Arrives closer to destination Enjoy time to read and relax 13% 15% 18% Don't drive/no licence 11% Car used by someone else Environmental reasons Other 4% 5% 8% Employer assistance in public transport costs 2% Refer to Table Convenience rules for car commuters Few carpooling For commuters who travelled to work by car, 53% said that they preferred the convenience and independence a car offers. Many car commuters said that PT services are indirect (37%) or slow (26%). Only 6% of car commuters carpooled to work. Figure 3.5.2: Reasons for commuting by car, 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Prefer convenience/independence of car 53% PT services are indirect 37% PT services are too slow 26% PT doesn't go where required PT timetable constraints Employer provides/subsidises car/parking Use car for work trips Use car for other non-work trips PT is unavailable here PT services are too infrequent Carpooling arrangements PT services are unreliable 17% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9% 6% 6% Other PT uncomfortable 3% 4% Refer to Table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 19
22 3.6 Public transport fare and ticket type Bulk of train trips by full fare One in four free on bus The majority of train trips (63%) were made by users who paid full fare. Nearly a quarter of train trips (23%) were made on concession tickets, either as students or pensioners. Many bus trips (25%) were made by students travelling on free school passes. Use of concession tickets was also high for bus (32%). Figure 3.6.1: Proportion of train and bus trips by fare type, and 70% 60% 50% 61% 63% 40% 30% 37% 37% 20% 10% 0% 9% 9% 15% 17% 8% 6% 5% 4% 2% 1% 1% 0% 24% 25% 16% 21% 14% 11% 5% 5% 3% 2% 2% 0% Full Fare Free School Pass Concession: Student and Other Concession: Pensioner/Aged Train Free Fare Other Child Fare Other Fare Full Fare Free School Pass Concession: Student and Other Concession: Pensioner/Aged Bus Free Fare Other Child Fare Other Fare Refer to Table Weeklies still the way to go Many bus trips free Weekly tickets remained popular among train users; however, this category contracted over the decade in line with the growth in the recently introduced fortnightly and monthly tickets. Three in ten bus trips were free, whilst a quarter of bus trips were made with fixed-multiple tickets, eg TravelTens. Figure 3.6.2: Proportion of train and bus trips by ticket type, and 40% 35% 38% 30% 34% 25% 20% 23% 25% 29% 30% 27% 25% 15% 10% 5% 0% 13% 12% 12% 8% 8% 10% 0% 1% 0% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1% 10% 10% 18% 3% 3% 12% 14% 15% 0% 0% 2% 1% 2% 0% Weekly Free travel Single Return Daily Train Fixed multiple trips Monthly/Fortnightly Quarterly/Yearly Other Weekly Free travel Single Return Daily Bus Fixed multiple trips Monthly/Fortnightly Quarterly/Yearly Other Refer to Table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
23 3.7 Trip distance PT outpacing car VKT rising in recent years Between and, distances travelled by bus increased by 22%, train by 17% and car driver by 11%. Total distance travelled by car drivers (VKT) has been growing on par with population but recently has accelerated, reaching 82.3 million kilometres on an average weekday in. Average car driver trips have reached the 10km mark (Figure 3.7.2). Upswing in distance travelled by train Following three years of steady decline, total distances travelled by train grew by 6% in to 16.3 million kilometres on an average weekday. Figure 3.7.1: Total trip distance by mode 100,000 80,000 Kilometres ('000) 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other Unlinked trip legs other includes taxi, ferry, bicycle etc. Refer to Table Bus trips getting longer Over the preceding nine years, the average bus trip has steadily grown from 5.9km to 6.7km. Figure 3.7.2: a Kilometres Unlinked trip legs Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Refer to Table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 21
24 Distances growing for most purposes Since the previous year, average trip distances grew for most trip purposes, in particular for commute and work-related business trips, which were already the trips with the longest average distances. Figure 3.7.3: Average trip distance by purpose 16 Kilometres Commute Work related business Education/ childcare Shopping Personal business Social/ recreation Serve passenger Refer to Table Short trips mainly active Trains used for longer trips The vast majority (71%) of trips that are less than 1km were made by walking. A quarter (24%) of trips that were 1-2km were also made by walking. The longer the trip, the more likely one is to use a train. Figure 3.7.4: Average weekday trips: distance by mode, 4,500,000 Vehicle driver Vehicle pass Train Bus Walking Other 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000, ,000-10% 27% 9% 6% 71% 26% 5% 24% 11% 21% 17% 24% 52% 16% 56% 9% 61% 43% 62% 17% Up to 1km km km km km More than 20km Refer to Table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
25 3.8 Trip duration 1 Time stands still Duration by mode unchanged Longest time spent on trains Walk trips shortest Sydneysiders spent an average of 79 minutes travelling each weekday. This has remained unchanged for the last decade. With the exception of train trips, average trip durations by mode have remained stable over the previous five years. Compared to other modes, average trip durations by train were the longest, at 28 minutes. Walk trips were shorter in duration than all other modes, averaging ten minutes. Figure 3.8.1: Average trip duration by mode Minutes Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Refer to Table Non-discretionary trips take most time Shopping nearby Time spent travelling relatively unchanged People travelled the longest for non-discretionary activities, such as work (35 minutes), work related business (30 minutes), and education (23 minutes). Sydneysiders travelled 15 minutes on average to make a shopping trip. Overall, the amount of time spent travelling by trip purpose was stable over the last five years. Figure 3.8.2: Average trip duration by purpose Minutes Commute Work related business Education/ childcare Shopping Personal business Social/ recreation Serve passenger Refer to Table Trip duration by purpose is based on the door-to-door journey time of linked trips. Trip duration by mode is based on unlinked trip legs, which refers to in-vehicle time in the case of motorised modes. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 23
26 3.9 Time of day Weekday travel peaks Weekend spread more even There were distinct weekday peaks at 8.30am, 3.30pm and 5.30pm. These coincide with trips to/from work and education. Weekend travel ramped up during the late morning and remained at this level most of the day. This was related to more discretionary trips on weekends. Discretionary trips include shopping and social/recreation which tend to be made throughout the day. Figure 3.9.1: Persons travelling on motorised modes by time of day, average weekday and weekend, 600,000 8:30am 12:00noon 3:30pm 5:30pm 500,000 Number of travellers 400, , , , am 1am 2am 3am 4am 5am 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm 10pm 11pm 12am weekday weekend Motorised travel only School s out Trips to drop-off or pick-up someone were closely aligned with trips for education. This is consistent with trips for education being increasingly made by private vehicle. Figure 3.9.2: Persons travelling on motorised modes for selected purposes by time of day, average weekday, 250,000 8:00am 12:00noon 3:30pm 5:30pm Number of travellers 200, , ,000 50, am 1am 2am 3am 4am 5am 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm 10pm 11pm 12am Motorised travel only Commute WRB Education/ Childcare Drop-off/Pick-up Discretionary 24 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
27 Mode and purpose alignment Trips made by car drivers and by train aligned closely in time with commute trips. Trips by car passengers and by bus aligned more closely with education trips. Figure 3.9.3: Persons travelling on motorised modes by time of day, average weekday, 300,000 8:00am 12:00noon 3:30pm 5:30pm 250,000 Number of travellers 200, , ,000 50, am 1am 2am 3am 4am 5am 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm 10pm 11pm 12am Motorised travel only Vehicle Driver Vehicle Passenger Train Bus Other Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 25
28 3.10 Profile of travellers Mode by gender Driving a male thing But also walking more Men were more likely to drive than women, while women were more likely to be car passengers than men. There were virtually no differences between the sexes for other modes in. The proportion of walking trips made by men increased from 15% in to 18% in. Figure : Mode share of trips by gender, and 60% 50% 40% 53% 50% 43% 44% 30% 20% 10% 19% 18% 5% 6% 5% 6% 15% 18% 3% 3% 25% 24% 5% 5% 6% 6% 19% 19% 2% 2% 0% Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other Male Female unlinked trips except for 'walk only' Refer to Table Mode by age Younger people driving less All age groups prefer car PT used most by younger travellers As compared to, people aged 30 years and below were less likely to drive in. Those aged over 60 were more likely to drive in the recent year. Whether it be by car passenger (particularly for younger people) or car driver, the car was the mode most likely to be used in all age groups. Public transport use was highest for those aged 11-30, the years associated with schooling and comparatively low access to vehicles. Figure : Mode share of trips by age group, and Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other 100% 80% 60% 18% 4% 13% 19% 18% 16% 17% 20% 4% 4% 4% 6% 5% 8% 4% 5% 14% 8% 9% 10% 14% 8% 12% 26% 18% 16% 20% 20% 4% 4% 17% 8% 6% 10% 11% 8% 5% 9% 15% 18% 19% 4% 4% 4% 7% 4% 10% 13% 26% 8% 18% 12% 16% 40% 20% 76% 39% 53% 64% 72% 63% 56% 39% 75% 42% 46% 60% 69% 64% 59% 43% 0% 17% % Refer to Table Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
29 3.11 Vehicles Vehicle ownership & vehicle occupancy Multi-vehicle households rising Solo driving dominates Vehicle occupancy unchanged In, 42% of Sydney households owned two or more vehicles. This figure rose to 47% in. The average number of vehicles per household increased from 1.41 to 1.54 in the same time period (Table 4.8.2). Two-thirds of weekday car trips did not have any passengers. Nearly three quarters of vehicle kilometres travelled (73%) were in single-occupant vehicles. Between and, the average vehicle occupancy remained stable at Trips to work (1.10) had a lower occupancy rate than non-work trips (1.66). (Table ). Figure : Vehicle driver trips and distance (VKT) by vehicle occupancy, 80% Trips Distance 70% 60% 67% 73% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 22% 18% 7% 5% 3% 3% 1% 1% One Two Three Four Five or more Vehicle Occupancy Refer to Tables and Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 27
30 28 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
31 4 Detailed tables 4.1 Total travel Table 4.1.1: Total population, households and number of travellers 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Population 1 4,067 4,181 4,218 4,279 4,352 4,420 4,482 4, % 11.6% ERP 2 4,128 4,245 4,282 4,340 4,411 4,487 4,550 4, % 11.6% Travellers average day 3,377 3,554 3,597 3,623 3,683 3,733 3,788 3, % 12.7% PT users average weekday % 8.5% PT users average day % 9.9% PT users last 7 days 3 N/A 1,197 1,175 1,206 1,228 1,289 1,312 1, % N/A Households 1,499 1,564 1,583 1,606 1,633 1,659 1,682 1, % 13.6% Average household size % -1.8% Table 4.1.2: Number of trips / /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Average weekday 15,207 15,757 15,939 16,263 16,312 16,159 16,322 16, % 8.2% Average weekend day 13,013 13,686 14,700 14,618 14,799 15,073 15,130 14, % 13.9% Average day 14,580 15,165 15,585 15,793 15,880 15,849 15,981 15, % 9.7% Average weekday AM peak 3,087 3,267 3,368 3,474 3,516 3,446 3,489 3, % 12.8% Total weekday (M-F) 76,034 78,787 79,695 81,315 81,561 80,796 81,608 82, % 8.2% Total weekend (S-S) 26,026 27,371 29,399 29,236 29,597 30,145 30,260 29, % 13.9% Total weekly (M-S) 102, , , , , , , , % 9.7% Table 4.1.3: Trip rates for persons 5 and households (average weekday) Average weekday 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Per person % -3.0% Per household % -4.7% NOTES 1 Population reported here is derived from the HTS and is for residents of private dwellings only. 2 ERP (ABS Estimated Resident Population) is higher than HTS population as it includes people in non-private dwellings. 3 Based on an average day for population aged over 14 years. 4 Number of trips is based on linked trips. See glossary for the definition of a linked trip. 5 Person trip rates are per capita, that is, they are estimated for the total population including those who did not make a trip. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 29
32 4.2 Purpose of travel Table 4.2.1: Number of trips by purpose 1 (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Social/recreation 3,359 3,614 3,670 3,659 3,714 3,688 3,837 3, % 17.4% Serve passenger 2,653 2,858 2,939 2,967 2,932 2,863 2,925 2, % 11.4% Shopping 2,453 2,489 2,473 2,555 2,554 2,570 2,603 2, % 9.1% Commute 2,262 2,389 2,468 2,541 2,559 2,565 2,586 2, % 12.0% Work related business 1,567 1,384 1,355 1,445 1,440 1,417 1,316 1, % -16.7% Education/childcare 1,279 1,329 1,377 1,423 1,449 1,432 1,477 1, % 17.0% Personal business 1,198 1,221 1,198 1,190 1,177 1,121 1,042 1, % -16.4% Other % 25.6% Total 15,207 15,757 15,939 16,263 16,312 16,159 16,322 16, % 8.2% Table 4.2.2: Proportion of trips by purpose (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 Social/recreation Serve passenger Shopping Commute 22.1% 17.4% 16.1% 14.9% 22.9% 18.1% 15.8% 15.2% 23.0% 18.4% 15.5% 15.5% 22.5% 18.2% 15.7% 15.6% 22.8% 18.0% 15.7% 15.7% 22.8% 17.7% 15.9% 15.9% 23.5% 17.9% 16.0% 15.8% 24.0% 18.0% 16.3% 15.4% Work related business 10.3% 8.8% 8.5% 8.9% 8.8% 8.8% 8.1% 7.9% Education/childcare Personal business 8.4% 7.9% 8.4% 7.7% 8.6% 7.5% 8.8% 7.3% 8.9% 7.2% 8.9% 6.9% 9.0% 6.4% 9.1% 6.1% Other 2.9% 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NOTE 1 Linked trips are used when reporting trips by purpose. Trips to return home have been allocated to the previous priority purpose. See glossary for an explanation and definitions. 30 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
33 4.3 Mode of travel Table 4.3.1: Number of trips by mode 1 (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Vehicle driver 7,686 7,952 7,992 8,080 8,015 7,943 8,062 8, % 6.2% Vehicle passenger 3,462 3,470 3,550 3,643 3,635 3,610 3,653 3, % 6.2% Total vehicle 11,148 11,422 11,542 11,722 11,650 11,553 11,715 11, % 6.2% Train % 22.8% Public Bus % 7.3% Private Bus % 29.9% Ferry % 54.8% Total public transport 1,706 1,756 1,775 1,863 1,915 1,928 1,977 2, % 19.8% Walk only 2,741 2,973 2,964 3,035 3,130 3,136 3,139 3, % 15.3% Bicycle % -5.9% Taxi % -6.2% Other % 73.9% Total 15,895 16,493 16,628 16,988 17,064 16,981 17,185 17, % 9.4% Table 4.3.2: Proportion of trips by mode (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 Vehicle driver 48.4% 48.2% 48.1% 47.6% 47.0% 46.8% 46.9% 46.9% Vehicle passenger Total vehicle 21.8% 70.1% 21.0% 69.3% 21.4% 69.4% 21.4% 69.0% 21.3% 68.3% 21.3% 68.0% 21.3% 68.2% 21.1% 68.1% Train 4.9% 4.8% 4.9% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3% 5.4% 5.5% Public Bus 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.4% Private Bus 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% 2.5% Ferry Total public transport Walk only Bicycle Taxi 0.2% 10.7% 17.2% 0.6% 0.7% 0.2% 10.6% 18.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 10.7% 17.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 11.0% 17.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 11.2% 18.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.3% 11.4% 18.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.3% 11.5% 18.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.3% 11.8% 18.2% 0.5% 0.6% Other 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NOTE 1 Mode figures are based on unlinked trip legs. Ferry, bicycle, taxi and other mode estimates are subject to high standard errors due to the small sample sizes for these modes. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 31
34 Table 4.3.3: Proportion of trips by mode and purpose 2 (average weekday) Purpose Vehicle Driver Vehicle Passenger Train Bus Walk Other 3 Total Commute 63.5% 6.4% 14.4% 7.0% 6.0% 2.8% 100.0% Work related business 80.5% 5.6% 3.5% 1.5% 7.0% 1.9% 100.0% Education/childcare 5.8% 47.4% 9.0% 17.9% 17.4% 2.5% 100.0% Shopping 51.6% 12.7% 2.8% 4.1% 27.8% 1.0% 100.0% Personal business 52.7% 18.1% 3.7% 4.3% 20.0% 1.2% 100.0% Social/recreation 36.0% 26.5% 2.7% 2.8% 28.7% 3.3% 100.0% Serve passenger 57.8% 30.0% 1.1% 0.7% 9.9% 0.6% 100.0% Commute 62.8% 6.5% 14.7% 7.1% 6.4% 2.5% 100.0% Work related business 80.2% 6.8% 3.2% 1.4% 6.4% 2.0% 100.0% Education/childcare 5.6% 48.9% 8.6% 16.5% 17.7% 2.7% 100.0% Shopping 51.9% 12.1% 2.8% 4.1% 27.9% 1.1% 100.0% Personal business 52.8% 17.1% 3.3% 4.7% 20.4% 1.7% 100.0% Social/recreation 35.7% 26.9% 2.4% 2.9% 28.7% 3.3% 100.0% Serve passenger 57.0% 30.5% 1.1% 0.8% 10.1% 0.5% 100.0% Commute 61.6% 6.3% 15.6% 7.7% 6.6% 2.1% 100.0% Work related business 80.0% 6.1% 3.0% 1.3% 7.3% 2.4% 100.0% Education/childcare 4.9% 49.0% 8.6% 15.9% 19.0% 2.7% 100.0% Shopping 51.4% 12.7% 2.9% 4.1% 27.7% 1.1% 100.0% Personal business 52.9% 16.7% 3.1% 5.0% 19.6% 2.7% 100.0% Social/recreation 35.2% 26.6% 2.5% 2.7% 29.6% 3.4% 100.0% Serve passenger 56.1% 32.2% 0.8% 0.6% 9.7% 0.6% 100.0% Commute 60.7% 6.3% 15.9% 7.4% 7.5% 2.3% 100.0% Work related business 79.5% 6.8% 3.1% 1.3% 6.9% 2.5% 100.0% Education/childcare 5.3% 50.2% 8.6% 17.1% 16.5% 2.4% 100.0% Shopping 51.5% 12.7% 2.9% 4.0% 27.8% 1.1% 100.0% Personal business 53.1% 15.5% 3.7% 4.8% 20.1% 2.8% 100.0% Social/recreation 35.7% 26.2% 2.7% 2.7% 29.4% 3.2% 100.0% Serve passenger 56.3% 32.4% 0.7% 0.5% 9.7% 0.4% 100.0% Commute 60.4% 6.6% 15.9% 7.6% 7.1% 2.3% 100.0% Work related business 80.2% 5.5% 3.6% 1.3% 7.0% 2.4% 100.0% Education/childcare 5.7% 50.7% 9.4% 16.6% 15.3% 2.3% 100.0% Shopping 52.5% 13.0% 2.5% 3.8% 27.2% 1.1% 100.0% Personal business 53.2% 16.1% 3.6% 4.4% 20.1% 2.5% 100.0% Social/recreation 35.8% 26.1% 2.8% 2.8% 29.1% 3.3% 100.0% Serve passenger 56.9% 32.3% 0.7% 0.4% 9.1% 0.6% 100.0% Commute 62.2% 8.3% 14.4% 6.1% 6.2% 2.9% 100.0% Work related business 81.3% 6.2% 2.7% 1.2% 7.2% 1.5% 100.0% Education/childcare 7.0% 44.9% 7.9% 17.2% 21.6% 1.3% 100.0% Shopping 51.7% 13.8% 2.9% 4.1% 26.5% 1.0% 100.0% Personal business 53.5% 16.8% 4.6% 4.0% 19.7% 1.3% 100.0% Social/recreation 36.6% 28.9% 2.6% 3.0% 25.6% 3.3% 100.0% Serve passenger 55.5% 32.9% 0.8% 0.9% 9.7% 0.3% 100.0% NOTES 2 The data used in this table are based on linked trips. In the analysis of trip purposes, trips to return home are allocated to the previous priority purpose. Mode is based on the priority mode of the linked trip. For further details, please refer to the glossary. 3 Other includes ferry. 32 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
35 Table 4.3.4: Reasons for travelling to work by public transport (weekdays) Reason Percent 4 Avoids parking problems Cheaper Faster 53% 33% 31% Less stressful than other forms 25% Do not have a car 22% Live or work close to public transport Arrives closer to destination Enjoy time to read and relax Don't drive/no licence Car used by someone else Environmental reasons 18% 15% 13% 11% 8% 5% Other 4% Employer assistance in public transport costs 2% Table 4.3.5: Reasons for travelling to work by car (weekdays) Reason Percent 4 Prefer convenience/independence of car PT services are indirect 53% 37% PT services are too slow 26% PT doesn't go where required PT timetable constraints Employer provides/subsidises car/parking Use car for work trips Use car for other non-work trips PT is unavailable here PT services are too infrequent Carpooling arrangements PT services are unreliable 17% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9% 6% 6% Other 4% PT uncomfortable 3% NOTE 4 Respondents could give more than one response, therefore percentages add to more than 100%. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 33
36 Table 4.3.6: Public transport 5 fare type (average weekday) Fare type 2002/ / / / /07 Full Fare 61.0% 61.9% 62.7% 61.8% 62.4% 61.5% 62.5% 64.8% 65.9% 64.7% 62.9% Child Fare 1.7% 1.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.7% 1.2% 1.2% 1.5% 0.9% 0.9% 1.1% Free School Pass 8.6% 7.6% 9.0% 10.0% 10.0% 9.0% 8.5% 7.6% 7.8% 8.3% 8.7% Free Fare Other 4.7% 4.1% 3.8% 3.6% 3.5% 3.0% 3.3% 4.5% 4.4% 4.0% 3.6% Concession Pensioner/Aged 8.3% 7.7% 6.7% 7.0% 7.2% 8.2% 7.6% 6.9% 6.4% 6.7% 6.2% Concession Student and Other 15.1% 16.4% 16.7% 16.2% 15.7% 16.3% 16.6% 14.6% 14.2% 15.0% 17.3% Other Fare 0.5% 0.5% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.3% 0.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% Fare type not provided 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bus Full Fare 36.9% 36.9% 38.3% 37.9% 38.2% 37.2% 37.5% 37.9% 39.3% 38.5% 36.6% Child Fare 2.5% 2.3% 2.3% 1.6% 1.2% 0.9% 1.4% 1.9% 1.7% 2.0% 1.7% Free School Pass 24.4% 24.8% 25.8% 27.4% 28.2% 27.9% 27.7% 27.0% 24.6% 24.0% 25.0% Free Fare Other 4.8% 4.6% 3.5% 4.0% 3.7% 4.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.8% 4.9% 4.7% Concession Pensioner/Aged 13.5% 12.6% 11.5% 12.6% 13.7% 14.8% 14.7% 14.4% 14.1% 11.9% 10.6% Concession Student and Other 15.9% 17.0% 17.3% 15.4% 13.9% 14.1% 14.6% 14.8% 16.1% 18.6% 21.4% Other Fare 1.8% 1.6% 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% Fare type not provided 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Train Table 4.3.7: Public transport 5 ticket type (average weekday) Ticket type 2002/ / / / /07 Train Single Return 11.5% 23.0% 10.3% 24.4% 10.2% 24.4% 9.3% 25.5% 9.2% 26.0% 9.0% 27.1% 9.3% 26.6% 9.9% 25.3% 9.5% 25.0% 9.1% 24.3% 8.3% 24.7% Daily Weekly Monthly/Fortnightly 6 Quarterly/Yearly Fixed multiple trips Free travel 7.8% 37.9% 0.0% 2.8% 0.4% 13.3% 8.8% 37.6% 0.0% 3.1% 0.4% 11.6% 8.0% 37.9% 0.0% 3.1% 0.3% 12.8% 7.8% 36.2% 0.0% 3.8% 0.2% 13.7% 7.2% 36.4% 0.0% 4.0% 0.3% 13.5% 8.0% 36.2% 0.0% 3.7% 0.9% 12.0% 7.6% 37.5% 0.0% 3.2% 1.1% 11.7% 7.0% 37.1% 0.0% 3.4% 1.4% 12.1% 7.1% 36.3% 1.8% 3.4% 0.8% 12.1% 7.9% 35.1% 3.6% 3.6% 0.9% 12.3% 9.5% 34.2% 5.2% 3.4% 1.4% 12.3% Other 3.2% 3.6% 3.1% 3.3% 3.5% 3.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.0% 3.1% 1.1% Ticket type not provided Total 0.1% 100.0% 0.2% 100.0% 0.2% 100.0% 0.3% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.1% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Bus Single Return 26.5% 3.4% 26.0% 4.9% 26.5% 5.4% 24.9% 4.0% 22.7% 3.5% 22.1% 3.8% 21.6% 4.8% 23.8% 4.7% 23.5% 4.4% 21.5% 3.6% 17.7% 2.8% Daily Weekly Monthly/Fortnightly 6 Quarterly/Yearly Fixed multiple trips Free travel 12.3% 10.2% 0.0% 1.5% 14.7% 29.2% 12.0% 8.9% 0.0% 1.4% 16.0% 29.3% 10.6% 9.7% 0.0% 1.2% 16.3% 29.4% 11.0% 9.3% 0.0% 0.8% 17.6% 31.4% 11.8% 10.4% 0.0% 1.4% 17.0% 31.9% 13.0% 8.8% 0.0% 1.4% 17.9% 32.1% 12.4% 9.9% 0.0% 1.4% 18.3% 30.8% 12.3% 8.5% 0.0% 1.1% 18.9% 30.5% 12.5% 9.6% 0.3% 0.9% 19.9% 28.4% 12.4% 9.5% 0.4% 1.1% 22.0% 28.9% 14.0% 9.8% 0.4% 0.8% 24.5% 29.7% Other 2.0% 1.3% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% Ticket type not provided Total 0.2% 100.0% 0.2% 100.0% 0.2% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.1% 100.0% 0.1% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% NOTES 5 Fare type and ticket type is collected for all public transport modes but only train and bus are reported here. 6 Fortnightly tickets were first introduced in. Monthly tickets were first introduced in. 34 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
37 4.4 Trip distance Table 4.4.1: Distance travelled (average weekday) 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Average distance (km) Av. trip length % 3.2% Av. km per person % 0.1% Av. VKT per person % -0.4% Total distance ( 000 km) Total km 127, , , , , , , , % 11.7% Total VKT 74,091 74,689 75,614 76,349 77,037 76,776 79,745 82, % 11.1% Total PT passenger km 19,634 20,604 21,416 23,315 22,960 22,210 22,035 23, % 18.2% Table 4.4.2: Distance travelled by mode (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Total distance ( 000 km) Vehicle driver 74,091 74,689 75,614 76,349 77,037 76,776 79,745 82, % 11.1% Vehicle passenger 27,684 27,439 27,354 26,969 27,022 26,938 28,791 29, % 6.6% Train 13,957 15,113 15,758 17,208 16,628 15,786 15,348 16, % 16.5% Bus 5,677 5,492 5,658 6,106 6,331 6,423 6,687 6, % 22.4% Walk only 1 2,497 2,623 2,585 2,602 2,664 2,643 2,529 2, % -4.1% Walk linked 2 1,853 2,028 2,157 2,239 2,451 2,353 2,342 2, % 18.8% Other 1,802 2,018 2,147 2,328 2,562 2,521 2,520 2, % 54.6% Total 127, , , , , , , , % 11.7% Average distance (km) Train % -5.1% Vehicle driver % 4.7% Vehicle passenger % 0.4% Bus % 5.7% Walk only % -16.8% Table 4.4.3: Proportion of distance travelled by mode (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 Vehicle driver 58.9% 58.6% 58.6% 58.0% 58.3% 58.6% 58.8% 58.7% Vehicle passenger 22.0% 21.5% 21.2% 20.5% 20.4% 20.5% 21.2% 21.0% Train 11.1% 11.9% 12.2% 13.1% 12.6% 12.0% 11.3% 11.6% Bus 4.5% 4.3% 4.4% 4.6% 4.8% 4.9% 4.9% 5.0% Walk only 1 2.0% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.7% Other 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NOTES 1 Walk-only trips are those where the whole trip is made by walking and no change of mode is involved. 2 Walk-linked trips are walking trips where the purpose is access to, or egress from, another mode e.g. Walk to the station to catch the train or walk from the train upon arrival at the other end. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 35
38 Table 4.4.4: Distance travelled by purpose (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Total distance ( 000 km) Commute 32,398 33,747 34,756 36,608 37,055 37,498 37,801 37, % 17.1% Work related business 20,522 20,616 20,611 21,124 20,527 20,210 19,578 20, % -0.7% Education/child care 8,392 9,020 9,606 9,609 9,963 9,638 10,605 10, % 30.1% Shopping 11,812 12,341 12,564 13,180 12,480 12,275 13,029 13, % 17.5% Personal business 8,252 8,120 7,827 7,673 7,775 7,280 6,898 6, % -19.6% Social/recreation 27,961 26,924 26,970 26,886 27,169 26,694 29,175 31, % 11.9% Serve passenger 16,016 16,385 16,728 16,678 17,369 17,107 17,837 18, % 12.9% Other 1,675 1,673 1,668 1,729 1,684 1,722 2,017 2, % 39.4% Average distance (km) Commute % 4.9% Work related business % 21.9% Education/child care % 11.8% Shopping % 6.8% Personal business % -4.9% Social/recreation % -6.0% Serve passenger % 0.8% Table 4.4.5: Proportion of distance travelled by purpose (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 Commute 25.5% 26.2% 26.6% 27.4% 27.6% 28.3% 27.6% 26.8% Work related business 16.2% 16.0% 15.8% 15.8% 15.3% 15.3% 14.3% 14.4% Education/child care Shopping Personal business 6.6% 9.3% 6.5% 7.0% 9.6% 6.3% 7.3% 9.6% 6.0% 7.2% 9.9% 5.7% 7.4% 9.3% 5.8% 7.3% 9.3% 5.5% 7.7% 9.5% 5.0% 7.7% 9.8% 4.7% Social/recreation Serve passenger Other 22.0% 12.6% 1.3% 20.9% 12.7% 1.3% 20.6% 12.8% 1.3% 20.1% 12.5% 1.3% 20.3% 13.0% 1.3% 20.2% 12.9% 1.3% 21.3% 13.0% 1.5% 22.1% 12.8% 1.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 36 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
39 Table 4.4.6: Trips by distance 3 category and mode (average weekday) Mode Up to 1km km km km km More than 20 km Total 000 Vehicle driver 574 1,034 2,250 1,759 1,426 1,090 8,134 Vehicle passenger , ,660 Train Bus ,034 Ferry Taxi Walk only 2, ,159 Bicycle Other Total 3,339 2,386 4,348 3,140 2,348 1,754 17,313 Table 4.4.7: Trips by distance 4 category and purpose (average weekday) More than Purpose Up to 1km km km km km 20 km Total Commute ,530 Work related business ,290 Education/child care ,496 Shopping ,674 Personal business ,002 Social/recreation ,911 Serve passenger ,955 Other Total 3,227 2,159 3,904 2,949 2,314 1,848 16, Table 4.4.8: Average trip distance, mode by purpose (average weekday) and Vehicle Vehicle driver passenger Train Bus Walk only Other (km) Commute Work related business Education/child care Shopping Personal business Social/recreation Serve passenger Other (km) Commute Work related business Education/child care Shopping Personal business Social/recreation Serve passenger Other NOTE 3 Based on unlinked trips and in-vehicle time only. 4 Based on linked trips and door-to-door travel time. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 37
40 4.5 Trip duration Table 4.5.1: Time spent travelling (average weekday) 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Average time (mins) Average trip duration % 3.4% Time spent travelling a day per person % 0.3% Table 4.5.2: Average trip duration by purpose 1 (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Average time (mins) Non-work trips Education/child care Social/recreation Shopping Personal business % 2.4% 0.5% 1.5% -2.6% 2.4% 8.4% -3.0% 1.8% 2.3% Serve passenger Work trips Commute % 1.8% 1.5% 2.1% 11.0% 4.0% Work related business % 14.9% Table 4.5.3: Average trip duration by mode 2 (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Average time (mins) Vehicle driver % 5.0% Vehicle passenger % 0.7% Train % -3.7% Bus % -0.3% Walk only % -3.2% NOTE 1 Duration by purpose estimates are based on linked trips. 2 Mode estimates are based on unlinked trips. 38 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
41 Table 4.5.4: Average trip duration, mode by purpose (average weekday) and Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Train Bus Walk only Other (mins) Commute Work related business Education/child care Shopping Personal business Social/recreation Serve passenger Other (mins) Commute Work related business Education/child care Shopping Personal business Social/recreation Serve passenger Other Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 39
42 4.6 Time of day travel Table 4.6.1: Persons travelling 1 on motorised modes by time of day (average weekday) Time of day 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ :30 am % 0.2% 8:00 am % 20.1% 10:00 am % 15.9% 12:00 noon % 13.6% 3:30 pm % 19.9% 5:30 pm % 18.3% 7:30 pm % -8.0% 10:30 pm % -18.7% Table 4.6.2: Morning peak 2 trips (average weekday) 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Morning peak trips ( 000) 3,087 3,267 3,368 3,474 3,516 3,446 3,489 3, % 12.8% Total trips ( 000) 15,207 15,757 15,939 16,263 16,312 16,159 16,322 16, % 8.2% % of total day in AM peak 20.3% 20.7% 21.1% 21.4% 21.6% 21.3% 21.4% 21.2% -1.0% 4.3% Table 4.6.3: Morning peak trips by purpose 3 (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Commute % 11.2% Work related business % -20.0% Education/child care % 15.2% Shopping % 17.4% Personal business % -6.3% Social/recreation % 41.7% Serve passenger % 18.1% Other % 146.7% Total 3,087 3,267 3,368 3,474 3,516 3,446 3,489 3, % 12.8% NOTES 1 Estimates based on unlinked trips. 2 Estimates of morning peak trips are based on linked trips arriving at their destination between 6.31 am and 9.30 am. 3 The purpose analysis uses linked trips. The trip purpose definition allocates return home trips to the previous priority purpose. Refer to the glossary for details. 40 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
43 Table 4.6.4: Proportion of morning peak trips by purpose (average weekday) Purpose 2005/ /07 Commute 26.8% 26.8% 26.9% 27.0% 27.1% 27.3% 27.0% 26.4% Work related business 11.2% 9.1% 9.2% 9.9% 9.6% 9.1% 8.1% 7.9% Education/child care Shopping Personal business 18.1% 7.1% 4.7% 17.9% 7.6% 4.7% 18.0% 7.0% 4.2% 18.0% 6.7% 4.2% 18.0% 6.6% 4.2% 18.2% 7.0% 4.3% 18.3% 7.1% 4.0% 18.5% 7.3% 3.9% Social/recreation Serve passenger Other 8.9% 23.0% 0.3% 9.5% 23.8% 0.6% 9.5% 24.7% 0.5% 9.1% 24.5% 0.5% 9.9% 24.1% 0.5% 10.1% 23.5% 0.6% 10.9% 23.9% 0.6% 11.2% 24.1% 0.7% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Table 4.6.5: Morning peak trips by mode 4 (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ Vehicle driver 1,626 1,727 1,762 1,797 1,804 1,777 1,803 1, % 10.4% Vehicle passenger Total private vehicle Train 678 2, , , , , , , , % -0.5% -0.5% 17.4% 12.5% 25.7% Bus % 22.5% Ferry 5 Total public transport Walk only Other % 4.0% 2.0% -4.2% 31.8% 24.2% 14.8% 17.5% Total 3,323 3,528 3,606 3,735 3,781 3,742 3,793 3, % 14.7% Table 4.6.6: Proportion of morning peak trips by mode 4 (average weekday) Mode 2005/ /07 Vehicle driver 48.9% 49.0% 48.9% 48.1% 47.7% 47.5% 47.5% 47.1% Vehicle passenger Total private vehicle Train 20.4% 69.3% 7.4% 20.6% 69.6% 7.5% 21.3% 70.2% 7.5% 21.2% 69.3% 7.8% 20.9% 68.6% 8.0% 20.7% 68.2% 8.2% 21.1% 68.7% 8.2% 20.9% 68.0% 8.1% Bus 7.9% 8.1% 8.0% 8.2% 8.0% 8.0% 7.8% 8.4% Ferry 5 Total public transport Walk only Other 0.3% 15.6% 13.6% 1.5% 0.3% 15.9% 12.8% 1.7% 0.3% 15.8% 12.3% 1.7% 0.3% 16.4% 12.6% 1.8% 0.3% 16.4% 13.3% 1.7% 0.3% 16.5% 13.8% 1.5% 0.4% 16.3% 13.4% 1.6% 0.4% 16.9% 13.6% 1.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NOTES 4 Mode analysis uses unlinked trips. 5 Ferry estimates may have high standard errors. 41
44 4.7 Profile of travellers Table 4.7.1: Travellers by sex and mode 1 (average weekday) 2005/ /07 Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Mode 000 Vehicle driver 4,303 3,383 4,161 3,791 4,059 3,933 4,145 3,934 4,169 3,846 4,161 3,782 4,219 3,843 4,220 3,939 Vehicle passenger 1,502 1,960 1,497 1,973 1,547 2,004 1,595 2,048 1,605 2,030 1,550 2,059 1,552 2,101 1,546 2,129 Train Bus Walk only 1,231 1,510 1,357 1,616 1,341 1,623 1,392 1,643 1,442 1,688 1,479 1,658 1,456 1,684 1,487 1,672 Other Total 8,053 7,842 8,118 8,375 8,065 8,563 8,306 8,682 8,415 8,649 8,403 8,578 8,426 8,759 8,478 8,907 Share of trips (%) Vehicle driver 53.4% 43.1% 51.3% 45.3% 50.3% 45.9% 49.9% 45.3% 49.5% 44.5% 49.5% 44.1% 50.1% 43.9% 49.8% 44.2% Vehicle passenger 18.7% 25.0% 18.4% 23.6% 19.2% 23.4% 19.2% 23.6% 19.1% 23.5% 18.5% 24.0% 18.4% 24.0% 18.2% 23.9% Train 5.1% 4.7% 5.1% 4.5% 5.4% 4.5% 5.3% 4.8% 5.6% 4.8% 5.6% 4.9% 5.8% 4.9% 5.9% 5.1% Bus 4.9% 6.4% 5.4% 5.8% 5.6% 5.5% 5.6% 5.7% 5.6% 5.9% 5.6% 6.0% 5.6% 6.1% 5.7% 6.2% Walk only 15.3% 19.3% 16.7% 19.3% 16.6% 19.0% 16.8% 18.9% 17.1% 19.5% 17.6% 19.3% 17.3% 19.2% 17.5% 18.8% Other 2.7% 1.5% 3.0% 1.6% 2.9% 1.7% 3.2% 1.6% 3.0% 1.8% 3.2% 1.7% 2.8% 1.9% 2.9% 1.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NOTE 1 Mode data uses unlinked trip legs except for walk trips. 42 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
45 Table 4.7.2: Mode 2 share by age of travellers (average weekday) Vehicle Vehicle Walk Age Group Driver Passenger Train Bus only Other 3 Total % 75.4% 1.1% 4.0% 17.7% 1.8% 100.0% % 42.2% 9.0% 16.8% 16.2% 3.0% 100.0% % 12.3% 11.1% 7.9% 20.3% 3.0% 100.0% % 7.7% 5.5% 4.0% 19.8% 2.7% 100.0% % 7.3% 4.4% 2.6% 14.8% 1.9% 100.0% % 9.6% 4.2% 3.2% 17.5% 1.5% 100.0% % 13.1% 3.5% 3.8% 18.6% 1.7% 100.0% % 16.3% 2.9% 8.2% 25.5% 3.7% 100.0% % 76.5% 0.9% 4.1% 16.9% 1.7% 100.0% % 41.2% 8.4% 16.0% 17.4% 3.2% 100.0% % 13.1% 10.4% 7.5% 20.1% 2.7% 100.0% % 7.7% 5.6% 3.9% 19.2% 2.7% 100.0% % 7.3% 4.5% 2.9% 14.7% 1.8% 100.0% % 9.6% 4.2% 3.2% 18.1% 1.9% 100.0% % 13.3% 3.4% 4.2% 20.1% 1.8% 100.0% % 16.8% 2.9% 8.7% 25.8% 3.6% 100.0% % 78.0% 0.9% 3.4% 16.1% 1.7% 100.0% % 40.3% 8.2% 15.5% 18.5% 3.2% 100.0% % 12.1% 10.3% 7.5% 20.7% 2.9% 100.0% % 7.5% 5.4% 3.7% 18.5% 2.6% 100.0% % 7.3% 4.7% 2.9% 15.5% 1.9% 100.0% % 9.6% 4.1% 3.4% 18.1% 2.2% 100.0% % 13.3% 3.4% 4.7% 19.6% 2.0% 100.0% % 17.3% 2.4% 9.6% 27.9% 3.3% 100.0% % 79.4% 0.5% 3.0% 15.7% 1.4% 100.0% % 40.2% 8.5% 16.7% 16.9% 3.1% 100.0% % 11.8% 9.7% 6.5% 20.5% 2.9% 100.0% % 7.6% 5.3% 3.6% 19.4% 2.4% 100.0% % 7.2% 4.6% 3.0% 15.3% 2.1% 100.0% % 9.5% 4.4% 3.5% 17.7% 2.2% 100.0% % 13.1% 3.6% 5.5% 20.7% 2.1% 100.0% % 17.8% 2.8% 8.5% 27.1% 3.1% 100.0% % 79.9% 0.5% 2.7% 15.6% 1.5% 100.0% % 40.4% 8.7% 16.2% 16.7% 3.5% 100.0% % 11.3% 9.6% 6.7% 20.6% 3.2% 100.0% % 7.3% 5.0% 3.4% 18.1% 2.1% 100.0% % 7.2% 4.3% 2.9% 15.0% 2.3% 100.0% % 9.7% 3.9% 3.4% 17.5% 1.9% 100.0% % 14.1% 4.2% 6.1% 19.9% 2.1% 100.0% % 17.3% 2.2% 8.5% 27.2% 2.9% 100.0% % 76.1% 0.5% 3.7% 18.3% 1.4% 100.0% % 38.6% 8.4% 14.3% 18.6% 3.1% 100.0% % 11.9% 8.1% 5.7% 18.2% 3.1% 100.0% % 8.9% 4.8% 3.5% 15.9% 2.7% 100.0% % 8.0% 3.5% 2.5% 12.8% 1.5% 100.0% % 10.0% 4.4% 4.4% 17.4% 1.3% 100.0% % 14.3% 3.3% 5.3% 20.4% 0.7% 100.0% % 18.0% 4.9% 9.9% 26.0% 2.0% 100.0% NOTES 2 Mode data uses unlinked trip legs except for walk trips. 3 Other includes ferry. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 43
46 4.8 Vehicles Table 4.8.1: Number of households in Sydney by number of vehicles Household vehicles 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/ None % -7.6% One % 6.9% Two % 22.7% Three or more % 44.3% Total households 1,499 1,564 1,583 1,606 1,633 1,659 1,682 1, % 13.6% Table 4.8.2: Proportion of households in Sydney by number of vehicles Household vehicles 2005/ /07 None 15.0% 13.5% 13.5% 13.6% 13.8% 14.0% 13.1% 12.2% One 43.3% 41.8% 41.7% 41.0% 39.8% 38.9% 39.7% 40.8% Two 31.1% 33.1% 33.4% 33.4% 33.6% 33.8% 33.8% 33.6% Three or more 10.6% 11.6% 11.4% 12.0% 12.8% 13.3% 13.5% 13.4% Total households 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Table 4.8.3: Average vehicle occupancy per trip Trip type 2005/ /07 10/11-11/12 01/02-11/12 Average weekday All day % 0.0% AM peak % 1.9% Average day Trips to work % -1.4% Non-work trips % -1.5% NOTE 1 The estimate of vehicle occupancy for work trips may involve passengers travelling for non-work purposes. 44 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
47 Table 4.8.4: Proportion of trips by vehicle occupancy 2 Vehicle Occupancy 2005/ /07 Average weekday One 67% 66% 66% 67% 67% 67% 67% 67% Two 22% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 22% 22% Three 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% Four 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Five or more 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Average weekend day One 48% 49% 49% 49% 48% 49% 50% 51% Two 32% 31% 31% 31% 31% 30% 29% 28% Three 10% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% Four 8% 6% 6% 5% 6% 6% 7% 7% Five or more 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Table 4.8.5: Proportion of distance travelled by vehicle occupancy 2 Vehicle Occupancy 2005/ /07 Average weekday One 72% 72% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% Two 18% 19% 18% 17% 17% 18% 18% 18% Three 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% Four 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% Five or more 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Average weekend day One 43% 45% 45% 46% 45% 45% 44% 45% Two 31% 32% 31% 32% 31% 30% 30% 29% Three 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 12% 13% 13% Four 10% 7% 7% 6% 7% 7% 8% 8% Five or more 4% 4% 5% 5% 6% 6% 5% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NOTE 2 Based on unlinked trips in private vehicles only. 45
48 46 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
49 5 Appendices 5.1 About the HTS The Household Travel Survey (HTS) is the largest and most comprehensive source of personal travel data for the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area. This area includes the Sydney and Illawarra Statistical Divisions and the Newcastle Statistical Subdivision. It extends from Port Stephens in the north to Shoalhaven in the south and the Blue Mountains in the west. See Figure 1 at the beginning of this report. This survey is a benchmark for best practice in travel surveys in Australia and around the world, as well as being the longest running continuous household travel survey in the country. The HTS was first conducted in 1997/98 and has been running continuously since then. Prior to the HTS, three major one-off household travel surveys were conducted in Sydney in 1971, 1981 and 1991/92. These had large samples (over 12,000 households) and used a face-to-face interview method. In 1997, the HTS was established to meet the needs of transport data users for more timely information. This is conducted by collecting personal travel data on a continuous basis. The HTS uses a similar method to the 1991/92 Home Interview Survey (HIS). Survey method The HTS consists of a face-to-face interview survey carried out every day from July to June of each financial year. This collection method ensures high data quality and maximises response rates. A simple travel diary is used by each householder to record the details of all travel undertaken for their nominated 24-hour period. An interviewer then interviews each householder to collect the details of each trip. The interviewer records the mode of travel, trip purpose, start and end location, and time of departure and arrival. Vehicle occupancy, toll roads used and parking are recorded for private vehicle trips and fare type and cost for public transport trips. Detailed socio-demographic information is also collected on the household. This includes dwelling type, household structure and vehicle details, as well as age, gender, employment status, occupation and income of individual household members. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 471
50 Sample design and statistical validity The sample of the continuous HTS is designed on a three-yearly cycle so that the pooling of three years of data gives a sample size similar to that achieved in the 1991/92 HIS. About 5,000 randomly selected households are approached each year to participate in the survey. The trip estimates in this report are based on three years of pooled data collected from July 2009 to June A sample of 14,612 households in the Greater Metropolitan Area were approached during this period, of which 9,688 (66%) responded. From these responding households, 25,090 people were interviewed, giving a total of 104,989 trip records as the basis for the estimates. The HTS sampling method was designed for BTS by the Statistical Consultancy section of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) such that the relative standard error (RSE) decreases and the statistical reliability increases as more waves of data are pooled (Figure A.1 below). Figure A.1 HTS RSEs Geographic level by waves pooled 30% SLA SSD SD GMA 25% Relative Standard Error 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Year 648 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
51 Data expansion The data collected in the HTS are expanded (weighted) to estimate the travel of the population in the survey area for a given year. The survey data are weighted based on the annual Estimated Resident Population (ERP) produced by the ABS. BTS further uses ABS data on households and individuals from the latest Census of Population and Housing to adjust the ERP to produce population benchmarks of residents in private dwellings only, which are then used in the weighting process. Reference Year Waves of the HTS in the 3 year pooled dataset ABS ERP for weighting 2009/2010, 2010/2011, 2011/ /2009, 2009/2010, 2010/ /2008, 2008/2009, 2009/ /2007, 2007/2008, 2008/ /2006, 2006/2007, 2007/ / /2005, 2005/2006, 2006/ / /2004, 2004/2005, 2005/ / /2003, 2003/2004, 2004/ / /2002, 2002/2003, 2003/ / /2001, 2001/2002, 2002/ /2000, 2000/2001, 2001/ / /1999, 1999/2000, 2000/ / /1998, 1998/1999, 1999/2000 June 2011 Preliminary ERP based on 2011 Census June 2010 Preliminary ERP based on 2011 Census June 2009 Preliminary ERP based on 2011 Census June 2008 Preliminary ERP based on 2011 Census June 2007 Preliminary ERP based on 2011 Census June 2006 Final ERP based on 2006 Census June 2005 Final ERP based on 2006 Census June 2004 Final ERP based on 2006 Census June 2003 Final ERP based on 2006 Census June 2002 Final ERP based on 2006 Census June 2001 Final ERP based on 2001 Census June 2000 Final ERP based on 2001 Census June 1999 Final ERP based on 2001 Census Comparison over time RSEs associated with estimates of change between years are greater than the RSEs for each individual year. Users should therefore be careful in interpreting the significance of over time changes. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 491
52 5.2 HTS data items People & households Public transport use Work characteristics Main occupation Work schedule Working hours & their flexibility Industry of employment Employer assistance with transport Tele-working and car pooling Licence holding and mobility Types of driver s licences Reason for no driver s licence Physical disabilities preventing or restricting use of transport Tickets and fares Amount paid Fare type Ticket type Multi-modal tickets Reasons commute by public transport Household characteristics Dwelling type Ownership status of dwelling Number of household vehicles Number of bicycles (adult & child) Structure of household Personal characteristics Age Gender Personal income Employment status Country of birth Modes Train Bus (private, public, school) Ferry (private, public) Monorail, light rail, taxi, aircraft Trip characteristics Trip origin and destination Purpose of trip Time of day of trip Trip length distance and duration Vehicle characteristics Trip characteristics Vehicle make and model Trip origin Vehicle age Trip destination Engine characteristics Time of day of trip Vehicle Type of registration and ownership Trip purpose Type of fuel used Number of vehicle occupants use Trip length distance and duration Reasons commute by car Toll roads used Parking Cost of parking and who pays Type of parking used Non- Walking and cycling Trip origin motorised Trip destination Distance modes No. working adult/child bikes in household Trip purpose Time of day 5.3 Acronyms ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics PT Public Transport BTS Bureau of Transport Statistics RSE Relative Standard Error ERP Estimated Resident Population SD Statistical Division GMA Greater Metropolitan Area SLA Statistical Local Area HIS Home Interview Survey SSD Statistical Subdivision HTS Household Travel Survey TZ Travel Zone JTW Journey to Work VKT Vehicle Kilometres Travelled 650 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
53 5.4 Glossary AM peak or Morning peak Average day Average weekday Average weekend day Distance Greater Metropolitan Area (GMA) Household vehicles Illawarra SD Linked trip Mode Motorised travel Newcastle SSD Population PM or Afternoon peak Unless otherwise stated, this refers to trips arriving at their destination between 6.31 am and 9.30 am on a weekday. Average of Mondays to Sundays. Used to calculate annual estimates, by multiplying average day by 365. Average of travel over Monday to Friday including public and school holidays. Average of travel undertaken on Saturdays and Sundays. Network kilometres travelled between the X,Y co-ordinates of the trip origin and destination address. See Trip Length. BTS defined geographical area for core BTS datasets. Comprises Sydney SD, Newcastle SSD and Illawarra SD. Number of registered vehicles usually garaged at the household overnight, whether privately or company owned. Covers the Local Government Areas of Wollongong, Shellharbour, Kiama, Shoalhaven and Wingecaribee. A linked trip is a journey from one activity to another, ignoring changes of mode. A linked trip may comprise one or more unlinked trip legs. See Unlinked Trips and Priority Mode. The mode of transport used for the trip. Unlinked trips have only one mode and one purpose. Where a linked trip comprises more than one journey leg by different modes, a priority mode is allocated to the linked trip based on a pre-determined priority list of modes. See Priority Mode. Trips by private vehicle, train, bus, ferry, monorail, light rail or aircraft. Newcastle SSD covers the Local Government Areas of Newcastle, Cessnock, Lake Macquarie, Maitland and Port Stephens. Residents of private dwellings. HTS estimates are slightly lower than the ABS Estimated Resident Population (ERP), which include residents of non-private dwellings (gaols, hospitals, hotels, etc.). Unless otherwise stated, refer to weekday trips departing between 3:01 pm and 6:00 pm. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 51
54 Priority mode Priority mode hierarchy Priority purpose Priority purpose hierarchy Where a linked trip is comprised of unlinked trips that uses more than one mode, a priority mode is allocated to the linked trip according to the following hierarchy, which is generally the mode with the largest likely (but not necessarily actual) duration of the trip. Ferry Train Light rail/monorail Bus Vehicle driver Vehicle passenger Taxi Bicycle Walk Other HIGHEST LOWEST BTS collects data on a detailed list of trip purposes, including the purpose return to home. Return home makes up about 34% of unlinked trips on an average weekday (Figure A.2). To give a better picture of what drives trip making, data in this report allocated return home to the main previous purpose. If a person is returning home from work this trip is defined as a commute FROM work rather than a trip TO home. Return home trips with multiple previous purposes are allocated based on a hierarchy or priority. If while returning home from work a person stopped off quickly at the shops, the main previous purpose is work not shopping. Work Work related business Education Purpose with the longest activity time Serve passenger Figure A.2 Share of trips by purpose as defined 40% HIGHEST LOWEST 35% 30% No recoding of return to home Recode return to home to previous purpose Recode return to home to a priority purpose 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Return to home Social/ Commuting Serve Shopping Work related Education/ Personal Other recreation passenger business childcare business Private vehicle Public transport Sydney Travel zone (TZ) Includes all motorised vehicles such as cars, 4WDs, vans, motorbikes, motor scooters, utes and trucks. Train, government and private bus and ferry, monorail and light rail. Refers to Sydney Statistical Division. A level of geography between ABS Census Collector Districts and Statistical Local Areas. The basis of BTS modelling and analysis, Travel Zones cover the BTS Study Area without omission or overlap. 652 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
55 Trip duration Trip length (distance) Travel time is derived from respondent s reported trip start and end times. Total trip duration is calculated as door-to-door travel time, including changes of mode and wait time. Trip duration by mode, means in-vehicle time only. Each trip origin and destination is coded by BTS to an X,Y co-ordinate and road network distance between these points is calculated in ARCGIS. Total distance reported is a door-to-door distance, including changes of mode. Distance by mode, refers to in-vehicle distance only. Prior to 2007 distance was calculated between Travel Zone centroids, rather than address co-ordinates. This method was prone to overestimate distance, particularly for short trips. Distances for 1999 to 2006 have been re-estimated using the updated method and this report contains revised distance data for previous years. Trip purpose Child care Trips by children to attend child care. categories Commuting The first trip to work of the day, usually from home, excluding trips to return to work. This also includes the first trip to a second job, if any. Work related business Education Home Personal business Serve passenger Shopping Work related trips away from respondent s usual work address. Also for respondents without a fixed work address eg. A plumber, household interviewers, etc. who work at various locations. Trips by students to attend educational institutions kindergarten, primary and secondary school, technical college or universities. Trips to return home. This publication reports trips to return home according to the previous priority purpose. See Priority purpose. Transact personal business not involving goods eg. bank, library, doctor. The purpose is to drop-off, pick-up or accompany another person eg. man drops his children to school on the way to work, a young child comes along for the ride on a parent s trip to the bank, a woman takes an elderly parent to a medical appointment. Trips to a shop, defined as premises that sell goods. Social/recreation Social visits, entertainment, sporting activities, hobbies, holidays, etc. Other Trips for purposes not identified elsewhere. Unlinked trip An unlinked trip is a single trip leg. Linked trips are made up of unlinked trips where there has been a change of mode. For example, a person living in Parramatta and working in Sydney CBD who travels by train with a walk trip at either end of the train trip has made three unlinked and one linked trip: TRIP ORIGIN DESTINATION MODE PURPOSE 1 Home Parramatta Station Walk Change mode 2 Parramatta Station Central Station Train Change mode 3 Central Station Workplace Walk Work Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 531
56 5.5 Other BTS Publications All BTS publications and summary statistics are free to download from bts.nsw.gov.au Recent Publications u Active Transport in Sydney: Walking (2013 Release) u Compendium of Sydney Rail Travel Statistics, 8th Edition (2013 Release) u Public Transport Users in Sydney (2013 Release) u 2011 Journey to Work User Guide u 2012 Sydney Cycling Survey (2013 Release) u Rail Station to Station Passenger Matrix Report (2013 Release) u Travel in Sydney, Newcastle, Illawarra (2012 Release) u NSW and Sydney Transport Facts (2012 Release) Visualisation Tools Travel Zone Explorer LGA Profiler Station Ins & Outs Landuse Planner JTW Explorer JTW Visualiser 654 Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release
57 Stay up to date by subscribing to our quarterly BTS News. It contains information on all our latest work, recent data and publication releases, relevant industry news and upcoming conferences. Simply visit our website and click on the Subscribe button on our homepage. Bureau of Transport Statistics Household Travel Survey Summary Report, 2013 Release 551
Transport Indicators Report June 2018
Transport Indicators Report June 2018 Board Meeting 21 August 2018 Recommendation That the Board: i. Receives this report. Executive summary 1. The attached Monthly and Quarterly Indicator Reports provide
More informationHOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY Household Travel Survey i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 SUMMARY OF TRAVEL... 2 2.1 All-Day Travel Patterns... 2 2.1.1 Automobile Availability... 2 2.1.2 Trip
More informationOtago Economic Overview 2013
Final report May 2014 www.berl.co.nz Background Author(s): Mark Cox, Hugh Dixon and Masrur Alam Khan DISCLAIMER All work is done, and services rendered at the request of, and for the purposes of the client
More informationTRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX
TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX Report - December 2016 AAA 1 AAA 2 Table of contents Foreword 4 Section One Overview 6 Section Two Summary of Results 7 Section Three Detailed Results 9 Section Four City
More informationEstimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism
Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism 2008-2013 Coverage: UK Date: 03 December 2014 Geographical Area: UK Theme: People and Places Theme: Economy Theme: Travel and Transport Key Points This article
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County July 2017 Table of contents 1) Key Findings for 2016 3 2) Local Tourism Trends 7 3) Trends in Visits and Spending 12 4) The Domestic Market 19 5) The
More information5 Rail demand in Western Sydney
5 Rail demand in Western Sydney About this chapter To better understand where new or enhanced rail services are needed, this chapter presents an overview of the existing and future demand on the rail network
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. TOURIST EXPENDITURE 31 Average Spend per Person per Night ( ) 31 Tourist Expenditure per Annum ( ) 32
FALKLAND ISLANDS International Tourism Statistics Report 2013 2 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 6 KEY FACTS AND FIGURES 7 INBOUND TOURISM (OVERNIGHT VISITORS) 8 TOURIST ARRIVALS 8 Tourist Arrivals
More informationDomestic VFR travel to NSW
Domestic VFR travel to NSW Year ended December 2015 INTRODUCTION The and (VFR) market is of considerable importance to Australia and NSW. It is the second largest purpose of visit segment, after the Holiday
More informationTRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX
TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX Report - March 2018 AAA 1 AAA 2 Table of contents Foreword 4 Section One Overview 6 Section Two Summary of Results 8 Section Three Detailed Results 14 Section Four State by
More informationNorfolk Island tourism industry
Norfolk Island tourism industry Significance of tourism The tourism industry is Norfolk Island s main export and is a major driver of the Island s economy. Using expected distribution and value of tourist
More informationEconomic Contribution of Tourism to NSW
Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW 2013-14 Tourism is a significant part of the NSW economy. In 2013-14, tourism contributed $34.9 billion (Tourism Consumption) to the NSW economy and employed 272,000
More informationHEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM
HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM 3Villages flight path analysis report January 216 1 Contents 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 3. Evolution of traffic from 25 to 215 4. Easterly departures 5. Westerly
More informationTrail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park:
Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park: New Connections, New Visitors Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, PhD Daniel Rodriguez, PhD Taylor Dennerlein, MSEE, MCRP, EIT Jill Mead, MPH Evan Comen University of
More information2015 Metro User Christchurch
2015 Metro User Christchurch Research Report June 2015 www.researchfirst.co.nz Contents 2015 Metro User Christchurch 1 Research Context and Design 03 1.1 Introduction 03 1.2 Research Objectives 03 1.3
More informationCoordinated Population Forecast for Clackamas County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs
Coordinated Population Forecast for Clackamas County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs 2017-2067 Prepared by Population Research Center College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland
More informationDestination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research Queensland: Understanding the Queensland Touring Group
Destination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research : Understanding the Touring Group Introduction Tourism is a major industry for (Qld), directly contributing around 124,000 jobs annually. In the year
More informationLondon Area Travel Survey National Rail Results
London Area Travel Survey National Rail Results An Introductory Report Strategic Rail Authority Statistics Team February 2005 LONDON AREA TRANSPORT SURVEY - FOREWORD This Introductory Report to the London
More informationThe Yorke & Mid North (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report
The Yorke & Mid North (State Govt) Region Workforce Wizard Region Report Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Population and Social Characteristics 4 Current Population 4 Age Groups 4 Key Populations
More informationCAA Passenger Survey Report 2005
Economic Regulation Group CAA Passenger Survey Report 2005 Survey of passengers at Aberdeen, Bournemouth, Durham Tees Valley, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, Inverness, Leeds Bradford, Luton, Manchester,
More information2013 TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR SURVEY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA 2013 TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR SURVEY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS By Aaron Archer, Anna Lyth and Corey Peterson CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS i ii 1 BACKGROUND 1 2 ABOUT THE SURVEY
More informationCrown copyright Published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty s Stationery Office (HMSO). ISBN ISSN
(ONS) Introduction A report on the 2000 International Passenger Survey London: The Stationery Office 1 Introduction Crown copyright 2001. Published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty
More informationAppraisal of Factors Influencing Public Transport Patronage in New Zealand
Appraisal of Factors Influencing Public Transport Patronage in New Zealand Dr Judith Wang Research Fellow in Transport Economics The Energy Centre The University of Auckland Business School, New Zealand
More informationDomestic Tourism Snapshot Year ending March 2018
Domestic overnight s within Australia Robust growth delivers records Domestic overnight expenditure in Australia Avg # Australians took a record 97.8m domestic overnight trips in 1 2 stay the year ending
More informationState of the States October 2017 State & territory economic performance report. Executive Summary
State of the States October 2017 State & territory economic performance report. Executive Summary NSW ON TOP; VICTORIA CLOSES IN How are Australia s states and territories performing? Each quarter CommSec
More informationAUSTRALIAN TRAVEL TIME METRIC 2017 EDITION
AUSTRALIAN TRAVEL TIME METRIC 217 EDITION For more information please contact: Brendan Lyon Chief Executive Officer Infrastructure Partnerships Australia Suite 3.3, Level 3, 9 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2
More information3. Aviation Activity Forecasts
3. Aviation Activity Forecasts This section presents forecasts of aviation activity for the Airport through 2029. Forecasts were developed for enplaned passengers, air carrier and regional/commuter airline
More information2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study
2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study November 4, 2009 Prepared by The District of Muskoka Planning and Economic Development Department BACKGROUND The Muskoka Airport is situated at the north end
More informationPage 1. Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company
Page 1 Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company INCORPORATING: Empower North is a group of expert consultants providing select clients with an integrated service across the specialist
More informationThe performance of Scotland s high growth companies
The performance of Scotland s high growth companies Viktoria Bachtler Fraser of Allander Institute Abstract The process of establishing and growing a strong business base is an important hallmark of any
More information2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY
2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY PREPARED FOR RENO-SPARKS CONVENTION & VISITOR AUTHORITY Study Conducted and Reported by 475 Hill Street, Suite 2 Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 323-7677 www.infosearchintl.com
More informationCommunity Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings
Community Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings Analysis and report NWA Social Research 1 Contents Page No. A. Summary of Main Findings...
More informationHotel. Price Index. November Released Date: January Hotel Price Index
Hotel Price Index November 2015 1 Released Date: January 2016 Introduction The Emirate of Abu Dhabi is one of the most attractive tourist destinations in the Middle East because of the developed infrastructure
More information2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.
2010 AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010. This report summarizes recently updated data from the Anchorage Economic Indicators Database,
More informationProjected demand for independent schools in New South Wales over the next 40 years: Summary report
Projected demand for independent schools in New South Wales over the next 40 years: Summary report Association of Independent Schools of New South Wales 22 October 2014 Glossary ABS ACT AIS ASGS DAE FTE
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH
The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale 2015 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of Results Table
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH
The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2013 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2
More informationJuneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey
Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey Prepared for: City and Borough of Juneau Prepared by: April 13, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Introduction and Methodology...6 Survey Results...7
More informationEast Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16
East Lothian Skills Assessment January 2016 SDS-1154-Jan16 Acknowledgement The Regional Skills Assessment Steering Group (Skills Development Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Funding Council
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, 2017 June 2018 Table of contents 1) Key Findings for 2017 3 2) Local Tourism Trends 7 3) Trends in Visits and Spending 12 4) The Domestic Market 19
More informationDomestic Tourism Survey 2016
STATISTICAL RELEASE P0352.1 Domestic Tourism Survey 2016 January to December 2016 Embargoed until: 04 September 2017 10:30 ENQUIRIES: FORTHCOMING ISSUE: EXPECTED RELEASE DATE User Information Services
More informationEconomic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018
Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, 2018 December 2018 1) Key Findings Growth rebounds in 2018 as a strong hunting season drives tourism growth Key facts about South Dakota s tourism sector Key
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL June 2016 Highlights Visitor spending surpassed $2.0 billion in 2015, growing 4.4%. As this money flowed through Duval County, the $2.0 billion in visitor
More informationHousing in Hobart: an overview of the data. Richard Eccleston, Lisa Denny, Julia Verdouw & Kathleen Flanagan University of Tasmania May 2018
Housing in Hobart: an overview of the data Richard Eccleston, Lisa Denny, Julia Verdouw & Kathleen Flanagan University of Tasmania May 2018 Informing the Housing Debate Tasmania is facing significant housing
More informationBRAZIL INTERNATIONAL INBOUND TRAVEL MARKET PROFILE (2011) Copyright 2012 by the U.S. Travel Association. All Rights Reserved.
BRAZIL INTERNATIONAL INBOUND TRAVEL MARKET PROFILE (211) Copyright 212 by the U.S. Travel Association. All Rights Reserved. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With a population of nearly 2 million and a GDP exceeding $2
More informationHIA-RP Data Residential Land Report
HIA-RP Data Residential Land Report March Qtr 29 Land s Back on the Rise The latest HIA-RP Data Residential Land Report highlights a rebound in raw land values following some moderation over 28. Median
More informationEconomic Contribution of Tourism to NSW
Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW 2015-16 Tourism is a significant part of the NSW economy. In 2015-16, tourism contributed $38.1 billion (Tourism Consumption) to the NSW economy and employed 261,100
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina 2017 Analysis September 2018 Introduction and definitions This study measures the economic impact of tourism in Buncombe County, North
More informationLOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report
LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL Wandsworth borough report London Development Agency May 2008 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Tourism in London and the UK: recent trends... 4 3. The LATI model: a brief
More informationSHORT BREAKS TO NSW INTRODUCTION
SHORT BREAKS TO NSW March 2016 INTRODUCTION This document provides demographic profile of domestic and international short break 1 visitors to NSW, and their travel behaviour. It makes comparisons in terms
More informationRail Sta s cs Compendium Great Britain Annual
Rail Stascs Compendium Great Britain 2017-18 Annual Publicaon Date: 4th December 2018 Next release: November 2019 Background This annual compendium publication contains a summary of the statistical releases
More informationFALKLAND ISLANDS International Tourism Statistics Report 2012
FALKLAND ISLANDS International Tourism Statistics Report 2012 2 Falkland Islands Tourism 2012 Land-Based Tourism Number of tourist arrivals All tourists: Leisure tourists: 7,791 17% compared to 2011 1,937
More informationTransit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide
Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide January 2017 translink.ca Table of Contents How should we determine transit fares in Metro Vancouver? 1 Varying fares by distance travelled 2 Varying fares
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014
The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of
More informationWorld Air Transport Statistics. Special AGM Edition WORLD AIR TRANSPORT SUMMIT
World Air Transport Statistics Special AGM Edition WORLD AIR TRANSPORT SUMMIT 61 st IATA ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING TOKYO, 29-31 MAY 2005 World Air Transport Statistics Ref. No: 9011-AGM 2005 International
More informationTourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014
Tourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014 Rijeka, February 2015. Table of Contents Pg No. 1. Introduction 3 2. Physical indicators on an annual level 4 2.1. Structure and
More informationInstitute of Transport and Logistics Studies Interfleet Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 3, September 2011
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Interfleet Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 3, September 2011 Transport stable as highest priority issue Highlights In the September 2011 quarter, 8%
More informationInstitute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS) Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 1, March 2017
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS) Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 1, March 2017 Highlights Infrastructure remains the same while transport decreases as the highest priority national
More informationInverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview
Strategic planning and research Economic information December 2007 Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview Summary Between 2001 and 2006, the population of Inverness, Culloden and
More informationAVSP 7 Summer Section 1: Executive Summary
AVSP 7 Summer 2016 Section 1: Executive Summary Introduction AVSP Overview The Alaska Visitor Statistics Program (AVSP) is a statewide visitor study periodically commissioned by the Alaska Department of
More informationRegional summary - Wellington
Regional summary Wellington Regional summary - Wellington This is a summary of data relevant to transportation in this region, viewed from a Land Transport NZ perspective. It s purpose is to inform the
More informationEconomic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island
Economic Impact Analysis Tourism on Tasmania s King Island i Economic Impact Analysis Tourism on Tasmania s King Island This project has been conducted by REMPLAN Project Team Matthew Nichol Principal
More informationExample report: numbers are for illustration purposes only
www.iata.org/pax-forecast Example report: numbers are for illustration purposes only Country Report - United States Page Table of Contents 1 Market Overview 2 Top Country Pairs 3 Annual Market Regional
More informationOccupancy in North Carolina
Smith Travel Research Year-End 2009 Lodging Report Year-end 2009 hotel/motel occupancy was down -9.0% statewide from 2008. This represents a decrease of -12.2% since 2005. o The US occupancy was down -8.6%
More informationPetrofin Research Greek fleet statistics
Petrofin Research 2 nd part of Petrofin Research : Greek fleet statistics In this 2 nd part of Petrofin research, the Greek Fleet Statistics, we analyse the composition of the Greek fleet, in terms of
More informationAviation Trends. Quarter Contents
Aviation Trends Quarter 1 28 Contents Introduction 2 1. Historical overview 3 2. Terminal passengers at UK airports 4 3. Passenger flights to and from UK airports 5 4. Terminal passengers at UK airports
More informationUnderstanding Business Visits
Understanding Business Visits Foresight issue 153 VisitBritain Research 1 Contents Introduction Summary and Highlights Business Visits in Context UK Business visits and spend Averages Duration of stay
More informationPeer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development
2017 Regional Peer Review Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 SNAPSHOT... 5 PEER SELECTION... 6 NOTES/METHODOLOGY...
More informationVALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from
VALUE OF TOURISM Trends from 2005-2015 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overview... 2 Key highlights in 2015... 2 2. Contributions to the economy... 4 TOURISM REVENUE... 5 Total revenue... 5 Tourism revenue
More informationChapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Population Estimate (thousands) Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Population Trends and Projections National Records of Scotland estimated (NRS SAPE) 1 the 2013 NHS Greater Glasgow
More informationNorth Lanarkshire. Skills Assessment January SDS-1163-Jan16
North Lanarkshire Skills Assessment January 2016 SDS-1163-Jan16 Acknowledgement The Regional Skills Assessment Steering Group (Skills Development Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Funding Council
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011
The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin July 2013 Key themes for 2012 The Walworth County, Wisconsin visitor economy continued its brisk growth in 2012. Visitor spending rose 11% after
More informationThe Millennial Traveller 2018
The Millennial Traveller 2018 Counter Intelligence Retail Counter Intelligence Retail is the travel retail industry s leading agency, with services covering areas including research, category development
More informationMemorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program
Memorandum DATE: May 9, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program RECOMMENDATION Board action is requested to approve an ordinance
More informationStatistical Picture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander School Students in Australia
Chapter 2 Statistical Picture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander School Students in Australia Statistical Picture The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) reported that the estimated resident Aboriginal
More informationEstimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail
A report by the University of Vermont Transportation Research Center Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail Report # 10-003 February 2010 Estimating
More informationAccommodation Survey: November 2009
Embargoed until 10:45am 19 January 2010 Accommodation Survey: November 2009 Highlights Compared with November 2008: International guest nights were up 2 percent, while domestic guest nights were down 1
More informationARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT
ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT Tiffany Lester, Darren Walton Opus International Consultants, Central Laboratories, Lower Hutt, New Zealand ABSTRACT A public transport
More informationTourism in numbers
Tourism in numbers 2013-2014 Glenda Varlack Introduction Tourism is a social, cultural and economic experience which involves the movement of people to countries or places outside their usual environment
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH
The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2014 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2
More informationIATA ECONOMIC BRIEFING DECEMBER 2008
ECONOMIC BRIEFING DECEMBER 28 THE IMPACT OF RECESSION ON AIR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Recession is now forecast for North America, Europe and Japan late this year and into 29. The last major downturn in air traffic,
More informationMonthly Australian road deaths last five years, with trend. 60 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13
January 213 This month's key figures There was a total of 97 road deaths in January 213. In comparison to the average for January over the previous five years, the current figure is 12.1 per cent lower.
More informationSanta Barbara County Association of Governments 2002 COMMUTE PROFILE
Santa Barbara County Association of Governments 2002 COMMUTE PROFILE for Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo and Ventura Counties FINAL REPORT Santa Barbara County Association of Governments - 2002 COMMUTE
More informationPerth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016
Perth & Kinross Council Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016 Contents Foreword... 3 Section 1: Spring 2016 destination follow up of 2014/15 school leavers... 4 Background... 4 Section A: Initial
More informationAviation Trends. Quarter Contents
Aviation Trends Quarter 3 215 Contents Introduction... 2 1. Historical overview of traffic... 3 a. Terminal passengers... 4 b. Commercial flights... 5 c. Cargo tonnage... 6 2. Terminal passengers at UK
More informationNAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report
Join Visit Napa Valley NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION
More informationHEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM. Sunninghill flight path analysis report February 2016
HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM Sunninghill flight path analysis report February 2016 1 Contents 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 3. Evolution of traffic from 2005 to 2015 4. Easterly departures 5.
More informationStreet Based Lifestyle Monitor
Street Based Lifestyle Monitor Cardiff (October 2013-October 2015) 0 Executive Summary Those living a street based lifestyle are the public face of homelessness and yet accurate data around how many people
More informationReport on Palm Beach County Tourism Fiscal Year 2007/2008 (October 2007 September 2008)
Report on Palm Beach County Tourism Fiscal Year 2007/2008 (October 2007 September 2008) Prepared for: Tourist Development Council of Palm Beach County Prepared by: 4020 S. 57 th Avenue Lake Worth, FL 33463
More informationForecast of Aviation Activity
DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTER B FORECAST OF AVIATION ACTIVITY Forecast of Aviation Activity Introduction This chapter summarizes past aviation
More informationContents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For
Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 Forecast 2011 2036... 9 Population Forecast... 9 Gross
More informationNatWest UK Regional PMI. Slowdown in UK growth in November led by downturn in London business activity
NatWest UK Regional PMI Embargoed until 0101 UK (0101 UTC) 10 December 2018 Slowdown in UK growth in November led by downturn in London business activity Key Findings East Midlands leads regional output
More information2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report
2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report Research prepared for the Irving Convention & Visitors Bureau by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION 2 Executive
More information2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report
2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report A Look at Visitors Who Included Cape Breton in their Trip to Nova Scotia Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without the express permission
More informationInterstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by
Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL 2017 Commissioned by Prepared by Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study Commissioned by: Sound Transit Prepared by: April 2017 Contents Section
More information2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report
2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report Research prepared for the Irving Convention & Visitors Bureau by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents S E C T I O N 1 Introduction 2 S E C T
More informationREPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn
REPORT VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor 2011 5-7 Museum Place Cardiff, Wales CF10 3BD Tel: ++44 (0)29 2030 3100 Fax: ++44 (0)29 2023 6556 www.strategic-marketing.co.uk Page 2 of 31 Contents Page
More informationSAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES
SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require
More informationProduced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director
Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Oxfordshire - 2016 Economic Impact of Tourism Headline Figures Oxfordshire - 2016 number of trips (day & staying) 27,592,106
More information